UNITED NATIONALISTS AUSTRALIA BANNED FROM FACEBOOK

UNITED NATIONALISTS AUSTRALIA BANNED FROM FACEBOOK

The Facebook page of United Nationalists Australia has been banned by the globalist powers operating the social media platform.

There has been a spate of such censorship recently, with any page opposing Islam, fake refugees, or globalism having their plugs pulled on the grounds of what is suggested to be “hate speech”. The most notable of these, apart from us was the United Patriots Front, which had been promoting such Zionists as Avi Yemini anyway, so go figure.

In fact, in the lead up to our hell-banning, an ultra-globalist Facebook page hosted a number of feral scabs purporting to have reported just about anything to get us taken down. And Facebook responded.

We received a message that the logo we use, two White hands shaking, breached community standards. Which community? What standards? Left-wing extremists like Antifa posting images of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro? They are the community? They determine the political standards? We could have posted a picture of a kitten. It wouldn’t have mattered.

The editor-in-chief of UNA has been banned a number of times for posting material on our former page that upset both the civic patriots and the snowflakes on the left. On one memorable occasion, his personal Facebook account was given a 30-day ban for posting the word “Amen”. This demonstrates that there are no community standards — all there are is a set of algorithms responding to a dedicated troll force committed to banning pages they don’t like.

There is no human force tending the light at the end of the tunnel, mainly as there is no light.

We received a message that the logo we use, two White hands shaking, breached community standards. Which community? What standards?

It is a sad reflection for nationalists that we cannot summon the same amount of will and energy to return the favour, but the problem isn’t so much which group gets the most takedowns, but the fact that we have become dependent on (((Facebook))).

This is quite pathetic, but Facebook has such a monopoly on communication flow, that many are hopelessly hooked on the audience numbers, which are massive.

rsz_18554436_447245232304406_1539718614_n
The image of the shaking hands breached Facebook’s “Community Standards”

This is the thing, it has become like trying to host an anti-Zog meeting at a synagogue — we are in an untenable position.

It is well-known that epochal traitor and peace criminal, German chancellor Angela Merkel met with Facebook’s chief rabbi Mark Zuckerberg asking him to ensure action was taken to stop any dissenting commentary about the rapeugee invasion of Europe, which she, along with her master George Soros, engineered. Moreover, from news reports covering the removal of the UPF’s page, it seems Australian pages are now being deemed “hate speech” and removed, possibly, too, because of government requests. Frankly, we do not know either way, and Facebook is not making any statements.

This is quite pathetic, but Facebook has such a monopoly on communication flow, that many are hopelessly hooked on the audience numbers, which are massive.

This, despite the loss of the instant audiences and large reach that Facebook offers, is an opportunity. It makes no sense to be captive to globalist forces with such important activism to pursue. Just as Stormfront Downunder became an untenable platform for Australian nationalists due to the high penetration of leftist trolls, conservative saboteurs such as Howard Crawford, and lunatics so Facebook has been more trouble than it is worth.

It is evident that despite being able to command audiences in the tens of thousands, none of this ‘reach’ has had much practical application. The political arm of the United Patriots Front, Fortitude, was intended to sign up users and establish a political party but — in spite of having tens of thousands of page likes — they barely got a trickle of memberships.

2CDCC5C800000578-3252209-image-a-11_1443456957855
Zucc and Merkel meet to silence Globalism’s critics, especially those upset at being raped and killed in Europe by fake male refugees of fighting age

For all the social media activity of Reclaim Australia, except for a fleeting moment, none of that activity ever translated to bodies on the street when it came to demonstrations. As such, the validity of these vast numbers has proven to be an illusion.

Why then suffer all the pain of feeding globalist parasites like the anarchists who seem to exist only to be outraged by patriot Facebook pages?

The nationalist community is as divided on Facebook as it is in the corporeal world. Instead of uniting under one group, subscribing to one page, there are a plethora of these pages of which most are simply newsfeeds regarding non-White crime. Nobody was ever happy to just participate, everyone had to go out and start their own thing, which is both a positive and a negative.

Why then suffer all the pain of feeding globalist parasites like the anarchists who seem to exist only to be outraged by patriot Facebook pages?

United Nationalists Australia went out of its way to buck this ‘pointing at the news’ trend. We refused to subscribe to the central tenet that Facebook audiences could not read anything wordier than a caption. Instead of grammatically impoverished one-sentence introductions to the same news all the other pages were sharing, we made the nationalist community, and anything affecting it, the subject of our focus, in very long, often complicated essays that challenged the reader.

And it worked! In fact, it worked so well that we became — disregarding our meek number of page ‘likes’ — one of the most influential voices of the nationalist pages. As we said, the civic patriots detested us, and often had our material removed, as did the lefties, challenged by the fact we are brainier than they are.

Now it is time to look to the future. If we have only a small community, let that community come to places where they will not become trolled, banned, harassed by the scum of the left; or misdirected by the Zionist-operated civic patriots.

Let them come to places where word of mouth can spread, and only those truly dedicated interact.

Leaving Facebook is a MUST. All nationalists must surrender the apathy of Facebook and make a serious effort. We must deprive Zucc of our patronage and the advertising dollars that automatically accompany our presence. No more will we be at the mercy of “community standards” which only reflect those eager to destroy White nations — and have the White race bred off with every black and brown monkey on the planet.

In this, we shall lead the way. The UNA blog will soon become UNA media, and we will operate where the whores of mammon cannot touch us.

En garde, Zucc, your filthy skype days are numbered!

facebook-jew

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

What do you do with the UPF? If you’re Facebook, you shut down their main page. So what do THEY then do? They migrate as much Zionist supporting material as they can to sister pages and to their Reclaim Australia – West Australia Rally page.

In every quote to the media, however, you will find their leadership claiming to be ‘nationalist’ and not ‘patriot’ which is such a conscious delineation that its intention is coldly clear to true Australian nationalists.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

On the same page (RA-WA) you will find a link to a True Blue Crew flag march where Whiteness is heavily emphasised. Then it’s back to the kosher meal of every possible Zionist-related entity they chug up – Britain First and Tommy Robinson shares right there in among them.

Well, they know by now; surely they aren’t naive. They know that promoting ultra-Zionists like Avi Yemini is a contradiction in terms to the single-minded cause of fighting Islamic extremism. Ultra-Zionists like Avi and his fellow countrymen create such extremism. They do so both by having manufactured ISIS, so as to pit them against the unfriendly Moslems on their list – and by continually stoking bloody conflict in the region.

The perennial program of destabilisation establishes a power balance that benefits the security of the state of Israel and services whatever objectives its allies may have in the region. But it also does something else – and has done so since the 1970s – it creates a mass migration of Middle Easterners into Australia.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

What does this portend for the ‘nationalism’ that they claim to be championing, having knowingly appropriated the term from staunch supporters of a new White Australia Policy? It kills it because those same Zionists do everything possible to eradicate such nationalist beliefs. They do more though — they align with the Left to attack serious nationalists such as we saw recently with Fairfax’s criminal toll Luke McMahon, who is known to have ties with Zionist-convert Neil Erikson.

Erikson, along with Nick Folkes, Howard Crawford, Scott Moerland and others have campaigned heavily against true nationalists. We are not at all surprised to find the UPF making the self-defeating move to once again associate with these cagey globalists in the hope of puffing up their waning profile.

Thus, nationalists for a White Australia become treated worse than kiddy fiddlers, and the planes keep flying more and more Indians, Chinese, Africans and MOSLEMS from the Middle East. The cathartic activity of stoking enmity against Islam merely gives a moral license to our globalist government to support military crimes in the Middle East which benefit Israel.

In this battle, all those values that Australians regarded as part of their birthright are trampled on. Zionists in Australia, while demanding racial and religious homogeneity at home, are forever insisting on total diversity for Australia and all White countries.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

This diversity has transformed our cities into utterly foreign destinations. The quarter-acre home has been replaced by towering (shoddily built) concrete toolboxes crammed with Chinese and Indians; the odour of their spicy cooking permeating the streets.

Australia needs reclaiming from all of this, not just one particular branch of this allegedly diverse community.

It is not the Indians, Africans, or Chinese who are losing their identities. They’ve never had it so sweet. While White Australians are slowly being discouraged from even considering ourselves Australian, this new population get dual identities. They get to be Indian AND Australian; they get to be African AND Australian, and they get to be Chinese AND Australian.

Islam is just a symptom of this single world government that has its master Zionist America. But while all these terms we throw about ‘Zionist’ ‘civic patriot’ and whatever might confuse the casual punter it is all quite simple. Unless you live in one of those last posts White Australian areas that are only ‘gradually’ being de-Europeanised you only have to take a walk, open your eyes, and smell the pungent waft of curry.

What difference does Islam make if – in the highly improbable event of removing it – you do so only to find yourself a stranger in your own country, shivering and alone among a new population of aliens? What will you reclaim then?

Wake up to the Zionists — you are being used.

C1ePePgVEAAVEM4
Avi Yemini, the ultra-Zionist who is now the darling of the civic patriots now calling themselves Australian ‘nationalists’

TRUMP DUPED — THE DREAM IS OVER — SYRIA BOMBINGS TRIGGER A NEW IRAQ!

TRUMP DUPED — THE DREAM IS OVER — SYRIA BOMBINGS TRIGGER A NEW IRAQ!

We hate to say we told you so, but UNA did warn readers that Trump offered little more than the illusion of a change from a world controlled by Zionist warmongers.

This is not an order that can be changed so easily. As of today, we are proved correct. Trump both sold the alt-right and White nationalists a hell of a line or else he was sincere up to a point but just couldn’t maintain his vision against the agitations of dark forces behind the scenes.

We choose to believe the latter, that he really did want to bring about a new policy on Syria, but the system is not designed to be remodelled.

The ‘fake news’ department hit him with powerfully stirring images of little Syrian kids being gassed by Assad, a line reminiscent of the lies of the WMDs that led to the invasion of Iraq and the beginning of the mass relocations into the west by Middle Eastern ‘refugees’.

Let’s remember, the US, Israel and its allies had been supplying ISIS etc. with the weapons and wherewithal to wage an insurgency against President Bashar al-Assad, so it bears the culpability for this bloody conflict.

The only ones actually fighting ‘terrorists’ were the government forces under Assad, and Russia, with president Putin’s powerful resolve to stand in defiance of this sick, evil Zionist world order. They fought alone.

We choose to believe the latter, that he really did want to bring about a new policy on Syria, but the system is not designed to be remodelled.

Then, this gassing incident occurs, and immediately we return to the WMD narrative that brought down Saddam Hussein and forever compromised global security — Assad gassing fresh-faced little children, his people.

Of course, the western media has been pushing the Zionist lies all along and was never about to acknowledge the basic tenets of fair reportage. Instead, it continued to dump Zionist-globalist lies on us like asbestos rubble.

C8yOim3VYAA1ZcP
Yes, fancy this sick Jew warmonger sending support to his new partner in war crimes

Remember, fair reportage is a cornerstone of western journalism and therefore a pillar of this so-called democracy that it keeps blowing foreign states up to impose upon them. However, Assad maintains that a Syrian airstrike on the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhun, in the Idlib province, hit a terrorist chemical weapons lab causing the leak. This is quite plausible indeed. It is every bit as plausible as suggesting he gassed the little children out of some brand of cartoon villainy.

This explanation was roundly dismissed by the west, which had its propaganda machine primed and rearing to go. Kids play a valuable hand in beguiling the western people. When Beach Boy washed up on a Turkish shore he became the symbol of justification for flooding Europe with rapeugees, the exploits of which fill the pages of social media and alternative blog news feeds almost on a daily basis.

Following the heavily reported gassing, arch-Zionist and US Ambassador to the UN Security Council, Nikki Haley, a woman of Sikh descent, gave a speech invoking more images of dead kiddies, and imploring, “We cannot close our eyes to those pictures. We cannot close our minds of the responsibility to act…

Of course, the western media has been pushing the Zionist lies all along and was never about to acknowledge the basic tenets of fair reportage. Instead, it continued to dump Zionist-globalist lies on us like asbestos rubble.

“Russia cannot escape responsibility for this. We know that if nothing is done, these attacks will continue. Assad has no incentive to stop using chemical weapons as long as Russia continues to protect his regime from consequences.”

Then the clincher at the end, when she said, “When the United Nations consistently acts in its duty to act collectively there are times in the life of states we are compelled to take our own action.”

150420130502-syria-war-780x439
It is due to this Zionist interference in Syria that this not-so-fake gas attack became fake news that swayed Trump to reneg on his promises

Yes, we heard this from George W. Bush before he went into Iraq, this same sort of spiel. But now it is coming from the administration of a president who was voted in precisely on the promise that he would not go down bloodthirsty Hillary’s warmongering road — a path leading directly to a confrontation with Russia, as much as another embedded and tumultuous military catastrophe in the Middle East.

Meanwhile, the usual cast of happy Zionists lines up to help stoke the furnace. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cynically Tweeted, “When I saw pictures of babies suffocating from a chemical attack in Syria, I was shocked and outraged.”

This colourless quote, which lacks any true spark of sincerity, is understandable given it was Israeli involvement that caused the sarin gassing in the first place.

Then the clincher at the end, when she said, “When the United Nations consistently acts in its duty to act collectively there are times in the life of states we are compelled to take our own action.”

Then the Tweet from the AnneFrankCenter of the US, which howled a whopper when it uploaded an image of Anne Frank graphically superimposed onto a picture of Syrian children. It wrote, “The Anne Franks of our time”, which is funny, considering that Anne Frank was not gassed but died of typhus.

Yet, all of this goes to show the same techniques are being used once again to lead us into a savage and unnecessary conflict for Israel that will result in our countries having to absorb even greater numbers of Moslems and others.

17821058_757468844419256_1147292494_n
Except, of course, Anne Frank was phony, she never died of gassing, and oi very, muh sarin gassing!

This is what Trump is bringing us early in his term, about as early as Hillary would have had she been elected instead. And how could he not? The office of the president of the United States does not allow him any license to actually change the system. The system is what it is and that is staunchly Zionist. Remember, too, that Trump personally supports Israel, and regardless of what many Jewish groups had to say about him, it was this confidence in his support that led to Jewish expansion on the West Bank resuming.

Today, news reports say more than 50 Tomahawk missiles were fired against a Syrian air base. Trump, who is hosting Chinese President Xi Jinping was very much thinking about the children. He issued a statement condemning the gas attack and justifying the bombing, saying, “Even beautiful babies were cruelly murdered in this barbaric attack. It was a slow and brutal death for so many.”

Zionist commentator and Jew, Bill Kristol, Tweeted, “If Pres. Trump takes appropriate action against Assad this #NeverTrumper will, of course, support him. He’s the president, not merely ‘Trump’.”

This was re-tweeted by Scott Adams, the creator of the comic character Dilbert, who led by remarking, “Here’s how you know that the Syrian gas attack is not what it appears.”

3F064BC900000578-4388834-image-a-45_1491534382380
And (((it))) begins.

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

If anything distinguishes those civic patriots on the right from us radical nationalists it is by whom we are most attacked.

In the case of the civics, they are dogged by what we collectively term ‘the left’, while radical nationalists, who occupy a third position on the political spectrum cop the most grief from either the civic patriots or those in the conservative camp.

Bear in mind that ‘the left’ is as eclectic when it comes to issues, identity, philosophy, and strategy as ‘the right’.

The left wants the patriot movement dispersed while the conservatives aim to drive away radical nationalists so they can inhabit our political ground and remodel it in their crypto-globalist image.

This is a curious fact that allows us to discuss a couple of cases in point. Let us begin with what some of those from the civic patriot side of the quadrangle contend with in their present day ‘clicktivism’. This essay shall be in two parts on account of its length and the dedication required to each of its players.

1. THE PATRIOT ACTORS AND THE COMBATANTS OF THE LEFT

There is a particularly malicious element at play among those who oppose the growth of the patriots. They view patriots as more of a concern than the nationalist movement given its mainstream accessibility. On that side, the Bogan element is mocked by those who are their mirror image with one factor separating them by the slimmest degree: the perception of their engaging in ‘racism’. This is, despite the ambiguity on the question of race amplified in the patriot fold.

Nationalists define Australianness as being of White European stock, as opposed to Aborigines. Patriots, who misuse the term nationalism understanding it not, and often deliberately misappropriating it, are nebulous in their definition of an Australian. Many are in mixed-race relationships and as such loath the absolutism of nationalism which would exclude them on the grounds of breaching its inviolate precepts.

However, it is important in the propaganda war of those conflicting with the anti-Islam movement to lump each in the same basket and defame both they and nationalists, as ‘Nazis’; which is like calling all socialists Marxists or anarchists communists. The Nazi tag is meant to invoke images of state organised terror that would ensue if these groups are allowed to put down political roots in the community.

In the lexicon of those of the left, patriots are ‘potatriots’, a witticism intended to disdain that group as ‘potato heads’. This is a derisive term that was originally applied to skinheads. Since the advent of the Reclaim Australia movement, which is almost exclusively dramatized on Facebook, a number of pages and counter-identities have sprung up to oppose the patriot pages and the groups that employ them.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

But virtue is subjective in this day and age when that moral asset is destroying the west. Opposition to Islam is the kindling of the realisation something is amiss. Australians are being de-culturized while globalism is dialectically re-culturizing us with a religion that negates the very tenets underpinning the idea of universal equality at play. Both are at the mercy of the culturally vacuous reality of globalism.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113
Alex Gollan, the assistant school principal and anti-fascist anarchist who ran the ‘anti-bogan’ word press site and was arrested for bulk kiddie porn

This is visible nowhere better than on those oppositional pages, which we mentioned. This genre has no purpose other than to negate. They do not attempt to counter ‘potatriot’ messages by promoting their own positive counter-messages they literally take the aforementioned messages and desecrate them. There is no intellectual component at play in the deconstruction of the patriot message. Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is a sledgehammer used to beat down the message and the messenger so that the mission becomes personal.

A very telling post occurred on one such page with a prominent leftist troll, “Can’t we just kill them [patriots] all?” The admin replied, “No, because then we would be Nazis.”
Disregarding the fact that had that comment been made on a nationalist page it would have been hidden or removed, it is a very instructive insight into both the pathology of the poster and the counter movement. The duplicitous essence of it is summed up in the gag, “We’re starting a war for peace.”

The assumed virtue of the poster is instantly invalidated by the revelation of this tyrannical instinct.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

This is, however, but one example. Narrowed down to a central theme outside of ‘race’ is the implication that patriots will potentially auger in a dictatorial system reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, the calls for an authoritarian response to the patriots are constant on the sample page we have used for our study.

There are flippant, but often sincere calls for patriots to be pursued by ASIO, or to be charged with offences that — were they on the other foot — would be vehemently contested as breaches of civil liberties. So we come to the actors or combatants, and here we shall actually name some.

Smith
Pete Smith from Melbourne, heavily active on Facebook, is linked to Antifascist Action Sydney and other ‘anarchist’ pages

 

We have had correspondence with a few members of the patriot movement, putting aside our ideological differences, keen to highlight certain combatants and the disreputable methods they have employed to target one or other of the patriot actors.

One, in particular, has been defamed over and over by combatants using various Facebook identities and private messaging the patriot actor we shall call ‘Mark’.

Mark is being consistently vilified as a person of heinous substance and the nature of the slander has transcended any honourable intent. The attacks led to the hostilities emerging from a social media setting and into the corporeal world when the authorities were involved. Mark is not alone in these vicious online assaults but his example is notable.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

So, who is behind these assaults on Mark’s character? Here, we merely repeat what he believes: John Linden Faulkner. But we also mention two others, Alex Gollan and David Hollis.

download (3)
Sydney’s Tayce Brown, shoplifter, hair stylist to the scabby, and a real skank

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This blog, as in others we’ve mentioned, is a flagrant vehicle to attack political opponents. Faulkner and Gollan are said to have co-administrated the site. Gollan, a former assistant school principal has since disappeared from ‘anti-fascist’ activities after being charged with child-sex offences.

Faulkner, who Mark and others believe to be behind a series of online profiles identifiable by their malevolence, has a criminal past to make anyone suddenly hosting him start eyeing the nearest exit. Faulkner was imprisoned for nine years for armed robberies in which women were his soft targets. He appealed his sentence as harsh, but in doing so was told it was actually lenient under the circumstances.

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This week [originally posted on Facebook March 11] , it was revealed that David Albain Hollis, the man in the red ‘Truth’ cap who accompanied Sue Munro to the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court to spy on the Bendigo Three’s supporters — and who appeared in an opportunistic pic with John Safran taken on the day — went on a “stabbing spree” in 1991, knifing seven people one of whom later died.

Hollis served only 17 months in jail on the grounds of diminished responsibility as he was in the throes of a “psychotic episode”, although how that should mitigate anything so appalling we do not know.

There are other cases on that extreme left of the bench such as Tayce Brown of Antifascist Action Sydney whose conduct and lifestyle are such that she would be considered a habitual criminal outside of the political activist underworld.

The radical left is sure something — in a world inhabited by junkies, thugs, hookers, thieves, and ex-murderers does becoming ‘anti-racist’ mean atoning for dissolute, wasted lives. Does championing the ‘other’ allow them to graduate from their moral squalor merely on the basis they aren’t racist? We are not psychologists, and this is not a forensic examination, but the pattern cannot be ignored.

Bear in mind, Blair Cottrell was confronted with a video created inside the correctional system while he was doing time for a crime of passion. He never killed anyone, nor caused anyone harm. What of these three? All fall into the very worst categories, and all comport themselves on social media in a manner that delegitimizes any hypothetical argument they believe they have concerning right and wrong.

If Faulkner is behind this campaign of defamation and stalking against Mark, then it appears that he has in no way left behind his violent past, but merely justified it in the context of the political theatre. He has reinvented himself as the ‘good guy’ and deemed those patriot actors as ‘bad guys’ in a morality play where his own contaminated ethics are masked by a blindness born of criminal denial.

In our next article, we will turn the focus on the patriots, who are to nationalists what the leftists we have described here have been to them.

oie_DqksmJ43gaGr
Anarchist Psycho

 

WE FELL FOR THE MEME NOT THE MAN

WE FELL FOR THE MEME NOT THE MAN

As the excitement subsides over Donald Trump’s unthinkable victory, Nationalists abroad are beginning to question just what exactly is going to change. In fact, amid a failing enthusiasm from capricious, even stupid decisions from the Trump administration, we’re beginning to think we fell for the meme, not the man.

Hardly any amongst us were not enthralled in the drawn out process of the Presidential election, and although it’s superfluous to waste words on the series of events itself we must reiterate that the greater portion of Nationalists the world over were glued to the virtual reality of memetic warfare with unquestioning faith in the Trump cause.

There was the hope that a certain je ne sais quoi moment was at our doorstep as the thinly veiled humour behind God Emperor memes revealed a subconscious yearning for such a figure to actually be walking among us.

images-2
Somewhere between man and meme lies Kek

In the past weeks of the Trump administration, however, we question the veracity of what we were told and more pertinently, what we told ourselves about the new POTUS. Detractors from the United States will argue that they had little choice given the alternate continuation of the Clinton family; they will say we are jumping the gun in too harsh a manner when the occupancy of the White House has just begun.

To an extent we concur, yet a greater catalyst to our derision forms: our riposte to Seppos in their time of apparent jubilee lies in questioning the primacy of American opinion in anything, for outside the realm of their own smugness lies a world that is deeply resentful of the gross impact of uninvited, unwanted imperialism for the past several decades.

In this regard, Trump is not only continuing that tradition but appears to be outdoing his predecessor in stirring the hornet’s nest that is the Middle East. The stern warnings sent to Iran and the politically motivated ‘Muslim ban’, contrary to Trump’s bloviating rants, puts no one but Israel first.

There was the hope that a certain je ne sais quoi moment was at our doorstep as the thinly veiled humour behind God Emperor memes revealed a subconscious yearning for such a figure to actually be walking among us.

Eric Trump gave a better picture on how deep Israeli interest runs in his father’s veins when, speaking to New York radio program AM 970 he revealed, “I think, honestly, the Iran nuclear deal was one of the things that made him jump into the race…I think that was a game changer for him. That is when he finally said, ‘Kids, I am going to do it. I am gong to give this a real shot.’”

Benjamin Netanyahu only earlier this month (Feb 17), no doubt emboldened by Trump’s staunch words of support to his close ally, claimed both the United Stares and Israel have a “grand mission” to confront the Iranian threat. We could go on and on listing saccharine statements made over the Chosen Land, but it would assail our principal point of asking why we need to justify a continued LARPing support over a President selling false goods.

maxresdefault
If only he would just bomb Israel we could get back to worshipping him 

Trump is a Zionist, and we’re sufficiently tired of hearing the ifs and buts avoiding that charge. If there’s one train of thought we don’t want to hear it’s the eternal excuse that the so-called most powerful man in the world cannot institute the reforms needed to clear away the irrefutable dross covering all corners of America’s political, economic and social bodies, so instead he’s just “playing games to remove them”; at this point in time it’s equivocal to saying “the dog ate my homework” – it’s a lie that’s biding time for the inevitable outing of the lie itself, whereby at the root of that falsehood is the absurd notion America can ever be the saviour of the West without being anything less than what we know as America, which it can’t, or won’t.

We note too with a mocking sneer at what this has done for the progression of Australian politics. It has come to our attention that a few self-styled “alt-right” publications have emerged with the intention of furthering Pauline Hanson as our answer to the same populist train-wreck that gave us Geert “I was under investigation by my own country for ties to Israel” Wilders.

The usual culprits in our patriot circus try to boost their own self-importance by rallying (unsuccessfully) around Hanson’s inner circle, so too do they champion Trump as a demigod; most cringeworthy of all are the exaltations to American patriots that are impossible not to be seen as anything other than a desperate grab for attention.

Eric Trump gave a better picture on how deep Israeli interest runs in his father’s veins when, speaking to New York radio program AM 970 he revealed, “I think, honestly, the Iran nuclear deal was one of the things that made him jump into the race…I think that was a game changer for him.

Trump made a good Pepe and captivated our interest as a God Emperor, but all the same, the power vested – or more precisely, imagined – in him was a dreamlike vapour that cannot and will not be translated into reality. The who, what, where, and when failed to correlate with the prerequisite conditions imposed on such a gargantuan figure. Likewise, the copycat minions scattered throughout the West are false idols on an even less impressive scale.

The idea of compromised Nationalism is no longer an acceptable game to place bets on, it dilutes our core message to an irrevocable perversion that can be seen in all its crassness throughout the civic nationalist fold. Australia finds more common ground than ever before with continental Europe’s Nationalist movements as our strident march towards sovereignty struggles with, among other things, throwing off American hegemony.

Trump may find it necessary to save Israel, we don’t. Which side will the people of Australia choose?

download-5
Alas…

ABBOTT’S GHOST MAKES SHRILL ZIONISM ALL THE STRONGER

ABBOTT’S GHOST MAKES SHRILL ZIONISM ALL THE STRONGER

Tony Abbott has been a busy little bee. Published in the Australian Spectator late December last year, the member for Warringah nonchalantly documented his time as part of a largely unnoticed delegation to Jerusalem for the Australia-Israel-UK Leadership Dialogue – clearly in the interests of his North Sydney constituents.

With fellow travellers, including Opposition Leader Bill Shorten and Federal Trade Minister Steve Ciobo, this motley crew of international mercenaries, aside from making a predictable and superfluous gesture of commitment to Israel, gave worrying signs on the direction of Australian foreign policy; signs too portentous to be ignored as storm clouds gather over Iran.

The Dialogue, “Originally intended as another forum to familiarise Australia’s leaders with Israel…” is a curious thing indeed. The familiarity of Australia’s elite to Israel is hardly a fledgeling relation, nor one that needs more meet-and-greets to reach its full potential. A few brief hiccups here and there in the history of Australian-Israeli relations are nonconsequential footnotes in light of Australia’s subservience to the Jewish ethnostate. Abbott salivates over this long history, “And long before we were taught to think of ourselves as a multicultural country, Jews had been Australia’s Chief Justice, army commander and head of state (as that’s what our governor-general is). Indeed, we’re the only country with this distinction other than Israel itself.”

download-4
A stupid evangelical Zionist to the last

As if that’s supposed to woo the audience, he proceeds to the disturbing crux of the article. Says Abbott:

“In a witches’ brew of complexity and danger, Palestine is no longer the region’s most intractable problem. As we learnt, Israel’s establishment is clear-eyed about what’s happening: Iranian policy is a mix of ancient Persian imperialism with apocalyptic Islam; Turkey’s President Erdogan bankers to be a modern version of Suleiman the Magnificent; Russia has opportunistically used America’s diffidence to realise its historic dream of a warm water port; Syria will continue to be a graveyard or it will evolve into a series of semi-autonomous statelets.”

Talking about the dismantling of a sovereign nation as if nothing is amiss, he relates Syria’s planned future within the larger context, “The bottom line, as Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu makes abundantly clear, is that Iran cannot be allowed to become a nuclear power.”

As if that’s supposed to woo the audience, he proceeds to the disturbing crux of the article.

The bad news according to the former Prime Minister – remember this is a man who can only deal in “goodies and baddies” – is that “Iran (whose official policy is to destroy Israel and whose aim is world dominance is identical – only in Shia form – to that of the so-called Caliphate) now dominates Iraq and Syria while Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah, has more capacity than ever to ravage northern Israel…” He also makes no secret of the emerging oddities amongst the Middle East, “There is now informal Israeli security cooperation with the Saudis and Emiratis.” That must be why Saudi Arabia is immune from international condemnation.

Abbott continues to rant and rave a little about Palestine, manages to throw a few lines in about his grievances with Climate Change, and closes his little adventure by going “…for a fraternal jog with Bill Shorten around Jerusalem’s old city…”

1kizws

The short report ultimately reveals a stench emanating from Abbott more grave to the olfactory system than a body processing raw onion. This is irrefutable posturing for the balkanization of Israel’s neighbours, centred on unprecedented hostility towards Iran and, to a different extent and for different reasons, Russia. For what purpose is a back-bencher stoking the flames of war? Consciously or not (we’re inclined to believe the former), Abbott is working in tandem with the conclusions set out in the Yinon Plan [ ], which infamously sets out the strategic blueprint for the implementation of a Greater Israel at the expense of destabilising its neighbours along ethnic and religious lines into useless and powerless – as Abbott says – statelets.

It could be observed that the hovering spirit of Abbott is eager to be reanimated into a politically corporal form. It could also be observed his tone pays homage to that old Bush-Blair-Howard triumvirate of travelling democracy. It is not altogether unthinkable given both the unimpressive tenure of and Abbott’s axe to grind with Turnbull, that another leadership spill is possible. Subsequently, a malcontent conservative bloc of the electorate that stubbornly (and falsely believed) they deviated away from Liberal hegemony are still malleable enough to be mopped up by a strong unifier. Pauline Hanson and the renegade Liberals would be made redundant in what little independence they had as the true father of the conservative zeitgeist returns more powerful than before; here, the existence of the patriots proves little more than lowly cultists, whose unintelligible incantations are precursors to the arrival of Cthulhu.

The patriot groups, hasbara-fed imbeciles who naïvely wave the Star of David as if the religious/political fraternity is reciprocal, are crucial to normalising and desensitising not a small part of the population to anti-Islam rhetoric which can, in turn, be cashed in as justification for reckless foreign adventures vis-à-vis popular support. From One Nation to the Q Society, it works well for establishment politics to have the angry mob on board; fruitful indeed it is to have people both fearful of an Iran whose aim is defamatorily described as “world dominance” and, perhaps more importantly, excited to combat a nebulously understood ‘Islam’ wherever it may be found, be it Tehran, Raqqa or Lakemba.

Abbott continues to rant and rave a little about Palestine, manages to throw a few lines in about his grievances with Climate Change, and closes his little adventure by going “…for a fraternal jog with Bill Shorten around Jerusalem’s old city…”

The dangerous vainness of pursuing Islam as the demonic scapegoat should be more apparent yet it isn’t. When criticism of the faith itself is warranted, it in almost all cases begins with the extremism espoused by Saudi Arabia and its allies. Its state ideology of Wahabism is a term notably absent from Abbott and patriot groups alike; instead, we hear “Islamic extremism” which acts as a buffer from the true understanding of what it is and what causes it. When criticism of the demographic exodus from the Middle East and Africa is warranted, it begins with the egregious assault on common sense that the West inflicted on otherwise stable (relatively speaking) regions. To this date, Europe is paying for the illegal overthrow of Gaddafi, and it’s currently paying for the attempt to overthrow the Assad regime.

Nationalists hope that in the near future we won’t be talking about our due punishment for attempting anything in Iran; to lessen that likelihood all clear-minded Australians need to reassess why such fervent support for a foreign nation, much less one with such an odious reputation, comes into play within the sphere of Australia and its own interests. The average patriot, good-intentioned as they may be, need to come to terms with the ease to which they’re manipulated into taking moral responsibility for a surrogate nation and the manifold problems that come with it.

[1] A brief note on the Yinon Plan is necessary. Composed by Oded Yinon as “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties” in 1982, it appeared in the Kivunim (Directions), the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organisation. Its premise is not unique to one mere paper, but an internalised general plan for Israel to become an imperialist power in the region. Theodore Herzl, an integral figure in modern Zionism claimed the area of the Jewish State stretches “from the brook of Egypt to the Euphrates”. To take for example one revealing excerpt from Yinon: “Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run, it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon.”

During the Iran-Iraq War of 1980-1988, we see the extent of intrigue at play. Saddam Hussein was backed by America, France and the U.K., while Israel provided minimal support to Iran. Ironically, there was no problem then with Iraq’s actual use of chemical weapons on both military and civilian populations.

keepcalmstudio-com-dancing-crown-keep-calm-and-fuck-israel

NICK FOLKES TRYING TO APPROPRIATE THE WORD NATIONALISM AGAIN

NICK FOLKES TRYING TO APPROPRIATE THE WORD NATIONALISM AGAIN

Will there ever be an end to the race-mixing promoting Zionist shill Nick Folkes? There has been no car accident yet, no falling anvil, no act of God to take this gormless piece of shit out of circulation. But we nationalists are growing impatient for the day we read his obituary in the gossip columns.

To be a nationalist means you adhere to strict principles regarding race. Nick Folkes knows this. But in the war, Nick would’ve been shot as a spy for donning the enemy uniform and conducting business as a spy. See, Nick married a Japanese woman and produced mixed-race kids, which is the very definition of a race traitor. It is everything a nationalist exists to oppose vehemently.

But Nick doesn’t appreciate the nuances of what makes serious nationalist politics tick, and he regards it like a game where he can play any character he chooses. Folkes treats the very serious business of nationalism like a communal food plate he can handle after using the dunny and neglecting to wash his hands. Yes, Folkes wants to fool everyone, but mainly himself. Nick would paint a McDonalds’ logo over the arch of his doorway and then attempt to sell you Hungry Jacks. This is what he is doing politically.

If Nick wants to escape the ire of nationalists, he can call himself what he is, which is a snivelling wormy CIVIC PATRIOT.

He knows him and his filthy mates Neil Erikson and Shermon Burgess are banned from calling themselves nationalists because they have sold out patriots, ratted out nationalists and promoted Zionist international politics. He knows we consider them a pack of Judas Goats but denial has a power equalled only by the magical powers of a placebo when it comes to countering the effects of reality.

folkes
Nick wants to pinch everything he can from nationalism except actual nationalism

God knows, but Nick seems to need it pounded into his lumpen skull that he has no right to use the word ‘nationalist’ in association with his little Peanuts for Freedom club. Pinger boy Toby Cook, who our information tells us was in rehab recently for a MAJOR drug problem, appropriated a Golden Dawn T-shirt while promoting Party for Freedom Zionist policies. He needed a serious smack-down for daring to link PfF to hardcore nationalism but fortunately, Golden Dawn’s leader in Australia made a public statement denouncing the fat mixed-race drug-addict piss boy as a fraud.

If Nick wants to escape the ire of nationalists, he can call himself what he is, which is a snivelling wormy CIVIC PATRIOT.

Nicholas shares that title along with the United Patriots Front and all those anti-Islam Zionist cucks who generate Facebook pages like a wombat produces crap.

Nationalism takes guts to pursue and pansies who are afraid to name race, or call out the Jew, or be known to desire a return to the White Australia policy have no right at all using this title which is reserved exclusively for the brave. This is why the Coalition of Australian Nationalists was formed, but so far they’ve done fuck-all to police this important rule. God knows they’ll have to do something to justify their existence real soon. They should be writing this stuff, not us. But uselessness is a disease that just about anyone can catch which is why we make such dire warning about safeguarding integrity if you have it.

Folkes can only be tolerated so much. The point will come when we will have to set up shop outside his front door. He does these things to provoke us.

This may serve as a final warning to Folkes: stop calling yourself a nationalist or we will divert our attention from our innumerable enemies and concentrate them fully on you. We will make shutting you down the absolute end goal of our time on this earth. You filthy disgusting Hansonite cuck Zionist son of a bitch.

nick-folkes-zion-puppet
Nick’s main man George Jameson swings an Israeli flag at Penrith. And they want to call themselves nationalists