IS IT WHITE GENOCIDE OR WHITE SUICIDE?

IS IT WHITE GENOCIDE OR WHITE SUICIDE?

This title question here can only be answered by being honest, and above all things, we as Nationalists have a responsibility not to fall into the trap of platitudes.

By Christopher Shortis

Progressive politics are full of examples of platitudes and the most famous was arguably former Labour P.M. Kevin Rudd’s sorry speech. It created a fuzzy, feel-good moment to appease the conscience of the progressives by condemning early Australian history, but achieving little if any positive outcome for the Aboriginal people. This is also a great example of cultural, or indeed, white suicide rather than genocide.

Ultimately our nation’s woes are from condescending white people with an aristocratic mindset in power, appeasing their globalist puppet masters, filling our nation with third-world hordes and selling our ports, farmland and God-knows-what-else to an emerging China. These Judas Iscariots of our race don’t care about Aboriginal welfare, let alone their fellow white man. In time, at the rate we’re going, we could potentially be under Chinese occupation, and how will this fare for the Aboriginal people?

We at United Nationalists Australia know that Kevin Rudd’s sorry speech was patronizing pish because if white people in positions of power can sell out their own, then how can they genuinely claim to care about Aboriginal welfare? This, however, is not about Aboriginal welfare, but whether we as whites are suffering from white genocide or suicide?

dfadfad
Kevin Rudd’s expurgated speech: he meant to say, “As Prime Minister of Australia, I am a sorry son of a bitch.”

The most striking example of platitudes from pretentious Nationalists is the term “It’s O.K to be white”, the latest in a line of mantras including “Diversity means White Genocide”. These trite statements are often adopted by uncultured boobs who think waving signs and yelling out “It is O.K to be White” is the apex of political activism. Neil Erikson who has doxed just about every group that he has ever been involved with walked on stage at an African culture event in Melbourne and yelled out “It’s O.K to be white” and it was nothing more than an attempt to incite a reaction.

This alleged state snitch, police informant and all-around serial-pest continued his moronathon at St. Kilda beach by filming Africans playing soccer, which incited a reaction that Erikson was looking for, with one African arrested for assault on a police officer. This created the propaganda Erikson wanted to promote his St. Kilda “Political Meeting”, which in turn created the spectacle the establishment needed to condemn the rally as racist.

This alleged state snitch, police informant and all-around serial-pest continued his moronathon at St. Kilda beach by filming Africans playing soccer, which incited a reaction that Erikson was looking for, with one African arrested for assault on a police officer. This created the propaganda Erikson wanted to promote his St. Kilda “Political Meeting”, which in turn created the spectacle the establishment needed to condemn the rally as racist.

The predictable dumbathon between left and right played out to script, with the left being filled with their Marxist birdseed parroting the variant of the same chant. “Africans are welcome racists are not”. The media, as well as the Left, were engaging in the hype of the rise of Neo-Nazis after a couple of clowns were filmed doing the Nazi Salute. The Jewish community also had to have their say through The Australian Jewish News, with the story titled ‘When right is wrong’” and the chosen ones had to make it about them. Wasn’t the counter-protest against the far-right about alleged racism towards Africans?

This also triggered left-wing groups to launch their own protests, warning of the threat of growing Nazism chanting another clichéd mantra “Never Again” in the city of Melbourne, which was painted red long ago. The two predominant figures leading the cuckfest at St. Kilda beach were Neil Erikson and Blair Cottrell, the main act at the circus protesting against African violence.

B1 and B2 were falling over themselves trying to prove they’re not racist, and Cottrell posing for a picture with a South Vietnamese man with the defunct South Vietnamese flag. Oh, the irony! The so-called Nationalist with a man who fled his homeland to Australia with his defunct flag, because Ho Chi Minh fought to unite Vietnam and as it happens were more Nationalist then he was, and more Nationalist than Blair will ever be.

screenshot_20190105-180512_facebook
It’s a wonder these jokers won’t be holding their own citizenship ceremony on Australia Day. They can start with this token Asian.

Queensland Senator Fraser Anning unsurprisingly lent his support to the rally seemingly without a single advisor in his office warning him about being within 1000 miles radius of the Erikson termite. The old ‘I support Israel’ line came out when questioned by the media and the strong denials that he was with Neo-Nazis. This is despite supporters executing the Roman Salute and looking like extras in the series Romper Stomper. But now we must address the elephant in the room. Both left and right were at St. Kilda beach herded like cattle by the Police and in this circus were The Unshackled, Dia Beltran and Kane Miller from the True-Blue Crew, making up some of the social media identities.

This also triggered left-wing groups to launch their own protests, warning of the threat of growing Nazism chanting another cliché mantra “Never Again” in the city of Melbourne, which was painted red long ago. The two predominant figures leading the cuckfest at St. Kilda beach were Neil Erikson and Blair Cottrell, the main act at the circus protesting against African violence.

Most of the people at St. Kilda beach whether they were left, right, the police or media, parliamentarians both State and Federal are a majority WHITE! As Nationalists waging our political struggle, we must come to terms with this mother of all paradoxes. Before we blame Jews, Africans, Muslims, China and every other symptom plaguing our nation today, remember the success of ending White Australia was done by whites willing to bow down to the globalist, egalitarian and elitist mindset.

Without white collaborators, there could be no ending of White Australia or the destruction of western culture in general. We as Nationalists need to accept that white history is a dual history and that the Nationalist-minded man was and still is always in direct opposition politically against the mercantile classes. Nationalists wanted a white man’s working paradise, where wages and conditions were just and not undermined by cheap non-white labour, while the bourgeois will do anything for profit.

Early Australian historical events such as the Eureka Stockade 1854, Buckland River Riots 1857, Lambing Flats 1861 and the Shearers Strike 1891 are prime examples of the Nationalist-minded men standing up against the greedy pastoralists. From the shearers strike of 1891, emerged the Australian Labor Party and ten years later under Edmund Barton, the first Australian P.M. the first act of parliament, the Immigration Restriction Act was legislated. This is referred to as the White Australia Policy and our forefathers were prepared to stand for the principles of Nationalism by legislation and put into practice that the continent of Australia was to be a white man’s land.

Without getting into specifics too much, after the end of WW2, the United Nations was formed in 1948 and the declaration of human rights was established. In reality, becoming a member of the United Nations marked the beginning of surrender to national sovereignty to the global Overlords, and since then Australia has lost its racial homogeneity, manufacturing and identity. Legal, economic and racial sovereignty destroyed not by external forces, but the Judas Iscariots of our race in collaboration with the globalists. The majority of whites have learned to hate themselves because of the distorted black armed band view of our history being taught in our institutions when in three words history can be summed up accurately, the good, the bad and the ugly.

Our foes will only give you the bad and the ugly, but not the good, and the salient message here as Christ said, “Your enemies will be those of your own household,” and it’s going to take more than bromides to take on the globalist and the enemies within our midst. White genocide or White suicide? Somehow it seems to be the latter.

7e827fa033b8c7631c0542a3b527641c.jpg
Blair Cottrell, the human megaphone, once again channelling Adolf Hitler while supporting a pro-Israel Senator and being photographed with an Asian man

ANDREWS’ RE-ELECTION WILL GREENLIGHT AFRICAN CRIME

ANDREWS’ RE-ELECTION WILL GREENLIGHT AFRICAN CRIME

As election time looms for Melbournians the inevitability of Labor premier Danny Andrews being re-elected emerges with it. Which also means, African crime gets re-elected.

Andrews, who just signed Victorians over to the One Belt One Road Chinese invasion initiative, so that he can accrue debt to the hungry Chinese at the cost of Australia’s security, has presided over a state in the throes of lawlessness. African crime is out of control but the state’s police commissioner and the government itself are beside themselves peddling misdirection and denials.

African “youth” fear no reprisals from the Victorian legal justice system because there seldom are any. The government is more concerned with its image as the country’s most multicultural state than it is with safeguarding its citizens from the violent acts of savage African immigrants who are here due to refugee quotas. And those quotas come about because for some reason the west has chosen to rescue these savage tribal people from their own self-made horror and import that mayhem to our own “civilised” lands.

The spate of African crimes in the state of Victoria is so incessant and relentless that African fatigue often prevents each and every outrage from being shared on social media communities concerned with the breakdown of Australian society thanks to immigration and especially immigration from incompatible races.

Barely a week goes about without reports of out of control African youths; home invasions; muggings; assaults; robberies and car-jacking in which that familiar phrase we’ve all come to cynically grin at is used when describing the suspects: “Of African appearance.”

When police respond to these incidents they adopt a “munch doughnuts” tactic until addressing 3AW in which case they make out everything is under control; reports are exaggerated; that it’s only a “few bad apples” spoiling it for a great community who love footy and are upset with the way they are being portrayed in the media.

Back in 2010, Andrew Bolt reported on how the then police commissioner Simon Overland admitted that the Victorian Police was hiding the truth about the ethnic crime problem.

One of the most astonishing revelations in Bolt’s article, and one which cuts to the very particular insanity suffered by the virtue-signalling small ‘l’ liberals always at the centre of championing open borders concepts, was that police were loath to issue colour-specific descriptions of African offenders because describing them as ‘black’ might cause these savage criminals offence.

The logical conclusion is not to describe them as “attackers”, or detail any specifics of their crimes, in case the negative criminal associations have an undesirable impact on their future employability as brain surgeons and rocket scientists.

Professor Andrew Fraser sparked a maelstrom of globalist indignation for having the gall to name the beast in the room. In 2005, he wrote a letter to the Parramatta Sun in which he warned: “…an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of other social problems.”

He added, “The fact is that ordinary Australians are being pushed down the path to national suicide by their own political, religious and economic elites.”

andrewfraser
Canadian-born Professor Andrew Fraser easily makes it onto UNA’s honours list!

In the ensuing row from that ‘inconvenient truth’ multiracialist apologists scrambled to bash out editorials condemning Professor Fraser; Channel 9 unleashed Ray Martin to confront him with a congenial group of church-going Africans as though this ambassadorial set were to negate the realities of African crime in much the same way a lot of bad apples spoil it for the few good ones; and academic papers were authored.

Sadly, Andrew Fraser apologised for his remarks after Sudanese man Safi Hareer complained to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission. Professor Fraser also drew the ire of Macquarie University when he wrote a paper advocating for a return to the White Australia Policy. That paper and others can be found here.

Professor Fraser was forced to take an early retirement package, but we shall not forget his courageous stand to state what everyone should regard as the bleeding obvious.

victoria-feature-image.png
A typical front page from Australia’s answer to Mogadishu

The open-borders liberal-elites’ response to all of this is to blame the messenger. There is no African crime problem, they argue, it’s the inherently racist character of the media and others reporting on the situation. They’re skewing the facts, using hyperbole, and they’re overblowing a few regrettable incidents into a campaign that impugns an entire community. It’s not the African gangs that are the problem, they say, but “the racists” who vilify them. And it is these class bigots of, as Drew Fraser said, “the political, religious and economic elites” who will always win sway over Victoria; which is on one level a showcase for a de-Europeanised Australia, which is, after all, the goal of the elites.

SOC.png
Straight from the webpage of the Victorian Socialists. See, it’s not them, it’s us, how could they possibly be responsible for their own actions?

With such a free hand from the elites, it’s little wonder that the crime-prone gang members fear nothing, respect nothing, and aspire to nothing but the accretion of consumerist trophies. In Victoria, the crime is not that committed by so-called refugees and children of refugees, it’s to mention the crime committed by these without rationalising it away as inherently a by-product of Australia’s inherent racism.

Below is the latest from the ABC as of the publication date of this blog:

Police are looking for a group of 10 to 15 youths responsible for two “ugly” and “vicious” robberies on the busy St Kilda foreshore in Melbourne’s south on Thursday night.

Key points:

  • Police said the offenders in both attacks were “perceived to be of African appearance”
  • Investigators are examining if a metal or wooden pole was used in the assaults
  • Local council has been asked to reintroduce an alcohol ban on the St Kilda foreshore

Police said two men were punched and one had a bottle smashed over his head in separate, unprovoked assaults.

In the first attack, a man had his mobile phone stolen and was left with swelling on his face.

In the second, a 25-year-old man received cuts to his face and head and was treated by ambulance officers.

Police said the offenders involved in both attacks were “perceived to be of African appearance”.

Detective Sergeant David Schaefer condemned the assaults.

“These attacks are quite cowardly and vicious, unprovoked and really an ugly event that actually occurs in normally a peaceful location where people frequently enjoy themselves,” he said.

The attacks happened on Jacka Boulevard at about 10:00pm and police said they were investigating whether the offenders may have used either a metal or wooden pole.

Call for alcohol ban

“We’re looking for a group of males of African appearance which we believe were congregating along the foreshore last night,” he said.

“We can’t speculate as to the numbers involved but on the second assault there was anywhere up to around 10 people who were involved in that second robbery,” Detective Sergeant Schaefer said.

Police said the victims had been “enjoying the sights” of the “iconic” St Kilda foreshore.

“The first victim just decided to walk down [and] enjoy the scenes and the second male was visiting a friend down there when he was accosted by the group.”

Victoria Police Inspector Jason Kelly said he was “very disappointed in what occurred”.

“Unfortunately we’ve had a large group of youth attend and the combination of youth, alcohol and public spaces just simply doesn’t mix,” he said.

He said alcohol at the “iconic beach location” was a “recipe for disaster”.

Inspector Kelly said police were calling for a full alcohol ban along the St Kilda foreshore to be reintroduced by the City of Port Phillip Council.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

Nothing prevented Saturday’s bi-state ‘International Freedom of Speech’ day, which is of itself ironic. However, in this muddle of libertarian and identity politics, attended by the usual provocateurs, when speech has no substantial content the point of whether or not it is free is moot.

The two-state ‘event’, which we cannot find any evidence of being internationally recognised despite its bold appellation, although there is said to a London event, was held in both Melbourne Docklands, where Jewish supremacist and mega Zionist Avi Yemini was joined by Senator Fraser Anning, with a crowd of around 50 free speech advocates, after the first got underway at Sydney’s Wiley Park, in Lakemba.

We will address the Wiley Park leg shortly, but first-up Anning’s speech would reveal a lot about this mysterious ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’. Senator Anning’s maiden speech, like Pauline Hanson’s before him, caused sparks when he called for a return to a “European Christian” immigration system. Yet, it did not take long to forge an allegiance with the Zionist ALA. This seems to be an inevitable pattern when it comes to outspoken politicians on the “right side”, especially those who create a false hope that they’ll support a return to the White Australia Policy.

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

He then got down to business and we’ll place a transcript of his speech verbatim on this page. What will become apparent is his pro-Zionism as he told the sparsely peopled audience, “My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’.

“This year we gave the Palestinian authority $43.8 million. They use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority.”

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

Australia shouldn’t be paying any money to that region, for sure, but that’s not what Anning’s point was – he doesn’t want it paid because, according to the very Zionist logic, innocent Israelis are being killed by evil Palestinians who have some screwed-up notion about wanting to stop their land being stolen by Jews.

The only attempt to shut down Fraser’s freedom of speech came from a longhaired ginger dressed in black who was shouted down by Avi and his supporters who chanted, “Zuck off!” a reference to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerbeg, who they blame personally for de-speeching them on his social media platform.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Meanwhile, Blair Cottrell did not attend the Melbourne rally. Instead, he drove to Sydney to yell at gimps in a windy park through a Chinese manufactured megaphone. He shook hands with the likes of marijuana advocate and serial instigator Nick Folkes who is back from cannabis country with his small multi-racial cast of resurrected Party for Freedom members (or as we dubbed them, Peanuts for Freedom) as he joined a line-up that included some uninteresting woman and Cottrell’s lawyer, John Bolton.

dfadsfs.png
Blair is a man who never lets standards get in the way of the company he consorts with (Folkes centre, Bluebeard taking a fan snap on the right)

Present also was Neil Erikson’s partner in crime, Rino Grgurgovic, aka Bluebeard, along with members of the Lads Society Sydney. If there was a Pictionary definition of “idiot” then Bluebeard’s picture would be posted there in all its pot-bellied glory, stink lines included. There would even be a colouring-in version for autistic kids.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which would be like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

MateyandFokles.png
The Fellowship of the Chicken is reunited. Matey Mate, Hollywood Nazi on the right, with his Zionist mate and colleague, Nick Folkes

It’s grouse Matey Mate is back with Nick because it’s like a reunion of the old fellowship of the chicken which was centred around the deep-seed Liberal muckraker and sometimes poultry farmer Howard “I’m not a financial member of any party” Crawford.  Howie even “liked” Nick’s post about the rally on his Facebook page which means so much for any of them retiring.

But what is more significant about these two is that it proves that Matey Mate, far from being owned by ‘The Lads’ is a random equation infecting the numbers. Any belief that he is not a two-way transistor between the meddlesome world of the Zionist spiv and the “youth” who have gravitated to Sewell’s boys’ club betrays an inadvisable trust in the skunk. Matey Mate’s record speaks for itself, and his intrigues run deep. It wouldn’t surprise UNA at all if he was receiving secret funding from a government agency. Likewise, given the ongoing theatre, and all the incongruities of his allegiances, policies, platform and behaviour, who is handling Nick Folkes?

Thus, with a gale blowing, and nobody infringing on their ‘free speech’, Bolton led the proceedings by opening up with a spiel about Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern; all this while the antifascist voyeurs tracked them with what must’ve been the cheapest drone on the market – a Chinese knock-off bought for a lobster from the markets. Those assembled in the park appear in an image smugly uploaded to the Anonykatz Facebook page from a vertigo-inducing height and with a visibility that rendered the whole exercise even more futile than what was happening down below.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer 8Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which is like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

Screenshot_20181006-230600_Facebook.jpg
The Antis will try to say that the object of the exercise was to view crowd numbers. But that’s a lie, they wanted to see who was there, but their cheap and nasty drone failed them. Lulz

Nick Folkes, no doubt nicely toasted on seventh-generation Indica skunk weed, then grabbed the bullhorn to foghorn about his freedom of speech, or should that be, his excess of it. Folkes is an idiot and no matter what anyone believes about personal liberty the whole world would be better off if a special law was passed limiting him to the use of sign language.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

Singling out “dogmatic communists” he aired his angst about how they “want to take freedom of speech and it’s an attack on the only civilisation in modern history that brought around freedom of speech is the British Empire.”

Perhaps they should tell that to D.H Lawrence or any of the other writers whose books were originally banned in England.

It’s worth noting too that both Folkes and Anning cited “communists” as being responsible for taking away their freedom of speech while last we checked Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk, who led a charge to censor Anning and stripped him of staff funding and extra staff is a dyed in the wool conservative.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

And while Folkes gasbags about freedom of speech he seems to forget when he attempted to shut down Australia First Party president Jim Saleam’s freedom of speech at the Reclaim Australia rally at Martin Place in Sydney during 2015 when he connived with the marshals to have him removed. Likewise, the marshals forbade AFP from distributing any materials at the rally but didn’t impose any ban on the kosher groups.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care. It is very clear that he chose long ago the path of civic patriotism. And for all the fascist talk from the Lads Society once again Matey Mate and his offsider Alex had no problem embedding themselves with Zionists and supporting an event that is fundamentally pro-Israel.

a7a6dc4f492afb2d327d9e154432017f
John Bolton, Zionist, anti-Islam activist, and most likely chief organiser of International Freedom of Speech day in Australia

John Bolton is probably the key to Cottrell’s attendance since as a lawyer he has taken up his appeal pro bono against charges of inciting serious contempt against Moslems. Did Blair really drive all the way to Sydney just to help his mate out, or did he have other business? Was he asked not to attend the Melbourne leg of the rally, or would Tom Sewell, the chock-heeled boss of the Lads Society have forbidden it? It’s hard to be sure once you try to figure out who put this thing together and why.

United Nationalists Australia has attempted to identify who the principal organisers of the ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’ are. Our strongest lead is actually John Bolton. He released a YouTube video on October 1 in which his concerns about freedom of speech link primarily to former EDL head and Zionist Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern who was prevented from entering the Moslem enclave of Lakemba during her tour of Sydney. Bear in mind, the Lads Society provided security for Southern both at Sydney and her Melbourne show.

During that tour, Southern appeared with Stefan Molyneux in a video filmed at Sydney’s Botanic Gardens in which she detailed how police prevented her exercising the simple right to walk the streets since her presence would be seen as a provocation. She claimed there was hypocrisy at play because mainstream media, which were actually filming her, were put under no such restrictions. Nonetheless, Southern began by explaining how her team had contacted police to advise them she would be journeying down with her crew.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care.

One could say it was stupid tipping them off, but one could also cynically suggest that she got the reaction she intended. If she was fair dinkum about slinking into a Moslem neighbourhood incognito — and let’s face it, most Moslems like most Aussies wouldn’t have known her from a bar of soap — there were countless other areas that are chockers with the followers of Mohammed; Punchbowl being one; Beverly Hills another. Either she was worried they might get creamed or else she’d calculated the police response and just how marvellously it would dovetail her narrative.

It was with this same expectation of publicity that Bolton chose Wiley Park near Lakemba to stage his rally. He stated so in his video in which he grimly warned against anyone inciting violence or attempting violence against his people. He clearly spelt out it was a test of “freedom” to be in the area. In the end, no one attempted anything, except some numbskull Antis who took their cheap-arse drone for a spin in the drizzle.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

So, Bolton is at the centre of this theatre that has drawn together the usual faces. But he is Cottrell’s lawyer and Blair is synonymous with allegedly suggesting that every classroom in Australia should have a copy of Mein Kampf (We are not sure if that quote is apocryphal or not). How does that then fit in with Bolton’s worldview? We quote him from the video, “As Australians, we are a melting pot. Women and men in Australia are equal. People of every race in Australia are equal. It’s abhorrent that people want to divide us.”

Well, isn’t Blair Cottrell one of those trying to divide us? I know we are. We’re proud to admit it since the only “us” we recognise are actual Australians, which means we aim to divide their “us”. So, if that’s the case, does he support freedom of speech by those who want to repudiate his statements of values as a bunch of gay libertarian crap? Did he not just call such abhorrent? On his Weebly blog, among an impressive list of professional credentials, Bolton describes himself as “conservative” but “politically independent”. We see a lot of that around the anti-Islam scene. And John is no stranger to that arena. In 2017, he joined the Peanuts as a speaker at their rally against a proposed Islamic school in Penrith.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

Among those were ‘Australian Patriot Uprising’ Commandant Matt Lowe and his non-Aryan Sergeant Schultz, Toby Cook.

Matt Lowe took over while Nick Folkes was on hiatus. He and fat boy Toby, who we understand to be a former mental patient, essentially formed the core of this absurd Facebook club along with Shermon Burgess, who himself made a quantum leap from strict kosher patriot to fully-blown neo-Nazi with such a vengeance that it defies credulity. Just as the movement was adopting a conspicuously fascist style, Folkes stepped sideways, Lowe et al moved in, but now they’re gone and Folkes is back along with the bagel brigade. But it remains of Mr Bolton to explain just what these glaring inconsistencies mean to him because being such a bright lad he cannot have failed to be aware of them. By the same token, Bolton cannot be unaware of what Blair Cottrell represents to the mainstream, while Nationalists know the truth and these associations of his only confirm: the man is a civic patriot and always will be.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

We now return to Nick Folkes’s comment about “it’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here”. It’s a shame that after all this time the dumb bastard hasn’t worked out why.

The last any significant support was galvanised for a comparable cause was the Reclaim Australia rallies. If we’re talking about Sydney alone, then the 2015 rallies were the ceiling. But let’s focus on that, shall we? How come they failed to capitalise on the kind of public support they saw from that concept? Arguably, it was a number of reasons. Firstly, too many civic micro-parties played tug-o-war with it, such as the ALA, and the unregistered PfF and those parties were avowedly Zionist. But while other factors occurred, especially in Melbourne where the street jouster mentality of the UPF had turned off the mums and dads (or “peasants” as Blair Cottrell charitably labels them), the simple fact no one seems to recognise is because they never actually stated what it is they wanted.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

What was it they wanted; a total end to Moslem immigration? Not really, if you attended the rallies and listened to the speeches, despite the slant the hard-left and globalist media put on it, they asked only for “assimilation”. Who was it that this petition was directed at? Was it the Moslem community, who were not represented and never addressed? Was it the politicians? There were frequent calls for “politicians” to “do something”. That’s a mighty naïve expression of faith right there, trusting a ‘politician’ working for an internationalist world-order controlled by corporations. The politicians are dedicated universally to pumping this country full of as much non-Anglo human content as can be mustered. This is the idea.

Opposition leader Bill Shorten has approached Scott Morrison to agree to a bipartisan commitment to a “big Australia”, and a big Australia means unfettered immigration.

The little-known corporation Consolidated Land & Rail (CLARA) has as its mission statement: “CLARA is an Australian private group formed to deliver a program to change Australia. We seek to undertake a re-balancing of our settlement and deliver new ways of imagining, planning and building cities, transport and infrastructure.”

This is insidious stuff: a private group with endless land assets knocking up micro-cities and connecting them with rail all over Australia. Who is to live in those cities? Well, CLARA says, “Australia’s population is projected to increase 69% between now and 2061 — up from 24.7 million to 41.5 million people, that is 16.8 million more Australians needing a home.”

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

Australians…? They seriously just called that projected figure Australians when they’re constantly harping on about the declining birth rate among White Australians?! No, that’s an import figure, and what’s more, CLARA seems to know something we don’t because they’re already building their cities and rails to accommodate this massive increase which will come from Asia, the Sub-Continent, the Middle-East and Africa, but really largely from China, and to serve the new Sino-Australia.

How can such a newish population in any way be Australian? By their importation, they signal the end of Australia and the creation of an artificial nation not founded on culture, race or custom, but on consumerism and serfdom to oligarchical concerns.

Given all this is happening, tiny little voices squeaking about “freedom of speech” in an ill-defined way don’t seem to grasp the issues especially when, like Bolton and all civic patriots, they accept a “melting pot” so long as it doesn’t come with Moslems and their “sharia law”.

But it also explains why Nick and Co can’t get massive numbers to their rallies despite the size of the cities because they are lost in a wilderness where their concerns are outnumbered by the demographic realities of those very cities.

The Nationalist message is very different and it is uncompromising and unwavering. And the key to the activism resides in that message and its purity something those who complain about “keyboard warriors” not attending these hopeless rallies cannot get their heads around.

Given the divide we suffer in major cities, the only logical thing to do is seek out our people where they reside, and where they are receptive to our message and that might not be in the sexy surrounds of an urban environment. It might be spread apart and out in the dust 200 kilometres each way between. But the cities are lost and those Whites remaining and who’ve adapted to this prefabricated metropolis are from the virtue-signalling hypocrite elites. Which is another thing Anning, Bolton and Yemini don’t understand about their “free speech”, especially when they equate it with social media — the political element of their “speech” is a product of the commercial.

Identity politics is a device by which aspirational consumers signal their social status. The greatest advocates of all these guises of progressive politics are in fact the corporations who splinter it all up into a consumerist matrix. It’s not even accurate to suggest that Facebook targets them on the basis of their politics, although it’s not so unfair an accusation to level at Twitter. Facebook operates on a combination of algorithms and human moderators and while the inconsistencies of their adjudications are frustrating they are more random than they seem. But if they really want to get down to an understanding what they lack is not a freedom of speech but a market share.

The topic of “freedom of speech” is too complex to be condensed for a mass audience at least in the fashion the civics are doing it. What their “freedom of speech” is banging up against is this very global order. There are no worries for Moslem Arabs discussing the finer points of socially unpalatable aspects of an extreme reading of their religion at meetings in Lakemba, for instance. They are no challenge to that order. But as Christopher Shortis found out when he, Cottrell and Neil Erikson were convicted of inciting serious contempt against Moslems, it sure isn’t so lenient when it happens the other way. While Moslems are allowed to discuss extreme ideas to characterise them as extreme, which is what the Bendigo Three did in their video, is considered the more extreme acts of the two. Indeed, we may consider naming the monster now to be heretical speech.

And once one makes a concession to unfettered freedom of expression where does it end? We cannot argue for the unconditional freedom of speech which would demand things like sex with baby giraffes or to legalise cannibalism. And as society fragments along the lines of those directing from the Bilderberg Group, it seems that sick ideas are gaining respectability on a daily basis. We’re already at the stage that we’ve repudiated nature and argued she is wrong, that there is no such thing as race or gender, and one woman described as an author and educator argues that parents should gain permission from their babies before changing their nappies. These are the signs of a society on the way out and that’s where the oligarchs want it so that it can be replaced by a new serfdom. When the serfs speak up about anything that may draw attention to this then, of course, that speech is no longer but very, very expensive.

As Nationalists we do not fight vigorously for freedom of speech, we strive to emphasize the hypocrisy of those who wish to silence us and demonise us in the name of an inclusive and progressive democracy in which freedom of expression is implied.

Anning.png
Senator Fraser Anning expressing his fear that Israelis might be being murdered by Palestinians

Senator Fraswer Anning’s Speech, Verbatim, Docklands, Melbourne, Oct 6, 2018 (don’t say we tried to take your free speech)

“ALA is the only democratic party in this state. These African gangs who are attacking people, destroying property and bashing different people and getting away with it is probably some of the worst things I’ve seen and I’m sure it’s not the fault of the police, I’m sure their hands have been tied by somebody further up. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right for any nation, it’s the first thing that goes and then normally what happens in a communist society they take your freedom of speech first, so occasionally we have clowns like this who deny you your right to freedom of speech,” (enter bozo ranga) to disrupt the event. Avi grabbed the mic and led the small gathering of ALA supporters and others in a chant of “Zucc off, mate!” Anning, continued, “So the first thing that goes in a communist country is your freedom of speech, just recently, as Avi said, both our (Facebook) pages were shut down. The premier in Queensland asked our members there – and three state members – to denounce my speech or lose funding for staff members. Now, that’s a travesty of justice, it was illegal, she eventually took those staff members and took that funding because they did not want to renounce me. My Facebook page, as far as I know, was taken down… we’ve never called for any violence… neither Avi or myself have called for any violence against anyone and never will. My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’ (loud claps from Zionist Avi and his ALAers). This year we give the Palestinian authority $43.8 million they use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority. And that’s where our tax dollars are going and when I called for that, in the senate, all three parties, the Liberals, Labor and the Greens vote against me every time. They’re the same people who the day after my speech were all crying and hugging and ringing their hands and they never damped a tissue but they pretended to cry then they denounce me — but they’re the same three parties who regularly vote against the motions that I put up to stop funding the Palestinian authority but also I call for getting the White South African farmers out of South Africa (Avi leads clapping) and again they vote against me so they’re hypocrites, they took two words out of context then they decided they would try to make some mileage out of that but they made their impatient speeches but the next day when the polls came out, even the ABC poll, they found around 80% of Australians were supporting me so, ah… (Applause) so they’ll have to eat their words a little bit. So we’ve got some big problems to overcome, we are supposed to have a conservative government but then they’re here five years but we still have 18C on the books, which takes away your freedom of speech. What’s happening there? So really what’s happened is that the parties that used to represent us have moved so far to the left that they don’t represent us anymore. There’s a vacuum on the right. We saw that in 2016 in America when Trump came like a freight train and hit poor old Hillary Clinton. She didn’t see that coming (laughter). He’s been a great man for America, he’s done a huge amount of work for America and America has never been better now economically or any other way you like to look at it. So a lot of this, this trying to take away our freedom of speech is coming out of the United Nations. Now, I’ve been calling for us to get out of Paris and to get out of the United Nations. They have no business here, they have no business with us, and their politicians like Marise Payne who’s over there now signing away your rights to everything, ah, she has no business doing that on your behalf. She’s signing a thing called the Immigration Compact, now, and that will effectively give your rights to who comes into this country – it will be handed over to the United Nations so you can imagine what’s going to happen with our society. By the way, that speech, that part with the final solution, what was actually said was ‘the final solution to our immigration problem is for the Australian people to have a vote via plebiscite’. And I will still continue to push that agenda because we’ve had votes on all sorts of things like same sex marriage and everything else, why should we not have the right to have a vote on not just how many people will come here but who comes here, what the makeup of this country will be like later on. So really I think the big fear is that good Australian men and a lot of them only boys died on battlefields all over the world. They died in freezing bloody muddy trenches in France and Belgium and other places and in the jungles of New Guinea and they died for one thing and that is for your freedom and for your rights. They stood up in front of bullets and they took bullets a lot of them and they’re not here with us anymore and the least we can do is to do what good people like yourselves are doing now and stand up for our freedoms and I applaud you all for being here and we’ve got to keep up the fight.”

THE BILDERBERG CHILD WHO WON’T STAND FOR HER PEOPLE

THE BILDERBERG CHILD WHO WON’T STAND FOR HER PEOPLE

Anti-Australians are celebrating news of a nine-year-old girl in Queensland who refused to stand for our national anthem as in her mind it excludes Aborigines.

The parents of nine-year-old Harper Nielsen who attends Kenmore South State School are claiming their pesky daughter was given detention following a “silent protest” when she refused to stand for our national anthem. The school has denied their allegations. The fourth-grader told the Daily Telegraph she boycotted the national anthem on the basis that “Advance Australia Fair means advance White Australia”. She added, “When it says were are young it completely ignores the fact that indigenous culture was here for over 50,000 years before colonisation.”

How this became news is about as much of a mystery as is where babies come from since her parents, both who look like they graduated from Chairman Mao 101 on an Australian Unions scholarship, went out of their way to ensure it became news. The very name ‘Harper’ we would wager is her parents’ dedication to liberal author Harper Lee, who wrote To Kill a Mockingbird.

Media has since lined up to sensationalise the frumpy pre-tween automaton when they should be interviewing her parents whom the good money’s odds say put her up to it for their own interests.

http_%2F%2Fprod.static9.net.au%2F_%2Fmedia%2F2018%2F09%2F12%2F18%2F42%2FANTHEMSTILL2.jpg
Let’s just hope Harper learns to despise her parents when she reaches her rebellious teen years which aren’t far off

At the tender age of nine, this child is merely parroting what’s been inculcated into her by the two agents of social decay she calls mum and dad (assuming they’re as traditional as to permit these stereotypical designations). These two Trotsykites are raising their brat to conform to all the desires of the misanthropes who comprise the Bilderberg Group.

The Bilderberg Group is a complex topic the reader must investigate independently. While we add a link to a useful webpage, we can only generally describe them and their goals. We invoke them here simply to alert the reader that this ‘news’ is hooey calculated to create tension and division.

Media has since lined up to sensationalise the frumpy pre-tween automaton when they should be interviewing her parents whom the good money’s odds say put her up to it for their own interests.  

Firstly, isn’t it odd that when globalists wish to paralyse this nation through moral invalidation they imply Australia is “all White” and thus all institutions, every significant cultural article, and each strand of our national aplomb is “White” and must be recoded. However, when they wish to own it and to repudiate an increasingly agitated White Australia this country is “multicultural (multiracial)”.

So there are two states of being for Australia and the two can only mutually exist if the paradox is permitted by lazy thinking. The Bilderberg Group advocates population control. Sociologist Hadley Cantril describes employing “Psycho-political operations” as “propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”

This is what we’re seeing all around the western, or to put it bluntly, the White world. This is because another goal of the one-world, one-government, and one-system controllers is the abolition of nation states. It’s little surprise then that the Bilderberg group boasts among its membership such luminaries of globalism as Henry Kissinger, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, David Rockefeller, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Ben Bernanke, and Rupert Murdoch just to name a few.

download (5).jpg

Rupert Murdoch is a glaring presence. The Bilderberg Group uses its media, such as CBS (which it is known to invite along to its secret meetings on the promise of secrecy), to promote mind-wash. Given that the group is not a conspiracy invented by right-wingers, it’s interesting to note that the left has virtually nothing to say about them, which isn’t all that surprising when as we’ve consistently pointed out, they stopped thinking independently long ago. This is why you can witness such incongruous behaviour as self-described “anarchist” Professor Rob Sparrow (aka Slackbastard) championing the cause of the Bilderbergs while believing he’s supporting a cadre of fellow travellers in a global revolution of non-existent “workers”.

Slackbastard swooped like a chicken hawk (or is that like convicted paedophile antifascist Alex Gollan?) onto this child’s story. Rob posted on the SB Facebook page, “mAAAAAAd props to the 9yo grrl for refusing to follow the herd — you rock!” We’re sure glad he isn’t her English teacher.

Sociologist Hadley Cantril describes employing “Psycho-political operations” as “propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”

Meanwhile, the clichés of fake indigenous activism over at Blackfulla Revolution (another FB group) used her case in a rhetorical bush breakfast when they tried to juxtapose the controversy over Herald Sun cartoonist Michael Knight’s spoof of Serena Williams’ recent dummy spit, with Harper’s story by offering up a yawning ‘meme’. Apparently, one is permissible (and racist) and the other is censored (and anti-racist).

41663711_1211907875616153_233038117957795840_n.jpg
Um, no… not even close. We know you’re the sanctified professional underdogs of this country but even you mob ought to be obliged to be accurate now and then

Michael Knight is a satirical cartoonist and well in his rights to exaggerate his subjects, and the other was never censored but instead given a platform which was picked up internationally giving Harper and her hippy parents their 15 mins of social justice-connected fame. It’s also led to her being viciously trolled, which is an inevitability her parents should’ve considered before putting her up to this attention-grabbing media stunt.

8e76d961900cbcbf097a9fe12deac8c0.jpg
Depicting coloured people in cartoons will soon be as dangerous as depicting the Prophet Mohammed 

Fake Nationalist Pauline Hanson even got an opportunity to try and steal back some ground lost to Katter Australia Party’s senator Fraser Anning. She slid out of her money chamber to offer a predictable quote about how she’d give the tot “a kick up the backside”.

Thus, a supposedly pressing social issue has become a kind of perverse entertainment in which the invalid nation state is tossed like a bone for two dogs to fight over. The messages behind these stories are quite startling. The furore over the depiction of Serena Williams now posits that people of colour, no matter how badly behaved, are beyond criticism by Whites; much like depicting the Prophet Mohammed will get your throat slit by a fundamentalist Moslem.

In the case of Harper’s media narrative, a phoney sense of expression on the issue of the supposed plight faced by indigenous Australians is given artificial oxygen. For, if there is a voice united in sounding about the indigenous cause, what is that cause? What is it really? Once they’ve figured out all that maybe they can ponder who it is they’re petitioning.  Is it a collective conscience? Is it political representatives?

Fake Nationalist Pauline Hanson even got an opportunity to try and steal back some ground lost to Katter Australia Party’s senator Fraser Anning. She slid out of her money chamber to offer a predictable quote about how she’d give the tot “a kick up the backside”.

If they really believe that any side that stands for office in Australian parliament will ever have the tools at their disposal to right a social wrong they’re back in the Dreamtime. They haven’t noticed that whichever government is elected serves the internationalist Anglo-American-Zionist bloc which is a faction of the One World Government cabal. The members of the Bilderberg Group aren’t interested in emancipation for the world’s peoples unless it leads to their military industrial complex profiting from war.

If it’s the collective conscience then that is filled now with the self-interest of countless ‘minority associations’ which see themselves as the primary ‘victim’ of White Australia, so in that sense, they’ve pushed the Abo out of the queue.

The oligarchs don’t want Aboriginal tribes achieving native title over lucrative mining assets they want to flog to China because assets are not for the serfs. It’ll never happen. Instead, it’s better to have the serfs beating each other in an irreconcilable conflict that has its flames nefariously fanned by those controlling the actors who are simultaneously condoning and condemning either one or both sides.

As to little Harper, maybe she can figure out whether she wants to stand for the parenting payment that helped raise her, or the Medicare benefits which keep her fit, the state education she receives, the accoutrements of the White race that she denounces that she couldn’t live without, such as her toys, computer, phone, technology in general, and the medium she has used to spit in the face of her own race. Because, little girl, you wouldn’t last long if you were shanghaied off and dropped in the middle of an outback Aboriginal community. Your parents’ rhetoric wouldn’t save you from the fate suffered by their own flesh and blood on a nauseatingly repetitive basis.

Perhaps she could also benefit from an education which permits an untarnished understanding of the origins of our country and how the indigenous people had no claims on it as a nation since they were disparate tribes and NOT a nation. Just maybe she might realise that those people were destined to be conquered by the rules of the human animals: if it wasn’t by the British Empire, it would certainly have been the Dutch or the Chinese. Moreover, she benefits nothing from those like her parents adding to the division of our people; only the certainty that the bigger gap they create in our nation the more inevitable it is that another force will seize on that and push right on through to take us over. In fact, it’s happening now.

Indeed, this little girl, so fresh off the potty yet so quick with the universal condemnations of her own country, should like to spare a thought for the current Chinese invasion now underway in Australia and just how much those in Beijing are likely to give a shit about the Aborigines that she and her parents patronise so.

But she is, as we say, a child. No kid could have the sophistication to make any sort of informed judgment on such matters. Likewise, no nipper could be filled with such patriotism as to look forward to assembly just for an opportunity to stand for the flag. These are kids, they’d rather be off playing.

None of this was ever about thinking… just reacting.

Screenshot_20180912-022419_Chrome.jpg
National Australia Bank employing Bilderberg logic in their ads: promoting multiracialism while brushing over the fact a practising Moslem would wholeheartedly revile their whole stinking usury system

NEWSPEAK HATE SPEECH LAWS HIT NEW SOUTH WALES

NEWSPEAK HATE SPEECH LAWS HIT NEW SOUTH WALES

New laws come into effect in NSW this week. Anyone “inciting violence” on the basis of race, minority religious status, sexual orientation, or this bogus Orwellian construct of “intersex people” face $11,000 fine or three years in jail.

United Nationalists Australia declares this the ‘Newspeak laws’ since anyone threatening violence against anybody is or should be, dealt with under existing laws. However, these laws, which were lobbied for hard by “minority organisations” adds a special status to anyone in these favoured political categories. This makes the rest of us (White Australians) an increasing sub-class subject to greater social restrictions and with less access to similar legal consideration.

politics-immigration-immigrants-american_politics-inboxes-outboxes-cgon838_low.jpg

Nationalists have long felt the “un-person” status by crossing the social rubicon and calling out occupied multiracial Australia. The Police are disinclined to act upon threats against us by extremist groups linked to institutions of globalist organized-thuggery such as the Construction Forestry Mining, Maritime and Energy Union (CFMMEU). Likewise, complaints based on incitements to violence, such as those by members of the clandestine terror group Antifascist Action, are ignored by a compliant state apparatus.

Now, the discussion about the ethnic cleansing of true Australians as defined by the European settlers of this land and who created this nation that all these rapacious other races swarm to will have to be necessarily handled by the more articulate and savvy among us. The reckless and immature propaganda purveyed by the likes of Antipodean Resistance only ever helped create these laws just as much as it managed to cause its British counterpart and inspiration National Action to become a proscribed organisation in England.

Make no mistake, the signifiers used in mainstream anti-White propaganda are unashamed in highlighting the fact these laws are aimed at White Australians. A screengrab from a June ABC report on the laws uses an image of patriots standing with Aussie flags to illustrate the story and secure in the reader’s mind just who these political amendments to the Crimes Act 1900 target.

dadgg.png
The red arrow points to the subjects of this bill. Yes, White Countries have a habit of legislating heavily against their own people in favour of every other non-threatened race on the face of this yellow, brown and black planet

The bill is called the Crimes Amendment (Publically Threatening and Inciting Violence) Bill 2018 and we probably have Nick Folkes, Neil Erikson, Mark Campbell-McDonald, Shermon Burgess and Ralph Cerminara to thank for it. There are three schedules the first of which inserts section 93Z into the Crimes Act while the second “…removes certain offences from the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 and makes a consequential amendment.” The third makes any of the described offences against the special citizens a summary offence.

Under the act, it won’t matter if threats are made in the heat of the moment, or if no violence is carried out. The bill concerns what it terms a “public act” which is defined as:

(a) any form of communication (including speaking, writing, displaying notices, playing of recorded material, broadcasting and communicating through social media and other electronic methods) to the public, and

(b) any conduct (including actions and gestures and the wearing or display of clothing, signs, flags, emblems and insignia) observable by the public, and (c) the distribution or dissemination of any matter to the public.

That is a fairly hefty set of criteria and as you can see open to wide interpretation and given the summary nature of the act it pretty much places all the power in the hands of the offended person(s), or group. The already litigious ‘minority’ groups will now be further emboldened to examine any context under which criticism is made for an interpretation of threat, violence, or vilification. This will be particularly so after the maiden speech by Katter’s Australia party senator Fraser Anning whose truths about the state of immigration and cultural disintegration has triggered the globalist jack-booters in the left-wing media to an even greater volume of anti-White hysteria.

And who is largely responsible for bringing these laws about? Aside from the NSW Liberal & Nationals we have a coalition group called ‘Keep NSW Safe’. Who comprises this group? They are as follows:

  • Federation of Indian Associations of Australia (Curry store owners)

  • Australian Hellenic Council NSW

  • New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies (Big surprise there)

  • Australian National Imams Council

  • Chinese Australian Services Society

  • Korean Society of Sydney

  • Australian Kurdistan Veteran Association

  • Assyrian Australian National Federation

  • Chinese Australia Forum (which works for Beijing’s interest to infiltrate Australian institutions)

  • International Coptic Union

  • Vietnamese Community in Australia – NSW Chapter

  • Australian South Sea Islanders

  • Hindu Council of Australia

  • Basmala Australia Inc (An Islamic mob)

  • Armenian National Committee of Australia

  • The Australian Egyptian Council Forum

  • South Asian Study Group, University of Sydney (Asian invaders taking jobs, shifting into high-rise apartments bought by rich Chinese parents, creating homelessness for Aussies)

  • Sikh Youth Australia (Gets to carry knives on religious grounds)

  • Cambodian-Australian Welfare Council of NSW (Pol Pot’s former soldiers)

  • NSW Council of Christians and Jews Inc. (Evangelical warmongers)

  • Australian Hellenic Educational Progressive Association (More Socialist Greek traitors)

  • Muslim Women Association (Burka battle axes)

  • Australian Cook Islander Community NSW

  • Australian Federation of Ukrainian Associations (Shame)

  • National Sikh Council of Australia (Like, India is >>>>THAT way!)

  • NSW Council for Pacific Communities

  • Philippine Community Council of NSW (Fuck off)

  • Warren Mundine (Get on out of it)

As you can see, these pork-barreling “communities” cobble together at the first chance to alter and affect the national character with the aid of the traitor political class. It would be like us shifting over to Arabia and forming the Australian Council of Pork-Munching Beer-Swillers, and then campaigning for the right to strut nude up and down the front of the country’s mosques in only our thongs and terrycloth hats.

However, what is also amusing is that these laws potentially threaten a little-publicised tactic used by the left itself. There are those among the anarchist and antifascist milieu who actually adopt ‘racist’ guises to harass and intimidate ideological opponents; one or two are even known to contribute to mainstream media. In fact, the anarcho-anti-globalist brown shirts are the readiest and willing to use threats and to vilify on the basis of race and religion, which is one of their myriad hyper-contradictions. It will be interesting to see how these laws affect that sector’s black ops.

Meanwhile, it will pay to be very measured in how our side communicates, but more to the point, such restrictions can only refine our language and grant our message precision.

article-5978-thumb.jpg
Once upon a time stating the obvious didn’t land you 3 years lag

 

LADS’ LEADER SUPPORTS NEIL ERIKSON AFTER EVERYTHING NOOL HAS DONE

LADS’ LEADER SUPPORTS NEIL ERIKSON AFTER EVERYTHING NOOL HAS DONE

ON Friday, June 8, Blair Cottrell lobbed up at a court appearance where Neil Erikson and his Muppets were facing charges of behaving in a riotous manner.

In a pic posted on the Facebook page of ‘Cooks Convicts’, (CC being the latest publicity-grabbing social-media enterprise generated by movement wrecker and state informant Neil Erikson), the two share a quality moment of ‘unity’ together in a café after proceedings. Neil’s hand rests tenderly on Blair’s muscly shoulder as if he wants to start caressing it. It suggests nothing of their culpabilities, contradictions, or their grubby history, much less the gaping hole in one another’s pseudo-political routines.

Yes, Blair was there to show ‘solidarity’ with “fellow patriots” whose charges stem from clashes at the December 2017 Milo Yiannopolous event at Melbourne Pavilion which was a shrewdly engineered riot that garnered not only publicity for its star but those like Erikson who trotted along to leech off Milo’s infamy. The “Milo five” are Neil Erikson, Ricky Turner, Richard Whelan, Garry Hume, and Garry Mattson. Richard Whelan, aka Richie Rich, has been a lifelong buddy to Erikson and has served time for various alcohol-related transgressions.

34892223_1049372775216933_8486637957061541888_n
(Pic Facebook) Neil Erikson lovingly strokes the shoulder of the man he denounced as a Nazi and an enemy of the ‘Patriot movement’. No hard feelings, but

Yiannopolous is a bourgeois homosexual who styles himself as a conservative and Alt-Right “troll”. He is an unlikely celebrity of America’s tangled Alt-Right. He once made a comment that veered perilously close to paedophilia advocacy and he is “married” to a Negro man so it defies belief that these supposed ‘conservatives’ would fawn after him. Simply supporting such a creature speaks volumes about their (lack of) creed.

This image of comradery comes after a torrid history where Erikson publically ratted on his former United Patriots Front (UPF) comrade, condemned him as a “Nazi”, and held him up to scorn for his audience. Neil also shut his other compatriots out of their Facebook page (a trick he and Richie Rich pulled on Nationalist Alternative) and worked to undermine each and every one of them. And having burned his people, what was Neil’s punishment? What did Blair do? He might as well have gotten down on his hands and knees, pulled down his fly, and blown him for all the disapproval he has publically expressed. Neil is now sharing Cottrell’s videos on his CC page (and endorsing former foes the True Blue Crew), so, here we go on the old Patriot Soap Opera Express. What, in fact, DO any of these jokers hold sacred?

Meanwhile, UNA has only ever scrutinised Cottrell and called him to account for his transgressions of the tenets of the Nationalism he claims a leadership role over but doesn’t uphold. Moreover, Cottrell genuinely despises us, even though we’ve never judged him on anything which he hasn’t said or done. Our criticisms have always been in the interests of the furtherance of Australian Nationalist focus; something we’ve never compromised and have held to steadfastly. Yet, he would not come down and show solidarity with us at any court appearance. Interesting, no? Added to that, he will talk to the mixed-race civics from The Unshackled on identitarian issues or, as he actually did, stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Sri Lankan Christian dingbat Danny Nalliah’s people before he ever accepted the Australian Nationalist community.

Yiannopolous is a bourgeois homosexual who styles himself as a conservative and Alt-Right “troll”.

Blair’s disdain is instructive of everything we’ve upheld about him and the infected milieu he inhabits. United Nationalists Australia has long maintained that Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell are about as nationalist as the parking lot outside of SBS studios. They may fool their cliquey Lads Society admirers, but they haven’t hoodwinked staunch nationalists such as us (although they did beguile others who call themselves nationalists).

Blair and Tom’s refusal to heed anyone of wider experience has fostered their self-deceiving soma. Owing to their insistence on dictating to others, an authority they have granted to themselves on the basis of conceit and a popularity derived from the lottery stakes of their proximity to the Reclaim Australia movement at its media heyday—and while bearing in mind that in the overall scheme of things they are still political greenhorns—means they never will. Putting it colloquially, they think they’re the duck’s guts.

34741162_2085225755082290_1415895810905735168_n.jpg
(Pic Facebook) Neil and soon-to-be Kook’s Convicts: Some bloke (L), Ricky Turner, Nool (C), and Richie Rich

Therefore, it’s irksome to honest activists that they’ve come along and wilfully disturbed the already chaotic thermosphere of the pro-Australian vanguard. But, our revolution is not theirs, since they are unable to articulate what their struggle actually is. Their mission, such as it can be discerned, is a hodgepodge of foreign identitarian concepts mixed with fragments of Australian nationalist rhetoric they’ve appropriated and used as adornments to their stage-managed facade.

This doesn’t mean that those veterans are vexed at their appearance in the theatre over lack of obsequiousness to ‘elders’, but they are understandably bothered by the damage these kids cause through their politics of personal identity wherein they take from the collective to expand their individual profile (although that more describes Blair than it does, Tom, speaking fairly). We know, too, that their defiance is grounded upon their fear of having their intellectual flaws laid bare.

Subsequently, they bob around and around in the civic patriot eddy while their Nationalism, such as it is, remains a general identitarian facsimile of what overseas ‘Alt-Right’ personalities are saying, kept strictly in-house lest they are held to any branding.

Blair and Tom’s refusal to heed anyone of wider experience has fostered their self-deceiving soma.

Given that we’ve so consistently argued these are not Nationalists, why should it even concern us?

Tom and Blair have contrived to market themselves as Nationalists, as has Neil Erikson, and others who fly around in their clucky coup. The Lads have conspicuously employed the Southern Cross on their Facebook page and in their clubhouse (which they are entitled to do) not because they are nativist, but because the Australia First Party uses it. They made a point of interposing themselves to poach any would-be members to their circle where they’ve fed them a poisoned line about established Nationalist organisations. It’s the equivalent to a shop owner stealing his competitor’s sign so he can misguide the other’s customers.

milo
So conservative, so Alt-Right, so incredibly race-mixingly homo: Milo, the hero of the hardcore Aussie Patriot movement. You cannot get more Aussie or conservative than him

They posit their club as “the only hope” while Tom Sewell is reputed to have remarked that sleeping with Asian women is OK “so long as you don’t get them pregnant”. No, it’s not OK. Blair said on ABC TV that “you don’t have to be White” to be a patriot, echoing the queen of civics, Pauline Hanson. But on the same hand, he talked about White identity to The Unshackled, which is multi-racialist and definitely no Nationalist mouthpiece.

As such, they would come onto ground, appropriate symbols which hold meaning to us and then undermine all the values inherent in them. They vacillate, so they say, to popularise a demonstrably failed strategy and certainly nothing original.

And how do they handle criticism? Right now, they’re engaged in the most puerile trolling antics. An associate member of theirs, ‘Darcey’ from Vic, has been creating fake Facebook profiles mocking critics of Tom Sewell. They share it around the Lads and all of them jump on board “friending” these fake pages. And Tom finds it funny as hell. How advanced of them. This is what their dynamic resorts to in place of having any actual words to state their case.

Subsequently, they bob around and around in the civic patriot eddy while their Nationalism, such as it is, remains a general identitarian facsimile of what overseas ‘Alt-Right’ personalities are saying, kept strictly in-house lest they are held to any branding.  

Blair getting chummy with Neil, who he should have bashed on sight, is another example of how staying in that half-stepping pseudo-celebrity terrain between nativism and the global ‘Alt-Right’ is more important than conceding to Nationalist beliefs. Furthermore, they will never do this because of their misguided conviction that Patriotism is inexorably intertwined with ‘conservatism’.

They cannot understand that our Nationalism is based on the traditional Australian labourist movement of early last century. They consider this “communist” in flavour, even though at the time Nationalists were attacked by both the conservatives and the communists. Nationalism is a third position neither left nor right.

And what of the evil clown Erikson? Neil has no discernible politics at all, and he is not fit to represent anybody. He couldn’t even hold his small family together: as soon as he moved to Tasmania to mooch off his missus’s people she threw him out for being a useless pilchard. He can’t hold a job because his shenanigans and desire for notoriety override his need to provide for his family. Nevertheless, he wants to ‘represent’ the Australian people and as such, in a wonderful arc of bullshit at court, he and his retarded entourage managed to evade an order on their bail conditions requiring they do not consort with one another. Why? Because he argued they’re starting a “political party” around “Cook’s Convicts” and they need to brainstorm together. This lot haven’t the combined mental energy to figure out how to unpack a box of groceries and if Fortitude failed, this palooka has a less than one in two-hundred trillion chance of getting registered.

More amazing, however, is that Gold Coast businessman Daniel Spiller was actually prepared to finance this walking disaster in another spectacular nativist move to bring a couple of foreign Alt-Right shuckers into Australia for a speaking circuit. In what was dubbed ‘Future Now’, he planned to finance the degenerate Yiannopolous back for another swing, along with ‘Proud Boy’ Canuck kook Gavin McInnes and Info Wars Alex Jones. Erikson was to join them, which would have created the impression he was in their ‘league’ whatever that’s supposed to figure as.

Spiller may also account for how come a bum like Erikson and his fellow debris can afford to travel all around the country when they should collectively be unable to afford the price of a McDonald’s cup of coffee.

Meanwhile, another one with more money than sense, David Pellowe of Axiomatic Events is adding to the improved wisdom of proud patriots by bringing Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux to Australia. Erikson and Turner along with some knuckleheads travelled to Queensland to storm his front door over accusations that he—along with Nool’s former Zionist ally, Avi Yemini—had sabotaged Spiller’s Future Now event by claiming to media that “Nazis” were organising the event.

Slapstick theatre aside, it says so much about this lot and their supposed ‘patriotism’ that they shun the many local veteran Nationalist speakers with so much to share for free in favour of Canadians speaking a generic ‘conservative line’. Molyneux is no Nationalist, or even White Nationalist, he is, if anything, a Libertarian, while Lauren Southern is an Alt-Right conservative without a real clue about Australian Nationalist issues. What’s more, to see them will cost upwards of $80 to $800.

Do not be mistaken; this sweep of conservatives trying to pass themselves off as Nationalists is just the same old players with a couple of new faces thrown in. Erikson is being funded from somewhere other than possibly Spiller, and it doubtless all ties back to the Liberal ‘far right’, he is speaking to the state, and the entire edifice of this ‘Cook’s Convicts’ and now Blair’s ‘Lads’ is just another conservative front misdirecting the eternal dumb that support them. No one expecting any sort of Nationalist result we see anything resembling change by supporting this string of show ponies.

Serious Nationalists never deviate from our position or compromise our principles and this implacability seems to upset these Patriots who trade allegiances like they change their socks (if in fact, they change their socks). We never make allies with those who’ve been proven to have violated codes of honour. What’s more, we are not squeamish about our Australianness, while waving flags and claiming to be “loyal patriots”.

Likewise, we don’t carelessly publish videos that inadvertently dox our own members, such as the brains trust at The Lads managed to achieve with their crowing ‘fight night’ videos posted to their FB page.

video-still.jpg
A lovers quarrel erupts over who is more Alt-Righty and less Nazi and more Aussie

PC IS NOT DEAD – IT IS THE MCCARTHYISM OF THE NEW MILLENIUM

PC IS NOT DEAD – IT IS THE MCCARTHYISM OF THE NEW MILLENIUM

NETFLIX is currently airing a movie about a bunch of Commie — and mostly Jewish — blacklisted scriptwriters in Hollywood during the 1950s in that period from 1947 to 1956 now known as the era of McCarthyism.

The movie is Trumbo, a 2015 biographical drama focusing on screenwriter Dalton Trumbo, who was blacklisted by Hollywood and served jail time after failing to sufficiently grovel to the House Committee on Un-American activities when accused of promoting communist propaganda.

In one sense, he was a hero, who transcended the politics of the time as we understand and characterise them today. On another, he was just a Hollywood spiv cranked up on Benzedrine and polluting his liver while disseminating his ideology through the medium of cinema. Yet, while that is all very interesting, this is not a pro-Commie rave, and he is not our subject; merely our point of entry.

While McCarthyism denotes a period in the mid-20th century characterised by political paranoia about ‘the red menace’, the Wikipedia definition creates a wholly more practical description for our purposes, “the practise of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence.”

What is interesting about it is that it describes the world today — only the ‘menace’ is more ephemeral and the line of delineation broader. But we’ll segue into that hypothesis once we’re done dealing with the confounding shock at the level of ‘sexual harassment’ being revealed in that great new church of ours, Hollywood.

We are seeing Goliaths of the PC capital of Hollywood being crucified on their self-constructed altar for gross violations of their own dogma. The icons of liberalism are being rounded-up and put on public trial and it is, for us nationalists, a joy to observe. The latest is Morgan Freeman, the 80-year-old African American actor and black-rights champion who has been accused of sexually harassing eight women — and not all of them sharing his skin tone.

The movie is Trumbo, a 2015 biographical drama focusing on screenwriter Dalton Trumbo, who was blacklisted by Hollywood and served jail time after failing to sufficiently grovel to the House Committee on Un-American activities when accused of promoting communist propaganda.

The “discovery” of his transgressions has happened at the height of the #MeToo anti-sexual-harassment campaign, and in the shadow of Harvey Weinstein’s colossal downfall for his sadistically predatory behaviour against defenceless, wholly innocent, pure and virtuous Hollywood actresses.

Indeed, what is amazing about the slew of scandals uncovered in this atmosphere is that nobody could possibly have imagined degenerates inhabit a world as morally correct as Hollywood. It is every bit as surprising as discovering that the desert is actually covered in sand. But let’s not labour that gag – in fact, let’s wipe away the irony and consider its implications.

download
The suspiciously bourgeois Dalton Trumbo in a classic communist pose reminiscent of Churchill at work 

The very name ‘Hollywood’ is synonymous with degeneracy — the evocation of the casting couch, wild parties, and cocaine flowing more freely than at a Colombian drug lord’s favourite sister’s wedding. Hollywood stars marry for publicity opportunities, adopt children on the same basis, and live lives that make the Elephant Man’s time on earth seem conventional.

Hollywood promotes degeneracy every chance it gets. Sure, it encourages a heap of good American, good world citizen, good globalist crap, but thanks to Hollywood, corruptive concepts are normalised and brought into our lives. What once occupied the milieu of pornography is now regarded as popular entertainment.

Paradoxically, society has historically regarded actors as equalling a social level of prostitutes, which in a sense, they are. These days, they are the new high priests, and especially if they’re coloured, they are the alpha heroes and founts of all wisdom and enlightenment — while enjoying all the liberal freedoms of hedonism which the average prostitute pursues such as drugs and countless sexual partners — all in a world so far removed from the reality of the average person that they could not be more distant from us if they were to exist on Alpha Centauri.

The “discovery” of his transgressions has happened at the height of the #MeToo anti-sexual-harassment campaign, and in the shadow of Harvey Weinstein’s colossal downfall for his sadistically predatory behaviour against defenceless, wholly innocent, pure and virtuous Hollywood actresses.

Yet, now we find there are “rules” and “boundaries” and concepts of “decency”, hitherto undetectable to the human eye, which have been violated. These binding values are just as enforceable against errant homos too, as Kevin Spacey found out when his alleged history of harassing male actors emerged and his brilliant career nosedived. Moreover, each of the condemned is “left-leaning” politically.

The central contradiction here is tied to the notion of consent encrypted in a narrative-strand concerning empowerment. This particular species of moral relativity asserts its absolutism in the theatre of “slut walks” where females (usually the ugly ones) deliberately set out to provoke with their sexuality while simultaneously denying it — using it, if you will, as a form of entrapment. They wish that eyes covet them salaciously so that they can screech, “Stop looking at me!”

morgan-freeman-quote-whatever-we-decide-we-want-to-do-is-what-we-do.jpg
A fine quote from Freeman. Of course, what he means is, if we decide to play grab-ass, then that’s what we do

One would argue if they did not wish to be gawked at that they hide their flesh, but they use their bodies as a form of ‘empowerment’ by inciting a perfectly natural response that they can then go on to censure. Within the inequality of that performance is the very logic of a new McCarthyism that has moved beyond the black and white of communism VS the American way and grown vast tentacles into areas that govern a range of principles: some political, some moral, some ethical, but others entirely nebulous.

There is nothing unreasonable about women, or men, expecting not to be sexually harassed. And if that whole movement and the witch-hunts growing out of it are simply about changing the working culture in that egregious community then so be it. But these are actors and actresses and Hollywood is a vast stage.

What we are seeing is a performance intended for our consumption. It is an instructive drama to alter the way we think and behave and its underlying message is that men are natural predators. It has delivered a problem, it has identified the cause, but its solution is yet to be decided.

What we are seeing is a performance intended for our consumption. It is an instructive drama to alter the way with think and behave and its underlying message is that men are natural predators. It has delivered a problem, it has identified the cause, but its solution is yet to be decided.

We began by talking about McCarthyism and made a wide curve into the corrupt culture of Hollywood but they are related. For, this new McCarthyism is not fixed to an “us VS them” narrative, but an organic conflict where “us” and what “we” believe is an ever-evolving set of social laws.

A new lexicon is needed to deal with everything from people with physical handicaps, to the Babylon of races flooding into western lands. The terms we use to describe our own sexes “boy and girl” are now the subjects of political revisionism and the misuse of the appropriate terminology may result in falling foul of an omnipresent “House committee into Un-Enlightened Attitudes”.

download (1).jpg
This pic is meant to prove a point but really it just makes us want to reach for a sick bag

There will be no panel seated to hear charges in this era of McCarthyism — instead, everyone becomes a committee judge.

We used the example of the “slut walk” as an entrapment and so too this goes for the rubbing in our faces of diversity. We are goaded with this purposefully-engineered population change, this demographic shift, and the abolition of every expectation we were born to. The media riles us up and then slaps us when those of us not conditioned to the Enlightened Attitudes voice our opposition.

They blacklisted Trumbo and his commie mates. In theory, this meant they couldn’t work (even though Trumbo used aliases to sell his work) and today they do the same to dissidents against the lunacy of the PC world in all its ‘diversity’. We employed Wikipedia’s entry definition of McCarthyism earlier and liked how it referred to “the practise of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence.”

There will be no panel seated to hear charges in this era of McCarthyism — instead, everyone becomes a committee judge.

In this era, to point at the social damage being done by uncapped immigration will earn you such tags as ‘Nazi’ with all its attendant anti-social signifiers and interpretations. This is regardless of whether or not you subscribe to National Socialist views. Your name will be besmirched on social media, and on the Google search engine, and blacklisting will begin.

Employers will Google your name as a matter of routine employment check and the calumny will disadvantage you. You will find that you are no longer treated equally by the police, or by the law. Your blacklisting might not even come about as a result of a division on the question of immigration or race it might be tied to views oppositional to other tenets of this mercurial PC dogma.

Trumbo waited it out — even winning an academy award or two under his non de plumes. In a sense, he helped to shape the new Hollywood. Does that mean his communism won out? Not really, it just meant that the overarching paranoia about it had relaxed. But we’re not dealing with paranoia; we’re up against the mind-viruses of a crypto global dictatorship centred round an almighty, omniscient floating shekel.

Nothing is as it seems.

obama-weinstein.jpg
Picture perfect — Weinstein was a massive financial contributor to the Democrats. But the fat Jew bastard ain’t laughing now