CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

Enthusiastically waiting to see your enemy’s name appear in the obituary is, perhaps, something a Seinfeld episode should have tackled. But in absence of a half-hour sitcom mocking the ethics of such a scene comes our rather blunt desire to see in big, beautiful text the confirmation of conservatism’s departure from this world for good.

And it would be a mercy. The ideological vagrant of the modern era is in agony; a shadow of its former self that, in losing its mental faculties gave us the playbook for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation; in losing control of its bowels gave us the Party for Freedom to clean up; and in its jittered ramblings at night gave us the Patriot’s Poet to, well, laugh at. And why wouldn’t we laugh?

Who would have thought that acquiring oriental wives, rampant alcoholism and aimlessly flying the Star of David would in any way forms the face of modern conservatism – that safeguard of traditionalism? In a way that says more about the progressive left if this is the standard an acceptable alternative is held to, but nonetheless, we diagnose cancer as cancer when we see it.

As befitting of an extended life, however, conservatism is a broad grouping of ideas and practices that through the centuries melded into particular localities and built up its own organic character.

Before the Tories of the U.K. and the Republicans of the US succumbed to the dreariness of the modern world and became the stock-standard “centre-right” parties – which plague our present-day political institutions with equal parts boredom and treason – there was, if only from a historical standpoint, more character and life prevalent in the internal workings of the party and its duties within the country.

Such a thing can be admitted without the analysing of the good or ill that became of these entities. Suffice to say that compared to its modern manifestation there was something that, from our perspective, draws less ire than the present set against the historic backdrop of actual traditionalism holding ground.

Though conservatism is a term seldom used as the main grouping of its constituent factions, it is the college where civic nationalists, patriots and other assorted fruit loops graduated from even though they try to paint themselves in a different light. As the main tributary, it is conservatism, particularly in regards to combatting the progressive left over the prominent issue of Islam and the extreme end of identity politics, that guides the more hard-line, right-wing groups.

By our standards, they are in their formulation reactionary without the reaction. The scattering of conservatism in Australia is less a developed ideology but rather pub-banter that became a little too rowdy.

Their analysis of a world gone awry fuelled their febrile imagination. Islam, the left, and the agreement that the Liberals had betrayed the core tenets of conservatism amounted to a call to arms of an invigorated force to take to the streets. Through its brief public rallies and continued online presence, it revealed to be inept at forming any manner of lasting policy that actually worked for the best interests of this country. Its tenure among our acceptance went from weak to its now non-existent status.

So when will it die?

The ideas of man are invested with his own similarity, and an idea’s death follows a metaphysical equivalent of the biological process whereby the cessation of its vital functions leads to its absolute end.

The conservative has sealed his own fate because while he sees the nation as the vital organ he refuses, to his fatal detriment, to recognise the nation as the culmination of race and culture; not cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism and every perversion betwixt which he defends and fruitlessly tries to tame in order to avoid the baneful accusation of racism.

It is ironical that conservatives ultimately laud the version of our nation that was designed by their apparent enemies on the left. For what else is the presentation of the 21st century, multicultural Australia but the great fantasy of progressives as the first stage of removing the nation state and its racial identity?

Indeed its days are numbered but there are no doubts conservatism’s last moments will be messy, and there’s no telling what yet-to-be-revealed horrors will spew forth from its ideological orifices in a last attempt to show there’s life in it.

In these times it won’t be bothered to keep up the façade there’s any real difference between itself and the left, but will instead – as we have seen – go after the force that exposed and systemically broke down its lies: Nationalism. It is Nationalism which remains the inextinguishable light of reason.

Its pillars are unchanging. Its leaders – both here and abroad in friendly movements – are some of the most besmirched figures in existence and yet remain defiant to their ideals.

As the leaders of fake conservatism rot, the former adherents to such leeches will atone for their misguidance by embracing Nationalism, in fact, they will realise it was what they were after all along: a place to call home among their own people.

God willing, here is another nail in the coffin of the unconvinced as to why our expedient wish for the demise of conservatism and its inbred children is not morbid gossip, nor a critique for the sake of a critique, nor a selfish ruse on our behalf, but a necessity on which the termination of this foul parasite can allow our own ideals to truly flourish; where those ideals are that of the nationhood of Australia: an Australia that lives up to its historic creation as a nation built by the White man and for the sake of the White man.

oie_qPhWNDomOMRR

THE RADICALISED SYDNEY HIGH SCHOOL PRINCIPAL AND THE BENDIGO THREE: HOW IT ALL ADDS UP TO REVERSE ASSIMILATION

THE RADICALISED SYDNEY HIGH SCHOOL PRINCIPAL AND THE BENDIGO THREE: HOW IT ALL ADDS UP TO REVERSE ASSIMILATION

As the Bendigo Three faces a Kangaroo court in Melbourne, in Sydney government high schools are validating every concern about the encroachment of Islamic doctrine that their beheading video stunt warned of.

At Western Sydney’s Punchbowl Boys High School the impact of Islam is reminiscent of a science fiction or horror film plot. The goings on at the government high school resemble one of those eerie films in which a traveller turns up in a strange town where everybody shares a dark secret. Either the townspeople are going off to worship Satan at midnight, or aliens have landed and replaced the population with replicas.

Punchbowl Boys High is one of 19 schools across Western Sydney that are, in government jargon, “at risk of radicalising Moslem students”. It would seem by the evidence that there is a disparity of imperative between the word “risk” and its fait accompli.

In the case of Punchbowl High, where outsider students were bullied into attending prayer sessions and adopting an appearance acceptable to Moslems that risk extended all the way up to the principal.

Chris Griffiths converted to Islam in 2014 while serving as the school’s principal. This is, of itself, intriguing. It’s probably not too far wrong as a guess to say that he was fiercely secular in his beliefs before his name was added to the principal’s door. Why the sudden flip to a medieval belief system that would no doubt generate a schism between himself, his family and his friends?

Here we can but speculate, had he been intimidated into converting? Had the students and their parents threatened him? Is Islam just so alluring in its teachings that once you are among large numbers of its adherents it becomes spiritually irresistible?

Was it even the pull of the religion at all? Perhaps there was such a high prevalence of Middle Easterners that as a White Australian outsider he felt compelled to assimilate to their religion by way of integrating as part of their community?

Anyone who has spent time at such schools can see evidence of the reverse assimilation effect. It is quite common to see young Australian girls who live in these areas going round with Middle Eastern boyfriends. This is the environment in which they have been raised and such couplings, although doubtless ill-fated and short-lasting due to the ethnic customs of the males, are normal. In fact, it is quite a disturbing thing to see. Are we essentially witnessing a kind of community Stockholm syndrome taking a grip?

Whatever the circumstance, he went native with a vengeance. Far from trying to prevent radicalisation, it seems that this White Australian convert was doing his best to expedite it.
In 2016, he was sacked by the Education Department after failing to implement de-radicalisation programs at his school. When his story recently broke, it was due to his having refused female teachers to be allowed at the graduation ceremony.

The new principal, Robert Patruno, was threatened with violence by the Moslem community when he undertook his new role.

But here we are, with two top Australian blokes and Neil Erikson, facing a possible six-month jail sentence for ostensibly warning about the perils of this type of thing which is by no means limited to the one high school mentioned.

Those scenes outside the Melbourne Magistrates Court were illuminating. A withering throng of tuck shop arms holding aloft placards deeming the B3 and their supporters to be Nazis, while they, who are aiding and abetting the spread of this dangerous doctrine, in which they chanted “Moslems are welcome, racists are not” assumed the moral high-ground. There is an alarming correlation between those Whites, and Chris Griffiths, as well as all the other White converts.

For it is not the Moslem community that can be seen to be pressuring us into allowing the spread of their draconian belief system, but our own people, which is quite an accomplishment when you think about it.

Nationalism argues that Islam alone is not the threat but those who have conditioned us to accept multiculturalism and multiracialism. We are now our own guards and executioners in the genocide of our nation.

 oie_vtWU30NrIAlU

GENERATION ME AND THE ABANDONED COLLECTIVE

GENERATION ME AND THE ABANDONED COLLECTIVE

We live in strange times, comrades. Whither Collectivism? This was the original working title for the following piece, we felt however that this approach lacked a little something, for we know where the spirit of Australian collectivism rests, it is with the Nationalists.

True, the Nationalists have always held to the ideals of collective action by and on behalf of the true Australians; it is something we have never abandoned, nor even altered these long decades.

The stunning reverses in this area by the Left, however, bear some commentary since they have the ear of politicians at every level of government and their mean ideals are front and centre in mainstream politics.

At every level, the Left have abandoned the ideal and practices of collective action in favour of an open-ended and particularly selfish brand of Liberalism.

In truth the Left are as wholly occupied by individualism and the propagation of the globalist consumer culture as the most rapacious of the capitalists; the Left also take this to the extremes of narcissism and anarchy more typically associated with bandit capitalists and their underlings.

At every turn we see some half-baked Leftist ideological concoction or mash-up of ideas being expressed as a stream of their identity politics; what is more, these constructs all relate to the personal realm as adherents to this way of seeing the world primarily self-identify themselves, through a checklist of recently invented identitarian categories.

The stunning reverses in this area by the Left, however, bear some commentary since they have the ear of politicians at every level of government and their mean ideals are front and centre in mainstream politics.

There is a tendency among the less well-informed activists of the “far-right” to label the Left of 2017 as Marxists, or Communists; nothing could be further from the truth and, in fact, all that they currently stand for goes against the principles laid down by Marx, Engels, Lenin and their successors.

We would not bore our readers with a digression into the how and why of this abandonment of Marxist-Leninist thought, suffice it to say that the modern Leftist barely knows the names of the old socialists, much less has any real appreciation of their work.

download (9)
The collectivist spirit of the Aussie worker as seen in the film Sunday Too Far Away (1975)

We can, however, provide a few illustrations of the fallacies inherent in modern Leftist and progressive thinking, where the narrow individualist core of their worldview is cynically presented to the working class as a broad consensus.

Most notable among these fraught patterns of thought are the prevailing Leftist attitudes toward Islam and Muslims, for it is here we see, in graphic detail, the progressive mind in action.

Leftists generalise about Muslims all the time, they encourage people to see the followers of Muhammad as a collective, or a class of people in society.

We would not bore our readers with a digression into the how and why of this abandonment of Marxist-Leninist thought, suffice it to say that the modern Leftist barely knows the names of the old socialists, much less has any real appreciation of their work.

This is blatantly false, Muslims are probably the most divided, atomised, faith group in the world; sectarian tensions are rife in their social groupings, as are ethnic, tribal and political rivalries.

When this is pointed out to the Leftist, however, he will begin to extoll the benefits of diversity within collectives, such as his imagined Muslim “community”; when he is pressed further and challenged with the evidence that this diversity is actually an impediment in many respects he falls back to reliance on individualism.

Yes, comrades, here we see the Leftist’s core belief in the individual as the most important unit of society as he name-drops and puts upon a pedestal the most individually accomplished and successful of the Muslims in Australia.

The fêted individual Muslim is then presented as the standard, the benchmark or the lens through which all well-meaning and virtuous people are said to regard Muslims and their religion.

Only the individual truly matters to the modern Left. Our next example is taken from the headlines of recent weeks: the so-called homeless crisis in our capital cities.

Yes, comrades, here we see the Leftist’s core belief in the individual as the most important unit of society as he name-drops and puts upon a pedestal the most individually accomplished and successful of the Muslims in Australia.

Once again the Left, in their propaganda, collectivise vagrants, itinerants and rough sleepers but when the idea arises of these urchins being an actual class of people, in a class system, who are fairly judged as troublesome by most right-thinking people the reversion to reliance on exceptions to the rule, individual cases and personal feelings on the matter occurs.

This exhortation to put oneself in the shoes of another “less fortunate” individual, to identify and sympathise with this cherry-picked homeless person who claims to have fallen from the middle classes to penury and disgrace further reinforces the conviction that the subjective, personal viewpoint is the core principle of the Left.

So too, their discussion of immigration is infected by this tendency to fantasise about the lives of others, to attempt to relate to them person to person rather than as members of distinctly different, often hostile out-groups.

Television programmes such as “Go Back To Where You Came From” highlight this tactic, this subjective view of the, often negative, individual experiences of migrants as the determining factor in judging the utility of immigration policy.

Indeed the whole progressive, open borders, agenda is predicated on fair treatment, in their eyes, of individual migrants and asylum seekers as opposed to the fair treatment of very real and longstanding collectives, namely the nations of the world.

So too, their discussion of immigration is infected by this tendency to fantasise about the lives of others, to attempt to relate to them person to person rather than as members of distinctly different, often hostile out-groups.

Progressives wilfully ignore ideas such as showing responsibility to their own national collective, or the migrants’ responsibilities to their home country; the belief is that the individual has the right to live anywhere they choose regardless of any other considerations.

In the end, though, the Left are failing precisely because the White Australian majority can no longer deny themselves the collectivism of the national group on the promise of the future benefits of diversity.

Our people are looking for more than the crass, nihilistic individualism of the globalist capitalist castes and their Leftist imitators: we want our trade unions and political parties to faithfully represent us, we want the security and social justice that collective national action has been proven to bring about in this country.

The Nationalists would see this return to collectivism realised, we would re-affirm the trade union and the fighting workers’ party as the primary instruments of White working class political struggle and take all necessary measures to protect the national collective and commonwealth.

Our forebears believed as we do now, that once Australia was transformed into a place where White men and women could thrive, then true social justice and progress could be achieved.

The return to the forms of collectivism which served us so well in the past is the only way forward in the present age of decaying standards of living, uncertain prospects for our children and anti-worker hostility from the elites.

We call upon all true radicals, those disillusioned by crass individualism to join us, to take the fighting spirit and radical politics of the “hungry years” of the 19th century for their inspiration as together we strive to re-animate Australian national consciousness.

Borg-Drohnen_auf_der_Enterprise
The collectivist ideal is powerful in the Borg. Well. It’s true

THE PRIMARY SOLUTION — AN OVERVIEW OF NATIONALISM

THE PRIMARY SOLUTION — AN OVERVIEW OF NATIONALISM

Patriots are conservatives, nationalists are radicals

Patriots who practise conservative politics under the impression they are expressing ‘patriotism’, especially when that entails clear Anglophile bias, and who ignorantly appropriate the term ‘nationalism’ assuming both are one and the same ultimately pervert the meaning.

However, there is also a preeminent character flaw typical of those in that neophyte movement and it is ugly for its sheer arrogance. Those writing for United Nationalists Australia — its founding members — have all dedicated ten years or more to the study of nationalist principles. We have been both activists and theorists and yet we constantly go around in circles having to brook the same absurd charges of ‘White supremacism’ and ‘Nazism’ and state our identity and its purpose again and again.

If you cannot fathom the concept of the nation as inexorably moored to race then you are neither patriots nor nationalists but a conservative xenophobe.

We have no intention to ourselves appear arrogant, or snobby, by making such an assertion but rather it is an observation made over many years from examining the inevitable patterns associated with those who gravitate towards nationalist politics.

So, at the risk of appearing contradictory, yes we are unashamedly pro-White but no we are not ‘White supremacist’.

ilangja001p1
Jack Lang, an Australian nationalist

The latter is a defamation employed by both left and right to delegitimise nationalists. By invoking imagery of men in sheets wielding shotguns and dragging Negroes behind pick-up trucks they create a mental association to villainy and barbarity. Moreover, they imply that this is indisputably our aim and if allowed to flourish all code of human conduct would be subverted to industrialised murder born out of base hatred. When a nationalist is presented as a ‘Nazi’ he is immediately repudiated on all fronts. It is an epithet and it is employed to dehumanise nationalists and validate the use of force to quiet us.

When our politics are compared to the very worst constructions of post-War propaganda involving Nazis spinning Jews into lampshades, and using their body fat to make soap, it presents our position as frightening and evil.

If you cannot fathom the concept of the nation as inexorably moored to race then you are neither patriots nor nationalists but a conservative xenophobe.

Very few on either the left side or those conservatives who claim WE are harming THEIR movement on the right side have bothered to exercise the scholastic effort to wipe away the propagandistic rhetoric and research the reality of our position; much less our long history as opposed to their fledgeling existence. For, were they to do so, they would discover a protectionist’ cause that has attained the understanding that a nation is the sum of racial kinship, with race denoting all aspects of the culture that thereafter make up its society.

By accepting that, then they must appreciate that the rule applies to all other races. The goal of a nationalist Australia — disregarding the inevitable vexed argument around theoretical ‘Aboriginal sovereignty’ — is no more than the desire it wishes for all races which is, without resorting to imperialism, to secure the right to pursue their own destiny in their own homeland without hindrance from more powerful states or coalitions of nations intent on exploitation.

image2
Bonza pro-White pineapples

In the age of globalism, it is especially a cogent philosophy. To that purpose, we here at UNA will endeavour to state our principles and objectives in an understandably imperfect kind, as we acknowledge that all learning is growing and therefore all teaching must be fluid. As times change, so do circumstances. As such, new challenges must be met with new solutions.

Nationalists have solutions; patriots are notoriously vague about their objectives. That vagueness is only in the rarest cases deliberate.

Those who believe they are gently acclimatizing ‘the masses’ to nationalism by leading them down the civic route have been responsible for destroying nationalism in the process. When the British National Party (BNP) adopted these ‘mainstreaming’ tactics British nationalism was contaminated beyond cure.

Nationalists have solutions; patriots are notoriously vague about their objectives. That vagueness is only in the rarest cases deliberate.

The BNP’s former leader Nick Griffin acknowledged this and apologised to British nationalists for his failed experiment which resulted in the establishment of the pro-Israeli anti-Islam movement the English Defence League. This, like all civic patriot anti-Islam groups, is mutton dressed as lamb for those seeking to defend blood and soil. That same mistake of mainstreaming was imported here and a few of those who introduced it into the bloodstream of Australian nationalism are currently still active; in some cases stirring up trouble once again.

Likewise, the French National Party under Marine Le Pen revoked the membership of her father its former leader of 39 years, Jean-Marie Le Pen, after controversy arose over him describing alleged Nazi concentration camps as “a detail of history”. The direction Marine Le pen has taken the veteran nationalist party is on a decidedly mainstream course, in the civic patriot vogue.

gettyimages-484584662
Jean-Marie Le Pen continues to shine the light for nationalism in France despite his own daughter turning traitor

Civic patriotism is, as nationalists understand, rooted deep in the interests of preserving Israel. It is a pro-foreign movement that has the audacity to kit itself in the regalia of militant patriotism. It seems to know only two positions: anti-Islam and anti-Leftist. Thereafter, in the case of Nick Folkes and his Party for Freedom, it will covet and appropriate nationalist issues which never gain traction or develop into solid policy under its leadership. At times, they even steal the symbols of White nationalism, yet their civic partners never call them on this.

The rank and file of civic patriot organisations are sensitive to other areas but the agencies they coalesce around do not expand to adapt those issues into their cause. For instance, there may be small vocal outbursts about Australia’s greatest national concern, China, but they peter out quickly. Most civic patriots, in fact, welcome Asian immigration for what they regard as the propensity of Asians to ‘assimilate’ into our culture; a concept that figures frequently in their rhetoric.

Likewise, many in its leadership entertain personal relationships with women of Oriental descent, which gives an immediate insight into why they take such an aggressive stance against White nationalists. On the other hand, comment on the high crime rates attributable to African migrants who create shocking headlines draws not just anger from civic nationalists but calls for “deportation” (the government is currently acting on the public mood and proposed the mandatory deportation of migrant criminals). So near, yet so far, one might say. What then is the missing link?

Civic patriotism is the vehicle of the pro-Israel agenda

Much has been written by nationalists about the civic patriot movement being a vehicle for Israeli interests. Nick Griffin, for one, wrote a lengthy investigative piece tying together Dutch politician Geert Wilders and his Party for Freedom with an expressly pro-Israel agenda. Thereto, he traced Israeli money and influence to the English Defence League. In Australia, the Q Society, and its political arm the Australian Liberty Alliance has written into its core policies support for Israel, as does Danny Nalliah’s Rise Up Australia party. These are just a few examples.

Why would this be? How can organisations that call themselves patriotic and cloak themselves in the national colours possibly be patriotic when they are in the long-term serving the interests of a foreign nation and its agenda?

120914-diwarnai-bentrokan-pembangunan-musala-di-sydney-disetujui2-618x412
Party for Freedom’s George Jameson is so patriotic that he waves the flag of a foreign nation — the very nation that got us all into this mess

Support for Israel is absolutely necessary if the international coalition led by the United States is to successfully enforce its will in the Middle East. Much of the contretemps that beset that region do so because of A) Arab anger over the subjugation of Palestine to the [illegal] expansion of the state of Israel B) the need for Israel and its allies to sustain a climate of conflict among Israel’s neighbours to keep them from unifying against Israel. That is, at any rate, a very basic outline of the situation.

Israel automatically becomes an ally in the reckoning of civic patriots because it is perceived as being an enemy of Islam. Moreover, conservatives (and even those from Labor’s side of the house) support military interventions which involve sending young Australians into combat on Arab soil. A strong opposition to Islam is a prerequisite to condition Australians to support such policies.

Nationalists at their fiercest oppose the state of Israel, on this and numerous other grounds, and at their most moderate simply wish an end to contact altogether.

Why would this be? How can organisations that call themselves patriotic and cloak themselves in the national colours possibly be patriotic when they are in the long-term serving the interests of a foreign nation and its agenda?

In our last chapter, we made reference to instances where civic patriots abandon their narrative that Australia is accepting of diversity ‘minus Islam’. It is natural that any group supportive of Israeli, and more accurately controlled by Jewish interests, will be hostile to the basic tenets of nationalism; the primary solution for which calls for ending immigration and gradual restoration of a White Australia.

Yet, as we shall argue further if Australia is not White, then how are we even a nation? Aboriginals, despite leftist revisionism, were never a nation. The abuse of our own history in terms of the nation’s settlement and especially in key narratives such as the battle of the Eureka Stockade has been introduced to aid a policy of deracinating post-colonial Australia. Regardless, Australia was perhaps the only nation to openly pursue a policy of protecting its White identity. And that IS Australian identity.

We make the comparison with China. Could we really regard China as being China if we were to swap the racial characteristics of a Chinese man with those of a Papua New Guinean highlander? Would this image gel in our reckoning? Can Africans truly be Greeks when Africans are so unmistakably of a different race altogether? The argument that race is a construct has become disseminated as an incontrovertible truth but not when applied to any other living animal. If we apply those same arguments to the animal world we find they are a fallacy. Only in certain parts of the world where a western, decidedly liberal notion of humanity reigns as gospel does this idea take seed.

The Primary Solution

All problems we face in Australia currently stem from one area — immigration. When the floodgates were opened to non-White immigration in the 1970s Australia’s aplomb was abandoned to quaintness and the era of our nation being predicated purely on an economic basis overtook. There is a marked difference between the economics of a nation and a nation as an economy. That definitive line has been so skilfully obfuscated by the globalist architects that the idea does not even occur to most. We are at a critical time.

If there was ever an argument that Australia is viewed by the oligarchs of industry and capitalism purely as a resource and its people simply in terms of consumers it can be made now. From academia to the media, to the government every effort is being made to eradicate the memory of White Australia and inculcate pluralist sensibilities. Who do these pluralist sensibilities benefit?

Tim Soutphommasane horizontal close up
Tim Soutphommasane, Australia’s Race Discrimination Commissioner who is a French-born Laotian who taxpayers fund to the tune of $300k

First up, they try and tell us that they benefit (White) Australians. The arguments are absurd, and begin with cuisine — the benefits of foreign cooking — and advance to the ludicrous — that we need masses of non-White immigration because we are “ageing”. That line about an “ageing population” and “declining birth rates” is ubiquitous anywhere White people have created a civilisation. Supposedly, those economically deprived, scientifically backwards peoples are more adept at sustaining life than those who transcended the gathering of the basic needs of sustaining life to organise societies so ordered and advanced they enabled us to reach the stars. In reality, it is only the immigrants that need us. What do we get from the deal? Well, to facilitate such a society we need laws to prevent us objecting to that society when we inevitably realise that our opportunities and way of life are being handed over to aliens. This resulted in laws that can be loosely termed anti-hate laws and which solely benefit, in practise and theory, non-Whites who migrate to Australia.

In fact, Australia currently has a non-Australian born Race Discrimination commissioner, Tim Soutphommasane. This person is paid an annuity of $300,000 by the Australian people to sustain a narrative about bigotry that he can then go on to address as a grave and ongoing concern that always grows worse. Yes, a man never born here, who has no kinship with White people and in fact every reason to despise us, is paid out of our own pockets to fault us on a racial basis. He has authored four books which are all centred on themes of Australians being fundamentally racist and why migrants like him are so important to us backwards White trash.

Oddly enough, those civic patriots who call us Nazis also object to this man and what he represents overall. However, they are in the thwarted position of being virulently opposed to the idea of a return to a White Australia. Notwithstanding, the very premise that merely to entertain a multiracial society requires legislating against its host population in stern draconian terms should be enough alone to question the justice of such a change.

If there was ever an argument that Australia is viewed by the oligarchs of industry and capitalism purely as a resource and its people simply in terms of consumers it can be made now. From academia to the media, to the government every effort is being made to eradicate the memory of White Australia and inculcate pluralist sensibilities. Who do these pluralist sensibilities benefit?

Alternately, it is what this man is paid to PROTECT that is equally deserving of outrage. Australia has always had its own problems with crime, but they were never on the epidemic scale we read about in the world news. There was a time Australians shook their head at the news coming out of, say, New York. The legendary crime rates achieved a kind of mystical quality for us. But now, in 2017, we live that same reality with a dull apathy and it is nearly always non-Whites who are perpetrating these crimes. From Africans as young as 12 carjacking, home invading, and rioting in the streets with machetes; to Middle Eastern crime gangs engaged in daily shootouts on what were only thirty years ago quiet suburban streets. We have bizarre stories from nearly every racial community.

Indeed, this is the much-flouted crime scenario that all White nationalists point at. But one must realise that immigration has led to all manner of ancillary issues: such as homelessness; the introduction of otherwise quarantined diseases; religious and ethnic conflicts that have been imported by these alien races; and the challenges of having to compete with them. It is no secret that many of Australia’s selective schools are stacked with Asian and Indian students.

The Primary Solution sweeps all of this, and every ill manifestation of multiracialism we have not included here, into the dust pile. It is the beginning, too, of protectionism; and a policy of self-sufficiency that is absolutely achievable given the extraordinary resources of this nation — resources currently being sold off at a rate that would make your hat spin.

This, of course, means that leadership and management roles will inevitably take on a brown and yellow colour. Australians are, before our eyes, becoming the underclass in their own country for a confluence of reasons. These changes are ground into our faces by the elites. Non-Whites have a great proclivity to breed and especially when they can do so with Australian welfare to enable them. The ever-growing strain on the welfare net will result in an end to welfare altogether. By welfare, we speak inclusively not just of the safety net that was paid by Australians to ensure their own security, but Medicare, child support and finally the pension.

The Primary Solution sweeps all of this, and every ill manifestation of multiracialism we have not included here, into the dust pile. It is the beginning, too, of protectionism; and a policy of self-sufficiency that is absolutely achievable given the extraordinary resources of this nation — resources currently being sold off at a rate that would make your hat spin.

You cannot end the spread of Islam without a total approach to immigration. There is no way a multiracial society can justify, or will ever ratify laws, that seek to exclude one group but permit the others. And how can they be so obsessed with the problems of those adherents to Islam and yet blind to all the problems stemming from every other alien race and culture?

Again, the complex problems created by this nightmare of diversity have one very simple solution: and Untied Nationalists Australia calls it the Primary Solution: an end to all immigration with the exception of White Europeans who desire to join us. Once we have done that, we have a chance to address the long process of reversing its effects. There too, we have solutions. But they will be covered in due course.

empty-north

MIKE HOLT: NOT OUR NAZI

MIKE HOLT: NOT OUR NAZI

As breathlessly reported by SMH cub reporter Rachel Olding, another White boy with a broken brain is being pilloried as a “Neo-Nazi”.

Michael Holt, a 26-year-old resident of the Sydney area, according to the Sun Herald, was arrested in 2015 on charges of manufacturing firearms and other offensive weapons, such as knuckle dusters, in his grandpa’s shed.

Holt appears to be yet another of those tragic figures, one of the discarded White kids of the multicultural age since he is described, by our apparently teenaged Fairfax jotter, as autistic and intellectually handicapped.

From what we have been able to discern, young Michael seems to have come up a confused and mentally deranged individual, from a multicultural horror show of a family.

Holt appears to be yet another of those tragic figures, one of the discarded White kids of the multicultural age since he is described, by our apparently teenaged Fairfax jotter, as autistic and intellectually handicapped.

From parents who split when he was a child and then both descended into the cess pit of race mixing; to his upbringing by a religious fundamentalist grandfather; coupled with his obvious mental challenges, it was no wonder that he would emerge into adulthood a scarred and dysfunctional young man.

There seems to be more, still, to the story; allegations have arisen which suggest that Holt may have fallen into the orbit of the notorious troublemaker and state snitch Peter Coleman.

1485594968343
Mike’s serious arsenal included toy guns

Yes, comrades, always look for the informer, the “Neo-Nazi” pimp or the compromised felon looking to curry favour with the cops in these affairs, the not-so-hidden hand of the state.

Michael Holt, it is understood, long ago came to the attention of ASIO and the Federal Police, it has been made known, also, that his radicalisation took place under the noses of these spooks and their informers.

We also, with good reason, believe that his appearance at a Toowoomba gun and militaria show, tooled up with a knife and knuckledusters may have been stage managed by persons with interests other than sports shooting or war memento collecting.

Michael Holt, it is understood, long ago came to the attention of ASIO and the Federal Police, it has been made known, also, that his radicalisation took place under the noses of these spooks and their informers.

To veteran Nationalists the Holt affair is depressingly familiar territory, he is a psycho, who gravitated to other fringe dwellers and lunatics in the eastern states; Rachel Olding is correct when she claims that he had no links to any organised groups, this was because given his unstable nature and the bad company he kept no reasonable person he approached would have anything to do with him.

Thus her characterisation of Mike Holt as an autistic loner falls flat, he was well known and had friends who, because they are themselves social pariahs and affect stereotypical “Neo-Nazism” in their dress and speech would have put the wind up the security services and police intelligence units.

1486017179252
Mike Holt after undergoing a serious Duke Nukem bypass

Mike Holt himself would run his mouth about all sorts of insane, often violent, shenanigans he had supposedly devised; all the information we have to hand, though, suggests that he was nothing but a harmless fruitcake, there is no suggestion that he has hurt anyone or ever sought to enact his fantasies of mayhem.

The one thing that is clear in the whole mucky affair is that this clearly unwell fellow was groomed as a political wrecker by veterans of the craft; the SMH article is merely his epitaph as a now discarded tool in a game against the “far right”.

Mike Holt himself would run his mouth about all sorts of insane, often violent, shenanigans he had supposedly devised; all the information we have to hand, though, suggests that he was nothing but a harmless fruitcake, there is no suggestion that he has hurt anyone or ever sought to enact his fantasies of mayhem.

Michael Holt now begins his journey down the conveyor belt toward rehabilitation by the publicly left wing element of the globalist machine.

Here we see the symbiosis of multiple arms, or stake holders if you will, of the globalist, anti-National struggle: the state, the media, the anti-racists and de-radicalisation experts.

We are informed by Rachel Olding that Holt has been hooked up with none other than obese Muslim convert and lawyer Lydia Shelly, who readers may recall sparring with Blair Cottrell on the JJJ Hack programme last year.

Lydia, in her capacity as Holt’s legal counsel, has declined to comment on the case, yet the SMH informs us that her client has been put forward for a de-radicalisation programme devised by the All Together Now group.

Now this collective, formerly known as Exit White Power was de-funded by the Abbott government some years ago, so it’s surprising to see them insert themselves in this drama in an official capacity; we assume that they are either compiling a “show reel” to take begging for another tax payer funded grant; or that they have secured other means of financial support.

Lydia, in her capacity as Holt’s legal counsel, has declined to comment on the case, yet the SMH informs us that her client has been put forward for a de-radicalisation programme devised by the All Together Now group.

Why we wonder, did nobody intervene when Mike Holt’s behaviour became an issue some ten years ago?

There are alarming reports of gun fetishism, internet addiction, suicidal ideation and homicidal fantasy in his biography, what’s more, he has been on the radar of police and security services for a very long time, possibly since the age of fifteen if we’re to believe Olding’s report.

As we say, these lost souls are set on a conveyor belt, they are used up in actions calculated to subvert the “Far Right, either by jealous lunatics and outsiders or the state; they always seem to be busted on some spectacular weapons or counter-terror charge, then further processed by the professional anti-racist crowd once they’ve been dealt with by the courts.

Sadly, for youngsters such as Holt, mischief makers, opportunists and those intent on exploiting the young and vulnerable hover in their peripheral vision; like rock spiders ready to pounce at the mere hint of vulnerability.

The anti-racists are every bit as nefarious as the neo-Nazis, people like Michael Holt are mere commodities in their business model; the road to radicalisation is just part of the supply chain of globalism.

nazi-zombies-e1395582748915
Face it, gang, the Nazi threat has gone zombie on us

6,000 SYRIANS TO BE DUMPED IN WESTERN SYDNEY

6,000 SYRIANS TO BE DUMPED IN WESTERN SYDNEY

The federal government are to dump 6,000 Syrian refugees into one council area in Western Sydney. That is exactly one-half of the intake of 12,000 Syrians insisted on by former Prime Minister Tony Abbott.

The rollout of the imminent Middle Eastern ghetto will take place over the following 12 months and Mike Baird will most likely be driving the bus that brings them in from Sydney airport (or maybe not since he has quit as NSW Premier since this was originally written- ED).

Baird promised Aussie jobs will go to the Syrians, who are here because of our involvement with the illegal military action instigated by President Obama under the direction of warmonger and Zionist Hillary Clinton.

Baird promised Aussie jobs will go to the Syrians, who are here because of our involvement with the illegal military action instigated by President Obama under the direction of warmonger and Zionist Hillary Clinton.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who together with unwavering military support from Russian President Vladimir Putin, defeated ISIS while the ‘good guys’ in the West were arming them to depose al-Assad as part of its provocations throughout the region.

assad_putin_266006
These two men have made Syria safe enough from Western-backed threats so that there is no need at all for Australia or anywhere else to be taking Syrian refugees. Assad wants them back to rebuild the country

In light of the success of al-Assad and Putin, the democratically elected Syrian president has called for the return of his people to help rebuild the country that America and its allies helped to destroy.

But in a blithe snub to Assad, Zionist-supporting Western powers such as our own Liberal government are hell-bent on inflicting the social impact that comes with the forced integration of thousands of immigrants.

Throughout the 1990s it was known as the heroin capital of Sydney, due to the flourishing Vietnamese drug trade. Thereafter, the problems with Middle Eastern criminal gangs became endemic.

The planned relocation area is already one of Australia’s most burdened. Initially a Vietnamese ghetto, in which councillor Phuong Nho, a former refugee, ordered Australia’s first political assassination against Australian-born Labor MP John Newman, it has since become a majority Iraqi and Syrian enclave.

1418404350202
One of Fairfield’s earliest success stories with multiculturalism and resettling refugees was when Vietnamese councillor Phuong Nho had an Australian politician knocked off in the country’s first political assassination

Throughout the 1990s it was known as the heroin capital of Sydney, due to the flourishing Vietnamese drug trade. Thereafter, the problems with Middle Eastern criminal gangs became endemic. As Sydney struggles with some of the highest costs of living in the world; as services such as hospitals and transport are critically stretched; as unemployment reaches epidemic proportions and homelessness soars, the government’s answer is to bring in more unskilled people and set them loose on the population.

The idea that Sydney alone can absorb half of Abbott’s refugee quota is insane and completely arbitrary. There was no consultation with the people of Western Sydney, and none with the local council. The government simply delivered an edict and will see it carried out. Just where all these refugees will be housed is another question, and given how Australians are being hounded off welfare through the use of a crooked records matching system by which Centrelink is unaccountably claiming largely non-existent debts from those already suffering because of the effects of globalism, it is a safe bet that this ‘humanitarian intake’ will not be subject to such draconian measures.

In fact, as we stated above, Premier Mike Baird has already assured that jobs will be made for them while Australians are left without work and are falsely punished by Centrelink.
This is where Camp of the Saints comes to Australia, and it is being served up by the globalist traitors in power.

3c2d409400000578-4124552-image-a-56_1484575607753
This is the kind of pandemonium triggered when rapeugees spot an unaccompanied female

EUROPEAN PRELUDE TO THE AUSTRALIAN IDENTITY

EUROPEAN PRELUDE TO THE AUSTRALIAN IDENTITY

Racial Identity, what is metaphysically referred to as Blood-Memory, is the progenitor and single most important point of the ethnic tribal group, around which all other aggregates of culture form.

On the most primal level, the tribal group attaches itself to the land on which its sustenance is guaranteed, on which its people may grow. Once a people prosper, expansion naturally follows suit; new lands are scouted, taken and tamed.

On the tribal level, these lands eventually lose their arbitrary status as purely geographic conveniences and become the transcendental scenery of an entire mythos: sacred and yet still workable to the machinations of civilization. In the opening lines of Theogony, Hesiod invokes the Muses of Helicon; that is, of Mount Helicon in Boeotia.

On the most primal level, the tribal group attaches itself to the land on which its sustenance is guaranteed, on which its people may grow. Once a people prosper, expansion naturally follows suit; new lands are scouted, taken and tamed.

This is no mere mountain, but a transit which relates the divinity of the gods to the Hellenic Spirit. In a less poetic explanation, we see then a people using a religion superimposed on the land to assert authority, nativity and therefore ownership; a symbiotic relation with nature that develops the character.

slide_36

That Ancient Greece, up until Alexander and the Hellenistic period, never saw a ‘nation-state’ as we know of today only emphasizes the intrinsic power of the ethnic tribal identity. Homer recounted the invading forces of Agamemnon not as a disparate people but rather as Achaeans, Argives, and Dardanians: all synonymic for Greek. This was a Panhellenic realization.

In the vast expanse of Europe’s timeline, every people can be found to have their own racial identity, and despite that its outward manifestation in the form of the polity can be considered temporal – liable to any form of change, great or terrible – it is in the living tapestry of the Blood-Memory that the deeds of the past remain tangible and unchanging: how else could Rome still own the title la città eterna, The Eternal City?

That Ancient Greece, up until Alexander and the Hellenistic period, never saw a ‘nation-state’ as we know of today only emphasizes the intrinsic power of the ethnic tribal identity.

In the emergent Identitarian politics of Europe and the Alt-Right in America, we in Australia must ask ourselves: where do we stand? We arrive at an odd and all too misunderstood position of identity and purpose. Where is the unio mystica of people, land and faith that unequivocally claims this land as Australian for Australians?

illyrian_dardanian_thureophoroi
The ancient Dardanians might’ve worn skirts, but they fought like men!

This problematic quandary has been visited before in the likes of Percy Stephensen whose principal work, The Foundations of Culture in Australia led to the formation of the Jindyworobak Movement; a movement all too conscious of the new realities of adopting the land to ethnic identity and culture. These early pioneers of Australian culture, these tamers of the land, wanted a Mount Helicon of their own. Through a genuine sincerity, they tried to coalesce an Anglo mythos with Australia’s primeval past.

In the emergent Identitarian politics of Europe and the Alt-Right in America, we in Australia must ask ourselves: where do we stand? 

However, no amount of good intention can remove the unshakable fact that the result was throwing white paint into the bucket with black paint; leaving an off-colour grey unusable to a modern audience. The terrible importunity still seen today reveals a deep and unconscious reluctance in questioning who this land truly belongs to. Unless the full force of our original ancestors’ proclamation of terra nullius reigns supreme, we will only ever see an aborted identity compatible with the weaker tenets of lowbrow patriotism and ‘shared real estate’ with an entirely different people.

pjimage-3
Our DNA in architecture…

There remains in the Classical Greek world a gold standard of the stirrings of the racial, tribal identity. So too in Rome, we get a similar feeling under the principle of mos maiorum, or way of the ancestors: that purely Latin foundation upon which Latin identity and culture flourished. We may interpret a similar view in the enforcement of the White Australia Policy as preserving the ways of the founders and builders of the nation: a purely Anglo foundation upon which the Anglo identity and culture could flourish.

Unless the full force of our original ancestors’ proclamation of terra nullius reigns supreme, we will only ever see an aborted identity compatible with the weaker tenets of lowbrow patriotism and ‘shared real estate’ with an entirely different people. 

There is in European history the most remarkable gifts left to us in the past: literature, poetry, philosophy, art, and architecture; all of which are a distant echo of the Apollonian form that has harmoniously influenced every corner of our Western World. This is not a smothering influence but rather a modifier to each unique people, whom, like the Greeks, hold their own special land. This is a new Pan-European realization – and it wants Australia to join its ranks.

So when we inquire into what the Racial Identity of Australia is we are inadvertently inquiring into what the New Man of the Australian future shall be; we ought to hold an open mind in remembering that as a young nation it is entirely expected that so too is our Blood-Memory.

It is neither the case that we find no past idols nor that none shall come after them. There ought to be no despair when we struggle to find our own Leonidas, our own Bismarck. As years and decades go by, so too does the expansion of our identity and our history. The bold heroes of our nation’s future are both in the making and also yet to come; they are reliant on the revival of the European Tradition, and our willingness to keep that flame alight when, through the iron edge of the demographic knife, it seems ever so close to being extinguished.

335704-russell-coight
The ancient Greeks had Hesiod… and we’ve got… erm… anyway, give it more time