FAIRFAX JOTTER MISREADS SMOKE SIGNALS FROM COOLAROO

FAIRFAX JOTTER MISREADS SMOKE SIGNALS FROM COOLAROO

Fairfax contributor Matt Holden recently penned an article, “The Dallas fire is a reminder Melbourne is not as classless as we’d like to think”, in which he tries, in vain, to make his case for class divides across the metropolitan area.

Dallas, for those not familiar with the layout of Greater Melbourne, is a working class suburb in the North-Western zone, it is one of the green field sites developed largely by The Housing Commission Of Victoria during the 1960’s, that style of commission homes would be familiar to most city dwellers.

The fire in question occurred in a stockpile of plastic products at a recycling plant in nearby Coolaroo, though due to the wind patterns during the several days it took to bring the blaze under control it was Dallas which was most heavily affected by the plume of toxic smoke and ash.

Several hundred Dallas residents were evacuated and forced to spend the night at local community centres according to the emergency response plan activated by the responsible authorities; though greatly inconvenienced by the order to leave there were no serious injuries, loss of life or property among the evacuees.

broadmed-mosque
Soon, mosques will be more common than McDonald’s

Now Dallas is a pretty ordinary neighbourhood in that part of town, people live their lives, raise their families, work, study, run businesses and so forth; the suburb, like those around it, is home to a large number of migrants, particularly from Turkey and Lebanon, as well as their second and third generation family members.

Matt Holden casts a fairly critical eye over the area in an effort to trump up his story of class antagonism, exclusivity and geographical as well as socio-economic divides; Holden doesn’t “go there” on the issue of the area’s large Muslim population, but he hints at ethnic divisions in his analysis.

Several hundred Dallas residents were evacuated and forced to spend the night at local community centres according to the emergency response plan activated by the responsible authorities; though greatly inconvenienced by the order to leave there were no serious injuries, loss of life or property among the evacuees.

The issue of median house prices is raised in the article but in reality, this means little, like so much of the new demographic data available to the layman, via the 2016 census, it is largely a matter of perspective gained through local knowledge.

The quality and age of the housing stock as well as the settled nature of the community would be factors in suppressing the turnover of real estate and the median sale price, not necessarily structural, societal inequality or class chauvinism.

Dallas appears to have a large number of families with children, which is what we could expect from an area which is 49% Muslim; few families would want to leave such an enclave, especially if the rent is relatively cheap and few outsiders would want to move into an area dominated, socially and economically by an ethnic group which is not their own.

Holden cites overseas research into social habits to bolster his thesis that Dallas residents have no choice but to live by the side of a rubbish recycling plant, claiming that the upper middle class purposely corrals off all the finer things in life from the lower classes.

ilim college
Aussie schoolgirls make up for our racist, Christian past

He further claims that disparity in educational outcomes, low-quality government schooling and a lack of private schools is somehow imposed upon the residents of Dallas by the upper echelons.

This conclusion is in no way borne out by the census numbers; students living in Dallas attend private schools in numbers three times the state average in the primary years and double the average in the secondary system. It should have been a no brainer for any competent journalist to conclude that Muslims like to live close to the Mosques and private Islamic colleges which are mostly situated in the West, (which we are assured are among the best schools in the state) just as the bourgeois Anglos or Chinese nouveau riche of the Eastern suburbs gravitate to certain school zones.

Dallas appears to have a large number of families with children, which is what we could expect from an area which is 49% Muslim; few families would want to leave such an enclave, especially if the rent is relatively cheap and few outsiders would want to move into an area dominated, socially and economically by an ethnic group which is not their own.

We could argue that the Muslims of Dallas are in fact getting the better deal in some ways due to the fact that they do not have to shell out millions of dollars just to live close to their preferred schools, they get all the benefits and less of the burden given that their suburb is far from the hell hole described by Fairfax.

The problem  is not socioeconomic class in this instance, especially in relation to the fire emergency. The recycling plant, if properly run, is not a particularly dangerous facility by which to live; the lax management practices and corner-cutting found on site by the authorities were the cause of the fire. These factors were no doubt influenced by the diminishing returns from recycling plastic in the current economy.

The implication in Holden’s article is that such a facility would not be tolerated in the affluent Eastern suburbs, and that the bourgeoisie would use their clout to have it shut down as a health hazard before any adverse impacts on their community.

Who can say one way or another? We suspect that Holden’s attitude stems from the fact that people of his social class wouldn’t like to work in a recycling plant, so they see no benefit in having it in an urban setting; the inhabitants of Dallas and surrounds might have a different view given that blue collar jobs are becoming harder to find in the globalised economy.

One way of looking at Dallas is as an intentional community which is developing in accordance with the tastes, needs, and aspirations of its ethnic majority groups; this is not without precedent in Victoria and is a predictable result of the programme of multiculturalism.

We suspect that Holden’s attitude stems from the fact that people of his social class wouldn’t like to work in a recycling plant, so they see no benefit in having it in an urban setting; the inhabitants of Dallas and surrounds might have a different view given that blue collar jobs are becoming harder to find in the globalised economy.

Take for example the ostensible, intentional White enclaves of Eltham, Daylesford or Castlemaine, communities where elements of the White middle and skilled/artisan working classes have migrated, en-masse to set up societies catering to their needs, tastes and aspirations.

Instead of Islamic colleges, there are Steiner schools and community colleges, artisan bakers and funky European style Boites stand in place of the Shisha parlours and Kebab joints while the folk festivals of the White enclaves mirror the Eid and Mawlid observances of the Muslims.

Mawlid
Everyone is welcome – to assimilate to Islam

Never the twain shall meet, at least if things stay the way they are, yet this distance has really nothing to do with social class and everything to do with ethnic cohesion and the natural tendency for people to feel most relaxed and emotionally centred when surrounded by people with the same attitudes and aspirations as themselves.

The differences in median family income between the White enclave of, say, Castlemaine and Dallas is a few dollars a week.  Both communities are cohesive, vibrant and stable, yet very different in terms of ethnic composition; leading us to conclude that people choosing to live in these intentional communities place a premium on things outside the realm of purely material prosperity. There are class divides, and Nationalists are well aware of this, but the Dallas fire emergency reveals nothing about the state of society beyond the effects of over 40 years of multiculturalism, in spite of Matt Holden’s desperate attempts to frame it as such.

We understand that our class antagonists operate through the projection of power, via their access to the media, the machinery of state, big business and academia but the author, Holden, being a part of that system is unlikely to ever see things clearly or to admit the truth even if he knew it.

CSF  FINALE
Festival of the Snowflake

WHITE IDENTITY, CHAUVINISM AND THE FUTILITY OF APPEASEMENT

WHITE IDENTITY, CHAUVINISM AND THE FUTILITY OF APPEASEMENT

If Nationalists have said it once, we have said it a thousand times, the concept socioeconomic class and the politics of class struggle are intrinsic to our ideology of Australianism.

The idea that Australia, in its post-modern clothing is somehow en-route to becoming a classless “level playing field”, with equality and prosperity for all is, like so much of the Globalist rhetoric, completely self-serving.

The old Aussie platitude: “She’ll be right mate”, once a sly dig at working class complacency and indifference is now being uttered with greater and greater frequency by the chattering classes as they contemplate their worst fears: a largely redundant and idle White working class.

There is a definitely forced tone in the voices of the narrators of the great 21st century Australian decline, where they once scoffed and mocked “Ockers” and “Bogans” who were regarded as too stupid to do anything but drink, root and vote Labor, they now nervously talk of White despair, the fracturing of our society and the soaring rates of addiction, madness and suicide.

depression
She’ll be right mate

Yet this affected concern for the well-being of those less fortunate is, again, narrowly focused and self-serving on the part of the provider; whereas being poor, White and desperate was once seen as a moral failing, it is now seen as akin to an illness to be treated and monitored.

The idea that Australia, in its post-modern clothing is somehow en-route to becoming a classless “level playing field”, with equality and prosperity for all is, like so much of the Globalist rhetoric, completely self-serving.

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

The delivery of social programs of this nature always comes with a heavy helping of middle-class chauvinism and saccharine condescension, we can observe there the intersection of bourgeois politics, with its cult of underdog victimhood and the new age therapeutical movement which seeks to pathologise all human behaviour which might tend to be counterproductive to the cosmopolitan ideal.

Nationalists could all find examples of this type of intervention in their own community, where they might see a neighbourhood group of well to do citizens with ties to mainstream globalist political parties running so-called “Men’s Sheds” or counselling the unemployed

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

The political activism of the do-gooders, be it the Greens, Labor or Liberal is a betrayal of the White workers and marginalised people so their therapeutic interventions into lower social classes are largely cynical and geared toward subduing any hostility toward the bourgeoisie and the elites beyond.

No Joe Blow, they say; you are angry because you are sick, not because you have been betrayed by those who rule you; you lash out at your loved ones because of your toxic masculinity, not out of frustration at your socioeconomic circumstances; here, take an antidepressant and join the boys on suicide watch at the community centre.

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

When you investigate these groups, who provide therapy to Whites under the euphemistically described outreach toward “Tradies” or “Sports Clubs” there is always, too, a strong relationship with self-styled Anti-Racist activists and people espousing similar anti-Nationalist or anti-Worker ideas.

On that basis, we cannot help wondering if, on one level, these programmes are a form of counter-radicalisation initiative calculated to head off any politicisation of the increasingly redundant White, blue collar male segment of society?

boofhead
Boofhead is of us, but he’s not really one of us

One contemporary clique who aggressively promotes this globalist oriented therapeutic movement is Mark Latham and his Outsiders; Latham provides the political credibility via his, admittedly encyclopaedic, insider knowledge of the mainstream players; Bettina Arndt is the court therapist, Daisy Cousens the winsome right-wing gadfly and the sundry other conspiracy theorists and down at heel media figures appearing on the show provide the illusion of a “debate’.

Latham and his co-presenters peddle the assimilationist line, the cult of male victimhood and men’s rights and the particularly counterproductive narrative of pervasive Anti-White Racism; all of which, unfortunately, seem to be having an effect upon working class consciousness.

The reality is that White working class unity is being subverted by the upper classes and their bourgeoisie via false victim narratives and the therapeutic movement, the whole point of their intervention is to head off any large scale political radicalisation of Whites.

The result of this line of thinking is a growing number of marginalised White people who are being conned into believing that seeking the approval of the upper classes and playing into their victim narratives with “Aussie Pride”, “White Genocide” and similar sentiments will lead to anything but further betrayal.

The irony here is that the groups and individuals falling into this trap are becoming stereotypically “racist”, as Leon Trotsky, who invented the concept, would have understood it; this, of course, sets them up for betrayal by their demagogues, racism of that sort demands walking a fine line, a balancing act which most civic Patriots are too uncoordinated to pull off.

Daisy cousens
Fetching sucker bait for disaffected White males

The reality is that White working class unity is being subverted by the upper classes and their bourgeoisie via false victim narratives and the therapeutic movement, the whole point of their intervention is to head off any large scale political radicalisation of Whites.

A radical White movement resting on the structure of socioeconomic class with the ideology of Australianism informing its politics is the only way forward for our working and marginalised people; currying favour with the elites by pushing the assimilationist line, or going cap in hand to the bourgeoisie for hand outs and treatment is undignified and unacceptable.

We are not victims of anything but the economic circumstances imposed upon us by globalist capitalism; our anger is righteous and justified as opposed to pathological and irrational; we are not sick, just sick and tired of being talked down to by people who have only their own interests in mind.

federation

 

MEANINGLESS STATISTICS FOR ROOTLESS COSMOPOLITANS

MEANINGLESS STATISTICS FOR ROOTLESS COSMOPOLITANS

 

The data from the extended cyber-espionage episode known as the 2016 Australian Census has just now been released to the public, to clamorous applause from anti-patriotic types and innumerate bourgeois aesthetes.

In spite of the typically skewed reporting of “tipping points” and “Asianisation”, which are just thinly veiled jabs at the White majority, Nationalist radicals could find in the document no case for extensive commentary above and beyond our normal calls for immigration to be pared back to a yearly intake of some tens of thousands of foreign technical experts, who might be needed to help re-industrialise our economy.

The census gives us a picture of an Australian population which has grown larger but which has remained mostly demographically static over the last five years; population increase sits at around 1.6%, which is about the average for the post-1945 era.

19511152_1747960515232910_6157674156421120830_n
The actual census figures regarding the place of birth of citizens contradict most everything the bourgeois press have said on the issue

The main anti-White talking point to emerge from the media in their reporting of the census is the revelation that some 51% of Australians were either born overseas or have a parent who was a migrant; this piece of fluff has been delivered as one of those “gotcha!” lines intended to denigrate and browbeat our people, but we are happy to shrug it off as the nonsense it clearly is.

This “tipping point” is no such thing, if one actually bothers to look at the figures they are little changed from the previous census and the increases in numbers of non-White ethnic groups are trivial in the scheme of things.

The census gives us a picture of an Australian population which has grown larger but which has remained mostly demographically static over the last five years; population increase sits at around 1.6%, which is about the average for the post-1945 era.

What this crowing over the 51%, which is mostly the residual effect of the postwar European immigration boom, shows us is the hatred the chattering classes have for the White majority; even if we at UNA, for tactical reasons, choose not to harp on idea of a White genocide, it is clearly uppermost in the minds of our class enemies.

There may be a tipping point in 40 or 50 years, however that eventuality is not certain, in an interconnected global economy the grass is always greener somewhere else and if this country is pillaged by capitalists and ruptured by civil strife, as many predict, we may yet see an exodus of our “fair weather friends” and their offspring.

brothels_jakarta_11
Brothels in a Jakarta slum: the nether reaches of Asian style societies

Yes, there are a lot of Chinese and Indians here and they make up the bulk of migrants, however a distinction must be made between immigrants and foreign residents; there are, most people would agree, far too many foreigners living in Australia and that it is this alien element who are causing massive distortions in the economic and social life of the country.

We are not defending non-White immigration here merely to make a point about the deleterious effects upon Australian society resulting from our being forced to host several million unassimilable foreigners; far from it, however the migrant, to a great extent is living under the same set of rules as we do, whereas the Asiatic foreigners live in what is effectively a parallel society.

It is this parallel society which best represents the process of Asianisation due to the fact that from the top to the bottom, from its garish high society to the sub-cultural level this nether world of so-called “students”, illegal workers, trafficked slaves, poor remittance men and corrupt nouveau riche Asians is, in microcosm, all which is wrong with globalist cosmopolitanism.

If we are to describe the true characteristics of Asianisation we would begin by pointing out that it is a pervasive and pernicious set of behaviours, or social norms, more so than a literal invasion which threatens to overwhelm us by sheer weight of numbers.

There may be a tipping point in 40 or 50 years, however that eventuality is not certain, in an interconnected global economy the grass is always greener somewhere else and if this country is pillaged by capitalists and ruptured by civil strife, as many predict, we may yet see an exodus of our “fair weather friends” and their offspring.

Asianisation is the normalisation of the corruption, nepotism, self-interest, cruelty and general indifference to the effects of one’s greed upon others which is endemic to all Asiatic societies; it is the mindset of political hacks and their Asian cronies, property developers, brothel keepers, human traffickers and drug dealers; a state of mind where the only god is money and personal gain.

This way of thinking is enabled by the enthusiastic endorsement of the worst kinds of Asian bandit capitalism by the elite political and business classes of Australia; these White sellouts and parliamentary pensioned traitors open the doors to the corruption, while the identity politics of the censorious, bourgeois “do-gooder” shields the wrongdoers from scrutiny or criticism by the working classes.

akwhawdengchina-20131219210408375222
Bob Hawke opened the door to Asianisation

Australian Nationalists are awake to this ugly process of Asianisation, the vertical Asian slums of Melbourne’s Docklands, or Ultimo in Sydney, are merely the most obvious symbols of the globalists social engineering; the downward shift in expectations, the cultural malaise, the crime the creeping poverty and disillusionment which pervades their society is the real rot eating away the heart of their world.

Asianisation is the normalisation of the corruption, nepotism, self-interest, cruelty and general indifference to the effects of one’s greed upon others which is endemic to all Asiatic societies; it is the mindset of political hacks and their Asian cronies, property developers, brothel keepers, human traffickers and drug dealers; a state of mind where the only god is money and personal gain.

If readers want to see the end point of the globalist program of Asianisation simply tour the back streets of Jakarta, Manila or Shanghai; there you will meet people who, by turns are neglected and oppressed by their ruling classes, who have no hope, who don’t even think about the future and whose children have no prospect of upward social mobility.

When the politicians and captains of industry of the 1980’s and 1990’s were pushing us closer to Asia, in particular, China, they must have done so in the full knowledge that it was always going to be a race to the bottom, a process of degrading and demoralising Australians so that they might gradually become Asianised, with an Asian mindset.

The Nationalists are, at present, the only radical group fighting this resurgent class war on behalf of our national group, the White working class and our marginalised people; we urge all patriotic Australians, be they radicalised or moderate, to act in solidarity with our struggle against cosmopolitanism, the money power and the Asianisation of our way of life.

Massage parlour
As above, so below, the Asianised sex industry, with all its attendant cruelty is thriving in Australian suburbs

 

THE BERNARDI BLACKSHIRT BEACH BLANKET BINGO

THE BERNARDI BLACKSHIRT BEACH BLANKET BINGO

If we here at UNA were addicted to games of chance rather than alliterated headlines we feel sure we would be able to clean up should anyone run a book on the future trajectory of conservative politics in this country.

While maintaining our customary passive-aggressive, give ‘em enough rope to hang themselves approach to the right-wing we are nevertheless prepared to speculate upon how the last embers of white shoe conservatism will be snuffed out.

The last man standing is Senator Cory Bernardi with his Australian Conservatives, which by all accounts is a growing movement and, as yet, untainted by scandal.

These conservatives seem to be the usual yawn-worthy formation of pearl clutching wowsers, po-faced killjoys and evangelical holy rollers intent on routing all the arse bandits, Commies and bludgers present in civil society; to repel, or moderate, these moral degenerates with good old “Judeo-Christian” values.

Caleb bond
Caleb Bond: The future of White youth?

Given the temperament and value systems of today’s Third World migrants we can imagine that this schtick will play well with Indian and Chinese Catholics, Korean Protestants and the savage, semi-heathen sects of the dark continent; high immigration is a dead weight upon  the rest of us but this uncritical audience may be the fillip that the Australian Conservatives need.

When we say that they are untainted by scandal we mean real juicy, Hanson or Dastyari level mischief; well so far so good as far as this, we hope, the final incarnation of old-school civic patriotism goes, but mischief of a different kind is inevitable

These conservatives seem to be the usual yawn-worthy formation of pearl clutching wowsers, po-faced killjoys and evangelical holy rollers intent on routing all the arse bandits, Commies and bludgers present in civil society; to repel, or moderate, these moral degenerates with good old “Judeo-Christian” values.

Yes, gentle reader, the spectre of Neo-Nazism haunts the conservatives.

At any minute their movement will be convulsed in collective outrage as, somewhere, the Manchurian Candidate programming of one of the many sideshow freaks likely embedded in their meetings will kick in and he will spring bolt upright screaming “Gas the Kikes!” just as the post-prandial tin of Quality Street is passed around.

Now we cannot predict exactly when such an outrage will occur, only that it will, an attempt by one of the LNP dirty tricks cadres is always on the cards and is easily predictable by those who know what they are looking at.

https-blueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.comuploadscardimage28005522487be77bfe44bbbe5db46dc7a57406
Get your conservative war bonnet while stocks last

Nor can we predict the exact form the fascist faux pas will take; we live in an age of advanced technology and instant communication, perhaps one of the state organisers will be gulled into appearing on an edgy Alt-Right web radio show?

Maybe the interloper will make it all the way to pre-selection before flipping his wig at the rostrum, calling for the death penalty for buggers and blaming the outburst on a mix-up in his medication?

At any minute their movement will be convulsed in collective outrage as, somewhere, the Manchurian Candidate programming of one of the many sideshow freaks likely embedded in their meetings will kick in and he will spring bolt upright screaming “Gas the Kikes!” just as the post-prandial tin of Quality Street is passed around.

Some of the other dramatis personae beloved of the sponsored counter-gang bosses are the “Racist with an Asian wife and children”, the “Redneck with undisclosed indigenous heritage” and the unassailable narrative figure of the “Islamophobe who loves Israel”.

Yes, what they lack in imagination the movement wreckers make up for in sheer dogged determination and the infinite amounts of abuse and invective they are able to tolerate before being cycled out of circulation and shelved for future projects.

The amazing thing is that there does not seem to be a lot of money in the venture for the sponsored interlopers and their handlers, which leads us to the conclusion that, perhaps, the wreckers are cultivated by astute, yet fanatical minions of the political class who can spot a pathological narcissist, or borderline personality case a mile off.

nedjpg-67c33c_1280w
Conservatives are usually only one doodly away from a meltdown

We have discussed this theory with our readers before, the fact is though that well-organised groups of any kind, but political groups, in particular, attract more than their fair share of people with anti-social personality disorders.

It is no wonder then that so many of the known political wreckers check all the boxes for these infirmities of the mind; many of them are loquacious, brash and even charming but beneath the thin facade of their adopted personae we can glimpse the howling void of emptiness at the core of all such people.

Nationalists are experienced at detecting and repelling sociopaths and serial pests, simply because we have historically been the prime targets of every manifestation of these dirty tricks campaigns, we sincerely doubt, though, that the type of person likely to be attracted to the Australian Conservatives, its office holders and principals will be so streetwise.

In any event, we hereby make the prediction that Bernardi’s outfit will be embroiled in one of these staged scandals and that it will likely be a watershed for his movement in that they will waste their resources putting out spot fires of “extremism” until the ultimate dissolution of their party and the re-absorption of its members into the LNP base.

Don’t ever go against the family Cory.

hanson bernardi
An ominous greeting

 

THE RICH GET RICHER, THE POOR GET THE PICTURE, THE BOMBS NEVER HIT YOU WHEN YOU’RE DOWN SO LOW

THE RICH GET RICHER, THE POOR GET THE PICTURE, THE BOMBS NEVER HIT YOU WHEN YOU’RE DOWN SO LOW

Readers would be well aware of the recent incident in Brighton, Victoria during which Australian police were caught up in a drama concerning a South American prostitute, a Chinese apartment building commissionaire and a Somalian terrorist.

We have chosen the wording of this first paragraph very carefully to place this event in its proper context; it must be said that the only Australians involved in this siege and shootout were, we suppose, the police officers who responded to the 000 calls.

So given that all the actual Australians swept up in the Brighton shootings are expected to recover and return to their duties we will herewith move on and, as is our mission, examine the responses to these events by real Australians and their interpretation according to Nationalist thinking.

The most obvious and stereotypical response from the chattering classes and their bourgeois commentariat are the hackneyed cries for “unity” and “social cohesion”; that is to say that nobody should say anything which might cause a spike in the normal level of distrust, nor do anything which might further inflame the now entrenched and deep-seated mutual hatred which simmers between Muslims and Australians.

la-fg-somalia-american-jihadis-20151208-001
Somalia, the land of the lost

Nationalists, as always, are advised to steer clear of Muslims and people of African and West Asian descent as far as possible; of course, it is impossible to completely avoid contact with such people but the best tactic for mitigation of exposure to their bad behaviour is separation.

The whole concept of social cohesion flies in the face of diversity dogma; apparently, diversity is our greatest strength, except in circumstances where the outcome actually matters; when results are expected we are urged to be one people and to speak with a single voice.

We have chosen the wording of this first paragraph very carefully to place this event in its proper context; it must be said that the only Australians involved in this siege and shootout were, we suppose, the police officers who responded to the 000 calls.

As we have explained in a previous article, unity in the face of diverse threats makes no sense, in fighting what amounts to an insurgency by de-assimilated fellow citizens in which the targets of violent extremism are, in the main, defenceless civilians a diverse range of responses is surely required.

There are some actions which sincerely patriotic Muslims cannot or will not take in this struggle, so too there are lines which White Nationalists and civic patriots cannot cross without being arrested for breaching the human rights of these criminals and their supporters; in fact the state does a pretty good job of nobbling any grass roots response to the community problem of Jihadist insurgency, so acting as one is out of the question anyway.

The call for unity then is really just an admonition to sit tight and not get involved when it is spoken by Daniel Andrews or Malcolm Turnbull and a trite example of virtue signalling, if not out-and-out cowardice by the bourgeoisie.

Smashed-avocado-v2-LGH-568ba110-4d9e-4023-a2bd-5ffd7528e72a-0-1400x919
Hipsters eating their smashed avocado now seem more likely terrorist targets than Bogans eating their fried chicken and chips

The problem with that approach and placing all our eggs in one basket by relying on the state to end the insurgency is that they have thus far proven themselves incapable and unwilling to rein in violent extremists or to perform any of the work necessary in interdiction of the known pathways to Jihadism: petty crime, drug use and family breakdown.

The core pathways to extremism listed above are the result of importing people who are bound to fail and turn upon their sponsors; it is impossible to maintain conservative family values and tribal structures in a society which dropped such norms over a thousand years ago. It is impossible for a migrant to make a positive contribution to society if he lacks the intelligence to master basic literacy and numeracy skills and it is impossible to draw wayward immigrant youth away from a life of crime in a situation where the entirety of popular media culture glorifies and encourages “gangster chic”.

The problem with that approach and placing all our eggs in one basket by relying on the state to end the insurgency is that they have thus far proven themselves incapable and unwilling to rein in violent extremists or to perform any of the work necessary in interdiction of the known pathways to Jihadism: petty crime, drug use and family breakdown.

In our so-called “knowledge economy”, the world envisioned by the globalist money power, the factors which delineate social class are less the ideas of race, religion or ethnicity and increasingly IQ and a person’s capacity to utilise what is between their ears, so to the informed observer widespread migrant dysfunction and failure was inevitable and predictable.

The 21st century Lumpenproletariat, of which many migrants along with many Whites are part, is therefore to all intents and purposes race-less in the eyes of the elites and their bourgeoisie; their intelligence quotient is what keeps them down and, sadly for revolutionaries, this growing class of people, the “have-nots”, have not the slightest inkling of class consciousness, nor even much insight into their own existence.

This is where middle-class virtue signalling over the plight of the “have-nots” becomes a vice like any other artificial coping mechanism. Publicly expressing White guilt and wearing the hair shirt of the social justice warrior in the face of the intractable problem of low Lumpenprole IQ is nowadays, for some people, as potent a feel-good measure as taking a swig of hard liquor or popping a prescription sedative.

Isis
If you are wondering where the Iraqi middle class went, these guys may be able to shed some light on the matter

The White middle class is shackled to the failure of its own system, the great cosmopolitan Ponzi scheme which was devised by the Baby Boomers to ensure that their class dominated for all time and which banked heavily upon White working class apathy or lack of political engagement

The question has been asked in recent days: was there an element of class war at play in the Brighton terrorist attack? Why did the Somali terrorist from seedy Roxburgh Park choose one of Melbourne’s most affluent suburbs as the location of his spree?

Buoyed by the successful integration of European refugees after the second world war the middle class and elected officials of those strata over-reached when they took upon themselves the job of diversifying the migrant intake to include Third World refugees. In 2017 the children of those baby-boomer, bourgeois do-gooders who are paying the price for their parents’ largesse and lack of foresight are lapsing into helpless self-indulgence; the physical intoxication of pills, booze, gambling and pick-up sexual encounters is bolstered by hollow virtue signalling, White guilt and ethno-masochism, vices all.

The question has been asked in recent days: was there an element of class war at play in the Brighton terrorist attack? Why did the Somali terrorist from seedy Roxburgh Park choose one of Melbourne’s most affluent suburbs as the location of his spree?

Not to place a wise head on the shoulders of this clearly intellectually sub-normal African criminal, but the symbolism was not missed by Nationalist radicals and as the only political tendency still prosecuting the class war the imagery and setting of Yacqub Khayre’s martyrdom operation are ours for the taking.

Islam coburg
Social cohesion in action: Islamist radicals teamed up with Antifa in Coburg, May 2016

 

ON MUSLIM TERRORISM AND BEING RIGHT FOR THE WRONG REASONS

ON MUSLIM TERRORISM AND BEING RIGHT FOR THE WRONG REASONS

As the blood of innocent civilians is washed away from yet another, vibrant cosmopolitan British town centre the now ritualised supplication before Muslims, the offering of meaningless platitudes and the excuse making begins.

Australian Nationalists need not concern themselves with any immediate ramifications for our people in these matters, we understand that these events are remote and unconnected to our lives and we need not be unduly alarmed, nor behave any differently than usual.

The response by Australian politicians to the Borough Market atrocity in London has followed the same template as their response to every other act of barbarism perpetrated upon civilised people by Muslims in the name of their religion.

Distilling the rhetoric of Malcolm Turnbull, Bill Shorten, Julie Bishop and Penny Wong we are left with the basic ideas that terrorists hate democracy and freedom, that they seek to divide multicultural communities, that they win if we show disunity or turn away from globalist, cosmopolitan ideas. This, of course, is patent nonsense, the Islamists of ISIS, Al Qaeda and their non-violent support groups in our country strive to unite all people in submission to their god, Allah.

lebos housos
If the media put as much effort into lampooning Jihadists as they do Lebos and Bogans, they might make a genuine difference

A harmonious, homogenous society in which people see themselves as having shared interests and values would seem to render that goal more easily achievable since, at some imaginary tipping point at which Islamists would take over the reins of state there would need to be a collective surrender or acceptance of terms by the general population.

Australia, we might guess, may have been spared the worst excesses of the Jihadis precisely because, while Muslims are integrated into our society they are not assimilated to the degree that they are in the U.K or Europe; that is to say that they are highly visible in their ethnic subcultures as they go about, living their lives among us.

The response by Australian politicians to the Borough Market atrocity in London has followed the same template as their response to every other act of barbarism perpetrated upon civilised people by Muslims in the name of their religion.

The profile of the modern Jihadist is routinely that of the well integrated, second or third generation non-White who, at some stage has been de-integrated from society through a life of crime or drug use, only to re-emerge as a radical Islamic convert.

So the threat clearly comes, to a greater degree, from the assimilated insider turned violent insurgent against his hometown and the people with whom he has the most in common, rather than the alien or the subversive immigrant.

cuba-guantanamo-10th-anniversary
Be careful what you wish for because you might get it

Could we ask if it is familiarity with cosmopolitanism which breeds contempt in the de-integrated, then radicalised Muslims?

After all, even if we were to accept the spurious claims of cowards and apologists for terrorism that it is because “we invade their countries” that the mind of the radical convert goes rotten, then is it not irrefutably the case that those adventures into the Mid-East and West Asia are done in the name of pluralism, democracy, human rights and cosmopolitan values?

Of course, to ask those questions in the Australia of 2017 is to run a gauntlet; a jail term is possible if the wrong person hears you pose a benign head scratcher such as: “Why are young, integrated people turning from cosmopolitanism, the material comforts of consumerism and multiculturalism to throw their lives away in Jihad against their neighbours?”

So the threat clearly comes, to a greater degree, from the assimilated insider turned violent insurgent against his hometown and the people with whom he has the most in common, rather than the alien or the subversive immigrant.

The question of what is to be done should be obvious to any political dissident, be they Nationalist, Civic Patriot or of the dwindling and moribund ranks of the real Left; it isn’t difficult, we need only employ the tactics against radical Islamists which are used against us: public ridicule, slander, relentless online stalking by vigilantes and co-opting of the Jihadist message by counter gangs.

The most effective tools in crippling problematic social movements like Jihadist Islam are the creation of a climate of fear, distrust and paranoia within the groups and the provocation by outsiders of infighting between factions of the movement.

UPF bendigo
The tactics used to break the civic patriot movement should logically also work on Jihadists

Whenever an outrage, such as Manchester or Nice occurs the apologists and enablers of terrorism cry loud and long over the fear of a violent “backlash” against Muslims by unsavoury elements of the “far-right” and so forth.

The fact that this backlash, this much-hyped revolt against sanity and decency never materialises is due to the reality that openly Islamophobic groups are relentlessly hounded by vigilantes and riven with internecine conflict due to the paranoia and distrust fomented by their tormentors.

We know this tactic is effective and the larger and more publicly active the group grows the more easily it is penetrated, fractured and ultimately dispersed by outside agents. So, to pose another twee, rhetorical question: why are counter-radicals forbidden to use these tactics and why are activists who do confront radical Muslims head on jailed or persecuted?

The fact that this backlash, this much-hyped revolt against sanity and decency never materialises is due to the reality that openly Islamophobic groups are relentlessly hounded by vigilantes and riven with internecine conflict due to the paranoia and distrust fomented by their tormentors.

The process of Islamic radicalisation is probably misunderstood and definitely misrepresented by Australian and other Anglosphere politicians; the elected officials and social commentators seek to make it fit their worldview, rather than take the Jihadists seriously.

U.K prime minister Theresa May, in her press conference concerning the Borough Markets attacks proposed a crackdown of the online safe spaces available to Jihadists, from whence they spread their dangerous ideology and, presumably sour the minds of impressionable youngsters.

isis one finger
There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his prophet…not a complex philosophy by any means

In the first place, there is no separate Jihadist ideology, only propaganda pieces and discussions of the virtues of a pious life; their only doctrine is the Koran. Secondly, the meaning of “safe space” refers a set of restrictions or a code of conduct put in place to protect those inside such a system from any criticism or censure which might alarm or distress them; so Theresa May is right, but for the wrong reason.

It is true that Jihadists are afforded safe spaces online but these exist as a result of codes of conduct enforced by the social media companies which protect all Muslims and all expressions of Islam from criticism or harassment by counter-Islamist agents.

Nationalists and all true dissidents know that the internet is not a safe place to plot or plan anything illegal or that which might arouse suspicion from the authorities; anyone who would do so is either not serious about their plans or so inept and deranged that their arrest would be inevitable. So too we realise from years of experience that the internet is useless in terms of recruiting and radicalising people, no matter what your political leaning or the goal of your activism; radicalisation must take place in person and is achieved through camaraderie and the bonds formed in a shared struggle.

It is true that Jihadists are afforded safe spaces online but these exist as a result of codes of conduct enforced by the social media companies which protect all Muslims and all expressions of Islam from criticism or harassment by counter-Islamist agents.

theresea may
Theresa May has been as much a part of the problem as she has the solution

 

The mainstream image of the Islamic radical casts him as an almost supernatural being, a cartoonish construct of film and television scripts who is one part technical wizard and two parts Third World sage. We suspect that the chattering classes, through their silly Orientalist mindset, really see the Jihadist, and non-Whites in general as superior beings capable of reaching out through cyberspace to twist the minds of their followers.

The truth is more mundane, the terrorist cells are formed largely by friends, cousins and brothers, the young are simply given a Koran and shown brotherly love; given mentoring, shelter and a purpose in life greater than anything offered by cosmopolitan consumerism; then behold, radicals are born.

So no, the measures proposed by the heads of state and their bureaus will not work, calls for unity, suppression of dissidents and state-run de-radicalisation programs will keep failing. We have discussed in this article the counter-radicalisation tactics which are proven to work, what’s more, they are a lot cheaper, more immediately effective, and less violent than kicking down the doors of council flats searching for terror cells or bombing Helmand and Raqqa into dust.

Amrosi_648x365_2289540338-hero
Enough should have been enough in 2003

 

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

Enthusiastically waiting to see your enemy’s name appear in the obituary is, perhaps, something a Seinfeld episode should have tackled. But in absence of a half-hour sitcom mocking the ethics of such a scene comes our rather blunt desire to see in big, beautiful text the confirmation of conservatism’s departure from this world for good.

And it would be a mercy. The ideological vagrant of the modern era is in agony; a shadow of its former self that, in losing its mental faculties gave us the playbook for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation; in losing control of its bowels gave us the Party for Freedom to clean up; and in its jittered ramblings at night gave us the Patriot’s Poet to, well, laugh at. And why wouldn’t we laugh?

Who would have thought that acquiring oriental wives, rampant alcoholism and aimlessly flying the Star of David would in any way forms the face of modern conservatism – that safeguard of traditionalism? In a way that says more about the progressive left if this is the standard an acceptable alternative is held to, but nonetheless, we diagnose cancer as cancer when we see it.

As befitting of an extended life, however, conservatism is a broad grouping of ideas and practices that through the centuries melded into particular localities and built up its own organic character.

Before the Tories of the U.K. and the Republicans of the US succumbed to the dreariness of the modern world and became the stock-standard “centre-right” parties – which plague our present-day political institutions with equal parts boredom and treason – there was, if only from a historical standpoint, more character and life prevalent in the internal workings of the party and its duties within the country.

Such a thing can be admitted without the analysing of the good or ill that became of these entities. Suffice to say that compared to its modern manifestation there was something that, from our perspective, draws less ire than the present set against the historic backdrop of actual traditionalism holding ground.

Though conservatism is a term seldom used as the main grouping of its constituent factions, it is the college where civic nationalists, patriots and other assorted fruit loops graduated from even though they try to paint themselves in a different light. As the main tributary, it is conservatism, particularly in regards to combatting the progressive left over the prominent issue of Islam and the extreme end of identity politics, that guides the more hard-line, right-wing groups.

By our standards, they are in their formulation reactionary without the reaction. The scattering of conservatism in Australia is less a developed ideology but rather pub-banter that became a little too rowdy.

Their analysis of a world gone awry fuelled their febrile imagination. Islam, the left, and the agreement that the Liberals had betrayed the core tenets of conservatism amounted to a call to arms of an invigorated force to take to the streets. Through its brief public rallies and continued online presence, it revealed to be inept at forming any manner of lasting policy that actually worked for the best interests of this country. Its tenure among our acceptance went from weak to its now non-existent status.

So when will it die?

The ideas of man are invested with his own similarity, and an idea’s death follows a metaphysical equivalent of the biological process whereby the cessation of its vital functions leads to its absolute end.

The conservative has sealed his own fate because while he sees the nation as the vital organ he refuses, to his fatal detriment, to recognise the nation as the culmination of race and culture; not cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism and every perversion betwixt which he defends and fruitlessly tries to tame in order to avoid the baneful accusation of racism.

It is ironical that conservatives ultimately laud the version of our nation that was designed by their apparent enemies on the left. For what else is the presentation of the 21st century, multicultural Australia but the great fantasy of progressives as the first stage of removing the nation state and its racial identity?

Indeed its days are numbered but there are no doubts conservatism’s last moments will be messy, and there’s no telling what yet-to-be-revealed horrors will spew forth from its ideological orifices in a last attempt to show there’s life in it.

In these times it won’t be bothered to keep up the façade there’s any real difference between itself and the left, but will instead – as we have seen – go after the force that exposed and systemically broke down its lies: Nationalism. It is Nationalism which remains the inextinguishable light of reason.

Its pillars are unchanging. Its leaders – both here and abroad in friendly movements – are some of the most besmirched figures in existence and yet remain defiant to their ideals.

As the leaders of fake conservatism rot, the former adherents to such leeches will atone for their misguidance by embracing Nationalism, in fact, they will realise it was what they were after all along: a place to call home among their own people.

God willing, here is another nail in the coffin of the unconvinced as to why our expedient wish for the demise of conservatism and its inbred children is not morbid gossip, nor a critique for the sake of a critique, nor a selfish ruse on our behalf, but a necessity on which the termination of this foul parasite can allow our own ideals to truly flourish; where those ideals are that of the nationhood of Australia: an Australia that lives up to its historic creation as a nation built by the White man and for the sake of the White man.

oie_qPhWNDomOMRR