KOOYONG’S CHICKENS ARE COMING HOME TO ROOST

KOOYONG’S CHICKENS ARE COMING HOME TO ROOST

Readers of this blog will have, no doubt, been amused to read of yet another group of “Teens” trashing a short-term rental property, this time in leafy, well-heeled Hawthorn.

In Hastings Rd this past weekend we saw the well-tested party plan of bogus identification being used by African youths to book an Airbnb rental, subsequent heavy drinking and drug use, then the customary early morning explosion of ad-hoc alterations to the decor.

This time, however, there were significant escalations in violence as neighbours, fearing for the safety of their properties and their very lives armed themselves with makeshift weapons and attempted to mount a defence; two elderly White bystanders were assaulted with one old gent admitted to hospital after being set upon by a gang of African females.

The police, as usual, waited until the fracas had burned itself out before venturing into the neighbourhood, no arrests were made on the night, however, we understand a series of raids have since been carried out and at least one boy has been charged.

riot
Victoria Police facing off against African rioters in 2017, the youths, we are told, won the battle of Kensington

This approach, though cold comfort to the embattled citizens, does make a certain amount of sense from a tactical point of view; the cops know who these Sudanese delinquents are, it is probably just easier to pick them off one by one, roust them out of bed at home rather than get crowned by a house brick trying to subdue fifty drunks at once.

The federal seat of Kooyong, in which Hawthorn is situated is a safe Liberal seat, once held by the likes of Sir Robert Menzies and Andrew Peacock the current sitting member is the minister for environment and energy Josh Frydenberg.

 Now, before we go all gushy over this latest outrage and lest we further entrench the perception that Nationalists are nothing but heartless pragmatists we will profess that we do care about the White residents affected by this incident simply because they are our kin, however, the inevitable considerations of class consciousness and voter behaviour in bourgeois suburbs must take precedence.

The federal seat of Kooyong, in which Hawthorn is situated is a safe Liberal seat, once held by the likes of Sir Robert Menzies and Andrew Peacock the current sitting member is the minister for environment and energy Josh Frydenberg.

We can safely say that the residents of Hawthorn, who habitually vote for the Liberals, must therefore be firmly in favour of globalism, high immigration, kowtowing to Beijing and the dissolution of our once prosperous and largely homogenous society into an Asian style free for all, where workers are pitted against one another and only investors, speculators and crooks can even afford to live in an area like Hastings Rd.

dutch migrants
Menzies is the real father of multiculturalism, though he had the sense to invite the right type of migrants, such as these Dutch people arriving in 1954

Time and again we have heard dissident voices exclaim that if only the negative effects of Third World immigration were visited upon the blue ribbon suburbs then the middle-class voters residing within could be shocked into action, that some of them could be swayed to the side of Nationalism and the workers struggle.

Well here is their reality check, globalisation writ large on the streets of Hawthorn: an African mob destroying a Chinese owned rental property hired out through an American website underwritten by a predatory coalition of hedge funds and Silicon Valley speculators.

Time and again we have heard dissident voices exclaim that if only the negative effects of Third World immigration were visited upon the blue ribbon suburbs then the middle class voters residing within could be shocked into action, that some of them could be swayed to the side of Nationalism and the workers struggle.

Assuming these out of control Sudanese parties can be taken at face value and are not part of some insurance scam by the Chinese owners then there is a double irony here in that we see more and more of the children of these middle-class suburbanites being locked out of the owning a house or even renting in their own suburb, due in large part to distortions in the market caused by foreign buyers and companies such as Airbnb.

peacock
Former member for Kooyong Andrew Peacock now resides in the U.S.A, far away from the effects of his party’s disastrous immigration policies.

Our question to the people in the seat of Kooyong, those White families who have held property there since the days of Bob Menzies would be: “When are you going to stand up for the future of your children?”

The inner Eastern suburbs of Melbourne are dotted with blocks of flats built over the past 80 years; ranging from stately low-rise Art Deco buildings to simple 1970’s brick veneer boxes, in fact 20 years ago it used to be a relatively cheap area to rent a flat, local kids could move out of home, get onto their feet and then buy in to the area themselves.

No more, the housing crisis has hit the middle class particularly hard as overseas buyers from Asia and opportunistic property tycoons have inflated the prices to the point that only the most wealthy people can afford to own a house in Hawthorn, Camberwell or Surrey Hills.

Our question to the people in the seat of Kooyong, those White families who have held property there since the days of Bob Menzies would be: “When are you going to stand up for the future of your children?”

So the Liberal die-hards of Kooyong either need to adjust to the new globalist reality, the incursions of troublesome migrant gangs and Asian profiteers drawn by the newly created and foreign driven short-term rental scene; they can get used to the noise, the loss of amenity and the hardships foisted upon their kids, or they can opt for change and take political action to arrest the decline of their neighbourhoods.

Nationalists have the program to stop the rot, but if Hawthorn’s good folk are not willing to accept a radical solution then at least they will still have their adult sons at home to wield the Gray Nicolls as Ice addled Negroes come over the back fence and the cops steadfastly ignore their triple zero calls for assistance.

house trashed
This ugly villa is what three million bucks buys you in Hawthorn, gang tags courtesy of Airbnb

PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

In the early months of this blog, we promised our readers that we would make an effort to examine the current affairs of the day in a sort of semi-frequent “news wrap”.

Snowed under as we have been, with the antics of our enemies on the far-right, sundry nutcases, cyber-pests and square-eyed Trolls occupying bulk column inches of our output, we feel obliged to give our followers a break from this bombast and have a dig at the big doings in the mainstream White world.

Hipster Melbourne was rocked this week by the death of one of its promising young scions, 22-year-old Eurydice Dixon met her end in middle-class Parkville, raped and left for dead by a total stranger, later revealed to be one Jaymes Todd, 19, of Broadmeadows.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-around good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

tribute
Tributes laid in Princes Park Melbourne for murdered artist Eurydice Dixon.

Eurydice’s talents on stage may have been questionable but being violated and dumped, lifeless, on a soccer pitch in the middle of the night by a marauding, outer suburban sex predator is a sad end for one of our own, who by all accounts did no harm in her short life.

The response to her death by the chattering classes was predictable, even though murders of this kind run at about five a year in Victoria, the usual suspects led by the lamentable premier Daniel Andrews, managed to blow the killing way out of proportion as a sop to their inner city, Greenbelt voting public.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-round good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

This insight clearly went over the heads of the ostentatiously ignorant members of the commentariat; re-animated after the long hiatus between stranger murders, Feminists and their fellow travellers have energised their “War On Women” narrative and began wailing that the problem is “Toxic Masculinity”.

We can imagine these harridans on the edge of their seats as the news of the murder broke, waiting, their claws reflexively drawing in and out of their sheaths in anticipation of the inevitable verbal misstep by Police or public officials, they were not disappointed.

ted-bundy---betrayal
American serial killer and rapist Ted Bundy would strike when women had their guard down, in supposedly “safe” areas.

The Police, who had all the data at their fingertips regarding crimes in the area surrounding the park where Eurydice was killed, and fearing in light of other attacks on women in Parkville, that there may have been a serial offender on the loose made the fatal mistake of urging women to take greater responsibility for their own safety.

From there it was on for young and old, the tired old trope “teach men not to rape” made an early and frequent appearance as did “women’s right to feel safe”, no matter the level of risk they are prepared to take in exercising their rights.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

If we take the three most recent and high-profile cases of stranger murder in Melbourne, those of Jill Meagher, Masa Vukotic and Euryidice Dixon one of these patterns appears, a pattern which is evident in many such crimes across the Anglosphere and across a time span of almost fifty years.

Misogynist criminals, rapists and killers are drawn to locations and situations in which women feel comfortable enough to let their guard down, or are otherwise vulnerable; this mode of operation is akin to that of any other predator in nature, which will attack weak and isolated members of a prey herd, or strike when the animals are at a waterhole.

bayley
Adrian Bayley, his sinister sexual urges would boil over into blind rage against women, he is the real face of misogyny.

Time and time again we have been presented with testimony from woman hating brutes and serial killers detailing their thought process in selecting victims; thinking people such as ourselves are, or ought to be, au fait with the tricks employed by dangerous men.

The more intelligent and devious predators, such as Ted Bundy and Ed Kemper, specifically chose university campuses as their hunting grounds or students as their victims based on the premise that women feel safe in such environments, so whatever ruse the killer might employ would be more likely taken in good faith by the victim.

A great deal of work has been done by the medical professions and law enforcement, both here and abroad, on understanding the way violent men think so as to be better able to predict and mitigate against their actions in the interest of public safety.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

To a great extent the routine activities of potential victims, the environments in which they move and even urban planning must be considered when trying to get into the minds of predators; this is at odds with premier Andrews’ exhortation for women to do whatever they want, whenever they want and for them to trust that putting a guilt trip on men as a group will be enough to deter potential rapists and killers.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

masa-and-killer
Masa Vukotic was chosen at random to be murdered by Sean Price, does he look like the sort of bloke who could be shamed into changing his ways?

Sean Price, the deranged killer of young Masa Vukotic in Doncaster in 2015 travelled all the way across Melbourne to a “safe” suburb and, in order to carry out his plan to blitz and kill a female, he lay in wait in bushes for a pretty “middle class” girl to pass on a popular walking track.

Adrian Bayley, the serial rapist and murderer of Jill Meagher prowled areas where young women were accessible and vulnerable, the backpacker havens and red light zones of St Kilda and the tangled, 19th-century streetscape of Brunswick, which is rich with female pedestrians but riddled with dark laneways and alcoves.

Society in general and women in particular need protection from dangerous men, as we have seen often enough, a single man in his wrath can destroy a whole community; what is needed however is a return to sensible education on matters of personal safety and codes of conduct in which everyone, women included, play their part in mitigating the threat of violence.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

The bare fact is that, contrary to the Feminist dogma, predatory males are not formed by society, nor is their behaviour an aspect of masculinity; such men are freaks and deviants and they almost always live their lives largely apart from normal men, who would most likely pick up on the fact that something is wrong with them.

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

The natural reaction by good men toward abusers of women and girls is to form a posse, hunt the offender down and mete out justice before the savage wreaks even more havoc upon the community, though in modern times we delegate this duty to the state which employs its hired gunmen, the police.

truro
The Truro killers were homosexuals, freaks and total social outcasts who got their kicks hurting women, nobody in the “straight” world had any time for them.

The police in the Euryidice Dixon case merely gave out the same advice we would expect a citizen posse to give the women they rally to protect: until this threat to your safety passes stay alert sisters, watch your backs, don’t take unnecessary risks and do not hesitate to call for help if you feel that something is not right in your surroundings.

So perhaps walking through the park alone late at night, in your “safe” suburb, which is almost certainly a magnet for sexual predators, with your headphones on and wearing high heels is actually making the jobs of those sworn to protect you more difficult?

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

In the end, however, what Feminists such as the Premier of Victoria say in public and what they do in private are likely two different things; we can credit the childless humanities department harpies and their virginal undergraduate acolytes with a lack of sense and a true belief in bullshit such as “toxic masculinity”, but most people do not think the way they do.

Daniel and Catherine Andrews are loving and responsible parents, just like the rest of us, so we highly doubt that they’re going to fill their own daughter’s head with nonsense and send her into harms way under the misapprehension that no matter the risks she takes if she is unfortunate enough to become a victim then society is wholly to blame.

andrews family
Victorian Premier Danny Andrews puts his son in a chokehold just in case he grows up to be a predator

ANZAC DAY – A REASON TO WHINGE FOR SOME AND AN EXCUSE FOR A PISS-UP TO OTHERS

ANZAC DAY – A REASON TO WHINGE FOR SOME AND AN EXCUSE FOR A PISS-UP TO OTHERS

We are not sure, and we were never actually there ourselves, but we’re fairly certain that the poor Anzacs waiting to be shredded piecemeal by Turk artillery while landing at Anzac Cove in the twilight of the 25th of April, 1915, weren’t sucking on tinnies of VB.

Thus, this tradition of getting pissed at six in the am on this period of national commemoration has more than a hint of Melbourne Cup Day about it. Nonetheless, those who made it back from that disastrous landing courtesy of the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, were no doubt in need of strong drink for the rest of their lives.

Anzac Day has been used as a pawn in the culture wars by those on the bourgeois liberal left fond of attacking national-spirited notches on the calendar, and by the government, marching in step with the internationalist agenda.

This year the whole parade has turned limp-wristed by inexplicably making it about women. Next year it might about gays or Rohingya refugees, but this year women are to march up the front while those regrettable specimens of Australian manhood must follow in their saintly shadow with heads bowed and any signifiers of masculinity kept out of sight. We’re grateful for the nurses that served, mind you, but we’ll be crocked if we’ll concede the entire Anzac Day over to a feminist narrative just because the army has turned so PC you could plug it in and surf the internet. Only recently they were trying to fish out servicemen who weren’t supporters of homosexual marriage, and now they want to ban ‘death symbols’ from being displayed on military hardware, despite the fact a smiley face stencilled on the side of a tank would seem way more jarring.

The majority of women who join the army can’t even make it through basic training but they expect us to cop this?

As Nationalists, we acknowledge the spirit of Anzac Day and defend it staunchly from those who would desecrate this National holiday with their identity politics. But we will not allow the globalist government, whoever they are to dictate its meaning to us. For they already try and have us believe that Australia Day is all about celebrating everything non-Australian. Likewise, they use Anzac Day to promote a false spirit of ‘service’ to foreign powers, to die for conflicts far removed from the interests of Australia.

Anzac Day has been used as a pawn in the culture wars by those on the bourgeois liberal left fond of attacking national-spirited notches on the calendar, and by the government, marching in step with the internationalist agenda.

Over a century has passed since the landing at Anzac Cove, a conflict between European empires triggered when an Austrian Archduke was shot by a Bosnian Serb and England got involved because Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia and Germany marched into Belgium threatening the Frogs. It was all riveting stuff and fairly typical of Europe up to that point in history.

Australians had no business in that war, but we were drawn in using the patriotic propaganda of Empire and a genuine sense of duty. In fact, the nation threw itself into the cause with gusto and the average bloke viewed it as an adventure, at a time when ideals were sharpened by romanticism and the national identity was still shackled to the concept of colony and motherland. Also, as with nearly all wars, there was the mistaken belief that it would all be over by Christmas. But it soon became clear this was no Boys’ Own adventure but a massacre. At that time, Australia was a paltry population of five million. Nearly five-hundred thousand enlisted with a loss of 60,000 and 156,000 wounded or taken prisoner.

71-gallipoliposter

From fervent allies of mother England, the spirit soured. As men were minced up on the battlefields of France etcetera England put pressure on Australians, now more reluctant to join the conflict, to introduce conscription. A plebiscite on the issue was twice defeated and resulted in queer fish Billy Hughes being turfed out of the Labor party.

Australia was not a paradise following the end of WW1. Those men who returned were broken physically and mentally and many of them turned to alcohol and crime. Indeed, during this period the rate of crime trebled. The social impact was monstrous as the pain of the generation that fought was passed onto their sons who were in turn born into trauma.

Anzac Day is, in reality, about acknowledging the sacrifices of Australians in all different foreign conflicts, from WW1 to Afghanistan, and if the globalists have their way, we’ll soon be serving an evil alliance as it aims to tear apart Syria and install an Israeli puppet as head of state. For this has been the sad fact of all these ‘sacrifices’ and all this service – with the exception of what was derisively called our ‘chocolate soldiers’, who were, in fact, our Kokoda heroes, we fought the one war in which our nation was truly endangered; the war against Japan.

The majority of women who join the army can’t even make it through basic training but they expect us to cop this?

This fact of the glorified military history seems to overlook our Kokoda heroes in favour of those who have ‘served’ globalist adventures.

Australia had no business shooting at the Boers, or backing England in suppressing the Boxer Rebellion or fighting in Korea, or Vietnam, or Afghanistan and so on. We did so because we’re part of a global gang whose interests our sons’ blood is spilt is never ours.

The meaning of Anzac Day, to Nationalists, is, therefore, a sober meditation on the idea of an Australia independent from being forced to sacrifice our own for the goals of overseas powers, or by “serving” in an auxiliary capacity a superpower protector.

As this author types these words, the sound of young people partying fills the cool midnight air. They are loud, and they are clearly not in a sombre, reflective mood. Earlier he passed a nightclub which was unusually busy with a queue of White Australian youth stretching down the street from the bollards and rope at the doors where they had to show ID to bouncers so they can get inside and join a debauched bash with DJs and scantily clad girls.

To them, Anzac Day is a day off – a day to get wrecked. To others, who’ll be awake for the service, they fly the Aussie flag because that’s what they’re supposed to do, just like at Christmas when they’re expected to put up a tree and decorate it with tinsel. They would be offended at Nationalist suggestions that there is a falsehood to the mainstream narrative of Anzac Day, as they watch the prescribed parade, hit the early opening bars and get next to anyone who looks like a legitimate serviceman so they can exaggerate whatever military credentials or legacy they feel they can boast, play two-up, and basically adopt what they estimate is a patriotic mind-frame.

This fact of the glorified military history seems to overlook our Kokoda heroes in favour of those who have ‘served’ globalist adventures.

Attending a dawn service doesn’t make you a greater patriot than one who stays home and reads a little of the true cost of that war. It does not make you less of a Nationalist to join in either, that’s not what we’re saying. Our message is simply that the spirit of Anzac, enveloping as it does myths of heroism, mateship, and honour, qualities presumed to be in the national character, should also question our endless service to conflicts which are none of our affair, not in our national interest, and to which in the case of the Middle East and Vietnam the whole basis was morally flawed.

Once we get through that we can travel to the root of the idea of an independent Australia, and then, when we’ve found that we can rejoice in finally coming to recognise we are Australians, and not just part of a globalist franchise of multi-racial, multiculturalists whose blood is shed in the pursuance of the wealth of and the accretion of land and resources for a cabal of ugly bankers, industrialists, warmongers and Zionists.

4B8B6A6600000578-5655153-image-a-41_1524665479011.jpg
Cup day or Anzac day? Actually, believe it or not, it’s Anzac Day

 

PANIC, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND THE EROSION OF TRUST IN AUTHORITY

PANIC, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND THE EROSION OF TRUST IN AUTHORITY

Over the past few years, the medium of podcasting has really come into its own; we are all now able to access quality programmes, with high production values on a myriad of subjects; the technology to record a professional sounding show has now become so cheap that anyone with an idea is now able to broadcast.

One of the more popular genres is the true crime documentary, with high profile series such as Sword And Scale, Casefile and Criminal gaining a wide audience and commercial sponsorship for their often confronting exposé style presentations of the most shocking murders and sex crimes from across the English speaking world.

A recent podcast, Atlanta Monster, examines in depth the case of Wayne Williams and the Atlanta child murders; we will not go too deeply into the details of the case on this blog, however, the writers and researchers of this series have done an excellent job of describing the fear and paranoia which gripped the city in the late 1970’s.

Between 1979 and 1981 it is alleged that a lone serial killer murdered as many as 28 Negro children, teenagers and adults, slipping in and out of the housing projects and inner-city ghettoes to abduct people then dumping his victims in semi-rural areas, often in the Chattahoochee River.

photos.medleyphoto.2373148
Wayne Williams (centre) was convicted of killing two men and is suspected of murdering as many as 26 other Black men and boys

Black music promoter and Atlanta native Wayne Williams, 23, was ultimately convicted of the murders of two of the adult victims and is presumed to be responsible for all the crimes in the series, though there is reasonable doubt over his guilt in those matters and skepticism even among the families of the 26 other victims as to Williams’ culpability in the death of their loved ones.

What is interesting to us, however, is the effect that this wave of brutality had upon a multiracial society and the extremely negative impacts of rumour, race-baiting and politically correct disinformation on the part of civic and community authority figures.

The rumours of a White plot to exterminate black youth persist to this day, this is in spite of the conviction of Williams and even though credible testimony implicating a gang of black homosexuals in the abuse and possible abductions of many of the dead boys has come to light, the passage of 40 years has also done little to restore the faith of Black Atlantans in their Police and municipal officials.

The disappearances of so many Black youngsters naturally spurred race hucksters and troublemakers into action, rumours of Ku Klux Klan terrorism began to take hold, which set the nerves of White citizens and city authorities on edge; the city seemed to be edging toward widespread rioting of the sort seen in Detroit and Chicago only a decade earlier.

Despite the expert opinion of both local Police and FBI behavioural analysts that the killer was almost certainly a black man the rumours and paranoia took hold, with community leaders and officials unable to dissuade some from propagating the view that the murders were a racist plot; the damage was done and mishandling of some aspects of the case by law enforcement led to a breakdown in trust between citizens and the Police.

The rumours of a White plot to exterminate black youth persist to this day, this is in spite of the conviction of Williams and even though credible testimony implicating a gang of black homosexuals in the abuse and possible abductions of many of the dead boys has come to light, the passage of 40 years has also done little to restore the faith of black Atlantans in their Police and municipal officials.

Screen Shot 2018-02-25 at 9.19.56 pm
Rumours of KKK involvement in The Bowen Homes Daycare disaster in 1980 further eroded race relations in Atlanta

One striking example of the effect that this breakdown in trust had was the response to another tragic event in 1980 at the height of the child murders panic: the Bowen Homes Daycare Centre explosion, in which a poorly maintained, gas fired boiler exploded, killing five Black children and two adults.

Bystanders and race hustling community leaders immediately jumped to the conclusion that the explosion had been the result of a KKK terrorist bomb and an escalation of the rumoured racist war on black boys, by this stage relations between the Negro community and authorities were so strained that many in the crowd could not be reasoned with and a riot was narrowly avoided.

The Indian media went berserk with allegations of a racist motive behind the attacks, egged on by Australia’s self-hating White press corps the situation began to spiral out of control, with ALP linked race baiters and ethnic community stooges agreeing, without evidence, that the violence against Indians was a White problem.

We use these points as an illustration of what can happen when a government and law enforcement authorities mishandle a crisis and the dire results upon social cohesion of equivocation, or deliberate misinformation by officials and offer a warning regarding the present situation in Australia.

Casting our minds back to 2009 we recall the Indian immigrant crisis in which a fairly large number of students, workers or migrants from the sub-continent were mugged, seriously assaulted and, in at least three cases, stabbed to death during robberies.

Indian rally
Indians rally in Melbourne, rumours of racist attacks by Whites fuelled the hysteria

The Indian media went berserk with allegations of a racist motive behind the attacks, egged on by Australia’s self-hating White press corps the situation began to spiral out of control, with ALP linked race baiters and ethnic community stooges agreeing, without evidence, that the violence against Indians was a White problem.

It turned out that many of the episodes of violence were either fabricated to cover up other misbehaviour by Indians, intra-ethnic trouble between migrants, the depredations of drug addicts or racially motivated gang activity by Pacific Islander, Sudanese or Arab youths.

We are not suggesting that no Whites at all were involved, only that the allegations of White racism had no foundation and the considerable unrest these rumours caused, including several large and raucous protest marches and revenge attacks against innocent Whites could have been avoided had the Police, media and state government behaved responsibly in the first place.

What we saw from Chief Commissioner of Police Simon Overland and Premier Ted Baillieu were the worst examples of political correctness and outright misinformation concerning ethnic crime, both all but agreeing that racism was a serious problem and proffering the utterly false assertion that crime was rare among immigrants.

When a Sudanese youth can go unpunished after kicking a policeman full in the face as he is kneeling, defenceless over a prone shoplifting suspect then that gives a green light to every badly socialised miscreant and predatory suburban bludger that it is open season on ordinary people, after all, in their minds nobody is going to stop them and no judge convict.

The official position was blown out of the water by events on the ground, the rampant criminality of many Indians and the conviction of a number of both White and non-White criminals for the muggings, murders and assaults; the resolution came not with a greater effort from Police but a tightening of visa rules for international students and workers, the problem abated to a manageable level within months of the change.

ricahrd deng
Sudanese spokesman Richard Deng, his shameless shilling for the Andrews ALP regime greatly diminishes his credibility

As a result confidence in Police and politicians on the matter of community safety nosedived, Victorians no longer trusted the authorities to tell the truth about crime, especially when the perpetrators were immigrants or people of colour; this has had a devastating effect upon community morale and social cohesion in Melbourne particularly in the migrant-heavy, crime-prone outer suburbs.

Flash forward to 2018 and the latest moral panic in Melbourne is the African gang crisis, which when compared to the Indian crisis of a decade ago is orders of magnitude worse and, in fact, has probably accounted for many times the number of Indian victims than the original series of crimes.

Trust in the Victorian authorities, particularly the police and judiciary, is at an all-time low, Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton and Premier Daniel Andrews have doubled down the politically correct disinformation, radically ramped up the grooming of ALP stooges in the African milieux and done nothing to tackle the widespread, and wholly justified, view that Sudanese criminals are given lenient treatment simply due to the anti-racist views of judges and politicians.

When a Sudanese youth can go unpunished after kicking a policeman full in the face as he is kneeling, defenceless over a prone shoplifting suspect then that gives a green light to every badly socialised miscreant and predatory suburban bludger that it is open season on ordinary people, after all, in their minds nobody is going to stop them and no judge convict.

Do not misread our intentions in writing this piece, we are no fans of Victoria Police or the current globalist criminal elite exemplified by the Andrews ALP regime; as far as we are concerned they are reaping what their predecessors have sown and the further down they slip in the esteem of worker the better.

Arnav sati
Arnav Sati of Tarneit, another multicultural demagogue with his own agenda petitioned the state for a clampdown on youth, ie African crime

We merely point out that once the spell is broken, once the powers that be have told one too many self serving lies about community security the social contract in which we give away the monopoly on the use of force to the state is rendered null and void; while ordinary workers will carry on as normal for the most part the rise of ethnic demagogues and the spread of pernicious, unreliable information and rumour will be the norm.

The lessons from Atlanta, the Indian student crisis and the African gang outrage are that if rumours are not tackled and cowardly political correctness gives rise to outright dishonesty on the part of officials then social cohesion quickly evaporates; once eroded the trust between citizens and state, it appears, is almost impossible to repair.

Criminals and fanatics, sensing a power vacuum, will always take over the dialogue between people and state when trust in authority is gone and these attitudes become so entrenched and the “racism” disinformation stories so deeply embedded in local folklore that lies eventually eclipse the truth.

Even under the heel of the globalists there is, as yet, no reason to think that community relations in Melbourne will deteriorate to the level of Atlanta, or other big American cities; however re-orienting the relationship between citizen and state to rest on lies, re-affirming existing prejudices and spreading misinformation certainly sets us on the road to similar levels of discord and violence.

atlanta riots
Atlanta riots, 1966, part of a continuum of poorly managed racial incidents

INTER-ETHNIC WORKING CLASS SOLIDARITY IS TRIGGERING SJW RAGE

INTER-ETHNIC WORKING CLASS SOLIDARITY IS TRIGGERING SJW RAGE

If it is not already apparent to all Aussie workers, the penny will soon drop and the realisation will dawn that the system under which we live, this regime of forcible globalist cosmopolitanism (or totalitarian humanism, take your pick) was set up to be a zero-sum game.

The evidence is there for all to see and in every facet of thought and deed the monied elites and their bourgeoisie promote the idea that the world is made up of winners and losers; that based upon on an ideological consensus among the upper classes certain groups of people should profit that others should, therefore, suffer a loss in direct proportion to the gains of others.

This mindset is most obvious in the attitudes of the elites toward the White Australian workers, whose class solidarity and social mobility they deliberately set out to crush through mass Third World immigration, their ceaseless attacks upon the labour movement and trade unions and the draconian restrictions upon freedom of speech and assembly specifically targeted at the White majority.

We have also witnessed, over the past ten years, the rise of the so-called Social Justice Warrior; these eager foot-soldiers of Capitalism have bullied and harangued their way into dominance over the internet and traditional media, working tirelessly and with the zealous energy of the true fanatic in their efforts to undermine the workers and normalise the globalist corporate code of conduct.

Jacinta-Price
Jacinta Price: an effective advocate for her people, which is why she is ridiculed by the sell-outs and White SJW’s

White working-class solidarity is, of course, utterly beyond the pale as far as the SJW is concerned; they react with bug-eyed fury at the mere mention of Whites organising in their own interest, typically sputtering out a string of epithets and clichés to shame and brow-beat anyone who dares step out of line.

When we think about it, Nelly Yoa is no more or less qualified to speak on the subject of Sudanese youth than Clementine Ford can be considered an expert on women, or Jeff Sparrow an authority on racism.

We note, however, another problematic tactic which is becoming increasingly common among the more shrill social justice advocates; the practice of sidelining or aggressively shutting down advocates of working-class unity among non-White ethnic groups.

The most obvious recent example of this in the much-hyped moral panic surrounding African street gangs in Victoria; the fashion in which the SJW’s and the state’s elite have approached this problem of lawlessness among Sudanese migrants reveals their true motivation.

Nelly yoa
Nelly Yoa may be a bit of a bullshit artist but that machete scar on his arm gives him a certain authority when it comes to the subject of Sudanese gangs.

The public humiliation of a young Sudanese man, Nelly Yoa is a prime example.

Yoa, who padded his resume in order to gain a platform to express his views on integration into Aussie society and access to employment appropriate to the meagre skills possessed by wayward African youth also made the mistake of suggesting that Sudanese crime was the real threat to social cohesion in the multicultural outer Western suburbs, not “racism”.

When we think about it, Nelly Yoa is no more or less qualified to speak on the subject of Sudanese youth than Clementine Ford can be considered an expert on women, or Jeff Sparrow an authority on racism.

Snide remarks about “internalised racism” will be made about such people, implying that they are somehow under the spell of some nefarious White supremacist tendency within broader society; we would argue though that the real sellouts and crawlers are the ethnic community “leaders” who cosy up to the state and co-operate with Police and bourgeois social justice activists.

Yoa is a Sudanese youth, Ford is a woman and Sparrow is a pseudo-communist arsehole; for what its worth, due to lived experience the opinions of all three could be considered as having equal weight; in fact the SJW usually insists on personal opinions and gut feelings being given higher priority than conventional wisdom or empirical facts.

With his emphasis on youth participation in sport as a road to redemption and his suggestion that being able to stick with hard, blue-collar work, day-in, day-out is a sign of self improvement and moral strength Nelly Yoa set himself on a collision course with the people who only see the African minority in terms of success stories or perpetual victimhood.

Africans, and non-Whites, in general, are supposed to turn to the state, the White bourgeoisie or the collaborators and sell outs of the educated “Community Leadership” and mentoring groups if they need help or have taken the wrong path in life; they are not supposed to knock around with the local footy players, act White and learn a trade or set themselves up as self-taught youth workers.

VICTORIA POLICE SUDANESE COMMUNITY
The state tends to throw its weight behind “educated” SJW’s, do not be fooled into thinking that bourgeois activism of this type is an exclusively White pursuit.

In fact the term “self-appointed” is now an epithet used to deride and denigrate any person who pops their head above the parapet and speaks without the permission of the Social Justice Warriors; Nelly Yoa is not the only person to have fallen foul of this unwritten law concerning who can, or cannot, participate in discussions of multiculturalism and integration.

Another case would be that of Adelaide based Shia cleric Mohammed Tawhidi; the self-appointed “Imam Of Peace” with his hokey spiel on tolerance and the need to reform Islam and combat Jihadism he has been pilloried by the mainstream media and subject to violent assaults by vested interests within Islam and the elites.

In fact the term “self-appointed” is now an epithet used to deride and denigrate any person who pops their head above the parapet and speaks without the permission of the Social Justice Warriors; Nelly Yoa is not the only person to have fallen foul of this unwritten law concerning who can, or cannot, participate in discussions of multiculturalism and integration.

So too indigenous commentator Jacinta Price, whose no-nonsense ideas on Aboriginal advancement and reconciliation put her squarely in the crosshairs of the SJW’s; she refuses to support the narrative, so she should be no longer heard.

Snide remarks about “internalised racism” will be made about such people, implying that they are somehow under the spell of some nefarious White supremacist tendency within broader society; we would argue though that the real sellouts and crawlers are the ethnic community “leaders” who cosy up to the state and co-operate with Police and bourgeois social justice activists.

Civic patriots too are basically the SJW’s public enemy number one at the present time because they refuse to follow the narrative and not get ideas from above their station; already excommunicated and “unpersoned” by the mainstream, outfits such as the True Blue Crew and their allies are a thorn in the side of the elitists because they promise to draw non-Whites away from the sell-out ethnic councils and into an integrated, grassroots and somewhat class-conscious movement.

Unlike the Social Justice Warriors the Nationalists have seen the T.B.C in action, at close quarters, over the course of their two year development; what else are we to make of their campaign to take back the streets of the Western suburbs from the gangs and run community safety patrols but an attempt at inter-ethnic, working class solidarity?

We know the Civic Patriots have no problem mixing and working with migrants and people of colour who are willing to integrate into their particular, simplistic version of a rainbow society where everyone is welcome as long as they “respect Aussie values”; so we can confidently predict that their forthcoming planning meeting in Tarneit will be an opportunity to connect with and recruit members of the Indian, Vietnamese, Lebanese, Pacific Islander and Chinese communities.

Tawhidi
Mohammed Tawhidi, the Angry Anderson of reformist Islam

This course of action really infuriates the SJW’s because it, in their minds, threatens social cohesion; the response by the Victoria Police, the media and academia have been totally over the top, to the point of harassing and intimidating Nationalists and our allies, who have nothing in common with Civic Patriots and who take no part in their schemes.

By their deeds we can judge the Social Justice Warriors; it is clear that their vision of a cohesive society is something like modern day China; a world where the state is always right and nobody can advocate on behalf of a class of people unless they register with the authorities and toe the party line.

Our prime concerns are identity, independence and freedom for the White majority, which puts us well out into the political wilderness with the handful of genuinely radical, alternative movements.

As Australian Nationalists we are no fans of Civic Patriotism and the easy path of populism; like all things sugary and sweet excessive consumption is bad for you in the long run.

Our prime concerns are identity, independence and freedom for the White majority, which puts us well out into the political wilderness with the handful of genuinely radical, alternative movements.

If this multi-ethnic people’s rising gains momentum we hope that their participation in the mainstreamers zero-sum game causes much distress and injury to the state, it’s minions and the Social Justice Warriors.

If the Ocker integrationist and elitist cosmopolitan movements wear each other down, so much the better; the weaker the state and the less cohesive mainstream society become, the more avenues of exploitation the Nationalists will find, until the entire edifice of Globalist-Capitalism is undermined to the point of collapse.

UPF steve
Vietnamese Steve, the “New Man” of working-class Civic Patriotism

THE FIGHTING SEASON: THOUGHTS ON THE MILITARISATION OF PUBLIC SPACES FROM KABUL TO MELBOURNE

THE FIGHTING SEASON: THOUGHTS ON THE MILITARISATION OF PUBLIC SPACES FROM KABUL TO MELBOURNE

The twilight zone between the end of the festive season and the resumption of the work year is, of late, a good opportunity to make the most of our Netflix and Stan subscriptions and in amongst the growing clutter of Bollywood movies and incomprehensible Taiwanese rom-coms we were able to find a few gems with which to pass the time.

A recent addition to the lineup was Ricky Schroder’s six part documentary series The Fighting Season, which follows several units of U.S Army military advisors and their Afghan allies as they develop security arrangements in Kabul during an election campaign, hunt Taliban fighters in the countryside and attempt to kill or capture an elusive insurgent commander.

To be frank, Schroder is a propagandist of the Obama era military effort in Afghanistan and the phased draw-down of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF); in general his film leans toward supporting the narrative of the Afghan National Army (ANA) and police finding their feet and slowly taking responsibility for their own security.

The Fighting Season, however, is very revealing in its depiction of modern, highly specialised combat troops re-tasked as, basically, police units and tactical response teams on overwatch, ready to leap into action should the Afghan forces get in over their heads.

Ricky schroder
Ricky Schroder, the former 1970’s child star is now an effective propagandist for the U.S war machine

In that sense this is a curious story, it has little in common with other War On Terror films, such as Sebastian Junger’s excellent Restrepo, or the dismal spectacle of the Ben Anderson documentary This Is What Winning Looks Like; the U.S paratroopers and 10th Mountain Division soldiers as depicted by Schroder exude a barely repressed bitterness and frustration even as they repeat the talking points of the official narrative.

From the slightly loopy security commander swanning around the teeming streets of Kabul as if he is going out for ice cream in his Midwestern hometown, seemingly oblivious to the threat of suicide bombers and kidnappers; to the hardened African American forward air controller calling in bombing runs on Taliban snipers these characters all ooze a superficial confidence and self control, but it is clear that they hate what they are doing and are deeply skeptical of the mission.

To be frank, Schroder is a propagandist of the Obama era military effort in Afghanistan and the phased draw-down of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF); in general his film leans toward supporting the narrative of the Afghan National Army (ANA) and police finding their feet and slowly taking responsibility for their own security.

Part of the dramatic tension which sets the pace across The Fighting Season’s six episodes is the sense that the Americans cannot trust the Afghan civilians, or rely upon the ANA and National Police to do their jobs; these are not, however, the drug addicts, child molesters and congenital idiots shown by Vice and Ben Anderson in 2013; on the contrary the Afghan soldiers are a mixed bag, ranging from merely competent, to tactically astute and, in some cases, almost suicidally brave.

sebastian junger tim hetherington
Sebastian Junger and Tim Hetherington produced an excellent film ,Restrepo, which captured life on a remote American firebase in the wilds of Afghanistan

Whether this is a completely accurate portrayal of the real ANA is another matter, we suspect the reality lies somewhere between Anderson’s pessimism and Schroders optimism; what is interesting from the point of our social commentary is this idea of a semi-competent but poorly equipped security force moving among the general population and maintaining a physical presence on the ground; guarded all the while by a high-tech, highly effective surveillance and intelligence group and backed up by heavily armed tactical units whose only task is to respond to emergencies.

It is this three-tiered security system used by foreign occupation forces in counter-insurgency operations, on behalf of their client regimes, which caught the eye of our writers; despite differences in the tempo of operations and the nature of the threats to civilians there is much in The Fighting Season which will feel familiar to the viewers, tucked up safe in their homes in the suburbs.

To the keen observer, there are distinct parallels between the militarization of public space in Afghanistan and the hardening of security precautions, recent restructure of police forces and the massive ramping up of state surveillance in Australian societies.

col graham
Colonel John Graham , on the right, confers with his long-suffering bodyguard; the colonel is a weird sort of fellow but his story is very interesting

One of the most striking scenes in Schroder’s series shows American advisors driving around Kabul performing spot checks on Afghan police vehicle control points; the commander of the inspection team, Colonel Graham who is, as we mentioned, somewhat of a weird, reckless character spends some minutes in effusive praise of the officers who man these roadblocks, search cars and try to detect Jihadist suicide bombers as they enter the city.

To the keen observer there are distinct parallels between the militarisation of public space in Afghanistan and the hardening of security precautions, recent restructure of police forces and the massive ramping up of state surveillance in Australian societies.

What Graham is saying, if we read between the lines, is that the ANP officers, the lowest tier of the security operation, are basically expendable; it is expected that if a suicide bomber or insurgent gunman is detected that there will be police casualties and that they are only expected to hold their own until the American rapid response teams and Afghan special forces can be scrambled, with their armoured vehicles, superior training and heavy weapons.

Put that into the context of Melbourne or Sydney, sure the threat is lower here and we do not have terrorist attacks every few weeks as they do in Kabul but broadly the same tactical, counterinsurgency regime is being applied in our cities; first responders, usually general duties police, will generally be running blindly into danger during an attack and even in bucolic Melbourne it is understood that they make take casualties before the better-equipped squads are deployed.

Afghan joint
An Afghan policeman smokes a spliff while on patrol in a scene from the confronting 2013 Vice documentary This Is What Winning Looks Like

Colonel Graham proudly shows off his “Ring Of Steel” around Kabul, the picket of concrete bollards, chicanes and fighting positions which has been built across Kabul to, if nothing else, impede insurgent attacks until a counter attack can be mounted; the topic of insurgent attacks is discussed as a certainty and the one gets the sense that the lowest tier officers and fortifications are in place to absorb most of the impact, that crime cannot be prevented, only a reactive use of force is available to mop up after any initial strike on the barricades.

In our cities similar measures are now in place: in keeping with the threat levels we have concrete bollards and discrete hardening of urban infrastructure, soft checkpoints such as booze buses and Protective Service officers at railway stations and the network of private security guards, authorised officers and municipal inspectors who provide eyes on capability across the community.

The Fighting Season’s other plot-lines provide not only the most exciting battlefield action sequences but show the middle path of pro-active counter-insurgent operations; the tactics of the famed U.S 10th Mountain Division and their ANA allies sit between the nearly passive defences of the “Ring Of Steel” and the reactive elements of the ISAF Quick Reaction Force made up of paratroopers and commandos.

The young American soldiers clearly hate the Afghan locals and gleefully take on the task of “getting in the face” of suspected Taliban insurgents; it is here we can see a contrast between this middle tier of counter terrorism operations in a combat zone and the pro-active policing efforts in the suburbs of Australian cities.

The young American soldiers clearly hate the Afghan locals and gleefully take on the task of “getting in the face” of suspected Taliban insurgents; it is here we can draw a comparison between this middle tier of counter-terrorism operations in a combat zone and the pro-active policing efforts in the suburbs of Australian cities.

forward
Forward Air Controller Sergeant Letnam, his hatred of the Afghans is apparent after he calls in an airstrike on a Taliban sniper nest and the insurgents walk away from the bombed-out position grinning and denying that they are fighters.

The point of the 10th Mountain troops operation was to disrupt, disturb and confront the Taliban and other outlaws, to break their routines, rattle their nerves and if possible kill or capture the fighters and drug smugglers; they patrolled in known Taliban strongholds, rousted their supporters in the villages, confiscated any goods or weapons suspected of belonging to fighters and attempted, by show of force, to diminish the Islamists standing in the community.

Australian police will claim that they are also pro-active when it comes to fighting our own low-level Islamic insurgency and gang crime, however it is this middle tier which, to many, has been the weak link in the local response, this is the cohort which has, in the minds of many workers been hobbled by political correctness and the point of the spear, so to speak, blunted by interference from government and social justice warriors.

It is generally accepted now that the day-to-day attempts by Australian police to play the “hearts and minds” routine in high crime suburbs, particularly those with high Third World migrant populations, have been a failure; what is more, by showing weakness they have actually made the problems worse.

What the people are becoming really agitated about is the weak effort at disrupting criminals and terrorists before they become a real problem, that not enough is being done to shut down radical Islamist recruiters and other fringe dwellers; there is also general outrage over the lack of in-patient services for the dangerously mentally ill or drug addicted and the apparent hands-off approach being taken toward ethnocentric criminal gangs.

It is significant that Aussie workers have quickly cottoned on to the fact that the fortification of public spaces and expansion of heavily armed flying squads are a necessary and proportionate reaction to the current threat environment; nobody seems particularly bothered by the sight of semi-trailers being used as shields against vehicle attacks outside the Cricket, or the unmarked vans cruising the streets loaded with specialist police armed with assault rifles.

What the people are becoming really agitated about is the weak effort at disrupting criminals and terrorists before they become a real problem, that not enough is being done to shut down radical Islamist recruiters and other fringe dwellers; there is also general outrage over the lack of in-patient services for the dangerously mentally ill or drug addicted and the apparent hands-off approach being taken toward ethnocentric criminal gangs.

sog
Tactical squads only arrive as an emergency unfolds, they are a reactive force, not pro-active.

In the general discussion of the militarization of police in Australia and the wider Anglosphere the tendency is, especially among the more libertarian or SJW cliques, to criticise the obvious trappings of the heightened security posture; the self-styled “cop watchers” seem to think that a citywide crackdown on civil liberties is underway merely because the security services have been on a spending spree, purchasing new carbines, armoured vehicles and surveillance gear.

As we have shown it is the tactical posture and the way policing is being conducted in our cities which is evidence of the move toward a counterinsurgency model rather than the traditional, low-key methods of the past; the real problem then becomes the synchronisation of the three tiers of security response: the bullet sponge beat cops, security guards and the fortifications; the pro-active, day-to-day, operations to disrupt, eliminate or humiliate Jihadis and criminal gangs and the rapid reaction forces who only appear once the threat is fully realised

Older Aussies may pine for the society we had and the bright future it promised, but which was squandered by the globalists; unfortunately there is the way things ought to be and the way things are; if Melbourne and Sydney are starting to resemble Kabul then half measures, a compassionate approach and political correctness have no place in the system.

If we are to accept this new security regime, which it is clear we must, at least in the short term purely as a matter of self-preservation then we expect the middle tier of state counter-terrorism operators and ASIO goons to emulate the 10th Mountain division in proportion to the scale of the threat.

If the cops are not kicking in the doors of rogue Imams, leaning hard on self-styled immigrant “community leaders” and making the lives of slacker Jihadis and ethnocentric street gangs utterly miserable then front line cops will have their blood spilled over those concrete bollards before the rapid reaction force can arrive, their bravery and that of the citizens who rush forward into danger will all count for nothing.

We, the workers of Australia, know what has to be done and we know why these very real but wholly imported threats to our lives have been allowed to fester all these years; we know that terrorism and ethnic gang crime is a direct result of globalist-capitalism, the vanity and cynicism of upper-class Whites and the creed of totalitarian humanism.

Older Aussies may pine for the society we had and the bright future it promised, but which was squandered by the globalists; unfortunately there is the way things ought to be and the way things are; if Melbourne and Sydney are starting to resemble Kabul then half measures, a compassionate approach and political correctness have no place in the system.

If we are to suffer under an insurgency where terrorism and gross crimes of violence are simply to be accepted as part of the “enriching” multicultural tapestry, then the security forces need to get serious; they should at least get the three tiers of policing working effectively, in the manner of ISAF and the SJW’s, politicians and do-gooders need to be kicked to the curb and no longer heard.

ring of steel
Afghan National Police: Expendable personnel deployed in the “Ring Of Steel” to absorb attacks, rather than repel them

ARROGANCE BEGAT INSECURITY: A REPLY TO DR TIM SOUTPHOMMASANE

ARROGANCE BEGAT INSECURITY: A REPLY TO DR TIM SOUTPHOMMASANE

Australia’s Race Discrimination Commissioner Dr Tim Soutphommasane is not only an overpaid and under-talented diversity hire, he is also a weaver of bad fiction in support of his own, self-serving hoax narrative.

For a recent column in the Fairfax press, Dr Tim has cobbled together an extraordinary tale framing 2017 as a year which saw rising support for White supremacy, the mainstreaming of anti-immigrant politics and a resurgence of Neo-Nazism.

Yes, comrades, this painful screed is every bit as ridiculous as it sounds; if one-tenth of the commissioner’s mantra of rote-learned talking points bore any relationship to the real world then cosmopolitan, capitalist run Australia would be in serious trouble.

In the time-honoured Anti-Racist fashion, the commissioner seems to have written a list of everyone he hates, or who disagrees with the goals of globalist capitalism on his boardroom wall and wired together a schizophrenic narrative with push-pins and string, like some sweaty stalker out of a Hollywood movie.

Goodes-26-Jan_adj
Dr Tim attempting to absorb credibility through the armpit of celebrity activist Adam Goodes

Little of it makes sense to anyone who knows what they are looking at, Dr Tim writes of “Right-Wing Nationalism” as if it is an authentic political tendency; the reality is, of course, that few if any “Right Wingers” approve of the radical Nationalist program, preferring instead their attachments to Zionism and a version of multiculturalism which excludes Islam and Muslims.

This pig-headed refusal by Tim and his broader academic caste to look beyond the outdated binary view of politics has already made them into figures of fun; if there is an ascendant “Right Wing Nationalism” then according to that rigid worldview there must also be left and centrist versions, sadly for these blockheads no such tendencies exist.

In the time honoured Anti-Racist fashion the commissioner seems to have written a list of everyone he hates, or who disagrees with the goals of globalist capitalism on his boardroom wall and wired together a schizophrenic narrative with push-pins and string, like some sweaty stalker out of a Hollywood movie.

There are Right Wingers and Left Wingers along the mainstream political axis who all enthusiastically support the globalist capitalist programme of mobile Third World populations, totalitarian humanist equality for all and the replacement of the citizen with the atomised, unquestioning, apolitical consumer who is ruled by oligarchs and their bourgeoisie.

Nationalism, as we practice it is neither left nor right, what it truly represents is secession from cosmopolitanism, a rejection of the binary worldview with all its rigid conformity and ever-thickening tangle of artificial social mores and pedantic restrictions upon the liberty of the working classes.

Dr Tim wilfully misrepresents recent events in Europe and North America in his attempt to lull his readers into believing that, say, the mass actions surrounding Polish independence day, the electoral success of AFD in Germany and the ill-fated Unite The Right rallies in the U.S.A are all part of some global trend toward a resurgent White supremacy.

Again, real Nationalists would have none of this since we reject outright the mindset which allows one to believe that the world is now integrated to the degree that universal White unity is a realistic possibility; universal ideals such as this do not enter the heads of radicals, this is the mindset of the globalists or the religious nuts, Islamic Jihadists being the obvious example.

Protesters-march-Sydney-September
Muslims in Sydney demanding that they are taken seriously by the chattering classes

This brings us to another dodgy connection in Tim’s web of untruths: Why would the people he labels conservatives, anti Semites or neo-Nazis have such a problem with Islam?

On the face of it Right Wing Islamophobia makes no sense, there is no logical explanation as to why one group of socially conservative people should be hostile to another group holding basically identical views, that is until one listens to what the right wingers are actually saying.

The natural reaction of the upper classes, of which Tim Soutphommasane is most decidedly a member, is to scoff and roll their eyes at any utterance by the “little people”; the problem, though, in assuming that their class holds the correct values and opinions on all matters is that these twits render themselves unable to take seriously anything which exists outside their bubble of self-satisfied political correctness.

On the face of it Right Wing Islamophobia makes no sense, there is no logical explanation as to why one group of socially conservative people should be hostile to another group holding basically identical views, that is until one listens to what the right wingers are actually saying.

The Right Wingers, on the other hand, take both cosmopolitanism and Islam completely seriously, probably more so than many Muslims and the faults they find with that way of life are all, basically, to do with its perceived negative effects upon multiculturalism, women’s rights, homosexual rights and the interests of Jews and Israel.

Dr Tim mentions in his article Milo Yiannopoulis, the homosexual, Jewish, Libertarian provocateur who is married to a black man; Tim is seemingly agog at the popularity of such a character in this day and age, however seen in its proper context Milo’s stage show is pure multicultural theatre, he is a perfect poster boy for the Right Wing because he embodies all that they hold dear and all that the upper classes lay claim to but, in their cynicism, neglect.

milo
Milo “The Dangerous Faggot” is not literally Hitler, he is more like the Dick Emery of globalist culture

The Islamic Jihad in the West is explicitly aimed at smashing social cohesion in multicultural societies by attacking its constituent parts,. The Right Wingers are one hundred percent correct on that score. Anyone who is capable of thinking tactically appreciates the structural weaknesses in cosmopolitanism, not to mention the studied indifference to this holy war among the upper classes, the politicians and the bourgeoisie.

This inability to think like one’s enemy by the people supposedly in charge leaves a cosmopolitan society wide open to subversion and the shock tactics of terrorists. If anything has become normalised in 2017 it is not “racism” as alleged by Dr Tim, rather it is this blasé attitude toward Islamic Jihad and its stated goals, which are the complete destruction of the multicultural West and the subjugation of its peoples by Muslims.

Further to his ballyhoo over the “Far Right” Soutphommasane also dramatically plays up the Neo-Nazi menace, albeit without specifically identifying anyone who openly admits to holding such opinions. We suspect this is because, like most people of his station his view of the new Nazis is likely informed by email circulars penned by Andre Oboler and the Jewish Board Of Deputies, so, therefore, we can assume that he knows nothing much about Nazis, either historical or contemporary.

Let us be blunt, Tim Soutphommasane is in trouble, if certain illiberal elements within the mainstream political scene have their way he and his fellow commissioners at HREOC will soon be out of a job, so he has to come up with something, anything really, to justify his three hundred thousand dollar a year salary.

The role most of the Neo-Nazis, as we have exhaustively explained in several articles is to stifle any dissent against globalist cosmopolitanism — to snuff out any spark of national feeling among Whites by tainting groups and individuals in guilt by association stings. True, some of these characters are motivated by the prospect of looting the money that organised political groups or clubs can raise, but in the main, they are wreckers under the direction of mainstream operatives.

Neo-Nazism, in contrast to Tim’s thesis, is actually the nemesis of White Nationalism and self-determination. It is chauvinistic within the context of White Australia since it attempts to apply phoney Third Reich racial categories to the White Australian ethnicity, something which, given our history on this continent, can never be accepted by true patriots.

charlottesvilleswast_14699_tn-992x558
The Neo-Nazi cuts a lonely figure at Unite The Right in Charlottesville

Dr Tim is peddling a load of horse manure. He is cobbling together a narrative of White supremacy and rising neo-Nazism to shore up his own precarious position as a globalist bureaucrat. If it all smacks of desperation it must be because Tim is, these days, a desperate man at the top tier of a widely hated bureaucracy.

Let us be blunt, Tim Soutphommasane is in trouble. Should certain illiberal elements within the mainstream political scene have their way he and his fellow commissioners at HREOC will soon be out of a job. He has to come up with something, anything really, to justify his three hundred thousand dollar a year salary.

Human rights are under attack by the minions of globalist capitalism; the idea is to roll back the legal protections available to citizens in the name of progress so that the transnational corporations can further embed themselves in the day to day life of working people.

Dr Tim is simply being made redundant by his real bosses. Maybe if he had done his job and protected the human rights of all Australians, rather than cultivating his reputation for arrogance, race-baiting and attacking the White majority, then he might have left his post in good standing and at a time of his choosing. As it stands though, he will probably be fired. His unpronounceable name will live on in infamy as just another haughty bureaucrat who got too big for his boots.

Dastyari
Pride comes before a fall, arrogant public servants in this country quickly grow into tall poppies, ripe for a hard pruning