FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

Nothing prevented Saturday’s bi-state ‘International Freedom of Speech’ day, which is of itself ironic. However, in this muddle of libertarian and identity politics, attended by the usual provocateurs, when speech has no substantial content the point of whether or not it is free is moot.

The two-state ‘event’, which we cannot find any evidence of being internationally recognised despite its bold appellation, although there is said to a London event, was held in both Melbourne Docklands, where Jewish supremacist and mega Zionist Avi Yemini was joined by Senator Fraser Anning, with a crowd of around 50 free speech advocates, after the first got underway at Sydney’s Wiley Park, in Lakemba.

We will address the Wiley Park leg shortly, but first-up Anning’s speech would reveal a lot about this mysterious ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’. Senator Anning’s maiden speech, like Pauline Hanson’s before him, caused sparks when he called for a return to a “European Christian” immigration system. Yet, it did not take long to forge an allegiance with the Zionist ALA. This seems to be an inevitable pattern when it comes to outspoken politicians on the “right side”, especially those who create a false hope that they’ll support a return to the White Australia Policy.

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

He then got down to business and we’ll place a transcript of his speech verbatim on this page. What will become apparent is his pro-Zionism as he told the sparsely peopled audience, “My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’.

“This year we gave the Palestinian authority $43.8 million. They use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority.”

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

Australia shouldn’t be paying any money to that region, for sure, but that’s not what Anning’s point was – he doesn’t want it paid because, according to the very Zionist logic, innocent Israelis are being killed by evil Palestinians who have some screwed-up notion about wanting to stop their land being stolen by Jews.

The only attempt to shut down Fraser’s freedom of speech came from a longhaired ginger dressed in black who was shouted down by Avi and his supporters who chanted, “Zuck off!” a reference to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerbeg, who they blame personally for de-speeching them on his social media platform.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Meanwhile, Blair Cottrell did not attend the Melbourne rally. Instead, he drove to Sydney to yell at gimps in a windy park through a Chinese manufactured megaphone. He shook hands with the likes of marijuana advocate and serial instigator Nick Folkes who is back from cannabis country with his small multi-racial cast of resurrected Party for Freedom members (or as we dubbed them, Peanuts for Freedom) as he joined a line-up that included some uninteresting woman and Cottrell’s lawyer, John Bolton.

dfadsfs.png
Blair is a man who never lets standards get in the way of the company he consorts with (Folkes centre, Bluebeard taking a fan snap on the right)

Present also was Neil Erikson’s partner in crime, Rino Grgurgovic, aka Bluebeard, along with members of the Lads Society Sydney. If there was a Pictionary definition of “idiot” then Bluebeard’s picture would be posted there in all its pot-bellied glory, stink lines included. There would even be a colouring-in version for autistic kids.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which would be like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

MateyandFokles.png
The Fellowship of the Chicken is reunited. Matey Mate, Hollywood Nazi on the right, with his Zionist mate and colleague, Nick Folkes

It’s grouse Matey Mate is back with Nick because it’s like a reunion of the old fellowship of the chicken which was centred around the deep-seed Liberal muckraker and sometimes poultry farmer Howard “I’m not a financial member of any party” Crawford.  Howie even “liked” Nick’s post about the rally on his Facebook page which means so much for any of them retiring.

But what is more significant about these two is that it proves that Matey Mate, far from being owned by ‘The Lads’ is a random equation infecting the numbers. Any belief that he is not a two-way transistor between the meddlesome world of the Zionist spiv and the “youth” who have gravitated to Sewell’s boys’ club betrays an inadvisable trust in the skunk. Matey Mate’s record speaks for itself, and his intrigues run deep. It wouldn’t surprise UNA at all if he was receiving secret funding from a government agency. Likewise, given the ongoing theatre, and all the incongruities of his allegiances, policies, platform and behaviour, who is handling Nick Folkes?

Thus, with a gale blowing, and nobody infringing on their ‘free speech’, Bolton led the proceedings by opening up with a spiel about Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern; all this while the antifascist voyeurs tracked them with what must’ve been the cheapest drone on the market – a Chinese knock-off bought for a lobster from the markets. Those assembled in the park appear in an image smugly uploaded to the Anonykatz Facebook page from a vertigo-inducing height and with a visibility that rendered the whole exercise even more futile than what was happening down below.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer 8Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which is like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

Screenshot_20181006-230600_Facebook.jpg
The Antis will try to say that the object of the exercise was to view crowd numbers. But that’s a lie, they wanted to see who was there, but their cheap and nasty drone failed them. Lulz

Nick Folkes, no doubt nicely toasted on seventh-generation Indica skunk weed, then grabbed the bullhorn to foghorn about his freedom of speech, or should that be, his excess of it. Folkes is an idiot and no matter what anyone believes about personal liberty the whole world would be better off if a special law was passed limiting him to the use of sign language.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

Singling out “dogmatic communists” he aired his angst about how they “want to take freedom of speech and it’s an attack on the only civilisation in modern history that brought around freedom of speech is the British Empire.”

Perhaps they should tell that to D.H Lawrence or any of the other writers whose books were originally banned in England.

It’s worth noting too that both Folkes and Anning cited “communists” as being responsible for taking away their freedom of speech while last we checked Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk, who led a charge to censor Anning and stripped him of staff funding and extra staff is a dyed in the wool conservative.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

And while Folkes gasbags about freedom of speech he seems to forget when he attempted to shut down Australia First Party president Jim Saleam’s freedom of speech at the Reclaim Australia rally at Martin Place in Sydney during 2015 when he connived with the marshals to have him removed. Likewise, the marshals forbade AFP from distributing any materials at the rally but didn’t impose any ban on the kosher groups.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care. It is very clear that he chose long ago the path of civic patriotism. And for all the fascist talk from the Lads Society once again Matey Mate and his offsider Alex had no problem embedding themselves with Zionists and supporting an event that is fundamentally pro-Israel.

a7a6dc4f492afb2d327d9e154432017f
John Bolton, Zionist, anti-Islam activist, and most likely chief organiser of International Freedom of Speech day in Australia

John Bolton is probably the key to Cottrell’s attendance since as a lawyer he has taken up his appeal pro bono against charges of inciting serious contempt against Moslems. Did Blair really drive all the way to Sydney just to help his mate out, or did he have other business? Was he asked not to attend the Melbourne leg of the rally, or would Tom Sewell, the chock-heeled boss of the Lads Society have forbidden it? It’s hard to be sure once you try to figure out who put this thing together and why.

United Nationalists Australia has attempted to identify who the principal organisers of the ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’ are. Our strongest lead is actually John Bolton. He released a YouTube video on October 1 in which his concerns about freedom of speech link primarily to former EDL head and Zionist Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern who was prevented from entering the Moslem enclave of Lakemba during her tour of Sydney. Bear in mind, the Lads Society provided security for Southern both at Sydney and her Melbourne show.

During that tour, Southern appeared with Stefan Molyneux in a video filmed at Sydney’s Botanic Gardens in which she detailed how police prevented her exercising the simple right to walk the streets since her presence would be seen as a provocation. She claimed there was hypocrisy at play because mainstream media, which were actually filming her, were put under no such restrictions. Nonetheless, Southern began by explaining how her team had contacted police to advise them she would be journeying down with her crew.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care.

One could say it was stupid tipping them off, but one could also cynically suggest that she got the reaction she intended. If she was fair dinkum about slinking into a Moslem neighbourhood incognito — and let’s face it, most Moslems like most Aussies wouldn’t have known her from a bar of soap — there were countless other areas that are chockers with the followers of Mohammed; Punchbowl being one; Beverly Hills another. Either she was worried they might get creamed or else she’d calculated the police response and just how marvellously it would dovetail her narrative.

It was with this same expectation of publicity that Bolton chose Wiley Park near Lakemba to stage his rally. He stated so in his video in which he grimly warned against anyone inciting violence or attempting violence against his people. He clearly spelt out it was a test of “freedom” to be in the area. In the end, no one attempted anything, except some numbskull Antis who took their cheap-arse drone for a spin in the drizzle.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

So, Bolton is at the centre of this theatre that has drawn together the usual faces. But he is Cottrell’s lawyer and Blair is synonymous with allegedly suggesting that every classroom in Australia should have a copy of Mein Kampf (We are not sure if that quote is apocryphal or not). How does that then fit in with Bolton’s worldview? We quote him from the video, “As Australians, we are a melting pot. Women and men in Australia are equal. People of every race in Australia are equal. It’s abhorrent that people want to divide us.”

Well, isn’t Blair Cottrell one of those trying to divide us? I know we are. We’re proud to admit it since the only “us” we recognise are actual Australians, which means we aim to divide their “us”. So, if that’s the case, does he support freedom of speech by those who want to repudiate his statements of values as a bunch of gay libertarian crap? Did he not just call such abhorrent? On his Weebly blog, among an impressive list of professional credentials, Bolton describes himself as “conservative” but “politically independent”. We see a lot of that around the anti-Islam scene. And John is no stranger to that arena. In 2017, he joined the Peanuts as a speaker at their rally against a proposed Islamic school in Penrith.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

Among those were ‘Australian Patriot Uprising’ Commandant Matt Lowe and his non-Aryan Sergeant Schultz, Toby Cook.

Matt Lowe took over while Nick Folkes was on hiatus. He and fat boy Toby, who we understand to be a former mental patient, essentially formed the core of this absurd Facebook club along with Shermon Burgess, who himself made a quantum leap from strict kosher patriot to fully-blown neo-Nazi with such a vengeance that it defies credulity. Just as the movement was adopting a conspicuously fascist style, Folkes stepped sideways, Lowe et al moved in, but now they’re gone and Folkes is back along with the bagel brigade. But it remains of Mr Bolton to explain just what these glaring inconsistencies mean to him because being such a bright lad he cannot have failed to be aware of them. By the same token, Bolton cannot be unaware of what Blair Cottrell represents to the mainstream, while Nationalists know the truth and these associations of his only confirm: the man is a civic patriot and always will be.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

We now return to Nick Folkes’s comment about “it’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here”. It’s a shame that after all this time the dumb bastard hasn’t worked out why.

The last any significant support was galvanised for a comparable cause was the Reclaim Australia rallies. If we’re talking about Sydney alone, then the 2015 rallies were the ceiling. But let’s focus on that, shall we? How come they failed to capitalise on the kind of public support they saw from that concept? Arguably, it was a number of reasons. Firstly, too many civic micro-parties played tug-o-war with it, such as the ALA, and the unregistered PfF and those parties were avowedly Zionist. But while other factors occurred, especially in Melbourne where the street jouster mentality of the UPF had turned off the mums and dads (or “peasants” as Blair Cottrell charitably labels them), the simple fact no one seems to recognise is because they never actually stated what it is they wanted.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

What was it they wanted; a total end to Moslem immigration? Not really, if you attended the rallies and listened to the speeches, despite the slant the hard-left and globalist media put on it, they asked only for “assimilation”. Who was it that this petition was directed at? Was it the Moslem community, who were not represented and never addressed? Was it the politicians? There were frequent calls for “politicians” to “do something”. That’s a mighty naïve expression of faith right there, trusting a ‘politician’ working for an internationalist world-order controlled by corporations. The politicians are dedicated universally to pumping this country full of as much non-Anglo human content as can be mustered. This is the idea.

Opposition leader Bill Shorten has approached Scott Morrison to agree to a bipartisan commitment to a “big Australia”, and a big Australia means unfettered immigration.

The little-known corporation Consolidated Land & Rail (CLARA) has as its mission statement: “CLARA is an Australian private group formed to deliver a program to change Australia. We seek to undertake a re-balancing of our settlement and deliver new ways of imagining, planning and building cities, transport and infrastructure.”

This is insidious stuff: a private group with endless land assets knocking up micro-cities and connecting them with rail all over Australia. Who is to live in those cities? Well, CLARA says, “Australia’s population is projected to increase 69% between now and 2061 — up from 24.7 million to 41.5 million people, that is 16.8 million more Australians needing a home.”

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

Australians…? They seriously just called that projected figure Australians when they’re constantly harping on about the declining birth rate among White Australians?! No, that’s an import figure, and what’s more, CLARA seems to know something we don’t because they’re already building their cities and rails to accommodate this massive increase which will come from Asia, the Sub-Continent, the Middle-East and Africa, but really largely from China, and to serve the new Sino-Australia.

How can such a newish population in any way be Australian? By their importation, they signal the end of Australia and the creation of an artificial nation not founded on culture, race or custom, but on consumerism and serfdom to oligarchical concerns.

Given all this is happening, tiny little voices squeaking about “freedom of speech” in an ill-defined way don’t seem to grasp the issues especially when, like Bolton and all civic patriots, they accept a “melting pot” so long as it doesn’t come with Moslems and their “sharia law”.

But it also explains why Nick and Co can’t get massive numbers to their rallies despite the size of the cities because they are lost in a wilderness where their concerns are outnumbered by the demographic realities of those very cities.

The Nationalist message is very different and it is uncompromising and unwavering. And the key to the activism resides in that message and its purity something those who complain about “keyboard warriors” not attending these hopeless rallies cannot get their heads around.

Given the divide we suffer in major cities, the only logical thing to do is seek out our people where they reside, and where they are receptive to our message and that might not be in the sexy surrounds of an urban environment. It might be spread apart and out in the dust 200 kilometres each way between. But the cities are lost and those Whites remaining and who’ve adapted to this prefabricated metropolis are from the virtue-signalling hypocrite elites. Which is another thing Anning, Bolton and Yemini don’t understand about their “free speech”, especially when they equate it with social media — the political element of their “speech” is a product of the commercial.

Identity politics is a device by which aspirational consumers signal their social status. The greatest advocates of all these guises of progressive politics are in fact the corporations who splinter it all up into a consumerist matrix. It’s not even accurate to suggest that Facebook targets them on the basis of their politics, although it’s not so unfair an accusation to level at Twitter. Facebook operates on a combination of algorithms and human moderators and while the inconsistencies of their adjudications are frustrating they are more random than they seem. But if they really want to get down to an understanding what they lack is not a freedom of speech but a market share.

The topic of “freedom of speech” is too complex to be condensed for a mass audience at least in the fashion the civics are doing it. What their “freedom of speech” is banging up against is this very global order. There are no worries for Moslem Arabs discussing the finer points of socially unpalatable aspects of an extreme reading of their religion at meetings in Lakemba, for instance. They are no challenge to that order. But as Christopher Shortis found out when he, Cottrell and Neil Erikson were convicted of inciting serious contempt against Moslems, it sure isn’t so lenient when it happens the other way. While Moslems are allowed to discuss extreme ideas to characterise them as extreme, which is what the Bendigo Three did in their video, is considered the more extreme acts of the two. Indeed, we may consider naming the monster now to be heretical speech.

And once one makes a concession to unfettered freedom of expression where does it end? We cannot argue for the unconditional freedom of speech which would demand things like sex with baby giraffes or to legalise cannibalism. And as society fragments along the lines of those directing from the Bilderberg Group, it seems that sick ideas are gaining respectability on a daily basis. We’re already at the stage that we’ve repudiated nature and argued she is wrong, that there is no such thing as race or gender, and one woman described as an author and educator argues that parents should gain permission from their babies before changing their nappies. These are the signs of a society on the way out and that’s where the oligarchs want it so that it can be replaced by a new serfdom. When the serfs speak up about anything that may draw attention to this then, of course, that speech is no longer but very, very expensive.

As Nationalists we do not fight vigorously for freedom of speech, we strive to emphasize the hypocrisy of those who wish to silence us and demonise us in the name of an inclusive and progressive democracy in which freedom of expression is implied.

Anning.png
Senator Fraser Anning expressing his fear that Israelis might be being murdered by Palestinians

Senator Fraswer Anning’s Speech, Verbatim, Docklands, Melbourne, Oct 6, 2018 (don’t say we tried to take your free speech)

“ALA is the only democratic party in this state. These African gangs who are attacking people, destroying property and bashing different people and getting away with it is probably some of the worst things I’ve seen and I’m sure it’s not the fault of the police, I’m sure their hands have been tied by somebody further up. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right for any nation, it’s the first thing that goes and then normally what happens in a communist society they take your freedom of speech first, so occasionally we have clowns like this who deny you your right to freedom of speech,” (enter bozo ranga) to disrupt the event. Avi grabbed the mic and led the small gathering of ALA supporters and others in a chant of “Zucc off, mate!” Anning, continued, “So the first thing that goes in a communist country is your freedom of speech, just recently, as Avi said, both our (Facebook) pages were shut down. The premier in Queensland asked our members there – and three state members – to denounce my speech or lose funding for staff members. Now, that’s a travesty of justice, it was illegal, she eventually took those staff members and took that funding because they did not want to renounce me. My Facebook page, as far as I know, was taken down… we’ve never called for any violence… neither Avi or myself have called for any violence against anyone and never will. My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’ (loud claps from Zionist Avi and his ALAers). This year we give the Palestinian authority $43.8 million they use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority. And that’s where our tax dollars are going and when I called for that, in the senate, all three parties, the Liberals, Labor and the Greens vote against me every time. They’re the same people who the day after my speech were all crying and hugging and ringing their hands and they never damped a tissue but they pretended to cry then they denounce me — but they’re the same three parties who regularly vote against the motions that I put up to stop funding the Palestinian authority but also I call for getting the White South African farmers out of South Africa (Avi leads clapping) and again they vote against me so they’re hypocrites, they took two words out of context then they decided they would try to make some mileage out of that but they made their impatient speeches but the next day when the polls came out, even the ABC poll, they found around 80% of Australians were supporting me so, ah… (Applause) so they’ll have to eat their words a little bit. So we’ve got some big problems to overcome, we are supposed to have a conservative government but then they’re here five years but we still have 18C on the books, which takes away your freedom of speech. What’s happening there? So really what’s happened is that the parties that used to represent us have moved so far to the left that they don’t represent us anymore. There’s a vacuum on the right. We saw that in 2016 in America when Trump came like a freight train and hit poor old Hillary Clinton. She didn’t see that coming (laughter). He’s been a great man for America, he’s done a huge amount of work for America and America has never been better now economically or any other way you like to look at it. So a lot of this, this trying to take away our freedom of speech is coming out of the United Nations. Now, I’ve been calling for us to get out of Paris and to get out of the United Nations. They have no business here, they have no business with us, and their politicians like Marise Payne who’s over there now signing away your rights to everything, ah, she has no business doing that on your behalf. She’s signing a thing called the Immigration Compact, now, and that will effectively give your rights to who comes into this country – it will be handed over to the United Nations so you can imagine what’s going to happen with our society. By the way, that speech, that part with the final solution, what was actually said was ‘the final solution to our immigration problem is for the Australian people to have a vote via plebiscite’. And I will still continue to push that agenda because we’ve had votes on all sorts of things like same sex marriage and everything else, why should we not have the right to have a vote on not just how many people will come here but who comes here, what the makeup of this country will be like later on. So really I think the big fear is that good Australian men and a lot of them only boys died on battlefields all over the world. They died in freezing bloody muddy trenches in France and Belgium and other places and in the jungles of New Guinea and they died for one thing and that is for your freedom and for your rights. They stood up in front of bullets and they took bullets a lot of them and they’re not here with us anymore and the least we can do is to do what good people like yourselves are doing now and stand up for our freedoms and I applaud you all for being here and we’ve got to keep up the fight.”

WILL SERIOUS CHARGES BE LAID AGAINST MOVEMENT-WRECKER NEIL ERIKSON?

WILL SERIOUS CHARGES BE LAID AGAINST MOVEMENT-WRECKER NEIL ERIKSON?

United Nationalists Australia can reveal a groundswell of concerned friends of an unidentified person who has privately levelled serious allegations against serial provocateur Neil Erikson.

For legal reasons, we cannot identify the person or the nature of their accusations except to say they delve into a very dark corner of human conduct. One believes that nothing Erikson does could generate surprise but then he managed to outdo himself in terms of depraved conduct during a visit to Perth for a rally in aid of the South African Farmers earlier this year.

Erikson, who describes himself as a “journalist” on his Facebook page (we know, we know), has been a cancerous growth on what could be loosely described for the purposes of this bulletin as ‘the movement’ since the days of Reclaim Australia.

Riding on the notoriety gained during his time with the defunct United Patriots Front, and his ceaseless social media shenanigans ever since which saw him team up with the likes of fellow grub Shermon Burgess, Erikson has maintained an ignominious profile. Willing to embarrass himself for any opportunity at publicity, whenever a right-wing event is held, Erikson will turn up and make a noise.

His escapades have involved avoiding conviction for making harassing phone calls to a Melbourne rabbi; for his part in a video stunt in which he beheaded a dummy and was convicted for inciting serious contempt for Moslems; contempt of court relating to a work uniform belonging to his former employer Toll; being charged with “assaulting an activist” at homo race-traitor Milo Yiannopolous’s 2017 publicity tour; and finally being charged with “using threat to prevent a clergyman to discharging his duties”.

Oh, he was also arrested at the September Nigel Farage event in Melbourne, but that didn’t result in charges.

34892223_1049372775216933_8486637957061541888_n
Blair Cottrell welcomed Erikson back to the fold despite all the crap he has pulled

Most of this is just bullshit, especially the dummy beheading, but it’s the crime the name of which we cannot utter that will prove the most injurious when it comes to finally taking him out of circulation.

Erikson has long been a retardant to the growth of serious counter-politics in this country and has almost certainly served the state as an informant. He has previously bragged about involvement with ASIO and members of the Federal Police. However, being as how 90% of Australian ‘patriots’ don’t even share so much as a single brain cell between them, Erikson has enjoyed an undiscerning following on his social media accounts despite the harm he has brought to genuine Patriots and Nationalists alike.

A Melbourne magistrate stated the obvious when she said that Erikson has a “tenuous relationship with the truth”.

In fact, Erikson is one of the most unashamed liars that have ever gushed forth into the porcelain bowl of Civic Patriotism. He turned on his former colleagues at Nationalist Alternative even after they’d supported him through his court matter with Rabbi David Gutnick, and then followed suit when he was moved sideways from the United Patriots Front leadership.

Erikson has aligned with the very worst of the Civic Patriot undergrowth and even supported arch Zionist and pseudo-Patriot Avi Yemini before turning on him too. Recently, businessman and Christian Daniel Spiller who controls the Future Now event has politely let Erikson go ahead of his November event in which Milo Yiannopolous will be appearing alongside Senator Fraser Anning, Ann Coulter, and Zio fraud Tommy Robinson (assuming he hasn’t been locked up again).

It is not clear whether Future Now has distanced themselves from Erikson on the back of these heinous allegations, which stem from a visit to Perth earlier this year, and involve accusations that include “threatening behaviour” among more serious others.

NOOL
Dumped ever so politely

United Nationalists Australia is well aware of the allegations and encourages the victim in question to immediately contact Perth police and waste no time in making a statement. We can assure this person that threats from Erikson are not to be taken seriously.

Recently, Erikson produced a low-rent video of himself with 29-year-old Andrew Nolch, a “comedian” who was charged with defacing a memorial to murdered fellow comedian Eurydice Dixon in the name of anti-feminism or something.

Nolch is that rare creature who is actually dumber and even more lacking in charisma than creepy Erikson.

However, this association speaks volumes about the pathology involved in the alleged crimes that Erikson is being accused of.

9942828-3x2-700x467
Andrew Nolch out-stupids even Erikson

PATRIOT JEW – THE DEEP-STATE STAIN LEFT OVER FROM THE RECLAIM AUSTRALIA DEBACLE

PATRIOT JEW – THE DEEP-STATE STAIN LEFT OVER FROM THE RECLAIM AUSTRALIA DEBACLE

If Neil Erikson isn’t under strict orders to fuck over Australian Nationalism then we are the editorial team for the Australian Women’s Weekly.

Yet again this problematical dick has managed to contaminate our cause through a perception of his association with us — a perception he has consciously worked at establishing especially in the gullible mind of the media.

His latest caper involves him and an associate knucklehead in a Hi-Vis shirt confronting Labor senator Sam Dastyari at a Melbourne university bar. There, despite the little ‘daigou’ standing at the bar buying beers contradictory to strict Moslem religious observance (and the fact he is non-practising) they film themselves abusing him as a “terrorist” and telling him to go back to “Iran”. Erikson later claimed on FB that he was addressing concerns Dastyari holds “duel” citizenship. It is about as embarrassing a political attack as this big fruit has thus far managed and so far wide of the mark it keeps circumference with Erikson’s bloated waistline.

Consequently, the headline in the ABC report is caterwauling about “White Nationalism” being on the rise.

If you plan to attack Dastyari it should be about his in flagrante delicto role in the selling off of Australia to China. But that’s not the point — Erikson is an arch-traitor to the White Nationalist movement yet the media now regards him as its stubbie-skolling ambassador, a situation that hasn’t come about by accident.

Many things have contributed to this beast’s destructive rampage not least the failure of prominent Nationalists to speak up against him despite the many lies, insults, and injuries he has knowingly inflicted on our cause.

Yet again this problematical dick has managed to contaminate our cause through a perception of his association with us — a perception he has consciously worked at establishing especially in the gullible mind of the media.

Erikson is aligned with Zionist Avi Yemini and has for a long time been in cahoots with Nick Folkes’s anti-Nationalist Peanuts for Freedom. A network of whispers has him linked to even more nefarious characters such as the fake news freelancer Luke McMahon and in all probability Liberal Party black ops coordinator Howard Crawford.

Back when he was cranking out defamatory videos on a Facebook page with fellow feral Shermon Burgess, one could discern the invisible trails of the lies he told from whom they originated. His and Burgess’s attacks were like a script and not one borne of spite or jealousy but a particular motive despite the pair being collectively too stupid to even have a motive beyond getting wasted.

VIDEO-STILL
Avi Yemini sends Erikson off for lox and bagels outside the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court

Strong suspicion arose with many——and it is a theory strengthened continually by everything this numpty does——that he was “turned” by the state following charges over his harassment of Rabbi Dovid Gutnick in 2014, an offence for which he mysteriously served no jail time. Then he totally went rogue.

The very Nationalists from whom Erikson sought advice prior to his inexplicably eventually landing himself a high-flying lawyer became the targets of his attack when he was denied a senior role in the equally disastrous United Patriots Front. In that case, such as he had similarly done with a Nationalist group beforehand, he used his administrator status on the UPF’s Facebook page to lock everyone out.

Erikson had been all along been soliciting advice from Nationalist sources which advised him not to go ahead with the Bendigo beheading stunt and if he did to not involve any of the UPF’s senior members or else legal hassles would follow. He ignored this warning and the rest is now legal history. At this point, when UPF’s leadership were distancing the group from the uncontrollable Erikson, he attempted to start a splinter project with among others Burgess and Ralph Cerminara. They intended to appropriate the Identitarian Movement from the French despite all being non-Nationalists. This was a deliberate provocation but when Australian WNs contacted France he shelved the idea.

Consequently, the headline in the ABC report is caterwauling about “White Nationalism” being on the rise.

Thereafter he reinvented his vehicles but never himself, teaming up with Sherm the Germ, and most recently provoking the Nationalist movement in Australia by appropriating the name ‘Nationalist Uprising’ while promoting Zionism.

Ah yes, the Zionism. In his many guises after UPF Erikson went on a ferocious dox against his former comrades, turning out secret video footage of Blair Cottrell and others, and denouncing all as ‘Nazis’. He made a point of claiming to have been a member of Blood & Honour and Nationalist Alternative and expressing redemption for his misguided and misspent skinhead past. In fact, Neil was largely responsible for bringing ‘Nazis’ to the rallies that he was later beseeching be cleansed of goose-steppers.

By this stage, the lies were flying from his bearded lips like shit squirting from the arse of a goose. A 2016 video is like a Best Hits of Neil Erikson lies. It includes:

  • He was a member of Nationalist Alternative
  • He was a member of Australia First Party
  • That Sammy Binz and/or an AFP member sent pictures of a “dead baby” to him over Facebook
  • That an AFP member who he’d never met, talked to, laid eyes on or been involved in any sort of social media interaction with is Jewish
  • That a certain person known only for his quality of character was guilty of a carnal indiscretion over social media
  • That he is a Nationalist

This is apart from the 6000 terabytes of lies told in videos and on FB posts stored away in which his bullshit is plentiful enough to outnumber the individual grains of sand on every beach in Australia.

Leaping to the present, and Neil’s ‘Patriot Blue’ incarnation, which he nicked from a forthcoming Net series based on the movie Romper Stomper due to appear on the Stan streaming service — We say, given his proclamation that “you cannot be a Nationalist WITHOUT supporting Israel”, they should rename their Facebook group, Patriot Jew.

46247BD300000578-5064085-An_anti_Islam_activist_has_defended_calling_senator_Sam_Dastyari-a-1_1510182585461
Australian Nationalism needs more dumb cunts in High-Vis shirts who’re prepared to follow Neil Erikson around

But you have to ask yourself, who benefits from all of this? Erikson is not running a political party, nor could he be given his fractured personality and lack of mental discipline. Is he hoping to start a mass movement? Not likely given his fractured personality and lack of mental discipline. And how did he just happen to be in that particular bar when last time we checked he’d moved his suffering missus and sprog to the Apple Isle? It’s as though someone wanted him there.

Again, who benefits? When you join all the dots on Erikson’s Conservative Reactionary associates then the picture begins to at least make a little more sense.

Erikson is a useful idiot with handlers and he is doing what he is told. His mission, at the end of the day, is to achieve certain ends for his shrouded Conservative connections while bringing Nationalism into disrepute.

Finally, it has to be accepted that Erikson came out of the unmitigated disaster of the Reclaim Australia movement. In fact, just about every ‘personality’ that emerged from that cluster fuck has somehow damaged Nationalism and generated factionalism, elite groups, and coteries that spring up and disappear just as quickly. True politics, true Australian Nationalist tradition and spirit are derided as quaint and irrelevant in this single-minded stampede for the ‘next’ big possibility.

There is too much changing, too much repackaging, too much mainstreaming and too little resolve.

4624996500000578-5064085-Neil_Erikson_founder_of_far_right_group_Patriot_Blue_filmed_hims-a-2_1510182585764.jpg
All of Neil Erikson’s best ideas come out of a VB bottle 

 

DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

Over the past year, UNA has spent bulk column inches describing the type of society Australia has been moulded into since the globalist, cosmopolitan juggernaut shifted into top gear under the Howard regime.

We have outlined, in broad strokes, the re-jigged class system being implemented by the bosses to pacify and subject the polyglot masses which now underpin the global capitalist power; likewise, we have examined, in depth, the bones of the system itself, that cunning fusion of second-generation Communism and limited free market capitalism.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

The trouble is that this increase in state power over the individual and the suppression of non-consumerist dissident tendencies is unlikely to be as spectacular, or compelling as the Spanish Civil War or The Great Leap Forward; the slide into, what Nationalists freely admit, is a looming dystopia will likely be slow, controlled and it will not flatter the egos of these prophets of doom.

special-ops-group2
If you really annoy the Globalists they do more than cancelling your Facebook account and getting you fired from your job

If we are truly on the hunt for signs and wonders in this age of mass surveillance and rule by global corporations then we might argue that present developments should occupy the bulk of our attention rather than endless examinations of the past.

We apply a slight caveat here in that there is nothing new under the sun as far as repressive regimes are concerned; the old rules of Stasi, Gestapo or Special Branch skullduggery still apply and we can be reasonably sure that if things really ran out of hand, as they did in the mid 20th century, that the knuckledusters and water board would be employed without hesitation by today’s state-sanctioned goon squads.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

As we have explained in a previous article, the Pigs serve the Globalists; if we may borrow from the lexicon of 1960’s Hippie radicals, the Pigs in blue, or in plain clothes and the Pig media support the big Capitalist Pigs on high.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

Smith
A Dog of the Leftist variety who regularly boasts of ratting people out to the Federal Police

In the Australia of 2017, this Dog culture is rampant and we would suggest that is the main impediment to radical political activism, no matter from where said radicals draw their inspiration; these days sincere Leftists are just as likely to be pilloried for their views as  Nationalists or Muslim fundamentalists.

We are appalled by the way Right-Wingers, Leftists and most people in between seem intent on publicly denouncing anything and anyone who challenges the mainstream narrative, or even mildly irritates them in a Facebook stoush, even to the point of bullying mentally unstable people into rash, or violent actions merely to tar their friends and comrades with the “extremist” label.

These attempts to pillory often harmless people are rarely done to gain political advantage, or to undermine the system, the snitch collectives, such as Antifa, as well as the Far-Right vigilantes really have no political background or strategic objective.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

The goal is to humiliate others and throw them into the maw of the security state based on where one stands of the false ideological divisions and ever-shifting, fantasy role-playing conventions of cyberspace.

This is not to say that there are no real-world consequences for people who interrupt or harass the minions of globalism, the security state loves a conspiracy or a human rights charge; as we saw with the Bendigo Three there is basically no way to defend oneself from accusations of so-called “Hate Crime”.

Erikson jameson
Fake Muslim but proud, self-described ASIO informant

We ask our readers to ponder that very situation and ask themselves why upsetting Muslims might, in theory, create a problem for the state to the degree that they are willing to pursue people uphill and down dale over a social media post deriding Jihadist Muslim terrorism?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

If we are to believe the top cops then all that has prevented Pitt St and Federation Square from being strewn with body parts from some Muslim outrage is the cooperation they receive from, we guess, “good Muslims”; though that brings up the question of who is really holding all the cards in the war on terror?

Who is to say that these Muslim collaborators are acting altruistically as opposed to playing a long game of their own?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

Globalist Cosmopolitanism requires Orwellian oversight, multiculturalism clearly cannot sustain itself without a substantial number of citizens being willing to act as de-facto censors and unpaid informers for the state and the corporations who are gradually assimilating into its institutions.

Furthermore, the only way the modern state can accommodate fractious minority groups, mainly, but not limited to, those citizens devoted to Mohammed is to cultivate an even more pervasive surveillance and informant network, a process, we now know, which requires total silence and obedience by all other Australians.

The absolute worst thing an Aussie can do these days is to disturb the status quo, to question where this regime of Globalist Capitalism fused to second generation Communism is leading us; forget your posterity, forget any notions of justice or fair play; do not disturb the Rats, just sit down, grab your iPad and credit cards and consume! Consume! Consume!

snitch161004

‘OZRAELI AVI YEMINI’ AND THE MOSSAD PATRIOT CHAIN

‘OZRAELI AVI YEMINI’ AND THE MOSSAD PATRIOT CHAIN

The background

When one of our staff messaged Zionist Avi Yemini by Facebook to substantiate any involvement with fringe political crook Nick Folkes we knew it was a roll of the dice as to whether or not he would respond, and if he did, would he be straight with us?

Nationalists had detected links between Folkes’s Party for Freedom and Yemini. There has been no proof to date that he and Folkes have any direct involvement together, yet members of his unregistered micro party certainly have, so the prospect existed.

However, as unsurprising as all this is, it actually warrants a good explanation, given its maze of ethical contradictions. For instance, UNA has learned that the former leader of Squadron 88, who goes by the possible alias Mark McDonald (we say alias because not even those in his inner circle really know anything about him), is now operating as PfF’s “security”. Once again, Matey Mate is recruiting for another suspect gang.

McDonald went hell for leather when he mysteriously appeared everywhere on the scene at once in 2013. Like a character from a spy novel, he materialised out of thin air, suddenly contacting anyone of note in the nationalist movement. How he came to make such varied connections is itself a mystery given the boy was a total greenhorn. Nevertheless, in no time he would bring ignominy down upon the Nationalist community while arrogantly dismissing every veteran around him. Just like Folkes, he became the latest in a historical chain of provocateurs, creating only discord for our nationalism.

When one of our staff messaged Zionist Avi Yemini by Facebook to substantiate any involvement with fringe political crook Nick Folkes we knew it was a roll of the dice as to whether or not he would respond, and if he did, would he be straight with us?

Matey Mate and his misfits were responsible for letterboxing Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s electorate in Sydney’s Eastern suburbs in September 2014 with badly written anti-Semitic flyers. The area has a high concentration of Jews. The purpose of the stunt was to gain notoriety for their group on the back of a recent incident of anti-Semitism that made the news. A gang of drunken teenagers (it has been suggested of Middle Eastern heritage) had boarded a bus bound for Bondi Junction and then allegedly threatened Jewish children as young as five. This generated community outrage and McDonald, who was enlisting for S88 via Stormfront Down Under, had the bright spark to cash in on it.

Interesting was, at the time, McDonald and his crew were in contact with one Howard Crawford, a Liberal party operative and, ironically, a staunch Zionist. Crawford was also involved with Folkes, and a peculiar alliance began. It was especially strange since S88 was primarily anti-Jew. McDonald lived in a dilapidated house belonging to a member of PfF. McDonald hosted many meetings at that house. Crawford was a regular visitor who occasionally brought gifts of beer and pizza.

The thing is, no matter how much it tries to piggyback on prevailing trends like the recent ‘edgy’ Alt-Right phenomenon, PfF is both a kosher patriot set and spoiler outfit. Radka Smith, who is the party’s second-in-charge, is Jewish. James Sternhell, who is not a PfF member but still supports PfF is as Jewish as a lox bagel. Thereafter, PfF was created specifically as an anti-Islam party. Folkes’s endorsement of Israel dates back to the days of when he and Darrin Hodges protested in defence of Max Brenner chocolates, a Jewish chain store targeted by left-wing pro-Palestinian groups.

screen-shot-2015-11-03-at-3-59-52-pm
George Jameson (L), Radka Smith (C), and some git (R). Back in 2014, Radka was abused for being a Jew by Mark McDonald who is now the Peanuts’ security. Is he another repentant Neil Erikson?

What then would supposedly fanatical neo-Nazis want with this mob? Putting aside Crawford and his Patriot Games, the question is as relevant as ever, since McDonald is back following an extended hiatus.

The Petersham-based McDonald was present earlier this year when the Peanuts hijacked a Penrith anti-mosque demonstration at Penrith. He also travelled to Lithgow for a failed demonstration against a proposed Moslem centre. He put in a furtive appearance at Newtown when Antifa failed to face down Nick and the Peanuts. Most recently, he marched with the Peanuts in Sydney, rallying around the statue of Captain Cook in Hyde Park. In one pic, he can be seen with his young recruits standing behind Jewish Jimmy Sternhell who is carrying a flagstaff. This did not seem to bother the supposedly virulent anti-Semite.

21754556_517427725286156_1363375268_n
Mark “Matey Mate” McDonald, the virulent anti-Semite standing behind James Sternhell (holding flag), who is very much a Semite. Contradictions? Nah…

What then would supposedly fanatical neo-Nazis want with this mob? Putting aside Crawford and his Patriot Games, the question is as relevant as ever, since McDonald is back following an extended hiatus.

Also at that rally was George Jameson who is of Serbian heritage. Seldom has a Patriot rally gone down when George wasn’t there. Wherever action is, Jameson is sure to be on hand. He waved the Israeli flag in the infamous image taken at the 2014 Penrith anti-mosque rally. His unremarkable Malteser head is everywhere if you browse through snaps from rallies past. Yet, despite his ubiquitousness, he remains a curious, marginal figure.

120914-diwarnai-bentrokan-pembangunan-musala-di-sydney-disetujui2-618x412
Georgie Boy Jameson intensifying his shilling for Israel

Jameson has been allied to rat Neil Erikson and attended each court date of The Bendigo Three, Erikson’s sole ally. Erikson has a history of involving himself in Folkes’s murky business. For a time there, Folkes’s enemies were Erikson’s enemies. Folkes’s lies became Erikson’s lies, and nobody tells pork pies quite as easily and unashamedly as Erikson. Erikson has lied so long and so often that to him truth is whatever pops into his mouth. Outside the trial, many nationalists reported Jameson was spotted with his skank Penny Tridgell in close consultation with Yemini. The three sure seemed thick as thieves. So when an emergent Zionist Patriot hero like Avi Yemini links up with associates of a freshly Nazified Nick Folkes you naturally ask, “What’s all this then?”

Similarly, when you hear from very reliable sources that the kid who modelled himself on Romper Stomper’s Hando, now aligned with Folkes, is attending Krav Maga classes in Bondi, a hand-to-hand combat system developed by the Israeli Defence Force, and of which Avi Yemini is a well-known exponent and entrepreneur then you sense the plot thickening.

Then, if you’re anything like our UNA staff, you fire off a private message to Yemini himself and ask him some rather blunt questions about his relationship with these characters. After all, true nationalism must be protected at all costs.

The Daily Mail and the “mocking” Jew

Just about every conspiracy theory regarding the Jews and their command of the mainstream media came true this week when our UNA staffer hit the send button on a series of private messages to Yemini.

That which started out as a fishing expedition for a quote regarding Yemini and Folkes wound up as a fake news story in the egregious Daily Mail. What was truly ridiculous was the angle given the story.

See, initially, our staffer asked Yemini about his involvement with Folkes. Yemini actually responded, much to his surprise. He told our chap that he had no involvement with Folkes. Our staffer then mentioned Jameson and asked about their tête-à-tête. Yemini, whose gift for champagne comedy rivals the greatest comedians who ever cracked a jape, responded with, “No. We’re in a gay relationship. He’s my sugar daddy.”

At this point, our staffer required emergency surgery so that his split sides could be sewn back together. Recoiling from the greatest rejoinder ever, the exchange eventually degenerated until it culminated with our scribe suggesting Avi tests out his “bullshit Jew martial art” in a “cage fight” with an “Aryan”. This wasn’t serious, although, frankly, it would be well worth the ticket price. As he put it to us, “I was dealing with an obtuse pillock whose schoolyard comebacks were deeply irritating and that’s what he got. Plus, I had several glasses of wine.”

So, imagine all of our surprises when we clicked on the Daily Mail and discovered this abortive exchange was deemed to be a news story in which a “neo-Nazi thug” was “mocked” by the hero Jew Patriot. In essence, the might of the mainstream media just did Avi’s fighting for him, and you have to interrogate that.

That which started out as a fishing expedition for a quote regarding Yemini and Folkes wound up as a fake news story in the egregious Daily Mail. What was truly ridiculous was the angle given the story.

This epochal put-down of his was not a genuine riposte since our writer never actually zinged him, to begin with. He only asked about a meeting witnessed between Avi and the Serb. When it came to print, however, that crucial point of the whole story was reduced to what is known in the trade as “bullshit”. It was inferred that he just happened by chance to be sitting next to “another” random “extreme right activist” in “the public gallery”, who was not mentioned by name. In fact, the meeting did not occur in the public gallery. After all of this, Yemini is still evading the question.

Then we had to field another problem, “How does a private message exchange from Facebook even end up with a journalist?”

12291897_904753899562212_1995994119040259997_o.jpg
A fully wakkas Aussie boy from Avi’s IDF school shows his Aussie Pride

There are two possibilities here: Yemini, being so proud of his fatuous response published it on his Facebook page and it was randomly spotted by a Daily Mail hack, or else Yemini has a hotline to the hacks and reported it promptly desiring either publicity or payback. Either is just as likely to be true. The disturbing thing is Yemini seems to be so regularly in the news.

As we ruminate about this mysterious Zionist’s power to command media, we will revisit our previous question about how this happened in the first place. This is where we took a look at the “journalist” involved and what did we discover? We found that Stephen Johnson is not one of your typical left-wing liberal ABC MEAA mafias, but is himself a civic patriot. This is interesting.

We checked out Johnson’s Twitter account since he had closed-settings on his Facebook page and we found a veritable who’s who of civic patriots and groups. By all accounts, this witless drab is a supporter of Avi Yemini and either is in contact with him regularly or makes a point of checking Avi’s FB page.

Then we had to field another problem, “How does a private message exchange from Facebook even end up with a journalist?”

So we have an ultra-orthodox Jew, or at least one with strong Zionist loyalties who has snagged for himself the leadership role in the yawning vacuum of the Reclaim Australia movement, consorting with a close comrade of Nick Folkes. When asked about this he whistled a sardonic tune to drown out the question and two days later is artificially declared the victor of a non-existent battle of wits by the DM, which is championing one who is making his bones as an anti, anti-racist activist. Confused?

It gets even more baffling since we got to this place in the first instance trying to figure out why this poster boy for Mossad is dealing with civics that deal with Nazis who deal with Jews.

Oh, and in its fake news article, it is worth noting that Johnson described Yemini as a “Jewish activist”. Bear this in mind because the distinction is of the utmost significance in its inadvertent resonance of truth.

The Mossad Patriot

The thing to do at a time like this is to stop, take a deep breath, and find out who the fuck Avi Yemini really is. What does a Jew think he’s doing styling himself as a dinky-di Aussie Patriot for Zionist Israel? Why do idiots buy into it in their tens of thousands on his tacky Facebook page? We can at least answer some of these questions.

As UNA types this screed, Yemini is preparing for a rally at Melbourne’s state parliament this Sunday to push his “Patriot” credentials on the broad basis of protesting a crime wave which he holds Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews responsible for. The platform is nebulous enough to satisfy all the requirements of the mainstreaming which the RA movement is infamous for. However, we think he hasn’t got the nuts to say what he really means, which is an AFRICAN crime wave. But there, we said it for him.

There is indeed a problem with Africans in Melbourne and it’s ironic that a Jewish fundamentalist has an issue with it since back in Israel they wanted to deal with their African problem by sending all of them here. But hey, where Jews are concerned, contradictions line the road like cryptic signposts.

Countering this nebulous show of civic dissatisfaction will be Antifa and a bunch of far left-wing groups who according to The Australian want to exert a show of strength against “the homophobic far-right”, which would suggest that some, or probably all of the parties involved, seriously have their issues mixed up.

But how could they make so angry when the chief organiser on the right side of the fence is a JEW? Haven’t they heard about the fourteen billion who were gassed and turned into ironing board covers and pillowcases during the thirty years of The Holocaust™?! Shouldn’t they be defending Avi, who, as persecuted minorities go in the game of victimhood, sits at the top of that particular food chain?

In that case, Avi is ‘the one’ since they don’t come more Jewish, or more Aussie, than Aussie Avi. So intertwined are the fortunes of our historically-wedded neighbouring nations that Avi had the genius inspiration to coin the term, Ozrael.

This is the price a patriot, and self-touted possible future candidate for One Nation must pay if he is going to do stuff. But what stuff is Avi going to do? Avi aims to reclaim Australia for Israel while reclaiming the Patriot movement from Blair Cottrell, who is a Nazi after all. If it’s to be a truly Australian movement then it must accept Jews. There should be nothing confusing about that since as brilliant nationalist theorist Neil Erikson pointed out when he told The Australian, “You cannot be a nationalist and NOT support Israel”.

In that case, Avi is ‘the one’ since they don’t come more Jewish, or more Aussie, than Aussie Avi. So intertwined are the fortunes of our historically-wedded neighbouring nations that Avi had the genius inspiration to coin the term, Ozrael.

21729089_516499462045649_1061722325_n
The easiest way to make Australia safe is to cut all ties with Israel and its bitch the UN, and send home all of its troublemakers

It’s pretty cool when, unlike an actual Australian, you inherit two identities. An Australian is just a, well, Australian, and we’re not even that because we’re mere boat people and anyone can be Australian. Only Aboriginals can truly be ridgy-didge Australians; even if White Europeans actually built this country. But an ISRAELI-AUSTRALIAN, well, he or she can enjoy the best of both worlds; shooting Palestinian kids one week, and bathing on iconic Bondi Beach the next. In fact, murdering Palestinians is as Australian as chucking a snag on the barbie or slicing a baby’s penis while a room full of kvetching Skypes nibbles a catered lunch.

Aussie Avi is so hell-bent on restoring this country to a pre-Whitlam Xanadu that he is doling out free stickers with “Make Australia Safe Again” on them. This must mean he is sincere!

Trouble is Australia will never be safe so long as these tribal Jews have any involvement in our country since they’re the most vociferous proponents of filling it with hostile aliens and then enacting laws so that we cannot speak out against them.

In that case, Avi is ‘the one’ since they don’t come more Jewish, or more Aussie, than Aussie Avi. So intertwined are the fortunes of our historically-wedded neighbouring nations that Avi had the genius inspiration to coin the term, Ozrael.

It is thanks to our “special relationship” with Israel that “international obligations” compel us to accept quota after quota of the refugees generated from pushing Israel’s agenda in the Middle East, so some, we’re not saying all, but some cynical souls just might want to tell Avi to fuck right off back to the red sea and drown.

So is Avi the darling of all media? Does the Jewish community, in general, regard him as an unsung hero for his tireless work promoting both himself and his homeland of Israel… erm, we mean, Australia?

Oddly enough, it depends on the ideological soundness of the publication, but we’ve discovered that Australian Jewish News isn’t terribly impressed with Avi’s dalliances with One Nation and ex-boot boy dickheads like Neil Erikson. In fact, they cannot get past the Erikson thing at all. This is a trend repeated by Jewish journalists in The New Matilda (no surprises there) and The Guardian. However, The Times of Israel, a neoconservative rag, allowed him a whole blog to gush about “Why I’m proud to be a fucking Jew”.

images
Avi never joined the Australian Defence Force. But instead, he went back to Israel to shoot Palestinian children

Nevertheless, when his first bold dash to seize patriot ground was attempted back in December last year after he invited One Nation senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts to address a meeting in a hall booked from Glen Eyrie Council matters came unstuck after the council cancelled the booking. But worse, the Jewish community was unified in their opposition to the meeting. Yemini responded by branding the council “anti-Semitic”.

Currently, Avi had his name and photo removed from the webpage of the Australian Jewish Association (AJA). The AJA was cobbled together only recently and Avi’s role in it is vague to those outside of its circles. For their part they claim, “Mr Yemini was never a director, office-bearer or spokesman for AJA.”

So is Avi the darling of all media? Does the Jewish community, in general, regard him as an unsung hero for his tireless work promoting both himself and his homeland of Israel… erm, we mean, Australia?

Yemini spat the dummy, accusing the fledgeling association of “cowardice” and adding, “I am resigning the board as I have lost faith in it.” Then he took credit for the whole idea, grizzling, and “I do it with a heavy heart as I do believe in the mission statement. In fact, the entire organisation was my idea.”

The first order of business at the AJA’s very recent launch at South Caulfield Synagogue was to discuss “The Threat of Islam to Jews”. This was after another, more nervous venue cancelled, for fears of a terror attack. It wasn’t ‘the threat of Islam to Australians’ but to “Jews”.

Avi’s objectives couldn’t be clearer — to garner support for his true homeland — and those who are fool enough to revere this foreign agent as being somehow emblematic of “Aussie pride” just reveal their ignorance. They are also hopelessly doomed to being fodder for the system.

Avi-Yemini.png
Once again, Avi showing his pride in another Nation, this time America’s (then soon-to-be) President

On another occasion, ever sensitive to Israel’s interests, Avi took offence at the ABC broadcasting a graphic in which Israel appeared to Yemini to have been blacked over on the map and captioned as being ‘Palestine’ in a news item. Posting once more on his Facebook page gained him media coverage after he feverishly wrote, “Last night ABC News wiped Israel off their map. They’re literally doing the Islamists’ dirty work for them. We must defund these traitors immediately.”

If it isn’t patently obvious by now that Yemini is a full-time shill for Israel then consider that through his “IDF Training” gym in Melbourne the former Israeli soldier has trained members to fight in Israel — that means to kill Palestinians. There is even an online application to join the Israeli Army on his IDF Training webpage! Ignoring the narrative of the occupiers,  Palestinian people’s land is being occupied by an aggressor comparable to the Nazis of Jewish Hollywood. It has been reported, too, that at his gym he ran a charity drive collecting money for Israeli Defence Force (IDF) families back in Israel: not Legacy.

Just in case there is any doubt remaining that Avi serves Israel’s interest and his whole involvement in Patriot Politics is to drum up backing for the chosen ones and their illegal wars, Avi runs the Facebook Page “I Stand with Mossad”.

Yemini was born here yet served as in the Israeli army — a soldier for a foreign state — and his loyalties so clearly lie with that aggressive little stretch of desert which is, one way or another, determining the fate of the entire world. If Israel was not unduly “recognised” by our government he would be considered in terms of a terrorist.

21729084_516499528712309_1264026518_n
Avi’s “other” group is not titled I Stand With ASIO

All his life Avi was burning to return to his Israel and kill Palestinians; a western-mandated one-sided conflict that is generating nearly all contretemps with the Arab world. This is very Australian of him. And this loyalty to an alien race is something else that typifies what we know as the far-right in this country — this blurring of the line that assumes any enemy of Islam is an ally of Australia and through that alliance IS Australian.

Nationalists first saw this in Reclaim Australia which ignited but then quickly came under the control of the Zionists who rebranded Patriotism and now want to own the word ‘Nationalism’. Indeed, just as much of what we buy is branded “MADE IN CHINA”, so much of what passes for far-right politics in this country should be stamped “MADE IN ISRAEL”.

UNA has defined Nationalism for our readers in every permutation possible. But here is the Collins English Dictionary definition: “Loyalty or devotion to one’s country; patriotism” — got that, Avi, to ONE’S country, not someone else’s country.

Just in case there is any doubt remaining that Avi serves Israel’s interest and his whole involvement in Patriot Politics is to drum up backing for the chosen ones and their illegal wars, Avi runs the Facebook Page “I Stand with Mossad”.

In 2010, it was revealed that Mossad faked three Australian passports used to murder Hamas leader Mahmoud Al Mabhouh in Dubai. Mossad regularly used fake Australian passports. Israel got snooty when our government asked questions. This is what a great friend Israel and Mossad are to us.

Birth of a Zionist

In 2004, a 52 min documentary Welcome To The Waks Family aired on SBS. Produced by a friend of Avi’s father, Zephaniah Waks, it documented a period in the lives of his Melbourne-based, Jewish orthodox family.

Avraham was one of 17 children raised in strict Chabad observance by Zephaniah and his wife, Chaya.

What stuck out was that Zephania’s  family did not bring him up to be such a fanatical Yid. They raised him in what most would describe as an “assimilated” lifestyle on Sydney’s North Shore.

welcometothewaksfamily.png
It was like Sylvania Waters only with the score to Fiddler on the Roof playing in the background

As a young bloke in the 70s, the liberal Zephaniah led a hippy lifestyle. He smoked Pot, surfed, and was ‘groovy’. But he began to feel spiritual pangs (either that or the munchies). His metaphysical yearnings led him to Buddhism, but he soon met some Lubavitch Jews. Before long he was sporting a gruesome beard, locks, and observing all the Hebrew pieties. Zephaniah was back with the tribe and that, in essence, is the goal of the Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidic movement — to reunite Jews with their faith so that Maschiach, or the Messiah, will rock back on down to earth and high-five all the Israelites (except the women, for modesty reasons).

Yemini Hippie Father
Avi’s dad Zephaniah back in his secular hippy days channeling Frank Zappa

Meanwhile, Avi’s mother grew up in Israel as strict as they come. At the time of the doco, the woman had never visited a cinema, or attended a gig; not even to see Simon and Garfunkel. The 70s were wasted on her. But she obediently submitted to her wifely duties squeezing out 17 new Jews. She spent the rest of her time wiping their bums and cooking. But not on Saturdays, since work of any kind are forbidden to these weirdos: they’re not even allowed to turn off a light-switch.

Avraham was one of 17 children raised in strict Chabad observance by Zephaniah and his wife, Chaya.

Outside of that, they were not permitted to play with “goyim” children. In one scene of this documentary, rather than risk mixing with the goyim, the Jewish community hires out Melbourne’s Luna Park for a day of fun in their yarmulkes. But they cannot leave well enough alone even on a break and the men can be seen stopping to pray in a room. This is where we come to wonder about Avi’s obsession with Islam. For all intents and purposes, his lifestyle was Islamic.

Instead of veils, Chabad women wear wigs or hats. They’re not as bad as Islamic women, certainly, but the men’s look is seriously crook. What’s more, due to modesty laws, Hasidic men and women, regardless of whether they’re married or not, cannot touch one another or socialise; even at a wedding. That sort of inhuman observance would please any Grand Mufti. But the Taliban stuff continued: movies, novels, mainstream music, none of these were allowed in the Waks household (what kind of name is Waks?). They had a TV and entertainment unit, but tacked to the glass of the cabinet was a note that read, “This unit is used only for Kadesh secular educational and family videos.”

Pity Hollywood Jews don’t feel that way when it comes to entertainment and the goyim mind.

PossibyAvi
The “Patriot” in embryo

Then there is food; Chabad Jews are just as fucked up about their food as Moslems. The Waks required two different stoves and a whole extended kitchen just to deal with their kosher requirements. Apparently, the council was so suspicious over planning drafts they suspected the Waks was planning on building a boarding house since their kitchen was so unbelievably huge.

Sealing them even more hermetically in a Jewish bubble, the family house was across the road from the Chabad factory: the St Kilda Yeshiva College, which is not only where the children were sent for religious indoctrination, but where Manny Waks, Avi’s brother, was sexually abused by a male guard.

Pity Hollywood Jews don’t feel that way when it comes to entertainment and the goyim mind.

Two other members of the Waks family were also interfered with while building their acquaintanceship with Hashem.

This all came out many years later and was the catalyst for the smashing of Manny and Zephania’s faith while Avi would side with the college and the Chabad community. This we draw attention to since it says much about Avi’s loyalty as a son and brother but more so where his loyalties lie to Australia. Avi wants to protest those Moslems who hold our laws in contempt yet opposes Mesirah, which is where a Jew reports another Jew to non-Rabbinic persons. How’s that any different from Sharia, or a Moslem refusing to observe respect for a magistrate or judge?

BetterPictureofYeshivaWhereMannyWasMolested.png
The view of the pedo rape house Jew college from the house where Yemini grew up

Manny’s case brought a supportive father out of a religious order Zephaniah Waks now dismisses as a “cult”. The charges were upheld and the college shamed. The case became a subject of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Rabbi Zvi Telsner, The Rabbi in charge of the college resigned in 2015 (his contract was renewed in August 2017, after the head died down). But for going against the tribe Manny, Zephaniah and Chaya were ostracised by the “cult” community.

AvisFatherJewishCommunityHiresOutLunaParkToCelebrateHolidayMostlyGoyimFree(exceptforshleppingstaff)
Avi’s dad and the Melbourne Jewish community enjoy a Goyim-free day at Luna Park

Avi’s parents sold up their house and moved on. But Avi is the most vicious of anyone in that cult: he went levelled bogus allegations of abuse against his own father in a bid to invalidate their accusations, which have been confirmed by the process of Australian law. He accused his victimised brother and father of conspiring in a lie.

A case of defamation arose between him and his brother over a Facebook post in which he inferred that, because of a disgraced Rabbi, who had been charged in New York with child offences, stayed at their home, they were hypocrites. The family claims they were unaware and asked him to leave when they learned the truth.

Two other members of the Waks family were also interfered with while building their acquaintanceship with Hashem.   

Note, too, that Avi no longer uses the surname Waks (can hardly blame him there) but Yemini. This is interesting since his mother was actually born in Yemen and moved to Israel as a nipper.

Can'tgetMoreAussieThanThis.png
The full Waks

In the end, what is the difference between the Islam that Avi wants us to unite with the Jews against and his Hasidic community and other outspoken Jews? They are both alien cultures who wish to recreate their foreign environment within our midst and impose their beliefs and attitudes.

As demonstrated above, when it came to a choice between his Judaism and his family, his religion came first. How do you think he feels about Australia?

Strictly business

In an interview with the Times of Israel, Avi admitted his intentions have little to do with embracing Australianness. He said, “My wife and I launched our business, IDF Training in 2009. Our goal went beyond supporting our growing family. Our mission was to show (Australian) Jews that being a proud Jew, being a proud Zionist can work for you and should be part of your business plan.”

And that, Folks, is the rub. If you think that Avi came amongst us inept Goyim to expunge “Nazis” from the Patriot Movement and lead us to a new golden age of Aussie identity, think again. His purpose is two-fold, to garner backing for Israel, and to fill his pockets with shekels. He has already admitted that he has political ambitions, and much as Pauline Hanson cynically used the Australian people for a payday this is Avi’s goal too.

Our media gives this Zionist oxygen, and the manner in which he was inserted into the contentious Game of Patriots to rival the “Nazi” Blair Cottrell should speak volumes to those who truly oppose the Globalist Order.

Sadly, the average Aussie Patriot is out of his ken when it comes to these matters, especially when the beguiling element of Zionism is thrown into the mix. They make the simple arithmetic that an enemy of their enemy is not only their friend but their ally. They have never had a head for world affairs and cannot draw the lines that connect Israel and its American host with the deeds and intrigues that generate Moslem immigration in the first place. They have little idea of the role that Israel has played in destabilising Syria which led to Tony Abbott, himself a Zionist, to import 12,000 Syrians into our country.

Because they are so clueless, these ‘Patriots’ as they apocryphally call themselves, haven’t figured out you can only be patriotic to your own people — not an alien Semitic race. But time and time again they fail this lesson, as they did by throwing support behind non-Australian, non-White Danny Nalliah.

These faux patriots are just as likely to support an African “Patriot” if he interposed himself on their movement. All he would need to do is to wrap the flag around himself, mouth a few platitudes, and due to the novelty of it all he would win their vote.

We now return to where we started — Nick Folkes and his Peanuts for Freedom. We have it on good authority that Nick Folkes did not sanction the stunt in which Jameson, a Downs Syndrome sufferer, and Neil Erikson stormed a Yarra Council meeting. And knowing Nick, who is jealous of anyone he senses as a rival, he is not pleased with the rise of Avi Yemini. But as capitulation is his only option, will Nick now once again publicly return to his support for Zionism and ditch the Totenkopf decals of the “edgy” Alt-Right?

Something is happening there, and because of the over-the-top reaction when UNA merely asked Avi what his business with Jameson is — seeing as how Jameson and his Peanut friends now have a staunch anti-Semite SS wannabe as “security” — we suggest that it is important enough since the question was so publically obfuscated by a curious chain of Zionist Patriots.

dekzjagtnlyuxgx-800x800-nopad
Aussie Patriots, we present Blair Cottrell’s replacement as Supreme Leader of the Aussie Patriot Movement for Reclaim Australia

 

 

THE ‘BENDIGO THREE’ VERDICT — INSIDE KANGAROO COURTROOM 19 AS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS REPEALED IN VICTORIA

THE ‘BENDIGO THREE’ VERDICT — INSIDE KANGAROO COURTROOM 19 AS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS REPEALED IN VICTORIA

Victoria is now officially an Orwellian Police State following last week’s conviction of the Bendigo Three on charges arising from the mock beheading of a dummy.

On Tuesday, September 5, in Melbourne Magistrates Court, Magistrate John Hardy found Blair Cottrell, Neil Erikson, and Chris Shortis guilty under section 25(2) of The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act, 2001 (RRTA). This is the first time that section of the law has been used in a prosecution. A conviction was recorded for each defendant, and a fine of $2000 plus a $79.50 statutory charge was imposed.

This judgment marks a turning point. Having peeled off its mask, the multiculturalist state is now showing its true authoritarian face. Magistrate Hardy’s judgment has not only set the bar for prosecution perilously low but decided it can be set anywhere the state chooses. Freedom of speech is the foundation of all other freedoms in a democratic society. Before the advent of multiculturalism in this country, the main restrictions to that implied freedom of expression were defamation, obscenity, intellectual property and incitement. While some argue that vilification laws are similar to defamation laws, the differences between the two indicate how far our freedoms have been eroded in the name of safeguarding feelings.

download (3)
The much overused still from the infamous video that incited hatred against Moslems and will probably trigger World War Three

Firstly, defamation is civil law, whereas section 25(2) of the RRTA is criminal law. Secondly, in defamation law, the plaintiff initiates a lawsuit and seeks a legal remedy. In Ross versus Shortis, Cottrell and Erikson, there was no complainant as in a criminal case. No Muslim had ever complained they felt ridiculed, hated, or treated as an object of contempt. No Patriot has testified that the video had incited them to have these attitudes. Instead, the case was brought by the Director of Public Prosecutions with Constable Erin Ross as the informant, who both exercised the entitlement that they, unlike ordinary citizens, have not to take the witness stand. This meant that the defendants could not cross examine their accusers as there were no accusers: a fundamental breach of procedural fairness, due process, and natural justice.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading. The video of the stunt together with extra footage of members walking and riding around Bendigo was uploaded to the United Patriots Front Facebook page as publicity for a 2015 rally held in Bendigo to protest the proposed building of a mosque.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading.

The first of the charges was ‘defacing the footpath and wall of the garden bed’ with ‘the emission of the red substance’. The second charge was ‘willfully damaging property’. “Damage does not need to be permanent”, presiding Magistrate Hardy informed the court. He left aside the question of why any rational person would describe a temporary stain on a footpath from water soluble food dye as “damage”. It took Bendigo Council two attempts to remove the pesky stain. The first time, ordinary water pressure from a hose wasn’t enough, but success was achieved the second time with a Gerni. A few weeks of weather and rain would probably have washed it away but then no-one would have been able to pretend it was a matter criminal enough to press charges. Chris Shortis actually paid the Council over $1000, a fine which exceeds the original cleaning bill. But the State required its pound of flesh!

download (6)
Magistrate John Hardy. He can find the harmless trigger of an eyebrow as incitement to ridicule or contempt

The first and second charges amounted to a prosecutorial fishing trip. The prosecutor, Fran Dalziel, was shamelessly up-front about this. She asked the Magistrate to hear the third charge first and only hear the other charges if the first charge was not proved. Hardy obligingly granted her request. The first two charges were only a backup. Clearly, it had been decided that the accused had to be charged with something, even if it ended up being trivial. Can anyone thereafter doubt that this trial was all along political and owed nothing to any theoretical victim?

RKTHwtp
The real victims in all of this

The trial lasted two days starting on a Monday. Supporters of the three accused had to pass through airport-style security on the ground floor, which was run by a security company. After queuing on the fifth floor, they passed through further security checkpoints, this time conducted by Victoria Police. These included complete photo ID scanning and twin 3D video cameras. Inside Courtroom 19, seating was restricted to 27 bodies, and much of that room was taken up by the less than objective media scrum. The lack of seating meant many travelled to court only to miss out on public seating.

Magistrate Hardy presented a curious anachronism, looking like a cross between Gandalf the Grey and Karl Marx. He informed the court that he had downloaded the RRTA and would read it out in the evening. However, by the end of the farcical proceedings, he would unquestioningly accept the prosecutor’s submission in what was so obviously a fait accompli. Before that, every pretence was made to try and lend seriousness to what was so evidently a show trial. Thus, presiding as he was over a circus, he cracked his whip on Day One of the two-day trial.

The Farce before the force

From the outset, a degree of exaggeration was necessary to contrive a sense of menace out of the stunt and convey this element of folk devilry to the court. A former official of the Greater Bendigo City Council took the stand, doing his best during testimony to convince the court this was a serious affair. After all, he had faced the extreme logistical difficulty and sheer angst posed by the mysterious red fluid it was his insurmountable duty to clean. Almost in judgement of this poppycock, a spectator’s mobile phone suddenly sounded, and the well-timed ringtone of The Benny Hill Show theme mocked the witness. He was subsequently cross-examined by each defendant in turn. Shown a more recent photograph of the ‘damage’ done by one of the defendants with the dummy’s fake blood, he sheepishly admitted that “the red spot may be a pebble”, and there was “no staining”. No graffiti artist had ever been held to such account.

download (4)
The Australia First Party have previously demonstrated in defence of the Bendigo Three

Thereafter, State functionaries dominated the first day’s proceedings with inane testimony that served only to pad out the dubious basis of the charges and give the court a false impression of their gravitas. Senior Sergeant John Phillip Dalton, the detective who headed the police response to the United Patriots Front Bendigo rallies, answered questions about the aims of the UPF. The prosecution then played the video, which was the only proper evidence presented throughout the trial. Afterwards, proceedings took a turn for the silly as Fran asked, “What is on Mr Shortis’s head?” “I’d say a religious cloth of some type”, Dalton replied. Under cross-examination, focus remained on the incriminating headdress worn by Chris Shortis, until Magistrate Hardy informed the defendants that a policeman’s opinion about a headdress was not admissible evidence. They might as well have taken Victorian taxpayer dollars and burnt the lot in a waste bin.

The following witness, Officer Gary Jenkins (a Freemason), didn’t even bother showing up. An excuse was given, that he had suffered a motorcycle accident. Examining the medical certificate (provided by one of the ‘brothers’?), Magistrate Hardy asked why he couldn’t be brought to court, as the certificate only covered work, not court. It was decided not to bother with his evidence, and another thrumming moment in Australian legal history squiggled to the ceiling like a yawning Z.

If the consequences of the day’s judgment would not turn out to be so grave, one may have been tempted to laugh as Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith took the stand. He led a raid on Chris Shortis’s house on Good Friday, 2016, where he seized Chris’s T-Shirt, jeans, and a toy Pirate’s sword. Of these vital pieces of evidence, the most dangerous was the T-Shirt, which hadn’t been washed. However, he forgot to bring them to court, a ditzy oversight that caused a 15-minute delay as they were sent for.

download (5)
Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith before Magistrate Hardy stole his Pirate sword

Once they arrived, Smith beamed devilishly. He could now show the court this damning evidence which he gleefully gathered up and fumbled with in his hands like an excited Lex Luther taunting Superman with kryptonite. But this was a comedy, not drama, and given such, he managed to clumsily drop the T-Shirt, sucking out the tiny puff of air that had momentarily inflated his sails in his moment of glory. He might have got to wave the sword about in a Douglas Fairbanks Jnr impression had the object described on the Bendigo Police evidence register as “One Fake Pirate Knife/Sword” not have been issued for destruction over a year earlier.

Another day, another truckload of taxpayers’ dollars

The morning of Day Two was taken up with submissions from the prosecutor and the three defendants followed by a rebuttal from Miss Dalziel. For reasons unknown, Detective Senior Constable Smith once more attended court, possibly hoping someone had found the Pirate sword. He evidently thought the prosecutor might have it, because in-between sessions he kept whispering anxiously in her ear. A request by Chris Shortis to quote from the Holy Qur’an was denied. He had hoped to share verse 8:12, which says, “Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): ‘I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them’.”

Denied this opportunity to be enriched by the words of the Prophet, the court adjourned for lunch so that Magistrate Hardy could consider his ruling and possibly play with the Pirate sword. On returning at 2 pm, the assembled were informed that Magistrate Hardy needed a further hour’s deliberation, proving he had found the sword after all. In the wash-up, and following all the tedious testimony from the witnesses, the only evidence taken into consideration was the first 39 seconds of the UPF video. Magistrate Hardy seemed particularly taken by this portion of the video given it contained his esteemed Pirate sword.

behead-the-infidel
Another victim of The Bendigo Three’s “intentions”

Mr Shortis had argued that since beheading is illegal, and the RRTA only protects lawful religious activity, the video cannot be subject to the act. Magistrate Hardy rejected this argument as “teleological”. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines teleology as “The explanation of phenomena in terms of the purpose they serve rather than of the cause by which they arise”. This seems to say more about Hardy’s convoluted reflections on the 39 seconds in the video than it does to Chris’s argument in their defence. In fact, we’re pretty sure it sounds like bullshit. Hardy might as well have yelled, “look behind you” for all the clarity of this argument. Likewise, he argued that the law was dealing with “Muslims not beheading”, which is again odd given that there were no Muslims in the video and the only thing beheaded was a sex toy.

But as sure as he invalidated all of Chris’s arguments, he ignored his contention relevant sections of the Australian Constitution imply freedom of expression and that Australia is a signatory to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The latter includes the right to freedom of opinion and expression as a basic principle. Hardy did not agree that there is a conflict between the RRTA and the corresponding Federal law. He did not refer to the Keating government memorandum which suggests there may be. As to the lack of a plaintiff or complainant, he simply said that section 25 does not require it, airily dismissing legal investigation. He noted that the video had chalked-up 275 likes, establishing that it had an audience, which was, to him, a solid basis for construing the malicious intent in the video he believed exists had probably gestated already in weak minds.

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.  Where intent is the issue then inference must be used … The context of the video leaves me no alternative than to find that the intention was to incite serious contempt or ridicule of persons of the Muslim faith.”

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.

So, no actual incitement needs to occur, mere intention, a mental state, is enough to convict and inference is all that’s required to “prove” the mental state of the accused. Thus the burden of proof is reversed for an action merely imputed, which is abstraction upon abstraction. No real barrier remains for the prosecution of anyone the state does not like and the broadness as well as the vagueness of the offending article is pure Kafka. Thus, the presentation of opposing views to any area of the multicultural dogma is potentially a punishable offence, be it Islam, African crime, Chinese imperialism or the objection to curry odours in a unit block. If these views are presented publicly, regardless of whether criminal activity occurs as a result, it can be considered as “incitement”, demonstrable by a few clicks of the ‘like’ button on Facebook. In other words, opposing multiculturalism is a thought crime as well as a hate crime, especially if expressed on Facebook, which half of the legal justice system and Police Force seem to spend their time (and our money) gawping at.

The one glimmer of light from the Magistrate in this otherwise grotesque Stalinesque show trial came during sentencing. The prosecutor claimed that the defendants were lacking in remorse.  Magistrate Hardy, for once disagreeing with Miss Dalziel, noted that remorse in issues of principle is a bit different from remorse in matters such as rape. Undeterred, Fran declared that “Opposition to Islam continues to be held by these men!”

Magistrate Hardy, salvaging an atom of credibility, reminded Miss Dalziel that “They are entitled to oppose Islam it is how that opposition is expressed that is at issue”. But this is another instance of Hardy’s dingbat logic given that opposition cannot exist WITHOUT expression and there are no terms of reference to define the acceptable expression.

In other words, two plus two now equals anything but four.

It is worth noting, too, that when the guilty verdict was delivered members of the media — some believe from the ABC — pumped the air with their fists in a show of celebration.

Following the decision, Blair Cottrell and what’s-his-name went off to file an appeal. Chris Shortis is considering his options.

Bendigo-Three-Arrive-at-Labors-Show-Trial
UNA salutes our smiling hero, Chris Shortis

ED — We point out here that Chris Shortis is a member of United Nationalists Australia, however, this article was produced by another member of our growing team who was present both days of the Kangaroo court.

AVI YEMINI — MAXIMUM LEADER OF AUSSIE PATRIOTS

AVI YEMINI — MAXIMUM LEADER OF AUSSIE PATRIOTS

The Australian Patriot Movement has a new figurehead and he is as Aussie as gefilte fish. His name is Avi Yemini and he used to shoot Palestinian children because he is a chosen one and God told him to do so.

That is the Jewish God, not your bogus God because they’re not the same and they wouldn’t agree to share a restroom.

You have to understand, Palestine is a land that was promised to the Jews, and so Palestinians have been squatting in their home for the past two thousand years. Therefore, think of those IDF bullets as eviction notices.

70ccd7fcb4621193c2788a0cba3524e9
Avi will teach you the Jewish technique of crying out in pain before striking your opponent

Yemini’s time in the IDF serving as a sniper for the Israeli Defence Forces (Defence?) is just one of the feathers in his IDF-issue yarmulke. Avi has been bravely blooded in the conflict against Islam, which is the biggest threat to the Australian way of life since killer Drop Bears, so this seals his reputation as a fully wukkas Australian hero.

Don’t forget, the Australians fought in Beersheba so that the Jews could have a homeland. This means that Aussies share a closer bond with Israel than we do with our dairy-obsessed UnZud neighbours.

But seriously — just in case your irony radar is experiencing interference, we jest. In fact, UNA signals what we regard as an extremely dangerous development in that sloppy circus known as the Civic Patriot Movement.

That is the Jewish God, not your bogus God because they’re not the same and they wouldn’t agree to share a restroom.

Scratch that, the Patriots have ALWAYS been a dangerous development but now their full conversion into a satellite of the Zionist movement is signed and sealed. From now on, to march publically with an Australian flag in any sort of demonstration of Aussie pride will mean respecting the flag of Israel.

The arc of Civic Patriotism runs in a half crescent moon from Victoria through New South Wales and up into Queensland where numb-nut Zionist shonk-merchants like Mike Holt push solidarity with Israel. Following that arc back down again and it comes to a full stop at the doors of the IDF Training Gym in the Jewish stronghold of Caulfield, Victoria. This is Avi’s Fortress of Solitude from where he controls the entire Australian Patriot Movement.

So who the cuck is Avi Yemini, for those who’ve had their brains bashed out with a bowling ball?

Yemini sort of materialised as the whole Patriot thing was in full stride. An Orthodox Jew fully to the right of Moses his gym teaches a martial arts mishmash that is ideal for fending off attacks occurring as you’re stepping out of a sauna.

He also has some sort of shooter’s club for Jews and Goyim who want to fly over to Gaza and blow the brains out of stone-throwing Arab kiddies.

So who the cuck is Avi Yemini, for those who’ve had their brains bashed out with a bowling ball?

For an orthodox Jew, Yemini failed to heed that bit they teach Jews about honouring their father, as he made a bogus claim against the old man who was a righteous activist against child abuse by rabbis in the Jewish community.

Avi saw this as a betrayal of Judaism and told the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse that his pops was a brute that beat him as a kid and was therefore guilty of abuse. This was, of course, completely irrelevant to the commission’s terms of reference but it demonstrated his mettle as Jew from the hard right.

Erikson.png
Yes, the skunk who spent two years ratting out Nationalists for opposing Israel is attempting to be ironic about the J question

Since then Avi has become the Kosher Ying to the Civic Patriot Yang and you will find his stuff being shared on the pages of all strictly anti-Islam protagonists. In fact, he has become a dominant force in this satellite politics, and a thumbs-down from Avi can ruin your Facebook career as a Civic.

When Sherm the Germ tried to reinvent himself as a ‘Nazi’ after doxing any anti-Zionist during his partnership with gerbil Neil Erikson Avi expelled him from the fold. This has also cost Neil Erikson his Kosher credentials and now the Fink who has done more than anyone from the Left to hammer Nationalists is trying to worm his way back with ironic posts and references to Israel on his drastically reduced ‘Nationalist Uprising’ Facebook page (without Facebook Erikson would be like a lifetime junkie undergoing a bone shivering cold turkey). But if anyone wants to know how much support Erikson enjoys they only have to visit Melbourne Magistrate’s Court when the Bendigo Three is in session. Neil’s only mate is the Serbian, George Jameson, with the bald head who famously waved an Israeli flag at the 2014 Penrith rally in Sydney. Other than that, he is surrounded by tumbleweeds and chirping cicadas. But we digress…

Whereas once only the Trotskyite baby killers from the Left had exclusive entrée into the elite media the ‘right wing’ Yemini only has to pluck a nose hair to secure mainstream coverage.

For an orthodox Jew, Yemini failed to heed that bit they teach Jews about honouring their father, as he made a bogus claim against the old man who was a righteous activist against child abuse by rabbis in the Jewish community.

Recently, Avi called for the government to proscribe Antifa as a terrorist organisation (even though it isn’t an organisation) in the wake of the Bolt assault.

When that White Pommy bloke took revenge on the Finsbury Park Mosque following the London terror attacks The Daily Mail, which sucks pig dick, reported on his condemnation of the Moslem community’s double standards in condemning one and not the other. And that should not even be news, but hey.

He received news coverage when some idiot rang up his gym and made a death threat, a total non-event covered by The Age’s Bianca Hall. That recently had a book-end last week when again the Daily Mail reported that the police bothered to track down an unnamed man and arrest him over the phone call. Let’s see if they take Luke McMahon into custody. Fingers crossed.

Realise, too, that Avi’s relationship with the media isn’t necessarily like that of Blair Cottrell. When the media quotes Blair it is to load the reportage but Avi, being untouchable, gets a free run. This was even the case when his attempt to arrange a meeting between Pauline Hanson and her mad dog Malcolm Roberts was protested by the Jewish Left Side. And that’s hardly everything but we’re sick of writing about him

Oh, wait on, we can’t leave it there, we haven’t mentioned the DONATION drive. Avi is chasing shekels on a Go Fund Me type page to “Help Avi Grow”. In this case, he hasn’t so much got what he wanted as what he deserved: $0.00. Something is the matter there.

Yes, folks; Avi Yemini is the new face of Australian Patriotism. The circle is complete. The anti-Islam message is as shrill as ever and inclusivity still rules so long as it doesn’t involve rag heads and Muzzie converts.

Remember, too, all of these tiny satellites are part of the much larger conservative organ which devotedly bangs its head against the Wailing Wall.

Any doubts about Jewish chutzpah in appropriating Australian political real estate is at an all-time high should be allayed by the fact that a person claiming to represent the ‘Australian Jewish Defence League’ recently messaged the Australia First Party offering ‘support’. If that doesn’t take the bagel.

IMPORTANT EDIT: UNA has examined this page supposedly belonging to Neil Erikson and has decided that it is most likely fake. Erikson would never extend to us the courtesy of acknowledging an erroneous source, but in our case, we believe the page we have referenced does not fall under Erikson’s admin but more likely those from our side who would choose to mock him. As funny as that is, UNA desires accuracy, and in the interests of such, admits that references to Erikson in this article must be discarded.

19554223_10155519408563699_1548960775942887118_n.jpg