ANDREWS’ RE-ELECTION WILL GREENLIGHT AFRICAN CRIME

ANDREWS’ RE-ELECTION WILL GREENLIGHT AFRICAN CRIME

As election time looms for Melbournians the inevitability of Labor premier Danny Andrews being re-elected emerges with it. Which also means, African crime gets re-elected.

Andrews, who just signed Victorians over to the One Belt One Road Chinese invasion initiative, so that he can accrue debt to the hungry Chinese at the cost of Australia’s security, has presided over a state in the throes of lawlessness. African crime is out of control but the state’s police commissioner and the government itself are beside themselves peddling misdirection and denials.

African “youth” fear no reprisals from the Victorian legal justice system because there seldom are any. The government is more concerned with its image as the country’s most multicultural state than it is with safeguarding its citizens from the violent acts of savage African immigrants who are here due to refugee quotas. And those quotas come about because for some reason the west has chosen to rescue these savage tribal people from their own self-made horror and import that mayhem to our own “civilised” lands.

The spate of African crimes in the state of Victoria is so incessant and relentless that African fatigue often prevents each and every outrage from being shared on social media communities concerned with the breakdown of Australian society thanks to immigration and especially immigration from incompatible races.

Barely a week goes about without reports of out of control African youths; home invasions; muggings; assaults; robberies and car-jacking in which that familiar phrase we’ve all come to cynically grin at is used when describing the suspects: “Of African appearance.”

When police respond to these incidents they adopt a “munch doughnuts” tactic until addressing 3AW in which case they make out everything is under control; reports are exaggerated; that it’s only a “few bad apples” spoiling it for a great community who love footy and are upset with the way they are being portrayed in the media.

Back in 2010, Andrew Bolt reported on how the then police commissioner Simon Overland admitted that the Victorian Police was hiding the truth about the ethnic crime problem.

One of the most astonishing revelations in Bolt’s article, and one which cuts to the very particular insanity suffered by the virtue-signalling small ‘l’ liberals always at the centre of championing open borders concepts, was that police were loath to issue colour-specific descriptions of African offenders because describing them as ‘black’ might cause these savage criminals offence.

The logical conclusion is not to describe them as “attackers”, or detail any specifics of their crimes, in case the negative criminal associations have an undesirable impact on their future employability as brain surgeons and rocket scientists.

Professor Andrew Fraser sparked a maelstrom of globalist indignation for having the gall to name the beast in the room. In 2005, he wrote a letter to the Parramatta Sun in which he warned: “…an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of other social problems.”

He added, “The fact is that ordinary Australians are being pushed down the path to national suicide by their own political, religious and economic elites.”

andrewfraser
Canadian-born Professor Andrew Fraser easily makes it onto UNA’s honours list!

In the ensuing row from that ‘inconvenient truth’ multiracialist apologists scrambled to bash out editorials condemning Professor Fraser; Channel 9 unleashed Ray Martin to confront him with a congenial group of church-going Africans as though this ambassadorial set were to negate the realities of African crime in much the same way a lot of bad apples spoil it for the few good ones; and academic papers were authored.

Sadly, Andrew Fraser apologised for his remarks after Sudanese man Safi Hareer complained to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission. Professor Fraser also drew the ire of Macquarie University when he wrote a paper advocating for a return to the White Australia Policy. That paper and others can be found here.

Professor Fraser was forced to take an early retirement package, but we shall not forget his courageous stand to state what everyone should regard as the bleeding obvious.

victoria-feature-image.png
A typical front page from Australia’s answer to Mogadishu

The open-borders liberal-elites’ response to all of this is to blame the messenger. There is no African crime problem, they argue, it’s the inherently racist character of the media and others reporting on the situation. They’re skewing the facts, using hyperbole, and they’re overblowing a few regrettable incidents into a campaign that impugns an entire community. It’s not the African gangs that are the problem, they say, but “the racists” who vilify them. And it is these class bigots of, as Drew Fraser said, “the political, religious and economic elites” who will always win sway over Victoria; which is on one level a showcase for a de-Europeanised Australia, which is, after all, the goal of the elites.

SOC.png
Straight from the webpage of the Victorian Socialists. See, it’s not them, it’s us, how could they possibly be responsible for their own actions?

With such a free hand from the elites, it’s little wonder that the crime-prone gang members fear nothing, respect nothing, and aspire to nothing but the accretion of consumerist trophies. In Victoria, the crime is not that committed by so-called refugees and children of refugees, it’s to mention the crime committed by these without rationalising it away as inherently a by-product of Australia’s inherent racism.

Below is the latest from the ABC as of the publication date of this blog:

Police are looking for a group of 10 to 15 youths responsible for two “ugly” and “vicious” robberies on the busy St Kilda foreshore in Melbourne’s south on Thursday night.

Key points:

  • Police said the offenders in both attacks were “perceived to be of African appearance”
  • Investigators are examining if a metal or wooden pole was used in the assaults
  • Local council has been asked to reintroduce an alcohol ban on the St Kilda foreshore

Police said two men were punched and one had a bottle smashed over his head in separate, unprovoked assaults.

In the first attack, a man had his mobile phone stolen and was left with swelling on his face.

In the second, a 25-year-old man received cuts to his face and head and was treated by ambulance officers.

Police said the offenders involved in both attacks were “perceived to be of African appearance”.

Detective Sergeant David Schaefer condemned the assaults.

“These attacks are quite cowardly and vicious, unprovoked and really an ugly event that actually occurs in normally a peaceful location where people frequently enjoy themselves,” he said.

The attacks happened on Jacka Boulevard at about 10:00pm and police said they were investigating whether the offenders may have used either a metal or wooden pole.

Call for alcohol ban

“We’re looking for a group of males of African appearance which we believe were congregating along the foreshore last night,” he said.

“We can’t speculate as to the numbers involved but on the second assault there was anywhere up to around 10 people who were involved in that second robbery,” Detective Sergeant Schaefer said.

Police said the victims had been “enjoying the sights” of the “iconic” St Kilda foreshore.

“The first victim just decided to walk down [and] enjoy the scenes and the second male was visiting a friend down there when he was accosted by the group.”

Victoria Police Inspector Jason Kelly said he was “very disappointed in what occurred”.

“Unfortunately we’ve had a large group of youth attend and the combination of youth, alcohol and public spaces just simply doesn’t mix,” he said.

He said alcohol at the “iconic beach location” was a “recipe for disaster”.

Inspector Kelly said police were calling for a full alcohol ban along the St Kilda foreshore to be reintroduced by the City of Port Phillip Council.

A DAY WHICH WILL LIVE IN INFAMY

A DAY WHICH WILL LIVE IN INFAMY

The films of Paul Greengrass, of which the writers of this blog are longtime fans, are always compelling, often confronting and his latest, 22 July, is no exception.

Recently released on Netflix and in selected theatres 22 July is centred upon the crimes of Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik, who in 2011 carried out twin terrorist attacks, a bombing in the central Oslo area and a shooting attack on the island of Utøya, which claimed the lives of 77 people and left over 300 injured.

Greengrass has woven together the stories of four people involved in the outrage; the terrorist Breivik, one of his young victims named Viljar Hanssen who was left partially blinded and severely maimed by gunfire, Breivik’s defence lawyer Geir Lippestadt and then Norwegian prime minister Jens Stoltenberg.

The opening scenes detailing the bombing of the Norwegian prime minister’s offices and the shooting attack on defenceless young people at the Utøya youth camp are hard on the viewer; if Greengrass does one thing well it is his masterful direction of the action scenes and the depiction of the visceral horror of being caught up in acts of extreme violence.

norway bomb
The aftermath of the Oslo bombing

As in his other films, notably Bloody Sunday and United 93, the viewer’s familiarity with the subject matter only enhances the almost unbearable tension felt as the victims and their assailants, in this case a “Lone Wolf”, move toward their awful shared destiny.

The performances across the board are solid, the actors acquit themselves well enough as horrified victims or helpless bystanders and the revulsion felt toward Breivik by all who cross his path is central to the plot; by the standards of all decent people this terrorist deserved nothing but a quick lynching, yet the film goes into some detail concerning his interrogation and the struggle by the authorities to conduct a fair trial.

As in his other films, notably Bloody Sunday and United 93, the viewer’s familiarity with the subject matter only enhances the almost unbearable tension felt as the victims and their assailants, in this case a “Lone Wolf”, move toward their awful shared destiny.

The moral of the story would be that outsiders, social outcasts if you will, have no right to impose their will upon the many through violent means, even if, on the surface, their cause is righteous.

On this point a serious discussion was had among Nationalists the world over in the weeks following Breivik’s outrage, the enormity of what he had done laid bare the gulf between genuine political activists and the big talking, would-be cyber revolutionaries; this important point is mentioned in 22 July, but it bears further scrutiny with the benefits of hindsight.

norwegian-survivors-viljar
The real Viljar Hanssen, survivor of the Utøya massacre.

Upon hearing of the twin attacks everyone on our side hit the internet to find out who this Anders Behring Breivik was, the feeling of “not again”, the idea that one of our extended Nationalist family had acted rashly and run off the rails, as happens from time to time, was on all our minds.

This was not the case, as the picture became clearer and Breivik’s online manifesto was absorbed by our veteran campaigners and intellectuals it quickly became obvious to us that Breivik was not a political soldier striking out from a trans-European underground, but just another sad loser lost in a fantasy world of his own creation.

Since 2011 there has emerged a good deal of useful analysis of Breivik, his crimes and state of mind; while not conclusive the 2016 paper by University Of Salford academics Lino Faccini and Clare Allely is helpful in putting Anders Breivik in his proper place among the rogues gallery of 21st century mass killers.

This was not the case, as the picture became clearer and Breivik’s online manifesto was absorbed by our veteran campaigners and intellectuals it quickly became obvious to us that Breivik was not a political soldier striking out from a trans-European underground, but just another sad loser lost in a fantasy world of his own creation.

Anders Behring Breivik was no political activist, every attempt he had made to be part of an authentic movement had failed; nor was he part of an underground sect, a youth gang, a fraternal order or a wider online community of fellow travellers; he was, in reality, an isolated, ineffectual individual seemingly beset by pathological narcissism and lifelong insecurities.

22July Breivik
Anders Danielsen Lie turns in a capable performance as Breivik in 22July

Breivik has very little in common with modern, ideologically motivated terrorists, however, he sits alongside some of the worst offenders, the school shooters such as Adam Lanza, Nicholas Cruz and the Harris-Klebold dyad who started it all at Columbine in 1999.

Breivik’s narcissistic rage and psychological decomposition in the face of his failure to launch into normal adult life were the real motivations behind his actions; in this regard Greengrass and his writers fail the viewer, they depict him as having being abandoned by his equally nefarious online comrades, this was never the case, everyone on the so-called “far right” was just as taken aback by the events of 22 July as was the rest of the world.

anders-behring-breivik
Some of Breivik’s home-made costumes for his fantasy personae, far from being a latter day crusader, it was all in his head

THE BILDERBERG CHILD WHO WON’T STAND FOR HER PEOPLE

THE BILDERBERG CHILD WHO WON’T STAND FOR HER PEOPLE

Anti-Australians are celebrating news of a nine-year-old girl in Queensland who refused to stand for our national anthem as in her mind it excludes Aborigines.

The parents of nine-year-old Harper Nielsen who attends Kenmore South State School are claiming their pesky daughter was given detention following a “silent protest” when she refused to stand for our national anthem. The school has denied their allegations. The fourth-grader told the Daily Telegraph she boycotted the national anthem on the basis that “Advance Australia Fair means advance White Australia”. She added, “When it says were are young it completely ignores the fact that indigenous culture was here for over 50,000 years before colonisation.”

How this became news is about as much of a mystery as is where babies come from since her parents, both who look like they graduated from Chairman Mao 101 on an Australian Unions scholarship, went out of their way to ensure it became news. The very name ‘Harper’ we would wager is her parents’ dedication to liberal author Harper Lee, who wrote To Kill a Mockingbird.

Media has since lined up to sensationalise the frumpy pre-tween automaton when they should be interviewing her parents whom the good money’s odds say put her up to it for their own interests.

http_%2F%2Fprod.static9.net.au%2F_%2Fmedia%2F2018%2F09%2F12%2F18%2F42%2FANTHEMSTILL2.jpg
Let’s just hope Harper learns to despise her parents when she reaches her rebellious teen years which aren’t far off

At the tender age of nine, this child is merely parroting what’s been inculcated into her by the two agents of social decay she calls mum and dad (assuming they’re as traditional as to permit these stereotypical designations). These two Trotsykites are raising their brat to conform to all the desires of the misanthropes who comprise the Bilderberg Group.

The Bilderberg Group is a complex topic the reader must investigate independently. While we add a link to a useful webpage, we can only generally describe them and their goals. We invoke them here simply to alert the reader that this ‘news’ is hooey calculated to create tension and division.

Media has since lined up to sensationalise the frumpy pre-tween automaton when they should be interviewing her parents whom the good money’s odds say put her up to it for their own interests.  

Firstly, isn’t it odd that when globalists wish to paralyse this nation through moral invalidation they imply Australia is “all White” and thus all institutions, every significant cultural article, and each strand of our national aplomb is “White” and must be recoded. However, when they wish to own it and to repudiate an increasingly agitated White Australia this country is “multicultural (multiracial)”.

So there are two states of being for Australia and the two can only mutually exist if the paradox is permitted by lazy thinking. The Bilderberg Group advocates population control. Sociologist Hadley Cantril describes employing “Psycho-political operations” as “propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”

This is what we’re seeing all around the western, or to put it bluntly, the White world. This is because another goal of the one-world, one-government, and one-system controllers is the abolition of nation states. It’s little surprise then that the Bilderberg group boasts among its membership such luminaries of globalism as Henry Kissinger, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, David Rockefeller, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Ben Bernanke, and Rupert Murdoch just to name a few.

download (5).jpg

Rupert Murdoch is a glaring presence. The Bilderberg Group uses its media, such as CBS (which it is known to invite along to its secret meetings on the promise of secrecy), to promote mind-wash. Given that the group is not a conspiracy invented by right-wingers, it’s interesting to note that the left has virtually nothing to say about them, which isn’t all that surprising when as we’ve consistently pointed out, they stopped thinking independently long ago. This is why you can witness such incongruous behaviour as self-described “anarchist” Professor Rob Sparrow (aka Slackbastard) championing the cause of the Bilderbergs while believing he’s supporting a cadre of fellow travellers in a global revolution of non-existent “workers”.

Slackbastard swooped like a chicken hawk (or is that like convicted paedophile antifascist Alex Gollan?) onto this child’s story. Rob posted on the SB Facebook page, “mAAAAAAd props to the 9yo grrl for refusing to follow the herd — you rock!” We’re sure glad he isn’t her English teacher.

Sociologist Hadley Cantril describes employing “Psycho-political operations” as “propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”

Meanwhile, the clichés of fake indigenous activism over at Blackfulla Revolution (another FB group) used her case in a rhetorical bush breakfast when they tried to juxtapose the controversy over Herald Sun cartoonist Michael Knight’s spoof of Serena Williams’ recent dummy spit, with Harper’s story by offering up a yawning ‘meme’. Apparently, one is permissible (and racist) and the other is censored (and anti-racist).

41663711_1211907875616153_233038117957795840_n.jpg
Um, no… not even close. We know you’re the sanctified professional underdogs of this country but even you mob ought to be obliged to be accurate now and then

Michael Knight is a satirical cartoonist and well in his rights to exaggerate his subjects, and the other was never censored but instead given a platform which was picked up internationally giving Harper and her hippy parents their 15 mins of social justice-connected fame. It’s also led to her being viciously trolled, which is an inevitability her parents should’ve considered before putting her up to this attention-grabbing media stunt.

8e76d961900cbcbf097a9fe12deac8c0.jpg
Depicting coloured people in cartoons will soon be as dangerous as depicting the Prophet Mohammed 

Fake Nationalist Pauline Hanson even got an opportunity to try and steal back some ground lost to Katter Australia Party’s senator Fraser Anning. She slid out of her money chamber to offer a predictable quote about how she’d give the tot “a kick up the backside”.

Thus, a supposedly pressing social issue has become a kind of perverse entertainment in which the invalid nation state is tossed like a bone for two dogs to fight over. The messages behind these stories are quite startling. The furore over the depiction of Serena Williams now posits that people of colour, no matter how badly behaved, are beyond criticism by Whites; much like depicting the Prophet Mohammed will get your throat slit by a fundamentalist Moslem.

In the case of Harper’s media narrative, a phoney sense of expression on the issue of the supposed plight faced by indigenous Australians is given artificial oxygen. For, if there is a voice united in sounding about the indigenous cause, what is that cause? What is it really? Once they’ve figured out all that maybe they can ponder who it is they’re petitioning.  Is it a collective conscience? Is it political representatives?

Fake Nationalist Pauline Hanson even got an opportunity to try and steal back some ground lost to Katter Australia Party’s senator Fraser Anning. She slid out of her money chamber to offer a predictable quote about how she’d give the tot “a kick up the backside”.

If they really believe that any side that stands for office in Australian parliament will ever have the tools at their disposal to right a social wrong they’re back in the Dreamtime. They haven’t noticed that whichever government is elected serves the internationalist Anglo-American-Zionist bloc which is a faction of the One World Government cabal. The members of the Bilderberg Group aren’t interested in emancipation for the world’s peoples unless it leads to their military industrial complex profiting from war.

If it’s the collective conscience then that is filled now with the self-interest of countless ‘minority associations’ which see themselves as the primary ‘victim’ of White Australia, so in that sense, they’ve pushed the Abo out of the queue.

The oligarchs don’t want Aboriginal tribes achieving native title over lucrative mining assets they want to flog to China because assets are not for the serfs. It’ll never happen. Instead, it’s better to have the serfs beating each other in an irreconcilable conflict that has its flames nefariously fanned by those controlling the actors who are simultaneously condoning and condemning either one or both sides.

As to little Harper, maybe she can figure out whether she wants to stand for the parenting payment that helped raise her, or the Medicare benefits which keep her fit, the state education she receives, the accoutrements of the White race that she denounces that she couldn’t live without, such as her toys, computer, phone, technology in general, and the medium she has used to spit in the face of her own race. Because, little girl, you wouldn’t last long if you were shanghaied off and dropped in the middle of an outback Aboriginal community. Your parents’ rhetoric wouldn’t save you from the fate suffered by their own flesh and blood on a nauseatingly repetitive basis.

Perhaps she could also benefit from an education which permits an untarnished understanding of the origins of our country and how the indigenous people had no claims on it as a nation since they were disparate tribes and NOT a nation. Just maybe she might realise that those people were destined to be conquered by the rules of the human animals: if it wasn’t by the British Empire, it would certainly have been the Dutch or the Chinese. Moreover, she benefits nothing from those like her parents adding to the division of our people; only the certainty that the bigger gap they create in our nation the more inevitable it is that another force will seize on that and push right on through to take us over. In fact, it’s happening now.

Indeed, this little girl, so fresh off the potty yet so quick with the universal condemnations of her own country, should like to spare a thought for the current Chinese invasion now underway in Australia and just how much those in Beijing are likely to give a shit about the Aborigines that she and her parents patronise so.

But she is, as we say, a child. No kid could have the sophistication to make any sort of informed judgment on such matters. Likewise, no nipper could be filled with such patriotism as to look forward to assembly just for an opportunity to stand for the flag. These are kids, they’d rather be off playing.

None of this was ever about thinking… just reacting.

Screenshot_20180912-022419_Chrome.jpg
National Australia Bank employing Bilderberg logic in their ads: promoting multiracialism while brushing over the fact a practising Moslem would wholeheartedly revile their whole stinking usury system

WE ARE THE PEACEKEEPERS

WE ARE THE PEACEKEEPERS

Amid all the political ructions in Canberra and the doings of the big end of town we thought it timely to spend some time on an examination of power in 21st century Australia.

If asked, we would guess that the average worker would name the government and the police as the organisations who wield power and enforce codes of behaviour upon the citizen; a cynic might suggest that there exists another layer of power above the institutions, an elite made up of shadowy oligarchs and “old money” or suchlike.

This is true, up to a certain point, that point is the limit of the patience, tolerance and goodwill of the people and their willingness to submit to being governed and abide by the law; the real power lies with the citizens with the institutions only able to function as they do with our total cooperation.

When citizens decide to disobey the rules, to go their own way or to take the outlaw path in life serious problems arise for the institutions of power, their bureaucrats and the police.

We do not have to look too far for examples of modern day outlawry which have delivered a shock to the system and had the law dogs scrambling to formulate a response; when bad men become convinced that compliance with the status quo is purely optional they can quickly overload the state’s response mechanisms.

Scenarios of this type are a nightmare for the authorities, since the beginnings of White colonisation of this continent there have been individuals and groups of people who have carried out acts of criminality or civil disobedience and in doing so they have exposed the fragility and the limitations of institutional power and its mercenary enforcers, the cops.

Ben_Hall_HISTORICALsmall
Bold Ben Hall, he showed the Traps some fun

We do not have to look too far for examples of modern day outlawry which have delivered a shock to the system and had the law dogs scrambling to formulate a response; when bad men become convinced that compliance with the status quo is purely optional they can quickly overload the state’s response mechanisms.

In our own backyard fugitives such as rapist and murderer Malcolm Naden and the latter day bushranging duo Gino and Mark Stocco, as the old Aussie folk song says “showed the Traps some fun” evading capture for many years despite a massive investment of police time and resources.

In the U.K we can observe the terror and confusion sown by maniacs on the loose such as Raoul Moat and Derrick Bird, who went on a sort of armed “Death Ride” as their lives spiralled out of control and they became convinced that murder, mayhem and suicide was their preferred method of exiting the mortal realm.

“Home grown” Islamic extremists, in spite of what the media and politicians would have us believe, also fall into this category of sad nihilists, misfits and wannabes; there is no revolutionary potential in throwing away one’s life on a one-off spectacular stunt, thus no real threat of a widespread Islamic insurgency in Australia.

The United States has been the setting for myriad outrages of a similar type, beginning in the Old West and carrying on into the 21st century with the escapades of disgruntled cop Christopher Dorner, or the Negro supremacists John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, nicknamed the D.C Snipers.

To this list we could add some Islamic terrorists such as the Kouachi Brothers who, after participating in the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris attempted a Death Ride of their own, leading the Gendarmerie on a chase through the suburbs which ended in their last stand on an industrial estate in Dammartin-en Goële.

naden cops
The hunt for psychopathic fugitive Malcolm Naden, if you are a big enough problem for the state the gloves quickly come off

We give these examples as an illustration of how even fairly deranged, though cunning and organised criminals can wreak absolute havoc in a community and bring the law enforcement apparatus close to breaking point simply by evading capture and carrying out their atrocities on the move; yet these people are, in the main, nihilistic and see no consequence of their actions other than their own death in an exchange of fire with the authorities.

“Homegrown” Islamic extremists, in spite of what the media and politicians would have us believe, also fall into this category of sad nihilists, misfits and wannabes; there is no revolutionary potential in throwing away one’s life on a one-off spectacular stunt, thus no real threat of a widespread Islamic insurgency in Australia.

Revolutionaries must, logically, live to fight another day and another, and so on; even if they do choose the path of the violent uprising they choose their battles carefully and martyrdom is an occupational hazard, as opposed to a tactic in itself.

Imagine then the impact of a hundred, or a thousand highly motivated revolutionaries who were living for the future, whose eyes were fixed upon the horizon for the coming of a new age; imagine a cadre of activists in every town and suburb, a distributed insurgency permanently embedded within the population.

For all the horror and upset caused by terrorists and rampaging, nihilistic criminals intent on making their last stand and their exposure of the limitations of state power in the face of a determined Lone Wolf, or small autonomous cell their outrages are notable for the fact that they never attract any real support or sympathy from normal citizens.

raoul moat
Raoul Moat spun out a jealous rage into a seven day “Death Ride” which caused panic across northern England; his sawn-off shotgun left one killed, one maimed, a policeman permanently blinded and Moat dead of a self-inflicted wound.

Here we come to the crux of the matter, we the workers are the ones who keep the peace in our society, not the state and not its mercenaries and spies.

Consider for a moment the demonstrable impact of one Lone Wolf insurgent upon a high tech, high trust society such as ours.

Now observe the level of fear caused by semi-organised gangs of ethnic criminals, say, the Islander or Sudanese hoodlums, who have no other objective beyond self-gratification, notoriety and the acquisition of cyberspace era electronic trinkets.

Imagine then the impact of a hundred, or a thousand highly motivated revolutionaries who were living for the future, whose eyes were fixed upon the horizon for the coming of a new age; imagine a cadre of activists in every town and suburb, a distributed insurgency permanently embedded within the population.

Indeed, we are the peacekeepers, it is only with our consent and tolerance that the modern, globalist techno-state remains stable; its fragility is obvious to anyone capable of thinking tactically, of wondering in all seriousness “How would we take down the system?”

It is the hope of Nationalists that the widespread withdrawal of consent to the status quo by the working classes, what we call the “secession of the mind” will be enough to frighten the globalist cronies, that this fear of popular revolt will stay their hand.

At this point in time the powers that be are walking a fine line between mere harassment of dissidents and secessionists and outright repression; should the balance tip toward tyranny, then rebellion becomes inevitable and all are acutely aware of the limits of state power, none more so than its architects and enforcers.

800px-Pikeman-IMG_0150-wiki

AUSTRALIAN FOODIES ARE DRUNK ON THE BLOOD OF THE WORKERS

AUSTRALIAN FOODIES ARE DRUNK ON THE BLOOD OF THE WORKERS

As Australia slips further into the grip of globalist corporate cartels and the flood of immigrants overwhelms our suburbs the rampant corruption of the opinion shapers and political power brokers is on display for all of us to see, in fact, the rotten bastards barely bother to hide it now that they rashly assume their great multicultural Ponzi scheme is a fait accompli.

Every day a new scandal is uncovered, a new speck of dry rot in the pillars of the house of globalism appears, be it a dodgy education scheme, an immigration lurk or a new case of wage theft and worker exploitation.

The central support column and chief propaganda meme supporting the globalist position is the “beautiful food” and the bloated, inefficient and deeply corrupt hospitality sector, with its plethora of quasi-ethnic eateries and associated home delivery, media and publishing industries.

If we, the workers, are to accept that an expanded range of dining out options is the only real payoff for all of the myriad other problems put upon us in the name of “progress”, then the globalist exhortation to eat, drink and be merry should ring hollow to our ears in light of the serious, criminal basis of the enterprise.

qantas-rockpool-karryon1-1000x520
Qantas CEO Allan Joyce with Samantha and Neil Perry, globalist Foodie culture in a nutshell

Time after time, outrage after outrage, from the tackiest greasy spoons and fast food joints, to the high end, fine dining restaurants the tales of wage theft, unpaid overtime, tax evasion, bogus labour hire practices and outright slavery have shocked those of us Nationalists in the true workers movement and even partially re-animated  our moribund and generally useless trade unions.

Every day a new scandal is uncovered, a new speck of dry rot in the pillars of the house of globalism appears, be it a dodgy education scheme, an immigration lurk or a new case of wage theft and worker exploitation.

In light of irrefutable evidence that most restaurants, bars and clubs are, at best, suspect and more likely, corrupt to some degree, the diners in search of their ethnic delicacies and foodie cachet are complicit in the rampant exploitation of workers and gaming of the labour-hire regulations; professions of ignorance as to what is going on behind the kitchen doors can no longer be a defence.

coolies embarking
Coolies then

So too the local pubs, once an integral part of working class communities, are now turned into parasitic entities whose sole function boils down to sucking the meagre wages and welfare payments of working people out through their poker machines and onsite Tote agencies and into the bank accounts of big corporations and their shareholders.

Franchise based fast food companies too have been dragged kicking and screaming into the spotlight accused of some of the worst excesses of wage theft and corporate misdemeanour; their targeting of greedy and naive immigrants as potential franchisees and their tolerance of corner cutting and kickbacks is a further indictment of the hospitality sector as a whole.

Furthermore we cannot ignore the new Coolie labour industry which has grown up around restaurant home deliveries, it is a sector dominated by foreign operators and relies on the exploitation of a pool of poorly paid young peons, riding scooters and bicycles, while struggling to make a few dollars an hour in the app-driven race to the bottom of the so-called “gig economy”.

tafe
While governments gut the TAFE colleges dodgy education providers and visa mills proliferate

We scarcely need to mention the corruption of the education sector with its worthless diplomas and certificates in bullshit subjects, Australian universities have become low-quality visa mills running on the same flawed model of part-time or casual tutors and remote learning to churn out not competent graduates but candidates fit only for employment as Coolies in the gig economy.

Franchise based fast food companies too have been dragged kicking and screaming into the spotlight accused of some of the worst excesses of wage theft and corporate misdemeanour; their targeting of greedy and naive immigrants as potential franchisees and their tolerance of corner cutting and kick-backs is a further indictment of the hospitality sector as a whole.

We regard these two pillars of globalist multiculturalism as weak points, if not lynchpins of the whole edifice, take away the pool of cheap student labour, kick out the horde of 457 contract workers and rigorously police, through effective unionisation, the exploitation of our own people and we, the worker-radicals might strike a severe blow to the globalist cronies.

When we speak of “effective” trade union advocacy we, of course, are calling for a de-coupling of the erstwhile workers movement from the globalist enterprise and a re-focusing of the ACTU upon real-world problems, as opposed to the pie-in-the-sky, progressive nonsense currently in vogue at Trades Hall; if this means agitating for entirely new workers committees and a representative body set up in competition to the present council of trade unions then that is the path we should pursue.

We cannot allow the present status quo to stand, we will not be reduced to the status of Third World Coolie labourers, beholden to foreign middlemen and their Australian cronies, sitting glued to our mobile phone apps in the hope of a few hours of badly paid work per day, nor can we allow our young people to be preyed upon by crooked education companies or held in debt bondage via student loans.

Nationalists have the answers, we are the only radical group carrying on in the tradition of the true Aussie workers movement, our salvation lies with the politics of working-class struggle which carried our ancestors out of the “Hungry Years”, which held our society fast against Fascism and Japanese imperialism and which filled our pockets and our bellies in the decades of prosperity in the second half of the 20th century.

deliveroo2-796x448
Coolies now

COMMIES AND COPPERS NOW PARTNERS IN PROTECTION RACKET

COMMIES AND COPPERS NOW PARTNERS IN PROTECTION RACKET

If nothing else, the tour of Australia by Canadian Libertarian YouTube personalities Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux has brought to light an interesting dynamic, if not evidence of a direct relationship, between Victoria Police and the Campaign Against Racism and Fascism (CARF).

Earlier in the week, we learned that, as in the case of the Milo Yiannopoulos tour, the events company which promoted Southern and Molyneux was to be saddled with a bill from the department of justice to cover the extra police resources needed to maintain order at the event, the sum quoted being around $68,000.

CARF and their allies, of course, had been on a months-long bender of “Anti Fascist” agitation in anticipation of the arrival of the two Canadian speakers; the charges of fascism levelled at Southern and Molyneux are patently absurd, as anyone familiar with their work would know, however, their views are not really the issue here.

southern
Stefan Molyneux and Lauren Southern: bloody foreigners.

CARF, at its core, is a bog standard Trotskyite group which serves as a matrix for cadres of bad actors of various tendencies, from Marxists, to Liberals, Christians, Jews and Anarchists. Their Anti-Fascism is nothing more than a hook, a recruiting tool used to gull the young, the lonely and, it seems, the prematurely senile into joining up with this “popular front”.

The opinions expressed by the constituent mouthpieces speaking on behalf of CARF may sound batshit crazy to the humble Aussie worker however they are exemplary of the incubator effect that social media has upon dodgy rhetoric and spurious propaganda.

CARF, at its core, is a bog standard Trotskyite group which serves as a matrix for cadres of bad actors of various tendencies, from Marxists, to Liberals, Christians, Jews and Anarchists their Anti-Fascism is nothing more than a hook, a recruiting tool used to gull the young, the lonely and, it seems, the prematurely senile into joining up with this “popular front”.

As has become painfully obvious, to the principal actors in CARF the Anti-Fascist psychodrama has little to do with confronting their quarry and everything to do with marketing a Trotskyite club; in this, they carefully play upon the insecurities of the young, the mentally unstable and the plain silly, especially those of mixed race background.

It has been shown several times, that even with the advantage of superior numbers the Anti-Racists of CARF are incapable of physically confronting the civic patriot groups, on every occasion where the use of force has been attempted by CARF they have been seen scurrying away as soon as the fisticuffs began.

el mirage
La Mirage reception centre, scene of the debacle, is reportedly owned by an Iraqi immigrant family.

This means that, contrary to their propaganda, “smashing the Fash” is not the real goal of their activities and the Police are not there to protect patriots from harm, they are effectively the security detail for CARF, to whom the cops show near limitless patience as they indulge their hysterical outbursts.

Clearly, something is going on between CARF and the police; empowered as they are to shut down, move on, search and arrest anyone present in a designated area. There is no reason for the authorities to tolerate the lawless behaviour of the Trotskyites.

Absent their presence the Alt-Right speaking circuit would require no policing at all since the events are always held on private property; we are of course dealing with White people.

Not only are CARF putting overtime money in the pockets of individual police officers they are complicit in the extortion racket being run by the cops by virtue of the fact of their playing the role of the “or else” in the demand “pay up, or else”.

cops beat
John, a mentally ill man being hosed down on his front lawn after being beaten and pepper sprayed during a Vicpol “welfare check”.

It is unheard of for any element of the faux-Left to be billed for police attendance at a gathering, even when it is widely known that their events routinely descend into unlawful acts which put members of the public at risk and cause great inconvenience through road closures and other attempts to take over public spaces.

Not only are CARF putting overtime money in the pockets of individual police officers they are complicit in the extortion racket being run by the cops by virtue of the fact of their playing the role of the “or else” in the demand “pay up, or else”.

These poseurs are acutely aware of how they present in public; the propaganda value of “optics” is as important to CARF as it is to anyone else in terms of building an esprit de corps by which to attract likeminded wretches to their cause, so their part in the state’s rackets and its suspension of the political liberty of anyone who, however meekly, challenges the immigration Ponzi scheme must be part of the “revolution”.

sherwood
In 2016 Frankston woman Elisha Sherwood allegedly had her face re-decorated by the Traps during a traffic stop.

It is one thing for CARF to attempt to goad Alt-Righters into illegal acts, thereby rendering them subject to fines and other court imposed conditions; it is quite another to openly support a crooked police commissioner who, at all turns has acted as the political head kicker for the Andrews administration and the crony capitalists who underwrite it.

It has also been reported that a CARF activist was arrested for assaulting police outside the Southern-Molyneux show. Given that the offence is now regarded as a Class-A crime and carries a mandatory jail term; if this scumbag gets off, well, what further proof of collusion should we ask for?

After all, that $68,000 is not going into the Poor Box, it is going straight into the operating budget of a gang of ill-disciplined goons who, we can all agree, go around beating up the mentally ill, fining the poor, oppressing the youth and harassing homeless people.

police-victoria-protests
The Bastard Squad conducting a formation shouting display on the streets of Melbourne.

PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

In the early months of this blog, we promised our readers that we would make an effort to examine the current affairs of the day in a sort of semi-frequent “news wrap”.

Snowed under as we have been, with the antics of our enemies on the far-right, sundry nutcases, cyber-pests and square-eyed Trolls occupying bulk column inches of our output, we feel obliged to give our followers a break from this bombast and have a dig at the big doings in the mainstream White world.

Hipster Melbourne was rocked this week by the death of one of its promising young scions, 22-year-old Eurydice Dixon met her end in middle-class Parkville, raped and left for dead by a total stranger, later revealed to be one Jaymes Todd, 19, of Broadmeadows.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-around good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

tribute
Tributes laid in Princes Park Melbourne for murdered artist Eurydice Dixon.

Eurydice’s talents on stage may have been questionable but being violated and dumped, lifeless, on a soccer pitch in the middle of the night by a marauding, outer suburban sex predator is a sad end for one of our own, who by all accounts did no harm in her short life.

The response to her death by the chattering classes was predictable, even though murders of this kind run at about five a year in Victoria, the usual suspects led by the lamentable premier Daniel Andrews, managed to blow the killing way out of proportion as a sop to their inner city, Greenbelt voting public.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-round good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

This insight clearly went over the heads of the ostentatiously ignorant members of the commentariat; re-animated after the long hiatus between stranger murders, Feminists and their fellow travellers have energised their “War On Women” narrative and began wailing that the problem is “Toxic Masculinity”.

We can imagine these harridans on the edge of their seats as the news of the murder broke, waiting, their claws reflexively drawing in and out of their sheaths in anticipation of the inevitable verbal misstep by Police or public officials, they were not disappointed.

ted-bundy---betrayal
American serial killer and rapist Ted Bundy would strike when women had their guard down, in supposedly “safe” areas.

The Police, who had all the data at their fingertips regarding crimes in the area surrounding the park where Eurydice was killed, and fearing in light of other attacks on women in Parkville, that there may have been a serial offender on the loose made the fatal mistake of urging women to take greater responsibility for their own safety.

From there it was on for young and old, the tired old trope “teach men not to rape” made an early and frequent appearance as did “women’s right to feel safe”, no matter the level of risk they are prepared to take in exercising their rights.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

If we take the three most recent and high-profile cases of stranger murder in Melbourne, those of Jill Meagher, Masa Vukotic and Euryidice Dixon one of these patterns appears, a pattern which is evident in many such crimes across the Anglosphere and across a time span of almost fifty years.

Misogynist criminals, rapists and killers are drawn to locations and situations in which women feel comfortable enough to let their guard down, or are otherwise vulnerable; this mode of operation is akin to that of any other predator in nature, which will attack weak and isolated members of a prey herd, or strike when the animals are at a waterhole.

bayley
Adrian Bayley, his sinister sexual urges would boil over into blind rage against women, he is the real face of misogyny.

Time and time again we have been presented with testimony from woman hating brutes and serial killers detailing their thought process in selecting victims; thinking people such as ourselves are, or ought to be, au fait with the tricks employed by dangerous men.

The more intelligent and devious predators, such as Ted Bundy and Ed Kemper, specifically chose university campuses as their hunting grounds or students as their victims based on the premise that women feel safe in such environments, so whatever ruse the killer might employ would be more likely taken in good faith by the victim.

A great deal of work has been done by the medical professions and law enforcement, both here and abroad, on understanding the way violent men think so as to be better able to predict and mitigate against their actions in the interest of public safety.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

To a great extent the routine activities of potential victims, the environments in which they move and even urban planning must be considered when trying to get into the minds of predators; this is at odds with premier Andrews’ exhortation for women to do whatever they want, whenever they want and for them to trust that putting a guilt trip on men as a group will be enough to deter potential rapists and killers.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

masa-and-killer
Masa Vukotic was chosen at random to be murdered by Sean Price, does he look like the sort of bloke who could be shamed into changing his ways?

Sean Price, the deranged killer of young Masa Vukotic in Doncaster in 2015 travelled all the way across Melbourne to a “safe” suburb and, in order to carry out his plan to blitz and kill a female, he lay in wait in bushes for a pretty “middle class” girl to pass on a popular walking track.

Adrian Bayley, the serial rapist and murderer of Jill Meagher prowled areas where young women were accessible and vulnerable, the backpacker havens and red light zones of St Kilda and the tangled, 19th-century streetscape of Brunswick, which is rich with female pedestrians but riddled with dark laneways and alcoves.

Society in general and women in particular need protection from dangerous men, as we have seen often enough, a single man in his wrath can destroy a whole community; what is needed however is a return to sensible education on matters of personal safety and codes of conduct in which everyone, women included, play their part in mitigating the threat of violence.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

The bare fact is that, contrary to the Feminist dogma, predatory males are not formed by society, nor is their behaviour an aspect of masculinity; such men are freaks and deviants and they almost always live their lives largely apart from normal men, who would most likely pick up on the fact that something is wrong with them.

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

The natural reaction by good men toward abusers of women and girls is to form a posse, hunt the offender down and mete out justice before the savage wreaks even more havoc upon the community, though in modern times we delegate this duty to the state which employs its hired gunmen, the police.

truro
The Truro killers were homosexuals, freaks and total social outcasts who got their kicks hurting women, nobody in the “straight” world had any time for them.

The police in the Euryidice Dixon case merely gave out the same advice we would expect a citizen posse to give the women they rally to protect: until this threat to your safety passes stay alert sisters, watch your backs, don’t take unnecessary risks and do not hesitate to call for help if you feel that something is not right in your surroundings.

So perhaps walking through the park alone late at night, in your “safe” suburb, which is almost certainly a magnet for sexual predators, with your headphones on and wearing high heels is actually making the jobs of those sworn to protect you more difficult?

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

In the end, however, what Feminists such as the Premier of Victoria say in public and what they do in private are likely two different things; we can credit the childless humanities department harpies and their virginal undergraduate acolytes with a lack of sense and a true belief in bullshit such as “toxic masculinity”, but most people do not think the way they do.

Daniel and Catherine Andrews are loving and responsible parents, just like the rest of us, so we highly doubt that they’re going to fill their own daughter’s head with nonsense and send her into harms way under the misapprehension that no matter the risks she takes if she is unfortunate enough to become a victim then society is wholly to blame.

andrews family
Victorian Premier Danny Andrews puts his son in a chokehold just in case he grows up to be a predator