THE GREAT PURGE OF 2017: A LOGICAL EXPLANATION

THE GREAT PURGE OF 2017: A LOGICAL EXPLANATION

Readers would be well aware of a change in attitude toward dissident viewpoints, at management level within Google and Facebook.

Where previously these companies exercised a degree of tolerance toward most points of view, the commercial realities of allowing anti-capitalist, anti-globalist or even just plain stupid material to take hold on their platforms have been brought into sharp focus over the past few months.

From around the first week of April, reports began to appear in the mainstream press concerning a backlash of sorts by advertisers on the Google-owned YouTube platform; the issues raised included concerns over “inappropriate” videos being preceded by corporate advertising and a lack of control on the part of sponsors over where their ads were appearing.

Companies such as Toyota, McDonald’s, Pepsi, Starbucks and many other globalist brands pulled their advertising from YouTube due the fact that their videos were being attached to, among other things, clips espousing Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism; this resulted in a hit in the order of 4% to the share price of Google’s parent company, Alphabet Inc.

cfd

The remedial action taken by Google, in this case, is not yet clear, they have spoken about re-writing the algorithms in their operating software to better tailor the targeting of advertising and made some comments about allowing advertisers greater freedom to tailor the placement of their ads on YouTube, as well as the millions of other, third-party sites overseen by Google.

It remains to be seen whether the measures taken by YouTube will make a difference to the user experience, or lure back lucrative advertising contracts; we may never really know the outcome but there has long been a policy in place where they do not allow posters of controversial material to monetise their channels as YouTube partners.

William_Gibson_by_FredArmitage
William Gibson predicted the corporate takeover of cyberspace

Facebook, it would seem, has decided to act quickly in heading off any potential advertiser walk-out by permanently banning a swathe of controversial, nationalistic or civic patriot themed accounts and the personal pages of anyone associated with banned material, notable among them our own UNA Facebook account.

Where previously these companies exercised a degree of tolerance toward most points of view, the commercial realities of allowing anti-capitalist, anti-globalist or even just plain stupid material to take hold on their platforms have been brought into sharp focus over the past few months.

Now, much has been made of this purge by self-styled, online anti-racists and their mirror images in what we call the “right wing Antifa”, those conservatives who zealously pursue and harass nationalists and true patriots.

These serial pests, shut-ins, and obsessive compulsives are crowing loud and long about their tactics of mass reporting of any dissident thought having brought down pages such as UNA, UPF and Reclaim Australia, to name a few.

Looking at the situation logically, while having a basic grasp of how Facebook actually works and its record on such matters since the inception of the platform, we can only come to one conclusion: this cull of dissenting points of view, this purge of ideas which contradict the globalist capitalist line must have been done in the name of the almighty dollar.

Rupert Murdoch, Michael Bloomberg
Fifteen years ago we were worried about the old media barons taking over the internet

After all, the White trash of Antifa and their ideological brothers and sisters in the civic patriot groups have been mass reporting genuine dissident material 24 hours a day, 365 days a year since the days of Myspace and message boards. Their numbers have actually greatly decreased over that time so the decision to kill off unpopular ideas on Facebook is clearly a commercial decision, not the result of a tactical breakthrough by a few, numerically irrelevant Trolls.

What is also clear to the logical observer is that cyberspace, to all intents and purposes, is no longer a neutral space, that corporations rule the internet, that what is commonly called “political correctness” is now an integral part of globalist lifestyle branding and that the only social engineering being attempted is within the consumer “culture” of the multinational corporation.

Looking at the situation logically, while having a basic grasp of how Facebook actually works and its record on such matters since the inception of the platform, we can only come to one conclusion: this cull of dissenting points of view, this purge of ideas which contradict the globalist capitalist line must have been done in the name of the almighty dollar.

The fashion in which the Facebook software tailors the user experience with targeted advertising, friend and page recommendations based on the browsing history of the individual user makes it unlikely that a person is ever going to see any content which may offend them, unless they go looking for it on purpose or something slips through on the feed of a friend.

sjw-freakshow-lauren-southern
No, uppity Social Justice Warriors had nothing to do with the great social media purges of 2017

This analysis also proves the fears regarding net neutrality, long held by futurists the world over; granted in the early years of the noughties it seemed as if Newscorp and traditional media might take over the web and turn it into something like Foxtel, however, the reality is that middle-of-the-road neo-liberalism now reigns supreme online.

The move to rid Facebook of commercially problematic content may be a way of appeasing the direct demands of its corporate partners, or it may simply be an expression of good faith by a company long criticised for hosting “extremist” points of view, we cannot say for sure.

It all makes sense to anyone in business, the inclusion of all individuals into the global consumer class and the accommodation of all their whims, tastes and fancies is obviously the best way to make money and the best use of the internet as a sales tool.

Globalist corporations support same-sex marriage, for example, because marketing these days largely revolves around concepts of lifestyle and a mix-and-match set of personal values drawn from the prescribed life choices of the cosmopolitan consumer culture; the more variations this culture can accept the more product the corporations can shift.

The move to rid Facebook of commercially problematic content may be a way of appeasing the direct demands of its corporate partners, or it may simply be an expression of good faith by a company long criticised for hosting “extremist” points of view, we cannot say for sure.

It is impossible to monetise ideas such as nationalism, patriotism, traditionalism and even Communism because they all rely on making us versus them distinctions and prescribe in-group loyalty above all else. If the consumer culture can be described as a smorgasbord, where the individual chooses his own identity from a range of possible components then its opposite must be a set menu, where a strictly limited number of options are available and the group assigns an identity for all.

enhanced-buzz-1504-1379943854-7
Liberals used to think this way

This is the heart of the matter and the real implication of the great social media purges of 2017, we must take the globalist-capitalists at their word.

They accuse Nationalists and true patriots of fostering division and unrest; a breakdown in social cohesion is their greatest fear but it is not the nation, the physical communities of towns and suburbs or the family they seek to protect, it is their global consumer monoculture, the deracinated, classless society held together by money and the material things it can buy.

We at UNA are, fortunately, on the record as being long term skeptics of social media, we use it when convenient but scarcely miss it when it is no longer available due to the fact that radicalisation of the proletariat and marginalised people via Facebook never seemed feasible to us.

What is more the people we seek to turn on to our brand of radical Australianism are not to be found on Facebook, where it is well known that something in the order of 80% of traffic is generated by around 10% of users; they are in the outer suburbs of our cities and the rural hinterland and outreach to those Whites with ears to hear has always been our primary concern.

alfred-e-neuman.jpeg

NATIONALIST TO PURSUE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST MEDIA TROLL

NATIONALIST TO PURSUE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST MEDIA TROLL

An Australian nationalist defamed in a recent news article that labelled him a “troll” is to pursue legal action against the journalist responsible for the fake news item.

In two separate statements now removed from Facebook, but accessible on the UNA blog, the nationalist reveals how the journalist – who works for a major news organisation – has spent two years criminally trolling him on social media.

The alleged harassment has taken the form of the most serious offences, as confirmed by a liaison officer with the Australian Federal Police. These involved using a fake account to stalk and intimidate, and other offences that will be detailed in the statement to be submitted to police presently.

The nationalist, who we will not name, has described the actions of the journalist as “psychopathic” and says that “the only troll in this whole equation is him… and he is a very sick, deranged troll. I owe it to the community at large to see that he is taken off social media, and hopefully put away on a custodial sentence to reflect on his criminal activities.

“He is a very cowardly, insipid, and weak specimen. He is a living condemnation of what has become of western journalism — he is the absolute definition of a fake news merchant. He needs his comeuppance.”

The nationalist is furious at the article, which he argues contains demonstrable untruths.

“The article was mostly made up. It was sourced almost entirely from social media and its main contention was the basis of a rumour started by the Zionist-convert Neil Erikson acting in concert with the Party for Freedom. Its aim was to hurt the Australia First Party, of which I am a member.”

However, it was not even the content of the article that provoked his ire, so much as the alleged stalking.

“I am surprised one who claims to have a legal background would so casually leave themselves open like this, but nobody ever said he was intelligent. However, at the base of this are very serious criminal threats against my person.”

download

LUKE MCMAHON: FAIRFAX’S ANARCHIST TROLL

LUKE MCMAHON: FAIRFAX’S ANARCHIST TROLL

Part A/ Addressing the lies

A few weeks ago, I was the victim of a scurrilous and defamatory fake-news article printed by Fairfax. The attack piece, scribbled by a shady hack named Luke McMahon, claimed among other things I am “Jewish”, and that I am one of Australia’s biggest trolls.

Before I reveal that the twisted “troll” is, in fact, McMahon, with a bit of help from Neil Erikson, I will respond to his lies. I do that in the knowledge that whatever I say wouldn’t move the real troll one degree so I make it only in the interest of truth.

Firstly, I am about as Jewish as Benito Mussolini. My family is of British/Irish descent and many generations Australian on the maternal side. This predictable calumny is instructive since we were able to trace its trajectory from associates of Nick Folkes, who hate my party before it travelled to his cohort and traitor Neil Erikson, who used it to slander me, even though he doesn’t know me from a bar of soap.

I have met Nick on only two brief occasions, neither of which he would recall, and Erikson never. In fact, we know the very person who generated the “Jewish” lie. We know his motives at the time and are certain that he was, as stated above, in the slow orbit of both Nick Folkes and Howard Crawford.

Yet, on the basis of this and foolishness regarding my name, McMahon — who has some connection to these warthogs — figures it will queer my act and uses it.

Why wouldn’t he? His purpose is to attack the Australia First Party. Fairfax has a history of defamatory entanglements with the AFP, starting chiefly with our president, Jim Saleam. Their last slanderous effort against an AFP candidate blew up in their communist faces so this is payback.

Before I reveal that the twisted “troll” is, in fact, McMahon, with a bit of help from Neil Erikson, I will respond to his lies. I do that in the knowledge that whatever I say wouldn’t move the real troll one degree so I make it only in the interest of truth.

Moreover, there is no chorus of wailing Jews stepping out of the woodwork wagging their fingers and shouting, “Oy vey, ‘tis him! I remember him from the latke bar. I bought him a dreidel. He used to be a BEAUTIFUL Jew! Where did he go wrong? Why is he now a Nazi? Does he not know about the Holocaust? How could he betray the tribe?”

There are no former rabbis, or friends with stories from my Bar Mitzvah, for the elementary fact that it is all fallacious. Sorry, dipsticks, but you’re not getting your True Believer ending. However, if you want to shut up a nationalist who is causing your cause distress then accusing him of being a Jew is the first tactic in the book. In this case, it’s not working.

Nevertheless, this lie is not only one of those defamatory claims made by McMahon, who we believe has some collusion with Erikson, but the article is riddled with absurdities. It is claimed that as an editor at ACP I played “German marching music” at my desk. Seriously, how Fairfax’s chief sub didn’t question that howling bit of bullshit is a testament to the low calibre of their editorial.

Next, he fabricated a quote supposedly from a colleague. There was no colleague interviewed and they would never have said I was Jewish since it would have been presumptuous on their part anyway. The only people who were close to me at ACP would not speak to these duds. It is poppycock. McMahon is a deceiver.

I know that journalists often claim privilege for sources, but that one can be blown open by asking the source to come forward. There isn’t one.

McMahon got a hold of my book, Stuck Forever in the Throat of Society, which I published on Amazon, as you cannot land a book deal here unless you’re a child refugee or a Moslem with interesting things to say.

I know that journalists often claim privilege for sources, but that one can be blown open by asking the source to come forward. There isn’t one.

Whereas I wrote a black comedy, making fun of a toxic work culture that I endured while at ACP, he is attempting to skew it as evidence of me being a potential random sniper. Another Brevik? And McMahon has used the Brevik line on my AFP colleague Chris Shortis back in November 2015.

I am more worried he is; valid fears I reveal in the next instalment. When I write about “trolling” in my first novel, it is total fiction. This is the thing about good writing, it must convince the reader. In McMahon’s case I was so convincing and he so gullible that he cannot assess it from fact.

I never seriously trolled. I used to treat the old Yahoo7 message boards like a cricket pitch, but that was all I referred to. The character in the book is a comical figure created so that any hagiographical material does not take itself too seriously. I deliberately wrote him as an ineffectual curmudgeon. I would hope I am not so dispassionate as he.

Nonetheless, McMahon lifted select passages to validate his un-researched, defamatory, cobbled-together cluster of unwieldy sentences as ridgy didge journalism. What’s more, McMahon is jealous of me as a writer, and that is powerfully evident and a motivating factor in his spite, or so my mate the psychologist reckons.

One of the few actual truths in the book, my attempting to give away an Adolf Hitler doll as a prize for the magazine I was editor of, is likewise attributed a false narrative. He claims I was the subject of company reprimand, or suchlike, for the stunt. This, like everything else this sick puppy writes, is baloney.

The character in the book is a comical figure created so that any hagiographical material does not take itself too seriously. I deliberately wrote him as an ineffectual curmudgeon. I would hope I am not so dispassionate as he.

It was in fact approved by the outgoing editor-in-chief beforehand who understood the humour behind it. The entire purpose of the gag was to run a headline strap, “WIN A WAR CRIMINAL”.

See, in magazines, the cover is everything. You create content with a mind to how to sell it. It was a low-rent Category One girlie magazine, so I figured it wasn’t about to upset our discerning readership.

At this time, in the company, I was not involved in politics, and this goes to the other stuff he tries using to impute an unsound mind. I am a collector of action figures. They are grouse. Some of the biggest pages on Facebook are dedicated to modellers and fanciers of scale figures. It is no more absurd than gaming. More to the point, intelligent people collect historical figures. Stupid people mock them for doing so.

I started collecting them as curios when I earned a bit of dosh and the collection grew. It had nothing to do with politics. But it does not entirely consist of “Nazis”, which do make interesting collectables. I have figures of Churchill, Montgomery, English soldiers, American soldiers, Roman soldiers, James Bond figures, Churchill and even Ariel Sharon! I also have a wonderful figure of Stalin! Does that make me a communist now?

Having raided my Facebook page for his “evidence” and relying on say-so from boofhead Neil Erikson, McMahon had only my book to go on. Oh, and he searched and discovered I am a bankrupt, the scourge of the left wing, a fact that he cheaply employs as a pejorative. Shame on this ‘anarchist’.

It was in fact approved by the outgoing editor-in-chief beforehand who understood the humour behind it. The entire purpose of the gag was to run a headline strap, “WIN A WAR CRIMINAL”.

I did not think they made status judgements like that. There were a lot of us underdogs coming out of the cowboy banker created Global Financial Crisis; we got hurt, they were rewarded. But that’s the Left for you; bourgeois as fuck.

I did not think they made status judgements like that. There were a lot of us underdogs coming out of the cowboy banker created Global Financial Crisis; we got hurt, they were rewarded. But that’s the Left for you; bourgeois as fuck.

Now, to the video…

In a video created to taunt Antifascist Action Sydney, I wear an SS officer’s cap. This, like my action figures, was purchased before I had a political awakening.

I was part of a circle of friends who decided we’d buy ‘drinking hats’. One bought a Russian bearskin hat; another procured a bowler hat, someone else acquired a pith helmet, while I purchased this SS cap because I wanted to be more outrageous. We would wear them while getting juiced. It was capital fun.

The video was a response to the clownery of Antifa, who found a UNA sticker someone glued up on a sign in Newtown. These nitwits made a big deal about posting one of their crappy stickers over the top of it, claiming they had captured a flag, so to speak, and so I went and peeled it off. For a laugh I made a video treating the sticker as a kidnap victim. I was sending up their ludicrousness. I was making fun of the “Nazi” tag.

In a video created to taunt Antifascist Action Sydney, I wear an SS officer’s cap. This, like my action figures, was purchased before I had a political awakening.

Anyone who knows me understands well that I do not approve of pussyfooters who believe slapping an iron cross on a bomber jacket and reciting facts about Hitler makes them a nationalist. I am not that kind of nationalist at all. I discourage cosplay and the sort of “club life” that believes that shouting 14/88 is a means to an end.

Finally, on the charge of being a troll, which McMahon is about to pay dearly for, I can say that I have no charges pending against me for the simple reason that I haven’t trolled anybody, unlike Luke.

The most I have done is pop onto one of their leftist pages, which exist for the very purpose of trolling patriot pages and have some sport with the semi-retarded individuals who inhabit those spaces.

In hoping to defame me as a “troll” and therefore as a ‘pest’, he implies some connection with Joshua Goldberg, who he alleges I met on Stormfront.

Goldberg is a nut — a quite surprising one — but a fruitcake nonetheless. If he wasn’t banged up in a loony bin in the US I would have been tempted to think Goldberg IS Luke McMahon.

On a final note in this first part, may I just say, this habit of Antifa’s referring to me as AFP’s “number two” is the cherry on the cake. I’m not even number 42. I am a rank-and-file member. What’s more, I have retired from public demonstrations because I don’t believe I am photogenic enough to go there.

Nathan Sykes

MULTICULTURALISM WITHIN MULTICULTURALISM

MULTICULTURALISM WITHIN MULTICULTURALISM

Are we one, or many? Pertaining to Australia’s European-descended populace we feel it’s high time to inquire a tidbit that invariably rises out of our nation’s demographics; for as it can be seen, our European population is so diverse it could almost be said we are hosting multiculturalism within multiculturalism.

The initial disclaimer here is that pinpointing entire groups is an invalid practice, and more germane than tiresomely listing statistics is instead the shared attributes dotted throughout certain elements of the diasporic communities. Those attributes stem principally from a conflict of interest between the country of origin and country of residence, whereby we note the natural difficulty of serving two masters at the same time. It is precisely from this that it’s noted true loyalty often lies with the country of origin.

We can appreciate that for certain established people the past was full of prejudice and hostility to the point of only strengthening those in-group structures, perhaps of most renown being the treatment of the Greeks and Italians.

We can also appreciate that what is in the blood is what is in the blood; it would be blasphemy as Nationalists to suggest Greeks, Italians, Germans etc., ought to automatically forget their heritage, but at the same time is it not natural to presume the same enthusiasm and attachment is given to the host nation where a good life has been bestowed?

It is true that our frequent use of ‘White Australia’ relates to European mankind in general, but where does this one neurone of thought lead to? How many layers of nuance does ‘European’ comprise in this case? What properties of it correlate to a nativist loyalty as opposed to a mere citizen stripped of higher engagement to the land – an engagement often found abroad in the parent culture? What is the bridge between ‘White’ and ‘Australia’?

Does the manner of arrival and circumstances thereto factor into the inauguration of Australianness? These are awkward questions observable from the interactions of those around us; questions that were always inevitable, perhaps, given that the line between White and non-White migration has been blurred significantly under the revised multicultural mythology as to whether one is really distinct from the other when contrasted with the cultural antagonist that is the traditional Anglo-Celtic stock.

We lament that the view of Australia is too often associated as a place where a good life is to be found and every other culture under the sun can expand unanswerably. Our limitless commentary of the non-White exploiting this feature must now include certain members of our fellow kin to the extent Australia is to them nothing more than a convenient home base where the dreariness of day-to-day life is carried out in relative comfort, yet where true loyalty and zeal for life lies overseas.

Perhaps even more irksome to us Nationalists is the ease to which these people will side with antagonistic narratives that condemn the Anglo as butchers and thieves in the building of this nation which is so enjoyable to all and sundry today.

Under these circumstances what is Australia but the short end of the stick in the same parasitic relationship we usually attribute to multiculturalism in general? We hope that the Europeans in our own ranks who are, to put it frankly, the complete opposite of the sort of people here discussed can see our point with a degree of sympathy.

Our rallying call to alleviate this nuisance is twofold: those Europeans amongst us with the fires of iniquity burning in their ancestral hearts must put aside past differences as greater threats are recognised, likewise those amongst us with the fires of passion to distant lands must contain the flames lest it becomes a crazed force incompatible with the traditional order of things.

It is with a phlegmatic temperament that all parties should seek to form new bonds built not around lofty ideals nor exaggerated ills, but on the very concrete mission of advancing Australian Nationalism into a new era. In this era, there are no ‘wogs’ or ‘rednecks’, but Australians of wholly European extraction aiming to keep their country as such. A jovial poet might here be inclined to pen this as a great stride towards ‘White solidarity’, but in reality, it is – and rather unimpressively at that – sorting out our own collective community; garden work if you will, a spring cleaning of the national psyche.

The leaders of the diaspora are tasked with the responsibility of inciting this new wave of thought, especially to the youth and extinguishing the dross and petty complaints that spread disunity amongst an otherwise fraternal people.

If Nationalists are opposed to multiculturalism then they must also be opposed to the multiculturalism within multiculturalism, which refers explicitly to our own extended racial group and an almost impenetrable in-group that selfishly propagates its own existence at the expense of the wider nation and wider brotherhood.

download (10)
When in doubt for a pertinent image to accompany a blog, turn to The Simpsons

 

NICK FOLKES — THE IDIOT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING

NICK FOLKES — THE IDIOT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING

Nick Folkes is lamenting SBS bias after appearing in their race-baiting virtue-porn reality series The Truth About Racism.

Speaking to the Daily Mail, Folkes has said, “It’s completely biased. SBS is only interested in showing the token White guy as a bigot and racist.”

In the program, which is one of a genre paid for by the Australian taxpayer and aimed at demonising us as low-intellect bigots blocking social progress, Nick faces off with serial Sudanese Moslem Yassmin Abdel-Magied. During a “scientific test” centred on empathic reactions to pain, he is accused of exhibiting less empathy for people of colour. They obviously don’t know about his wife and children who are all yellow; although by all accounts he hasn’t much compassion for them either, so maybe that’s not such a great example. Moreover, the test is supposed to measure brainwaves so we’d be astounded if Nick’s monitor registered any activity at all.

This “test” is based on the Milgram Experiments of 1961, in which participants were encouraged to administer electric shocks to a subject to evaluate their willingness to accede to authority regardless of the ethical component. Stanley Milgram, who concocted the research, was a Jew and the tests were inspired by the trial of Adolf Eichmann occurring in Jerusalem around the same time.

Meanwhile, Abdel-Magied is the latest in a never-ending stream of ‘others’ who are granted societal privilege in Australia so they can highlight how unjust we are. They occupy a place in media as semi-political figures standing sentries for multi-racialism and even when they fuck up like Yassmin did after she was caught on social media asking for pointers on Sharia Law from a radical Islamic, they roll out of it spotless.

This is the narrative, and this is the purpose of the show. Only masochists and anti-White voyeurs would tune into that piffle. As we have said, they have reduced the ‘Aussie racist’ stereotype to household entertainment: an idiot who can be caught on spy camera and used for the quasi-religious catharsis of the virtue signalling elites.

But this is SECOND TIME that Folkes has thrown himself at the feet of the anti-White public broadcaster in his unquenchable thirst for notoriety. He made a nana out himself in 2014 when he appeared in Living with the Enemy. Folkes should have learned his lesson by then, but then Nick has no shame; he would pull down his pants and play with his willy if there was an audience.

Folkes had, prior to the televising of this dreck, engaged in his usual game of signalling ambiguously on sentiments of White pride. We happen to know that he has questioned privately Australia First Party’s policy on Whiteness, which he regards as extreme.

As such, it is unsurprising when he makes comments like, “I believe Australia is a tolerant country, and most people don’t make opinions based on skin colour.”

Nationalists understand there should be very few occasions when we agree to speak to the mainstream media. There is no question of them NOT skewing their reportage, which is why they are so eager to buttonhole us.

But Nick’s type isn’t about what is sensible any more than he represents patriotic activists around Australia. Folkes is, if anything, a showman. He is in it strictly for the publicity and the less easily classifiable rewards that come from being an infamous person.

Folkes complaining about being duped by SBS is like complaining about contracting salmonella after eating at an Asian chew ’n’ spew.

10686607_366509190185792_6825946808527311876_n
Is Nick a buffoon? We will let you make up your own mind

 

THE AUSSIE RACIST IS THE LATEST IN WATER COOLER ENTERTAINMENT

THE AUSSIE RACIST IS THE LATEST IN WATER COOLER ENTERTAINMENT

Punters were quick to highlight the dubious nature of the latest in a slew of SBS programs dealing exclusively with alleged White racism in Australia.

Is Australia Racist had only just aired when many took to social media either to ask WTF or to revel in the quasi-religious fervour of virtue signalling coming from anti-Whites.

Ray Martin is an excellent choice for host given how terribly Australia has treated him during his life. Halfway through his career Ray found out that he had a great, great, great grandmother fifty times removed on one parent’s side who was an indigenous person and right away it all fell into place: the crude Abo jokes tittered behind his back; the refusal of bottle shop service on Saturday nights; and the way the maître d’ always susses him out as if he’s about to bolt on the bill in any restaurant he eats at. Because let’s face it, Ray is as black as a barrel of crude oil.

download-7
Ray Martin is one-billionth Aboriginal and very sensitive about his cultural roots

Given his powerful credentials as a victim of racism who was held back from earning his first two million because of rampant prejudice in this country, as we say, Ray is the ideal choice to host a show that has about as much integrity as a bookmaker drumming up business at a Gambling Anonymous meeting.

See, folks, SBS is a business and people tend to forget this because they have some duped notion spawned by a halfwit myth of an antiquated thing called ‘journalistic integrity’ which old-timers go on about. Journalists would be the first to laugh at hearing this oxymoron, but none more so than the pot-smoking hipsters over at SBS. They know it’s all about ratings because simply being a government broadcaster is no guarantee of broadcast survival in an industry where economic sustainability trumps any unprofitable ethical and ideological considerations.

Which is why, when even a study by Flinders University debunked this myth of Australian ‘Islamophobia’, SBS will not let go of the racism cudgel because it is a guaranteed ratings’ winner.

Given his powerful credentials as a victim of racism who was held back from earning his first two million because of rampant prejudice in this country, as we say, Ray is the ideal choice to host a show that has about as much integrity as a bookmaker drumming up business at a Gambling Anonymous meeting.

As the abovementioned report revealed, when you stop skewing the survey questions to find the answers that you want (say, that most Aussies are racist), you get a more realistic picture of where we are at.

The question of ‘racism’ is something you have a position upon reliant on your interest in it. Tim Soutphommasane, the Race Discrimination Commissioner has to justify his $300K in taxpayer’ spoils each year. Given he wasn’t born here and arrived with ‘issues’ related to his background growing up in France to Laotian parents, you get an idea why it’s in his best interest to find racism everywhere he looks.

download-8
Our writers can’t get book contracts, but this Sudanese Moslem blow-in can get anything she wants just ‘cos she is a Google

Likewise, Yassmin Abdel-Magied is a 25-year-old Sudanese Moslem “engineer” and “author” whose entire existence is dependent upon her race, ethnicity, and religion. It is ironic that given most White Australians will never receive the opportunities she has based on the same criteria. We could pull out example after example, but you get the rub.

Now, what about us? The concept that a nationalist, who is chasing a racialist end, is not necessarily racist in act, word, or deed is an idea that would totally send the virtue signallers spinning on their pointy heads. But for bona fide nationalists, this is true. To want your own self-determination as a race doesn’t mean you spend your time 24/7 hating on every non-White that you pass by on the street. It doesn’t mean you load on hate when you buy a magazine from an Asian newsagent. You might even be polite in the course of your inevitable interactions.

The nationalist understands that multiracialism, and the presence of so many non-Whites, is a symptom, not the cause.

The nationalist understands that multiracialism, and the presence of so many non-Whites, is a symptom, not the cause.

But this is digression that has no place in a single-stream discussion about identity because the Aussie racist is entertainment pure and simple. He, or she, sells advertising and guarantees clicks and views.

It is all the better when some irate Australian reacting to the relentless tide of multicultural propaganda aimed at assimilating him or her reacts with a blown valve in a social situation and gets caught on a camera. This is the latest empirical evidence of a country so far to the right of Josef Mengele.

SBS will continue to pump out this garbage as surely as Coca-Cola will keep producing bottled cola and McDonald’s will serve up burgers: because it is an earner. Selah.

main-qimg-90079925f78ef2f013df2c1f474c55d3-c
Fuck it, let’s just break out the jackboots!

THE NATURE OF THE BOGAN

THE NATURE OF THE BOGAN

Australian culture, it is often derided, exists solely within the stereotypes of vulgarity endemic to the bogan. Whether the term itself is evoked or not is irrelevant; its existence is tacitly understood as the central character in representing all the undesirable nature of Australia’s seedy underworld.

There is no denying that the meat of the bogan in its current form is its crassness; despite a quixotic array of definitions, this one attribute shines brightly as the reference point for understanding what separates a bogan from a non-bogan. Crass in every facet of outward demeanour, every facet of inward demeanour, and a Weltanschauung so tainted by the basest instincts that we could scarcely believe these characters exist in anything other than dystopian fiction.

30f138c776740a06aebfd3059b9c58bb
This is Daryl. He wants to marry your daughter

In this world, empty appraisal of sport and junkie gossip fill the social milieu, complemented by excessive booze, ciggies and narcotics. The most lurid vernacular and atrocious illiteracy assails the primacy of the English language. Hitherto indifference has ruled our collective policy on this netherworld, yet posed with a personal question we cut away at all indifference and politeness: would you impose upon your children this lifestyle?

We are right to say ‘lifestyle’, in doing so we correct a fallacy that usually attaches itself to the above, namely that the bogan is an exclusive product of the working class. We ought not to suggest the crass, loutish behaviours and outlooks are in the exclusive domain of any class; rather it is spread all amongst White Australia. The true psychology of the bogan is that it clasps, clumsily at that, the last remnants of internalised Whiteness but can’t at the same time overturn the cannibalised chaff deposited on it by the cosmopolitan elite.

Nationalists are aesthetes, not snobs. Our judgment is reserved for those whose agency is tainted by a wilful arrestment of decency regardless of their lot in life and regardless of the behavioural trends society’s elite seek to groom them with. Our standards are not material, but immaterial in advancing the psyche of Australianness to those who have been inducted into perverted copy of it.

Evidently, it is here we depart from the braggart and soulless urbanite; those social climbers whose quips on bogans were forged in the beginning from contempt, not critique. These identity freeloaders are the first to mercilessly lampoon Australian culture and in the very next breath whine about its lack of anything that isn’t borne of the very same tropes they have spent years lumping onto, and obviously shaping, the nature of. Akin to repeatedly lambasting an otherwise average man he’s an idiot of the highest order, are we not surprised that the initial innocence of our people was so pliable to degenerate into the designated mythos the media pushed?

Nationalists are aesthetes, not snobs. Our judgment is reserved for those whose agency is tainted by a wilful arrestment of decency regardless of their lot in life and regardless of the behavioural trends society’s elite seek to groom them with. Our standards are not material, but immaterial in advancing the psyche of Australianness to those who have been inducted into perverted copy of it.

For far from a stereotype, the bogan is a mutation of the healthy citizenry; similar to J.R.R. Tolkien’s genealogy (or one of them) of the vile Orc as a corruption and mutilation of the fair and noble Elves. The bogan no doubt grew from what we once knew as the Aussie larrikin, that down-to-earth man who knew his place in the world and still acted in the greater interest of nation and people; the sort of man discernible in archival footage and the undying pages of past literature that attests to being the stalwart of our Antipodean Jewel – dare we say the most perfected and balanced evolution of the Anglo. We must press this imagery to truly grasp the devolution of what we are becoming. Indeed, our friends at the Eureka Youth League recently published a short list of recommended literature pertaining to this bygone era.

The ‘Australianness’ mentioned supra is a term Nationalists hold great attachment to. In fact, it’s a necessary vested interest as a precursor to cultural revival, and one would be hard pressed to encounter a Nationalist placing little faith in the study, refinement and advancement of culture. The bogan, a sizeable portion of the White populace, falls under this by default.

As far as we’re concerned it’s as good a time as any to broach this subject; the coming role for Nationalists is to pierce the heart of this sensation – and it is just that – to reinstate the ‘status quo ante’ vigour of a Nativist identity that flourished prior to gates of the citadel being flung opened far and wide to the barbaric hordes. The nature of the bogan must metamorphose into the nature of the Australian, lest its devolution reaches its last stop at extinction, and with it, a large portion of White Australia.

e967cc9216e4943646af8f77555e8950
Henry Lawson never saw this lot coming