THE VOTE THAT SPLIT WHITE AUSTRALIA

THE VOTE THAT SPLIT WHITE AUSTRALIA

Scenes from the revelry of the Yes camp this week uncomfortably revealed just how White it is.

For too long decadence has been sold as a virtue, thus the invidious message coming out of the Same Sex Marriage vote is that us Whites are the ones tearing down our own Christian values, and not some abhorrent foreign parasite. This cannot be ignored unless you buy into conspiracy theories, in which case, the vote was rigged.

We wouldn’t discount that possibility, but, truthfully, it’s unlikely. If you can read the writing on the wall then all signs point to the Yes vote being the overwhelming consensus of half of our fellow countrymen. Resisting this is undignified. Remember how the Alt-Right laughed at Hillary supporters demanding a recount after Donald Trump won the US Presidency? Well, that shoe is now on our foot.

1zjwj8

The Queer lobby, in all its incessant variety: the freaks and transsexuals, the trans-genders, fags, dykes, AIDS fairies and all the derivatives of counter-heterosexuality no decent person would know of or comprehend, both they and their SJW champions are White. Post-vote analysis revealed how it was the heavy migrant safe Labor seats such as Blaxland in NSW and Calwell in Victoria that predominantly ticked the No box.

This is a bitter pill to swallow for those of us White Nationalists who’ve been pushing the concept of race realism. We must now soberly confront that reality — that our own race resoundingly rejects our message. It is non-Whites standing firmest for family values, modesty, and moral stability.

You will hear all the reasons why this is the case and the most likely will be that “it’s the Jews”. We know for sure the Jews will be delighting in our discomfort but to surrender our own culpability for the choices of our people — to suggest that we are so pliable that Jewish Supremacists can twist us up like origami figures as they please — is to belie our argument that we were ever a masterful race to begin with.

No, sadly, we did this on our own, and if we are honest about history, then this is just another chronological step towards the White liberal nirvana where we cease to exist just to be sporting to the ‘lesser races’ that outnumber us in the multiple digits. After all, it was Whites who abolished slavery; it was “cisgender” White males who recognised women’s rights and gave women the vote; it was Whites who enshrined ‘civil rights’ favouring alien peoples who are culturally erasing us from our own civilisations, inheritance, and birthright.

Whites are on a constant quest to emancipate one victim or another regardless of whether or not the object of our protection is actually in bondage. Moreover, these deeds pass without thanks, much less acknowledgement.

Given this evidence, it should be much easier to dispel the universal prejudice that insists we are a nation of bigots. It should be, but it won’t, for the same reason that the Yes vote got through — because the problem isn’t so much other races as it is our own. Yes, it is other Whites labelling us ‘a nation of bigots’, and censoring ourselves over imagined misdeeds to those poor races these self-appointed conscience-bearers among us hypocritically condescend to without even realising it. It is other Whites who foment the atmosphere wherein our status is reduced on dubious egalitarian grounds.

See, what we have here is a struggle within the White race itself; a fight for a dominant idea of what Whiteness means. For instance, it is no accident that Nationalists are White, but so is Antifa. Therefore, the war is not outward, but inward, and rather than sink into a negative pit of crippling despair over this rude truth we must make contingencies to readjust our strategy, revise our enemy, and prepare to fight our own kind. Whites are divided in two, and there is no amount of proselytizing that will win that lost half of our race back to us — it simply has to be dominated, or decimated.

If Whites are to survive we will have to turn against family, friends, and foe alike.  The Whites who want to live will have to “come with” the Terminator.

1zjvt8

Advertisements

EXIT HOMOPHOBIA, ENTER HETEROPHOBIA: “SODOM” VOTERS PROVE DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

EXIT HOMOPHOBIA, ENTER HETEROPHOBIA: “SODOM” VOTERS PROVE DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

Scrawled in pink chalk on a Sydney pathway in the wake of today’s vote on the Sodom Law were two words, “Love Wins.”

This is a propagandistic slogan if ever there was one. We should know since we’ve come up with enough of our own.

Once you’ve understood the slogan’s referential function, deduced its expressive function, surmised its conative function, fathomed its phatic function and flipped by its contextual function you’ll realise what the slogan would properly mean separated from the sentimentality of its addresser is that “institutionalized love wins”. Once you’ve dealt with that dialectic you should be free enough from the propaganda to deduce that this has nothing to do with ‘love’.

Love doesn’t require the formal acknowledgement of an institution to prosper and in fact, it is more likely to stifle and suppress that love.

Moreover, you must grapple with the logic of tearing down the pillars of an institution to institutionalise that which the former pillars existed to ensure did not endanger the institution that was in place to safeguard against what the new institution formally validates. Meaning, there was, beyond what the Cultural Marxists who voted Yes perceive, more to the institution of marriage than “love”. Indeed, it was a social contract beyond enshrining the rights of deviant minorities into law.

But before we use the word deviant we must now readdress the contextual relevance of that word since deviancy can only really be determined by the majority of society and policed by its agents of social control, such as the media, lawmakers, academics, politicians, Waleed Aly and so forth.

Even here we have a problem since the degenerate homos who have won this “right” to smash apart a sacred pact between a man and a woman are not of themselves in the majority but the reverse. It is their agents who are in the majority.

gay
Consider this when putting shekels in the coffers of these corporations who have forced upon us the reign of everything abominable to a healthy society

For that matter, the vote only passed by a rabbit’s dick of 7% with some Labor electorates like ‘Calwell’ in Victoria, named after our Nationalist Aussie hero Arthur Calwell, doing us proud by voting No. Now it is down to the traitor political class to pass this bullshit law and applaud themselves for having totally fucked everything that this country once stood for. It is now in the hands of the banks, corporations, and the hedonistic consumers who keep their share portfolios fattening with profit. This same-sex marriage vote was, after all, pushed heavily by media and the corporations.

Anyway, having digressed for a moment, we have ascertained that the majority has granted the minority an unequal representation among the majority. If we tie that back to what social science once understood about deviancy we now have anyone from the former institution who is strident enough to hold firm to their beliefs cast on the outside of what society now upholds to be ‘normal’. The respectable is now the outsider and the deviant is the pillar of this brave new society.

Since we’re talking about institutions, it seems fair to acknowledge that garbage from the baby boomer generation who trampled this filth into our lives — who inculcated these Cultural Marxist codes into the heads of our youth via the institutions they took over — were the ones who loathed the very concept of the institution of marriage. Their lot burned their bras and jockstraps and went in for “free love” and threw things at Servicemen returning from the horrors of America’s doomed war in Vietnam.

lesbian-wedding-14.jpg
This is an SJW two-fer deal, yet get the dyke White woman with the black dyke and they may adopt a White male baby and kill it

Yet, here are the fruits of their decades of campaigning — they have killed the social and religious premise of marriage. They have redefined it and in doing so have set in motion an entire wheel of social changes that will exclude, criminalise, and disadvantage all of those whose ideological and religious convictions now place them as an “other”.

The despised “cisgender” White male; the devout Christian; the fervent social conservative are all now outside of that societal approval and therefore beyond the gates of the institution which ironically once upon a time they were the most ardent advocates for.

Any parent who doesn’t wish their child to be taught the finer points of buggery by a genderless freak reared in the social laboratory of modern society will be demonised, ostracised, and — if they aren’t just patronisingly dismissed as absurdly quaint — used as an example of that which is abhorrent to this newfangled society based on repudiated gender and opposition to the fundamentals of nature. Any Christian who refuses to accommodate a reception or conduct a marriage between freakish gender-confused parties will be sued, vilified, hounded, doxed, and probably beaten up by roaming squadrons of Nazi Dykes, Faggots, and Transgender Chemical commandos.

It will be ironic to see how they must now shuffle their hierarchy of victimhood to accommodate the obvious dissension of devout Moslems, which are still currently a protected species in the Social Justice Warrior red book.

Now they need another cause; now they’ve run out of steam there is another minority group whose interests must usurp that of the majority until there is nothing left but until the day invading armies of Chinese soldiers paint the walls with their soft, squishy, fucked-up, chemically-altered brains.

Yes, folks, we are on the road to being a PC Police State, just like England.

EDIT: After we went to press with this item out came the images from the unscheduled orgy at Hyde Park where fairies, fags, dykes, princesses, lady boys, he-girls and every kind of pervert combo imagined in this age of decadence, got straight down to exposing themselves and cavorting in a manner that would, in saner countries, have them all shot.

4660722000000578-0-image-a-39_1510748685748.jpg
A bizarre dyke with hairy legs, hairy armpits struts half-nude (blarrggggh) in a major Sydney park because that’s what the world will be like now that the Yes vote got through by a whisker.
4660904400000578-0-image-a-42_1510748699620
Broad daylight and the green-light signals for the degenerate exhibitionists. That’s nothing, but, wait till you see the latest dog-collars, leashes and leatherwear for next year’s Back to School uniforms!

oie_JhUXWGI010X4.jpg

 

ANTIFA AUSTRALIA — PROUDLY DEFENDED BY YOUR ABC!

ANTIFA AUSTRALIA — PROUDLY DEFENDED BY YOUR ABC!

What do anarchists and our public broadcaster have in common? That’s a no-brainer, a rapport with ANTIFA!

Monday night’s Media Watch effectively eschewed all allegations made against Antifa in a recent News.com interview with its “founder” Shayne Hunter. By doing so the public broadcaster actually validated the criminal actions of this militant left-wing set.

We will stop for a minute. Did Hunter actually found Antifa in this country? Unlikely, Nationalists are aware of how the media works, a concession to the truth you should not expect from the gunsels operating under the Antifa banner.

But that same allowance is never forthcoming when it involves those on the opposite end of the political spectrum from your partisan ABC reptile.

For example, Media Watch made no fuss about fake news freelance journalist Luke McMahon’s egregious and defamatory attacks on two Nationalists. Any claims of exaggeration in the piece on the Antifa defector have nothing on those whoppers casually printed by Fairfax and gobbled up by everyone from Victoria’s Police Commissioner to the reactionaries who obsessively inhabit the myriad Facebook pages dedicated to the Patriot VS Left sideshow.

ShayneHunter-1000x700
Shayne Hunter, the “anarchist comedian” and former Antifa tosspot who has forged new ground by outing Antifa as mindless gumbies

Likewise, there was no dissection of the Bendigo Three case in which our mate Chris Shortis was convicted along with two others of inciting serious ridicule or contempt against unspecified Moslems. That same sort of stunt was conducted as a matter of programming content on a weekly basis by their darlings from The Chaser.

These were textbook cases of why Media Watch exists in the first place, to highlight factual and ethical breaches by the Australian media. Yet, while the program and its host Paul Barry quietly condoned those outrages by psycho troll McMahon, he was quick to leap to the defence of Antifa; an obscure client to champion you would think.

The entirety of Antifa’s violent form was reduced by Paul Barry to the incident involving conservative commentator Andrew Bolt in which an Antifa clown attacked him with “shaving cream and glitter” (and got pounded for his folly). These remarks were juxtaposed with footage of witnesses at the London Bridge attack to diminish perceptions of the genuine threat Antifa poses against comparisons with ISIS.

oie_IJLKhJZFC04C
ABC Media Watch presenter Paul Barry in his favourite T-Shirt

When the Australia First Party’s President’s apolitical son was jumped by Antifa cretins outside his Tempe home in 2015 while they were high on the dangerous drug ice that wasn’t as benign as the flippant Barry implied.

The family of the Golden Dawn members murdered in Greece by Antifa terrorists surely wouldn’t be assuaged by Barry’s playing down of the allegations made by Hunter.

And what were those allegations? He is reported to have admitted to News Corps reporter Corrine Barraclough among other things that:

  • “It’s more dangerous than ISIS”
  • “I read that Antifa in the US is training people to shoot and punch. It’s the same here. Antifa in Sydney are doing martial arts (ED-Lol!) to, as they would put it, ‘fight the Nazis’. It’s a paramilitary mindset.”
  • “The radical left of Antifa presents itself as being about compassion and empathy; it’s a Trojan horse. All conversations are about entitlement and rights, not responsibility. When these people talk about freedom, they really mean freedom from responsibility.”
  • “Often the people who are drawn to this cult don’t have a strong identity outside it.”
  • “Antifa would say there is nothing good about Australian society. Their minds project that belief, and everything is filtered through this ideology.”
  • “Without a doubt it’s a huge and growing threat to Australian society. It’s a miserable mindset.”

It’s hard to know whether the journalist was selectively paraphrasing Hunter or he did indeed make these claims verbatim, but there is nothing in the content of any of those sentences that we would dispute. Well, perhaps “growing threat to Australian society” is a bit rich. Antifa doesn’t pose the threat they merely enforce it at a gutter level. Nonetheless, all the rest is pretty much what Nationalists have said from the word go.

Responding to a predictable salvo by Antifa maximum leader Rob Sparrow on Slackbastard, Hunter issued denials in the comments section of its blog, writing:

  • “More dangerous than Isis’ (sic) was a hyperbolic comment, in the video below i (sic) explain that content.”
  • “I didn’t claim i (sic) started antifa, i told the journalist i made a call out in brisbane (sic) to get all the elements of the far left to meet up an certainly took a leadership role in organising the first counter rally against reclaim Australia.”

Addressing allegations of rape made against him by jilted former comrades, he wrote: “The smears of my characters (sic) are disgusting, and many of the people in the radical left if they were honest with themselves will admit that baseless slurs of sexism or racism etc happen all the time when people have disagreements, etc.”

He finishes by defiantly asserting, “Although the news.com.au article isnt (sic) the [choice] of words i (sic) would of used if it had control it (sic), i do not regret it as many people have been bullied by the SJWs, from ex radicals to current lefties to ex far right extremists to former friends and lovers of people who become ideologically possessed. If it helps those people i am happy.”

The fact that the ABC bothered addressing the article when there is so much fake news about demonstrates the interrelationship of the Far Left with your ABC.

As Paul Barry plays White Knight to the toe-rags of Antifa the true Left are more critical of them. In September on www.counterpunch.org in an article titled ‘Antifa in Theory and in Practise’, Diana Johnstone took Antifa to task post-Charlottesville, concluding that, “In the United States, the worst thing about Antifa is the effort to lead the disoriented American left into a wild goose chase, tracking down imaginary “fascists” instead of getting together openly to work out a coherent positive program.”

Earlier she observed, “The idea that the way to shut someone up is to punch him in the jaw is as American as Hollywood movies. It is also typical of the gang war that prevails in certain parts of Los Angeles. Banding together with others “like us” to fight against gangs of “them” for control of turf is characteristic of young men in uncertain circumstances. The search for a cause can involve endowing such conduct with political purpose: either fascist or antifascist. For disoriented youth, this is an alternative to joining the U.S. Marines.”

In effect, she is saying the ideological warriors of Antifa are driven more by a desire for a purpose in their rootless lives and they are picking a ‘colour’ much like the Black and Latino gangs. When it comes to the ideological component of their cause Johnstone points out they tend to get in the way and will just as easily turn on left wing voices who they believe through a difference of opinion are supporting those phantom ‘fascists’. This effectively bespeaks the tyranny they oppose.

Likewise, late in August Gabriel Black wrote on the World Socialist Web Site, ‘Why is the media promoting Antifa?’

He defines a very interesting relationship with Antifa in America and the Democratic Party. Black argues, “Indeed, many of the groups involved in Antifa are essentially factions of the Democratic Party. By Any Means Necessary, BAMN — is among the most fervent advocates of the racialist politics of the Democrats. It received national attention in 2014 for its campaign for Affirmative Action, which was waged in alliance with the Democrats and sections of the corporate elite and military.”

In essence, what Nationalists have long been saying, we are now corroborated by the legitimate Left, Antifa is useful tools of the neoliberal Globalist state.

oie_QPskvNAUGh3k
Never fear, Antifa are here!

 

ASSERTIVE NEUTRALITY: THE NATIONALIST ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT

ASSERTIVE NEUTRALITY: THE NATIONALIST ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT

In our ideological struggle against the system and its toadies, we must constantly be on the front foot in terms of laying out for our people exactly where we stand on the issues of the day.

It should go without saying that Australian Nationalists oppose, on principle, any involvement of the national defence forces in the wars of imperialism currently being waged by the so-called “coalition of the willing”.

Our doctrine of identity, independence and freedom sits at the polar extreme to that of all-conquering globalist capitalism; we value genuine diversity among the nations of the world, a position which obviously rejects any false notions of equality, supremacy or inferiority in the relationships between the mosaic of national groups.

Furthermore, we reject out of hand the adherence to treaties entailing international obligations which might needlessly put our people in harm’s way at the behest of the superpowers, or which could seriously interfere with the self-determination, good order or sovereignty of other nations.

aleppo
Aleppo, Syria: a tragic situation, but it has nothing to do with us

 

For example, our position on the recent Sunni insurgencies in Syria and Iraq has been consistent as we have stated from the beginning of the hostilities that this conflict should be fought and won by a strong coalition of Middle-Eastern regional forces and their northern hemisphere allies.

This eternal struggle for the soul of the Islamic world has nothing whatsoever to do with Australians, who are a people of the global south and should see ourselves as a nation apart from the endless squabbling among some 70 factions of Mohammedans with their myriad tribal and ethnic divisions.

There is no need for a nation of the south, which is socially, racially and geographically a world away from North Asia to be involved in the politics of that region, especially not as the yapping Lap Dog of the clown president Donald Trump and his Zionist cronies.

So too the sabre rattling by Canberra’s imperial globalist warmongers against the hermit state of North Korea is strongly condemned by Australian Nationalists for it is no concern of ours whether the Kim family stands or falls as rulers, or whether their crypto-Fascist system of government remains in place.

KCNA picture of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un speaking at the first party committee meeting in Pyongyang
We would bet the farm that Kim Jong Un will never bother us if we do not bother him

 

The possession of weapons of mass destruction by such regimes has, in recent times, tended to mitigate against widespread conventional warfare of the sort which ravaged the world in the 20th century, so it is no concern of ours whether North Korea remains as it is, armed to the teeth and ruled by a despot and his secret police.

There is no need for a nation of the south, which is socially, racially and geographically a world away from North Asia to be involved in the politics of that region, especially not as the yapping lap Dog of the clown president Donald Trump and his Zionist cronies.

The threats posed by Jihadism are likewise made far more manageable by a prudent immigration program which excludes non-assimilable Mohammedans, a move to Australian neutrality in foreign affairs, including cutting ties with the Zionist entity and an end to opportunistic political support for Islamism by the current political elites.

 

Talal Almeddine
Talal Almeddin and the other plotters of the Parramatta outrage are symptoms, not the disease and the cure is simple

 

As a nation we are blessed to inhabit one of the quieter corners of the globe and Nationalists feel no shame in our past reputation as a cozy, bucolic backwater at the ends of the earth, this ideal is, in fact, the state of affairs which patriotic folk ought to have explicitly tried to “reclaim” in the heady days of 2015.

The threats posed by Jihadism are likewise made far more manageable by a prudent immigration program which excludes non-assimilable Mohammedans, a move to Australian neutrality in foreign affairs, including cutting ties with the Zionist entity and an end to opportunistic political support for Islamism by the current political elites.

In the era of immigration restriction and White supremacy Australia was a genuinely progressive society and despite being embroiled in the wars of the 20th century, the second of which was unavoidable anyway, there was a sense of relentless forward momentum, optimism and the feeling that through the pursuit of social justice at home we might lead by example the developing nations of the world.

The heroes of Kokoda and the men who fought the campaigns against Japanese Fascism across our region are the examples for our assertive brand of neutrality; they fought for blood and soil, in the interests of their nation against a foe who sought to obliterate all societies in its path and impose totalitarian rule across the Pacific.

Let us be clear, however, that we are in no way “Antifascist” in the context of the fake Left and Zionist Right, we are simply aloof from that fraudulent and time-wasting argument because Australian Nationalists are the legitimate heirs and standard bearers of the political theories and way of life which exterminated the anti-national, totalitarian regimes of the 20th century.

kokoda_australians
The heroes of Kokoda, they fought against imperialist bullies and the killers of nations

 

To hostile powers, despots and imperialists Australian Nationalists would issue the admonition: leave us alone and benefit from our diplomatic skills, engineering prowess and scientific know-how; trade with us and receive goods of the best quality, clean foodstuffs and licences to deal your produce in kind.

However, intimidate or threaten us, make demands of, or coerce our nearest neighbours and, as an armed but neutral nation, we will send you scurrying away, starving and in rags, like General Horii and his Japanese forces in 1942.

Australian Nationalists hate war and imperialism, we hate the anti-nationalist, globalist thugs who are flourishing under Trump and Turnbull just as our forebears hated the anti-nationalist bullies of the 1930’s and 1940’s.

eureka

THE MAN WITH THE IRON HEART AND NO PERSONALITY

THE MAN WITH THE IRON HEART AND NO PERSONALITY

The new film from French director Cédric Jiminez (The Connection, Aux Yeux De Tous) represents nothing but a series of opportunities to tell an interesting story which has been squandered through equivocation in narrative and a lack of detail in its script.

The Man With The Iron Heart, abbreviated to HHhH, has so many problems it is hard to know where to start; it is poorly edited, the nominally stellar cast is restrained by hamfisted writing and poor character development and it is difficult to discern what point, if any, the writer-director is trying to make.

The story centres on the 1942 assassination, in Prague, of SS General Reinhard Heydrich. We are given some snapshots of his former life as a Navy officer, his rise through the ranks of the NSDAP, and his ascension to the top echelons of the National Socialist hierarchy.

hhhh-h_2017
Jason Clarke and Rosamund Pike as Reinhard and Lina Heydrich: a strong woman and her unfathomable blob of a husband

This series of badly constructed jump cuts, flashbacks and flashes forward, introduces Jason Clarke as Heydrich, Rosamund Pike as his wife Lina, and the always excellent Stephen Graham as an eerily realistic Heinrich Himmler.

The trouble with this opening sequence, however, is that the writers assume that the viewer already knows who the characters are, the timeline of NSDAP history, and the events which led up to Hitler’s ascension to power in 1933; we are confident that the average moviegoer would have no idea where, say, Ernst Röhm or Heinrich Müller fit into the story

The Man With The Iron Heart, abbreviated to HHhH, has so many problems it is hard to know where to start; it is poorly edited, the nominally stellar cast is restrained by hamfisted writing and poor character development and it is difficult to discern what point, if any, the writer-director is trying to make.

Röhm and Müller appear as pop-up characters for mere seconds of screentime in HHhH, Hitler is absent altogether and highly significant events, such as the “Night Of The Long Knives” are glossed over in a way which might leave the average punter scratching his head in confusion over what he had just watched.

Kubis
The Czech resistance also suffers at the hands of director Jiminez

Clarke’s Heydrich comes across as a flat, even passive character; he is sometimes annoyed, sometimes explosively violent but he never has anything really profound or interesting to say.

We would assume that the writers were aiming for a steely, near psychopathic aura for the character, but the result is a dull and listless cartoon of a man whose personal motivations and deeper thoughts are never made clear.

Moreover, Jiminez plays it so safe with his “Holocaust” narrative that he almost strays into the area of heresy by the omission of pertinent details of the (((official))) WW2 story.

The repression of Czech resistance, the police actions and mass killings carried out by Heydrich’s SS units are, remarkably, even turned into boring vignettes in HHhH; to anyone familiar with the real story the film goes close to exculpating senior NS officials by effectively cutting them out of the picture.

Clarke’s Heydrich comes across as a flat, even passive character; he is sometimes annoyed, sometimes explosively violent but he never has anything really profound or interesting to say

You see, in opposition to the mainstream, Hollywood inspired story of the Holocaust there is a school of thought which puts forth the idea that the Final Solution was a criminal conspiracy carried out by elements within the SS in pursuit of their own objectives; that the true magnitude of the mass killings and ethnic cleansing was deliberately kept from Hitler and his inner circle.

By omitting Hitler from the film the director has, perhaps unwittingly, veered into forbidden territory. If the viewer is paying attention, he could easily form the impression that Heydrich really was the sole architect of the planned destruction of native Czech culture and the liquidation of ethnic minorities within his area of responsibility.

The second half of the film is utterly forgettable in spite of the introduction of some fine actors into the cast; Mia Wasikowska, Jack Raynor and Jack O’Connell form the nexus of the Czech resistance plotline but that too falls flat and fails to make an impact on the viewer, there is simply not enough meat on the bones of the characters for the script to be effective.

anthropoid
Jamie Dornan and Cillian Murphy in Anthropoid, fine actors who were clearly given good direction and a first-rate script by Sean Ellis

In contrast to HHhH we recommend the excellent film Anthropoid. The 2016 feature directed by Sean Ellis examines in detail the actual plot to assassinate Heydrich which was led by resistance fighters and British trained Czech special forces soldiers Jan Kubis and Josef Gabcíc.

Jamie Dornan and Cillian Murphy are altogether more convincing as Kubis and Gabcíc, their operation, codenamed Anthropoid, takes place amid a far more fraught atmosphere, a vision of Prague riddled with collaborators, cowardly resistance turncoats and Gestapo spies.

By omitting Hitler from the film the director has, perhaps unwittingly, veered into forbidden territory, if the viewer is paying attention he could easily form the impression that Heydrich really was the sole architect of the planned destruction of native Czech culture and the liquidation of ethnic minorities within his area of responsibility.

The supporting cast, though lacking the big names of HHhH are equally impressive; Charlotte Le Bon and Anna Geislerova acquit themselves well in their roles as resistance sympathisers Marie and Lenka, who sacrifice everything they hold dear to free their country.

Anthropoid2
Young love was thought the perfect cover in a city brimming with spies and collaborators

Due to superior writing, it is what is said in Anthropoid, as opposed to what is explicitly shown, but poorly explained in HHhH that drives home to the viewer the horrors inflicted upon the people of Czechoslovakia by the National Socialists.

The impact of the SS reprisals against those who aided Heydrich’s assassins as depicted in the former film is far more dramatic than in the latter simply because by the climax of the film one has begun to sympathise with the characters in Anthropoid, due to their being more well rounded and the actors working from a better-prepared script.

In the end, HHhH is a badly made Holocaust drama which fails to land any of its punches due to the limitations of that genre, even though it does appear, to the trained eye at least, to bend that tiresome narrative to some extent.

Anthropoid, on the other hand, is a film Australian Nationalists may relate to, being as it is a depiction of where true patriots can be taken in their fight for a free country; it shows in graphic detail the sacrifices required of resistance fighters in a struggle against a tyrannical colonial power bent on crushing the native society.

There is much in the story of Kubis and Gabcíc and the wider European resistance movements against National Socialist and, later, Soviet imperialism which should inspire Nationalists everywhere, Anthropoid, as an entertaining piece of popular culture is a good place to start.

Mother
Alena Mihulová, playing the heroic Mrs Moravec, who faces the Gestapo as the reprisal raids begin

THE LEFT ARE NOW THE BOSSES’ BEST FRIENDS

THE LEFT ARE NOW THE BOSSES’ BEST FRIENDS

What are we to make of today’s Leftist? We could follow the standard conservative line and declare them to be anachronistic Marxist hold-outs who could never accept the dissolution of International Socialism in the heady days of 1989, but that is simplistic and we are better than that.

If anything, the Left of 2017 with their arcane take on identity politics represent a failure of Marxist ideals, they are, in effect pushing a distorted version of Socialism which has now fused with the superstructure of globalist capitalism.

White Nationalists in the U.S.A developed a theory in the mid-2000’s which placed the modern Left as the junior partner in a hybrid economic and social system, which fused a type of globalist feudalism with second generation Communism.

Tim Murdock, who further developed the theories of a former Washington political insider, the late Bob Whitaker, not only described the system commonly known as “Cultural Marxism” but put forward his tactical approach to overthrowing both the burgeoning Leftist cultural hegemony and its capitalist cronies.

whitaker_header_101 (1).png
The late Bob Whitaker was a former Washington political insider turned pro-White dissident

Murdock’s method centres on practical politics, the repetition of talking points and the tactical humiliation of Leftists at every opportunity; non-violence is stressed as the most radical path to confronting the Left, “dealing steel”, as he puts it, cannot produce satisfactory results.

White Nationalists in the U.S.A developed a theory in the mid-2000’s which placed the modern Left as the junior partner in a hybrid economic and social system, which fused a type of globalist feudalism with second generation Communism.

We saw this principle at work on our shores in the tumult of the 2015 civic patriot uprisings, chiefly carried forth by Melbourne based United Patriots Front and their allies; the tactics employed by this group mirrored the Murdock method, even if the Patriots themselves were unaware of what they were unleashing.

In the beginning, the use of non-violent demonstrations and the tactical humiliation of key opposition figures had the Left and their sponsors reeling in shock; who could forget the comical visits by UPF members to the Melbourne Anarchist Club and Leftist propaganda radio station 3CR?

riot
Antifa got more than they bargained for when they broke police lines at Coburg, the TV news didn’t show the part where the Left turned and ran away when the fists started flying

As the UPF provocations intensified, the Left, wounded and embarrassed spiralled into ever more extreme rhetoric and behaviour as their supporting cast of well fed, middle-class activists drifted away and their visible street movement dwindled, from some hundreds to a core of about eighty.

The Civic Patriot rising showed what is possible when dash and bravery are coupled with the right rhetoric and clever tactics; the modern Left fall apart when seriously challenged as they lack the discipline of their Communist forebears, the core of their activist base being made up primarily of Bohemians, hysterics, Peter Pan cases and middle-class adventurers.

 Had the young civic patriots known the powerful effects of their non-violent activities they might have husbanded their resources and held the line; in the end though, the debacle on Bell Street, Coburg in 2016 knocked the wind out of their sails as they, from that point, became folk devils in their own right.

The Civic Patriot rising showed what is possible when dash and bravery are coupled with the right rhetoric and clever tactics; the modern Left fall apart when seriously challenged as they lack the discipline of their Communist forebears, the core of their activist base being made up primarily of Bohemians, hysterics, Peter Pan cases and middle-class adventurers.

joyce
Alan Joyce, capitalist patron of the radical Left, he is donating a million dollars of his personal fortune to help rig the same sex marriage survey

It is only their connection to the institutions of capitalist power which sustains the wider Left, though it is now landlocked within the new class system and operates on the level of a Stasi like militia, policing the Working Class and Marginalised People on behalf of the bosses.

There is no other way of viewing the Left in 2017, their campaigns against ordinary folk, reason and common decency all lob the ball squarely back into the court of the Bourgeoisie and the global corporations; their denunciations of so-called “Hate Speech” and their insistence that transgressors be fired from their jobs does nothing but empower the bosses to silence the political opinions of workers.

For at one level this really is a quasi-religious problem, the Left being concerned with what they suspect people of believing and how, with their serial killer style system of thumbtacks and string, they weave a web of intersectionality fine enough to catch the mildest transgression.

This is a serious and growing problem, especially for authentic radicals and dissidents, with the puritanical Left coming down like a tonne of bricks upon anyone who dares step out of line, say the wrong thing or express scepticism toward their dogma.

For at one level this really is a quasi-religious problem, the Left being concerned with what they suspect people of believing and how, with their serial killer style system of thumbtacks and string, they weave a web of intersectionality fine enough to catch the mildest transgression.

You see, for the schtick with which they beat the lower classes to make an impact everyone must, in effect, wholeheartedly accept the idea that people have immortal souls; that a man can be trapped in a woman’s body or vice versa; that a person of one of the victim classes lives the oppression and hurt visited upon his ancestors; or that White people are automatically networked and privileged via their spiritual succession of the pioneering settlers

aglCEO
AGL boss Andrew Vesey, another patron of social justice causes and supporter of the LGBTI movement

As mad as all of this sounds, it is not enough to say that the Left are useful idiots, putty in the hands of the capitalist classes, especially when they are visibly part of the globalist machine, with CEO’s and directors of companies enthusiastically supporting causes such as Same Sex Marriage, the refugee scams and anti-racism initiatives while creating formal partnerships with Leftist activist groups.

If a social movement is sponsored by Google, endorsed by Qantas and patronised by the CEO’s of resource and infrastructure corporations it is a pretty safe bet to assume that the rhetoric coming from Left activists, the junior partners, is calculated to support the people and corporations further up the food chain.

fair_use_white_rabbit_bio_STFU-750x410
Follow the White Rabbit

 

THE MATTER OF SOCIAL CLASS

THE MATTER OF SOCIAL CLASS

Australian politicians of the globalist caste will flat out deny that, in 2017, we have an entrenched class system which regulates, and in many ways undermines public life and the ability of citizens to politically organise on their own behalf.

To make our case for, dare we use the term “class struggle” in Nationalist politics we should first give our readers a simple explanation of class structures in contemporary society.

Logically, starting from the top, we have the monied families, those now fading clans of colonial aristocrats whose fortunes were made in the 19th and 20th centuries, on the markets, as graziers, miners or other entrepreneurial adventures.

It is hard to know how much influence such folk have nowadays, their exclusive clubs and rural, baronial cliques are, we are told, on the wane as the younger family members sell up the stations to the Chinese, or other foreign concerns and re-settle in the major cities.

The old families may still be influential, to a point, but they are rarely politically active anymore, beyond donating to, or fundraising for, the major parties; with a few exceptions the remaining graziers and sundry other bluebloods are no longer regularly sitting in Parliament.

In any case these “hidden hands”, if in fact, that is the way they choose to operate, are beyond the reach of grassroots activism, for the time being anyway; as dissidents push in from the margins toward the structures of power they may well reveal themselves, though the major parties would do all they could to screen off their benefactors and power brokers from the public gaze.

The Bourgeoisie are usually on the bottom of the second page of the Financial Review Rich List, they are typically well off and their influence stems from their control of the ebb and flow of, not only commerce but information. 

The Bourgeoisie are usually on the bottom of the second page of the Financial Review Rich List, they are typically well off and their influence stems from their control of the ebb and flow of, not only commerce but information. In this class, we find people who can move laterally through the key areas comprising the structure of power in this country: big business, government, the arts and media industry and academia.

The next, and more visible class would be what we often term the Bourgeoisie, taking the Marxist interpretation; these are the people who, subject to government rule, man the levers of the system of globalist capitalism, as we now know it.

winning_cup_hawke_bond_1sn0ctv-mr_udnu73a
Bob Hawke and Alan Bond, wealthy yes, but also influential beyond the power of money

Members of this class, just as two examples would include people such as Malcolm Turnbull and Bob Hawke, though they may be spectacularly wealthy by working class standards their main power lies in their freedom of movement through these key decision making sectors of society.

Third on our list is the upper middle class, who could loosely be described as the people who keep those five key structures of power running on behalf of the bourgeoisie; they may be senior bureaucrats, lawyers, union officials, journalists or artists of one sort or another.

Well, known figures in the upper middle class are people of the calibre of Andrew Bolt, Waleed Aly, Peter Garrett, Dick Smith and so forth, people who have limited access to the structures of power but who have made a niche as demagogues, mid level entrepreneurs or successful artists.

Well-known figures in the upper middle-class are people of the calibre of Andrew Bolt, Waleed Aly, Peter Garrett, Dick Smith and so forth, people who have limited access to the structures of power but who have made a niche as demagogues, mid level entrepreneurs or successful artists.

It is in this class that we see values and ideology start to play a role in the social status of its members, rather than the raw power of wealth; we could argue that it is the class from which a lot of lower house MP’s, local councillors and, for want of a better term “community leaders” are drawn.

waleed
Race, ethnicity and creed matter little in the upper classes

It is also at this level of society that race, religion and ethnic background start to really matter in determining social status; whereas the Bourgeoisie is largely blind to such concerns the upper middle class will routinely impose themselves, in a broad sense, as representatives of particular groups in society.

Of course, the politics of the upper middle class tend to be egalitarian, in that they are bound by ethics, codes of conduct and social mores by virtue of the fact that they, unlike the classes above them, have to make a living largely by their own enterprise.

The Middle Class, having a measure of financial security are able to contribute their time and a share of their resources to causes such as sporting clubs, schools, political parties, churches and other community projects. 

Their values are that of the shopkeeper, anyone who has the money can partake of their wares, however, they see themselves as protectors of this broad class of clientele and wish to maximise their sales by catering to every whim and taste of their customers.

So the upper middle-class, when active in the community and thus visible to the two lower classes will style themselves as benevolent and virtuous, taking up the causes of those perceived to be “less fortunate” in the name of equal opportunity for all, as long as everyone knows their station in life.

GreensMPsGroup-th
The Australian Greens, a solidly Middle-Class outfit

We come then to the “middle”, whom we shall simply term the Middle Class, for the sake of clarity. These are the people who, while not struggling to make ends meet must still work for a living, generally as employees or sole traders; they may own one or two properties, be able to partake in leisure activities and political activism but they have very limited access to the structures of power save by appeal to those higher up the ladder.

The Middle Class, having a measure of financial security are able to contribute their time and a share of their resources to causes such as sporting clubs, schools, political parties, churches and other community projects. They are the rank and file party branch members, the activists, social justice warriors and club men who, while feathering their own nest are able to devote their energy to achieving specific communal goals at a grass roots level, as opposed to the abstract egalitarianism of the Upper Middle Class.

Below them is the Working Class proper, the skilled workers on salaries, university educated or qualified in a trade or profession in most cases they mirror the Bourgeoisie in terms of drive to succeed and financial self interest, but they are mostly apolitical and place little value on the abstract “virtues” of the Upper Middle Class.The Working Class will join trade unions and social clubs if it is in their interest but in general, they are apolitical; they are worldly enough know that they are cut off completely from the structures of power and they tend to resent to some extent those who are supposedly their betters, especially politicians.

The Working Class will join trade unions and social clubs if it is in their interest but in general, they are apolitical; they are worldly enough know that they are cut off completely from the structures of power and they resent, to some extent, those who are supposedly their betters, especially politicians.

This class of builders, office workers, junior public servants, consultants and sub-contractors are self-reliant in that they practice what might be called Anarcho-Syndicalism; they, for the most part, are able to set the price of their own labour and will form temporary, ad hoc partnerships and syndicates in which profits are made.\

the block
The Block, relatable working class archetypes for the mass media age

Generally, this class sees politics as means to an end for the upper classes and views government policy as something which is done to them, rather than for them, to that end there is widespread avoidance of “red tape” and corner cutting when it comes to compliance with rules and regulations.

This is the anarchic part of the Working Class make up if we take anarchy to mean self-rule as opposed to the nihilistic connotations of Bohemian “anarchism”; the anarchic worker, as far as possible, games the system and breaks the law insofar as those laws might inhibit his making a living.

This class of people, in general, will fiddle things to their own advantage in a self-centred fashion but not go overboard into outright corruption or the self-destructive criminality seen in the truly marginalised people, they are thus viewed with a degree of hostility by the Upper Middle Class

Marginalised people are the minimum wage slaves, the itinerants, contract workers, the disabled, pensioners and others who are purposely shut out of the financial-political power structure and spoken over by the middle and upper classes.

The final class of Australian we will call the Marginalised Class, as this is the description which most closely fits their situation, for the most part.

Marginalised people are the minimum wage slaves, the itinerants, contract workers, the disabled, pensioners and others who are purposely shut out of the financial-political power structure and spoken over by the middle and upper classes.

A person on the margins of society has no material security in comparison to the other classes, he doesn’t starve, but progress above the station of the casual worker or, in the case of an infirmity of mind or body, the social welfare recipient, is both extremely difficult and, nowadays increasingly rare.

struggle st
The SBS programme Struggle Street gave us an insight into the challenges, hopes and dreams of some of our most marginalised suburbanites

These are the people whose fragile economic lives are rendered precarious by globalism and who are viewed, in terms of their class, as an impediment to the ambitions of the upper and middle classes; we hear them described as idle, ignorant and quarrelsome, words which might have come from some 18th century nobleman as he contemplated “Les Miserables” on the streets.

We will conclude this article at the point of describing the present class structure with a view to creating an axis for discussion among Nationalists and our supporters; this analysis will be built upon and developed as a reference point as we explore strategies for building class consciousness and, as far as possible, class solidarity among White workers and marginalised people.

Due to class relationships and the antagonism of the upper classes toward working and marginalised people the only way forward is to start on the outside and clear the margins of all the political competitors, opportunists, Bohemians, criminals and controlled counter gangs imposed upon our people by the globalists.

Our talking points on what we call “margin-streaming” here come into play, where we attempt to build a political movement in the wilderness of suburbia, beyond the pale, with such resources and personnel as can be scavenged from the ruins of Globalist Cosmopolitanism.

 

USA: Demonstrators March In National Day Of Action On Immigrant Rights
A shadow puppeteer out on strike