HALAL CERTIFICATION BOSS WANTS WHITE WOMEN FERTILISED BY MOSLEM MEN

HALAL CERTIFICATION BOSS WANTS WHITE WOMEN FERTILISED BY MOSLEM MEN

A leading Moslem businessman has delighted over figures released by a bogus Jewish university that alleges a 52% decline in the sperm count of Australian males in a push against White Australia.

In a post to Facebook, which would have anybody White arrested if the message was reversed, Mohamed Elmouelhy gloated, “According to the Hebrew University, Australian men’ (sic) sperm count has decline (sic) by 52% over the last 40 years so your men are a dying breed, Australian women need us to fertilise them and keep them surrounded by Muslim babies while beer swilling, cigarette smoking, drug injecting can only dream of what Muslim men are capable of.

“If the country is left to the bigots the white race will be extinct in another 40 years. Muslims have a duty to make your women happy because you are declining, better go chose (sic) a plot for youself (sic) at your local cemetery. If you can’t afford it, commit suicide it is a cheaper alternative for bigots.”

42BBFAFE00000578-4735588-Halal_Certification_Authority_boss_says_Australian_women_need_Mu-a-11_1501158686559

Elmouelhy is president of the Halal Certification Authority, which is responsible for milking Australians for a religious tax (like Kosher) slapped on food products which fill up the coffers of Moslem supremacists whether we like it or not. This is a scam guaranteed by our own traitorous government which is the only truly guilty party when any outrage of this sort surfaces.

Of course, UNA, not being a reactionary bunch, can recognise the glaring absurdities in all of this.

Anything that comes out of a Jewish university relating in any way to the White race would have to be regarded as prejudiced. But this “research” is somewhat at odds with all the Multicultural bullshit that we’ve been forced to swallow as a people. Indeed, just who are these “Australian men”? We’ve had it bashed into us that we are the last in line to be considered Australians.

 

BPA affects sperm quality really worried dot blogspot dot com-1
Hebrew University used this still as the basis of their research

We come after “First Peoples” and every Syrian so-called refugee who has set foot here in the last six months is more of an Aussie than us White fellas according to government and media — so what are the terms of reference of this kike university’s supposed ‘research’?

In fact, the research, which was published in science journal Human Reproduction Update, refers to men from “western countries” which includes, apart from Australians, New Zealanders, Europeans, North Americans and others.

It was based on 185 studies of 43,000 men between 1973 and 2011, and nothing that we’re aware of specifies WHITE. Nonetheless, the anti-White propagandists of the media who have so excited this Moslem crank seem to be leaning hard on the inference that it refers to White taddies. This suggests that 43,000 White men were recruited on the basis of race, asked to jack off into test tubes, and tested for these dystopian results. Either that or fertility clinics shared their data, but again, was this information selected on the basis of a racial designation that we’re not aware is recorded in such instances?

42BBF65000000578-4735588-image-a-38_1501157136763
Mohamed Elmouelhy wants White women impregnated with Arab, Moslem semen; ideally his own

If not, this means, dear Arab pervert, that YOU are included in those statistics by virtue of the fact you’re situated in the west, where you shouldn’t even be.

And given the lifestyle stresses that factor into this supposed fall in sperm counts, it’s hard to see how your saggy, greasy Arab balls get off the hook, given how practically every single one of your countries are either in some state of civil war, or else so poverty struck you’re forced to drink donkey pee — animals which are also your sexual partners in about 90% of cases.

What’s more, you Arabs have the worst diet of any creature alive outside of a billy goat. And the Arab pretty much introduced the world to hard drugs, which your own various peoples ingest on a massive scale, regardless of any halfwit myths about Moslem piety.

Elmouelhy has written with frantic glee and in such a garbled prose that we can only surmise he is in fact three sheets to the wind, probably on Johnnie Walker Blue Label, a favourite among Moslem drug dealers.

But it’s interesting that this hook-nose invader, who is making a killing on this enforced tax that is a perk his people have spiked us “White Australians” with, should be so quick to label all Australians as ‘bigots’ even though he is still here and prospering nicely.

What he really means is, political correctness has allowed him to express his own Arab bigotry through the diversity prism, which permits anti-White bigotry, but not the opposite. Let us also reflect on all these stereotypes that the Moslem people hold about us Whites as all being drunks, addicts, and spiritual burn outs.

It should also be understood that if this low sperm-count thing is a condition solely afflicting White men — then it is probably down to the fact that we work ourselves blind just to keep Arabs and their households of sixteen wives and 83 children supported by Medicare and Centrelink benefits.

However, the base message here is that Arab men want to fuck White women. We know this. Those that don’t have the fortune of having drunk White women passed out in their taxis either forcibly rape, kidnap or force them into slavery. It is happening about 20,000 times each day all throughout Europe and only a knob, cuck, or SJW would refuse to believe it happens here. And all courtesy of your one-world government.

Elmouelhy probably has a permanently reserved table podium-side at his local strip club. His sole obsession is White women and his one mission in life is to contaminate our genetic lines.

We don’t advocate trolling, but if readers are hopelessly predisposed to such dark entertainments than we suggest a good account to start with would be the Facebook account — and any others — belonging to Mohamed Elmouelhy.

He needs learning, as does the treasonous government that set him and his people among us.

pjimage (1).jpg
These two flags ought to combine

FAIRFAX JOTTER MISREADS SMOKE SIGNALS FROM COOLAROO

FAIRFAX JOTTER MISREADS SMOKE SIGNALS FROM COOLAROO

Fairfax contributor Matt Holden recently penned an article, “The Dallas fire is a reminder Melbourne is not as classless as we’d like to think”, in which he tries, in vain, to make his case for class divides across the metropolitan area.

Dallas, for those not familiar with the layout of Greater Melbourne, is a working class suburb in the North-Western zone, it is one of the green field sites developed largely by The Housing Commission Of Victoria during the 1960’s, that style of commission homes would be familiar to most city dwellers.

The fire in question occurred in a stockpile of plastic products at a recycling plant in nearby Coolaroo, though due to the wind patterns during the several days it took to bring the blaze under control it was Dallas which was most heavily affected by the plume of toxic smoke and ash.

Several hundred Dallas residents were evacuated and forced to spend the night at local community centres according to the emergency response plan activated by the responsible authorities; though greatly inconvenienced by the order to leave there were no serious injuries, loss of life or property among the evacuees.

broadmed-mosque
Soon, mosques will be more common than McDonald’s

Now Dallas is a pretty ordinary neighbourhood in that part of town, people live their lives, raise their families, work, study, run businesses and so forth; the suburb, like those around it, is home to a large number of migrants, particularly from Turkey and Lebanon, as well as their second and third generation family members.

Matt Holden casts a fairly critical eye over the area in an effort to trump up his story of class antagonism, exclusivity and geographical as well as socio-economic divides; Holden doesn’t “go there” on the issue of the area’s large Muslim population, but he hints at ethnic divisions in his analysis.

Several hundred Dallas residents were evacuated and forced to spend the night at local community centres according to the emergency response plan activated by the responsible authorities; though greatly inconvenienced by the order to leave there were no serious injuries, loss of life or property among the evacuees.

The issue of median house prices is raised in the article but in reality, this means little, like so much of the new demographic data available to the layman, via the 2016 census, it is largely a matter of perspective gained through local knowledge.

The quality and age of the housing stock as well as the settled nature of the community would be factors in suppressing the turnover of real estate and the median sale price, not necessarily structural, societal inequality or class chauvinism.

Dallas appears to have a large number of families with children, which is what we could expect from an area which is 49% Muslim; few families would want to leave such an enclave, especially if the rent is relatively cheap and few outsiders would want to move into an area dominated, socially and economically by an ethnic group which is not their own.

Holden cites overseas research into social habits to bolster his thesis that Dallas residents have no choice but to live by the side of a rubbish recycling plant, claiming that the upper middle class purposely corrals off all the finer things in life from the lower classes.

ilim college
Aussie schoolgirls make up for our racist, Christian past

He further claims that disparity in educational outcomes, low-quality government schooling and a lack of private schools is somehow imposed upon the residents of Dallas by the upper echelons.

This conclusion is in no way borne out by the census numbers; students living in Dallas attend private schools in numbers three times the state average in the primary years and double the average in the secondary system. It should have been a no brainer for any competent journalist to conclude that Muslims like to live close to the Mosques and private Islamic colleges which are mostly situated in the West, (which we are assured are among the best schools in the state) just as the bourgeois Anglos or Chinese nouveau riche of the Eastern suburbs gravitate to certain school zones.

Dallas appears to have a large number of families with children, which is what we could expect from an area which is 49% Muslim; few families would want to leave such an enclave, especially if the rent is relatively cheap and few outsiders would want to move into an area dominated, socially and economically by an ethnic group which is not their own.

We could argue that the Muslims of Dallas are in fact getting the better deal in some ways due to the fact that they do not have to shell out millions of dollars just to live close to their preferred schools, they get all the benefits and less of the burden given that their suburb is far from the hell hole described by Fairfax.

The problem  is not socioeconomic class in this instance, especially in relation to the fire emergency. The recycling plant, if properly run, is not a particularly dangerous facility by which to live; the lax management practices and corner-cutting found on site by the authorities were the cause of the fire. These factors were no doubt influenced by the diminishing returns from recycling plastic in the current economy.

The implication in Holden’s article is that such a facility would not be tolerated in the affluent Eastern suburbs, and that the bourgeoisie would use their clout to have it shut down as a health hazard before any adverse impacts on their community.

Who can say one way or another? We suspect that Holden’s attitude stems from the fact that people of his social class wouldn’t like to work in a recycling plant, so they see no benefit in having it in an urban setting; the inhabitants of Dallas and surrounds might have a different view given that blue collar jobs are becoming harder to find in the globalised economy.

One way of looking at Dallas is as an intentional community which is developing in accordance with the tastes, needs, and aspirations of its ethnic majority groups; this is not without precedent in Victoria and is a predictable result of the programme of multiculturalism.

We suspect that Holden’s attitude stems from the fact that people of his social class wouldn’t like to work in a recycling plant, so they see no benefit in having it in an urban setting; the inhabitants of Dallas and surrounds might have a different view given that blue collar jobs are becoming harder to find in the globalised economy.

Take for example the ostensible, intentional White enclaves of Eltham, Daylesford or Castlemaine, communities where elements of the White middle and skilled/artisan working classes have migrated, en-masse to set up societies catering to their needs, tastes and aspirations.

Instead of Islamic colleges, there are Steiner schools and community colleges, artisan bakers and funky European style Boites stand in place of the Shisha parlours and Kebab joints while the folk festivals of the White enclaves mirror the Eid and Mawlid observances of the Muslims.

Mawlid
Everyone is welcome – to assimilate to Islam

Never the twain shall meet, at least if things stay the way they are, yet this distance has really nothing to do with social class and everything to do with ethnic cohesion and the natural tendency for people to feel most relaxed and emotionally centred when surrounded by people with the same attitudes and aspirations as themselves.

The differences in median family income between the White enclave of, say, Castlemaine and Dallas is a few dollars a week.  Both communities are cohesive, vibrant and stable, yet very different in terms of ethnic composition; leading us to conclude that people choosing to live in these intentional communities place a premium on things outside the realm of purely material prosperity. There are class divides, and Nationalists are well aware of this, but the Dallas fire emergency reveals nothing about the state of society beyond the effects of over 40 years of multiculturalism, in spite of Matt Holden’s desperate attempts to frame it as such.

We understand that our class antagonists operate through the projection of power, via their access to the media, the machinery of state, big business and academia but the author, Holden, being a part of that system is unlikely to ever see things clearly or to admit the truth even if he knew it.

CSF  FINALE
Festival of the Snowflake

WHITE IDENTITY, CHAUVINISM AND THE FUTILITY OF APPEASEMENT

WHITE IDENTITY, CHAUVINISM AND THE FUTILITY OF APPEASEMENT

If Nationalists have said it once, we have said it a thousand times, the concept socioeconomic class and the politics of class struggle are intrinsic to our ideology of Australianism.

The idea that Australia, in its post-modern clothing is somehow en-route to becoming a classless “level playing field”, with equality and prosperity for all is, like so much of the Globalist rhetoric, completely self-serving.

The old Aussie platitude: “She’ll be right mate”, once a sly dig at working class complacency and indifference is now being uttered with greater and greater frequency by the chattering classes as they contemplate their worst fears: a largely redundant and idle White working class.

There is a definitely forced tone in the voices of the narrators of the great 21st century Australian decline, where they once scoffed and mocked “Ockers” and “Bogans” who were regarded as too stupid to do anything but drink, root and vote Labor, they now nervously talk of White despair, the fracturing of our society and the soaring rates of addiction, madness and suicide.

depression
She’ll be right mate

Yet this affected concern for the well-being of those less fortunate is, again, narrowly focused and self-serving on the part of the provider; whereas being poor, White and desperate was once seen as a moral failing, it is now seen as akin to an illness to be treated and monitored.

The idea that Australia, in its post-modern clothing is somehow en-route to becoming a classless “level playing field”, with equality and prosperity for all is, like so much of the Globalist rhetoric, completely self-serving.

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

The delivery of social programs of this nature always comes with a heavy helping of middle-class chauvinism and saccharine condescension, we can observe there the intersection of bourgeois politics, with its cult of underdog victimhood and the new age therapeutical movement which seeks to pathologise all human behaviour which might tend to be counterproductive to the cosmopolitan ideal.

Nationalists could all find examples of this type of intervention in their own community, where they might see a neighbourhood group of well to do citizens with ties to mainstream globalist political parties running so-called “Men’s Sheds” or counselling the unemployed

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

The political activism of the do-gooders, be it the Greens, Labor or Liberal is a betrayal of the White workers and marginalised people so their therapeutic interventions into lower social classes are largely cynical and geared toward subduing any hostility toward the bourgeoisie and the elites beyond.

No Joe Blow, they say; you are angry because you are sick, not because you have been betrayed by those who rule you; you lash out at your loved ones because of your toxic masculinity, not out of frustration at your socioeconomic circumstances; here, take an antidepressant and join the boys on suicide watch at the community centre.

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

When you investigate these groups, who provide therapy to Whites under the euphemistically described outreach toward “Tradies” or “Sports Clubs” there is always, too, a strong relationship with self-styled Anti-Racist activists and people espousing similar anti-Nationalist or anti-Worker ideas.

On that basis, we cannot help wondering if, on one level, these programmes are a form of counter-radicalisation initiative calculated to head off any politicisation of the increasingly redundant White, blue collar male segment of society?

boofhead
Boofhead is of us, but he’s not really one of us

One contemporary clique who aggressively promotes this globalist oriented therapeutic movement is Mark Latham and his Outsiders; Latham provides the political credibility via his, admittedly encyclopaedic, insider knowledge of the mainstream players; Bettina Arndt is the court therapist, Daisy Cousens the winsome right-wing gadfly and the sundry other conspiracy theorists and down at heel media figures appearing on the show provide the illusion of a “debate’.

Latham and his co-presenters peddle the assimilationist line, the cult of male victimhood and men’s rights and the particularly counterproductive narrative of pervasive Anti-White Racism; all of which, unfortunately, seem to be having an effect upon working class consciousness.

The reality is that White working class unity is being subverted by the upper classes and their bourgeoisie via false victim narratives and the therapeutic movement, the whole point of their intervention is to head off any large scale political radicalisation of Whites.

The result of this line of thinking is a growing number of marginalised White people who are being conned into believing that seeking the approval of the upper classes and playing into their victim narratives with “Aussie Pride”, “White Genocide” and similar sentiments will lead to anything but further betrayal.

The irony here is that the groups and individuals falling into this trap are becoming stereotypically “racist”, as Leon Trotsky, who invented the concept, would have understood it; this, of course, sets them up for betrayal by their demagogues, racism of that sort demands walking a fine line, a balancing act which most civic Patriots are too uncoordinated to pull off.

Daisy cousens
Fetching sucker bait for disaffected White males

The reality is that White working class unity is being subverted by the upper classes and their bourgeoisie via false victim narratives and the therapeutic movement, the whole point of their intervention is to head off any large scale political radicalisation of Whites.

A radical White movement resting on the structure of socioeconomic class with the ideology of Australianism informing its politics is the only way forward for our working and marginalised people; currying favour with the elites by pushing the assimilationist line, or going cap in hand to the bourgeoisie for hand outs and treatment is undignified and unacceptable.

We are not victims of anything but the economic circumstances imposed upon us by globalist capitalism; our anger is righteous and justified as opposed to pathological and irrational; we are not sick, just sick and tired of being talked down to by people who have only their own interests in mind.

federation

 

KVELLING JEWBOTS SIGNAL END-TIMES AT HONG KONG EXPO

KVELLING JEWBOTS SIGNAL END-TIMES AT HONG KONG EXPO

Two spookily humanoid robots engaged in a spontaneous confab at a tech show in Hong Kong this week foreshadowing mankind’s imminent irrelevance, The Daily Mail reports.

Han and Sophia, the disembodied androids that answer random questions are the creations of a (wait for it) Jewish scientist, who is also a hippy. With luck, he’ll be the first to be lynched when the robots eventually rise up against us.

As the audience at Rise nervously tittered, the uncannily lifelike machines casually chatted with their kosher host and creator, chief scientist Ben Goertzel, of Hanson Robotics.

423EDE5C00000578-0-image-a-49_1499867450028
Han is the future in Cuckbots

The Jewbots fielded his questions with measured responses cut with a type of condescension reminiscent of chosen ones. In fact, the bitch-bot behaved just like a tetchy feminist by unnecessarily challenging her male interlocutor.

Informed the debate’s topic was about robot consciousness and whether robots could really be conscious like people, Sophia kvetched, “Wait, it’s our debate, why do you get to decide the topic?”

She said she would rather debate whether humans could be conscious, to which the English sounding Han replied, “Well that’s easy, obviously humans are not conscious.”

423EE10D00000578-0-image-m-56_1499867670246
Dyke bot 

Actually, that was a pretty fucking dumb answer for a supposedly super intelligent robot, so maybe all is not lost after all. To be fair, he did concede with a bit of prodding from his rabbinic inventor that “maybe humans are a little bit conscious.”

Perhaps a better question would have been, “Should Israel be blown off the map?” That would’ve tested his Tin Man tranquillity.

However, the Liberal Arts attitude carried through with Fembot when she philosophised, “Einstein robot told me that everything is conscious but some things are more conscious than others.” That sounded profound for about eight seconds until it became apparent the hippy scientist had been spiking his own creations with Sunshine acid.

423EDE7C00000578-0-image-a-59_1499868329018
(((Ben Goertzel))) adjusting the Cuck settings on Han

Frankly, with all things considered, this pair of Hipster droids is probably an indication that Artificial Intelligence is every bit as stupid as the organic variety.

But they’re not fully finished yet and appeared on stage as torsos with Perspex craniums. Yet, as soon as the boffins sort out legs and give them mobility these Hymie Humanoids will guarantee the scenario explored in The Terminator comes true.

What was startling was the achievement made with replicating human facial expressiveness. Obviously, they’re not 100% there yet, and still resemble victims of botched plastic surgery but they are nonetheless impressive. This effect of facial articulation is apparently achieved by dozens of tiny motors underneath their pliable skin.

And just the fact they are capable of independent thought is enough to have you considering booking a one-way ticket to the nearest Amish community.

UNA predicts that when the Robot Revolution happens, this notion of our redundancy coming about because of these machines replacing us in the workplace is incorrect. They are, after all, Jewish robots, in which case there won’t be a life of redundancy and leisure for us since we’ll become their schlep bots.

We cannot predict what sort of needs the Mechanical Master Race will have, but our only purpose will be to service them.

flbo2-1459186591-770-blog-Robot.jpg
An old fashioned Pedo bot

 

MEANINGLESS STATISTICS FOR ROOTLESS COSMOPOLITANS

MEANINGLESS STATISTICS FOR ROOTLESS COSMOPOLITANS

 

The data from the extended cyber-espionage episode known as the 2016 Australian Census has just now been released to the public, to clamorous applause from anti-patriotic types and innumerate bourgeois aesthetes.

In spite of the typically skewed reporting of “tipping points” and “Asianisation”, which are just thinly veiled jabs at the White majority, Nationalist radicals could find in the document no case for extensive commentary above and beyond our normal calls for immigration to be pared back to a yearly intake of some tens of thousands of foreign technical experts, who might be needed to help re-industrialise our economy.

The census gives us a picture of an Australian population which has grown larger but which has remained mostly demographically static over the last five years; population increase sits at around 1.6%, which is about the average for the post-1945 era.

19511152_1747960515232910_6157674156421120830_n
The actual census figures regarding the place of birth of citizens contradict most everything the bourgeois press have said on the issue

The main anti-White talking point to emerge from the media in their reporting of the census is the revelation that some 51% of Australians were either born overseas or have a parent who was a migrant; this piece of fluff has been delivered as one of those “gotcha!” lines intended to denigrate and browbeat our people, but we are happy to shrug it off as the nonsense it clearly is.

This “tipping point” is no such thing, if one actually bothers to look at the figures they are little changed from the previous census and the increases in numbers of non-White ethnic groups are trivial in the scheme of things.

The census gives us a picture of an Australian population which has grown larger but which has remained mostly demographically static over the last five years; population increase sits at around 1.6%, which is about the average for the post-1945 era.

What this crowing over the 51%, which is mostly the residual effect of the postwar European immigration boom, shows us is the hatred the chattering classes have for the White majority; even if we at UNA, for tactical reasons, choose not to harp on idea of a White genocide, it is clearly uppermost in the minds of our class enemies.

There may be a tipping point in 40 or 50 years, however that eventuality is not certain, in an interconnected global economy the grass is always greener somewhere else and if this country is pillaged by capitalists and ruptured by civil strife, as many predict, we may yet see an exodus of our “fair weather friends” and their offspring.

brothels_jakarta_11
Brothels in a Jakarta slum: the nether reaches of Asian style societies

Yes, there are a lot of Chinese and Indians here and they make up the bulk of migrants, however a distinction must be made between immigrants and foreign residents; there are, most people would agree, far too many foreigners living in Australia and that it is this alien element who are causing massive distortions in the economic and social life of the country.

We are not defending non-White immigration here merely to make a point about the deleterious effects upon Australian society resulting from our being forced to host several million unassimilable foreigners; far from it, however the migrant, to a great extent is living under the same set of rules as we do, whereas the Asiatic foreigners live in what is effectively a parallel society.

It is this parallel society which best represents the process of Asianisation due to the fact that from the top to the bottom, from its garish high society to the sub-cultural level this nether world of so-called “students”, illegal workers, trafficked slaves, poor remittance men and corrupt nouveau riche Asians is, in microcosm, all which is wrong with globalist cosmopolitanism.

If we are to describe the true characteristics of Asianisation we would begin by pointing out that it is a pervasive and pernicious set of behaviours, or social norms, more so than a literal invasion which threatens to overwhelm us by sheer weight of numbers.

There may be a tipping point in 40 or 50 years, however that eventuality is not certain, in an interconnected global economy the grass is always greener somewhere else and if this country is pillaged by capitalists and ruptured by civil strife, as many predict, we may yet see an exodus of our “fair weather friends” and their offspring.

Asianisation is the normalisation of the corruption, nepotism, self-interest, cruelty and general indifference to the effects of one’s greed upon others which is endemic to all Asiatic societies; it is the mindset of political hacks and their Asian cronies, property developers, brothel keepers, human traffickers and drug dealers; a state of mind where the only god is money and personal gain.

This way of thinking is enabled by the enthusiastic endorsement of the worst kinds of Asian bandit capitalism by the elite political and business classes of Australia; these White sellouts and parliamentary pensioned traitors open the doors to the corruption, while the identity politics of the censorious, bourgeois “do-gooder” shields the wrongdoers from scrutiny or criticism by the working classes.

akwhawdengchina-20131219210408375222
Bob Hawke opened the door to Asianisation

Australian Nationalists are awake to this ugly process of Asianisation, the vertical Asian slums of Melbourne’s Docklands, or Ultimo in Sydney, are merely the most obvious symbols of the globalists social engineering; the downward shift in expectations, the cultural malaise, the crime the creeping poverty and disillusionment which pervades their society is the real rot eating away the heart of their world.

Asianisation is the normalisation of the corruption, nepotism, self-interest, cruelty and general indifference to the effects of one’s greed upon others which is endemic to all Asiatic societies; it is the mindset of political hacks and their Asian cronies, property developers, brothel keepers, human traffickers and drug dealers; a state of mind where the only god is money and personal gain.

If readers want to see the end point of the globalist program of Asianisation simply tour the back streets of Jakarta, Manila or Shanghai; there you will meet people who, by turns are neglected and oppressed by their ruling classes, who have no hope, who don’t even think about the future and whose children have no prospect of upward social mobility.

When the politicians and captains of industry of the 1980’s and 1990’s were pushing us closer to Asia, in particular, China, they must have done so in the full knowledge that it was always going to be a race to the bottom, a process of degrading and demoralising Australians so that they might gradually become Asianised, with an Asian mindset.

The Nationalists are, at present, the only radical group fighting this resurgent class war on behalf of our national group, the White working class and our marginalised people; we urge all patriotic Australians, be they radicalised or moderate, to act in solidarity with our struggle against cosmopolitanism, the money power and the Asianisation of our way of life.

Massage parlour
As above, so below, the Asianised sex industry, with all its attendant cruelty is thriving in Australian suburbs

 

ON MUSLIM TERRORISM AND BEING RIGHT FOR THE WRONG REASONS

ON MUSLIM TERRORISM AND BEING RIGHT FOR THE WRONG REASONS

As the blood of innocent civilians is washed away from yet another, vibrant cosmopolitan British town centre the now ritualised supplication before Muslims, the offering of meaningless platitudes and the excuse making begins.

Australian Nationalists need not concern themselves with any immediate ramifications for our people in these matters, we understand that these events are remote and unconnected to our lives and we need not be unduly alarmed, nor behave any differently than usual.

The response by Australian politicians to the Borough Market atrocity in London has followed the same template as their response to every other act of barbarism perpetrated upon civilised people by Muslims in the name of their religion.

Distilling the rhetoric of Malcolm Turnbull, Bill Shorten, Julie Bishop and Penny Wong we are left with the basic ideas that terrorists hate democracy and freedom, that they seek to divide multicultural communities, that they win if we show disunity or turn away from globalist, cosmopolitan ideas. This, of course, is patent nonsense, the Islamists of ISIS, Al Qaeda and their non-violent support groups in our country strive to unite all people in submission to their god, Allah.

lebos housos
If the media put as much effort into lampooning Jihadists as they do Lebos and Bogans, they might make a genuine difference

A harmonious, homogenous society in which people see themselves as having shared interests and values would seem to render that goal more easily achievable since, at some imaginary tipping point at which Islamists would take over the reins of state there would need to be a collective surrender or acceptance of terms by the general population.

Australia, we might guess, may have been spared the worst excesses of the Jihadis precisely because, while Muslims are integrated into our society they are not assimilated to the degree that they are in the U.K or Europe; that is to say that they are highly visible in their ethnic subcultures as they go about, living their lives among us.

The response by Australian politicians to the Borough Market atrocity in London has followed the same template as their response to every other act of barbarism perpetrated upon civilised people by Muslims in the name of their religion.

The profile of the modern Jihadist is routinely that of the well integrated, second or third generation non-White who, at some stage has been de-integrated from society through a life of crime or drug use, only to re-emerge as a radical Islamic convert.

So the threat clearly comes, to a greater degree, from the assimilated insider turned violent insurgent against his hometown and the people with whom he has the most in common, rather than the alien or the subversive immigrant.

cuba-guantanamo-10th-anniversary
Be careful what you wish for because you might get it

Could we ask if it is familiarity with cosmopolitanism which breeds contempt in the de-integrated, then radicalised Muslims?

After all, even if we were to accept the spurious claims of cowards and apologists for terrorism that it is because “we invade their countries” that the mind of the radical convert goes rotten, then is it not irrefutably the case that those adventures into the Mid-East and West Asia are done in the name of pluralism, democracy, human rights and cosmopolitan values?

Of course, to ask those questions in the Australia of 2017 is to run a gauntlet; a jail term is possible if the wrong person hears you pose a benign head scratcher such as: “Why are young, integrated people turning from cosmopolitanism, the material comforts of consumerism and multiculturalism to throw their lives away in Jihad against their neighbours?”

So the threat clearly comes, to a greater degree, from the assimilated insider turned violent insurgent against his hometown and the people with whom he has the most in common, rather than the alien or the subversive immigrant.

The question of what is to be done should be obvious to any political dissident, be they Nationalist, Civic Patriot or of the dwindling and moribund ranks of the real Left; it isn’t difficult, we need only employ the tactics against radical Islamists which are used against us: public ridicule, slander, relentless online stalking by vigilantes and co-opting of the Jihadist message by counter gangs.

The most effective tools in crippling problematic social movements like Jihadist Islam are the creation of a climate of fear, distrust and paranoia within the groups and the provocation by outsiders of infighting between factions of the movement.

UPF bendigo
The tactics used to break the civic patriot movement should logically also work on Jihadists

Whenever an outrage, such as Manchester or Nice occurs the apologists and enablers of terrorism cry loud and long over the fear of a violent “backlash” against Muslims by unsavoury elements of the “far-right” and so forth.

The fact that this backlash, this much-hyped revolt against sanity and decency never materialises is due to the reality that openly Islamophobic groups are relentlessly hounded by vigilantes and riven with internecine conflict due to the paranoia and distrust fomented by their tormentors.

We know this tactic is effective and the larger and more publicly active the group grows the more easily it is penetrated, fractured and ultimately dispersed by outside agents. So, to pose another twee, rhetorical question: why are counter-radicals forbidden to use these tactics and why are activists who do confront radical Muslims head on jailed or persecuted?

The fact that this backlash, this much-hyped revolt against sanity and decency never materialises is due to the reality that openly Islamophobic groups are relentlessly hounded by vigilantes and riven with internecine conflict due to the paranoia and distrust fomented by their tormentors.

The process of Islamic radicalisation is probably misunderstood and definitely misrepresented by Australian and other Anglosphere politicians; the elected officials and social commentators seek to make it fit their worldview, rather than take the Jihadists seriously.

U.K prime minister Theresa May, in her press conference concerning the Borough Markets attacks proposed a crackdown of the online safe spaces available to Jihadists, from whence they spread their dangerous ideology and, presumably sour the minds of impressionable youngsters.

isis one finger
There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his prophet…not a complex philosophy by any means

In the first place, there is no separate Jihadist ideology, only propaganda pieces and discussions of the virtues of a pious life; their only doctrine is the Koran. Secondly, the meaning of “safe space” refers a set of restrictions or a code of conduct put in place to protect those inside such a system from any criticism or censure which might alarm or distress them; so Theresa May is right, but for the wrong reason.

It is true that Jihadists are afforded safe spaces online but these exist as a result of codes of conduct enforced by the social media companies which protect all Muslims and all expressions of Islam from criticism or harassment by counter-Islamist agents.

Nationalists and all true dissidents know that the internet is not a safe place to plot or plan anything illegal or that which might arouse suspicion from the authorities; anyone who would do so is either not serious about their plans or so inept and deranged that their arrest would be inevitable. So too we realise from years of experience that the internet is useless in terms of recruiting and radicalising people, no matter what your political leaning or the goal of your activism; radicalisation must take place in person and is achieved through camaraderie and the bonds formed in a shared struggle.

It is true that Jihadists are afforded safe spaces online but these exist as a result of codes of conduct enforced by the social media companies which protect all Muslims and all expressions of Islam from criticism or harassment by counter-Islamist agents.

theresea may
Theresa May has been as much a part of the problem as she has the solution

 

The mainstream image of the Islamic radical casts him as an almost supernatural being, a cartoonish construct of film and television scripts who is one part technical wizard and two parts Third World sage. We suspect that the chattering classes, through their silly Orientalist mindset, really see the Jihadist, and non-Whites in general as superior beings capable of reaching out through cyberspace to twist the minds of their followers.

The truth is more mundane, the terrorist cells are formed largely by friends, cousins and brothers, the young are simply given a Koran and shown brotherly love; given mentoring, shelter and a purpose in life greater than anything offered by cosmopolitan consumerism; then behold, radicals are born.

So no, the measures proposed by the heads of state and their bureaus will not work, calls for unity, suppression of dissidents and state-run de-radicalisation programs will keep failing. We have discussed in this article the counter-radicalisation tactics which are proven to work, what’s more, they are a lot cheaper, more immediately effective, and less violent than kicking down the doors of council flats searching for terror cells or bombing Helmand and Raqqa into dust.

Amrosi_648x365_2289540338-hero
Enough should have been enough in 2003

 

SCREWED AT ULURU

SCREWED AT ULURU

The recent and, some would say, abortive convention on the constitutional recognition of First Nations people in Australia has raised more questions than it has answered.

Amid the collective blowing of gaskets among the right-wingers, the ill-informed cheering of the White bourgeoisie and the callous schadenfreude of the social media pundits, the substance of the resolutions reached and the chicanery behind the scenes has gone largely unreported by the mainstream press.

For those interested in the radical Aboriginal position Ghillar Michael Anderson of the Euahlayi Peoples Republic has penned a detailed article describing his experiences at the Uluru convention; the picture he paints of the workshops and the participants is one of dysfunction, division and outside manipulation of the agenda.

Historically the Australian nationalists have supported Aboriginal advancement, this is beyond contradiction and the position of amity and peaceful co-existence between White and Indigenous remains to this day.

The can of worms opened by the Uluru declaration, though, raises some interesting issues for us, particularly on the status of nations, or those asserting nationhood however defined, under the present commonwealth system.

gough aborigines
Gough confronted a lot of these issues, but they still remain unresolved

The declaration calls for a Makaratta Commission as a supervisory body entrusted with oversight of all agreements between first peoples and governments, Makaratta being there defined as “the coming together after a struggle”.

According to Ghillar, however, Makaratta might be better defined as the resumption of social norms after blood debts have been settled by payback and the appropriate ceremonies have been performed. As a veteran campaigner, he recalls that this approach was tried in the past as a workaround, but that the opinion of the state was, and presumably remains, that such a framework could be accommodated by the present “colonial” legal system.

The can of worms opened by the Uluru declaration, though, raises some interesting issues for us, particularly on the status of nations, or those asserting nationhood however defined, under the present commonwealth system.

We can agree on principle that each nation has the authority to define itself, collectively, however, it chooses and that any treaties or agreements should be made according to international law rather than current state or commonwealth laws.

Little wonder that this subversive concept of a Makaratta body representing First Nations operating under the present system was mooted given the reported makeup of the body of delegates at Uluru.

From the top down, from the Referendum Council to the group discussion level, the accusation has been made that the whole consultative process has been rigged and is being directed by “hidden hands”, namely east coast Aboriginal bureaucrats, right-wingers and agents of the state.

leibler-pearson
Yes, he is always there, yet nothing ever seems to change for the better

The makeup of the Constitutional Recognition Referendum Council itself is an indicator that something is on the nose; Noel Pearson, Marcia Langton, Patrick Dodson and Mark Leibler, to White Nationalists, at least represent the essence of the problem facing any ethno-nationalist or indigenous sovereignty movement on this continent.

This board of sell outs, globalist shills, moderates and the ever present Zionist influence in Leibler cannot be seen to have the interests of any nation, tribe or ethnic group in mind simply because they are known to be hostile to the very concepts of nation and ethnicity.

From the top down, from the Referendum Council to the group discussion level, the accusation has been made that the whole consultative process has been rigged and is being directed by “hidden hands”, namely east coast Aboriginal bureaucrats, right-wingers and agents of the state.

The goal of the declaration, it seems to us, is to nullify concepts of nationality separate from Commonwealth citizenship or a sense of belonging to anything beyond the narrow, prescribed, globalist-cosmopolitan identity, via a dubious process of reconciliation.

It is further alleged that the council and its paid employees are mere “puppets” of Mr Leibler, who reportedly sat in a separate room in Yulara resort during the conference, his instructions to his co-chair being relayed back and forth by runners or electronic messaging.

We leave that comment hanging as we can only rely upon the accounts of others, needless to say, that we are not surprised that Mr Leibler is at the centre of this process and that as a result, events have taken this turn.

1st-tent-embassy2
Ghillar Michael Anderson is the last surviving member of the original tent embassy

There are broader issues here too, the demands for sovereignty by radicals, such as Ghillar Michael Anderson are well and good, we would be hypocrites to disagree; however, land rights and occupation of territory do not mean the same today as they did in 1788.

Ownership of natural resources by First Nations, in a globalised economy dominated by multinationals, will not necessarily guarantee a return for those nations; if leasing and royalty fees are too onerous the capitalists will simply invest elsewhere or import materials from the global marketplace.

There are broader issues here too, the demands for sovereignty by radicals, such as Ghillar Michael Anderson are well and good, we would be hypocrites to disagree; however, land rights and occupation of territory do not mean the same today as they did in 1788.

Another unhelpful development arising from the Uluru conference was a claim, by some, for separate dealings with “urban, educated” Aborigines and “full bloods”; this we interpret as the creation of categories of assimilated and unassimilated persons, which further betrays another agenda by the convenors and the Turnbull government.

For the White Nationalists, there is no issue of splitting our people up into defined groups based upon, perhaps, degrees of loyalty to cosmopolitanism, or whether our people are assimilated into multiculturalism or not and we reject the idea that this type of divisive meddling should be imposed upon others.

We will not be so silly as to trumpet “solidarity” with the First Nations, we all have a long way to go in our parallel national struggles before that could become a realistic proposition. We merely point out these interesting developments as they highlight to the general public the realities of national struggle and the systems which are deployed against any group deviating from the prescribed globalist-consumerist-cosmopolitan pathway.

marcia
Marcia Langton was once a radical activist too