HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

If anything distinguishes those civic patriots on the right from us radical nationalists it is by whom we are most attacked.

In the case of the civics, they are dogged by what we collectively term ‘the left’, while radical nationalists, who occupy a third position on the political spectrum cop the most grief from either the civic patriots or those in the conservative camp.

Bear in mind that ‘the left’ is as eclectic when it comes to issues, identity, philosophy, and strategy as ‘the right’.

The left wants the patriot movement dispersed while the conservatives aim to drive away radical nationalists so they can inhabit our political ground and remodel it in their crypto-globalist image.

This is a curious fact that allows us to discuss a couple of cases in point. Let us begin with what some of those from the civic patriot side of the quadrangle contend with in their present day ‘clicktivism’. This essay shall be in two parts on account of its length and the dedication required to each of its players.

1. THE PATRIOT ACTORS AND THE COMBATANTS OF THE LEFT

There is a particularly malicious element at play among those who oppose the growth of the patriots. They view patriots as more of a concern than the nationalist movement given its mainstream accessibility. On that side, the Bogan element is mocked by those who are their mirror image with one factor separating them by the slimmest degree: the perception of their engaging in ‘racism’. This is, despite the ambiguity on the question of race amplified in the patriot fold.

Nationalists define Australianness as being of White European stock, as opposed to Aborigines. Patriots, who misuse the term nationalism understanding it not, and often deliberately misappropriating it, are nebulous in their definition of an Australian. Many are in mixed-race relationships and as such loath the absolutism of nationalism which would exclude them on the grounds of breaching its inviolate precepts.

However, it is important in the propaganda war of those conflicting with the anti-Islam movement to lump each in the same basket and defame both they and nationalists, as ‘Nazis’; which is like calling all socialists Marxists or anarchists communists. The Nazi tag is meant to invoke images of state organised terror that would ensue if these groups are allowed to put down political roots in the community.

In the lexicon of those of the left, patriots are ‘potatriots’, a witticism intended to disdain that group as ‘potato heads’. This is a derisive term that was originally applied to skinheads. Since the advent of the Reclaim Australia movement, which is almost exclusively dramatized on Facebook, a number of pages and counter-identities have sprung up to oppose the patriot pages and the groups that employ them.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

But virtue is subjective in this day and age when that moral asset is destroying the west. Opposition to Islam is the kindling of the realisation something is amiss. Australians are being de-culturized while globalism is dialectically re-culturizing us with a religion that negates the very tenets underpinning the idea of universal equality at play. Both are at the mercy of the culturally vacuous reality of globalism.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113
Alex Gollan, the assistant school principal and anti-fascist anarchist who ran the ‘anti-bogan’ word press site and was arrested for bulk kiddie porn

This is visible nowhere better than on those oppositional pages, which we mentioned. This genre has no purpose other than to negate. They do not attempt to counter ‘potatriot’ messages by promoting their own positive counter-messages they literally take the aforementioned messages and desecrate them. There is no intellectual component at play in the deconstruction of the patriot message. Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is a sledgehammer used to beat down the message and the messenger so that the mission becomes personal.

A very telling post occurred on one such page with a prominent leftist troll, “Can’t we just kill them [patriots] all?” The admin replied, “No, because then we would be Nazis.”
Disregarding the fact that had that comment been made on a nationalist page it would have been hidden or removed, it is a very instructive insight into both the pathology of the poster and the counter movement. The duplicitous essence of it is summed up in the gag, “We’re starting a war for peace.”

The assumed virtue of the poster is instantly invalidated by the revelation of this tyrannical instinct.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

This is, however, but one example. Narrowed down to a central theme outside of ‘race’ is the implication that patriots will potentially auger in a dictatorial system reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, the calls for an authoritarian response to the patriots are constant on the sample page we have used for our study.

There are flippant, but often sincere calls for patriots to be pursued by ASIO, or to be charged with offences that — were they on the other foot — would be vehemently contested as breaches of civil liberties. So we come to the actors or combatants, and here we shall actually name some.

Smith
Pete Smith from Melbourne, heavily active on Facebook, is linked to Antifascist Action Sydney and other ‘anarchist’ pages

 

We have had correspondence with a few members of the patriot movement, putting aside our ideological differences, keen to highlight certain combatants and the disreputable methods they have employed to target one or other of the patriot actors.

One, in particular, has been defamed over and over by combatants using various Facebook identities and private messaging the patriot actor we shall call ‘Mark’.

Mark is being consistently vilified as a person of heinous substance and the nature of the slander has transcended any honourable intent. The attacks led to the hostilities emerging from a social media setting and into the corporeal world when the authorities were involved. Mark is not alone in these vicious online assaults but his example is notable.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

So, who is behind these assaults on Mark’s character? Here, we merely repeat what he believes: John Linden Faulkner. But we also mention two others, Alex Gollan and David Hollis.

download (3)
Sydney’s Tayce Brown, shoplifter, hair stylist to the scabby, and a real skank

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This blog, as in others we’ve mentioned, is a flagrant vehicle to attack political opponents. Faulkner and Gollan are said to have co-administrated the site. Gollan, a former assistant school principal has since disappeared from ‘anti-fascist’ activities after being charged with child-sex offences.

Faulkner, who Mark and others believe to be behind a series of online profiles identifiable by their malevolence, has a criminal past to make anyone suddenly hosting him start eyeing the nearest exit. Faulkner was imprisoned for nine years for armed robberies in which women were his soft targets. He appealed his sentence as harsh, but in doing so was told it was actually lenient under the circumstances.

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This week [originally posted on Facebook March 11] , it was revealed that David Albain Hollis, the man in the red ‘Truth’ cap who accompanied Sue Munro to the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court to spy on the Bendigo Three’s supporters — and who appeared in an opportunistic pic with John Safran taken on the day — went on a “stabbing spree” in 1991, knifing seven people one of whom later died.

Hollis served only 17 months in jail on the grounds of diminished responsibility as he was in the throes of a “psychotic episode”, although how that should mitigate anything so appalling we do not know.

There are other cases on that extreme left of the bench such as Tayce Brown of Antifascist Action Sydney whose conduct and lifestyle are such that she would be considered a habitual criminal outside of the political activist underworld.

The radical left is sure something — in a world inhabited by junkies, thugs, hookers, thieves, and ex-murderers does becoming ‘anti-racist’ mean atoning for dissolute, wasted lives. Does championing the ‘other’ allow them to graduate from their moral squalor merely on the basis they aren’t racist? We are not psychologists, and this is not a forensic examination, but the pattern cannot be ignored.

Bear in mind, Blair Cottrell was confronted with a video created inside the correctional system while he was doing time for a crime of passion. He never killed anyone, nor caused anyone harm. What of these three? All fall into the very worst categories, and all comport themselves on social media in a manner that delegitimizes any hypothetical argument they believe they have concerning right and wrong.

If Faulkner is behind this campaign of defamation and stalking against Mark, then it appears that he has in no way left behind his violent past, but merely justified it in the context of the political theatre. He has reinvented himself as the ‘good guy’ and deemed those patriot actors as ‘bad guys’ in a morality play where his own contaminated ethics are masked by a blindness born of criminal denial.

In our next article, we will turn the focus on the patriots, who are to nationalists what the leftists we have described here have been to them.

oie_DqksmJ43gaGr
Anarchist Psycho

 

THE ALLURE OF FOREIGN RULERS IS THE HEART OF POPULISM

THE ALLURE OF FOREIGN RULERS IS THE HEART OF POPULISM

According to Opposition Leader Bill Shorten, “Putin should not be admired by anyone”. This stern warning which is backed with all the authority of a man lecturing his wife’s son comes in response to Pauline Hanson’s latest appraisal of the Russian leader.

Confident that Hanson hasn’t the foggiest outside the whispered instructions of James Ashby and Malcolm Roberts, we’re putting this down to another excruciating attempt to accrue relevance vis-à-vis, foreign demagogues.

Similarly, the Trump phenomenon – which we’ve recently decried as a fraudulent ploy to deceive White Identitarians into supporting Trumpism – is also a go-to man for a Hanson covering up her party’s internal entropy.

Far from an exclusive happening to our own shores, it’s this two-man show that reveals itself all around the civic world with the same annoying recurrence as an accursed fly on a hot day.

It comes to us always in the same package: “we want a strong leader like Putin,” “we want Putin’s style of leadership,” “we need someone like Trump,” “Trump is a strong leader,” and too many ghastly variants thereof.

It’s remarkable that this one, quite broad and yet at the same time quite simplified quality of strength, is presented in such a fashion as though it’s an exotic viand to be searched out and acquired by adventurous merchants, brought back to us in all haste so we can sup of this ‘strength’ and ‘strong governance’.

Also remarkable, is that the actual political considerations between the two leaders and goals of their respective countries – which are manifestly at odds in many areas – are so blatantly ignored which hazes the proper definition of what the Hansonites and associated

Also remarkable, is that the actual political considerations between the two leaders and goals of their respective countries – which are manifestly at odds in many areas – are so blatantly ignored which hazes the proper definition of what the Hansonites and associated

It comes to us always in the same package: “we want a strong leader like Putin,” “we want Putin’s style of leadership,” “we need someone like Trump,” “Trump is a strong leader,” and too many ghastly variants thereof.

download (13)
A strong leader? Yep, that’s me!

It’s remarkable that this one, quite broad and yet at the same time quite simplified quality of strength, is presented in such a fashion as though it’s an exotic viand to be searched out and acquired by adventurous merchants, brought back to us in all haste so we can sup of this ‘strength’ and ‘strong governance’.

It’s likewise remarkable that the actual political considerations between the two leaders and goals of their respective countries – which are manifestly at odds in many areas – are so blatantly ignored which hazes the proper definition of what the Hansonites and associated

It’s remarkable too that the actual political considerations between the two leaders and goals of their respective countries – which are manifestly at odds in many areas – are so blatantly ignored which hazes the proper definition of what the Hansonites and associated fiends are even after anymore. As the spud fields aren’t known for producing Machiavellians, we would save these civic patriots the trouble of questing after that which they won’t acquire by recommending some essential reading in the form of Roger Hargreaves’

It comes to us always in the same package: “we want a strong leader like Putin,” “we want Putin’s style of leadership,” “we need someone like Trump,” “Trump is a strong leader,” and too many ghastly variants thereof.

As the spud fields aren’t known for producing Machiavellians, we would save these civic patriots the trouble of questing after that which they won’t acquire by recommending some essential reading in the form of Roger Hargreaves’ Mr. Strong, supplemented by Mr. Clever; the teachings are simply codified and full of quaint illustrations – imagine the infused wisdom the flag-wavers could learn from these benevolent characters.

Nevertheless, it’s perplexing as to why we want or even need a leader like Trump or Putin. You can’t have a leader like them without mimicking them in some way or another, and you can’t mimic them without looking like a total dill.

Surely a ‘strong’ leader does not mimic, but acts from his own competent self; and surely if one did have that competency of leadership they would act on it and not be asking where it is or why we don’t have it, much less trying to cheaply copy and paste it from overseas. Hanson’s bellowing for such leaders while not matching them on any level is likely as close a personal confession we’ll get that she positively doesn’t have in her what the people think she does.

Surely a ‘strong’ leader does not mimic, but acts from his own competent self; and surely if one did have that competency of leadership they would act on it and not be asking where it is or why we don’t have it, much less trying to cheaply copy and paste it from overseas. Hanson’s bellowing for such leaders while not matching them on any level is likely as close a personal confession we’ll get that she positively doesn’t have in her what the people think she does.

That’s why the sickly obsession with these men, personality envy if you will, is so rampant: the allure of foreign rulers make up for everything our own equivalents lack; it’s a dazzling show to trick the masses. That Hanson’s goons post images of her everywhere with the appropriated slogan “Make Australia Great Again” shows the authority is borrowed and tied to offshore markets – again, mimicking.

Nevertheless, it’s perplexing as to why we want or even need a leader like Trump or Putin. You can’t have a leader like them without mimicking them in some way or another, and you can’t mimic them without looking like a total dill.

But when something is over exaggerated these patriots will never cease to amaze us by under exaggerating, if not flat out ignoring, other events that strike anyone else as rather important. A prominent case in point being Putin’s crucial intervention in the Syrian Civil War. It’s in this Arab country that otherwise vocal Putinophiles are quieter than the Russian President’s critics.

Yes, they appear to keep mum over the fact Russia has cosy relations with Ba’athist Syria and, worse on the patriot Richter scale, Iran. Now, what does that mean? It means that outside theatrics, patriots know and care about their idols as much as Dan Evans knows and cares about being sober.

9a35716d6a74c13913b1c49eeb0e61f9a0ed89eb
Pauline Hanson, super-nationalist!

The extent of Russia’s cordial relations with the Islamic world (part of it at any rate) is hardly a minor matter, yet here we are scratching our heads as to why Putin isn’t persona non grata to those drooling over his perceived magnificence. His choice in international friends is a little halal, no?

That Hanson’s goons post images of her everywhere with the appropriated slogan “Make Australia Great Again” shows the authority is borrowed and tied to offshore markets – again, mimicking. But when something is over exaggerated these patriots will never cease to amaze us by under exaggerating, if not flat out ignoring, other events that strike anyone else as rather important.

A prominent case in point being Putin’s crucial intervention in the Syrian Civil War. It’s in this Arab country that otherwise vocal Putinophiles are quieter than the Russian President’s critics. Yes, they appear to keep mum over the fact Russia has cosy relations with Ba’athist Syria and, worse on the patriot Richter scale, Iran.

Yes, they appear to keep mum over the fact Russia has cosy relations with Ba’athist Syria and, worse on the patriot Richter scale, Iran. Now, what does that mean? It means that outside theatrics, patriots know and care about their idols as much as Dan Evans knows and cares about being sober.

Now, what does that mean? It means that outside theatrics, patriots know and care about their idols as much as Dan Evans knows and cares about being sober. The extent of Russia’s cordial relations with the Islamic world (part of it at any rate) is hardly a minor matter, yet here we are scratching our heads as to why Putin isn’t persona non grata to those drooling over his perceived magnificence. His choice in international friends is a little halal, no?

A prominent case in point being Putin’s crucial intervention in the Syrian Civil War. It’s in this Arab country that otherwise vocal Putinophiles are quieter than the Russian President’s critics. Yes, they appear to keep mum over the fact Russia has cosy relations with Ba’athist Syria and, worse on the patriot Richter scale, Iran.

Now, what does that mean? It means that outside theatrics, patriots know and care about their idols as much as Dan Evans knows and cares about being sober. The extent of Russia’s cordial relations with the Islamic world (part of it at any rate) is hardly a minor matter, yet here we are scratching our heads as to why Putin isn’t persona non grata to those drooling over his perceived magnificence. His choice in international friends is a little halal, no?

Now, what does that mean? It means that outside theatrics, patriots know and care about their idols as much as Dan Evans knows and cares about being sober. The extent of Russia’s cordial relations with the Islamic world (part of it at any rate) is hardly a minor matter, yet here we are scratching our heads as to why Putin isn’t persona non grata to those drooling over his perceived magnificence. His choice in international friends is a little halal, no?

The fatal flaw in Australian populism is that it can’t grow an organic, incorruptible base. Instead, we’ve shown to be inundated with scoundrels, hacks and, probably most insulting to the people, opportunists. As the nativism gives way to popularity and egoism so do the tenets of pure Nationalism. Populism co-opts its way into the established order of things and, lo and behold, we have but a different shade of globalism. Hanson’s own economic and immigration policies attest to that.

Nationalists hope the lesson is slowly sinking in that any so-called ‘saviour of the people’ placing too much attachment in foreign politics is more than likely not too sure about their own individualistic capabilities back home.

screen-shot-2016-02-22-at-12-37-57-am
Dan “the conservative capitalist” Evans (R) and the biggest grub on the Internet (L)

INTERNET DRAMA AND STREET THEATRE ARE NOT HELPING TO OVERTHROW GLOBALISM

INTERNET DRAMA AND STREET THEATRE ARE NOT HELPING TO OVERTHROW GLOBALISM

As the Civic Patriots and Anti-fascists continue their tussle over the rights to the title of the most disgraceful example of the White race, the Nationalists, and we suspect the saner members of the traditional Left, are simply in awe of both sides capacity for self-abasement.

We have pointed out many times this duel between two factions of, let us be frank, White trash has its roots deep in the twilight world of social media banter, trolling and cyber-bullying.

To those of us who still live the bulk of our lives in the real world and are physically engaged in alternative politics this constant bickering and sniping between parties in cyberspace presents some infuriating problems.

We originally intended this article to be a guide on how to deal with narcissists who try to impose themselves upon organised political groups, however, as important an issue as that may be it is not the whole picture.

Narcissists, by which we mean those people with positively malignant personality disorders, as opposed to merely self-confident, impatient or pushy people, are mercifully rare, but even one such person can devastate an entire activist community.

These people have a need to cause drama, call it a hunger or a craving for chaos but, as the author and diagnosed narcissist Sam Vaknin observes, this behaviour is all geared to securing what he has termed “narcissistic supply”.

We have pointed out many times this duel between two factions of, let us be frank, White trash has its roots deep in the twilight world of social media banter, trolling and cyber-bullying.

In brief, the severe narcissist could best be portrayed as a black hole of self-loathing and self-doubt, these people are often described as having no emotional core and no actual personality just a series of masks they wear, depending on the temperament and interests of the people they are tapping for acknowledgement and validation.

These masks or personae may involve things like sexual seduction of others, grandiose plans to really shake up the world into which other people are drawn, or they may offer some insight into a hidden subculture, or obscure field of expertise in which the narcissist is the enlightened master or expert.

million flag
The Million Flag Patriot was almost bashed by Antifa at his first rally. His skits are so poorly done that most people still don’t get the joke

The severe narcissist is all things to all people, he is your best mate, your benefactor and teacher as long as he can be the centre of attention, play his mind games, tell his tall tales and big-note himself in order secure his narcissistic supply and stave off the howling emptiness at the core of his being.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, these narcissists are usually unable to hold themselves back from becoming abusive toward the people around them, this stems from the fact that they are basically parasites. With no emotional core they have no moral compass, so they will often steal, lie, swindle, blackmail and stand over the people in their social circle without even a hint of remorse.

It is when the narcissist is caught out in a lie or some other abusive behaviour that the real problems begin, when confronted they can be quite dangerous as they will fly into an uncontrollable rage, but once they have calmed down then the long, drawn-out, sadistic process of their retribution begins.

These masks or personae may involve things like sexual seduction of others, grandiose plans to really shake up the world into which other people are drawn, or they may offer some insight into a hidden subculture, or obscure field of expertise in which the narcissist is the enlightened master or expert.

When the narcissist is exposed as a liar or a thief, for example, this causes a deeply-felt psychic wound, there is no possibility of them apologising, taking their lumps and learning to be a better person in the future, because the narcissistic supply from that source is now tainted the source must be destroyed at all costs. You can see where we are going with this comrades.

Put this in the context of an activist group, or any political organisation for that matter; a prominent member of the group exhibits the symptoms of narcissism discussed above, he is discovered to be a liar, a thief, a gossip or a sexual predator and confronted by the other members of the collective.

His response will then be to turn on the group, maybe he will denounce its members, or ingratiate himself with opposing political groups and the security services, anything to secure a new source of narcissistic supply. He urgently needs people to listen to his stories, to value his expertise and expert knowledge of his former group and to help him exact revenge upon his former comrades.

This is why you sometimes see formerly well known political extremists re-inventing themselves as anti-racists or conservatives, as the case may be; the phenomenon of group-hopping where people constantly change alliances or even invent new political tendencies out of thin air may be a red flag for the activists the narcissist will approach in his search for a new host.

To go back to our main point, social media is obviously a haven for narcissists and anti-social personality types and unfortunately, these fora allow the narcissist to create potentially limitless little bubbles of chaos and insanity, which to some extent can be transferred out of cyberspace into the real world.

Put this in the context of an activist group, or any political organisation for that matter; a prominent member of the group exhibits the symptoms of narcissism discussed above, he is discovered to be a liar, a thief, a gossip or a sexual predator and confronted by the other members of the collective.

This willingness by some people to take internet drama or their online personae to the streets creates real headaches for the good, genuine activists trying to build effective political parties or clubs.

We encounter people who demand to be treated as comrades, or even dignitaries, if you like, on the basis of their blog posts or social media jottings; then there are those who expect to be able to roll up to a rally or gathering and use us as human shields against people they have offended or provoked online.

Unfortunately for them, out in the real world, where the Nationalists live there are rules and etiquette and laws of the land which must be obeyed in order to advance our cause.

Nationalists and the authentic Left know that threats and challenges made online are rarely carried out, however there is an unwritten agreement among all sensible activists regarding the escalation of hostilities generated in the political struggle into attacks on the person, vandalism of personal property or aggression against non-belligerents; spouses, children, parents and so on.

The internet heroes, narcissistic parasites, trolls and bullies make maintaining this “truce” difficult, every time some dotty Antifa or drug addled Zio-Patriot type blows a gasket starts throwing death threats around or commences stalking their opponents it increases the risk to real activists on both sides.

The danger lies in the difficulty some people have in distinguishing fact from fiction and fantasy from reality; coupled with the tunnel vision and paranoia generated in these flame wars and stalking incidents this disconnect has the potential to blow trivial social media comments out into cycles of violent payback in which innocent people will be harmed.

While our side would never shrink from confrontation and we are more than able to ensure our own safety in public, we really do not want to see the current vigorous back and forth between Nationalists and Globalists degenerate into European levels of political violence on the basis of hurt feelings and sore egos caused by cyber-bullying.

Unfortunately, there may well come a time when we are forced to fight to secure the existence of our people and a future for White children, but for our part, we will first employ all legal and morally defensible avenues in order to bring down the globalist hegemony.

Just do not expect us to go to war to secure your narcissistic supply or get involved in your unnecessary flame wars, we are on to the game players and headcases.

cyber-bullying-finalcolor.png
Everybody hurts sometime

NICK FOLKES — THE IDIOT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING

NICK FOLKES — THE IDIOT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING

Nick Folkes is lamenting SBS bias after appearing in their race-baiting virtue-porn reality series The Truth About Racism.

Speaking to the Daily Mail, Folkes has said, “It’s completely biased. SBS is only interested in showing the token White guy as a bigot and racist.”

In the program, which is one of a genre paid for by the Australian taxpayer and aimed at demonising us as low-intellect bigots blocking social progress, Nick faces off with serial Sudanese Moslem Yassmin Abdel-Magied. During a “scientific test” centred on empathic reactions to pain, he is accused of exhibiting less empathy for people of colour. They obviously don’t know about his wife and children who are all yellow; although by all accounts he hasn’t much compassion for them either, so maybe that’s not such a great example. Moreover, the test is supposed to measure brainwaves so we’d be astounded if Nick’s monitor registered any activity at all.

This “test” is based on the Milgram Experiments of 1961, in which participants were encouraged to administer electric shocks to a subject to evaluate their willingness to accede to authority regardless of the ethical component. Stanley Milgram, who concocted the research, was a Jew and the tests were inspired by the trial of Adolf Eichmann occurring in Jerusalem around the same time.

Meanwhile, Abdel-Magied is the latest in a never-ending stream of ‘others’ who are granted societal privilege in Australia so they can highlight how unjust we are. They occupy a place in media as semi-political figures standing sentries for multi-racialism and even when they fuck up like Yassmin did after she was caught on social media asking for pointers on Sharia Law from a radical Islamic, they roll out of it spotless.

This is the narrative, and this is the purpose of the show. Only masochists and anti-White voyeurs would tune into that piffle. As we have said, they have reduced the ‘Aussie racist’ stereotype to household entertainment: an idiot who can be caught on spy camera and used for the quasi-religious catharsis of the virtue signalling elites.

But this is SECOND TIME that Folkes has thrown himself at the feet of the anti-White public broadcaster in his unquenchable thirst for notoriety. He made a nana out himself in 2014 when he appeared in Living with the Enemy. Folkes should have learned his lesson by then, but then Nick has no shame; he would pull down his pants and play with his willy if there was an audience.

Folkes had, prior to the televising of this dreck, engaged in his usual game of signalling ambiguously on sentiments of White pride. We happen to know that he has questioned privately Australia First Party’s policy on Whiteness, which he regards as extreme.

As such, it is unsurprising when he makes comments like, “I believe Australia is a tolerant country, and most people don’t make opinions based on skin colour.”

Nationalists understand there should be very few occasions when we agree to speak to the mainstream media. There is no question of them NOT skewing their reportage, which is why they are so eager to buttonhole us.

But Nick’s type isn’t about what is sensible any more than he represents patriotic activists around Australia. Folkes is, if anything, a showman. He is in it strictly for the publicity and the less easily classifiable rewards that come from being an infamous person.

Folkes complaining about being duped by SBS is like complaining about contracting salmonella after eating at an Asian chew ’n’ spew.

10686607_366509190185792_6825946808527311876_n
Is Nick a buffoon? We will let you make up your own mind

 

ABBOTT’S GHOST MAKES SHRILL ZIONISM ALL THE STRONGER

ABBOTT’S GHOST MAKES SHRILL ZIONISM ALL THE STRONGER

Tony Abbott has been a busy little bee. Published in the Australian Spectator late December last year, the member for Warringah nonchalantly documented his time as part of a largely unnoticed delegation to Jerusalem for the Australia-Israel-UK Leadership Dialogue – clearly in the interests of his North Sydney constituents.

With fellow travellers, including Opposition Leader Bill Shorten and Federal Trade Minister Steve Ciobo, this motley crew of international mercenaries, aside from making a predictable and superfluous gesture of commitment to Israel, gave worrying signs on the direction of Australian foreign policy; signs too portentous to be ignored as storm clouds gather over Iran.

The Dialogue, “Originally intended as another forum to familiarise Australia’s leaders with Israel…” is a curious thing indeed. The familiarity of Australia’s elite to Israel is hardly a fledgeling relation, nor one that needs more meet-and-greets to reach its full potential. A few brief hiccups here and there in the history of Australian-Israeli relations are nonconsequential footnotes in light of Australia’s subservience to the Jewish ethnostate. Abbott salivates over this long history, “And long before we were taught to think of ourselves as a multicultural country, Jews had been Australia’s Chief Justice, army commander and head of state (as that’s what our governor-general is). Indeed, we’re the only country with this distinction other than Israel itself.”

download-4
A stupid evangelical Zionist to the last

As if that’s supposed to woo the audience, he proceeds to the disturbing crux of the article. Says Abbott:

“In a witches’ brew of complexity and danger, Palestine is no longer the region’s most intractable problem. As we learnt, Israel’s establishment is clear-eyed about what’s happening: Iranian policy is a mix of ancient Persian imperialism with apocalyptic Islam; Turkey’s President Erdogan bankers to be a modern version of Suleiman the Magnificent; Russia has opportunistically used America’s diffidence to realise its historic dream of a warm water port; Syria will continue to be a graveyard or it will evolve into a series of semi-autonomous statelets.”

Talking about the dismantling of a sovereign nation as if nothing is amiss, he relates Syria’s planned future within the larger context, “The bottom line, as Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu makes abundantly clear, is that Iran cannot be allowed to become a nuclear power.”

As if that’s supposed to woo the audience, he proceeds to the disturbing crux of the article.

The bad news according to the former Prime Minister – remember this is a man who can only deal in “goodies and baddies” – is that “Iran (whose official policy is to destroy Israel and whose aim is world dominance is identical – only in Shia form – to that of the so-called Caliphate) now dominates Iraq and Syria while Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah, has more capacity than ever to ravage northern Israel…” He also makes no secret of the emerging oddities amongst the Middle East, “There is now informal Israeli security cooperation with the Saudis and Emiratis.” That must be why Saudi Arabia is immune from international condemnation.

Abbott continues to rant and rave a little about Palestine, manages to throw a few lines in about his grievances with Climate Change, and closes his little adventure by going “…for a fraternal jog with Bill Shorten around Jerusalem’s old city…”

1kizws

The short report ultimately reveals a stench emanating from Abbott more grave to the olfactory system than a body processing raw onion. This is irrefutable posturing for the balkanization of Israel’s neighbours, centred on unprecedented hostility towards Iran and, to a different extent and for different reasons, Russia. For what purpose is a back-bencher stoking the flames of war? Consciously or not (we’re inclined to believe the former), Abbott is working in tandem with the conclusions set out in the Yinon Plan [ ], which infamously sets out the strategic blueprint for the implementation of a Greater Israel at the expense of destabilising its neighbours along ethnic and religious lines into useless and powerless – as Abbott says – statelets.

It could be observed that the hovering spirit of Abbott is eager to be reanimated into a politically corporal form. It could also be observed his tone pays homage to that old Bush-Blair-Howard triumvirate of travelling democracy. It is not altogether unthinkable given both the unimpressive tenure of and Abbott’s axe to grind with Turnbull, that another leadership spill is possible. Subsequently, a malcontent conservative bloc of the electorate that stubbornly (and falsely believed) they deviated away from Liberal hegemony are still malleable enough to be mopped up by a strong unifier. Pauline Hanson and the renegade Liberals would be made redundant in what little independence they had as the true father of the conservative zeitgeist returns more powerful than before; here, the existence of the patriots proves little more than lowly cultists, whose unintelligible incantations are precursors to the arrival of Cthulhu.

The patriot groups, hasbara-fed imbeciles who naïvely wave the Star of David as if the religious/political fraternity is reciprocal, are crucial to normalising and desensitising not a small part of the population to anti-Islam rhetoric which can, in turn, be cashed in as justification for reckless foreign adventures vis-à-vis popular support. From One Nation to the Q Society, it works well for establishment politics to have the angry mob on board; fruitful indeed it is to have people both fearful of an Iran whose aim is defamatorily described as “world dominance” and, perhaps more importantly, excited to combat a nebulously understood ‘Islam’ wherever it may be found, be it Tehran, Raqqa or Lakemba.

Abbott continues to rant and rave a little about Palestine, manages to throw a few lines in about his grievances with Climate Change, and closes his little adventure by going “…for a fraternal jog with Bill Shorten around Jerusalem’s old city…”

The dangerous vainness of pursuing Islam as the demonic scapegoat should be more apparent yet it isn’t. When criticism of the faith itself is warranted, it in almost all cases begins with the extremism espoused by Saudi Arabia and its allies. Its state ideology of Wahabism is a term notably absent from Abbott and patriot groups alike; instead, we hear “Islamic extremism” which acts as a buffer from the true understanding of what it is and what causes it. When criticism of the demographic exodus from the Middle East and Africa is warranted, it begins with the egregious assault on common sense that the West inflicted on otherwise stable (relatively speaking) regions. To this date, Europe is paying for the illegal overthrow of Gaddafi, and it’s currently paying for the attempt to overthrow the Assad regime.

Nationalists hope that in the near future we won’t be talking about our due punishment for attempting anything in Iran; to lessen that likelihood all clear-minded Australians need to reassess why such fervent support for a foreign nation, much less one with such an odious reputation, comes into play within the sphere of Australia and its own interests. The average patriot, good-intentioned as they may be, need to come to terms with the ease to which they’re manipulated into taking moral responsibility for a surrogate nation and the manifold problems that come with it.

[1] A brief note on the Yinon Plan is necessary. Composed by Oded Yinon as “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties” in 1982, it appeared in the Kivunim (Directions), the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organisation. Its premise is not unique to one mere paper, but an internalised general plan for Israel to become an imperialist power in the region. Theodore Herzl, an integral figure in modern Zionism claimed the area of the Jewish State stretches “from the brook of Egypt to the Euphrates”. To take for example one revealing excerpt from Yinon: “Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run, it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon.”

During the Iran-Iraq War of 1980-1988, we see the extent of intrigue at play. Saddam Hussein was backed by America, France and the U.K., while Israel provided minimal support to Iran. Ironically, there was no problem then with Iraq’s actual use of chemical weapons on both military and civilian populations.

keepcalmstudio-com-dancing-crown-keep-calm-and-fuck-israel

NATIONALISTS HAVE NO USE FOR THE FAR RIGHT

NATIONALISTS HAVE NO USE FOR THE FAR RIGHT

Well, comrades, we called it straight after the 2016 federal election, time after time since then we have hammered home the point: Pauline Hanson’s One Nation are simply an organ of the Liberal party.

The preference deals struck by the Liberals with PHON for the coming Western Australian state election revealed, for all to see, the real game; it is also rumoured that the Kevin Andrews faction in Victoria is eyeing a similar arrangement.

We hardly need to point out the implications of these arrangements, our readers are more than capable of putting two and two together and coming up with the correct sum; so too, it seems, are some of the One Nation candidates in the West.

Margaret Dodd, PHON candidate for Scarborough has emphatically stated that she will defy party orders and choose her own preferences; Ms Dodd went so far as to describe the One Nation leadership as bullies.

So too, the Nationalists have gone to great lengths over the last 12 months to expose the links between so-called “far-right” groups and the Liberal party; by virtue of having made ourselves accessible to disaffected members of these groups, as confidants with a reputation for getting things done we are privy to all the goings-on in patriot and right wing circles.

Liberal party operatives have their sticky little fingers all over the far-right circus, this we have shown, through our own activism, to be absolutely true; from Party For Freedom to the Burgess-Erikson circle of provocateurs and the remnants of the Victorian street movements, all signs point back to Liberal fixers.

Margaret Dodd, PHON candidate for Scarborough has emphatically stated that she will defy party orders and choose her own preferences; Ms Dodd went so far as to describe the One Nation leadership as bullies.

What is also absolutely true is that the Nationalists, far from wanting supremacy over the far-right, want to see it pushed back and taken out of the lives of workers and marginalised people; to be clear, we want nothing from the right, its personnel, its ideals and its ludicrous talking points are of no use to us.

Veteran Nationalists we have spoken to are aghast at the simply mindless bigotry of many far-right figures, the sort of negative, angst-ridden “ugly Australians” you would expect to find portrayed in an SBS expose on racism.

9dc486b0029288d16273df2704dc45e4
Margaret Dodd understands that giving the Liberals preferences defeats the purpose of creating opposition

When we see literal race mixers, men with Asian wives and children at home, spewing venomous invective at immigrants and their advocates who among us could fail to be disgusted?

We do not merely point our fingers at these charlatans and scream “hypocrite!”, as people devoted to our families we are genuinely revolted by anyone who would put their loved ones through such humiliation, to the Nationalists this is an unforgivable transgression.

Likewise, we have no sympathy for the loyal followers of these would-be far-right demagogues, the people who, in full knowledge of the bad character of their spokesmen still continue to traipse around after them, defend these degenerates and delude themselves that they are part of a “movement”.

When we see literal race mixers, men with Asian wives and children at home, spewing venomous invective at immigrants and their advocates who among us could fail to be disgusted?

Readers may also have seen reports of the recent Q-Society fundraising events in Sydney and Melbourne; apart from the fact that this club is centred on bolstering support for the Zionist entity and that information to hand suggests a Kahanist element at work behind the scenes, we wonder if our comrades spotted the other obvious con-job going on?

We have long said that the only function of the conservative demagogue is to betray the workers and direct their votes toward the Liberal party, no clearer example of this could be found than on the list of speakers at the Q-Society functions.

16998221_1478762628810019_7467990098763364922_n
Embarrassing times for the Q Society

The presence of senator Cory Bernardi and MP George Christensen is self-explanatory in the context of this article, the addition to the bill of working class 1970’s cultural icons, Gary “Angry” Anderson and Larry Pickering is particularly galling, even upsetting for Nationalists of a certain age.

These men are cynically trading on their history as formerly respected artists, voices of the old Australia, that ghost society which now lives only in the memories of those White Australians born before the 1990’s.

Anderson, the rock and roll outlaw with his trademark Jacky Howe singlets and boiler suits and Pickering with his smutty cartoons lampooning the high and mighty of Australian society were much-loved figures; it is plain to see that both have long since abandoned their roots, sold out and now represent the big end of town, the globalist liberal project and the Israel first crowd.

These men are cynically trading on their history as formerly respected artists, voices of the old Australia, that ghost society which now lives only in the memories of those White Australians born before the 1990’s.

This is the hook to the swindle being played upon the workers and marginalised people by the far-right, two artists with whom the true Australians could once relate are effectively the bait in a political trap for well-meaning and genuinely patriotic Aussies; their brand of politics, though, directs that patriotic feeling to blatantly anti-Australian ends.

The more polished performers on the far-right circuit also give workers the impression that status could be gained by throwing in their lot with the Anti-Islam groups, that Whites could conceivably advocate on behalf of their people without being labelled as “racist” due to the admission to the fold of selected Asians or other “Uncle Toms”, to borrow an American pejorative term.

Unfortunately for the unwary, well-meaning Whites, this is not the case, it is merely another deception being perpetrated by opportunists and manipulative, anti-White globalists.

Nationalists know that under present conditions there is no “safe” way to advocate on behalf of White Australia; no amount of nostalgia, fluffy multiculturalism or false piety can obscure the fact that to take up the politics of White Nationalism is not only social suicide, but that it puts the Nationalist on a collision course with all elements of the globalist liberal mainstream, including the far-right.

At some point, our brand of politics will become safer as the right wing degenerates are rolled and their parties deactivated for good.

Until that time the Whites who are concerned for the fate of White Australia have only one option, the somewhat precarious life of the dissident White Nationalist in the struggle with the globalist establishment.

1480728284152
National Party Whip George Christensen no more. As of this blog’s publication, the fat bastard has resigned