WHO IS BEHIND ‘AUSSIE NATIONALISTS’ AND ‘THOSE’ POSTERS?

WHO IS BEHIND ‘AUSSIE NATIONALISTS’ AND ‘THOSE’ POSTERS?

It took UNA just the time needed to type in a URL to discover the most likely culprit behind a series of well publicised ‘White Nationalist’ posters that have appeared in Sydney today.

Don’t get us wrong, they’re great posters and a top troll. But we are not here to discuss the posters per se: our point relates to our prime suspect for the creation of “Aussie Nationalists”. Coming from anyone else we might have cause to want to high-five a comrade too, but given the general motives of the suspected instigator, whose obsession with Whiteness ended at his choice of a wife and the children produced from their mixed-race marriage, we must abjure. If our mistrust seems offputting, it comes with the territory, sadly, because Nationalists don’t fight hostiles on the Left, we spend all our time tied up struggling to keep our politics protected from Right Wing fakers.

We will explain…

waleed
Don’t get us wrong, they’re great posters and a top troll

When we saw ‘AussieNationalists.wordpress.com’ as the address of the posters’ authors we did the obvious thing and visited the site. We encountered a WordPress blog barren, except for an incongruous trio of items: the first of which is a link to a demonstration in Lithgow hosted by — ta-ra, Peanuts for Freedom! This, of course, is the golden giveaway, or to us anyway, particularly since it bears the headline, “Next nationalist event you need to attend”.

The PfF Facebook page that it originates from appears to have been removed, either temporarily or permanently, which wouldn’t be a first for the Peanuts.

The second item is, for some bizarre reason, a link to a YouTube video about Oswald Mosely (an odd choice for those purporting to be ‘Aussie Nationalists’), which is an addendum to a gallery of the images from the Pokemon-themed posters plastered up around the inner-west of Sydney, which, again, are very clever and right on the target. They have achieved their desired aim of generating publicity. But to where does this publicity funnel? There is nothing at the end of it, no contact details, nothing but a cue back to this blog and the PfF rally. it advertises. It seems to be a one-shot blog. Given the rally flyer, in all likelihood, the blog’s creator has a vested interest in promoting that group. This would, by logic, place its ownership in that group’s orbit. In this case, the heavy emphasis on the designation “Nationalism” is a key element of the authors’ intentions. If you cannot change Nationalism, then change its definition.

The Facebook page that it originates from appears to have been removed, either temporarily or permanently, which wouldn’t be a first for the Peanuts.

The Sydney Traditionalists tried the same game of appropriation that Folkes is infamous for when they got involved with The Dingoes and surreptitiously organised the Dingocon [see Rape House and Dingoes Conned]. They saw a young movement and wanted to control its direction. We hazard a guess that the Trads have some link to Folkes, who, on the same day as Dingocon, took his family of Peanuts to Newtown to face down an absent Antifa. Anyway, now that we’ve figured out the most likely culprits, we can dismiss their claims to be Nationalists, yet take note of the strange activity occurring around them, which is indicative of the Patriot Games of old.

In attendance at Folkes’s rally was New Zealand provocateur Mark McDonald, who has been vandalising Australian Nationalism in one way or another since his feet landed on our soil in 2013. McDonald has no ties to the Australian soil or its people. He is White, but he is a foreigner. This hasn’t stopped him trying to poison our movement and members who have an earnest dedication to the principles of Australian Nationalism.

The same cannot be said for either he or his new Peanut tribe. Now is a good time to consider the absolute gobsmacking hypocrisy of Folkes.

In February, Folkes burned a Nazi flag outside the Tempe headquarters of Australia First Party (while he and his Boy Friday, Tobes, were very convincingly dressed as Moslems) protesting — we’re still not sure what — but making it clear that he and his Zion-friendly PfF oppose the racial politics of AFP.

imageedit_6_6825016602.jpg
A few months ago ‘edgy’ symbols like this upset Nicky boy (note the UNA reference on the flag)
imageedit_2_9753072060
If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em, eh Nick?

He did this before with the “bunker” video (Nick Folkes is now referring to his home as the ‘Rozelle Bunker’), in which Jim Saleam and others toasted the passing of slain Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. Much was made of the Nationalist Socialist flags which appear in the background of the host’s apartment. He is known to be a collector of such memorabilia and being a guest who was just passing through, Jim had no control over what bric-a-brac or ornamentation decorated the apartment. Of course, it was a connection to Folkes from this person and his acquaintances that put the video in the possession of Howard Crawford to begin with, a contradiction never reflected on by those who mistook both its relevance and currency.

Present there, and we have a pic of him from the event tucked away for a rainy day, is New Zealand provocateur Mark McDonald, who has been trying to ruin Australian Nationalism since his two left feet landed on our country’s soil in 2013.

Now, of course, Folkes is “joining in” with the whole alt-right fashion, which utilises edgy ‘fash’ symbolism. Folkes appropriated the Totenkopf symbol, often associated with Hitler’s SS, on a flyer for the demonstration in Newtown. The more influential it becomes, the more Folkes tries reinventing himself so he can get inside it. This is in spite of defaming true Nationalists as “Nazis” — along with his cohorts like Dan Evans, Neil Erikson and mad Scotty Moerland.

Bear in mind that while enacting that ‘anti-Nazi’ shtick, Folkes was keeping lines open to McDonald. This here poses questions about the purity of S88, which was going hell for leather to be the most undisputed anti-Jewish show in town. Yet, here now, as then, we have its former Fuhrer photographed (on file) within spitting distance of Radka Smith, second-in-charge of Peanuts for Freedom.

download (1) (1)
The message behind this  PfF character reads, “It’s a foreign invasion”. Erm, ever get the feeling someone’s having a lend?

Radka is Jewish. But there must be a degree of indignation Radka feels being in the presence of Matey Mate, since in 2014 when McDonald met Smith he almost spat the words in her face, “You’re a JEW!” Indeed, Matey is quick to accuse people of being Jewish, and yet has no problem with associating with Jewish-friendly organisations.

Remember too, Jewish James Sternhell is a supporter of the Peanuts, which also boasts an Asian member. This should be borne in mind when viewing Folkes’s take on appropriating the White Genocide message. Do not put out of mind their strong links to Liberal Party operator Howard Crawford, who is a major league Zionist. They must wonder too about Toby’s “I Support Open Borders for Israel”, but they’re a crazy, whacky, zany bunch of cripples round at Peanut Palace. Even odder, is that Dan Evans, an absolute multi-racialist and enemy of Australian Nationalism was a speaker at Nick’s rally against Antifa. How does a character like that accord with one like Matey Mate with his Seig Heil and 14/88 cliches? About the same as they ever did, because the pattern is this: Larping is fine so long as real Nationalists with purist inclinations don’t come by rocking the boat.

Bear this in mind, because S88 tried passing itself off as hard-core anti-Jewish. But here we have its former Fuhrer standing within pissing distance of Radka Smith, second-in-charge of Peanuts for Freedom.

Radka’s Jewishness is of no concern to us. However, in this instance, it is a level indicator of the kind of deceit that is PfF’s stock in trade.

We call on Folkes to publically denounce his own contributions to White Genocide, by despoiling his bloodline with Asian genes, and to state categorically that PfF is dedicated to restoring a White Australia.

This is where you get to nail Nicholas since he won’t do either.

Thus, we swing back to those posters, which we repeat, are just a product and not the subject of our editorial. Under different circumstances, we could applaud the trolling along with everyone else. But knowing what a fragile state true Nationalism is in presently we would be contributing to its hastening demise by giving kudos to those who seek to subvert it. What’s more, it is the ‘usual suspects’ who have been pursuing this goal for years.

These creatures have never shied away from doxing true Nationalists to either the Media and our ideological opponents on the Left. In fact, that has been one of their longstanding tactics, so bear that in mind when they showily ‘face off’ with Antifa as they are staring down the same people they secretly supply info when hiding behind their computers.

A friend of ours told us in all soberness that what is needed is for everything to absolutely go to crap. It all needs to be broken apart and smashed up because only on fresh, healthy soil, can we hope to grow anew. He might be onto something.

Still, they are great posters, and that message is always welcome even if the messenger is on the nose.

11058381_1614577155478721_2950402781380467801_n
One of Nick’s regular anti-White Genocide campaigners

DINGOES CONNED?

DINGOES CONNED?

You say 1488, I say 1788

Matthew Grant

There is a valid reason we lead this week’s story on last Saturday night’s Dingocon with the brilliant quote above.

It is all to do with a difference of perspective which separates Australian Nationalist activists from those inside the ‘Australian alt-right’ phenomenon.

Do not misunderstand us; we are not out to trash the Dingoes. We merely bear the kind of admonitions one should expect from us, as well as sober observations from the perspective of those involved in a political movement informed by experience.

Firstly, no UNA member was in attendance on the evening in question. It was not expected that we would be invited any more than would Australia First Party president Jim Saleam have been.

C92udsHUwAA1n4r.jpg
The ad forgot to say “Political Nationalists Not Welcome!”

Nobody from the Australian Protectionist Party was invited either, although we understand Nationalist Alternative was represented.

Contrary to popular belief, we state again, Jim Saleam wields no influence over United Nationalists Australia regardless of whether some of our writers are AFP members. We offer ALL true Nationalists an opportunity of expression, but so far only AFP members have accepted that invitation, which permanently stands. As such, Jim Saleam is totally free to submit whenever he wishes, and we are delighted to publish him. Likewise, AFP often shares links to UNA material, and we are grateful for the extended reach that affords us. We are, after all, working together in the interests of the Australian nationalist movement. AFP is internationally recognised for its work in nationalism.

It is all to do with a difference of perspective which separates Australian Nationalist activists from those inside the ‘Australian alt-right’ phenomenon.

We raise the subject of Jim Saleam, as we learned from sources that he was a contentious figure at Dingocon. There was an implication that his article ‘Rape House’ was a mitigating factor in the snub. In fact, a UNA rep met with Dingocon’s organiser a few weeks before the convention so we could suss each other out. The message was then as it was afterwards that Jim Saleam was “too much of a divisive figure”. The question is, divisive for whom? We shall get to that, although this matter is only a sidebar subject of this article.

In fact, if you want to get down to brass tacks, it was the Australian Nationalist Movement in its Political aspect that was excluded from Dingocon. So let us stop for a moment and ask, what is a Dingo?

anthro_dash_dingo_by_skull1045oscar-d56rkyf.png
A Dingo

UNA always regarded a Dingo as an editorial contributor to the Podcast bearing the name of the Dingoes; although in fact (according to one youth we asked) it is a generic appellation for nativist followers of Australia’s alt-right movement. We knew anyway, we just wanted to hear how they described themselves.

They are irreverent, social-media savvy, politically-incorrect, meme-focused, and just like their American cousins communicate via their own coded lingo. Their weapon is humour with a generous dash of irony.

In fact, if you want to get down to brass tacks, it was the Australian Nationalist Movement in its Political aspect that was excluded from Dingocon. So let us stop for a moment and ask, what is a Dingo?

This subculture rejects the “old school” Nationalists as irrelevant. In short, they are full of the self-assuredness of youth, and the conviction that in their freshness and vigour they will be able to institute a change that us others have thus far ‘failed’ to deliver. Moreover, they are not interested in political activism in the conventional sense and wouldn’t lay a vote AFP’s way; although they follow One Nation because they have this idea about invading its youth wing. According to one who was close to the Dingoes of the Podcast fame, while they might employ the usual alt-right National Socialist schtick, they are quite Civic in regards to homosexuals and even on the Zionist question.

We cannot comment on that claim other than to say the young person who told us seemed sound. Others suggest this youngster has issues.

Here, we wish to refute accusations that UNA is “hostile” to the Dingoes in regards to the loose affiliation of those who collect under its banner. We are not hostile to them in any way. But we know those behind the Dingoes’ curtain are very much hostile to us, but more so to Jim Saleam.

14705738_334529890272448_421088926577493001_n
You say 1488, Matt says 1788!

At this point, our commentary splits into two key areas: addressing those operators behind that curtain, and the nature of this ‘Dingo’ counterculture and how it relates to the spirit of the Australian Nationalist Movement.

Again, we refer back to our initial meeting with Dingocon’s organiser. It was made clear to UNA that Jim Saleam was in no uncertain terms unwelcome. Following Dingocon the word was that he had been the subject of much derision. So we ask ourselves, why would a young scene that has had no prior dealings with Jim Saleam prejudice him thus? The short answer is they wouldn’t. It is those operating the convention that sought to isolate him from the various guests. Who are these operators? Apart from ex-Klub Nation’s David McBryde, who Dingocon’s organiser refused to discuss, we have also confirmed the presence of Luke Torrisi, whom he particularly declined to comment on.

We cannot comment on that claim other than to say the young person who told us seemed sound. Others suggest this youngster has his or her own issues. The point in mentioning is to allow for a fuller coverage of the subject.

Torrisi is a “paleoconservative” and a contributor to the ultra-conservative Sydney Traditionalists. We have had unconfirmed reports, too, that Torrisi was a past financier of Nick Folkes and the Party for Freedom. The Sydney Trads and Nationalists acrimoniously diverge on the question of a White Australia (they are conservatives after all). Yet, Torrisi hosts a conservative show Monday nights on 88.9FM on which he will give a conspiratorial ‘wink’ to White Nationalism; even though he is fundamentally at odds with it.

Two other names have come our way, but we cannot confirm either was present, and they are associates of McBryde — Morgan Qasabian (ex-Klub Nation), and Dylan Anderson.

-v8J1t-O_400x400.jpg
It’s all about the Principle on the Sydney Trads’ colours

If there is one message that UNA has been tirelessly pushing it is the threat to Nationalism posed by manipulative conservatives. It is a story as old as Zeus and it never seems to change. Here we have a fledgeling movement in the sphere of influence of conservatives.

In a December 2016 article on The Dingoes, Pommy social researcher John Smith said ‘these groups are’, “People saying things which aren’t themselves objectionable, which appeal to people’s sense of patriotism and identity. It is often used as a way of smuggling in a kind of much more nationalist politics, a politics which is much further right than most people would agree with.”

However, Smith does not venture to consider that the very opposite might be the case, and people might say objectionable things as a means of smuggling in a more conservative politics than the third position of where true Nationalism must inevitably end up. We contend this is exactly what is happening.

Two other names have come our way, but we cannot confirm either was present, and they are associates of McBryde — Morgan Qasabian (ex-Klub Nation), and Dylan Anderson.

It is little wonder those organisers would not have countenanced Jim Saleam coming among them or even the Australian Protectionist Party, who are similarly wise to their scam. It is not that these Dingoes are necessarily going to be rewired into conservatives but rather that the whole movement ends up being steered out to sea. And would that bother Nationalists? In a sense, no it wouldn’t.

A prominent figure in the movement told a UNA reporter, in conversation, that the fundaments of this young generation involve a conscious shift from a Beta type to an Alpha. This means they look to building themselves up both physically, in the gym, and socially, in their earning power (and there is nothing wrong at all with doing so). According to him, there is a competitive edge to the alt-right youth as they seek to dominate, and become “superior to” the bloke next to him. There is no distinction of whether this other “bloke” happens to be White also, in which case, the competitiveness becomes for its own sake.

screen-shot-2015-11-03-at-6-21-31-pm
David McBryde, the man behind the Dingocon curtain

Bear in mind, too, just as an interesting observation, that girls are noticeably excluded from this movement.

Our characterisation of the alt-right as a counterculture, as opposed to a Political movement, seems right enough. From what we can gather, this subculture is by its nature upwardly mobile, and consciously elitist. In essence, those are the persnickety qualities of the Young Liberals, even if those involved haven’t realised it. If what our source told us is on the money, then by that description they risk becoming concerned with acquisition and confusing status with strength, while pride in race becomes simply pride.

There is also, speaking plainly, arrogance on show. The contention that anyone over the age of 25 who has been involved in the movement longer than yesterday is somehow a failure demonstrates a total lack of comprehension of the enormity of what our people face. It is not a matter of convincing the masses they need Alpha heroes to worship, but of bringing down an immovable system. Those in the American alt-right might have noticed this about their ‘Emperor God’ Donald Trump. Sure, he won the Presidency, but any idealistic notions he may have had of seriously changing things have been thwarted by the very system that has stymied — and will continue to block — Australian Nationalists at every turn.

Bear in mind, too, just as an interesting observation, that girls are noticeably excluded from this movement.

Characters like McBryde and Torissi arguably ARE that system, if they are only concerned with matters of tradition, and by interposing themselves in the Dingo counterculture they are meddling. In their desire to misdirect these kids from Nationalism, they might not be intent on creating an ‘alt-light’, but simply a movement unable to actually move anywhere. This is the risk it faces on its own, anyway, as it is in danger of being stuck in a cul-de-sac from where it cannot advance onto political turf because it is founded purely on counterculture codes and insider signalling.

Moreover, the very quality of ‘youth’ being flaunted is undermined by the fact the people organising them are old men. We find this particularly ironic. UNA reiterates, however, that we are not concerned either way. For our part, we do not wish to influence this Dingo subculture. Frankly, it is irrelevant to us.

download (3).jpg
Far more relevant to Aussies than a swastika

Our purpose IS political and it is not egos we as Nationalists aim to shape but the hearts and minds of White Australians. The mass of White Aussies who voted in Pauline Hanson’s One Nation to the Senate believing they were getting a Nationalist were not cocky youths judging them on their cut pecs and speccy hairstyles. The Australians who we need do not understand the codewords used by the alt-right, nor do they necessarily ‘get’ their memes. For memes will not fill their bellies, nor save their jobs, or stop them from becoming homeless.

The Australians that Nationalism needs are aged from ten to a hundred. We do not judge them on their body shape, or whether they can afford boutique beers at a trendy foodie establishment for we know they cannot.

UNA reiterates, however, that we are not concerned either way. For our part, we do not wish to influence this Dingo subculture. Frankly, it is irrelevant to us.

Right now, the Australians whose support we seek are begging charity to help them pay for unaffordable utility bills. They are dying in hospital queues while waiting rooms are overcrowded by an unsustainable influx of non-White aliens generated by the very conservatives whose obsequiousness to the globalist powers open our airport gates. The solidarity that these conservatives share with America and therefore Israel keep us involved in illegal military actions in the Middle East which generate a ceaseless traffic of non-Whites and Moslems hell-bent on knocking down this spiritually desolate marketplace our nation has become (which isn’t a bad thing) and instating a state founded on a Semitic faith (which is an egregious prospect).

While some devote themselves to executing “edgy” performances with National Socialist symbols in the belief they are spearheading a counter-cultural revolution, Australians are disappearing in the blackening shadows of Chinese-owned tower blocks soon to be filled with our replacement population. To date, no known Larrikinism, or meme, has been able to prevent Chinese entry into our country.

The Australia we wish to change is not within the clique of a single generation but out there in the un-sexy wild of the Australian suburbs and rural zones.

They might give 88 an Aussie twist, but it’s still 88, and as Matthew Grant said, “You say 14/88, I say 1788.” You say, Adolf Hitler, we say, William Lane, Jack Lang, John Curtin, Percy Stephensen and Henry Lawson. You say Nuremberg, we say Lambing Flats.

We close by reminding our readers that this is in no way intended as a sledge against this alt-right counterculture nor do we even regard it as an infallible account of it. We are on different paths anyway. We also stress that just because individuals turned up to Dingocon does not mean they have been influenced by a strain of conservatism they might otherwise find unacceptable if those we mentioned do hold undue sway.

We are just responding to the fact that Nationalism was stopped from entering the doors of Dingocon last Saturday night. And while we applaud the alt-right for being there and exhibiting signs of cockiness, UNA reminds our young friends that we’ve been down this road ourselves and as much as you think that it’s new it really doesn’t change. We all started out brimming with confidence and believing our predecessors had dropped the ball.

Awaiting you, young friends is all the hurt that is part and parcel of the struggle against the one-world government. Awaiting you is doxing, broken friendships, backstabbing, betrayal and potential loss of income. Awaiting you is aggro,  and total silence from those who you thought were your allies but turn out to be no better than window dummies when you are dropped in it. You will be lied about, misrepresented, they will call you names, accuse you of things you haven’t done, and in some cases, they will jail you. Perhaps some have already figured this out. In the end, you will learn the bitter lesson that things are not (pardon the pun) black and White and those who you would think are like us turn out to be bigger enemies than the Trots on the Left.

dingo.jpeg
This Dingo eats conservatives

RAPE HOUSE

RAPE HOUSE

Introduction

A COUPLE of months ago, a social media phenomenon, an embryonic political-cultural movement in fact – ‘the Dingoes’ – came in for public criticism. Its advent reminded the liberal media that the ‘Alt Right’ had made its way to Australia and that its emergence opened a new front against the ideological props of the liberal globalist society. Some of the Dingoes began the process of Australianizing their reference points which placed them onto the path of embracing Australian Nationalism.

But then there were those who set out to stop that process from maturing. They decided to do this by stealing the Dingo phenomenon.

It is a sad fact that the Dingoes, indeed the Alt Right generally, became subjects for subversion courtesy of a poisonous group whose line of political descent over decades demonstrates a long history of parasitism, wrecking and plain sociopathy.

It is necessary to start somewhere in discussing these wreckers and our reference to the attempted takeover of the Dingo movement only sets our stage. Their subversion runs deeper than the Dingoes.

As we shall see, if it isn’t ‘other people’s money’, it is ‘other people’s efforts’ that are to the attention of the wrecking group.

We speak here of the ‘Rape House’, not just because of some sexual assaults which occurred in proximity to this group, but rather because the group mentally despoils any rational and fair element with whom it comes into contact.

The time has come for this garbage-group was the subject not only of ruthless exposure but a concerted drive to eliminate them from the terrain of any movement that may contribute to national regeneration.

We want their guts and we want them gone.

However, given the tangled connections of the Rape House gang, that is easier said than done! It must be the subject of a mobilization by all nationalists. We can begin first with the Dingoes and help them purge these wreckers and then we can move on with other struggles to limit the wreckers’ field of action, all while we consolidate the Australian Nationalist message in every way possible.

Dr Jim Saleam, 2017

The Rape House

In 2007, Jason Rafty rented a house on Fennell Street, North Parramatta. He moved in a few tenants from his ‘scene’ and made a profit on the rent.

Whether this profit went to his new creation the ‘Public Information Forum’ (or Klub Nation as it was generally known) we don’t know, but this unofficial headquarters of his enterprise gave him a centre for his officers (sic) to live in, and act out of, as they contrived a series of schemes.

Jason Rafty, as the impresario of Klub Nation, was a product of a long-standing gang which he had served already for eight years, but we shall get to that. A remarkable letter came into our possession addressed by Rafty to Jeremy Jones of the Australia Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC). It is reproduced at the end of this article.

Here, Rafty offers to travel to Russia and spy on Russian nationalists and in particular an organisation known as Russian National Unity. He asks AIJAC for money and equipment and he sets out in detail how the operation would work and how he might also profit at the end, with book rights no less. It is understood the letter was written around 1999. He also refers to his Jewish wife, a peculiar circumstance, given the internal game-playing of Klub Nation, often involved its claim to represent neo-nazism.

The existence of the letter was well known to the Klub Nation gang, but it did not seem to worry them, accepting as they will say they did Rafty’s chutzpah explanation that he was trying to rip off Jones.

That in itself sets a certain tone for Rafty, but the very idea of trying to panhandle Jones, given his professional resources at disentangling bullshit – was incredible. More likely, the letter was a ‘genuine’ attempt to get money and betray people whom Rafty later said he found ideologically agreeable. As we shall see, Rafty was not the only person in Klub Nation with special connections. Did Rafty continue this connection with AIJAC?

The existence of the letter was well known to the Klub Nation gang, but it did not seem to worry them, accepting as they will say they did Rafty’s chutzpah explanation that he was trying to rip off Jones. 

The morally oblique style of Klub Nation extended to one of Jason Rafty’s closest lieutenants formally recruited in 2007 but known to the gang before this time. This person, who functioned as his number-two, was the person for whom Rape House is dedicated. Some three women were sexually assaulted at the Fennell Street house. One was raped and two others sexually assaulted in different ways.

Rafty
The only known correspondence from Klub Nation was this letter from Rafty to Jeremy Jones of  the Australia/Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) offering to spy on Nationalists in Russia 

The assaults were known to the residents. Around 2011, one Michael Holt resided there and paid rent. As he recounted to other persons, the assaults were talked about and were to be hushed up. This troubled young man who mucked about with neo-nazi ideology would later be imprisoned on gun charges and was accused of planning a mass shooting. For ourselves, we have also talked to one of the victims who are quite specific about her experiences and she named the other victims. She certainly named the perpetrator. It is our understanding that one of the tenants remains furious with the rapist for using his bed and leaving traces of the assault. Charming.

oie_n7tcGoe6Sl1D
Klub Nation scammer Andrew Wilson of the Rape House infamy is now appropriating political real estate of The Dingoes

The cover up of sexual assault by this gang is despicable, but it’s just the start. Covering their tracks is something we just cannot permit. How can we understand Klub Nation?

Klub Nation met at the Humanist House in the inner-Sydney suburb of Chippendale from early 2005 until October 2009. It met every few weeks and its political identity was known to the Humanist member who permitted their presence by renting out the rooms. The same Humanist member must have been aware of ‘something’ going on when members of Klub Nation began to actually join the Humanist Society itself as members. He cannot say he wasn’t warned as Jim Saleam spoke to him at some point about the group and what its real intentions might be.

1486122148137
Rape House resident Michael Holt is now in prison for violating Duke Nukem’s copyright 

Ultimately, the Klub Nation members made a bid to take over the Humanist Society because as an incorporated body it owned the property and other assets, over a million dollars worth. Fortunately, they were beaten back, evicted from the use of the facility and their members removed from the Society. This effort to steal the assets of a community organisation wasn’t a new thing to Klub Nation, as we shall also explain.

The cover up of sexual assault by this gang is despicable, but it’s just the start. Covering their tracks is something we just cannot permit. How can we understand Klub Nation?

Klub Nation was remarkable in that it had no website, no magazine, no political manifesto, never organized a demonstration, nor contested an election, nor ran any campaign of agitation, nor even performed any specific act of violence (given the tone of its meetings on occasion). It claimed to be a forum of ideas and held ‘talks’, sometimes graced by Rafty wearing a Soviet military tunic; but it also said it was a survival club and a group that would raise money towards the purchase of a property in a rural setting. Yet essentially, it was simply whatever its leaders said it was at any particular moment, and to whomsoever the‘mark’ might be.

So what was it really? A big-mouth group with no real records or obvious structure could be a type of fraud, or perhaps a version of the French Resistance. And our choice of options – is the former. It was a con. Not just a money con for the operators, but a political charade.

Humanist_House4©R.jpg
The Humanist Society house in Sydney’s Chippendale which Klub Nation tried taking over

Klub Nation has been described by some who blundered into it and by those affected and burned by it in several overlapping ways: listening post, Liberal Party dirty-tricks op, drain-pool of the mentally challenged, a pretend survivalist club, a money-making operation for Rafty, neutralizing agency for anyone with a brain, a counter-gang and a rumour mill that would target genuine nationalists and patriots. Each of these claims reflected the truth.

At its ‘height’ in 2009, this group pretended that it was going to purchase a block of rural land as an investment upon which buildings would be constructed for the use of the whole patriotic movement and this would serve as a training centre in trades and politics for young people. Its leaders said that they were really the “general staff” in waiting for the Australian patriot movement and the genuine force of “nationalism” (they appropriated the term), not like all of us pretenders in our various organisations.

They said they were the focal point for building the real unity that was so lacking with all of us. They tried to con into their web the new Nationalist Alternative and even older Skinhead groups. But all saw through them.

So what was it really? A big-mouth group with no real records or obvious structure could be a type of fraud, or perhaps a version of the French Resistance. And our choice of options – is the former. It was a con. Not just a money con for the operators, but a political charade.

People from an array of patriot groups did at different times attend their gatherings, usually invited by ‘runners’ but with the true nature of the group concealed from them. This was essential cover and useful in garnering intelligence and spreading misinformation about genuine groups. Newbies were quietly relieved of their money. Some were even sold silver bars which they could ‘re-invest’, or they were asked to invest in a Ponzi scheme of Pyramid-selling-type intricacy. We won’t try to explain it as it’s just too hard. Some withdrew from contact with Klub Nation, but some got hooked on the hype. A five-figure-sum bank account (after expenses and there were a lot of those) was built.

Key players in Klub Nation included Andrew Wilson, David McBryde, Steven Moore and Mark Pavic. All had murky histories, personal and political. John Boyle, a solicitor who had run the Liberal Party’s ‘Chinese Special Branch’ in Haymarket and who later became a China immigration agent and who married a Chinese woman, was noted at the meetings. Moore and Boyle were linked to the Fellowship of the Round Table a private discussion group now known as ‘Western Heritage’ and which today runs meetings at NSW Parliament House. This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party.

This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party. The Fellowship was run by the very Humanist who first let in the Klub Nation crew at the Chippendale building.

With Klub Nation, weakened after the failure to rip off the Humanists, a new plan came into being. Meetings resumed in 2010 at the Mechanics Institute in Pitt Street Sydney and the members began to join this society, also with the plan to rort it, or at least, to make fulsome use of its resources. A witness says he was handed a Mechanics membership form at the Rape House and told to “join”. Once again, nationalists warned the Mechanics what the plan was. Ultimately also, this new scam came to nought. We were also advised that nationalists were accused of warning a bowling club which they intended to ‘take over’ – and they were booted from there. On this occasion, we deny any involvement.

By late 2013, some of the ‘investors’ in Klub Nation, essentially some of those basically conned by it, were clamouring for their money. Others decided they also wanted their money, particularly a certain Peter Coleman, whom we shall meet shortly. David McBryde (who was the “treasurer”) made a big play of refunding a percentage of this money (but much was simply missing). In what must be a bemusing moment, a witness says that some of this money was repaid to claimants sometime in late 2014 or early 2015, “during a social” at an address in Summer Hill – which was also the ‘headquarters’ of the neo-nazi grouplet Squadron 88.

This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party. The Fellowship was run by the very Humanist who first let in the Klub Nation crew at the Chippendale building.

It wasn’t over. The Klub Nation crew were ready to move on. But first, a question. Where did this gang come from? Klub Nation was follow-on incarnation of a group that came into existence in Sydney in 1988 – 1989.

Nationalists call this first group the Palmer-Coleman gang, naming it after Peter Coleman, a member of Jack van Tongeren’s (misnamed) Australian Nationalists Movement and a seemingly eccentric jack-in-the-box, David Palmer.

Palmerr.png
David Palmer described himself  as “some sort of ASIO asset”

Below are two documents from the Jim Saleam Special Branch police file. One shows that Coleman was not averse to providing material to the Special Branch about nationalism (in this case Jim Saleam). The second shows that Neville Ireland, who ran the case against the nationalist organisation National Action in 1988 – 1991, had an appointment in late May 1989 with an informer called ‘Cabbie’. This informer was Coleman. Both men in a court in November 1990 denied meeting each other until that very day, a little piece of perjury that covered over a substantial relationship.

 

Sal2 001.jpg
Neville Ireland’s Duty Book reveals an informant called ‘Cabbie’. This was
Peter Coleman

 

At the Police Royal Commission in 1997, Coleman received a title, ‘Commission Code 18’ (CC18). He was important to Neville Ireland’s operations. Indeed, as we reasonably know, Coleman betrayed van Tongeren to prison and from the outside managed some disruption of National Action in the years 1989-1991.

Did Klub Nation concern itself with this? Was any member worried about it at all? No, they weren’t. Coleman’s former status was just another day in the life of the group. It was well known.

Nationalists call this first group the Palmer-Coleman gang, naming it after Peter Coleman, a member of Jack van Tongeren’s (misnamed) Australian Nationalists Movement and a seemingly eccentric jack-in-the-box, David Palmer.

David Palmer came on the scene late in 1988, joined with Coleman in early 1989 and carried on from there and in 1990 established a neo-nazi group calling itself the National Socialist Defending Aryan People Party. Well, that’s what it said it was. In 2005, he would even say in writing that he had been some sort of ASIO asset. To other people, he confessed receiving “$200 a report” from ASIO.

Did anyone in Klub Nation ever come forward to explain their relationship with Palmer or to provide information to nationalists about him? Not at all. Again, it was just another day.

 

Sal1 001.jpg
A Special Branch incident report: Peter Coleman happily provides information

In tandem and for years, these two political police assets harassed nationalists, appeared in the press with provocative statements, made their statements a parody of ‘racist’ thought and reported back to their masters. So what was the Palmer-Coleman gang?

It was listening post, an ASIO / Special Branch dirty-tricks op which collected intelligence on an array of patriotic people, a drain-pool of the mentally challenged, a neutralizing agency for anyone who wanted to be an ‘activist’, a counter-gang and a rumour mill. Each of these claims reflected the truth.

At different points, Australians would hear these actors had infiltrated Pauline Hanson’s party, controlled terror networks and were ready to bomb the Olympics. A seemingly ‘believing’ media would always report them. We wonder why?

Did anyone in Klub Nation ever come forward to explain their relationship with Palmer or to provide information to nationalists about him? Not at all. Again, it was just another day.

Then in 1999, Palmer decided to infiltrate the religious society, the British Israel World Federation. They had inherited a house in the Blue Mountains and $140,000 in cash and already maintained a bookshop in York Street with maybe $20,000 in assets there.

Palmer had met Rafty and a man called Mark Pavic. This quality lad had spent years in gaol for weighing down his mum’s body at the bottom of Lake Burley Griffin. But better still, he had tried to rort the Theosophical Society in 1996-7 and take its assets by moving in, siding with a ‘faction’, helping that faction and trying to come out on top. The Court of Appeal decision that saw him defeated makes interesting reading. He was a perfect organizer for the takeover of British Israel just as he was later an operator in trying to take over the Humanists.

The British Israel scheme collapsed finally in 2002 when the company was wound up and the assets found their way to the good guys in the affair. John Boyle was their solicitor and he profited to the tune of $50,000 in fees paid for (as the law demanded) by the legitimate company.  Nice.

Did the attempt to defraud British Israel ‘disturb’ the later Klub Nation leaders? Not at all. They thought to carry on with the Humanists, the Mechanics …

Taking over groups

Taking over organisations (and not just for the money) has been a stock in trade of the Palmer-Coleman gang and the successor Klub Nation gang.

In 2000, Palmer made moves to enter the Australians Against Further Immigration Party in New South Wales. That was exposed by the nationalists and the gang came up zero. Perhaps the plan was to run a party that would truly be a counter to legitimate patriotic parties? With the funds of British Israel, had they been acquired, this brand of provocation would have had long-term viability.

Klub Nation sought to take over — or at least coordinate — some nationalist and patriotic youth groups. They sought to integrate them with the funds’ raising and the plans for youth fronts, camps and the fantastic property they would buy. It was again the suspicions they incited and the counsel sought out by the supposed victims – again – which kept them out. The nationalists put the obstacles in their way.

So today, when we learn of plans to take over the Dingoes, we are not surprised. This is just another ‘takeover’ along the way. However, this time around, the gang has ‘professionalised’ itself and sounds much more believable.

The Liberal Party connection

The connection between the Palmer-Coleman gang and Klub Nation and the Liberal Party was continuous. That is another secret in the life of this gang.

Palmer, who had once been a Liberal party candidate in Queensland, boasted often of his links with senior Liberals. He meant those Liberals who described themselves as ‘conservatives’, ‘the hard right’, ‘the uglies’ in the party. This group had a long history, but as a so-called faction, it was revamped in August 1996 by no less than Tony Abbott himself. It formed up at a planning meeting (one month before Hanson’s so-called ‘maiden speech’ in parliament that set off a furore) and formalised in December 1996 (four months before Hanson launched One Nation). Its aim was to anchor Liberal Party supporters against any defection to One Nation while that party was permitted to ‘run’ – and then, once One Nation had normalised certain ideas and opinions, the Liberals simply would reel it all back in. Howard’s master stroke! Palmer, as noted, tried to disrupt One Nation as part of the shepherding strategy.

John Boyle was one of these Liberals in this so called ‘faction’. As said, the Fellowship was part of it. The Liberal connection was a portent for the future. Now as open Liberal and Liberal-satellite auxiliary activists

The collapse of Klub Nation made for a new change in the group. They had done their apprenticeship and could now be trusted with higher tasks.

After Klub Nation dissolved, McBryde and a new player Morgan Qasabian, joined a Liberal Branch. They then went on in 2012 to form the Sydney Traditionalists. They advertise Cory’s Tories (Cory Bernardi’s ‘Australian Conservatives’) and Cory’s book The Conservative Revolution. This group parades itself as “conservative”. And that is good. They are not nationalists. Yet, they are described as offering the “sister site” to the Dingoes website. Who puts that on the Dingoes website?

 

screen-shot-2015-11-03-at-6-21-31-pm.png
David McBryde is to nationalism what Ribena is to hard liquor

There is zero nationalism in them; no commitment to the old ideal of White Australia, no base in the Australian radical nationalist tradition that proclaimed the vision of Australia as the workingman’s paradise. Quite the contrary. The rabble at Sydney Traditionalists considers themselves ‘born to rule’, a ‘growing’ special caste who serve the wealthy and are to one day be promoted as part of the ruling Tory class. After all, Cory’s Tories was launched upon the blessing of the oligarch, Gina Rinehart. The Traditionalists invited Cory Bernardi to a forum and gained his personal blessings too. The rabid free marketeer multiracialist Bernardi offers another angle for ‘promotion’. Bernardi’s Conservatives are also a Liberal satellite and really are nothing different from the Liberal Party.

Qasabian
Morgan Qasabian 

The ex Klub Nation conservative players will occasionally playact that they are concerned at immigration, or might even say something cryptic about Zionism (Bernardi’s party is actually Zionophile), but they always refuse to answer hard questions in writing, or commit themselves except orally to anything and then with nods and winks and one can believe what one likes. When pushed about onto the social question – they support free market economics as ‘success’ proves the worth of the better people. They do not want Australian wealth in the hands of our people, nor the social uplift of all of us. Born to rule reactionaries are better (sic) than the ordinary people?

Alt Rights and Counter-gangs — the final battle

This gang has since 2013 been part of a new ‘conservative front’ in Sydney. Howard Crawford, the Liberal Party dirty tricks operator, has played a major role in building it, just as he struck at the genuine nationalists especially Australia First Party. Certain Liberals like Penrith Councillor Marcus Cornish (a multiracialist), the Sydney Traditionalists, the Reclaim movement and Nick Folkes’s ‘Party For Freedom’ (PFF) make up the system of orbiting satellites.

The Reclaim movement tried to refocus the immigration debate upon Islam only. They deny the challenge to Australia of Chinese imperialism. Many of its leaders sought to propagate the idea that Zionist Israel was the world’s friend against Islamism. People like Cornish exhausted the people’s anti-mosque movement in Penrith. As all the while the Chinese began the ‘move in’ he still found himself lauded as a conservative leader.

The gang turned up during the Penrith ‘anti-Mosque’ protests in 2014 and would bloc with Nick Folkes’s Party For Freedom (PFF), The PFF copies nationalists; from little things like allowing a member to go about in a Golden Dawn T-shirt, to flying the Eureka Flag, and even flying the Celtic Cross to talking of campaigns against Chinese takeover and about the “white genocide”. Folkes mimics others, a sure giveaway about his role, and acts like a clownish idiot. All the while, he calls nationalists ‘Nazis’. Of course, it was PFF, as we have exposed elsewhere, that met at the ‘Nazi’ headquarters in Sydney, met with Squadron 88 and had its leader close at its side. Indeed, when he wound up the Squadron, its leader told his friends he would just run with those opposed to “Islam” and would “work with Nick Folkes”. Just as the ex Klub Nation gang did too.

Crawford had his hands over Squadron 88 and gave money to it and seems to have known of ‘plans’ to attack a Muslim prayer hall in Newcastle. Did he also know of the plan of Squadron 88’s leader to attack the homes of Penrith councillors? What were the purposes of such plans being talked about? The playacting with neo-nazism serves a minor role in this conservative front. If it follows the usual pathway, it is to have fired up foolish or mad people on hand who can be encouraged to attack nationalists in one way or another on the basis that they are in the way of the birth of Fourth Reich. In what must be an amusing con, Crawford told Squadron 88 that the Liberal Party was founded by Hitler-friendly conservatives who let lots of ‘Nazis’ into Australia after the War. And they were always there and now, their descendants and acolytes are ready to ‘takeover’! Given that Crawford was caught on video urging attacks upon Australia First Party people and property, it is arguable that this was the role he would have ascribed to the Squadron had things not gone belly-up.

The ex Klub Nation gang also took on a new impresario, relevant to the Dingoes tale. It is a certain Clifford Jennings has been put out front as the Alt-Right leader and the organizer of Dingo activity, But Clifford was a member of the Liberal Party till recently (did he resign on purpose?). Information reveals that while he was never part of the scammers of Klub Nation years back, but he knows them as brothers and also attended fests with them in the company of Squadron 88 and the choirmaster, Howard Crawford.

Information to hand says that Clifford has told Dingoes and some other patriots that his force will either “take over the Young Liberals” or in the alternate, form a “youth wing of One Nation” and be the power there. Again takeover and role playing. We do not accept that Clifford is a nationalist and we again say that this is really an effort to grind up patriot and potentially nationalist young people in a mincer machine that will turn out more useless conservative sausages.

Final conflict

The Dingoes are just the latest victims of the gang. We have no doubt that they will ultimately be beaten off.

In the final conflict between the nationalists and the gang, it will be said by them (and remember they have a history that spans almost thirty years) that the nationalists are an ‘old road’, and that they are fresh and new. They will say simply that the nationalists – lie! “That was the past, they are talking about. We are us and we have plans for growth.”

Sheltering behind newbie Alt-Right folk, they will say they can take it to the skies. Some may believe them. The nationalists shall say: “they are fakers and a look at who they are, at their actual history and who they connect to, sets you straight. They simply cannot be what they say they are.” The gang will hold frenetic meetings, talk of takeovers and rising hordes, their contacts in the Libs and Cory’s Tories who are “ready to move” and maybe even “big dollars”, but even more maddening for the newbies struggling with it all, they will look them straight in the eye and say: “we are you and you are us; we are the toughest of the tough and the hardest of the hard, but we are clever and work through groups and systems.”

Nationalist ideology and politics are a unity. The ideology of Australian nativist nationalism is grounded in the old radical-nationalist-labourist traditions of long ago. Its heroes are Henry Lawson and William Lane, Jack Lang and William Spence, John Curtin and Percy Stephensen. Its flag is the Southern Cross. It is the people’s cause. This cause is the true cause of Australian identity, independence and freedom and it needs a movement that is independent of the system’s ideology and politics. It does not pretend to infiltrate the regime parties. Quite the contrary, it calls them traitors and organizes against them. That means as a matter of course that these conservatives do not serve the Australian People, but the system. Yes, perhaps a few might be genuine folk mixed there in the pot, but to use an old Christian adage, it is time to come out from amongst them and be separate. The final conflict will resolve whether the conservatives will blunt and defeat the new arising movements of patriotism and nationalism or whether they will b e put to rout.

It is time to shut the Rape House – once and for all.

Screenshot_2016-09-30_09.48.00

SHERM THE GERM GOES 88 — SO WHAT’S HIS SCAM THIS TIME?

SHERM THE GERM GOES 88 — SO WHAT’S HIS SCAM THIS TIME?

Shermon Burgess, who once made videos condemning White Nationalists and encouraging Aussie men to have sex with Asian women is now marketing himself as one of those White Nationalists he so reviled.

Shermbles would have us believe he experienced an epiphany regarding Israel and all the pieces of a full conversion to WN fell neatly into place.

Yet, this is just a partial red-pilling, since his trademark ignorance of anything regarding the political science of nationalism remains — along with his slanders against those loyal nationalists who fought against the likes of, well, HIM.

1a7ucm
The cognizant dissonance is powerful in Shermon

You can always tell a fake nationalist, by the way, they stick only to those generalities such as the J question and even then their understanding of it is rooted purely in Tabloid WN themes usually of the American variety. They do this because their intention is to gain acceptance among nationalists, but if they do beguile their way in, that is when the full ju-ju of their hidden agenda kicks in.

As UNA, and Whitelaw Towers before us have revealed, this is the manner in which the Liberal Party operators infiltrate and misdirect nationalist groups and individuals at a fledgeling stage. In fact, Shermunz is up to ears in an association with one of the most contaminated names out there, but we will get to that.

Faker nationalists can only cut-and-paste stories of non-White crime from the mainstream media and add a bellicose intro. They never explore nationalist theory, never submit an essay, and never attempt to go back to the roots of Australian nationalism and understand themselves in our glorious nationalist past. They’re just happy cultivating a kind of Romper Stomper appeal and winking about “the Jews”.

Shermbles would have us believe he experienced an epiphany regarding Israel and all the pieces of a full conversion to WN fell neatly into place.

Back in the days of Reclaim Australia, which he boasts of “taking the movement mainstream”, Shermitz did his utmost to keep White nationalists away from demonstrations and the movement as a whole.

He cited his version of history — about how the ANZACS fought AGAINST Nazis and hammered this point home in his low-rent video productions in which he whacked on about some probably non-existent soldier relative of his. Together with his then sidekick, the Boy Blubber Neil Erikson, they turned on their United Patriots Front colleagues and doxed them in videos and PMs in which the UPF referred to the J question. They did this to expose them as “Nazis”.

rsz_burger
Gee, has Nick Folkes approved that comment about sucking up to Israel, Sherm? Or is that just there so you can get amongst the nationalist movement and try to pollute it? Nevermind,  both were rhetorical questions

Following that, they betrayed other sources who advised them during their period of soliciting cooperation from nationalists. Those sources probably weren’t aware of how deeply in bed with nationalism’s enemies these jokers were. All lines were being fed right back to the very worst of these political bottom-feeders.

All monitoring of Burgess, Erikson, and what turned out to be their silent partner, Nick Folkes, resulted in “Jewish tactics” being employed against those who kept a watchful eye on their dirty dealings. This mob thought nothing — and still, don’t — of carrying their subterfuge over to the “lefties” and in particular Slackbastard. They would then turn and accuse their victims of doing what they had just done. Oy vey!

And this is the onion in the ointment for old Shermbles — because we at UNA have it on good authority that he has maintained his connection with Folkesy.

Back in the days of Reclaim Australia, which he boasts of “taking the movement mainstream”, Shermitz did his utmost to keep White nationalists away from demonstrations and the movement as a whole.

You might recall, the disastrous attempt of these two Zios to cash in on the tenth anniversary of the Cronulla Uprising resulted in a court action that has left Shermbles over a $100,000 in hock to the Cronulla Council. Somehow Folkes wiggled his way out of it, but as was revealed on Whitelaw Towers at the time, in a sting operation conducted against Liberal Party operative Howard Crawford, the Libs covered his bills.

So here is a former anti-WN who despised us on the grounds his ANZAC gramps or whoever fought “the Nazis” (lol) for the establishment of liberal Jewish values (despite the fact these men and women came from a White Australia Policy) in cahoots with Australian nationalism’s worst opponent.

S1080009.JPG
An unwashed Nick Folkes appropriating Donald Trump at a recent Penrith Rally which he also ended up appropriating off Reclaim Australia

Funnily enough, his former partner in shilling, Neil Erikson, is also tight with the King Peanut (Nick Folkes).

It is through King Peanut and his benefactor from the Liberal Party (Howard Crawford) that counter-nationalist operations were conducted. Claiming to abhor Australia First Party’s traditional brand of nationalism because it is pro-White, Folkes and Crawford nonetheless cultivate strange bedfellows, one of these being the former leader of Hollywood Nazi grouplet Squadron 88.

There was always something not right about this clown. He came from nowhere (not an Australian) and suddenly thrust himself deep into the guts of a movement among people a neophyte like himself could never have known of.

Funnily enough, his former partner in shilling, Neil Erikson, is also tight with the King Peanut (Nick Folkes).

However, that is a topic for another day; suffice to say the illuminating aspect of this character’s part in the story is that he shared a house with a Party for Freedom member in which he lived rent-free. His group often held meetings there at which the swastika flag flew proudly. This is the same Party for Freedom supposedly in ideological objection to anything White nationalist. Bear in mind, Folkes is married to a Japanese woman, and Crawford spends most of his time up to his guts in the yellow vagina. He is an associate of fellow Yellow Poon Pounder Mike Holt.

Hodges and other Ziobots defend Jews
Countering anti-Israeli protesters: they’re all there, Nick Folkes, Darrin Hodges… the more things change, the more they stay the same

Yet, at the recent rally in Penrith against the construction of an Islamic school, Nick’s close associate Toby Cook can be seen flying a White Pride Worldwide flag alongside an Aboriginal flag. Um, yeah… This flag is believed to have been purchased by Penny Louise, who is in a conjugal relationship with sweaty oaf George Jameson, the Slav who famously waved the Israeli flag at the 2014 Penrith anti-mosque protest. Cook, who some suspect of not being so White, also has a Celtic cross tattooed on his upper arm.

S1080010.JPG
This is nationalism if Folkes and Shermon ever get hold of it: the WPWW flag flying alongside the Aboriginal flag and probably the Israeli flag is in there somewhere

So what gives? Why, if they are partial to White Australia rhetoric, do they wage an unending campaign of slur and defamation against The Australia First Party, and its leader, Jim Saleam? When the abovementioned S88 leader created the rumour that AFP member Nathan Sykes is Jewish, this lie travelled in a traceable path from this shady group, through Folkes, all the way to Neil Erikson and Shermon Burgess who made Sykes the subject of a video. This is without either having a reindeer’s clue who-the-fuck Sykes was.

More disturbing is how simultaneously the Fairfax Troll Luke McMahon became involved at this point, in absolute tandem with Neil Erikson. It was at this exact point that McMahon’s criminal stalking, now the subject of a pending police report by Sykes, began. It was as if he and Erikson were working together on this lie which was all about disabling who they believed to be a powerful commentator working against them.

Howard Crawford can be heard uttering the Jew lie in the sting video filmed by AFP’s Ace Facebook Troll Michael Allen. When one understands the queer relationship he had with Squadron 88 — not only providing them money but filling them with stories about taking over the Liberal Party and turning it Nazi — the nature of these people and their motives becomes a lot clearer.

This is the same Party for Freedom supposedly in ideological objection to anything White nationalist. Bear in mind, Folkes is married to a Japanese woman, and Crawford spends most of his time up to his guts in the yellow vagina. He is an associate of fellow Yellow Peril Pounder Mike Holt.

See, readers, this is all about subverting nationalism. You see it all the time but it doesn’t always register with you what’s happening. You will still find Burgess shilling for the conservative Pauline Hanson, as he spent most of the last year doing. She has about as much to do with true nationalism as a Bangladeshi does with the legend of Percival.

rsz_sdfdsfds
Shermitz, mysteriously shilling for pro-Israel Pauline Hanson. Um…?

Now that this screed has wound out to over a thousand words, we think we’ve made the point that Shermon is not ever what he purports to be. And if he IS genuine then he is guilty of switching teams like a whore burns through rubbers, which is never good, because it proves that the person has no fundamental loyalty to a cause or the power of conviction to be sincere.

All nationalists should make any newcomer aware of Burgess and his ilk and keep this nationalism of ours protected. Fortress Nationalism can only succeed with knowledge and an understanding of the movement’s history.

Now, we will finish up by saying, in regards to Shermbles and his alliance with Folkes, UNA has it on excellent authority that Shermon Burgess intends to speak at an upcoming anti-mosque rally being organised by Folkes in the NSW town of Lithgow.

Say… no… more…

oie_sxHDEPPebj6j
A filthy pair of grubs

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

If anything distinguishes those civic patriots on the right from us radical nationalists it is by whom we are most attacked.

In the case of the civics, they are dogged by what we collectively term ‘the left’, while radical nationalists, who occupy a third position on the political spectrum cop the most grief from either the civic patriots or those in the conservative camp.

Bear in mind that ‘the left’ is as eclectic when it comes to issues, identity, philosophy, and strategy as ‘the right’.

The left wants the patriot movement dispersed while the conservatives aim to drive away radical nationalists so they can inhabit our political ground and remodel it in their crypto-globalist image.

This is a curious fact that allows us to discuss a couple of cases in point. Let us begin with what some of those from the civic patriot side of the quadrangle contend with in their present day ‘clicktivism’. This essay shall be in two parts on account of its length and the dedication required to each of its players.

1. THE PATRIOT ACTORS AND THE COMBATANTS OF THE LEFT

There is a particularly malicious element at play among those who oppose the growth of the patriots. They view patriots as more of a concern than the nationalist movement given its mainstream accessibility. On that side, the Bogan element is mocked by those who are their mirror image with one factor separating them by the slimmest degree: the perception of their engaging in ‘racism’. This is, despite the ambiguity on the question of race amplified in the patriot fold.

Nationalists define Australianness as being of White European stock, as opposed to Aborigines. Patriots, who misuse the term nationalism understanding it not, and often deliberately misappropriating it, are nebulous in their definition of an Australian. Many are in mixed-race relationships and as such loath the absolutism of nationalism which would exclude them on the grounds of breaching its inviolate precepts.

However, it is important in the propaganda war of those conflicting with the anti-Islam movement to lump each in the same basket and defame both they and nationalists, as ‘Nazis’; which is like calling all socialists Marxists or anarchists communists. The Nazi tag is meant to invoke images of state organised terror that would ensue if these groups are allowed to put down political roots in the community.

In the lexicon of those of the left, patriots are ‘potatriots’, a witticism intended to disdain that group as ‘potato heads’. This is a derisive term that was originally applied to skinheads. Since the advent of the Reclaim Australia movement, which is almost exclusively dramatized on Facebook, a number of pages and counter-identities have sprung up to oppose the patriot pages and the groups that employ them.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

But virtue is subjective in this day and age when that moral asset is destroying the west. Opposition to Islam is the kindling of the realisation something is amiss. Australians are being de-culturized while globalism is dialectically re-culturizing us with a religion that negates the very tenets underpinning the idea of universal equality at play. Both are at the mercy of the culturally vacuous reality of globalism.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113
Alex Gollan, the assistant school principal and anti-fascist anarchist who ran the ‘anti-bogan’ word press site and was arrested for bulk kiddie porn

This is visible nowhere better than on those oppositional pages, which we mentioned. This genre has no purpose other than to negate. They do not attempt to counter ‘potatriot’ messages by promoting their own positive counter-messages they literally take the aforementioned messages and desecrate them. There is no intellectual component at play in the deconstruction of the patriot message. Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is a sledgehammer used to beat down the message and the messenger so that the mission becomes personal.

A very telling post occurred on one such page with a prominent leftist troll, “Can’t we just kill them [patriots] all?” The admin replied, “No, because then we would be Nazis.”
Disregarding the fact that had that comment been made on a nationalist page it would have been hidden or removed, it is a very instructive insight into both the pathology of the poster and the counter movement. The duplicitous essence of it is summed up in the gag, “We’re starting a war for peace.”

The assumed virtue of the poster is instantly invalidated by the revelation of this tyrannical instinct.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

This is, however, but one example. Narrowed down to a central theme outside of ‘race’ is the implication that patriots will potentially auger in a dictatorial system reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, the calls for an authoritarian response to the patriots are constant on the sample page we have used for our study.

There are flippant, but often sincere calls for patriots to be pursued by ASIO, or to be charged with offences that — were they on the other foot — would be vehemently contested as breaches of civil liberties. So we come to the actors or combatants, and here we shall actually name some.

Smith
Pete Smith from Melbourne, heavily active on Facebook, is linked to Antifascist Action Sydney and other ‘anarchist’ pages

 

We have had correspondence with a few members of the patriot movement, putting aside our ideological differences, keen to highlight certain combatants and the disreputable methods they have employed to target one or other of the patriot actors.

One, in particular, has been defamed over and over by combatants using various Facebook identities and private messaging the patriot actor we shall call ‘Mark’.

Mark is being consistently vilified as a person of heinous substance and the nature of the slander has transcended any honourable intent. The attacks led to the hostilities emerging from a social media setting and into the corporeal world when the authorities were involved. Mark is not alone in these vicious online assaults but his example is notable.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

So, who is behind these assaults on Mark’s character? Here, we merely repeat what he believes: John Linden Faulkner. But we also mention two others, Alex Gollan and David Hollis.

download (3)
Sydney’s Tayce Brown, shoplifter, hair stylist to the scabby, and a real skank

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This blog, as in others we’ve mentioned, is a flagrant vehicle to attack political opponents. Faulkner and Gollan are said to have co-administrated the site. Gollan, a former assistant school principal has since disappeared from ‘anti-fascist’ activities after being charged with child-sex offences.

Faulkner, who Mark and others believe to be behind a series of online profiles identifiable by their malevolence, has a criminal past to make anyone suddenly hosting him start eyeing the nearest exit. Faulkner was imprisoned for nine years for armed robberies in which women were his soft targets. He appealed his sentence as harsh, but in doing so was told it was actually lenient under the circumstances.

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This week [originally posted on Facebook March 11] , it was revealed that David Albain Hollis, the man in the red ‘Truth’ cap who accompanied Sue Munro to the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court to spy on the Bendigo Three’s supporters — and who appeared in an opportunistic pic with John Safran taken on the day — went on a “stabbing spree” in 1991, knifing seven people one of whom later died.

Hollis served only 17 months in jail on the grounds of diminished responsibility as he was in the throes of a “psychotic episode”, although how that should mitigate anything so appalling we do not know.

There are other cases on that extreme left of the bench such as Tayce Brown of Antifascist Action Sydney whose conduct and lifestyle are such that she would be considered a habitual criminal outside of the political activist underworld.

The radical left is sure something — in a world inhabited by junkies, thugs, hookers, thieves, and ex-murderers does becoming ‘anti-racist’ mean atoning for dissolute, wasted lives. Does championing the ‘other’ allow them to graduate from their moral squalor merely on the basis they aren’t racist? We are not psychologists, and this is not a forensic examination, but the pattern cannot be ignored.

Bear in mind, Blair Cottrell was confronted with a video created inside the correctional system while he was doing time for a crime of passion. He never killed anyone, nor caused anyone harm. What of these three? All fall into the very worst categories, and all comport themselves on social media in a manner that delegitimizes any hypothetical argument they believe they have concerning right and wrong.

If Faulkner is behind this campaign of defamation and stalking against Mark, then it appears that he has in no way left behind his violent past, but merely justified it in the context of the political theatre. He has reinvented himself as the ‘good guy’ and deemed those patriot actors as ‘bad guys’ in a morality play where his own contaminated ethics are masked by a blindness born of criminal denial.

In our next article, we will turn the focus on the patriots, who are to nationalists what the leftists we have described here have been to them.

oie_DqksmJ43gaGr
Anarchist Psycho

 

THE ALLURE OF FOREIGN RULERS IS THE HEART OF POPULISM

THE ALLURE OF FOREIGN RULERS IS THE HEART OF POPULISM

According to Opposition Leader Bill Shorten, “Putin should not be admired by anyone”. This stern warning which is backed with all the authority of a man lecturing his wife’s son comes in response to Pauline Hanson’s latest appraisal of the Russian leader.

Confident that Hanson hasn’t the foggiest outside the whispered instructions of James Ashby and Malcolm Roberts, we’re putting this down to another excruciating attempt to accrue relevance vis-à-vis, foreign demagogues.

Similarly, the Trump phenomenon – which we’ve recently decried as a fraudulent ploy to deceive White Identitarians into supporting Trumpism – is also a go-to man for a Hanson covering up her party’s internal entropy.

Far from an exclusive happening to our own shores, it’s this two-man show that reveals itself all around the civic world with the same annoying recurrence as an accursed fly on a hot day.

It comes to us always in the same package: “we want a strong leader like Putin,” “we want Putin’s style of leadership,” “we need someone like Trump,” “Trump is a strong leader,” and too many ghastly variants thereof.

It’s remarkable that this one, quite broad and yet at the same time quite simplified quality of strength, is presented in such a fashion as though it’s an exotic viand to be searched out and acquired by adventurous merchants, brought back to us in all haste so we can sup of this ‘strength’ and ‘strong governance’.

Also remarkable, is that the actual political considerations between the two leaders and goals of their respective countries – which are manifestly at odds in many areas – are so blatantly ignored which hazes the proper definition of what the Hansonites and associated

Also remarkable, is that the actual political considerations between the two leaders and goals of their respective countries – which are manifestly at odds in many areas – are so blatantly ignored which hazes the proper definition of what the Hansonites and associated

It comes to us always in the same package: “we want a strong leader like Putin,” “we want Putin’s style of leadership,” “we need someone like Trump,” “Trump is a strong leader,” and too many ghastly variants thereof.

download (13)
A strong leader? Yep, that’s me!

It’s remarkable that this one, quite broad and yet at the same time quite simplified quality of strength, is presented in such a fashion as though it’s an exotic viand to be searched out and acquired by adventurous merchants, brought back to us in all haste so we can sup of this ‘strength’ and ‘strong governance’.

It’s likewise remarkable that the actual political considerations between the two leaders and goals of their respective countries – which are manifestly at odds in many areas – are so blatantly ignored which hazes the proper definition of what the Hansonites and associated

It’s remarkable too that the actual political considerations between the two leaders and goals of their respective countries – which are manifestly at odds in many areas – are so blatantly ignored which hazes the proper definition of what the Hansonites and associated fiends are even after anymore. As the spud fields aren’t known for producing Machiavellians, we would save these civic patriots the trouble of questing after that which they won’t acquire by recommending some essential reading in the form of Roger Hargreaves’

It comes to us always in the same package: “we want a strong leader like Putin,” “we want Putin’s style of leadership,” “we need someone like Trump,” “Trump is a strong leader,” and too many ghastly variants thereof.

As the spud fields aren’t known for producing Machiavellians, we would save these civic patriots the trouble of questing after that which they won’t acquire by recommending some essential reading in the form of Roger Hargreaves’ Mr. Strong, supplemented by Mr. Clever; the teachings are simply codified and full of quaint illustrations – imagine the infused wisdom the flag-wavers could learn from these benevolent characters.

Nevertheless, it’s perplexing as to why we want or even need a leader like Trump or Putin. You can’t have a leader like them without mimicking them in some way or another, and you can’t mimic them without looking like a total dill.

Surely a ‘strong’ leader does not mimic, but acts from his own competent self; and surely if one did have that competency of leadership they would act on it and not be asking where it is or why we don’t have it, much less trying to cheaply copy and paste it from overseas. Hanson’s bellowing for such leaders while not matching them on any level is likely as close a personal confession we’ll get that she positively doesn’t have in her what the people think she does.

Surely a ‘strong’ leader does not mimic, but acts from his own competent self; and surely if one did have that competency of leadership they would act on it and not be asking where it is or why we don’t have it, much less trying to cheaply copy and paste it from overseas. Hanson’s bellowing for such leaders while not matching them on any level is likely as close a personal confession we’ll get that she positively doesn’t have in her what the people think she does.

That’s why the sickly obsession with these men, personality envy if you will, is so rampant: the allure of foreign rulers make up for everything our own equivalents lack; it’s a dazzling show to trick the masses. That Hanson’s goons post images of her everywhere with the appropriated slogan “Make Australia Great Again” shows the authority is borrowed and tied to offshore markets – again, mimicking.

Nevertheless, it’s perplexing as to why we want or even need a leader like Trump or Putin. You can’t have a leader like them without mimicking them in some way or another, and you can’t mimic them without looking like a total dill.

But when something is over exaggerated these patriots will never cease to amaze us by under exaggerating, if not flat out ignoring, other events that strike anyone else as rather important. A prominent case in point being Putin’s crucial intervention in the Syrian Civil War. It’s in this Arab country that otherwise vocal Putinophiles are quieter than the Russian President’s critics.

Yes, they appear to keep mum over the fact Russia has cosy relations with Ba’athist Syria and, worse on the patriot Richter scale, Iran. Now, what does that mean? It means that outside theatrics, patriots know and care about their idols as much as Dan Evans knows and cares about being sober.

9a35716d6a74c13913b1c49eeb0e61f9a0ed89eb
Pauline Hanson, super-nationalist!

The extent of Russia’s cordial relations with the Islamic world (part of it at any rate) is hardly a minor matter, yet here we are scratching our heads as to why Putin isn’t persona non grata to those drooling over his perceived magnificence. His choice in international friends is a little halal, no?

That Hanson’s goons post images of her everywhere with the appropriated slogan “Make Australia Great Again” shows the authority is borrowed and tied to offshore markets – again, mimicking. But when something is over exaggerated these patriots will never cease to amaze us by under exaggerating, if not flat out ignoring, other events that strike anyone else as rather important.

A prominent case in point being Putin’s crucial intervention in the Syrian Civil War. It’s in this Arab country that otherwise vocal Putinophiles are quieter than the Russian President’s critics. Yes, they appear to keep mum over the fact Russia has cosy relations with Ba’athist Syria and, worse on the patriot Richter scale, Iran.

Yes, they appear to keep mum over the fact Russia has cosy relations with Ba’athist Syria and, worse on the patriot Richter scale, Iran. Now, what does that mean? It means that outside theatrics, patriots know and care about their idols as much as Dan Evans knows and cares about being sober.

Now, what does that mean? It means that outside theatrics, patriots know and care about their idols as much as Dan Evans knows and cares about being sober. The extent of Russia’s cordial relations with the Islamic world (part of it at any rate) is hardly a minor matter, yet here we are scratching our heads as to why Putin isn’t persona non grata to those drooling over his perceived magnificence. His choice in international friends is a little halal, no?

A prominent case in point being Putin’s crucial intervention in the Syrian Civil War. It’s in this Arab country that otherwise vocal Putinophiles are quieter than the Russian President’s critics. Yes, they appear to keep mum over the fact Russia has cosy relations with Ba’athist Syria and, worse on the patriot Richter scale, Iran.

Now, what does that mean? It means that outside theatrics, patriots know and care about their idols as much as Dan Evans knows and cares about being sober. The extent of Russia’s cordial relations with the Islamic world (part of it at any rate) is hardly a minor matter, yet here we are scratching our heads as to why Putin isn’t persona non grata to those drooling over his perceived magnificence. His choice in international friends is a little halal, no?

Now, what does that mean? It means that outside theatrics, patriots know and care about their idols as much as Dan Evans knows and cares about being sober. The extent of Russia’s cordial relations with the Islamic world (part of it at any rate) is hardly a minor matter, yet here we are scratching our heads as to why Putin isn’t persona non grata to those drooling over his perceived magnificence. His choice in international friends is a little halal, no?

The fatal flaw in Australian populism is that it can’t grow an organic, incorruptible base. Instead, we’ve shown to be inundated with scoundrels, hacks and, probably most insulting to the people, opportunists. As the nativism gives way to popularity and egoism so do the tenets of pure Nationalism. Populism co-opts its way into the established order of things and, lo and behold, we have but a different shade of globalism. Hanson’s own economic and immigration policies attest to that.

Nationalists hope the lesson is slowly sinking in that any so-called ‘saviour of the people’ placing too much attachment in foreign politics is more than likely not too sure about their own individualistic capabilities back home.

screen-shot-2016-02-22-at-12-37-57-am
Dan “the conservative capitalist” Evans (R) and the biggest grub on the Internet (L)

INTERNET DRAMA AND STREET THEATRE ARE NOT HELPING TO OVERTHROW GLOBALISM

INTERNET DRAMA AND STREET THEATRE ARE NOT HELPING TO OVERTHROW GLOBALISM

As the Civic Patriots and Anti-fascists continue their tussle over the rights to the title of the most disgraceful example of the White race, the Nationalists, and we suspect the saner members of the traditional Left, are simply in awe of both sides capacity for self-abasement.

We have pointed out many times this duel between two factions of, let us be frank, White trash has its roots deep in the twilight world of social media banter, trolling and cyber-bullying.

To those of us who still live the bulk of our lives in the real world and are physically engaged in alternative politics this constant bickering and sniping between parties in cyberspace presents some infuriating problems.

We originally intended this article to be a guide on how to deal with narcissists who try to impose themselves upon organised political groups, however, as important an issue as that may be it is not the whole picture.

Narcissists, by which we mean those people with positively malignant personality disorders, as opposed to merely self-confident, impatient or pushy people, are mercifully rare, but even one such person can devastate an entire activist community.

These people have a need to cause drama, call it a hunger or a craving for chaos but, as the author and diagnosed narcissist Sam Vaknin observes, this behaviour is all geared to securing what he has termed “narcissistic supply”.

We have pointed out many times this duel between two factions of, let us be frank, White trash has its roots deep in the twilight world of social media banter, trolling and cyber-bullying.

In brief, the severe narcissist could best be portrayed as a black hole of self-loathing and self-doubt, these people are often described as having no emotional core and no actual personality just a series of masks they wear, depending on the temperament and interests of the people they are tapping for acknowledgement and validation.

These masks or personae may involve things like sexual seduction of others, grandiose plans to really shake up the world into which other people are drawn, or they may offer some insight into a hidden subculture, or obscure field of expertise in which the narcissist is the enlightened master or expert.

million flag
The Million Flag Patriot was almost bashed by Antifa at his first rally. His skits are so poorly done that most people still don’t get the joke

The severe narcissist is all things to all people, he is your best mate, your benefactor and teacher as long as he can be the centre of attention, play his mind games, tell his tall tales and big-note himself in order secure his narcissistic supply and stave off the howling emptiness at the core of his being.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, these narcissists are usually unable to hold themselves back from becoming abusive toward the people around them, this stems from the fact that they are basically parasites. With no emotional core they have no moral compass, so they will often steal, lie, swindle, blackmail and stand over the people in their social circle without even a hint of remorse.

It is when the narcissist is caught out in a lie or some other abusive behaviour that the real problems begin, when confronted they can be quite dangerous as they will fly into an uncontrollable rage, but once they have calmed down then the long, drawn-out, sadistic process of their retribution begins.

These masks or personae may involve things like sexual seduction of others, grandiose plans to really shake up the world into which other people are drawn, or they may offer some insight into a hidden subculture, or obscure field of expertise in which the narcissist is the enlightened master or expert.

When the narcissist is exposed as a liar or a thief, for example, this causes a deeply-felt psychic wound, there is no possibility of them apologising, taking their lumps and learning to be a better person in the future, because the narcissistic supply from that source is now tainted the source must be destroyed at all costs. You can see where we are going with this comrades.

Put this in the context of an activist group, or any political organisation for that matter; a prominent member of the group exhibits the symptoms of narcissism discussed above, he is discovered to be a liar, a thief, a gossip or a sexual predator and confronted by the other members of the collective.

His response will then be to turn on the group, maybe he will denounce its members, or ingratiate himself with opposing political groups and the security services, anything to secure a new source of narcissistic supply. He urgently needs people to listen to his stories, to value his expertise and expert knowledge of his former group and to help him exact revenge upon his former comrades.

This is why you sometimes see formerly well known political extremists re-inventing themselves as anti-racists or conservatives, as the case may be; the phenomenon of group-hopping where people constantly change alliances or even invent new political tendencies out of thin air may be a red flag for the activists the narcissist will approach in his search for a new host.

To go back to our main point, social media is obviously a haven for narcissists and anti-social personality types and unfortunately, these fora allow the narcissist to create potentially limitless little bubbles of chaos and insanity, which to some extent can be transferred out of cyberspace into the real world.

Put this in the context of an activist group, or any political organisation for that matter; a prominent member of the group exhibits the symptoms of narcissism discussed above, he is discovered to be a liar, a thief, a gossip or a sexual predator and confronted by the other members of the collective.

This willingness by some people to take internet drama or their online personae to the streets creates real headaches for the good, genuine activists trying to build effective political parties or clubs.

We encounter people who demand to be treated as comrades, or even dignitaries, if you like, on the basis of their blog posts or social media jottings; then there are those who expect to be able to roll up to a rally or gathering and use us as human shields against people they have offended or provoked online.

Unfortunately for them, out in the real world, where the Nationalists live there are rules and etiquette and laws of the land which must be obeyed in order to advance our cause.

Nationalists and the authentic Left know that threats and challenges made online are rarely carried out, however there is an unwritten agreement among all sensible activists regarding the escalation of hostilities generated in the political struggle into attacks on the person, vandalism of personal property or aggression against non-belligerents; spouses, children, parents and so on.

The internet heroes, narcissistic parasites, trolls and bullies make maintaining this “truce” difficult, every time some dotty Antifa or drug addled Zio-Patriot type blows a gasket starts throwing death threats around or commences stalking their opponents it increases the risk to real activists on both sides.

The danger lies in the difficulty some people have in distinguishing fact from fiction and fantasy from reality; coupled with the tunnel vision and paranoia generated in these flame wars and stalking incidents this disconnect has the potential to blow trivial social media comments out into cycles of violent payback in which innocent people will be harmed.

While our side would never shrink from confrontation and we are more than able to ensure our own safety in public, we really do not want to see the current vigorous back and forth between Nationalists and Globalists degenerate into European levels of political violence on the basis of hurt feelings and sore egos caused by cyber-bullying.

Unfortunately, there may well come a time when we are forced to fight to secure the existence of our people and a future for White children, but for our part, we will first employ all legal and morally defensible avenues in order to bring down the globalist hegemony.

Just do not expect us to go to war to secure your narcissistic supply or get involved in your unnecessary flame wars, we are on to the game players and headcases.

cyber-bullying-finalcolor.png
Everybody hurts sometime