THE VOTE THAT SPLIT WHITE AUSTRALIA

THE VOTE THAT SPLIT WHITE AUSTRALIA

Scenes from the revelry of the Yes camp this week uncomfortably revealed just how White it is.

For too long decadence has been sold as a virtue, thus the invidious message coming out of the Same Sex Marriage vote is that us Whites are the ones tearing down our own Christian values, and not some abhorrent foreign parasite. This cannot be ignored unless you buy into conspiracy theories, in which case, the vote was rigged.

We wouldn’t discount that possibility, but, truthfully, it’s unlikely. If you can read the writing on the wall then all signs point to the Yes vote being the overwhelming consensus of half of our fellow countrymen. Resisting this is undignified. Remember how the Alt-Right laughed at Hillary supporters demanding a recount after Donald Trump won the US Presidency? Well, that shoe is now on our foot.

1zjwj8

The Queer lobby, in all its incessant variety: the freaks and transsexuals, the trans-genders, fags, dykes, AIDS fairies and all the derivatives of counter-heterosexuality no decent person would know of or comprehend, both they and their SJW champions are White. Post-vote analysis revealed how it was the heavy migrant safe Labor seats such as Blaxland in NSW and Calwell in Victoria that predominantly ticked the No box.

This is a bitter pill to swallow for those of us White Nationalists who’ve been pushing the concept of race realism. We must now soberly confront that reality — that our own race resoundingly rejects our message. It is non-Whites standing firmest for family values, modesty, and moral stability.

You will hear all the reasons why this is the case and the most likely will be that “it’s the Jews”. We know for sure the Jews will be delighting in our discomfort but to surrender our own culpability for the choices of our people — to suggest that we are so pliable that Jewish Supremacists can twist us up like origami figures as they please — is to belie our argument that we were ever a masterful race to begin with.

No, sadly, we did this on our own, and if we are honest about history, then this is just another chronological step towards the White liberal nirvana where we cease to exist just to be sporting to the ‘lesser races’ that outnumber us in the multiple digits. After all, it was Whites who abolished slavery; it was “cisgender” White males who recognised women’s rights and gave women the vote; it was Whites who enshrined ‘civil rights’ favouring alien peoples who are culturally erasing us from our own civilisations, inheritance, and birthright.

Whites are on a constant quest to emancipate one victim or another regardless of whether or not the object of our protection is actually in bondage. Moreover, these deeds pass without thanks, much less acknowledgement.

Given this evidence, it should be much easier to dispel the universal prejudice that insists we are a nation of bigots. It should be, but it won’t, for the same reason that the Yes vote got through — because the problem isn’t so much other races as it is our own. Yes, it is other Whites labelling us ‘a nation of bigots’, and censoring ourselves over imagined misdeeds to those poor races these self-appointed conscience-bearers among us hypocritically condescend to without even realising it. It is other Whites who foment the atmosphere wherein our status is reduced on dubious egalitarian grounds.

See, what we have here is a struggle within the White race itself; a fight for a dominant idea of what Whiteness means. For instance, it is no accident that Nationalists are White, but so is Antifa. Therefore, the war is not outward, but inward, and rather than sink into a negative pit of crippling despair over this rude truth we must make contingencies to readjust our strategy, revise our enemy, and prepare to fight our own kind. Whites are divided in two, and there is no amount of proselytizing that will win that lost half of our race back to us — it simply has to be dominated, or decimated.

If Whites are to survive we will have to turn against family, friends, and foe alike.  The Whites who want to live will have to “come with” the Terminator.

1zjvt8

Advertisements

EXIT HOMOPHOBIA, ENTER HETEROPHOBIA: “SODOM” VOTERS PROVE DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

EXIT HOMOPHOBIA, ENTER HETEROPHOBIA: “SODOM” VOTERS PROVE DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

Scrawled in pink chalk on a Sydney pathway in the wake of today’s vote on the Sodom Law were two words, “Love Wins.”

This is a propagandistic slogan if ever there was one. We should know since we’ve come up with enough of our own.

Once you’ve understood the slogan’s referential function, deduced its expressive function, surmised its conative function, fathomed its phatic function and flipped by its contextual function you’ll realise what the slogan would properly mean separated from the sentimentality of its addresser is that “institutionalized love wins”. Once you’ve dealt with that dialectic you should be free enough from the propaganda to deduce that this has nothing to do with ‘love’.

Love doesn’t require the formal acknowledgement of an institution to prosper and in fact, it is more likely to stifle and suppress that love.

Moreover, you must grapple with the logic of tearing down the pillars of an institution to institutionalise that which the former pillars existed to ensure did not endanger the institution that was in place to safeguard against what the new institution formally validates. Meaning, there was, beyond what the Cultural Marxists who voted Yes perceive, more to the institution of marriage than “love”. Indeed, it was a social contract beyond enshrining the rights of deviant minorities into law.

But before we use the word deviant we must now readdress the contextual relevance of that word since deviancy can only really be determined by the majority of society and policed by its agents of social control, such as the media, lawmakers, academics, politicians, Waleed Aly and so forth.

Even here we have a problem since the degenerate homos who have won this “right” to smash apart a sacred pact between a man and a woman are not of themselves in the majority but the reverse. It is their agents who are in the majority.

gay
Consider this when putting shekels in the coffers of these corporations who have forced upon us the reign of everything abominable to a healthy society

For that matter, the vote only passed by a rabbit’s dick of 7% with some Labor electorates like ‘Calwell’ in Victoria, named after our Nationalist Aussie hero Arthur Calwell, doing us proud by voting No. Now it is down to the traitor political class to pass this bullshit law and applaud themselves for having totally fucked everything that this country once stood for. It is now in the hands of the banks, corporations, and the hedonistic consumers who keep their share portfolios fattening with profit. This same-sex marriage vote was, after all, pushed heavily by media and the corporations.

Anyway, having digressed for a moment, we have ascertained that the majority has granted the minority an unequal representation among the majority. If we tie that back to what social science once understood about deviancy we now have anyone from the former institution who is strident enough to hold firm to their beliefs cast on the outside of what society now upholds to be ‘normal’. The respectable is now the outsider and the deviant is the pillar of this brave new society.

Since we’re talking about institutions, it seems fair to acknowledge that garbage from the baby boomer generation who trampled this filth into our lives — who inculcated these Cultural Marxist codes into the heads of our youth via the institutions they took over — were the ones who loathed the very concept of the institution of marriage. Their lot burned their bras and jockstraps and went in for “free love” and threw things at Servicemen returning from the horrors of America’s doomed war in Vietnam.

lesbian-wedding-14.jpg
This is an SJW two-fer deal, yet get the dyke White woman with the black dyke and they may adopt a White male baby and kill it

Yet, here are the fruits of their decades of campaigning — they have killed the social and religious premise of marriage. They have redefined it and in doing so have set in motion an entire wheel of social changes that will exclude, criminalise, and disadvantage all of those whose ideological and religious convictions now place them as an “other”.

The despised “cisgender” White male; the devout Christian; the fervent social conservative are all now outside of that societal approval and therefore beyond the gates of the institution which ironically once upon a time they were the most ardent advocates for.

Any parent who doesn’t wish their child to be taught the finer points of buggery by a genderless freak reared in the social laboratory of modern society will be demonised, ostracised, and — if they aren’t just patronisingly dismissed as absurdly quaint — used as an example of that which is abhorrent to this newfangled society based on repudiated gender and opposition to the fundamentals of nature. Any Christian who refuses to accommodate a reception or conduct a marriage between freakish gender-confused parties will be sued, vilified, hounded, doxed, and probably beaten up by roaming squadrons of Nazi Dykes, Faggots, and Transgender Chemical commandos.

It will be ironic to see how they must now shuffle their hierarchy of victimhood to accommodate the obvious dissension of devout Moslems, which are still currently a protected species in the Social Justice Warrior red book.

Now they need another cause; now they’ve run out of steam there is another minority group whose interests must usurp that of the majority until there is nothing left but until the day invading armies of Chinese soldiers paint the walls with their soft, squishy, fucked-up, chemically-altered brains.

Yes, folks, we are on the road to being a PC Police State, just like England.

EDIT: After we went to press with this item out came the images from the unscheduled orgy at Hyde Park where fairies, fags, dykes, princesses, lady boys, he-girls and every kind of pervert combo imagined in this age of decadence, got straight down to exposing themselves and cavorting in a manner that would, in saner countries, have them all shot.

4660722000000578-0-image-a-39_1510748685748.jpg
A bizarre dyke with hairy legs, hairy armpits struts half-nude (blarrggggh) in a major Sydney park because that’s what the world will be like now that the Yes vote got through by a whisker.
4660904400000578-0-image-a-42_1510748699620
Broad daylight and the green-light signals for the degenerate exhibitionists. That’s nothing, but, wait till you see the latest dog-collars, leashes and leatherwear for next year’s Back to School uniforms!

oie_JhUXWGI010X4.jpg

 

BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

If there is one demographic, or social stratum, which regularly draws the ire of UNA bloggers it is the waffling bourgeoisie and their nominally empty-headed offspring, who sound off like a battery of howitzers every time an issue of so-called “social justice” is inserted into public discourse.

Take young Frances Abbott, the middle child of Tony and Margie, who, channelling Mary Bennet, the middle sister in Jane Austen’s Pride And Prejudice, felt moved to put forth a Vlog on matters of love, romance and tier-one Lesbianism in support of same-sex marriage.

Quoting the experience of her aunt, Christine Forster, who is a middle-aged homosexual convert, Frances declared that people “cannot help who they fall in love with” and that “love is unexpected”.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

frances abbott
Bourgeois Bikini Babe Frances Abbott: all brawn, little brains

If homosexual relationships are based on love then it is clearly a completely different form of bond to opposite-sex unions; in which, as lifelong spinster Jane Austen herself observed, there are much more considerations than “love” to be taken into account when making a match.

In its most basic, and most commonly understood form the pair-bond between man and woman is based on a partnership to take on the challenges of the world together and raise children, if they are lucky the spouses will get along well and, in time, come to love each other.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

In most cases in which men and women marry for love, the unions quickly fall apart as the realisation hits home that such a marriage is lacking in substance, has no direction and no real reason to exist aside from the vanity, or unrealistic expectations of the spouses.

Pride pejudice
The Bennet sisters scan the horizon for well-endowed suitors

Of course we understand the reasoning behind the patter which upper-class twits such as Ms Abbott have been trained to parrot, we can never, ever describe homosexuality as a choice, nor credit homosexuals with the agency to make their own decisions; rather, according to Globalist social convention, they are subjects whose vital nature is simply something which has “occurred”.

Here we find another point of difference, which also gives the lie to the calls for absolute equality for all: heterosexuality is very much a choice, yet we are taught to believe that homosexuality is something which “just happens”.

muslims1
Guess which other global capitalist side project also poo-poohs the idea of free will?

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

If homosexuals are not going through these processes and are subject to the whims of some deity, or hidden forces in the universe then equality will remain a distant dream, regardless of the outcome of the postal survey and subsequent parliamentary vote.

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

Of course, we know full well why this meme has been propagated, that in fact most people who begin their intimate lives in the homosexual world are actually deprived of choice by virtue of, in the main, having been seduced and manipulated into that lifestyle by self-serving adults while in their early teens.

This detail, however, is beyond the scope of our discussion and, as we have stated before, we simply do not care enough about homosexuals, their tiny queer sub-culture or their struggles against normal society to develop an in-depth critique of them as people.

Orlando united
Omar Mateen was homosexual and Muslim, obviously  the Pulse nightclub outrage “just happened”

As ever, we at UNA are interested in the bigger picture and the picture of Globalist equality, that synthesis of second-generation Communism and multinational corporate hegemony, has come into sharp relief during the SSM debate; the man behind the curtain pulling the levers has been revealed.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

“Things just happen” only to subjects, rather than workers in charge of their own fate; subjects are drafted into the military against their will, they are unfairly taxed, sold shoddy goods, given poor quality housing, or arbitrarily arrested and jailed; this is why most forms of monarchy, dictatorship and theocracy have such a bad reputation.

What “Love Is Love” in its proper context, globalist cosmopolitanism, ultimately boils down to is that we are all no greater or more able to master our own destiny than that young child whose choices are limited by the actions of the adults around them; that we are apt to just fall into situations and that it is advisable simply to go with the flow rather than resist or seek our own autonomy.

 

mateen-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwfSVWeZ_vEN7c6bHu2jJnT8
Agents act, subjects are acted upon, inshallah

 

THE MATTER OF SOCIAL CLASS

THE MATTER OF SOCIAL CLASS

Australian politicians of the globalist caste will flat out deny that, in 2017, we have an entrenched class system which regulates, and in many ways undermines public life and the ability of citizens to politically organise on their own behalf.

To make our case for, dare we use the term “class struggle” in Nationalist politics we should first give our readers a simple explanation of class structures in contemporary society.

Logically, starting from the top, we have the monied families, those now fading clans of colonial aristocrats whose fortunes were made in the 19th and 20th centuries, on the markets, as graziers, miners or other entrepreneurial adventures.

It is hard to know how much influence such folk have nowadays, their exclusive clubs and rural, baronial cliques are, we are told, on the wane as the younger family members sell up the stations to the Chinese, or other foreign concerns and re-settle in the major cities.

The old families may still be influential, to a point, but they are rarely politically active anymore, beyond donating to, or fundraising for, the major parties; with a few exceptions the remaining graziers and sundry other bluebloods are no longer regularly sitting in Parliament.

In any case these “hidden hands”, if in fact, that is the way they choose to operate, are beyond the reach of grassroots activism, for the time being anyway; as dissidents push in from the margins toward the structures of power they may well reveal themselves, though the major parties would do all they could to screen off their benefactors and power brokers from the public gaze.

The Bourgeoisie are usually on the bottom of the second page of the Financial Review Rich List, they are typically well off and their influence stems from their control of the ebb and flow of, not only commerce but information. 

The Bourgeoisie are usually on the bottom of the second page of the Financial Review Rich List, they are typically well off and their influence stems from their control of the ebb and flow of, not only commerce but information. In this class, we find people who can move laterally through the key areas comprising the structure of power in this country: big business, government, the arts and media industry and academia.

The next, and more visible class would be what we often term the Bourgeoisie, taking the Marxist interpretation; these are the people who, subject to government rule, man the levers of the system of globalist capitalism, as we now know it.

winning_cup_hawke_bond_1sn0ctv-mr_udnu73a
Bob Hawke and Alan Bond, wealthy yes, but also influential beyond the power of money

Members of this class, just as two examples would include people such as Malcolm Turnbull and Bob Hawke, though they may be spectacularly wealthy by working class standards their main power lies in their freedom of movement through these key decision making sectors of society.

Third on our list is the upper middle class, who could loosely be described as the people who keep those five key structures of power running on behalf of the bourgeoisie; they may be senior bureaucrats, lawyers, union officials, journalists or artists of one sort or another.

Well, known figures in the upper middle class are people of the calibre of Andrew Bolt, Waleed Aly, Peter Garrett, Dick Smith and so forth, people who have limited access to the structures of power but who have made a niche as demagogues, mid level entrepreneurs or successful artists.

Well-known figures in the upper middle-class are people of the calibre of Andrew Bolt, Waleed Aly, Peter Garrett, Dick Smith and so forth, people who have limited access to the structures of power but who have made a niche as demagogues, mid level entrepreneurs or successful artists.

It is in this class that we see values and ideology start to play a role in the social status of its members, rather than the raw power of wealth; we could argue that it is the class from which a lot of lower house MP’s, local councillors and, for want of a better term “community leaders” are drawn.

waleed
Race, ethnicity and creed matter little in the upper classes

It is also at this level of society that race, religion and ethnic background start to really matter in determining social status; whereas the Bourgeoisie is largely blind to such concerns the upper middle class will routinely impose themselves, in a broad sense, as representatives of particular groups in society.

Of course, the politics of the upper middle class tend to be egalitarian, in that they are bound by ethics, codes of conduct and social mores by virtue of the fact that they, unlike the classes above them, have to make a living largely by their own enterprise.

The Middle Class, having a measure of financial security are able to contribute their time and a share of their resources to causes such as sporting clubs, schools, political parties, churches and other community projects. 

Their values are that of the shopkeeper, anyone who has the money can partake of their wares, however, they see themselves as protectors of this broad class of clientele and wish to maximise their sales by catering to every whim and taste of their customers.

So the upper middle-class, when active in the community and thus visible to the two lower classes will style themselves as benevolent and virtuous, taking up the causes of those perceived to be “less fortunate” in the name of equal opportunity for all, as long as everyone knows their station in life.

GreensMPsGroup-th
The Australian Greens, a solidly Middle-Class outfit

We come then to the “middle”, whom we shall simply term the Middle Class, for the sake of clarity. These are the people who, while not struggling to make ends meet must still work for a living, generally as employees or sole traders; they may own one or two properties, be able to partake in leisure activities and political activism but they have very limited access to the structures of power save by appeal to those higher up the ladder.

The Middle Class, having a measure of financial security are able to contribute their time and a share of their resources to causes such as sporting clubs, schools, political parties, churches and other community projects. They are the rank and file party branch members, the activists, social justice warriors and club men who, while feathering their own nest are able to devote their energy to achieving specific communal goals at a grass roots level, as opposed to the abstract egalitarianism of the Upper Middle Class.

Below them is the Working Class proper, the skilled workers on salaries, university educated or qualified in a trade or profession in most cases they mirror the Bourgeoisie in terms of drive to succeed and financial self interest, but they are mostly apolitical and place little value on the abstract “virtues” of the Upper Middle Class.The Working Class will join trade unions and social clubs if it is in their interest but in general, they are apolitical; they are worldly enough know that they are cut off completely from the structures of power and they tend to resent to some extent those who are supposedly their betters, especially politicians.

The Working Class will join trade unions and social clubs if it is in their interest but in general, they are apolitical; they are worldly enough know that they are cut off completely from the structures of power and they resent, to some extent, those who are supposedly their betters, especially politicians.

This class of builders, office workers, junior public servants, consultants and sub-contractors are self-reliant in that they practice what might be called Anarcho-Syndicalism; they, for the most part, are able to set the price of their own labour and will form temporary, ad hoc partnerships and syndicates in which profits are made.\

the block
The Block, relatable working class archetypes for the mass media age

Generally, this class sees politics as means to an end for the upper classes and views government policy as something which is done to them, rather than for them, to that end there is widespread avoidance of “red tape” and corner cutting when it comes to compliance with rules and regulations.

This is the anarchic part of the Working Class make up if we take anarchy to mean self-rule as opposed to the nihilistic connotations of Bohemian “anarchism”; the anarchic worker, as far as possible, games the system and breaks the law insofar as those laws might inhibit his making a living.

This class of people, in general, will fiddle things to their own advantage in a self-centred fashion but not go overboard into outright corruption or the self-destructive criminality seen in the truly marginalised people, they are thus viewed with a degree of hostility by the Upper Middle Class

Marginalised people are the minimum wage slaves, the itinerants, contract workers, the disabled, pensioners and others who are purposely shut out of the financial-political power structure and spoken over by the middle and upper classes.

The final class of Australian we will call the Marginalised Class, as this is the description which most closely fits their situation, for the most part.

Marginalised people are the minimum wage slaves, the itinerants, contract workers, the disabled, pensioners and others who are purposely shut out of the financial-political power structure and spoken over by the middle and upper classes.

A person on the margins of society has no material security in comparison to the other classes, he doesn’t starve, but progress above the station of the casual worker or, in the case of an infirmity of mind or body, the social welfare recipient, is both extremely difficult and, nowadays increasingly rare.

struggle st
The SBS programme Struggle Street gave us an insight into the challenges, hopes and dreams of some of our most marginalised suburbanites

These are the people whose fragile economic lives are rendered precarious by globalism and who are viewed, in terms of their class, as an impediment to the ambitions of the upper and middle classes; we hear them described as idle, ignorant and quarrelsome, words which might have come from some 18th century nobleman as he contemplated “Les Miserables” on the streets.

We will conclude this article at the point of describing the present class structure with a view to creating an axis for discussion among Nationalists and our supporters; this analysis will be built upon and developed as a reference point as we explore strategies for building class consciousness and, as far as possible, class solidarity among White workers and marginalised people.

Due to class relationships and the antagonism of the upper classes toward working and marginalised people the only way forward is to start on the outside and clear the margins of all the political competitors, opportunists, Bohemians, criminals and controlled counter gangs imposed upon our people by the globalists.

Our talking points on what we call “margin-streaming” here come into play, where we attempt to build a political movement in the wilderness of suburbia, beyond the pale, with such resources and personnel as can be scavenged from the ruins of Globalist Cosmopolitanism.

 

USA: Demonstrators March In National Day Of Action On Immigrant Rights
A shadow puppeteer out on strike 

 

CTRL-LEFT ICONOCLASM IS PETTY AND DERIVATIVE

CTRL-LEFT ICONOCLASM IS PETTY AND DERIVATIVE

As the culture wars rage on, the Sydneyside Left have now outdone themselves in terms of boneheaded, historically illiterate dummy spitting.

The cretins have made a moonlight, anti-Australia Day graffiti raid upon several statues of historical significance, yet, simpletons that they are, they have managed to tag the wrong naval captain, the wrong colonial governor and the wrong monarch.

James Cook, what is more, made only short visits to Terra Australis, Lachlan Macquarie went home to London once his tenure was up and Queen Victoria, as far as anyone knows, never set foot upon her antipodean colony, none of them has any direct link to January 26, 1788.

Even more astonishing is the fact that all three were generally well disposed toward the native inhabitants of this new world, after the fashion of their time; Queen Victoria, in particular, was well regarded by her indigenous subjects, many of whom saw the monarchy as a mechanism of appeal against their treatment by often tyrannical colonial bureaucrats.

hyde-park
The suspected Hyde Park vandal and his handiwork

Macquarie was even something of a progressive on race relations when he arrived in Sydney in 1810, in our time he would be regarded as a “social justice warrior” and reformer, no administrator is perfect but he was one of the good guys, all things considered.

Of course the picture formed of the monarch by naive Aborigines desperate for the intervention of a greater power to alleviate their poverty and perceived ill treatment was probably wide of the mark, it nevertheless remained a part of their post-colonial folklore until the rise of the currently fashionable, revisionist stream of Australian historical story telling in the early 1970’s.

The cretins have made a moonlight, anti-Australia Day graffiti raid upon several statues of historical significance, yet, simpletons that they are, they have managed to tag the wrong naval captain, the wrong colonial governor and the wrong monarch.

1938-DayMourning
A photo taken in 1938: Protesting Australia Day is not a new idea, you just didn’t see many Whites doing it back then

We would like to point out that this current fancy for iconoclasm among the Ctrl-Left is but another piece of reactionary, copycat behaviour influenced by equally awful and misguided pseudo-socialist groups overseas, particularly in the United States.

Readers will notice that nowadays everything the Australian branch of the Ctrl-Left does is an attempt to directly transplant rhetoric and fashions in activism from other societies; this is due to the fact that their senior members had abandoned the traditional, Maoist influenced but Australian centred tropes popular on the left from the mid-1960’s.

Seattle had a Black Bloc in 1999, so Melbourne had to have one in 2000, New York had Occupy Wall St in 2011, Melbourne and Sydney had to have squatter camps and sit ins as well; rinse and repeat for Black Lives Matter, Opposition to the Trump inauguration and lately a Charlottesville solidarity rally.

These people have no shame, many of the wrinkled faces in today’s Lefty rent-a-crowd flash mobs, we know for a fact, were avid “China Line” Marxist-Leninists in their youth, throughout the following two decades they cynically used the imagery, poetry and folk culture of colonial White Australia as their central motif, in the hope of awakening the “natural Socialism” of the working classes.

Fremantle lefties
Flash forward and every Hippy-Dip White is on the bandwagon, but for how long?

Their hypocrisy has no limit, we have covered, as one example, the hue and cry over the use of the Eureka flag by Australia First Party and the attempt by elements of the new Ctrl-Left to “reclaim” the image in the name of Communists past.

Seattle had a Black Bloc in 1999, so Melbourne had to have one in 2000, New York had Occupy Wall St in 2011, Melbourne and Sydney had to have squatter camps and sit ins as well; rinse and repeat for Black Lives Matter, Opposition to the Trump inauguration and lately a Charlottesville solidarity rally.

So how does that sentiment fit in with their current iconoclastic play-acting and their mad rush to publicly denounce every White explorer, squatter and would-be Bunyip aristocrat of the 19th century?

Nationalists see our history as a continuum, one unbroken line of events in which the whole provides the context for the constituent parts and examining events in isolation is regarded as a fruitless pastime which can only lead a person along the wrong path.

January 26, 1788, and December 3rd, 1854 are inseparable in our political philosophy, to denounce one and attach symbolic virtues to another would be akin to demonising the heroes of Kokoda in 1942 while idealising the A.I.F who fought on the Somme in 1916, only a schizophrenic or a con-artist could wrap their mind around that way of thinking.

Ben hall
Ben Hall, thanks to the Commos everyone who went to school in the 1970’s knows that he was hunted from his station and like a Dog shot down

Right there we have the heart of the matter, the Ctrl-Left, Lily White in hue as it is, comprises a bunch of con-artists and hysterical nutjobs at the top who gather the ignorant and gullible as their acolytes.

This year they are talking about tearing down monuments and going all INGSOC on our national folklore and like their innocent tribal ancestors the urban Blacks are lapping up the lamentations of Ben Quilty, Julia Baird and Bill Shorten.

Nationalists see our history as a continuum, one unbroken line of events in which the whole provides the context for the constituent parts and examining events in isolation is regarded as a fruitless pastime which can only lead a person along the wrong path.

Trouble is, in years to come these same people may well be engaged in another colonial revival in an attempt to capitalise upon the growing discontent among the White workers and marginalised people forced to live under the heel of globalist capitalism.

Do not be surprised, dear reader, if in a few years you emerge from Southern Cross Station to be greeted by a hippy with a Henry Lawson moustache, in moleskins and a leather hat inviting you to the Socialist Alternative wool-shed dance and bush poetry evening.

To a Nationalist who has lived among these progressive dopes for many decades, this is all well within the realm of possibility and those urban Blacks will once again be pushed back to the status of a novelty act in the next failed Leftist play for the soul of the nation.

1989_swaggies
Even crappy lefty pub bands from the ’80s may be part of some theoretical Ctrl-Left attempt at Aussie cultural renaissance

JANUARY 26 IS NOW WHITE AUSTRALIA DAY

JANUARY 26 IS NOW WHITE AUSTRALIA DAY

Another day, another giant step backwards by the self-aggrandising, suburban cultural elites which pass for town councils these days.

Darebin Council, which for those not in the know serves a municipality in Melbourne’s inner northern suburbs, has joined nearby Yarra city council in cancelling their Australia Day commemorations. The stated reasons for the action boil down to pretty bog standard White, Bourgeois virtue signalling concerning the British invasion of this continent in 1788.

Egged on by a handful of semi-professional Aborigines and bolstered by an opinion poll which garnered a whopping 81 responses from a population of 147,000 residents, the council resolved to dispense with their January 26 activities and to move the 2018 event back a day as a symbolic gesture of solidarity with the Indigenous peoples of the land.

Local blacks
Darebin’s local Blacks were vocal in the debate over Australia Day. In fact, they were so vocal nobody actually listened to the 147,000 other residents 

To many Nationalists the post-1994 vision of Australia Day is a joke. At at best, the real meaning of the day has been largely excised from the commemorations in favour of globalist cosmopolitan fluff. The 26th is now basically “Immigrants Day” in all but name.

The main purpose of the council run Australia Day activities has been to welcome new immigrants and hold citizenship ceremonies for the newcomers, to the extent that publicly funded celebrations or parades are held in major cities they focus almost exclusively on multicultural themes.

To many Nationalists the post-1994 vision of Australia Day is a joke, at best; the real meaning of the day has been largely excised from the commemorations in favour of globalist cosmopolitan fluff; the 26th is now, basically, “Immigrants Day” in all but name.

The trend toward change and the “Black Arm Band” approach to Australia Day probably began with the actions of Fremantle City council, who have repeatedly, and unilaterally, tried to change the date of the event, to great consternation among residents.

The response by the Turnbull government, in the case of Yarra council at least has been to strip the city of its authority to conduct citizenship ceremonies, with the possibility of a federally run event being held in Yarra on January 26th in spite of the council’s wishes.

Muslims australia day
Australia Day since 1994 has been stripped of any coherent socio-political message besides the globalist-capitalist mantra: “Diversity Is Strength!”

In expectation of such ban being placed upon Darebin too, we wonder what then the dissenting councils will actually present to their supporters in their alternative programme? Presumably some Aboriginal dancing, a smoking ceremony and welcome to country, activities which they already held on Australia day anyway.

Looking at it from the perspective of the patriotic and civic minded rate payer it is probably better that these dissident councillors keep away from Australia Day; why would the public want councillors cheapening the national holiday by officiating over something they do not believe in?

January 26 then, logically, defaults to a day of remembrance for Whites and a day of mourning for Aborigines, which is well and good since the two ethnic groups are the original, and only protagonists in that historical drama, “New Australians” and cosmopolitans be damned.

From an Australian Nationalist point of view, this is a gift punted straight into our laps by these politically naive councillors, who are more interested in signalling their social status and bourgeois credentials than playing the long game.

If the globalists and rootless cosmopolitans wish to walk away from Australia Day in a symbolic gesture toward racial reconciliation then we can only offer the traditional sarcastic advice to someone who has worn out their welcome: “Here’s your hat, mind how you go”.

Beer drinking
Feel free to go overboard with the trimmings next White Australia Day, Nanny is no longer watching 

January 26 then, logically, defaults to a day of remembrance for Whites and a day of mourning for Aborigines, which is well and good since the two ethnic groups are the original, and only protagonists in that historical drama, “New Australians” and cosmopolitans be damned.

Shaming tactics only work on those with a guilty conscience or people afflicted by the (((Old World))) neuroses surrounding race and identity; normal, mentally healthy Whites might whoop for joy and kick up their heels knowing that Darebin and Yarra’s globalist busybodies will now have to keep their beaks out of traditional Australia Day celebrations.

As one Nationalist pointed out to us in conversation: “Nothing these people do ever works!”, so I guess we really should thank the Green and Socialist councillors of Yarra and Darebin for abandoning their right to voice an opinion on who does what on what we can now rightly call White Australia Day, January 26.

Founding-web

FAIRFAX JOTTER MISREADS SMOKE SIGNALS FROM COOLAROO

FAIRFAX JOTTER MISREADS SMOKE SIGNALS FROM COOLAROO

Fairfax contributor Matt Holden recently penned an article, “The Dallas fire is a reminder Melbourne is not as classless as we’d like to think”, in which he tries, in vain, to make his case for class divides across the metropolitan area.

Dallas, for those not familiar with the layout of Greater Melbourne, is a working class suburb in the North-Western zone, it is one of the green field sites developed largely by The Housing Commission Of Victoria during the 1960’s, that style of commission homes would be familiar to most city dwellers.

The fire in question occurred in a stockpile of plastic products at a recycling plant in nearby Coolaroo, though due to the wind patterns during the several days it took to bring the blaze under control it was Dallas which was most heavily affected by the plume of toxic smoke and ash.

Several hundred Dallas residents were evacuated and forced to spend the night at local community centres according to the emergency response plan activated by the responsible authorities; though greatly inconvenienced by the order to leave there were no serious injuries, loss of life or property among the evacuees.

broadmed-mosque
Soon, mosques will be more common than McDonald’s

Now Dallas is a pretty ordinary neighbourhood in that part of town, people live their lives, raise their families, work, study, run businesses and so forth; the suburb, like those around it, is home to a large number of migrants, particularly from Turkey and Lebanon, as well as their second and third generation family members.

Matt Holden casts a fairly critical eye over the area in an effort to trump up his story of class antagonism, exclusivity and geographical as well as socio-economic divides; Holden doesn’t “go there” on the issue of the area’s large Muslim population, but he hints at ethnic divisions in his analysis.

Several hundred Dallas residents were evacuated and forced to spend the night at local community centres according to the emergency response plan activated by the responsible authorities; though greatly inconvenienced by the order to leave there were no serious injuries, loss of life or property among the evacuees.

The issue of median house prices is raised in the article but in reality, this means little, like so much of the new demographic data available to the layman, via the 2016 census, it is largely a matter of perspective gained through local knowledge.

The quality and age of the housing stock as well as the settled nature of the community would be factors in suppressing the turnover of real estate and the median sale price, not necessarily structural, societal inequality or class chauvinism.

Dallas appears to have a large number of families with children, which is what we could expect from an area which is 49% Muslim; few families would want to leave such an enclave, especially if the rent is relatively cheap and few outsiders would want to move into an area dominated, socially and economically by an ethnic group which is not their own.

Holden cites overseas research into social habits to bolster his thesis that Dallas residents have no choice but to live by the side of a rubbish recycling plant, claiming that the upper middle class purposely corrals off all the finer things in life from the lower classes.

ilim college
Aussie schoolgirls make up for our racist, Christian past

He further claims that disparity in educational outcomes, low-quality government schooling and a lack of private schools is somehow imposed upon the residents of Dallas by the upper echelons.

This conclusion is in no way borne out by the census numbers; students living in Dallas attend private schools in numbers three times the state average in the primary years and double the average in the secondary system. It should have been a no brainer for any competent journalist to conclude that Muslims like to live close to the Mosques and private Islamic colleges which are mostly situated in the West, (which we are assured are among the best schools in the state) just as the bourgeois Anglos or Chinese nouveau riche of the Eastern suburbs gravitate to certain school zones.

Dallas appears to have a large number of families with children, which is what we could expect from an area which is 49% Muslim; few families would want to leave such an enclave, especially if the rent is relatively cheap and few outsiders would want to move into an area dominated, socially and economically by an ethnic group which is not their own.

We could argue that the Muslims of Dallas are in fact getting the better deal in some ways due to the fact that they do not have to shell out millions of dollars just to live close to their preferred schools, they get all the benefits and less of the burden given that their suburb is far from the hell hole described by Fairfax.

The problem  is not socioeconomic class in this instance, especially in relation to the fire emergency. The recycling plant, if properly run, is not a particularly dangerous facility by which to live; the lax management practices and corner-cutting found on site by the authorities were the cause of the fire. These factors were no doubt influenced by the diminishing returns from recycling plastic in the current economy.

The implication in Holden’s article is that such a facility would not be tolerated in the affluent Eastern suburbs, and that the bourgeoisie would use their clout to have it shut down as a health hazard before any adverse impacts on their community.

Who can say one way or another? We suspect that Holden’s attitude stems from the fact that people of his social class wouldn’t like to work in a recycling plant, so they see no benefit in having it in an urban setting; the inhabitants of Dallas and surrounds might have a different view given that blue collar jobs are becoming harder to find in the globalised economy.

One way of looking at Dallas is as an intentional community which is developing in accordance with the tastes, needs, and aspirations of its ethnic majority groups; this is not without precedent in Victoria and is a predictable result of the programme of multiculturalism.

We suspect that Holden’s attitude stems from the fact that people of his social class wouldn’t like to work in a recycling plant, so they see no benefit in having it in an urban setting; the inhabitants of Dallas and surrounds might have a different view given that blue collar jobs are becoming harder to find in the globalised economy.

Take for example the ostensible, intentional White enclaves of Eltham, Daylesford or Castlemaine, communities where elements of the White middle and skilled/artisan working classes have migrated, en-masse to set up societies catering to their needs, tastes and aspirations.

Instead of Islamic colleges, there are Steiner schools and community colleges, artisan bakers and funky European style Boites stand in place of the Shisha parlours and Kebab joints while the folk festivals of the White enclaves mirror the Eid and Mawlid observances of the Muslims.

Mawlid
Everyone is welcome – to assimilate to Islam

Never the twain shall meet, at least if things stay the way they are, yet this distance has really nothing to do with social class and everything to do with ethnic cohesion and the natural tendency for people to feel most relaxed and emotionally centred when surrounded by people with the same attitudes and aspirations as themselves.

The differences in median family income between the White enclave of, say, Castlemaine and Dallas is a few dollars a week.  Both communities are cohesive, vibrant and stable, yet very different in terms of ethnic composition; leading us to conclude that people choosing to live in these intentional communities place a premium on things outside the realm of purely material prosperity. There are class divides, and Nationalists are well aware of this, but the Dallas fire emergency reveals nothing about the state of society beyond the effects of over 40 years of multiculturalism, in spite of Matt Holden’s desperate attempts to frame it as such.

We understand that our class antagonists operate through the projection of power, via their access to the media, the machinery of state, big business and academia but the author, Holden, being a part of that system is unlikely to ever see things clearly or to admit the truth even if he knew it.

CSF  FINALE
Festival of the Snowflake