NEWSPEAK HATE SPEECH LAWS HIT NEW SOUTH WALES

NEWSPEAK HATE SPEECH LAWS HIT NEW SOUTH WALES

New laws come into effect in NSW this week. Anyone “inciting violence” on the basis of race, minority religious status, sexual orientation, or this bogus Orwellian construct of “intersex people” face $11,000 fine or three years in jail.

United Nationalists Australia declares this the ‘Newspeak laws’ since anyone threatening violence against anybody is or should be, dealt with under existing laws. However, these laws, which were lobbied for hard by “minority organisations” adds a special status to anyone in these favoured political categories. This makes the rest of us (White Australians) an increasing sub-class subject to greater social restrictions and with less access to similar legal consideration.

politics-immigration-immigrants-american_politics-inboxes-outboxes-cgon838_low.jpg

Nationalists have long felt the “un-person” status by crossing the social rubicon and calling out occupied multiracial Australia. The Police are disinclined to act upon threats against us by extremist groups linked to institutions of globalist organized-thuggery such as the Construction Forestry Mining, Maritime and Energy Union (CFMMEU). Likewise, complaints based on incitements to violence, such as those by members of the clandestine terror group Antifascist Action, are ignored by a compliant state apparatus.

Now, the discussion about the ethnic cleansing of true Australians as defined by the European settlers of this land and who created this nation that all these rapacious other races swarm to will have to be necessarily handled by the more articulate and savvy among us. The reckless and immature propaganda purveyed by the likes of Antipodean Resistance only ever helped create these laws just as much as it managed to cause its British counterpart and inspiration National Action to become a proscribed organisation in England.

Make no mistake, the signifiers used in mainstream anti-White propaganda are unashamed in highlighting the fact these laws are aimed at White Australians. A screengrab from a June ABC report on the laws uses an image of patriots standing with Aussie flags to illustrate the story and secure in the reader’s mind just who these political amendments to the Crimes Act 1900 target.

dadgg.png
The red arrow points to the subjects of this bill. Yes, White Countries have a habit of legislating heavily against their own people in favour of every other non-threatened race on the face of this yellow, brown and black planet

The bill is called the Crimes Amendment (Publically Threatening and Inciting Violence) Bill 2018 and we probably have Nick Folkes, Neil Erikson, Mark Campbell-McDonald, Shermon Burgess and Ralph Cerminara to thank for it. There are three schedules the first of which inserts section 93Z into the Crimes Act while the second “…removes certain offences from the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 and makes a consequential amendment.” The third makes any of the described offences against the special citizens a summary offence.

Under the act, it won’t matter if threats are made in the heat of the moment, or if no violence is carried out. The bill concerns what it terms a “public act” which is defined as:

(a) any form of communication (including speaking, writing, displaying notices, playing of recorded material, broadcasting and communicating through social media and other electronic methods) to the public, and

(b) any conduct (including actions and gestures and the wearing or display of clothing, signs, flags, emblems and insignia) observable by the public, and (c) the distribution or dissemination of any matter to the public.

That is a fairly hefty set of criteria and as you can see open to wide interpretation and given the summary nature of the act it pretty much places all the power in the hands of the offended person(s), or group. The already litigious ‘minority’ groups will now be further emboldened to examine any context under which criticism is made for an interpretation of threat, violence, or vilification. This will be particularly so after the maiden speech by Katter’s Australia party senator Fraser Anning whose truths about the state of immigration and cultural disintegration has triggered the globalist jack-booters in the left-wing media to an even greater volume of anti-White hysteria.

And who is largely responsible for bringing these laws about? Aside from the NSW Liberal & Nationals we have a coalition group called ‘Keep NSW Safe’. Who comprises this group? They are as follows:

  • Federation of Indian Associations of Australia (Curry store owners)

  • Australian Hellenic Council NSW

  • New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies (Big surprise there)

  • Australian National Imams Council

  • Chinese Australian Services Society

  • Korean Society of Sydney

  • Australian Kurdistan Veteran Association

  • Assyrian Australian National Federation

  • Chinese Australia Forum (which works for Beijing’s interest to infiltrate Australian institutions)

  • International Coptic Union

  • Vietnamese Community in Australia – NSW Chapter

  • Australian South Sea Islanders

  • Hindu Council of Australia

  • Basmala Australia Inc (An Islamic mob)

  • Armenian National Committee of Australia

  • The Australian Egyptian Council Forum

  • South Asian Study Group, University of Sydney (Asian invaders taking jobs, shifting into high-rise apartments bought by rich Chinese parents, creating homelessness for Aussies)

  • Sikh Youth Australia (Gets to carry knives on religious grounds)

  • Cambodian-Australian Welfare Council of NSW (Pol Pot’s former soldiers)

  • NSW Council of Christians and Jews Inc. (Evangelical warmongers)

  • Australian Hellenic Educational Progressive Association (More Socialist Greek traitors)

  • Muslim Women Association (Burka battle axes)

  • Australian Cook Islander Community NSW

  • Australian Federation of Ukrainian Associations (Shame)

  • National Sikh Council of Australia (Like, India is >>>>THAT way!)

  • NSW Council for Pacific Communities

  • Philippine Community Council of NSW (Fuck off)

  • Warren Mundine (Get on out of it)

As you can see, these pork-barreling “communities” cobble together at the first chance to alter and affect the national character with the aid of the traitor political class. It would be like us shifting over to Arabia and forming the Australian Council of Pork-Munching Beer-Swillers, and then campaigning for the right to strut nude up and down the front of the country’s mosques in only our thongs and terrycloth hats.

However, what is also amusing is that these laws potentially threaten a little-publicised tactic used by the left itself. There are those among the anarchist and antifascist milieu who actually adopt ‘racist’ guises to harass and intimidate ideological opponents; one or two are even known to contribute to mainstream media. In fact, the anarcho-anti-globalist brown shirts are the readiest and willing to use threats and to vilify on the basis of race and religion, which is one of their myriad hyper-contradictions. It will be interesting to see how these laws affect that sector’s black ops.

Meanwhile, it will pay to be very measured in how our side communicates, but more to the point, such restrictions can only refine our language and grant our message precision.

article-5978-thumb.jpg
Once upon a time stating the obvious didn’t land you 3 years lag

 

PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

In the early months of this blog, we promised our readers that we would make an effort to examine the current affairs of the day in a sort of semi-frequent “news wrap”.

Snowed under as we have been, with the antics of our enemies on the far-right, sundry nutcases, cyber-pests and square-eyed Trolls occupying bulk column inches of our output, we feel obliged to give our followers a break from this bombast and have a dig at the big doings in the mainstream White world.

Hipster Melbourne was rocked this week by the death of one of its promising young scions, 22-year-old Eurydice Dixon met her end in middle-class Parkville, raped and left for dead by a total stranger, later revealed to be one Jaymes Todd, 19, of Broadmeadows.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-around good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

tribute
Tributes laid in Princes Park Melbourne for murdered artist Eurydice Dixon.

Eurydice’s talents on stage may have been questionable but being violated and dumped, lifeless, on a soccer pitch in the middle of the night by a marauding, outer suburban sex predator is a sad end for one of our own, who by all accounts did no harm in her short life.

The response to her death by the chattering classes was predictable, even though murders of this kind run at about five a year in Victoria, the usual suspects led by the lamentable premier Daniel Andrews, managed to blow the killing way out of proportion as a sop to their inner city, Greenbelt voting public.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-round good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

This insight clearly went over the heads of the ostentatiously ignorant members of the commentariat; re-animated after the long hiatus between stranger murders, Feminists and their fellow travellers have energised their “War On Women” narrative and began wailing that the problem is “Toxic Masculinity”.

We can imagine these harridans on the edge of their seats as the news of the murder broke, waiting, their claws reflexively drawing in and out of their sheaths in anticipation of the inevitable verbal misstep by Police or public officials, they were not disappointed.

ted-bundy---betrayal
American serial killer and rapist Ted Bundy would strike when women had their guard down, in supposedly “safe” areas.

The Police, who had all the data at their fingertips regarding crimes in the area surrounding the park where Eurydice was killed, and fearing in light of other attacks on women in Parkville, that there may have been a serial offender on the loose made the fatal mistake of urging women to take greater responsibility for their own safety.

From there it was on for young and old, the tired old trope “teach men not to rape” made an early and frequent appearance as did “women’s right to feel safe”, no matter the level of risk they are prepared to take in exercising their rights.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

If we take the three most recent and high-profile cases of stranger murder in Melbourne, those of Jill Meagher, Masa Vukotic and Euryidice Dixon one of these patterns appears, a pattern which is evident in many such crimes across the Anglosphere and across a time span of almost fifty years.

Misogynist criminals, rapists and killers are drawn to locations and situations in which women feel comfortable enough to let their guard down, or are otherwise vulnerable; this mode of operation is akin to that of any other predator in nature, which will attack weak and isolated members of a prey herd, or strike when the animals are at a waterhole.

bayley
Adrian Bayley, his sinister sexual urges would boil over into blind rage against women, he is the real face of misogyny.

Time and time again we have been presented with testimony from woman hating brutes and serial killers detailing their thought process in selecting victims; thinking people such as ourselves are, or ought to be, au fait with the tricks employed by dangerous men.

The more intelligent and devious predators, such as Ted Bundy and Ed Kemper, specifically chose university campuses as their hunting grounds or students as their victims based on the premise that women feel safe in such environments, so whatever ruse the killer might employ would be more likely taken in good faith by the victim.

A great deal of work has been done by the medical professions and law enforcement, both here and abroad, on understanding the way violent men think so as to be better able to predict and mitigate against their actions in the interest of public safety.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

To a great extent the routine activities of potential victims, the environments in which they move and even urban planning must be considered when trying to get into the minds of predators; this is at odds with premier Andrews’ exhortation for women to do whatever they want, whenever they want and for them to trust that putting a guilt trip on men as a group will be enough to deter potential rapists and killers.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

masa-and-killer
Masa Vukotic was chosen at random to be murdered by Sean Price, does he look like the sort of bloke who could be shamed into changing his ways?

Sean Price, the deranged killer of young Masa Vukotic in Doncaster in 2015 travelled all the way across Melbourne to a “safe” suburb and, in order to carry out his plan to blitz and kill a female, he lay in wait in bushes for a pretty “middle class” girl to pass on a popular walking track.

Adrian Bayley, the serial rapist and murderer of Jill Meagher prowled areas where young women were accessible and vulnerable, the backpacker havens and red light zones of St Kilda and the tangled, 19th-century streetscape of Brunswick, which is rich with female pedestrians but riddled with dark laneways and alcoves.

Society in general and women in particular need protection from dangerous men, as we have seen often enough, a single man in his wrath can destroy a whole community; what is needed however is a return to sensible education on matters of personal safety and codes of conduct in which everyone, women included, play their part in mitigating the threat of violence.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

The bare fact is that, contrary to the Feminist dogma, predatory males are not formed by society, nor is their behaviour an aspect of masculinity; such men are freaks and deviants and they almost always live their lives largely apart from normal men, who would most likely pick up on the fact that something is wrong with them.

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

The natural reaction by good men toward abusers of women and girls is to form a posse, hunt the offender down and mete out justice before the savage wreaks even more havoc upon the community, though in modern times we delegate this duty to the state which employs its hired gunmen, the police.

truro
The Truro killers were homosexuals, freaks and total social outcasts who got their kicks hurting women, nobody in the “straight” world had any time for them.

The police in the Euryidice Dixon case merely gave out the same advice we would expect a citizen posse to give the women they rally to protect: until this threat to your safety passes stay alert sisters, watch your backs, don’t take unnecessary risks and do not hesitate to call for help if you feel that something is not right in your surroundings.

So perhaps walking through the park alone late at night, in your “safe” suburb, which is almost certainly a magnet for sexual predators, with your headphones on and wearing high heels is actually making the jobs of those sworn to protect you more difficult?

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

In the end, however, what Feminists such as the Premier of Victoria say in public and what they do in private are likely two different things; we can credit the childless humanities department harpies and their virginal undergraduate acolytes with a lack of sense and a true belief in bullshit such as “toxic masculinity”, but most people do not think the way they do.

Daniel and Catherine Andrews are loving and responsible parents, just like the rest of us, so we highly doubt that they’re going to fill their own daughter’s head with nonsense and send her into harms way under the misapprehension that no matter the risks she takes if she is unfortunate enough to become a victim then society is wholly to blame.

andrews family
Victorian Premier Danny Andrews puts his son in a chokehold just in case he grows up to be a predator

PC IS NOT DEAD – IT IS THE MCCARTHYISM OF THE NEW MILLENIUM

PC IS NOT DEAD – IT IS THE MCCARTHYISM OF THE NEW MILLENIUM

NETFLIX is currently airing a movie about a bunch of Commie — and mostly Jewish — blacklisted scriptwriters in Hollywood during the 1950s in that period from 1947 to 1956 now known as the era of McCarthyism.

The movie is Trumbo, a 2015 biographical drama focusing on screenwriter Dalton Trumbo, who was blacklisted by Hollywood and served jail time after failing to sufficiently grovel to the House Committee on Un-American activities when accused of promoting communist propaganda.

In one sense, he was a hero, who transcended the politics of the time as we understand and characterise them today. On another, he was just a Hollywood spiv cranked up on Benzedrine and polluting his liver while disseminating his ideology through the medium of cinema. Yet, while that is all very interesting, this is not a pro-Commie rave, and he is not our subject; merely our point of entry.

While McCarthyism denotes a period in the mid-20th century characterised by political paranoia about ‘the red menace’, the Wikipedia definition creates a wholly more practical description for our purposes, “the practise of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence.”

What is interesting about it is that it describes the world today — only the ‘menace’ is more ephemeral and the line of delineation broader. But we’ll segue into that hypothesis once we’re done dealing with the confounding shock at the level of ‘sexual harassment’ being revealed in that great new church of ours, Hollywood.

We are seeing Goliaths of the PC capital of Hollywood being crucified on their self-constructed altar for gross violations of their own dogma. The icons of liberalism are being rounded-up and put on public trial and it is, for us nationalists, a joy to observe. The latest is Morgan Freeman, the 80-year-old African American actor and black-rights champion who has been accused of sexually harassing eight women — and not all of them sharing his skin tone.

The movie is Trumbo, a 2015 biographical drama focusing on screenwriter Dalton Trumbo, who was blacklisted by Hollywood and served jail time after failing to sufficiently grovel to the House Committee on Un-American activities when accused of promoting communist propaganda.

The “discovery” of his transgressions has happened at the height of the #MeToo anti-sexual-harassment campaign, and in the shadow of Harvey Weinstein’s colossal downfall for his sadistically predatory behaviour against defenceless, wholly innocent, pure and virtuous Hollywood actresses.

Indeed, what is amazing about the slew of scandals uncovered in this atmosphere is that nobody could possibly have imagined degenerates inhabit a world as morally correct as Hollywood. It is every bit as surprising as discovering that the desert is actually covered in sand. But let’s not labour that gag – in fact, let’s wipe away the irony and consider its implications.

download
The suspiciously bourgeois Dalton Trumbo in a classic communist pose reminiscent of Churchill at work 

The very name ‘Hollywood’ is synonymous with degeneracy — the evocation of the casting couch, wild parties, and cocaine flowing more freely than at a Colombian drug lord’s favourite sister’s wedding. Hollywood stars marry for publicity opportunities, adopt children on the same basis, and live lives that make the Elephant Man’s time on earth seem conventional.

Hollywood promotes degeneracy every chance it gets. Sure, it encourages a heap of good American, good world citizen, good globalist crap, but thanks to Hollywood, corruptive concepts are normalised and brought into our lives. What once occupied the milieu of pornography is now regarded as popular entertainment.

Paradoxically, society has historically regarded actors as equalling a social level of prostitutes, which in a sense, they are. These days, they are the new high priests, and especially if they’re coloured, they are the alpha heroes and founts of all wisdom and enlightenment — while enjoying all the liberal freedoms of hedonism which the average prostitute pursues such as drugs and countless sexual partners — all in a world so far removed from the reality of the average person that they could not be more distant from us if they were to exist on Alpha Centauri.

The “discovery” of his transgressions has happened at the height of the #MeToo anti-sexual-harassment campaign, and in the shadow of Harvey Weinstein’s colossal downfall for his sadistically predatory behaviour against defenceless, wholly innocent, pure and virtuous Hollywood actresses.

Yet, now we find there are “rules” and “boundaries” and concepts of “decency”, hitherto undetectable to the human eye, which have been violated. These binding values are just as enforceable against errant homos too, as Kevin Spacey found out when his alleged history of harassing male actors emerged and his brilliant career nosedived. Moreover, each of the condemned is “left-leaning” politically.

The central contradiction here is tied to the notion of consent encrypted in a narrative-strand concerning empowerment. This particular species of moral relativity asserts its absolutism in the theatre of “slut walks” where females (usually the ugly ones) deliberately set out to provoke with their sexuality while simultaneously denying it — using it, if you will, as a form of entrapment. They wish that eyes covet them salaciously so that they can screech, “Stop looking at me!”

morgan-freeman-quote-whatever-we-decide-we-want-to-do-is-what-we-do.jpg
A fine quote from Freeman. Of course, what he means is, if we decide to play grab-ass, then that’s what we do

One would argue if they did not wish to be gawked at that they hide their flesh, but they use their bodies as a form of ‘empowerment’ by inciting a perfectly natural response that they can then go on to censure. Within the inequality of that performance is the very logic of a new McCarthyism that has moved beyond the black and white of communism VS the American way and grown vast tentacles into areas that govern a range of principles: some political, some moral, some ethical, but others entirely nebulous.

There is nothing unreasonable about women, or men, expecting not to be sexually harassed. And if that whole movement and the witch-hunts growing out of it are simply about changing the working culture in that egregious community then so be it. But these are actors and actresses and Hollywood is a vast stage.

What we are seeing is a performance intended for our consumption. It is an instructive drama to alter the way we think and behave and its underlying message is that men are natural predators. It has delivered a problem, it has identified the cause, but its solution is yet to be decided.

What we are seeing is a performance intended for our consumption. It is an instructive drama to alter the way with think and behave and its underlying message is that men are natural predators. It has delivered a problem, it has identified the cause, but its solution is yet to be decided.

We began by talking about McCarthyism and made a wide curve into the corrupt culture of Hollywood but they are related. For, this new McCarthyism is not fixed to an “us VS them” narrative, but an organic conflict where “us” and what “we” believe is an ever-evolving set of social laws.

A new lexicon is needed to deal with everything from people with physical handicaps, to the Babylon of races flooding into western lands. The terms we use to describe our own sexes “boy and girl” are now the subjects of political revisionism and the misuse of the appropriate terminology may result in falling foul of an omnipresent “House committee into Un-Enlightened Attitudes”.

download (1).jpg
This pic is meant to prove a point but really it just makes us want to reach for a sick bag

There will be no panel seated to hear charges in this era of McCarthyism — instead, everyone becomes a committee judge.

We used the example of the “slut walk” as an entrapment and so too this goes for the rubbing in our faces of diversity. We are goaded with this purposefully-engineered population change, this demographic shift, and the abolition of every expectation we were born to. The media riles us up and then slaps us when those of us not conditioned to the Enlightened Attitudes voice our opposition.

They blacklisted Trumbo and his commie mates. In theory, this meant they couldn’t work (even though Trumbo used aliases to sell his work) and today they do the same to dissidents against the lunacy of the PC world in all its ‘diversity’. We employed Wikipedia’s entry definition of McCarthyism earlier and liked how it referred to “the practise of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence.”

There will be no panel seated to hear charges in this era of McCarthyism — instead, everyone becomes a committee judge.

In this era, to point at the social damage being done by uncapped immigration will earn you such tags as ‘Nazi’ with all its attendant anti-social signifiers and interpretations. This is regardless of whether or not you subscribe to National Socialist views. Your name will be besmirched on social media, and on the Google search engine, and blacklisting will begin.

Employers will Google your name as a matter of routine employment check and the calumny will disadvantage you. You will find that you are no longer treated equally by the police, or by the law. Your blacklisting might not even come about as a result of a division on the question of immigration or race it might be tied to views oppositional to other tenets of this mercurial PC dogma.

Trumbo waited it out — even winning an academy award or two under his non de plumes. In a sense, he helped to shape the new Hollywood. Does that mean his communism won out? Not really, it just meant that the overarching paranoia about it had relaxed. But we’re not dealing with paranoia; we’re up against the mind-viruses of a crypto global dictatorship centred round an almighty, omniscient floating shekel.

Nothing is as it seems.

obama-weinstein.jpg
Picture perfect — Weinstein was a massive financial contributor to the Democrats. But the fat Jew bastard ain’t laughing now

 

A POLITICISED VICPOL STRUGGLES AGAINST THE BLACK UNDERTOW

A POLITICISED VICPOL STRUGGLES AGAINST THE BLACK UNDERTOW

African gang crime in Melbourne is, as we all know, out of control in certain suburbs; in Tarneit, Sunshine, Melton and Flemington the problem is out in the open and beginning to impede upon the lives of ordinary working class people.

To be sure, there is a degree of hysteria surrounding African gang crime, however this is mostly a normal response to an extremely violent, unpredictable and irrational group of people; the fear of a group of twenty Black thugs, high on Ice and armed with edged weapons kicking in your door at three in the morning is very much a reasonable apprehension for the workers of the outer Western suburbs.

We will not labour the point here, it is obvious to anyone, even the most fanatical “Anti-Racist”, that people from the Horn Of Africa who arrived under the refugee resettlement program from the mid-1990’s have largely failed to thrive and that no amount of coddling, or turning a blind eye to their dysfunction will slow their inevitable decline into a widely despised minority.

If the Africans are the errant children of multiculturalism then we can put much of the blame for their horrible behaviour upon the parents and midwives of the refugee disaster: the “do-gooder” politicians, the profiteers and scumbags of the refugee resettlement industry, the opportunistic priests and ministers of the mainstream churches and the cynical armchair revolutionaries of the Refugee Action Coalition.

ecoville
Ecoville community centre in Tarneit, an expensive local resource trashed by African gangs

The trend these days among the chattering classes is for collective amnesia to set in every time a discussion of the causal factors concerning African dysfunction arises; the events of the prior decade, the tensions between Left-Wing lawyers, Police command and politicians effectively led to a decade-long “hands-off” mentality towards Black youth gangs.

The recent history of the African minority in Melbourne was marked by a couple of significant events which led directly, most would agree, to the present state of affairs; the Sunshine police station “racism” affair and the successful lawsuit by social justice advocate Tamar Hopkins against Victoria Police on behalf of several Africans who had alleged Police brutality.

hopkins seidel
Tamar Hopkins, Peter Seidel and their clients in a lawsuit against Victoria Police; police brutality is real, we just don’t accept there is an ethnic bias, they bash anyone if they think they can get away with it.

We can accept that Pig brutality toward young people is an ongoing problem, we just don’t accept that in 2017 there is a systematic bias against coloured kids which warrants such an extreme reaction from Anti-Racists; certain people seem to want want a Black Lives Matter Movement at any cost, even if it means stirring up racial grievances to achieve that end.

Police command under Christine Nixon and later Simon Overland and Ken Lay caved into what amounted to only moderate pressure from the social justice warriors and began a purge of “racist” officers accompanied by a drive for cultural change within the rank and file of the service.

What this amounted to, in the minds of ordinary citizens and certainly among the Negroes, was an order from the top that police were not to interfere with the Africans and a feeling among officers that actually doing their job and chasing down Black criminals was neither worth the hassle due to the refusal of judges to convict them, or career suicide as any trivial complaint by offenders would likely see the hapless general duties cop sacked, if not charged themselves.

We can accept that Pig brutality toward young people is an ongoing problem, we just don’t accept that in 2017 there is a systematic bias against coloured kids which warrants such an extreme reaction from Anti-Racists; certain people seem to want a Black Lives Matter Movement at any cost, even if it means stirring up racial grievances to achieve that end.

Horvath
In 1996 21-year-old Corinna Horvath had her face smashed in by Victorian cops, years later she was represented by none other than Tamar Hopkins in an action against the state

This is how we arrived in 2017 with a small but totally lawless African sub-culture literally raping and pillaging on the margins of society, whatever they were when they arrived from the dark continent, whatever limited potential their children had has been trashed distorted by overindulgence, lack of discipline and the unrealistic expectations of unhinged social justice warriors.

While African and Islander gangs were running amok in Sunshine and Broadmeadows the Cops were planted at railway stations, armed with metal detectors searching Asian students and White pensioners for concealed shivs as approving media crews looked on to “keep them honest”.

We generally avoid epithets on this blog but it is plain to see that the system, by a process of “Californication” turned them from African migrants into “Street Niggers”, that the SJW’s probably wanted Will Smith and Jada Pinkett as their ideal but instead, they created Letalvis Cobbins and Vanessa Coleman.

Crime is a hot topic generally but there is the sense among Melbournians that we are over the hump, so to speak, of the Ice epidemic among the poor and marginalised White population and official statistics tend to back this conclusion; crime is on the wane and the specific types of crime and mob action carried out by the Blacks are almost unheard of among other ethnic groups.

These facts make the recent comments by Police commanders even more infuriating, on several occasions officers above the rank of Inspector, including Acting Commissioner Shane Patton and Superintendent Therese Fitzgerald have denied the ethnic-racial aspect to the African crimewave stating that their flash mobs, muggings, riots, carjackings and home invasions are part of a pattern of behaviour common to “all youths”.

police reciept
The ICR system was a joke, it emboldened the crooks and race baiters by initiating unnecessary stop and search actions just to prove that the system was being used

Youth crime is somewhat of a problem in Victoria, we cannot deny it, but if the Police are going to spread the blame and crack down on “all youth” for the sake of anti-racism, when we know that street gang crime, the crimes which strike the most fear into the hearts of families, are pretty much restricted to the African and to a lesser extent Middle Eastern and Pacific Islander minorities then we have a problem.

We have seen the ludicrous spectacle of politically correct police crackdowns before: who recalls the risible prohibited weapons blitz of the late noughties?

While African and Islander gangs were running amok in Sunshine and Broadmeadows the Cops were planted at railway stations, armed with metal detectors searching Asian students and White pensioners for concealed shivs as approving media crews looked on to “keep them honest”.

So too the trial program set up after a campaign of intense whining by Anti-Racists, where police dispensed receipts for every interaction they had with “youths” was scrapped as useless, counterproductive and an all around waste of time.

If they intend to crack down on all youth crime they need to justify this with proof and, if nothing else, ought we not be warned of the dangers of these hitherto invisible non-African gangs for our own safety?

It has come to the point where the Pigs have to put up or shut up as far as ethnic bias in street crime is concerned, if they have evidence of gangs of up to two hundred White youths, or any other ethnicity for that matter, running wild in the suburbs and attacking people going about their normal business then they should publicise this information.

shane patton
Assistant Commissioner Shane Patton won the booby prize when his boss took sick leave, he’s now in the hot seat as another summer of African gang crime gets underway.

If they intend to crack down on all youth crime they need to justify this with proof and, if nothing else, ought we not be warned of the dangers of these hitherto invisible non-African gangs for our own safety?

After all, we know to avoid certain parks and the areas where African gangs congregate; shopkeepers and business owners in the outer West have already taken precautions to mitigate the threat of mob attacks by Blacks on their premises, even if that amounts to letting the Negroes walk out of the shop with armfuls of goods lest they turn on the staff with fists and concealed weapons.

Time, we say, to name and shame all youth gangs, to make public note of their habits, home turf and all relevant information necessary to the maintenance of public order and safety; otherwise the unpleasant reality is that hard truths must be accepted by police command and their allies in the political or social justice spheres; they must be dragged, kicking and screaming no doubt into, at the very least, a frank discussion of the explicitly ethnic character of gang crime in Victoria.

Ecoville-02
The owner’s vision of Ecoville park: notice that this artists impression failed to include ice addled Africans fighting on the lawn, obscene graffiti and and all the seating smashed into kindling

TWENTY FIVE FANTASTIC THESES ON FASCISM: A REPLY TO SHANE BURLEY

TWENTY FIVE FANTASTIC THESES ON FASCISM: A REPLY TO SHANE BURLEY

Shane Burley of the Black Rose Anarchist Federation website has favoured observers of alternative politics with an article outlining his Twenty-Five Theses On Fascism.

By James Hillman

Without conducting a tedious point by point examination of his theory of Fascism in the post-modern era we will nevertheless confront Burley’s hysterical, reactionary screed on the historical continuity and mass appeal of so-called 21st-century neo-Fascism.

This brand of Anarcho-Idiocy should be laughed back into the oblivion of cyberspace by all right-thinking people, however, as we all know, the basic principles of this anti-Fascist argument are being adopted by globalist-capitalist public relations officers to further the interests of the international commercial elites.

It would appear to the casual reader that Shane Burley is singing from the same hymn sheet as the evangelists of hyper-consumerism, indeed his thesis puts him in a very safe space; his views would tend to endear him to the proponents of totalitarian humanism with their dreams of a global village inhabited only by consumers.

antifa1
Antifa: The guardians of the political vacuum caused by the retreat of the Left

These 25 talking points, even though they are repetitive and obtuse in parts scream Bourgeois adventurism with every line, Burley puts so many theoretical roadblocks in the path of grassroots radical action, applies so many caveats to working-class mobilisation that we might imagine him, in silk cravat and frock coat, swooning on his embroidered chaise through the effort of writing his polemic.

This brand of Anarcho-idiocy should be laughed back into the oblivion of cyberspace by all right thinking people, however, as we all know, the basic principles of this anti-Fascist argument are being adopted by globalist-capitalist public relations officers to further the interests of the international commercial elites.

The basic threads in this neurotic, overly tightly wrapped tapestry of nonsense are that Fascism is everywhere hoovering up doctrine and practical political measures from all tendencies; that even though the Left have all but submitted to the global money power and abandoned radical action the anti-Capitalist efforts of anyone not explicitly identifying himself as an Anti-Fascist must be de-platformed, physically attacked and, if possible, utterly destroyed.

alt-right
The neo-Fascist elements gravitating toward the Alt-Right are just as much blocking force in the road to radical change

Under Burley’s model it is forbidden to hold views which amount to a Third Position, it is unacceptable for anyone to  carry out activism in the political spaces lately abandoned by the Left; “Fascists” should be prevented at all costs from agitating against capitalism and war, for working-class unity or in solidarity with movements of national liberation in the Third World.

In essence, we have a theory which places the Anti-Fascists in the role of ideological squatters, a loose assemblage of people who occupy political spaces merely so that nobody else may utilise them to radicalise and mobilise the working class and marginalised people.

All that these Anarchists are doing is behaving in a manner identical to their globalist-capitalist sympathisers, this approach is akin to the mentality of the property speculator who buys up cheap apartments and leaves them empty as they appreciate in value; it drains his capital in the short term and denies working people a place to live, creating a social deficit in the hope of future profit.

In essence we have a theory which places the Anti-Fascists in the role of ideological squatters, a loose assemblage of people who occupy political spaces merely so that nobody else may utilise them to radicalise and mobilise the working classes and marginalised people.

The post-modern Left as exemplified by the Black Rose writers are holding political spaces aside for some future, utopian mass movement of a cosmopolitan character, in the process draining the political capital of the radical Left through their violence toward opposing tendencies and their tolerance toward, if not outright collusion with capitalist interests.

It is no wonder that Civic Patriot groups are intruding upon the politically vacant, yet energetically policed spaces notionally held by Anti-Fascists; for all Shane’s blather about entryism and co-option of Left tactics it is plain to see that the Civics are moving in upon a political vacuum, effectively a clean slate upon which to write their own dogma once the rabble squatting there has been run off.

PFF
Team Idiot, the Civic Patriots, will take any opportunity afforded them, to muddy the waters and dilute the core nationalist message of White survival

There is a danger here too that other tendencies, with whom the Nationalists have much in common, in their efforts to take the reactionary anti-Fascists head on and break their hold on these spaces would similarly occupy them only to leave them ideologically vacant.

We refer here to the issue of subcultures and the club mentality, as opposed to radicalised cadres prepared to settle into the unflattering roles of, say, anti-war protestors, city councillors or grassroots advocates for the White ethnic group.

There is simply no time left for playing the Antifa at their own games, we cannot afford another fifteen year cycle of clubs and gangs, of edgy internet banter, ironic Roman salutes and any of the other artefacts of the great meme wars of the early 21st century, or the brothers wars of the 20th.

Anti-Fascists such as Burley rely heavily on strawman arguments, misinformation, fiction and the creation of satirical dramatis personae for publicly identifiable dissidents; the Fascists to which he refers are largely caricatures invented by the left for their own ends.

In reality we cannot fight fire with fire, we cannot adopt the same tactics used by the Anti-Fascists lest they produce identical outcomes; bear in mind always that the reason they adopt this hysterical, authoritarian position is that they are, in principle, totally against the idea of any form of politics at all.

We could point out here that the Australian pioneer ethos, that wellspring of the Australian Nationalist movements is fundamentally a form of Anarcho-Syndicalism and that, contrary to their utterances, the Anti-Fascists oppose any and all manifestations of that primal national character, that they are anti-political to the core and as such cannot ever fully occupy the political landscape and develop a coherent, much less a democratic movement.

It falls upon Nationalist dissidents and their allies to not only challenge these ideological squatters and enablers of the money power, to fight them for the power vacuums in post-modern politics, but it is incumbent upon us to radicalise and motivate our people to hold them and establish concrete political principles and a framework for collective action with which to fill the void.

There is simply no time left for playing the Antifa at their own games; we cannot afford another fifteen-year cycle of clubs and gangs, of edgy internet banter, ironic Roman salutes and any of the other artefacts of the great meme wars of the early 21st century, or the brothers’ wars of the 20th.

The time to move is now, the real Left is in retreat and the field of struggle is being squatted by ragpickers, retards and Bourgeois dilettantes, meanwhile immigrants flood in, the suburbs degenerate into something reminiscent of A Clockwork Orange and the globalist money men consolidate their power as they count their loot.

1re2tu
Anti-Fascists refuse to confront the real problem because the solutions are incongruous with the arcane codes of conduct underpinning their fantasy world

THE VOTE THAT SPLIT WHITE AUSTRALIA

THE VOTE THAT SPLIT WHITE AUSTRALIA

Scenes from the revelry of the Yes camp this week uncomfortably revealed just how White it is.

For too long decadence has been sold as a virtue, thus the invidious message coming out of the Same Sex Marriage vote is that us Whites are the ones tearing down our own Christian values, and not some abhorrent foreign parasite. This cannot be ignored unless you buy into conspiracy theories, in which case, the vote was rigged.

We wouldn’t discount that possibility, but, truthfully, it’s unlikely. If you can read the writing on the wall then all signs point to the Yes vote being the overwhelming consensus of half of our fellow countrymen. Resisting this is undignified. Remember how the Alt-Right laughed at Hillary supporters demanding a recount after Donald Trump won the US Presidency? Well, that shoe is now on our foot.

1zjwj8

The Queer lobby, in all its incessant variety: the freaks and transsexuals, the trans-genders, fags, dykes, AIDS fairies and all the derivatives of counter-heterosexuality no decent person would know of or comprehend, both they and their SJW champions are White. Post-vote analysis revealed how it was the heavy migrant safe Labor seats such as Blaxland in NSW and Calwell in Victoria that predominantly ticked the No box.

This is a bitter pill to swallow for those of us White Nationalists who’ve been pushing the concept of race realism. We must now soberly confront that reality — that our own race resoundingly rejects our message. It is non-Whites standing firmest for family values, modesty, and moral stability.

You will hear all the reasons why this is the case and the most likely will be that “it’s the Jews”. We know for sure the Jews will be delighting in our discomfort but to surrender our own culpability for the choices of our people — to suggest that we are so pliable that Jewish Supremacists can twist us up like origami figures as they please — is to belie our argument that we were ever a masterful race to begin with.

No, sadly, we did this on our own, and if we are honest about history, then this is just another chronological step towards the White liberal nirvana where we cease to exist just to be sporting to the ‘lesser races’ that outnumber us in the multiple digits. After all, it was Whites who abolished slavery; it was “cisgender” White males who recognised women’s rights and gave women the vote; it was Whites who enshrined ‘civil rights’ favouring alien peoples who are culturally erasing us from our own civilisations, inheritance, and birthright.

Whites are on a constant quest to emancipate one victim or another regardless of whether or not the object of our protection is actually in bondage. Moreover, these deeds pass without thanks, much less acknowledgement.

Given this evidence, it should be much easier to dispel the universal prejudice that insists we are a nation of bigots. It should be, but it won’t, for the same reason that the Yes vote got through — because the problem isn’t so much other races as it is our own. Yes, it is other Whites labelling us ‘a nation of bigots’, and censoring ourselves over imagined misdeeds to those poor races these self-appointed conscience-bearers among us hypocritically condescend to without even realising it. It is other Whites who foment the atmosphere wherein our status is reduced on dubious egalitarian grounds.

See, what we have here is a struggle within the White race itself; a fight for a dominant idea of what Whiteness means. For instance, it is no accident that Nationalists are White, but so is Antifa. Therefore, the war is not outward, but inward, and rather than sink into a negative pit of crippling despair over this rude truth we must make contingencies to readjust our strategy, revise our enemy, and prepare to fight our own kind. Whites are divided in two, and there is no amount of proselytizing that will win that lost half of our race back to us — it simply has to be dominated, or decimated.

If Whites are to survive we will have to turn against family, friends, and foe alike.  The Whites who want to live will have to “come with” the Terminator.

1zjvt8

EXIT HOMOPHOBIA, ENTER HETEROPHOBIA: “SODOM” VOTERS PROVE DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

EXIT HOMOPHOBIA, ENTER HETEROPHOBIA: “SODOM” VOTERS PROVE DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

Scrawled in pink chalk on a Sydney pathway in the wake of today’s vote on the Sodom Law were two words, “Love Wins.”

This is a propagandistic slogan if ever there was one. We should know since we’ve come up with enough of our own.

Once you’ve understood the slogan’s referential function, deduced its expressive function, surmised its conative function, fathomed its phatic function and flipped by its contextual function you’ll realise what the slogan would properly mean separated from the sentimentality of its addresser is that “institutionalized love wins”. Once you’ve dealt with that dialectic you should be free enough from the propaganda to deduce that this has nothing to do with ‘love’.

Love doesn’t require the formal acknowledgement of an institution to prosper and in fact, it is more likely to stifle and suppress that love.

Moreover, you must grapple with the logic of tearing down the pillars of an institution to institutionalise that which the former pillars existed to ensure did not endanger the institution that was in place to safeguard against what the new institution formally validates. Meaning, there was, beyond what the Cultural Marxists who voted Yes perceive, more to the institution of marriage than “love”. Indeed, it was a social contract beyond enshrining the rights of deviant minorities into law.

But before we use the word deviant we must now readdress the contextual relevance of that word since deviancy can only really be determined by the majority of society and policed by its agents of social control, such as the media, lawmakers, academics, politicians, Waleed Aly and so forth.

Even here we have a problem since the degenerate homos who have won this “right” to smash apart a sacred pact between a man and a woman are not of themselves in the majority but the reverse. It is their agents who are in the majority.

gay
Consider this when putting shekels in the coffers of these corporations who have forced upon us the reign of everything abominable to a healthy society

For that matter, the vote only passed by a rabbit’s dick of 7% with some Labor electorates like ‘Calwell’ in Victoria, named after our Nationalist Aussie hero Arthur Calwell, doing us proud by voting No. Now it is down to the traitor political class to pass this bullshit law and applaud themselves for having totally fucked everything that this country once stood for. It is now in the hands of the banks, corporations, and the hedonistic consumers who keep their share portfolios fattening with profit. This same-sex marriage vote was, after all, pushed heavily by media and the corporations.

Anyway, having digressed for a moment, we have ascertained that the majority has granted the minority an unequal representation among the majority. If we tie that back to what social science once understood about deviancy we now have anyone from the former institution who is strident enough to hold firm to their beliefs cast on the outside of what society now upholds to be ‘normal’. The respectable is now the outsider and the deviant is the pillar of this brave new society.

Since we’re talking about institutions, it seems fair to acknowledge that garbage from the baby boomer generation who trampled this filth into our lives — who inculcated these Cultural Marxist codes into the heads of our youth via the institutions they took over — were the ones who loathed the very concept of the institution of marriage. Their lot burned their bras and jockstraps and went in for “free love” and threw things at Servicemen returning from the horrors of America’s doomed war in Vietnam.

lesbian-wedding-14.jpg
This is an SJW two-fer deal, yet get the dyke White woman with the black dyke and they may adopt a White male baby and kill it

Yet, here are the fruits of their decades of campaigning — they have killed the social and religious premise of marriage. They have redefined it and in doing so have set in motion an entire wheel of social changes that will exclude, criminalise, and disadvantage all of those whose ideological and religious convictions now place them as an “other”.

The despised “cisgender” White male; the devout Christian; the fervent social conservative are all now outside of that societal approval and therefore beyond the gates of the institution which ironically once upon a time they were the most ardent advocates for.

Any parent who doesn’t wish their child to be taught the finer points of buggery by a genderless freak reared in the social laboratory of modern society will be demonised, ostracised, and — if they aren’t just patronisingly dismissed as absurdly quaint — used as an example of that which is abhorrent to this newfangled society based on repudiated gender and opposition to the fundamentals of nature. Any Christian who refuses to accommodate a reception or conduct a marriage between freakish gender-confused parties will be sued, vilified, hounded, doxed, and probably beaten up by roaming squadrons of Nazi Dykes, Faggots, and Transgender Chemical commandos.

It will be ironic to see how they must now shuffle their hierarchy of victimhood to accommodate the obvious dissension of devout Moslems, which are still currently a protected species in the Social Justice Warrior red book.

Now they need another cause; now they’ve run out of steam there is another minority group whose interests must usurp that of the majority until there is nothing left but until the day invading armies of Chinese soldiers paint the walls with their soft, squishy, fucked-up, chemically-altered brains.

Yes, folks, we are on the road to being a PC Police State, just like England.

EDIT: After we went to press with this item out came the images from the unscheduled orgy at Hyde Park where fairies, fags, dykes, princesses, lady boys, he-girls and every kind of pervert combo imagined in this age of decadence, got straight down to exposing themselves and cavorting in a manner that would, in saner countries, have them all shot.

4660722000000578-0-image-a-39_1510748685748.jpg
A bizarre dyke with hairy legs, hairy armpits struts half-nude (blarrggggh) in a major Sydney park because that’s what the world will be like now that the Yes vote got through by a whisker.
4660904400000578-0-image-a-42_1510748699620
Broad daylight and the green-light signals for the degenerate exhibitionists. That’s nothing, but, wait till you see the latest dog-collars, leashes and leatherwear for next year’s Back to School uniforms!

oie_JhUXWGI010X4.jpg