ON Friday, June 8, Blair Cottrell lobbed up at a court appearance where Neil Erikson and his Muppets were facing charges of behaving in a riotous manner.

In a pic posted on the Facebook page of ‘Cooks Convicts’, (CC being the latest publicity-grabbing social-media enterprise generated by movement wrecker and state informant Neil Erikson), the two share a quality moment of ‘unity’ together in a café after proceedings. Neil’s hand rests tenderly on Blair’s muscly shoulder as if he wants to start caressing it. It suggests nothing of their culpabilities, contradictions, or their grubby history, much less the gaping hole in one another’s pseudo-political routines.

Yes, Blair was there to show ‘solidarity’ with “fellow patriots” whose charges stem from clashes at the December 2017 Milo Yiannopolous event at Melbourne Pavilion which was a shrewdly engineered riot that garnered not only publicity for its star but those like Erikson who trotted along to leech off Milo’s infamy. The “Milo five” are Neil Erikson, Ricky Turner, Richard Whelan, Garry Hume, and Garry Mattson. Richard Whelan, aka Richie Rich, has been a lifelong buddy to Erikson and has served time for various alcohol-related transgressions.

(Pic Facebook) Neil Erikson lovingly strokes the shoulder of the man he denounced as a Nazi and an enemy of the ‘Patriot movement’. No hard feelings, but

Yiannopolous is a bourgeois homosexual who styles himself as a conservative and Alt-Right “troll”. He is an unlikely celebrity of America’s tangled Alt-Right. He once made a comment that veered perilously close to paedophilia advocacy and he is “married” to a Negro man so it defies belief that these supposed ‘conservatives’ would fawn after him. Simply supporting such a creature speaks volumes about their (lack of) creed.

This image of comradery comes after a torrid history where Erikson publically ratted on his former United Patriots Front (UPF) comrade, condemned him as a “Nazi”, and held him up to scorn for his audience. Neil also shut his other compatriots out of their Facebook page (a trick he and Richie Rich pulled on Nationalist Alternative) and worked to undermine each and every one of them. And having burned his people, what was Neil’s punishment? What did Blair do? He might as well have gotten down on his hands and knees, pulled down his fly, and blown him for all the disapproval he has publically expressed. Neil is now sharing Cottrell’s videos on his CC page (and endorsing former foes the True Blue Crew), so, here we go on the old Patriot Soap Opera Express. What, in fact, DO any of these jokers hold sacred?

Meanwhile, UNA has only ever scrutinised Cottrell and called him to account for his transgressions of the tenets of the Nationalism he claims a leadership role over but doesn’t uphold. Moreover, Cottrell genuinely despises us, even though we’ve never judged him on anything which he hasn’t said or done. Our criticisms have always been in the interests of the furtherance of Australian Nationalist focus; something we’ve never compromised and have held to steadfastly. Yet, he would not come down and show solidarity with us at any court appearance. Interesting, no? Added to that, he will talk to the mixed-race civics from The Unshackled on identitarian issues or, as he actually did, stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Sri Lankan Christian dingbat Danny Nalliah’s people before he ever accepted the Australian Nationalist community.

Yiannopolous is a bourgeois homosexual who styles himself as a conservative and Alt-Right “troll”.

Blair’s disdain is instructive of everything we’ve upheld about him and the infected milieu he inhabits. United Nationalists Australia has long maintained that Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell are about as nationalist as the parking lot outside of SBS studios. They may fool their cliquey Lads Society admirers, but they haven’t hoodwinked staunch nationalists such as us (although they did beguile others who call themselves nationalists).

Blair and Tom’s refusal to heed anyone of wider experience has fostered their self-deceiving soma. Owing to their insistence on dictating to others, an authority they have granted to themselves on the basis of conceit and a popularity derived from the lottery stakes of their proximity to the Reclaim Australia movement at its media heyday—and while bearing in mind that in the overall scheme of things they are still political greenhorns—means they never will. Putting it colloquially, they think they’re the duck’s guts.

(Pic Facebook) Neil and soon-to-be Kook’s Convicts: Some bloke (L), Ricky Turner, Nool (C), and Richie Rich

Therefore, it’s irksome to honest activists that they’ve come along and wilfully disturbed the already chaotic thermosphere of the pro-Australian vanguard. But, our revolution is not theirs, since they are unable to articulate what their struggle actually is. Their mission, such as it can be discerned, is a hodgepodge of foreign identitarian concepts mixed with fragments of Australian nationalist rhetoric they’ve appropriated and used as adornments to their stage-managed facade.

This doesn’t mean that those veterans are vexed at their appearance in the theatre over lack of obsequiousness to ‘elders’, but they are understandably bothered by the damage these kids cause through their politics of personal identity wherein they take from the collective to expand their individual profile (although that more describes Blair than it does, Tom, speaking fairly). We know, too, that their defiance is grounded upon their fear of having their intellectual flaws laid bare.

Subsequently, they bob around and around in the civic patriot eddy while their Nationalism, such as it is, remains a general identitarian facsimile of what overseas ‘Alt-Right’ personalities are saying, kept strictly in-house lest they are held to any branding.

Blair and Tom’s refusal to heed anyone of wider experience has fostered their self-deceiving soma.

Given that we’ve so consistently argued these are not Nationalists, why should it even concern us?

Tom and Blair have contrived to market themselves as Nationalists, as has Neil Erikson, and others who fly around in their clucky coup. The Lads have conspicuously employed the Southern Cross on their Facebook page and in their clubhouse (which they are entitled to do) not because they are nativist, but because the Australia First Party uses it. They made a point of interposing themselves to poach any would-be members to their circle where they’ve fed them a poisoned line about established Nationalist organisations. It’s the equivalent to a shop owner stealing his competitor’s sign so he can misguide the other’s customers.

So conservative, so Alt-Right, so incredibly race-mixingly homo: Milo, the hero of the hardcore Aussie Patriot movement. You cannot get more Aussie or conservative than him

They posit their club as “the only hope” while Tom Sewell is reputed to have remarked that sleeping with Asian women is OK “so long as you don’t get them pregnant”. No, it’s not OK. Blair said on ABC TV that “you don’t have to be White” to be a patriot, echoing the queen of civics, Pauline Hanson. But on the same hand, he talked about White identity to The Unshackled, which is multi-racialist and definitely no Nationalist mouthpiece.

As such, they would come onto ground, appropriate symbols which hold meaning to us and then undermine all the values inherent in them. They vacillate, so they say, to popularise a demonstrably failed strategy and certainly nothing original.

And how do they handle criticism? Right now, they’re engaged in the most puerile trolling antics. An associate member of theirs, ‘Darcey’ from Vic, has been creating fake Facebook profiles mocking critics of Tom Sewell. They share it around the Lads and all of them jump on board “friending” these fake pages. And Tom finds it funny as hell. How advanced of them. This is what their dynamic resorts to in place of having any actual words to state their case.

Subsequently, they bob around and around in the civic patriot eddy while their Nationalism, such as it is, remains a general identitarian facsimile of what overseas ‘Alt-Right’ personalities are saying, kept strictly in-house lest they are held to any branding.  

Blair getting chummy with Neil, who he should have bashed on sight, is another example of how staying in that half-stepping pseudo-celebrity terrain between nativism and the global ‘Alt-Right’ is more important than conceding to Nationalist beliefs. Furthermore, they will never do this because of their misguided conviction that Patriotism is inexorably intertwined with ‘conservatism’.

They cannot understand that our Nationalism is based on the traditional Australian labourist movement of early last century. They consider this “communist” in flavour, even though at the time Nationalists were attacked by both the conservatives and the communists. Nationalism is a third position neither left nor right.

And what of the evil clown Erikson? Neil has no discernible politics at all, and he is not fit to represent anybody. He couldn’t even hold his small family together: as soon as he moved to Tasmania to mooch off his missus’s people she threw him out for being a useless pilchard. He can’t hold a job because his shenanigans and desire for notoriety override his need to provide for his family. Nevertheless, he wants to ‘represent’ the Australian people and as such, in a wonderful arc of bullshit at court, he and his retarded entourage managed to evade an order on their bail conditions requiring they do not consort with one another. Why? Because he argued they’re starting a “political party” around “Cook’s Convicts” and they need to brainstorm together. This lot haven’t the combined mental energy to figure out how to unpack a box of groceries and if Fortitude failed, this palooka has a less than one in two-hundred trillion chance of getting registered.

More amazing, however, is that Gold Coast businessman Daniel Spiller was actually prepared to finance this walking disaster in another spectacular nativist move to bring a couple of foreign Alt-Right shuckers into Australia for a speaking circuit. In what was dubbed ‘Future Now’, he planned to finance the degenerate Yiannopolous back for another swing, along with ‘Proud Boy’ Canuck kook Gavin McInnes and Info Wars Alex Jones. Erikson was to join them, which would have created the impression he was in their ‘league’ whatever that’s supposed to figure as.

Spiller may also account for how come a bum like Erikson and his fellow debris can afford to travel all around the country when they should collectively be unable to afford the price of a McDonald’s cup of coffee.

Meanwhile, another one with more money than sense, David Pellowe of Axiomatic Events is adding to the improved wisdom of proud patriots by bringing Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux to Australia. Erikson and Turner along with some knuckleheads travelled to Queensland to storm his front door over accusations that he—along with Nool’s former Zionist ally, Avi Yemini—had sabotaged Spiller’s Future Now event by claiming to media that “Nazis” were organising the event.

Slapstick theatre aside, it says so much about this lot and their supposed ‘patriotism’ that they shun the many local veteran Nationalist speakers with so much to share for free in favour of Canadians speaking a generic ‘conservative line’. Molyneux is no Nationalist, or even White Nationalist, he is, if anything, a Libertarian, while Lauren Southern is an Alt-Right conservative without a real clue about Australian Nationalist issues. What’s more, to see them will cost upwards of $80 to $800.

Do not be mistaken; this sweep of conservatives trying to pass themselves off as Nationalists is just the same old players with a couple of new faces thrown in. Erikson is being funded from somewhere other than possibly Spiller, and it doubtless all ties back to the Liberal ‘far right’, he is speaking to the state, and the entire edifice of this ‘Cook’s Convicts’ and now Blair’s ‘Lads’ is just another conservative front misdirecting the eternal dumb that support them. No one expecting any sort of Nationalist result we see anything resembling change by supporting this string of show ponies.

Serious Nationalists never deviate from our position or compromise our principles and this implacability seems to upset these Patriots who trade allegiances like they change their socks (if in fact, they change their socks). We never make allies with those who’ve been proven to have violated codes of honour. What’s more, we are not squeamish about our Australianness, while waving flags and claiming to be “loyal patriots”.

Likewise, we don’t carelessly publish videos that inadvertently dox our own members, such as the brains trust at The Lads managed to achieve with their crowing ‘fight night’ videos posted to their FB page.

A lovers quarrel erupts over who is more Alt-Righty and less Nazi and more Aussie



According to a confidential source with intimate ties to the Sydney Lads Society, their shady leader has, pardon the pun, a dark secret he is keeping closely guarded — he has Maori ancestry in his bloodline.

Mark McDonald, who is also known as Mark Campbell, among other aliases, is one of the cagiest cats in the Identitarian alleyway. Speaking on the assurance of anonymity, our insider says, “He has these two old people that he tries passing off as his parents. But there is no way they are his parents. He doesn’t want us to know who his real parents are because that will just confirm our suspicions about his tainted heritage.”

We fully support our New Zealand brothers and sisters, but we’re sure our Nationalist friends in NZ would agree it is not the place of Australian Nationalists to dictate New Zealandness to them. Likewise, it’s too much to cop that Mark “Matey Mate” is here trying to tell Australians what the deal is with our own kind. It’s doubly galling to know that the Lads Society’s supreme leader, Thomas Sewell, is himself a Kiwi.

We ran a little digital scan test. And we needed surgery after laughing so hard

But whereas we’re sure Sewell’s bloodline is clean of Maori genetics, it is very likely that the same cannot be said of his illustrious Sydney 2IC who our deep-throat describes as being “as dumb as a box of broken hammers”.

Apparently, Matey Mate’s grey matter is likely to present a concern since he cannot hold a serious discussion about politics and lacks educational basics. “If you asked him whereabouts Belgium sat on the world map, for instance, he’d probably point at South America.”

Matey Mate in his 45-degree bomber jacket

McDonald, or Campbell, or perhaps Tunafahekatamooki, is also said to be “back on the steroids” to improve his body image as Lads’ tribal chief. He appears to be on rocky ground leadership-wise, too, since his bidding to have Nick Folkes’s “boy” Toby Cook come aboard and join The Lads was down-thumbed by a majority vote. What’s even more curious is why he’d want an embarrassing lump like Toby in the club in the first place; perhaps since their mixed-race peccadillo is something they can both share. Or maybe there is a more sinister agenda at work given his connections to Liberal party para-state operatives and his relationship with cronies that surrounded the former Party for Freedom.

But this is not the only area that McDonald/Campbell has clashed with club policy: he is breaking with the strict Men’s Movement ideals of the Lads by reportedly having “gotten engaged” to an actual female. It is hoped that his bride to be is well-off with her own home because Matey is back in Summer Hill living at Club Squalor in the dilapidated house belonging to former PfF member Jerry Dragosevic. There are so many holes in the floor, ceiling and walls at Club Squalor that any attempt at consummating his marriage could lead to him unwittingly providing a free peep show to his landlord. But given that Matey is “back on the steroids” then the shrivelled offerings this will make of his wedding tackle makes that scenario most unlikely.

Lastly, our source made mention of reports that Matey Mate has “bragged” about having “frequently met with ASIO” and how he “enjoys a protected status because of it”. This is nothing more than what UNA has maintained from the get-go. But now he’s the Lads problems and given that it’s all just one deep murky pond in which the same toxic fish all swim and feed off the usual plankton it’s of little concern to us. We do, however, enjoy a good gloat from time to time.

Once Were White Nationalists





BACK IN 2015, the bulk of the patriot movement was dodging any accusation they might be ‘racist’ in the hope of garnering widespread acceptance. The Nazis were infiltrating Reclaim Australia, or so they complained.

But the civic patriots who gathered at rallies in Australian cities weren’t about White supremacy or worshipping Hitler, which they believed were synonymous. No, they were a mainstream movement where anyone was welcome so long as they ‘accepted our values’ and abided by ‘our laws’. It was a refrain coming loudest from the queen of civic patriots, Pauline Hanson, who pushed smiling media opportunities with African children. She even forged a slogan saying ‘You don’t have to be White to be Australian’.

Hanson had more to gain from this mainstreaming scam than anyone since it was her that 90% of the civic movement was throwing their support behind.

Steps were taken to oust persons whose views ran contrary to an acceptance of diversity minus Islam. What “our values” happened to be was never satisfactorily defined except broadly as ‘Christian values’. This vagueness was not resident purely in the rhetoric but in the construction of these allegedly ‘patriot’ groups.

Israeli flags flapped alongside the Southern Cross at counter-demonstrated rallies. Inscribed into the core policies of civic patriot micro parties like the Australian Liberty Alliance and Danny Nalliah’s Rise Up Australia was a fundamental support for the State of Israel. Remember, these others were founded on the pretext of a pro-Australian locus yet here they were concerning themselves with a foreign nation embroiled in the military intrigues of the Middle East generating the flow of displaced Moslems which they objected to in the first place. Thus, it was never Australianness they were demonstrating for, but something that the rank and file would never be sufficiently able to articulate, much less understand.

Arch-Zionist Avi Yemini was raised as an orthodox Jew who wasn’t allowed to mingle with Aussie kids. Now he is the duck’s guts of the anti-Islam movement personifying for many disenfranchised patriots these nebulous ‘Aussie values’ while facilitating members of his gym to go and kill Palestinians for Israel. Yemini is the leftover from a milieu which has experienced a cosmic shift since Reclaim Australia activity generated clickbait. He came in almost as if he was selected by forces unknown to challenge Blair Cottrell for the position of patriot leader. It was Liberal Party’s grubby hack man Howard Crawford who cited Jim Saleam and Blair Cottrell as being the two “biggest threats” to conservatism.

Hanson had more to gain from this mainstreaming scam than anyone since it was her that 90% of the civic movement was throwing their support behind.

Styling himself as spokesman for Australian patriotism, he is actually saying that we as a nation are just a strand of a Western Alliance centred around his beloved Israel and to not face up to that is somehow unpatriotic. To show patriotism to this country means loyalty to the ends and purposes of the Western Alliance currently ganging up on Syria and Iran.

Yemini’s Facebook page boasts hundreds of thousands of followers, while he commands a presence in conservative media like the Daily Mail and Sky News; the latter on which he recently appeared drumming up membership to get the ALA, for which he is now a leading member, registered in Victoria in time for the elections. Avi might be in Tel Aviv one minute, and West Australia the next. Just quietly, it wouldn’t surprise us if he is being bankrolled by the Mossad.

Australianness is a simple matter of values, not skin colour, sez Pauline

Yet, in the maelstrom of that ambiguous crossover that always existed between the groups who staunchly supported Israel, and those claiming to be mainstreaming as a strategy, the vociferous kosher patriots have dwindled. With the influence of the Alt-Right, which protagonists from the anti-Islam movement latched onto, it’s not so cool to back Israel now. It’s much more fashionable to come across ‘edgy fash’. Today, even Nick Folkes is a Nazi. Yesterday, he was burning Nazi flags. The component of this alleged ‘Nazism’, the identitarian aspect of asserting Whiteness is the entire vogue whereas only a couple of years ago Pauline was, as we have said, telling us we don’t have to be White to be Australian. Her message was backed up by the same people now professing to be all about ‘the White race’.

Shermon Burgess, when teamed up with fellow political wrecking ball Neil Erikson, produced videos purportedly exposing their fellow comrades from the defunct UPF as ‘Nazis’. Burgess even made a video recommending White Australian men sleep with Asian women because according to him they made better wives.

Now, Shermon has created another of his endless Facebook pages, one of which is ‘No More White Guilt’. He is also associated with former Party for Freedom stalwarts Toby Cook, Matt Lowe and Chris Grantham in a new entity the name of which we won’t even bother including since it will have changed by next week. But all of these people were fervently ‘anti-Nazi’ and PfF made a major campaign out of smearing Australia First Party leader Jim Saleam as a Nazi and burned a Nazi battle flag outside of the party’s Tempe headquarters in 2016. Several names were symbolically listed on that flag including United Nationalists Australia.

Shermon Burgess, when teamed up with fellow political wrecking ball Neil Erikson, produced videos purportedly exposing their fellow comrades from the defunct UPF as ‘Nazis’.

But who were these Nazis so deplored? In fact, Australian Nationalists who opposed the globalist imposition of mass-immigration of non-Whites leading to population replacement of Australians were primarily in the crosshairs of these civic patriots. They opposed only Moslem immigration and then only if they did not “assimilate”. It was, to anyone gifted with logic and reason, an inexplicable position.

Meanwhile, also in their crosshairs but avoiding Australian Nationalists for the same reason was the United Patriots Front. Between the leadership of UPF, specifically Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell, a channel was open to veteran nationalists via, among others, the Whitelaw Towers’ blog and Nationalist Alternative.

UPF steve
Mainstreaming puts non-Whites first for cunning strategic reasons which have something to do with fooling “the masses”

Chief among these communicating was Neil Erikson, the harbinger of disharmony, who would later crucify online just about anybody serious who he had associations with. Likewise, despite the advice and encouragement received from the Nationalists, the United Patriots Front’s Blair and Tom treated us as if we had herpes. They much preferred to be photographed ‘getting along’ with people of colour than being seen with anyone known to be an Australian Nationalist, or the more generic White Nationalist.

They would say this was for ‘strategic reasons’. If they had the capacity to listen and learn instead of dictate they might have been able to absorb that this was a doomed approach. We said so then and we were proved right when their political entity Fortitude crashed and burned like the African space program. Yet, where arrogance and inexperience were UPF’s fault, the others with whom they now sat uneasily in a bloc with, something else altogether was happening.

As far as they were concerned, Australia First Party had failed under Jim Saleam, they were too old, and Blair has a special contempt for Nationalist Alternative the origins of which are obscure. Their bias continues today, but they are joined by equally domineering upstarts, who believe ‘they’ and only ‘they’ are right despite being neophytes and not understanding the history, aims of, and essential tenets of Australian Nationalism.

Meanwhile, also in their crosshairs but avoiding Australian Nationalists for the same reason was the United Patriots Front. Between the leadership of UPF, specifically Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell, a channel was open to veteran nationalists via, among others, the Whitelaw Towers’ blog and Nationalist Alternative.

Thus, they argue, their latest manifestation, The Lads Society, is the only viable organisation for ‘young’ White Australians and others. And the emphasis is most definitely on ‘young’ but we’ll get to that in due course. They are joined by another exclusively young set, which is doing everything possible to provide authorities with an excuse to outlaw them as a terrorist group, The Antipodeans.

It’s a sign of the times that much of the dark humour that resides in The Antipodean’s propaganda materials are now regarded with fear and loathing. About 50 years ago, chuckle magazines like National Lampoon were cracking up a generation with tasteless material that helped shape the funny bone of the times. They were not afraid to touch on race either and frequently did. Posters such as the one in which The Antipodeans would “Legalise the execution of Jews” would’ve slipped in there no worries. But it’s a big ask to expect the Australian people to swallow the thought of killing any group of people even if it is said in a satirical manner calculated to deliberately upset and shock.

There’s always somebody who’ll be silly enough to do it

A major hypocrisy exists with Julie Nathan, research officer with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry condemning them in the name of Jews when Israel’s Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef referred to black people as ‘monkeys’, and for many Jewish people, the feeling against non-Jews is one of unconcealed contempt. It certainly is for the Palestinians and others of their neighbours. UNA views the model these boys have based themselves on and sees them speeding headlong into a disaster which will blow back on anyone even six-degrees separated from them.

An Israeli citizen drags a black by his hair and takes a selfie with the “monkey”. But oi vey, what about the Holocaust says the ECAJ

Nevertheless, the point is made that ‘the movement’ as elements of this melange of rightist entities refers to its associations, is now all ‘Nazi’. We use that term advisedly. The non-racialists are now touting racialist sentiments, even if only obliquely at times, while this appears to be a change it is in fact not; it’s just that the Liberal party connections behind the curtain have decided to absorb the ‘Alt-Right’ the same way they jumped on board Reclaim Australia the moment it got going and steered it on a course towards kosher patriotism. We are not suggesting they influence every entity but they are sure trying to. Right now, the Lads Society is firmly in their sights, only the leadership of that group is too stubborn to heed a word the veteran nationalists have to say; dismissing it as anything but what it is.

In Sydney, they already have a foot through the door with the appointment of Mark “matey mate” McDonald, ex-cohort of Howard Crawford and still, from what we guarantee, moving in murky Liberal-connected circles. If you know your Aussie Nationalist history, you will recognise this is not a fanciful conspiracy theory but a time-honoured strategy.

A major hypocrisy exists with Julie Nathan, research officer with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry condemning them in the name of Jews when Israel’s Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef referred to black people as ‘monkeys’, and for many Jewish people, the feeling against non-Jews is one of unconcealed contempt.

Rather than rewrite this history from the 1960s to the 2000s we include here a link to Kangaroo Reich which details the curious early history of the Liberal Party “rubbing up against the so-called National Socialist Party of Australia (NSPA)”.

It mentions certain names that are still ghosting in the shadows today, hovering on the fringes, and coveting groups such as The Lads Society. And it’s noteworthy that all of these entities of what we shall refer to as an Alt-Right oeuvre discuss among themselves “infiltrating” parties and institutions without realising it is they are most likely to be, and in fact are being, infiltrated themselves.

Familiarity with the Australian far-right’s history helps you see how back in the day when the Liberal Party flirted with neo-Nazis because they were anti-communist in character, these days they wish to direct them into the conservative current or render them inoperable. And this is why it is only ever true Nationalism that is constantly coming under attack as these operatives infiltrate and use these groups as weapons with which to attack the established Nationalists. The one thing that is unacceptable to the Western Alliance is a truly nationalised Australia.

This is why it confounds us that many young blokes of the Alt-Right still keep a foot in the Young Liberal camp. How could they want to? Is it the old familiar line about changing from within, for it is those fools who are the ones to get changed?

Everything on the fringes is something else, or up to something else. For instance, there can be little doubt remaining to all but the unreachable that Neil Erikson is collaborating, in whatever manner, with the authorities. How so? None of his shenanigans, nothing he has to say is either consistent with a political line or true to an ideology. His are just utterances of a conservative style that are simply negation.

Rather than rewrite this history from the 1960s to the 2000s we include here a link to Kangaroo Reich which details the curious early history of the Liberal Party “rubbing up against the so-called National Socialist Party of Australia (NSPA)”.

Arthur Conan Doyle, who created Sherlock Holmes, wrote: “Eliminate the impossible, and whatever remaining, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”

This is a valuable rule when dealing with the hucksters, dupe-merchants, swindlers and hacks that appear in the topography whenever anything vaguely resembling the Nationalistic arises. Indeed, they are much happier with Neo-Nazis since they so easily play into the narrative that serves both the system and its Zionist beneficiaries of this ‘menace’ which they can point at.

Nothing that offers a hope of change exists in those fetishists who are more concerned with mimicking a uniform and profess to ‘White Nationalism’ above nativism. Take for instance Robert Edhouse and Melony Atwood. Robert, who once went under the name Mathew Collins, visited the United States and was granted permission by Aryan Nations to set up a “chapter” here.

This was not a Nationalist entity but a gang. And what did this fervent ally of the White Race do? He conspired with Atwood, his lover, to murder Atwood’s 42-year-old husband, Alan Taylor while living under his roof.

Taylor was a hard-working White Man with a young son by Atwood. He was murdered for a one-million-dollar life insurance policy he supposedly held. Now they’re both serving minimum terms of 21 years. Atwood will be a scarecrow by the time she is released and Edhouse an institutionalised old man.

Arthur Conan Doyle, who created Sherlock Holmes, wrote: “Eliminate the impossible, and whatever remaining, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”

All of this noise around the fringes of Nationalism keeps the real thing from spreading. So rather than accept the tenets of Australian Nationalism those who cannot fulfil its needs bitch and gripe that certain people “think they make the rules”. The rules are tenets and those tenets exist independent of those persons who for one reason or another do not seem to be able to live up to them. So in a rash fit, they simply steal the word ‘Nationalism’ and remodel it into their own identitarian image.

United Nationalists Australia was conceived back in 2016 as an antidote to this violation of our ideology. It came ahead of the anticipated Coalition of Australian Nationalists (CAN). It envisaged a Fortress Nationalism fortified against these unsavoury elements. But nothing came of it. It was immediately undermined by those elements we’ve described that still resided in one or more of those parties involved. It rotted from the inside before it ever ripened. Then, to the horror of UNA, Nationalist Alternative not only never had our back, but they actually threw their support behind Blair Cottrell, of all people; a kid with absolutely no respect for anybody else. This mistake has left the house of Nationalism in disarray.

But that is just for now since identitarian is the flavour of the month. Those young folk who have pledged themselves to certain fraternities masquerading as ‘societies’, which are in fact just club life, risk being set on the wrong path forever, winding back the true cause at least another ten years. Presumably, there’ll be new Liberal agents waiting in the bracken for when that time comes.

One thing is for sure, the anarchists and anti-fascists who so love to quote the others have never and will never reference our commentaries on this link to the conservatives. In some cases, there is an overlap, as the aforementioned are only half of the enemy. The Nationalist finds himself burned by conservatives only too happy to utilize these agencies of the state against him.

David Palmer, one of the earliest to subvert the Nationalist Movement (see Kangaroo Reich link)




The Left is addicted to trolling. If there were no ‘right wing’ Facebook pages, or social media sites for them to troll, they’d fade into a suffocating obscurity; seeking recognition by trying to write ‘urban rhymes’ or making personal YouTube videos or blogging about the insignificant experiences of their drab lives as if in that turgid oblivion of their soul-destroying mediocrity was the nucleus of something far more metaphysical and vital to impart to the human race.

Instead, they inhabit Facebook pages like Anonykatz and entertain themselves by being routinely un-amazed at the typically inane postings of the cognizant-dissonant on the political right of the social-media tennis court.

Their day revolves around entertaining themselves reviewing the latest sarcastically reworked ‘potatriot posts’ uploaded by the admins of their favourite pages and then lending droll witticisms as an ideological antidote to what they’re confronted with. In most cases, one group of idiots is passing judgement on another — and we don’t employ ‘idiot’ as a pejorative here, it’s simply all we can deduce by examining the pathology of the thoughts they express.


If, say, Anonykatz had any grasp of Nationalist politics it wouldn’t even bother with the likes of Neil Erikson or Shermon Burgess, who’re blank cartridges from a circus shooting range.

These characters, like many who comment from their side of the fence, are the product of the social media identity factory and the digital age that spawned it. In the 1970s, Alvin Toffler wrote a book called Future shock predicting the absorption into a myriad of subcultures for a population divided along complex social strata, and if he was still alive, he’d deserve a cigar for this prophecy alone; although he only died in 2016 so he pretty much saw it come true. More-or-less, he predicted the Internet.

There is no political substance or even consistency of message from the flaky characters that Anonykatz fixates on and yet they’ve never bothered to address this in any scrupulous detail — they simply guffaw at the overall ideology as they perceive it — mainly because they are the flipside to the same coin.

They are no more sophisticated than those they deride. The UNA team actually read a poster responding to Nick Folkes on the Anonykatz page who claimed that Hitler went to jail with Heinrich Himmler and there devised the National Socialist German Workers Party. No Katz admin bothered to correct this boob who had the comical impudence to then censure Folkes for not being intelligent enough to have assimilated this important historical fact. But, we digress…


Erikson, Folkes, and Blair Cottrell are the constructions of a media that were once obsessed with the anti-Islam movement and required ‘actors’ for the narrative surrounding this multicultural society of Australia. It inflated them, and then, when it all became passé, they pricked their hides and deflated their spirits, which were always inordinately out of scale compared to the size of any actual talent they might have possessed. They now play a constant game of catch-up with that sub-tier celebrity which, of all of them, Erikson Joneses for the most.

If, say, Anonykatz had any grasp of Nationalist politics it wouldn’t even bother with the likes of Neil Erikson or Shermon Burgess, who’re blank cartridges from a circus shooting range.

Individually, none of those mentioned above is remarkable people. Yet, like most human beings, they crave attention. The need for recognition is one of the most powerful human motivators which are why there are those who’ll seek it in evil and anti-social ways, such as mass-shooters, and serial killers.

Once upon a time, this type of character was the feeder for the music industry as the promise of ‘fame’ for the not-so-talented were offered by the vision of pop stars which they looked at and thought, “I could do that too”. So they formed bands or became performance artists or did anything that might lead to that ‘break’. Andy Warhol observed all this and made one of the most astute utterances of the 20th century — that one day every person would have their fifteen minutes of fame. And Warhol understood fame better than anyone.

This is why it ill-behoves the likes of Anonykatz to feed the egos of these pseudo-revolutionaries, but to make such an assertion fails to take into account that by doing so the players from their camp are exercising their own egocentricities. Again, they are the same animal. Erikson, Folkes, Cottrell do not pursue issues, as would be expected of earnest political crusaders, but rather use a cause to promote themselves. Separated from the substance of issues, we have mere personalities, and a kind of ‘fanboy’ nationalism, which is a term coined by UNA and covered in a previous article.


The Alt-Right gained its infamy through ‘trolling’; it doesn’t necessarily make anything better if the Left apes those tactics which, when all has been said and done, were questionable (although often hugely successful) to begin with. Let’s deal with a semantic before we get down to brass tacks here: We call this opposition ‘the Left’ for convenience purposes, or even ‘Cultural Marxists’, but that’s not necessarily accurate.

Much of what is assumed to be politically Left are actually the lackeys of the pseudo-progressive-democratic-liberal-globalist-capitalist-world-order. In the most basic reading of the morality contest underlying the narrative in which the Left is pitted against the Far Right, the former are supposedly upholding virtues that the latter dream of stripping from civic life for the sake of an authoritarian, race-based order. This assumes ‘good guys and bad guys’ when viewed through the glass of 20th century western struggles against Fascism, Japanese Imperialism, and National Socialism. Here we invoke Alvin Toffler once more because he had another insight into the future. He wrote: “The illiterate of the 21st Century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn”.


In this era, for either side, applying historical lessons, or ideologies, or prejudices from a bygone era is a glittering example of that new millennium illiteracy of which he wrote. So, with the exception of pure Nationalists, or even fluid-thinking true leftists whose worldview we may largely oppose but whose sincerity and logic we might otherwise respect, we have the ‘Katz’ — whose own obsessions are every bit as unhealthy as those provocateurs they make a subculture out of countering online.

The time has, therefore, come to bring these ‘Katz’ into the spotlight. For the main part, those posters who fill the ranks can be easily searched and profiled for themselves. But who runs Anonykatz?

In our last entry, we responded to an article by Honi Soit that claimed that we ‘doxx lefties’ under the guise of self-defence. In this case, we do it as a public service.

In our last entry, we responded to an article by Honi Soit that claimed that we ‘doxx lefties’ under the guise of self-defence. In this case, we do it as a public service.

United Nationalists Australia has been, for a long time now, flooded with requests to doxx the admin of Anonykatz. We have been given theories on who runs it, and countless links. We, therefore, posit the following as a theory which we back up with what we believe is convincing evidence. But as we doxx Anonykatz it is now incumbent on us to out one of its most consistent serial pests — Andrew J. Forster.


There are amusing trolls, there are witty combatants, and then there are those who if they weren’t harassing people online they would be stealing women’s underwear off clotheslines and wearing it over their heads as they tortured small furry animals. Andrew Forster fits into the latter category.

Hardly a nationalist, patriot or anyone ‘rightist’ conservative has not had an uninvited excretion from the poster using the name Andrew Forster appearing in their messenger inbox. He is unbothered by any transgression of Facebook policy, about laws pertaining to electronic-devices and stalking, or even whether or not he comes across as a complete body snatcher.

He has poured vile abuse on women, accessed accounts belonging to minors, attacked the sick, and violated the privacy of at least one person grieving over the passing of a close relative. It doesn’t matter to him. He is not made of the stuff that exhibits conscience nor is he equipped with the intellectual faculties to express an ideological rationale. He is purely a sociopath with access to the Internet.

He is by no means clever — he often gets rattled when challenged to any degree and scurries off to hit the ‘block’ button even though it was he who initiated contact. It all depends on how much alcohol or pot is in his system or whether or not the methamphetamine he has smoked was of a high enough grade. All in all, his entire act is based on a war of attrition, or who will blink first.

The best response to Forster is to block him. You are not dealing with an intellect, but a lummox whose cerebral deadness serves him well in his abusive trespasses onto the accounts of others. The nature of the world he supposedly abhors in the reckoning of his political opposition is exactly the one which he inhabits online: one where ideas must be singular, where the debate gets shut down, and where other human beings are objectified and reduced to caricatures.

Hardly a nationalist, patriot or anyone ‘rightist’ conservative has not had an uninvited excretion from the poster using the name Andrew Forster appearing in their messenger inbox. He is unbothered by any transgression of Facebook policy, about laws pertaining to electronic-devices and stalking, or even whether or not he comes across as a complete body snatcher.

His profiles list him as residing in Perth. In the past, we have had intelligence pinpointing him to a certain address, but we cannot be sure that information is accurate. We do have what we are assured are images of him. We share two of his Facebook profiles, which are queer things. He seems to have a fetish for the obscure matron of the 1990s British sitcom Keeping Up Appearances, Hyacinth Bucket. In others, he has cheesy personalities from bygone pop culture decorating his bizarre user profile. Likewise, when he wants to be tricky he uses the alias Andrew Forester (see what he did there, genius).

Jame Gumb, stand aside, there is a new retro freak in town

UNA recently, through a lengthy operation, uncovered the address and information regarding the business practices of fake news journalist Luke McMahon. We have his residential address, and we know a lot about him now. We are in the process of uncovering even more information. The same will apply to Forster, who has made such a bore of himself we will coordinate with our people – and even those who aren’t nationalists – in West Australia to finally trace him to his lair. That will be a day he will wish had never come. Thanks to a major financial injection by a benefactor, we have resources that a year ago was not available to us.

Well, it’s pretty obvious Andy is an X-Genner. Note how this profile he brilliantly moves around the letters of his alleged surname to create ‘Forester’. We suggest everyone inbox him and congratulate him on his cleverness. Or just keep reporting his bogus accounts

Firstly, we have to question whether or not Forster is his actual name, and true identity. It will be easy enough to ascertain, but for the sake of discussion, we suggest that it might very well be, given the arguments about identity and ego that we’ve laid out above. It is in the psychopathology of someone like Forster to seek credit for his deeds otherwise he would operate under ever-changing aliases such as Luke McMahon has done.

Hip? Forster barely has a pelvis

It is also noteworthy that his profile appears on the friends’ list of lefty author John Birmingham, which might mean that Birmingham approves any old friend request, or else he is known to the man. Around 1990, when Birmingham contributed to Rolling Stone, he wrote an article about Jim Saleam and National Action that was a direct reflection of the lies being promulgated by disgraced Special Branch detective Neville Ireland; which would suggest that a relationship existed between the two. Jim Saleam complained and either a letter was published in Rolling Stone, or there was a retraction, but he cannot say for sure.

It is also noteworthy that his profile appears on the friends’ list of lefty author John Birmingham, which might mean that Birmingham approves any old friend request, or else he is known to the man.

In Birmingham’s book, Leviathan published around 2000, which is sold as “an electrifying epic history of the city of Sydney” reference was made to Jim Saleam and National Action and an incident involving an alleged theft from a woman by him and a man named Peter Coleman. The case was in dispute and when Jim Saleam confronted the publishers those extracts were subsequently expurgated from the paperback edition.

All in all, it appears that Birmingham, who models himself as a rebel, may very well have been a snitch operating with the corrupt authorities of the time.

We are told this is a floor plan to Forster’s Perth home. The hydroponic chamber is listed as ‘BRM 2’

But returning to Andrew ‘J’ Forster, we are also informed that he might be lying about the ‘J’ initial in his name, as we are told his name is Andrew Robert Forster.

Whatever, the thing to do now with all his accounts, if you do not block them, is to inundate them until it becomes unviable for him to post any more of his scurrilous silliness. Troll the troll. Find him wherever he is and just let him have it. His accounts are most likely fake so there is little point in him crying to Facebook, and you can make all sorts of threats, and say any sick thing that comes into your head, because the police simply won’t do a damned thing about it and he is too compromised to make such a complaint anyhow. Go for it. He is a real petal; a total snowflake.


download (2)

The most obvious eccentricity of those running Anonykatz is their obsession with felines. It goes beyond a simple shtick and into the realm of full-blown mania.

Smith and Anthony Albanese: boy the air must’ve smelt bad when that shot was taken

Therefore when it turns out that noted anti-fascist, the mushy-bellied beer-quaffing Pete Smith and his equally chubby partner Ariana Klepac are the authors of two books classified as “humour” and which reflect an almost Egyptian worship of pussycats it seems a reasonable enough contention that these two are responsible for Anonykatz. At least, this is the theory being presented to us. Obviously, we cannot say definitively, but the circumstances certainly make it highly plausible.

Awww, look at that, Pete’s a Labor man, which means he’s not a proper lefty at all. Slackbastard should stop talking to him

The pair has authored the books How to Get Ahead in Business with Office Cat, and The Cat-phabet: A Guide to our Furry Overlords — From A to Z. We do not recommend you buy these books unless for some reason Kleenex is in dire shortage. Given the level of wit expressed on what may or may not be their Facebook page, the quality of humour is obviously somewhere about the level of Bill Shorten after a few snorts of paint thinners.

Mrs Anonykatz (allegedly), Ariana Klepac, whose public persona along with her partner is as an author of two naff cat books and who looks like she applies her lipstick with a paint roller

Klepac also notably wrote a book titled Stark Raving Mod about the Mod scene in Australia from the late 1970s to 1980s. The book is currently unavailable for purchase.

The blurriness of Katz Palace (allegedly) in Balmain must be down to all the beers Pete drinks to try and make his missus look attractive. And vice versa. Ho ho… just a jolly jape, we are pretty sure both would nab first place in any swimsuit contest

What we DO know is that they both live in Balmain, or Toy World, as some wags refer to it, and if they do in fact control Anonykatz then their background could not be more perfect given the character of the suburb. However, if you want to Google their ‘publisher address’, which is Klepac’s residential & business address, you’ll encounter the extremely odd situation of finding their house blurred out on all Google Street View maps. We are not sure how, or why, one goes about getting their residence blurred out – especially when it is supplied by Google as a place of business – so we’ll just show you a blurry image of the joint which won’t mean much without an accompanying address so they can spare us any bullshit about litigation. As we say, it’s on Google anyway if you search Ariana Klepac. Both are authors which place them in the public domain and their works are therefore subject to fair comment, opinion, and literary criticism.

What also is justified editorial comment in the context of this article is Smith’s alleged connection to the convicted paedophile and former anti-fascist state informant, Alex Gollan. A former assistant principal at a Sydney school, Gollan led a double life as an anti-racist crusader, running a blog called Anti-Bogan at the WordPress site. Smith is implicated in having shared editorial responsibilities with the Gollan, who in 2016 was jailed for possession of child abuse material, released on bail, and the story sort of goes cold there. Perhaps his police handlers, long used to dealing with kiddy fiddlers, provided him with some sort of out clause. We’re sure to find out one way or another. Meanwhile, this does not cast Smith in a very convincing light as a social crusader.

Convicted pedo Alex Gollan was allegedly an associate of Smith

So, folks, there you have it; these anti-fascists are literally a bunch of pussies, with the gayest being Andrew Forster and his psychosexual fixation with Hyacinth Bucket. Perhaps she reminds him of the mother he’s always wanted to get into the sack. Who knows with these sickos? Adieu.

The technical term for this item is a ‘waste of money’



Now is the winter of Nick Folkes’s discontent. This very moment, he is weeping into his 49th stubbie of lager. For teary-eyed Nick, whatever solace can be had, comes out of a bottle. No bottle is deep enough to brighten Nick’s spirits.

Yet, that bottle now defines Nick; it directs his actions, and ultimately contributed to his ignominious downfall. Those high times spent making a goose of himself on SBS reality shows like ‘I’m Not Racist, But’ and being recognised in public are over — his king-tide ride as media provocateur has passed. Nick is now sombrely talking about “writing a book”, or hagiography, which is a concession of defeat if ever there was one. We can think of a million titles for his magnum opus, but the most appropriate is already taken, The Idiot.

Yes, readers, it’s all over for Nick, and even better, it’s the end of the road for his beloved Peanuts for Freedom.

Nick is a man in shock — a wobbly jester struggling to come to terms with his inglorious banishment from court. All his putrid karma has swung back and hit him in the face like the stink from an Egyptian port-a-loo. It has left him even more dazed and confused than one of his benders. Frankly, we are delighted. So where did it all start to unravel for the grotty burke and his obese offsider?

Nick began the Peanuts for Freedom in 2012 after splitting from the Australian Protectionist Party. In its nearly six years of existence, it has never come within a cooee of being registered. The word ‘Party’ in its name has therefore always served more of a pointer to its orgiastic activities than any qualifier of the group as a bona fide political group.

Over the years, Nick has spent more time in Arab drag than the combined hierarchy of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils. Except for those occasions when he’s inexplicably starkers, it’s his number one favourite choice of presentation. Perhaps shutting the curtains and dressing up as the Grand Mufti of Lakemba is one of the last innocent pleasures left to Nick now that the Peanuts have been officially roasted.

Yes, readers, it’s all over for Nick, and even better, it’s the end of the road for his beloved Peanuts for Freedom.

Nick’s hasn’t been the clean death that many of those who wear the cloth prefer when administering the last rites. Periods of acceptance are punctuated by episodes of him thrashing about on his death-bed like Reagan freaking out in The Exorcist; spewing green bile hither and thither on social media. The devil just doesn’t want to leave Nick; he has his nails dug in sharper than a kitten clawing at a tea cosy. But what’s obvious is that he can never rebuild what was.

Those supporters of his that he savagely burned and abused are now exacting their sweet revenge on him all over Facebook. In fact, having said more about Nick than any other blog in existence, we shall leave the final word up to former associate Deb Daldy, who posted a long denunciation of Folkes on Facebook.

We just cannot figure out why people would turn their backs on Nick…

Deb is from Kim Vuga’s party, Love Australia or Leave. As a matter of fact, many former members of PfF are now with Kim. Deb herself explains why, but before we get to that we will recap. The divisions really began long before the infamous night of the Peanuts on Pingas, when Nick, Toby Cook, and Penny Louise got wasted and began carnage calling former members whose numbers Nick gleefully provided. But that was as good a marker as any for the purposes of establishing a point of its decline.

UNA had previously published an account provided by one such insider, who blew the whistle on its drug culture and Nick’s unsuitability for representing any aspect of Australia save for its inebriates.

Certain opportunities to appear cohesive cropped up after the Peanuts on Pingas incident, like a rally in Penrith which he characteristically hijacked, and a protest against the defacement of a statue of Captain Cook in Sydney’s Hyde Park. But like much surrounding these civic patriots, it was largely an illusion with his numbers bolstered by others, including repugnant Kiwi troublemaker Mark McDonald, the Hollywood Nazi who has been appointed Sydney organiser for the Lads Society.

UNA had previously published an account provided by one such insider, who blew the whistle on its drug culture and Nick’s unsuitability for representing any aspect of Australia save for its inebriates.

None of this could mask the cracks, however, and as loyal lieutenant George Jameson and his skank Penny Tridgell moved closer to soon-to-be-jailed sewer-rat Neil Erikson, the green-eyed-monster reared its head. Hell hath no fury like a jealous Nick Folkes, so we’re told, and he is constantly jealous. You could be on the ground being kicked by cops and Nick would be envious you were getting more attention than him.

When Jam Jams split and joined the multiculturalist dental cases of the True Blue Crew taking with him a bunch of dumb PfF placards, Nick went a curious Bananas-in-Pyjamas version of Tony Montana. Nick and his remaining circle of loyal Peanuts accused Jameson of being a “Jew lover”, which is rich given their past associations with kosher conservatives. Unbelievably, PfF’s Jewish second-in-command, Radka Smith, even got in the swing and in one Facebook post accuses “Mr Buttman” (Jameson) of being a ‘Mossad agent’, which is definitely the pot calling the kettle black.

Mr “Buttman”, aka George Jameson, once loved for his Jewish flag is now a Peanuts’ pariah

We’ll just veer off topic for two seconds to explain the ‘Mr Buttman’ reference since it speaks volumes not only of Jambalaya but about his former party. Apparently, Jameson had publically expressed his love of anal sex with the object of his cradle-snatching, Pen Pen. Tridgell, who is more than half Jameson’s age, abandoned her infant child to smoke drugs with the Peanuts and cop it up the date from Jam Jams, and, even more sordidly,  his brother.

Now Pen is preggers and it’s a miracle since women aren’t usually impregnated via their clacker. Either Jameson or his bro is incredibly fertile or now and then they broke with habit and rolled on top of her. But nobody wants to think about that since the image it invokes is too disturbing. Plus, this is a family blog.

This spat has caused sparks to fly between T.B.C and PfF, or T.B.C Sydney and Melbourne or something, and, so we hear but cannot be bothered confirming, Ralph Cerminara, who was the subject of shocking allegations revealed to us by a whistle-blower, is acting as peacemaker. Hurrah.

This spat has caused sparks to fly between T.B.C and PfF and, so we hear but cannot be bothered confirming, Ralph Cerminara, who was the subject of shocking allegations revealed to us by a whistle-blower, is acting as peacemaker. Hurrah.

Meanwhile, the remnants of the Peanuts are reportedly turning ‘hard-core racialist’, most likely with the influence of Sydney Lads leader Mark ‘Matey Mate’ McDonald’. With Toby Cook modelling himself as a racially impure George Lincoln Rockwell, they are attempting to steal the thunder from The Antipodeans by going all-out anti-Semitic (with Jewess Radka Smith wholeheartedly supporting them).

Tobes has apparently created a Facebook group of limited membership named ‘Aryan Brothers and Sisters’. (We know, we know, it’s too much already). We still have all the footage of Tobes helping burn a Nazi flag outside the Australia First Party headquarters in Tempe; just one of the many contradictions in the baffling free-for-all that has bubbled up from the civic patriot swamp.

The saviour of the White race. Himmler would have appointed him head of the SS Racial Purity Division

Now, it’s about time this was settled once and for all — there is no way on God’s earth that Toby Cook is White. His fanatical Julius Streicher act is totally designed to draw attention away from his racial shortcomings. He seems to have the deluded idea that by thumping hard about the Jews he is less likely to be scrutinised for his ancestral roots, which, given the thickness of his lips, the rich caterpillar fuzziness of his eyebrows, and the overall Islander cast of his Polynesian head have caused great speculation. We have some bets that he is a mix of Malaysian and Islander, some suggest he has Bornean DNA.

UNA is very close to answering the question that has puzzled Nationalists for three years now — what race is Toby Cook? We will publish our results when we finally unearth them. In the meantime, this new core of crazy racialist warriors including Toby, Matt Lowe, and some slapper who looks like a former groupie for a third-rate pub rock band are rumoured to be attempting to move in on The Lads Society, possibly since their man Matey Mate McDonald has successfully infiltrated them.

The Peanuts once burned Nazi flags. Now they swear by ’em

Matt is apparently the new leader of PfF which means that they’ll be struggling to get the kind of publicity they’re addicted to since it takes an un-embarrass-able twit like Folkes to make enough of a tool of himself to generate that publicity.

Regardless, they’ll never be registered, and will never be anything but a tick fastened to a host group.

Now, we shall raise the tone somewhat so that Deb Daldy can take it from here. We post this knowing she would prefer this account of hers remained in the public sphere. Her post is reproduced exactly as it appeared. Take it away, Deb!

Party for Freedom is Airing dirty laundry? Ok, Lets!!

I used to create memes for PFF. Free of charge, as that was part of my contribution to the patriotic movement. My hubby also contributed, out of respect for me, by assisting with the PFF website. We did this for months.

Then, when the Love Australia or Leave Party was set up, I advised both of the respective party leaders that I would be happy to assist helping both of them generate memes and do admin work for them, but it was necessary from my point of view to be transparent to both parties from the beginning. I advised Nick Folkes that I would be assisting LAOL with their memes, to which he agreed wholeheartedly, only to have a change of heart three weeks later. What should have occurred was that we walk away amicably. But Nick got nasty, accusing me and the leader of LAOL, Kim Vuga of helping LAOL steal PFF people from his political party. FACT: Nick, It’s not a political party, until its registered with the AEC. All you have is a boys club minus the cubby house. You do however have pass the bong game and nude activities for attendees, so I’m told. Lol FACT: PFF members were never poached, but since we are here airing everything…truth be told, your members flocked to LAOL. In droves. Their reasoning: because they never believed you would ever get registered with the AEC.

FACT: They were right. My current sentiment of your party should have been alerted long ago when you rang me up, asking for advice on whether it was a good idea to attend the funeral service of Curtis Cheng, sit in the service wearing badges making a political statement!! The fact you had to ask whether that was a good idea indicated your lack of judgement and complete disrespect for people just wanting to mourn the loss of their family member. The only redeeming outcome was that I was able to talk you out of it, and you didn’t go ahead with it. You make the claim that George was a helpful PFF member for the best part of three years. So helpful, that you saw fit to bag George out behind his back to anyone that would listen. Now, I am certainly no fan of George, but what kind of a leader discusses party members with other members behind their backs, and even with people that aren’t party members?

I find it nothing short of comical how quickly you turned on Penny, when not even 8 months ago you defended Penny, almost parading her as the PFF mascot. You were so loyal to Penny, a newcomer, that when others took issue with Penny’s deviant behavior, you saw fit to rebuke the loyal in favour of the newcomer. That’s the kind of loyalty YOU show people. You demand loyalty but never give it. Or if you do, its always with strings attached.

Now, lets talk about the placards. To be honest, I don’t give a crap who owns the placards, but if I’m going to call a spade a spade, I would have thought it wouldn’t matter to someone that was ALL about the patriotic movement, WHO used the placards, as long as the message that was on the placard was being shown in public. I mean, isn’t that was its supposed to be about…educating the public, publicly supporting our views and beliefs and showing the rest of Australia that there are people that care about the country? So why, then, if that is the sole purpose of those placards would it matter who was holding them up? From a party leader point of view, I would have thought that getting the PFF name out there with the message was constructive, or at least it was till your petty carry on ensure George cut the bottom off. Now nobody wins.


You saw no problem with sharing other people’s platforms at events like Reclaim Rallies and jumped on other party’s bandwagons, even going so far as to make a homeless video with a real patriotic party, who’s idea it was in the first place, then putting your logo all over it. When asked for a copy of the video, you wouldn’t give them the footage. So, before you are quick to publicly execute George for not handing over stuff that wasn’t his, can I offer you a mirror?

And as for hypocrisy, let’s talk about the defamation you heaped on Jim Saleam for years, even allowing people to believe that he had a Nazi styled bunker in his place with the Nazi Flag hung up. What you don’t realise and probably never banked on, was that other people in the patriotic movement had reason to visit Jim’s house (courtesy of you) and this couldn’t be further from the truth. You have willfully deceived patriots right across the movement that Jim Saleam is a Nazi. Where is your integrity? Nothing wrong with disagreeing with Jim’s political views, as there are quite a few I disagree with, but to outright character assassinate him, you should consider yourself fortunate you haven’t found yourself in front of a magistrate having to defend defamation charges. If we take that mirror I offered you before, assuming you have not broken the mirror in frustration and anger, and hold it up to for self- examination of PFF then it’s clear, thanks to Toby (Tobias Cook) and the “Aryan Brothers and Sisters” chat group, where those with real Nazi beliefs (and flags to boot, reside). It’s in the pretend cubby house.

Now let’s talk about your weekend parties, oh sorry, party meetings, where the sole entertainment seems to be you handing out past members (and associates) phone numbers so that you can harass them in the wee early hours of the morning. And by harass, I mean ring them up and verbally abuse people in a manner that is so crass, crude and vulgar that the contents of those phone conversations only serve to show the character of the man that you are by handing out those phone numbers and then sitting in the back laughing and egging them all on for your amusement. People don’t ever seem to be able to amicably walk away from your party, you just turn nasty and see fit to try and intimidate them. Again….fabulous adult leadership. The last time most people reading this made prank obscene phone calls was back when they were 12-13 years of age. I do see that you now attempting to blame Penny for making the phone calls. Well that’s a coward act, with the exception of when you hid behind two patriotic women Tess Pearce and Jody R Henry at a rally because ANTIFA showed up, if ever I have seen one. It was YOU and YOU alone that had the phone numbers of Jody R Henry and Judith Macalpine, and Penny would never have been able to have made those calls had you not handed her those phone numbers on a silver platter. So if you are going to air dirty laundry, then at least do it with a mirror, and take personal responsibility for your part in it. In saying that, Penny is as equally responsible for those calls, as are the Toby and Matt Lowe for those obscene calls. As the leader of PFF Nick, you are responsible for your members do, especially when they are in your presence and whilst representing your party.

Are you registered yet with the AEC, where again, money collected requires transparency? NO! So until such a time, all that happened was that money was given to Nick by George and you bought placards with that money putting and put a wannabe political party name on the bottom of them. As the party is not registered, the party technically doesn’t exist and therefore the placards belong to nobody. Sure, you can go through the motions of holding pretend committee meetings, but at the end of the day, the only people you are fooling into believing PFF is a registered political party, is yourselves. Don’t be too embarrassed, when my daughter was 6 she liked to play doctors and nurses, so you aren’t completely alone in your desire for playing make-believe games.

Right now, all I see, and everyone watching this post from afar (and there are lots) is your party imploding. The only one to blame here is you, as with any organization, registered or make-believe without a cubby house, the buck stops at the top! Your pettiness is what has alienated people from your wannabe party. Your disloyalty to past and current members has and will be your complete undoing.

The one thing, I want to make clear, is that I don’t write this in favour of either George or Penny, as I have issues with both of them, including but not limited to the way George has treated women in the past by attempting to hit a patriotic women by launching over a table at her, and Penny because I will never understand how a person that has walked out on her kid has any right to lecture other people on how to mother. Any woman that can then make prank phone calls to harass people because she was called out on her BS is childish and immature and leaves me questioning her age and maturity level.

Out of nothing but sheer jealousy you have turned on people that were your friends, that were loyal to the patriotic movement and would have moved heaven and earth to have helped you. I know, I was one of them. In fact, all of the people I know that you have shat on, all say the same thing: the only person you are loyal to is yourself. If you can so easily talk about George behind his back when he was loyal to you and your party, what on earth would make others want to be loyal to you? Then there is the small issue of you accusing a women that financially contributed to your party in ways that far exceed just money, of being the reason another member committed suicide. WHO DOES THAT!! That would be you, Nick, who had so much respect for the dearly departed Fiona, that you and your PFF crew saw fit to smoke weed at her
funeral to the horror of her family.

No doubt your first instinct, once you have read this, will be to delete my post. But you can’t. Your sordid history of the way you treat people will no doubt be doing the rounds over FB. For once, just once, try and resist the urge to be a coward for a change and own your responsibility of the collapse and destruction of PFF.

I stand by everything I have written in this post as it is a true and correct statement. For those doubtful there are quite a few people that I can think of off the top of head that would be able to verify this post.

All Australia wants is for people to come together, and all you’ve achieved is nothing but division in order to satisfy your ego, and all over placards. There’s a part of me that should be sad at the division you have generated amongst the patriotic movement, but there’s no point. It’s what I’ve come to expect. I’ve heard it said: “He who laughs last, laughs loudest”. Well you can rest assured that I have never laughed as hard as what I have in the last few days watching you and your PFF crew reap what they sow! These days, I have no need to think about PFF and how pathetic it is, but you can rest assured that we have made it a habit of telling everyone about PFF and what complete jokes you all are, before advising them that its best they don’t support PFF as it is considered to be an embarrassment to real patriots, particularly those in Victoria. You are just mock worthy, cringe worthy and the only worth you all possess now is to be ex-communicated out of the movement altogether.

This post was going to be as a response to your post, but when I saw you delete Jody Renay’s response for calling a spade a spade re PFF, then saw fit to outright fabricate and accuse her of being on welfare, (as though that’s somehow derogatory) even though she’s not, as a way of deterring people from her truthful claims, I have now seen fit to post this to my wall and into groups, where you will have lost all power to have it deleted, where you can’t cover up the truth any more. Of course, there will be people that screen shot it and send it to you. I’m banking on it and expecting a course of abusive phone calls to ensue in the coming months, but you will never be able to cover up what you did to loyal members of your party and how your party has self-destructed almost completely, at your hand. Not while there is breath in my body.

The two leaders. The burke in the blue shirt is Matt Lowe. He is apparently a Nazi or something cool like that





ED: The following account has been by a Victorian Nationalist, himself a young chap, who does NOT accord with the direction of this article’s subjects – despite having approached them initially with an open mind. His work has naturally been edited, and here and there an addition made by the editor to improve its cogency. The editor has added some details unknown to the author, but the thrust of it is otherwise his own words, although it has been necessary to effect a few tricks of the trade to disguise his identity.


During last December’s meeting at the anniversary of the Eureka Uprising in Victoria, a Nationalist gave a speech urging everyone to set aside their differences and work together for our common interest. It was a nice pep-talk and well-received. However, its flaw lay in this notion of ‘everyone’ and, frankly, in the concept of a ‘common interest’. This is not a swipe at the speaker, whose intentions were honourable, but the time has come to address current events in the context of his message.

His speech might be understood as directed at United Nationalists Australia blogsite and probably others we weren’t aware of. Our unwavering commitment to the precepts of Australian Nationalism seems to bother many of those he implied in his use of the pronoun.

Those it troubles do not fall into the category of ‘Nationalist’ and they have now come together as an organisation. Yet we have the incredible situation where one of the most influential of Nationalist thinkers has thrown his all in with this non-Nationalist group. Moreover, he is paying it tributes that not only it hasn’t earned, but which are not in any way deserved by this non-political, non-activist, non-Nationalist association.

We will not name the individual or any organisation to which this Nationalist may belong, but by ‘this group’ – we mean the ‘Lads Society’.


A broad column of individuals exists in the wilds between a definitive Nationalist organisation with a confirmed mission-statement, philosophy, core-policies, written history and political intent — and a notional collective of an imprecise creed that seems to have as its intentions to vacuum up all those who would dedicate their energies other than to its own. And they wish to marshal all that energy for what purpose? Just because ‘one day’ there’ll be a reckoning… What sort of reckoning? They are unable to say.

Over the years there have been other such clusters of suggested Nationalists and Patriots usually springing up with duplicitous intentions and huckster aims. Klub Nation was one such mob. It was all about the shekels and was an outright scam. Now we have The Lads Society, which is the brainchild of Tom Sewell, called by some ‘the permanent shadow’ of Blair Cottrell. But is it Klub Nation 2.0? Tom and Blair, as everyone knows, were the Batman & Robin of the United Patriots Front after its founding members and Christopher Shortis split.

In a way, it’s a pity about Tom, because in those days of 2015 he could be relied upon to support Nationalist views. He even supported the Australia First Party in a video that Blair had removed because it might upset half-stepping civic patriots who, having no education on politics, passionately back ‘diversity minus Islam’. It seems Tom finally went in that direction too in practise if not always in words. In the beginning, the word is, Tom was much more amenable to what proper Nationalists had to say.

Some of those involved in this civic patriot milieu are touchy on the question of White Australia, often because they’re busy copulating with Asian women.

It is an open secret that Tom Sewell was in a relationship with a part Filipino (some Sydney civics now say ‘Vietnamese’ and say it is current) girl as recently as 2015. All believe he would no longer engage in such relationships and congratulate him on that.  Maybe some of those attacking Tom on this have an agenda, which we will discuss in a moment?

Some of those involved in this civic patriot milieu are touchy on the question of White Australia, often because they’re busy copulating with Asian women.

From the very outset, the political kids of the UPF, particularly Blair and Tom, pronounced themselves to be ‘the’ answer. They had not figured out the question yet, but they were unflappable in their chauvinism. This has been observed by some young people who are not so naïve to believe that before them being on the scene – there was never any sort of nationalist or patriot movement.

At the time, they dismissed the bedrock Nationalist leaders of the Australia First Party as “too old” and charged that it had “done nothing”. This last criticism betrayed the kind of arrogance one expects but which is not helpful for any side. Having just landed on the ground they had no concept of the terrain but with the cocksureness of inexperience divined themselves as superior to surviving Nationalists because they were loudly out and facing off with Antifa in city areas of Melbourne long ago lost to the fifth-columnists of globalism.

So, from their arrival, they were derisive of veteran Nationalists, going so far as to encourage others to avoid the established organisations. Remarkably, they now accuse veteran-Nationalists of undermining them while encouraging every young bloke from the Alt-Right or wherever to join them and avoid the “baby boomers” and “Gen-Xers” of AFP and similar. Apparently, they, and those at UNA “shoot too far to the right”, whatever that’s supposed to mean, since Nationalism shoots neither left or right, it is simply a Third Position.

Nationalists from all groups have never advised political prospects not to deal with the Lads Society. UNA has never, until now, even mentioned them. More to the point, Nationalists such as the AFP and others wants to work with any bona fide Nationalist, on any agreeable terms. They would be pleased for them to join their cause but are under no pressure. AFP has long worked with non-members. The absolutism of The Lads Society is therefore hypocritical on this score since according to hypnotic messages delivered to its younger members by Tom during bonding sessions, the Lads Society is “the only” group who can “save Australia.”

Any individual who did not burst out laughing, get up and walk out at this point is open to accusations of gullibility. His act bears more in common with the sale of snake oil and rain dances than with anything founded on credible Nationalist ground. It is a wonder he and Blair aren’t issuing absolution on the way out the door.

From the very outset, the political kids of the UPF, particularly Blair and Tom, pronounced themselves to be ‘the’ answer. They had not figured out the question yet, but they were unflappable in their chauvinism.

What an outrageous assertion for a club to make given they have no political direction and exist as only a fraternal structure!

And that is the thing about the Lads! They are CLUB LIFE pure and simple. There is a gym, and a bar and they encourage attendance in a cultish kind. Membership is exclusively open to males. Given how any swing towards Nationalism would require a substantial female input, their prospects of ‘saving Australia’ are presently limited.

There is no quarrel at all with some of the aims of the Lads: the push to fitness and the improvement of the self-esteem of young Aussie blokes is a commendable thing. But if they wish to emulate ‘the Hitler youth’ then they have overlooked that it was, in fact, an organisation attached to a political party. It was not of itself a movement.

“Listen up, Lads…”

Most alarming of all is that the Lads are not even choosing to identify as Nationalists anywhere but on the quiet. This is classic UPF; it is exactly what Tom and Blair did all along with the UPF; they made overtures to Nationalists with a nod and wink that ‘one day’ when the political climate was right they would emerge as fully-fledged Nationalists. Nationalists were sceptical about them then, and now we outright call bullshit!

Blair Cottrell admitted in a recent video posted to his new Facebook page in which he identifies as “right wing” and “conservative.” Does that mean he is pitching away from Nationalism? Furthermore, the Lads’ association with the non-political, non-Nationalist, street association known as The True Blue Crew continues. This is a bunch of blokes with utterly no political comprehension whatsoever who make no secret about being an openly civic patriot unit. It has been said the two groups are merging at the Lads’ Melbourne clubhouse to share rent and better coordinate activities. This is as direct a disavowal of Nationalist principles as can be understood.

What an outrageous assertion for a club to make given they have no political direction and exist as only a fra!ternal structure

Thus we come back to the original speech about ‘everyone’ and ‘common interest’. Through the perversity of the thing, this ‘everyone’ excludes true Nationalists, and ‘interests’ could not be less common.

Nationalists understand that patriotic cause can only be served politically and with absolute preservation of its ideals. It cannot be talked away from its implicit understanding of Australianness as being determined solely by White heritage.

The Lads Society is a monetised operation dependent on fee-paying members to sustain the club and maintain its equipment. Klub Nation was likewise monetised although it was done so along the lines of a Ponzi scheme.  It does not possess a real hope of survival. This is subculture at best and as such it has a finite lifespan. Under the conditions described there is no hope of ‘saving Australia’, particularly when its leaders are reticent about committing to a definition of what constitutes an Australian.

Unless they are prepared to come out and say ‘Australians are White, and Whites are under threat, and we support the cause of Australian Nationalism, and agree with the idea of a White Australia Policy’, then they are grifting us all just like in the UPF days.


It’s not enough that Tom and Blair are silly enough to view themselves as ‘saviours’, but they have chosen not to confine the infection of their Lads Society to Melbourne. Tom is quoted as having addressed ‘the Sydney problem’.

Those Sydney Nationalists see the only ‘problem’ as being people like Tom and his Lads Society. Their status as a corrosive ‘problem’ was confirmed when Tom had the stunning absence of mind to fly to Sydney a few weeks ago and appoint none other than former Squadron 88 leader Mark McDonald (real name unknown) to arrange its Sydney operations, which we understand are destined for setting up with a ‘clubhouse’ in Cronulla. This has caused a real upset in the Alt-Right ranks in Sydney. None of them wants anything to do with McDonald.

The choice of area is predictable given McDonald’s connection to the leftovers of the civic patriot Party for Freedom, which is eyeing off the Lads Society, and at its very least, hopes to become its political arm. Is it the PfF civics who are now telling that ‘Vietnamese’ story about Tom as part of a final takeover bid? If this group of Sydney civics is a Klub Nation 2,0, spreading deceits undermines the target so they can get control.

In 2015, Nick and his Peanuts for Freedom attempted to hijack the Cronulla Uprising commemoration in a cheap grab for publicity. The fallout led to his mate Shermon Burgess being slugged with a $100k fine from the local council. These crooks are now all over Sydney Lads and if they use the same talent for disaster that they had then, Melbourne Lads is in for a rough ride.

Much has been written about McDonald and this truth is just too well known. His track record of spreading discord is infamous and his every furtive move involves acquisition and recruitment. He has been connected to Party for Freedom since he arrived on the scene but he has attempted to involve himself in every known Nationalist group, or White Nationalist organisation.

It’s not enough that Tom and Blair are silly enough to view themselves as ‘saviours’, but they have chosen not to confine the infection of their Lads Society to Melbourne. Tom is quoted as having addressed ‘the Sydney problem’.

He is, in fact, a New Zealander. In the case of ‘Matey Mate’ McDonald, with his history of attempting to rope others into criminal activities; his refusal to reveal the truth about his past and his identity; and an avowed determination to create havoc for true Australian Nationalists before one asks anything else, the primary question is, “What are you really?” He can’t be doing it for Australia because he’s not an Australian. He is not even a New Zealand patriot because nobody over there has ever heard of him.

The Party for Freedom has shed its leader of many years, Nick Folkes. He has been sidelined, some say, for the establishment of a “harder” more “Nationalist” PfF, which is classic Peanuts gameplay. We have a lot of groups and individuals who therefore can never stay one course, but have to reinvent themselves like fashions. The one thing they have in common is that their goals are just to ‘attract’, never to pursue an issue towards public influence.

They have also never done a thing to help true Nationalists. Blair Cottrell has long preferred (he says for ‘tactical reasons’) to shake hands with non-Whites for grip-and-grin opportunities than being caught dead hosting Nationalists. On the other hand, Nationalists tried their hardest to provide the UPF with guidance and advice. One bit of advice was to avoid Mark McDonald like the plague. Tom’s solution, and what is really a foul gob in the eye of all Nationalists, is to appoint this shifty narc its Sydney organiser, complete with access to Lads Society funds.

All in all, this talk about ‘everyone’ and ‘common interests’ is naïve indeed; it is really time to talk facts and truths and for the Lads to clean up its act.

Boys only tree house
The Lads Society clubhouse in Melbourne




Australia’s Race Discrimination Commissioner Dr Tim Soutphommasane is not only an overpaid and under-talented diversity hire, he is also a weaver of bad fiction in support of his own, self-serving hoax narrative.

For a recent column in the Fairfax press, Dr Tim has cobbled together an extraordinary tale framing 2017 as a year which saw rising support for White supremacy, the mainstreaming of anti-immigrant politics and a resurgence of Neo-Nazism.

Yes, comrades, this painful screed is every bit as ridiculous as it sounds; if one-tenth of the commissioner’s mantra of rote-learned talking points bore any relationship to the real world then cosmopolitan, capitalist run Australia would be in serious trouble.

In the time-honoured Anti-Racist fashion, the commissioner seems to have written a list of everyone he hates, or who disagrees with the goals of globalist capitalism on his boardroom wall and wired together a schizophrenic narrative with push-pins and string, like some sweaty stalker out of a Hollywood movie.

Dr Tim attempting to absorb credibility through the armpit of celebrity activist Adam Goodes

Little of it makes sense to anyone who knows what they are looking at, Dr Tim writes of “Right-Wing Nationalism” as if it is an authentic political tendency; the reality is, of course, that few if any “Right Wingers” approve of the radical Nationalist program, preferring instead their attachments to Zionism and a version of multiculturalism which excludes Islam and Muslims.

This pig-headed refusal by Tim and his broader academic caste to look beyond the outdated binary view of politics has already made them into figures of fun; if there is an ascendant “Right Wing Nationalism” then according to that rigid worldview there must also be left and centrist versions, sadly for these blockheads no such tendencies exist.

In the time honoured Anti-Racist fashion the commissioner seems to have written a list of everyone he hates, or who disagrees with the goals of globalist capitalism on his boardroom wall and wired together a schizophrenic narrative with push-pins and string, like some sweaty stalker out of a Hollywood movie.

There are Right Wingers and Left Wingers along the mainstream political axis who all enthusiastically support the globalist capitalist programme of mobile Third World populations, totalitarian humanist equality for all and the replacement of the citizen with the atomised, unquestioning, apolitical consumer who is ruled by oligarchs and their bourgeoisie.

Nationalism, as we practice it is neither left nor right, what it truly represents is secession from cosmopolitanism, a rejection of the binary worldview with all its rigid conformity and ever-thickening tangle of artificial social mores and pedantic restrictions upon the liberty of the working classes.

Dr Tim wilfully misrepresents recent events in Europe and North America in his attempt to lull his readers into believing that, say, the mass actions surrounding Polish independence day, the electoral success of AFD in Germany and the ill-fated Unite The Right rallies in the U.S.A are all part of some global trend toward a resurgent White supremacy.

Again, real Nationalists would have none of this since we reject outright the mindset which allows one to believe that the world is now integrated to the degree that universal White unity is a realistic possibility; universal ideals such as this do not enter the heads of radicals, this is the mindset of the globalists or the religious nuts, Islamic Jihadists being the obvious example.

Muslims in Sydney demanding that they are taken seriously by the chattering classes

This brings us to another dodgy connection in Tim’s web of untruths: Why would the people he labels conservatives, anti Semites or neo-Nazis have such a problem with Islam?

On the face of it Right Wing Islamophobia makes no sense, there is no logical explanation as to why one group of socially conservative people should be hostile to another group holding basically identical views, that is until one listens to what the right wingers are actually saying.

The natural reaction of the upper classes, of which Tim Soutphommasane is most decidedly a member, is to scoff and roll their eyes at any utterance by the “little people”; the problem, though, in assuming that their class holds the correct values and opinions on all matters is that these twits render themselves unable to take seriously anything which exists outside their bubble of self-satisfied political correctness.

On the face of it Right Wing Islamophobia makes no sense, there is no logical explanation as to why one group of socially conservative people should be hostile to another group holding basically identical views, that is until one listens to what the right wingers are actually saying.

The Right Wingers, on the other hand, take both cosmopolitanism and Islam completely seriously, probably more so than many Muslims and the faults they find with that way of life are all, basically, to do with its perceived negative effects upon multiculturalism, women’s rights, homosexual rights and the interests of Jews and Israel.

Dr Tim mentions in his article Milo Yiannopoulis, the homosexual, Jewish, Libertarian provocateur who is married to a black man; Tim is seemingly agog at the popularity of such a character in this day and age, however seen in its proper context Milo’s stage show is pure multicultural theatre, he is a perfect poster boy for the Right Wing because he embodies all that they hold dear and all that the upper classes lay claim to but, in their cynicism, neglect.

Milo “The Dangerous Faggot” is not literally Hitler, he is more like the Dick Emery of globalist culture

The Islamic Jihad in the West is explicitly aimed at smashing social cohesion in multicultural societies by attacking its constituent parts,. The Right Wingers are one hundred percent correct on that score. Anyone who is capable of thinking tactically appreciates the structural weaknesses in cosmopolitanism, not to mention the studied indifference to this holy war among the upper classes, the politicians and the bourgeoisie.

This inability to think like one’s enemy by the people supposedly in charge leaves a cosmopolitan society wide open to subversion and the shock tactics of terrorists. If anything has become normalised in 2017 it is not “racism” as alleged by Dr Tim, rather it is this blasé attitude toward Islamic Jihad and its stated goals, which are the complete destruction of the multicultural West and the subjugation of its peoples by Muslims.

Further to his ballyhoo over the “Far Right” Soutphommasane also dramatically plays up the Neo-Nazi menace, albeit without specifically identifying anyone who openly admits to holding such opinions. We suspect this is because, like most people of his station his view of the new Nazis is likely informed by email circulars penned by Andre Oboler and the Jewish Board Of Deputies, so, therefore, we can assume that he knows nothing much about Nazis, either historical or contemporary.

Let us be blunt, Tim Soutphommasane is in trouble, if certain illiberal elements within the mainstream political scene have their way he and his fellow commissioners at HREOC will soon be out of a job, so he has to come up with something, anything really, to justify his three hundred thousand dollar a year salary.

The role most of the Neo-Nazis, as we have exhaustively explained in several articles is to stifle any dissent against globalist cosmopolitanism — to snuff out any spark of national feeling among Whites by tainting groups and individuals in guilt by association stings. True, some of these characters are motivated by the prospect of looting the money that organised political groups or clubs can raise, but in the main, they are wreckers under the direction of mainstream operatives.

Neo-Nazism, in contrast to Tim’s thesis, is actually the nemesis of White Nationalism and self-determination. It is chauvinistic within the context of White Australia since it attempts to apply phoney Third Reich racial categories to the White Australian ethnicity, something which, given our history on this continent, can never be accepted by true patriots.

The Neo-Nazi cuts a lonely figure at Unite The Right in Charlottesville

Dr Tim is peddling a load of horse manure. He is cobbling together a narrative of White supremacy and rising neo-Nazism to shore up his own precarious position as a globalist bureaucrat. If it all smacks of desperation it must be because Tim is, these days, a desperate man at the top tier of a widely hated bureaucracy.

Let us be blunt, Tim Soutphommasane is in trouble. Should certain illiberal elements within the mainstream political scene have their way he and his fellow commissioners at HREOC will soon be out of a job. He has to come up with something, anything really, to justify his three hundred thousand dollar a year salary.

Human rights are under attack by the minions of globalist capitalism; the idea is to roll back the legal protections available to citizens in the name of progress so that the transnational corporations can further embed themselves in the day to day life of working people.

Dr Tim is simply being made redundant by his real bosses. Maybe if he had done his job and protected the human rights of all Australians, rather than cultivating his reputation for arrogance, race-baiting and attacking the White majority, then he might have left his post in good standing and at a time of his choosing. As it stands though, he will probably be fired. His unpronounceable name will live on in infamy as just another haughty bureaucrat who got too big for his boots.

Pride comes before a fall, arrogant public servants in this country quickly grow into tall poppies, ripe for a hard pruning