THE RICH GET RICHER, THE POOR GET THE PICTURE, THE BOMBS NEVER HIT YOU WHEN YOU’RE DOWN SO LOW

THE RICH GET RICHER, THE POOR GET THE PICTURE, THE BOMBS NEVER HIT YOU WHEN YOU’RE DOWN SO LOW

Readers would be well aware of the recent incident in Brighton, Victoria during which Australian police were caught up in a drama concerning a South American prostitute, a Chinese apartment building commissionaire and a Somalian terrorist.

We have chosen the wording of this first paragraph very carefully to place this event in its proper context; it must be said that the only Australians involved in this siege and shootout were, we suppose, the police officers who responded to the 000 calls.

So given that all the actual Australians swept up in the Brighton shootings are expected to recover and return to their duties we will herewith move on and, as is our mission, examine the responses to these events by real Australians and their interpretation according to Nationalist thinking.

The most obvious and stereotypical response from the chattering classes and their bourgeois commentariat are the hackneyed cries for “unity” and “social cohesion”; that is to say that nobody should say anything which might cause a spike in the normal level of distrust, nor do anything which might further inflame the now entrenched and deep-seated mutual hatred which simmers between Muslims and Australians.

la-fg-somalia-american-jihadis-20151208-001
Somalia, the land of the lost

Nationalists, as always, are advised to steer clear of Muslims and people of African and West Asian descent as far as possible; of course, it is impossible to completely avoid contact with such people but the best tactic for mitigation of exposure to their bad behaviour is separation.

The whole concept of social cohesion flies in the face of diversity dogma; apparently, diversity is our greatest strength, except in circumstances where the outcome actually matters; when results are expected we are urged to be one people and to speak with a single voice.

We have chosen the wording of this first paragraph very carefully to place this event in its proper context; it must be said that the only Australians involved in this siege and shootout were, we suppose, the police officers who responded to the 000 calls.

As we have explained in a previous article, unity in the face of diverse threats makes no sense, in fighting what amounts to an insurgency by de-assimilated fellow citizens in which the targets of violent extremism are, in the main, defenceless civilians a diverse range of responses is surely required.

There are some actions which sincerely patriotic Muslims cannot or will not take in this struggle, so too there are lines which White Nationalists and civic patriots cannot cross without being arrested for breaching the human rights of these criminals and their supporters; in fact the state does a pretty good job of nobbling any grass roots response to the community problem of Jihadist insurgency, so acting as one is out of the question anyway.

The call for unity then is really just an admonition to sit tight and not get involved when it is spoken by Daniel Andrews or Malcolm Turnbull and a trite example of virtue signalling, if not out-and-out cowardice by the bourgeoisie.

Smashed-avocado-v2-LGH-568ba110-4d9e-4023-a2bd-5ffd7528e72a-0-1400x919
Hipsters eating their smashed avocado now seem more likely terrorist targets than Bogans eating their fried chicken and chips

The problem with that approach and placing all our eggs in one basket by relying on the state to end the insurgency is that they have thus far proven themselves incapable and unwilling to rein in violent extremists or to perform any of the work necessary in interdiction of the known pathways to Jihadism: petty crime, drug use and family breakdown.

The core pathways to extremism listed above are the result of importing people who are bound to fail and turn upon their sponsors; it is impossible to maintain conservative family values and tribal structures in a society which dropped such norms over a thousand years ago. It is impossible for a migrant to make a positive contribution to society if he lacks the intelligence to master basic literacy and numeracy skills and it is impossible to draw wayward immigrant youth away from a life of crime in a situation where the entirety of popular media culture glorifies and encourages “gangster chic”.

The problem with that approach and placing all our eggs in one basket by relying on the state to end the insurgency is that they have thus far proven themselves incapable and unwilling to rein in violent extremists or to perform any of the work necessary in interdiction of the known pathways to Jihadism: petty crime, drug use and family breakdown.

In our so-called “knowledge economy”, the world envisioned by the globalist money power, the factors which delineate social class are less the ideas of race, religion or ethnicity and increasingly IQ and a person’s capacity to utilise what is between their ears, so to the informed observer widespread migrant dysfunction and failure was inevitable and predictable.

The 21st century Lumpenproletariat, of which many migrants along with many Whites are part, is therefore to all intents and purposes race-less in the eyes of the elites and their bourgeoisie; their intelligence quotient is what keeps them down and, sadly for revolutionaries, this growing class of people, the “have-nots”, have not the slightest inkling of class consciousness, nor even much insight into their own existence.

This is where middle-class virtue signalling over the plight of the “have-nots” becomes a vice like any other artificial coping mechanism. Publicly expressing White guilt and wearing the hair shirt of the social justice warrior in the face of the intractable problem of low Lumpenprole IQ is nowadays, for some people, as potent a feel-good measure as taking a swig of hard liquor or popping a prescription sedative.

Isis
If you are wondering where the Iraqi middle class went, these guys may be able to shed some light on the matter

The White middle class is shackled to the failure of its own system, the great cosmopolitan Ponzi scheme which was devised by the Baby Boomers to ensure that their class dominated for all time and which banked heavily upon White working class apathy or lack of political engagement

The question has been asked in recent days: was there an element of class war at play in the Brighton terrorist attack? Why did the Somali terrorist from seedy Roxburgh Park choose one of Melbourne’s most affluent suburbs as the location of his spree?

Buoyed by the successful integration of European refugees after the second world war the middle class and elected officials of those strata over-reached when they took upon themselves the job of diversifying the migrant intake to include Third World refugees. In 2017 the children of those baby-boomer, bourgeois do-gooders who are paying the price for their parents’ largesse and lack of foresight are lapsing into helpless self-indulgence; the physical intoxication of pills, booze, gambling and pick-up sexual encounters is bolstered by hollow virtue signalling, White guilt and ethno-masochism, vices all.

The question has been asked in recent days: was there an element of class war at play in the Brighton terrorist attack? Why did the Somali terrorist from seedy Roxburgh Park choose one of Melbourne’s most affluent suburbs as the location of his spree?

Not to place a wise head on the shoulders of this clearly intellectually sub-normal African criminal, but the symbolism was not missed by Nationalist radicals and as the only political tendency still prosecuting the class war the imagery and setting of Yacqub Khayre’s martyrdom operation are ours for the taking.

Islam coburg
Social cohesion in action: Islamist radicals teamed up with Antifa in Coburg, May 2016

 

ON MUSLIM TERRORISM AND BEING RIGHT FOR THE WRONG REASONS

ON MUSLIM TERRORISM AND BEING RIGHT FOR THE WRONG REASONS

As the blood of innocent civilians is washed away from yet another, vibrant cosmopolitan British town centre the now ritualised supplication before Muslims, the offering of meaningless platitudes and the excuse making begins.

Australian Nationalists need not concern themselves with any immediate ramifications for our people in these matters, we understand that these events are remote and unconnected to our lives and we need not be unduly alarmed, nor behave any differently than usual.

The response by Australian politicians to the Borough Market atrocity in London has followed the same template as their response to every other act of barbarism perpetrated upon civilised people by Muslims in the name of their religion.

Distilling the rhetoric of Malcolm Turnbull, Bill Shorten, Julie Bishop and Penny Wong we are left with the basic ideas that terrorists hate democracy and freedom, that they seek to divide multicultural communities, that they win if we show disunity or turn away from globalist, cosmopolitan ideas. This, of course, is patent nonsense, the Islamists of ISIS, Al Qaeda and their non-violent support groups in our country strive to unite all people in submission to their god, Allah.

lebos housos
If the media put as much effort into lampooning Jihadists as they do Lebos and Bogans, they might make a genuine difference

A harmonious, homogenous society in which people see themselves as having shared interests and values would seem to render that goal more easily achievable since, at some imaginary tipping point at which Islamists would take over the reins of state there would need to be a collective surrender or acceptance of terms by the general population.

Australia, we might guess, may have been spared the worst excesses of the Jihadis precisely because, while Muslims are integrated into our society they are not assimilated to the degree that they are in the U.K or Europe; that is to say that they are highly visible in their ethnic subcultures as they go about, living their lives among us.

The response by Australian politicians to the Borough Market atrocity in London has followed the same template as their response to every other act of barbarism perpetrated upon civilised people by Muslims in the name of their religion.

The profile of the modern Jihadist is routinely that of the well integrated, second or third generation non-White who, at some stage has been de-integrated from society through a life of crime or drug use, only to re-emerge as a radical Islamic convert.

So the threat clearly comes, to a greater degree, from the assimilated insider turned violent insurgent against his hometown and the people with whom he has the most in common, rather than the alien or the subversive immigrant.

cuba-guantanamo-10th-anniversary
Be careful what you wish for because you might get it

Could we ask if it is familiarity with cosmopolitanism which breeds contempt in the de-integrated, then radicalised Muslims?

After all, even if we were to accept the spurious claims of cowards and apologists for terrorism that it is because “we invade their countries” that the mind of the radical convert goes rotten, then is it not irrefutably the case that those adventures into the Mid-East and West Asia are done in the name of pluralism, democracy, human rights and cosmopolitan values?

Of course, to ask those questions in the Australia of 2017 is to run a gauntlet; a jail term is possible if the wrong person hears you pose a benign head scratcher such as: “Why are young, integrated people turning from cosmopolitanism, the material comforts of consumerism and multiculturalism to throw their lives away in Jihad against their neighbours?”

So the threat clearly comes, to a greater degree, from the assimilated insider turned violent insurgent against his hometown and the people with whom he has the most in common, rather than the alien or the subversive immigrant.

The question of what is to be done should be obvious to any political dissident, be they Nationalist, Civic Patriot or of the dwindling and moribund ranks of the real Left; it isn’t difficult, we need only employ the tactics against radical Islamists which are used against us: public ridicule, slander, relentless online stalking by vigilantes and co-opting of the Jihadist message by counter gangs.

The most effective tools in crippling problematic social movements like Jihadist Islam are the creation of a climate of fear, distrust and paranoia within the groups and the provocation by outsiders of infighting between factions of the movement.

UPF bendigo
The tactics used to break the civic patriot movement should logically also work on Jihadists

Whenever an outrage, such as Manchester or Nice occurs the apologists and enablers of terrorism cry loud and long over the fear of a violent “backlash” against Muslims by unsavoury elements of the “far-right” and so forth.

The fact that this backlash, this much-hyped revolt against sanity and decency never materialises is due to the reality that openly Islamophobic groups are relentlessly hounded by vigilantes and riven with internecine conflict due to the paranoia and distrust fomented by their tormentors.

We know this tactic is effective and the larger and more publicly active the group grows the more easily it is penetrated, fractured and ultimately dispersed by outside agents. So, to pose another twee, rhetorical question: why are counter-radicals forbidden to use these tactics and why are activists who do confront radical Muslims head on jailed or persecuted?

The fact that this backlash, this much-hyped revolt against sanity and decency never materialises is due to the reality that openly Islamophobic groups are relentlessly hounded by vigilantes and riven with internecine conflict due to the paranoia and distrust fomented by their tormentors.

The process of Islamic radicalisation is probably misunderstood and definitely misrepresented by Australian and other Anglosphere politicians; the elected officials and social commentators seek to make it fit their worldview, rather than take the Jihadists seriously.

U.K prime minister Theresa May, in her press conference concerning the Borough Markets attacks proposed a crackdown of the online safe spaces available to Jihadists, from whence they spread their dangerous ideology and, presumably sour the minds of impressionable youngsters.

isis one finger
There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his prophet…not a complex philosophy by any means

In the first place, there is no separate Jihadist ideology, only propaganda pieces and discussions of the virtues of a pious life; their only doctrine is the Koran. Secondly, the meaning of “safe space” refers a set of restrictions or a code of conduct put in place to protect those inside such a system from any criticism or censure which might alarm or distress them; so Theresa May is right, but for the wrong reason.

It is true that Jihadists are afforded safe spaces online but these exist as a result of codes of conduct enforced by the social media companies which protect all Muslims and all expressions of Islam from criticism or harassment by counter-Islamist agents.

Nationalists and all true dissidents know that the internet is not a safe place to plot or plan anything illegal or that which might arouse suspicion from the authorities; anyone who would do so is either not serious about their plans or so inept and deranged that their arrest would be inevitable. So too we realise from years of experience that the internet is useless in terms of recruiting and radicalising people, no matter what your political leaning or the goal of your activism; radicalisation must take place in person and is achieved through camaraderie and the bonds formed in a shared struggle.

It is true that Jihadists are afforded safe spaces online but these exist as a result of codes of conduct enforced by the social media companies which protect all Muslims and all expressions of Islam from criticism or harassment by counter-Islamist agents.

theresea may
Theresa May has been as much a part of the problem as she has the solution

 

The mainstream image of the Islamic radical casts him as an almost supernatural being, a cartoonish construct of film and television scripts who is one part technical wizard and two parts Third World sage. We suspect that the chattering classes, through their silly Orientalist mindset, really see the Jihadist, and non-Whites in general as superior beings capable of reaching out through cyberspace to twist the minds of their followers.

The truth is more mundane, the terrorist cells are formed largely by friends, cousins and brothers, the young are simply given a Koran and shown brotherly love; given mentoring, shelter and a purpose in life greater than anything offered by cosmopolitan consumerism; then behold, radicals are born.

So no, the measures proposed by the heads of state and their bureaus will not work, calls for unity, suppression of dissidents and state-run de-radicalisation programs will keep failing. We have discussed in this article the counter-radicalisation tactics which are proven to work, what’s more, they are a lot cheaper, more immediately effective, and less violent than kicking down the doors of council flats searching for terror cells or bombing Helmand and Raqqa into dust.

Amrosi_648x365_2289540338-hero
Enough should have been enough in 2003

 

Melbourne’s Most Dangerous: UPF or Non-White Gangs?

Melbourne’s Most Dangerous: UPF or Non-White Gangs?

As Africans and Islanders attacked each other in Melbourne’s CBD just for the hell of it last night we wonder if it’s time to stop being terrified of the UPF.

Because so far we’ve had nothing but a steady drip-feed to the brain of wartime propaganda painting the United Patriots Front out to be the next incarnation of the Third Reich. We have been led to believe that Blair Cottrell is Hitler and the UPF the SS, only with Aussie strine in place of German, and thongs instead of jackboots.

Meanwhile, we learn that a gang comprised of rejected brain surgeons from the African and Islander communities has Melbourne police cowering behind the station desk. There is apparently no moral outcry about ‘Apex’ or ‘Islander 23’ criminal gangs because they just assault and rob people and don’t disparage diversity.

And indeed, what diversity was on offer last night; with hundreds of ebonies running ape not only in Melbourne but in Sydney as well. Perhaps a lunar cycle was to blame, or maybe it was just White oppression — not enough free stuff for so-called refugees.

But it’s worth noting — and if you’re a nationalist you’ll have noted this a bragillion times over — that one group is condemned for pointing out the negative racial realities of diversity, which is wholly confirmed by the deviant behaviour of that group.

It is an Orwellian twist on the Emperor’s New Clothes fable. You are not allowed to mention that Onga is wielding a machete in Federation Square because folks might then fear Onga. And when White people fear black people it is racism.

Meanwhile, we learn that a gang comprised of rejected brain surgeons from the African and Islander communities has Melbourne police cowering behind the station desk. There is apparently no moral outcry about ‘Apex’ or ‘Islander 23’ criminal gangs because they just assault and rob people and don’t disparage diversity.

Sure, we have problems with drunken Aussie youth playing up, and that’s bad enough, but where is the sense in bringing the full Dulux colour chart of reprobate conduct into play just because a Marxist somewhere told us we have to?

There is a good reason that these Africans come as refugees to this great mug of a land. They are incapable of living in harmony with their own kind, let alone throwing them into a civilised atmosphere, where the embarrassingly thin blue line of the law doesn’t worry them in the least.

Instead, it’s easier to make the bad apple analogy whereby it’s just one bad apple that spoils the barrel. But instead, they usually make examples of one or two good apples to excuse a whole harvest of rotten apples.

However, in a plain-speaking kind, it’s fair to ask where the sense is in rescuing these savage African tribes from their self-made fate to bring them here just to recreate the disaster they’ve fled — and we also pay for it?

It isn’t wise to interrupt nature when he’s doing you a favour. And it’s worth bearing in mind that at the same time with the situation reversed Whites in places like Zimbabwe are living in tin huts and eating lizards and the world is happy with that.

They are just waiting for blacks to come along and cook them alive in car tyres, but they daren’t apply for protection visas because Whites are bad and blacks are good. That might be a statement of values based on the very definition of judging people by the colour of their skin, but that’s how things roll in the arse-backwards Twilight Zone Age of the Cultural Marxist we live in.

CdYvZlHUAAADnxU
If it wasn’t for dangerous ethnic gangs, manufacturers of capsicum spray would be doing it tough