HALAL CERTIFICATION BOSS WANTS WHITE WOMEN FERTILISED BY MOSLEM MEN

HALAL CERTIFICATION BOSS WANTS WHITE WOMEN FERTILISED BY MOSLEM MEN

A leading Moslem businessman has delighted over figures released by a bogus Jewish university that alleges a 52% decline in the sperm count of Australian males in a push against White Australia.

In a post to Facebook, which would have anybody White arrested if the message was reversed, Mohamed Elmouelhy gloated, “According to the Hebrew University, Australian men’ (sic) sperm count has decline (sic) by 52% over the last 40 years so your men are a dying breed, Australian women need us to fertilise them and keep them surrounded by Muslim babies while beer swilling, cigarette smoking, drug injecting can only dream of what Muslim men are capable of.

“If the country is left to the bigots the white race will be extinct in another 40 years. Muslims have a duty to make your women happy because you are declining, better go chose (sic) a plot for youself (sic) at your local cemetery. If you can’t afford it, commit suicide it is a cheaper alternative for bigots.”

42BBFAFE00000578-4735588-Halal_Certification_Authority_boss_says_Australian_women_need_Mu-a-11_1501158686559

Elmouelhy is president of the Halal Certification Authority, which is responsible for milking Australians for a religious tax (like Kosher) slapped on food products which fill up the coffers of Moslem supremacists whether we like it or not. This is a scam guaranteed by our own traitorous government which is the only truly guilty party when any outrage of this sort surfaces.

Of course, UNA, not being a reactionary bunch, can recognise the glaring absurdities in all of this.

Anything that comes out of a Jewish university relating in any way to the White race would have to be regarded as prejudiced. But this “research” is somewhat at odds with all the Multicultural bullshit that we’ve been forced to swallow as a people. Indeed, just who are these “Australian men”? We’ve had it bashed into us that we are the last in line to be considered Australians.

 

BPA affects sperm quality really worried dot blogspot dot com-1
Hebrew University used this still as the basis of their research

We come after “First Peoples” and every Syrian so-called refugee who has set foot here in the last six months is more of an Aussie than us White fellas according to government and media — so what are the terms of reference of this kike university’s supposed ‘research’?

In fact, the research, which was published in science journal Human Reproduction Update, refers to men from “western countries” which includes, apart from Australians, New Zealanders, Europeans, North Americans and others.

It was based on 185 studies of 43,000 men between 1973 and 2011, and nothing that we’re aware of specifies WHITE. Nonetheless, the anti-White propagandists of the media who have so excited this Moslem crank seem to be leaning hard on the inference that it refers to White taddies. This suggests that 43,000 White men were recruited on the basis of race, asked to jack off into test tubes, and tested for these dystopian results. Either that or fertility clinics shared their data, but again, was this information selected on the basis of a racial designation that we’re not aware is recorded in such instances?

42BBF65000000578-4735588-image-a-38_1501157136763
Mohamed Elmouelhy wants White women impregnated with Arab, Moslem semen; ideally his own

If not, this means, dear Arab pervert, that YOU are included in those statistics by virtue of the fact you’re situated in the west, where you shouldn’t even be.

And given the lifestyle stresses that factor into this supposed fall in sperm counts, it’s hard to see how your saggy, greasy Arab balls get off the hook, given how practically every single one of your countries are either in some state of civil war, or else so poverty struck you’re forced to drink donkey pee — animals which are also your sexual partners in about 90% of cases.

What’s more, you Arabs have the worst diet of any creature alive outside of a billy goat. And the Arab pretty much introduced the world to hard drugs, which your own various peoples ingest on a massive scale, regardless of any halfwit myths about Moslem piety.

Elmouelhy has written with frantic glee and in such a garbled prose that we can only surmise he is in fact three sheets to the wind, probably on Johnnie Walker Blue Label, a favourite among Moslem drug dealers.

But it’s interesting that this hook-nose invader, who is making a killing on this enforced tax that is a perk his people have spiked us “White Australians” with, should be so quick to label all Australians as ‘bigots’ even though he is still here and prospering nicely.

What he really means is, political correctness has allowed him to express his own Arab bigotry through the diversity prism, which permits anti-White bigotry, but not the opposite. Let us also reflect on all these stereotypes that the Moslem people hold about us Whites as all being drunks, addicts, and spiritual burn outs.

It should also be understood that if this low sperm-count thing is a condition solely afflicting White men — then it is probably down to the fact that we work ourselves blind just to keep Arabs and their households of sixteen wives and 83 children supported by Medicare and Centrelink benefits.

However, the base message here is that Arab men want to fuck White women. We know this. Those that don’t have the fortune of having drunk White women passed out in their taxis either forcibly rape, kidnap or force them into slavery. It is happening about 20,000 times each day all throughout Europe and only a knob, cuck, or SJW would refuse to believe it happens here. And all courtesy of your one-world government.

Elmouelhy probably has a permanently reserved table podium-side at his local strip club. His sole obsession is White women and his one mission in life is to contaminate our genetic lines.

We don’t advocate trolling, but if readers are hopelessly predisposed to such dark entertainments than we suggest a good account to start with would be the Facebook account — and any others — belonging to Mohamed Elmouelhy.

He needs learning, as does the treasonous government that set him and his people among us.

pjimage (1).jpg
These two flags ought to combine

FAIRFAX JOTTER MISREADS SMOKE SIGNALS FROM COOLAROO

FAIRFAX JOTTER MISREADS SMOKE SIGNALS FROM COOLAROO

Fairfax contributor Matt Holden recently penned an article, “The Dallas fire is a reminder Melbourne is not as classless as we’d like to think”, in which he tries, in vain, to make his case for class divides across the metropolitan area.

Dallas, for those not familiar with the layout of Greater Melbourne, is a working class suburb in the North-Western zone, it is one of the green field sites developed largely by The Housing Commission Of Victoria during the 1960’s, that style of commission homes would be familiar to most city dwellers.

The fire in question occurred in a stockpile of plastic products at a recycling plant in nearby Coolaroo, though due to the wind patterns during the several days it took to bring the blaze under control it was Dallas which was most heavily affected by the plume of toxic smoke and ash.

Several hundred Dallas residents were evacuated and forced to spend the night at local community centres according to the emergency response plan activated by the responsible authorities; though greatly inconvenienced by the order to leave there were no serious injuries, loss of life or property among the evacuees.

broadmed-mosque
Soon, mosques will be more common than McDonald’s

Now Dallas is a pretty ordinary neighbourhood in that part of town, people live their lives, raise their families, work, study, run businesses and so forth; the suburb, like those around it, is home to a large number of migrants, particularly from Turkey and Lebanon, as well as their second and third generation family members.

Matt Holden casts a fairly critical eye over the area in an effort to trump up his story of class antagonism, exclusivity and geographical as well as socio-economic divides; Holden doesn’t “go there” on the issue of the area’s large Muslim population, but he hints at ethnic divisions in his analysis.

Several hundred Dallas residents were evacuated and forced to spend the night at local community centres according to the emergency response plan activated by the responsible authorities; though greatly inconvenienced by the order to leave there were no serious injuries, loss of life or property among the evacuees.

The issue of median house prices is raised in the article but in reality, this means little, like so much of the new demographic data available to the layman, via the 2016 census, it is largely a matter of perspective gained through local knowledge.

The quality and age of the housing stock as well as the settled nature of the community would be factors in suppressing the turnover of real estate and the median sale price, not necessarily structural, societal inequality or class chauvinism.

Dallas appears to have a large number of families with children, which is what we could expect from an area which is 49% Muslim; few families would want to leave such an enclave, especially if the rent is relatively cheap and few outsiders would want to move into an area dominated, socially and economically by an ethnic group which is not their own.

Holden cites overseas research into social habits to bolster his thesis that Dallas residents have no choice but to live by the side of a rubbish recycling plant, claiming that the upper middle class purposely corrals off all the finer things in life from the lower classes.

ilim college
Aussie schoolgirls make up for our racist, Christian past

He further claims that disparity in educational outcomes, low-quality government schooling and a lack of private schools is somehow imposed upon the residents of Dallas by the upper echelons.

This conclusion is in no way borne out by the census numbers; students living in Dallas attend private schools in numbers three times the state average in the primary years and double the average in the secondary system. It should have been a no brainer for any competent journalist to conclude that Muslims like to live close to the Mosques and private Islamic colleges which are mostly situated in the West, (which we are assured are among the best schools in the state) just as the bourgeois Anglos or Chinese nouveau riche of the Eastern suburbs gravitate to certain school zones.

Dallas appears to have a large number of families with children, which is what we could expect from an area which is 49% Muslim; few families would want to leave such an enclave, especially if the rent is relatively cheap and few outsiders would want to move into an area dominated, socially and economically by an ethnic group which is not their own.

We could argue that the Muslims of Dallas are in fact getting the better deal in some ways due to the fact that they do not have to shell out millions of dollars just to live close to their preferred schools, they get all the benefits and less of the burden given that their suburb is far from the hell hole described by Fairfax.

The problem  is not socioeconomic class in this instance, especially in relation to the fire emergency. The recycling plant, if properly run, is not a particularly dangerous facility by which to live; the lax management practices and corner-cutting found on site by the authorities were the cause of the fire. These factors were no doubt influenced by the diminishing returns from recycling plastic in the current economy.

The implication in Holden’s article is that such a facility would not be tolerated in the affluent Eastern suburbs, and that the bourgeoisie would use their clout to have it shut down as a health hazard before any adverse impacts on their community.

Who can say one way or another? We suspect that Holden’s attitude stems from the fact that people of his social class wouldn’t like to work in a recycling plant, so they see no benefit in having it in an urban setting; the inhabitants of Dallas and surrounds might have a different view given that blue collar jobs are becoming harder to find in the globalised economy.

One way of looking at Dallas is as an intentional community which is developing in accordance with the tastes, needs, and aspirations of its ethnic majority groups; this is not without precedent in Victoria and is a predictable result of the programme of multiculturalism.

We suspect that Holden’s attitude stems from the fact that people of his social class wouldn’t like to work in a recycling plant, so they see no benefit in having it in an urban setting; the inhabitants of Dallas and surrounds might have a different view given that blue collar jobs are becoming harder to find in the globalised economy.

Take for example the ostensible, intentional White enclaves of Eltham, Daylesford or Castlemaine, communities where elements of the White middle and skilled/artisan working classes have migrated, en-masse to set up societies catering to their needs, tastes and aspirations.

Instead of Islamic colleges, there are Steiner schools and community colleges, artisan bakers and funky European style Boites stand in place of the Shisha parlours and Kebab joints while the folk festivals of the White enclaves mirror the Eid and Mawlid observances of the Muslims.

Mawlid
Everyone is welcome – to assimilate to Islam

Never the twain shall meet, at least if things stay the way they are, yet this distance has really nothing to do with social class and everything to do with ethnic cohesion and the natural tendency for people to feel most relaxed and emotionally centred when surrounded by people with the same attitudes and aspirations as themselves.

The differences in median family income between the White enclave of, say, Castlemaine and Dallas is a few dollars a week.  Both communities are cohesive, vibrant and stable, yet very different in terms of ethnic composition; leading us to conclude that people choosing to live in these intentional communities place a premium on things outside the realm of purely material prosperity. There are class divides, and Nationalists are well aware of this, but the Dallas fire emergency reveals nothing about the state of society beyond the effects of over 40 years of multiculturalism, in spite of Matt Holden’s desperate attempts to frame it as such.

We understand that our class antagonists operate through the projection of power, via their access to the media, the machinery of state, big business and academia but the author, Holden, being a part of that system is unlikely to ever see things clearly or to admit the truth even if he knew it.

CSF  FINALE
Festival of the Snowflake

WHITE IDENTITY, CHAUVINISM AND THE FUTILITY OF APPEASEMENT

WHITE IDENTITY, CHAUVINISM AND THE FUTILITY OF APPEASEMENT

If Nationalists have said it once, we have said it a thousand times, the concept socioeconomic class and the politics of class struggle are intrinsic to our ideology of Australianism.

The idea that Australia, in its post-modern clothing is somehow en-route to becoming a classless “level playing field”, with equality and prosperity for all is, like so much of the Globalist rhetoric, completely self-serving.

The old Aussie platitude: “She’ll be right mate”, once a sly dig at working class complacency and indifference is now being uttered with greater and greater frequency by the chattering classes as they contemplate their worst fears: a largely redundant and idle White working class.

There is a definitely forced tone in the voices of the narrators of the great 21st century Australian decline, where they once scoffed and mocked “Ockers” and “Bogans” who were regarded as too stupid to do anything but drink, root and vote Labor, they now nervously talk of White despair, the fracturing of our society and the soaring rates of addiction, madness and suicide.

depression
She’ll be right mate

Yet this affected concern for the well-being of those less fortunate is, again, narrowly focused and self-serving on the part of the provider; whereas being poor, White and desperate was once seen as a moral failing, it is now seen as akin to an illness to be treated and monitored.

The idea that Australia, in its post-modern clothing is somehow en-route to becoming a classless “level playing field”, with equality and prosperity for all is, like so much of the Globalist rhetoric, completely self-serving.

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

The delivery of social programs of this nature always comes with a heavy helping of middle-class chauvinism and saccharine condescension, we can observe there the intersection of bourgeois politics, with its cult of underdog victimhood and the new age therapeutical movement which seeks to pathologise all human behaviour which might tend to be counterproductive to the cosmopolitan ideal.

Nationalists could all find examples of this type of intervention in their own community, where they might see a neighbourhood group of well to do citizens with ties to mainstream globalist political parties running so-called “Men’s Sheds” or counselling the unemployed

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

The political activism of the do-gooders, be it the Greens, Labor or Liberal is a betrayal of the White workers and marginalised people so their therapeutic interventions into lower social classes are largely cynical and geared toward subduing any hostility toward the bourgeoisie and the elites beyond.

No Joe Blow, they say; you are angry because you are sick, not because you have been betrayed by those who rule you; you lash out at your loved ones because of your toxic masculinity, not out of frustration at your socioeconomic circumstances; here, take an antidepressant and join the boys on suicide watch at the community centre.

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

When you investigate these groups, who provide therapy to Whites under the euphemistically described outreach toward “Tradies” or “Sports Clubs” there is always, too, a strong relationship with self-styled Anti-Racist activists and people espousing similar anti-Nationalist or anti-Worker ideas.

On that basis, we cannot help wondering if, on one level, these programmes are a form of counter-radicalisation initiative calculated to head off any politicisation of the increasingly redundant White, blue collar male segment of society?

boofhead
Boofhead is of us, but he’s not really one of us

One contemporary clique who aggressively promotes this globalist oriented therapeutic movement is Mark Latham and his Outsiders; Latham provides the political credibility via his, admittedly encyclopaedic, insider knowledge of the mainstream players; Bettina Arndt is the court therapist, Daisy Cousens the winsome right-wing gadfly and the sundry other conspiracy theorists and down at heel media figures appearing on the show provide the illusion of a “debate’.

Latham and his co-presenters peddle the assimilationist line, the cult of male victimhood and men’s rights and the particularly counterproductive narrative of pervasive Anti-White Racism; all of which, unfortunately, seem to be having an effect upon working class consciousness.

The reality is that White working class unity is being subverted by the upper classes and their bourgeoisie via false victim narratives and the therapeutic movement, the whole point of their intervention is to head off any large scale political radicalisation of Whites.

The result of this line of thinking is a growing number of marginalised White people who are being conned into believing that seeking the approval of the upper classes and playing into their victim narratives with “Aussie Pride”, “White Genocide” and similar sentiments will lead to anything but further betrayal.

The irony here is that the groups and individuals falling into this trap are becoming stereotypically “racist”, as Leon Trotsky, who invented the concept, would have understood it; this, of course, sets them up for betrayal by their demagogues, racism of that sort demands walking a fine line, a balancing act which most civic Patriots are too uncoordinated to pull off.

Daisy cousens
Fetching sucker bait for disaffected White males

The reality is that White working class unity is being subverted by the upper classes and their bourgeoisie via false victim narratives and the therapeutic movement, the whole point of their intervention is to head off any large scale political radicalisation of Whites.

A radical White movement resting on the structure of socioeconomic class with the ideology of Australianism informing its politics is the only way forward for our working and marginalised people; currying favour with the elites by pushing the assimilationist line, or going cap in hand to the bourgeoisie for hand outs and treatment is undignified and unacceptable.

We are not victims of anything but the economic circumstances imposed upon us by globalist capitalism; our anger is righteous and justified as opposed to pathological and irrational; we are not sick, just sick and tired of being talked down to by people who have only their own interests in mind.

federation

 

WHO IS BEHIND ‘AUSSIE NATIONALISTS’ AND ‘THOSE’ POSTERS?

WHO IS BEHIND ‘AUSSIE NATIONALISTS’ AND ‘THOSE’ POSTERS?

It took UNA just the time needed to type in a URL to discover the most likely culprit behind a series of well publicised ‘White Nationalist’ posters that have appeared in Sydney today.

Don’t get us wrong, they’re great posters and a top troll. But we are not here to discuss the posters per se: our point relates to our prime suspect for the creation of “Aussie Nationalists”. Coming from anyone else we might have cause to want to high-five a comrade too, but given the general motives of the suspected instigator, whose obsession with Whiteness ended at his choice of a wife and the children produced from their mixed-race marriage, we must abjure. If our mistrust seems offputting, it comes with the territory, sadly, because Nationalists don’t fight hostiles on the Left, we spend all our time tied up struggling to keep our politics protected from Right Wing fakers.

We will explain…

waleed
Don’t get us wrong, they’re great posters and a top troll

When we saw ‘AussieNationalists.wordpress.com’ as the address of the posters’ authors we did the obvious thing and visited the site. We encountered a WordPress blog barren, except for an incongruous trio of items: the first of which is a link to a demonstration in Lithgow hosted by — ta-ra, Peanuts for Freedom! This, of course, is the golden giveaway, or to us anyway, particularly since it bears the headline, “Next nationalist event you need to attend”.

The PfF Facebook page that it originates from appears to have been removed, either temporarily or permanently, which wouldn’t be a first for the Peanuts.

The second item is, for some bizarre reason, a link to a YouTube video about Oswald Mosely (an odd choice for those purporting to be ‘Aussie Nationalists’), which is an addendum to a gallery of the images from the Pokemon-themed posters plastered up around the inner-west of Sydney, which, again, are very clever and right on the target. They have achieved their desired aim of generating publicity. But to where does this publicity funnel? There is nothing at the end of it, no contact details, nothing but a cue back to this blog and the PfF rally. it advertises. It seems to be a one-shot blog. Given the rally flyer, in all likelihood, the blog’s creator has a vested interest in promoting that group. This would, by logic, place its ownership in that group’s orbit. In this case, the heavy emphasis on the designation “Nationalism” is a key element of the authors’ intentions. If you cannot change Nationalism, then change its definition.

The Facebook page that it originates from appears to have been removed, either temporarily or permanently, which wouldn’t be a first for the Peanuts.

The Sydney Traditionalists tried the same game of appropriation that Folkes is infamous for when they got involved with The Dingoes and surreptitiously organised the Dingocon [see Rape House and Dingoes Conned]. They saw a young movement and wanted to control its direction. We hazard a guess that the Trads have some link to Folkes, who, on the same day as Dingocon, took his family of Peanuts to Newtown to face down an absent Antifa. Anyway, now that we’ve figured out the most likely culprits, we can dismiss their claims to be Nationalists, yet take note of the strange activity occurring around them, which is indicative of the Patriot Games of old.

In attendance at Folkes’s rally was New Zealand provocateur Mark McDonald, who has been vandalising Australian Nationalism in one way or another since his feet landed on our soil in 2013. McDonald has no ties to the Australian soil or its people. He is White, but he is a foreigner. This hasn’t stopped him trying to poison our movement and members who have an earnest dedication to the principles of Australian Nationalism.

The same cannot be said for either he or his new Peanut tribe. Now is a good time to consider the absolute gobsmacking hypocrisy of Folkes.

In February, Folkes burned a Nazi flag outside the Tempe headquarters of Australia First Party (while he and his Boy Friday, Tobes, were very convincingly dressed as Moslems) protesting — we’re still not sure what — but making it clear that he and his Zion-friendly PfF oppose the racial politics of AFP.

imageedit_6_6825016602.jpg
A few months ago ‘edgy’ symbols like this upset Nicky boy (note the UNA reference on the flag)
imageedit_2_9753072060
If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em, eh Nick?

He did this before with the “bunker” video (Nick Folkes is now referring to his home as the ‘Rozelle Bunker’), in which Jim Saleam and others toasted the passing of slain Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. Much was made of the Nationalist Socialist flags which appear in the background of the host’s apartment. He is known to be a collector of such memorabilia and being a guest who was just passing through, Jim had no control over what bric-a-brac or ornamentation decorated the apartment. Of course, it was a connection to Folkes from this person and his acquaintances that put the video in the possession of Howard Crawford to begin with, a contradiction never reflected on by those who mistook both its relevance and currency.

Present there, and we have a pic of him from the event tucked away for a rainy day, is New Zealand provocateur Mark McDonald, who has been trying to ruin Australian Nationalism since his two left feet landed on our country’s soil in 2013.

Now, of course, Folkes is “joining in” with the whole alt-right fashion, which utilises edgy ‘fash’ symbolism. Folkes appropriated the Totenkopf symbol, often associated with Hitler’s SS, on a flyer for the demonstration in Newtown. The more influential it becomes, the more Folkes tries reinventing himself so he can get inside it. This is in spite of defaming true Nationalists as “Nazis” — along with his cohorts like Dan Evans, Neil Erikson and mad Scotty Moerland.

Bear in mind that while enacting that ‘anti-Nazi’ shtick, Folkes was keeping lines open to McDonald. This here poses questions about the purity of S88, which was going hell for leather to be the most undisputed anti-Jewish show in town. Yet, here now, as then, we have its former Fuhrer photographed (on file) within spitting distance of Radka Smith, second-in-charge of Peanuts for Freedom.

download (1) (1)
The message behind this  PfF character reads, “It’s a foreign invasion”. Erm, ever get the feeling someone’s having a lend?

Radka is Jewish. But there must be a degree of indignation Radka feels being in the presence of Matey Mate, since in 2014 when McDonald met Smith he almost spat the words in her face, “You’re a JEW!” Indeed, Matey is quick to accuse people of being Jewish, and yet has no problem with associating with Jewish-friendly organisations.

Remember too, Jewish James Sternhell is a supporter of the Peanuts, which also boasts an Asian member. This should be borne in mind when viewing Folkes’s take on appropriating the White Genocide message. Do not put out of mind their strong links to Liberal Party operator Howard Crawford, who is a major league Zionist. They must wonder too about Toby’s “I Support Open Borders for Israel”, but they’re a crazy, whacky, zany bunch of cripples round at Peanut Palace. Even odder, is that Dan Evans, an absolute multi-racialist and enemy of Australian Nationalism was a speaker at Nick’s rally against Antifa. How does a character like that accord with one like Matey Mate with his Seig Heil and 14/88 cliches? About the same as they ever did, because the pattern is this: Larping is fine so long as real Nationalists with purist inclinations don’t come by rocking the boat.

Bear this in mind, because S88 tried passing itself off as hard-core anti-Jewish. But here we have its former Fuhrer standing within pissing distance of Radka Smith, second-in-charge of Peanuts for Freedom.

Radka’s Jewishness is of no concern to us. However, in this instance, it is a level indicator of the kind of deceit that is PfF’s stock in trade.

We call on Folkes to publically denounce his own contributions to White Genocide, by despoiling his bloodline with Asian genes, and to state categorically that PfF is dedicated to restoring a White Australia.

This is where you get to nail Nicholas since he won’t do either.

Thus, we swing back to those posters, which we repeat, are just a product and not the subject of our editorial. Under different circumstances, we could applaud the trolling along with everyone else. But knowing what a fragile state true Nationalism is in presently we would be contributing to its hastening demise by giving kudos to those who seek to subvert it. What’s more, it is the ‘usual suspects’ who have been pursuing this goal for years.

These creatures have never shied away from doxing true Nationalists to either the Media and our ideological opponents on the Left. In fact, that has been one of their longstanding tactics, so bear that in mind when they showily ‘face off’ with Antifa as they are staring down the same people they secretly supply info when hiding behind their computers.

A friend of ours told us in all soberness that what is needed is for everything to absolutely go to crap. It all needs to be broken apart and smashed up because only on fresh, healthy soil, can we hope to grow anew. He might be onto something.

Still, they are great posters, and that message is always welcome even if the messenger is on the nose.

11058381_1614577155478721_2950402781380467801_n
One of Nick’s regular anti-White Genocide campaigners

DINGOES CONNED?

DINGOES CONNED?

You say 1488, I say 1788

Matthew Grant

There is a valid reason we lead this week’s story on last Saturday night’s Dingocon with the brilliant quote above.

It is all to do with a difference of perspective which separates Australian Nationalist activists from those inside the ‘Australian alt-right’ phenomenon.

Do not misunderstand us; we are not out to trash the Dingoes. We merely bear the kind of admonitions one should expect from us, as well as sober observations from the perspective of those involved in a political movement informed by experience.

Firstly, no UNA member was in attendance on the evening in question. It was not expected that we would be invited any more than would Australia First Party president Jim Saleam have been.

C92udsHUwAA1n4r.jpg
The ad forgot to say “Political Nationalists Not Welcome!”

Nobody from the Australian Protectionist Party was invited either, although we understand Nationalist Alternative was represented.

Contrary to popular belief, we state again, Jim Saleam wields no influence over United Nationalists Australia regardless of whether some of our writers are AFP members. We offer ALL true Nationalists an opportunity of expression, but so far only AFP members have accepted that invitation, which permanently stands. As such, Jim Saleam is totally free to submit whenever he wishes, and we are delighted to publish him. Likewise, AFP often shares links to UNA material, and we are grateful for the extended reach that affords us. We are, after all, working together in the interests of the Australian nationalist movement. AFP is internationally recognised for its work in nationalism.

It is all to do with a difference of perspective which separates Australian Nationalist activists from those inside the ‘Australian alt-right’ phenomenon.

We raise the subject of Jim Saleam, as we learned from sources that he was a contentious figure at Dingocon. There was an implication that his article ‘Rape House’ was a mitigating factor in the snub. In fact, a UNA rep met with Dingocon’s organiser a few weeks before the convention so we could suss each other out. The message was then as it was afterwards that Jim Saleam was “too much of a divisive figure”. The question is, divisive for whom? We shall get to that, although this matter is only a sidebar subject of this article.

In fact, if you want to get down to brass tacks, it was the Australian Nationalist Movement in its Political aspect that was excluded from Dingocon. So let us stop for a moment and ask, what is a Dingo?

anthro_dash_dingo_by_skull1045oscar-d56rkyf.png
A Dingo

UNA always regarded a Dingo as an editorial contributor to the Podcast bearing the name of the Dingoes; although in fact (according to one youth we asked) it is a generic appellation for nativist followers of Australia’s alt-right movement. We knew anyway, we just wanted to hear how they described themselves.

They are irreverent, social-media savvy, politically-incorrect, meme-focused, and just like their American cousins communicate via their own coded lingo. Their weapon is humour with a generous dash of irony.

In fact, if you want to get down to brass tacks, it was the Australian Nationalist Movement in its Political aspect that was excluded from Dingocon. So let us stop for a moment and ask, what is a Dingo?

This subculture rejects the “old school” Nationalists as irrelevant. In short, they are full of the self-assuredness of youth, and the conviction that in their freshness and vigour they will be able to institute a change that us others have thus far ‘failed’ to deliver. Moreover, they are not interested in political activism in the conventional sense and wouldn’t lay a vote AFP’s way; although they follow One Nation because they have this idea about invading its youth wing. According to one who was close to the Dingoes of the Podcast fame, while they might employ the usual alt-right National Socialist schtick, they are quite Civic in regards to homosexuals and even on the Zionist question.

We cannot comment on that claim other than to say the young person who told us seemed sound. Others suggest this youngster has issues.

Here, we wish to refute accusations that UNA is “hostile” to the Dingoes in regards to the loose affiliation of those who collect under its banner. We are not hostile to them in any way. But we know those behind the Dingoes’ curtain are very much hostile to us, but more so to Jim Saleam.

14705738_334529890272448_421088926577493001_n
You say 1488, Matt says 1788!

At this point, our commentary splits into two key areas: addressing those operators behind that curtain, and the nature of this ‘Dingo’ counterculture and how it relates to the spirit of the Australian Nationalist Movement.

Again, we refer back to our initial meeting with Dingocon’s organiser. It was made clear to UNA that Jim Saleam was in no uncertain terms unwelcome. Following Dingocon the word was that he had been the subject of much derision. So we ask ourselves, why would a young scene that has had no prior dealings with Jim Saleam prejudice him thus? The short answer is they wouldn’t. It is those operating the convention that sought to isolate him from the various guests. Who are these operators? Apart from ex-Klub Nation’s David McBryde, who Dingocon’s organiser refused to discuss, we have also confirmed the presence of Luke Torrisi, whom he particularly declined to comment on.

We cannot comment on that claim other than to say the young person who told us seemed sound. Others suggest this youngster has his or her own issues. The point in mentioning is to allow for a fuller coverage of the subject.

Torrisi is a “paleoconservative” and a contributor to the ultra-conservative Sydney Traditionalists. We have had unconfirmed reports, too, that Torrisi was a past financier of Nick Folkes and the Party for Freedom. The Sydney Trads and Nationalists acrimoniously diverge on the question of a White Australia (they are conservatives after all). Yet, Torrisi hosts a conservative show Monday nights on 88.9FM on which he will give a conspiratorial ‘wink’ to White Nationalism; even though he is fundamentally at odds with it.

Two other names have come our way, but we cannot confirm either was present, and they are associates of McBryde — Morgan Qasabian (ex-Klub Nation), and Dylan Anderson.

-v8J1t-O_400x400.jpg
It’s all about the Principle on the Sydney Trads’ colours

If there is one message that UNA has been tirelessly pushing it is the threat to Nationalism posed by manipulative conservatives. It is a story as old as Zeus and it never seems to change. Here we have a fledgeling movement in the sphere of influence of conservatives.

In a December 2016 article on The Dingoes, Pommy social researcher John Smith said ‘these groups are’, “People saying things which aren’t themselves objectionable, which appeal to people’s sense of patriotism and identity. It is often used as a way of smuggling in a kind of much more nationalist politics, a politics which is much further right than most people would agree with.”

However, Smith does not venture to consider that the very opposite might be the case, and people might say objectionable things as a means of smuggling in a more conservative politics than the third position of where true Nationalism must inevitably end up. We contend this is exactly what is happening.

Two other names have come our way, but we cannot confirm either was present, and they are associates of McBryde — Morgan Qasabian (ex-Klub Nation), and Dylan Anderson.

It is little wonder those organisers would not have countenanced Jim Saleam coming among them or even the Australian Protectionist Party, who are similarly wise to their scam. It is not that these Dingoes are necessarily going to be rewired into conservatives but rather that the whole movement ends up being steered out to sea. And would that bother Nationalists? In a sense, no it wouldn’t.

A prominent figure in the movement told a UNA reporter, in conversation, that the fundaments of this young generation involve a conscious shift from a Beta type to an Alpha. This means they look to building themselves up both physically, in the gym, and socially, in their earning power (and there is nothing wrong at all with doing so). According to him, there is a competitive edge to the alt-right youth as they seek to dominate, and become “superior to” the bloke next to him. There is no distinction of whether this other “bloke” happens to be White also, in which case, the competitiveness becomes for its own sake.

screen-shot-2015-11-03-at-6-21-31-pm
David McBryde, the man behind the Dingocon curtain

Bear in mind, too, just as an interesting observation, that girls are noticeably excluded from this movement.

Our characterisation of the alt-right as a counterculture, as opposed to a Political movement, seems right enough. From what we can gather, this subculture is by its nature upwardly mobile, and consciously elitist. In essence, those are the persnickety qualities of the Young Liberals, even if those involved haven’t realised it. If what our source told us is on the money, then by that description they risk becoming concerned with acquisition and confusing status with strength, while pride in race becomes simply pride.

There is also, speaking plainly, arrogance on show. The contention that anyone over the age of 25 who has been involved in the movement longer than yesterday is somehow a failure demonstrates a total lack of comprehension of the enormity of what our people face. It is not a matter of convincing the masses they need Alpha heroes to worship, but of bringing down an immovable system. Those in the American alt-right might have noticed this about their ‘Emperor God’ Donald Trump. Sure, he won the Presidency, but any idealistic notions he may have had of seriously changing things have been thwarted by the very system that has stymied — and will continue to block — Australian Nationalists at every turn.

Bear in mind, too, just as an interesting observation, that girls are noticeably excluded from this movement.

Characters like McBryde and Torissi arguably ARE that system, if they are only concerned with matters of tradition, and by interposing themselves in the Dingo counterculture they are meddling. In their desire to misdirect these kids from Nationalism, they might not be intent on creating an ‘alt-light’, but simply a movement unable to actually move anywhere. This is the risk it faces on its own, anyway, as it is in danger of being stuck in a cul-de-sac from where it cannot advance onto political turf because it is founded purely on counterculture codes and insider signalling.

Moreover, the very quality of ‘youth’ being flaunted is undermined by the fact the people organising them are old men. We find this particularly ironic. UNA reiterates, however, that we are not concerned either way. For our part, we do not wish to influence this Dingo subculture. Frankly, it is irrelevant to us.

download (3).jpg
Far more relevant to Aussies than a swastika

Our purpose IS political and it is not egos we as Nationalists aim to shape but the hearts and minds of White Australians. The mass of White Aussies who voted in Pauline Hanson’s One Nation to the Senate believing they were getting a Nationalist were not cocky youths judging them on their cut pecs and speccy hairstyles. The Australians who we need do not understand the codewords used by the alt-right, nor do they necessarily ‘get’ their memes. For memes will not fill their bellies, nor save their jobs, or stop them from becoming homeless.

The Australians that Nationalism needs are aged from ten to a hundred. We do not judge them on their body shape, or whether they can afford boutique beers at a trendy foodie establishment for we know they cannot.

UNA reiterates, however, that we are not concerned either way. For our part, we do not wish to influence this Dingo subculture. Frankly, it is irrelevant to us.

Right now, the Australians whose support we seek are begging charity to help them pay for unaffordable utility bills. They are dying in hospital queues while waiting rooms are overcrowded by an unsustainable influx of non-White aliens generated by the very conservatives whose obsequiousness to the globalist powers open our airport gates. The solidarity that these conservatives share with America and therefore Israel keep us involved in illegal military actions in the Middle East which generate a ceaseless traffic of non-Whites and Moslems hell-bent on knocking down this spiritually desolate marketplace our nation has become (which isn’t a bad thing) and instating a state founded on a Semitic faith (which is an egregious prospect).

While some devote themselves to executing “edgy” performances with National Socialist symbols in the belief they are spearheading a counter-cultural revolution, Australians are disappearing in the blackening shadows of Chinese-owned tower blocks soon to be filled with our replacement population. To date, no known Larrikinism, or meme, has been able to prevent Chinese entry into our country.

The Australia we wish to change is not within the clique of a single generation but out there in the un-sexy wild of the Australian suburbs and rural zones.

They might give 88 an Aussie twist, but it’s still 88, and as Matthew Grant said, “You say 14/88, I say 1788.” You say, Adolf Hitler, we say, William Lane, Jack Lang, John Curtin, Percy Stephensen and Henry Lawson. You say Nuremberg, we say Lambing Flats.

We close by reminding our readers that this is in no way intended as a sledge against this alt-right counterculture nor do we even regard it as an infallible account of it. We are on different paths anyway. We also stress that just because individuals turned up to Dingocon does not mean they have been influenced by a strain of conservatism they might otherwise find unacceptable if those we mentioned do hold undue sway.

We are just responding to the fact that Nationalism was stopped from entering the doors of Dingocon last Saturday night. And while we applaud the alt-right for being there and exhibiting signs of cockiness, UNA reminds our young friends that we’ve been down this road ourselves and as much as you think that it’s new it really doesn’t change. We all started out brimming with confidence and believing our predecessors had dropped the ball.

Awaiting you, young friends is all the hurt that is part and parcel of the struggle against the one-world government. Awaiting you is doxing, broken friendships, backstabbing, betrayal and potential loss of income. Awaiting you is aggro,  and total silence from those who you thought were your allies but turn out to be no better than window dummies when you are dropped in it. You will be lied about, misrepresented, they will call you names, accuse you of things you haven’t done, and in some cases, they will jail you. Perhaps some have already figured this out. In the end, you will learn the bitter lesson that things are not (pardon the pun) black and White and those who you would think are like us turn out to be bigger enemies than the Trots on the Left.

dingo.jpeg
This Dingo eats conservatives

FACEBOOK EGOS WILL EAT THE PATRIOTS

FACEBOOK EGOS WILL EAT THE PATRIOTS

Facebook is yet to be thoroughly examined to ascertain the full scope of its social impact on the players in the psychodramas that it enables. However, we have witnessed enough to observe that it aggravates the sociopaths who gravitate to this Patriot thing.

The relationship between trolling and the anonymity of social media has been well recognised but whether or not the reach of Facebook creates the sociopath or that personality type is drawn to the Patriot Movement could be the subject of a peer-reviewed paper.

What we have recognised is that when starved of attention, or removed from the spotlight, certain personalities in the Patriot movement become destructive.

UNA offers this insight as Nationalists, whose separate movement doesn’t seem to harbour the same level of miscreants. There is in itself a lesson to be gleaned from a comparison between the two. Who, for instance, could locate in Nationalist Alternative the kind of monstrous egos that are evident in a Neil Erikson, Shermon Burgess or Nick Folkes?

We name these three individuals because UNA has such experience with chronicling their behaviour but they are far from the entirety of problematic persons who feel that the Patriot Movement offers them an opportunity for the celebrity they will never attain on the basis of personal merit in the outside world.

Here, it is probably useful for newcomers if we define the two in a manner that makes this pronounced difference between both movements understandable. We have, at UNA, had cause to define Patriots and Nationalists in a couple of different ways, but here we highlight the aspect of which ‘mainstreaming’ is the significant catalyst for egocentricity in the individual player.

What we have recognised is that when starved of attention, or removed from the spotlight, certain personalities in the Patriot movement become destructive.

The Patriots desire appeal, and as such focus on a message that emphasises the incompatibility of Islam with Western life. Arguably, therein is a kernel of acknowledgement of the Nationalist awareness of race as being central to national and social cohesion, but this is repudiated for the popularity that comes from inclusiveness.

That is to say, the Patriot will argue that ‘Asians’ are capable of assimilation or that non-Islamic Indians are welcome as supporters. This is as much a cynical means for them to dispute accusations of ‘racism’ which a learned Nationalist will dismiss as irrelevant name calling. All of this is for the sake of achieving a wider following, to which they are prepared to surrender a fundamental integrity of the issue, and turn their eyes to the critical truth that all immigration of a non-White European kind principally alters the fabric of the Australianness central to what we are defending.

It is here that we challenge the assertion made by many who follow this path that by broader exposure they will achieve their objectives, since in the course of seeking popularity they have obscured their former goals, and altered them from a mission to change the social contract of Australian citizenship, to one of accruing approval for rewards both definable and less easily classifiable.

The Nationalist has a greater understanding of the futility of challenging the dominant system in a prescribed manner. But we do not wish to be tangentially misdirected because the salient factor here is ‘popularity’ and its relationship to the the Patriot Egoist.

It is much easier to gain Facebook appeal when not exhorting followers to necessarily exclude others. Nationalists will exclude those of non-White European backgrounds. Also, most who subscribe to the Patriot pages are still indoctrinated into a ‘multicultural’ attitude; it’s just that — being creations of the very system they believe they are in dispute with — they desire Diversity minus Islam.

The Nationalist has a greater understanding of the futility of challenging the dominant system in a prescribed manner. But we do not wish to be tangentially misdirected because the salient factor here is ‘popularity’ and its relationship to the pathology of the Patriot Egoist.

Thus, we have those who regard themselves as ‘players’ because they have a message of sorts, an audience, and a platform with which to interact with that active audience. It is no secret that the reach of Patriot pages far eclipses those of the Nationalists and we will argue that those who administrate their pages have become enticed away from the principles that are assumed to be associated with their activities in preference for the ‘Facebook fame’ they feel they have achieved.

Indeed, why change the outside world when what happens out there sustains the inner world of Facebook they have created for themselves?

We will not go into a full definition of a sociopath as that would be treading ground, not in the purview of this essay. But some traits of the sociopath involve a lack of conscience, an absence of remorse or shame, unreliability, and fantastical behaviour.

We have witnessed all of this with, just as one example, and probably the best, Neil Erikson. But we are not here to revisit the topic of Erikson but telegraph a warning about a type that will ultimately destroy this brand of alternative politics for want of attention.

UNA recently had an experience with the admin of a high-reach page who, for over a year, was trusted among us. Yet, he was always of a volatile personality type and began exhibiting the classic signs that of the Patriot Egoist. So concealed was the more extreme elements of his pathology that we didn’t even notice he was suffering from this condition until he outed some of us to Leftists and threw shared admins off his page which he now clings to, not because it is a tool in our political struggle, but as it is an ace in his hand.

Indeed, why change the outside world when what happens out there sustains the inner world of Facebook they have created for themselves?

Never once was he ever concerned with the quality of commentary passing through his page, but was more obsessed with the ‘reach’ and was constantly fetishizing the number of likes and visits and how they inflated his status. But his critical motivator was jealousy over his abilities as a communicator not measuring up to ours and while we never judged him on this defecit it caused in him seething as it challenged his ego. To that end he sought our destruction.

Neil Erikson is the absolute prototype of this in the Patriot scene. When his access to attention is ever challenged, he will dox, defame, lie, and use any tactic within his arsenal to damage the very thing that supposedly spawned him.

When deprived of exposure on Facebook, this type will display symptoms equivalent to narco-dependency. They actually exhibit symptoms of withdrawal. If they do not regain the attention they are reliant on they become dangerous. The ‘movement’ ceases to matter. All that is left is their jilted ego.

Again, we present nationalists like Nationalist Alternative as a counter example. There is clearly humility within its rank and file based on true belief in the cause. True believers will subjugate themselves for the sake of the cause. We see the same thing in the Australia First Party, and the selflessness of Dr Jim Saleam and the Australia-wide party membership, as well as the Australian Protectionist Party, who likewise have no such characters as Erikson to scandalise them.

Finally, we offer ourselves, since no UNA writer who is not already a public figure seeks the attention of notoriety. Let’s hope it stays that way because we forecast a disaster on the horizon based on this beast that is Facebook and the social phenomena it has produced.

Unknown

RAPE HOUSE

RAPE HOUSE

Introduction

A COUPLE of months ago, a social media phenomenon, an embryonic political-cultural movement in fact – ‘the Dingoes’ – came in for public criticism. Its advent reminded the liberal media that the ‘Alt Right’ had made its way to Australia and that its emergence opened a new front against the ideological props of the liberal globalist society. Some of the Dingoes began the process of Australianizing their reference points which placed them onto the path of embracing Australian Nationalism.

But then there were those who set out to stop that process from maturing. They decided to do this by stealing the Dingo phenomenon.

It is a sad fact that the Dingoes, indeed the Alt Right generally, became subjects for subversion courtesy of a poisonous group whose line of political descent over decades demonstrates a long history of parasitism, wrecking and plain sociopathy.

It is necessary to start somewhere in discussing these wreckers and our reference to the attempted takeover of the Dingo movement only sets our stage. Their subversion runs deeper than the Dingoes.

As we shall see, if it isn’t ‘other people’s money’, it is ‘other people’s efforts’ that are to the attention of the wrecking group.

We speak here of the ‘Rape House’, not just because of some sexual assaults which occurred in proximity to this group, but rather because the group mentally despoils any rational and fair element with whom it comes into contact.

The time has come for this garbage-group was the subject not only of ruthless exposure but a concerted drive to eliminate them from the terrain of any movement that may contribute to national regeneration.

We want their guts and we want them gone.

However, given the tangled connections of the Rape House gang, that is easier said than done! It must be the subject of a mobilization by all nationalists. We can begin first with the Dingoes and help them purge these wreckers and then we can move on with other struggles to limit the wreckers’ field of action, all while we consolidate the Australian Nationalist message in every way possible.

Dr Jim Saleam, 2017

The Rape House

In 2007, Jason Rafty rented a house on Fennell Street, North Parramatta. He moved in a few tenants from his ‘scene’ and made a profit on the rent.

Whether this profit went to his new creation the ‘Public Information Forum’ (or Klub Nation as it was generally known) we don’t know, but this unofficial headquarters of his enterprise gave him a centre for his officers (sic) to live in, and act out of, as they contrived a series of schemes.

Jason Rafty, as the impresario of Klub Nation, was a product of a long-standing gang which he had served already for eight years, but we shall get to that. A remarkable letter came into our possession addressed by Rafty to Jeremy Jones of the Australia Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC). It is reproduced at the end of this article.

Here, Rafty offers to travel to Russia and spy on Russian nationalists and in particular an organisation known as Russian National Unity. He asks AIJAC for money and equipment and he sets out in detail how the operation would work and how he might also profit at the end, with book rights no less. It is understood the letter was written around 1999. He also refers to his Jewish wife, a peculiar circumstance, given the internal game-playing of Klub Nation, often involved its claim to represent neo-nazism.

The existence of the letter was well known to the Klub Nation gang, but it did not seem to worry them, accepting as they will say they did Rafty’s chutzpah explanation that he was trying to rip off Jones.

That in itself sets a certain tone for Rafty, but the very idea of trying to panhandle Jones, given his professional resources at disentangling bullshit – was incredible. More likely, the letter was a ‘genuine’ attempt to get money and betray people whom Rafty later said he found ideologically agreeable. As we shall see, Rafty was not the only person in Klub Nation with special connections. Did Rafty continue this connection with AIJAC?

The existence of the letter was well known to the Klub Nation gang, but it did not seem to worry them, accepting as they will say they did Rafty’s chutzpah explanation that he was trying to rip off Jones. 

The morally oblique style of Klub Nation extended to one of Jason Rafty’s closest lieutenants formally recruited in 2007 but known to the gang before this time. This person, who functioned as his number-two, was the person for whom Rape House is dedicated. Some three women were sexually assaulted at the Fennell Street house. One was raped and two others sexually assaulted in different ways.

Rafty
The only known correspondence from Klub Nation was this letter from Rafty to Jeremy Jones of  the Australia/Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) offering to spy on Nationalists in Russia 

The assaults were known to the residents. Around 2011, one Michael Holt resided there and paid rent. As he recounted to other persons, the assaults were talked about and were to be hushed up. This troubled young man who mucked about with neo-nazi ideology would later be imprisoned on gun charges and was accused of planning a mass shooting. For ourselves, we have also talked to one of the victims who are quite specific about her experiences and she named the other victims. She certainly named the perpetrator. It is our understanding that one of the tenants remains furious with the rapist for using his bed and leaving traces of the assault. Charming.

oie_n7tcGoe6Sl1D
Klub Nation scammer Andrew Wilson of the Rape House infamy is now appropriating political real estate of The Dingoes

The cover up of sexual assault by this gang is despicable, but it’s just the start. Covering their tracks is something we just cannot permit. How can we understand Klub Nation?

Klub Nation met at the Humanist House in the inner-Sydney suburb of Chippendale from early 2005 until October 2009. It met every few weeks and its political identity was known to the Humanist member who permitted their presence by renting out the rooms. The same Humanist member must have been aware of ‘something’ going on when members of Klub Nation began to actually join the Humanist Society itself as members. He cannot say he wasn’t warned as Jim Saleam spoke to him at some point about the group and what its real intentions might be.

1486122148137
Rape House resident Michael Holt is now in prison for violating Duke Nukem’s copyright 

Ultimately, the Klub Nation members made a bid to take over the Humanist Society because as an incorporated body it owned the property and other assets, over a million dollars worth. Fortunately, they were beaten back, evicted from the use of the facility and their members removed from the Society. This effort to steal the assets of a community organisation wasn’t a new thing to Klub Nation, as we shall also explain.

The cover up of sexual assault by this gang is despicable, but it’s just the start. Covering their tracks is something we just cannot permit. How can we understand Klub Nation?

Klub Nation was remarkable in that it had no website, no magazine, no political manifesto, never organized a demonstration, nor contested an election, nor ran any campaign of agitation, nor even performed any specific act of violence (given the tone of its meetings on occasion). It claimed to be a forum of ideas and held ‘talks’, sometimes graced by Rafty wearing a Soviet military tunic; but it also said it was a survival club and a group that would raise money towards the purchase of a property in a rural setting. Yet essentially, it was simply whatever its leaders said it was at any particular moment, and to whomsoever the‘mark’ might be.

So what was it really? A big-mouth group with no real records or obvious structure could be a type of fraud, or perhaps a version of the French Resistance. And our choice of options – is the former. It was a con. Not just a money con for the operators, but a political charade.

Humanist_House4©R.jpg
The Humanist Society house in Sydney’s Chippendale which Klub Nation tried taking over

Klub Nation has been described by some who blundered into it and by those affected and burned by it in several overlapping ways: listening post, Liberal Party dirty-tricks op, drain-pool of the mentally challenged, a pretend survivalist club, a money-making operation for Rafty, neutralizing agency for anyone with a brain, a counter-gang and a rumour mill that would target genuine nationalists and patriots. Each of these claims reflected the truth.

At its ‘height’ in 2009, this group pretended that it was going to purchase a block of rural land as an investment upon which buildings would be constructed for the use of the whole patriotic movement and this would serve as a training centre in trades and politics for young people. Its leaders said that they were really the “general staff” in waiting for the Australian patriot movement and the genuine force of “nationalism” (they appropriated the term), not like all of us pretenders in our various organisations.

They said they were the focal point for building the real unity that was so lacking with all of us. They tried to con into their web the new Nationalist Alternative and even older Skinhead groups. But all saw through them.

So what was it really? A big-mouth group with no real records or obvious structure could be a type of fraud, or perhaps a version of the French Resistance. And our choice of options – is the former. It was a con. Not just a money con for the operators, but a political charade.

People from an array of patriot groups did at different times attend their gatherings, usually invited by ‘runners’ but with the true nature of the group concealed from them. This was essential cover and useful in garnering intelligence and spreading misinformation about genuine groups. Newbies were quietly relieved of their money. Some were even sold silver bars which they could ‘re-invest’, or they were asked to invest in a Ponzi scheme of Pyramid-selling-type intricacy. We won’t try to explain it as it’s just too hard. Some withdrew from contact with Klub Nation, but some got hooked on the hype. A five-figure-sum bank account (after expenses and there were a lot of those) was built.

Key players in Klub Nation included Andrew Wilson, David McBryde, Steven Moore and Mark Pavic. All had murky histories, personal and political. John Boyle, a solicitor who had run the Liberal Party’s ‘Chinese Special Branch’ in Haymarket and who later became a China immigration agent and who married a Chinese woman, was noted at the meetings. Moore and Boyle were linked to the Fellowship of the Round Table a private discussion group now known as ‘Western Heritage’ and which today runs meetings at NSW Parliament House. This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party.

This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party. The Fellowship was run by the very Humanist who first let in the Klub Nation crew at the Chippendale building.

With Klub Nation, weakened after the failure to rip off the Humanists, a new plan came into being. Meetings resumed in 2010 at the Mechanics Institute in Pitt Street Sydney and the members began to join this society, also with the plan to rort it, or at least, to make fulsome use of its resources. A witness says he was handed a Mechanics membership form at the Rape House and told to “join”. Once again, nationalists warned the Mechanics what the plan was. Ultimately also, this new scam came to nought. We were also advised that nationalists were accused of warning a bowling club which they intended to ‘take over’ – and they were booted from there. On this occasion, we deny any involvement.

By late 2013, some of the ‘investors’ in Klub Nation, essentially some of those basically conned by it, were clamouring for their money. Others decided they also wanted their money, particularly a certain Peter Coleman, whom we shall meet shortly. David McBryde (who was the “treasurer”) made a big play of refunding a percentage of this money (but much was simply missing). In what must be a bemusing moment, a witness says that some of this money was repaid to claimants sometime in late 2014 or early 2015, “during a social” at an address in Summer Hill – which was also the ‘headquarters’ of the neo-nazi grouplet Squadron 88.

This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party. The Fellowship was run by the very Humanist who first let in the Klub Nation crew at the Chippendale building.

It wasn’t over. The Klub Nation crew were ready to move on. But first, a question. Where did this gang come from? Klub Nation was follow-on incarnation of a group that came into existence in Sydney in 1988 – 1989.

Nationalists call this first group the Palmer-Coleman gang, naming it after Peter Coleman, a member of Jack van Tongeren’s (misnamed) Australian Nationalists Movement and a seemingly eccentric jack-in-the-box, David Palmer.

Palmerr.png
David Palmer described himself  as “some sort of ASIO asset”

Below are two documents from the Jim Saleam Special Branch police file. One shows that Coleman was not averse to providing material to the Special Branch about nationalism (in this case Jim Saleam). The second shows that Neville Ireland, who ran the case against the nationalist organisation National Action in 1988 – 1991, had an appointment in late May 1989 with an informer called ‘Cabbie’. This informer was Coleman. Both men in a court in November 1990 denied meeting each other until that very day, a little piece of perjury that covered over a substantial relationship.

 

Sal2 001.jpg
Neville Ireland’s Duty Book reveals an informant called ‘Cabbie’. This was
Peter Coleman

 

At the Police Royal Commission in 1997, Coleman received a title, ‘Commission Code 18’ (CC18). He was important to Neville Ireland’s operations. Indeed, as we reasonably know, Coleman betrayed van Tongeren to prison and from the outside managed some disruption of National Action in the years 1989-1991.

Did Klub Nation concern itself with this? Was any member worried about it at all? No, they weren’t. Coleman’s former status was just another day in the life of the group. It was well known.

Nationalists call this first group the Palmer-Coleman gang, naming it after Peter Coleman, a member of Jack van Tongeren’s (misnamed) Australian Nationalists Movement and a seemingly eccentric jack-in-the-box, David Palmer.

David Palmer came on the scene late in 1988, joined with Coleman in early 1989 and carried on from there and in 1990 established a neo-nazi group calling itself the National Socialist Defending Aryan People Party. Well, that’s what it said it was. In 2005, he would even say in writing that he had been some sort of ASIO asset. To other people, he confessed receiving “$200 a report” from ASIO.

Did anyone in Klub Nation ever come forward to explain their relationship with Palmer or to provide information to nationalists about him? Not at all. Again, it was just another day.

 

Sal1 001.jpg
A Special Branch incident report: Peter Coleman happily provides information

In tandem and for years, these two political police assets harassed nationalists, appeared in the press with provocative statements, made their statements a parody of ‘racist’ thought and reported back to their masters. So what was the Palmer-Coleman gang?

It was listening post, an ASIO / Special Branch dirty-tricks op which collected intelligence on an array of patriotic people, a drain-pool of the mentally challenged, a neutralizing agency for anyone who wanted to be an ‘activist’, a counter-gang and a rumour mill. Each of these claims reflected the truth.

At different points, Australians would hear these actors had infiltrated Pauline Hanson’s party, controlled terror networks and were ready to bomb the Olympics. A seemingly ‘believing’ media would always report them. We wonder why?

Did anyone in Klub Nation ever come forward to explain their relationship with Palmer or to provide information to nationalists about him? Not at all. Again, it was just another day.

Then in 1999, Palmer decided to infiltrate the religious society, the British Israel World Federation. They had inherited a house in the Blue Mountains and $140,000 in cash and already maintained a bookshop in York Street with maybe $20,000 in assets there.

Palmer had met Rafty and a man called Mark Pavic. This quality lad had spent years in gaol for weighing down his mum’s body at the bottom of Lake Burley Griffin. But better still, he had tried to rort the Theosophical Society in 1996-7 and take its assets by moving in, siding with a ‘faction’, helping that faction and trying to come out on top. The Court of Appeal decision that saw him defeated makes interesting reading. He was a perfect organizer for the takeover of British Israel just as he was later an operator in trying to take over the Humanists.

The British Israel scheme collapsed finally in 2002 when the company was wound up and the assets found their way to the good guys in the affair. John Boyle was their solicitor and he profited to the tune of $50,000 in fees paid for (as the law demanded) by the legitimate company.  Nice.

Did the attempt to defraud British Israel ‘disturb’ the later Klub Nation leaders? Not at all. They thought to carry on with the Humanists, the Mechanics …

Taking over groups

Taking over organisations (and not just for the money) has been a stock in trade of the Palmer-Coleman gang and the successor Klub Nation gang.

In 2000, Palmer made moves to enter the Australians Against Further Immigration Party in New South Wales. That was exposed by the nationalists and the gang came up zero. Perhaps the plan was to run a party that would truly be a counter to legitimate patriotic parties? With the funds of British Israel, had they been acquired, this brand of provocation would have had long-term viability.

Klub Nation sought to take over — or at least coordinate — some nationalist and patriotic youth groups. They sought to integrate them with the funds’ raising and the plans for youth fronts, camps and the fantastic property they would buy. It was again the suspicions they incited and the counsel sought out by the supposed victims – again – which kept them out. The nationalists put the obstacles in their way.

So today, when we learn of plans to take over the Dingoes, we are not surprised. This is just another ‘takeover’ along the way. However, this time around, the gang has ‘professionalised’ itself and sounds much more believable.

The Liberal Party connection

The connection between the Palmer-Coleman gang and Klub Nation and the Liberal Party was continuous. That is another secret in the life of this gang.

Palmer, who had once been a Liberal party candidate in Queensland, boasted often of his links with senior Liberals. He meant those Liberals who described themselves as ‘conservatives’, ‘the hard right’, ‘the uglies’ in the party. This group had a long history, but as a so-called faction, it was revamped in August 1996 by no less than Tony Abbott himself. It formed up at a planning meeting (one month before Hanson’s so-called ‘maiden speech’ in parliament that set off a furore) and formalised in December 1996 (four months before Hanson launched One Nation). Its aim was to anchor Liberal Party supporters against any defection to One Nation while that party was permitted to ‘run’ – and then, once One Nation had normalised certain ideas and opinions, the Liberals simply would reel it all back in. Howard’s master stroke! Palmer, as noted, tried to disrupt One Nation as part of the shepherding strategy.

John Boyle was one of these Liberals in this so called ‘faction’. As said, the Fellowship was part of it. The Liberal connection was a portent for the future. Now as open Liberal and Liberal-satellite auxiliary activists

The collapse of Klub Nation made for a new change in the group. They had done their apprenticeship and could now be trusted with higher tasks.

After Klub Nation dissolved, McBryde and a new player Morgan Qasabian, joined a Liberal Branch. They then went on in 2012 to form the Sydney Traditionalists. They advertise Cory’s Tories (Cory Bernardi’s ‘Australian Conservatives’) and Cory’s book The Conservative Revolution. This group parades itself as “conservative”. And that is good. They are not nationalists. Yet, they are described as offering the “sister site” to the Dingoes website. Who puts that on the Dingoes website?

 

screen-shot-2015-11-03-at-6-21-31-pm.png
David McBryde is to nationalism what Ribena is to hard liquor

There is zero nationalism in them; no commitment to the old ideal of White Australia, no base in the Australian radical nationalist tradition that proclaimed the vision of Australia as the workingman’s paradise. Quite the contrary. The rabble at Sydney Traditionalists considers themselves ‘born to rule’, a ‘growing’ special caste who serve the wealthy and are to one day be promoted as part of the ruling Tory class. After all, Cory’s Tories was launched upon the blessing of the oligarch, Gina Rinehart. The Traditionalists invited Cory Bernardi to a forum and gained his personal blessings too. The rabid free marketeer multiracialist Bernardi offers another angle for ‘promotion’. Bernardi’s Conservatives are also a Liberal satellite and really are nothing different from the Liberal Party.

Qasabian
Morgan Qasabian 

The ex Klub Nation conservative players will occasionally playact that they are concerned at immigration, or might even say something cryptic about Zionism (Bernardi’s party is actually Zionophile), but they always refuse to answer hard questions in writing, or commit themselves except orally to anything and then with nods and winks and one can believe what one likes. When pushed about onto the social question – they support free market economics as ‘success’ proves the worth of the better people. They do not want Australian wealth in the hands of our people, nor the social uplift of all of us. Born to rule reactionaries are better (sic) than the ordinary people?

Alt Rights and Counter-gangs — the final battle

This gang has since 2013 been part of a new ‘conservative front’ in Sydney. Howard Crawford, the Liberal Party dirty tricks operator, has played a major role in building it, just as he struck at the genuine nationalists especially Australia First Party. Certain Liberals like Penrith Councillor Marcus Cornish (a multiracialist), the Sydney Traditionalists, the Reclaim movement and Nick Folkes’s ‘Party For Freedom’ (PFF) make up the system of orbiting satellites.

The Reclaim movement tried to refocus the immigration debate upon Islam only. They deny the challenge to Australia of Chinese imperialism. Many of its leaders sought to propagate the idea that Zionist Israel was the world’s friend against Islamism. People like Cornish exhausted the people’s anti-mosque movement in Penrith. As all the while the Chinese began the ‘move in’ he still found himself lauded as a conservative leader.

The gang turned up during the Penrith ‘anti-Mosque’ protests in 2014 and would bloc with Nick Folkes’s Party For Freedom (PFF), The PFF copies nationalists; from little things like allowing a member to go about in a Golden Dawn T-shirt, to flying the Eureka Flag, and even flying the Celtic Cross to talking of campaigns against Chinese takeover and about the “white genocide”. Folkes mimics others, a sure giveaway about his role, and acts like a clownish idiot. All the while, he calls nationalists ‘Nazis’. Of course, it was PFF, as we have exposed elsewhere, that met at the ‘Nazi’ headquarters in Sydney, met with Squadron 88 and had its leader close at its side. Indeed, when he wound up the Squadron, its leader told his friends he would just run with those opposed to “Islam” and would “work with Nick Folkes”. Just as the ex Klub Nation gang did too.

Crawford had his hands over Squadron 88 and gave money to it and seems to have known of ‘plans’ to attack a Muslim prayer hall in Newcastle. Did he also know of the plan of Squadron 88’s leader to attack the homes of Penrith councillors? What were the purposes of such plans being talked about? The playacting with neo-nazism serves a minor role in this conservative front. If it follows the usual pathway, it is to have fired up foolish or mad people on hand who can be encouraged to attack nationalists in one way or another on the basis that they are in the way of the birth of Fourth Reich. In what must be an amusing con, Crawford told Squadron 88 that the Liberal Party was founded by Hitler-friendly conservatives who let lots of ‘Nazis’ into Australia after the War. And they were always there and now, their descendants and acolytes are ready to ‘takeover’! Given that Crawford was caught on video urging attacks upon Australia First Party people and property, it is arguable that this was the role he would have ascribed to the Squadron had things not gone belly-up.

The ex Klub Nation gang also took on a new impresario, relevant to the Dingoes tale. It is a certain Clifford Jennings has been put out front as the Alt-Right leader and the organizer of Dingo activity, But Clifford was a member of the Liberal Party till recently (did he resign on purpose?). Information reveals that while he was never part of the scammers of Klub Nation years back, but he knows them as brothers and also attended fests with them in the company of Squadron 88 and the choirmaster, Howard Crawford.

Information to hand says that Clifford has told Dingoes and some other patriots that his force will either “take over the Young Liberals” or in the alternate, form a “youth wing of One Nation” and be the power there. Again takeover and role playing. We do not accept that Clifford is a nationalist and we again say that this is really an effort to grind up patriot and potentially nationalist young people in a mincer machine that will turn out more useless conservative sausages.

Final conflict

The Dingoes are just the latest victims of the gang. We have no doubt that they will ultimately be beaten off.

In the final conflict between the nationalists and the gang, it will be said by them (and remember they have a history that spans almost thirty years) that the nationalists are an ‘old road’, and that they are fresh and new. They will say simply that the nationalists – lie! “That was the past, they are talking about. We are us and we have plans for growth.”

Sheltering behind newbie Alt-Right folk, they will say they can take it to the skies. Some may believe them. The nationalists shall say: “they are fakers and a look at who they are, at their actual history and who they connect to, sets you straight. They simply cannot be what they say they are.” The gang will hold frenetic meetings, talk of takeovers and rising hordes, their contacts in the Libs and Cory’s Tories who are “ready to move” and maybe even “big dollars”, but even more maddening for the newbies struggling with it all, they will look them straight in the eye and say: “we are you and you are us; we are the toughest of the tough and the hardest of the hard, but we are clever and work through groups and systems.”

Nationalist ideology and politics are a unity. The ideology of Australian nativist nationalism is grounded in the old radical-nationalist-labourist traditions of long ago. Its heroes are Henry Lawson and William Lane, Jack Lang and William Spence, John Curtin and Percy Stephensen. Its flag is the Southern Cross. It is the people’s cause. This cause is the true cause of Australian identity, independence and freedom and it needs a movement that is independent of the system’s ideology and politics. It does not pretend to infiltrate the regime parties. Quite the contrary, it calls them traitors and organizes against them. That means as a matter of course that these conservatives do not serve the Australian People, but the system. Yes, perhaps a few might be genuine folk mixed there in the pot, but to use an old Christian adage, it is time to come out from amongst them and be separate. The final conflict will resolve whether the conservatives will blunt and defeat the new arising movements of patriotism and nationalism or whether they will b e put to rout.

It is time to shut the Rape House – once and for all.

Screenshot_2016-09-30_09.48.00