THE VOTE THAT SPLIT WHITE AUSTRALIA

THE VOTE THAT SPLIT WHITE AUSTRALIA

Scenes from the revelry of the Yes camp this week uncomfortably revealed just how White it is.

For too long decadence has been sold as a virtue, thus the invidious message coming out of the Same Sex Marriage vote is that us Whites are the ones tearing down our own Christian values, and not some abhorrent foreign parasite. This cannot be ignored unless you buy into conspiracy theories, in which case, the vote was rigged.

We wouldn’t discount that possibility, but, truthfully, it’s unlikely. If you can read the writing on the wall then all signs point to the Yes vote being the overwhelming consensus of half of our fellow countrymen. Resisting this is undignified. Remember how the Alt-Right laughed at Hillary supporters demanding a recount after Donald Trump won the US Presidency? Well, that shoe is now on our foot.

1zjwj8

The Queer lobby, in all its incessant variety: the freaks and transsexuals, the trans-genders, fags, dykes, AIDS fairies and all the derivatives of counter-heterosexuality no decent person would know of or comprehend, both they and their SJW champions are White. Post-vote analysis revealed how it was the heavy migrant safe Labor seats such as Blaxland in NSW and Calwell in Victoria that predominantly ticked the No box.

This is a bitter pill to swallow for those of us White Nationalists who’ve been pushing the concept of race realism. We must now soberly confront that reality — that our own race resoundingly rejects our message. It is non-Whites standing firmest for family values, modesty, and moral stability.

You will hear all the reasons why this is the case and the most likely will be that “it’s the Jews”. We know for sure the Jews will be delighting in our discomfort but to surrender our own culpability for the choices of our people — to suggest that we are so pliable that Jewish Supremacists can twist us up like origami figures as they please — is to belie our argument that we were ever a masterful race to begin with.

No, sadly, we did this on our own, and if we are honest about history, then this is just another chronological step towards the White liberal nirvana where we cease to exist just to be sporting to the ‘lesser races’ that outnumber us in the multiple digits. After all, it was Whites who abolished slavery; it was “cisgender” White males who recognised women’s rights and gave women the vote; it was Whites who enshrined ‘civil rights’ favouring alien peoples who are culturally erasing us from our own civilisations, inheritance, and birthright.

Whites are on a constant quest to emancipate one victim or another regardless of whether or not the object of our protection is actually in bondage. Moreover, these deeds pass without thanks, much less acknowledgement.

Given this evidence, it should be much easier to dispel the universal prejudice that insists we are a nation of bigots. It should be, but it won’t, for the same reason that the Yes vote got through — because the problem isn’t so much other races as it is our own. Yes, it is other Whites labelling us ‘a nation of bigots’, and censoring ourselves over imagined misdeeds to those poor races these self-appointed conscience-bearers among us hypocritically condescend to without even realising it. It is other Whites who foment the atmosphere wherein our status is reduced on dubious egalitarian grounds.

See, what we have here is a struggle within the White race itself; a fight for a dominant idea of what Whiteness means. For instance, it is no accident that Nationalists are White, but so is Antifa. Therefore, the war is not outward, but inward, and rather than sink into a negative pit of crippling despair over this rude truth we must make contingencies to readjust our strategy, revise our enemy, and prepare to fight our own kind. Whites are divided in two, and there is no amount of proselytizing that will win that lost half of our race back to us — it simply has to be dominated, or decimated.

If Whites are to survive we will have to turn against family, friends, and foe alike.  The Whites who want to live will have to “come with” the Terminator.

1zjvt8

Advertisements

PATRIOT JEW – THE DEEP-STATE STAIN LEFT OVER FROM THE RECLAIM AUSTRALIA DEBACLE

PATRIOT JEW – THE DEEP-STATE STAIN LEFT OVER FROM THE RECLAIM AUSTRALIA DEBACLE

If Neil Erikson isn’t under strict orders to fuck over Australian Nationalism then we are the editorial team for the Australian Women’s Weekly.

Yet again this problematical dick has managed to contaminate our cause through a perception of his association with us — a perception he has consciously worked at establishing especially in the gullible mind of the media.

His latest caper involves him and an associate knucklehead in a Hi-Vis shirt confronting Labor senator Sam Dastyari at a Melbourne university bar. There, despite the little ‘daigou’ standing at the bar buying beers contradictory to strict Moslem religious observance (and the fact he is non-practising) they film themselves abusing him as a “terrorist” and telling him to go back to “Iran”. Erikson later claimed on FB that he was addressing concerns Dastyari holds “duel” citizenship. It is about as embarrassing a political attack as this big fruit has thus far managed and so far wide of the mark it keeps circumference with Erikson’s bloated waistline.

Consequently, the headline in the ABC report is caterwauling about “White Nationalism” being on the rise.

If you plan to attack Dastyari it should be about his in flagrante delicto role in the selling off of Australia to China. But that’s not the point — Erikson is an arch-traitor to the White Nationalist movement yet the media now regards him as its stubbie-skolling ambassador, a situation that hasn’t come about by accident.

Many things have contributed to this beast’s destructive rampage not least the failure of prominent Nationalists to speak up against him despite the many lies, insults, and injuries he has knowingly inflicted on our cause.

Yet again this problematical dick has managed to contaminate our cause through a perception of his association with us — a perception he has consciously worked at establishing especially in the gullible mind of the media.

Erikson is aligned with Zionist Avi Yemini and has for a long time been in cahoots with Nick Folkes’s anti-Nationalist Peanuts for Freedom. A network of whispers has him even linked to even more nefarious characters such as the fake news freelancer Luke McMahon and in all probability Liberal Party black ops coordinator Howard Crawford.

Back when he was cranking out defamatory videos on a Facebook page with fellow feral Shermon Burgess, one could discern the invisible trails of the lies he told from whom they originated. His and Burgess’s attacks were like a script and not one borne of spite or jealousy but a particular motive despite the pair being collectively too stupid to even have a motive beyond getting wasted.

VIDEO-STILL
Avi Yemini sends Erikson off for lox and bagels outside the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court

Strong suspicion arose with many——and it is a theory strengthened continually by everything this numpty does——that he was “turned” by the state following charges over his harassment of Rabbi Dovid Gutnick in 2014, an offence for which he mysteriously served no jail time. Then he totally went rogue.

The very Nationalists from whom Erikson sought advice prior to his inexplicably eventually landing himself a high-flying lawyer became the targets of his attack when he was denied a senior role in the equally disastrous United Patriots Front. In that case, such as he had similarly done with a Nationalist group beforehand, he used his administrator status on the UPF’s Facebook page to lock everyone out.

Erikson had been all along been soliciting advice from Nationalist sources which advised him not to go ahead with the Bendigo beheading stunt and if he did to not involve any of the UPF’s senior members or else legal hassles would follow. He ignored this warning and the rest is now legal history. At this point, when UPF’s leadership were distancing the group from the uncontrollable Erikson, he attempted to start a splinter project with among others Burgess and Ralph Cerminara. They intended to appropriate the Identitarian Movement from the French despite all being non-Nationalists. This was a deliberate provocation but when Australian WNs contacted France he shelved the idea.

Consequently, the headline in the ABC report is caterwauling about “White Nationalism” being on the rise.

Thereafter he reinvented his vehicles but never himself, teaming up with Sherm the Germ, and most recently provoking the Nationalist movement in Australia by appropriating the name ‘Nationalist Uprising’ while promoting Zionism.

Ah yes, the Zionism. In his many guises after UPF Erikson went on a ferocious dox against his former comrades, turning out secret video footage of Blair Cottrell and others, and denouncing all as ‘Nazis’. He made a point of claiming to have been a member of Blood & Honour and Nationalist Alternative and expressing redemption for his misguided and misspent skinhead past. In fact, Neil was largely responsible for bringing ‘Nazis’ to the rallies that he was later beseeching be cleansed of goose-steppers.

By this stage, the lies were flying from his bearded lips like shit squirting from the arse of a goose. A 2016 video is like a Best Hits of Neil Erikson lies. It includes:

  • He was a member of Nationalist Alternative
  • He was a member of Australia First Party
  • That Sammy Binz and/or an AFP member sent pictures of a “dead baby” to him over Facebook
  • That an AFP member who he’d never met, talked to, laid eyes on or been involved in any sort of social media interaction with is Jewish
  • That a certain person known only for his quality of character was guilty of a carnal indiscretion over social media
  • That he is a Nationalist

This is apart from the 6000 terabytes of lies told in videos and on FB posts stored away in which his bullshit is plentiful enough to outnumber the individual grains of sand on every beach in Australia.

Leaping to the present, and Neil’s ‘Patriot Blue’ incarnation, which he nicked from a forthcoming Net series based on the movie Romper Stomper due to appear on the Stan streaming service — We say, given his proclamation that “you cannot be a Nationalist WITHOUT supporting Israel”, they should rename their Facebook group, Patriot Jew.

46247BD300000578-5064085-An_anti_Islam_activist_has_defended_calling_senator_Sam_Dastyari-a-1_1510182585461
Australian Nationalism needs more dumb cunts in High-Vis shirts who’re prepared to follow Neil Erikson around

But you have to ask yourself, who benefits from all of this? Erikson is not running a political party, nor could he be given his fractured personality and lack of mental discipline. Is he hoping to start a mass movement? Not likely given his fractured personality and lack of mental discipline. And how did he just happen to be in that particular bar when last time we checked he’d moved his suffering missus and sprog to the Apple Isle? It’s as though someone wanted him there.

Again, who benefits? When you join all the dots on Erikson’s Conservative Reactionary associates then the picture begins to at least make a little more sense.

Erikson is a useful idiot with handlers and he is doing what he is told. His mission, at the end of the day, is to achieve certain ends for his shrouded Conservative connections while bringing Nationalism into disrepute.

Finally, it has to be accepted that Erikson came out of the unmitigated disaster of the Reclaim Australia movement. In fact, just about every ‘personality’ that emerged from that cluster fuck has somehow damaged Nationalism and generated factionalism, elite groups, and coteries that spring up and disappear just as quickly. True politics, true Australian Nationalist tradition and spirit are derided as quaint and irrelevant in this single-minded stampede for the ‘next’ big possibility.

There is too much changing, too much repackaging, too much mainstreaming and too little resolve.

4624996500000578-5064085-Neil_Erikson_founder_of_far_right_group_Patriot_Blue_filmed_hims-a-2_1510182585764.jpg
All of Neil Erikson’s best ideas come out of a VB bottle 

 

DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

Over the past year, UNA has spent bulk column inches describing the type of society Australia has been moulded into since the globalist, cosmopolitan juggernaut shifted into top gear under the Howard regime.

We have outlined, in broad strokes, the re-jigged class system being implemented by the bosses to pacify and subject the polyglot masses which now underpin the global capitalist power; likewise, we have examined, in depth, the bones of the system itself, that cunning fusion of second-generation Communism and limited free market capitalism.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

The trouble is that this increase in state power over the individual and the suppression of non-consumerist dissident tendencies is unlikely to be as spectacular, or compelling as the Spanish Civil War or The Great Leap Forward; the slide into, what Nationalists freely admit, is a looming dystopia will likely be slow, controlled and it will not flatter the egos of these prophets of doom.

special-ops-group2
If you really annoy the Globalists they do more than cancelling your Facebook account and getting you fired from your job

If we are truly on the hunt for signs and wonders in this age of mass surveillance and rule by global corporations then we might argue that present developments should occupy the bulk of our attention rather than endless examinations of the past.

We apply a slight caveat here in that there is nothing new under the sun as far as repressive regimes are concerned; the old rules of Stasi, Gestapo or Special Branch skullduggery still apply and we can be reasonably sure that if things really ran out of hand, as they did in the mid 20th century, that the knuckledusters and water board would be employed without hesitation by today’s state-sanctioned goon squads.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

As we have explained in a previous article, the Pigs serve the Globalists; if we may borrow from the lexicon of 1960’s Hippie radicals, the Pigs in blue, or in plain clothes and the Pig media support the big Capitalist Pigs on high.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

Smith
A Dog of the Leftist variety who regularly boasts of ratting people out to the Federal Police

In the Australia of 2017, this Dog culture is rampant and we would suggest that is the main impediment to radical political activism, no matter from where said radicals draw their inspiration; these days sincere Leftists are just as likely to be pilloried for their views as  Nationalists or Muslim fundamentalists.

We are appalled by the way Right-Wingers, Leftists and most people in between seem intent on publicly denouncing anything and anyone who challenges the mainstream narrative, or even mildly irritates them in a Facebook stoush, even to the point of bullying mentally unstable people into rash, or violent actions merely to tar their friends and comrades with the “extremist” label.

These attempts to pillory often harmless people are rarely done to gain political advantage, or to undermine the system, the snitch collectives, such as Antifa, as well as the Far-Right vigilantes really have no political background or strategic objective.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

The goal is to humiliate others and throw them into the maw of the security state based on where one stands of the false ideological divisions and ever-shifting, fantasy role-playing conventions of cyberspace.

This is not to say that there are no real-world consequences for people who interrupt or harass the minions of globalism, the security state loves a conspiracy or a human rights charge; as we saw with the Bendigo Three there is basically no way to defend oneself from accusations of so-called “Hate Crime”.

Erikson jameson
Fake Muslim but proud, self-described ASIO informant

We ask our readers to ponder that very situation and ask themselves why upsetting Muslims might, in theory, create a problem for the state to the degree that they are willing to pursue people uphill and down dale over a social media post deriding Jihadist Muslim terrorism?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

If we are to believe the top cops then all that has prevented Pitt St and Federation Square from being strewn with body parts from some Muslim outrage is the cooperation they receive from, we guess, “good Muslims”; though that brings up the question of who is really holding all the cards in the war on terror?

Who is to say that these Muslim collaborators are acting altruistically as opposed to playing a long game of their own?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

Globalist Cosmopolitanism requires Orwellian oversight, multiculturalism clearly cannot sustain itself without a substantial number of citizens being willing to act as de-facto censors and unpaid informers for the state and the corporations who are gradually assimilating into its institutions.

Furthermore, the only way the modern state can accommodate fractious minority groups, mainly, but not limited to, those citizens devoted to Mohammed is to cultivate an even more pervasive surveillance and informant network, a process, we now know, which requires total silence and obedience by all other Australians.

The absolute worst thing an Aussie can do these days is to disturb the status quo, to question where this regime of Globalist Capitalism fused to second generation Communism is leading us; forget your posterity, forget any notions of justice or fair play; do not disturb the Rats, just sit down, grab your iPad and credit cards and consume! Consume! Consume!

snitch161004

WHITE AUSTRALIA DOES NOT HAVE A BLACK HISTORY

WHITE AUSTRALIA DOES NOT HAVE A BLACK HISTORY

History is written by the victor, we know this, so we can assume history and conquest have an inexorable linkage.

However, history requires the written word, archiving and preserving — but primarily it entails epochal events, heroes and villains, achievement and again, a permanency of record. Given that the Aboriginal race has never managed anything but some quaint Dreamtime stories and a few primitive rock paintings then what is this “black history” that White Australia is supposed to have? In fact, Aboriginals didn’t have a history until Whites came along and imparted the concept.

Through White Man’s magic we were able to learn a lot that can now be absorbed into a ‘history’ that could not exist but by a dubious word-of-mouth shared by particular Aboriginal tribes and heavily weighted down by the cultural context of those walkabout fullas. This much more reasonable argument turns that aforementioned maxim on its head because, in fact, Aboriginals owe the awareness of any history of theirs to White Australia.

Now, we’re not knocking the Aboriginal lifestyle per se. We acknowledge that it was harmonious, in respect of the land and all that. It was; no doubt about it. These people lived a compatible existence with the environment. This landscape, this ecosystem, the natural resources that surround us have been jeopardised by the greed of a few that exploit it for profit. Nationalists abhor this exploitation as much as any other activist set. The settlement itself has had consequences, but the settlement was coming, and it was either going to be by ‘liberal’ Whites or else by the Chinese whose attitude to other races is not so redactable.

351416-small
We post this pic to say a little about the duality of  White man: that side which cares and that which doesn’t give a fuck

Moreover is the question of what is nobler, maintaining the human species at a primitive rate of evolution, or accepting the changes of scientific advancement as part and parcel of the wonder of human progress?

So don’t give us this “White Australia has a black history” cod because that it is just self-effacing Cultural Marxist drivel.

And, what is this White Australia anyway? Are they once again getting our original British colonial overlords confused with the poor sucker political prisoners who were dragged here in chains, and who combatted adversity to become the indigenous ‘Australians’? Their version of White Australian history needs some serious adjustment, in that case, since it is viewed through the tampered lens of the partisan Left. These are the same tub-thumpers who loud hail about “multicultural Australia”, which therefore means, by the stringencies of their own particular rhetoric, all these other races and ‘cultures’ are complicit in alleged Aboriginal subjugation.

oie_NUQSh9HaukJK
Oh gee, it’s another anti-Semitic Soros conspiracy theory. Everyone knows Soros just sits at home enjoying his money and doesn’t involve himself in funding activist agents around the world

Are they saying we should ask the Abos to hand back every stitch of modern life we gave them in exchange for our passage back to an Islamic-occupied Europe so that the black fella can once more go walkabout and spear fish for supper?

Once triggered, there is no end to the cycle of guilt demanded by these political manipulators with their slogans. This history is still being written, it would seem. Aboriginal ‘advocates’ can either accept the reality of life here or submit to Chinese domination and 24th citizen-place status in a polyglot market nation.

Furthermore, Nationalists will not tolerate a treaty-based Australia in which lawyers grant Aboriginals a more-equal status on the back of a victimhood narrative. Either they are in this country, or they find some way to return to their nomadic ways and live outside of where the ‘history’ is made, but they will not have the two.

oie_JFNHbh04IJ29
A more correct version of a self-effacing Cultural Marxist maxim

 

THE MAIN PIG SHILLS FOR SATAN

THE MAIN PIG SHILLS FOR SATAN

“The survival of Western Civilisation is at stake. There is no ‘moral’ and ‘immoral’. The only immoral thing is to permit an enemy to destroy one’s people, either by decay or by physical annihilation.”
– George Lincoln Rockwell

Although it may give a sense of comfort and legitimacy for Patriots to ally themselves with the Police, to put oneself on the side of law and order, and to believe that the authority of the state tacitly approves their ideals, just reinforces a false sense of security.

Aussie Patriots have not figured out that Nationalism is not the will of the state; rather, to follow the Nationalist ideal is to run contrary to its will.  Ardent Nationalists realise this.

Any belief that the Australian state has Nationalist sympathies must be done away with. Nationalism is devotion to one’s nation, while Civic Patriotism is devotion to one’s government; the ideal is a nation-state in which the state and its apparatuses serve the nation, thereby making patriotism and nationalism indistinguishable, and reconciling their accurate meanings.

62643be694f822940319fd21a082e1ec
Southern Cross Soldier, 15-year-old Tyler Cassidy, is the youngest known person to be shot dead by Police. He was gunned down in Victoria under extremely dubious circumstances in 2009. The SCS was largely a myth but the media made much of his alleged associations. The boy had been a victim of ‘diversity’ which led to his meltdown.

In Australia today, you are free to be as patriotic as you like. You can support sodomy, usury, unsustainable immigration levels, environmental destruction, pointless wars, historical negationism, child grooming experiments in schools by intellectuals, or any of the other programmes sanctioned by the Commonwealth of Australia and/or state governments. You can support any or all of these with as fervently as you desire, and you won’t land yourself in any hot water with the various law enforcement agencies.

Nationalism is not the will of the Australian state; rather, to follow the Nationalist ideal is to run counter to that will.

However, if you question whether or not masturbating into another man’s anus is a valid basis for marriage, you’ll be branded as a “homophobe” and thus cast out as the media demands. If you active resentment for the 180,000 immigrants a year this country absorbs a year, you’ll be dragged in front of the courts for racial vilification. If you oppose expensive military operations conducted for the benefit of Israel, you’ll end up condemned by parliament as being a “freedom hater” or a “supporter of human rights violations”; and the list goes on.

Politics is the acquisition and retention of power – questioning and opposing state programmes threatens the power of the state, therefore anyone who does this will incur the wrath of the state.

r1250996_16668743.jpg
Pig breeding has gotten colourful over the years

No matter how safe an organisation plays it when it questions the state and its programmes the organisation becomes the enemy of the state which requires the police and the courts acting on behalf of the legislature, shut it down. The United Patriots Front is a telling example of this.

Everything the group did was lawful, at least up until the beheading video, which as Chris Shortis pointed out declaring it unlawful meant that the state was “effectively trying to defend what is an unlawful act under Australian law”. This didn’t matter, the group was declared an enemy of the State of Victoria, and it was shut down.

The conviction of the “Bendigo Three” came after the UPF, or at least some of the group’s members, organised a counter protest of Melbourne Black Lives Matter rally in July 2016 in a show of support for Police and the Blue Lives Matter cause. As the show of appreciation for this, the Australian Federal Police later pressured Facebook into removing the United Patriots Front’s page, which greatly reduced its capacity to organise, effectively leaving it dead in the water.

No matter how safe an organisation plays it when it questions the state and its programmes the organisation becomes the enemy of the state which requires the police and the courts acting on behalf of the legislature, shut it down. The United Patriots Front is a telling example of this.

Regardless of whether or not a group says that negroes shouldn’t kill police officers; gangs of Pacific Islanders should obey the law and not commit home invasions; or that Islamists should respect the Australian way of life, the state will come after you if you threaten their power – independent of whether or not the state technically should agree with in some legalistic manner. As Ian Stuart eloquently put it “the fucking boys in blue will do exactly what the Jew bastards in the government tell them to do”.

Support for the police is support for the enemy’s guardians. The legal system actively prevents Nationalists from gaining power; they did so with Jim Saleam; they did so with Pauline Hanson (she was imprisoned on fabricated charges of electoral fraud, and only allowed to sit in parliament once she abandoned nationalism), and they did so with the UPF.  The way to stop this enemy of Nationalism is not by supporting the Police, but by ending public faith in them.

images (5)
Australian woman Justine Damond was gunned down in Minneapolis this year by “Somali-American” cop Mohamed Noor. She was, in fact, alerting to the Police to a prowler when he blew her away for no discernible reason. The Police Union over there has stood by their trigger-happy non-White murdering pig.

Public faith in Police gives them their power, and once that faith is eroded, society will look to other means of protection which will allow for the creation of something similar to Golden Dawn. Think twice the next time you decide to show support for the Police – they do a decent job of eroding their support on their own (replacing officers with women, covering up the sexual assault of their female staff, and allowing the negroes to run wild through Australian homes, etc.).

There is no reason to slow this decline. And should another Curtis Cheng case arises, certainly don’t condemn Muslims for it, instead look at it with extreme indifference. They put Nationalists who oppose Islamic immigration in prison, and the Muslims put one of their people six feet under? Who cares? And if you want a laugh, tell your left-leaning friends about how you think it’s disgusting that police oppression of minorities has gotten to the point where the Muslims are left with no other option than to voice their cries for help by gunning down officers of the law – who knows, it might even get you the phone number of a cute Marxist girl at uni.

images (6)
March of the Nazi Faggots.

FANBOY NATIONALISM PUTS FACES FIRST AND POLITICS LAST

FANBOY NATIONALISM PUTS FACES FIRST AND POLITICS LAST

We have stretched definitions here, since the subjects of today’s chat we do not regard as bona fide Nationalists. Nevertheless, they are considered to be so by outsiders and the clueless.

Worse yet, recognised Nationalists are now fawning over one or more of their ‘heroes’ and it is as much a betrayal of Nationalist precepts as the actual duplicities by those we indirectly refer to.

True Nationalism has as its most unwavering principles the cessation of immigration to this country, the abolition of multiculturalism, and the recognition of White Australians as the only Australians. Aboriginals are Aboriginals, and Australians are White Europeans. We aim for a mono-racial, Protective, mono-cultural state. The wisdom is manifold when the corrosiveness of pluralism is understood socially, economically, and psychologically.

Many years back, a group around a twerp called Darrin Hodges began spruiking the fool’s gold of mainstreaming. This has as its primary tenet something roughly along the lines that ‘the masses’ will be turned off by the racialism of White Nationalism. Rather than ever dare mention Israel, or god forbid the Zionists, the mainstream party actually becomes inclusive on a multiracial basis of anyone opposed to Islam. Thus was coined the expression ‘Diversity minus Islam’ and subsequently Zionists became fervent proponents.

What would, by all other measures, be a simpatico parallel movement to Nationalism, in fact, began to see Nationalists as enemies. No longer satisfied with carving out turf for its own manoeuvres, it came to desire the destruction of Nationalism as inherently counter its nebulous aims. Suddenly, this unwanted bastard child of Nationalism is worried about how Nationalism affects IT as if the hammer came before the stone.

Mainstreaming, of course, by its own rules, became occupied by the very mainstream it hoped to influence. Rather, the mainstream influences it and not the other way round. To that end, political interests of the “right” found it a useful vehicle.

This idea of ‘mainstreaming’ is something that subsequent groups that sprung out of Reclaim Australia embraced as infallible wisdom and who, today, their principle players are far from having renounced. Any Nationalism on their part is “assumed” as if it is a tacit secret between them and their ‘fans’.

There, we said it, ‘fans’. Because the colourful heroes sucking up all the follows on Twitter, and all the ‘likes’ on Facebook do not have serious political adherents, they have ‘fans’. They are admired for some aspect other than their politics since none of them has ever definitively stated their true Political orientation, their aims, or expressed sincere beliefs.

They have ‘winked’ at certain issues while becoming mawkish about them whenever they sensed the kind of negative publicity that might compromise their mainstream standing.

Likewise, a study of their personality type tends to reveal a character with a desire for adoration and popularity. The cause becomes the vehicle with which to drive them to their desired destination of popularity, recognition, and ultimately ‘fame’. Time and time again a misdirected desire for sub-tier fame has created and burnt out identities on the Patriot side. It has generated more hubris than a meeting of oil barons.

And there, beaut reader is the reason that we see so many woeful, embarrassing wet farts like Zionist Avi Yemini’s great Patriot rally in Melbourne: it is because their followers are fans and not serious activists.

Again, it is a shame Nationalists who should know better are smitten with these fleeting idols like gushing teenyboppers. The real Nationalism is THAT WAY, folks, and we don’t require an X-Factor to pass along the simple message that unless you stand up, you … are … doomed.

Hodges and other Ziobots defend Jews
The original mainstreamers Nick Folkes and Darrin Hodges protest in support of a Jewish Chocolate Store targeted by anti-Zionists

 

THE MATTER OF SOCIAL CLASS

THE MATTER OF SOCIAL CLASS

Australian politicians of the globalist caste will flat out deny that, in 2017, we have an entrenched class system which regulates, and in many ways undermines public life and the ability of citizens to politically organise on their own behalf.

To make our case for, dare we use the term “class struggle” in Nationalist politics we should first give our readers a simple explanation of class structures in contemporary society.

Logically, starting from the top, we have the monied families, those now fading clans of colonial aristocrats whose fortunes were made in the 19th and 20th centuries, on the markets, as graziers, miners or other entrepreneurial adventures.

It is hard to know how much influence such folk have nowadays, their exclusive clubs and rural, baronial cliques are, we are told, on the wane as the younger family members sell up the stations to the Chinese, or other foreign concerns and re-settle in the major cities.

The old families may still be influential, to a point, but they are rarely politically active anymore, beyond donating to, or fundraising for, the major parties; with a few exceptions the remaining graziers and sundry other bluebloods are no longer regularly sitting in Parliament.

In any case these “hidden hands”, if in fact, that is the way they choose to operate, are beyond the reach of grassroots activism, for the time being anyway; as dissidents push in from the margins toward the structures of power they may well reveal themselves, though the major parties would do all they could to screen off their benefactors and power brokers from the public gaze.

The Bourgeoisie are usually on the bottom of the second page of the Financial Review Rich List, they are typically well off and their influence stems from their control of the ebb and flow of, not only commerce but information. 

The Bourgeoisie are usually on the bottom of the second page of the Financial Review Rich List, they are typically well off and their influence stems from their control of the ebb and flow of, not only commerce but information. In this class, we find people who can move laterally through the key areas comprising the structure of power in this country: big business, government, the arts and media industry and academia.

The next, and more visible class would be what we often term the Bourgeoisie, taking the Marxist interpretation; these are the people who, subject to government rule, man the levers of the system of globalist capitalism, as we now know it.

winning_cup_hawke_bond_1sn0ctv-mr_udnu73a
Bob Hawke and Alan Bond, wealthy yes, but also influential beyond the power of money

Members of this class, just as two examples would include people such as Malcolm Turnbull and Bob Hawke, though they may be spectacularly wealthy by working class standards their main power lies in their freedom of movement through these key decision making sectors of society.

Third on our list is the upper middle class, who could loosely be described as the people who keep those five key structures of power running on behalf of the bourgeoisie; they may be senior bureaucrats, lawyers, union officials, journalists or artists of one sort or another.

Well, known figures in the upper middle class are people of the calibre of Andrew Bolt, Waleed Aly, Peter Garrett, Dick Smith and so forth, people who have limited access to the structures of power but who have made a niche as demagogues, mid level entrepreneurs or successful artists.

Well-known figures in the upper middle-class are people of the calibre of Andrew Bolt, Waleed Aly, Peter Garrett, Dick Smith and so forth, people who have limited access to the structures of power but who have made a niche as demagogues, mid level entrepreneurs or successful artists.

It is in this class that we see values and ideology start to play a role in the social status of its members, rather than the raw power of wealth; we could argue that it is the class from which a lot of lower house MP’s, local councillors and, for want of a better term “community leaders” are drawn.

waleed
Race, ethnicity and creed matter little in the upper classes

It is also at this level of society that race, religion and ethnic background start to really matter in determining social status; whereas the Bourgeoisie is largely blind to such concerns the upper middle class will routinely impose themselves, in a broad sense, as representatives of particular groups in society.

Of course, the politics of the upper middle class tend to be egalitarian, in that they are bound by ethics, codes of conduct and social mores by virtue of the fact that they, unlike the classes above them, have to make a living largely by their own enterprise.

The Middle Class, having a measure of financial security are able to contribute their time and a share of their resources to causes such as sporting clubs, schools, political parties, churches and other community projects. 

Their values are that of the shopkeeper, anyone who has the money can partake of their wares, however, they see themselves as protectors of this broad class of clientele and wish to maximise their sales by catering to every whim and taste of their customers.

So the upper middle-class, when active in the community and thus visible to the two lower classes will style themselves as benevolent and virtuous, taking up the causes of those perceived to be “less fortunate” in the name of equal opportunity for all, as long as everyone knows their station in life.

GreensMPsGroup-th
The Australian Greens, a solidly Middle-Class outfit

We come then to the “middle”, whom we shall simply term the Middle Class, for the sake of clarity. These are the people who, while not struggling to make ends meet must still work for a living, generally as employees or sole traders; they may own one or two properties, be able to partake in leisure activities and political activism but they have very limited access to the structures of power save by appeal to those higher up the ladder.

The Middle Class, having a measure of financial security are able to contribute their time and a share of their resources to causes such as sporting clubs, schools, political parties, churches and other community projects. They are the rank and file party branch members, the activists, social justice warriors and club men who, while feathering their own nest are able to devote their energy to achieving specific communal goals at a grass roots level, as opposed to the abstract egalitarianism of the Upper Middle Class.

Below them is the Working Class proper, the skilled workers on salaries, university educated or qualified in a trade or profession in most cases they mirror the Bourgeoisie in terms of drive to succeed and financial self interest, but they are mostly apolitical and place little value on the abstract “virtues” of the Upper Middle Class.The Working Class will join trade unions and social clubs if it is in their interest but in general, they are apolitical; they are worldly enough know that they are cut off completely from the structures of power and they tend to resent to some extent those who are supposedly their betters, especially politicians.

The Working Class will join trade unions and social clubs if it is in their interest but in general, they are apolitical; they are worldly enough know that they are cut off completely from the structures of power and they resent, to some extent, those who are supposedly their betters, especially politicians.

This class of builders, office workers, junior public servants, consultants and sub-contractors are self-reliant in that they practice what might be called Anarcho-Syndicalism; they, for the most part, are able to set the price of their own labour and will form temporary, ad hoc partnerships and syndicates in which profits are made.\

the block
The Block, relatable working class archetypes for the mass media age

Generally, this class sees politics as means to an end for the upper classes and views government policy as something which is done to them, rather than for them, to that end there is widespread avoidance of “red tape” and corner cutting when it comes to compliance with rules and regulations.

This is the anarchic part of the Working Class make up if we take anarchy to mean self-rule as opposed to the nihilistic connotations of Bohemian “anarchism”; the anarchic worker, as far as possible, games the system and breaks the law insofar as those laws might inhibit his making a living.

This class of people, in general, will fiddle things to their own advantage in a self-centred fashion but not go overboard into outright corruption or the self-destructive criminality seen in the truly marginalised people, they are thus viewed with a degree of hostility by the Upper Middle Class

Marginalised people are the minimum wage slaves, the itinerants, contract workers, the disabled, pensioners and others who are purposely shut out of the financial-political power structure and spoken over by the middle and upper classes.

The final class of Australian we will call the Marginalised Class, as this is the description which most closely fits their situation, for the most part.

Marginalised people are the minimum wage slaves, the itinerants, contract workers, the disabled, pensioners and others who are purposely shut out of the financial-political power structure and spoken over by the middle and upper classes.

A person on the margins of society has no material security in comparison to the other classes, he doesn’t starve, but progress above the station of the casual worker or, in the case of an infirmity of mind or body, the social welfare recipient, is both extremely difficult and, nowadays increasingly rare.

struggle st
The SBS programme Struggle Street gave us an insight into the challenges, hopes and dreams of some of our most marginalised suburbanites

These are the people whose fragile economic lives are rendered precarious by globalism and who are viewed, in terms of their class, as an impediment to the ambitions of the upper and middle classes; we hear them described as idle, ignorant and quarrelsome, words which might have come from some 18th century nobleman as he contemplated “Les Miserables” on the streets.

We will conclude this article at the point of describing the present class structure with a view to creating an axis for discussion among Nationalists and our supporters; this analysis will be built upon and developed as a reference point as we explore strategies for building class consciousness and, as far as possible, class solidarity among White workers and marginalised people.

Due to class relationships and the antagonism of the upper classes toward working and marginalised people the only way forward is to start on the outside and clear the margins of all the political competitors, opportunists, Bohemians, criminals and controlled counter gangs imposed upon our people by the globalists.

Our talking points on what we call “margin-streaming” here come into play, where we attempt to build a political movement in the wilderness of suburbia, beyond the pale, with such resources and personnel as can be scavenged from the ruins of Globalist Cosmopolitanism.

 

USA: Demonstrators March In National Day Of Action On Immigrant Rights
A shadow puppeteer out on strike