FANBOY NATIONALISM PUTS FACES FIRST AND POLITICS LAST

FANBOY NATIONALISM PUTS FACES FIRST AND POLITICS LAST

We have stretched definitions here, since the subjects of today’s chat we do not regard as bona fide Nationalists. Nevertheless, they are considered to be so by outsiders and the clueless.

Worse yet, recognised Nationalists are now fawning over one or more of their ‘heroes’ and it is as much a betrayal of Nationalist precepts as the actual duplicities by those we indirectly refer to.

True Nationalism has as its most unwavering principles the cessation of immigration to this country, the abolition of multiculturalism, and the recognition of White Australians as the only Australians. Aboriginals are Aboriginals, and Australians are White Europeans. We aim for a mono-racial, Protective, mono-cultural state. The wisdom is manifold when the corrosiveness of pluralism is understood socially, economically, and psychologically.

Many years back, a group around a twerp called Darrin Hodges began spruiking the fool’s gold of mainstreaming. This has as its primary tenet something roughly along the lines that ‘the masses’ will be turned off by the racialism of White Nationalism. Rather than ever dare mention Israel, or god forbid the Zionists, the mainstream party actually becomes inclusive on a multiracial basis of anyone opposed to Islam. Thus was coined the expression ‘Diversity minus Islam’ and subsequently Zionists became fervent proponents.

What would, by all other measures, be a simpatico parallel movement to Nationalism, in fact, began to see Nationalists as enemies. No longer satisfied with carving out turf for its own manoeuvres, it came to desire the destruction of Nationalism as inherently counter its nebulous aims. Suddenly, this unwanted bastard child of Nationalism is worried about how Nationalism affects IT as if the hammer came before the stone.

Mainstreaming, of course, by its own rules, became occupied by the very mainstream it hoped to influence. Rather, the mainstream influences it and not the other way round. To that end, political interests of the “right” found it a useful vehicle.

This idea of ‘mainstreaming’ is something that subsequent groups that sprung out of Reclaim Australia embraced as infallible wisdom and who, today, their principle players are far from having renounced. Any Nationalism on their part is “assumed” as if it is a tacit secret between them and their ‘fans’.

There, we said it, ‘fans’. Because the colourful heroes sucking up all the follows on Twitter, and all the ‘likes’ on Facebook do not have serious political adherents, they have ‘fans’. They are admired for some aspect other than their politics since none of them has ever definitively stated their true Political orientation, their aims, or expressed sincere beliefs.

They have ‘winked’ at certain issues while becoming mawkish about them whenever they sensed the kind of negative publicity that might compromise their mainstream standing.

Likewise, a study of their personality type tends to reveal a character with a desire for adoration and popularity. The cause becomes the vehicle with which to drive them to their desired destination of popularity, recognition, and ultimately ‘fame’. Time and time again a misdirected desire for sub-tier fame has created and burnt out identities on the Patriot side. It has generated more hubris than a meeting of oil barons.

And there, beaut reader is the reason that we see so many woeful, embarrassing wet farts like Zionist Avi Yemini’s great Patriot rally in Melbourne: it is because their followers are fans and not serious activists.

Again, it is a shame Nationalists who should know better are smitten with these fleeting idols like gushing teenyboppers. The real Nationalism is THAT WAY, folks, and we don’t require an X-Factor to pass along the simple message that unless you stand up, you … are … doomed.

Hodges and other Ziobots defend Jews
The original mainstreamers Nick Folkes and Darrin Hodges protest in support of a Jewish Chocolate Store targeted by anti-Zionists

 

Advertisements

THE MATTER OF SOCIAL CLASS

THE MATTER OF SOCIAL CLASS

Australian politicians of the globalist caste will flat out deny that, in 2017, we have an entrenched class system which regulates, and in many ways undermines public life and the ability of citizens to politically organise on their own behalf.

To make our case for, dare we use the term “class struggle” in Nationalist politics we should first give our readers a simple explanation of class structures in contemporary society.

Logically, starting from the top, we have the monied families, those now fading clans of colonial aristocrats whose fortunes were made in the 19th and 20th centuries, on the markets, as graziers, miners or other entrepreneurial adventures.

It is hard to know how much influence such folk have nowadays, their exclusive clubs and rural, baronial cliques are, we are told, on the wane as the younger family members sell up the stations to the Chinese, or other foreign concerns and re-settle in the major cities.

The old families may still be influential, to a point, but they are rarely politically active anymore, beyond donating to, or fundraising for, the major parties; with a few exceptions the remaining graziers and sundry other bluebloods are no longer regularly sitting in Parliament.

In any case these “hidden hands”, if in fact, that is the way they choose to operate, are beyond the reach of grassroots activism, for the time being anyway; as dissidents push in from the margins toward the structures of power they may well reveal themselves, though the major parties would do all they could to screen off their benefactors and power brokers from the public gaze.

The Bourgeoisie are usually on the bottom of the second page of the Financial Review Rich List, they are typically well off and their influence stems from their control of the ebb and flow of, not only commerce but information. 

The Bourgeoisie are usually on the bottom of the second page of the Financial Review Rich List, they are typically well off and their influence stems from their control of the ebb and flow of, not only commerce but information. In this class, we find people who can move laterally through the key areas comprising the structure of power in this country: big business, government, the arts and media industry and academia.

The next, and more visible class would be what we often term the Bourgeoisie, taking the Marxist interpretation; these are the people who, subject to government rule, man the levers of the system of globalist capitalism, as we now know it.

winning_cup_hawke_bond_1sn0ctv-mr_udnu73a
Bob Hawke and Alan Bond, wealthy yes, but also influential beyond the power of money

Members of this class, just as two examples would include people such as Malcolm Turnbull and Bob Hawke, though they may be spectacularly wealthy by working class standards their main power lies in their freedom of movement through these key decision making sectors of society.

Third on our list is the upper middle class, who could loosely be described as the people who keep those five key structures of power running on behalf of the bourgeoisie; they may be senior bureaucrats, lawyers, union officials, journalists or artists of one sort or another.

Well, known figures in the upper middle class are people of the calibre of Andrew Bolt, Waleed Aly, Peter Garrett, Dick Smith and so forth, people who have limited access to the structures of power but who have made a niche as demagogues, mid level entrepreneurs or successful artists.

Well-known figures in the upper middle-class are people of the calibre of Andrew Bolt, Waleed Aly, Peter Garrett, Dick Smith and so forth, people who have limited access to the structures of power but who have made a niche as demagogues, mid level entrepreneurs or successful artists.

It is in this class that we see values and ideology start to play a role in the social status of its members, rather than the raw power of wealth; we could argue that it is the class from which a lot of lower house MP’s, local councillors and, for want of a better term “community leaders” are drawn.

waleed
Race, ethnicity and creed matter little in the upper classes

It is also at this level of society that race, religion and ethnic background start to really matter in determining social status; whereas the Bourgeoisie is largely blind to such concerns the upper middle class will routinely impose themselves, in a broad sense, as representatives of particular groups in society.

Of course, the politics of the upper middle class tend to be egalitarian, in that they are bound by ethics, codes of conduct and social mores by virtue of the fact that they, unlike the classes above them, have to make a living largely by their own enterprise.

The Middle Class, having a measure of financial security are able to contribute their time and a share of their resources to causes such as sporting clubs, schools, political parties, churches and other community projects. 

Their values are that of the shopkeeper, anyone who has the money can partake of their wares, however, they see themselves as protectors of this broad class of clientele and wish to maximise their sales by catering to every whim and taste of their customers.

So the upper middle-class, when active in the community and thus visible to the two lower classes will style themselves as benevolent and virtuous, taking up the causes of those perceived to be “less fortunate” in the name of equal opportunity for all, as long as everyone knows their station in life.

GreensMPsGroup-th
The Australian Greens, a solidly Middle-Class outfit

We come then to the “middle”, whom we shall simply term the Middle Class, for the sake of clarity. These are the people who, while not struggling to make ends meet must still work for a living, generally as employees or sole traders; they may own one or two properties, be able to partake in leisure activities and political activism but they have very limited access to the structures of power save by appeal to those higher up the ladder.

The Middle Class, having a measure of financial security are able to contribute their time and a share of their resources to causes such as sporting clubs, schools, political parties, churches and other community projects. They are the rank and file party branch members, the activists, social justice warriors and club men who, while feathering their own nest are able to devote their energy to achieving specific communal goals at a grass roots level, as opposed to the abstract egalitarianism of the Upper Middle Class.

Below them is the Working Class proper, the skilled workers on salaries, university educated or qualified in a trade or profession in most cases they mirror the Bourgeoisie in terms of drive to succeed and financial self interest, but they are mostly apolitical and place little value on the abstract “virtues” of the Upper Middle Class.The Working Class will join trade unions and social clubs if it is in their interest but in general, they are apolitical; they are worldly enough know that they are cut off completely from the structures of power and they tend to resent to some extent those who are supposedly their betters, especially politicians.

The Working Class will join trade unions and social clubs if it is in their interest but in general, they are apolitical; they are worldly enough know that they are cut off completely from the structures of power and they resent, to some extent, those who are supposedly their betters, especially politicians.

This class of builders, office workers, junior public servants, consultants and sub-contractors are self-reliant in that they practice what might be called Anarcho-Syndicalism; they, for the most part, are able to set the price of their own labour and will form temporary, ad hoc partnerships and syndicates in which profits are made.\

the block
The Block, relatable working class archetypes for the mass media age

Generally, this class sees politics as means to an end for the upper classes and views government policy as something which is done to them, rather than for them, to that end there is widespread avoidance of “red tape” and corner cutting when it comes to compliance with rules and regulations.

This is the anarchic part of the Working Class make up if we take anarchy to mean self-rule as opposed to the nihilistic connotations of Bohemian “anarchism”; the anarchic worker, as far as possible, games the system and breaks the law insofar as those laws might inhibit his making a living.

This class of people, in general, will fiddle things to their own advantage in a self-centred fashion but not go overboard into outright corruption or the self-destructive criminality seen in the truly marginalised people, they are thus viewed with a degree of hostility by the Upper Middle Class

Marginalised people are the minimum wage slaves, the itinerants, contract workers, the disabled, pensioners and others who are purposely shut out of the financial-political power structure and spoken over by the middle and upper classes.

The final class of Australian we will call the Marginalised Class, as this is the description which most closely fits their situation, for the most part.

Marginalised people are the minimum wage slaves, the itinerants, contract workers, the disabled, pensioners and others who are purposely shut out of the financial-political power structure and spoken over by the middle and upper classes.

A person on the margins of society has no material security in comparison to the other classes, he doesn’t starve, but progress above the station of the casual worker or, in the case of an infirmity of mind or body, the social welfare recipient, is both extremely difficult and, nowadays increasingly rare.

struggle st
The SBS programme Struggle Street gave us an insight into the challenges, hopes and dreams of some of our most marginalised suburbanites

These are the people whose fragile economic lives are rendered precarious by globalism and who are viewed, in terms of their class, as an impediment to the ambitions of the upper and middle classes; we hear them described as idle, ignorant and quarrelsome, words which might have come from some 18th century nobleman as he contemplated “Les Miserables” on the streets.

We will conclude this article at the point of describing the present class structure with a view to creating an axis for discussion among Nationalists and our supporters; this analysis will be built upon and developed as a reference point as we explore strategies for building class consciousness and, as far as possible, class solidarity among White workers and marginalised people.

Due to class relationships and the antagonism of the upper classes toward working and marginalised people the only way forward is to start on the outside and clear the margins of all the political competitors, opportunists, Bohemians, criminals and controlled counter gangs imposed upon our people by the globalists.

Our talking points on what we call “margin-streaming” here come into play, where we attempt to build a political movement in the wilderness of suburbia, beyond the pale, with such resources and personnel as can be scavenged from the ruins of Globalist Cosmopolitanism.

 

USA: Demonstrators March In National Day Of Action On Immigrant Rights
A shadow puppeteer out on strike 

 

THE ‘BENDIGO THREE’ VERDICT — INSIDE KANGAROO COURTROOM 19 AS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS REPEALED IN VICTORIA

THE ‘BENDIGO THREE’ VERDICT — INSIDE KANGAROO COURTROOM 19 AS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS REPEALED IN VICTORIA

Victoria is now officially an Orwellian Police State following last week’s conviction of the Bendigo Three on charges arising from the mock beheading of a dummy.

On Tuesday, September 5, in Melbourne Magistrates Court, Magistrate John Hardy found Blair Cottrell, Neil Erikson, and Chris Shortis guilty under section 25(2) of The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act, 2001 (RRTA). This is the first time that section of the law has been used in a prosecution. A conviction was recorded for each defendant, and a fine of $2000 plus a $79.50 statutory charge was imposed.

This judgment marks a turning point. Having peeled off its mask, the multiculturalist state is now showing its true authoritarian face. Magistrate Hardy’s judgment has not only set the bar for prosecution perilously low but decided it can be set anywhere the state chooses. Freedom of speech is the foundation of all other freedoms in a democratic society. Before the advent of multiculturalism in this country, the main restrictions to that implied freedom of expression were defamation, obscenity, intellectual property and incitement. While some argue that vilification laws are similar to defamation laws, the differences between the two indicate how far our freedoms have been eroded in the name of safeguarding feelings.

download (3)
The much overused still from the infamous video that incited hatred against Moslems and will probably trigger World War Three

Firstly, defamation is civil law, whereas section 25(2) of the RRTA is criminal law. Secondly, in defamation law, the plaintiff initiates a lawsuit and seeks a legal remedy. In Ross versus Shortis, Cottrell and Erikson, there was no complainant as in a criminal case. No Muslim had ever complained they felt ridiculed, hated, or treated as an object of contempt. No Patriot has testified that the video had incited them to have these attitudes. Instead, the case was brought by the Director of Public Prosecutions with Constable Erin Ross as the informant, who both exercised the entitlement that they, unlike ordinary citizens, have not to take the witness stand. This meant that the defendants could not cross examine their accusers as there were no accusers: a fundamental breach of procedural fairness, due process, and natural justice.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading. The video of the stunt together with extra footage of members walking and riding around Bendigo was uploaded to the United Patriots Front Facebook page as publicity for a 2015 rally held in Bendigo to protest the proposed building of a mosque.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading.

The first of the charges was ‘defacing the footpath and wall of the garden bed’ with ‘the emission of the red substance’. The second charge was ‘willfully damaging property’. “Damage does not need to be permanent”, presiding Magistrate Hardy informed the court. He left aside the question of why any rational person would describe a temporary stain on a footpath from water soluble food dye as “damage”. It took Bendigo Council two attempts to remove the pesky stain. The first time, ordinary water pressure from a hose wasn’t enough, but success was achieved the second time with a Gerni. A few weeks of weather and rain would probably have washed it away but then no-one would have been able to pretend it was a matter criminal enough to press charges. Chris Shortis actually paid the Council over $1000, a fine which exceeds the original cleaning bill. But the State required its pound of flesh!

download (6)
Magistrate John Hardy. He can find the harmless trigger of an eyebrow as incitement to ridicule or contempt

The first and second charges amounted to a prosecutorial fishing trip. The prosecutor, Fran Dalziel, was shamelessly up-front about this. She asked the Magistrate to hear the third charge first and only hear the other charges if the first charge was not proved. Hardy obligingly granted her request. The first two charges were only a backup. Clearly, it had been decided that the accused had to be charged with something, even if it ended up being trivial. Can anyone thereafter doubt that this trial was all along political and owed nothing to any theoretical victim?

RKTHwtp
The real victims in all of this

The trial lasted two days starting on a Monday. Supporters of the three accused had to pass through airport-style security on the ground floor, which was run by a security company. After queuing on the fifth floor, they passed through further security checkpoints, this time conducted by Victoria Police. These included complete photo ID scanning and twin 3D video cameras. Inside Courtroom 19, seating was restricted to 27 bodies, and much of that room was taken up by the less than objective media scrum. The lack of seating meant many travelled to court only to miss out on public seating.

Magistrate Hardy presented a curious anachronism, looking like a cross between Gandalf the Grey and Karl Marx. He informed the court that he had downloaded the RRTA and would read it out in the evening. However, by the end of the farcical proceedings, he would unquestioningly accept the prosecutor’s submission in what was so obviously a fait accompli. Before that, every pretence was made to try and lend seriousness to what was so evidently a show trial. Thus, presiding as he was over a circus, he cracked his whip on Day One of the two-day trial.

The Farce before the force

From the outset, a degree of exaggeration was necessary to contrive a sense of menace out of the stunt and convey this element of folk devilry to the court. A former official of the Greater Bendigo City Council took the stand, doing his best during testimony to convince the court this was a serious affair. After all, he had faced the extreme logistical difficulty and sheer angst posed by the mysterious red fluid it was his insurmountable duty to clean. Almost in judgement of this poppycock, a spectator’s mobile phone suddenly sounded, and the well-timed ringtone of The Benny Hill Show theme mocked the witness. He was subsequently cross-examined by each defendant in turn. Shown a more recent photograph of the ‘damage’ done by one of the defendants with the dummy’s fake blood, he sheepishly admitted that “the red spot may be a pebble”, and there was “no staining”. No graffiti artist had ever been held to such account.

download (4)
The Australia First Party have previously demonstrated in defence of the Bendigo Three

Thereafter, State functionaries dominated the first day’s proceedings with inane testimony that served only to pad out the dubious basis of the charges and give the court a false impression of their gravitas. Senior Sergeant John Phillip Dalton, the detective who headed the police response to the United Patriots Front Bendigo rallies, answered questions about the aims of the UPF. The prosecution then played the video, which was the only proper evidence presented throughout the trial. Afterwards, proceedings took a turn for the silly as Fran asked, “What is on Mr Shortis’s head?” “I’d say a religious cloth of some type”, Dalton replied. Under cross-examination, focus remained on the incriminating headdress worn by Chris Shortis, until Magistrate Hardy informed the defendants that a policeman’s opinion about a headdress was not admissible evidence. They might as well have taken Victorian taxpayer dollars and burnt the lot in a waste bin.

The following witness, Officer Gary Jenkins (a Freemason), didn’t even bother showing up. An excuse was given, that he had suffered a motorcycle accident. Examining the medical certificate (provided by one of the ‘brothers’?), Magistrate Hardy asked why he couldn’t be brought to court, as the certificate only covered work, not court. It was decided not to bother with his evidence, and another thrumming moment in Australian legal history squiggled to the ceiling like a yawning Z.

If the consequences of the day’s judgment would not turn out to be so grave, one may have been tempted to laugh as Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith took the stand. He led a raid on Chris Shortis’s house on Good Friday, 2016, where he seized Chris’s T-Shirt, jeans, and a toy Pirate’s sword. Of these vital pieces of evidence, the most dangerous was the T-Shirt, which hadn’t been washed. However, he forgot to bring them to court, a ditzy oversight that caused a 15-minute delay as they were sent for.

download (5)
Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith before Magistrate Hardy stole his Pirate sword

Once they arrived, Smith beamed devilishly. He could now show the court this damning evidence which he gleefully gathered up and fumbled with in his hands like an excited Lex Luther taunting Superman with kryptonite. But this was a comedy, not drama, and given such, he managed to clumsily drop the T-Shirt, sucking out the tiny puff of air that had momentarily inflated his sails in his moment of glory. He might have got to wave the sword about in a Douglas Fairbanks Jnr impression had the object described on the Bendigo Police evidence register as “One Fake Pirate Knife/Sword” not have been issued for destruction over a year earlier.

Another day, another truckload of taxpayers’ dollars

The morning of Day Two was taken up with submissions from the prosecutor and the three defendants followed by a rebuttal from Miss Dalziel. For reasons unknown, Detective Senior Constable Smith once more attended court, possibly hoping someone had found the Pirate sword. He evidently thought the prosecutor might have it, because in-between sessions he kept whispering anxiously in her ear. A request by Chris Shortis to quote from the Holy Qur’an was denied. He had hoped to share verse 8:12, which says, “Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): ‘I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them’.”

Denied this opportunity to be enriched by the words of the Prophet, the court adjourned for lunch so that Magistrate Hardy could consider his ruling and possibly play with the Pirate sword. On returning at 2 pm, the assembled were informed that Magistrate Hardy needed a further hour’s deliberation, proving he had found the sword after all. In the wash-up, and following all the tedious testimony from the witnesses, the only evidence taken into consideration was the first 39 seconds of the UPF video. Magistrate Hardy seemed particularly taken by this portion of the video given it contained his esteemed Pirate sword.

behead-the-infidel
Another victim of The Bendigo Three’s “intentions”

Mr Shortis had argued that since beheading is illegal, and the RRTA only protects lawful religious activity, the video cannot be subject to the act. Magistrate Hardy rejected this argument as “teleological”. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines teleology as “The explanation of phenomena in terms of the purpose they serve rather than of the cause by which they arise”. This seems to say more about Hardy’s convoluted reflections on the 39 seconds in the video than it does to Chris’s argument in their defence. In fact, we’re pretty sure it sounds like bullshit. Hardy might as well have yelled, “look behind you” for all the clarity of this argument. Likewise, he argued that the law was dealing with “Muslims not beheading”, which is again odd given that there were no Muslims in the video and the only thing beheaded was a sex toy.

But as sure as he invalidated all of Chris’s arguments, he ignored his contention relevant sections of the Australian Constitution imply freedom of expression and that Australia is a signatory to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The latter includes the right to freedom of opinion and expression as a basic principle. Hardy did not agree that there is a conflict between the RRTA and the corresponding Federal law. He did not refer to the Keating government memorandum which suggests there may be. As to the lack of a plaintiff or complainant, he simply said that section 25 does not require it, airily dismissing legal investigation. He noted that the video had chalked-up 275 likes, establishing that it had an audience, which was, to him, a solid basis for construing the malicious intent in the video he believed exists had probably gestated already in weak minds.

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.  Where intent is the issue then inference must be used … The context of the video leaves me no alternative than to find that the intention was to incite serious contempt or ridicule of persons of the Muslim faith.”

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.

So, no actual incitement needs to occur, mere intention, a mental state, is enough to convict and inference is all that’s required to “prove” the mental state of the accused. Thus the burden of proof is reversed for an action merely imputed, which is abstraction upon abstraction. No real barrier remains for the prosecution of anyone the state does not like and the broadness as well as the vagueness of the offending article is pure Kafka. Thus, the presentation of opposing views to any area of the multicultural dogma is potentially a punishable offence, be it Islam, African crime, Chinese imperialism or the objection to curry odours in a unit block. If these views are presented publicly, regardless of whether criminal activity occurs as a result, it can be considered as “incitement”, demonstrable by a few clicks of the ‘like’ button on Facebook. In other words, opposing multiculturalism is a thought crime as well as a hate crime, especially if expressed on Facebook, which half of the legal justice system and Police Force seem to spend their time (and our money) gawping at.

The one glimmer of light from the Magistrate in this otherwise grotesque Stalinesque show trial came during sentencing. The prosecutor claimed that the defendants were lacking in remorse.  Magistrate Hardy, for once disagreeing with Miss Dalziel, noted that remorse in issues of principle is a bit different from remorse in matters such as rape. Undeterred, Fran declared that “Opposition to Islam continues to be held by these men!”

Magistrate Hardy, salvaging an atom of credibility, reminded Miss Dalziel that “They are entitled to oppose Islam it is how that opposition is expressed that is at issue”. But this is another instance of Hardy’s dingbat logic given that opposition cannot exist WITHOUT expression and there are no terms of reference to define the acceptable expression.

In other words, two plus two now equals anything but four.

It is worth noting, too, that when the guilty verdict was delivered members of the media — some believe from the ABC — pumped the air with their fists in a show of celebration.

Following the decision, Blair Cottrell and what’s-his-name went off to file an appeal. Chris Shortis is considering his options.

Bendigo-Three-Arrive-at-Labors-Show-Trial
UNA salutes our smiling hero, Chris Shortis

ED — We point out here that Chris Shortis is a member of United Nationalists Australia, however, this article was produced by another member of our growing team who was present both days of the Kangaroo court.

CTRL-LEFT ICONOCLASM IS PETTY AND DERIVATIVE

CTRL-LEFT ICONOCLASM IS PETTY AND DERIVATIVE

As the culture wars rage on, the Sydneyside Left have now outdone themselves in terms of boneheaded, historically illiterate dummy spitting.

The cretins have made a moonlight, anti-Australia Day graffiti raid upon several statues of historical significance, yet, simpletons that they are, they have managed to tag the wrong naval captain, the wrong colonial governor and the wrong monarch.

James Cook, what is more, made only short visits to Terra Australis, Lachlan Macquarie went home to London once his tenure was up and Queen Victoria, as far as anyone knows, never set foot upon her antipodean colony, none of them has any direct link to January 26, 1788.

Even more astonishing is the fact that all three were generally well disposed toward the native inhabitants of this new world, after the fashion of their time; Queen Victoria, in particular, was well regarded by her indigenous subjects, many of whom saw the monarchy as a mechanism of appeal against their treatment by often tyrannical colonial bureaucrats.

hyde-park
The suspected Hyde Park vandal and his handiwork

Macquarie was even something of a progressive on race relations when he arrived in Sydney in 1810, in our time he would be regarded as a “social justice warrior” and reformer, no administrator is perfect but he was one of the good guys, all things considered.

Of course the picture formed of the monarch by naive Aborigines desperate for the intervention of a greater power to alleviate their poverty and perceived ill treatment was probably wide of the mark, it nevertheless remained a part of their post-colonial folklore until the rise of the currently fashionable, revisionist stream of Australian historical story telling in the early 1970’s.

The cretins have made a moonlight, anti-Australia Day graffiti raid upon several statues of historical significance, yet, simpletons that they are, they have managed to tag the wrong naval captain, the wrong colonial governor and the wrong monarch.

1938-DayMourning
A photo taken in 1938: Protesting Australia Day is not a new idea, you just didn’t see many Whites doing it back then

We would like to point out that this current fancy for iconoclasm among the Ctrl-Left is but another piece of reactionary, copycat behaviour influenced by equally awful and misguided pseudo-socialist groups overseas, particularly in the United States.

Readers will notice that nowadays everything the Australian branch of the Ctrl-Left does is an attempt to directly transplant rhetoric and fashions in activism from other societies; this is due to the fact that their senior members had abandoned the traditional, Maoist influenced but Australian centred tropes popular on the left from the mid-1960’s.

Seattle had a Black Bloc in 1999, so Melbourne had to have one in 2000, New York had Occupy Wall St in 2011, Melbourne and Sydney had to have squatter camps and sit ins as well; rinse and repeat for Black Lives Matter, Opposition to the Trump inauguration and lately a Charlottesville solidarity rally.

These people have no shame, many of the wrinkled faces in today’s Lefty rent-a-crowd flash mobs, we know for a fact, were avid “China Line” Marxist-Leninists in their youth, throughout the following two decades they cynically used the imagery, poetry and folk culture of colonial White Australia as their central motif, in the hope of awakening the “natural Socialism” of the working classes.

Fremantle lefties
Flash forward and every Hippy-Dip White is on the bandwagon, but for how long?

Their hypocrisy has no limit, we have covered, as one example, the hue and cry over the use of the Eureka flag by Australia First Party and the attempt by elements of the new Ctrl-Left to “reclaim” the image in the name of Communists past.

Seattle had a Black Bloc in 1999, so Melbourne had to have one in 2000, New York had Occupy Wall St in 2011, Melbourne and Sydney had to have squatter camps and sit ins as well; rinse and repeat for Black Lives Matter, Opposition to the Trump inauguration and lately a Charlottesville solidarity rally.

So how does that sentiment fit in with their current iconoclastic play-acting and their mad rush to publicly denounce every White explorer, squatter and would-be Bunyip aristocrat of the 19th century?

Nationalists see our history as a continuum, one unbroken line of events in which the whole provides the context for the constituent parts and examining events in isolation is regarded as a fruitless pastime which can only lead a person along the wrong path.

January 26, 1788, and December 3rd, 1854 are inseparable in our political philosophy, to denounce one and attach symbolic virtues to another would be akin to demonising the heroes of Kokoda in 1942 while idealising the A.I.F who fought on the Somme in 1916, only a schizophrenic or a con-artist could wrap their mind around that way of thinking.

Ben hall
Ben Hall, thanks to the Commos everyone who went to school in the 1970’s knows that he was hunted from his station and like a Dog shot down

Right there we have the heart of the matter, the Ctrl-Left, Lily White in hue as it is, comprises a bunch of con-artists and hysterical nutjobs at the top who gather the ignorant and gullible as their acolytes.

This year they are talking about tearing down monuments and going all INGSOC on our national folklore and like their innocent tribal ancestors the urban Blacks are lapping up the lamentations of Ben Quilty, Julia Baird and Bill Shorten.

Nationalists see our history as a continuum, one unbroken line of events in which the whole provides the context for the constituent parts and examining events in isolation is regarded as a fruitless pastime which can only lead a person along the wrong path.

Trouble is, in years to come these same people may well be engaged in another colonial revival in an attempt to capitalise upon the growing discontent among the White workers and marginalised people forced to live under the heel of globalist capitalism.

Do not be surprised, dear reader, if in a few years you emerge from Southern Cross Station to be greeted by a hippy with a Henry Lawson moustache, in moleskins and a leather hat inviting you to the Socialist Alternative wool-shed dance and bush poetry evening.

To a Nationalist who has lived among these progressive dopes for many decades, this is all well within the realm of possibility and those urban Blacks will once again be pushed back to the status of a novelty act in the next failed Leftist play for the soul of the nation.

1989_swaggies
Even crappy lefty pub bands from the ’80s may be part of some theoretical Ctrl-Left attempt at Aussie cultural renaissance

JANUARY 26 IS NOW WHITE AUSTRALIA DAY

JANUARY 26 IS NOW WHITE AUSTRALIA DAY

Another day, another giant step backwards by the self-aggrandising, suburban cultural elites which pass for town councils these days.

Darebin Council, which for those not in the know serves a municipality in Melbourne’s inner northern suburbs, has joined nearby Yarra city council in cancelling their Australia Day commemorations. The stated reasons for the action boil down to pretty bog standard White, Bourgeois virtue signalling concerning the British invasion of this continent in 1788.

Egged on by a handful of semi-professional Aborigines and bolstered by an opinion poll which garnered a whopping 81 responses from a population of 147,000 residents, the council resolved to dispense with their January 26 activities and to move the 2018 event back a day as a symbolic gesture of solidarity with the Indigenous peoples of the land.

Local blacks
Darebin’s local Blacks were vocal in the debate over Australia Day. In fact, they were so vocal nobody actually listened to the 147,000 other residents 

To many Nationalists the post-1994 vision of Australia Day is a joke. At at best, the real meaning of the day has been largely excised from the commemorations in favour of globalist cosmopolitan fluff. The 26th is now basically “Immigrants Day” in all but name.

The main purpose of the council run Australia Day activities has been to welcome new immigrants and hold citizenship ceremonies for the newcomers, to the extent that publicly funded celebrations or parades are held in major cities they focus almost exclusively on multicultural themes.

To many Nationalists the post-1994 vision of Australia Day is a joke, at best; the real meaning of the day has been largely excised from the commemorations in favour of globalist cosmopolitan fluff; the 26th is now, basically, “Immigrants Day” in all but name.

The trend toward change and the “Black Arm Band” approach to Australia Day probably began with the actions of Fremantle City council, who have repeatedly, and unilaterally, tried to change the date of the event, to great consternation among residents.

The response by the Turnbull government, in the case of Yarra council at least has been to strip the city of its authority to conduct citizenship ceremonies, with the possibility of a federally run event being held in Yarra on January 26th in spite of the council’s wishes.

Muslims australia day
Australia Day since 1994 has been stripped of any coherent socio-political message besides the globalist-capitalist mantra: “Diversity Is Strength!”

In expectation of such ban being placed upon Darebin too, we wonder what then the dissenting councils will actually present to their supporters in their alternative programme? Presumably some Aboriginal dancing, a smoking ceremony and welcome to country, activities which they already held on Australia day anyway.

Looking at it from the perspective of the patriotic and civic minded rate payer it is probably better that these dissident councillors keep away from Australia Day; why would the public want councillors cheapening the national holiday by officiating over something they do not believe in?

January 26 then, logically, defaults to a day of remembrance for Whites and a day of mourning for Aborigines, which is well and good since the two ethnic groups are the original, and only protagonists in that historical drama, “New Australians” and cosmopolitans be damned.

From an Australian Nationalist point of view, this is a gift punted straight into our laps by these politically naive councillors, who are more interested in signalling their social status and bourgeois credentials than playing the long game.

If the globalists and rootless cosmopolitans wish to walk away from Australia Day in a symbolic gesture toward racial reconciliation then we can only offer the traditional sarcastic advice to someone who has worn out their welcome: “Here’s your hat, mind how you go”.

Beer drinking
Feel free to go overboard with the trimmings next White Australia Day, Nanny is no longer watching 

January 26 then, logically, defaults to a day of remembrance for Whites and a day of mourning for Aborigines, which is well and good since the two ethnic groups are the original, and only protagonists in that historical drama, “New Australians” and cosmopolitans be damned.

Shaming tactics only work on those with a guilty conscience or people afflicted by the (((Old World))) neuroses surrounding race and identity; normal, mentally healthy Whites might whoop for joy and kick up their heels knowing that Darebin and Yarra’s globalist busybodies will now have to keep their beaks out of traditional Australia Day celebrations.

As one Nationalist pointed out to us in conversation: “Nothing these people do ever works!”, so I guess we really should thank the Green and Socialist councillors of Yarra and Darebin for abandoning their right to voice an opinion on who does what on what we can now rightly call White Australia Day, January 26.

Founding-web

“VIRTUE” IS THE RELIGION OF THE CTRL-LEFT

“VIRTUE” IS THE RELIGION OF THE CTRL-LEFT

One thing that can be said about the West is that it sure swallows lies easily. It had no problem buying into the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie that Dubya and his allies used as a pretext to illegally invade Iraq and kill its leader. That’s just one example.

As Adolf Hitler said, “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”

Now the mainstream media talks about “fake news”. What a chutzpah. When it comes to most geopolitical matters and anything involving the Globalist narrative fake news is all that it’s serving.

But lies and gullibility are just symptoms of Western infantilism. An infantilised people respond well to the Globalist Media. Think of this fine example of infantilism: When Donald Trump won the 2017 Presidential Election, in spite of the relentless negative media coverage he received, college students were so traumatised that they were given Play-Doh as therapy.

Play-Doh
Play-Doh is the Prozac of Generation Triggered

Another troubled petal publicly defecated on a pro-Trump placard in the wave of anarchy that followed the result and swept the streets of US cities — a very infantile demonstration of anal aggression from one who is no doubt receiving a first world education in one of the world’s most advanced and militaristic nations.

As Adolf Hitler said, “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”

Indeed, you can see this infantilism in much of the way that the CTRL-LEFT advocates through its pervasive hysteria. If it doesn’t have its way, it will scream, and cry, and break things. It will fall thrashing to the ground like a misbehaving cat.

It is at once a spoiled brat and a bully believing itself to be functioning at the highest level of human consciousness.

DurhamStatue.png
ISIS have their counterparts in the CTRL-LEFT

However, it is not this infantilism alone, but the new religion of the West, which has cast off Christianity and replaced it with the bourgeoisie dogma of Virtue. And Virtue has a duty to atone for sins, real and imagined — while forcing others to recompense too regardless of whether or not they subscribe to its collective guilt.

Virtue gives no quarter and has its brutal way, even if its actions and philosophies are contradictory of the very moral foundation it is imagined to rest upon.

This is why Virtue, with its very coloured concept of history, absorbed through a didactic prism of historical Civil Rights Movement revisionism, considers no hypocrisy in stigmatising White people.

It is at once a spoiled brat and a bully believing itself to be functioning at the highest level of human consciousness.

Virtue, not satisfied with its history, sets about erasing it and rewriting it as it would like to believe it was. Virtue can abhor ISIS for destroying wondrous historical monuments of bygone civilisations, and yet it impels others to destroy historical tributes from its own past in the course of abolishing that history.

Virtue speaks of truth through lying lips and waxes lyrical about love while its heart is full of hate. Virtue condemns the totalitarianism it perceives in Fascism and Nationalism while its own sensibilities are authoritarian.

Black Caesar
Caesar was black. Caesar has always been black. The historical inaccuracy is those two White guys who would never have been in African Ancient Rome

Virtue is the religion of Globalism even though Globalism recognises no religion. Globalism doesn’t care — globalism is, at its core, a business and to it, the precepts of the Virtue religion are just marketable values.

The alt-right, in an alternate universe, would be understood as being a legitimate manifestation coming out of a genuine civil rights position.

The alt-right, in an alternate universe, would be understood as being a legitimate manifestation coming out of a genuine civil rights position.

When you are told that you are to blame for every misfortune befalling every minority; when you are taught not to judge others for the colour of their skin but then receive lessons in how you are a privileged person, a racist, and a fool based on the colour of yours – you either submit to the shaming or resist.

You particularly resist when at the same time you are casually informed you are part of a race that is dying. More irksome is when you understand your race is on a downward slope because it is being asked to make space for much larger races which aren’t in danger of disappearing from the earth.

WhitePriv2.png
Virtue calls for spiritual ablution by writing anti-White gibberish all over your face in dark pen

Black Lives Matter is celebrated, but the alt-right is demonised. The central message of BLM is that black people are the victim of White people when anyone with open eyes can see that now it’s completely the other way around.

As blacks, Asians and Middle Easterners spread across Europe, their riotous numbers are driving the aboriginal peoples of nearly every single European country into minority status. As the European peoples are replaced, so their culture, and the marvels of the civilisation that bear their names, disappears too. The gates are being forced open by the Globalists and the only crime is to speak out against it. In Europe, that can be a serious crime indeed.

This is what George Orwell meant when he wrote that “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four.”

This is what George Orwell meant when he wrote that “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four.”

This religion of Virtue, more than anything else, was the trigger for Charlottesville. It was the very thing against which the alt-right was demonstrating whether or not it managed to articulate that fact sufficiently. It would not have mattered if there was no small presence of play-actors with Swastikas, or bogeyman Klansman outfits because the ‘White Supremacist’ angle was predetermined.

While the Police ignored a federal injunction permitting the Unite the Right rally to take place they allowed the so-called counter protesters — you might call them the Inquisitors of the Virtue religion — to continue. The state created that scene and the Globalist media wrote the narrative. It stoked the fire.

As alt-righters are doxed and face losing their jobs for attending a legally sanctioned rally, those who vandalise statues; those who throw bottles, and use intimidation wherever possible, are rewarded for their Globalist Crusade.

Demonstrations continue to ignite like spot fires around the US. Those CTRL-LEFT protesters not defacing historical monuments are openly waving placards with messages like “KILL WHITEY”. Graffiti is appearing  with no less subtle sentiment. In one pic from a protest a smiling college girl holds a sign that reads, “LOL. YOUR GRAND-KIDS WILL BE BROWN”. Meanwhile, the State stands by like a mute centurion condemning only alt-right apostates.

SPLCBlackWonderWomamn
Wonder Woman is based on the goddess ISIS who was, as everyone knows, either black or a beaner

CHARLOTTESVILLE WAS NEVER A POPULARITY CONTEST

CHARLOTTESVILLE WAS NEVER A POPULARITY CONTEST

Whichever way you slice it, the events at Charlottesville were a case of something, as opposed to the perennial nothing, happening.

Whether or not what transpired is even relevant to us Bruces and Sheilas here down under is debatable. However, on the Left side they sure think so. A Negro stubbing its big toe in Chicago is considered grounds for them to express a sympethetic flash demonstration here in Oz.

This is why a gaggle of gimps and geeks from an over-caffeinated cosplay group calling itself Campaign Against Racism and Fascism turned out at the American consulate in Melbourne on Monday to show solidarity with cupcake anti-racists from Virginia. It was impossible to watch the first two seconds of their ‘demonstration’ without hitting the floor in crippling spasms of laughter.

It was like the Care Bears had discovered the Gender Reassignment Clinic on their way to a Refugees Welcoming Committee.

oie_nqcoK2YQ1hXc (1)
Meanwhile, in Melbourne, the Care Bears held a vigil

No one from Unite the Right is laughing, although possibly they should be. There seems to be no shortage of analysis occurring and the more critical voices point to displays of overt “Roman Saluting”, Larping NS wannabes serving up the perfect images for a biased liberal media, lousy organisation, ego shines from the ‘leaders’ and the absence of an overall cogent message.

There were missives about the wisdom of holding the event in a “college” town given the college is the town’s economic driving force and the police would inevitably back what the campus wanted. One blogger even spat the dummy that David Duke was invited, although why he shouldn’t have been, beats this writer.

It was like the Care Bears had discovered the Gender Reassignment Clinic on their way to a Refugees Welcoming Committee.

There was the police helicopter crash, the ‘violence’, and Based Car Man whose actions are already being judged as homicidal even though the whole thing was likely just a terrible accident that Police could have prevented.

A hell of a lot of this commentary is valid indeed. At times it seemed that any perception that “the left” and “the right” were separate entities was an illusion. Finer minds perceived them as being a holistic “whole” in a physics analogy whereby ‘everything is everything’ and the universe is just one mass of swarming molecules bumping up against one another.

oie_cZWCxCJiHRew (1)
A faggot version of Thermopylae 

This was two branches of middle-class Whites opposing each other for reasons that seemed closer to religious than political. Was the ‘United Right’ now behaving just it always points its finger at the Left for? All in all, as it is tiresomely pointed out, this serves but the deep state of the Globalist Order — it is exactly the narrative they want to be plugged.

The left is claiming a victory, the right is boasting they kicked arse, and a strong possibility exists that the American alt-right will go the way of the Reclaim Australia movement. Reclaim Australia burned ever so brightly for a fleeting instant before Zionists and their conservative Shabbos goy took it over. The comparisons are indeed sobering.

Yet, this sort of negativity from some of those commentators grows a wee tiresome. It’s as if all along they were rooting for an outcome they could condemn post-analysis and use as a justification for furthering their comfortable paradigm of inertia.

There was the helicopter crash, the ‘violence’, and Based Car Man whose actions are already being judged as homicidal even though the whole thing was likely just a terrible accident that Police could have prevented.

For one thing, it was without a doubt the Charlottesville Council and the Police over there who shoulder the blame. We do know that the cops and Council ignored a federal injunction against an ideologically motivated ban on the rally. We also know the cops herded the two groups together and it was inevitable that argy would occur.

Any criticisms over alt-right conduct on the day are withering to this scribe. He knows from bitter experience that they could just as well have turned out in pyjamas sucking their thumbs the whole while and the media would have created a “White Supremacy Violence” narrative.

download (2)
If pigs were meant to fly they’d have wings not choppers

Was the idea to win over normies? Who even cares about normies? Normies are that third element in the sad mess of the White race at the moment — the couch potatoes and comfort seekers.

The greatest tragedy of the whole affair is not that a childless overweight anti-White BLM fag hag is now beached with the heavenly whales — it’s that James Alex Field’s car will probably be sent to the scrap heap. As much as General Robert E. Lee’s statue should be protected by a 24-hour armed guard, so Field’s motor should be stuck on a plinth and guarded around the clock by militia until the day the world ends.

tmp_uJe5D7_1cdd040aab6dc0fa_GettyImages-830784976
A familiar theme: Whites carrying blacks

And that’s the thing, the scenes out of Durham, North Carolina, where a Confederate statue was ripped down, echoed those of ISIS on its march of destruction through Syria. Great monuments to a wondrous, bygone civilisation are now forever lost. Artefacts of American History have been destroyed without a peep from the media or state.

Was the idea to win over normies? Who even cares about normies? Normies are that third element in the sad mess of the White race at the moment — the couch potatoes and comfort seekers.

Given the momentous cost of lives that went into forging that history, the calamitous toll of America’s Civil War, those who pulled down the relics are guilty of a crime that transcends common law.

Throughout all of this, Donald Trump, once described as the ‘Glorious God Emperor’, is now on the nose. But is he?

charlottesville-getty-830759682
Sports Store owners saw an unusal spike in profits last weekend

Initially, The Donald spoke of “both sides” before condemning the “racists” and “Nazis” but he’s now back to his “both sides” position after naming “the violent alt-left” on Tuesday EST and saying there was “there was a lot of bad people in the other group too”.

Again, we know all about how the Left triggers these confrontations full well realising they’ll be perceived as valiant champions of good morality.

So we come full circle back to our own White side and we’ll leave this one for the Americans to figure out. It is not our battle but we are with them in solidarity.

Throughout all of this, Donald Trump, once described as the ‘Glorious God Emperor’, is now on the nose. But is he?

In the spirit of that solidarity, this UNA writer argues that it is only natural that alt-right will re-examine itself. There’ll be ups here, downs there, damage control, and the rest of it. They need to get ‘right’ with all the “uniforms” and “edginess”. That part of the script has been played and straight shooters are what is needed. But all in all, the spark has ignited the flame.

This was never a popularity contest. The big question many are asking is, well, what was the message? What was the point to the whole thing?

Actually, that’s pretty obvious — it was about young Whites standing up and saying “fuck this, I’m White, I’m proud, I’m not going to be replaced — I am mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore!”

The real issue to galvanise against is the “Israeli-Anti Boycott Act” which could see US citizens fined or jailed for boycotting Israeli goods or services. This is where the right can re-unite and hopefully on their terms, with better organisation, and lessons learned from Charlottesville.

For, if you rewind to the beginning of the whole thing and revisit that magnificent torch lit rally through the university that some ignorant goops have criticised — with that scene reminiscent of Golden Dawn — at that moment it was all together… it was all happening. And it will happen again.

170515110556-charlottesville-lee-monument-spencer-protests-0513-full-169
A moment so glorious — perhaps they should have left it at that!