THE GREAT PURGE OF 2017: A LOGICAL EXPLANATION

THE GREAT PURGE OF 2017: A LOGICAL EXPLANATION

Readers would be well aware of a change in attitude toward dissident viewpoints, at management level within Google and Facebook.

Where previously these companies exercised a degree of tolerance toward most points of view, the commercial realities of allowing anti-capitalist, anti-globalist or even just plain stupid material to take hold on their platforms have been brought into sharp focus over the past few months.

From around the first week of April, reports began to appear in the mainstream press concerning a backlash of sorts by advertisers on the Google-owned YouTube platform; the issues raised included concerns over “inappropriate” videos being preceded by corporate advertising and a lack of control on the part of sponsors over where their ads were appearing.

Companies such as Toyota, McDonald’s, Pepsi, Starbucks and many other globalist brands pulled their advertising from YouTube due the fact that their videos were being attached to, among other things, clips espousing Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism; this resulted in a hit in the order of 4% to the share price of Google’s parent company, Alphabet Inc.

cfd

The remedial action taken by Google, in this case, is not yet clear, they have spoken about re-writing the algorithms in their operating software to better tailor the targeting of advertising and made some comments about allowing advertisers greater freedom to tailor the placement of their ads on YouTube, as well as the millions of other, third-party sites overseen by Google.

It remains to be seen whether the measures taken by YouTube will make a difference to the user experience, or lure back lucrative advertising contracts; we may never really know the outcome but there has long been a policy in place where they do not allow posters of controversial material to monetise their channels as YouTube partners.

William_Gibson_by_FredArmitage
William Gibson predicted the corporate takeover of cyberspace

Facebook, it would seem, has decided to act quickly in heading off any potential advertiser walk-out by permanently banning a swathe of controversial, nationalistic or civic patriot themed accounts and the personal pages of anyone associated with banned material, notable among them our own UNA Facebook account.

Where previously these companies exercised a degree of tolerance toward most points of view, the commercial realities of allowing anti-capitalist, anti-globalist or even just plain stupid material to take hold on their platforms have been brought into sharp focus over the past few months.

Now, much has been made of this purge by self-styled, online anti-racists and their mirror images in what we call the “right wing Antifa”, those conservatives who zealously pursue and harass nationalists and true patriots.

These serial pests, shut-ins, and obsessive compulsives are crowing loud and long about their tactics of mass reporting of any dissident thought having brought down pages such as UNA, UPF and Reclaim Australia, to name a few.

Looking at the situation logically, while having a basic grasp of how Facebook actually works and its record on such matters since the inception of the platform, we can only come to one conclusion: this cull of dissenting points of view, this purge of ideas which contradict the globalist capitalist line must have been done in the name of the almighty dollar.

Rupert Murdoch, Michael Bloomberg
Fifteen years ago we were worried about the old media barons taking over the internet

After all, the White trash of Antifa and their ideological brothers and sisters in the civic patriot groups have been mass reporting genuine dissident material 24 hours a day, 365 days a year since the days of Myspace and message boards. Their numbers have actually greatly decreased over that time so the decision to kill off unpopular ideas on Facebook is clearly a commercial decision, not the result of a tactical breakthrough by a few, numerically irrelevant Trolls.

What is also clear to the logical observer is that cyberspace, to all intents and purposes, is no longer a neutral space, that corporations rule the internet, that what is commonly called “political correctness” is now an integral part of globalist lifestyle branding and that the only social engineering being attempted is within the consumer “culture” of the multinational corporation.

Looking at the situation logically, while having a basic grasp of how Facebook actually works and its record on such matters since the inception of the platform, we can only come to one conclusion: this cull of dissenting points of view, this purge of ideas which contradict the globalist capitalist line must have been done in the name of the almighty dollar.

The fashion in which the Facebook software tailors the user experience with targeted advertising, friend and page recommendations based on the browsing history of the individual user makes it unlikely that a person is ever going to see any content which may offend them, unless they go looking for it on purpose or something slips through on the feed of a friend.

sjw-freakshow-lauren-southern
No, uppity Social Justice Warriors had nothing to do with the great social media purges of 2017

This analysis also proves the fears regarding net neutrality, long held by futurists the world over; granted in the early years of the noughties it seemed as if Newscorp and traditional media might take over the web and turn it into something like Foxtel, however, the reality is that middle-of-the-road neo-liberalism now reigns supreme online.

The move to rid Facebook of commercially problematic content may be a way of appeasing the direct demands of its corporate partners, or it may simply be an expression of good faith by a company long criticised for hosting “extremist” points of view, we cannot say for sure.

It all makes sense to anyone in business, the inclusion of all individuals into the global consumer class and the accommodation of all their whims, tastes and fancies is obviously the best way to make money and the best use of the internet as a sales tool.

Globalist corporations support same-sex marriage, for example, because marketing these days largely revolves around concepts of lifestyle and a mix-and-match set of personal values drawn from the prescribed life choices of the cosmopolitan consumer culture; the more variations this culture can accept the more product the corporations can shift.

The move to rid Facebook of commercially problematic content may be a way of appeasing the direct demands of its corporate partners, or it may simply be an expression of good faith by a company long criticised for hosting “extremist” points of view, we cannot say for sure.

It is impossible to monetise ideas such as nationalism, patriotism, traditionalism and even Communism because they all rely on making us versus them distinctions and prescribe in-group loyalty above all else. If the consumer culture can be described as a smorgasbord, where the individual chooses his own identity from a range of possible components then its opposite must be a set menu, where a strictly limited number of options are available and the group assigns an identity for all.

enhanced-buzz-1504-1379943854-7
Liberals used to think this way

This is the heart of the matter and the real implication of the great social media purges of 2017, we must take the globalist-capitalists at their word.

They accuse Nationalists and true patriots of fostering division and unrest; a breakdown in social cohesion is their greatest fear but it is not the nation, the physical communities of towns and suburbs or the family they seek to protect, it is their global consumer monoculture, the deracinated, classless society held together by money and the material things it can buy.

We at UNA are, fortunately, on the record as being long term skeptics of social media, we use it when convenient but scarcely miss it when it is no longer available due to the fact that radicalisation of the proletariat and marginalised people via Facebook never seemed feasible to us.

What is more the people we seek to turn on to our brand of radical Australianism are not to be found on Facebook, where it is well known that something in the order of 80% of traffic is generated by around 10% of users; they are in the outer suburbs of our cities and the rural hinterland and outreach to those Whites with ears to hear has always been our primary concern.

alfred-e-neuman.jpeg

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

What do you do with the UPF? If you’re Facebook, you shut down their main page. So what do THEY then do? They migrate as much Zionist supporting material as they can to sister pages and to their Reclaim Australia – West Australia Rally page.

In every quote to the media, however, you will find their leadership claiming to be ‘nationalist’ and not ‘patriot’ which is such a conscious delineation that its intention is coldly clear to true Australian nationalists.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

On the same page (RA-WA) you will find a link to a True Blue Crew flag march where Whiteness is heavily emphasised. Then it’s back to the kosher meal of every possible Zionist-related entity they chug up – Britain First and Tommy Robinson shares right there in among them.

Well, they know by now; surely they aren’t naive. They know that promoting ultra-Zionists like Avi Yemini is a contradiction in terms to the single-minded cause of fighting Islamic extremism. Ultra-Zionists like Avi and his fellow countrymen create such extremism. They do so both by having manufactured ISIS, so as to pit them against the unfriendly Moslems on their list – and by continually stoking bloody conflict in the region.

The perennial program of destabilisation establishes a power balance that benefits the security of the state of Israel and services whatever objectives its allies may have in the region. But it also does something else – and has done so since the 1970s – it creates a mass migration of Middle Easterners into Australia.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

What does this portend for the ‘nationalism’ that they claim to be championing, having knowingly appropriated the term from staunch supporters of a new White Australia Policy? It kills it because those same Zionists do everything possible to eradicate such nationalist beliefs. They do more though — they align with the Left to attack serious nationalists such as we saw recently with Fairfax’s criminal toll Luke McMahon, who is known to have ties with Zionist-convert Neil Erikson.

Erikson, along with Nick Folkes, Howard Crawford, Scott Moerland and others have campaigned heavily against true nationalists. We are not at all surprised to find the UPF making the self-defeating move to once again associate with these cagey globalists in the hope of puffing up their waning profile.

Thus, nationalists for a White Australia become treated worse than kiddy fiddlers, and the planes keep flying more and more Indians, Chinese, Africans and MOSLEMS from the Middle East. The cathartic activity of stoking enmity against Islam merely gives a moral license to our globalist government to support military crimes in the Middle East which benefit Israel.

In this battle, all those values that Australians regarded as part of their birthright are trampled on. Zionists in Australia, while demanding racial and religious homogeneity at home, are forever insisting on total diversity for Australia and all White countries.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

This diversity has transformed our cities into utterly foreign destinations. The quarter-acre home has been replaced by towering (shoddily built) concrete toolboxes crammed with Chinese and Indians; the odour of their spicy cooking permeating the streets.

Australia needs reclaiming from all of this, not just one particular branch of this allegedly diverse community.

It is not the Indians, Africans, or Chinese who are losing their identities. They’ve never had it so sweet. While White Australians are slowly being discouraged from even considering ourselves Australian, this new population get dual identities. They get to be Indian AND Australian; they get to be African AND Australian, and they get to be Chinese AND Australian.

Islam is just a symptom of this single world government that has its master Zionist America. But while all these terms we throw about ‘Zionist’ ‘civic patriot’ and whatever might confuse the casual punter it is all quite simple. Unless you live in one of those last posts White Australian areas that are only ‘gradually’ being de-Europeanised you only have to take a walk, open your eyes, and smell the pungent waft of curry.

What difference does Islam make if – in the highly improbable event of removing it – you do so only to find yourself a stranger in your own country, shivering and alone among a new population of aliens? What will you reclaim then?

Wake up to the Zionists — you are being used.

C1ePePgVEAAVEM4
Avi Yemini, the ultra-Zionist who is now the darling of the civic patriots now calling themselves Australian ‘nationalists’

KITCHEN NIGHTMARES

KITCHEN NIGHTMARES

Nationalists would be well aware of the range of propositions and inducements offered to workers by the supporters of multiculturalism, chief among them and a seemingly unfalsifiable retort to opponents of mass immigration is “the food”.

Indeed, in their darkest hours, the globalists and their supporters have relied upon the symbolic breaking of bread (or a suitable ethnic analogue) as a means of repairing the many flaws and rips in the great rainbow tapestry which is the “nation of immigrants”.

The ridiculous Sam Dastyari wields his halal snack pack as if it had been cooked by the prophet Mohammed himself (PBUH); the plate of greasy lamb, chips and garlic sauce is thus imbued with almost supernatural peacemaking properties, all unbelievers should immediately submit to Allah upon tasting such a delicacy.

food_network_promo_desktop_01a
TV for the self-righteous bourgeoisie

Who can forget the time a well-known civic patriot was alleged to have purchased and eaten a Doner kebab on his lunch break? In contrast to the purely utilitarian view, most of us have of takeaway food the anti-racists, judging by the way they carried on, must have expected the lad to have spontaneously combusted via the hand of the almighty, or to have erupted in religious ecstasy, seeking out the nearest Imam for further instruction.

Magic dirt is a staple of the globalist dogma, we suppose it is also reasonable for them to swallow the idea of magic tucker; whereas the dusky skinned third world ragamuffin, upon de-planing at Tullamarine is instantly reborn as a dinky-di Aussie, the native is made a true believer of multiculturalism after his first sip of curry Laksa.

Indeed, in their darkest hours, the globalists and their supporters have relied upon the symbolic breaking of  bread (or a suitable ethnic analogue) as a means of repairing the many flaws and rips in the great rainbow tapestry which is the “nation of immigrants”.

Lately, though, the Sushi and Sake lunch has turned to ashes in their mouths as a stream of revelations concerning the poor condition of the, now globalised, restaurant and food service industries have hit the internet.

magic tucker
The ritual of the Magic Tucker

Who would have suspected that having suburban shopping strips packed with identical Asian themed cafés serving identical dishes at the same ridiculously low price would be leading to rampant abuse and underpayment of workers and some appalling food safety issues, due to lack of investment in proper staff training?

The globalist chain junk food outlets and their many immigrant franchisees represent the lower end of the spectrum, they are the ultimate sucker deal for the gormless Oriental rube with dollar signs in his eyes; the Dominos pizza scandal is probably only the tip of the iceberg.

The rot, however, has worked its way right to the top of foodie culture with the revelations concerning the plight of workers in the top line businesses of George Calombaris and Adriano Zumbo.

Zumbo macaroons.jpg
Sweets flavoured with the tears of the working class

Now we are led to understand that the grub at the Hellenic Republic is really very good, if out of reach of most working folk and that Zumbo’s cakes are worth every cent, but in an oversaturated market with cheap Chinese knock-offs of everything including fine patisserie the squeeze is on even fine dining.

Who would have suspected that having suburban shopping strips packed with identical Asian themed cafés serving identical dishes at the same ridiculously low price would be leading to rampant abuse and underpayment of workers and some appalling food safety issues, due to lack of investment in proper staff training?

This is far from the most upsetting aspect of the scandal-plagued restaurant scene, Fairfax media and Overland, which are both enthusiastically pro-globalist in outlook, have presented exposes of the allegedly rampant sexism, abuse, and intimidation of female workers in the hospitality industry.

There are lurid tales of payment in kind, favouritism shown to male workers who are willing to put in unpaid overtime in exchange for workplace privileges and the full gamut of unpleasant sexual harassment allegations, enough to cause a fatal blood clot in any committed Feminist.

The anecdotes offered as supporting evidence of corruption of the restaurant industry by these ostensibly left-wing publications all seem to come from young women employed in the relatively well-policed hipster coffee bar end of the market; we might shudder to think what the situation is like for those girls slinging Pho on Victoria St Richmond, where the margins are tighter and the black economy is the norm.

Dominos
Low-grade food, low-grade workers, low-grade corporate culture

The enhanced range of dining options brought by immigration is no longer a viable argument for the opponents of our brand of Nationalism if anything it’s an emphatic validation of our positions on both immigration and industrial relations.

Like everything else globalism has wrought the once trendy dining out scene is has degenerated into the same excruciating race to the bottom as every other sector of the economy; at least as far as quality and workers rights go.

There are lurid tales of payment in kind, favouritism shown to male workers who are willing to put in unpaid overtime in exchange for workplace privileges and the full gamut of unpleasant sexual harassment allegations, enough to cause a fatal blood clot in any committed Feminist.

Less is more, in the old days, when the UNA contributors were youngsters a Chinese takeaway or an authentic Italian pizza were a treat; country folk would get dressed up in their best clothes to go out for a feed of Lemon Chicken and deep fried ice-cream at the local Cantonese café, which was the often only game in town.

The Chinamen and Italians charged a bomb for their fare because it was novel and in most towns and suburbs the only alternative was a night at the pub; we seem to recall that a Pizza or a tub of Sweet And Sour cost more, dollar for dollar, in 1980 than it does today.

Now we are not knocking the old Aussie counter meal, it was cheap and normally well prepared and there were modern French and Italian restaurants about for the big night out. We merely point out that once upon a time there was genuine diversity in dining options and it was possible for everyone to make a quid out of the market, some restaurant owners even became rich, with workers lining up to apprentice in their kitchens or wait on their tables because the wages and tips were so good.

So no, the food is no longer a viable prospect as the great redeemer of the failed globalist experiment, if anything it is a tumour eating away at its innards.

The thin veneer of propriety which allowed the chattering classes to turn a blind eye to the disaster that veteran hospitality workers have seen coming for years has been ripped away, the real worker-parasite dynamic of the black economy is laid bare for all to see and no amount of sub-continental spice can cover the stench of corruption.

Magic tucker is served from the hands of a kid who is likely working below minimum wage, if not for nothing at all or only for his keep; foodies might count themselves lucky if they don’t get a case of food poisoning to go with their smug self-righteousness.

Ramsay

FAIRFAX MEDIA’S CRIMINAL TROLL EXPOSED!

 

B/ The sick Fairfax troll Luke McMahon

I have already addressed the untruths printed about me in a fake-news article by shadowy Fairfax journalist, Luke McMahon. Having been labelled one of Australia’s worst trolls — even though I have not had any complaints of trolling levelled my way — I can go on to reveal the troll is in fact – McMahon himself.

McMahon has, for nearly two years, been stalking me around social media. He has created YouTube channels, fake Facebook accounts, and even been active on Twitter. He also created a Daily Stormer profile under the name ‘That Aussie Guy’ on which he shared a defamatory page about me from the extremist Antifascist Action Sydney blog (which we suspect he has a hand in maintaining). It has shown all evidence of being a deranged obsession.

But the level of McMahon’s stalking is now in the criminal realm and it is a matter of whether or not to make an official police complaint against the Fairfax employee: a development that would surely require comment from his supporting editors at the odious organisation! We shall see.

Luke
Luke McMahon. If anyone in Melbourne knows this guy, please contact either Australia First Party or UNA. He is wanted for making serious threats among his other crimes

 

I blocked McMahon from my Facebook a long time ago, but he turned up again prior to and after the publication of the fake news article. The trouble is, he was stalking the account of a party colleague, who he was convinced – was me.

His baiting came from two accounts, of which forensic testing of his computers will reveal both belong to McMahon. In one, he posted as Luke McMahon. In the other, he adopted the vile persona of Mark Watford. He revealed them to be one and the same by cross-sharing information on both accounts, and dually targeting the wrong chap. Also, he made no effort to conceal the pathology of his own typing habits so you can plainly see they were sent by the same person: of this, there is no doubt whatsoever. Maybe McMahon wants to get caught, who can say?

McMahon’s Watford account is a straight case of using a carriage to harass and intimidate. In the screen grabs supplied to the Australia First Party, this very sick man, who is supposedly anti-racist, made heavy use of anti-Semitic slurs and outright threats of violence. He did this as part of his campaign to convince nationalists that I am Jewish. His theory appears to be that if he goads long enough I’ll somehow snap. It is ‘gaslighting’.

I blocked McMahon from my Facebook a long time ago, but he turned up again prior to and after the publication of the fake news article. The trouble is, he was stalking the account of a party colleague, who he was convinced – was me.

Soon after publication of the defamatory fake-news article by Fairfax, a video I made a while ago, and which I explained in the previous instalment of this story, appeared on a YouTube channel called ‘Aussie Lads’ I NOTE THIS is a very similar moniker to his Daily Stormer account, ‘That Aussie Guy’.

I COMPLAINED TO YOUTUBE.

McMasters
McMahon or ‘McMasters’ uses Fairfax’s address to conduct his trolling

 

In the process of issuing my complaint, McMahon’s details were supplied to me with a mobile phone number and an address which turns out to be Fairfax offices in Melbourne. Also, his name is given as ‘Luke McMasters’. Now, this is significant, because this YouTube channel exists to troll patriots. It is trolling. Moreover, it is happening directly in the name of Fairfax Media. McMahon has used his credentials to try and appropriate my copyright on my own video as a means of ‘trolling’ me.

But that is not the most disturbing part: growing increasingly frustrated at his lack of response from the account holder on Facebook he was convinced was me, McMahon posted evidence that he has been stalking what he believes to be my home address.

18175790_455425074804189_457123512_oCavendish

Watford1

Watford2

On the Watford account, along with a lot of sick threats and deranged dribble about “following” me home, he posted a pic of what he purports is where I live. At the same time, on the tranche of harassing private messages in the name of Luke McMahon, he provides that same address, making careful allusions to physical threats to be carried out. He even makes screen grabs of his Daily Stormer posts in those messages. So now one must question the sanity of the fellow.

Regardless or not of any hereditary mental illness he may be suffering, McMahon is a Fairfax Media employee, whose defamations were allowed to be published without question by a supposed institution of hard news.

But that is not the most disturbing part: growing increasingly frustrated at his lack of response from the account holder on Facebook he was convinced was me, McMahon posted evidence that he has been stalking what he believes to be my home address.

Yet, he also makes reference to “Andy Hutchings” (PROBABLE EARLIER IDENTITY OF SLACKBASTARD BUT A PLAYER IN THE NETWORK)) having information on me, suggesting that the CURRENT Slackbastard operator (real name Professor Rob Sparrow of Monash University), is perhaps paying for a private investigator.

The pics of what he believes are my address, and which will have to become subject to a police report, were either taken by a private investigator or one of the networks of anarchists working in the area. ‘Yusef’ of the Australian Communist Workers Party made threats of violence against me and Jim Saleam after the publication of the fake news. His connection to the duo and their threats of violence is yet to be determined.

So, it is no surprise that this campaign of harassment is being waged by both Slackbastard and McMahon who are known to be close associates.

So who IS McMahon? A search of the electoral role pinpointed him clearly as the Luke McMahon whose details are “suppressed”.

However, his Linked account gives a nice little biographical background which we shall use to track him down.

So, it is no surprise that this campaign of harassment is being waged by both Slackbastard and McMahon who are known to be close associates.

According to his profile, the one who calls me a “bin scab” lists his major talents as Investigative Journalism (lol), Law (as in ‘breaking it’), and Advisory (as in reporting to Slackbastard).

He is listed as Australian coordinator — ‘founder’ of Media Direct. Thereafter, he references several positions that he has held, and which people might remember him from, such as Managing Director of ‘Job Community’, and IYSS case manager for Anglicare Australia. Perhaps those organisations can provide a comment on this man’s behaviour, too. Finally, he was educated at the University of Melbourne, and has, if he is not just fabricating his work history, a degree in law.

Yes, in law… This is what age we are living in folks, investigative journalists that don’t investigate the stories they fake up, and lawyers whose principal occupation is breaking the very law they spent years studying.

It is of the utmost importance that readers in Melbourne or elsewhere who know anything about McMahon either contact the Australia First Party or the United Nationalists Australia. We will provide an image of him on our blog. We want to know everything: where he hangs out, who his friends are, where he parks his car, where he walks his dog (or boyfriend), where he buys his lipstick, what drugs the degenerate uses — everything.

I wish to finish by pointing out an irony. It was around two years ago when I learned that Christopher Shortis had been defamed in an article by Fairfax Media. In it, every effort was made to infer, based on a video that Chris had uploaded to YouTube that given his faith in Jesus and his fondness for collecting guns he was a potential ‘Anders Breivik’. I was studying media law at the time and recognised this right away as gross defamation. I did not know Chris then, but I passed on this word through back channels.

Who would have thought that soon after leaving court having travelled to Melbourne to support my now-colleague Christopher Shortis I would be subject to the same treatment by the same Fairfax criminal? It makes you wonder.

Nathan Sykes

20160622_192042
McMahon survivors together

 

TRUMP DUPED — THE DREAM IS OVER — SYRIA BOMBINGS TRIGGER A NEW IRAQ!

TRUMP DUPED — THE DREAM IS OVER — SYRIA BOMBINGS TRIGGER A NEW IRAQ!

We hate to say we told you so, but UNA did warn readers that Trump offered little more than the illusion of a change from a world controlled by Zionist warmongers.

This is not an order that can be changed so easily. As of today, we are proved correct. Trump both sold the alt-right and White nationalists a hell of a line or else he was sincere up to a point but just couldn’t maintain his vision against the agitations of dark forces behind the scenes.

We choose to believe the latter, that he really did want to bring about a new policy on Syria, but the system is not designed to be remodelled.

The ‘fake news’ department hit him with powerfully stirring images of little Syrian kids being gassed by Assad, a line reminiscent of the lies of the WMDs that led to the invasion of Iraq and the beginning of the mass relocations into the west by Middle Eastern ‘refugees’.

Let’s remember, the US, Israel and its allies had been supplying ISIS etc. with the weapons and wherewithal to wage an insurgency against President Bashar al-Assad, so it bears the culpability for this bloody conflict.

The only ones actually fighting ‘terrorists’ were the government forces under Assad, and Russia, with president Putin’s powerful resolve to stand in defiance of this sick, evil Zionist world order. They fought alone.

We choose to believe the latter, that he really did want to bring about a new policy on Syria, but the system is not designed to be remodelled.

Then, this gassing incident occurs, and immediately we return to the WMD narrative that brought down Saddam Hussein and forever compromised global security — Assad gassing fresh-faced little children, his people.

Of course, the western media has been pushing the Zionist lies all along and was never about to acknowledge the basic tenets of fair reportage. Instead, it continued to dump Zionist-globalist lies on us like asbestos rubble.

C8yOim3VYAA1ZcP
Yes, fancy this sick Jew warmonger sending support to his new partner in war crimes

Remember, fair reportage is a cornerstone of western journalism and therefore a pillar of this so-called democracy that it keeps blowing foreign states up to impose upon them. However, Assad maintains that a Syrian airstrike on the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhun, in the Idlib province, hit a terrorist chemical weapons lab causing the leak. This is quite plausible indeed. It is every bit as plausible as suggesting he gassed the little children out of some brand of cartoon villainy.

This explanation was roundly dismissed by the west, which had its propaganda machine primed and rearing to go. Kids play a valuable hand in beguiling the western people. When Beach Boy washed up on a Turkish shore he became the symbol of justification for flooding Europe with rapeugees, the exploits of which fill the pages of social media and alternative blog news feeds almost on a daily basis.

Following the heavily reported gassing, arch-Zionist and US Ambassador to the UN Security Council, Nikki Haley, a woman of Sikh descent, gave a speech invoking more images of dead kiddies, and imploring, “We cannot close our eyes to those pictures. We cannot close our minds of the responsibility to act…

Of course, the western media has been pushing the Zionist lies all along and was never about to acknowledge the basic tenets of fair reportage. Instead, it continued to dump Zionist-globalist lies on us like asbestos rubble.

“Russia cannot escape responsibility for this. We know that if nothing is done, these attacks will continue. Assad has no incentive to stop using chemical weapons as long as Russia continues to protect his regime from consequences.”

Then the clincher at the end, when she said, “When the United Nations consistently acts in its duty to act collectively there are times in the life of states we are compelled to take our own action.”

150420130502-syria-war-780x439
It is due to this Zionist interference in Syria that this not-so-fake gas attack became fake news that swayed Trump to reneg on his promises

Yes, we heard this from George W. Bush before he went into Iraq, this same sort of spiel. But now it is coming from the administration of a president who was voted in precisely on the promise that he would not go down bloodthirsty Hillary’s warmongering road — a path leading directly to a confrontation with Russia, as much as another embedded and tumultuous military catastrophe in the Middle East.

Meanwhile, the usual cast of happy Zionists lines up to help stoke the furnace. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cynically Tweeted, “When I saw pictures of babies suffocating from a chemical attack in Syria, I was shocked and outraged.”

This colourless quote, which lacks any true spark of sincerity, is understandable given it was Israeli involvement that caused the sarin gassing in the first place.

Then the clincher at the end, when she said, “When the United Nations consistently acts in its duty to act collectively there are times in the life of states we are compelled to take our own action.”

Then the Tweet from the AnneFrankCenter of the US, which howled a whopper when it uploaded an image of Anne Frank graphically superimposed onto a picture of Syrian children. It wrote, “The Anne Franks of our time”, which is funny, considering that Anne Frank was not gassed but died of typhus.

Yet, all of this goes to show the same techniques are being used once again to lead us into a savage and unnecessary conflict for Israel that will result in our countries having to absorb even greater numbers of Moslems and others.

17821058_757468844419256_1147292494_n
Except, of course, Anne Frank was phony, she never died of gassing, and oi very, muh sarin gassing!

This is what Trump is bringing us early in his term, about as early as Hillary would have had she been elected instead. And how could he not? The office of the president of the United States does not allow him any license to actually change the system. The system is what it is and that is staunchly Zionist. Remember, too, that Trump personally supports Israel, and regardless of what many Jewish groups had to say about him, it was this confidence in his support that led to Jewish expansion on the West Bank resuming.

Today, news reports say more than 50 Tomahawk missiles were fired against a Syrian air base. Trump, who is hosting Chinese President Xi Jinping was very much thinking about the children. He issued a statement condemning the gas attack and justifying the bombing, saying, “Even beautiful babies were cruelly murdered in this barbaric attack. It was a slow and brutal death for so many.”

Zionist commentator and Jew, Bill Kristol, Tweeted, “If Pres. Trump takes appropriate action against Assad this #NeverTrumper will, of course, support him. He’s the president, not merely ‘Trump’.”

This was re-tweeted by Scott Adams, the creator of the comic character Dilbert, who led by remarking, “Here’s how you know that the Syrian gas attack is not what it appears.”

3F064BC900000578-4388834-image-a-45_1491534382380
And (((it))) begins.

PATRIOTS, LOOK TO THE SOUTH AND THE DESTINY OF YOUR PEOPLE!

PATRIOTS, LOOK TO THE SOUTH AND THE DESTINY OF YOUR PEOPLE!

Once again the Nationalists are bound to respond to further provocation from the civic patriots. The appropriation of the description “nationalism”, by groups who, despite affecting patriotic airs, still have a wholly globalist-liberal outlook is unacceptable and demands a stern reply.

One of the key elements of our Australian Nationalism is the concept of independence from foreign or imperial powers; we reject absolutely the rule of the British monarchy, the resurgent imperialism of the Chinese, Americans and Russians or the soft Jihad of the Sunni Islamists.

Certain people need to get it into their heads that Australia is a young country of the global south, that we must look to ourselves, to the south, for inspiration in matters of national identity.

It is unacceptable for any Australian political operator to adopt the name Nationalist while his gaze is still directed to the north, while he still hangs on every word emanating from so-called “patriots” of the old world he can never be a true patriot to his own nation, which is of the new world.

Take, as an example, Donald Trump, a figure whose brand of populist showmanship is much in vogue among the yokels and numbskulls currently enamoured of civic patriotism.

The appropriation of the description “nationalism”, by groups who, despite affecting patriotic airs, still have a wholly globalist-liberal outlook is unacceptable and demands a stern reply.

We at UNA have previously written on the character both of the man and the Trump administration so our readers will not be shocked by our criticism of his agenda or leadership style.

Trump’s treatment of Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany during her recent state visit to the U.S.A is telling.

images (6)
The Donald’s hand will need amputating after touching her

Naturally Mrs Merkel’s politics are basically incompatible with our own ideals, however, the manner in which president Trump publicly humiliated her revealed him as the worst kind of imperialist thug; he displayed the manners of a tyrant dealing with an errant vassal. Having said, he should have nutted her, and then broken both her ankles for destroying Europe.

Trump should be no hero of patriots, no matter their national or racial background, in Trump is manifested the old-school colonial bully, the big country kicking the little country; his treatment of middle tier players, such as the Germans, bodes not well for little countries such as Australia.

We see also, in the Australian patriot circles the idolatry of foreign nationalist movements, the promotion of their activism and even attempts to transplant such groups down under; this is without the patriots having much of an idea about what these groups stand for.

We at UNA have previously written on the character both of the man and the Trump administration so our readers will not be shocked by our criticism of his agenda or leadership style.

UNA are, of course, interested in overseas nationalist movements but having had some interaction with various groups, particularly in Europe we are well placed to point out that many such organisations are extremely xenophobic; they are often hostile even toward sympathetic people if they are from a different European national background.

The language barrier is also a major hurdle, we cannot be sure where, say, Polish, Hungarian, or Russian nationalists stand on certain issues because they do not distribute their platforms in English, or that they simply do not use social media much at all.

Australian patriots seem to be dazzled by the large rallies held in some of the European capitals, the footage from Russia Today or Reuters looks impressive to those who see such displays as central to their cause; but who are the groups facilitating the marches? What is their reputation among the working classes, are they connected to the state or foreign governments and so forth?

We know for a fact that some European nationalists are tolerant of Shia Islam, or of certain other immigrant groups and native-born, non-European people with whom they share some common cause. That is, of course, their own business but rather than idolising foreign groups, or simply copying their aesthetics, the Australian patriots, as we say, need to look to the south for inspiration; the old-world groups may look flash in Youtube clips, but unless you speak their language fluently it is hard to know what you are imitating.

The other bone we at UNA have to pick with the civic patriots is this conflation of the foreign Islamist threat with current affairs in Australia; one example might be the elevation to folk devil status of the presently incarcerated troublemaker Anjem Choudhary.

The language barrier is also a major hurdle, we cannot be sure where, say, Polish, Hungarian, or Russian nationalists stand on certain issues because they do not distribute their platforms in English, or that they simply do not use social media much at all.

Choudhary is a U.K based Islamist loudmouth whose career was given a massive boost by the indulgence of mainstream media outlets. The BBC, Sky TV and others gave him a platform to spread his nonsense and he allowed the media to make him into a sort of Emmanuel Goldstein figure, against which all and sundry could rant and rave to blow off steam.

Australian Nationalists realise that the threat from political Islamism and the wider, nihilistic Jihadist worldview is real, that due to the nature of the religion this menace does spread through ostensibly “peaceful” dialogue by diaspora Muslims; however, Anjem Choudhary could never have had the profile he did in the U.K in our country.

Islamic march in Wootton Bassett cancelled
Anjem Choudhary’s likeness will soon appear on the five pound note

The Australian media would not allow a radical Islamist the airtime needed to become a folk devil, mainly, we suspect, because most editors and producers within the system are wary of promoting anything which could lead to a negative perception of Muslims.

Furthermore, Choudhary’s sophistry and the way he always just skirted the anti-terrorism laws by choosing his words carefully would not wash in this country; he would likely have been jailed a lot sooner here than he was in the U.K.

In the end, this idolatry of the European political movements and excessive focus on the social problems of the northern hemisphere is counterproductive.

Australian Nationalists realise that the threat from political Islamism and the wider, nihilistic Jihadist worldview is real, that due to the nature of the religion this menace does spread through ostensibly “peaceful” dialogue by diaspora Muslims; however, Anjem Choudhary could never have had the profile he did in the U.K in our country.

Looking longingly at groups, who by virtue of existing in far more populous, and for that matter densely populated countries can obviously put more feet on the street than Australian patriots leads only to a paralysing sense of ennui, which we have seen occur time and time again.

We urge all patriots to stop fumbling around, to cease the promotion to the Australian workers and marginalised people of foreign nationalist ideas, which you only half understand.
It is time to give up the support for the imperialist gangster Donald Trump and the hollow populism of Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen or Pauline Hanson.

White Australians, the only true Aussies, already have a brand of political nationalism which was laid out by our recent forefathers with the express intention of creating a truly progressive society, a system where White men and women could thrive and authentic social justice could be achieved.

The radicals of UNA and our friends in other nationalist groups will continue to promote the ideals of White Australia, the only form Australian nationalism can realistically take; as for the civic patriots, the time has come to make a choice.

Will they continue to play silly games, to cast their gaze back at the old world and avoid taking responsibility for their race and nation?

Or will they, sometime soon, look to the South, as all true nationalists do and begin to really care about the destiny of their own people, the White Australians?

whiteaustraliablackhistory
Fixed!

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

Enthusiastically waiting to see your enemy’s name appear in the obituary is, perhaps, something a Seinfeld episode should have tackled. But in absence of a half-hour sitcom mocking the ethics of such a scene comes our rather blunt desire to see in big, beautiful text the confirmation of conservatism’s departure from this world for good.

And it would be a mercy. The ideological vagrant of the modern era is in agony; a shadow of its former self that, in losing its mental faculties gave us the playbook for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation; in losing control of its bowels gave us the Party for Freedom to clean up; and in its jittered ramblings at night gave us the Patriot’s Poet to, well, laugh at. And why wouldn’t we laugh?

Who would have thought that acquiring oriental wives, rampant alcoholism and aimlessly flying the Star of David would in any way forms the face of modern conservatism – that safeguard of traditionalism? In a way that says more about the progressive left if this is the standard an acceptable alternative is held to, but nonetheless, we diagnose cancer as cancer when we see it.

As befitting of an extended life, however, conservatism is a broad grouping of ideas and practices that through the centuries melded into particular localities and built up its own organic character.

Before the Tories of the U.K. and the Republicans of the US succumbed to the dreariness of the modern world and became the stock-standard “centre-right” parties – which plague our present-day political institutions with equal parts boredom and treason – there was, if only from a historical standpoint, more character and life prevalent in the internal workings of the party and its duties within the country.

Such a thing can be admitted without the analysing of the good or ill that became of these entities. Suffice to say that compared to its modern manifestation there was something that, from our perspective, draws less ire than the present set against the historic backdrop of actual traditionalism holding ground.

Though conservatism is a term seldom used as the main grouping of its constituent factions, it is the college where civic nationalists, patriots and other assorted fruit loops graduated from even though they try to paint themselves in a different light. As the main tributary, it is conservatism, particularly in regards to combatting the progressive left over the prominent issue of Islam and the extreme end of identity politics, that guides the more hard-line, right-wing groups.

By our standards, they are in their formulation reactionary without the reaction. The scattering of conservatism in Australia is less a developed ideology but rather pub-banter that became a little too rowdy.

Their analysis of a world gone awry fuelled their febrile imagination. Islam, the left, and the agreement that the Liberals had betrayed the core tenets of conservatism amounted to a call to arms of an invigorated force to take to the streets. Through its brief public rallies and continued online presence, it revealed to be inept at forming any manner of lasting policy that actually worked for the best interests of this country. Its tenure among our acceptance went from weak to its now non-existent status.

So when will it die?

The ideas of man are invested with his own similarity, and an idea’s death follows a metaphysical equivalent of the biological process whereby the cessation of its vital functions leads to its absolute end.

The conservative has sealed his own fate because while he sees the nation as the vital organ he refuses, to his fatal detriment, to recognise the nation as the culmination of race and culture; not cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism and every perversion betwixt which he defends and fruitlessly tries to tame in order to avoid the baneful accusation of racism.

It is ironical that conservatives ultimately laud the version of our nation that was designed by their apparent enemies on the left. For what else is the presentation of the 21st century, multicultural Australia but the great fantasy of progressives as the first stage of removing the nation state and its racial identity?

Indeed its days are numbered but there are no doubts conservatism’s last moments will be messy, and there’s no telling what yet-to-be-revealed horrors will spew forth from its ideological orifices in a last attempt to show there’s life in it.

In these times it won’t be bothered to keep up the façade there’s any real difference between itself and the left, but will instead – as we have seen – go after the force that exposed and systemically broke down its lies: Nationalism. It is Nationalism which remains the inextinguishable light of reason.

Its pillars are unchanging. Its leaders – both here and abroad in friendly movements – are some of the most besmirched figures in existence and yet remain defiant to their ideals.

As the leaders of fake conservatism rot, the former adherents to such leeches will atone for their misguidance by embracing Nationalism, in fact, they will realise it was what they were after all along: a place to call home among their own people.

God willing, here is another nail in the coffin of the unconvinced as to why our expedient wish for the demise of conservatism and its inbred children is not morbid gossip, nor a critique for the sake of a critique, nor a selfish ruse on our behalf, but a necessity on which the termination of this foul parasite can allow our own ideals to truly flourish; where those ideals are that of the nationhood of Australia: an Australia that lives up to its historic creation as a nation built by the White man and for the sake of the White man.

oie_qPhWNDomOMRR