BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

If there is one demographic, or social stratum, which regularly draws the ire of UNA bloggers it is the waffling bourgeoisie and their nominally empty-headed offspring, who sound off like a battery of howitzers every time an issue of so-called “social justice” is inserted into public discourse.

Take young Frances Abbott, the middle child of Tony and Margie, who, channelling Mary Bennet, the middle sister in Jane Austen’s Pride And Prejudice, felt moved to put forth a Vlog on matters of love, romance and tier-one Lesbianism in support of same-sex marriage.

Quoting the experience of her aunt, Christine Forster, who is a middle-aged homosexual convert, Frances declared that people “cannot help who they fall in love with” and that “love is unexpected”.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

frances abbott
Bourgeois Bikini Babe Frances Abbott: all brawn, little brains

If homosexual relationships are based on love then it is clearly a completely different form of bond to opposite-sex unions; in which, as lifelong spinster Jane Austen herself observed, there are much more considerations than “love” to be taken into account when making a match.

In its most basic, and most commonly understood form the pair-bond between man and woman is based on a partnership to take on the challenges of the world together and raise children, if they are lucky the spouses will get along well and, in time, come to love each other.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

In most cases in which men and women marry for love, the unions quickly fall apart as the realisation hits home that such a marriage is lacking in substance, has no direction and no real reason to exist aside from the vanity, or unrealistic expectations of the spouses.

Pride pejudice
The Bennet sisters scan the horizon for well-endowed suitors

Of course we understand the reasoning behind the patter which upper-class twits such as Ms Abbott have been trained to parrot, we can never, ever describe homosexuality as a choice, nor credit homosexuals with the agency to make their own decisions; rather, according to Globalist social convention, they are subjects whose vital nature is simply something which has “occurred”.

Here we find another point of difference, which also gives the lie to the calls for absolute equality for all: heterosexuality is very much a choice, yet we are taught to believe that homosexuality is something which “just happens”.

muslims1
Guess which other global capitalist side project also poo-poohs the idea of free will?

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

If homosexuals are not going through these processes and are subject to the whims of some deity, or hidden forces in the universe then equality will remain a distant dream, regardless of the outcome of the postal survey and subsequent parliamentary vote.

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

Of course, we know full well why this meme has been propagated, that in fact most people who begin their intimate lives in the homosexual world are actually deprived of choice by virtue of, in the main, having been seduced and manipulated into that lifestyle by self-serving adults while in their early teens.

This detail, however, is beyond the scope of our discussion and, as we have stated before, we simply do not care enough about homosexuals, their tiny queer sub-culture or their struggles against normal society to develop an in-depth critique of them as people.

Orlando united
Omar Mateen was homosexual and Muslim, obviously  the Pulse nightclub outrage “just happened”

As ever, we at UNA are interested in the bigger picture and the picture of Globalist equality, that synthesis of second-generation Communism and multinational corporate hegemony, has come into sharp relief during the SSM debate; the man behind the curtain pulling the levers has been revealed.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

“Things just happen” only to subjects, rather than workers in charge of their own fate; subjects are drafted into the military against their will, they are unfairly taxed, sold shoddy goods, given poor quality housing, or arbitrarily arrested and jailed; this is why most forms of monarchy, dictatorship and theocracy have such a bad reputation.

What “Love Is Love” in its proper context, globalist cosmopolitanism, ultimately boils down to is that we are all no greater or more able to master our own destiny than that young child whose choices are limited by the actions of the adults around them; that we are apt to just fall into situations and that it is advisable simply to go with the flow rather than resist or seek our own autonomy.

 

mateen-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwfSVWeZ_vEN7c6bHu2jJnT8
Agents act, subjects are acted upon, inshallah

 

Advertisements

WHITE AUSTRALIA DOES NOT HAVE A BLACK HISTORY

WHITE AUSTRALIA DOES NOT HAVE A BLACK HISTORY

History is written by the victor, we know this, so we can assume history and conquest have an inexorable linkage.

However, history requires the written word, archiving and preserving — but primarily it entails epochal events, heroes and villains, achievement and again, a permanency of record. Given that the Aboriginal race has never managed anything but some quaint Dreamtime stories and a few primitive rock paintings then what is this “black history” that White Australia is supposed to have? In fact, Aboriginals didn’t have a history until Whites came along and imparted the concept.

Through White Man’s magic we were able to learn a lot that can now be absorbed into a ‘history’ that could not exist but by a dubious word-of-mouth shared by particular Aboriginal tribes and heavily weighted down by the cultural context of those walkabout fullas. This much more reasonable argument turns that aforementioned maxim on its head because, in fact, Aboriginals owe the awareness of any history of theirs to White Australia.

Now, we’re not knocking the Aboriginal lifestyle per se. We acknowledge that it was harmonious, in respect of the land and all that. It was; no doubt about it. These people lived a compatible existence with the environment. This landscape, this ecosystem, the natural resources that surround us have been jeopardised by the greed of a few that exploit it for profit. Nationalists abhor this exploitation as much as any other activist set. The settlement itself has had consequences, but the settlement was coming, and it was either going to be by ‘liberal’ Whites or else by the Chinese whose attitude to other races is not so redactable.

351416-small
We post this pic to say a little about the duality of  White man: that side which cares and that which doesn’t give a fuck

Moreover is the question of what is nobler, maintaining the human species at a primitive rate of evolution, or accepting the changes of scientific advancement as part and parcel of the wonder of human progress?

So don’t give us this “White Australia has a black history” cod because that it is just self-effacing Cultural Marxist drivel.

And, what is this White Australia anyway? Are they once again getting our original British colonial overlords confused with the poor sucker political prisoners who were dragged here in chains, and who combatted adversity to become the indigenous ‘Australians’? Their version of White Australian history needs some serious adjustment, in that case, since it is viewed through the tampered lens of the partisan Left. These are the same tub-thumpers who loud hail about “multicultural Australia”, which therefore means, by the stringencies of their own particular rhetoric, all these other races and ‘cultures’ are complicit in alleged Aboriginal subjugation.

oie_NUQSh9HaukJK
Oh gee, it’s another anti-Semitic Soros conspiracy theory. Everyone knows Soros just sits at home enjoying his money and doesn’t involve himself in funding activist agents around the world

Are they saying we should ask the Abos to hand back every stitch of modern life we gave them in exchange for our passage back to an Islamic-occupied Europe so that the black fella can once more go walkabout and spear fish for supper?

Once triggered, there is no end to the cycle of guilt demanded by these political manipulators with their slogans. This history is still being written, it would seem. Aboriginal ‘advocates’ can either accept the reality of life here or submit to Chinese domination and 24th citizen-place status in a polyglot market nation.

Furthermore, Nationalists will not tolerate a treaty-based Australia in which lawyers grant Aboriginals a more-equal status on the back of a victimhood narrative. Either they are in this country, or they find some way to return to their nomadic ways and live outside of where the ‘history’ is made, but they will not have the two.

oie_JFNHbh04IJ29
A more correct version of a self-effacing Cultural Marxist maxim

 

THE LEFT ARE NOW THE BOSSES’ BEST FRIENDS

THE LEFT ARE NOW THE BOSSES’ BEST FRIENDS

What are we to make of today’s Leftist? We could follow the standard conservative line and declare them to be anachronistic Marxist hold-outs who could never accept the dissolution of International Socialism in the heady days of 1989, but that is simplistic and we are better than that.

If anything, the Left of 2017 with their arcane take on identity politics represent a failure of Marxist ideals, they are, in effect pushing a distorted version of Socialism which has now fused with the superstructure of globalist capitalism.

White Nationalists in the U.S.A developed a theory in the mid-2000’s which placed the modern Left as the junior partner in a hybrid economic and social system, which fused a type of globalist feudalism with second generation Communism.

Tim Murdock, who further developed the theories of a former Washington political insider, the late Bob Whitaker, not only described the system commonly known as “Cultural Marxism” but put forward his tactical approach to overthrowing both the burgeoning Leftist cultural hegemony and its capitalist cronies.

whitaker_header_101 (1).png
The late Bob Whitaker was a former Washington political insider turned pro-White dissident

Murdock’s method centres on practical politics, the repetition of talking points and the tactical humiliation of Leftists at every opportunity; non-violence is stressed as the most radical path to confronting the Left, “dealing steel”, as he puts it, cannot produce satisfactory results.

White Nationalists in the U.S.A developed a theory in the mid-2000’s which placed the modern Left as the junior partner in a hybrid economic and social system, which fused a type of globalist feudalism with second generation Communism.

We saw this principle at work on our shores in the tumult of the 2015 civic patriot uprisings, chiefly carried forth by Melbourne based United Patriots Front and their allies; the tactics employed by this group mirrored the Murdock method, even if the Patriots themselves were unaware of what they were unleashing.

In the beginning, the use of non-violent demonstrations and the tactical humiliation of key opposition figures had the Left and their sponsors reeling in shock; who could forget the comical visits by UPF members to the Melbourne Anarchist Club and Leftist propaganda radio station 3CR?

riot
Antifa got more than they bargained for when they broke police lines at Coburg, the TV news didn’t show the part where the Left turned and ran away when the fists started flying

As the UPF provocations intensified, the Left, wounded and embarrassed spiralled into ever more extreme rhetoric and behaviour as their supporting cast of well fed, middle-class activists drifted away and their visible street movement dwindled, from some hundreds to a core of about eighty.

The Civic Patriot rising showed what is possible when dash and bravery are coupled with the right rhetoric and clever tactics; the modern Left fall apart when seriously challenged as they lack the discipline of their Communist forebears, the core of their activist base being made up primarily of Bohemians, hysterics, Peter Pan cases and middle-class adventurers.

 Had the young civic patriots known the powerful effects of their non-violent activities they might have husbanded their resources and held the line; in the end though, the debacle on Bell Street, Coburg in 2016 knocked the wind out of their sails as they, from that point, became folk devils in their own right.

The Civic Patriot rising showed what is possible when dash and bravery are coupled with the right rhetoric and clever tactics; the modern Left fall apart when seriously challenged as they lack the discipline of their Communist forebears, the core of their activist base being made up primarily of Bohemians, hysterics, Peter Pan cases and middle-class adventurers.

joyce
Alan Joyce, capitalist patron of the radical Left, he is donating a million dollars of his personal fortune to help rig the same sex marriage survey

It is only their connection to the institutions of capitalist power which sustains the wider Left, though it is now landlocked within the new class system and operates on the level of a Stasi like militia, policing the Working Class and Marginalised People on behalf of the bosses.

There is no other way of viewing the Left in 2017, their campaigns against ordinary folk, reason and common decency all lob the ball squarely back into the court of the Bourgeoisie and the global corporations; their denunciations of so-called “Hate Speech” and their insistence that transgressors be fired from their jobs does nothing but empower the bosses to silence the political opinions of workers.

For at one level this really is a quasi-religious problem, the Left being concerned with what they suspect people of believing and how, with their serial killer style system of thumbtacks and string, they weave a web of intersectionality fine enough to catch the mildest transgression.

This is a serious and growing problem, especially for authentic radicals and dissidents, with the puritanical Left coming down like a tonne of bricks upon anyone who dares step out of line, say the wrong thing or express scepticism toward their dogma.

For at one level this really is a quasi-religious problem, the Left being concerned with what they suspect people of believing and how, with their serial killer style system of thumbtacks and string, they weave a web of intersectionality fine enough to catch the mildest transgression.

You see, for the schtick with which they beat the lower classes to make an impact everyone must, in effect, wholeheartedly accept the idea that people have immortal souls; that a man can be trapped in a woman’s body or vice versa; that a person of one of the victim classes lives the oppression and hurt visited upon his ancestors; or that White people are automatically networked and privileged via their spiritual succession of the pioneering settlers

aglCEO
AGL boss Andrew Vesey, another patron of social justice causes and supporter of the LGBTI movement

As mad as all of this sounds, it is not enough to say that the Left are useful idiots, putty in the hands of the capitalist classes, especially when they are visibly part of the globalist machine, with CEO’s and directors of companies enthusiastically supporting causes such as Same Sex Marriage, the refugee scams and anti-racism initiatives while creating formal partnerships with Leftist activist groups.

If a social movement is sponsored by Google, endorsed by Qantas and patronised by the CEO’s of resource and infrastructure corporations it is a pretty safe bet to assume that the rhetoric coming from Left activists, the junior partners, is calculated to support the people and corporations further up the food chain.

fair_use_white_rabbit_bio_STFU-750x410
Follow the White Rabbit

 

THE ‘BENDIGO THREE’ VERDICT — INSIDE KANGAROO COURTROOM 19 AS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS REPEALED IN VICTORIA

THE ‘BENDIGO THREE’ VERDICT — INSIDE KANGAROO COURTROOM 19 AS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS REPEALED IN VICTORIA

Victoria is now officially an Orwellian Police State following last week’s conviction of the Bendigo Three on charges arising from the mock beheading of a dummy.

On Tuesday, September 5, in Melbourne Magistrates Court, Magistrate John Hardy found Blair Cottrell, Neil Erikson, and Chris Shortis guilty under section 25(2) of The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act, 2001 (RRTA). This is the first time that section of the law has been used in a prosecution. A conviction was recorded for each defendant, and a fine of $2000 plus a $79.50 statutory charge was imposed.

This judgment marks a turning point. Having peeled off its mask, the multiculturalist state is now showing its true authoritarian face. Magistrate Hardy’s judgment has not only set the bar for prosecution perilously low but decided it can be set anywhere the state chooses. Freedom of speech is the foundation of all other freedoms in a democratic society. Before the advent of multiculturalism in this country, the main restrictions to that implied freedom of expression were defamation, obscenity, intellectual property and incitement. While some argue that vilification laws are similar to defamation laws, the differences between the two indicate how far our freedoms have been eroded in the name of safeguarding feelings.

download (3)
The much overused still from the infamous video that incited hatred against Moslems and will probably trigger World War Three

Firstly, defamation is civil law, whereas section 25(2) of the RRTA is criminal law. Secondly, in defamation law, the plaintiff initiates a lawsuit and seeks a legal remedy. In Ross versus Shortis, Cottrell and Erikson, there was no complainant as in a criminal case. No Muslim had ever complained they felt ridiculed, hated, or treated as an object of contempt. No Patriot has testified that the video had incited them to have these attitudes. Instead, the case was brought by the Director of Public Prosecutions with Constable Erin Ross as the informant, who both exercised the entitlement that they, unlike ordinary citizens, have not to take the witness stand. This meant that the defendants could not cross examine their accusers as there were no accusers: a fundamental breach of procedural fairness, due process, and natural justice.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading. The video of the stunt together with extra footage of members walking and riding around Bendigo was uploaded to the United Patriots Front Facebook page as publicity for a 2015 rally held in Bendigo to protest the proposed building of a mosque.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading.

The first of the charges was ‘defacing the footpath and wall of the garden bed’ with ‘the emission of the red substance’. The second charge was ‘willfully damaging property’. “Damage does not need to be permanent”, presiding Magistrate Hardy informed the court. He left aside the question of why any rational person would describe a temporary stain on a footpath from water soluble food dye as “damage”. It took Bendigo Council two attempts to remove the pesky stain. The first time, ordinary water pressure from a hose wasn’t enough, but success was achieved the second time with a Gerni. A few weeks of weather and rain would probably have washed it away but then no-one would have been able to pretend it was a matter criminal enough to press charges. Chris Shortis actually paid the Council over $1000, a fine which exceeds the original cleaning bill. But the State required its pound of flesh!

download (6)
Magistrate John Hardy. He can find the harmless trigger of an eyebrow as incitement to ridicule or contempt

The first and second charges amounted to a prosecutorial fishing trip. The prosecutor, Fran Dalziel, was shamelessly up-front about this. She asked the Magistrate to hear the third charge first and only hear the other charges if the first charge was not proved. Hardy obligingly granted her request. The first two charges were only a backup. Clearly, it had been decided that the accused had to be charged with something, even if it ended up being trivial. Can anyone thereafter doubt that this trial was all along political and owed nothing to any theoretical victim?

RKTHwtp
The real victims in all of this

The trial lasted two days starting on a Monday. Supporters of the three accused had to pass through airport-style security on the ground floor, which was run by a security company. After queuing on the fifth floor, they passed through further security checkpoints, this time conducted by Victoria Police. These included complete photo ID scanning and twin 3D video cameras. Inside Courtroom 19, seating was restricted to 27 bodies, and much of that room was taken up by the less than objective media scrum. The lack of seating meant many travelled to court only to miss out on public seating.

Magistrate Hardy presented a curious anachronism, looking like a cross between Gandalf the Grey and Karl Marx. He informed the court that he had downloaded the RRTA and would read it out in the evening. However, by the end of the farcical proceedings, he would unquestioningly accept the prosecutor’s submission in what was so obviously a fait accompli. Before that, every pretence was made to try and lend seriousness to what was so evidently a show trial. Thus, presiding as he was over a circus, he cracked his whip on Day One of the two-day trial.

The Farce before the force

From the outset, a degree of exaggeration was necessary to contrive a sense of menace out of the stunt and convey this element of folk devilry to the court. A former official of the Greater Bendigo City Council took the stand, doing his best during testimony to convince the court this was a serious affair. After all, he had faced the extreme logistical difficulty and sheer angst posed by the mysterious red fluid it was his insurmountable duty to clean. Almost in judgement of this poppycock, a spectator’s mobile phone suddenly sounded, and the well-timed ringtone of The Benny Hill Show theme mocked the witness. He was subsequently cross-examined by each defendant in turn. Shown a more recent photograph of the ‘damage’ done by one of the defendants with the dummy’s fake blood, he sheepishly admitted that “the red spot may be a pebble”, and there was “no staining”. No graffiti artist had ever been held to such account.

download (4)
The Australia First Party have previously demonstrated in defence of the Bendigo Three

Thereafter, State functionaries dominated the first day’s proceedings with inane testimony that served only to pad out the dubious basis of the charges and give the court a false impression of their gravitas. Senior Sergeant John Phillip Dalton, the detective who headed the police response to the United Patriots Front Bendigo rallies, answered questions about the aims of the UPF. The prosecution then played the video, which was the only proper evidence presented throughout the trial. Afterwards, proceedings took a turn for the silly as Fran asked, “What is on Mr Shortis’s head?” “I’d say a religious cloth of some type”, Dalton replied. Under cross-examination, focus remained on the incriminating headdress worn by Chris Shortis, until Magistrate Hardy informed the defendants that a policeman’s opinion about a headdress was not admissible evidence. They might as well have taken Victorian taxpayer dollars and burnt the lot in a waste bin.

The following witness, Officer Gary Jenkins (a Freemason), didn’t even bother showing up. An excuse was given, that he had suffered a motorcycle accident. Examining the medical certificate (provided by one of the ‘brothers’?), Magistrate Hardy asked why he couldn’t be brought to court, as the certificate only covered work, not court. It was decided not to bother with his evidence, and another thrumming moment in Australian legal history squiggled to the ceiling like a yawning Z.

If the consequences of the day’s judgment would not turn out to be so grave, one may have been tempted to laugh as Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith took the stand. He led a raid on Chris Shortis’s house on Good Friday, 2016, where he seized Chris’s T-Shirt, jeans, and a toy Pirate’s sword. Of these vital pieces of evidence, the most dangerous was the T-Shirt, which hadn’t been washed. However, he forgot to bring them to court, a ditzy oversight that caused a 15-minute delay as they were sent for.

download (5)
Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith before Magistrate Hardy stole his Pirate sword

Once they arrived, Smith beamed devilishly. He could now show the court this damning evidence which he gleefully gathered up and fumbled with in his hands like an excited Lex Luther taunting Superman with kryptonite. But this was a comedy, not drama, and given such, he managed to clumsily drop the T-Shirt, sucking out the tiny puff of air that had momentarily inflated his sails in his moment of glory. He might have got to wave the sword about in a Douglas Fairbanks Jnr impression had the object described on the Bendigo Police evidence register as “One Fake Pirate Knife/Sword” not have been issued for destruction over a year earlier.

Another day, another truckload of taxpayers’ dollars

The morning of Day Two was taken up with submissions from the prosecutor and the three defendants followed by a rebuttal from Miss Dalziel. For reasons unknown, Detective Senior Constable Smith once more attended court, possibly hoping someone had found the Pirate sword. He evidently thought the prosecutor might have it, because in-between sessions he kept whispering anxiously in her ear. A request by Chris Shortis to quote from the Holy Qur’an was denied. He had hoped to share verse 8:12, which says, “Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): ‘I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them’.”

Denied this opportunity to be enriched by the words of the Prophet, the court adjourned for lunch so that Magistrate Hardy could consider his ruling and possibly play with the Pirate sword. On returning at 2 pm, the assembled were informed that Magistrate Hardy needed a further hour’s deliberation, proving he had found the sword after all. In the wash-up, and following all the tedious testimony from the witnesses, the only evidence taken into consideration was the first 39 seconds of the UPF video. Magistrate Hardy seemed particularly taken by this portion of the video given it contained his esteemed Pirate sword.

behead-the-infidel
Another victim of The Bendigo Three’s “intentions”

Mr Shortis had argued that since beheading is illegal, and the RRTA only protects lawful religious activity, the video cannot be subject to the act. Magistrate Hardy rejected this argument as “teleological”. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines teleology as “The explanation of phenomena in terms of the purpose they serve rather than of the cause by which they arise”. This seems to say more about Hardy’s convoluted reflections on the 39 seconds in the video than it does to Chris’s argument in their defence. In fact, we’re pretty sure it sounds like bullshit. Hardy might as well have yelled, “look behind you” for all the clarity of this argument. Likewise, he argued that the law was dealing with “Muslims not beheading”, which is again odd given that there were no Muslims in the video and the only thing beheaded was a sex toy.

But as sure as he invalidated all of Chris’s arguments, he ignored his contention relevant sections of the Australian Constitution imply freedom of expression and that Australia is a signatory to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The latter includes the right to freedom of opinion and expression as a basic principle. Hardy did not agree that there is a conflict between the RRTA and the corresponding Federal law. He did not refer to the Keating government memorandum which suggests there may be. As to the lack of a plaintiff or complainant, he simply said that section 25 does not require it, airily dismissing legal investigation. He noted that the video had chalked-up 275 likes, establishing that it had an audience, which was, to him, a solid basis for construing the malicious intent in the video he believed exists had probably gestated already in weak minds.

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.  Where intent is the issue then inference must be used … The context of the video leaves me no alternative than to find that the intention was to incite serious contempt or ridicule of persons of the Muslim faith.”

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.

So, no actual incitement needs to occur, mere intention, a mental state, is enough to convict and inference is all that’s required to “prove” the mental state of the accused. Thus the burden of proof is reversed for an action merely imputed, which is abstraction upon abstraction. No real barrier remains for the prosecution of anyone the state does not like and the broadness as well as the vagueness of the offending article is pure Kafka. Thus, the presentation of opposing views to any area of the multicultural dogma is potentially a punishable offence, be it Islam, African crime, Chinese imperialism or the objection to curry odours in a unit block. If these views are presented publicly, regardless of whether criminal activity occurs as a result, it can be considered as “incitement”, demonstrable by a few clicks of the ‘like’ button on Facebook. In other words, opposing multiculturalism is a thought crime as well as a hate crime, especially if expressed on Facebook, which half of the legal justice system and Police Force seem to spend their time (and our money) gawping at.

The one glimmer of light from the Magistrate in this otherwise grotesque Stalinesque show trial came during sentencing. The prosecutor claimed that the defendants were lacking in remorse.  Magistrate Hardy, for once disagreeing with Miss Dalziel, noted that remorse in issues of principle is a bit different from remorse in matters such as rape. Undeterred, Fran declared that “Opposition to Islam continues to be held by these men!”

Magistrate Hardy, salvaging an atom of credibility, reminded Miss Dalziel that “They are entitled to oppose Islam it is how that opposition is expressed that is at issue”. But this is another instance of Hardy’s dingbat logic given that opposition cannot exist WITHOUT expression and there are no terms of reference to define the acceptable expression.

In other words, two plus two now equals anything but four.

It is worth noting, too, that when the guilty verdict was delivered members of the media — some believe from the ABC — pumped the air with their fists in a show of celebration.

Following the decision, Blair Cottrell and what’s-his-name went off to file an appeal. Chris Shortis is considering his options.

Bendigo-Three-Arrive-at-Labors-Show-Trial
UNA salutes our smiling hero, Chris Shortis

ED — We point out here that Chris Shortis is a member of United Nationalists Australia, however, this article was produced by another member of our growing team who was present both days of the Kangaroo court.

ABSURD SAME-SEX MARRIAGE VOTE DISTRACTS FROM CHINESE INVASION

ABSURD SAME-SEX MARRIAGE VOTE DISTRACTS FROM CHINESE INVASION

While Australians are preoccupied with the pressing “issue” of voting on ‘same-sex marriage’ it is noteworthy how many matters are subordinate to the lifestyle choices of a small percentage of society.

It seems that the chattering classes would much rather rally around a cause which is when all else is said and done, absurd. See, those that are loud-hailing for inclusivity in the ‘institution’ of marriage are the very types to abhor convention.

The homosexual subculture was a rejection of society’s norms, and particularly the nuclear family. Those who would once upon a time have urged liberation from the ‘shackles’ of conformity in marriage now aim to herald success in social progress by becoming the most vociferous advocates for the very institution they spurned.

So, frankly, all you withered old bra-burners and whatnot, what was wrong with marriage, to begin with?

oie_VVDDwh3InOyL
Opposition leader Bill Shorten who is rumoured to make a habit of turning a ‘No’ into a ‘Yes’

Never mind, it is not the subject of our article, and we don’t talk to degenerates. What we WILL say, however, before we return to the point of our piece, is that in a fine example of ethical dissonance, Sydney mayor Clover Moore has wasted $110k of public money to pay for rainbow flags urging a “yes” vote throughout Sydney.

So, frankly, all you withered old bra-burners and whatnot, what was wrong with marriage, to begin with?

Bear in mind, only a few weeks back, Sydney’s homeless were occupying Martin Place. A standoff occurred between the ‘principled’ Clover Moore and NSW’s Armenian Premier, Liberal Gladys Berejiklian, with Berejiklian wanting them removed because they made her “completely uncomfortable”. Clover stood by the homeless. Or did she?

Wouldn’t that $110k have better served the homeless than being wasted on a propaganda campaign? Bear in mind, the essence of this campaign is revenge, in that queers win the satisfaction of having non-supportive normies forcibly recognise them as being ‘lawfully wedded’ until either AIDS or domestic violence they do part.

Hug
The love that dares not come anywhere near us

Again, we digress, because what we REALLY want to say is that the acquisition of social recognition for these chatterers and their darling freaks will count for zip in no time at all. Assuming they win the vote, according to a complacent enabler of Australia’s cultural ruination, multi-millionaire Gerry Harvey, this country is destined to become ‘Asian’. And since there is really no such thing as a generic ‘Asian’ what he means is ‘Chinese’.

Being a typical Globalist Mercantile Mercenary, he limply shrugs off entrepreneur Dick Smith’s caveats about unfettered population growth arguing that “The problem is you can’t control it. The rest of the world at some stage is not going to let you control it. Sometimes when you smell the inevitable you’ve got to go along with it.”

He says that “The people that exist today, me and you, we all have our view but we’ll be long gone.”

He says that “The people that exist today, me and you, we all have our view but we’ll be long gone.”

China holds that belief, too. While its Global Times labelled Australia as “Second class citizen of the West”, whatever that means, they’re busily acquiring our ports, farm, electricity, gas, water, and residential properties. They are, in fact, procuring entire suburbs by stealth as development changes the face of Australian cities into something resembling downtown Hong Kong.

How is this playing out for the ‘same sex’ couples who’ll be hoping to set up a nice little nest and feather it with little luxuries like food?

As more and more primary production falls into majority Chinese ownership then they will effectively own our food supply. The best product will be shipped to Chinese markets and we’ll be left with rotting scraps which will command inflated prices. Our market will be lost and the jobs, now already being handed to foreign workers, will be taken over as Chinese owners fly in their own workers.

If Australia was one great milkshake, China just stuck one fantastic straw into us and is busily slurping up all our nutrients. Meanwhile, the matter at hand is whether a bunch of fags, dykes and unclassifiable freaks of our decadent age have the right to hang a “just married” sign on the back of their imported car.

ED -We note, too, with disgust and irony that WordPress has imposed a rainbow banner on our view reader. Incredible.

artworks-000064468589-ocjp70-t500x500
Cupid needs bringing up to date

 

 

JANUARY 26 IS NOW WHITE AUSTRALIA DAY

JANUARY 26 IS NOW WHITE AUSTRALIA DAY

Another day, another giant step backwards by the self-aggrandising, suburban cultural elites which pass for town councils these days.

Darebin Council, which for those not in the know serves a municipality in Melbourne’s inner northern suburbs, has joined nearby Yarra city council in cancelling their Australia Day commemorations. The stated reasons for the action boil down to pretty bog standard White, Bourgeois virtue signalling concerning the British invasion of this continent in 1788.

Egged on by a handful of semi-professional Aborigines and bolstered by an opinion poll which garnered a whopping 81 responses from a population of 147,000 residents, the council resolved to dispense with their January 26 activities and to move the 2018 event back a day as a symbolic gesture of solidarity with the Indigenous peoples of the land.

Local blacks
Darebin’s local Blacks were vocal in the debate over Australia Day. In fact, they were so vocal nobody actually listened to the 147,000 other residents 

To many Nationalists the post-1994 vision of Australia Day is a joke. At at best, the real meaning of the day has been largely excised from the commemorations in favour of globalist cosmopolitan fluff. The 26th is now basically “Immigrants Day” in all but name.

The main purpose of the council run Australia Day activities has been to welcome new immigrants and hold citizenship ceremonies for the newcomers, to the extent that publicly funded celebrations or parades are held in major cities they focus almost exclusively on multicultural themes.

To many Nationalists the post-1994 vision of Australia Day is a joke, at best; the real meaning of the day has been largely excised from the commemorations in favour of globalist cosmopolitan fluff; the 26th is now, basically, “Immigrants Day” in all but name.

The trend toward change and the “Black Arm Band” approach to Australia Day probably began with the actions of Fremantle City council, who have repeatedly, and unilaterally, tried to change the date of the event, to great consternation among residents.

The response by the Turnbull government, in the case of Yarra council at least has been to strip the city of its authority to conduct citizenship ceremonies, with the possibility of a federally run event being held in Yarra on January 26th in spite of the council’s wishes.

Muslims australia day
Australia Day since 1994 has been stripped of any coherent socio-political message besides the globalist-capitalist mantra: “Diversity Is Strength!”

In expectation of such ban being placed upon Darebin too, we wonder what then the dissenting councils will actually present to their supporters in their alternative programme? Presumably some Aboriginal dancing, a smoking ceremony and welcome to country, activities which they already held on Australia day anyway.

Looking at it from the perspective of the patriotic and civic minded rate payer it is probably better that these dissident councillors keep away from Australia Day; why would the public want councillors cheapening the national holiday by officiating over something they do not believe in?

January 26 then, logically, defaults to a day of remembrance for Whites and a day of mourning for Aborigines, which is well and good since the two ethnic groups are the original, and only protagonists in that historical drama, “New Australians” and cosmopolitans be damned.

From an Australian Nationalist point of view, this is a gift punted straight into our laps by these politically naive councillors, who are more interested in signalling their social status and bourgeois credentials than playing the long game.

If the globalists and rootless cosmopolitans wish to walk away from Australia Day in a symbolic gesture toward racial reconciliation then we can only offer the traditional sarcastic advice to someone who has worn out their welcome: “Here’s your hat, mind how you go”.

Beer drinking
Feel free to go overboard with the trimmings next White Australia Day, Nanny is no longer watching 

January 26 then, logically, defaults to a day of remembrance for Whites and a day of mourning for Aborigines, which is well and good since the two ethnic groups are the original, and only protagonists in that historical drama, “New Australians” and cosmopolitans be damned.

Shaming tactics only work on those with a guilty conscience or people afflicted by the (((Old World))) neuroses surrounding race and identity; normal, mentally healthy Whites might whoop for joy and kick up their heels knowing that Darebin and Yarra’s globalist busybodies will now have to keep their beaks out of traditional Australia Day celebrations.

As one Nationalist pointed out to us in conversation: “Nothing these people do ever works!”, so I guess we really should thank the Green and Socialist councillors of Yarra and Darebin for abandoning their right to voice an opinion on who does what on what we can now rightly call White Australia Day, January 26.

Founding-web

“VIRTUE” IS THE RELIGION OF THE CTRL-LEFT

“VIRTUE” IS THE RELIGION OF THE CTRL-LEFT

One thing that can be said about the West is that it sure swallows lies easily. It had no problem buying into the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie that Dubya and his allies used as a pretext to illegally invade Iraq and kill its leader. That’s just one example.

As Adolf Hitler said, “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”

Now the mainstream media talks about “fake news”. What a chutzpah. When it comes to most geopolitical matters and anything involving the Globalist narrative fake news is all that it’s serving.

But lies and gullibility are just symptoms of Western infantilism. An infantilised people respond well to the Globalist Media. Think of this fine example of infantilism: When Donald Trump won the 2017 Presidential Election, in spite of the relentless negative media coverage he received, college students were so traumatised that they were given Play-Doh as therapy.

Play-Doh
Play-Doh is the Prozac of Generation Triggered

Another troubled petal publicly defecated on a pro-Trump placard in the wave of anarchy that followed the result and swept the streets of US cities — a very infantile demonstration of anal aggression from one who is no doubt receiving a first world education in one of the world’s most advanced and militaristic nations.

As Adolf Hitler said, “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”

Indeed, you can see this infantilism in much of the way that the CTRL-LEFT advocates through its pervasive hysteria. If it doesn’t have its way, it will scream, and cry, and break things. It will fall thrashing to the ground like a misbehaving cat.

It is at once a spoiled brat and a bully believing itself to be functioning at the highest level of human consciousness.

DurhamStatue.png
ISIS have their counterparts in the CTRL-LEFT

However, it is not this infantilism alone, but the new religion of the West, which has cast off Christianity and replaced it with the bourgeoisie dogma of Virtue. And Virtue has a duty to atone for sins, real and imagined — while forcing others to recompense too regardless of whether or not they subscribe to its collective guilt.

Virtue gives no quarter and has its brutal way, even if its actions and philosophies are contradictory of the very moral foundation it is imagined to rest upon.

This is why Virtue, with its very coloured concept of history, absorbed through a didactic prism of historical Civil Rights Movement revisionism, considers no hypocrisy in stigmatising White people.

It is at once a spoiled brat and a bully believing itself to be functioning at the highest level of human consciousness.

Virtue, not satisfied with its history, sets about erasing it and rewriting it as it would like to believe it was. Virtue can abhor ISIS for destroying wondrous historical monuments of bygone civilisations, and yet it impels others to destroy historical tributes from its own past in the course of abolishing that history.

Virtue speaks of truth through lying lips and waxes lyrical about love while its heart is full of hate. Virtue condemns the totalitarianism it perceives in Fascism and Nationalism while its own sensibilities are authoritarian.

Black Caesar
Caesar was black. Caesar has always been black. The historical inaccuracy is those two White guys who would never have been in African Ancient Rome

Virtue is the religion of Globalism even though Globalism recognises no religion. Globalism doesn’t care — globalism is, at its core, a business and to it, the precepts of the Virtue religion are just marketable values.

The alt-right, in an alternate universe, would be understood as being a legitimate manifestation coming out of a genuine civil rights position.

The alt-right, in an alternate universe, would be understood as being a legitimate manifestation coming out of a genuine civil rights position.

When you are told that you are to blame for every misfortune befalling every minority; when you are taught not to judge others for the colour of their skin but then receive lessons in how you are a privileged person, a racist, and a fool based on the colour of yours – you either submit to the shaming or resist.

You particularly resist when at the same time you are casually informed you are part of a race that is dying. More irksome is when you understand your race is on a downward slope because it is being asked to make space for much larger races which aren’t in danger of disappearing from the earth.

WhitePriv2.png
Virtue calls for spiritual ablution by writing anti-White gibberish all over your face in dark pen

Black Lives Matter is celebrated, but the alt-right is demonised. The central message of BLM is that black people are the victim of White people when anyone with open eyes can see that now it’s completely the other way around.

As blacks, Asians and Middle Easterners spread across Europe, their riotous numbers are driving the aboriginal peoples of nearly every single European country into minority status. As the European peoples are replaced, so their culture, and the marvels of the civilisation that bear their names, disappears too. The gates are being forced open by the Globalists and the only crime is to speak out against it. In Europe, that can be a serious crime indeed.

This is what George Orwell meant when he wrote that “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four.”

This is what George Orwell meant when he wrote that “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four.”

This religion of Virtue, more than anything else, was the trigger for Charlottesville. It was the very thing against which the alt-right was demonstrating whether or not it managed to articulate that fact sufficiently. It would not have mattered if there was no small presence of play-actors with Swastikas, or bogeyman Klansman outfits because the ‘White Supremacist’ angle was predetermined.

While the Police ignored a federal injunction permitting the Unite the Right rally to take place they allowed the so-called counter protesters — you might call them the Inquisitors of the Virtue religion — to continue. The state created that scene and the Globalist media wrote the narrative. It stoked the fire.

As alt-righters are doxed and face losing their jobs for attending a legally sanctioned rally, those who vandalise statues; those who throw bottles, and use intimidation wherever possible, are rewarded for their Globalist Crusade.

Demonstrations continue to ignite like spot fires around the US. Those CTRL-LEFT protesters not defacing historical monuments are openly waving placards with messages like “KILL WHITEY”. Graffiti is appearing  with no less subtle sentiment. In one pic from a protest a smiling college girl holds a sign that reads, “LOL. YOUR GRAND-KIDS WILL BE BROWN”. Meanwhile, the State stands by like a mute centurion condemning only alt-right apostates.

SPLCBlackWonderWomamn
Wonder Woman is based on the goddess ISIS who was, as everyone knows, either black or a beaner