FAIRFAX HYPOCRITES PROFILE TROLL VICTIMS WHILE JOURNALIST LUKE MCMAHON KEEPS TROLLING SOCIAL MEDIA

FAIRFAX HYPOCRITES PROFILE TROLL VICTIMS WHILE JOURNALIST LUKE MCMAHON KEEPS TROLLING SOCIAL MEDIA

Fairfax Media this week published a story entitled ‘Who will help the women being traumatised by anonymous trolls?’

The story comes a week after Fairfax ran a three-part series on trolling as if they actually care. The article detailed the futility certain women faced in trying to report cyber-stalking. It is a serious topic and the underlying message, that the law is so far behind the trolls, must come as welcome news to one of their contributing journalists, Luke McMahon.

Back in April, the editor of The Age green-lighted a hit piece by the mysterious Luke McMahon. The target of McMahon’s poison crayon was Nathan Sykes, a UNA writer and Australian nationalist. In it, he was defamed as, among other calumnies, a “Jewish” Nazi troll. This was news to Sykes who (is not Jewish) since he is, in fact, the victim of the troll — and the troll is McMahon himself.

Luke.v1
Luke McMahon of Geelong, Victoria, works for Fairfax Media and is one of the country’s worst trolls

In a report to be handed to NSW police this week, Sykes will describe how McMahon spent two years stalking him around social media with “shocking slurs” and threats the likes of which Jenny Noyes and Ginger Gorman outlined in their respective articles. An informant told us that McMahon had hatched the idea for the story in cahoots with an even bigger troll, self-described ‘Patriot’ Neil Erikson, early in 2016.

McMahon has gone to great lengths to maintain his anonymity, just like the malicious trolls in Noyes’ and Gorman’s stories. What we do know is that he is based in Geelong, Vic, and operates Media Direct, a bogus online ‘whistle-blower’ agency, which is a front for doxing political enemies of the Left. He is also a welcome contributor to Fairfax although his true status as a journalist has not been quantified.

Apart from his myriad social media identities, McMahon uses the alias “Luke McMasters” and gives his address as the Collins Street offices of Fairfax Media.

Apart from his myriad social media identities McMahon uses the alias “Luke McMasters” and gives his address as the Collins Street offices of Fairfax Media.

McMahon’s criminal trolling continues to this day, as Noyes’ article sits still fresh from publication. Presently, he is active on Twitter and Facebook. On the former, he has established a group of identities, one of which is Nathaniel J.S. Sykes “Unemployed, bankrupt, king of shrill (sic) & I love playing with my dolly.” He uses his other accounts to try to prod reactions from United Nationalists Australia and the Australia First Party. Meanwhile, on Facebook, he is taunting Sykes (via someone else’s account who he believes to be Sykes) to make his police report.

S1.png
Luke’s handiwork on Twitter

This same Fairfax troll has accounts on leading ‘hate sites’ such as Vanguard News Network, Stormfront, and Daily Stormer where he uses his fake identities to try and turn members against certain figures. He keeps several YouTube accounts such as one under the name ‘Aussie Lads’ where he promotes videos created by the extreme Left hate group Antifa, of which he is a prominent editor on their Antifascist Action Sydney blog.

In the course of his trolling, McMahon has had Sykes’s former apartment photographed and messaged him with the pic under an alias, published sensitive documents relating to his bankruptcy on a major website (again, goading him with proof of his deeds), used fake accounts to threaten Sykes with being “cut”, and has given his address and other details to CFMEU-related thugs. No doubt the Left-leaning authors of the Fairfax articles would find no fault with him given that Sykes is a Nationalist and his ideology puts him outside of their notion of human rights.

rsz_lukeyluke
In 2016, creepy McMahon expressed his frustrations towards his employer for not publishing his defamations

This is certainly the case with the Fairfax editor who approved the story, and who has failed to acknowledge any of UNA’s submissions to him on the matter. Nor did a demonstration held by supporters of Sykes outside of Fairfax’s Melbourne offices earlier this month elicit a peep. The demo was led by a colleague of Sykes who two years earlier was himself dealt the outrageous Fairfax/McMahon defamation treatment.

No doubt the Left-leaning authors of the Fairfax articles would find no fault with him given that Sykes is a Nationalist and his ideology puts him outside of their notion of human rights.

Christopher Shortis, a practising Christian and a licensed firearm collector (and UNA staffer), was forced into a costly legal battle in a bid to secure his shooter’s license after Fairfax irresponsibly published an article by McMahon designed to portray Chris as being like “Anders Breivik”. Shortis had produced a YouTube video in which he appeared with one of his rifles while addressing an American Christian audience, also sporting shooters with, of all things, a message of non-violence in response to government heavy-handedness in relation to a matter relating to civil liberties.

However, it was not until Chris became a leading figure in the fledgeling Patriot movement, and a prominent member of the United Patriots Front, that McMahon went on the attack. In both Sykes’s and Chris’s cases Fairfax has provided a monstrous weapon for the extremist McMahon to attack his political enemies. Fairfax, like McMahon, has more interest in harming its ideological opponents than caring much for the methods employed.

It is a stretch even to believe that McMahon’s gratification is drawn exclusively from political ammunition: he actually enjoys what he does. Noyes quotes Gorman on the pathology of trolls, “These trolls are not mucking around, they have told me themselves that they are trying to incite people to suicide. They find vulnerable people, they pick on them in a sustained way and they find their weakest point.”

Given the experiences of Sykes and Shortis, it is almost impossible for either to read these stories without being struck by the disingenuousness of their source.

We shall see how eager Fairfax is to report on the sick, vile, pernicious troll that it nurtures knowingly and without judgement of his methods under its mastheads.

Fairf.png
Chris Shortis and Australian nationalists call on Fairfax to expose their troll 

 

TOLERANCE, RESILIENCE AND THE POLITICS OF THE MARGINS

TOLERANCE, RESILIENCE AND THE POLITICS OF THE MARGINS

The Bendigo Three have appeared, for the second time, before the Melbourne Magistrates Court. Nationalist radicals and other supporters joined the defendants in the courtroom and at the subsequent social gathering afterwards.

The contest mention itself was unremarkable, the bulk of the time in the chamber was devoted to a back-and-forth discussion between the prosecutor and Magistrate Popovic regarding a date for the hearing itself, the earliest available time slot being September 4, 2017.

There was a depressingly ironic moment as, prior to the judge entering the court, breaking news of the Manchester Arena outrage was whispered among the Nationalists and Patriots seated in the public gallery. Given that we were there to support our respective comrades as they fight charges relating to political activism against militant Salafism and the doctrine of the Koran, the news was sadly poignant.

Jelena popovic
Magistrate Jelena Popovic, firm but fair

 

With the formalities of the day over it was once again time to form up and allow the riot squad to escort us from the court building, in contrast to the March 6 hearing the small Anti-Racist protest outside on William St had broken up, leaving only a handful of Antifa militants on scene to jeer and harass the Bendigo Three and their supporters.

There was a minor fracas as we made our way to Healey’s lane for the post-hearing morning tea and impromptu press conference, most of the aggravation was the fault of the media pack, who had to be held back by Police.

In the end, apart from a few easily thwarted attempts by Antifa to mingle with the Patriots and the comical, mutually assured destruction tactic of taking each other’s photographs, the mood was upbeat and congenial.

There was a depressingly ironic moment as, prior to the judge entering the court, breaking news of the Manchester Arena outrage was whispered among the nationalists and patriots seated in the public gallery. Given that we were there to support our respective comrades as they fight charges relating to political activism against militant Salafism and the doctrine of the Koran, the news was sadly poignant.

The real struggle for the Bendigo Three begins on September 4 and, as always UNA radicals will be there, front and centre to support our friend and comrade, Chris Shortis.

The bigger issue arising from the day went largely unnoticed by us, due to the fact that the leftist party had decamped while we were still inside the court complex; it was only upon returning home and watching video footage shot by others that we picked up on the motif of the counter protest.

MAIN-Manchester
Manchester’s fallen sons and daughters

As far as we can tell from the extensive, yet incomplete footage of the speeches the main gripe of these undergraduate socialists is that “far-right” activity somehow empowers capitalism and the oppression of not only marginalised groups but all citizens, by the state.

This is correct as insofar as there are many Hansonites, Liberal Party agents and conservatives operating under the broad Aussie Patriot banner; it is not true of all the factions represented among the Bendigo Three supporter group, most of them are good, honest people.

We cannot speak for others, but Australian Nationalism is not now, nor has it ever been an enabler or apologist of the worst kinds of crony capitalism, old-world privilege or the oppression of workers and marginalised people.

As far as we can tell from the extensive, yet incomplete footage of the speeches the main gripe of these undergraduate socialists is that “far-right” activity somehow empowers capitalism and the oppression of not only marginalised groups but all citizens, by the state.

The true situation is quite the opposite and we at UNA stand by our record of relentlessly criticising and exposing the very elements of the far-right which seem to so vex the Left; we go further in claiming that we, in fact, do much more to attack the state, expose the money power and harass the minions of Neo-Liberalism than any of the currently active leftists.

Nationalists would ask the Leftists to think the issue through more carefully, who are the groups coming under the most sustained and serious attack from these “far-right” groups and their sponsors?

hollis
The “Bum’s Rush” being applied to an actual bum

Any Leftist with a sharp mind can see that it is the radical Left and radical Nationalists who are being hammered by the globalist-capitalists and their media because we, in our different ways, represent the greatest threats to the capitalist programme. Granted, due to the success of the march through the institutions the Left have a lot more to lose in material terms, it will come as a shock to many on that side to be cast back out into the wilderness, however, we predicted this over a year ago.

Leftists are being purged from the mainstream and will soon inhabit the same space, beyond the pale, as all other true radicals; the difference is that Nationalists have a head start and are becoming adept at the politics of the margins, it is our home turf.

If they do not immediately succumb to the shock of banishment and collapse altogether, the real Left will have to make a choice: tolerate other dissidents as we wage parallel struggles against the Centrist mainstream, or exhaust themselves fighting us on our own ground.

9-3101566-new years 2016_t620.jpg

FAIRFAX MEDIA’S CRIMINAL TROLL EXPOSED!

 

B/ The sick Fairfax troll Luke McMahon

I have already addressed the untruths printed about me in a fake-news article by shadowy Fairfax journalist, Luke McMahon. Having been labelled one of Australia’s worst trolls — even though I have not had any complaints of trolling levelled my way — I can go on to reveal the troll is in fact – McMahon himself.

McMahon has, for nearly two years, been stalking me around social media. He has created YouTube channels, fake Facebook accounts, and even been active on Twitter. He also created a Daily Stormer profile under the name ‘That Aussie Guy’ on which he shared a defamatory page about me from the extremist Antifascist Action Sydney blog (which we suspect he has a hand in maintaining). It has shown all evidence of being a deranged obsession.

But the level of McMahon’s stalking is now in the criminal realm and it is a matter of whether or not to make an official police complaint against the Fairfax employee: a development that would surely require comment from his supporting editors at the odious organisation! We shall see.

Luke
Luke McMahon. If anyone in Melbourne knows this guy, please contact either Australia First Party or UNA. He is wanted for making serious threats among his other crimes

 

I blocked McMahon from my Facebook a long time ago, but he turned up again prior to and after the publication of the fake news article. The trouble is, he was stalking the account of a party colleague, who he was convinced – was me.

His baiting came from two accounts, of which forensic testing of his computers will reveal both belong to McMahon. In one, he posted as Luke McMahon. In the other, he adopted the vile persona of Mark Watford. He revealed them to be one and the same by cross-sharing information on both accounts, and dually targeting the wrong chap. Also, he made no effort to conceal the pathology of his own typing habits so you can plainly see they were sent by the same person: of this, there is no doubt whatsoever. Maybe McMahon wants to get caught, who can say?

McMahon’s Watford account is a straight case of using a carriage to harass and intimidate. In the screen grabs supplied to the Australia First Party, this very sick man, who is supposedly anti-racist, made heavy use of anti-Semitic slurs and outright threats of violence. He did this as part of his campaign to convince nationalists that I am Jewish. His theory appears to be that if he goads long enough I’ll somehow snap. It is ‘gaslighting’.

I blocked McMahon from my Facebook a long time ago, but he turned up again prior to and after the publication of the fake news article. The trouble is, he was stalking the account of a party colleague, who he was convinced – was me.

Soon after publication of the defamatory fake-news article by Fairfax, a video I made a while ago, and which I explained in the previous instalment of this story, appeared on a YouTube channel called ‘Aussie Lads’ I NOTE THIS is a very similar moniker to his Daily Stormer account, ‘That Aussie Guy’.

I COMPLAINED TO YOUTUBE.

McMasters
McMahon or ‘McMasters’ uses Fairfax’s address to conduct his trolling

 

In the process of issuing my complaint, McMahon’s details were supplied to me with a mobile phone number and an address which turns out to be Fairfax offices in Melbourne. Also, his name is given as ‘Luke McMasters’. Now, this is significant, because this YouTube channel exists to troll patriots. It is trolling. Moreover, it is happening directly in the name of Fairfax Media. McMahon has used his credentials to try and appropriate my copyright on my own video as a means of ‘trolling’ me.

But that is not the most disturbing part: growing increasingly frustrated at his lack of response from the account holder on Facebook he was convinced was me, McMahon posted evidence that he has been stalking what he believes to be my home address.

18175790_455425074804189_457123512_oCavendish

Watford1

Watford2

On the Watford account, along with a lot of sick threats and deranged dribble about “following” me home, he posted a pic of what he purports is where I live. At the same time, on the tranche of harassing private messages in the name of Luke McMahon, he provides that same address, making careful allusions to physical threats to be carried out. He even makes screen grabs of his Daily Stormer posts in those messages. So now one must question the sanity of the fellow.

Regardless or not of any hereditary mental illness he may be suffering, McMahon is a Fairfax Media employee, whose defamations were allowed to be published without question by a supposed institution of hard news.

But that is not the most disturbing part: growing increasingly frustrated at his lack of response from the account holder on Facebook he was convinced was me, McMahon posted evidence that he has been stalking what he believes to be my home address.

Yet, he also makes reference to “Andy Hutchings” (PROBABLE EARLIER IDENTITY OF SLACKBASTARD BUT A PLAYER IN THE NETWORK)) having information on me, suggesting that the CURRENT Slackbastard operator (real name Professor Rob Sparrow of Monash University), is perhaps paying for a private investigator.

The pics of what he believes are my address, and which will have to become subject to a police report, were either taken by a private investigator or one of the networks of anarchists working in the area. ‘Yusef’ of the Australian Communist Workers Party made threats of violence against me and Jim Saleam after the publication of the fake news. His connection to the duo and their threats of violence is yet to be determined.

So, it is no surprise that this campaign of harassment is being waged by both Slackbastard and McMahon who are known to be close associates.

So who IS McMahon? A search of the electoral role pinpointed him clearly as the Luke McMahon whose details are “suppressed”.

However, his Linked account gives a nice little biographical background which we shall use to track him down.

So, it is no surprise that this campaign of harassment is being waged by both Slackbastard and McMahon who are known to be close associates.

According to his profile, the one who calls me a “bin scab” lists his major talents as Investigative Journalism (lol), Law (as in ‘breaking it’), and Advisory (as in reporting to Slackbastard).

He is listed as Australian coordinator — ‘founder’ of Media Direct. Thereafter, he references several positions that he has held, and which people might remember him from, such as Managing Director of ‘Job Community’, and IYSS case manager for Anglicare Australia. Perhaps those organisations can provide a comment on this man’s behaviour, too. Finally, he was educated at the University of Melbourne, and has, if he is not just fabricating his work history, a degree in law.

Yes, in law… This is what age we are living in folks, investigative journalists that don’t investigate the stories they fake up, and lawyers whose principal occupation is breaking the very law they spent years studying.

It is of the utmost importance that readers in Melbourne or elsewhere who know anything about McMahon either contact the Australia First Party or the United Nationalists Australia. We will provide an image of him on our blog. We want to know everything: where he hangs out, who his friends are, where he parks his car, where he walks his dog (or boyfriend), where he buys his lipstick, what drugs the degenerate uses — everything.

I wish to finish by pointing out an irony. It was around two years ago when I learned that Christopher Shortis had been defamed in an article by Fairfax Media. In it, every effort was made to infer, based on a video that Chris had uploaded to YouTube that given his faith in Jesus and his fondness for collecting guns he was a potential ‘Anders Breivik’. I was studying media law at the time and recognised this right away as gross defamation. I did not know Chris then, but I passed on this word through back channels.

Who would have thought that soon after leaving court having travelled to Melbourne to support my now-colleague Christopher Shortis I would be subject to the same treatment by the same Fairfax criminal? It makes you wonder.

Nathan Sykes

20160622_192042
McMahon survivors together

 

COMMUNIST EXTREMIST IN TERROR PLOT AGAINST AUSSIE NATIONALISTS

COMMUNIST EXTREMIST IN TERROR PLOT AGAINST AUSSIE NATIONALISTS

A communist extremist is said to be plotting an act of terror against two Australian nationalists, as reported by the Australia First Party.

A member of the Communist Workers’ Party of Australia — a radicalised splinter group — and admin of their Facebook Page identified as “Yousef” is alleged to be behind the plan. The two nationalists are named as Australia First Party President Jim Saleam, and AFP member, Nathan Sykes.

Using the Facebook identity Sleek Castro, Yousef, who is of Lebanese descent, is said to be preoccupied with violent revolution and wishes to make a name on the Communist scene.

We are unaware of whether the Federal Police are investigating Yousef or his group, who are regular protestors at the Villawood Detention Centre in Sydney.

We are unaware of whether the Federal Police are investigating Yousef or his group, who are regular protestors at the Villawood Detention Centre in Sydney.

The extremists have been involved in pro-refugee activities outside the centre such as the “Free Saeed” campaign, who is an Iraqi refugee.

Yousef is reported to have organised the assaults at the Villawood picket site last fortnight after reading a defamatory article about Sykes penned by Fairfax troll, Luke McMahon.

In the article, McMahon deliberately misrepresented Sykes as “Jewish” and a major racist “troll”.

In the article, McMahon deliberately misrepresented Sykes as “Jewish” and a major racist “troll”.

It was a fascination with McMahon’s slurs that is said to have inspired Yousef’s plan, which involved assembling a group to stalk and assault the two men.

We are making nationalists aware of this “Yousef”, his ‘party’, and his social media page which we link to.

It is unknown at this stage whether McMahon or his friend “Slackbastard” are linked to the plot.

tyusef
Yousef, or “Sleek Castro” as he appears on his Facebook page is behind a terror plot against nationalists

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

If anything distinguishes those civic patriots on the right from us radical nationalists it is by whom we are most attacked.

In the case of the civics, they are dogged by what we collectively term ‘the left’, while radical nationalists, who occupy a third position on the political spectrum cop the most grief from either the civic patriots or those in the conservative camp.

Bear in mind that ‘the left’ is as eclectic when it comes to issues, identity, philosophy, and strategy as ‘the right’.

The left wants the patriot movement dispersed while the conservatives aim to drive away radical nationalists so they can inhabit our political ground and remodel it in their crypto-globalist image.

This is a curious fact that allows us to discuss a couple of cases in point. Let us begin with what some of those from the civic patriot side of the quadrangle contend with in their present day ‘clicktivism’. This essay shall be in two parts on account of its length and the dedication required to each of its players.

1. THE PATRIOT ACTORS AND THE COMBATANTS OF THE LEFT

There is a particularly malicious element at play among those who oppose the growth of the patriots. They view patriots as more of a concern than the nationalist movement given its mainstream accessibility. On that side, the Bogan element is mocked by those who are their mirror image with one factor separating them by the slimmest degree: the perception of their engaging in ‘racism’. This is, despite the ambiguity on the question of race amplified in the patriot fold.

Nationalists define Australianness as being of White European stock, as opposed to Aborigines. Patriots, who misuse the term nationalism understanding it not, and often deliberately misappropriating it, are nebulous in their definition of an Australian. Many are in mixed-race relationships and as such loath the absolutism of nationalism which would exclude them on the grounds of breaching its inviolate precepts.

However, it is important in the propaganda war of those conflicting with the anti-Islam movement to lump each in the same basket and defame both they and nationalists, as ‘Nazis’; which is like calling all socialists Marxists or anarchists communists. The Nazi tag is meant to invoke images of state organised terror that would ensue if these groups are allowed to put down political roots in the community.

In the lexicon of those of the left, patriots are ‘potatriots’, a witticism intended to disdain that group as ‘potato heads’. This is a derisive term that was originally applied to skinheads. Since the advent of the Reclaim Australia movement, which is almost exclusively dramatized on Facebook, a number of pages and counter-identities have sprung up to oppose the patriot pages and the groups that employ them.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

But virtue is subjective in this day and age when that moral asset is destroying the west. Opposition to Islam is the kindling of the realisation something is amiss. Australians are being de-culturized while globalism is dialectically re-culturizing us with a religion that negates the very tenets underpinning the idea of universal equality at play. Both are at the mercy of the culturally vacuous reality of globalism.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113
Alex Gollan, the assistant school principal and anti-fascist anarchist who ran the ‘anti-bogan’ word press site and was arrested for bulk kiddie porn

This is visible nowhere better than on those oppositional pages, which we mentioned. This genre has no purpose other than to negate. They do not attempt to counter ‘potatriot’ messages by promoting their own positive counter-messages they literally take the aforementioned messages and desecrate them. There is no intellectual component at play in the deconstruction of the patriot message. Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is a sledgehammer used to beat down the message and the messenger so that the mission becomes personal.

A very telling post occurred on one such page with a prominent leftist troll, “Can’t we just kill them [patriots] all?” The admin replied, “No, because then we would be Nazis.”
Disregarding the fact that had that comment been made on a nationalist page it would have been hidden or removed, it is a very instructive insight into both the pathology of the poster and the counter movement. The duplicitous essence of it is summed up in the gag, “We’re starting a war for peace.”

The assumed virtue of the poster is instantly invalidated by the revelation of this tyrannical instinct.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

This is, however, but one example. Narrowed down to a central theme outside of ‘race’ is the implication that patriots will potentially auger in a dictatorial system reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, the calls for an authoritarian response to the patriots are constant on the sample page we have used for our study.

There are flippant, but often sincere calls for patriots to be pursued by ASIO, or to be charged with offences that — were they on the other foot — would be vehemently contested as breaches of civil liberties. So we come to the actors or combatants, and here we shall actually name some.

Smith
Pete Smith from Melbourne, heavily active on Facebook, is linked to Antifascist Action Sydney and other ‘anarchist’ pages

 

We have had correspondence with a few members of the patriot movement, putting aside our ideological differences, keen to highlight certain combatants and the disreputable methods they have employed to target one or other of the patriot actors.

One, in particular, has been defamed over and over by combatants using various Facebook identities and private messaging the patriot actor we shall call ‘Mark’.

Mark is being consistently vilified as a person of heinous substance and the nature of the slander has transcended any honourable intent. The attacks led to the hostilities emerging from a social media setting and into the corporeal world when the authorities were involved. Mark is not alone in these vicious online assaults but his example is notable.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

So, who is behind these assaults on Mark’s character? Here, we merely repeat what he believes: John Linden Faulkner. But we also mention two others, Alex Gollan and David Hollis.

download (3)
Sydney’s Tayce Brown, shoplifter, hair stylist to the scabby, and a real skank

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This blog, as in others we’ve mentioned, is a flagrant vehicle to attack political opponents. Faulkner and Gollan are said to have co-administrated the site. Gollan, a former assistant school principal has since disappeared from ‘anti-fascist’ activities after being charged with child-sex offences.

Faulkner, who Mark and others believe to be behind a series of online profiles identifiable by their malevolence, has a criminal past to make anyone suddenly hosting him start eyeing the nearest exit. Faulkner was imprisoned for nine years for armed robberies in which women were his soft targets. He appealed his sentence as harsh, but in doing so was told it was actually lenient under the circumstances.

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This week [originally posted on Facebook March 11] , it was revealed that David Albain Hollis, the man in the red ‘Truth’ cap who accompanied Sue Munro to the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court to spy on the Bendigo Three’s supporters — and who appeared in an opportunistic pic with John Safran taken on the day — went on a “stabbing spree” in 1991, knifing seven people one of whom later died.

Hollis served only 17 months in jail on the grounds of diminished responsibility as he was in the throes of a “psychotic episode”, although how that should mitigate anything so appalling we do not know.

There are other cases on that extreme left of the bench such as Tayce Brown of Antifascist Action Sydney whose conduct and lifestyle are such that she would be considered a habitual criminal outside of the political activist underworld.

The radical left is sure something — in a world inhabited by junkies, thugs, hookers, thieves, and ex-murderers does becoming ‘anti-racist’ mean atoning for dissolute, wasted lives. Does championing the ‘other’ allow them to graduate from their moral squalor merely on the basis they aren’t racist? We are not psychologists, and this is not a forensic examination, but the pattern cannot be ignored.

Bear in mind, Blair Cottrell was confronted with a video created inside the correctional system while he was doing time for a crime of passion. He never killed anyone, nor caused anyone harm. What of these three? All fall into the very worst categories, and all comport themselves on social media in a manner that delegitimizes any hypothetical argument they believe they have concerning right and wrong.

If Faulkner is behind this campaign of defamation and stalking against Mark, then it appears that he has in no way left behind his violent past, but merely justified it in the context of the political theatre. He has reinvented himself as the ‘good guy’ and deemed those patriot actors as ‘bad guys’ in a morality play where his own contaminated ethics are masked by a blindness born of criminal denial.

In our next article, we will turn the focus on the patriots, who are to nationalists what the leftists we have described here have been to them.

oie_DqksmJ43gaGr
Anarchist Psycho

 

THE LEFT ARE NOT TAKING HANSON AND THE CONSERVATIVES SERIOUSLY

THE LEFT ARE NOT TAKING HANSON AND THE CONSERVATIVES SERIOUSLY

It has been a while since we published any substantial articles on those formations which, for the sake of brevity and clarity, we must still describe as the Left.

It is true that the Left has gone into rapid decline over the last ten years, we could put that down to their ageing supporter and activist bases, or the fact that they failed to produce enough children of their own who could carry forth the values of their parents.

That last point makes some sense when viewed in a historical context; we would expect that the political radicalisation toward the left of disaffected Irish immigrant labourers with a houseful of mouths to feed may have been somewhat easier to achieve than the indoctrination of, relatively speaking, well off and child-free workers in the current year.

A failure to radicalise one generation effectively breaks the chain and denies a movement any real sense of cohesion and continuity, few people are going to become invested in something which seemingly has no future.

While it is still possible to radicalise a tiny minority of young people, undergraduate girls, for the most part, these “conversions” are almost always temporary; these youths, with few exceptions, grow up to be middle of the road liberals or soppy social democrats.

The changing nature of work in the 21st century could be said to have contributed to the Left’s freefall into obscurity, as would the significant demographic changes wrought by 20 years of relentless immigration from the third world; our theory that the immigration program is now “rigged for success” valuing, most of all, quality over quantity seems more prescient now than ever.

A failure to radicalise one generation effectively breaks the chain and denies a movement any real sense of cohesion and continuity, few people are going to become invested in something which seemingly has no future.

It would be difficult to recruit the conservative, conformist minded and deeply religious Asians of the new Australian middle class to Left groups using their currently ubiquitous tactics of pilfered subaltern identity politics, humourless satire, censorship, pseudoscience and character assassination.

Australian Leftists also fell into the same trap as many on the right; as political tendencies of all shades have mostly retreated to internet safe spaces where only compliments are allowed, dissent can be easily squashed by a few mouse clicks and the flow of information strictly controlled.

The result of this has been the proliferation of loosely organised micro-groups and flash mobs, whose outlook is conceived in an internet echo chamber and whose aesthetics are that of internet pop-culture; veteran campaigners such as the U.S based Maoist Jason Unruhe have also noted with dismay the rise of this “alt-Left” to counter the equally problematic alt-Right.

As Nationalists well know, this insistence by some people on taking to the streets their internet role playing, with its eclectic mix of foreign and just completely made-up folklore, has not produced a stable base on which to stand a cohesive and durable activist collective.

This all begs the question: If not the Left, with all its material resources and residual goodwill from the days when it actually stood for working Whites, then who on the political scene besides the Nationalists is fit to stand against the approaching juggernaut of the LNP and One Nation coalition?

Australian Leftists also fell into the same trap as many on the right; as political tendencies of all shades have mostly retreated to internet safe spaces where only compliments are allowed, dissent can be easily squashed by a few mouse clicks and the flow of information strictly controlled.

Comrades, we are, of course, in no way suggesting any sort of alliance or compromise between ourselves and the “Loony Left”, in most cases the enemy of our enemy is just another enemy, however the prospect of widespread acceptance by the White workers of the Hanson deception, purely because there are no other options, is a real cause for concern.

Inasmuch as we can trust opinion polls, the recent surveys indicating a One Nation-LNP victory in the 2018 Victorian election are notable for one thing, they suggest a substantial defection of Labor voters toward the Hanson camp; this information will surely add to the sense of ill foreboding which must, by now, hang like a black cloud over the Daniel Andrews team offices in Treasury Place.

Consider the implications here; we have workers in the most Left friendly state in the federation abandoning their traditional party, the ALP, for an anti-worker, pro-globalist, conservative snake-in-the-grass like Pauline Hanson and her cohort of conspiracy nuts, rural knuckle draggers and unfathomable multicult freaks.

Nationalists understand the reasons for this disillusionment among White workers, the Victorian ALP is rotten, from the branch level to the caucus the party is riddled with crooks and bourgeois opportunists.

From the thieving MP’s like Don Nardella and Telmo Languiller, to the corrupt union bosses who hold sway over the rank and file and the morally bankrupt grassroots leaders, such as the appalling Intaj Khan in Wyndham, the party is no longer seen as something which working people of good conscience and who hold on to healthy values can support.

Nationalists understand the reasons for this disillusionment among White workers, the Victorian ALP is rotten, from the branch level to the caucus the party is riddled with crooks and bourgeois opportunists.

The problems also extend to the policies of the ALP and the leadership style of Daniel Andrews’ Left faction, deficiencies which are mirrored, to a large extent, in the other state branches as well as the federal parliamentary party.

The very policies which have, in large part, caused the electoral collapse of the Left and opened the door to right wingers are still being employed, in the most pig-headed fashion, as a supposed defence against conservatism and Hansonism; we could cue that old Albert Einstein quote about the definition of madness here, but the Left are not really mad in that sense, they are simply lazy, smug and complacent.

Identity politics, feminism and poorly written satire will be no match for the likes of Kevin Andrews and his murder of Crows in the Liberal right and who knows what manner of suburban Frankenstein’s monsters Pauline will cobble together as candidates; the Leftists can scoff, roll their eyes and make fun to their hearts content, but unless they start to take their politics seriously they can expect to lose, big time.

We have no words of encouragement to offer the Left, we merely point out that they are on the road to ruin, our solution to their problems is simply to ask the genuine radicals among them to jump ship and become Australian Nationalists.

For that is the real political battle of our age, the struggle between globalist-capitalism and Nationalism.

Our side will continue with our programme of White radicalisation, as we always have, but calling Pauline Hanson a racist from your internet safe space and expecting the White working class to self-radicalise on the basis of hollow virtue signalling and confected moral panics is worse than doing nothing, it actually makes resistance to globalism harder across the board.

oie_h7XOIyDK6dnW

INTERNET DRAMA AND STREET THEATRE ARE NOT HELPING TO OVERTHROW GLOBALISM

INTERNET DRAMA AND STREET THEATRE ARE NOT HELPING TO OVERTHROW GLOBALISM

As the Civic Patriots and Anti-fascists continue their tussle over the rights to the title of the most disgraceful example of the White race, the Nationalists, and we suspect the saner members of the traditional Left, are simply in awe of both sides capacity for self-abasement.

We have pointed out many times this duel between two factions of, let us be frank, White trash has its roots deep in the twilight world of social media banter, trolling and cyber-bullying.

To those of us who still live the bulk of our lives in the real world and are physically engaged in alternative politics this constant bickering and sniping between parties in cyberspace presents some infuriating problems.

We originally intended this article to be a guide on how to deal with narcissists who try to impose themselves upon organised political groups, however, as important an issue as that may be it is not the whole picture.

Narcissists, by which we mean those people with positively malignant personality disorders, as opposed to merely self-confident, impatient or pushy people, are mercifully rare, but even one such person can devastate an entire activist community.

These people have a need to cause drama, call it a hunger or a craving for chaos but, as the author and diagnosed narcissist Sam Vaknin observes, this behaviour is all geared to securing what he has termed “narcissistic supply”.

We have pointed out many times this duel between two factions of, let us be frank, White trash has its roots deep in the twilight world of social media banter, trolling and cyber-bullying.

In brief, the severe narcissist could best be portrayed as a black hole of self-loathing and self-doubt, these people are often described as having no emotional core and no actual personality just a series of masks they wear, depending on the temperament and interests of the people they are tapping for acknowledgement and validation.

These masks or personae may involve things like sexual seduction of others, grandiose plans to really shake up the world into which other people are drawn, or they may offer some insight into a hidden subculture, or obscure field of expertise in which the narcissist is the enlightened master or expert.

million flag
The Million Flag Patriot was almost bashed by Antifa at his first rally. His skits are so poorly done that most people still don’t get the joke

The severe narcissist is all things to all people, he is your best mate, your benefactor and teacher as long as he can be the centre of attention, play his mind games, tell his tall tales and big-note himself in order secure his narcissistic supply and stave off the howling emptiness at the core of his being.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, these narcissists are usually unable to hold themselves back from becoming abusive toward the people around them, this stems from the fact that they are basically parasites. With no emotional core they have no moral compass, so they will often steal, lie, swindle, blackmail and stand over the people in their social circle without even a hint of remorse.

It is when the narcissist is caught out in a lie or some other abusive behaviour that the real problems begin, when confronted they can be quite dangerous as they will fly into an uncontrollable rage, but once they have calmed down then the long, drawn-out, sadistic process of their retribution begins.

These masks or personae may involve things like sexual seduction of others, grandiose plans to really shake up the world into which other people are drawn, or they may offer some insight into a hidden subculture, or obscure field of expertise in which the narcissist is the enlightened master or expert.

When the narcissist is exposed as a liar or a thief, for example, this causes a deeply-felt psychic wound, there is no possibility of them apologising, taking their lumps and learning to be a better person in the future, because the narcissistic supply from that source is now tainted the source must be destroyed at all costs. You can see where we are going with this comrades.

Put this in the context of an activist group, or any political organisation for that matter; a prominent member of the group exhibits the symptoms of narcissism discussed above, he is discovered to be a liar, a thief, a gossip or a sexual predator and confronted by the other members of the collective.

His response will then be to turn on the group, maybe he will denounce its members, or ingratiate himself with opposing political groups and the security services, anything to secure a new source of narcissistic supply. He urgently needs people to listen to his stories, to value his expertise and expert knowledge of his former group and to help him exact revenge upon his former comrades.

This is why you sometimes see formerly well known political extremists re-inventing themselves as anti-racists or conservatives, as the case may be; the phenomenon of group-hopping where people constantly change alliances or even invent new political tendencies out of thin air may be a red flag for the activists the narcissist will approach in his search for a new host.

To go back to our main point, social media is obviously a haven for narcissists and anti-social personality types and unfortunately, these fora allow the narcissist to create potentially limitless little bubbles of chaos and insanity, which to some extent can be transferred out of cyberspace into the real world.

Put this in the context of an activist group, or any political organisation for that matter; a prominent member of the group exhibits the symptoms of narcissism discussed above, he is discovered to be a liar, a thief, a gossip or a sexual predator and confronted by the other members of the collective.

This willingness by some people to take internet drama or their online personae to the streets creates real headaches for the good, genuine activists trying to build effective political parties or clubs.

We encounter people who demand to be treated as comrades, or even dignitaries, if you like, on the basis of their blog posts or social media jottings; then there are those who expect to be able to roll up to a rally or gathering and use us as human shields against people they have offended or provoked online.

Unfortunately for them, out in the real world, where the Nationalists live there are rules and etiquette and laws of the land which must be obeyed in order to advance our cause.

Nationalists and the authentic Left know that threats and challenges made online are rarely carried out, however there is an unwritten agreement among all sensible activists regarding the escalation of hostilities generated in the political struggle into attacks on the person, vandalism of personal property or aggression against non-belligerents; spouses, children, parents and so on.

The internet heroes, narcissistic parasites, trolls and bullies make maintaining this “truce” difficult, every time some dotty Antifa or drug addled Zio-Patriot type blows a gasket starts throwing death threats around or commences stalking their opponents it increases the risk to real activists on both sides.

The danger lies in the difficulty some people have in distinguishing fact from fiction and fantasy from reality; coupled with the tunnel vision and paranoia generated in these flame wars and stalking incidents this disconnect has the potential to blow trivial social media comments out into cycles of violent payback in which innocent people will be harmed.

While our side would never shrink from confrontation and we are more than able to ensure our own safety in public, we really do not want to see the current vigorous back and forth between Nationalists and Globalists degenerate into European levels of political violence on the basis of hurt feelings and sore egos caused by cyber-bullying.

Unfortunately, there may well come a time when we are forced to fight to secure the existence of our people and a future for White children, but for our part, we will first employ all legal and morally defensible avenues in order to bring down the globalist hegemony.

Just do not expect us to go to war to secure your narcissistic supply or get involved in your unnecessary flame wars, we are on to the game players and headcases.

cyber-bullying-finalcolor.png
Everybody hurts sometime