FAIRFAX MEDIA’S CRIMINAL TROLL EXPOSED!

 

B/ The sick Fairfax troll Luke McMahon

I have already addressed the untruths printed about me in a fake-news article by shadowy Fairfax journalist, Luke McMahon. Having been labelled one of Australia’s worst trolls — even though I have not had any complaints of trolling levelled my way — I can go on to reveal the troll is in fact – McMahon himself.

McMahon has, for nearly two years, been stalking me around social media. He has created YouTube channels, fake Facebook accounts, and even been active on Twitter. He also created a Daily Stormer profile under the name ‘That Aussie Guy’ on which he shared a defamatory page about me from the extremist Antifascist Action Sydney blog (which we suspect he has a hand in maintaining). It has shown all evidence of being a deranged obsession.

But the level of McMahon’s stalking is now in the criminal realm and it is a matter of whether or not to make an official police complaint against the Fairfax employee: a development that would surely require comment from his supporting editors at the odious organisation! We shall see.

Luke
Luke McMahon. If anyone in Melbourne knows this guy, please contact either Australia First Party or UNA. He is wanted for making serious threats among his other crimes

 

I blocked McMahon from my Facebook a long time ago, but he turned up again prior to and after the publication of the fake news article. The trouble is, he was stalking the account of a party colleague, who he was convinced – was me.

His baiting came from two accounts, of which forensic testing of his computers will reveal both belong to McMahon. In one, he posted as Luke McMahon. In the other, he adopted the vile persona of Mark Watford. He revealed them to be one and the same by cross-sharing information on both accounts, and dually targeting the wrong chap. Also, he made no effort to conceal the pathology of his own typing habits so you can plainly see they were sent by the same person: of this, there is no doubt whatsoever. Maybe McMahon wants to get caught, who can say?

McMahon’s Watford account is a straight case of using a carriage to harass and intimidate. In the screen grabs supplied to the Australia First Party, this very sick man, who is supposedly anti-racist, made heavy use of anti-Semitic slurs and outright threats of violence. He did this as part of his campaign to convince nationalists that I am Jewish. His theory appears to be that if he goads long enough I’ll somehow snap. It is ‘gaslighting’.

I blocked McMahon from my Facebook a long time ago, but he turned up again prior to and after the publication of the fake news article. The trouble is, he was stalking the account of a party colleague, who he was convinced – was me.

Soon after publication of the defamatory fake-news article by Fairfax, a video I made a while ago, and which I explained in the previous instalment of this story, appeared on a YouTube channel called ‘Aussie Lads’ I NOTE THIS is a very similar moniker to his Daily Stormer account, ‘That Aussie Guy’.

I COMPLAINED TO YOUTUBE.

McMasters
McMahon or ‘McMasters’ uses Fairfax’s address to conduct his trolling

 

In the process of issuing my complaint, McMahon’s details were supplied to me with a mobile phone number and an address which turns out to be Fairfax offices in Melbourne. Also, his name is given as ‘Luke McMasters’. Now, this is significant, because this YouTube channel exists to troll patriots. It is trolling. Moreover, it is happening directly in the name of Fairfax Media. McMahon has used his credentials to try and appropriate my copyright on my own video as a means of ‘trolling’ me.

But that is not the most disturbing part: growing increasingly frustrated at his lack of response from the account holder on Facebook he was convinced was me, McMahon posted evidence that he has been stalking what he believes to be my home address.

18175790_455425074804189_457123512_oCavendish

Watford1

Watford2

On the Watford account, along with a lot of sick threats and deranged dribble about “following” me home, he posted a pic of what he purports is where I live. At the same time, on the tranche of harassing private messages in the name of Luke McMahon, he provides that same address, making careful allusions to physical threats to be carried out. He even makes screen grabs of his Daily Stormer posts in those messages. So now one must question the sanity of the fellow.

Regardless or not of any hereditary mental illness he may be suffering, McMahon is a Fairfax Media employee, whose defamations were allowed to be published without question by a supposed institution of hard news.

But that is not the most disturbing part: growing increasingly frustrated at his lack of response from the account holder on Facebook he was convinced was me, McMahon posted evidence that he has been stalking what he believes to be my home address.

Yet, he also makes reference to “Andy Hutchings” (PROBABLE EARLIER IDENTITY OF SLACKBASTARD BUT A PLAYER IN THE NETWORK)) having information on me, suggesting that the CURRENT Slackbastard operator (real name Professor Rob Sparrow of Monash University), is perhaps paying for a private investigator.

The pics of what he believes are my address, and which will have to become subject to a police report, were either taken by a private investigator or one of the networks of anarchists working in the area. ‘Yusef’ of the Australian Communist Workers Party made threats of violence against me and Jim Saleam after the publication of the fake news. His connection to the duo and their threats of violence is yet to be determined.

So, it is no surprise that this campaign of harassment is being waged by both Slackbastard and McMahon who are known to be close associates.

So who IS McMahon? A search of the electoral role pinpointed him clearly as the Luke McMahon whose details are “suppressed”.

However, his Linked account gives a nice little biographical background which we shall use to track him down.

So, it is no surprise that this campaign of harassment is being waged by both Slackbastard and McMahon who are known to be close associates.

According to his profile, the one who calls me a “bin scab” lists his major talents as Investigative Journalism (lol), Law (as in ‘breaking it’), and Advisory (as in reporting to Slackbastard).

He is listed as Australian coordinator — ‘founder’ of Media Direct. Thereafter, he references several positions that he has held, and which people might remember him from, such as Managing Director of ‘Job Community’, and IYSS case manager for Anglicare Australia. Perhaps those organisations can provide a comment on this man’s behaviour, too. Finally, he was educated at the University of Melbourne, and has, if he is not just fabricating his work history, a degree in law.

Yes, in law… This is what age we are living in folks, investigative journalists that don’t investigate the stories they fake up, and lawyers whose principal occupation is breaking the very law they spent years studying.

It is of the utmost importance that readers in Melbourne or elsewhere who know anything about McMahon either contact the Australia First Party or the United Nationalists Australia. We will provide an image of him on our blog. We want to know everything: where he hangs out, who his friends are, where he parks his car, where he walks his dog (or boyfriend), where he buys his lipstick, what drugs the degenerate uses — everything.

I wish to finish by pointing out an irony. It was around two years ago when I learned that Christopher Shortis had been defamed in an article by Fairfax Media. In it, every effort was made to infer, based on a video that Chris had uploaded to YouTube that given his faith in Jesus and his fondness for collecting guns he was a potential ‘Anders Breivik’. I was studying media law at the time and recognised this right away as gross defamation. I did not know Chris then, but I passed on this word through back channels.

Who would have thought that soon after leaving court having travelled to Melbourne to support my now-colleague Christopher Shortis I would be subject to the same treatment by the same Fairfax criminal? It makes you wonder.

Nathan Sykes

20160622_192042
McMahon survivors together

 

COMMUNIST EXTREMIST IN TERROR PLOT AGAINST AUSSIE NATIONALISTS

COMMUNIST EXTREMIST IN TERROR PLOT AGAINST AUSSIE NATIONALISTS

A communist extremist is said to be plotting an act of terror against two Australian nationalists, as reported by the Australia First Party.

A member of the Communist Workers’ Party of Australia — a radicalised splinter group — and admin of their Facebook Page identified as “Yousef” is alleged to be behind the plan. The two nationalists are named as Australia First Party President Jim Saleam, and AFP member, Nathan Sykes.

Using the Facebook identity Sleek Castro, Yousef, who is of Lebanese descent, is said to be preoccupied with violent revolution and wishes to make a name on the Communist scene.

We are unaware of whether the Federal Police are investigating Yousef or his group, who are regular protestors at the Villawood Detention Centre in Sydney.

We are unaware of whether the Federal Police are investigating Yousef or his group, who are regular protestors at the Villawood Detention Centre in Sydney.

The extremists have been involved in pro-refugee activities outside the centre such as the “Free Saeed” campaign, who is an Iraqi refugee.

Yousef is reported to have organised the assaults at the Villawood picket site last fortnight after reading a defamatory article about Sykes penned by Fairfax troll, Luke McMahon.

In the article, McMahon deliberately misrepresented Sykes as “Jewish” and a major racist “troll”.

In the article, McMahon deliberately misrepresented Sykes as “Jewish” and a major racist “troll”.

It was a fascination with McMahon’s slurs that is said to have inspired Yousef’s plan, which involved assembling a group to stalk and assault the two men.

We are making nationalists aware of this “Yousef”, his ‘party’, and his social media page which we link to.

It is unknown at this stage whether McMahon or his friend “Slackbastard” are linked to the plot.

tyusef
Yousef, or “Sleek Castro” as he appears on his Facebook page is behind a terror plot against nationalists

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

If anything distinguishes those civic patriots on the right from us radical nationalists it is by whom we are most attacked.

In the case of the civics, they are dogged by what we collectively term ‘the left’, while radical nationalists, who occupy a third position on the political spectrum cop the most grief from either the civic patriots or those in the conservative camp.

Bear in mind that ‘the left’ is as eclectic when it comes to issues, identity, philosophy, and strategy as ‘the right’.

The left wants the patriot movement dispersed while the conservatives aim to drive away radical nationalists so they can inhabit our political ground and remodel it in their crypto-globalist image.

This is a curious fact that allows us to discuss a couple of cases in point. Let us begin with what some of those from the civic patriot side of the quadrangle contend with in their present day ‘clicktivism’. This essay shall be in two parts on account of its length and the dedication required to each of its players.

1. THE PATRIOT ACTORS AND THE COMBATANTS OF THE LEFT

There is a particularly malicious element at play among those who oppose the growth of the patriots. They view patriots as more of a concern than the nationalist movement given its mainstream accessibility. On that side, the Bogan element is mocked by those who are their mirror image with one factor separating them by the slimmest degree: the perception of their engaging in ‘racism’. This is, despite the ambiguity on the question of race amplified in the patriot fold.

Nationalists define Australianness as being of White European stock, as opposed to Aborigines. Patriots, who misuse the term nationalism understanding it not, and often deliberately misappropriating it, are nebulous in their definition of an Australian. Many are in mixed-race relationships and as such loath the absolutism of nationalism which would exclude them on the grounds of breaching its inviolate precepts.

However, it is important in the propaganda war of those conflicting with the anti-Islam movement to lump each in the same basket and defame both they and nationalists, as ‘Nazis’; which is like calling all socialists Marxists or anarchists communists. The Nazi tag is meant to invoke images of state organised terror that would ensue if these groups are allowed to put down political roots in the community.

In the lexicon of those of the left, patriots are ‘potatriots’, a witticism intended to disdain that group as ‘potato heads’. This is a derisive term that was originally applied to skinheads. Since the advent of the Reclaim Australia movement, which is almost exclusively dramatized on Facebook, a number of pages and counter-identities have sprung up to oppose the patriot pages and the groups that employ them.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

But virtue is subjective in this day and age when that moral asset is destroying the west. Opposition to Islam is the kindling of the realisation something is amiss. Australians are being de-culturized while globalism is dialectically re-culturizing us with a religion that negates the very tenets underpinning the idea of universal equality at play. Both are at the mercy of the culturally vacuous reality of globalism.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113
Alex Gollan, the assistant school principal and anti-fascist anarchist who ran the ‘anti-bogan’ word press site and was arrested for bulk kiddie porn

This is visible nowhere better than on those oppositional pages, which we mentioned. This genre has no purpose other than to negate. They do not attempt to counter ‘potatriot’ messages by promoting their own positive counter-messages they literally take the aforementioned messages and desecrate them. There is no intellectual component at play in the deconstruction of the patriot message. Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is a sledgehammer used to beat down the message and the messenger so that the mission becomes personal.

A very telling post occurred on one such page with a prominent leftist troll, “Can’t we just kill them [patriots] all?” The admin replied, “No, because then we would be Nazis.”
Disregarding the fact that had that comment been made on a nationalist page it would have been hidden or removed, it is a very instructive insight into both the pathology of the poster and the counter movement. The duplicitous essence of it is summed up in the gag, “We’re starting a war for peace.”

The assumed virtue of the poster is instantly invalidated by the revelation of this tyrannical instinct.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

This is, however, but one example. Narrowed down to a central theme outside of ‘race’ is the implication that patriots will potentially auger in a dictatorial system reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, the calls for an authoritarian response to the patriots are constant on the sample page we have used for our study.

There are flippant, but often sincere calls for patriots to be pursued by ASIO, or to be charged with offences that — were they on the other foot — would be vehemently contested as breaches of civil liberties. So we come to the actors or combatants, and here we shall actually name some.

Smith
Pete Smith from Melbourne, heavily active on Facebook, is linked to Antifascist Action Sydney and other ‘anarchist’ pages

 

We have had correspondence with a few members of the patriot movement, putting aside our ideological differences, keen to highlight certain combatants and the disreputable methods they have employed to target one or other of the patriot actors.

One, in particular, has been defamed over and over by combatants using various Facebook identities and private messaging the patriot actor we shall call ‘Mark’.

Mark is being consistently vilified as a person of heinous substance and the nature of the slander has transcended any honourable intent. The attacks led to the hostilities emerging from a social media setting and into the corporeal world when the authorities were involved. Mark is not alone in these vicious online assaults but his example is notable.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

So, who is behind these assaults on Mark’s character? Here, we merely repeat what he believes: John Linden Faulkner. But we also mention two others, Alex Gollan and David Hollis.

download (3)
Sydney’s Tayce Brown, shoplifter, hair stylist to the scabby, and a real skank

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This blog, as in others we’ve mentioned, is a flagrant vehicle to attack political opponents. Faulkner and Gollan are said to have co-administrated the site. Gollan, a former assistant school principal has since disappeared from ‘anti-fascist’ activities after being charged with child-sex offences.

Faulkner, who Mark and others believe to be behind a series of online profiles identifiable by their malevolence, has a criminal past to make anyone suddenly hosting him start eyeing the nearest exit. Faulkner was imprisoned for nine years for armed robberies in which women were his soft targets. He appealed his sentence as harsh, but in doing so was told it was actually lenient under the circumstances.

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This week [originally posted on Facebook March 11] , it was revealed that David Albain Hollis, the man in the red ‘Truth’ cap who accompanied Sue Munro to the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court to spy on the Bendigo Three’s supporters — and who appeared in an opportunistic pic with John Safran taken on the day — went on a “stabbing spree” in 1991, knifing seven people one of whom later died.

Hollis served only 17 months in jail on the grounds of diminished responsibility as he was in the throes of a “psychotic episode”, although how that should mitigate anything so appalling we do not know.

There are other cases on that extreme left of the bench such as Tayce Brown of Antifascist Action Sydney whose conduct and lifestyle are such that she would be considered a habitual criminal outside of the political activist underworld.

The radical left is sure something — in a world inhabited by junkies, thugs, hookers, thieves, and ex-murderers does becoming ‘anti-racist’ mean atoning for dissolute, wasted lives. Does championing the ‘other’ allow them to graduate from their moral squalor merely on the basis they aren’t racist? We are not psychologists, and this is not a forensic examination, but the pattern cannot be ignored.

Bear in mind, Blair Cottrell was confronted with a video created inside the correctional system while he was doing time for a crime of passion. He never killed anyone, nor caused anyone harm. What of these three? All fall into the very worst categories, and all comport themselves on social media in a manner that delegitimizes any hypothetical argument they believe they have concerning right and wrong.

If Faulkner is behind this campaign of defamation and stalking against Mark, then it appears that he has in no way left behind his violent past, but merely justified it in the context of the political theatre. He has reinvented himself as the ‘good guy’ and deemed those patriot actors as ‘bad guys’ in a morality play where his own contaminated ethics are masked by a blindness born of criminal denial.

In our next article, we will turn the focus on the patriots, who are to nationalists what the leftists we have described here have been to them.

oie_DqksmJ43gaGr
Anarchist Psycho

 

THE LEFT ARE NOT TAKING HANSON AND THE CONSERVATIVES SERIOUSLY

THE LEFT ARE NOT TAKING HANSON AND THE CONSERVATIVES SERIOUSLY

It has been a while since we published any substantial articles on those formations which, for the sake of brevity and clarity, we must still describe as the Left.

It is true that the Left has gone into rapid decline over the last ten years, we could put that down to their ageing supporter and activist bases, or the fact that they failed to produce enough children of their own who could carry forth the values of their parents.

That last point makes some sense when viewed in a historical context; we would expect that the political radicalisation toward the left of disaffected Irish immigrant labourers with a houseful of mouths to feed may have been somewhat easier to achieve than the indoctrination of, relatively speaking, well off and child-free workers in the current year.

A failure to radicalise one generation effectively breaks the chain and denies a movement any real sense of cohesion and continuity, few people are going to become invested in something which seemingly has no future.

While it is still possible to radicalise a tiny minority of young people, undergraduate girls, for the most part, these “conversions” are almost always temporary; these youths, with few exceptions, grow up to be middle of the road liberals or soppy social democrats.

The changing nature of work in the 21st century could be said to have contributed to the Left’s freefall into obscurity, as would the significant demographic changes wrought by 20 years of relentless immigration from the third world; our theory that the immigration program is now “rigged for success” valuing, most of all, quality over quantity seems more prescient now than ever.

A failure to radicalise one generation effectively breaks the chain and denies a movement any real sense of cohesion and continuity, few people are going to become invested in something which seemingly has no future.

It would be difficult to recruit the conservative, conformist minded and deeply religious Asians of the new Australian middle class to Left groups using their currently ubiquitous tactics of pilfered subaltern identity politics, humourless satire, censorship, pseudoscience and character assassination.

Australian Leftists also fell into the same trap as many on the right; as political tendencies of all shades have mostly retreated to internet safe spaces where only compliments are allowed, dissent can be easily squashed by a few mouse clicks and the flow of information strictly controlled.

The result of this has been the proliferation of loosely organised micro-groups and flash mobs, whose outlook is conceived in an internet echo chamber and whose aesthetics are that of internet pop-culture; veteran campaigners such as the U.S based Maoist Jason Unruhe have also noted with dismay the rise of this “alt-Left” to counter the equally problematic alt-Right.

As Nationalists well know, this insistence by some people on taking to the streets their internet role playing, with its eclectic mix of foreign and just completely made-up folklore, has not produced a stable base on which to stand a cohesive and durable activist collective.

This all begs the question: If not the Left, with all its material resources and residual goodwill from the days when it actually stood for working Whites, then who on the political scene besides the Nationalists is fit to stand against the approaching juggernaut of the LNP and One Nation coalition?

Australian Leftists also fell into the same trap as many on the right; as political tendencies of all shades have mostly retreated to internet safe spaces where only compliments are allowed, dissent can be easily squashed by a few mouse clicks and the flow of information strictly controlled.

Comrades, we are, of course, in no way suggesting any sort of alliance or compromise between ourselves and the “Loony Left”, in most cases the enemy of our enemy is just another enemy, however the prospect of widespread acceptance by the White workers of the Hanson deception, purely because there are no other options, is a real cause for concern.

Inasmuch as we can trust opinion polls, the recent surveys indicating a One Nation-LNP victory in the 2018 Victorian election are notable for one thing, they suggest a substantial defection of Labor voters toward the Hanson camp; this information will surely add to the sense of ill foreboding which must, by now, hang like a black cloud over the Daniel Andrews team offices in Treasury Place.

Consider the implications here; we have workers in the most Left friendly state in the federation abandoning their traditional party, the ALP, for an anti-worker, pro-globalist, conservative snake-in-the-grass like Pauline Hanson and her cohort of conspiracy nuts, rural knuckle draggers and unfathomable multicult freaks.

Nationalists understand the reasons for this disillusionment among White workers, the Victorian ALP is rotten, from the branch level to the caucus the party is riddled with crooks and bourgeois opportunists.

From the thieving MP’s like Don Nardella and Telmo Languiller, to the corrupt union bosses who hold sway over the rank and file and the morally bankrupt grassroots leaders, such as the appalling Intaj Khan in Wyndham, the party is no longer seen as something which working people of good conscience and who hold on to healthy values can support.

Nationalists understand the reasons for this disillusionment among White workers, the Victorian ALP is rotten, from the branch level to the caucus the party is riddled with crooks and bourgeois opportunists.

The problems also extend to the policies of the ALP and the leadership style of Daniel Andrews’ Left faction, deficiencies which are mirrored, to a large extent, in the other state branches as well as the federal parliamentary party.

The very policies which have, in large part, caused the electoral collapse of the Left and opened the door to right wingers are still being employed, in the most pig-headed fashion, as a supposed defence against conservatism and Hansonism; we could cue that old Albert Einstein quote about the definition of madness here, but the Left are not really mad in that sense, they are simply lazy, smug and complacent.

Identity politics, feminism and poorly written satire will be no match for the likes of Kevin Andrews and his murder of Crows in the Liberal right and who knows what manner of suburban Frankenstein’s monsters Pauline will cobble together as candidates; the Leftists can scoff, roll their eyes and make fun to their hearts content, but unless they start to take their politics seriously they can expect to lose, big time.

We have no words of encouragement to offer the Left, we merely point out that they are on the road to ruin, our solution to their problems is simply to ask the genuine radicals among them to jump ship and become Australian Nationalists.

For that is the real political battle of our age, the struggle between globalist-capitalism and Nationalism.

Our side will continue with our programme of White radicalisation, as we always have, but calling Pauline Hanson a racist from your internet safe space and expecting the White working class to self-radicalise on the basis of hollow virtue signalling and confected moral panics is worse than doing nothing, it actually makes resistance to globalism harder across the board.

oie_h7XOIyDK6dnW

INTERNET DRAMA AND STREET THEATRE ARE NOT HELPING TO OVERTHROW GLOBALISM

INTERNET DRAMA AND STREET THEATRE ARE NOT HELPING TO OVERTHROW GLOBALISM

As the Civic Patriots and Anti-fascists continue their tussle over the rights to the title of the most disgraceful example of the White race, the Nationalists, and we suspect the saner members of the traditional Left, are simply in awe of both sides capacity for self-abasement.

We have pointed out many times this duel between two factions of, let us be frank, White trash has its roots deep in the twilight world of social media banter, trolling and cyber-bullying.

To those of us who still live the bulk of our lives in the real world and are physically engaged in alternative politics this constant bickering and sniping between parties in cyberspace presents some infuriating problems.

We originally intended this article to be a guide on how to deal with narcissists who try to impose themselves upon organised political groups, however, as important an issue as that may be it is not the whole picture.

Narcissists, by which we mean those people with positively malignant personality disorders, as opposed to merely self-confident, impatient or pushy people, are mercifully rare, but even one such person can devastate an entire activist community.

These people have a need to cause drama, call it a hunger or a craving for chaos but, as the author and diagnosed narcissist Sam Vaknin observes, this behaviour is all geared to securing what he has termed “narcissistic supply”.

We have pointed out many times this duel between two factions of, let us be frank, White trash has its roots deep in the twilight world of social media banter, trolling and cyber-bullying.

In brief, the severe narcissist could best be portrayed as a black hole of self-loathing and self-doubt, these people are often described as having no emotional core and no actual personality just a series of masks they wear, depending on the temperament and interests of the people they are tapping for acknowledgement and validation.

These masks or personae may involve things like sexual seduction of others, grandiose plans to really shake up the world into which other people are drawn, or they may offer some insight into a hidden subculture, or obscure field of expertise in which the narcissist is the enlightened master or expert.

million flag
The Million Flag Patriot was almost bashed by Antifa at his first rally. His skits are so poorly done that most people still don’t get the joke

The severe narcissist is all things to all people, he is your best mate, your benefactor and teacher as long as he can be the centre of attention, play his mind games, tell his tall tales and big-note himself in order secure his narcissistic supply and stave off the howling emptiness at the core of his being.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, these narcissists are usually unable to hold themselves back from becoming abusive toward the people around them, this stems from the fact that they are basically parasites. With no emotional core they have no moral compass, so they will often steal, lie, swindle, blackmail and stand over the people in their social circle without even a hint of remorse.

It is when the narcissist is caught out in a lie or some other abusive behaviour that the real problems begin, when confronted they can be quite dangerous as they will fly into an uncontrollable rage, but once they have calmed down then the long, drawn-out, sadistic process of their retribution begins.

These masks or personae may involve things like sexual seduction of others, grandiose plans to really shake up the world into which other people are drawn, or they may offer some insight into a hidden subculture, or obscure field of expertise in which the narcissist is the enlightened master or expert.

When the narcissist is exposed as a liar or a thief, for example, this causes a deeply-felt psychic wound, there is no possibility of them apologising, taking their lumps and learning to be a better person in the future, because the narcissistic supply from that source is now tainted the source must be destroyed at all costs. You can see where we are going with this comrades.

Put this in the context of an activist group, or any political organisation for that matter; a prominent member of the group exhibits the symptoms of narcissism discussed above, he is discovered to be a liar, a thief, a gossip or a sexual predator and confronted by the other members of the collective.

His response will then be to turn on the group, maybe he will denounce its members, or ingratiate himself with opposing political groups and the security services, anything to secure a new source of narcissistic supply. He urgently needs people to listen to his stories, to value his expertise and expert knowledge of his former group and to help him exact revenge upon his former comrades.

This is why you sometimes see formerly well known political extremists re-inventing themselves as anti-racists or conservatives, as the case may be; the phenomenon of group-hopping where people constantly change alliances or even invent new political tendencies out of thin air may be a red flag for the activists the narcissist will approach in his search for a new host.

To go back to our main point, social media is obviously a haven for narcissists and anti-social personality types and unfortunately, these fora allow the narcissist to create potentially limitless little bubbles of chaos and insanity, which to some extent can be transferred out of cyberspace into the real world.

Put this in the context of an activist group, or any political organisation for that matter; a prominent member of the group exhibits the symptoms of narcissism discussed above, he is discovered to be a liar, a thief, a gossip or a sexual predator and confronted by the other members of the collective.

This willingness by some people to take internet drama or their online personae to the streets creates real headaches for the good, genuine activists trying to build effective political parties or clubs.

We encounter people who demand to be treated as comrades, or even dignitaries, if you like, on the basis of their blog posts or social media jottings; then there are those who expect to be able to roll up to a rally or gathering and use us as human shields against people they have offended or provoked online.

Unfortunately for them, out in the real world, where the Nationalists live there are rules and etiquette and laws of the land which must be obeyed in order to advance our cause.

Nationalists and the authentic Left know that threats and challenges made online are rarely carried out, however there is an unwritten agreement among all sensible activists regarding the escalation of hostilities generated in the political struggle into attacks on the person, vandalism of personal property or aggression against non-belligerents; spouses, children, parents and so on.

The internet heroes, narcissistic parasites, trolls and bullies make maintaining this “truce” difficult, every time some dotty Antifa or drug addled Zio-Patriot type blows a gasket starts throwing death threats around or commences stalking their opponents it increases the risk to real activists on both sides.

The danger lies in the difficulty some people have in distinguishing fact from fiction and fantasy from reality; coupled with the tunnel vision and paranoia generated in these flame wars and stalking incidents this disconnect has the potential to blow trivial social media comments out into cycles of violent payback in which innocent people will be harmed.

While our side would never shrink from confrontation and we are more than able to ensure our own safety in public, we really do not want to see the current vigorous back and forth between Nationalists and Globalists degenerate into European levels of political violence on the basis of hurt feelings and sore egos caused by cyber-bullying.

Unfortunately, there may well come a time when we are forced to fight to secure the existence of our people and a future for White children, but for our part, we will first employ all legal and morally defensible avenues in order to bring down the globalist hegemony.

Just do not expect us to go to war to secure your narcissistic supply or get involved in your unnecessary flame wars, we are on to the game players and headcases.

cyber-bullying-finalcolor.png
Everybody hurts sometime

THE AUSSIE RACIST IS THE LATEST IN WATER COOLER ENTERTAINMENT

THE AUSSIE RACIST IS THE LATEST IN WATER COOLER ENTERTAINMENT

Punters were quick to highlight the dubious nature of the latest in a slew of SBS programs dealing exclusively with alleged White racism in Australia.

Is Australia Racist had only just aired when many took to social media either to ask WTF or to revel in the quasi-religious fervour of virtue signalling coming from anti-Whites.

Ray Martin is an excellent choice for host given how terribly Australia has treated him during his life. Halfway through his career Ray found out that he had a great, great, great grandmother fifty times removed on one parent’s side who was an indigenous person and right away it all fell into place: the crude Abo jokes tittered behind his back; the refusal of bottle shop service on Saturday nights; and the way the maître d’ always susses him out as if he’s about to bolt on the bill in any restaurant he eats at. Because let’s face it, Ray is as black as a barrel of crude oil.

download-7
Ray Martin is one-billionth Aboriginal and very sensitive about his cultural roots

Given his powerful credentials as a victim of racism who was held back from earning his first two million because of rampant prejudice in this country, as we say, Ray is the ideal choice to host a show that has about as much integrity as a bookmaker drumming up business at a Gambling Anonymous meeting.

See, folks, SBS is a business and people tend to forget this because they have some duped notion spawned by a halfwit myth of an antiquated thing called ‘journalistic integrity’ which old-timers go on about. Journalists would be the first to laugh at hearing this oxymoron, but none more so than the pot-smoking hipsters over at SBS. They know it’s all about ratings because simply being a government broadcaster is no guarantee of broadcast survival in an industry where economic sustainability trumps any unprofitable ethical and ideological considerations.

Which is why, when even a study by Flinders University debunked this myth of Australian ‘Islamophobia’, SBS will not let go of the racism cudgel because it is a guaranteed ratings’ winner.

Given his powerful credentials as a victim of racism who was held back from earning his first two million because of rampant prejudice in this country, as we say, Ray is the ideal choice to host a show that has about as much integrity as a bookmaker drumming up business at a Gambling Anonymous meeting.

As the abovementioned report revealed, when you stop skewing the survey questions to find the answers that you want (say, that most Aussies are racist), you get a more realistic picture of where we are at.

The question of ‘racism’ is something you have a position upon reliant on your interest in it. Tim Soutphommasane, the Race Discrimination Commissioner has to justify his $300K in taxpayer’ spoils each year. Given he wasn’t born here and arrived with ‘issues’ related to his background growing up in France to Laotian parents, you get an idea why it’s in his best interest to find racism everywhere he looks.

download-8
Our writers can’t get book contracts, but this Sudanese Moslem blow-in can get anything she wants just ‘cos she is a Google

Likewise, Yassmin Abdel-Magied is a 25-year-old Sudanese Moslem “engineer” and “author” whose entire existence is dependent upon her race, ethnicity, and religion. It is ironic that given most White Australians will never receive the opportunities she has based on the same criteria. We could pull out example after example, but you get the rub.

Now, what about us? The concept that a nationalist, who is chasing a racialist end, is not necessarily racist in act, word, or deed is an idea that would totally send the virtue signallers spinning on their pointy heads. But for bona fide nationalists, this is true. To want your own self-determination as a race doesn’t mean you spend your time 24/7 hating on every non-White that you pass by on the street. It doesn’t mean you load on hate when you buy a magazine from an Asian newsagent. You might even be polite in the course of your inevitable interactions.

The nationalist understands that multiracialism, and the presence of so many non-Whites, is a symptom, not the cause.

The nationalist understands that multiracialism, and the presence of so many non-Whites, is a symptom, not the cause.

But this is digression that has no place in a single-stream discussion about identity because the Aussie racist is entertainment pure and simple. He, or she, sells advertising and guarantees clicks and views.

It is all the better when some irate Australian reacting to the relentless tide of multicultural propaganda aimed at assimilating him or her reacts with a blown valve in a social situation and gets caught on a camera. This is the latest empirical evidence of a country so far to the right of Josef Mengele.

SBS will continue to pump out this garbage as surely as Coca-Cola will keep producing bottled cola and McDonald’s will serve up burgers: because it is an earner. Selah.

main-qimg-90079925f78ef2f013df2c1f474c55d3-c
Fuck it, let’s just break out the jackboots!

LIVING IN THE AGE OF VAGINAGGRESSION

LIVING IN THE AGE OF VAGINAGGRESSION

Worldwide anti-Trump rallies have exposed an immutable truth about what was once referred to as the fairer sex — they are in sorry moral and aesthetic disorder. Indeed, today’s woman, invariably politicised, has all the appeal of untreated sewage.

Not every woman deserves this criticism; there are fine nationalist women out there who do us all proud. However, this is not about them.

This is not even about the women who fall short of being nationalists. But it IS about those social feminists who are so wrapped up in a bubble of their own self-importance that they cannot compute the reality that they are in fact chauvinists.

download-13
Women complain about not being taken seriously

Let us get something straight — western women are not victims. There is no pay gap. Women are not paid less than men and their prospects are generally much brighter than men’s. They receive a superior deal in education, workplace politics always favour them, and even if they cannot gain work on their intellectual merits they can earn a packet working the dance pole for Arab taxi drivers at Pure Platinum. Family Law Court is a palace of female privilege where just about every ruling goes in the favour of the female as though it is a biological determination. You can hardly land a teaching gig if you’re a man because a cabal of women will hound you out of the profession with scurrilous imputations of paedophilia. Overall, society has placed women upon a pedestal from which, for some reason, they churlishly moon us while cultivating hairy armpits and taunting us with ‘pussy’ hats on.

This is not even about the women who fall short of being nationalists. But it IS about those social feminists who are so wrapped up in a bubble of their own self-importance that they cannot compute the reality that they are in fact chauvinists.

The only tough ride women get is the one that all must endure or else which they create for themselves. So what is their problem and why are the same communist Jewish hags baiting us with decades-old bullshit that was lies even back then?

Women who shamelessly go topless to promote their “right” to dress like “sluts” will then lock elbows in a daisy chain of dingbat womanhood chanting slogans against those men they accuse of treating them like sluts. But not if they live in Europe and Moslem men are objectifying and raping them. This is like a black hole of logic collapsed in on itself, which possibly describes the psychic condition of these women. When that happens, all you can hear are crickets chirping, as they instead find reasons to blame men of their own race for the behaviour of the parasites.

tumblr_nz9cw6insg1scro0fo1_1280
When women have something to say about being reduced to a sexual stereotype, they tend to speak as a sexual stereotype

Women who label themselves feminists are in fact at war with the very notion of what constitutes femininity.

There used to be a joke about how women’s bodily functions were a big secret and men often doubted they even had them. It went something like, “You know what they say about boys who hang around women’s lavatories? They tend to have their illusions shattered.”

But nowadays that rather elegant myth is being smashed apart by women themselves. Yes, scrabbling for oppressed credibility, created a Free the Poop movement last year where they happily discussed their bowel movements and revelled in infantile coprophilous attitudes.

Women who label themselves feminists are in fact at war with the very notion of what constitutes femininity.

The maternal instinct of women is being both gratuitously flaunted and simultaneously repudiated. Certain women make a deliberate issue out of breastfeeding by hauling their infant down to a public café, flopping out their mammary, and letting the sprog gnaw on their tit while patrons are trying to sip hot milk-based beverages. This will understandably cause revulsion for a cross-section of the community not so enamoured of the intimate biological functions of individual females of questionable hygiene. It is a crass display for bored mothers to affect some sort of controversy to lift them above what they treat as the mediocrity of child-rearing.

The female paedophile is on the rise. Check your tabloids daily, and inevitably there is another story about a (usually) female teacher who has taken advantage of some young male pupil to satisfy her predatory libido. You will read about mothers pimping out their own daughters to pay for drugs, or even joining is as they’re raped by hairy losers with Satan fetishes. How come so many women become pen-pals to notorious murderers and then want to marry them? You can’t count on women to cook anymore; you cannot count on them for fucking anything much except victim attitudes. The worst thing yet, they would betray their nation and race as quickly as pulling a tampon string. It is somehow an expression of liberation from non-existent oppression for women to declare they are “nasty” and make virtues out of traits that they condemn in men.

We could frankly go on and on and rattle out a list that will trigger many and inspire even more but we’ve made our point.

5883cb181700009f0a92b763.jpeg
Offers Hillary voters head-jobs, turned a generation of girls into vacuous sluts, wears a “pussy” hat to signify her mouldy old vagina, but has an issue with Trump because he said something sexist about thirty years ago

Jewish-run Hollywood takes a big chunk of responsibility for moulding the slatternly role models that these women invariably assimilate. Nonetheless, we aren’t letting them off that easy. No way, the onus is upon them alone. If Hollywood told them to go out and snort bird shit would they do it?

The whole “princess” deal where girls, forever slaves to materialism and mammon, exploit their bodies in the name of ‘empowerment’ is a fine example of the inherent insincerity and deep falsehood at the heart of what we might as well call ‘the movement’. Hollywood and glamour media promote it, and “society” enables it.

Jewish-run Hollywood takes a big chunk of responsibility for moulding the slatternly role models that these women invariably assimilate. Nonetheless, we aren’t letting them off that easy. No way, the onus is upon them alone. If Hollywood told them to go out and snort bird shit would they do it?

But if that is true, what the hell is ‘society’ and is that a croc of balls? They blame society, yet they ARE society. They object to society, and yet they change society into an objectionable setting.

So what the fuck were all those anti-Trump demonstrations about anyway? There is a vague, base claim at the heart of it that Trump represents the ‘objectification’ of women. Yet, they objectify themselves in response to this bogus perception. They wear “pussy hats” and dress up as vaginas. Some flash themselves, they brandish placards with baffling sentiments and at the end of it you have to ask, what the fuck is it they want?
What are their demands? What is the problem?

The problem is those women themselves. The irony of it all was the protesters who turn out to be the real issue and not their supposed target.

They are the privileged sex with aggressive vaginas wanting to throw their weight around and these days just about any excuse will do.

16194998_1410113392374839_7634493332513611596_n
Any man willing or sick enough to want to grab it would need to mine for it underneath that umpteen tonnage of blubber