BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

If there is one demographic, or social stratum, which regularly draws the ire of UNA bloggers it is the waffling bourgeoisie and their nominally empty-headed offspring, who sound off like a battery of howitzers every time an issue of so-called “social justice” is inserted into public discourse.

Take young Frances Abbott, the middle child of Tony and Margie, who, channelling Mary Bennet, the middle sister in Jane Austen’s Pride And Prejudice, felt moved to put forth a Vlog on matters of love, romance and tier-one Lesbianism in support of same-sex marriage.

Quoting the experience of her aunt, Christine Forster, who is a middle-aged homosexual convert, Frances declared that people “cannot help who they fall in love with” and that “love is unexpected”.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

frances abbott
Bourgeois Bikini Babe Frances Abbott: all brawn, little brains

If homosexual relationships are based on love then it is clearly a completely different form of bond to opposite-sex unions; in which, as lifelong spinster Jane Austen herself observed, there are much more considerations than “love” to be taken into account when making a match.

In its most basic, and most commonly understood form the pair-bond between man and woman is based on a partnership to take on the challenges of the world together and raise children, if they are lucky the spouses will get along well and, in time, come to love each other.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

In most cases in which men and women marry for love, the unions quickly fall apart as the realisation hits home that such a marriage is lacking in substance, has no direction and no real reason to exist aside from the vanity, or unrealistic expectations of the spouses.

Pride pejudice
The Bennet sisters scan the horizon for well-endowed suitors

Of course we understand the reasoning behind the patter which upper-class twits such as Ms Abbott have been trained to parrot, we can never, ever describe homosexuality as a choice, nor credit homosexuals with the agency to make their own decisions; rather, according to Globalist social convention, they are subjects whose vital nature is simply something which has “occurred”.

Here we find another point of difference, which also gives the lie to the calls for absolute equality for all: heterosexuality is very much a choice, yet we are taught to believe that homosexuality is something which “just happens”.

muslims1
Guess which other global capitalist side project also poo-poohs the idea of free will?

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

If homosexuals are not going through these processes and are subject to the whims of some deity, or hidden forces in the universe then equality will remain a distant dream, regardless of the outcome of the postal survey and subsequent parliamentary vote.

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

Of course, we know full well why this meme has been propagated, that in fact most people who begin their intimate lives in the homosexual world are actually deprived of choice by virtue of, in the main, having been seduced and manipulated into that lifestyle by self-serving adults while in their early teens.

This detail, however, is beyond the scope of our discussion and, as we have stated before, we simply do not care enough about homosexuals, their tiny queer sub-culture or their struggles against normal society to develop an in-depth critique of them as people.

Orlando united
Omar Mateen was homosexual and Muslim, obviously  the Pulse nightclub outrage “just happened”

As ever, we at UNA are interested in the bigger picture and the picture of Globalist equality, that synthesis of second-generation Communism and multinational corporate hegemony, has come into sharp relief during the SSM debate; the man behind the curtain pulling the levers has been revealed.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

“Things just happen” only to subjects, rather than workers in charge of their own fate; subjects are drafted into the military against their will, they are unfairly taxed, sold shoddy goods, given poor quality housing, or arbitrarily arrested and jailed; this is why most forms of monarchy, dictatorship and theocracy have such a bad reputation.

What “Love Is Love” in its proper context, globalist cosmopolitanism, ultimately boils down to is that we are all no greater or more able to master our own destiny than that young child whose choices are limited by the actions of the adults around them; that we are apt to just fall into situations and that it is advisable simply to go with the flow rather than resist or seek our own autonomy.

 

mateen-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwfSVWeZ_vEN7c6bHu2jJnT8
Agents act, subjects are acted upon, inshallah

 

Advertisements

THE ‘BENDIGO THREE’ VERDICT — INSIDE KANGAROO COURTROOM 19 AS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS REPEALED IN VICTORIA

THE ‘BENDIGO THREE’ VERDICT — INSIDE KANGAROO COURTROOM 19 AS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS REPEALED IN VICTORIA

Victoria is now officially an Orwellian Police State following last week’s conviction of the Bendigo Three on charges arising from the mock beheading of a dummy.

On Tuesday, September 5, in Melbourne Magistrates Court, Magistrate John Hardy found Blair Cottrell, Neil Erikson, and Chris Shortis guilty under section 25(2) of The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act, 2001 (RRTA). This is the first time that section of the law has been used in a prosecution. A conviction was recorded for each defendant, and a fine of $2000 plus a $79.50 statutory charge was imposed.

This judgment marks a turning point. Having peeled off its mask, the multiculturalist state is now showing its true authoritarian face. Magistrate Hardy’s judgment has not only set the bar for prosecution perilously low but decided it can be set anywhere the state chooses. Freedom of speech is the foundation of all other freedoms in a democratic society. Before the advent of multiculturalism in this country, the main restrictions to that implied freedom of expression were defamation, obscenity, intellectual property and incitement. While some argue that vilification laws are similar to defamation laws, the differences between the two indicate how far our freedoms have been eroded in the name of safeguarding feelings.

download (3)
The much overused still from the infamous video that incited hatred against Moslems and will probably trigger World War Three

Firstly, defamation is civil law, whereas section 25(2) of the RRTA is criminal law. Secondly, in defamation law, the plaintiff initiates a lawsuit and seeks a legal remedy. In Ross versus Shortis, Cottrell and Erikson, there was no complainant as in a criminal case. No Muslim had ever complained they felt ridiculed, hated, or treated as an object of contempt. No Patriot has testified that the video had incited them to have these attitudes. Instead, the case was brought by the Director of Public Prosecutions with Constable Erin Ross as the informant, who both exercised the entitlement that they, unlike ordinary citizens, have not to take the witness stand. This meant that the defendants could not cross examine their accusers as there were no accusers: a fundamental breach of procedural fairness, due process, and natural justice.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading. The video of the stunt together with extra footage of members walking and riding around Bendigo was uploaded to the United Patriots Front Facebook page as publicity for a 2015 rally held in Bendigo to protest the proposed building of a mosque.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading.

The first of the charges was ‘defacing the footpath and wall of the garden bed’ with ‘the emission of the red substance’. The second charge was ‘willfully damaging property’. “Damage does not need to be permanent”, presiding Magistrate Hardy informed the court. He left aside the question of why any rational person would describe a temporary stain on a footpath from water soluble food dye as “damage”. It took Bendigo Council two attempts to remove the pesky stain. The first time, ordinary water pressure from a hose wasn’t enough, but success was achieved the second time with a Gerni. A few weeks of weather and rain would probably have washed it away but then no-one would have been able to pretend it was a matter criminal enough to press charges. Chris Shortis actually paid the Council over $1000, a fine which exceeds the original cleaning bill. But the State required its pound of flesh!

download (6)
Magistrate John Hardy. He can find the harmless trigger of an eyebrow as incitement to ridicule or contempt

The first and second charges amounted to a prosecutorial fishing trip. The prosecutor, Fran Dalziel, was shamelessly up-front about this. She asked the Magistrate to hear the third charge first and only hear the other charges if the first charge was not proved. Hardy obligingly granted her request. The first two charges were only a backup. Clearly, it had been decided that the accused had to be charged with something, even if it ended up being trivial. Can anyone thereafter doubt that this trial was all along political and owed nothing to any theoretical victim?

RKTHwtp
The real victims in all of this

The trial lasted two days starting on a Monday. Supporters of the three accused had to pass through airport-style security on the ground floor, which was run by a security company. After queuing on the fifth floor, they passed through further security checkpoints, this time conducted by Victoria Police. These included complete photo ID scanning and twin 3D video cameras. Inside Courtroom 19, seating was restricted to 27 bodies, and much of that room was taken up by the less than objective media scrum. The lack of seating meant many travelled to court only to miss out on public seating.

Magistrate Hardy presented a curious anachronism, looking like a cross between Gandalf the Grey and Karl Marx. He informed the court that he had downloaded the RRTA and would read it out in the evening. However, by the end of the farcical proceedings, he would unquestioningly accept the prosecutor’s submission in what was so obviously a fait accompli. Before that, every pretence was made to try and lend seriousness to what was so evidently a show trial. Thus, presiding as he was over a circus, he cracked his whip on Day One of the two-day trial.

The Farce before the force

From the outset, a degree of exaggeration was necessary to contrive a sense of menace out of the stunt and convey this element of folk devilry to the court. A former official of the Greater Bendigo City Council took the stand, doing his best during testimony to convince the court this was a serious affair. After all, he had faced the extreme logistical difficulty and sheer angst posed by the mysterious red fluid it was his insurmountable duty to clean. Almost in judgement of this poppycock, a spectator’s mobile phone suddenly sounded, and the well-timed ringtone of The Benny Hill Show theme mocked the witness. He was subsequently cross-examined by each defendant in turn. Shown a more recent photograph of the ‘damage’ done by one of the defendants with the dummy’s fake blood, he sheepishly admitted that “the red spot may be a pebble”, and there was “no staining”. No graffiti artist had ever been held to such account.

download (4)
The Australia First Party have previously demonstrated in defence of the Bendigo Three

Thereafter, State functionaries dominated the first day’s proceedings with inane testimony that served only to pad out the dubious basis of the charges and give the court a false impression of their gravitas. Senior Sergeant John Phillip Dalton, the detective who headed the police response to the United Patriots Front Bendigo rallies, answered questions about the aims of the UPF. The prosecution then played the video, which was the only proper evidence presented throughout the trial. Afterwards, proceedings took a turn for the silly as Fran asked, “What is on Mr Shortis’s head?” “I’d say a religious cloth of some type”, Dalton replied. Under cross-examination, focus remained on the incriminating headdress worn by Chris Shortis, until Magistrate Hardy informed the defendants that a policeman’s opinion about a headdress was not admissible evidence. They might as well have taken Victorian taxpayer dollars and burnt the lot in a waste bin.

The following witness, Officer Gary Jenkins (a Freemason), didn’t even bother showing up. An excuse was given, that he had suffered a motorcycle accident. Examining the medical certificate (provided by one of the ‘brothers’?), Magistrate Hardy asked why he couldn’t be brought to court, as the certificate only covered work, not court. It was decided not to bother with his evidence, and another thrumming moment in Australian legal history squiggled to the ceiling like a yawning Z.

If the consequences of the day’s judgment would not turn out to be so grave, one may have been tempted to laugh as Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith took the stand. He led a raid on Chris Shortis’s house on Good Friday, 2016, where he seized Chris’s T-Shirt, jeans, and a toy Pirate’s sword. Of these vital pieces of evidence, the most dangerous was the T-Shirt, which hadn’t been washed. However, he forgot to bring them to court, a ditzy oversight that caused a 15-minute delay as they were sent for.

download (5)
Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith before Magistrate Hardy stole his Pirate sword

Once they arrived, Smith beamed devilishly. He could now show the court this damning evidence which he gleefully gathered up and fumbled with in his hands like an excited Lex Luther taunting Superman with kryptonite. But this was a comedy, not drama, and given such, he managed to clumsily drop the T-Shirt, sucking out the tiny puff of air that had momentarily inflated his sails in his moment of glory. He might have got to wave the sword about in a Douglas Fairbanks Jnr impression had the object described on the Bendigo Police evidence register as “One Fake Pirate Knife/Sword” not have been issued for destruction over a year earlier.

Another day, another truckload of taxpayers’ dollars

The morning of Day Two was taken up with submissions from the prosecutor and the three defendants followed by a rebuttal from Miss Dalziel. For reasons unknown, Detective Senior Constable Smith once more attended court, possibly hoping someone had found the Pirate sword. He evidently thought the prosecutor might have it, because in-between sessions he kept whispering anxiously in her ear. A request by Chris Shortis to quote from the Holy Qur’an was denied. He had hoped to share verse 8:12, which says, “Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): ‘I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them’.”

Denied this opportunity to be enriched by the words of the Prophet, the court adjourned for lunch so that Magistrate Hardy could consider his ruling and possibly play with the Pirate sword. On returning at 2 pm, the assembled were informed that Magistrate Hardy needed a further hour’s deliberation, proving he had found the sword after all. In the wash-up, and following all the tedious testimony from the witnesses, the only evidence taken into consideration was the first 39 seconds of the UPF video. Magistrate Hardy seemed particularly taken by this portion of the video given it contained his esteemed Pirate sword.

behead-the-infidel
Another victim of The Bendigo Three’s “intentions”

Mr Shortis had argued that since beheading is illegal, and the RRTA only protects lawful religious activity, the video cannot be subject to the act. Magistrate Hardy rejected this argument as “teleological”. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines teleology as “The explanation of phenomena in terms of the purpose they serve rather than of the cause by which they arise”. This seems to say more about Hardy’s convoluted reflections on the 39 seconds in the video than it does to Chris’s argument in their defence. In fact, we’re pretty sure it sounds like bullshit. Hardy might as well have yelled, “look behind you” for all the clarity of this argument. Likewise, he argued that the law was dealing with “Muslims not beheading”, which is again odd given that there were no Muslims in the video and the only thing beheaded was a sex toy.

But as sure as he invalidated all of Chris’s arguments, he ignored his contention relevant sections of the Australian Constitution imply freedom of expression and that Australia is a signatory to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The latter includes the right to freedom of opinion and expression as a basic principle. Hardy did not agree that there is a conflict between the RRTA and the corresponding Federal law. He did not refer to the Keating government memorandum which suggests there may be. As to the lack of a plaintiff or complainant, he simply said that section 25 does not require it, airily dismissing legal investigation. He noted that the video had chalked-up 275 likes, establishing that it had an audience, which was, to him, a solid basis for construing the malicious intent in the video he believed exists had probably gestated already in weak minds.

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.  Where intent is the issue then inference must be used … The context of the video leaves me no alternative than to find that the intention was to incite serious contempt or ridicule of persons of the Muslim faith.”

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.

So, no actual incitement needs to occur, mere intention, a mental state, is enough to convict and inference is all that’s required to “prove” the mental state of the accused. Thus the burden of proof is reversed for an action merely imputed, which is abstraction upon abstraction. No real barrier remains for the prosecution of anyone the state does not like and the broadness as well as the vagueness of the offending article is pure Kafka. Thus, the presentation of opposing views to any area of the multicultural dogma is potentially a punishable offence, be it Islam, African crime, Chinese imperialism or the objection to curry odours in a unit block. If these views are presented publicly, regardless of whether criminal activity occurs as a result, it can be considered as “incitement”, demonstrable by a few clicks of the ‘like’ button on Facebook. In other words, opposing multiculturalism is a thought crime as well as a hate crime, especially if expressed on Facebook, which half of the legal justice system and Police Force seem to spend their time (and our money) gawping at.

The one glimmer of light from the Magistrate in this otherwise grotesque Stalinesque show trial came during sentencing. The prosecutor claimed that the defendants were lacking in remorse.  Magistrate Hardy, for once disagreeing with Miss Dalziel, noted that remorse in issues of principle is a bit different from remorse in matters such as rape. Undeterred, Fran declared that “Opposition to Islam continues to be held by these men!”

Magistrate Hardy, salvaging an atom of credibility, reminded Miss Dalziel that “They are entitled to oppose Islam it is how that opposition is expressed that is at issue”. But this is another instance of Hardy’s dingbat logic given that opposition cannot exist WITHOUT expression and there are no terms of reference to define the acceptable expression.

In other words, two plus two now equals anything but four.

It is worth noting, too, that when the guilty verdict was delivered members of the media — some believe from the ABC — pumped the air with their fists in a show of celebration.

Following the decision, Blair Cottrell and what’s-his-name went off to file an appeal. Chris Shortis is considering his options.

Bendigo-Three-Arrive-at-Labors-Show-Trial
UNA salutes our smiling hero, Chris Shortis

ED — We point out here that Chris Shortis is a member of United Nationalists Australia, however, this article was produced by another member of our growing team who was present both days of the Kangaroo court.

HALAL CERTIFICATION BOSS WANTS WHITE WOMEN FERTILISED BY MOSLEM MEN

HALAL CERTIFICATION BOSS WANTS WHITE WOMEN FERTILISED BY MOSLEM MEN

A leading Moslem businessman has delighted over figures released by a bogus Jewish university that alleges a 52% decline in the sperm count of Australian males in a push against White Australia.

In a post to Facebook, which would have anybody White arrested if the message was reversed, Mohamed Elmouelhy gloated, “According to the Hebrew University, Australian men’ (sic) sperm count has decline (sic) by 52% over the last 40 years so your men are a dying breed, Australian women need us to fertilise them and keep them surrounded by Muslim babies while beer swilling, cigarette smoking, drug injecting can only dream of what Muslim men are capable of.

“If the country is left to the bigots the white race will be extinct in another 40 years. Muslims have a duty to make your women happy because you are declining, better go chose (sic) a plot for youself (sic) at your local cemetery. If you can’t afford it, commit suicide it is a cheaper alternative for bigots.”

42BBFAFE00000578-4735588-Halal_Certification_Authority_boss_says_Australian_women_need_Mu-a-11_1501158686559

Elmouelhy is president of the Halal Certification Authority, which is responsible for milking Australians for a religious tax (like Kosher) slapped on food products which fill up the coffers of Moslem supremacists whether we like it or not. This is a scam guaranteed by our own traitorous government which is the only truly guilty party when any outrage of this sort surfaces.

Of course, UNA, not being a reactionary bunch, can recognise the glaring absurdities in all of this.

Anything that comes out of a Jewish university relating in any way to the White race would have to be regarded as prejudiced. But this “research” is somewhat at odds with all the Multicultural bullshit that we’ve been forced to swallow as a people. Indeed, just who are these “Australian men”? We’ve had it bashed into us that we are the last in line to be considered Australians.

 

BPA affects sperm quality really worried dot blogspot dot com-1
Hebrew University used this still as the basis of their research

We come after “First Peoples” and every Syrian so-called refugee who has set foot here in the last six months is more of an Aussie than us White fellas according to government and media — so what are the terms of reference of this kike university’s supposed ‘research’?

In fact, the research, which was published in science journal Human Reproduction Update, refers to men from “western countries” which includes, apart from Australians, New Zealanders, Europeans, North Americans and others.

It was based on 185 studies of 43,000 men between 1973 and 2011, and nothing that we’re aware of specifies WHITE. Nonetheless, the anti-White propagandists of the media who have so excited this Moslem crank seem to be leaning hard on the inference that it refers to White taddies. This suggests that 43,000 White men were recruited on the basis of race, asked to jack off into test tubes, and tested for these dystopian results. Either that or fertility clinics shared their data, but again, was this information selected on the basis of a racial designation that we’re not aware is recorded in such instances?

42BBF65000000578-4735588-image-a-38_1501157136763
Mohamed Elmouelhy wants White women impregnated with Arab, Moslem semen; ideally his own

If not, this means, dear Arab pervert, that YOU are included in those statistics by virtue of the fact you’re situated in the west, where you shouldn’t even be.

And given the lifestyle stresses that factor into this supposed fall in sperm counts, it’s hard to see how your saggy, greasy Arab balls get off the hook, given how practically every single one of your countries are either in some state of civil war, or else so poverty struck you’re forced to drink donkey pee — animals which are also your sexual partners in about 90% of cases.

What’s more, you Arabs have the worst diet of any creature alive outside of a billy goat. And the Arab pretty much introduced the world to hard drugs, which your own various peoples ingest on a massive scale, regardless of any halfwit myths about Moslem piety.

Elmouelhy has written with frantic glee and in such a garbled prose that we can only surmise he is in fact three sheets to the wind, probably on Johnnie Walker Blue Label, a favourite among Moslem drug dealers.

But it’s interesting that this hook-nose invader, who is making a killing on this enforced tax that is a perk his people have spiked us “White Australians” with, should be so quick to label all Australians as ‘bigots’ even though he is still here and prospering nicely.

What he really means is, political correctness has allowed him to express his own Arab bigotry through the diversity prism, which permits anti-White bigotry, but not the opposite. Let us also reflect on all these stereotypes that the Moslem people hold about us Whites as all being drunks, addicts, and spiritual burn outs.

It should also be understood that if this low sperm-count thing is a condition solely afflicting White men — then it is probably down to the fact that we work ourselves blind just to keep Arabs and their households of sixteen wives and 83 children supported by Medicare and Centrelink benefits.

However, the base message here is that Arab men want to fuck White women. We know this. Those that don’t have the fortune of having drunk White women passed out in their taxis either forcibly rape, kidnap or force them into slavery. It is happening about 20,000 times each day all throughout Europe and only a knob, cuck, or SJW would refuse to believe it happens here. And all courtesy of your one-world government.

Elmouelhy probably has a permanently reserved table podium-side at his local strip club. His sole obsession is White women and his one mission in life is to contaminate our genetic lines.

We don’t advocate trolling, but if readers are hopelessly predisposed to such dark entertainments than we suggest a good account to start with would be the Facebook account — and any others — belonging to Mohamed Elmouelhy.

He needs learning, as does the treasonous government that set him and his people among us.

pjimage (1).jpg
These two flags ought to combine

FAIRFAX JOTTER MISREADS SMOKE SIGNALS FROM COOLAROO

FAIRFAX JOTTER MISREADS SMOKE SIGNALS FROM COOLAROO

Fairfax contributor Matt Holden recently penned an article, “The Dallas fire is a reminder Melbourne is not as classless as we’d like to think”, in which he tries, in vain, to make his case for class divides across the metropolitan area.

Dallas, for those not familiar with the layout of Greater Melbourne, is a working class suburb in the North-Western zone, it is one of the green field sites developed largely by The Housing Commission Of Victoria during the 1960’s, that style of commission homes would be familiar to most city dwellers.

The fire in question occurred in a stockpile of plastic products at a recycling plant in nearby Coolaroo, though due to the wind patterns during the several days it took to bring the blaze under control it was Dallas which was most heavily affected by the plume of toxic smoke and ash.

Several hundred Dallas residents were evacuated and forced to spend the night at local community centres according to the emergency response plan activated by the responsible authorities; though greatly inconvenienced by the order to leave there were no serious injuries, loss of life or property among the evacuees.

broadmed-mosque
Soon, mosques will be more common than McDonald’s

Now Dallas is a pretty ordinary neighbourhood in that part of town, people live their lives, raise their families, work, study, run businesses and so forth; the suburb, like those around it, is home to a large number of migrants, particularly from Turkey and Lebanon, as well as their second and third generation family members.

Matt Holden casts a fairly critical eye over the area in an effort to trump up his story of class antagonism, exclusivity and geographical as well as socio-economic divides; Holden doesn’t “go there” on the issue of the area’s large Muslim population, but he hints at ethnic divisions in his analysis.

Several hundred Dallas residents were evacuated and forced to spend the night at local community centres according to the emergency response plan activated by the responsible authorities; though greatly inconvenienced by the order to leave there were no serious injuries, loss of life or property among the evacuees.

The issue of median house prices is raised in the article but in reality, this means little, like so much of the new demographic data available to the layman, via the 2016 census, it is largely a matter of perspective gained through local knowledge.

The quality and age of the housing stock as well as the settled nature of the community would be factors in suppressing the turnover of real estate and the median sale price, not necessarily structural, societal inequality or class chauvinism.

Dallas appears to have a large number of families with children, which is what we could expect from an area which is 49% Muslim; few families would want to leave such an enclave, especially if the rent is relatively cheap and few outsiders would want to move into an area dominated, socially and economically by an ethnic group which is not their own.

Holden cites overseas research into social habits to bolster his thesis that Dallas residents have no choice but to live by the side of a rubbish recycling plant, claiming that the upper middle class purposely corrals off all the finer things in life from the lower classes.

ilim college
Aussie schoolgirls make up for our racist, Christian past

He further claims that disparity in educational outcomes, low-quality government schooling and a lack of private schools is somehow imposed upon the residents of Dallas by the upper echelons.

This conclusion is in no way borne out by the census numbers; students living in Dallas attend private schools in numbers three times the state average in the primary years and double the average in the secondary system. It should have been a no brainer for any competent journalist to conclude that Muslims like to live close to the Mosques and private Islamic colleges which are mostly situated in the West, (which we are assured are among the best schools in the state) just as the bourgeois Anglos or Chinese nouveau riche of the Eastern suburbs gravitate to certain school zones.

Dallas appears to have a large number of families with children, which is what we could expect from an area which is 49% Muslim; few families would want to leave such an enclave, especially if the rent is relatively cheap and few outsiders would want to move into an area dominated, socially and economically by an ethnic group which is not their own.

We could argue that the Muslims of Dallas are in fact getting the better deal in some ways due to the fact that they do not have to shell out millions of dollars just to live close to their preferred schools, they get all the benefits and less of the burden given that their suburb is far from the hell hole described by Fairfax.

The problem  is not socioeconomic class in this instance, especially in relation to the fire emergency. The recycling plant, if properly run, is not a particularly dangerous facility by which to live; the lax management practices and corner-cutting found on site by the authorities were the cause of the fire. These factors were no doubt influenced by the diminishing returns from recycling plastic in the current economy.

The implication in Holden’s article is that such a facility would not be tolerated in the affluent Eastern suburbs, and that the bourgeoisie would use their clout to have it shut down as a health hazard before any adverse impacts on their community.

Who can say one way or another? We suspect that Holden’s attitude stems from the fact that people of his social class wouldn’t like to work in a recycling plant, so they see no benefit in having it in an urban setting; the inhabitants of Dallas and surrounds might have a different view given that blue collar jobs are becoming harder to find in the globalised economy.

One way of looking at Dallas is as an intentional community which is developing in accordance with the tastes, needs, and aspirations of its ethnic majority groups; this is not without precedent in Victoria and is a predictable result of the programme of multiculturalism.

We suspect that Holden’s attitude stems from the fact that people of his social class wouldn’t like to work in a recycling plant, so they see no benefit in having it in an urban setting; the inhabitants of Dallas and surrounds might have a different view given that blue collar jobs are becoming harder to find in the globalised economy.

Take for example the ostensible, intentional White enclaves of Eltham, Daylesford or Castlemaine, communities where elements of the White middle and skilled/artisan working classes have migrated, en-masse to set up societies catering to their needs, tastes and aspirations.

Instead of Islamic colleges, there are Steiner schools and community colleges, artisan bakers and funky European style Boites stand in place of the Shisha parlours and Kebab joints while the folk festivals of the White enclaves mirror the Eid and Mawlid observances of the Muslims.

Mawlid
Everyone is welcome – to assimilate to Islam

Never the twain shall meet, at least if things stay the way they are, yet this distance has really nothing to do with social class and everything to do with ethnic cohesion and the natural tendency for people to feel most relaxed and emotionally centred when surrounded by people with the same attitudes and aspirations as themselves.

The differences in median family income between the White enclave of, say, Castlemaine and Dallas is a few dollars a week.  Both communities are cohesive, vibrant and stable, yet very different in terms of ethnic composition; leading us to conclude that people choosing to live in these intentional communities place a premium on things outside the realm of purely material prosperity. There are class divides, and Nationalists are well aware of this, but the Dallas fire emergency reveals nothing about the state of society beyond the effects of over 40 years of multiculturalism, in spite of Matt Holden’s desperate attempts to frame it as such.

We understand that our class antagonists operate through the projection of power, via their access to the media, the machinery of state, big business and academia but the author, Holden, being a part of that system is unlikely to ever see things clearly or to admit the truth even if he knew it.

CSF  FINALE
Festival of the Snowflake

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

What do you do with the UPF? If you’re Facebook, you shut down their main page. So what do THEY then do? They migrate as much Zionist supporting material as they can to sister pages and to their Reclaim Australia – West Australia Rally page.

In every quote to the media, however, you will find their leadership claiming to be ‘nationalist’ and not ‘patriot’ which is such a conscious delineation that its intention is coldly clear to true Australian nationalists.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

On the same page (RA-WA) you will find a link to a True Blue Crew flag march where Whiteness is heavily emphasised. Then it’s back to the kosher meal of every possible Zionist-related entity they chug up – Britain First and Tommy Robinson shares right there in among them.

Well, they know by now; surely they aren’t naive. They know that promoting ultra-Zionists like Avi Yemini is a contradiction in terms to the single-minded cause of fighting Islamic extremism. Ultra-Zionists like Avi and his fellow countrymen create such extremism. They do so both by having manufactured ISIS, so as to pit them against the unfriendly Moslems on their list – and by continually stoking bloody conflict in the region.

The perennial program of destabilisation establishes a power balance that benefits the security of the state of Israel and services whatever objectives its allies may have in the region. But it also does something else – and has done so since the 1970s – it creates a mass migration of Middle Easterners into Australia.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

What does this portend for the ‘nationalism’ that they claim to be championing, having knowingly appropriated the term from staunch supporters of a new White Australia Policy? It kills it because those same Zionists do everything possible to eradicate such nationalist beliefs. They do more though — they align with the Left to attack serious nationalists such as we saw recently with Fairfax’s criminal toll Luke McMahon, who is known to have ties with Zionist-convert Neil Erikson.

Erikson, along with Nick Folkes, Howard Crawford, Scott Moerland and others have campaigned heavily against true nationalists. We are not at all surprised to find the UPF making the self-defeating move to once again associate with these cagey globalists in the hope of puffing up their waning profile.

Thus, nationalists for a White Australia become treated worse than kiddy fiddlers, and the planes keep flying more and more Indians, Chinese, Africans and MOSLEMS from the Middle East. The cathartic activity of stoking enmity against Islam merely gives a moral license to our globalist government to support military crimes in the Middle East which benefit Israel.

In this battle, all those values that Australians regarded as part of their birthright are trampled on. Zionists in Australia, while demanding racial and religious homogeneity at home, are forever insisting on total diversity for Australia and all White countries.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

This diversity has transformed our cities into utterly foreign destinations. The quarter-acre home has been replaced by towering (shoddily built) concrete toolboxes crammed with Chinese and Indians; the odour of their spicy cooking permeating the streets.

Australia needs reclaiming from all of this, not just one particular branch of this allegedly diverse community.

It is not the Indians, Africans, or Chinese who are losing their identities. They’ve never had it so sweet. While White Australians are slowly being discouraged from even considering ourselves Australian, this new population get dual identities. They get to be Indian AND Australian; they get to be African AND Australian, and they get to be Chinese AND Australian.

Islam is just a symptom of this single world government that has its master Zionist America. But while all these terms we throw about ‘Zionist’ ‘civic patriot’ and whatever might confuse the casual punter it is all quite simple. Unless you live in one of those last posts White Australian areas that are only ‘gradually’ being de-Europeanised you only have to take a walk, open your eyes, and smell the pungent waft of curry.

What difference does Islam make if – in the highly improbable event of removing it – you do so only to find yourself a stranger in your own country, shivering and alone among a new population of aliens? What will you reclaim then?

Wake up to the Zionists — you are being used.

C1ePePgVEAAVEM4
Avi Yemini, the ultra-Zionist who is now the darling of the civic patriots now calling themselves Australian ‘nationalists’

PATRIOTS, LOOK TO THE SOUTH AND THE DESTINY OF YOUR PEOPLE!

PATRIOTS, LOOK TO THE SOUTH AND THE DESTINY OF YOUR PEOPLE!

Once again the Nationalists are bound to respond to further provocation from the civic patriots. The appropriation of the description “nationalism”, by groups who, despite affecting patriotic airs, still have a wholly globalist-liberal outlook is unacceptable and demands a stern reply.

One of the key elements of our Australian Nationalism is the concept of independence from foreign or imperial powers; we reject absolutely the rule of the British monarchy, the resurgent imperialism of the Chinese, Americans and Russians or the soft Jihad of the Sunni Islamists.

Certain people need to get it into their heads that Australia is a young country of the global south, that we must look to ourselves, to the south, for inspiration in matters of national identity.

It is unacceptable for any Australian political operator to adopt the name Nationalist while his gaze is still directed to the north, while he still hangs on every word emanating from so-called “patriots” of the old world he can never be a true patriot to his own nation, which is of the new world.

Take, as an example, Donald Trump, a figure whose brand of populist showmanship is much in vogue among the yokels and numbskulls currently enamoured of civic patriotism.

The appropriation of the description “nationalism”, by groups who, despite affecting patriotic airs, still have a wholly globalist-liberal outlook is unacceptable and demands a stern reply.

We at UNA have previously written on the character both of the man and the Trump administration so our readers will not be shocked by our criticism of his agenda or leadership style.

Trump’s treatment of Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany during her recent state visit to the U.S.A is telling.

images (6)
The Donald’s hand will need amputating after touching her

Naturally Mrs Merkel’s politics are basically incompatible with our own ideals, however, the manner in which president Trump publicly humiliated her revealed him as the worst kind of imperialist thug; he displayed the manners of a tyrant dealing with an errant vassal. Having said, he should have nutted her, and then broken both her ankles for destroying Europe.

Trump should be no hero of patriots, no matter their national or racial background, in Trump is manifested the old-school colonial bully, the big country kicking the little country; his treatment of middle tier players, such as the Germans, bodes not well for little countries such as Australia.

We see also, in the Australian patriot circles the idolatry of foreign nationalist movements, the promotion of their activism and even attempts to transplant such groups down under; this is without the patriots having much of an idea about what these groups stand for.

We at UNA have previously written on the character both of the man and the Trump administration so our readers will not be shocked by our criticism of his agenda or leadership style.

UNA are, of course, interested in overseas nationalist movements but having had some interaction with various groups, particularly in Europe we are well placed to point out that many such organisations are extremely xenophobic; they are often hostile even toward sympathetic people if they are from a different European national background.

The language barrier is also a major hurdle, we cannot be sure where, say, Polish, Hungarian, or Russian nationalists stand on certain issues because they do not distribute their platforms in English, or that they simply do not use social media much at all.

Australian patriots seem to be dazzled by the large rallies held in some of the European capitals, the footage from Russia Today or Reuters looks impressive to those who see such displays as central to their cause; but who are the groups facilitating the marches? What is their reputation among the working classes, are they connected to the state or foreign governments and so forth?

We know for a fact that some European nationalists are tolerant of Shia Islam, or of certain other immigrant groups and native-born, non-European people with whom they share some common cause. That is, of course, their own business but rather than idolising foreign groups, or simply copying their aesthetics, the Australian patriots, as we say, need to look to the south for inspiration; the old-world groups may look flash in Youtube clips, but unless you speak their language fluently it is hard to know what you are imitating.

The other bone we at UNA have to pick with the civic patriots is this conflation of the foreign Islamist threat with current affairs in Australia; one example might be the elevation to folk devil status of the presently incarcerated troublemaker Anjem Choudhary.

The language barrier is also a major hurdle, we cannot be sure where, say, Polish, Hungarian, or Russian nationalists stand on certain issues because they do not distribute their platforms in English, or that they simply do not use social media much at all.

Choudhary is a U.K based Islamist loudmouth whose career was given a massive boost by the indulgence of mainstream media outlets. The BBC, Sky TV and others gave him a platform to spread his nonsense and he allowed the media to make him into a sort of Emmanuel Goldstein figure, against which all and sundry could rant and rave to blow off steam.

Australian Nationalists realise that the threat from political Islamism and the wider, nihilistic Jihadist worldview is real, that due to the nature of the religion this menace does spread through ostensibly “peaceful” dialogue by diaspora Muslims; however, Anjem Choudhary could never have had the profile he did in the U.K in our country.

Islamic march in Wootton Bassett cancelled
Anjem Choudhary’s likeness will soon appear on the five pound note

The Australian media would not allow a radical Islamist the airtime needed to become a folk devil, mainly, we suspect, because most editors and producers within the system are wary of promoting anything which could lead to a negative perception of Muslims.

Furthermore, Choudhary’s sophistry and the way he always just skirted the anti-terrorism laws by choosing his words carefully would not wash in this country; he would likely have been jailed a lot sooner here than he was in the U.K.

In the end, this idolatry of the European political movements and excessive focus on the social problems of the northern hemisphere is counterproductive.

Australian Nationalists realise that the threat from political Islamism and the wider, nihilistic Jihadist worldview is real, that due to the nature of the religion this menace does spread through ostensibly “peaceful” dialogue by diaspora Muslims; however, Anjem Choudhary could never have had the profile he did in the U.K in our country.

Looking longingly at groups, who by virtue of existing in far more populous, and for that matter densely populated countries can obviously put more feet on the street than Australian patriots leads only to a paralysing sense of ennui, which we have seen occur time and time again.

We urge all patriots to stop fumbling around, to cease the promotion to the Australian workers and marginalised people of foreign nationalist ideas, which you only half understand.
It is time to give up the support for the imperialist gangster Donald Trump and the hollow populism of Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen or Pauline Hanson.

White Australians, the only true Aussies, already have a brand of political nationalism which was laid out by our recent forefathers with the express intention of creating a truly progressive society, a system where White men and women could thrive and authentic social justice could be achieved.

The radicals of UNA and our friends in other nationalist groups will continue to promote the ideals of White Australia, the only form Australian nationalism can realistically take; as for the civic patriots, the time has come to make a choice.

Will they continue to play silly games, to cast their gaze back at the old world and avoid taking responsibility for their race and nation?

Or will they, sometime soon, look to the South, as all true nationalists do and begin to really care about the destiny of their own people, the White Australians?

whiteaustraliablackhistory
Fixed!

ON THE RELATIVE UTILITIES OF ISLAMISM AND NEO-NAZISM IN A NATIONAL MOVEMENT FOR DEMOCRATIC CHANGE

ON THE RELATIVE UTILITIES OF ISLAMISM AND NEO-NAZISM IN A NATIONAL MOVEMENT FOR DEMOCRATIC CHANGE

Never fear comrades, that overly wordy headline is mere meme fodder for our opposition; granted, depending on whether the critic is a dumb right-winger or a dumb Antifa, our enemies naturally assume that we are either closet Nazis or Jihadis-in-waiting anyway.

What we intend to explore in this article are the relative theoretical merits of these two ideals and the tactical advantages, if any, which would accrue to a Nationalist movement should it decide to take either of the two courses.

Due to a lack of imagination on the part of the enemies of White Australia we, the Nationalists, are frequently tarred with the epithet “Nazi” in an effort to shame and silence any dissent against the globalist liberal world order.

goughwhitlam
Gough Whitlam was Australia’s first true Nazi

This tactic would probably have worked in, say, the 1970’s when the people who actually had a stake in the Fascist-Anti Fascist struggle were still active participants in our society, as opposed to drooling dementia patients.

The trouble is that in 2017 there are so few people left who could legitimately take offence at Neo-Nazi posturing, based on prior real life experiences, that the whole Antifa psychodrama requires a predilection to daydreaming and delusions of grandeur.

On whose behalf are the latter day Anti-Fascists mobilising? The dead? Those yet unborn but theoretically prone to victimisation? Imaginary victims of imaginary regimes?

Due to a lack of imagination on the part of the enemies of White Australia we, the Nationalists, are frequently tarred with the epithet “Nazi” in an effort to shame and silence any dissent against the globalist liberal world order.

More to the point, if Neo-Nazism was a viable tool in our national struggle why would us Nationalists have any qualms about donning our brown shirts and jodhpurs and simply getting on with the job?

Nazism, or Fascism, are ideas so at odds with the White Australian character and temperament that it is surely no mystery as to why our forebears so enthusiastically resisted their original proponents in the 1930’s and 1940’s.

491014a04e9929fe0590ff5f91d83a05
Paul Hogan in his Nazi phase

Could anyone seriously contemplate the rise of a Hitlerian-Aussie strongman in the Australia of 2017?

The closest we have ever come to that type of personality cult was, we suppose, the Whitlam years; yet old Gough was seen publicly, even by his fans, as the pompous, impatient and imperious individual that he surely was and he was mercilessly lampooned as a result.

Australians hate tall poppies, we cannot stand politicians or public figures who will not exhibit the traditional humility and conservatism expected of adults in our society; a Hitler-like figure could never survive in a nation where merely buying a new car can lead to assumptions by the neighbours that one is “too big for his boots”.

Nazism, or Fascism, are ideas so at odds with the White Australian character and temperament that it is surely no mystery as to why our forebears so enthusiastically resisted their original proponents in the 1930’s and 1940’s.

In recent years several people have attempted this type of fuhrerprinzip approach to Aussie street movements and ended up as laughingstocks; true, they lacked the intelligence and life experience of an old school Nazi, like Hitler, but they also lacked his personal modesty and self-effacing manner.

Neo-Nazism, to the Nationalists then, is worse than useless because, even stylistically, it is an affront to the national character of our people; among a nation wary of show ponies and wise to the ways of narcissistic blowhards and con artists it is simply a non-starter.

r811816_7259142
Arthur C. Smith, leader of the Australian Nazi Party circa 1964

Taken in that light the accusations of Nazism thrown our way are simply slurs intended to imply that Nationalists are stupid; the implication being that we are intent on employing tactics which could never work. However, we are clearly not stupid people though and having limited resources with which to run our campaigns we simply do not have the luxury of using dumb tactics which could never bear fruit for an Australian political movement.

The Left and Right wingers, by contrast, can get away with peddling nonsense and play-acting at anachronistic, 20th century politics due to the largesse of their benefactors; that is to say it’s pretty easy to pretend to be a Patriot, Trotskyite or Anarchist when you have the resources of the Jewish community, a trade union or a university to back you up.

Radical, Jihadist Islam, on the other hand, is a somewhat trickier subject; not least because it is a current — one might say eternal — stream of political thought and action bubbling away beneath the surface of world affairs, whereas Nazism has been dead for nigh on four generations.

Neo-Nazism, to the Nationalists then, is worse than useless because, even stylistically, it is an affront to the national character of our people; among a nation wary of show ponies and wise to the ways of narcissistic blowhards and con artists it is simply a non-starter.

Indeed White Nationalism in the broad sense, over the past fifteen years, has been fending off interlopers who, seduced by the apparent machismo and dash of the Jihadist gangs and dazzled by their open anti-Semitism, seek to create some detente between, or worse, fusion, of Islamic radicalism and pan-Europeanism.

These pernicious orientalists seem to be convinced that, in the hands of Whites at least, Islam could become something other than it has always been; that is to say that in the right hands there could be a real “golden age” where capitalism is overthrown, the Jews are servile dhimmis, the women kept barefoot and pregnant and all the better aspects of Sharia provide peace and plenty for all.

naziscan1
Before the Interwebs

Apart from the fact that these serial pests are almost always fruitcakes, stereotypical “racist” morons, bitter misogynists, or all three, there is the intractable problem of the Arab supremacism at the heart of Islam.

All roads lead to Mecca, all decisions on the future of the Ummah are taken by Islamic jurists in countries like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Egypt and Morocco; Islam is a religion centred on the orient, all of its traditions stem from the lands to the south and east of the Bosphorus.

Nationalist radicals understand the attraction of this way of thinking, in theory a mass conversion of Nationalists to Islam and the adoption of Jihadism would appear to be a path of least resistance; one could theoretically speak one’s mind and enjoy the protection of Australia’s de facto blasphemy laws, section 18c and the state human rights regimes.

Apart from the fact that these serial pests are almost always fruitcakes, stereotypical “racist” morons, bitter misogynists, or all three, there is the intractable problem of the Arab supremacism at the heart of Islam.

Presumably once a certain critical mass had been reached funds would begin flowing toward this all White, Islamo-racist cult from the gulf states and elsewhere, an insurgency against the globalist liberal order would ensue and the system would be overthrown.

Hardly, for one thing, the central issue here is ethnicity, it should be well understood by now that none of the protections afforded to Muslims by the current human rights framework apply to White Australians; so should some bright spark decide to call a “White Jihad” he might expect to be quickly snatched from his bed by the security services and then find himself buried alive in his local Supermax prison.

Imagine, if you can, a group of White men organising a stand alone group along the lines of Hizb-ut-Tahrir, holding rallies railing against the Zionist entity, issuing guidelines for the discipline of wives and female relatives and calling for death to unbelievers.

Muslim radicals have been pepper sprayed and set upon by police dogs conducting such activities even though they are under special protection by the state; we feel confident that any White power Islamists might be met with far more oppressive violence from the authorities.

In common with Nazism, Islamism is also at its core a multi-ethnic, internationalist creed; outfits styled after the Waffen SS and the early Jihadis would be, if true to the ideals of their forebears, compelled to admit anyone with the desired fanaticism and ambition, regardless of national origin.

Imagine, if you can, a group of White men organising a stand alone group along the lines of Hizb-ut-Tahrir, holding rallies railing against the Zionist entity, issuing guidelines for the discipline of wives and female relatives and calling for death to unbelievers.

Well, comrades, as edifying as this discussion of useless ideologies and tactics has been, we must here defend the modes of struggle presently employed by authentic Nationalist radicals after all these methods are all we have available to us.

Australian Nationalists have only the electoral system, the internet and the private meeting available as reliable fora; our activism takes place where it always has in our country: in the back rooms of pubs, on the worksites, in private suburban gatherings and now, online, our version of the sympathetic print media.

Unless we, by some stroke of fortune, attract a benefactor, a modern day J.F. Archibald figure then we are stuck with the un-glamorous lot of the grassroots, working class activist.

We would love to go poncing about the CBD in full regalia, with marching bands and eagle standards, or go tearing around the hinterland in our utes, bearded and armed to the teeth; the reality is though that White Australians would either laugh us out of existence, or beat the snot out of us every time we stepped out of our front doors.

download-6
Arthur Calwell, no flags, no uniforms, just honest Aussie nationalism