THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

What do you do with the UPF? If you’re Facebook, you shut down their main page. So what do THEY then do? They migrate as much Zionist supporting material as they can to sister pages and to their Reclaim Australia – West Australia Rally page.

In every quote to the media, however, you will find their leadership claiming to be ‘nationalist’ and not ‘patriot’ which is such a conscious delineation that its intention is coldly clear to true Australian nationalists.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

On the same page (RA-WA) you will find a link to a True Blue Crew flag march where Whiteness is heavily emphasised. Then it’s back to the kosher meal of every possible Zionist-related entity they chug up – Britain First and Tommy Robinson shares right there in among them.

Well, they know by now; surely they aren’t naive. They know that promoting ultra-Zionists like Avi Yemini is a contradiction in terms to the single-minded cause of fighting Islamic extremism. Ultra-Zionists like Avi and his fellow countrymen create such extremism. They do so both by having manufactured ISIS, so as to pit them against the unfriendly Moslems on their list – and by continually stoking bloody conflict in the region.

The perennial program of destabilisation establishes a power balance that benefits the security of the state of Israel and services whatever objectives its allies may have in the region. But it also does something else – and has done so since the 1970s – it creates a mass migration of Middle Easterners into Australia.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

What does this portend for the ‘nationalism’ that they claim to be championing, having knowingly appropriated the term from staunch supporters of a new White Australia Policy? It kills it because those same Zionists do everything possible to eradicate such nationalist beliefs. They do more though — they align with the Left to attack serious nationalists such as we saw recently with Fairfax’s criminal toll Luke McMahon, who is known to have ties with Zionist-convert Neil Erikson.

Erikson, along with Nick Folkes, Howard Crawford, Scott Moerland and others have campaigned heavily against true nationalists. We are not at all surprised to find the UPF making the self-defeating move to once again associate with these cagey globalists in the hope of puffing up their waning profile.

Thus, nationalists for a White Australia become treated worse than kiddy fiddlers, and the planes keep flying more and more Indians, Chinese, Africans and MOSLEMS from the Middle East. The cathartic activity of stoking enmity against Islam merely gives a moral license to our globalist government to support military crimes in the Middle East which benefit Israel.

In this battle, all those values that Australians regarded as part of their birthright are trampled on. Zionists in Australia, while demanding racial and religious homogeneity at home, are forever insisting on total diversity for Australia and all White countries.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

This diversity has transformed our cities into utterly foreign destinations. The quarter-acre home has been replaced by towering (shoddily built) concrete toolboxes crammed with Chinese and Indians; the odour of their spicy cooking permeating the streets.

Australia needs reclaiming from all of this, not just one particular branch of this allegedly diverse community.

It is not the Indians, Africans, or Chinese who are losing their identities. They’ve never had it so sweet. While White Australians are slowly being discouraged from even considering ourselves Australian, this new population get dual identities. They get to be Indian AND Australian; they get to be African AND Australian, and they get to be Chinese AND Australian.

Islam is just a symptom of this single world government that has its master Zionist America. But while all these terms we throw about ‘Zionist’ ‘civic patriot’ and whatever might confuse the casual punter it is all quite simple. Unless you live in one of those last posts White Australian areas that are only ‘gradually’ being de-Europeanised you only have to take a walk, open your eyes, and smell the pungent waft of curry.

What difference does Islam make if – in the highly improbable event of removing it – you do so only to find yourself a stranger in your own country, shivering and alone among a new population of aliens? What will you reclaim then?

Wake up to the Zionists — you are being used.

C1ePePgVEAAVEM4
Avi Yemini, the ultra-Zionist who is now the darling of the civic patriots now calling themselves Australian ‘nationalists’

PATRIOTS, LOOK TO THE SOUTH AND THE DESTINY OF YOUR PEOPLE!

PATRIOTS, LOOK TO THE SOUTH AND THE DESTINY OF YOUR PEOPLE!

Once again the Nationalists are bound to respond to further provocation from the civic patriots. The appropriation of the description “nationalism”, by groups who, despite affecting patriotic airs, still have a wholly globalist-liberal outlook is unacceptable and demands a stern reply.

One of the key elements of our Australian Nationalism is the concept of independence from foreign or imperial powers; we reject absolutely the rule of the British monarchy, the resurgent imperialism of the Chinese, Americans and Russians or the soft Jihad of the Sunni Islamists.

Certain people need to get it into their heads that Australia is a young country of the global south, that we must look to ourselves, to the south, for inspiration in matters of national identity.

It is unacceptable for any Australian political operator to adopt the name Nationalist while his gaze is still directed to the north, while he still hangs on every word emanating from so-called “patriots” of the old world he can never be a true patriot to his own nation, which is of the new world.

Take, as an example, Donald Trump, a figure whose brand of populist showmanship is much in vogue among the yokels and numbskulls currently enamoured of civic patriotism.

The appropriation of the description “nationalism”, by groups who, despite affecting patriotic airs, still have a wholly globalist-liberal outlook is unacceptable and demands a stern reply.

We at UNA have previously written on the character both of the man and the Trump administration so our readers will not be shocked by our criticism of his agenda or leadership style.

Trump’s treatment of Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany during her recent state visit to the U.S.A is telling.

images (6)
The Donald’s hand will need amputating after touching her

Naturally Mrs Merkel’s politics are basically incompatible with our own ideals, however, the manner in which president Trump publicly humiliated her revealed him as the worst kind of imperialist thug; he displayed the manners of a tyrant dealing with an errant vassal. Having said, he should have nutted her, and then broken both her ankles for destroying Europe.

Trump should be no hero of patriots, no matter their national or racial background, in Trump is manifested the old-school colonial bully, the big country kicking the little country; his treatment of middle tier players, such as the Germans, bodes not well for little countries such as Australia.

We see also, in the Australian patriot circles the idolatry of foreign nationalist movements, the promotion of their activism and even attempts to transplant such groups down under; this is without the patriots having much of an idea about what these groups stand for.

We at UNA have previously written on the character both of the man and the Trump administration so our readers will not be shocked by our criticism of his agenda or leadership style.

UNA are, of course, interested in overseas nationalist movements but having had some interaction with various groups, particularly in Europe we are well placed to point out that many such organisations are extremely xenophobic; they are often hostile even toward sympathetic people if they are from a different European national background.

The language barrier is also a major hurdle, we cannot be sure where, say, Polish, Hungarian, or Russian nationalists stand on certain issues because they do not distribute their platforms in English, or that they simply do not use social media much at all.

Australian patriots seem to be dazzled by the large rallies held in some of the European capitals, the footage from Russia Today or Reuters looks impressive to those who see such displays as central to their cause; but who are the groups facilitating the marches? What is their reputation among the working classes, are they connected to the state or foreign governments and so forth?

We know for a fact that some European nationalists are tolerant of Shia Islam, or of certain other immigrant groups and native-born, non-European people with whom they share some common cause. That is, of course, their own business but rather than idolising foreign groups, or simply copying their aesthetics, the Australian patriots, as we say, need to look to the south for inspiration; the old-world groups may look flash in Youtube clips, but unless you speak their language fluently it is hard to know what you are imitating.

The other bone we at UNA have to pick with the civic patriots is this conflation of the foreign Islamist threat with current affairs in Australia; one example might be the elevation to folk devil status of the presently incarcerated troublemaker Anjem Choudhary.

The language barrier is also a major hurdle, we cannot be sure where, say, Polish, Hungarian, or Russian nationalists stand on certain issues because they do not distribute their platforms in English, or that they simply do not use social media much at all.

Choudhary is a U.K based Islamist loudmouth whose career was given a massive boost by the indulgence of mainstream media outlets. The BBC, Sky TV and others gave him a platform to spread his nonsense and he allowed the media to make him into a sort of Emmanuel Goldstein figure, against which all and sundry could rant and rave to blow off steam.

Australian Nationalists realise that the threat from political Islamism and the wider, nihilistic Jihadist worldview is real, that due to the nature of the religion this menace does spread through ostensibly “peaceful” dialogue by diaspora Muslims; however, Anjem Choudhary could never have had the profile he did in the U.K in our country.

Islamic march in Wootton Bassett cancelled
Anjem Choudhary’s likeness will soon appear on the five pound note

The Australian media would not allow a radical Islamist the airtime needed to become a folk devil, mainly, we suspect, because most editors and producers within the system are wary of promoting anything which could lead to a negative perception of Muslims.

Furthermore, Choudhary’s sophistry and the way he always just skirted the anti-terrorism laws by choosing his words carefully would not wash in this country; he would likely have been jailed a lot sooner here than he was in the U.K.

In the end, this idolatry of the European political movements and excessive focus on the social problems of the northern hemisphere is counterproductive.

Australian Nationalists realise that the threat from political Islamism and the wider, nihilistic Jihadist worldview is real, that due to the nature of the religion this menace does spread through ostensibly “peaceful” dialogue by diaspora Muslims; however, Anjem Choudhary could never have had the profile he did in the U.K in our country.

Looking longingly at groups, who by virtue of existing in far more populous, and for that matter densely populated countries can obviously put more feet on the street than Australian patriots leads only to a paralysing sense of ennui, which we have seen occur time and time again.

We urge all patriots to stop fumbling around, to cease the promotion to the Australian workers and marginalised people of foreign nationalist ideas, which you only half understand.
It is time to give up the support for the imperialist gangster Donald Trump and the hollow populism of Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen or Pauline Hanson.

White Australians, the only true Aussies, already have a brand of political nationalism which was laid out by our recent forefathers with the express intention of creating a truly progressive society, a system where White men and women could thrive and authentic social justice could be achieved.

The radicals of UNA and our friends in other nationalist groups will continue to promote the ideals of White Australia, the only form Australian nationalism can realistically take; as for the civic patriots, the time has come to make a choice.

Will they continue to play silly games, to cast their gaze back at the old world and avoid taking responsibility for their race and nation?

Or will they, sometime soon, look to the South, as all true nationalists do and begin to really care about the destiny of their own people, the White Australians?

whiteaustraliablackhistory
Fixed!

ON THE RELATIVE UTILITIES OF ISLAMISM AND NEO-NAZISM IN A NATIONAL MOVEMENT FOR DEMOCRATIC CHANGE

ON THE RELATIVE UTILITIES OF ISLAMISM AND NEO-NAZISM IN A NATIONAL MOVEMENT FOR DEMOCRATIC CHANGE

Never fear comrades, that overly wordy headline is mere meme fodder for our opposition; granted, depending on whether the critic is a dumb right-winger or a dumb Antifa, our enemies naturally assume that we are either closet Nazis or Jihadis-in-waiting anyway.

What we intend to explore in this article are the relative theoretical merits of these two ideals and the tactical advantages, if any, which would accrue to a Nationalist movement should it decide to take either of the two courses.

Due to a lack of imagination on the part of the enemies of White Australia we, the Nationalists, are frequently tarred with the epithet “Nazi” in an effort to shame and silence any dissent against the globalist liberal world order.

goughwhitlam
Gough Whitlam was Australia’s first true Nazi

This tactic would probably have worked in, say, the 1970’s when the people who actually had a stake in the Fascist-Anti Fascist struggle were still active participants in our society, as opposed to drooling dementia patients.

The trouble is that in 2017 there are so few people left who could legitimately take offence at Neo-Nazi posturing, based on prior real life experiences, that the whole Antifa psychodrama requires a predilection to daydreaming and delusions of grandeur.

On whose behalf are the latter day Anti-Fascists mobilising? The dead? Those yet unborn but theoretically prone to victimisation? Imaginary victims of imaginary regimes?

Due to a lack of imagination on the part of the enemies of White Australia we, the Nationalists, are frequently tarred with the epithet “Nazi” in an effort to shame and silence any dissent against the globalist liberal world order.

More to the point, if Neo-Nazism was a viable tool in our national struggle why would us Nationalists have any qualms about donning our brown shirts and jodhpurs and simply getting on with the job?

Nazism, or Fascism, are ideas so at odds with the White Australian character and temperament that it is surely no mystery as to why our forebears so enthusiastically resisted their original proponents in the 1930’s and 1940’s.

491014a04e9929fe0590ff5f91d83a05
Paul Hogan in his Nazi phase

Could anyone seriously contemplate the rise of a Hitlerian-Aussie strongman in the Australia of 2017?

The closest we have ever come to that type of personality cult was, we suppose, the Whitlam years; yet old Gough was seen publicly, even by his fans, as the pompous, impatient and imperious individual that he surely was and he was mercilessly lampooned as a result.

Australians hate tall poppies, we cannot stand politicians or public figures who will not exhibit the traditional humility and conservatism expected of adults in our society; a Hitler-like figure could never survive in a nation where merely buying a new car can lead to assumptions by the neighbours that one is “too big for his boots”.

Nazism, or Fascism, are ideas so at odds with the White Australian character and temperament that it is surely no mystery as to why our forebears so enthusiastically resisted their original proponents in the 1930’s and 1940’s.

In recent years several people have attempted this type of fuhrerprinzip approach to Aussie street movements and ended up as laughingstocks; true, they lacked the intelligence and life experience of an old school Nazi, like Hitler, but they also lacked his personal modesty and self-effacing manner.

Neo-Nazism, to the Nationalists then, is worse than useless because, even stylistically, it is an affront to the national character of our people; among a nation wary of show ponies and wise to the ways of narcissistic blowhards and con artists it is simply a non-starter.

r811816_7259142
Arthur C. Smith, leader of the Australian Nazi Party circa 1964

Taken in that light the accusations of Nazism thrown our way are simply slurs intended to imply that Nationalists are stupid; the implication being that we are intent on employing tactics which could never work. However, we are clearly not stupid people though and having limited resources with which to run our campaigns we simply do not have the luxury of using dumb tactics which could never bear fruit for an Australian political movement.

The Left and Right wingers, by contrast, can get away with peddling nonsense and play-acting at anachronistic, 20th century politics due to the largesse of their benefactors; that is to say it’s pretty easy to pretend to be a Patriot, Trotskyite or Anarchist when you have the resources of the Jewish community, a trade union or a university to back you up.

Radical, Jihadist Islam, on the other hand, is a somewhat trickier subject; not least because it is a current — one might say eternal — stream of political thought and action bubbling away beneath the surface of world affairs, whereas Nazism has been dead for nigh on four generations.

Neo-Nazism, to the Nationalists then, is worse than useless because, even stylistically, it is an affront to the national character of our people; among a nation wary of show ponies and wise to the ways of narcissistic blowhards and con artists it is simply a non-starter.

Indeed White Nationalism in the broad sense, over the past fifteen years, has been fending off interlopers who, seduced by the apparent machismo and dash of the Jihadist gangs and dazzled by their open anti-Semitism, seek to create some detente between, or worse, fusion, of Islamic radicalism and pan-Europeanism.

These pernicious orientalists seem to be convinced that, in the hands of Whites at least, Islam could become something other than it has always been; that is to say that in the right hands there could be a real “golden age” where capitalism is overthrown, the Jews are servile dhimmis, the women kept barefoot and pregnant and all the better aspects of Sharia provide peace and plenty for all.

naziscan1
Before the Interwebs

Apart from the fact that these serial pests are almost always fruitcakes, stereotypical “racist” morons, bitter misogynists, or all three, there is the intractable problem of the Arab supremacism at the heart of Islam.

All roads lead to Mecca, all decisions on the future of the Ummah are taken by Islamic jurists in countries like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Egypt and Morocco; Islam is a religion centred on the orient, all of its traditions stem from the lands to the south and east of the Bosphorus.

Nationalist radicals understand the attraction of this way of thinking, in theory a mass conversion of Nationalists to Islam and the adoption of Jihadism would appear to be a path of least resistance; one could theoretically speak one’s mind and enjoy the protection of Australia’s de facto blasphemy laws, section 18c and the state human rights regimes.

Apart from the fact that these serial pests are almost always fruitcakes, stereotypical “racist” morons, bitter misogynists, or all three, there is the intractable problem of the Arab supremacism at the heart of Islam.

Presumably once a certain critical mass had been reached funds would begin flowing toward this all White, Islamo-racist cult from the gulf states and elsewhere, an insurgency against the globalist liberal order would ensue and the system would be overthrown.

Hardly, for one thing, the central issue here is ethnicity, it should be well understood by now that none of the protections afforded to Muslims by the current human rights framework apply to White Australians; so should some bright spark decide to call a “White Jihad” he might expect to be quickly snatched from his bed by the security services and then find himself buried alive in his local Supermax prison.

Imagine, if you can, a group of White men organising a stand alone group along the lines of Hizb-ut-Tahrir, holding rallies railing against the Zionist entity, issuing guidelines for the discipline of wives and female relatives and calling for death to unbelievers.

Muslim radicals have been pepper sprayed and set upon by police dogs conducting such activities even though they are under special protection by the state; we feel confident that any White power Islamists might be met with far more oppressive violence from the authorities.

In common with Nazism, Islamism is also at its core a multi-ethnic, internationalist creed; outfits styled after the Waffen SS and the early Jihadis would be, if true to the ideals of their forebears, compelled to admit anyone with the desired fanaticism and ambition, regardless of national origin.

Imagine, if you can, a group of White men organising a stand alone group along the lines of Hizb-ut-Tahrir, holding rallies railing against the Zionist entity, issuing guidelines for the discipline of wives and female relatives and calling for death to unbelievers.

Well, comrades, as edifying as this discussion of useless ideologies and tactics has been, we must here defend the modes of struggle presently employed by authentic Nationalist radicals after all these methods are all we have available to us.

Australian Nationalists have only the electoral system, the internet and the private meeting available as reliable fora; our activism takes place where it always has in our country: in the back rooms of pubs, on the worksites, in private suburban gatherings and now, online, our version of the sympathetic print media.

Unless we, by some stroke of fortune, attract a benefactor, a modern day J.F. Archibald figure then we are stuck with the un-glamorous lot of the grassroots, working class activist.

We would love to go poncing about the CBD in full regalia, with marching bands and eagle standards, or go tearing around the hinterland in our utes, bearded and armed to the teeth; the reality is though that White Australians would either laugh us out of existence, or beat the snot out of us every time we stepped out of our front doors.

download-6
Arthur Calwell, no flags, no uniforms, just honest Aussie nationalism

CONSERVATIVE MUSLIMS ARE NO MATCH FOR PROGRESSIVES

CONSERVATIVE MUSLIMS ARE NO MATCH FOR PROGRESSIVES

In our ongoing campaign against Islamophobic conservatives, self-styled civic patriots and those whose primary goal is protecting the interests of the Zionist entity, Nationalists are frequently accused of being “soft” on Islam.

We use the attack word, Islamophobia, in its proper context; that is to say that, in most cases, our enemies on the right are not capable of thinking clearly, nor of behaving rationally around the subject of Islam and Muslims.

It is a fact that the line pushed by these Zio-patriots has become the basis of an asocial internet cult for lonely, dysfunctional and depressed workers and marginalised people.

We hear often enough that it’s better to feel as though one belongs to something bigger than the sum of its parts, even if the whole program is flawed and most of the followers know that the emperor has no clothes.

As any frequent reader of our Nationalist media will observe, the main grievances against Islam expressed by the patriots are fear mongering of one sort or another, or ephemera and trivia gleaned from overseas news sources and conflated with events closer to home.

Nationalists really do not care about the inhabitants of, say Mauritania, Afghanistan or Bangladesh; it is none of our concern whether Islamic jurists push onerous Sharia laws upon the peasants of those regions; nor do we care about the status of women and minorities living under those regimes.

It is a fact that the line pushed by these Zio-patriots has become the basis of an asocial internet cult for lonely, dysfunctional and depressed workers and marginalised people.

We don’t feel the need to mention Islam in every single article we pen or to bring discussions of genital mutilation, halal slaughter or terrorism into our readers’ news feeds simply to shock and traumatise them into supporting a particular point of view.

Islam and Muslims in Australia are, as we see it, at a crossroads of sorts in that by allowing themselves to be manipulated into supporting progressive identity politics they have shackled themselves to a doomed project.

Tobes.png
Progressive Moslem, Toby Cook, is a member of multiracial Civic Nationalist Party for Freedom

As any White Nationalist knows, the whole progressive programme is calculated to bring about absolute equality of all people, by any means necessary, up to and including waging wars of aggression and imperialist adventures.

Since the end of the great European fratricide of the 20th century, progressive subversion has been directed to the sole purpose of eradicating the national, spiritual and communal life of all the White groups across the globe.

It is to this project, genocide according to the rules laid down by progressives themselves, that the modern Australian Muslim, whether he agrees with it or not, finds himself shackled via the umbilical cord of identity politics.

As any White Nationalist knows, the whole progressive programme is calculated to bring about absolute equality of all people, by any means necessary, up to and including waging wars of aggression and imperialist adventures.

The patriots own rhetoric, addled as it is, clearly announces that their targets are Islam and the Left, whom they see as allies at least, co-conspirators at worst; Muslims are therefore held to be equally culpable for the actions of their progressive allies.

We already see Islam in Australia being re-defined by progressives and attempts made to philosophically and physically reconstruct that religion into something which, like the “reformed” Christian and Jewish movements, can be slaved to the globalist liberal project.

The Islamic State group, which all well-informed people regard as a literal manifestation of Mohammedan teachings, routinely berates Muslims in the west for their subservience to the progressive cause, after their duty to their god the main talking point expressed by these Jihadists is the desire to crush the decadent, degenerate and weakened progressive western nations.

27df95e
When you see this logo, you know that you will not be blown up without a damn good reason… like, you insulted trannies

As the progressives would have it, however, Islam’s inbuilt militancy and its demands for conquest can be simply sidestepped by liberal reforms to the faith; we see a desire among progressives to neuter Islam, to transform it into something like the Uniting Church.

As all clear thinking people know, though, the progressive project has proven itself to be useless at reconstructing national, ethnic and religious groups via liberal reforms; rather they tend to kill these things with kindness, so to speak, the treatment of Aboriginal children and wards of the state in the 20th century are but two examples.

Muslims would be well advised to avoid entanglements with the progressives since, from the White population, there is already great enmity toward their oriental faith and its adherents just on the basis of its basic incompatibility with our way of life; alliances with the widely hated progressives only strengthen the conviction that there must be something on the nose in Islam.

As the progressives would have it, however, Islam’s inbuilt militancy and its demands for conquest can be simply sidestepped by liberal reforms to the faith; we see a desire among progressives to neuter Islam, to transform it into something like the Uniting Church.

Islam in Australia can only ever return to what it was before the 1990’s, a little known but tolerated minority grouping which stood aloof from the mainstream and stayed out of politics.

Any opportunism by Muslims while under the wing of the progressives will backfire due mainly to the fact that, while many are prepared to ignore Muslims most of the time, a good many of our people seek to crush the progressives and globalist liberals.

download-1
Tolerance of other religions could be taken as insufficient devotion to your own

The Zio-patriots claim to have solutions to the “Muslim problem”, all of which are ill-conceived, immoral, impractical and, if carried to fruition, would likely see any hypothetical “Patriotic” government hauled before the International Criminal Court on charges of committing acts in preparation for genocide.

The Nationalists Primary Solution, however, the move to heavy immigration restriction would see adherents of Islam in Australia having to fall back on their own resources; with foreign-born Imams and Muslim immigrants unable to enter the country, coupled with the removal of state funding for all faith-based schools we would naturally expect the character of the local Islamic community to change over time.

Under current immigration rules, foreign-born people with serious criminal offences to their names can be deported to their home country, in most cases; the issue of immigrant crime could be largely solved by tightening this regime to include charges arising from less serious anti-social behaviour, such as persistent flouting of the road rules, habitual drug use, welfare fraud and so forth.

Any opportunism by Muslims while under the wing of the progressives will backfire due mainly to the fact that, while many are prepared to ignore Muslims most of the time, a good many of our people seek to crush the progressives and globalist liberals.

Further to that, allowing aspiring Jihadis to leave the country forever, to renounce their citizenship and leave Australia for whatever fate their god has in store for them on a one-way ticket would go some way to solving the expensive and time-consuming problem of detecting and preventing such excursions.

As we can see, under the Nationalist Primary Solution, the more troublesome aspects of hosting a Muslim minority, the crime, the problematic religious fanaticism and anti-social behaviour could be alleviated, if not removed altogether, all by peaceful, legal means.

Jamal ud-Din Arrest
A world of regret in the making

You see, comrades, Nationalists have no interest in traumatising the whole country with pogroms, deportations and persecution of people who have done nothing wrong; can you imagine what rounding up and deporting close to half a million people would do to our society?

Our Primary Solution puts the ball in the court of the Muslims, if we rid their community of troublemakers, parasites and fanatics but otherwise leave them alone, then they have the option of living here as a minority with all the same rights and obligations as everyone else.

If however, they want a more authentic life in submission to Allah then there are over 50 countries which would be able to provide just that.

As we can see, under the Nationalist Primary Solution, the more troublesome aspects of hosting a Muslim minority, the crime, the problematic religious fanaticism and anti-social behaviour could be alleviated, if not removed altogether, all by peaceful, legal means.

As it stands, though, the Muslim minority in Australia is being led down the path to further conflict with Australians due to the opportunism and corruption of their spokesmen, the infiltration of the faith by progressives and converts with other agendas besides religion and the subversion of traditional values by Leftist and liberal reformers.

The real choice for Muslims is not East vs West, it is whether they want to live their lives as they choose, albeit with no support for their faith from the state; or whether they will allow progressives to reform Islam and remake it according to their ideals.

The reality is that Muslims have to ask themselves if they want their faith to become a joke, like some of the progressive, mainstream Christian churches.

Does anyone, in fact really want to see secularised Mosques under the direction of, say, transvestite Imams as the call to prayer is delivered by a White, Lesbian Muezzin? How would that ensure peace and good order in our most “vibrant” suburbs?

download-2
See, it’s like… um… you know when… ah, fuck it

COME IN, RECLAIM AUSTRALIA, YOUR TIME IS UP

COME IN, RECLAIM AUSTRALIA, YOUR TIME IS UP

Reclaim Australia was posed with the unavoidable reality that they could not even reclaim Martin Place at their rally from last Sunday, 29, January. Nope, it was totally owned by seagulls and pigeons and a lot of cops in blue overalls.

But aside from the vast big nothingness that was the (non) attendance is the baffling riddles it leaves behind.

Reclaim Australia adopted a stringent policy of discouraging entry to anyone from the White Pride side of the fence. In fact, it denied anyone from just the nationalist side of the fence. What’s more, it even frowned on avowed civic patriots such as the United Patriots Front after comments made by Blair Cottrell about Adolf Hitler’s bestseller which was re-contextualised by certain grubby ex-comrades of his with an axe to grind.

16358673_392143191149066_1116181990_n.jpg
Blair Cottrell with a fully Aussie member of Peanuts for Freedom. Remember, you cannot unsee this

The previous Sunday’s showdown with the forces of Islam and the Left was to be the purest of the pure: the super middle-of-the-road, no ‘White Pride’, no ‘Nazi salutes’, no ‘boneheads’ crystallisation of the absolute cream of the mums and dads.This is why nobody turned up. But it was those who DID attend that throw the very logic of RA into a steep perplexing curve.

Aside from an image of Blair Cottrell standing beside an Asian Peanuts for Freedom volunteer was that of Sammy “Hooligal” Binz flanking Rise Up Australia’s Rosalie Crestani.

The previous Sunday’s showdown with the forces of Islam and the Left was to be the purest of the pure: the super middle-of-the-road, no ‘White Pride’, no ‘Nazi salutes’, no ‘boneheads’ crystallisation of the absolute cream of the mums and dads.This is why nobody turned up. But it was those who DID attend that throw the very logic of RA into a steep perplexing curve.

Now, Sammy has a quite visible tattoo of a swastika just below her neck and above her right breast. Sammy is about as 14/88 as it gets. Rosalie, on the other hand, belongs to a ministry run by a short curry who claims to talk to God. Oh yeah, and who raises the dead from time to time in-between bottling chutney.

What’s more, this ministry is totally down with Israel and believes the Jews are the chosen ones who deserve to enslave all of goyimkind. Sammy used to comment on UNA so it would be assumed that she knew this from our endless articles criticising the civics. There is no way she could have missed our denunciations of their denunciations of us nationalists.

sammyandrosalie
Some geezer, Rosalie “For God and Israel” Crestani, and Sammy Binz, who seems to have forgotten the 14 words

You would have assumed Ralph “the Nazi Hunter” Cerminara who was in also in attendance would have sniffed the Blood and Honour off this girl a mile off. We are not suggesting that any of the cucked civics were aware of her background but she certainly doesn’t look like one of them, with her Skin-girl style.

We do not pretend to have any answers about that, by the way, just questions which we are not overly interested in having answered.

The principle organiser, so we understand, was Scott Moerland who is the absolute personification of zero. He drinks, he peppers every sentence with cussing, and he believes Jews are the duck’s guts. There is no talking sense to ‘Scotty’ on anything. He could be standing there with his pants on fire and if you told him he would deny it. Scotty is as thick as they come.

You would have assumed Ralph “the Nazi Hunter” Cerminara who was in also in attendance would have sniffed the Blood and Honour off this girl a mile off. We are not suggesting that any of the cucked civics were aware of her background but she certainly doesn’t look like one of them, with her Skin-girl style.

Other than that, was the usual attendance from the cast of Peanuts for Freedom. Nick Folkes was there as was his blubbery sidekick Tobes who seems to have ballooned into morbid obesity. As usual, there was no excuse for any of them. Blair seemed to get along with them though, but perhaps he didn’t. Who the fucks knows. Or cares. His presence was unconvincing on a curious level.

But it is time for that lot to face the hard realities that their day in the sun is over. It is kaput. It has ceased to be. There is nothing left but memories and court dates. It is the end of an era, and these brazen patriots, who rejected all association with nationalists, who ratted us out, and made it known we were not welcome at their rallies — totally failed to make a difference.

There is not much else to say but it is over. The fat lady has sung. Come in, Reclaim Australia, your time is up.

Garden Fantail Pigeon (Columba livia) walking
Come to the rally, they said, there’ll be heaps of people there, they said

THE GENESIS OF THE PATRIOT MOVEMENT

THE GENESIS OF THE PATRIOT MOVEMENT

The Rise and Fall of the Patriot Movement: Part Two

Pauline Hanson’s Zionist Connection – Malcolm Roberts, The Ziopatriots And The Liberals In The Mix

By Dr. Jim Saleam

untitled3
A properly instructed Australian Patriot knows where his allegiances lie

Pauline Hanson says some basic truths about Australia’s Muslim minority. Yes, they don’t seem to respect Australian values. Yes, some would live by Sharia law. Yes, some try to impose Halal food upon one and all.  And agreed, there is a danger in allowing Muslim immigration and there is a real and present danger from Muslim terrorists.

Yet, she has also said: her party has Muslim members and she only opposes radical Islam and not Islam in Australia; her programme says that refugees (sic), many of whom are Muslims, may ultimately become citizens.

Talk about inconsistency! What is this ‘populist’ politician really all about? Indeed, it is enough to cause patriotic people to turn away. Many are.However, there is something else.  I think it is sinister.

Yet, she has also said: her party has Muslim members and she only opposes radical Islam and not Islam in Australia; her programme says that refugees (sic), many of whom are Muslims, may ultimately become citizens.

Essentially, Pauline Hanson has been deathly silent about the origins of the current Muslim terrorist danger and for all of her ‘speaking up for people’, there is nothing, absolutely nothing in her pronouncements about our government’s knowledge of the financial and military connections between our ‘allies’ (the USA, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Qatar and Turkey) and the rise of ISIS and the on-going terrorism of al Qaeda. These connections play out right now on the Syrian battlefields as the Russians are telling us.

Then, there is nothing about the perverted attempt to overthrow President Assad in Syria, courtesy of our allies, employing these very terrorists and other stooges who have reduced the country to chaos – causing millions of ‘refugees’ to have streamed out of the country. There is nothing about President Assad wanting those refugees to return home. If terrorism can be spread by ‘blowback’, Australians have the right to know. Blowback? If the terrorists were, or maybe still are, occasionally in the employ of ‘the West’ and its allies with all the problems that can cause, it is a scandal of the highest order. It begs a thousand questions.

Essentially, Pauline Hanson has been deathly silent about the origins of the current Muslim terrorist danger and for all of her ‘speaking up for people’, there is nothing, absolutely nothing in her pronouncements about our government’s knowledge of the financial and military connections between our ‘allies’ (the USA, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Qatar and Turkey) and the rise of ISIS and the on-going terrorism of al Qaeda.

This material would be dynamite if launched in the Senate. Of course, Pauline Hanson is in the Senate and reasonably knows of the data. We can only conclude that the Hansonites do not want this information to get wider coverage. Do they fear its release? Is that because it eats right into the fabric of state decision-making and this is a dangerous subject to talk about? Is it easier just to make noises about ‘Islam’?

Meantime, Australia First Party and its friends struggle to get the information into the public arena as best we can. This party will get better at it. We are obliged to note that the Hansonites shun this truth. We have come to suspect it goes beyond opportunism and fear of condemnation by the big parties and the media.

The problem may lie deep in the belly of the new One Nation. For us, it is the Zionist connection of the new One Nation which is the issue here.

I must now refer to Malcolm Roberts.

MALCOLM ROBERTS ENTERS THE GAME

The original One Nation party had its Svengali in David Oldfield, an opportunist but still a Liberal and friend of Tony Abbott, who set it up alongside Hanson. As he was later to say in the New South Wales Legislative Assembly, “the aim of One Nation was to make the Liberal Party more right wing”. Or as we might say: the aim was to anchor dissent close to the Liberal Party so at a certain point, the Liberals could rein it in – as they did. He kept Hanson to the straight and narrow and even when the Liberals (through Abbott in fact) decided to deflate their own balloon by gaoling Hanson, the Svengali escaped prosecution.

malcolm-roberts
For Malcolm Roberts, trying NOT to look like he is about to do homicide, is a full-time occupation. This is what earned him the nickname “Mad dog Mal”

The new Svengali is Malcolm Roberts (aka ‘Mad dog Mal’) who, if he is to be believed, has said that he may not even vote the same way as Pauline Hanson in the Senate and he has told her so. Such latitude to an underling!  As Hanson tells it, she met him and approached him to join her Senate ticket. We might better suspect that the two were melded by the interests who lurk behind Roberts. Thanks to further investigations, even those of mainstream media in their capacity of ‘’reporting’, these interests have become known.

The new Svengali is Malcolm Roberts who, if he is to be believed, has said that he may not even vote the same way as Pauline Hanson in the Senate and he has told her so. Such latitude to an underling! 

Malcolm Roberts entered the comity of so-called ‘right wing groups’ in Queensland via his role as a member of the Galileo movement. This movement, founded in February 2011, is the ‘climate sceptic’ group, financially supported by billionaire oligarch, Gina Rinehart. Its patron was radio impresario Alan Jones, a Liberal and (pseudo) Hanson supporter.

images-2
The best thing about Zio patriotism is that you can come from anywhere in the world, be any colour, and still get to be a fully wakkas Aussie champ

The climate sceptics were of great interest to the Liberals and to the conservatives in general. In particular, during the period after the elevation of Julia Gillard to the position of Prime Minister in 2010, a Liberal mobilisation got under way with the intention of driving her from office and installing a new Liberal Party government. I am not arguing here one way or the other that the climate sceptics may have a point or two, I am merely saying that they were of service (and still are) to the Liberals and those who finance them. They are certainly of service of Gina Rinehart who wants to export coal and other minerals for the ‘dirty’ and polluting factories of China.

For some time, Tony Abbott marketed himself as a sceptic and Senator Cory Bernardi certainly so. Their status inter-links them with a mass of well-meaning conservatives who can then be manipulated. The Liberal connected Institute of Public Affairs has from its inception, played a shadowy role in organizing the climate sceptics. And today, Abbott and Bernardi feature strongly in the ‘conservative movement’, they romance Pauline Hanson (who has forgiven Abbott for gaoling her) and then provide focus for little would-be patriots of all sorts.

The climate sceptics were of great interest to the Liberals and to the conservatives in general. In particular, during the period after the elevation of Julia Gillard to the position of Prime Minister in 2010, a Liberal mobilisation got under way with the intention of driving her from office and installing a new Liberal Party government.

A Climate Sceptics Party had already formed in 2007 and a “club” came into being in the Sydney suburb of Five Dock to provide a venue for them. Libertarians and other conservatives (sic) flocked there. Ziopatriots (a patriot who believes support for Israel and Zionism defines his worldview) found the atmosphere congenial. Supporters of Ziopatriot Nick Folkes and his Party for Freedom would attend after 2012. Bob Vinnecombe, a former One Nation official and Ziopatriot, the half-mad Lex Stewart (one of the founders of the original One Nation) and many other identities operated out of there.

Malcolm Roberts and (now Senator) Brian Burston during the 2016 election campaign used it as a venue to rally their foot soldiers. The Sydney Traditionalists, a student-centred Liberal group, also sent members there; these ‘Trads’ were also friends of Bernardi and had connections with the shadowy Howard Crawford of the Liberal Party’s dirty tricks group. We shall meet Crawford again. Basically, such a club provides the grounds for cross-fertilisation and common action, a germ pool for new initiatives. It will attract that sort of ‘conservative’ who will suggest action outside the Liberal Party is necessary to ‘save the country’, but through these connections is subordinated to Liberal party requirements – which are to corral this dissent and remobilize it to serve Liberal interests.

two
Howard Crawford demonstrates the best way to choke a chicken

In Brisbane, the field was well stacked with similar stooges. A grassroots activism developed. Malcolm Roberts spoke at the anti-Carbon Tax and anti-illegal immigration rally on June 25, 2011, at Logan south of Brisbane. It was organized by the Australian Patriots Defence Movement an umbrella co-ordination group. As far as can be determined, this was the first mention of the term ‘Patriots’ in a movement title and it was the first time the term ‘Defence’ made an appearance. That was a portent of the future.

Malcolm Roberts spoke at the anti-Carbon Tax and anti-illegal immigration rally on June 25, 2011 at Logan south of Brisbane. It was organized by the Australian Patriots Defence Movement an umbrella co-ordination group. As far as can be determined, this was the first mention of the term ‘Patriots’ in a movement title and it was the first time the term ‘Defence’ made an appearance.

Two meetings occurred. The first was at the Vietnam Veterans’ Club in July followed by another in August. The Tea Party (Tea: taxed enough already, formed in 2010) leader David Goodridge is now a primary adviser to Malcolm Roberts (he was also close to the Liberals and was noted to hand out how to vote cards for them) and a part of the inner core of One Nation (Courier Mail, October 1 2016), a fact which helps centre Hanson (as we shall see) in the Zionist camp. The Tea Party led a number of anti-carbon tax rallies across the country in 2010 and 2011, one of which in Canberra was graced by ‘conservative’ Tony Abbott. Of course, it was.

033650-tony-abbott

Why do all these Zios look like close relatives of Charles Manson?

Goodridge proposed at these two Brisbane meetings resolved that Queensland Patriots (sic) would be rallied to oppose the extreme-left controlled Boycott, Disinvestment and Sanctions movement (BDS) which focused on Israel’s occupation of the rump Palestine in the West Bank and Gaza. The BDS intended to picket the Max Brenner Chocolate Shops throughout Australia, given Brenner’s business links to the Israeli Army.

The Tea Party led a number of anti-carbon tax rallies across the country in 2010 and 2011, one of which in Canberra was graced by ‘conservative’ Tony Abbott. Of course it was.

Michael Darby, a member of the Liberal Party and prominent ‘conservative’ in New South Wales, said: “Inspired by two splendid ladies, Natalie and Dani Keyes, and operating under the guidance of members of the Australian Tea Party led by David Goodridge, the numerically (and morally) superior defenders included people of all ages from teens to septuagenarians, Logan Councillors Hajnal Black and Sean Black, Malcolm Roberts of the Galileo Movement and James Darby of SBandEP.org. Several Defenders had South African accents and a dozen or more were born in Israel — God bless Israel.”

hqdefault
Before Danny Nalliah, Kamahl was the leader of the very first Australian Tea Party

Another group said of the Left: “They were met by a larger counter-protest of over 60 people from a diverse range of groups such as the Australian Tea Party, the Australian Patriots Defence Movement, student groups, Israeli community members and politicians.”

Supporting Israel and defending the Australian nexus with it are clearly goals of this new conservative mobilization. These Ziopatriots cannot conceive of a new patriotism without a reference to Israel and they are aggressive in that idea.

Malcolm Roberts, Councillor Sean Black (now a speechwriter for Hanson and member of the inner-core of One Nation and a former anti-carbon tax movement activist) and the Queensland University Liberal Club activists, all endorsed Zionism and Israel. A photograph and video of Roberts places him at the scene.

Supporting Israel and defending the Australian nexus with it are clearly goals of this new conservative mobilization. These Ziopatriots cannot conceive of a new patriotism without a reference to Israel and they are aggressive in that idea. To a participant in these Brisbane meetings, David Goodridge confided the importance of countering the extreme-left, the Left generally and the Greens over the BDS issue. The BDS movement was explained as “anti-Semitism” and “fascist” and it was explained that all patriots and conservatives should oppose BDS and support Israel. When Australia First Party was mentioned, Goodridge replied that they were “fascist” too. Goodridge drew the connection between Islam, Islamism and Muslim migrants and the danger they posed in Australia for Zionism and Israel.

A CONSTELLATION OF LIBERAL SATELLITES

At the same moment that the anti BDS people were rallying the troops in Brisbane, a group of Sydney-siders were on the same ball. The Brisbane and Sydney crews were known to each other through the anti-carbon tax movement.

The Sydney group came together in numbers on September 10, 2011. At that time, Darrin Hodges and Nick Folkes were inside the Australian Protectionist Party, trying to force it into support for Zionism. They joined up with nascent followers of the ‘Australian Defence League’ (ADL) and others to counter protest a BDS group at a Brenner chocolate shop in inner-city Newtown. Indeed, there is some evidence Hodges and Folkes were actually the initial founders of ADL in Australia, but the group moved into independent status quick enough.

darren_photolge
Darrin Hodges invented calling Nationalists Nazis. Pity he didn’t invent a normal pair of glasses

At the same moment that the anti BDS people were rallying the troops in Brisbane, a group of Sydney-siders were on the same ball. The Brisbane and Sydney crews were known to each other through the anti-carbon tax movement.

Daphne Anson, Jewish historian and rabid Zionist (the name is a pseudonym), lavished praise upon the Hodges / Folkes group for their participation in the Newtown demo. This was encouraging for them.

nig
Nick Folkes protesting White Genocide by making friends with a person of colour

Folkes hoped to get control of the ADL so he could have the link to the English Defence League and when Hodges, a wrecker and smear monger of the first rank, just walked out and quit politics Folkes still continued his approach, targeting nationalists with unremitting misinformation and outright smear. He would call nationalists “Nazis” in the hope he would be noticed as the sort of patriot (sic) Zionists could trust. He even took to writing in the letters’ columns of Jewish community newspapers. Folkes courted the support of the New South Wales Jewish leadership which is almost Zionist to a man and it is understood he had telephone conversations with prominent Zionists assuring him of his support for Israel and the need for common anti-Islam action. Did he also promise to keep misrepresenting nationalists?

Folkes courted the support of the New South Wales Jewish leadership which is almost Zionist to a man and it is understood he had telephone conversations with prominent Zionists assuring him of his support for Israel and the need for common anti-Islam action. Did he also promise to keep misrepresenting nationalists?

Stunning research by the former leader of the British National Party Nick Griffin showed conclusively that the English Defence League was a Zionist funded operation (with dollars from America) which was designed to twist the anti-immigration movement in England into an anti-Muslim movement. It was schemed it would then target other groups which were nationalist for disruption and it would create a pro-Israel propaganda for the public. The Australian case showed similarities.

nick-griffin
Nick Griffin’s Jewdar detects the English Defence League

However, rather than put their eggs all in one basket, the ADL was hived into two, an official ADL and the Patriots Defence League of Australia (PDLA), based largely in Brisbane and a descendant of the Goodrich-connected group. In Sydney, the notorious Ralph Cerminara took leadership of ADL in 2013 and maintained its website and conducted demonstrations. He occasionally demonstrated with Folkes in tow. Ziopatriot and multiracialist Shermon Burgess also made his first appearance in ADL around that time.

Folkes hoped to get control of the ADL so he could have the link to the English Defence League and when Hodges, a wrecker and smear monger of the first rank, just walked out and quit politics Folkes still continued his approach, targeting nationalists with unremitting misinformation and outright smear. He would call nationalists “Nazis” in the hope he would be noticed as the sort of patriot (sic) Zionists could trust.

For the next couple of years, the anti-Islam movement was amorphous and the province of these Defence leagues and other minor groups – and Folkes’ Freedomites. Then, in November 2014, a call went out for ‘Reclaim Australia’ rallies across the country to be held in April 2015. Reclaim would challenge the growth of Islam in Australia and its ‘danger’ to the world. It was a galvanizing moment.

The founders of the Reclaim group were non-patriot-connected people Wanda Marsh and John Oliver – but also Shermon Burgess. Catherine Brennen joined as an organizer and has said that she had never been politically active, but that the 2014 siege at the Sydney Lindt Café was a “turning point” for her. But given the Burgess link, at once the ADL, PDLA and similar groups were all over it. Pauline Hanson and Liberal Federal MP George Christensen, who to this day stays very friendly to Hanson, were speakers at its rallies in 2015. At a Brisbane rally, Hanson was shepherded by one Scott Moerland, a rabid Zionist sympathizer.

snip20151012_56
Wanda Marsh, John Oliver, and Catherine Brennen were what patriots looked like before ICE, hard liquor, and wife bashing entered the scene

For the next couple of years, the anti-Islam movement was amorphous and the province of these Defence leagues and other minor groups – and Folkes’ Freedomites. Then, in November 2014, a call went out for ‘Reclaim Australia’ rallies across the country to be held in April 2015. Reclaim would challenge the growth of Islam in Australia and its ‘danger’ to the world. It was a galvanizing moment.

What am I saying about this anti-Islam movement? Simple. Whatever the immediate origin of Reclaim, it was the perfect Liberal Party ‘movement’ satellite. It would discuss immigration as essentially a ‘Muslim’ matter and condemn those who said otherwise. It would favour diversity minus Islam as its social principle and dub nationalists as ‘racists’ or ‘Nazis’ for saying the Australian identity was ‘White’.

It would proclaim Israel a friend of Australia and condemn all those who criticised Israel. It would suggest Australia’s involvements in the Middle East were good things that were fighting ‘Islam’. With these blinkers, seeing the truths about the overthrow of Saddam Hussein or Colonel Gaddafi or the attempt at President Assad (that these things fuelled Islamism and terror and immigration and that these rulers were secular), was next to impossible and if ‘Islam’ was the enemy, then Zionism in Israel had open slather to wage war with it.

What am I saying about this anti-Islam movement? Simple. Whatever the immediate origin of Reclaim, it was the perfect Liberal Party ‘movement’ satellite. It would discuss immigration as essentially a ‘Muslim’ matter and condemn those who said otherwise. It would favour diversity minus Islam as its social principle and dub nationalists as ‘racists’ or ‘Nazis’ for saying the Australian identity was ‘White’. It would proclaim Israel a friend of Australia and condemn all those who criticised Israel.

This witches’ brew of rubbish was just too perfect, too crafted, too honed, to have fallen out of the sky. It was the product of a coven within. As a mass of new persons attached themselves, people from the patriot scene, it was clear it would not challenge the political order (it never said it would) but demand of ‘our’ politicians that they stand up and oppose ‘Islamisation’ That was more than convenient to the Liberals who had uses for it.

THE SATELLITE PAULINE HANSON’S ONE NATION PARTY

The Reclaim movement had the activist intervention of Christian Zionist Pastor Danny Nalliah and his Rise Up Australia Party (RUAP) and the Zionist Q Society. The latter has the connection to Geert Wilders, whose Party For Freedom in Holland is openly funded by Zionists in America and serves Israel as a Trojan Horse in European politics.  Wilders pushes that Europe defends Israel Again; Nick Griffin’s marvellous research for the (European) Alliance for Peace and Freedom has established the parameters of the funding given to the Wilders network.

The Q Society, with the support of Wilders, sponsored the foundation of Australian Liberty Alliance (ALA) which was gestated in 2014, registered as a party in July 2015 and launched by Wilders in person in October 2015. However, satellite politics in Australia has one great fact attached to it. The Liberal Party never operates just one satellite in any field and there are always different ones for other tasks.

download-2
Geert Wilders taught us that to be Australian meant to love Israel

The 2016 election campaign and the ‘use’ the conservative anti-Islam movement could be put to in that election — and afterwards — meant a rivalry existed between ALA and the Hanson party. The electoral victor was Hanson. When it came down to it, Hanson who had been employed as a star commentator on Channel 7 for a year had public recognition while ALA did not. Of course, the networks of Q Society and ALA are still there and may now be more closely employed to buttress Hanson at a community level.

If satellite politics is the rule of Liberal Party method, a viable corral for all ‘conservative’ and ‘patriot’ dissent must be constructed all while the public still remains volatile over immigration, globalisation, terrorism, and so forth. If we observe more of these elements drifting into the Hanson party, we can confirm the decision to buttress Hanson will have been taken. Certainly, Hanson maintains a close alliance with Rise Up Australia Party and cannot but approve of its fulsome multiracialism and its Zionism. She also enjoys the frenzied support of bit-players like Folkes and the street level anti-Islam movement. In other words, the satellite party has its own satellites!

The Q Society, with the support of Wilders, sponsored the foundation of Australian Liberty Alliance (ALA) which was gestated in 2014, registered as a party in July 2015 and launched by Wilders in person in October 2015.

The Hanson party has been kept in reserve for a long while to serve as a major satellite if new needs arose. Certainly, One Nation was founded as one, demobilized after 2003, but allowed to drift along as a nothing entity for over a decade till the call was made. Interestingly, when Hanson returned to it in 2013, she also purged it, expelling the nationalist-minded branches in Western Australia and Northern Territory and expelling many individual members elsewhere. Hanson progressively made it clear that she was tame and could be trusted with holding office.

A visible sign of Pauline’s new tame ‘character’ occurred in November 2015 when she rubbed shoulders in Penrith City with Councillor Marcus Cornish. He was running a somewhat bogus anti-mosque campaign that had many locals sucked in. Cornish was a Liberal Party member and had as his aide de camp, Howard Crawford. Hanson came to the Cornish fundraiser to assist such that a case could be financed in the New South Wales courts against the Council’s approval of two mosques in the City.

bce5a98cdf724bfd4b46e733b1570d7a
Marcus Cornish courts the million-dollar patriot carrot-top. And his tie matches

The money was to go to solicitor Robert Balzola (who lost a string of anti-mosque cases in several cities). Balzola was also a Liberal and a so-called conservative, who just also happened to be close to the Liberty Alliance Senate candidate for Queensland – Bernard Gaynor! Cornish even resigned from the Liberals in 2016 because of the unfair treatment of Abbott by Malcolm Turnbull, but his loyalties remained clear enough. Crawford, who in text messages maintained by Australia First Party, had said of Hanson, “I hate that slut”, still serves Cornish. Infiltrated into Australia First Party in July 2011 (a significant synchronicity, given the activities of Goodridge in Brisbane), Crawford sought to wreck it and weaken in particular the party’s impact in Western Sydney. As could be reasoned, the Liberty Party’s dirty tricks department (aka ‘Australians for Honest Politics’) plans ahead – and plans well. Crawford would most certainly have reported to his masters Hanson’s essential political reliability in their very specialized  anti-Islam crusade.

Hanson progressively made it clear that she was tame and could be trusted with office.

Then even better for Liberal interests. On the way to the Senate this year, Pauline Hanson referred to her “Australia is in danger of being swamped by Asians” remark of 1996 as something she didn’t accept any longer, that “you don’t have to be White to be an Australian” and that “many of my leaders have Asian wives”. This was the ‘diversity minus Islam’ logic of the Reclaim movement, the Freedomites, the Australian Patriots Defence Movement and the rest of them. As far as Hanson was concerned, the danger to Australia did not lie in Asia particularly in China but was purely Islamic’ (sic) in nature. Hanson was ready. In the chaos of system politics which was tearing at Liberal credibility, she was needed. Hanson was able to gather the votes of the well-meaning upset citizens beyond the scope of ALA whose preferences she also harvested. And once in office, she betrayed her oldest followers, proving loyalty beyond doubt, sitting down to do business with Tony Abbott who had managed to imprison her, offering her votes in the Senate to the Liberals, when need be.

The ruse was complete. The safety valve was in full operation.

THE ENDGAME

The new Senator Hanson is surrounded by ex-Liberals, so called conservatives, Ziopatriots and has her own Svengali by her side. The vile hand of Zionism is on the Hanson movement. That means it will run the anti-Islam game as we have described it – to keep people’s eyes off the entire problem of immigration and the globalist forces that inspire it, and off the real genesis of terrorism, off the criminal Middle East politics of our political and military leadership, off the Asianization of Australia.

Would her inner core, if ever challenged, deny their Ziopatriotism? Hardly, although they have not yet been openly challenged. They will be challenged by nationalists.

The effort that has gone into this satellite structure, building its profile, its structure, its financing, suggest it will be around for some time and given people who support it may not readily appreciate the critique made of it, breaking into its supporter base will not be easy.

Nonetheless, the truth is there and the will of the nationalists absolute. Hansonism will not restrain the people’s awakening.

tumblr_ntg4gfowpf1udwanoo1_1280

AUSTRALIAN LIBERTY ALLIANCE BACKS CHINESE IMPERIALISM: SPECIAL REPORT

AUSTRALIAN LIBERTY ALLIANCE BACKS CHINESE IMPERIALISM: SPECIAL REPORT

13521783_291127237900641_1604836111_n (1)

The ALA has a mysterious relationship with China, United Nationalists Australia can reveal.

Posting on his Lindsay Facebook page, fat-cat Zionist candidate for the crucial seat of Lindsay in Western Sydney, Steve Roddick, has posted a snippet from an unidentifiable Chinese news-site .

UNA writers have had a problem even pulling up the page other than by Steve’s link, which has its web address as www.wiloop.net. However, we can confirm the link is Chinese in origin, but seems to get blocked.

The page, which is listed as “Australia News” advocates ‘Chinese Australians’ voting for the Liberal Party. In a translation of what appears to be Mandarin (although it’s all Chinese to us), the news outlet commentators write, “You may not have the right to vote, but you influential! This time, Chinese crucial votes in the future decide the future of Australia.”

ALAaaa
The following are Google translated comments from this mysterious Chinese news page

Yes, the writer is stating that Chinese will decide the future of Australia in times to come.

And yet, just like ALA and all the Ziopatriots, this Chinese news organ seems concerned with the Islamificiation of Australia as an impediment to their own interests in our nation: and the ALA has their back! Indeed, the endorsement of Australian Liberty Alliance comes via a recent story about opposition leader Bill Shorten promising permanent residency to boat people.

It writes, “Once abolished, after the refugees coming to Australia, or to directly obtain a green card.

“The world’s millions of refugees have been just around the corner, everyone is waiting for election results in Australia! Once elected Labor party, all refugees will all rush to Australia!

The page, which is listed as “Australia News” advocates ‘Chinese Australians’ voting for the Liberal Party. In a translation of what appears to be Mandarin (although it’s all Chinese to us), the news outlet commentators write, “You may not have the right to vote, but you influential! This time, Chinese crucial votes in the future decide the future of Australia.”

Australia will become the African middle east countries.”

There is even a curious sentence, obviously indelicately translated, that is like a road mine of irony as it reads, “Once elected Labor leader, so everything will become Days yellow.”

We shall glide over that chestnut and wonder aloud whether there is a Zionist link between all three?

The Chinese community backs ALA, ALA are a multi ethnic party for a multi ethnic society!

Steve Roddick ALA

We cannot know, but we can clearly state it is the height of ‘chutzpah’ for these Chinese to be concerned with foreign invaders flocking to a country they are busily invading themselves. But it is also URGENT that Australian voters note this treasonous link between the ALA, and Chinese sources. What IS that link? Does Roddick have business interests there? Does his ability to access a page we are unable to mean that he has a special link to Chinese communications?

The ALA, just like Pauline Hanson and the laughable non-White Rise Up Australia Party, were key in the hijacking of the fledgling so-called Patriot movement, which rose out of social media in response to the effects of globalisation.

ALLLLLLLLLL

Concerned primarily with Islamic intrusion into this  nation, it was quickly co-opted by Zionist money and influence. UNA has already published from ALA and Rise Up’s own core policies that reference support for the illegal state of Israel.

But worse than that, the ALA is not only blithely unconcerned with Chinese cultural domination of Lindsay, and of course Australia, but it welcomes their support in this illusionary war against ‘Sharia Law’.

Now China has jumped on the Zionist tatictal bandwagon and is mobilising its propaganda here to that particular tune, and EVERY patriot group from the ALA to the United Patriots Front is now servicing foreign interests in their activities (whether or not the UPF knows, cares, or is willing to even listen to this. UNA can report that this week its leaders confirmed their intention to follow a strictly civic patriot route).

The ALA, just like Pauline Hanson and the laughable non-White Rise Up Australia Party, were key in the hijacking of the fledgling so-called Patriot movement, which rose out of social media in response to the effects of globalisation.

Australia First Party president Jim Saleam has been unwavering in his criticisms and exposure of the Chinese invasion of Western Sydney. The AFP has long exposed the ALA as a Liberal party satellite, but now it is undeniable.

The ALA has been sent to smash nationalist sentiment and co-opt it all, via mobilasation around opposition to Islam, into a fervent force to drive Australia economically and socially into foreign hands.

download (2)
Confucius say, “A vote for ALA is a vote for Chinese control of Australia!