FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

Nothing prevented Saturday’s bi-state ‘International Freedom of Speech’ day, which is of itself ironic. However, in this muddle of libertarian and identity politics, attended by the usual provocateurs, when speech has no substantial content the point of whether or not it is free is moot.

The two-state ‘event’, which we cannot find any evidence of being internationally recognised despite its bold appellation, although there is said to a London event, was held in both Melbourne Docklands, where Jewish supremacist and mega Zionist Avi Yemini was joined by Senator Fraser Anning, with a crowd of around 50 free speech advocates, after the first got underway at Sydney’s Wiley Park, in Lakemba.

We will address the Wiley Park leg shortly, but first-up Anning’s speech would reveal a lot about this mysterious ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’. Senator Anning’s maiden speech, like Pauline Hanson’s before him, caused sparks when he called for a return to a “European Christian” immigration system. Yet, it did not take long to forge an allegiance with the Zionist ALA. This seems to be an inevitable pattern when it comes to outspoken politicians on the “right side”, especially those who create a false hope that they’ll support a return to the White Australia Policy.

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

He then got down to business and we’ll place a transcript of his speech verbatim on this page. What will become apparent is his pro-Zionism as he told the sparsely peopled audience, “My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’.

“This year we gave the Palestinian authority $43.8 million. They use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority.”

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

Australia shouldn’t be paying any money to that region, for sure, but that’s not what Anning’s point was – he doesn’t want it paid because, according to the very Zionist logic, innocent Israelis are being killed by evil Palestinians who have some screwed-up notion about wanting to stop their land being stolen by Jews.

The only attempt to shut down Fraser’s freedom of speech came from a longhaired ginger dressed in black who was shouted down by Avi and his supporters who chanted, “Zuck off!” a reference to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerbeg, who they blame personally for de-speeching them on his social media platform.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Meanwhile, Blair Cottrell did not attend the Melbourne rally. Instead, he drove to Sydney to yell at gimps in a windy park through a Chinese manufactured megaphone. He shook hands with the likes of marijuana advocate and serial instigator Nick Folkes who is back from cannabis country with his small multi-racial cast of resurrected Party for Freedom members (or as we dubbed them, Peanuts for Freedom) as he joined a line-up that included some uninteresting woman and Cottrell’s lawyer, John Bolton.

dfadsfs.png
Blair is a man who never lets standards get in the way of the company he consorts with (Folkes centre, Bluebeard taking a fan snap on the right)

Present also was Neil Erikson’s partner in crime, Rino Grgurgovic, aka Bluebeard, along with members of the Lads Society Sydney. If there was a Pictionary definition of “idiot” then Bluebeard’s picture would be posted there in all its pot-bellied glory, stink lines included. There would even be a colouring-in version for autistic kids.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which would be like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

MateyandFokles.png
The Fellowship of the Chicken is reunited. Matey Mate, Hollywood Nazi on the right, with his Zionist mate and colleague, Nick Folkes

It’s grouse Matey Mate is back with Nick because it’s like a reunion of the old fellowship of the chicken which was centred around the deep-seed Liberal muckraker and sometimes poultry farmer Howard “I’m not a financial member of any party” Crawford.  Howie even “liked” Nick’s post about the rally on his Facebook page which means so much for any of them retiring.

But what is more significant about these two is that it proves that Matey Mate, far from being owned by ‘The Lads’ is a random equation infecting the numbers. Any belief that he is not a two-way transistor between the meddlesome world of the Zionist spiv and the “youth” who have gravitated to Sewell’s boys’ club betrays an inadvisable trust in the skunk. Matey Mate’s record speaks for itself, and his intrigues run deep. It wouldn’t surprise UNA at all if he was receiving secret funding from a government agency. Likewise, given the ongoing theatre, and all the incongruities of his allegiances, policies, platform and behaviour, who is handling Nick Folkes?

Thus, with a gale blowing, and nobody infringing on their ‘free speech’, Bolton led the proceedings by opening up with a spiel about Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern; all this while the antifascist voyeurs tracked them with what must’ve been the cheapest drone on the market – a Chinese knock-off bought for a lobster from the markets. Those assembled in the park appear in an image smugly uploaded to the Anonykatz Facebook page from a vertigo-inducing height and with a visibility that rendered the whole exercise even more futile than what was happening down below.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer 8Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which is like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

Screenshot_20181006-230600_Facebook.jpg
The Antis will try to say that the object of the exercise was to view crowd numbers. But that’s a lie, they wanted to see who was there, but their cheap and nasty drone failed them. Lulz

Nick Folkes, no doubt nicely toasted on seventh-generation Indica skunk weed, then grabbed the bullhorn to foghorn about his freedom of speech, or should that be, his excess of it. Folkes is an idiot and no matter what anyone believes about personal liberty the whole world would be better off if a special law was passed limiting him to the use of sign language.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

Singling out “dogmatic communists” he aired his angst about how they “want to take freedom of speech and it’s an attack on the only civilisation in modern history that brought around freedom of speech is the British Empire.”

Perhaps they should tell that to D.H Lawrence or any of the other writers whose books were originally banned in England.

It’s worth noting too that both Folkes and Anning cited “communists” as being responsible for taking away their freedom of speech while last we checked Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk, who led a charge to censor Anning and stripped him of staff funding and extra staff is a dyed in the wool conservative.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

And while Folkes gasbags about freedom of speech he seems to forget when he attempted to shut down Australia First Party president Jim Saleam’s freedom of speech at the Reclaim Australia rally at Martin Place in Sydney during 2015 when he connived with the marshals to have him removed. Likewise, the marshals forbade AFP from distributing any materials at the rally but didn’t impose any ban on the kosher groups.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care. It is very clear that he chose long ago the path of civic patriotism. And for all the fascist talk from the Lads Society once again Matey Mate and his offsider Alex had no problem embedding themselves with Zionists and supporting an event that is fundamentally pro-Israel.

a7a6dc4f492afb2d327d9e154432017f
John Bolton, Zionist, anti-Islam activist, and most likely chief organiser of International Freedom of Speech day in Australia

John Bolton is probably the key to Cottrell’s attendance since as a lawyer he has taken up his appeal pro bono against charges of inciting serious contempt against Moslems. Did Blair really drive all the way to Sydney just to help his mate out, or did he have other business? Was he asked not to attend the Melbourne leg of the rally, or would Tom Sewell, the chock-heeled boss of the Lads Society have forbidden it? It’s hard to be sure once you try to figure out who put this thing together and why.

United Nationalists Australia has attempted to identify who the principal organisers of the ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’ are. Our strongest lead is actually John Bolton. He released a YouTube video on October 1 in which his concerns about freedom of speech link primarily to former EDL head and Zionist Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern who was prevented from entering the Moslem enclave of Lakemba during her tour of Sydney. Bear in mind, the Lads Society provided security for Southern both at Sydney and her Melbourne show.

During that tour, Southern appeared with Stefan Molyneux in a video filmed at Sydney’s Botanic Gardens in which she detailed how police prevented her exercising the simple right to walk the streets since her presence would be seen as a provocation. She claimed there was hypocrisy at play because mainstream media, which were actually filming her, were put under no such restrictions. Nonetheless, Southern began by explaining how her team had contacted police to advise them she would be journeying down with her crew.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care.

One could say it was stupid tipping them off, but one could also cynically suggest that she got the reaction she intended. If she was fair dinkum about slinking into a Moslem neighbourhood incognito — and let’s face it, most Moslems like most Aussies wouldn’t have known her from a bar of soap — there were countless other areas that are chockers with the followers of Mohammed; Punchbowl being one; Beverly Hills another. Either she was worried they might get creamed or else she’d calculated the police response and just how marvellously it would dovetail her narrative.

It was with this same expectation of publicity that Bolton chose Wiley Park near Lakemba to stage his rally. He stated so in his video in which he grimly warned against anyone inciting violence or attempting violence against his people. He clearly spelt out it was a test of “freedom” to be in the area. In the end, no one attempted anything, except some numbskull Antis who took their cheap-arse drone for a spin in the drizzle.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

So, Bolton is at the centre of this theatre that has drawn together the usual faces. But he is Cottrell’s lawyer and Blair is synonymous with allegedly suggesting that every classroom in Australia should have a copy of Mein Kampf (We are not sure if that quote is apocryphal or not). How does that then fit in with Bolton’s worldview? We quote him from the video, “As Australians, we are a melting pot. Women and men in Australia are equal. People of every race in Australia are equal. It’s abhorrent that people want to divide us.”

Well, isn’t Blair Cottrell one of those trying to divide us? I know we are. We’re proud to admit it since the only “us” we recognise are actual Australians, which means we aim to divide their “us”. So, if that’s the case, does he support freedom of speech by those who want to repudiate his statements of values as a bunch of gay libertarian crap? Did he not just call such abhorrent? On his Weebly blog, among an impressive list of professional credentials, Bolton describes himself as “conservative” but “politically independent”. We see a lot of that around the anti-Islam scene. And John is no stranger to that arena. In 2017, he joined the Peanuts as a speaker at their rally against a proposed Islamic school in Penrith.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

Among those were ‘Australian Patriot Uprising’ Commandant Matt Lowe and his non-Aryan Sergeant Schultz, Toby Cook.

Matt Lowe took over while Nick Folkes was on hiatus. He and fat boy Toby, who we understand to be a former mental patient, essentially formed the core of this absurd Facebook club along with Shermon Burgess, who himself made a quantum leap from strict kosher patriot to fully-blown neo-Nazi with such a vengeance that it defies credulity. Just as the movement was adopting a conspicuously fascist style, Folkes stepped sideways, Lowe et al moved in, but now they’re gone and Folkes is back along with the bagel brigade. But it remains of Mr Bolton to explain just what these glaring inconsistencies mean to him because being such a bright lad he cannot have failed to be aware of them. By the same token, Bolton cannot be unaware of what Blair Cottrell represents to the mainstream, while Nationalists know the truth and these associations of his only confirm: the man is a civic patriot and always will be.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

We now return to Nick Folkes’s comment about “it’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here”. It’s a shame that after all this time the dumb bastard hasn’t worked out why.

The last any significant support was galvanised for a comparable cause was the Reclaim Australia rallies. If we’re talking about Sydney alone, then the 2015 rallies were the ceiling. But let’s focus on that, shall we? How come they failed to capitalise on the kind of public support they saw from that concept? Arguably, it was a number of reasons. Firstly, too many civic micro-parties played tug-o-war with it, such as the ALA, and the unregistered PfF and those parties were avowedly Zionist. But while other factors occurred, especially in Melbourne where the street jouster mentality of the UPF had turned off the mums and dads (or “peasants” as Blair Cottrell charitably labels them), the simple fact no one seems to recognise is because they never actually stated what it is they wanted.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

What was it they wanted; a total end to Moslem immigration? Not really, if you attended the rallies and listened to the speeches, despite the slant the hard-left and globalist media put on it, they asked only for “assimilation”. Who was it that this petition was directed at? Was it the Moslem community, who were not represented and never addressed? Was it the politicians? There were frequent calls for “politicians” to “do something”. That’s a mighty naïve expression of faith right there, trusting a ‘politician’ working for an internationalist world-order controlled by corporations. The politicians are dedicated universally to pumping this country full of as much non-Anglo human content as can be mustered. This is the idea.

Opposition leader Bill Shorten has approached Scott Morrison to agree to a bipartisan commitment to a “big Australia”, and a big Australia means unfettered immigration.

The little-known corporation Consolidated Land & Rail (CLARA) has as its mission statement: “CLARA is an Australian private group formed to deliver a program to change Australia. We seek to undertake a re-balancing of our settlement and deliver new ways of imagining, planning and building cities, transport and infrastructure.”

This is insidious stuff: a private group with endless land assets knocking up micro-cities and connecting them with rail all over Australia. Who is to live in those cities? Well, CLARA says, “Australia’s population is projected to increase 69% between now and 2061 — up from 24.7 million to 41.5 million people, that is 16.8 million more Australians needing a home.”

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

Australians…? They seriously just called that projected figure Australians when they’re constantly harping on about the declining birth rate among White Australians?! No, that’s an import figure, and what’s more, CLARA seems to know something we don’t because they’re already building their cities and rails to accommodate this massive increase which will come from Asia, the Sub-Continent, the Middle-East and Africa, but really largely from China, and to serve the new Sino-Australia.

How can such a newish population in any way be Australian? By their importation, they signal the end of Australia and the creation of an artificial nation not founded on culture, race or custom, but on consumerism and serfdom to oligarchical concerns.

Given all this is happening, tiny little voices squeaking about “freedom of speech” in an ill-defined way don’t seem to grasp the issues especially when, like Bolton and all civic patriots, they accept a “melting pot” so long as it doesn’t come with Moslems and their “sharia law”.

But it also explains why Nick and Co can’t get massive numbers to their rallies despite the size of the cities because they are lost in a wilderness where their concerns are outnumbered by the demographic realities of those very cities.

The Nationalist message is very different and it is uncompromising and unwavering. And the key to the activism resides in that message and its purity something those who complain about “keyboard warriors” not attending these hopeless rallies cannot get their heads around.

Given the divide we suffer in major cities, the only logical thing to do is seek out our people where they reside, and where they are receptive to our message and that might not be in the sexy surrounds of an urban environment. It might be spread apart and out in the dust 200 kilometres each way between. But the cities are lost and those Whites remaining and who’ve adapted to this prefabricated metropolis are from the virtue-signalling hypocrite elites. Which is another thing Anning, Bolton and Yemini don’t understand about their “free speech”, especially when they equate it with social media — the political element of their “speech” is a product of the commercial.

Identity politics is a device by which aspirational consumers signal their social status. The greatest advocates of all these guises of progressive politics are in fact the corporations who splinter it all up into a consumerist matrix. It’s not even accurate to suggest that Facebook targets them on the basis of their politics, although it’s not so unfair an accusation to level at Twitter. Facebook operates on a combination of algorithms and human moderators and while the inconsistencies of their adjudications are frustrating they are more random than they seem. But if they really want to get down to an understanding what they lack is not a freedom of speech but a market share.

The topic of “freedom of speech” is too complex to be condensed for a mass audience at least in the fashion the civics are doing it. What their “freedom of speech” is banging up against is this very global order. There are no worries for Moslem Arabs discussing the finer points of socially unpalatable aspects of an extreme reading of their religion at meetings in Lakemba, for instance. They are no challenge to that order. But as Christopher Shortis found out when he, Cottrell and Neil Erikson were convicted of inciting serious contempt against Moslems, it sure isn’t so lenient when it happens the other way. While Moslems are allowed to discuss extreme ideas to characterise them as extreme, which is what the Bendigo Three did in their video, is considered the more extreme acts of the two. Indeed, we may consider naming the monster now to be heretical speech.

And once one makes a concession to unfettered freedom of expression where does it end? We cannot argue for the unconditional freedom of speech which would demand things like sex with baby giraffes or to legalise cannibalism. And as society fragments along the lines of those directing from the Bilderberg Group, it seems that sick ideas are gaining respectability on a daily basis. We’re already at the stage that we’ve repudiated nature and argued she is wrong, that there is no such thing as race or gender, and one woman described as an author and educator argues that parents should gain permission from their babies before changing their nappies. These are the signs of a society on the way out and that’s where the oligarchs want it so that it can be replaced by a new serfdom. When the serfs speak up about anything that may draw attention to this then, of course, that speech is no longer but very, very expensive.

As Nationalists we do not fight vigorously for freedom of speech, we strive to emphasize the hypocrisy of those who wish to silence us and demonise us in the name of an inclusive and progressive democracy in which freedom of expression is implied.

Anning.png
Senator Fraser Anning expressing his fear that Israelis might be being murdered by Palestinians

Senator Fraswer Anning’s Speech, Verbatim, Docklands, Melbourne, Oct 6, 2018 (don’t say we tried to take your free speech)

“ALA is the only democratic party in this state. These African gangs who are attacking people, destroying property and bashing different people and getting away with it is probably some of the worst things I’ve seen and I’m sure it’s not the fault of the police, I’m sure their hands have been tied by somebody further up. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right for any nation, it’s the first thing that goes and then normally what happens in a communist society they take your freedom of speech first, so occasionally we have clowns like this who deny you your right to freedom of speech,” (enter bozo ranga) to disrupt the event. Avi grabbed the mic and led the small gathering of ALA supporters and others in a chant of “Zucc off, mate!” Anning, continued, “So the first thing that goes in a communist country is your freedom of speech, just recently, as Avi said, both our (Facebook) pages were shut down. The premier in Queensland asked our members there – and three state members – to denounce my speech or lose funding for staff members. Now, that’s a travesty of justice, it was illegal, she eventually took those staff members and took that funding because they did not want to renounce me. My Facebook page, as far as I know, was taken down… we’ve never called for any violence… neither Avi or myself have called for any violence against anyone and never will. My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’ (loud claps from Zionist Avi and his ALAers). This year we give the Palestinian authority $43.8 million they use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority. And that’s where our tax dollars are going and when I called for that, in the senate, all three parties, the Liberals, Labor and the Greens vote against me every time. They’re the same people who the day after my speech were all crying and hugging and ringing their hands and they never damped a tissue but they pretended to cry then they denounce me — but they’re the same three parties who regularly vote against the motions that I put up to stop funding the Palestinian authority but also I call for getting the White South African farmers out of South Africa (Avi leads clapping) and again they vote against me so they’re hypocrites, they took two words out of context then they decided they would try to make some mileage out of that but they made their impatient speeches but the next day when the polls came out, even the ABC poll, they found around 80% of Australians were supporting me so, ah… (Applause) so they’ll have to eat their words a little bit. So we’ve got some big problems to overcome, we are supposed to have a conservative government but then they’re here five years but we still have 18C on the books, which takes away your freedom of speech. What’s happening there? So really what’s happened is that the parties that used to represent us have moved so far to the left that they don’t represent us anymore. There’s a vacuum on the right. We saw that in 2016 in America when Trump came like a freight train and hit poor old Hillary Clinton. She didn’t see that coming (laughter). He’s been a great man for America, he’s done a huge amount of work for America and America has never been better now economically or any other way you like to look at it. So a lot of this, this trying to take away our freedom of speech is coming out of the United Nations. Now, I’ve been calling for us to get out of Paris and to get out of the United Nations. They have no business here, they have no business with us, and their politicians like Marise Payne who’s over there now signing away your rights to everything, ah, she has no business doing that on your behalf. She’s signing a thing called the Immigration Compact, now, and that will effectively give your rights to who comes into this country – it will be handed over to the United Nations so you can imagine what’s going to happen with our society. By the way, that speech, that part with the final solution, what was actually said was ‘the final solution to our immigration problem is for the Australian people to have a vote via plebiscite’. And I will still continue to push that agenda because we’ve had votes on all sorts of things like same sex marriage and everything else, why should we not have the right to have a vote on not just how many people will come here but who comes here, what the makeup of this country will be like later on. So really I think the big fear is that good Australian men and a lot of them only boys died on battlefields all over the world. They died in freezing bloody muddy trenches in France and Belgium and other places and in the jungles of New Guinea and they died for one thing and that is for your freedom and for your rights. They stood up in front of bullets and they took bullets a lot of them and they’re not here with us anymore and the least we can do is to do what good people like yourselves are doing now and stand up for our freedoms and I applaud you all for being here and we’ve got to keep up the fight.”

NEWSPEAK HATE SPEECH LAWS HIT NEW SOUTH WALES

NEWSPEAK HATE SPEECH LAWS HIT NEW SOUTH WALES

New laws come into effect in NSW this week. Anyone “inciting violence” on the basis of race, minority religious status, sexual orientation, or this bogus Orwellian construct of “intersex people” face $11,000 fine or three years in jail.

United Nationalists Australia declares this the ‘Newspeak laws’ since anyone threatening violence against anybody is or should be, dealt with under existing laws. However, these laws, which were lobbied for hard by “minority organisations” adds a special status to anyone in these favoured political categories. This makes the rest of us (White Australians) an increasing sub-class subject to greater social restrictions and with less access to similar legal consideration.

politics-immigration-immigrants-american_politics-inboxes-outboxes-cgon838_low.jpg

Nationalists have long felt the “un-person” status by crossing the social rubicon and calling out occupied multiracial Australia. The Police are disinclined to act upon threats against us by extremist groups linked to institutions of globalist organized-thuggery such as the Construction Forestry Mining, Maritime and Energy Union (CFMMEU). Likewise, complaints based on incitements to violence, such as those by members of the clandestine terror group Antifascist Action, are ignored by a compliant state apparatus.

Now, the discussion about the ethnic cleansing of true Australians as defined by the European settlers of this land and who created this nation that all these rapacious other races swarm to will have to be necessarily handled by the more articulate and savvy among us. The reckless and immature propaganda purveyed by the likes of Antipodean Resistance only ever helped create these laws just as much as it managed to cause its British counterpart and inspiration National Action to become a proscribed organisation in England.

Make no mistake, the signifiers used in mainstream anti-White propaganda are unashamed in highlighting the fact these laws are aimed at White Australians. A screengrab from a June ABC report on the laws uses an image of patriots standing with Aussie flags to illustrate the story and secure in the reader’s mind just who these political amendments to the Crimes Act 1900 target.

dadgg.png
The red arrow points to the subjects of this bill. Yes, White Countries have a habit of legislating heavily against their own people in favour of every other non-threatened race on the face of this yellow, brown and black planet

The bill is called the Crimes Amendment (Publically Threatening and Inciting Violence) Bill 2018 and we probably have Nick Folkes, Neil Erikson, Mark Campbell-McDonald, Shermon Burgess and Ralph Cerminara to thank for it. There are three schedules the first of which inserts section 93Z into the Crimes Act while the second “…removes certain offences from the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 and makes a consequential amendment.” The third makes any of the described offences against the special citizens a summary offence.

Under the act, it won’t matter if threats are made in the heat of the moment, or if no violence is carried out. The bill concerns what it terms a “public act” which is defined as:

(a) any form of communication (including speaking, writing, displaying notices, playing of recorded material, broadcasting and communicating through social media and other electronic methods) to the public, and

(b) any conduct (including actions and gestures and the wearing or display of clothing, signs, flags, emblems and insignia) observable by the public, and (c) the distribution or dissemination of any matter to the public.

That is a fairly hefty set of criteria and as you can see open to wide interpretation and given the summary nature of the act it pretty much places all the power in the hands of the offended person(s), or group. The already litigious ‘minority’ groups will now be further emboldened to examine any context under which criticism is made for an interpretation of threat, violence, or vilification. This will be particularly so after the maiden speech by Katter’s Australia party senator Fraser Anning whose truths about the state of immigration and cultural disintegration has triggered the globalist jack-booters in the left-wing media to an even greater volume of anti-White hysteria.

And who is largely responsible for bringing these laws about? Aside from the NSW Liberal & Nationals we have a coalition group called ‘Keep NSW Safe’. Who comprises this group? They are as follows:

  • Federation of Indian Associations of Australia (Curry store owners)

  • Australian Hellenic Council NSW

  • New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies (Big surprise there)

  • Australian National Imams Council

  • Chinese Australian Services Society

  • Korean Society of Sydney

  • Australian Kurdistan Veteran Association

  • Assyrian Australian National Federation

  • Chinese Australia Forum (which works for Beijing’s interest to infiltrate Australian institutions)

  • International Coptic Union

  • Vietnamese Community in Australia – NSW Chapter

  • Australian South Sea Islanders

  • Hindu Council of Australia

  • Basmala Australia Inc (An Islamic mob)

  • Armenian National Committee of Australia

  • The Australian Egyptian Council Forum

  • South Asian Study Group, University of Sydney (Asian invaders taking jobs, shifting into high-rise apartments bought by rich Chinese parents, creating homelessness for Aussies)

  • Sikh Youth Australia (Gets to carry knives on religious grounds)

  • Cambodian-Australian Welfare Council of NSW (Pol Pot’s former soldiers)

  • NSW Council of Christians and Jews Inc. (Evangelical warmongers)

  • Australian Hellenic Educational Progressive Association (More Socialist Greek traitors)

  • Muslim Women Association (Burka battle axes)

  • Australian Cook Islander Community NSW

  • Australian Federation of Ukrainian Associations (Shame)

  • National Sikh Council of Australia (Like, India is >>>>THAT way!)

  • NSW Council for Pacific Communities

  • Philippine Community Council of NSW (Fuck off)

  • Warren Mundine (Get on out of it)

As you can see, these pork-barreling “communities” cobble together at the first chance to alter and affect the national character with the aid of the traitor political class. It would be like us shifting over to Arabia and forming the Australian Council of Pork-Munching Beer-Swillers, and then campaigning for the right to strut nude up and down the front of the country’s mosques in only our thongs and terrycloth hats.

However, what is also amusing is that these laws potentially threaten a little-publicised tactic used by the left itself. There are those among the anarchist and antifascist milieu who actually adopt ‘racist’ guises to harass and intimidate ideological opponents; one or two are even known to contribute to mainstream media. In fact, the anarcho-anti-globalist brown shirts are the readiest and willing to use threats and to vilify on the basis of race and religion, which is one of their myriad hyper-contradictions. It will be interesting to see how these laws affect that sector’s black ops.

Meanwhile, it will pay to be very measured in how our side communicates, but more to the point, such restrictions can only refine our language and grant our message precision.

article-5978-thumb.jpg
Once upon a time stating the obvious didn’t land you 3 years lag

 

ANNING’S SPEECH TRIGGERS THE MULTIRACIALIST TERROR STATE

ANNING’S SPEECH TRIGGERS THE MULTIRACIALIST TERROR STATE

Queensland Senator Fraser Anning has popped the cork on the multiracial genie bottle. In his maiden speech to parliament, he heroically called for a plebiscite on a return to the predominantly European immigration policy of the pre-Whitlam consensus.

While Anning focused mainly on the Moslem problem skirting over the far more dangerous Asianisation of this country his speech was nonetheless the clarion call that most Australians have been bursting to hear.

Highlighting the failures of multiracialism, a system which was imposed on us by successive governments from Whitlam onwards, Mr Anning insisted we return to a “European Christian” immigration system.

In fact, we should be thinking more in terms of a blanket halt to immigration but we nonetheless appreciate Anning’s comments. Just as Andrew Bolt recently described Australia as having turned into a “hotel” with unfettered immigration, so Mr Anning argues “Ethnocultural diversity… has been allowed to rise to dangerous levels in many suburbs. In direct response, self-segregation, including White flight from poorer inner-urban areas, has become the norm.”

Mr Anning somewhat injudiciously suggested such a vote would be “the final solution to the immigration problem.”

Naturally, these words were not uttered with the intention of stirring up the ghost of National Socialist Germany, but the globalist-controlled media immediately contextualised it within the narrative of “the Holocaust”, invoking the usual signifiers of gas ovens and striped concentration camp uniforms. The ABC’s Adam Masters described his use of this expression as either “ignorance” or “dog whistle politics to the ever-present racist undercurrents in Australian society.” He then went on to give a historical account of Nazi Germany’s policy towards the Jews.

Highlighting the failures of multiracialism, a system which was imposed on us by successive governments from Whitlam onwards, Mr Anning insisted we return to a “European Christian” immigration system.

The ABC rushed to quote rabid anti-Whites as if their opinion holds greater truth than one who names the elephant in the room, quoting the Malaysian-born lesbian Labor senator Penny Wong who unsurprisingly said of the White Australia Policy, “We’ve rightly consigned that policy to the dustbin of history.” Crackpot Greens’ leader Richard Di Natale “demanded” an apology from Anning. We demand Mr Natale’s mother delivers an apology for giving birth to such a treasonous snail.

Anning’s most surprising critic was Pauline Hanson, his former party leader, who joined the multiracialists in condemning him by suggesting his words came out of “Joseph Goebbel’s handbook”.

Nationalists have all along argued that Pauline Hanson is a fraud: a conservative working for the interests of those such as her “friend” the mining oligarch Gina Rinehart who infamously penned an egregious poem to the virtues of mass immigration as an excellent means for increasing profits for those like her while eroding pay and conditions for workers.

Hanson went on to declare “We are a multicultural society and I’ve always advocated you do not have to be White to be Australian.”

Bob Katter, who leads Katter’s Australia Party in which Anning serves as a senator told a reporter that Hanson was “abandoning the territory that made her infamous or famous.”

Hanson went on to declare “We are a multicultural society and I’ve always advocated you do not have to be White to be Australian.”

This, we hope, doesn’t signal an unprecedented stampede towards Katter’s Australia Party. Katter is about as genuinely Nationalist as an Indian store clerk. But what it hopefully will do is lance the great boil so that Australians can see the true pus of a terror state we’re not fighting but actually living in.

hasnon
Hanson, the “Patriot Queen” slammed Fraser Anning and compared him to Goebbels

Not only has it brought forth the usual stampede of skewed editorials from the brown shirt journalists of globalist media but it is sure to have triggered the state apparatus that controls our thoughts and crushes us under its jackboot if we question the cleansing of White Australia.

Many consider that Mein Kampf is the narrative for the Nationalist whereas, in fact, it is more like Franz Kafka. The serious Nationalist inevitably becomes targeted by the deep-state: demonised, victimised, persecuted and ground-down like a peppercorn.

We are right to compare the globalist journalist as “brown shirts” since especially among the former Fairfax Media stable of political assassins, their so-called journalists actively engage in the persecution of any target that crosses the Rubicon of state intolerance towards dissent; stepping out from behind their keyboard to pursue practises that would land anyone else in prison: employing stalking tactics, defamation, and conspiratorial collusion in false allegations.

Lauren Southern, the Alt-Right YouTube celebrity who many pretend Nationalists spent their money to hear instead of listening to actual Australians with something to say, nonetheless encapsulated much when she said that “Melbourne should be nuked”.

Many consider that Mein Kampf is the narrative for the Nationalist whereas, in fact, it is more like Franz Kafka. The serious Nationalist inevitably becomes targeted by the deep-state: demonised, victimised, persecuted and ground-down like a peppercorn.

Even for a Canuck who’d whizzed through the country, she managed to figure out there is a deep corruption in the state of Victoria that hedges against anyone challenging the dogma of multiracialism.

And this is the thing. Malcolm Turnbull, who does a very poor impersonation of a Prime Minister, condemned Anning’s speech on the grounds terrorists will be emboldened by his words. What terrorists? Our entire system is a terrorist, and it gives carte blanche to terrorists especially those who identify as “antifascists”. One of our United Nationalists Australia’s team has been a target of such a terrorist and a victim of the state that condones him.

images
Won’t someone PLEASE think of the Holocaust!

DAVE GULLIS THE ANTIFASCIST SYDNEY COMMUNIST CFMMEU TERRORIST

Dave Gullis is a member of the Australian Communist Party and Antifascist Action Sydney. He is known to live in and around Enmore, in Sydney’s inner-west and is usually in the company of an Aboriginal woman.

In October last year, he began a campaign against our editor, first threatening his life and then attacking his home. He returned a third time on a curious date that coincides with a wider conspiracy but that is something UNA will report on much later.

11188276_877885448935926_5245648042568850460_n - Copy
State-condoned terrorist Dave Gullis is also a romping stomping sodomite 

At first, we had no idea who we were dealing with. We ran a citizens campaign on this page and it resulted in him being identified by a Facebook page. Dave Gullis may or may not be his real name. When contacted for information, the then CFMEU denied any knowledge of Gullis arguing that his penchant for CFMEU clobber did not make him a member since it was for sale to anybody – as if anybody would want to wear their crabby rags. However, in late August he was spotted by a witness at the NSW State Labor conference in company with CFMMEU representatives.

An attempt by our editor to have an Apprehended Violence Order issued against Gullis was thwarted by Newtown Police who told him that it wasn’t their job to play detective. In fact, at no stage did the cops show the slightest concern for our man and we believe that a political directive was issued from above to do nothing.

Hunter.png
Ex-Antifa comedian Shayne Hunter was bashed by Gullis (who at one time tried to sexually molest him) for “endangering Antifa”, which is a testament to the logic of Antifa and the state that sponsors their terror

Surprisingly, we learned only recently that Newtown Police — pardon the pun — were telling porkies when they denied knowledge of him. At around October last year, a young lad was at Newtown Station with some mates. He was wearing a Make America Great Again cap. Gullis allegedly challenged him over the hat and assaulted him. One of the bloke’s friends caught a pic of old matey and supplied it to police along with a post on Facebook promising a reward of $500 for information leading to his identification. It was classic Gullis, fat, stupid, and wearing his crappy CFMEU terror-wear.

9.jpg
After Gullis assaulted a random Alt-Righter the kid posted this

Perhaps the greatest lead of all, and one that UNA was ignorant of at the time was the release of a video by Antifa defector and comedian, Shayne Hunter. In the video, titled ‘Punched by a Communist’, Hunter describes being confronted and assaulted by Gullis at Newtown library. He went so far as to confirm that Gullis is a member of Antifascist Action Sydney and the whacko Commie party. Gullis punched him for “endangering Antifa” by outing them as brainwashed loonies. He too reported Gullis to Newtown Police. Hunter believes Newtown Pigs were actually keen to charge Gullis, but were unable to trace his address. We say they’re full of excrement and deserve the Golden Doughnut Award for excellence in uselessness. It is our considered opinion that Newtown, which is like a mini Victoria, bends over backwards to accommodate the anti-White fruitcakes bred and manufactured at the nearby Sydney University anti-White factory.

Hunter also mentioned that Dave Gullis is an invasive, grabby, rampant homosexual, a revelation which had us all rolling around the floor cacking ourselves.

Again, we make the point, that here we are in the West, travelling around the world blowing up countries because we say they are ruled by authoritarian dictatorships who suppress freedom of expression and allow only government-approved thought. Well, how are we any different? Our state is a terror state only you must cross that Multiracialist Rubicon to discover that you can quickly become a un-person for challenging the ethnic cleansing of White Australia.

2fxthy.jpg

SYRIA IS ISRAEL’S FLIGHT PATH TO WAR WITH IRAN VIA A HISTORY MUDDLED BY A DEMOCRAT BOOZEHOUND

SYRIA IS ISRAEL’S FLIGHT PATH TO WAR WITH IRAN VIA A HISTORY MUDDLED BY A DEMOCRAT BOOZEHOUND

History might very well be a broken record and it always seems to be one group of people who keep breaking it. In this case, it’s the unholy US-Israel alliance (with their unlikely ties to terrorist-financing Saudi Arabia) that is scratch-mixing it in a loop back-and-forth so that the same verse follows the same familiar chorus.

Last time it was Iraq and ‘Saddam Hussein’ who paid a hefty price for the blowback from the CIA’s covert funding of the Mujahideen thanks to a heavy boozing, womanising, and cocaine snorting Texas congressman named Charlie Wilson. The congressman had been to the refugee camps inside Pakistan in the early 1980s and its effect on him and others he was to take along as witnesses were profound.

It was through his subsequent lobbying along with a bible-bashing millionaire floozy from Houston named Joanne Herring (who he was banging on the side) together with a CIA spook named Gust Avrakotos who were able through strategic manipulation to amass from the US government the millions of dollars that would help the suffering people of Soviet-occupied Afghanistan “…do everything possible to kill Russians, as painfully as possible.”

11wilson_CA-popup
Charlie Wilson was literally gunning for Russia

That wasn’t such a bad thing from the Afghanis’ point of view since the Russkis were blowing the bejesus out of them. These sandaled peasants had only WW1 rifles to shoot back at Mil Mi-24 helicopters which the Russians used to pick them off like ducks at a shooting gallery. It was a turkey shoot.

The money bought Russian weapons from Israel which were funnelled through Pakistan and into the hands of the Mujahideen. Suddenly they weren’t trying to pop at the Russian helicopters with slings and arrows any longer but with stinger missiles and other high-grade military weaponry.

The money bought Russian weapons from Israel which were funnelled through Pakistan and into the hands of the Mujahideen. Suddenly they weren’t trying to pop at the Russian helicopters with slings and arrows any longer but with stinger missiles and other high-grade military weaponry.

By the end of the 1980s, the Soviets were driven out and that was all she wrote for communist Russia as the Soviet Union soon collapsed. For those who’d funded the Mujahideen rebels, it was yesterday’s news but not Charlie. He knew something dirty was coming since there had been no planning or financing for the aftermath. Afghanistan’s infrastructure was decimated; there were no schools, no hospitals, and no law.

This is where Osama bin Laden was able to slip into the void and seize control never having fired a single bullet against the Russians since the Yanks closed the bank and lost interest in Afghanistan. Frankly, their contribution hadn’t all been all in the name of Jesus and the brotherhood of man, but as a wily manoeuvre in their cold war against the Soviet Union.

images (1).jpg
Charlie Wilson (circled) with his Afghan pals and one of the stinger missiles his lobbying bought them

What’s interesting about Charlie Wilson is that he owed his position, and openly admitted so, to New York Jews who held the sway of his Democratic party. There were probably two Jews in his entire constituency. But Charlie was a big fan of Israel regardless and spurred on by a sense of unity with the “underdog” Israel in the Yom Kippur war of 1973 was responsible for jacking up US aid to Israel to a walloping $3 billion annually. Wilson was the total liberal, too, barracking for minority rights, women’s rights, and the inalienable right for Stan to have babies even though he can’t have babies which was nobody’s fault, not even the Romans.

Charlie is remembered as a hero and honoured with an award from the CIA. What has Charlie got to do with anything? Well, everything, and nothing. His good intentions aside it’s ironic that after all that through his efforts the Mujahedeen would come after his country as “the great Satan” and that over ten years later the home of the brave would be more-or-less occupying Afghanistan although not to spread communism.

The legacy of the freedom fighters would end up with the Twin Towers being taken down, 3000 Americans killed, and America’s fall guy in the Middle East, Saddam Hussein, being described as a “monster”, just as the dynastic heir to American Imperialist wrath, Bashar al-Assad, is today, and accused of gassing his own people. The US is lining up pawns against the Russians once more, and American money is buying arms that are being smuggled to Arabs who hate them so they can kill other Arabs who they hate even more. And those people are the enemies of Charlie’s beloved Israelites.

This is where Osama bin Laden was able to slip into the void and seize control never having fired a single bullet against the Russians since the Yanks closed the bank and lost interest in Afghanistan. Frankly, their contribution hadn’t been all in the name of Jesus and the brotherhood of man, but as a wily manoeuvre in their cold war against the Soviet Union.

Saddam Hussein had no “weapons of mass destruction” and the inspectors the UN insisted on sending in found jack. Again, they are calling for inspectors to go into Syria and look for Assad’s phantom stash and, well, as you’ve no doubt figured because you’re reading this page it is all a crock of horseshit.

This has about as much to do with chemical weapons as spark plugs have to do with dental hygiene. Iraq opened up a giant hole, one that was necessary for a regime change in order to weaken the region and destabilise surrounding states. The US desires Israel expand its territories according to the Yinon Plan and aid in the Balkanization of the Middle East. Saudi Arabia, which hates the US and Israel, loathes Shia Moslem Iran even more and so aids its enemies in isolating it.

download (2)
One thoroughly evil Zionist cunt

All sorts of other unbelievable shenanigans have gone on, too numerous and complex to go into, but to cut a long story short Iran was invited into Syria along with Russia to fight the Islamist terrorists who the US and Israel have assisted so they can topple Assad for the necessary expansion plans outlined above.

But this time Russia is not going to be so easily shuffled out. Whatever noble intentions Charlie Wilson may honestly have held there are none to be found anywhere in Trump’s camp which includes as National Security Advisor the insane neo-conservative Zionist war monger John Bolton whose entire career has been dedicated to bringing on World War 3; not to mention the bomb-happy US Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley whose soul is so dangerous to life on earth that it’s kept securely guarded at a top secret military complex deep in the Antarctic in case its darkness blots out the sun for eternity.

Yes, it’s history repeating, but whereas Wilson and his CIA cronies hid behind Pakistan, Egypt and Israel to fight their war against the Soviet Union now all the players are facing off squarely. It’s eyeball-to-eyeball stuff and if the world is to survive this it’ll all be down to who actually blinks first.

Israel wants after Iran to stem its growing influence and Russia has Iran’s back. It was John Bolton who a decade ago was agitating for a war against Iran led by Israel. Israel and Iran have already traded shots with a drone attack and an airstrike. The Zionists view Iran’s involvement in Syria as the place setting for a base of operations against Israel and the two are on the hair-trigger. If that happens, the US and Russia go to the mat, and that means a world-changing throw of a set of dice that might turn nuclear as the brinkmanship gets real.

oie_XPFB99YvxMWY

 

THE FIGHTING SEASON: THOUGHTS ON THE MILITARISATION OF PUBLIC SPACES FROM KABUL TO MELBOURNE

THE FIGHTING SEASON: THOUGHTS ON THE MILITARISATION OF PUBLIC SPACES FROM KABUL TO MELBOURNE

The twilight zone between the end of the festive season and the resumption of the work year is, of late, a good opportunity to make the most of our Netflix and Stan subscriptions and in amongst the growing clutter of Bollywood movies and incomprehensible Taiwanese rom-coms we were able to find a few gems with which to pass the time.

A recent addition to the lineup was Ricky Schroder’s six part documentary series The Fighting Season, which follows several units of U.S Army military advisors and their Afghan allies as they develop security arrangements in Kabul during an election campaign, hunt Taliban fighters in the countryside and attempt to kill or capture an elusive insurgent commander.

To be frank, Schroder is a propagandist of the Obama era military effort in Afghanistan and the phased draw-down of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF); in general his film leans toward supporting the narrative of the Afghan National Army (ANA) and police finding their feet and slowly taking responsibility for their own security.

The Fighting Season, however, is very revealing in its depiction of modern, highly specialised combat troops re-tasked as, basically, police units and tactical response teams on overwatch, ready to leap into action should the Afghan forces get in over their heads.

Ricky schroder
Ricky Schroder, the former 1970’s child star is now an effective propagandist for the U.S war machine

In that sense this is a curious story, it has little in common with other War On Terror films, such as Sebastian Junger’s excellent Restrepo, or the dismal spectacle of the Ben Anderson documentary This Is What Winning Looks Like; the U.S paratroopers and 10th Mountain Division soldiers as depicted by Schroder exude a barely repressed bitterness and frustration even as they repeat the talking points of the official narrative.

From the slightly loopy security commander swanning around the teeming streets of Kabul as if he is going out for ice cream in his Midwestern hometown, seemingly oblivious to the threat of suicide bombers and kidnappers; to the hardened African American forward air controller calling in bombing runs on Taliban snipers these characters all ooze a superficial confidence and self control, but it is clear that they hate what they are doing and are deeply skeptical of the mission.

To be frank, Schroder is a propagandist of the Obama era military effort in Afghanistan and the phased draw-down of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF); in general his film leans toward supporting the narrative of the Afghan National Army (ANA) and police finding their feet and slowly taking responsibility for their own security.

Part of the dramatic tension which sets the pace across The Fighting Season’s six episodes is the sense that the Americans cannot trust the Afghan civilians, or rely upon the ANA and National Police to do their jobs; these are not, however, the drug addicts, child molesters and congenital idiots shown by Vice and Ben Anderson in 2013; on the contrary the Afghan soldiers are a mixed bag, ranging from merely competent, to tactically astute and, in some cases, almost suicidally brave.

sebastian junger tim hetherington
Sebastian Junger and Tim Hetherington produced an excellent film ,Restrepo, which captured life on a remote American firebase in the wilds of Afghanistan

Whether this is a completely accurate portrayal of the real ANA is another matter, we suspect the reality lies somewhere between Anderson’s pessimism and Schroders optimism; what is interesting from the point of our social commentary is this idea of a semi-competent but poorly equipped security force moving among the general population and maintaining a physical presence on the ground; guarded all the while by a high-tech, highly effective surveillance and intelligence group and backed up by heavily armed tactical units whose only task is to respond to emergencies.

It is this three-tiered security system used by foreign occupation forces in counter-insurgency operations, on behalf of their client regimes, which caught the eye of our writers; despite differences in the tempo of operations and the nature of the threats to civilians there is much in The Fighting Season which will feel familiar to the viewers, tucked up safe in their homes in the suburbs.

To the keen observer, there are distinct parallels between the militarization of public space in Afghanistan and the hardening of security precautions, recent restructure of police forces and the massive ramping up of state surveillance in Australian societies.

col graham
Colonel John Graham , on the right, confers with his long-suffering bodyguard; the colonel is a weird sort of fellow but his story is very interesting

One of the most striking scenes in Schroder’s series shows American advisors driving around Kabul performing spot checks on Afghan police vehicle control points; the commander of the inspection team, Colonel Graham who is, as we mentioned, somewhat of a weird, reckless character spends some minutes in effusive praise of the officers who man these roadblocks, search cars and try to detect Jihadist suicide bombers as they enter the city.

To the keen observer there are distinct parallels between the militarisation of public space in Afghanistan and the hardening of security precautions, recent restructure of police forces and the massive ramping up of state surveillance in Australian societies.

What Graham is saying, if we read between the lines, is that the ANP officers, the lowest tier of the security operation, are basically expendable; it is expected that if a suicide bomber or insurgent gunman is detected that there will be police casualties and that they are only expected to hold their own until the American rapid response teams and Afghan special forces can be scrambled, with their armoured vehicles, superior training and heavy weapons.

Put that into the context of Melbourne or Sydney, sure the threat is lower here and we do not have terrorist attacks every few weeks as they do in Kabul but broadly the same tactical, counterinsurgency regime is being applied in our cities; first responders, usually general duties police, will generally be running blindly into danger during an attack and even in bucolic Melbourne it is understood that they make take casualties before the better-equipped squads are deployed.

Afghan joint
An Afghan policeman smokes a spliff while on patrol in a scene from the confronting 2013 Vice documentary This Is What Winning Looks Like

Colonel Graham proudly shows off his “Ring Of Steel” around Kabul, the picket of concrete bollards, chicanes and fighting positions which has been built across Kabul to, if nothing else, impede insurgent attacks until a counter attack can be mounted; the topic of insurgent attacks is discussed as a certainty and the one gets the sense that the lowest tier officers and fortifications are in place to absorb most of the impact, that crime cannot be prevented, only a reactive use of force is available to mop up after any initial strike on the barricades.

In our cities similar measures are now in place: in keeping with the threat levels we have concrete bollards and discrete hardening of urban infrastructure, soft checkpoints such as booze buses and Protective Service officers at railway stations and the network of private security guards, authorised officers and municipal inspectors who provide eyes on capability across the community.

The Fighting Season’s other plot-lines provide not only the most exciting battlefield action sequences but show the middle path of pro-active counter-insurgent operations; the tactics of the famed U.S 10th Mountain Division and their ANA allies sit between the nearly passive defences of the “Ring Of Steel” and the reactive elements of the ISAF Quick Reaction Force made up of paratroopers and commandos.

The young American soldiers clearly hate the Afghan locals and gleefully take on the task of “getting in the face” of suspected Taliban insurgents; it is here we can see a contrast between this middle tier of counter terrorism operations in a combat zone and the pro-active policing efforts in the suburbs of Australian cities.

The young American soldiers clearly hate the Afghan locals and gleefully take on the task of “getting in the face” of suspected Taliban insurgents; it is here we can draw a comparison between this middle tier of counter-terrorism operations in a combat zone and the pro-active policing efforts in the suburbs of Australian cities.

forward
Forward Air Controller Sergeant Letnam, his hatred of the Afghans is apparent after he calls in an airstrike on a Taliban sniper nest and the insurgents walk away from the bombed-out position grinning and denying that they are fighters.

The point of the 10th Mountain troops operation was to disrupt, disturb and confront the Taliban and other outlaws, to break their routines, rattle their nerves and if possible kill or capture the fighters and drug smugglers; they patrolled in known Taliban strongholds, rousted their supporters in the villages, confiscated any goods or weapons suspected of belonging to fighters and attempted, by show of force, to diminish the Islamists standing in the community.

Australian police will claim that they are also pro-active when it comes to fighting our own low-level Islamic insurgency and gang crime, however it is this middle tier which, to many, has been the weak link in the local response, this is the cohort which has, in the minds of many workers been hobbled by political correctness and the point of the spear, so to speak, blunted by interference from government and social justice warriors.

It is generally accepted now that the day-to-day attempts by Australian police to play the “hearts and minds” routine in high crime suburbs, particularly those with high Third World migrant populations, have been a failure; what is more, by showing weakness they have actually made the problems worse.

What the people are becoming really agitated about is the weak effort at disrupting criminals and terrorists before they become a real problem, that not enough is being done to shut down radical Islamist recruiters and other fringe dwellers; there is also general outrage over the lack of in-patient services for the dangerously mentally ill or drug addicted and the apparent hands-off approach being taken toward ethnocentric criminal gangs.

It is significant that Aussie workers have quickly cottoned on to the fact that the fortification of public spaces and expansion of heavily armed flying squads are a necessary and proportionate reaction to the current threat environment; nobody seems particularly bothered by the sight of semi-trailers being used as shields against vehicle attacks outside the Cricket, or the unmarked vans cruising the streets loaded with specialist police armed with assault rifles.

What the people are becoming really agitated about is the weak effort at disrupting criminals and terrorists before they become a real problem, that not enough is being done to shut down radical Islamist recruiters and other fringe dwellers; there is also general outrage over the lack of in-patient services for the dangerously mentally ill or drug addicted and the apparent hands-off approach being taken toward ethnocentric criminal gangs.

sog
Tactical squads only arrive as an emergency unfolds, they are a reactive force, not pro-active.

In the general discussion of the militarization of police in Australia and the wider Anglosphere the tendency is, especially among the more libertarian or SJW cliques, to criticise the obvious trappings of the heightened security posture; the self-styled “cop watchers” seem to think that a citywide crackdown on civil liberties is underway merely because the security services have been on a spending spree, purchasing new carbines, armoured vehicles and surveillance gear.

As we have shown it is the tactical posture and the way policing is being conducted in our cities which is evidence of the move toward a counterinsurgency model rather than the traditional, low-key methods of the past; the real problem then becomes the synchronisation of the three tiers of security response: the bullet sponge beat cops, security guards and the fortifications; the pro-active, day-to-day, operations to disrupt, eliminate or humiliate Jihadis and criminal gangs and the rapid reaction forces who only appear once the threat is fully realised

Older Aussies may pine for the society we had and the bright future it promised, but which was squandered by the globalists; unfortunately there is the way things ought to be and the way things are; if Melbourne and Sydney are starting to resemble Kabul then half measures, a compassionate approach and political correctness have no place in the system.

If we are to accept this new security regime, which it is clear we must, at least in the short term purely as a matter of self-preservation then we expect the middle tier of state counter-terrorism operators and ASIO goons to emulate the 10th Mountain division in proportion to the scale of the threat.

If the cops are not kicking in the doors of rogue Imams, leaning hard on self-styled immigrant “community leaders” and making the lives of slacker Jihadis and ethnocentric street gangs utterly miserable then front line cops will have their blood spilled over those concrete bollards before the rapid reaction force can arrive, their bravery and that of the citizens who rush forward into danger will all count for nothing.

We, the workers of Australia, know what has to be done and we know why these very real but wholly imported threats to our lives have been allowed to fester all these years; we know that terrorism and ethnic gang crime is a direct result of globalist-capitalism, the vanity and cynicism of upper-class Whites and the creed of totalitarian humanism.

Older Aussies may pine for the society we had and the bright future it promised, but which was squandered by the globalists; unfortunately there is the way things ought to be and the way things are; if Melbourne and Sydney are starting to resemble Kabul then half measures, a compassionate approach and political correctness have no place in the system.

If we are to suffer under an insurgency where terrorism and gross crimes of violence are simply to be accepted as part of the “enriching” multicultural tapestry, then the security forces need to get serious; they should at least get the three tiers of policing working effectively, in the manner of ISAF and the SJW’s, politicians and do-gooders need to be kicked to the curb and no longer heard.

ring of steel
Afghan National Police: Expendable personnel deployed in the “Ring Of Steel” to absorb attacks, rather than repel them

WHAT DOES THE AFRICAN GANG MEME REALLY SAY ABOUT AUSTRALIA?

WHAT DOES THE AFRICAN GANG MEME REALLY SAY ABOUT AUSTRALIA?

As expected, the powers that be in the state of Victoria and beyond have been dragged, kicking and screaming, into a debate over youth crime and more specifically Sudanese gang crime in Melbourne.

There are a few memes concerning the issue bouncing around in cyberspace, some of them prescient, some ludicrous, while some are blatant Strawman arguments, it falls upon Nationalists, the only true outsider political tendency, to put some pressure on these talking points by, to some extent, playing Devil’s advocate.

The foremost and most popular among the bourgeois commentariat is the usual obfuscation of the issue with the cry: “Not all Africans!”

This defensive tactic is popular in the milieux who gain most of their insight into the workings of the world through the lens of ABC, Guardian and SBS editorials; we suspect that the intended outcome is that people will be shamed into remaining silent on the very real issue of Black gang crime when confronted with immigrant success stories and interviews with well dressed, articulate Africans.

sneetches_on_beaches
The Star-Bellied Sneetches thought they were all that and more, unfortunately, today’s SJW shows far worse character than any snooty Sneetches did

What we have here is just another case of filibustering by the Bourgeois media; the domination of public discourse with white noise, irrelevant information and the diversion of necessary and healthy democratic debate into side issues and intellectual dead-ends is a time-worn tactic.

In fact this tactic reveals the deep cynicism and arrogance of the upper castes; they seem to believe that if they can filibuster on the airwaves for a couple of 24 hour news cycles during a time of crisis, or widespread public disquiet, then the working classes will get sick of the noise and, easily distracted as we appear to those above, quickly move on to some other garish spectacle.

What we have here is just another case of filibustering by the Bourgeois media; the domination of public discourse with white noise, irrelevant information and the diversion of necessary and healthy democratic debate into side issues and intellectual dead-ends is a time worn tactic.

The Not All Africans meme is also problematic on other levels due to the fact that if it fails to mollify the population, as it has in recent weeks due to a spike in Sudanese gang crime and bullying targeting working class people, then it opens the door to widespread discrimination against very specific groups of people.

We understand that the upper castes do not want the little people thinking about big questions, that is why in Victoria it is a criminal offence to notice, then publicise obvious ethnic differences; nevertheless, think we do and the realisation soon comes that the more concentrated the demographic profile of serious youth offending becomes, the worse the true picture must be.

Let us take at face value the assertion that not all African migrants are troublemakers, which is obviously the case, so what we are left with is a very specific demographic cohort, Sudanese under the age of 30; in other words refugees from Sudan and their locally born children are the problem and given their astronomical rates of offending relative to their small population this becomes very much an issue of ethnicity.

1200px-Death_of_General_Gordon_at_Khartoum,_by_J.L.G._Ferris
Gordon of Khartoum, the original Social Justice Warrior captured in monochrome as his life is snuffed out by slaveholding Sudanese Muslims

The profile of “African” offenders can be broken down further, it is mainly the negroid South Sudanese who are the problem, Sudan, of course, is a racially, religiously and linguistically divided region with Muslim Arab influence in the north and tribal Negro populations in the south, this further concentration when taken in the context of their importation into our country makes the whole mess into a political question.

As well informed people will know the Sudan conflict began with the Arab Muslim conquest of Byzantine Christian Egypt in the year 642; Muslim slavers have been ranging south into Africa ever since, despite numerous interventions by outside forces intent on abolishing the trade in Negro slaves, notably the British and lately the United Nations.

Let us call the Sudan problem by its proper name, it is a near 1500 year race war in which the intellectually and materially superior Muslim Northerners have dominated the Negro populations of the south, who never developed beyond the stage of bronze age cattle herding, tribal society and animistic spiritualism.

We understand that the upper castes do not want the little people thinking about big questions, that is why in Victoria it is a criminal offence to notice, then publicise obvious ethnic differences; nevertheless, think we do and the realisation that the more concentrated the demographic profile of serious youth offending becomes, the worse the true picture must be.

The politicians of the Howard era immigration ministry, notably Phillip Ruddock and Amanda Vanstone, therefore, went on a mission to deliberately induct into our society the most helpless specimens of the losing side in a centuries-long racial struggle, all in the name of compassion and for the international prestige of their regime.

This analysis is borne out not only in the appalling behaviour of the Sudanese migrants and their inability to integrate, which became a problem as soon as they arrived and were concentrated in housing commission areas, it is the attitudes expressed by their spokesmen and apologists which totally give the game away.

Every time Sudanese migrants run out of control, be it in the context of a gang attack, the grotesque family violence which wracks their community or as a result of their general lack of intelligence the “community leaders” are wheeled out to decry the lack of resources and government guidance allocated to Sudanese people; in other words the senior members of that ethnic group clearly came here with the expectation of unlimited handouts and a free ride through life for their kids.

GrapesWrath_030Pyxurz
For the Joad family, the acceptance of welfare in the refugee camps of California was a grave moral issue

As Ma Joad in John Steinbeck’s masterpiece, The Grapes Of Wrath observed: “Charity leaves a stain”; never a truer word was written and in the Sudanese we have seen the importation, by ill-informed do-gooders, of a group of people with an ingrained welfare mentality into a social security system which does not tolerate slackers and malingerers.

What does this say about the status of the Sudanese in Australia and the refugees of the 21st century generally?

Comrades, never underestimate the vanity and cynicism of the politicians and managerial castes of the globalist cosmopolitan enterprise; they will do anything and say anything to achieve their end goal of the destruction of all nationalities and ethnic identities in the name of capitalism.

Australians are pretty good at looking after people with special needs, the aged and disabled care systems, while not perfect, work well for the most part and peoples basic needs are met, lessening the burden on families; however the system is not set up to cater for people with special needs based on ethnicity and family history.

Are Sudanese leaders asking for their ethnic group to become wards of the state in some sense?

Why is it up to the government to provide unlimited material support and guidance and to give a failing group of people, who when taken as a whole are nothing but trouble a free ride?

Rhetorical questions aside we cannot be too hard on the refugees when they were obviously sold on the idea of migration with a pack of lies by recruiters in the refugee camps all those years ago; after all, having been supported, for free, by the U.N for many years these people could be excused for thinking that everyone in developed societies receives the same indulgences and whole of life welfare support.

1200px-Elderly_swagman
An Aussie down on his luck, in the era before social security “humping Bluey” up and down the East coast, was the only way to survive

Comrades, never underestimate the vanity and cynicism of the politicians and managerial castes of the globalist cosmopolitan enterprise; they will do anything and say anything to achieve their end goal of the destruction of all nationalities and ethnic identities in the name of capitalism.

We are at the point, in 2018, where a group like Campaign Against Racism And Fascism, which is directly connected to the regime, will spread blatant lies about an assault on a Muslim woman to goad immigrant youth into fighting with police, as happened in the Milo Yiannopoulis counter-demonstration in Kensington recently.

Even as the anti-racism spiel is wearing thin and significant numbers of migrants from other, non-White ethnic groups are speaking out about Sudanese dysfunction the elites and their bourgeois agents in the “Social Justice” sphere are doubling down on the rhetoric and lashing out at all who dare challenge their dogma, to the point of going to ridiculous and dangerous extremes.

We are at the point in 2018 where a group like the Campaign Against Racism And Fascism, which is directly connected to the regime, will spread blatant lies about an assault on a Muslim woman to goad immigrant youth into fighting with police, as happened in the Milo Yiannopoulis counter-demonstration in Kensington recently.

The point of that exercise was to create the conditions for a progressive, White led “Black Lives Matter” movement, as evidenced by their follow up rally in the same neighbourhood some weeks later; what is implicit in the actions of CARF is that they are prepared to see immigrant youths incarcerated or, hopefully from their perspective, gunned down by the Pigs if it helps the cause of globalist progress.

This is where things stand in the first days of 2018, if history is our guide the current crop of Sudanese gang members will burn out and fade away within a few years, however, the dark, malignant core of the globalist system remains, with its determined race baiters and the freaks who daydream of an unthinking, coffee coloured humanity which does nothing but consume and generate debt to the oligarchy.

Sudanese do not belong in our society, this much is true, but they are here and we must never stop pointing out the reasons why they were imported and repeating the names of the people responsible for the refugee disaster in order to prevent them from making the situation infinitely worse.

895369-amanda-vanstone
Former immigration minister Amanda Vanstone shows off her prized Juan Peron action figure in the hope of redeeming herself in the eyes of the working class

ARROGANCE BEGAT INSECURITY: A REPLY TO DR TIM SOUTPHOMMASANE

ARROGANCE BEGAT INSECURITY: A REPLY TO DR TIM SOUTPHOMMASANE

Australia’s Race Discrimination Commissioner Dr Tim Soutphommasane is not only an overpaid and under-talented diversity hire, he is also a weaver of bad fiction in support of his own, self-serving hoax narrative.

For a recent column in the Fairfax press, Dr Tim has cobbled together an extraordinary tale framing 2017 as a year which saw rising support for White supremacy, the mainstreaming of anti-immigrant politics and a resurgence of Neo-Nazism.

Yes, comrades, this painful screed is every bit as ridiculous as it sounds; if one-tenth of the commissioner’s mantra of rote-learned talking points bore any relationship to the real world then cosmopolitan, capitalist run Australia would be in serious trouble.

In the time-honoured Anti-Racist fashion, the commissioner seems to have written a list of everyone he hates, or who disagrees with the goals of globalist capitalism on his boardroom wall and wired together a schizophrenic narrative with push-pins and string, like some sweaty stalker out of a Hollywood movie.

Goodes-26-Jan_adj
Dr Tim attempting to absorb credibility through the armpit of celebrity activist Adam Goodes

Little of it makes sense to anyone who knows what they are looking at, Dr Tim writes of “Right-Wing Nationalism” as if it is an authentic political tendency; the reality is, of course, that few if any “Right Wingers” approve of the radical Nationalist program, preferring instead their attachments to Zionism and a version of multiculturalism which excludes Islam and Muslims.

This pig-headed refusal by Tim and his broader academic caste to look beyond the outdated binary view of politics has already made them into figures of fun; if there is an ascendant “Right Wing Nationalism” then according to that rigid worldview there must also be left and centrist versions, sadly for these blockheads no such tendencies exist.

In the time honoured Anti-Racist fashion the commissioner seems to have written a list of everyone he hates, or who disagrees with the goals of globalist capitalism on his boardroom wall and wired together a schizophrenic narrative with push-pins and string, like some sweaty stalker out of a Hollywood movie.

There are Right Wingers and Left Wingers along the mainstream political axis who all enthusiastically support the globalist capitalist programme of mobile Third World populations, totalitarian humanist equality for all and the replacement of the citizen with the atomised, unquestioning, apolitical consumer who is ruled by oligarchs and their bourgeoisie.

Nationalism, as we practice it is neither left nor right, what it truly represents is secession from cosmopolitanism, a rejection of the binary worldview with all its rigid conformity and ever-thickening tangle of artificial social mores and pedantic restrictions upon the liberty of the working classes.

Dr Tim wilfully misrepresents recent events in Europe and North America in his attempt to lull his readers into believing that, say, the mass actions surrounding Polish independence day, the electoral success of AFD in Germany and the ill-fated Unite The Right rallies in the U.S.A are all part of some global trend toward a resurgent White supremacy.

Again, real Nationalists would have none of this since we reject outright the mindset which allows one to believe that the world is now integrated to the degree that universal White unity is a realistic possibility; universal ideals such as this do not enter the heads of radicals, this is the mindset of the globalists or the religious nuts, Islamic Jihadists being the obvious example.

Protesters-march-Sydney-September
Muslims in Sydney demanding that they are taken seriously by the chattering classes

This brings us to another dodgy connection in Tim’s web of untruths: Why would the people he labels conservatives, anti Semites or neo-Nazis have such a problem with Islam?

On the face of it Right Wing Islamophobia makes no sense, there is no logical explanation as to why one group of socially conservative people should be hostile to another group holding basically identical views, that is until one listens to what the right wingers are actually saying.

The natural reaction of the upper classes, of which Tim Soutphommasane is most decidedly a member, is to scoff and roll their eyes at any utterance by the “little people”; the problem, though, in assuming that their class holds the correct values and opinions on all matters is that these twits render themselves unable to take seriously anything which exists outside their bubble of self-satisfied political correctness.

On the face of it Right Wing Islamophobia makes no sense, there is no logical explanation as to why one group of socially conservative people should be hostile to another group holding basically identical views, that is until one listens to what the right wingers are actually saying.

The Right Wingers, on the other hand, take both cosmopolitanism and Islam completely seriously, probably more so than many Muslims and the faults they find with that way of life are all, basically, to do with its perceived negative effects upon multiculturalism, women’s rights, homosexual rights and the interests of Jews and Israel.

Dr Tim mentions in his article Milo Yiannopoulis, the homosexual, Jewish, Libertarian provocateur who is married to a black man; Tim is seemingly agog at the popularity of such a character in this day and age, however seen in its proper context Milo’s stage show is pure multicultural theatre, he is a perfect poster boy for the Right Wing because he embodies all that they hold dear and all that the upper classes lay claim to but, in their cynicism, neglect.

milo
Milo “The Dangerous Faggot” is not literally Hitler, he is more like the Dick Emery of globalist culture

The Islamic Jihad in the West is explicitly aimed at smashing social cohesion in multicultural societies by attacking its constituent parts,. The Right Wingers are one hundred percent correct on that score. Anyone who is capable of thinking tactically appreciates the structural weaknesses in cosmopolitanism, not to mention the studied indifference to this holy war among the upper classes, the politicians and the bourgeoisie.

This inability to think like one’s enemy by the people supposedly in charge leaves a cosmopolitan society wide open to subversion and the shock tactics of terrorists. If anything has become normalised in 2017 it is not “racism” as alleged by Dr Tim, rather it is this blasé attitude toward Islamic Jihad and its stated goals, which are the complete destruction of the multicultural West and the subjugation of its peoples by Muslims.

Further to his ballyhoo over the “Far Right” Soutphommasane also dramatically plays up the Neo-Nazi menace, albeit without specifically identifying anyone who openly admits to holding such opinions. We suspect this is because, like most people of his station his view of the new Nazis is likely informed by email circulars penned by Andre Oboler and the Jewish Board Of Deputies, so, therefore, we can assume that he knows nothing much about Nazis, either historical or contemporary.

Let us be blunt, Tim Soutphommasane is in trouble, if certain illiberal elements within the mainstream political scene have their way he and his fellow commissioners at HREOC will soon be out of a job, so he has to come up with something, anything really, to justify his three hundred thousand dollar a year salary.

The role most of the Neo-Nazis, as we have exhaustively explained in several articles is to stifle any dissent against globalist cosmopolitanism — to snuff out any spark of national feeling among Whites by tainting groups and individuals in guilt by association stings. True, some of these characters are motivated by the prospect of looting the money that organised political groups or clubs can raise, but in the main, they are wreckers under the direction of mainstream operatives.

Neo-Nazism, in contrast to Tim’s thesis, is actually the nemesis of White Nationalism and self-determination. It is chauvinistic within the context of White Australia since it attempts to apply phoney Third Reich racial categories to the White Australian ethnicity, something which, given our history on this continent, can never be accepted by true patriots.

charlottesvilleswast_14699_tn-992x558
The Neo-Nazi cuts a lonely figure at Unite The Right in Charlottesville

Dr Tim is peddling a load of horse manure. He is cobbling together a narrative of White supremacy and rising neo-Nazism to shore up his own precarious position as a globalist bureaucrat. If it all smacks of desperation it must be because Tim is, these days, a desperate man at the top tier of a widely hated bureaucracy.

Let us be blunt, Tim Soutphommasane is in trouble. Should certain illiberal elements within the mainstream political scene have their way he and his fellow commissioners at HREOC will soon be out of a job. He has to come up with something, anything really, to justify his three hundred thousand dollar a year salary.

Human rights are under attack by the minions of globalist capitalism; the idea is to roll back the legal protections available to citizens in the name of progress so that the transnational corporations can further embed themselves in the day to day life of working people.

Dr Tim is simply being made redundant by his real bosses. Maybe if he had done his job and protected the human rights of all Australians, rather than cultivating his reputation for arrogance, race-baiting and attacking the White majority, then he might have left his post in good standing and at a time of his choosing. As it stands though, he will probably be fired. His unpronounceable name will live on in infamy as just another haughty bureaucrat who got too big for his boots.

Dastyari
Pride comes before a fall, arrogant public servants in this country quickly grow into tall poppies, ripe for a hard pruning