WHAT DOES THE AFRICAN GANG MEME REALLY SAY ABOUT AUSTRALIA?

WHAT DOES THE AFRICAN GANG MEME REALLY SAY ABOUT AUSTRALIA?

An update from Melbourne, the city too afraid to dine out, by James Hillman.

As expected, the powers that be in the state of Victoria and beyond have been dragged, kicking and screaming, into a debate over youth crime and more specifically Sudanese gang crime in Melbourne.

There are a few memes concerning the issue bouncing around in cyberspace, some of them prescient, some ludicrous, while some are blatant Strawman arguments, it falls upon Nationalists, the only true outsider political tendency, to put some pressure on these talking points by, to some extent, playing Devil’s advocate.

The foremost and most popular among the bourgeois commentariat is the usual obfuscation of the issue with the cry: “Not all Africans!”

This defensive tactic is popular in the milieux who gain most of their insight into the workings of the world through the lens of ABC, Guardian and SBS editorials; we suspect that the intended outcome is that people will be shamed into remaining silent on the very real issue of Black gang crime when confronted with immigrant success stories and interviews with well dressed, articulate Africans.

sneetches_on_beaches
The Star-Bellied Sneetches thought they were all that and more, unfortunately, today’s SJW shows far worse character than any snooty Sneetches did

What we have here is just another case of filibustering by the Bourgeois media; the domination of public discourse with white noise, irrelevant information and the diversion of necessary and healthy democratic debate into side issues and intellectual dead-ends is a time-worn tactic.

In fact this tactic reveals the deep cynicism and arrogance of the upper castes; they seem to believe that if they can filibuster on the airwaves for a couple of 24 hour news cycles during a time of crisis, or widespread public disquiet, then the working classes will get sick of the noise and, easily distracted as we appear to those above, quickly move on to some other garish spectacle.

What we have here is just another case of filibustering by the Bourgeois media; the domination of public discourse with white noise, irrelevant information and the diversion of necessary and healthy democratic debate into side issues and intellectual dead-ends is a time worn tactic.

The Not All Africans meme is also problematic on other levels due to the fact that if it fails to mollify the population, as it has in recent weeks due to a spike in Sudanese gang crime and bullying targeting working class people, then it opens the door to widespread discrimination against very specific groups of people.

We understand that the upper castes do not want the little people thinking about big questions, that is why in Victoria it is a criminal offence to notice, then publicise obvious ethnic differences; nevertheless, think we do and the realisation soon comes that the more concentrated the demographic profile of serious youth offending becomes, the worse the true picture must be.

Let us take at face value the assertion that not all African migrants are troublemakers, which is obviously the case, so what we are left with is a very specific demographic cohort, Sudanese under the age of 30; in other words refugees from Sudan and their locally born children are the problem and given their astronomical rates of offending relative to their small population this becomes very much an issue of ethnicity.

1200px-Death_of_General_Gordon_at_Khartoum,_by_J.L.G._Ferris
Gordon of Khartoum, the original Social Justice Warrior captured in monochrome as his life is snuffed out by slaveholding Sudanese Muslims

The profile of “African” offenders can be broken down further, it is mainly the negroid South Sudanese who are the problem, Sudan, of course, is a racially, religiously and linguistically divided region with Muslim Arab influence in the north and tribal Negro populations in the south, this further concentration when taken in the context of their importation into our country makes the whole mess into a political question.

As well informed people will know the Sudan conflict began with the Arab Muslim conquest of Byzantine Christian Egypt in the year 642; Muslim slavers have been ranging south into Africa ever since, despite numerous interventions by outside forces intent on abolishing the trade in Negro slaves, notably the British and lately the United Nations.

Let us call the Sudan problem by its proper name, it is a near 1500 year race war in which the intellectually and materially superior Muslim Northerners have dominated the Negro populations of the south, who never developed beyond the stage of bronze age cattle herding, tribal society and animistic spiritualism.

We understand that the upper castes do not want the little people thinking about big questions, that is why in Victoria it is a criminal offence to notice, then publicise obvious ethnic differences; nevertheless, think we do and the realisation that the more concentrated the demographic profile of serious youth offending becomes, the worse the true picture must be.

The politicians of the Howard era immigration ministry, notably Phillip Ruddock and Amanda Vanstone, therefore, went on a mission to deliberately induct into our society the most helpless specimens of the losing side in a centuries-long racial struggle, all in the name of compassion and for the international prestige of their regime.

This analysis is borne out not only in the appalling behaviour of the Sudanese migrants and their inability to integrate, which became a problem as soon as they arrived and were concentrated in housing commission areas, it is the attitudes expressed by their spokesmen and apologists which totally give the game away.

Every time Sudanese migrants run out of control, be it in the context of a gang attack, the grotesque family violence which wracks their community or as a result of their general lack of intelligence the “community leaders” are wheeled out to decry the lack of resources and government guidance allocated to Sudanese people; in other words the senior members of that ethnic group clearly came here with the expectation of unlimited handouts and a free ride through life for their kids.

GrapesWrath_030Pyxurz
For the Joad family, the acceptance of welfare in the refugee camps of California was a grave moral issue

As Ma Joad in John Steinbeck’s masterpiece, The Grapes Of Wrath observed: “Charity leaves a stain”; never a truer word was written and in the Sudanese we have seen the importation, by ill-informed do-gooders, of a group of people with an ingrained welfare mentality into a social security system which does not tolerate slackers and malingerers.

What does this say about the status of the Sudanese in Australia and the refugees of the 21st century generally?

Comrades, never underestimate the vanity and cynicism of the politicians and managerial castes of the globalist cosmopolitan enterprise; they will do anything and say anything to achieve their end goal of the destruction of all nationalities and ethnic identities in the name of capitalism.

Australians are pretty good at looking after people with special needs, the aged and disabled care systems, while not perfect, work well for the most part and peoples basic needs are met, lessening the burden on families; however the system is not set up to cater for people with special needs based on ethnicity and family history.

Are Sudanese leaders asking for their ethnic group to become wards of the state in some sense?

Why is it up to the government to provide unlimited material support and guidance and to give a failing group of people, who when taken as a whole are nothing but trouble a free ride?

Rhetorical questions aside we cannot be too hard on the refugees when they were obviously sold on the idea of migration with a pack of lies by recruiters in the refugee camps all those years ago; after all, having been supported, for free, by the U.N for many years these people could be excused for thinking that everyone in developed societies receives the same indulgences and whole of life welfare support.

1200px-Elderly_swagman
An Aussie down on his luck, in the era before social security “humping Bluey” up and down the East coast, was the only way to survive

Comrades, never underestimate the vanity and cynicism of the politicians and managerial castes of the globalist cosmopolitan enterprise; they will do anything and say anything to achieve their end goal of the destruction of all nationalities and ethnic identities in the name of capitalism.

We are at the point, in 2018, where a group like Campaign Against Racism And Fascism, which is directly connected to the regime, will spread blatant lies about an assault on a Muslim woman to goad immigrant youth into fighting with police, as happened in the Milo Yiannopoulis counter-demonstration in Kensington recently.

Even as the anti-racism spiel is wearing thin and significant numbers of migrants from other, non-White ethnic groups are speaking out about Sudanese dysfunction the elites and their bourgeois agents in the “Social Justice” sphere are doubling down on the rhetoric and lashing out at all who dare challenge their dogma, to the point of going to ridiculous and dangerous extremes.

We are at the point in 2018 where a group like Campaign Against Racism And Fascism, which is directly connected to the regime, will spread blatant lies about an assault on a Muslim woman to goad immigrant youth into fighting with police, as happened in the Milo Yiannopoulis counter-demonstration in Kensington recently.

The point of that exercise was to create the conditions for a progressive, White led “Black Lives Matter” movement, as evidenced by their follow up rally in the same neighbourhood some weeks later; what is implicit in the actions of CARF is that they are prepared to see immigrant youths incarcerated or, hopefully from their perspective, gunned down by the Pigs if it helps the cause of globalist progress.

This is where things stand in the first days of 2018, if history is our guide the current crop of Sudanese gang members will burn out and fade away within a few years, however, the dark, malignant core of the globalist system remains, with its determined race baiters and the freaks who daydream of an unthinking, coffee coloured humanity which does nothing but consume and generate debt to the oligarchy.

Sudanese do not belong in our society, this much is true, but they are here and we must never stop pointing out the reasons why they were imported and repeating the names of the people responsible for the refugee disaster in order to prevent them from making the situation infinitely worse.

895369-amanda-vanstone
Former immigration minister Amanda Vanstone shows off her prized Juan Peron action figure in the hope of redeeming herself in the eyes of the working class
Advertisements

THE FASCISM FIASCO CONTINUES…

THE FASCISM FIASCO CONTINUES…

I read with interest the United Nationalists Australia article on fascism, published just a few days ago. I understand it caused various commentary.

It is fair to say, with the recent Alt-Right appearance in Australia, the development of new youth organisations and with other factors in play, many younger people are pondering over fascism. Does it offer anything?

Dr. Jim Saleam

Of course, we live in a time when just about everything has been lied about by the ruling establishment, so why not fascism too? What if it was some sort of ‘answer’? Sometimes today by this new upsurge, things about fascism are said humorously, or to provoke, all of which have no real significance. However, things put forward often enough can take on a life of their own. I have come to the conclusion the matter of fascism should be broadly discussed.

The United Nationalists’ writer was quick enough to warn that the adoption of foreign ideologies in Australia can be part of a cultural cringe. Yes. And that any foreign ideology has messages that just do fit Australian realities. I could not agree more. However, if the United Nationalists article went on to make any errors in the facts, or in the interpretation of facts, it may fail to signal those warnings. I did detect a little of that, but generally, I won’t go over the ground.

37C16BF700000578-3767201-image-a-60_1472653614419
Mussolini believed that rice was a better diet than pasta

I do have a bias in this discussion: my political experience has recorded many persons, claiming to act as types of Australian nationalist and who have misunderstood fascism – have gone on to personal calamities, often pulling others and groups into disaster. I have asked whether their ill fortunes were related to this initial ideological error? To say that is not unfair or unreasonable.

Over the Christmas break, I am intending a series of articles – ‘My Fascist Questions’. I hope to show how difficult the area is to traverse. I intend to relate the whole question to Australia. However, in this short entrance into the debate about fascism, I would give two examples of how fraught with problems this affair truly is.

Take One:

It has been said by some persons that historical fascism (I am referring to the period of the movements and regimes 1919 – 1945) and in particular the German version (National Socialism), was a type of pioneer ‘white nationalism” – and consequently it is relevant in some way or another to an Australian nationalist movement in the present. I would offer two quotes.

Benito Mussolini said:

“ When dealing with such a race as Slavic – inferior and barbarian – we must not pursue the carrot, but the stick, policy. We should not be afraid of new victims. The Italian border should run across the Brenner Pass, Monte Nevoso and the Dinaric Alps. I would say we can easily sacrifice 500,000 barbaric Slavs for 50,000 Italians.”

Adolf Hitler was very detailed (I have edited the section from his Mein Kampf to be consistent with the current subject):

“….we National Socialists consciously draw a line beneath the foreign policy tendency of our pre-War period. …. we break off the colonial and commercial policy of the pre-War period and shift to the soil policy of the future.

If we speak of soil in Europe today, we can primarily have in mind only Russia and her vassal border states.

Here Fate itself seems desirous of giving us a sign. By handing Russia to Bolshevism, it robbed the Russian nation of that intelligentsia which previously brought about and guaranteed its existence as a state. For the organisation of a Russian state formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the state-forming efficacity of the German element in an inferior race. ….. Lower nations led by Germanic organisers and overlords have more than once grown to be mighty state formations and have endured as long as the racial nucleus of the creative state race maintained itself.

Impossible as it is for the Russian by himself to shake off the yoke of the Jew by his own resources, it is equally impossible for the Jew to maintain the mighty empire forever. He himself is no element of an organisation, but a ferment of decomposition. The Persian empire in the east is ripe for collapse. And the end of Jewish rule in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a state. ……”

hqdefault
If Hitler was alive today he would be head of the UN Human Rights Commission

The problem with these assessments is that the Italian and German leaders were asserting that the Slavic third of the white race was “inferior” to their peoples. How are we to deal with that? I would doubt that any Australian nationalist or patriot could draw any sustenance from such a position. How would it be relevant to Australia? If we stripped all the European history out of it, we are still left with the single core idea that one-third of the white race is “inferior” to the remainder. Can that really mean that historical fascism was a ‘white nationalism’?

download (7)
Lída Baarová, the “subhuman” Slavic goddess that Hitler’s propaganda minister drooled over

Of course, we could conclude fascism had ideas around it, which must have arisen from somewhere, that we do not approve of. So, how do we cherry-pick if we were minded to? And once we accept this or reject that, it becomes very messy indeed. What if there is some odd fellow who actually swallows the thing whole and says it might have been a valid notion? And where would that lead him – to an odd history club?

Or might it be that my Take One is evidence to support the notion we act as Australians only, with an Australian cause? Yet, there’s more.

Take Two:

The United Nationalists article gave a bit of stick to Francis Parker Yockey, a post-war writer, sometimes called a neo-fascist. In point, he might have been called in aid of the writer’s argument.

Yockey wrote in his book, Imperium (1948):

“The first concept in order is Race.  The materialistic race-thinking of the 19th century had particularly heavy consequences for Europe when it was coupled with one of the early 20th century movements of Resurgence of  Authority. Any excrescence of theoretical equipment on a political movement is a luxury, and the Europe of 1933–2000 can afford none such. Europe has paid dearly for this Romantic concern with old-fashioned racial theories, and they must be destroyed. “

“The racial snobbery of the 19th century was intellectual, and its adoption in a too-narrow sphere by the Resurgence of Authority in Europe between the first two World Wars was a grotesquerie.

yockey
Francis Parker Yockey was that rare thing: a genius

Yockey, who had a lot to do with survivors of the fascist period in Germany, Italy, France and Britain, many of whom changed their minds or developed out their views on these very issues, had his views informed accordingly: they concluded and he followed on, that there was something not quite right with the racial ideologies of the fascist parties and states and in the practice of these states in the invasion of Russia, I would mention to my readers that this history can be found in Kevin Coogan, Dreamer Of The Day: Francis Parker Yockey And The Post War Fascist International. It is a massive subject.

So what do we do now? Is this post-war view of the participants correct? Or is the former view the right one? Is the history already beyond us? How does it all advance an Australian movement?

I should add Yockey’s comment in 1952 on the evolution of Russia away from the nexus between a section of Jewry and communism, the very thing that bedevilled the fascists in the earlier period:

“Russia’s break with Jewry marks the beginning of the end of Bolshevism. It is called forth by the true, religious Russia, which abhors politics and technics, and which has been dominated by Petrinism and Moscovite Bolshevism alike. Of course, this break was only a beginning, but the final, inner collapse of Bolshevism is unavoidable. The possibility-indeed, I must say, the inevitability of the destruction of Bolshevism by the true Russia is posited in Imperium.”

Today’s Conclusion

An Australian nationalist movement can and should base itself upon historical facts and appreciating how the present world came into being is part of that. Consequently, a discussion of fascism is part of our knowledge-seeking. Equally, we live in the age of the population-food crisis, of refugee wanderings, of immigration invasions, of the rise of Chinese imperialism and the crisis of New World Order capitalism. So, where each historical discussion fits with deriving answers to these historical problems, will be the crucial thing.

I would conclude here today with a provocative quote from none other than Sir Oswald Mosley, whose name has come up often in the new fascist debate. Of course, there are two Mosleys – the 1930’s leader of the British Union of Fascists and the leader of Union Movement founded in 1947. He was rather critical of his past and fascism’s past and he said: “fascism is  a corpse regardless of how cleverly it has been embalmed.”

Will that be our finding? Or will it be that some things are in fact cherry-picked, not by men, but by deep historical forces and if anything contains even a scintilla of virtue, it is indeed passed on? Let us begin this dialogue!

s2g2Yv8
The ultimate symbol of Australian Nationalism

NOBODY ASKED YOU TO BE FASCISTS

NOBODY ASKED YOU TO BE FASCISTS

If there is one current fad which has us scratching our heads it is the infatuation some so-called Nationalists have developed for the now anachronistic and ideologically compromised political movements of the 20th century.

We have repeatedly pointed out the “cultural cringe” and creeping universalism implied by adherence to this mindset, or sub-culture, if you will.

Let us be clear from the beginning: Fascism, National Socialism and their variants run in direct opposition to the ideals and goals of contemporary Australian White Nationalism; the NS imperialism, geopolitical ambition and toxic racial doctrine should exclude those schools of thought from serious discussions of Australian identity, independence and freedom.

As we have been at pains to point out, the lot of antipodean White Nationalists in the early 21st century must be that of the anti-colonial partisan; the anti-capitalist worker’s advocate; the community support group of a shamed and demoralised ethnic minority.

Moseley
Ecce Homo

This conclusion should be obvious to all people sympathetic to the cause of White survival; as recent events have shown, globalist capitalism and corporate cosmopolitanism have captivated an overwhelming majority of our folk, with a sizeable minority also falling into the ideologically impotent and politically useless Conservative category.

The tendency for some Dinky-Di intellectuals to pine for a Europe they never knew, mimic political theories which were never part of our cultural landscape and imagine some primal kinship with the races of the global North risks heaping further insult upon injuries to the national psyche

Let us be clear from the beginning: Fascism, National Socialism and their variants run in direct opposition to the ideals and goals of contemporary Australian White Nationalism; the NS imperialism, geopolitical ambition and toxic racial doctrine should exclude those schools of thought from serious discussions of Australian identity, independence and freedom.

The 1933-45 era was great if you were a German, up to a point, but bad luck if you were a Pole, a Russian or a Frenchman; a Norwegian, a Yugoslav or a Greek.

Given that from the gold rush era onward White Australia has been shaped by the interactions, intermarriage and cross cultural collaborations of it’s blueprint ethnic groups we ought to laugh in the face of Fascist universalism and its risible racial theories.

hatebus8
Low rent boys and their sputtering Hate Bus

That we count as kin the descendants of those regarded as subhumans by the defunct authoritarian regimes of middle Europe should render any discussion of Neo-Fascism as a pathway to national rebirth liable to be, rightly, howled down by true patriots.

The very idea of modern Australian Nationalism is to get away from the morass of the past and to forge a unique, vibrant and progressive White culture free from the hereditary privilege, political instability and tedious ethnic squabbles of central Europe.

Let us make the Nationalist position even clearer, nobody out there in the East-Coast urban jungles, which hold 75% of our population, even knows, much less cares about Evola, or Rosenberg, Hitler, Yockey, Rockwell nor any of the long dead legends of the authoritarian, northern hemisphere’s past.

The 1933-45 era was great if you were a German, up to a point, but bad luck if you were a Pole, a Russian or a Frenchman; a Norwegian, a Yugoslav or a Greek.

In the era of trash culture and the consensual hallucination of cyberspace it is enough of a struggle to gain recognition among White Australians of our own pantheon of intellectual and political legends of the 20th century; who were, after all, our own people working in the interests of our own nation.

Alfred-Rosenberg-portrait-1263x560
Alfred Rosenberg: blame him for the self-conscious, Hamster wheel futility of modern neo-Fascism

Neo-Nazism, if true to its roots, logically has no room for national identity outside some universal, global village of suitably Nordic Europids; we in the diaspora might just as well adopt Islam or become part of the European Union, they being the path of least resistance to the same overall outcome of a homogenized “Ummah” living in the new age of semi-divine authority imagined by these intellectuals.

Grow up, take some ownership of YOUR past while casting an eye to YOUR future; Neo-Fascism and idolatry of it’s founding prophets is not only a cultural cringe, it is morbid, especially in light of the fact that the heroes of White Australia largely succeeded in achieving their goals, in-extremis might we add; meanwhile the leading Fascists were dancing the “Tyburn Jig” in the rubble of their own creations.

A DISCUSSION CONCERNING PERCY STEPHENSEN AND THE AUSTRALIA FIRST MOVEMENT – VITALLY USEFUL

A DISCUSSION CONCERNING PERCY STEPHENSEN AND THE AUSTRALIA FIRST MOVEMENT – VITALLY USEFUL

 

For reasons that make no sense to us, the entire text for this entry has vanished off WordPress. The Ed-in-chief assumes it is a vagary with a tablet app connected to WordPress which is an awful bastard of a thing. However, the text can be read at the Australia First Party website by clicking THIS link.

ASSERTIVE NEUTRALITY: THE NATIONALIST ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT

ASSERTIVE NEUTRALITY: THE NATIONALIST ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT

In our ideological struggle against the system and its toadies, we must constantly be on the front foot in terms of laying out for our people exactly where we stand on the issues of the day.

It should go without saying that Australian Nationalists oppose, on principle, any involvement of the national defence forces in the wars of imperialism currently being waged by the so-called “coalition of the willing”.

Our doctrine of identity, independence and freedom sits at the polar extreme to that of all-conquering globalist capitalism; we value genuine diversity among the nations of the world, a position which obviously rejects any false notions of equality, supremacy or inferiority in the relationships between the mosaic of national groups.

Furthermore, we reject out of hand the adherence to treaties entailing international obligations which might needlessly put our people in harm’s way at the behest of the superpowers, or which could seriously interfere with the self-determination, good order or sovereignty of other nations.

aleppo
Aleppo, Syria: a tragic situation, but it has nothing to do with us

 

For example, our position on the recent Sunni insurgencies in Syria and Iraq has been consistent as we have stated from the beginning of the hostilities that this conflict should be fought and won by a strong coalition of Middle-Eastern regional forces and their northern hemisphere allies.

This eternal struggle for the soul of the Islamic world has nothing whatsoever to do with Australians, who are a people of the global south and should see ourselves as a nation apart from the endless squabbling among some 70 factions of Mohammedans with their myriad tribal and ethnic divisions.

There is no need for a nation of the south, which is socially, racially and geographically a world away from North Asia to be involved in the politics of that region, especially not as the yapping Lap Dog of the clown president Donald Trump and his Zionist cronies.

So too the sabre rattling by Canberra’s imperial globalist warmongers against the hermit state of North Korea is strongly condemned by Australian Nationalists for it is no concern of ours whether the Kim family stands or falls as rulers, or whether their crypto-Fascist system of government remains in place.

KCNA picture of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un speaking at the first party committee meeting in Pyongyang
We would bet the farm that Kim Jong Un will never bother us if we do not bother him

 

The possession of weapons of mass destruction by such regimes has, in recent times, tended to mitigate against widespread conventional warfare of the sort which ravaged the world in the 20th century, so it is no concern of ours whether North Korea remains as it is, armed to the teeth and ruled by a despot and his secret police.

There is no need for a nation of the south, which is socially, racially and geographically a world away from North Asia to be involved in the politics of that region, especially not as the yapping lap Dog of the clown president Donald Trump and his Zionist cronies.

The threats posed by Jihadism are likewise made far more manageable by a prudent immigration program which excludes non-assimilable Mohammedans, a move to Australian neutrality in foreign affairs, including cutting ties with the Zionist entity and an end to opportunistic political support for Islamism by the current political elites.

 

Talal Almeddine
Talal Almeddin and the other plotters of the Parramatta outrage are symptoms, not the disease and the cure is simple

 

As a nation we are blessed to inhabit one of the quieter corners of the globe and Nationalists feel no shame in our past reputation as a cozy, bucolic backwater at the ends of the earth, this ideal is, in fact, the state of affairs which patriotic folk ought to have explicitly tried to “reclaim” in the heady days of 2015.

The threats posed by Jihadism are likewise made far more manageable by a prudent immigration program which excludes non-assimilable Mohammedans, a move to Australian neutrality in foreign affairs, including cutting ties with the Zionist entity and an end to opportunistic political support for Islamism by the current political elites.

In the era of immigration restriction and White supremacy Australia was a genuinely progressive society and despite being embroiled in the wars of the 20th century, the second of which was unavoidable anyway, there was a sense of relentless forward momentum, optimism and the feeling that through the pursuit of social justice at home we might lead by example the developing nations of the world.

The heroes of Kokoda and the men who fought the campaigns against Japanese Fascism across our region are the examples for our assertive brand of neutrality; they fought for blood and soil, in the interests of their nation against a foe who sought to obliterate all societies in its path and impose totalitarian rule across the Pacific.

Let us be clear, however, that we are in no way “Antifascist” in the context of the fake Left and Zionist Right, we are simply aloof from that fraudulent and time-wasting argument because Australian Nationalists are the legitimate heirs and standard bearers of the political theories and way of life which exterminated the anti-national, totalitarian regimes of the 20th century.

kokoda_australians
The heroes of Kokoda, they fought against imperialist bullies and the killers of nations

 

To hostile powers, despots and imperialists Australian Nationalists would issue the admonition: leave us alone and benefit from our diplomatic skills, engineering prowess and scientific know-how; trade with us and receive goods of the best quality, clean foodstuffs and licences to deal your produce in kind.

However, intimidate or threaten us, make demands of, or coerce our nearest neighbours and, as an armed but neutral nation, we will send you scurrying away, starving and in rags, like General Horii and his Japanese forces in 1942.

Australian Nationalists hate war and imperialism, we hate the anti-nationalist, globalist thugs who are flourishing under Trump and Turnbull just as our forebears hated the anti-nationalist bullies of the 1930’s and 1940’s.

eureka

THE MAN WITH THE IRON HEART AND NO PERSONALITY

THE MAN WITH THE IRON HEART AND NO PERSONALITY

The new film from French director Cédric Jiminez (The Connection, Aux Yeux De Tous) represents nothing but a series of opportunities to tell an interesting story which has been squandered through equivocation in narrative and a lack of detail in its script.

The Man With The Iron Heart, abbreviated to HHhH, has so many problems it is hard to know where to start; it is poorly edited, the nominally stellar cast is restrained by hamfisted writing and poor character development and it is difficult to discern what point, if any, the writer-director is trying to make.

The story centres on the 1942 assassination, in Prague, of SS General Reinhard Heydrich. We are given some snapshots of his former life as a Navy officer, his rise through the ranks of the NSDAP, and his ascension to the top echelons of the National Socialist hierarchy.

hhhh-h_2017
Jason Clarke and Rosamund Pike as Reinhard and Lina Heydrich: a strong woman and her unfathomable blob of a husband

This series of badly constructed jump cuts, flashbacks and flashes forward, introduces Jason Clarke as Heydrich, Rosamund Pike as his wife Lina, and the always excellent Stephen Graham as an eerily realistic Heinrich Himmler.

The trouble with this opening sequence, however, is that the writers assume that the viewer already knows who the characters are, the timeline of NSDAP history, and the events which led up to Hitler’s ascension to power in 1933; we are confident that the average moviegoer would have no idea where, say, Ernst Röhm or Heinrich Müller fit into the story

The Man With The Iron Heart, abbreviated to HHhH, has so many problems it is hard to know where to start; it is poorly edited, the nominally stellar cast is restrained by hamfisted writing and poor character development and it is difficult to discern what point, if any, the writer-director is trying to make.

Röhm and Müller appear as pop-up characters for mere seconds of screentime in HHhH, Hitler is absent altogether and highly significant events, such as the “Night Of The Long Knives” are glossed over in a way which might leave the average punter scratching his head in confusion over what he had just watched.

Kubis
The Czech resistance also suffers at the hands of director Jiminez

Clarke’s Heydrich comes across as a flat, even passive character; he is sometimes annoyed, sometimes explosively violent but he never has anything really profound or interesting to say.

We would assume that the writers were aiming for a steely, near psychopathic aura for the character, but the result is a dull and listless cartoon of a man whose personal motivations and deeper thoughts are never made clear.

Moreover, Jiminez plays it so safe with his “Holocaust” narrative that he almost strays into the area of heresy by the omission of pertinent details of the (((official))) WW2 story.

The repression of Czech resistance, the police actions and mass killings carried out by Heydrich’s SS units are, remarkably, even turned into boring vignettes in HHhH; to anyone familiar with the real story the film goes close to exculpating senior NS officials by effectively cutting them out of the picture.

Clarke’s Heydrich comes across as a flat, even passive character; he is sometimes annoyed, sometimes explosively violent but he never has anything really profound or interesting to say

You see, in opposition to the mainstream, Hollywood inspired story of the Holocaust there is a school of thought which puts forth the idea that the Final Solution was a criminal conspiracy carried out by elements within the SS in pursuit of their own objectives; that the true magnitude of the mass killings and ethnic cleansing was deliberately kept from Hitler and his inner circle.

By omitting Hitler from the film the director has, perhaps unwittingly, veered into forbidden territory. If the viewer is paying attention, he could easily form the impression that Heydrich really was the sole architect of the planned destruction of native Czech culture and the liquidation of ethnic minorities within his area of responsibility.

The second half of the film is utterly forgettable in spite of the introduction of some fine actors into the cast; Mia Wasikowska, Jack Raynor and Jack O’Connell form the nexus of the Czech resistance plotline but that too falls flat and fails to make an impact on the viewer, there is simply not enough meat on the bones of the characters for the script to be effective.

anthropoid
Jamie Dornan and Cillian Murphy in Anthropoid, fine actors who were clearly given good direction and a first-rate script by Sean Ellis

In contrast to HHhH we recommend the excellent film Anthropoid. The 2016 feature directed by Sean Ellis examines in detail the actual plot to assassinate Heydrich which was led by resistance fighters and British trained Czech special forces soldiers Jan Kubis and Josef Gabcíc.

Jamie Dornan and Cillian Murphy are altogether more convincing as Kubis and Gabcíc, their operation, codenamed Anthropoid, takes place amid a far more fraught atmosphere, a vision of Prague riddled with collaborators, cowardly resistance turncoats and Gestapo spies.

By omitting Hitler from the film the director has, perhaps unwittingly, veered into forbidden territory, if the viewer is paying attention he could easily form the impression that Heydrich really was the sole architect of the planned destruction of native Czech culture and the liquidation of ethnic minorities within his area of responsibility.

The supporting cast, though lacking the big names of HHhH are equally impressive; Charlotte Le Bon and Anna Geislerova acquit themselves well in their roles as resistance sympathisers Marie and Lenka, who sacrifice everything they hold dear to free their country.

Anthropoid2
Young love was thought the perfect cover in a city brimming with spies and collaborators

Due to superior writing, it is what is said in Anthropoid, as opposed to what is explicitly shown, but poorly explained in HHhH that drives home to the viewer the horrors inflicted upon the people of Czechoslovakia by the National Socialists.

The impact of the SS reprisals against those who aided Heydrich’s assassins as depicted in the former film is far more dramatic than in the latter simply because by the climax of the film one has begun to sympathise with the characters in Anthropoid, due to their being more well rounded and the actors working from a better-prepared script.

In the end, HHhH is a badly made Holocaust drama which fails to land any of its punches due to the limitations of that genre, even though it does appear, to the trained eye at least, to bend that tiresome narrative to some extent.

Anthropoid, on the other hand, is a film Australian Nationalists may relate to, being as it is a depiction of where true patriots can be taken in their fight for a free country; it shows in graphic detail the sacrifices required of resistance fighters in a struggle against a tyrannical colonial power bent on crushing the native society.

There is much in the story of Kubis and Gabcíc and the wider European resistance movements against National Socialist and, later, Soviet imperialism which should inspire Nationalists everywhere, Anthropoid, as an entertaining piece of popular culture is a good place to start.

Mother
Alena Mihulová, playing the heroic Mrs Moravec, who faces the Gestapo as the reprisal raids begin

WHITE AUSTRALIA DOES NOT HAVE A BLACK HISTORY

WHITE AUSTRALIA DOES NOT HAVE A BLACK HISTORY

History is written by the victor, we know this, so we can assume history and conquest have an inexorable linkage.

However, history requires the written word, archiving and preserving — but primarily it entails epochal events, heroes and villains, achievement and again, a permanency of record. Given that the Aboriginal race has never managed anything but some quaint Dreamtime stories and a few primitive rock paintings then what is this “black history” that White Australia is supposed to have? In fact, Aboriginals didn’t have a history until Whites came along and imparted the concept.

Through White Man’s magic we were able to learn a lot that can now be absorbed into a ‘history’ that could not exist but by a dubious word-of-mouth shared by particular Aboriginal tribes and heavily weighted down by the cultural context of those walkabout fullas. This much more reasonable argument turns that aforementioned maxim on its head because, in fact, Aboriginals owe the awareness of any history of theirs to White Australia.

Now, we’re not knocking the Aboriginal lifestyle per se. We acknowledge that it was harmonious, in respect of the land and all that. It was; no doubt about it. These people lived a compatible existence with the environment. This landscape, this ecosystem, the natural resources that surround us have been jeopardised by the greed of a few that exploit it for profit. Nationalists abhor this exploitation as much as any other activist set. The settlement itself has had consequences, but the settlement was coming, and it was either going to be by ‘liberal’ Whites or else by the Chinese whose attitude to other races is not so redactable.

351416-small
We post this pic to say a little about the duality of  White man: that side which cares and that which doesn’t give a fuck

Moreover is the question of what is nobler, maintaining the human species at a primitive rate of evolution, or accepting the changes of scientific advancement as part and parcel of the wonder of human progress?

So don’t give us this “White Australia has a black history” cod because that it is just self-effacing Cultural Marxist drivel.

And, what is this White Australia anyway? Are they once again getting our original British colonial overlords confused with the poor sucker political prisoners who were dragged here in chains, and who combatted adversity to become the indigenous ‘Australians’? Their version of White Australian history needs some serious adjustment, in that case, since it is viewed through the tampered lens of the partisan Left. These are the same tub-thumpers who loud hail about “multicultural Australia”, which therefore means, by the stringencies of their own particular rhetoric, all these other races and ‘cultures’ are complicit in alleged Aboriginal subjugation.

oie_NUQSh9HaukJK
Oh gee, it’s another anti-Semitic Soros conspiracy theory. Everyone knows Soros just sits at home enjoying his money and doesn’t involve himself in funding activist agents around the world

Are they saying we should ask the Abos to hand back every stitch of modern life we gave them in exchange for our passage back to an Islamic-occupied Europe so that the black fella can once more go walkabout and spear fish for supper?

Once triggered, there is no end to the cycle of guilt demanded by these political manipulators with their slogans. This history is still being written, it would seem. Aboriginal ‘advocates’ can either accept the reality of life here or submit to Chinese domination and 24th citizen-place status in a polyglot market nation.

Furthermore, Nationalists will not tolerate a treaty-based Australia in which lawyers grant Aboriginals a more-equal status on the back of a victimhood narrative. Either they are in this country, or they find some way to return to their nomadic ways and live outside of where the ‘history’ is made, but they will not have the two.

oie_JFNHbh04IJ29
A more correct version of a self-effacing Cultural Marxist maxim