THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

What do you do with the UPF? If you’re Facebook, you shut down their main page. So what do THEY then do? They migrate as much Zionist supporting material as they can to sister pages and to their Reclaim Australia – West Australia Rally page.

In every quote to the media, however, you will find their leadership claiming to be ‘nationalist’ and not ‘patriot’ which is such a conscious delineation that its intention is coldly clear to true Australian nationalists.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

On the same page (RA-WA) you will find a link to a True Blue Crew flag march where Whiteness is heavily emphasised. Then it’s back to the kosher meal of every possible Zionist-related entity they chug up – Britain First and Tommy Robinson shares right there in among them.

Well, they know by now; surely they aren’t naive. They know that promoting ultra-Zionists like Avi Yemini is a contradiction in terms to the single-minded cause of fighting Islamic extremism. Ultra-Zionists like Avi and his fellow countrymen create such extremism. They do so both by having manufactured ISIS, so as to pit them against the unfriendly Moslems on their list – and by continually stoking bloody conflict in the region.

The perennial program of destabilisation establishes a power balance that benefits the security of the state of Israel and services whatever objectives its allies may have in the region. But it also does something else – and has done so since the 1970s – it creates a mass migration of Middle Easterners into Australia.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

What does this portend for the ‘nationalism’ that they claim to be championing, having knowingly appropriated the term from staunch supporters of a new White Australia Policy? It kills it because those same Zionists do everything possible to eradicate such nationalist beliefs. They do more though — they align with the Left to attack serious nationalists such as we saw recently with Fairfax’s criminal toll Luke McMahon, who is known to have ties with Zionist-convert Neil Erikson.

Erikson, along with Nick Folkes, Howard Crawford, Scott Moerland and others have campaigned heavily against true nationalists. We are not at all surprised to find the UPF making the self-defeating move to once again associate with these cagey globalists in the hope of puffing up their waning profile.

Thus, nationalists for a White Australia become treated worse than kiddy fiddlers, and the planes keep flying more and more Indians, Chinese, Africans and MOSLEMS from the Middle East. The cathartic activity of stoking enmity against Islam merely gives a moral license to our globalist government to support military crimes in the Middle East which benefit Israel.

In this battle, all those values that Australians regarded as part of their birthright are trampled on. Zionists in Australia, while demanding racial and religious homogeneity at home, are forever insisting on total diversity for Australia and all White countries.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

This diversity has transformed our cities into utterly foreign destinations. The quarter-acre home has been replaced by towering (shoddily built) concrete toolboxes crammed with Chinese and Indians; the odour of their spicy cooking permeating the streets.

Australia needs reclaiming from all of this, not just one particular branch of this allegedly diverse community.

It is not the Indians, Africans, or Chinese who are losing their identities. They’ve never had it so sweet. While White Australians are slowly being discouraged from even considering ourselves Australian, this new population get dual identities. They get to be Indian AND Australian; they get to be African AND Australian, and they get to be Chinese AND Australian.

Islam is just a symptom of this single world government that has its master Zionist America. But while all these terms we throw about ‘Zionist’ ‘civic patriot’ and whatever might confuse the casual punter it is all quite simple. Unless you live in one of those last posts White Australian areas that are only ‘gradually’ being de-Europeanised you only have to take a walk, open your eyes, and smell the pungent waft of curry.

What difference does Islam make if – in the highly improbable event of removing it – you do so only to find yourself a stranger in your own country, shivering and alone among a new population of aliens? What will you reclaim then?

Wake up to the Zionists — you are being used.

C1ePePgVEAAVEM4
Avi Yemini, the ultra-Zionist who is now the darling of the civic patriots now calling themselves Australian ‘nationalists’

NO, PAULINE, THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO SAVE AUSTRALIA

NO, PAULINE, THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO SAVE AUSTRALIA

Pauline Hanson has bulk to learn when it comes to understanding the expectations of those who voted for her.

Regardless of what the cucks trumpet on her behalf, this is not about treating Australian identity like a piece of paper stamped by a government department that anyone can own. By that we mean it’s not about coming from anywhere you like as long as you ‘assimilate’ and don’t practise Islamic teachings.

It doesn’t work like that in China, or Japan, most African countries or anywhere that hasn’t turned itself into a colossal tin of human Smarties.

But Pauline either doesn’t get that message or is so wrapped up in proving she is not what most of us know she isn’t any way that she went out of her way to air-kiss a woman who has no place in Australia let alone in our parliament.

We speak, of course, of Kenyan-born ‘lawyer’ Lucy Gichuhi, who takes over the Family First senator’s seat vacated by Bob Day.

401E0D6B00000578-4486898-image-a-69_1494304916163
See. She’s no racist. But she should be. We are of course talking about the black woman.

Yes, Pauline, we are meant to be encouraging highly skilled individuals like Lucy to return to Kenya and share her gift with her own people and own nation. That way, her people benefit, and we get to have our own nation back. How many colourful and vibrant souls like her and that African thing with the glasses that hates Australia are we meant to cop just because we are part of this anti-White organisation called the United Nations?

By welcoming her, particularly when your presence is supposed to connote some sort of nationalism (lol) you are not only behaving against the interests of your voters but you are complicit in the ruination of Australia.

But then Pauline clearly doesn’t have a clue, and as we’ve argued ourselves hoarse here explaining, she is just a woman with a meal ticket in politics. She hasn’t made one single contribution to politics which isn’t purely symbolic and symbolic of all the things she actually doesn’t stand for.

8135976-3x2-700x467
Erm, yeah, and then there was this. She actually sacked her Asian candidate for being “homophobic”

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

If anything distinguishes those civic patriots on the right from us radical nationalists it is by whom we are most attacked.

In the case of the civics, they are dogged by what we collectively term ‘the left’, while radical nationalists, who occupy a third position on the political spectrum cop the most grief from either the civic patriots or those in the conservative camp.

Bear in mind that ‘the left’ is as eclectic when it comes to issues, identity, philosophy, and strategy as ‘the right’.

The left wants the patriot movement dispersed while the conservatives aim to drive away radical nationalists so they can inhabit our political ground and remodel it in their crypto-globalist image.

This is a curious fact that allows us to discuss a couple of cases in point. Let us begin with what some of those from the civic patriot side of the quadrangle contend with in their present day ‘clicktivism’. This essay shall be in two parts on account of its length and the dedication required to each of its players.

1. THE PATRIOT ACTORS AND THE COMBATANTS OF THE LEFT

There is a particularly malicious element at play among those who oppose the growth of the patriots. They view patriots as more of a concern than the nationalist movement given its mainstream accessibility. On that side, the Bogan element is mocked by those who are their mirror image with one factor separating them by the slimmest degree: the perception of their engaging in ‘racism’. This is, despite the ambiguity on the question of race amplified in the patriot fold.

Nationalists define Australianness as being of White European stock, as opposed to Aborigines. Patriots, who misuse the term nationalism understanding it not, and often deliberately misappropriating it, are nebulous in their definition of an Australian. Many are in mixed-race relationships and as such loath the absolutism of nationalism which would exclude them on the grounds of breaching its inviolate precepts.

However, it is important in the propaganda war of those conflicting with the anti-Islam movement to lump each in the same basket and defame both they and nationalists, as ‘Nazis’; which is like calling all socialists Marxists or anarchists communists. The Nazi tag is meant to invoke images of state organised terror that would ensue if these groups are allowed to put down political roots in the community.

In the lexicon of those of the left, patriots are ‘potatriots’, a witticism intended to disdain that group as ‘potato heads’. This is a derisive term that was originally applied to skinheads. Since the advent of the Reclaim Australia movement, which is almost exclusively dramatized on Facebook, a number of pages and counter-identities have sprung up to oppose the patriot pages and the groups that employ them.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

But virtue is subjective in this day and age when that moral asset is destroying the west. Opposition to Islam is the kindling of the realisation something is amiss. Australians are being de-culturized while globalism is dialectically re-culturizing us with a religion that negates the very tenets underpinning the idea of universal equality at play. Both are at the mercy of the culturally vacuous reality of globalism.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113
Alex Gollan, the assistant school principal and anti-fascist anarchist who ran the ‘anti-bogan’ word press site and was arrested for bulk kiddie porn

This is visible nowhere better than on those oppositional pages, which we mentioned. This genre has no purpose other than to negate. They do not attempt to counter ‘potatriot’ messages by promoting their own positive counter-messages they literally take the aforementioned messages and desecrate them. There is no intellectual component at play in the deconstruction of the patriot message. Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is a sledgehammer used to beat down the message and the messenger so that the mission becomes personal.

A very telling post occurred on one such page with a prominent leftist troll, “Can’t we just kill them [patriots] all?” The admin replied, “No, because then we would be Nazis.”
Disregarding the fact that had that comment been made on a nationalist page it would have been hidden or removed, it is a very instructive insight into both the pathology of the poster and the counter movement. The duplicitous essence of it is summed up in the gag, “We’re starting a war for peace.”

The assumed virtue of the poster is instantly invalidated by the revelation of this tyrannical instinct.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

This is, however, but one example. Narrowed down to a central theme outside of ‘race’ is the implication that patriots will potentially auger in a dictatorial system reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, the calls for an authoritarian response to the patriots are constant on the sample page we have used for our study.

There are flippant, but often sincere calls for patriots to be pursued by ASIO, or to be charged with offences that — were they on the other foot — would be vehemently contested as breaches of civil liberties. So we come to the actors or combatants, and here we shall actually name some.

Smith
Pete Smith from Melbourne, heavily active on Facebook, is linked to Antifascist Action Sydney and other ‘anarchist’ pages

 

We have had correspondence with a few members of the patriot movement, putting aside our ideological differences, keen to highlight certain combatants and the disreputable methods they have employed to target one or other of the patriot actors.

One, in particular, has been defamed over and over by combatants using various Facebook identities and private messaging the patriot actor we shall call ‘Mark’.

Mark is being consistently vilified as a person of heinous substance and the nature of the slander has transcended any honourable intent. The attacks led to the hostilities emerging from a social media setting and into the corporeal world when the authorities were involved. Mark is not alone in these vicious online assaults but his example is notable.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

So, who is behind these assaults on Mark’s character? Here, we merely repeat what he believes: John Linden Faulkner. But we also mention two others, Alex Gollan and David Hollis.

download (3)
Sydney’s Tayce Brown, shoplifter, hair stylist to the scabby, and a real skank

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This blog, as in others we’ve mentioned, is a flagrant vehicle to attack political opponents. Faulkner and Gollan are said to have co-administrated the site. Gollan, a former assistant school principal has since disappeared from ‘anti-fascist’ activities after being charged with child-sex offences.

Faulkner, who Mark and others believe to be behind a series of online profiles identifiable by their malevolence, has a criminal past to make anyone suddenly hosting him start eyeing the nearest exit. Faulkner was imprisoned for nine years for armed robberies in which women were his soft targets. He appealed his sentence as harsh, but in doing so was told it was actually lenient under the circumstances.

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This week [originally posted on Facebook March 11] , it was revealed that David Albain Hollis, the man in the red ‘Truth’ cap who accompanied Sue Munro to the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court to spy on the Bendigo Three’s supporters — and who appeared in an opportunistic pic with John Safran taken on the day — went on a “stabbing spree” in 1991, knifing seven people one of whom later died.

Hollis served only 17 months in jail on the grounds of diminished responsibility as he was in the throes of a “psychotic episode”, although how that should mitigate anything so appalling we do not know.

There are other cases on that extreme left of the bench such as Tayce Brown of Antifascist Action Sydney whose conduct and lifestyle are such that she would be considered a habitual criminal outside of the political activist underworld.

The radical left is sure something — in a world inhabited by junkies, thugs, hookers, thieves, and ex-murderers does becoming ‘anti-racist’ mean atoning for dissolute, wasted lives. Does championing the ‘other’ allow them to graduate from their moral squalor merely on the basis they aren’t racist? We are not psychologists, and this is not a forensic examination, but the pattern cannot be ignored.

Bear in mind, Blair Cottrell was confronted with a video created inside the correctional system while he was doing time for a crime of passion. He never killed anyone, nor caused anyone harm. What of these three? All fall into the very worst categories, and all comport themselves on social media in a manner that delegitimizes any hypothetical argument they believe they have concerning right and wrong.

If Faulkner is behind this campaign of defamation and stalking against Mark, then it appears that he has in no way left behind his violent past, but merely justified it in the context of the political theatre. He has reinvented himself as the ‘good guy’ and deemed those patriot actors as ‘bad guys’ in a morality play where his own contaminated ethics are masked by a blindness born of criminal denial.

In our next article, we will turn the focus on the patriots, who are to nationalists what the leftists we have described here have been to them.

oie_DqksmJ43gaGr
Anarchist Psycho

 

THE LEFT ARE NOT TAKING HANSON AND THE CONSERVATIVES SERIOUSLY

THE LEFT ARE NOT TAKING HANSON AND THE CONSERVATIVES SERIOUSLY

It has been a while since we published any substantial articles on those formations which, for the sake of brevity and clarity, we must still describe as the Left.

It is true that the Left has gone into rapid decline over the last ten years, we could put that down to their ageing supporter and activist bases, or the fact that they failed to produce enough children of their own who could carry forth the values of their parents.

That last point makes some sense when viewed in a historical context; we would expect that the political radicalisation toward the left of disaffected Irish immigrant labourers with a houseful of mouths to feed may have been somewhat easier to achieve than the indoctrination of, relatively speaking, well off and child-free workers in the current year.

A failure to radicalise one generation effectively breaks the chain and denies a movement any real sense of cohesion and continuity, few people are going to become invested in something which seemingly has no future.

While it is still possible to radicalise a tiny minority of young people, undergraduate girls, for the most part, these “conversions” are almost always temporary; these youths, with few exceptions, grow up to be middle of the road liberals or soppy social democrats.

The changing nature of work in the 21st century could be said to have contributed to the Left’s freefall into obscurity, as would the significant demographic changes wrought by 20 years of relentless immigration from the third world; our theory that the immigration program is now “rigged for success” valuing, most of all, quality over quantity seems more prescient now than ever.

A failure to radicalise one generation effectively breaks the chain and denies a movement any real sense of cohesion and continuity, few people are going to become invested in something which seemingly has no future.

It would be difficult to recruit the conservative, conformist minded and deeply religious Asians of the new Australian middle class to Left groups using their currently ubiquitous tactics of pilfered subaltern identity politics, humourless satire, censorship, pseudoscience and character assassination.

Australian Leftists also fell into the same trap as many on the right; as political tendencies of all shades have mostly retreated to internet safe spaces where only compliments are allowed, dissent can be easily squashed by a few mouse clicks and the flow of information strictly controlled.

The result of this has been the proliferation of loosely organised micro-groups and flash mobs, whose outlook is conceived in an internet echo chamber and whose aesthetics are that of internet pop-culture; veteran campaigners such as the U.S based Maoist Jason Unruhe have also noted with dismay the rise of this “alt-Left” to counter the equally problematic alt-Right.

As Nationalists well know, this insistence by some people on taking to the streets their internet role playing, with its eclectic mix of foreign and just completely made-up folklore, has not produced a stable base on which to stand a cohesive and durable activist collective.

This all begs the question: If not the Left, with all its material resources and residual goodwill from the days when it actually stood for working Whites, then who on the political scene besides the Nationalists is fit to stand against the approaching juggernaut of the LNP and One Nation coalition?

Australian Leftists also fell into the same trap as many on the right; as political tendencies of all shades have mostly retreated to internet safe spaces where only compliments are allowed, dissent can be easily squashed by a few mouse clicks and the flow of information strictly controlled.

Comrades, we are, of course, in no way suggesting any sort of alliance or compromise between ourselves and the “Loony Left”, in most cases the enemy of our enemy is just another enemy, however the prospect of widespread acceptance by the White workers of the Hanson deception, purely because there are no other options, is a real cause for concern.

Inasmuch as we can trust opinion polls, the recent surveys indicating a One Nation-LNP victory in the 2018 Victorian election are notable for one thing, they suggest a substantial defection of Labor voters toward the Hanson camp; this information will surely add to the sense of ill foreboding which must, by now, hang like a black cloud over the Daniel Andrews team offices in Treasury Place.

Consider the implications here; we have workers in the most Left friendly state in the federation abandoning their traditional party, the ALP, for an anti-worker, pro-globalist, conservative snake-in-the-grass like Pauline Hanson and her cohort of conspiracy nuts, rural knuckle draggers and unfathomable multicult freaks.

Nationalists understand the reasons for this disillusionment among White workers, the Victorian ALP is rotten, from the branch level to the caucus the party is riddled with crooks and bourgeois opportunists.

From the thieving MP’s like Don Nardella and Telmo Languiller, to the corrupt union bosses who hold sway over the rank and file and the morally bankrupt grassroots leaders, such as the appalling Intaj Khan in Wyndham, the party is no longer seen as something which working people of good conscience and who hold on to healthy values can support.

Nationalists understand the reasons for this disillusionment among White workers, the Victorian ALP is rotten, from the branch level to the caucus the party is riddled with crooks and bourgeois opportunists.

The problems also extend to the policies of the ALP and the leadership style of Daniel Andrews’ Left faction, deficiencies which are mirrored, to a large extent, in the other state branches as well as the federal parliamentary party.

The very policies which have, in large part, caused the electoral collapse of the Left and opened the door to right wingers are still being employed, in the most pig-headed fashion, as a supposed defence against conservatism and Hansonism; we could cue that old Albert Einstein quote about the definition of madness here, but the Left are not really mad in that sense, they are simply lazy, smug and complacent.

Identity politics, feminism and poorly written satire will be no match for the likes of Kevin Andrews and his murder of Crows in the Liberal right and who knows what manner of suburban Frankenstein’s monsters Pauline will cobble together as candidates; the Leftists can scoff, roll their eyes and make fun to their hearts content, but unless they start to take their politics seriously they can expect to lose, big time.

We have no words of encouragement to offer the Left, we merely point out that they are on the road to ruin, our solution to their problems is simply to ask the genuine radicals among them to jump ship and become Australian Nationalists.

For that is the real political battle of our age, the struggle between globalist-capitalism and Nationalism.

Our side will continue with our programme of White radicalisation, as we always have, but calling Pauline Hanson a racist from your internet safe space and expecting the White working class to self-radicalise on the basis of hollow virtue signalling and confected moral panics is worse than doing nothing, it actually makes resistance to globalism harder across the board.

oie_h7XOIyDK6dnW

WHERE WE STAND

WHERE WE STAND

Nationalist radicals are, once again, going on the front foot against civic patriots, Hansonites and other “conservative” impostors.

It is our long-held conviction that conservative activism exists only to betray the working classes of Australia by, in the most dishonest fashion, directing votes, along with the scarce free time and material resources of workers, back toward the liberal centre-ground.

Make no mistake comrades, it is this globalist-liberal status quo, the bloc of Liberal, National, Labor and Greens parties which present the greatest obstacle to the realisation of Australia as a real workers paradise.

Thus any formation of the “right” which, either openly, or by subterfuge directs support to the globalist bloc must be resisted tooth and nail by Nationalists.

One Nation, in particular, has shown themselves to be openly hostile toward workers and marginalised people; their voting record in the senate over the last months of 2016 revealed the true face of the Hanson revival.

We must judge them by the company they keep, the unravelling string of prospective One Nation candidates reveals a plethora of perverts, weirdos, conspiracy nuts and shysters.
We are tempted into optimism here, simply because the One Nation brand is so rotten from an ideological standpoint that we assume the workers and marginalised people smell the stench a mile off and refuse to have anything to do with the party.

One Nation, in particular, has shown themselves to be openly hostile toward workers and marginalised people; their voting record in the senate over the last months of 2016 revealed the true face of the Hanson revival.

The only people putting their hands up for One Nation pre-selection are from the very bottom of the barrel, the dregs of the suburban and rural middle classes who are too dissolute or just plain barmy to fit into the mainstream parties.

On the other hand, it would also make our lives easier if the Left were still able to do some of the heavy-lifting in the generations long class war; as it stands though they are mired in the failed identity politics of the liberal status quo.

30e5f6f600000578-3432965-image-a-61_1454648015582
Scott Moerland leads civic patriots on the road to nowhere which is where they wanted to go

The medium-term goal of our brand of Nationalism is the development and solidification of a viable third position with which to win over the White workers, the marginalised people and so many of the middle class as has ears to hear the message.

Genuine leftists must surely see now that there is no future in simple, superficial variations of globalist-liberal doctrine; that splitting hairs with liberals over things like same-sex activity in order to create the illusion of a radical difference of opinion really won’t wash.

The “loony” left merely perform the same function, albeit in mirror image, that One Nation and the civic patriots do on the right: they direct votes to the globalist parties in the lazy belief that “near enough is good enough”.

The medium-term goal of our brand of Nationalism is the development and solidification of a viable third position with which to win over the White workers, the marginalised people and so many of the middle class as has ears to hear the message.

The goal from both sides should be to put the squeeze on the liberal-globalist centre in order to create the new paradigm, the new order for the world after liberalism; the contemporary left, however, continues in a state of confused inertia while Nationalists take baby steps forward.

In the end, though, we don’t care too much about the Left since they contribute absolutely nothing to the debate over where our nation is headed and what type of society our children will be living in if globalist-liberalism is not reversed.

download-18
The “loony left” on day release from the marshmallow hospital

A strong alternative vision from the Left would at least give us an opportunity to form counter arguments and set ourselves to the task of political struggle, assuming of course that those ideas were wholly objectionable or flawed.

You see, comrade, Nationalists are not stupid people and we are not averse to appropriating, or supporting good ideas which would enhance the prospects of White Australians; should a restructured Left, in the future, come up with proposals which would benefit our people we would not necessarily oppose them.

In the end, though, we don’t care too much about the Left since they contribute absolutely nothing to the debate over where our nation is headed and what type of society our children will be living in if globalist-liberalism is not reversed.

This is pure speculation though, the Left are presently in such a poor state that we cannot envisage the rise of a viable “Alt-Left” with whom we could engage; the only possibility is that we could absorb some of their currently disillusioned young activists into third position Nationalism, a tactic which is bearing fruit at this writing.

Nationalists are presently embroiled in a two-front war against the dead ends of the political spectrum in the hope of cutting the supply lines of support to the liberal globalist status quo.

One side, the Left, suffering from shell shock have shot themselves in the foot and are immobilised until their wounds heal.

The other side, the Civic patriots, have raced ahead of the front and are a rabble without orders, living off the land and upsetting all the civilians with their noise and bravado.

59b1366d4c1ee7c7cb9c36fe09799ded
Finally we can breathe: a good old fashioned fascist

HANSON PUTS THE BOOT INTO BATTLERS BUT WON’T TALK ABOUT THAT $200,000

HANSON PUTS THE BOOT INTO BATTLERS BUT WON’T TALK ABOUT THAT $200,000

Pauline Hanson has become obsessed with welfare fraud despite refusing to answer questions about $200,000 in taxpayers’ money she drained from the bank account of her former United Australia Party.

This obsession with welfare runs conspicuously in tandem with the Liberal government’s pogrom on the poor. The government is currently under fire over its data-matching system to sniff out benefits recipients that have been overpaid.

The controversial system, which was cynically established with the full knowledge it would affect innocent Australians, was also intended to economise the already understaffed Centrelink down to critical staff levels. This has resulted in those victims of mismatching being unable to contact anyone in the department to clear them.

Rather that defending the battlers falling foul of this Federal Government scam, Hanson is joining in with the boot and proposing a fingerprint encoded “identity card” be issued to all Australians to curb the sort of fraud she herself is guilty of.

Rather that defending the battlers falling foul of this Federal Government scam, Hanson is joining in with the boot and proposing a fingerprint encoded “identity card” be issued to all Australians to curb the sort of fraud she herself is guilty of. She is plugging this very ‘conservative’ idea on her party’s website. It reads in part:

“For those who wish to access taxpayer funded services whether it be doctor, hospital, pharmaceuticals, education, welfare or any other taxpayer funded service it will be a legal requirement to prove that you are an Australian citizen or permanent resident entitled to benefits or otherwise pay the full cost of the service… Australians who wish to use taxpayer-funded services will be required to hold a ‘National Identity Card’ with their photo and an electronic chip. Machines will be used to scan the card at the point of service e.g. at a doctor’s surgery, Centrelink and other government departments that require identification.”

3668495300000578-3697186-a_mug_shot_of_pauline_hanson_has_surfaced_more_than_a_decade_aft-a-6_1468925943621
Hanson was jailed in 2003 for something she didn’t do, but they won’t go after her now for something she did do

Nationalists agree that the Australian system should not be open to abuse from blow-ins but we have a much simpler idea — END IMMIGRATION!

If Pauline Hanson was truly a proud Australian patriot she would have come to the very elementary understanding that if you wish to stop strangers abusing your hospitality you don’t invite them into your home.

Nationalists agree that the Australian system should not be open to abuse from blow-ins but we have a much simpler idea — END IMMIGRATION!

Anyhow, policy to her is simply a hobby; a bunch of sentences needed to stop people thinking she is only after payola. And we all know that Pauline just loves her payday, which is why she kept throwing herself in the ring for a senate seat at every election.

Hanson has been accused of misappropriating more than $200,000 from a bank account to which she and a supporter were joint signatories to. It is said that she simply walked into the bank and signed over the funds from her Pauline Hanson’s United Australia Party into her own account and high-fived herself. She reacted like Regan in The Exorcist when quizzed about the whereabouts of the dough in 2009 by a Today Tonight reporter.

As she mentioned (in non-sequiturs) during that interview, “I am not going to sit back and be suppressed, have my way of life taken away from me, my standard of living.”

Hanson has been accused of misappropriating more than $200,000 from a bank account to which she and a supporter were joint signatories to. It is said that she simply walked into the bank and signed over the funds from her Pauline Hanson’s United Australia Party into her own account and high-fived herself.

Politics has been the golden ticket to that standard of living for Pauline. She got a taste for that free money when her One Nation party qualified for public funding in 1998 to the tune of $4.7 million. Then again, in 2004-2007, she raked in $413,000 from the mug taxpayer. Yet, like all politicians with their snouts in the public trough, she is quite haughty about other people’s circumstances and judgmental on a level that equals class prejudice.

Hers is the snobbish conservatism of a dumb rube that has lucked their way into a VIP lounge. Her views are at their most expressive after a few flutes of Yellowglen Vintage. This puts her in perfect company with those from the Liberals who are at odds with the soft Liberals running the show.

oie_gyjgusqxnhon
One must rely on the commoners for their vote, but one is under no obligation to support the wretched sweaties once one has been elected

LNP MP Steve Dickson who once served with the Newman government has crossed over to Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party.

There is all sorts of static in the air for the Libs, with Cory Bernadi and fat slob George Christensen eyeing off free bucks from mining oligarch Gina Rinehart to start yet another conservative party.

Hers is the snobbish conservatism of a dumb rube that has lucked their way into a VIP lounge. Her views are at their most expressive after a few flutes of Yellowglen Vintage.

Queensland is certainly not spoiled for choice when it comes to conservatives, but as to a party that stands for nationalist principles and doesn’t want to kick the poor for being displaced from work by foreigners that make Liberal business people rich, Queenslanders are still waiting.

Meanwhile, Hanson revels in her own celebrity, her home bedecked with garish memorabilia of herself like Gloria Swanson in Sunset Boulevard.

UNA acknowledges sourcing from the ABC, Daily Mail, the Daily Telegraph, and Today Tonight.
oie_q8nabjypsskr
Pauline will one day make the best PM the Liberals have ever had