EXIT HOMOPHOBIA, ENTER HETEROPHOBIA: “SODOM” VOTERS PROVE DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

EXIT HOMOPHOBIA, ENTER HETEROPHOBIA: “SODOM” VOTERS PROVE DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

Scrawled in pink chalk on a Sydney pathway in the wake of today’s vote on the Sodom Law were two words, “Love Wins.”

This is a propagandistic slogan if ever there was one. We should know since we’ve come up with enough of our own.

Once you’ve understood the slogan’s referential function, deduced its expressive function, surmised its conative function, fathomed its phatic function and flipped by its contextual function you’ll realise what the slogan would properly mean separated from the sentimentality of its addresser is that “institutionalized love wins”. Once you’ve dealt with that dialectic you should be free enough from the propaganda to deduce that this has nothing to do with ‘love’.

Love doesn’t require the formal acknowledgement of an institution to prosper and in fact, it is more likely to stifle and suppress that love.

Moreover, you must grapple with the logic of tearing down the pillars of an institution to institutionalise that which the former pillars existed to ensure did not endanger the institution that was in place to safeguard against what the new institution formally validates. Meaning, there was, beyond what the Cultural Marxists who voted Yes perceive, more to the institution of marriage than “love”. Indeed, it was a social contract beyond enshrining the rights of deviant minorities into law.

But before we use the word deviant we must now readdress the contextual relevance of that word since deviancy can only really be determined by the majority of society and policed by its agents of social control, such as the media, lawmakers, academics, politicians, Waleed Aly and so forth.

Even here we have a problem since the degenerate homos who have won this “right” to smash apart a sacred pact between a man and a woman are not of themselves in the majority but the reverse. It is their agents who are in the majority.

gay
Consider this when putting shekels in the coffers of these corporations who have forced upon us the reign of everything abominable to a healthy society

For that matter, the vote only passed by a rabbit’s dick of 7% with some Labor electorates like ‘Calwell’ in Victoria, named after our Nationalist Aussie hero Arthur Calwell, doing us proud by voting No. Now it is down to the traitor political class to pass this bullshit law and applaud themselves for having totally fucked everything that this country once stood for. It is now in the hands of the banks, corporations, and the hedonistic consumers who keep their share portfolios fattening with profit. This same-sex marriage vote was, after all, pushed heavily by media and the corporations.

Anyway, having digressed for a moment, we have ascertained that the majority has granted the minority an unequal representation among the majority. If we tie that back to what social science once understood about deviancy we now have anyone from the former institution who is strident enough to hold firm to their beliefs cast on the outside of what society now upholds to be ‘normal’. The respectable is now the outsider and the deviant is the pillar of this brave new society.

Since we’re talking about institutions, it seems fair to acknowledge that garbage from the baby boomer generation who trampled this filth into our lives — who inculcated these Cultural Marxist codes into the heads of our youth via the institutions they took over — were the ones who loathed the very concept of the institution of marriage. Their lot burned their bras and jockstraps and went in for “free love” and threw things at Servicemen returning from the horrors of America’s doomed war in Vietnam.

lesbian-wedding-14.jpg
This is an SJW two-fer deal, yet get the dyke White woman with the black dyke and they may adopt a White male baby and kill it

Yet, here are the fruits of their decades of campaigning — they have killed the social and religious premise of marriage. They have redefined it and in doing so have set in motion an entire wheel of social changes that will exclude, criminalise, and disadvantage all of those whose ideological and religious convictions now place them as an “other”.

The despised “cisgender” White male; the devout Christian; the fervent social conservative are all now outside of that societal approval and therefore beyond the gates of the institution which ironically once upon a time they were the most ardent advocates for.

Any parent who doesn’t wish their child to be taught the finer points of buggery by a genderless freak reared in the social laboratory of modern society will be demonised, ostracised, and — if they aren’t just patronisingly dismissed as absurdly quaint — used as an example of that which is abhorrent to this newfangled society based on repudiated gender and opposition to the fundamentals of nature. Any Christian who refuses to accommodate a reception or conduct a marriage between freakish gender-confused parties will be sued, vilified, hounded, doxed, and probably beaten up by roaming squadrons of Nazi Dykes, Faggots, and Transgender Chemical commandos.

It will be ironic to see how they must now shuffle their hierarchy of victimhood to accommodate the obvious dissension of devout Moslems, which are still currently a protected species in the Social Justice Warrior red book.

Now they need another cause; now they’ve run out of steam there is another minority group whose interests must usurp that of the majority until there is nothing left but until the day invading armies of Chinese soldiers paint the walls with their soft, squishy, fucked-up, chemically-altered brains.

Yes, folks, we are on the road to being a PC Police State, just like England.

EDIT: After we went to press with this item out came the images from the unscheduled orgy at Hyde Park where fairies, fags, dykes, princesses, lady boys, he-girls and every kind of pervert combo imagined in this age of decadence, got straight down to exposing themselves and cavorting in a manner that would, in saner countries, have them all shot.

4660722000000578-0-image-a-39_1510748685748.jpg
A bizarre dyke with hairy legs, hairy armpits struts half-nude (blarrggggh) in a major Sydney park because that’s what the world will be like now that the Yes vote got through by a whisker.
4660904400000578-0-image-a-42_1510748699620
Broad daylight and the green-light signals for the degenerate exhibitionists. That’s nothing, but, wait till you see the latest dog-collars, leashes and leatherwear for next year’s Back to School uniforms!

oie_JhUXWGI010X4.jpg

 

Advertisements

ASSERTIVE NEUTRALITY: THE NATIONALIST ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT

ASSERTIVE NEUTRALITY: THE NATIONALIST ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT

In our ideological struggle against the system and its toadies, we must constantly be on the front foot in terms of laying out for our people exactly where we stand on the issues of the day.

It should go without saying that Australian Nationalists oppose, on principle, any involvement of the national defence forces in the wars of imperialism currently being waged by the so-called “coalition of the willing”.

Our doctrine of identity, independence and freedom sits at the polar extreme to that of all-conquering globalist capitalism; we value genuine diversity among the nations of the world, a position which obviously rejects any false notions of equality, supremacy or inferiority in the relationships between the mosaic of national groups.

Furthermore, we reject out of hand the adherence to treaties entailing international obligations which might needlessly put our people in harm’s way at the behest of the superpowers, or which could seriously interfere with the self-determination, good order or sovereignty of other nations.

aleppo
Aleppo, Syria: a tragic situation, but it has nothing to do with us

 

For example, our position on the recent Sunni insurgencies in Syria and Iraq has been consistent as we have stated from the beginning of the hostilities that this conflict should be fought and won by a strong coalition of Middle-Eastern regional forces and their northern hemisphere allies.

This eternal struggle for the soul of the Islamic world has nothing whatsoever to do with Australians, who are a people of the global south and should see ourselves as a nation apart from the endless squabbling among some 70 factions of Mohammedans with their myriad tribal and ethnic divisions.

There is no need for a nation of the south, which is socially, racially and geographically a world away from North Asia to be involved in the politics of that region, especially not as the yapping Lap Dog of the clown president Donald Trump and his Zionist cronies.

So too the sabre rattling by Canberra’s imperial globalist warmongers against the hermit state of North Korea is strongly condemned by Australian Nationalists for it is no concern of ours whether the Kim family stands or falls as rulers, or whether their crypto-Fascist system of government remains in place.

KCNA picture of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un speaking at the first party committee meeting in Pyongyang
We would bet the farm that Kim Jong Un will never bother us if we do not bother him

 

The possession of weapons of mass destruction by such regimes has, in recent times, tended to mitigate against widespread conventional warfare of the sort which ravaged the world in the 20th century, so it is no concern of ours whether North Korea remains as it is, armed to the teeth and ruled by a despot and his secret police.

There is no need for a nation of the south, which is socially, racially and geographically a world away from North Asia to be involved in the politics of that region, especially not as the yapping lap Dog of the clown president Donald Trump and his Zionist cronies.

The threats posed by Jihadism are likewise made far more manageable by a prudent immigration program which excludes non-assimilable Mohammedans, a move to Australian neutrality in foreign affairs, including cutting ties with the Zionist entity and an end to opportunistic political support for Islamism by the current political elites.

 

Talal Almeddine
Talal Almeddin and the other plotters of the Parramatta outrage are symptoms, not the disease and the cure is simple

 

As a nation we are blessed to inhabit one of the quieter corners of the globe and Nationalists feel no shame in our past reputation as a cozy, bucolic backwater at the ends of the earth, this ideal is, in fact, the state of affairs which patriotic folk ought to have explicitly tried to “reclaim” in the heady days of 2015.

The threats posed by Jihadism are likewise made far more manageable by a prudent immigration program which excludes non-assimilable Mohammedans, a move to Australian neutrality in foreign affairs, including cutting ties with the Zionist entity and an end to opportunistic political support for Islamism by the current political elites.

In the era of immigration restriction and White supremacy Australia was a genuinely progressive society and despite being embroiled in the wars of the 20th century, the second of which was unavoidable anyway, there was a sense of relentless forward momentum, optimism and the feeling that through the pursuit of social justice at home we might lead by example the developing nations of the world.

The heroes of Kokoda and the men who fought the campaigns against Japanese Fascism across our region are the examples for our assertive brand of neutrality; they fought for blood and soil, in the interests of their nation against a foe who sought to obliterate all societies in its path and impose totalitarian rule across the Pacific.

Let us be clear, however, that we are in no way “Antifascist” in the context of the fake Left and Zionist Right, we are simply aloof from that fraudulent and time-wasting argument because Australian Nationalists are the legitimate heirs and standard bearers of the political theories and way of life which exterminated the anti-national, totalitarian regimes of the 20th century.

kokoda_australians
The heroes of Kokoda, they fought against imperialist bullies and the killers of nations

 

To hostile powers, despots and imperialists Australian Nationalists would issue the admonition: leave us alone and benefit from our diplomatic skills, engineering prowess and scientific know-how; trade with us and receive goods of the best quality, clean foodstuffs and licences to deal your produce in kind.

However, intimidate or threaten us, make demands of, or coerce our nearest neighbours and, as an armed but neutral nation, we will send you scurrying away, starving and in rags, like General Horii and his Japanese forces in 1942.

Australian Nationalists hate war and imperialism, we hate the anti-nationalist, globalist thugs who are flourishing under Trump and Turnbull just as our forebears hated the anti-nationalist bullies of the 1930’s and 1940’s.

eureka

DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

Over the past year, UNA has spent bulk column inches describing the type of society Australia has been moulded into since the globalist, cosmopolitan juggernaut shifted into top gear under the Howard regime.

We have outlined, in broad strokes, the re-jigged class system being implemented by the bosses to pacify and subject the polyglot masses which now underpin the global capitalist power; likewise, we have examined, in depth, the bones of the system itself, that cunning fusion of second-generation Communism and limited free market capitalism.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

The trouble is that this increase in state power over the individual and the suppression of non-consumerist dissident tendencies is unlikely to be as spectacular, or compelling as the Spanish Civil War or The Great Leap Forward; the slide into, what Nationalists freely admit, is a looming dystopia will likely be slow, controlled and it will not flatter the egos of these prophets of doom.

special-ops-group2
If you really annoy the Globalists they do more than cancelling your Facebook account and getting you fired from your job

If we are truly on the hunt for signs and wonders in this age of mass surveillance and rule by global corporations then we might argue that present developments should occupy the bulk of our attention rather than endless examinations of the past.

We apply a slight caveat here in that there is nothing new under the sun as far as repressive regimes are concerned; the old rules of Stasi, Gestapo or Special Branch skullduggery still apply and we can be reasonably sure that if things really ran out of hand, as they did in the mid 20th century, that the knuckledusters and water board would be employed without hesitation by today’s state-sanctioned goon squads.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

As we have explained in a previous article, the Pigs serve the Globalists; if we may borrow from the lexicon of 1960’s Hippie radicals, the Pigs in blue, or in plain clothes and the Pig media support the big Capitalist Pigs on high.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

Smith
A Dog of the Leftist variety who regularly boasts of ratting people out to the Federal Police

In the Australia of 2017, this Dog culture is rampant and we would suggest that is the main impediment to radical political activism, no matter from where said radicals draw their inspiration; these days sincere Leftists are just as likely to be pilloried for their views as  Nationalists or Muslim fundamentalists.

We are appalled by the way Right-Wingers, Leftists and most people in between seem intent on publicly denouncing anything and anyone who challenges the mainstream narrative, or even mildly irritates them in a Facebook stoush, even to the point of bullying mentally unstable people into rash, or violent actions merely to tar their friends and comrades with the “extremist” label.

These attempts to pillory often harmless people are rarely done to gain political advantage, or to undermine the system, the snitch collectives, such as Antifa, as well as the Far-Right vigilantes really have no political background or strategic objective.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

The goal is to humiliate others and throw them into the maw of the security state based on where one stands of the false ideological divisions and ever-shifting, fantasy role-playing conventions of cyberspace.

This is not to say that there are no real-world consequences for people who interrupt or harass the minions of globalism, the security state loves a conspiracy or a human rights charge; as we saw with the Bendigo Three there is basically no way to defend oneself from accusations of so-called “Hate Crime”.

Erikson jameson
Fake Muslim but proud, self-described ASIO informant

We ask our readers to ponder that very situation and ask themselves why upsetting Muslims might, in theory, create a problem for the state to the degree that they are willing to pursue people uphill and down dale over a social media post deriding Jihadist Muslim terrorism?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

If we are to believe the top cops then all that has prevented Pitt St and Federation Square from being strewn with body parts from some Muslim outrage is the cooperation they receive from, we guess, “good Muslims”; though that brings up the question of who is really holding all the cards in the war on terror?

Who is to say that these Muslim collaborators are acting altruistically as opposed to playing a long game of their own?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

Globalist Cosmopolitanism requires Orwellian oversight, multiculturalism clearly cannot sustain itself without a substantial number of citizens being willing to act as de-facto censors and unpaid informers for the state and the corporations who are gradually assimilating into its institutions.

Furthermore, the only way the modern state can accommodate fractious minority groups, mainly, but not limited to, those citizens devoted to Mohammed is to cultivate an even more pervasive surveillance and informant network, a process, we now know, which requires total silence and obedience by all other Australians.

The absolute worst thing an Aussie can do these days is to disturb the status quo, to question where this regime of Globalist Capitalism fused to second generation Communism is leading us; forget your posterity, forget any notions of justice or fair play; do not disturb the Rats, just sit down, grab your iPad and credit cards and consume! Consume! Consume!

snitch161004

BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

If there is one demographic, or social stratum, which regularly draws the ire of UNA bloggers it is the waffling bourgeoisie and their nominally empty-headed offspring, who sound off like a battery of howitzers every time an issue of so-called “social justice” is inserted into public discourse.

Take young Frances Abbott, the middle child of Tony and Margie, who, channelling Mary Bennet, the middle sister in Jane Austen’s Pride And Prejudice, felt moved to put forth a Vlog on matters of love, romance and tier-one Lesbianism in support of same-sex marriage.

Quoting the experience of her aunt, Christine Forster, who is a middle-aged homosexual convert, Frances declared that people “cannot help who they fall in love with” and that “love is unexpected”.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

frances abbott
Bourgeois Bikini Babe Frances Abbott: all brawn, little brains

If homosexual relationships are based on love then it is clearly a completely different form of bond to opposite-sex unions; in which, as lifelong spinster Jane Austen herself observed, there are much more considerations than “love” to be taken into account when making a match.

In its most basic, and most commonly understood form the pair-bond between man and woman is based on a partnership to take on the challenges of the world together and raise children, if they are lucky the spouses will get along well and, in time, come to love each other.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

In most cases in which men and women marry for love, the unions quickly fall apart as the realisation hits home that such a marriage is lacking in substance, has no direction and no real reason to exist aside from the vanity, or unrealistic expectations of the spouses.

Pride pejudice
The Bennet sisters scan the horizon for well-endowed suitors

Of course we understand the reasoning behind the patter which upper-class twits such as Ms Abbott have been trained to parrot, we can never, ever describe homosexuality as a choice, nor credit homosexuals with the agency to make their own decisions; rather, according to Globalist social convention, they are subjects whose vital nature is simply something which has “occurred”.

Here we find another point of difference, which also gives the lie to the calls for absolute equality for all: heterosexuality is very much a choice, yet we are taught to believe that homosexuality is something which “just happens”.

muslims1
Guess which other global capitalist side project also poo-poohs the idea of free will?

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

If homosexuals are not going through these processes and are subject to the whims of some deity, or hidden forces in the universe then equality will remain a distant dream, regardless of the outcome of the postal survey and subsequent parliamentary vote.

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

Of course, we know full well why this meme has been propagated, that in fact most people who begin their intimate lives in the homosexual world are actually deprived of choice by virtue of, in the main, having been seduced and manipulated into that lifestyle by self-serving adults while in their early teens.

This detail, however, is beyond the scope of our discussion and, as we have stated before, we simply do not care enough about homosexuals, their tiny queer sub-culture or their struggles against normal society to develop an in-depth critique of them as people.

Orlando united
Omar Mateen was homosexual and Muslim, obviously  the Pulse nightclub outrage “just happened”

As ever, we at UNA are interested in the bigger picture and the picture of Globalist equality, that synthesis of second-generation Communism and multinational corporate hegemony, has come into sharp relief during the SSM debate; the man behind the curtain pulling the levers has been revealed.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

“Things just happen” only to subjects, rather than workers in charge of their own fate; subjects are drafted into the military against their will, they are unfairly taxed, sold shoddy goods, given poor quality housing, or arbitrarily arrested and jailed; this is why most forms of monarchy, dictatorship and theocracy have such a bad reputation.

What “Love Is Love” in its proper context, globalist cosmopolitanism, ultimately boils down to is that we are all no greater or more able to master our own destiny than that young child whose choices are limited by the actions of the adults around them; that we are apt to just fall into situations and that it is advisable simply to go with the flow rather than resist or seek our own autonomy.

 

mateen-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwfSVWeZ_vEN7c6bHu2jJnT8
Agents act, subjects are acted upon, inshallah

 

‘OZRAELI AVI YEMINI’ AND THE MOSSAD PATRIOT CHAIN

‘OZRAELI AVI YEMINI’ AND THE MOSSAD PATRIOT CHAIN

The background

When one of our staff messaged Zionist Avi Yemini by Facebook to substantiate any involvement with fringe political crook Nick Folkes we knew it was a roll of the dice as to whether or not he would respond, and if he did, would he be straight with us?

Nationalists had detected links between Folkes’s Party for Freedom and Yemini. There has been no proof to date that he and Folkes have any direct involvement together, yet members of his unregistered micro party certainly have, so the prospect existed.

However, as unsurprising as all this is, it actually warrants a good explanation, given its maze of ethical contradictions. For instance, UNA has learned that the former leader of Squadron 88, who goes by the possible alias Mark McDonald (we say alias because not even those in his inner circle really know anything about him), is now operating as PfF’s “security”. Once again, Matey Mate is recruiting for another suspect gang.

McDonald went hell for leather when he mysteriously appeared everywhere on the scene at once in 2013. Like a character from a spy novel, he materialised out of thin air, suddenly contacting anyone of note in the nationalist movement. How he came to make such varied connections is itself a mystery given the boy was a total greenhorn. Nevertheless, in no time he would bring ignominy down upon the Nationalist community while arrogantly dismissing every veteran around him. Just like Folkes, he became the latest in a historical chain of provocateurs, creating only discord for our nationalism.

When one of our staff messaged Zionist Avi Yemini by Facebook to substantiate any involvement with fringe political crook Nick Folkes we knew it was a roll of the dice as to whether or not he would respond, and if he did, would he be straight with us?

Matey Mate and his misfits were responsible for letterboxing Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s electorate in Sydney’s Eastern suburbs in September 2014 with badly written anti-Semitic flyers. The area has a high concentration of Jews. The purpose of the stunt was to gain notoriety for their group on the back of a recent incident of anti-Semitism that made the news. A gang of drunken teenagers (it has been suggested of Middle Eastern heritage) had boarded a bus bound for Bondi Junction and then allegedly threatened Jewish children as young as five. This generated community outrage and McDonald, who was enlisting for S88 via Stormfront Down Under, had the bright spark to cash in on it.

Interesting was, at the time, McDonald and his crew were in contact with one Howard Crawford, a Liberal party operative and, ironically, a staunch Zionist. Crawford was also involved with Folkes, and a peculiar alliance began. It was especially strange since S88 was primarily anti-Jew. McDonald lived in a dilapidated house belonging to a member of PfF. McDonald hosted many meetings at that house. Crawford was a regular visitor who occasionally brought gifts of beer and pizza.

The thing is, no matter how much it tries to piggyback on prevailing trends like the recent ‘edgy’ Alt-Right phenomenon, PfF is both a kosher patriot set and spoiler outfit. Radka Smith, who is the party’s second-in-charge, is Jewish. James Sternhell, who is not a PfF member but still supports PfF is as Jewish as a lox bagel. Thereafter, PfF was created specifically as an anti-Islam party. Folkes’s endorsement of Israel dates back to the days of when he and Darrin Hodges protested in defence of Max Brenner chocolates, a Jewish chain store targeted by left-wing pro-Palestinian groups.

screen-shot-2015-11-03-at-3-59-52-pm
George Jameson (L), Radka Smith (C), and some git (R). Back in 2014, Radka was abused for being a Jew by Mark McDonald who is now the Peanuts’ security. Is he another repentant Neil Erikson?

What then would supposedly fanatical neo-Nazis want with this mob? Putting aside Crawford and his Patriot Games, the question is as relevant as ever, since McDonald is back following an extended hiatus.

The Petersham-based McDonald was present earlier this year when the Peanuts hijacked a Penrith anti-mosque demonstration at Penrith. He also travelled to Lithgow for a failed demonstration against a proposed Moslem centre. He put in a furtive appearance at Newtown when Antifa failed to face down Nick and the Peanuts. Most recently, he marched with the Peanuts in Sydney, rallying around the statue of Captain Cook in Hyde Park. In one pic, he can be seen with his young recruits standing behind Jewish Jimmy Sternhell who is carrying a flagstaff. This did not seem to bother the supposedly virulent anti-Semite.

21754556_517427725286156_1363375268_n
Mark “Matey Mate” McDonald, the virulent anti-Semite standing behind James Sternhell (holding flag), who is very much a Semite. Contradictions? Nah…

What then would supposedly fanatical neo-Nazis want with this mob? Putting aside Crawford and his Patriot Games, the question is as relevant as ever, since McDonald is back following an extended hiatus.

Also at that rally was George Jameson who is of Serbian heritage. Seldom has a Patriot rally gone down when George wasn’t there. Wherever action is, Jameson is sure to be on hand. He waved the Israeli flag in the infamous image taken at the 2014 Penrith anti-mosque rally. His unremarkable Malteser head is everywhere if you browse through snaps from rallies past. Yet, despite his ubiquitousness, he remains a curious, marginal figure.

120914-diwarnai-bentrokan-pembangunan-musala-di-sydney-disetujui2-618x412
Georgie Boy Jameson intensifying his shilling for Israel

Jameson has been allied to rat Neil Erikson and attended each court date of The Bendigo Three, Erikson’s sole ally. Erikson has a history of involving himself in Folkes’s murky business. For a time there, Folkes’s enemies were Erikson’s enemies. Folkes’s lies became Erikson’s lies, and nobody tells pork pies quite as easily and unashamedly as Erikson. Erikson has lied so long and so often that to him truth is whatever pops into his mouth. Outside the trial, many nationalists reported Jameson was spotted with his skank Penny Tridgell in close consultation with Yemini. The three sure seemed thick as thieves. So when an emergent Zionist Patriot hero like Avi Yemini links up with associates of a freshly Nazified Nick Folkes you naturally ask, “What’s all this then?”

Similarly, when you hear from very reliable sources that the kid who modelled himself on Romper Stomper’s Hando, now aligned with Folkes, is attending Krav Maga classes in Bondi, a hand-to-hand combat system developed by the Israeli Defence Force, and of which Avi Yemini is a well-known exponent and entrepreneur then you sense the plot thickening.

Then, if you’re anything like our UNA staff, you fire off a private message to Yemini himself and ask him some rather blunt questions about his relationship with these characters. After all, true nationalism must be protected at all costs.

The Daily Mail and the “mocking” Jew

Just about every conspiracy theory regarding the Jews and their command of the mainstream media came true this week when our UNA staffer hit the send button on a series of private messages to Yemini.

That which started out as a fishing expedition for a quote regarding Yemini and Folkes wound up as a fake news story in the egregious Daily Mail. What was truly ridiculous was the angle given the story.

See, initially, our staffer asked Yemini about his involvement with Folkes. Yemini actually responded, much to his surprise. He told our chap that he had no involvement with Folkes. Our staffer then mentioned Jameson and asked about their tête-à-tête. Yemini, whose gift for champagne comedy rivals the greatest comedians who ever cracked a jape, responded with, “No. We’re in a gay relationship. He’s my sugar daddy.”

At this point, our staffer required emergency surgery so that his split sides could be sewn back together. Recoiling from the greatest rejoinder ever, the exchange eventually degenerated until it culminated with our scribe suggesting Avi tests out his “bullshit Jew martial art” in a “cage fight” with an “Aryan”. This wasn’t serious, although, frankly, it would be well worth the ticket price. As he put it to us, “I was dealing with an obtuse pillock whose schoolyard comebacks were deeply irritating and that’s what he got. Plus, I had several glasses of wine.”

So, imagine all of our surprises when we clicked on the Daily Mail and discovered this abortive exchange was deemed to be a news story in which a “neo-Nazi thug” was “mocked” by the hero Jew Patriot. In essence, the might of the mainstream media just did Avi’s fighting for him, and you have to interrogate that.

That which started out as a fishing expedition for a quote regarding Yemini and Folkes wound up as a fake news story in the egregious Daily Mail. What was truly ridiculous was the angle given the story.

This epochal put-down of his was not a genuine riposte since our writer never actually zinged him, to begin with. He only asked about a meeting witnessed between Avi and the Serb. When it came to print, however, that crucial point of the whole story was reduced to what is known in the trade as “bullshit”. It was inferred that he just happened by chance to be sitting next to “another” random “extreme right activist” in “the public gallery”, who was not mentioned by name. In fact, the meeting did not occur in the public gallery. After all of this, Yemini is still evading the question.

Then we had to field another problem, “How does a private message exchange from Facebook even end up with a journalist?”

12291897_904753899562212_1995994119040259997_o.jpg
A fully wakkas Aussie boy from Avi’s IDF school shows his Aussie Pride

There are two possibilities here: Yemini, being so proud of his fatuous response published it on his Facebook page and it was randomly spotted by a Daily Mail hack, or else Yemini has a hotline to the hacks and reported it promptly desiring either publicity or payback. Either is just as likely to be true. The disturbing thing is Yemini seems to be so regularly in the news.

As we ruminate about this mysterious Zionist’s power to command media, we will revisit our previous question about how this happened in the first place. This is where we took a look at the “journalist” involved and what did we discover? We found that Stephen Johnson is not one of your typical left-wing liberal ABC MEAA mafias, but is himself a civic patriot. This is interesting.

We checked out Johnson’s Twitter account since he had closed-settings on his Facebook page and we found a veritable who’s who of civic patriots and groups. By all accounts, this witless drab is a supporter of Avi Yemini and either is in contact with him regularly or makes a point of checking Avi’s FB page.

Then we had to field another problem, “How does a private message exchange from Facebook even end up with a journalist?”

So we have an ultra-orthodox Jew, or at least one with strong Zionist loyalties who has snagged for himself the leadership role in the yawning vacuum of the Reclaim Australia movement, consorting with a close comrade of Nick Folkes. When asked about this he whistled a sardonic tune to drown out the question and two days later is artificially declared the victor of a non-existent battle of wits by the DM, which is championing one who is making his bones as an anti, anti-racist activist. Confused?

It gets even more baffling since we got to this place in the first instance trying to figure out why this poster boy for Mossad is dealing with civics that deal with Nazis who deal with Jews.

Oh, and in its fake news article, it is worth noting that Johnson described Yemini as a “Jewish activist”. Bear this in mind because the distinction is of the utmost significance in its inadvertent resonance of truth.

The Mossad Patriot

The thing to do at a time like this is to stop, take a deep breath, and find out who the fuck Avi Yemini really is. What does a Jew think he’s doing styling himself as a dinky-di Aussie Patriot for Zionist Israel? Why do idiots buy into it in their tens of thousands on his tacky Facebook page? We can at least answer some of these questions.

As UNA types this screed, Yemini is preparing for a rally at Melbourne’s state parliament this Sunday to push his “Patriot” credentials on the broad basis of protesting a crime wave which he holds Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews responsible for. The platform is nebulous enough to satisfy all the requirements of the mainstreaming which the RA movement is infamous for. However, we think he hasn’t got the nuts to say what he really means, which is an AFRICAN crime wave. But there, we said it for him.

There is indeed a problem with Africans in Melbourne and it’s ironic that a Jewish fundamentalist has an issue with it since back in Israel they wanted to deal with their African problem by sending all of them here. But hey, where Jews are concerned, contradictions line the road like cryptic signposts.

Countering this nebulous show of civic dissatisfaction will be Antifa and a bunch of far left-wing groups who according to The Australian want to exert a show of strength against “the homophobic far-right”, which would suggest that some, or probably all of the parties involved, seriously have their issues mixed up.

But how could they make so angry when the chief organiser on the right side of the fence is a JEW? Haven’t they heard about the fourteen billion who were gassed and turned into ironing board covers and pillowcases during the thirty years of The Holocaust™?! Shouldn’t they be defending Avi, who, as persecuted minorities go in the game of victimhood, sits at the top of that particular food chain?

In that case, Avi is ‘the one’ since they don’t come more Jewish, or more Aussie, than Aussie Avi. So intertwined are the fortunes of our historically-wedded neighbouring nations that Avi had the genius inspiration to coin the term, Ozrael.

This is the price a patriot, and self-touted possible future candidate for One Nation must pay if he is going to do stuff. But what stuff is Avi going to do? Avi aims to reclaim Australia for Israel while reclaiming the Patriot movement from Blair Cottrell, who is a Nazi after all. If it’s to be a truly Australian movement then it must accept Jews. There should be nothing confusing about that since as brilliant nationalist theorist Neil Erikson pointed out when he told The Australian, “You cannot be a nationalist and NOT support Israel”.

In that case, Avi is ‘the one’ since they don’t come more Jewish, or more Aussie, than Aussie Avi. So intertwined are the fortunes of our historically-wedded neighbouring nations that Avi had the genius inspiration to coin the term, Ozrael.

21729089_516499462045649_1061722325_n
The easiest way to make Australia safe is to cut all ties with Israel and its bitch the UN, and send home all of its troublemakers

It’s pretty cool when, unlike an actual Australian, you inherit two identities. An Australian is just a, well, Australian, and we’re not even that because we’re mere boat people and anyone can be Australian. Only Aboriginals can truly be ridgy-didge Australians; even if White Europeans actually built this country. But an ISRAELI-AUSTRALIAN, well, he or she can enjoy the best of both worlds; shooting Palestinian kids one week, and bathing on iconic Bondi Beach the next. In fact, murdering Palestinians is as Australian as chucking a snag on the barbie or slicing a baby’s penis while a room full of kvetching Skypes nibbles a catered lunch.

Aussie Avi is so hell-bent on restoring this country to a pre-Whitlam Xanadu that he is doling out free stickers with “Make Australia Safe Again” on them. This must mean he is sincere!

Trouble is Australia will never be safe so long as these tribal Jews have any involvement in our country since they’re the most vociferous proponents of filling it with hostile aliens and then enacting laws so that we cannot speak out against them.

In that case, Avi is ‘the one’ since they don’t come more Jewish, or more Aussie, than Aussie Avi. So intertwined are the fortunes of our historically-wedded neighbouring nations that Avi had the genius inspiration to coin the term, Ozrael.

It is thanks to our “special relationship” with Israel that “international obligations” compel us to accept quota after quota of the refugees generated from pushing Israel’s agenda in the Middle East, so some, we’re not saying all, but some cynical souls just might want to tell Avi to fuck right off back to the red sea and drown.

So is Avi the darling of all media? Does the Jewish community, in general, regard him as an unsung hero for his tireless work promoting both himself and his homeland of Israel… erm, we mean, Australia?

Oddly enough, it depends on the ideological soundness of the publication, but we’ve discovered that Australian Jewish News isn’t terribly impressed with Avi’s dalliances with One Nation and ex-boot boy dickheads like Neil Erikson. In fact, they cannot get past the Erikson thing at all. This is a trend repeated by Jewish journalists in The New Matilda (no surprises there) and The Guardian. However, The Times of Israel, a neoconservative rag, allowed him a whole blog to gush about “Why I’m proud to be a fucking Jew”.

images
Avi never joined the Australian Defence Force. But instead, he went back to Israel to shoot Palestinian children

Nevertheless, when his first bold dash to seize patriot ground was attempted back in December last year after he invited One Nation senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts to address a meeting in a hall booked from Glen Eyrie Council matters came unstuck after the council cancelled the booking. But worse, the Jewish community was unified in their opposition to the meeting. Yemini responded by branding the council “anti-Semitic”.

Currently, Avi had his name and photo removed from the webpage of the Australian Jewish Association (AJA). The AJA was cobbled together only recently and Avi’s role in it is vague to those outside of its circles. For their part they claim, “Mr Yemini was never a director, office-bearer or spokesman for AJA.”

So is Avi the darling of all media? Does the Jewish community, in general, regard him as an unsung hero for his tireless work promoting both himself and his homeland of Israel… erm, we mean, Australia?

Yemini spat the dummy, accusing the fledgeling association of “cowardice” and adding, “I am resigning the board as I have lost faith in it.” Then he took credit for the whole idea, grizzling, and “I do it with a heavy heart as I do believe in the mission statement. In fact, the entire organisation was my idea.”

The first order of business at the AJA’s very recent launch at South Caulfield Synagogue was to discuss “The Threat of Islam to Jews”. This was after another, more nervous venue cancelled, for fears of a terror attack. It wasn’t ‘the threat of Islam to Australians’ but to “Jews”.

Avi’s objectives couldn’t be clearer — to garner support for his true homeland — and those who are fool enough to revere this foreign agent as being somehow emblematic of “Aussie pride” just reveal their ignorance. They are also hopelessly doomed to being fodder for the system.

Avi-Yemini.png
Once again, Avi showing his pride in another Nation, this time America’s (then soon-to-be) President

On another occasion, ever sensitive to Israel’s interests, Avi took offence at the ABC broadcasting a graphic in which Israel appeared to Yemini to have been blacked over on the map and captioned as being ‘Palestine’ in a news item. Posting once more on his Facebook page gained him media coverage after he feverishly wrote, “Last night ABC News wiped Israel off their map. They’re literally doing the Islamists’ dirty work for them. We must defund these traitors immediately.”

If it isn’t patently obvious by now that Yemini is a full-time shill for Israel then consider that through his “IDF Training” gym in Melbourne the former Israeli soldier has trained members to fight in Israel — that means to kill Palestinians. There is even an online application to join the Israeli Army on his IDF Training webpage! Ignoring the narrative of the occupiers,  Palestinian people’s land is being occupied by an aggressor comparable to the Nazis of Jewish Hollywood. It has been reported, too, that at his gym he ran a charity drive collecting money for Israeli Defence Force (IDF) families back in Israel: not Legacy.

Just in case there is any doubt remaining that Avi serves Israel’s interest and his whole involvement in Patriot Politics is to drum up backing for the chosen ones and their illegal wars, Avi runs the Facebook Page “I Stand with Mossad”.

Yemini was born here yet served as in the Israeli army — a soldier for a foreign state — and his loyalties so clearly lie with that aggressive little stretch of desert which is, one way or another, determining the fate of the entire world. If Israel was not unduly “recognised” by our government he would be considered in terms of a terrorist.

21729084_516499528712309_1264026518_n
Avi’s “other” group is not titled I Stand With ASIO

All his life Avi was burning to return to his Israel and kill Palestinians; a western-mandated one-sided conflict that is generating nearly all contretemps with the Arab world. This is very Australian of him. And this loyalty to an alien race is something else that typifies what we know as the far-right in this country — this blurring of the line that assumes any enemy of Islam is an ally of Australia and through that alliance IS Australian.

Nationalists first saw this in Reclaim Australia which ignited but then quickly came under the control of the Zionists who rebranded Patriotism and now want to own the word ‘Nationalism’. Indeed, just as much of what we buy is branded “MADE IN CHINA”, so much of what passes for far-right politics in this country should be stamped “MADE IN ISRAEL”.

UNA has defined Nationalism for our readers in every permutation possible. But here is the Collins English Dictionary definition: “Loyalty or devotion to one’s country; patriotism” — got that, Avi, to ONE’S country, not someone else’s country.

Just in case there is any doubt remaining that Avi serves Israel’s interest and his whole involvement in Patriot Politics is to drum up backing for the chosen ones and their illegal wars, Avi runs the Facebook Page “I Stand with Mossad”.

In 2010, it was revealed that Mossad faked three Australian passports used to murder Hamas leader Mahmoud Al Mabhouh in Dubai. Mossad regularly used fake Australian passports. Israel got snooty when our government asked questions. This is what a great friend Israel and Mossad are to us.

Birth of a Zionist

In 2004, a 52 min documentary Welcome To The Waks Family aired on SBS. Produced by a friend of Avi’s father, Zephaniah Waks, it documented a period in the lives of his Melbourne-based, Jewish orthodox family.

Avraham was one of 17 children raised in strict Chabad observance by Zephaniah and his wife, Chaya.

What stuck out was that Zephania’s  family did not bring him up to be such a fanatical Yid. They raised him in what most would describe as an “assimilated” lifestyle on Sydney’s North Shore.

welcometothewaksfamily.png
It was like Sylvania Waters only with the score to Fiddler on the Roof playing in the background

As a young bloke in the 70s, the liberal Zephaniah led a hippy lifestyle. He smoked Pot, surfed, and was ‘groovy’. But he began to feel spiritual pangs (either that or the munchies). His metaphysical yearnings led him to Buddhism, but he soon met some Lubavitch Jews. Before long he was sporting a gruesome beard, locks, and observing all the Hebrew pieties. Zephaniah was back with the tribe and that, in essence, is the goal of the Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidic movement — to reunite Jews with their faith so that Maschiach, or the Messiah, will rock back on down to earth and high-five all the Israelites (except the women, for modesty reasons).

Yemini Hippie Father
Avi’s dad Zephaniah back in his secular hippy days channeling Frank Zappa

Meanwhile, Avi’s mother grew up in Israel as strict as they come. At the time of the doco, the woman had never visited a cinema, or attended a gig; not even to see Simon and Garfunkel. The 70s were wasted on her. But she obediently submitted to her wifely duties squeezing out 17 new Jews. She spent the rest of her time wiping their bums and cooking. But not on Saturdays, since work of any kind are forbidden to these weirdos: they’re not even allowed to turn off a light-switch.

Avraham was one of 17 children raised in strict Chabad observance by Zephaniah and his wife, Chaya.

Outside of that, they were not permitted to play with “goyim” children. In one scene of this documentary, rather than risk mixing with the goyim, the Jewish community hires out Melbourne’s Luna Park for a day of fun in their yarmulkes. But they cannot leave well enough alone even on a break and the men can be seen stopping to pray in a room. This is where we come to wonder about Avi’s obsession with Islam. For all intents and purposes, his lifestyle was Islamic.

Instead of veils, Chabad women wear wigs or hats. They’re not as bad as Islamic women, certainly, but the men’s look is seriously crook. What’s more, due to modesty laws, Hasidic men and women, regardless of whether they’re married or not, cannot touch one another or socialise; even at a wedding. That sort of inhuman observance would please any Grand Mufti. But the Taliban stuff continued: movies, novels, mainstream music, none of these were allowed in the Waks household (what kind of name is Waks?). They had a TV and entertainment unit, but tacked to the glass of the cabinet was a note that read, “This unit is used only for Kadesh secular educational and family videos.”

Pity Hollywood Jews don’t feel that way when it comes to entertainment and the goyim mind.

PossibyAvi
The “Patriot” in embryo

Then there is food; Chabad Jews are just as fucked up about their food as Moslems. The Waks required two different stoves and a whole extended kitchen just to deal with their kosher requirements. Apparently, the council was so suspicious over planning drafts they suspected the Waks was planning on building a boarding house since their kitchen was so unbelievably huge.

Sealing them even more hermetically in a Jewish bubble, the family house was across the road from the Chabad factory: the St Kilda Yeshiva College, which is not only where the children were sent for religious indoctrination, but where Manny Waks, Avi’s brother, was sexually abused by a male guard.

Pity Hollywood Jews don’t feel that way when it comes to entertainment and the goyim mind.

Two other members of the Waks family were also interfered with while building their acquaintanceship with Hashem.

This all came out many years later and was the catalyst for the smashing of Manny and Zephania’s faith while Avi would side with the college and the Chabad community. This we draw attention to since it says much about Avi’s loyalty as a son and brother but more so where his loyalties lie to Australia. Avi wants to protest those Moslems who hold our laws in contempt yet opposes Mesirah, which is where a Jew reports another Jew to non-Rabbinic persons. How’s that any different from Sharia, or a Moslem refusing to observe respect for a magistrate or judge?

BetterPictureofYeshivaWhereMannyWasMolested.png
The view of the pedo rape house Jew college from the house where Yemini grew up

Manny’s case brought a supportive father out of a religious order Zephaniah Waks now dismisses as a “cult”. The charges were upheld and the college shamed. The case became a subject of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Rabbi Zvi Telsner, The Rabbi in charge of the college resigned in 2015 (his contract was renewed in August 2017, after the head died down). But for going against the tribe Manny, Zephaniah and Chaya were ostracised by the “cult” community.

AvisFatherJewishCommunityHiresOutLunaParkToCelebrateHolidayMostlyGoyimFree(exceptforshleppingstaff)
Avi’s dad and the Melbourne Jewish community enjoy a Goyim-free day at Luna Park

Avi’s parents sold up their house and moved on. But Avi is the most vicious of anyone in that cult: he went levelled bogus allegations of abuse against his own father in a bid to invalidate their accusations, which have been confirmed by the process of Australian law. He accused his victimised brother and father of conspiring in a lie.

A case of defamation arose between him and his brother over a Facebook post in which he inferred that, because of a disgraced Rabbi, who had been charged in New York with child offences, stayed at their home, they were hypocrites. The family claims they were unaware and asked him to leave when they learned the truth.

Two other members of the Waks family were also interfered with while building their acquaintanceship with Hashem.   

Note, too, that Avi no longer uses the surname Waks (can hardly blame him there) but Yemini. This is interesting since his mother was actually born in Yemen and moved to Israel as a nipper.

Can'tgetMoreAussieThanThis.png
The full Waks

In the end, what is the difference between the Islam that Avi wants us to unite with the Jews against and his Hasidic community and other outspoken Jews? They are both alien cultures who wish to recreate their foreign environment within our midst and impose their beliefs and attitudes.

As demonstrated above, when it came to a choice between his Judaism and his family, his religion came first. How do you think he feels about Australia?

Strictly business

In an interview with the Times of Israel, Avi admitted his intentions have little to do with embracing Australianness. He said, “My wife and I launched our business, IDF Training in 2009. Our goal went beyond supporting our growing family. Our mission was to show (Australian) Jews that being a proud Jew, being a proud Zionist can work for you and should be part of your business plan.”

And that, Folks, is the rub. If you think that Avi came amongst us inept Goyim to expunge “Nazis” from the Patriot Movement and lead us to a new golden age of Aussie identity, think again. His purpose is two-fold, to garner backing for Israel, and to fill his pockets with shekels. He has already admitted that he has political ambitions, and much as Pauline Hanson cynically used the Australian people for a payday this is Avi’s goal too.

Our media gives this Zionist oxygen, and the manner in which he was inserted into the contentious Game of Patriots to rival the “Nazi” Blair Cottrell should speak volumes to those who truly oppose the Globalist Order.

Sadly, the average Aussie Patriot is out of his ken when it comes to these matters, especially when the beguiling element of Zionism is thrown into the mix. They make the simple arithmetic that an enemy of their enemy is not only their friend but their ally. They have never had a head for world affairs and cannot draw the lines that connect Israel and its American host with the deeds and intrigues that generate Moslem immigration in the first place. They have little idea of the role that Israel has played in destabilising Syria which led to Tony Abbott, himself a Zionist, to import 12,000 Syrians into our country.

Because they are so clueless, these ‘Patriots’ as they apocryphally call themselves, haven’t figured out you can only be patriotic to your own people — not an alien Semitic race. But time and time again they fail this lesson, as they did by throwing support behind non-Australian, non-White Danny Nalliah.

These faux patriots are just as likely to support an African “Patriot” if he interposed himself on their movement. All he would need to do is to wrap the flag around himself, mouth a few platitudes, and due to the novelty of it all he would win their vote.

We now return to where we started — Nick Folkes and his Peanuts for Freedom. We have it on good authority that Nick Folkes did not sanction the stunt in which Jameson, a Downs Syndrome sufferer, and Neil Erikson stormed a Yarra Council meeting. And knowing Nick, who is jealous of anyone he senses as a rival, he is not pleased with the rise of Avi Yemini. But as capitulation is his only option, will Nick now once again publicly return to his support for Zionism and ditch the Totenkopf decals of the “edgy” Alt-Right?

Something is happening there, and because of the over-the-top reaction when UNA merely asked Avi what his business with Jameson is — seeing as how Jameson and his Peanut friends now have a staunch anti-Semite SS wannabe as “security” — we suggest that it is important enough since the question was so publically obfuscated by a curious chain of Zionist Patriots.

dekzjagtnlyuxgx-800x800-nopad
Aussie Patriots, we present Blair Cottrell’s replacement as Supreme Leader of the Aussie Patriot Movement for Reclaim Australia

 

 

THE LEFT ARE NOW THE BOSSES’ BEST FRIENDS

THE LEFT ARE NOW THE BOSSES’ BEST FRIENDS

What are we to make of today’s Leftist? We could follow the standard conservative line and declare them to be anachronistic Marxist hold-outs who could never accept the dissolution of International Socialism in the heady days of 1989, but that is simplistic and we are better than that.

If anything, the Left of 2017 with their arcane take on identity politics represent a failure of Marxist ideals, they are, in effect pushing a distorted version of Socialism which has now fused with the superstructure of globalist capitalism.

White Nationalists in the U.S.A developed a theory in the mid-2000’s which placed the modern Left as the junior partner in a hybrid economic and social system, which fused a type of globalist feudalism with second generation Communism.

Tim Murdock, who further developed the theories of a former Washington political insider, the late Bob Whitaker, not only described the system commonly known as “Cultural Marxism” but put forward his tactical approach to overthrowing both the burgeoning Leftist cultural hegemony and its capitalist cronies.

whitaker_header_101 (1).png
The late Bob Whitaker was a former Washington political insider turned pro-White dissident

Murdock’s method centres on practical politics, the repetition of talking points and the tactical humiliation of Leftists at every opportunity; non-violence is stressed as the most radical path to confronting the Left, “dealing steel”, as he puts it, cannot produce satisfactory results.

White Nationalists in the U.S.A developed a theory in the mid-2000’s which placed the modern Left as the junior partner in a hybrid economic and social system, which fused a type of globalist feudalism with second generation Communism.

We saw this principle at work on our shores in the tumult of the 2015 civic patriot uprisings, chiefly carried forth by Melbourne based United Patriots Front and their allies; the tactics employed by this group mirrored the Murdock method, even if the Patriots themselves were unaware of what they were unleashing.

In the beginning, the use of non-violent demonstrations and the tactical humiliation of key opposition figures had the Left and their sponsors reeling in shock; who could forget the comical visits by UPF members to the Melbourne Anarchist Club and Leftist propaganda radio station 3CR?

riot
Antifa got more than they bargained for when they broke police lines at Coburg, the TV news didn’t show the part where the Left turned and ran away when the fists started flying

As the UPF provocations intensified, the Left, wounded and embarrassed spiralled into ever more extreme rhetoric and behaviour as their supporting cast of well fed, middle-class activists drifted away and their visible street movement dwindled, from some hundreds to a core of about eighty.

The Civic Patriot rising showed what is possible when dash and bravery are coupled with the right rhetoric and clever tactics; the modern Left fall apart when seriously challenged as they lack the discipline of their Communist forebears, the core of their activist base being made up primarily of Bohemians, hysterics, Peter Pan cases and middle-class adventurers.

 Had the young civic patriots known the powerful effects of their non-violent activities they might have husbanded their resources and held the line; in the end though, the debacle on Bell Street, Coburg in 2016 knocked the wind out of their sails as they, from that point, became folk devils in their own right.

The Civic Patriot rising showed what is possible when dash and bravery are coupled with the right rhetoric and clever tactics; the modern Left fall apart when seriously challenged as they lack the discipline of their Communist forebears, the core of their activist base being made up primarily of Bohemians, hysterics, Peter Pan cases and middle-class adventurers.

joyce
Alan Joyce, capitalist patron of the radical Left, he is donating a million dollars of his personal fortune to help rig the same sex marriage survey

It is only their connection to the institutions of capitalist power which sustains the wider Left, though it is now landlocked within the new class system and operates on the level of a Stasi like militia, policing the Working Class and Marginalised People on behalf of the bosses.

There is no other way of viewing the Left in 2017, their campaigns against ordinary folk, reason and common decency all lob the ball squarely back into the court of the Bourgeoisie and the global corporations; their denunciations of so-called “Hate Speech” and their insistence that transgressors be fired from their jobs does nothing but empower the bosses to silence the political opinions of workers.

For at one level this really is a quasi-religious problem, the Left being concerned with what they suspect people of believing and how, with their serial killer style system of thumbtacks and string, they weave a web of intersectionality fine enough to catch the mildest transgression.

This is a serious and growing problem, especially for authentic radicals and dissidents, with the puritanical Left coming down like a tonne of bricks upon anyone who dares step out of line, say the wrong thing or express scepticism toward their dogma.

For at one level this really is a quasi-religious problem, the Left being concerned with what they suspect people of believing and how, with their serial killer style system of thumbtacks and string, they weave a web of intersectionality fine enough to catch the mildest transgression.

You see, for the schtick with which they beat the lower classes to make an impact everyone must, in effect, wholeheartedly accept the idea that people have immortal souls; that a man can be trapped in a woman’s body or vice versa; that a person of one of the victim classes lives the oppression and hurt visited upon his ancestors; or that White people are automatically networked and privileged via their spiritual succession of the pioneering settlers

aglCEO
AGL boss Andrew Vesey, another patron of social justice causes and supporter of the LGBTI movement

As mad as all of this sounds, it is not enough to say that the Left are useful idiots, putty in the hands of the capitalist classes, especially when they are visibly part of the globalist machine, with CEO’s and directors of companies enthusiastically supporting causes such as Same Sex Marriage, the refugee scams and anti-racism initiatives while creating formal partnerships with Leftist activist groups.

If a social movement is sponsored by Google, endorsed by Qantas and patronised by the CEO’s of resource and infrastructure corporations it is a pretty safe bet to assume that the rhetoric coming from Left activists, the junior partners, is calculated to support the people and corporations further up the food chain.

fair_use_white_rabbit_bio_STFU-750x410
Follow the White Rabbit

 

THE MATTER OF SOCIAL CLASS

THE MATTER OF SOCIAL CLASS

Australian politicians of the globalist caste will flat out deny that, in 2017, we have an entrenched class system which regulates, and in many ways undermines public life and the ability of citizens to politically organise on their own behalf.

To make our case for, dare we use the term “class struggle” in Nationalist politics we should first give our readers a simple explanation of class structures in contemporary society.

Logically, starting from the top, we have the monied families, those now fading clans of colonial aristocrats whose fortunes were made in the 19th and 20th centuries, on the markets, as graziers, miners or other entrepreneurial adventures.

It is hard to know how much influence such folk have nowadays, their exclusive clubs and rural, baronial cliques are, we are told, on the wane as the younger family members sell up the stations to the Chinese, or other foreign concerns and re-settle in the major cities.

The old families may still be influential, to a point, but they are rarely politically active anymore, beyond donating to, or fundraising for, the major parties; with a few exceptions the remaining graziers and sundry other bluebloods are no longer regularly sitting in Parliament.

In any case these “hidden hands”, if in fact, that is the way they choose to operate, are beyond the reach of grassroots activism, for the time being anyway; as dissidents push in from the margins toward the structures of power they may well reveal themselves, though the major parties would do all they could to screen off their benefactors and power brokers from the public gaze.

The Bourgeoisie are usually on the bottom of the second page of the Financial Review Rich List, they are typically well off and their influence stems from their control of the ebb and flow of, not only commerce but information. 

The Bourgeoisie are usually on the bottom of the second page of the Financial Review Rich List, they are typically well off and their influence stems from their control of the ebb and flow of, not only commerce but information. In this class, we find people who can move laterally through the key areas comprising the structure of power in this country: big business, government, the arts and media industry and academia.

The next, and more visible class would be what we often term the Bourgeoisie, taking the Marxist interpretation; these are the people who, subject to government rule, man the levers of the system of globalist capitalism, as we now know it.

winning_cup_hawke_bond_1sn0ctv-mr_udnu73a
Bob Hawke and Alan Bond, wealthy yes, but also influential beyond the power of money

Members of this class, just as two examples would include people such as Malcolm Turnbull and Bob Hawke, though they may be spectacularly wealthy by working class standards their main power lies in their freedom of movement through these key decision making sectors of society.

Third on our list is the upper middle class, who could loosely be described as the people who keep those five key structures of power running on behalf of the bourgeoisie; they may be senior bureaucrats, lawyers, union officials, journalists or artists of one sort or another.

Well, known figures in the upper middle class are people of the calibre of Andrew Bolt, Waleed Aly, Peter Garrett, Dick Smith and so forth, people who have limited access to the structures of power but who have made a niche as demagogues, mid level entrepreneurs or successful artists.

Well-known figures in the upper middle-class are people of the calibre of Andrew Bolt, Waleed Aly, Peter Garrett, Dick Smith and so forth, people who have limited access to the structures of power but who have made a niche as demagogues, mid level entrepreneurs or successful artists.

It is in this class that we see values and ideology start to play a role in the social status of its members, rather than the raw power of wealth; we could argue that it is the class from which a lot of lower house MP’s, local councillors and, for want of a better term “community leaders” are drawn.

waleed
Race, ethnicity and creed matter little in the upper classes

It is also at this level of society that race, religion and ethnic background start to really matter in determining social status; whereas the Bourgeoisie is largely blind to such concerns the upper middle class will routinely impose themselves, in a broad sense, as representatives of particular groups in society.

Of course, the politics of the upper middle class tend to be egalitarian, in that they are bound by ethics, codes of conduct and social mores by virtue of the fact that they, unlike the classes above them, have to make a living largely by their own enterprise.

The Middle Class, having a measure of financial security are able to contribute their time and a share of their resources to causes such as sporting clubs, schools, political parties, churches and other community projects. 

Their values are that of the shopkeeper, anyone who has the money can partake of their wares, however, they see themselves as protectors of this broad class of clientele and wish to maximise their sales by catering to every whim and taste of their customers.

So the upper middle-class, when active in the community and thus visible to the two lower classes will style themselves as benevolent and virtuous, taking up the causes of those perceived to be “less fortunate” in the name of equal opportunity for all, as long as everyone knows their station in life.

GreensMPsGroup-th
The Australian Greens, a solidly Middle-Class outfit

We come then to the “middle”, whom we shall simply term the Middle Class, for the sake of clarity. These are the people who, while not struggling to make ends meet must still work for a living, generally as employees or sole traders; they may own one or two properties, be able to partake in leisure activities and political activism but they have very limited access to the structures of power save by appeal to those higher up the ladder.

The Middle Class, having a measure of financial security are able to contribute their time and a share of their resources to causes such as sporting clubs, schools, political parties, churches and other community projects. They are the rank and file party branch members, the activists, social justice warriors and club men who, while feathering their own nest are able to devote their energy to achieving specific communal goals at a grass roots level, as opposed to the abstract egalitarianism of the Upper Middle Class.

Below them is the Working Class proper, the skilled workers on salaries, university educated or qualified in a trade or profession in most cases they mirror the Bourgeoisie in terms of drive to succeed and financial self interest, but they are mostly apolitical and place little value on the abstract “virtues” of the Upper Middle Class.The Working Class will join trade unions and social clubs if it is in their interest but in general, they are apolitical; they are worldly enough know that they are cut off completely from the structures of power and they tend to resent to some extent those who are supposedly their betters, especially politicians.

The Working Class will join trade unions and social clubs if it is in their interest but in general, they are apolitical; they are worldly enough know that they are cut off completely from the structures of power and they resent, to some extent, those who are supposedly their betters, especially politicians.

This class of builders, office workers, junior public servants, consultants and sub-contractors are self-reliant in that they practice what might be called Anarcho-Syndicalism; they, for the most part, are able to set the price of their own labour and will form temporary, ad hoc partnerships and syndicates in which profits are made.\

the block
The Block, relatable working class archetypes for the mass media age

Generally, this class sees politics as means to an end for the upper classes and views government policy as something which is done to them, rather than for them, to that end there is widespread avoidance of “red tape” and corner cutting when it comes to compliance with rules and regulations.

This is the anarchic part of the Working Class make up if we take anarchy to mean self-rule as opposed to the nihilistic connotations of Bohemian “anarchism”; the anarchic worker, as far as possible, games the system and breaks the law insofar as those laws might inhibit his making a living.

This class of people, in general, will fiddle things to their own advantage in a self-centred fashion but not go overboard into outright corruption or the self-destructive criminality seen in the truly marginalised people, they are thus viewed with a degree of hostility by the Upper Middle Class

Marginalised people are the minimum wage slaves, the itinerants, contract workers, the disabled, pensioners and others who are purposely shut out of the financial-political power structure and spoken over by the middle and upper classes.

The final class of Australian we will call the Marginalised Class, as this is the description which most closely fits their situation, for the most part.

Marginalised people are the minimum wage slaves, the itinerants, contract workers, the disabled, pensioners and others who are purposely shut out of the financial-political power structure and spoken over by the middle and upper classes.

A person on the margins of society has no material security in comparison to the other classes, he doesn’t starve, but progress above the station of the casual worker or, in the case of an infirmity of mind or body, the social welfare recipient, is both extremely difficult and, nowadays increasingly rare.

struggle st
The SBS programme Struggle Street gave us an insight into the challenges, hopes and dreams of some of our most marginalised suburbanites

These are the people whose fragile economic lives are rendered precarious by globalism and who are viewed, in terms of their class, as an impediment to the ambitions of the upper and middle classes; we hear them described as idle, ignorant and quarrelsome, words which might have come from some 18th century nobleman as he contemplated “Les Miserables” on the streets.

We will conclude this article at the point of describing the present class structure with a view to creating an axis for discussion among Nationalists and our supporters; this analysis will be built upon and developed as a reference point as we explore strategies for building class consciousness and, as far as possible, class solidarity among White workers and marginalised people.

Due to class relationships and the antagonism of the upper classes toward working and marginalised people the only way forward is to start on the outside and clear the margins of all the political competitors, opportunists, Bohemians, criminals and controlled counter gangs imposed upon our people by the globalists.

Our talking points on what we call “margin-streaming” here come into play, where we attempt to build a political movement in the wilderness of suburbia, beyond the pale, with such resources and personnel as can be scavenged from the ruins of Globalist Cosmopolitanism.

 

USA: Demonstrators March In National Day Of Action On Immigrant Rights
A shadow puppeteer out on strike