IS IT WHITE GENOCIDE OR WHITE SUICIDE?

IS IT WHITE GENOCIDE OR WHITE SUICIDE?

This title question here can only be answered by being honest, and above all things, we as Nationalists have a responsibility not to fall into the trap of platitudes.

By Christopher Shortis

Progressive politics are full of examples of platitudes and the most famous was arguably former Labour P.M. Kevin Rudd’s sorry speech. It created a fuzzy, feel-good moment to appease the conscience of the progressives by condemning early Australian history, but achieving little if any positive outcome for the Aboriginal people. This is also a great example of cultural, or indeed, white suicide rather than genocide.

Ultimately our nation’s woes are from condescending white people with an aristocratic mindset in power, appeasing their globalist puppet masters, filling our nation with third-world hordes and selling our ports, farmland and God-knows-what-else to an emerging China. These Judas Iscariots of our race don’t care about Aboriginal welfare, let alone their fellow white man. In time, at the rate we’re going, we could potentially be under Chinese occupation, and how will this fare for the Aboriginal people?

We at United Nationalists Australia know that Kevin Rudd’s sorry speech was patronizing pish because if white people in positions of power can sell out their own, then how can they genuinely claim to care about Aboriginal welfare? This, however, is not about Aboriginal welfare, but whether we as whites are suffering from white genocide or suicide?

dfadfad
Kevin Rudd’s expurgated speech: he meant to say, “As Prime Minister of Australia, I am a sorry son of a bitch.”

The most striking example of platitudes from pretentious Nationalists is the term “It’s O.K to be white”, the latest in a line of mantras including “Diversity means White Genocide”. These trite statements are often adopted by uncultured boobs who think waving signs and yelling out “It is O.K to be White” is the apex of political activism. Neil Erikson who has doxed just about every group that he has ever been involved with walked on stage at an African culture event in Melbourne and yelled out “It’s O.K to be white” and it was nothing more than an attempt to incite a reaction.

This alleged state snitch, police informant and all-around serial-pest continued his moronathon at St. Kilda beach by filming Africans playing soccer, which incited a reaction that Erikson was looking for, with one African arrested for assault on a police officer. This created the propaganda Erikson wanted to promote his St. Kilda “Political Meeting”, which in turn created the spectacle the establishment needed to condemn the rally as racist.

This alleged state snitch, police informant and all-around serial-pest continued his moronathon at St. Kilda beach by filming Africans playing soccer, which incited a reaction that Erikson was looking for, with one African arrested for assault on a police officer. This created the propaganda Erikson wanted to promote his St. Kilda “Political Meeting”, which in turn created the spectacle the establishment needed to condemn the rally as racist.

The predictable dumbathon between left and right played out to script, with the left being filled with their Marxist birdseed parroting the variant of the same chant. “Africans are welcome racists are not”. The media, as well as the Left, were engaging in the hype of the rise of Neo-Nazis after a couple of clowns were filmed doing the Nazi Salute. The Jewish community also had to have their say through The Australian Jewish News, with the story titled ‘When right is wrong’” and the chosen ones had to make it about them. Wasn’t the counter-protest against the far-right about alleged racism towards Africans?

This also triggered left-wing groups to launch their own protests, warning of the threat of growing Nazism chanting another clichéd mantra “Never Again” in the city of Melbourne, which was painted red long ago. The two predominant figures leading the cuckfest at St. Kilda beach were Neil Erikson and Blair Cottrell, the main act at the circus protesting against African violence.

B1 and B2 were falling over themselves trying to prove they’re not racist, and Cottrell posing for a picture with a South Vietnamese man with the defunct South Vietnamese flag. Oh, the irony! The so-called Nationalist with a man who fled his homeland to Australia with his defunct flag, because Ho Chi Minh fought to unite Vietnam and as it happens were more Nationalist then he was, and more Nationalist than Blair will ever be.

screenshot_20190105-180512_facebook
It’s a wonder these jokers won’t be holding their own citizenship ceremony on Australia Day. They can start with this token Asian.

Queensland Senator Fraser Anning unsurprisingly lent his support to the rally seemingly without a single advisor in his office warning him about being within 1000 miles radius of the Erikson termite. The old ‘I support Israel’ line came out when questioned by the media and the strong denials that he was with Neo-Nazis. This is despite supporters executing the Roman Salute and looking like extras in the series Romper Stomper. But now we must address the elephant in the room. Both left and right were at St. Kilda beach herded like cattle by the Police and in this circus were The Unshackled, Dia Beltran and Kane Miller from the True-Blue Crew, making up some of the social media identities.

This also triggered left-wing groups to launch their own protests, warning of the threat of growing Nazism chanting another cliché mantra “Never Again” in the city of Melbourne, which was painted red long ago. The two predominant figures leading the cuckfest at St. Kilda beach were Neil Erikson and Blair Cottrell, the main act at the circus protesting against African violence.

Most of the people at St. Kilda beach whether they were left, right, the police or media, parliamentarians both State and Federal are a majority WHITE! As Nationalists waging our political struggle, we must come to terms with this mother of all paradoxes. Before we blame Jews, Africans, Muslims, China and every other symptom plaguing our nation today, remember the success of ending White Australia was done by whites willing to bow down to the globalist, egalitarian and elitist mindset.

Without white collaborators, there could be no ending of White Australia or the destruction of western culture in general. We as Nationalists need to accept that white history is a dual history and that the Nationalist-minded man was and still is always in direct opposition politically against the mercantile classes. Nationalists wanted a white man’s working paradise, where wages and conditions were just and not undermined by cheap non-white labour, while the bourgeois will do anything for profit.

Early Australian historical events such as the Eureka Stockade 1854, Buckland River Riots 1857, Lambing Flats 1861 and the Shearers Strike 1891 are prime examples of the Nationalist-minded men standing up against the greedy pastoralists. From the shearers strike of 1891, emerged the Australian Labor Party and ten years later under Edmund Barton, the first Australian P.M. the first act of parliament, the Immigration Restriction Act was legislated. This is referred to as the White Australia Policy and our forefathers were prepared to stand for the principles of Nationalism by legislation and put into practice that the continent of Australia was to be a white man’s land.

Without getting into specifics too much, after the end of WW2, the United Nations was formed in 1948 and the declaration of human rights was established. In reality, becoming a member of the United Nations marked the beginning of surrender to national sovereignty to the global Overlords, and since then Australia has lost its racial homogeneity, manufacturing and identity. Legal, economic and racial sovereignty destroyed not by external forces, but the Judas Iscariots of our race in collaboration with the globalists. The majority of whites have learned to hate themselves because of the distorted black armed band view of our history being taught in our institutions when in three words history can be summed up accurately, the good, the bad and the ugly.

Our foes will only give you the bad and the ugly, but not the good, and the salient message here as Christ said, “Your enemies will be those of your own household,” and it’s going to take more than bromides to take on the globalist and the enemies within our midst. White genocide or White suicide? Somehow it seems to be the latter.

7e827fa033b8c7631c0542a3b527641c.jpg
Blair Cottrell, the human megaphone, once again channelling Adolf Hitler while supporting a pro-Israel Senator and being photographed with an Asian man

AFRICAN CRIME BECOMES AFRICAN VICTIMHOOD AT ST. KILDA BEACH

AFRICAN CRIME BECOMES AFRICAN VICTIMHOOD AT ST. KILDA BEACH

Once again a Patriot Rally has been generating media hype for negative reasons. The central issue that inspired the gathering at St Kilda beach on Saturday 5 has been obfuscated by a narrative about extremism, racism, and the threat from ‘far right’ groups. The word ‘Nazi’ is appearing everywhere.

Moreover, it all arose thanks to the habitual instigator, social media impresario, and reputed state informant Neil Erikson after he seized on the controversy surrounding a clash between African gangsters and members of the Vietnamese community in St Albans in the week leading up to the rally. All of a sudden, the talk ceased being about African-related crime and was all about the danger of White extremists.

United Nationalists Australia makes no criticism of those well-intentioned Aussies who attended the ‘Reclaim the Beach’ rally at Melbourne’s St Kilda beach believing that they were standing up for a principle. We ask our readers to accept that we are seasoned nationalists that have witnessed much in our time and this informs what is often mistakenly conceived as negative commentaries, but whereas in truth our goal is quite the opposite; to illuminate our people to the political frauds that feed on those who stray into far-right politics.

We wish honest nationalists to discern the true essence of those individuals and groups they lend their support to because 99 times out of 100 they’re being misdirected by many who would misspend their enthusiasm and exhaust their political will.

For in politics, deception is a constant, and in “far-right” politics, there is nothing but false players, swindlers, and provocateurs, and through a conspiratorial arc, they become the champions of the ill-informed. And now we dispense with this necessary introduction let us get down to the nitty-gritty of the rally that is still being reported on.

We wish honest nationalists to discern the true essence of those individuals and groups they lend their support to because 99 times out of 100 they’re being misdirected by many who would misspend their enthusiasm and exhaust their political will.

A news.com.au report reproduced a screenshot purportedly lifted from a private group “Cooks Convicts Inner Circle” on which Neil Erikson was offering notes on the organising his rally. Ultimately, the rhetoric surrounding the event was watered-down from a hoped-for confrontation with Sudanese youth to appease the powers and was instead presented as a peaceful “community meeting”.

According to the screengrab supposedly posted by Erikson, “The goal is not violence it’s exposure to our pages”. Ironic then that during the week leading up to the rally Facebook removed Neil’s pages and his Twitter account was taken down. But while the tone of the post quoted is nothing unsurprising its authenticity has been questioned. A battered sav has more brain cells than Neil Erikson and yet the spelling “watching us like horks (sic)” and “good to have you back on bored Blair (sic)” seems pretty dense even for him. Still, as we say, you could tread in dog faeces that possess greater hopes of sentient evolution than Erikson.

s.png
The authenticity of this post has been questioned yet it somehow screams NOOL

Erikson, as we’ve pointed out many times, is a serial provocateur. His entire existence confirms regardless of how flagrantly shonky a person can be he or she will still find loyal followers to lead down the garden path. UNA last year reported on how Blair Cottrell simply disregarded all the rotten things that Neil did to him: doxing him; calling him names, making up wild rumours about him — to join with this jackal. Note that Blair would never make such an exception for the members of UNA, or AFP, who’ve only ever been frank about his activities, yet when it comes to a twerp as crooked as Erikson is he is prepared time and time again to put aside any differences and unite for some inadequately defined purpose. So too, the True Blue Crew allied with this reunification as the old band got back together.

Just who was leading who behind the scenes we do not know but the idea that any right-thinking activist would willingly associate with an Erikson circus is contemptible. Blair has been ambiguous to some younger followers given how he freely admits to chatting with ASIO regularly and continues the associations with civics. Some say he is pursuing clever tactics to cover himself while others take a harder line. Our point simply is that a discussion has begun in Blair’s supporter-base and how he addresses it all will ultimately be important to progress or decline.

Indeed, the very prospect of the rally had set the media into a frenzy of hyperbole and already, where once it was generating clickbait from African gangsters it was now focusing squarely on the “threat” of White extremists. Erikson has already built up quite a form for himself leading up to the rally by crashing an African cultural event and provoking a situation on St Kilda beach by filming a group of African youths playing football. Helpful too was that the Antipodean Resistance decided to piggyback on the controversy by posting their stickers outside a Jewish nursing home for Holocaust survivors. While this was a droll move by these serial paper hangers, it does the cause of Australian nationalism about as much good as if they’d dressed in white sheets and dragged a Negro down Flinders Street tied behind a pick-up truck.

Such was the composition of those behind the rally that the Australia First Party released a media statement distancing itself from Erikson and his rally and qualifying their objection to the use of the name ‘nationalist’ by these civics. In a submission to Victoria’s Police Commissioner, the question was even asked outright whether Victoria Police was prepared to admit that Neil Erikson acts as an informant and is a troublemaker operating with a green light. These squealers are spreading.

For in politics, deception is a constant, and in “far-right” politics, there is nothing but false players, swindlers, and provocateurs, and through a conspiratorial arc, they become the champions of the ill-informed. And now we dispense with this necessary introduction let us get down to the nitty-gritty of the rally that is still being reported on.

There is only one reason anyone should talk to the police and that’s to tell them to fuck off. Hunter S. Thompson, the late gonzo journalist, had a note stuck to his refrigerator that reiterated this wisdom and it read: “Never ring 911 for anything! Ever! And that means YOU!” The idea that the police are in any way supportive of right-wing politics or its cause is whacko. They hate left and right equally and are beholden only to themselves: they are their own gang and any information drip fed to them can and probably will be used against us at some later stage.

There is a further anomaly that indicates a certain acquiescence to the state which can threaten Lads integrity as an organisation. Tom Sewell, the Lads Society leader admitted in a screenshot taken from a private group that he regularly chats to Victoria Police. Might it better to not be so ‘helpful’? And it is recorded by leftists present that Tom and his Lads including the inveterate liar Mark McDonald and his bestie Alex Annenkov were present in an aborted attempt to intimidate picnicking lefties. Although the reliability of that account is open to question.

46952269_676201839482275_8499608964453892096_n.png
Worryingly enough, Sewell freely admits to flapping his gums to the cops

In the struggle for influence over the patriot scene, it’s also been alleged by some close to the Lads that in a bid to undermine what he sees as his competition from established nationalists Tom Sewell has been willing to freely leak to anti-fascists. Such a claim now being spread about should be treated with real caution, but the allegation itself points to difficulties in a scene where ideological consistency has been lacking and personalisms rule the roost – and ideology should be the glue that keeps things together. Or on the other hand, as is quite possible, anti-fascists have found a way to plant such a toxic story through bad elements to sink the credibility of the group? Whatever it may all be in actuality, serious folk should keep right out of it.

Thus, with Erikson as the nucleus of an opportunistic rally that once upon a time would’ve been typical of the civic patriot dero Nick Folkes, a dubious coalition has formed in spite of an article published in The Age claiming that “the far right has been divided and conquered – by themselves”. In this inaccurate piece of reportage which claims that Blair Cottrell is Australia’s most prominent nationalist the author has failed to perceive that the broad conservative milieu, give or take certain players, is indeed functioning in unison. It is correct that ‘the movement’ is divided by those supportive of Israel and those who’re not, which explains why the Australian Liberty Alliance weren’t represented, but it isn’t accurate either.

There is only one reason anyone should talk to the police and that’s to tell them to fuck off. Hunter S. Thompson, the late gonzo journalist, had a note stuck to his refrigerator that reiterated this wisdom and it read: “Never ring 911 for anything! Ever! And that means YOU!”

Senator Fraser Anning, whose appearance at the rally has become the media focal point of Nazi hysteria, given Anning’s support for a White European Australia he is nonetheless an outspoken advocate of Israel. Last October he supported Avi Yemini at a rally in Melbourne and declared his support for Israel. The following day of the St Kilda rally he went on national television and did likewise. None of his pro-Israel rhetoric seems to have troubled his ‘anti-Semitic’ supporters like Blair Cottrell.

But then, nothing has changed for Blair – be it cognitive dissonance or simply a desire to overcome accusations of racism he has a fine knack for appearing in grip-and-grin shots with non-Whites as he did during drinks following the rally when he appeared with a Vietnamese man holding out the South Vietnamese flag. Any self-respecting nationalist, if he HAD to appear in front of a Vietnamese flag would’ve been better of standing with a North Vietnamese flag given the South was a corrupt sell-out to foreign interests while the north was fighting essentially for nationalism. As it happens, the Vietnamese community boycotted the event.

screenshot_20190105-180512_facebook
Cottrell and Ricky Turner all grins with their token Viet and the abominable South Vietnamese flag which no nationalist would recognise since the South was a sell-out

These acts of sucking up to “integrated” Asian minority groups further betray Cottrell and Erikson’s youthful naiveté, anyone over 40 will remember the hideous violence perpetrated by Vietnamese immigrants in the 1980’s and 1990’s. By the turn of the millennium the news media were salivating over stories of Asian gang fights, limbs severed in machete attacks, muggings and street brawls involving dozens of combatants; not to mention the cruelty of Vietnamese dog and cockfighting rings, their drug pushing, car re-birthing scams and standover rackets which persist to this day.

Then, too, is the way the conservative youth media voices of XYZ and The Unshackled have shamelessly plugged Neil Erikson almost in defiance of the pig’s history. Just the same way that Future Now happily declares him a “mate” despite the fact he’d pimp out their grandmothers for crisps money if he could get the chance. There isn’t anybody Erikson wouldn’t rat out, sell out, or stab in the back. There is no lie he wouldn’t tell or stunt he wouldn’t pull. If anyone truly wanted to serve the movement they’d push him in front of a speeding garbage truck and encourage the driver to reverse back and forth over his body about two dozen times. The types of characters that get drawn to Erikson speak for themselves.

Take Rino Grgrovuic, AKA Blue Beard for instance. Leading up to Christmas Blue Beard encountered Left Wing pest Tom Tengu by chance on a Melbourne Street. One thing led to another and he ended up allegedly assaulting the cuck’s girlfriend. Now, don’t get us wrong, we couldn’t give a crap for either party, but it was the confrontation that ensued with Victoria Police, caught by Blue Beard on his own phone, that truly demonstrated what a basket case he is. Then there is Ricky T, Neil’s offsider who is thicker than a side of beef and has all the charisma of soiled underpants. The way things are going Neil’s next sidekick and newest political spokesman will be suffering Down syndrome. As it is, Ricky T is not too far off.

These acts of sucking up to “integrated” Asian minority groups further betray Cottrell and Erikson’s youthful naiveté, anyone over 40 will remember the hideous violence perpetrated by Vietnamese immigrants in the 1980’s and 1990’s.

The least impressive thing about the rally was the rally itself despite the media hype. The emphasis on ‘Nazis’ being present seemed contrived. In footage taken one man holds his finger against his top lip and gives a Nazi salute before goose-stepping away. The context of this act is never made clear. Was it taken while the rally’s organisers were giving their speeches or was he mocking the Nazi accusation while facing off with the anti-racists? Yet, when a drongo rolled up in a Cosmic Psychos top, holding an SS helmet the optics changed decidedly Nazi. We have made enquiries and so far nobody has any idea who this joker is leading to speculation that he might well have been planted there.

fb81d2ca3619023742d60cb306cf967f.jpg
The bloke in the Cosmic Psychos T-Shirt shows off a souvenir from his days working for Social Security

Following an unremarkable bunch of sentences from Senator Anning, Blair’s speech was interesting from the point of view that he correctly blamed the state for the presence of the African criminals. But when he flew into Fuhrer mode as he is apt to do when speaking publicly and vowed to march to Daniel Andrews office he betrayed the fact that he hadn’t figured out who was really in control. It wasn’t he or his motley supporters it was the Victoria Police who had each side well corralled and controlled. Blue Beard learned as much when he attempted to taunt the opposition but wound up confronted by a mounted policeman with whom he had an exchange that resulted in about ten cops rugby tackling him to the ground and presumably arresting him, possibly for breach of bail conditions resulting from his run-in with Tom Tengu.

When it was Neil’s turn to speak he gave some wimpy whine about his social media accounts before blowing off like a popcorn fart. Then he asked whether there were any Nazis present and made a joke about a couple of Vietnamese chaps. Obviously, he hadn’t seen the stooge in the Cosmic Psychos T-Shirt with the SS helmet. It kind of undermined the counter optics he was suggesting.

The most interesting thing about the rally was the victory against the left who have hitherto marshalled a greater presence and organised themselves far better than those on the right. In fact, the rally has left certain parties in disarray, with The Smashed Avocado movement being accused of being piss-weak liberals by the ‘Anarchists in Narrm.’ Likewise, at some point, police control of the crowd purportedly got lax and anti-racists holding a picnic were menaced by members of the right. Complaints were made that Citizens against Racism and Fascism (CARF) split leaving their comrades in danger. Later on, or earlier on, we can’t be sure, a truck laden with sound equipment broadcasting reggae music and anti-racist messages was targeted by a group of right-wing protesters who busted some speakers and messed with other equipment. UNA can officially declare we have no sympathy whatsoever for the antis.

The final indignity for the Anarcho-Communists and their bourgeois cat-lady allies was being shepherded to the Acland St tram terminus by scores of police, all the while being harangued and cat-called by a numerically superior and physically more aggressive civic patriot mob. This is the fundamental problem for the CARF and their fellow travellers, as much as they try to project a tough, rebellious and counter-cultural image the demographics of their movement let them down; there is no way a group comprising around 85% women can physically confront an opposing mob which is obviously 99% male.

The events on the St Kilda foreshore that afternoon and their mostly incoherent talking points have been largely obscured by the flood of disinformation emanating from the dinosaur media, which was slavishly repeated by politicians and pundits on all sides. As of this writing, the most interesting development has been the announcement by Senator Fraser Anning that he is attempting to register a new micro-party, the Conservative Nationals.

But there are reports that a fake-news-journalist is fishing around to get a story together about neo-nazis and terrorism given that a couple of months back a gaggle of so-called neo-nazis met in a Sydney hotel with a couple of civics to discuss their two pet targets – Australia First Party and the Lads Society. A rumour says that they are communicating with the journalist in what would be a two-way street. While it is true these people have long had connections to political police agencies and Fairfax, might they not conjure up a terrorism case and a terrorism story?

That is a lot more serious and allowing too the fake-news-journalist may have a couple of ‘ins’ to shifties who attached themselves to the protest, it bodes badly for all. We will see how far the spirit of St Kilda takes Anning and the Civic Patriots. We are willing to bet that once the registration of a new pseudo-nationalist party is ratified by the AEC, head cases such as Erikson and Burgess and opportunists like Avi Yemini will be all over it like a rash. Blair Cottrell will be in a singular position to signal clearly what he is and is not. That will be a big decision and we await it with concern.

660d30ef94ba273f3f5d01a0fb23f709.jpg
The dark side of the force was present that day

DISSIDENT POLITICAL ACTIVISM IS NOT A WORTHWHILE SACRIFICE FOR THE YOUNG

DISSIDENT POLITICAL ACTIVISM IS NOT A WORTHWHILE SACRIFICE FOR THE YOUNG

Jordan Peterson, when he keeps his beak out of politics, is a compelling speaker and a wise man; his lectures on men and masculinity are recommended viewing for young people.

We particularly admire Peterson’s take on the post-modern orthodoxy where men, and in particular young White men are being gradually hammered down to near the bottom of the “progressive stack”; this is the theoretical pecking order imposed by globalist liberalism, the effect being a rising tide of “man-babies” and Peter Pan cases.

Young White men today are told, in no uncertain terms that their kind is on the way out, that women and non-Whites are morally and intellectually superior to “old White men”; given this prevailing view among the elites and upper castes some of our young men are taking the view that there is no point growing up and they retreat from adulthood to pursue a life of childish hedonism.

antifa punk
Antifa is full of Peter Pan cases, it is premised on the truth that an “Anarchist’ at 60 is just as silly and immature as one of 15

We would never tar the whole of our youth with the epithet “Peter Pan”, the majority of young Whites are blissfully unaffected by the dogmatic Globalists, the media and the bourgeois Left types with their Newspeak and tawdry historical revisionism; that is one of the unintended consequences of a politically correct education, so much of it is fluff that it goes in one ear and out the other leaving the young with no real frame of reference on which to hang their White guilt.

We are seeing this very fable manifested in society in many sectors of society, the groups of Lost Boys congregating on social media, in clubs and underground associations, accompanied at times by their undemanding Tinker Bell female accomplices.

Allegorically Peter Pan was the boy who refused to grow up because he had Captain Hook as his example of adult life; the tyrant Hook is condemned and pursued by age, the lurking figure of the crocodile, announced by his tick-tock rhythm of time gradually chipping away at both the pirate leader’s sanity and his physical body.

Peter Pan instead chooses to be the eternal teenager, leading his band of Lost Boys, with all their insecurities and sorrows; the only female archetype in their world being the fairy Tinker Bell, the ethereal, one-dimensional girl who is mostly an enabler of their shared delusion.

greg davies
There is a whole genre of comedy based on the intersection of Peter Pan syndrome and midlife crisis

We are seeing this very fable manifested in society in many sectors of society, the groups of Lost Boys congregating on social media, in clubs and underground associations, accompanied at times by their undemanding Tinker Bell female accomplices.

In his work on contemporary masculinity Jordan Peterson points out that avoiding the sacrifices required of manhood and behaving like the eternal teenager into one’s thirties, or even forties is a road to personal desolation; a youth only gets to choose the sacrifice he is going to make to become an adult, he does not have the option of avoiding it if he wishes to take his place in the world of men.

Peter Pan cases are the most negative element when it comes to misleading the youth into throwing themselves into the maw of the globalist state, effectively wrecking their future prospects for no personal gain or any tangible benefit to their nation.

What is meant by sacrifice? The simplest way of visualising it would be to imagine masculinity as having an hourglass shape.

The lower half of our hourglass represents youth, with all of its potentials, while the upper portion is manhood with all the variety of options available to a man who has made a successful transition from the world of boys.

The narrow section in the middle is the period of sacrifice in which the boy becomes something more than he was by accepting a narrowing of his world and submitting himself to the guidance of his elders, as a student, an apprentice, a cadet and so forth.

Youth has to become something through sacrificing, for a time, all the freedoms and relative luxuries of childhood to pursue and gain mastery over an occupation in order that he, as a man, might enjoy the freedoms and numerous pathways to spiritual and material enrichment available only to adults.

Dawn rising on muddy, horrific battlefie
“In war, you learn your lessons and they stay learned”- Ernst Jünger

As has been noted, avoidance of this period of sacrifice, with all its limitations and the necessity for developing social skills such as humility, patience, tolerance and perseverance will only end in disaster; as Peterson puts it, instead of choosing the sacrifice he wishes to make in order to become a man the Peter Pan case will end up having sacrifices imposed by time and ageing, sacrifices which will likely crush him.

This brings us to the point of the article, dissident political action should not be regarded as a sacrifice worth making by the White youth of Australia, especially in an era when being blacklisted for life can be the result of a few lines of text on social media or an ill-judged appearance in public among the wrong crowd.

Transition to manhood is impossible from within a tribe of Lost Boys led by a would-be Peter Pan, therefore, a youth movement without connection to and supervision by sober adults is bound for disaster.

Peter Pan cases are the most negative element when it comes to misleading the youth into throwing themselves into the maw of the globalist state, effectively wrecking their future prospects for no personal gain or any tangible benefit to their nation.

Political engagement should only be considered in the light of maturity, once the sacrifices required of manhood have been made and all the options of the adult world are open to the individual; nobody expects the youth to march as the vanguard in the great struggle; it is immoral to do so and those lessons were learned long ago, at Passchendaele and Kokoda.

It is the responsibility of the elders to guard against the exploitation of our most precious resource, the youth; it is for this reason we expose and undermine charlatans, globalist pimps, Peter Pan cases and any other bad actors seeking to act as puppeteers of young White men.

870x489_gilets_jaune_2
French “Yellow Vest” protestors, this is what a grassroots movement looks like

 

ANDREWS’ RE-ELECTION WILL GREENLIGHT AFRICAN CRIME

ANDREWS’ RE-ELECTION WILL GREENLIGHT AFRICAN CRIME

As election time looms for Melbournians the inevitability of Labor premier Danny Andrews being re-elected emerges with it. Which also means, African crime gets re-elected.

Andrews, who just signed Victorians over to the One Belt One Road Chinese invasion initiative, so that he can accrue debt to the hungry Chinese at the cost of Australia’s security, has presided over a state in the throes of lawlessness. African crime is out of control but the state’s police commissioner and the government itself are beside themselves peddling misdirection and denials.

African “youth” fear no reprisals from the Victorian legal justice system because there seldom are any. The government is more concerned with its image as the country’s most multicultural state than it is with safeguarding its citizens from the violent acts of savage African immigrants who are here due to refugee quotas. And those quotas come about because for some reason the west has chosen to rescue these savage tribal people from their own self-made horror and import that mayhem to our own “civilised” lands.

The spate of African crimes in the state of Victoria is so incessant and relentless that African fatigue often prevents each and every outrage from being shared on social media communities concerned with the breakdown of Australian society thanks to immigration and especially immigration from incompatible races.

Barely a week goes about without reports of out of control African youths; home invasions; muggings; assaults; robberies and car-jacking in which that familiar phrase we’ve all come to cynically grin at is used when describing the suspects: “Of African appearance.”

When police respond to these incidents they adopt a “munch doughnuts” tactic until addressing 3AW in which case they make out everything is under control; reports are exaggerated; that it’s only a “few bad apples” spoiling it for a great community who love footy and are upset with the way they are being portrayed in the media.

Back in 2010, Andrew Bolt reported on how the then police commissioner Simon Overland admitted that the Victorian Police was hiding the truth about the ethnic crime problem.

One of the most astonishing revelations in Bolt’s article, and one which cuts to the very particular insanity suffered by the virtue-signalling small ‘l’ liberals always at the centre of championing open borders concepts, was that police were loath to issue colour-specific descriptions of African offenders because describing them as ‘black’ might cause these savage criminals offence.

The logical conclusion is not to describe them as “attackers”, or detail any specifics of their crimes, in case the negative criminal associations have an undesirable impact on their future employability as brain surgeons and rocket scientists.

Professor Andrew Fraser sparked a maelstrom of globalist indignation for having the gall to name the beast in the room. In 2005, he wrote a letter to the Parramatta Sun in which he warned: “…an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of other social problems.”

He added, “The fact is that ordinary Australians are being pushed down the path to national suicide by their own political, religious and economic elites.”

andrewfraser
Canadian-born Professor Andrew Fraser easily makes it onto UNA’s honours list!

In the ensuing row from that ‘inconvenient truth’ multiracialist apologists scrambled to bash out editorials condemning Professor Fraser; Channel 9 unleashed Ray Martin to confront him with a congenial group of church-going Africans as though this ambassadorial set were to negate the realities of African crime in much the same way a lot of bad apples spoil it for the few good ones; and academic papers were authored.

Sadly, Andrew Fraser apologised for his remarks after Sudanese man Safi Hareer complained to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission. Professor Fraser also drew the ire of Macquarie University when he wrote a paper advocating for a return to the White Australia Policy. That paper and others can be found here.

Professor Fraser was forced to take an early retirement package, but we shall not forget his courageous stand to state what everyone should regard as the bleeding obvious.

victoria-feature-image.png
A typical front page from Australia’s answer to Mogadishu

The open-borders liberal-elites’ response to all of this is to blame the messenger. There is no African crime problem, they argue, it’s the inherently racist character of the media and others reporting on the situation. They’re skewing the facts, using hyperbole, and they’re overblowing a few regrettable incidents into a campaign that impugns an entire community. It’s not the African gangs that are the problem, they say, but “the racists” who vilify them. And it is these class bigots of, as Drew Fraser said, “the political, religious and economic elites” who will always win sway over Victoria; which is on one level a showcase for a de-Europeanised Australia, which is, after all, the goal of the elites.

SOC.png
Straight from the webpage of the Victorian Socialists. See, it’s not them, it’s us, how could they possibly be responsible for their own actions?

With such a free hand from the elites, it’s little wonder that the crime-prone gang members fear nothing, respect nothing, and aspire to nothing but the accretion of consumerist trophies. In Victoria, the crime is not that committed by so-called refugees and children of refugees, it’s to mention the crime committed by these without rationalising it away as inherently a by-product of Australia’s inherent racism.

Below is the latest from the ABC as of the publication date of this blog:

Police are looking for a group of 10 to 15 youths responsible for two “ugly” and “vicious” robberies on the busy St Kilda foreshore in Melbourne’s south on Thursday night.

Key points:

  • Police said the offenders in both attacks were “perceived to be of African appearance”
  • Investigators are examining if a metal or wooden pole was used in the assaults
  • Local council has been asked to reintroduce an alcohol ban on the St Kilda foreshore

Police said two men were punched and one had a bottle smashed over his head in separate, unprovoked assaults.

In the first attack, a man had his mobile phone stolen and was left with swelling on his face.

In the second, a 25-year-old man received cuts to his face and head and was treated by ambulance officers.

Police said the offenders involved in both attacks were “perceived to be of African appearance”.

Detective Sergeant David Schaefer condemned the assaults.

“These attacks are quite cowardly and vicious, unprovoked and really an ugly event that actually occurs in normally a peaceful location where people frequently enjoy themselves,” he said.

The attacks happened on Jacka Boulevard at about 10:00pm and police said they were investigating whether the offenders may have used either a metal or wooden pole.

Call for alcohol ban

“We’re looking for a group of males of African appearance which we believe were congregating along the foreshore last night,” he said.

“We can’t speculate as to the numbers involved but on the second assault there was anywhere up to around 10 people who were involved in that second robbery,” Detective Sergeant Schaefer said.

Police said the victims had been “enjoying the sights” of the “iconic” St Kilda foreshore.

“The first victim just decided to walk down [and] enjoy the scenes and the second male was visiting a friend down there when he was accosted by the group.”

Victoria Police Inspector Jason Kelly said he was “very disappointed in what occurred”.

“Unfortunately we’ve had a large group of youth attend and the combination of youth, alcohol and public spaces just simply doesn’t mix,” he said.

He said alcohol at the “iconic beach location” was a “recipe for disaster”.

Inspector Kelly said police were calling for a full alcohol ban along the St Kilda foreshore to be reintroduced by the City of Port Phillip Council.

A FEW WORDS ON THE SUBJECT OF MARTYRDOM

A FEW WORDS ON THE SUBJECT OF MARTYRDOM

There ought to be a realisation by now, among Nationalistic people, that the Internet and in particular social media are these days very much a hindrance, rather than an aid in pursuing the cause of national revolution.

Time after time we are presented with the stories of people who have lost their way and become obsessed with the fantasy world of Facebook, Twitter, Gab and the myriad other portals through which people shout into the abyss of cyberspace; many of these individuals suffer full-blown mental breakdowns as a result of their journeys beyond the looking glass.

We have already posted several articles on this blog on the topics of violent extremism, unilateral action by Lone Wolf actors and the way ill, desperate or lonely Cybernauts are consistently fed false information and distortions of fact when it comes to matters of authentic political dissent against the Globalist-Capitalist system.

wretström
Daniel Wretström, a Swedish skinhead murdered by immigrants in 2000 is regarded by many on the continent as a martyr

We have laboured long and hard on blog posts which have examined the near zero potential of terrorism and political violence as a means of effecting lasting societal change; in addition to that we have been relentless in our criticism of the globalist leaning Alt-Right posers who have hijacked the Nationalist narrative and attempted to replace political principles with juvenile cyber-gibberish.

As sincere radicals we long ago came to the conclusion that social media is a cancer, that its potential to draw citizens together into a common cause for a better world was a mirage, a con-job by the owners of the sites which sucked billions across the world into submitting to a Globalist-Capitalist data mining and surveillance programme.

That is not to say, of course, that we wish to denigrate hardworking Nationalistic writers, it is important to create for posterity a permanent record of our theories and the overall tone of early 21st century Nationalism; the problem is that to the time poor worker, sorting the gold from the dross is nigh on impossible a task in the face of so much white noise coming from the social media zoo.

As sincere radicals we long ago came to the conclusion that social media is a cancer, that its potential to draw citizens together into a common cause for a better world was a mirage, a con-job by the owners of the sites which sucked billions across the world into submitting to a Globalist-Capitalist data mining and surveillance programme.

The problem is that the real world does not work in the same way as the cyber-playpens; pretty much every time the psychodrama of meme-rich social media groups is transposed onto the streets it has ended in ignominious failure, recriminations and bitter divides among participants, this is as true of the so-called “Far Right” as it is of Antifa and their ilk.

The really sad part of this is the potential for the disillusioned Cybernaut to spiral into an episode of mental decompensation when he is faced with this clash of values; when his hopes of concrete action, camaraderie and a lasting commitment to a great cause are dashed before his eyes the temptation to go it alone and create a spectacle can become overwhelming.

tommy
Tommy Robinson may be a fraud with suspicious ties to the Zionist entity but there is no doubt he is being ruthlessly persecuted by the UK authorities, his perseverance makes him a hero to civic patriots

Shooting up a house of worship, assassinating a minor politician or driving a van into a crowd of civilians will not make a martyr of the assailant, his reams of blog posts and social media interactions will be immediately expunged from the internet and in a few months, after he is tried and convicted, nobody but those with an academic interest in the case will remember his name.

Innocence, perseverance in the face of impossible odds, showing grace under fire and, above all survival to the very last, no matter what occurs, are the qualities of a martyr; such people are outwardly unaffected by frustration or despair and they are hailed for their self-sacrifice and their considered approach to their situation.

Shooting up a house of worship, assassinating a minor politician or driving a van into a crowd of civilians will not make a martyr of the assailant, his reams of blog posts and social media interactions will be immediately expunged from the internet and in a few months, after he is tried and convicted, nobody but those with an academic interest in the case will remember his name.

Think about this for a moment: Who can name, off the top of their head, one rank and file member of the SS Einsatzgruppen, or a police officer, who roamed Eastern Europe doing the dirty work of eliminating Jews, Communists and Partisans from the occupied zones?

We are talking here of the people who heard the screams and got blood spattered on their boots; so who can name one Khmer Rouge cadre? One Hutu militiaman from Rwanda in 1994? One Phalangist gunman from the Sabra and Shatila atrocity in 1982?

SS&SD unit Somewhere in Russia
The SS and SD Einsatzgruppen did all the dirty work on the Eastern front, they were the most ruthless and efficient killing machine going around, yet 70 years later their names are unknown outside academic circles

In truth, as horrible as it sounds, those killers were actually making their mark on the world, following orders as part of a great machine with clear orders, the camaraderie of brothers and a sense of purpose, yet they are forgotten by the world and only the names of their ideologues and leaders are barely remembered by ordinary workers, even if it is often for the wrong reasons.

Getting all worked up over social media memes, “truths” which are usually anything but true and expecting communion, or even ovations from your online peers when you finally flip out and do something spectacularly stupid is a sad way to live.

True radicals have their eyes on the horizon awaiting the new dawn, they move toward the light on the hill, so to speak; they see the good in the world and recoil from negativity and the dark side of life; they elevate beauty, vitality, art and love over depression, paranoia and insanity.

Getting all worked up over social media memes, “truths” which are usually anything but true and expecting communion, or even ovations from your online peers when you finally flip out and do something spectacularly stupid is a sad way to live.

If you see no hope of salvation, if the world seems to be spinning out of control and if your online fantasy world fails to reach its potential as a vehicle to sweep the globalists and their cronies from power then you can either step away from the keyboard, seek treatment for your mental problems and find something else to occupy your evenings, or you can implode and take the coward’s way out.

So put up or shut up, if the world is as fucked as you think it is and throwing away your life on a spectacular action seems the only option, instead of taking out your frustrations on others, why not write your great manifesto and last testament, lay down on your flag and put the gun to your temple?

Assuming that your writing was any good if you were possessed of great insight and could conceivably have made a wider contribution to “the cause” your death will be mourned as a tragedy and your name will live forever.

If, on the other hand, you really were just a sad, internet-addled loser parroting half-truths and engaging in social media group hysteria, so be it: to dust you will return in your forgotten and untended grave.

_54203247_comp_hess
When people began making pilgrimages to the grave of Rudolf Hess the German authorities exhumed his remains and levelled the site

NOT-SO-WHITE ROSE SOCIETY AT CENTRE OF MAJOR DEFAMATION

NOT-SO-WHITE ROSE SOCIETY AT CENTRE OF MAJOR DEFAMATION

Imagine being nationally condemned in China for believing China should not be forced to absorb millions of non-Chinese. Consider a scenario where arguing that China should retain its distinctive racial and cultural independence involved risking your livelihood, reputation, and possibly your freedom.

Then, entertain the idea of being reviled as Chinese supremacists by your fellow Chinese, who considered it evil to desire a racially homogenous China. Not only would such a scenario seem far-fetched, but one would reject it as implausible.

In the west, however, that bizarre world is a reality! Despite all that the ‘free west’ rests its reputation on, and backs-up militarily, that sort of view is indeed taboo at a social level. In fact, as Australia is forced by the globalist order to de-Europeanise into a Babylonian satellite predicated upon consumerism, one would imagine it was desirable that a voice is given to a racial group entering minority status — but no such thing.

Likewise, it would be odd to encounter young Turks expressing hypercritical ideas about what it means to be ethnically Turkish: dredging up and interpreting history to fortify arguments that persuade curbing their racial group from expanding or prospering in their home country.

In the west, Pavlovian self-abasement has been engendered into White people. It is comparable to what heathens faced in the centuries after Rome converted to Christianity when the sandal was on the other foot. There is some truth to the maxim that patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel. But when patriotism becomes heretical then it is not the patriot who is the scoundrel but his oppressor. Indeed, his patriotism is no longer an empty grab for salvation but a dutiful act of defiance.

Thus, as the globalists strive to end the dominion of White man over this nation, and which none of the shrill critics of White Australia is lining up to leave, expressing pro-White sentiment is akin to “extremism”. There is no delineation of the protagonists in what the mainstream lumps together as “the far-right”. This ‘far-right’ now occupies a similar space that communists once inhabited as folk devils.

Then, entertain the idea of being reviled as Chinese supremacists by your fellow Chinese, who considered it evil to desire a racially homogenous China. Not only would such a scenario seem far-fetched, but one would reject it as implausible.

Nothing is what it seems in the ‘far-right’ milieu but that doesn’t matter to the volunteer sentries of globalism. Bundling all the groups underneath the ‘far-right’ umbrella is like comparing Sunnis to Shias because they’re all Moslems. The media has had long enough to acquaint itself with disparities between civic patriots, nationalists, alt-righters and Tom Sewell from the Lads Society.

These differences are profound and in many cases run contrary to the narrative they have ascribed their subjects. For instance, the Australian Liberty Alliance could hardly be described as a “White Supremacist” group, with its acceptance of multiracialism and its basis in evangelical Christianity. Yet, that’s what these absolutists of globalism do in their bid to demonise anyone who whatsoever questions their script.

TmCsqOaa_400x400
Wes Fang, one of the most violently anti-White members of the Nationals

By daring to join and naively attempt to influence the executive council of the Young Nationals NSW in a righteous direction, a group of young Australians have run afoul not only of their chosen party but the duplicitous forces of media and its shadowy cabal of auxiliaries who recognise nothing in the hypocrisy of their actions.

To wit; the so-called White Rose Society has just doxed young, proud, White Australians. This act of publication, United Nationalists Australia suggests is a defamation that those involved should immediately pursue in court. To do nothing would give validation for the left side of the ideological spectrum. To accede to their dogma would be a sheepish act of guilt as if they have anything to be guilty for.

That the ABC collaborated in a joint exercise between the metrosexual Alex Mann and this cluster of trolls led by a China-shill living in Tasmania for a project fraught with political bias, normalising the idea that to object to population replacement, or resist sublimating to identity politics, is “extreme” and not a defensive counter-reaction, is a selective use of a public resource. Where was the depth of analysis, where was the balance? Why not also expose Antifa for evenness; surely to discuss one it is only reasonable to explain the other? Or at least aim to put the alt-right in context rather than fail to explain why the Australian alt-right came about. Moreover, it is becoming a trend wherein the Alex Manns of this world hope to make their bones with their hardly investigative exposes of the alt-right while everything they themselves stand for corrodes western society.

By daring to join and naively attempt to influence the executive council of the Young Nationalists NSW in a righteous direction, a group of young Australians have run afoul not only of their chosen party but the duplicitous forces of media and its shadowy cabal of auxiliaries who recognise nothing in the hypocrisy of their actions.

Allegations made about persons in that article, which is supported by the hyperbole of Mann’s podcast ‘Haircuts and hate: Inside the rise of Australia’s alt-right’, expresses no irony about using as sources social media “infiltrators” to frame a titillating narrowcast about nationalistic youth subverting a party that has traded on its voters naïve assumption that it too is nationalist.

The suggestion that these parties may be being infiltrated by radical elements is made while they themselves harbour dangerous extremists in their political choices. For instance, the ABC is as we have seen synced with Labor Party. Today, the Facebook page The Australian Labor Party Supporters shared a link to the WRS’s story coming via the anarchist page ‘Kieran’s Review’. This anarchist links in with Antifascist Action which has never shied away from violence, vandalism, or theft: and the other mainstream political party is normalising that extreme sector.

Within the orbit of the Australian Labor Party are dangerous zealots who hide inside the union fold. UNA has revealed how the CFMMEU hosts leftist extremist groups like the Communist Workers Party of Australia. In the ranks of these are sociopaths such as David Gullis, who has been reported for various assaults and acts of threatening lives to Newtown Police in NSW, who choose not arrest him.

Major news media groups employ trolls who target ideological victims by stalking them online and then dox them, endangering their employment prospects, their ability to rent a home, and ultimately destroy the quality of their lives. This is considered justifiable behaviour, but which is far worse than anything the groups they report on has ever done. In fact, the most extreme acts thus far by anyone on the ‘far-right’ have been the beheading of a dummy in a public place by a group of civic patriots or flinging pig’s guts outside the door of some perceived traitor. Yet, the ABC has no interest in doxing ideological comrades regardless of how vile their hearts and minds are.

Fascinating, too, is how they only ever hunt those who have somehow ‘threatened’ the establishment. Why would the media go after particular persons, such as Fairfax Media has done in the past, and avoid others like the leader of the Sydney Lads Society? In that whole rubbishy article by the White Rose Society they never once named the truly diabolical characters on the scene. The media only goes after the sincere patriots and nationalists.

Allegations made about persons in that article, which is supported by the hyperbole of Mann’s podcast ‘Haircuts and hate: Inside the rise of Australia’s alt-right’, expresses no irony about using as sources social media “infiltrators” to frame a titillating narrowcast about nationalistic youth subverting a party that has traded on its voters naïve assumption that it too is nationalist.

Mark McDonald Campbell (yes – that is what he calls himself) was appointed the leader of the Sydney Lads Society by that group’s founder, a fellow New Zealander, Tom Sewell. Conceited to a fault, Sewell has made it his life’s mission to bullishly appropriate all nationalist assets and disdain any veteran (except when in trouble). He has engendered a subculture that is politically and ideologically unintelligible and which contains strong elements of ageism and other biases not in accord with nationalist thinking.

This young fool, against the strongest warnings of seasoned nationalists, appointed McDonald to head his Sydney franchise of the Lads. It would be in the realm of high probability that McDonald, through his shady connections that lead back to darker political forces, played a hand in doxing certain persons included in that article. And yet, despite being the former leader of Squadron 88, with the notoriety of stunts attributable to that small group, the media has never profiled him. Is it because he’s made himself an asset to them? With what we know about Matey Mate, believe us, this is not at all a possibility anyone involved should dismiss.

Do note, in a central image used by the ABC Blair Cottrell and one other, are named, but conspicuously not Matey Mate, who is probably one of those requiring exposing the most, having played an endless background role linking to the likes of Liberal Party dirty tricks man, Howard Crawford. He has burned nationalists, too, and Sewell was warned that he is regarded as filth by the established Australian nationalist brand. However, it strikes UNA as astounding these lug nuts obligingly lined up grinning for a pic that would be used in a damaging piece. They have betrayed the fact they adore media attention at their own peril whereas seasoned nationalists are wise to the perfidy of the media.

Matey.png
Ah, Mark McDonald Campbell (centre) yet again evades scrutiny by the media. Funny how the ex-Squadron-88 leader and the head of the Lads Society Sydney always manages to do that. It might have something to do with that “get out of jail free card” he used to boast about

But while Matey presents one area of inquiry, it goes without saying that the National Party itself, especially privileged former private school boy Ethan Gordon, under the instructions of John Barilaro, worked to expose and will ultimately expel these loyal young Australians. The penetration of the Young Nationals was not an idea that nationalists supported. The belief that a group could infiltrate and overtake a party is seriously misguided, for either they are exposed, as has happened, or it is they themselves who become overtaken.

There was no way that a party like the Nationals which includes such rabid globalists as the son of Chinese immigrants Wes Fang was about to be undermined by pro-White Australians. The Nationals’ interest lies in the commoditising of Australia: it believes in mass immigration and has no time for anyone who might endanger their greasing their sweaty palms with Chinese baksheesh. Furthermore, the NSW Young Nationals had backed gay marriage, which is such an obvious signal of their mainstream ambitions.

Already, two of those named have been removed from the NSW Young Nationals executive pending a review which will inevitably turn them out. We shall not contribute to their doxing and refuse to name them out of respect.

Already, two of those named have been removed from the NSW Young Nationals executive pending a review which will inevitably turn them out. We shall not contribute to their doxing and refuse to name them out of respect.

But why fight it? Hell, it should be a ‘fair cop’ and a ‘nice try’ with a Cheshire grin but maybe now you young folks should turn your attention towards, oh, we don’t know, a PROPER Australian Nationalist Party, like, perhaps, the Australia First Party!? That they never do is an endless point of irritation to nationalists.

r0_0_5472_3648_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg
Like Wes Fang, The Nationals’ John Barilaro (pictured) hates Nationalists with a vengeance

This time, instead of shrouding your beliefs, how about being unashamed about expressing them? They are better expressed through a Nationalist organisation rather than a mainstream host, which was inevitably going to rumble your act. Bring that energy to bear to proper nationalist activism and away from elitist playpens marshalled by wreckers.

Oh, and while we’re at it, lose the embarrassing African-American style gang signs. They are not an expression of Australian nativism and are totally juvenile. Have a little bit of dignity and class.

But this is all part and parcel of the broad church that exists in the catchall ‘alt-right’ social media world of these young people replete with insular alphabets. Flirting with concepts that seem to them edgy but bear no kinship with Australian nationalism like ‘The New Guard’ and Italian Fascism has given them little room to retreat. None of them really understand that to invoke the New Guard pretty much puts them back in the conservative stick-pile of the prejudiced middle-class.

Oh, and while we’re at it, lose the embarrassing African-American style gang signs. They are not an expression of Australian nativism and are totally juvenile. Have a little bit of dignity and class.

Likewise, even notionally supporting The Antipodeans, a group that modelled itself directly on the MI5-riddled National Action which Nick Griffin revealed, pardon the pun, queerly approved homosexuality creeping into the ranks, was always likely to back-spray on these inexperienced kids. And it has never occurred to the Antipodeans themselves that they are serving up with a cherry on top the very menace that the Jewish community especially thrives on. They not only validate those ‘concerns’ of anti-Semitism but they cheerfully oblige by wearing the right costumes and acting the part of the Nazi to a tee.

It seems more to be a matter of peer-identification than sound calibrating of ideology to share a room with those who assume that German National Socialism, Fascism, White Nationalism, Nationalism, Civic Patriotism, and whatever other ism is more-or-less the same thing, or at least, intent on achieving the same goal. It’s even sadder when they adopt these appellations without understanding them, or for reasons of shock value, or because it’s fashionable.

The easiest thing to remember, aside from the inherent truth in the 14 words, is that Australians are White, and Whites are under threat.

In the end, the most these infiltrators have done is give the Nationals a free kick in signalling their commitment to multiracialism. If they had dedicated that energy to the AFP, who knows? But then those who swim in their current and claim to be promoting Nationalism are really doing the absolute opposite: helping to cripple it.

THE WHITE ROSE SOCIETY’S LINK TO COMMUNIST CHINA

This second part of our article, following what we believe was a necessary digression, gets right down to brass tacks. Given they’ve plagued other people’s lives it’s only fair that we now turnabout and establish who this collective of parasites are.

We know from Alex Mann’s podcast that the central figure is a Tasmanian Asian Studies lecturer and Sinophile, Kaz Ross. Kaz’s Twitter page is an infestation of materials relating to Asia and in particular to China. In an interview with her beta male ABC compatriot, she described how she strayed into doxing. “I started off tracking anti-Chinese sentiment and I got involved looking at the anti-Chinese action on Facebook. There is a very short path between anti-Chinese sentiment and neo-Nazis.”

6532970-3x4-700x933
Morbidly obese Kaz Ross, (most likely) coordinator of the White Rose Society and a shill for China

That comment is so ludicrous but it raises questions of how close to Chinese interests this woman is. UNA notes that we have Chinese eyes watching our content, as does the Australia First Party, and no doubt other groups that publish nationalist content.

The White Rose Society borrows its name from a resistance group that distributed anti-Nazi leaflets during the days of the Third Reich, so it’s funny that its principal coordinator should be a shill for China.

Also, it’s worth noting that the National Party was one of those who received $100,000 in donations from Communist China-agent Chau Chak Wing from 2013-14. With a rural constituency and preparations underway for the movement of a large immigrant population into regional Australia Chinese money will inevitably be changing hands and it wouldn’t do to have a bunch of “White Supremacists” in your party if you hope to get a hold of any of that Communist lucre. This is notwithstanding the flogging of Aussie farmland and primary exports.

Of course, the Nationals really don’t need the mere possibility of profiting from China to have targeted any pro-White people coming within their executive. This is a party that voted in favour of gay marriage and is doing its damned best to fall into line with mainstream identity politics.

But in the case of Kaz Ross, shilling for China is a fanatical ideal, and boy, does she shill for China! You don’t need that above quote alone to put her prejudice into context. In September 2012, Kaz Ross penned a paper titled ‘Building an ‘Asia capable’ state: Response to the Tasmania’s Place in the Asian Century Issues Paper’ The paper is a prep piece for the Asianisation of the Australian workforce as well as an ad spruiking Tasmania as a destination for Asian students where apparently “there is a burgeoning interest in Australian literature, poetry and art”.

In 2016, Ross authored an op-ed piece for The Mercury in which she weighed in on the sale of Australia’s largest dairy producer, the Van Diemen’s Land Company. She dismissed concerns about the sale to Chinese billionaire Lu Xianfeng as “anti-Chinese dog whistling”. The rest is a soliloquy to what she believes is the essential role the Chinese have played in creating Tasmania and how that engagement with Asians must continue and grow. She writes, “Tasmania’s forgotten past connections with Asia remind us of one important fact: Tasmania has always needed Asia. And it still does today.”

Kaz has been preoccupied with those she perceives as hating on her beloved China. She was quoted in a 2017 ABC radio report ‘Calls for Facebook to be more accountable for the rise in fear and hatred on social media’.

In this interview, she details how she began snooping for dissidents commenting negatively on the sale of the Van Diemen’s Land Company to the Chinese. She described how Facebook should be policing comments unfriendly to globalism and admitted that “I report probably at least a dozen posts every single day and some days I might get two or three posts taken down but not always.”

It is patently evident that this traitor has formed an alliance with trolls from the extreme left whose interest is in chopping down any development of a discussion relating to the repopulation of this country. It’s quite in keeping with her beloved Beijing masters’ penchant for strict censorship, too.

Therefore, we can quite unequivocally state that Kaz Ross is doubtless the central force behind the White Rose Society and that if those who’ve had their futures compromised for belonging to a non-traditional political position choose to pursue action there is a good place to start. Her contact details will be available on the University of Tasmania web page.

But it would also be interesting to cover what role, if any, the Chinese interests have played in the doxing of these young people since the connection is right there.

UPDATE: Following the publication of this article the ABC gave the White Rose Society leader a platform to post her views.

Twitter
Kaz Ross responding to our article and clearly enjoys the attention

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

Nothing prevented Saturday’s bi-state ‘International Freedom of Speech’ day, which is of itself ironic. However, in this muddle of libertarian and identity politics, attended by the usual provocateurs, when speech has no substantial content the point of whether or not it is free is moot.

The two-state ‘event’, which we cannot find any evidence of being internationally recognised despite its bold appellation, although there is said to a London event, was held in both Melbourne Docklands, where Jewish supremacist and mega Zionist Avi Yemini was joined by Senator Fraser Anning, with a crowd of around 50 free speech advocates, after the first got underway at Sydney’s Wiley Park, in Lakemba.

We will address the Wiley Park leg shortly, but first-up Anning’s speech would reveal a lot about this mysterious ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’. Senator Anning’s maiden speech, like Pauline Hanson’s before him, caused sparks when he called for a return to a “European Christian” immigration system. Yet, it did not take long to forge an allegiance with the Zionist ALA. This seems to be an inevitable pattern when it comes to outspoken politicians on the “right side”, especially those who create a false hope that they’ll support a return to the White Australia Policy.

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

He then got down to business and we’ll place a transcript of his speech verbatim on this page. What will become apparent is his pro-Zionism as he told the sparsely peopled audience, “My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’.

“This year we gave the Palestinian authority $43.8 million. They use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority.”

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

Australia shouldn’t be paying any money to that region, for sure, but that’s not what Anning’s point was – he doesn’t want it paid because, according to the very Zionist logic, innocent Israelis are being killed by evil Palestinians who have some screwed-up notion about wanting to stop their land being stolen by Jews.

The only attempt to shut down Fraser’s freedom of speech came from a longhaired ginger dressed in black who was shouted down by Avi and his supporters who chanted, “Zuck off!” a reference to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerbeg, who they blame personally for de-speeching them on his social media platform.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Meanwhile, Blair Cottrell did not attend the Melbourne rally. Instead, he drove to Sydney to yell at gimps in a windy park through a Chinese manufactured megaphone. He shook hands with the likes of marijuana advocate and serial instigator Nick Folkes who is back from cannabis country with his small multi-racial cast of resurrected Party for Freedom members (or as we dubbed them, Peanuts for Freedom) as he joined a line-up that included some uninteresting woman and Cottrell’s lawyer, John Bolton.

dfadsfs.png
Blair is a man who never lets standards get in the way of the company he consorts with (Folkes centre, Bluebeard taking a fan snap on the right)

Present also was Neil Erikson’s partner in crime, Rino Grgurgovic, aka Bluebeard, along with members of the Lads Society Sydney. If there was a Pictionary definition of “idiot” then Bluebeard’s picture would be posted there in all its pot-bellied glory, stink lines included. There would even be a colouring-in version for autistic kids.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which would be like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

MateyandFokles.png
The Fellowship of the Chicken is reunited. Matey Mate, Hollywood Nazi on the right, with his Zionist mate and colleague, Nick Folkes

It’s grouse Matey Mate is back with Nick because it’s like a reunion of the old fellowship of the chicken which was centred around the deep-seed Liberal muckraker and sometimes poultry farmer Howard “I’m not a financial member of any party” Crawford.  Howie even “liked” Nick’s post about the rally on his Facebook page which means so much for any of them retiring.

But what is more significant about these two is that it proves that Matey Mate, far from being owned by ‘The Lads’ is a random equation infecting the numbers. Any belief that he is not a two-way transistor between the meddlesome world of the Zionist spiv and the “youth” who have gravitated to Sewell’s boys’ club betrays an inadvisable trust in the skunk. Matey Mate’s record speaks for itself, and his intrigues run deep. It wouldn’t surprise UNA at all if he was receiving secret funding from a government agency. Likewise, given the ongoing theatre, and all the incongruities of his allegiances, policies, platform and behaviour, who is handling Nick Folkes?

Thus, with a gale blowing, and nobody infringing on their ‘free speech’, Bolton led the proceedings by opening up with a spiel about Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern; all this while the antifascist voyeurs tracked them with what must’ve been the cheapest drone on the market – a Chinese knock-off bought for a lobster from the markets. Those assembled in the park appear in an image smugly uploaded to the Anonykatz Facebook page from a vertigo-inducing height and with a visibility that rendered the whole exercise even more futile than what was happening down below.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer 8Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which is like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

Screenshot_20181006-230600_Facebook.jpg
The Antis will try to say that the object of the exercise was to view crowd numbers. But that’s a lie, they wanted to see who was there, but their cheap and nasty drone failed them. Lulz

Nick Folkes, no doubt nicely toasted on seventh-generation Indica skunk weed, then grabbed the bullhorn to foghorn about his freedom of speech, or should that be, his excess of it. Folkes is an idiot and no matter what anyone believes about personal liberty the whole world would be better off if a special law was passed limiting him to the use of sign language.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

Singling out “dogmatic communists” he aired his angst about how they “want to take freedom of speech and it’s an attack on the only civilisation in modern history that brought around freedom of speech is the British Empire.”

Perhaps they should tell that to D.H Lawrence or any of the other writers whose books were originally banned in England.

It’s worth noting too that both Folkes and Anning cited “communists” as being responsible for taking away their freedom of speech while last we checked Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk, who led a charge to censor Anning and stripped him of staff funding and extra staff is a dyed in the wool conservative.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

And while Folkes gasbags about freedom of speech he seems to forget when he attempted to shut down Australia First Party president Jim Saleam’s freedom of speech at the Reclaim Australia rally at Martin Place in Sydney during 2015 when he connived with the marshals to have him removed. Likewise, the marshals forbade AFP from distributing any materials at the rally but didn’t impose any ban on the kosher groups.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care. It is very clear that he chose long ago the path of civic patriotism. And for all the fascist talk from the Lads Society once again Matey Mate and his offsider Alex had no problem embedding themselves with Zionists and supporting an event that is fundamentally pro-Israel.

a7a6dc4f492afb2d327d9e154432017f
John Bolton, Zionist, anti-Islam activist, and most likely chief organiser of International Freedom of Speech day in Australia

John Bolton is probably the key to Cottrell’s attendance since as a lawyer he has taken up his appeal pro bono against charges of inciting serious contempt against Moslems. Did Blair really drive all the way to Sydney just to help his mate out, or did he have other business? Was he asked not to attend the Melbourne leg of the rally, or would Tom Sewell, the chock-heeled boss of the Lads Society have forbidden it? It’s hard to be sure once you try to figure out who put this thing together and why.

United Nationalists Australia has attempted to identify who the principal organisers of the ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’ are. Our strongest lead is actually John Bolton. He released a YouTube video on October 1 in which his concerns about freedom of speech link primarily to former EDL head and Zionist Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern who was prevented from entering the Moslem enclave of Lakemba during her tour of Sydney. Bear in mind, the Lads Society provided security for Southern both at Sydney and her Melbourne show.

During that tour, Southern appeared with Stefan Molyneux in a video filmed at Sydney’s Botanic Gardens in which she detailed how police prevented her exercising the simple right to walk the streets since her presence would be seen as a provocation. She claimed there was hypocrisy at play because mainstream media, which were actually filming her, were put under no such restrictions. Nonetheless, Southern began by explaining how her team had contacted police to advise them she would be journeying down with her crew.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care.

One could say it was stupid tipping them off, but one could also cynically suggest that she got the reaction she intended. If she was fair dinkum about slinking into a Moslem neighbourhood incognito — and let’s face it, most Moslems like most Aussies wouldn’t have known her from a bar of soap — there were countless other areas that are chockers with the followers of Mohammed; Punchbowl being one; Beverly Hills another. Either she was worried they might get creamed or else she’d calculated the police response and just how marvellously it would dovetail her narrative.

It was with this same expectation of publicity that Bolton chose Wiley Park near Lakemba to stage his rally. He stated so in his video in which he grimly warned against anyone inciting violence or attempting violence against his people. He clearly spelt out it was a test of “freedom” to be in the area. In the end, no one attempted anything, except some numbskull Antis who took their cheap-arse drone for a spin in the drizzle.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

So, Bolton is at the centre of this theatre that has drawn together the usual faces. But he is Cottrell’s lawyer and Blair is synonymous with allegedly suggesting that every classroom in Australia should have a copy of Mein Kampf (We are not sure if that quote is apocryphal or not). How does that then fit in with Bolton’s worldview? We quote him from the video, “As Australians, we are a melting pot. Women and men in Australia are equal. People of every race in Australia are equal. It’s abhorrent that people want to divide us.”

Well, isn’t Blair Cottrell one of those trying to divide us? I know we are. We’re proud to admit it since the only “us” we recognise are actual Australians, which means we aim to divide their “us”. So, if that’s the case, does he support freedom of speech by those who want to repudiate his statements of values as a bunch of gay libertarian crap? Did he not just call such abhorrent? On his Weebly blog, among an impressive list of professional credentials, Bolton describes himself as “conservative” but “politically independent”. We see a lot of that around the anti-Islam scene. And John is no stranger to that arena. In 2017, he joined the Peanuts as a speaker at their rally against a proposed Islamic school in Penrith.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

Among those were ‘Australian Patriot Uprising’ Commandant Matt Lowe and his non-Aryan Sergeant Schultz, Toby Cook.

Matt Lowe took over while Nick Folkes was on hiatus. He and fat boy Toby, who we understand to be a former mental patient, essentially formed the core of this absurd Facebook club along with Shermon Burgess, who himself made a quantum leap from strict kosher patriot to fully-blown neo-Nazi with such a vengeance that it defies credulity. Just as the movement was adopting a conspicuously fascist style, Folkes stepped sideways, Lowe et al moved in, but now they’re gone and Folkes is back along with the bagel brigade. But it remains of Mr Bolton to explain just what these glaring inconsistencies mean to him because being such a bright lad he cannot have failed to be aware of them. By the same token, Bolton cannot be unaware of what Blair Cottrell represents to the mainstream, while Nationalists know the truth and these associations of his only confirm: the man is a civic patriot and always will be.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

We now return to Nick Folkes’s comment about “it’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here”. It’s a shame that after all this time the dumb bastard hasn’t worked out why.

The last any significant support was galvanised for a comparable cause was the Reclaim Australia rallies. If we’re talking about Sydney alone, then the 2015 rallies were the ceiling. But let’s focus on that, shall we? How come they failed to capitalise on the kind of public support they saw from that concept? Arguably, it was a number of reasons. Firstly, too many civic micro-parties played tug-o-war with it, such as the ALA, and the unregistered PfF and those parties were avowedly Zionist. But while other factors occurred, especially in Melbourne where the street jouster mentality of the UPF had turned off the mums and dads (or “peasants” as Blair Cottrell charitably labels them), the simple fact no one seems to recognise is because they never actually stated what it is they wanted.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

What was it they wanted; a total end to Moslem immigration? Not really, if you attended the rallies and listened to the speeches, despite the slant the hard-left and globalist media put on it, they asked only for “assimilation”. Who was it that this petition was directed at? Was it the Moslem community, who were not represented and never addressed? Was it the politicians? There were frequent calls for “politicians” to “do something”. That’s a mighty naïve expression of faith right there, trusting a ‘politician’ working for an internationalist world-order controlled by corporations. The politicians are dedicated universally to pumping this country full of as much non-Anglo human content as can be mustered. This is the idea.

Opposition leader Bill Shorten has approached Scott Morrison to agree to a bipartisan commitment to a “big Australia”, and a big Australia means unfettered immigration.

The little-known corporation Consolidated Land & Rail (CLARA) has as its mission statement: “CLARA is an Australian private group formed to deliver a program to change Australia. We seek to undertake a re-balancing of our settlement and deliver new ways of imagining, planning and building cities, transport and infrastructure.”

This is insidious stuff: a private group with endless land assets knocking up micro-cities and connecting them with rail all over Australia. Who is to live in those cities? Well, CLARA says, “Australia’s population is projected to increase 69% between now and 2061 — up from 24.7 million to 41.5 million people, that is 16.8 million more Australians needing a home.”

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

Australians…? They seriously just called that projected figure Australians when they’re constantly harping on about the declining birth rate among White Australians?! No, that’s an import figure, and what’s more, CLARA seems to know something we don’t because they’re already building their cities and rails to accommodate this massive increase which will come from Asia, the Sub-Continent, the Middle-East and Africa, but really largely from China, and to serve the new Sino-Australia.

How can such a newish population in any way be Australian? By their importation, they signal the end of Australia and the creation of an artificial nation not founded on culture, race or custom, but on consumerism and serfdom to oligarchical concerns.

Given all this is happening, tiny little voices squeaking about “freedom of speech” in an ill-defined way don’t seem to grasp the issues especially when, like Bolton and all civic patriots, they accept a “melting pot” so long as it doesn’t come with Moslems and their “sharia law”.

But it also explains why Nick and Co can’t get massive numbers to their rallies despite the size of the cities because they are lost in a wilderness where their concerns are outnumbered by the demographic realities of those very cities.

The Nationalist message is very different and it is uncompromising and unwavering. And the key to the activism resides in that message and its purity something those who complain about “keyboard warriors” not attending these hopeless rallies cannot get their heads around.

Given the divide we suffer in major cities, the only logical thing to do is seek out our people where they reside, and where they are receptive to our message and that might not be in the sexy surrounds of an urban environment. It might be spread apart and out in the dust 200 kilometres each way between. But the cities are lost and those Whites remaining and who’ve adapted to this prefabricated metropolis are from the virtue-signalling hypocrite elites. Which is another thing Anning, Bolton and Yemini don’t understand about their “free speech”, especially when they equate it with social media — the political element of their “speech” is a product of the commercial.

Identity politics is a device by which aspirational consumers signal their social status. The greatest advocates of all these guises of progressive politics are in fact the corporations who splinter it all up into a consumerist matrix. It’s not even accurate to suggest that Facebook targets them on the basis of their politics, although it’s not so unfair an accusation to level at Twitter. Facebook operates on a combination of algorithms and human moderators and while the inconsistencies of their adjudications are frustrating they are more random than they seem. But if they really want to get down to an understanding what they lack is not a freedom of speech but a market share.

The topic of “freedom of speech” is too complex to be condensed for a mass audience at least in the fashion the civics are doing it. What their “freedom of speech” is banging up against is this very global order. There are no worries for Moslem Arabs discussing the finer points of socially unpalatable aspects of an extreme reading of their religion at meetings in Lakemba, for instance. They are no challenge to that order. But as Christopher Shortis found out when he, Cottrell and Neil Erikson were convicted of inciting serious contempt against Moslems, it sure isn’t so lenient when it happens the other way. While Moslems are allowed to discuss extreme ideas to characterise them as extreme, which is what the Bendigo Three did in their video, is considered the more extreme acts of the two. Indeed, we may consider naming the monster now to be heretical speech.

And once one makes a concession to unfettered freedom of expression where does it end? We cannot argue for the unconditional freedom of speech which would demand things like sex with baby giraffes or to legalise cannibalism. And as society fragments along the lines of those directing from the Bilderberg Group, it seems that sick ideas are gaining respectability on a daily basis. We’re already at the stage that we’ve repudiated nature and argued she is wrong, that there is no such thing as race or gender, and one woman described as an author and educator argues that parents should gain permission from their babies before changing their nappies. These are the signs of a society on the way out and that’s where the oligarchs want it so that it can be replaced by a new serfdom. When the serfs speak up about anything that may draw attention to this then, of course, that speech is no longer but very, very expensive.

As Nationalists we do not fight vigorously for freedom of speech, we strive to emphasize the hypocrisy of those who wish to silence us and demonise us in the name of an inclusive and progressive democracy in which freedom of expression is implied.

Anning.png
Senator Fraser Anning expressing his fear that Israelis might be being murdered by Palestinians

Senator Fraswer Anning’s Speech, Verbatim, Docklands, Melbourne, Oct 6, 2018 (don’t say we tried to take your free speech)

“ALA is the only democratic party in this state. These African gangs who are attacking people, destroying property and bashing different people and getting away with it is probably some of the worst things I’ve seen and I’m sure it’s not the fault of the police, I’m sure their hands have been tied by somebody further up. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right for any nation, it’s the first thing that goes and then normally what happens in a communist society they take your freedom of speech first, so occasionally we have clowns like this who deny you your right to freedom of speech,” (enter bozo ranga) to disrupt the event. Avi grabbed the mic and led the small gathering of ALA supporters and others in a chant of “Zucc off, mate!” Anning, continued, “So the first thing that goes in a communist country is your freedom of speech, just recently, as Avi said, both our (Facebook) pages were shut down. The premier in Queensland asked our members there – and three state members – to denounce my speech or lose funding for staff members. Now, that’s a travesty of justice, it was illegal, she eventually took those staff members and took that funding because they did not want to renounce me. My Facebook page, as far as I know, was taken down… we’ve never called for any violence… neither Avi or myself have called for any violence against anyone and never will. My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’ (loud claps from Zionist Avi and his ALAers). This year we give the Palestinian authority $43.8 million they use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority. And that’s where our tax dollars are going and when I called for that, in the senate, all three parties, the Liberals, Labor and the Greens vote against me every time. They’re the same people who the day after my speech were all crying and hugging and ringing their hands and they never damped a tissue but they pretended to cry then they denounce me — but they’re the same three parties who regularly vote against the motions that I put up to stop funding the Palestinian authority but also I call for getting the White South African farmers out of South Africa (Avi leads clapping) and again they vote against me so they’re hypocrites, they took two words out of context then they decided they would try to make some mileage out of that but they made their impatient speeches but the next day when the polls came out, even the ABC poll, they found around 80% of Australians were supporting me so, ah… (Applause) so they’ll have to eat their words a little bit. So we’ve got some big problems to overcome, we are supposed to have a conservative government but then they’re here five years but we still have 18C on the books, which takes away your freedom of speech. What’s happening there? So really what’s happened is that the parties that used to represent us have moved so far to the left that they don’t represent us anymore. There’s a vacuum on the right. We saw that in 2016 in America when Trump came like a freight train and hit poor old Hillary Clinton. She didn’t see that coming (laughter). He’s been a great man for America, he’s done a huge amount of work for America and America has never been better now economically or any other way you like to look at it. So a lot of this, this trying to take away our freedom of speech is coming out of the United Nations. Now, I’ve been calling for us to get out of Paris and to get out of the United Nations. They have no business here, they have no business with us, and their politicians like Marise Payne who’s over there now signing away your rights to everything, ah, she has no business doing that on your behalf. She’s signing a thing called the Immigration Compact, now, and that will effectively give your rights to who comes into this country – it will be handed over to the United Nations so you can imagine what’s going to happen with our society. By the way, that speech, that part with the final solution, what was actually said was ‘the final solution to our immigration problem is for the Australian people to have a vote via plebiscite’. And I will still continue to push that agenda because we’ve had votes on all sorts of things like same sex marriage and everything else, why should we not have the right to have a vote on not just how many people will come here but who comes here, what the makeup of this country will be like later on. So really I think the big fear is that good Australian men and a lot of them only boys died on battlefields all over the world. They died in freezing bloody muddy trenches in France and Belgium and other places and in the jungles of New Guinea and they died for one thing and that is for your freedom and for your rights. They stood up in front of bullets and they took bullets a lot of them and they’re not here with us anymore and the least we can do is to do what good people like yourselves are doing now and stand up for our freedoms and I applaud you all for being here and we’ve got to keep up the fight.”