THE GREAT PURGE OF 2017: A LOGICAL EXPLANATION

THE GREAT PURGE OF 2017: A LOGICAL EXPLANATION

Readers would be well aware of a change in attitude toward dissident viewpoints, at management level within Google and Facebook.

Where previously these companies exercised a degree of tolerance toward most points of view, the commercial realities of allowing anti-capitalist, anti-globalist or even just plain stupid material to take hold on their platforms have been brought into sharp focus over the past few months.

From around the first week of April, reports began to appear in the mainstream press concerning a backlash of sorts by advertisers on the Google-owned YouTube platform; the issues raised included concerns over “inappropriate” videos being preceded by corporate advertising and a lack of control on the part of sponsors over where their ads were appearing.

Companies such as Toyota, McDonald’s, Pepsi, Starbucks and many other globalist brands pulled their advertising from YouTube due the fact that their videos were being attached to, among other things, clips espousing Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism; this resulted in a hit in the order of 4% to the share price of Google’s parent company, Alphabet Inc.

cfd

The remedial action taken by Google, in this case, is not yet clear, they have spoken about re-writing the algorithms in their operating software to better tailor the targeting of advertising and made some comments about allowing advertisers greater freedom to tailor the placement of their ads on YouTube, as well as the millions of other, third-party sites overseen by Google.

It remains to be seen whether the measures taken by YouTube will make a difference to the user experience, or lure back lucrative advertising contracts; we may never really know the outcome but there has long been a policy in place where they do not allow posters of controversial material to monetise their channels as YouTube partners.

William_Gibson_by_FredArmitage
William Gibson predicted the corporate takeover of cyberspace

Facebook, it would seem, has decided to act quickly in heading off any potential advertiser walk-out by permanently banning a swathe of controversial, nationalistic or civic patriot themed accounts and the personal pages of anyone associated with banned material, notable among them our own UNA Facebook account.

Where previously these companies exercised a degree of tolerance toward most points of view, the commercial realities of allowing anti-capitalist, anti-globalist or even just plain stupid material to take hold on their platforms have been brought into sharp focus over the past few months.

Now, much has been made of this purge by self-styled, online anti-racists and their mirror images in what we call the “right wing Antifa”, those conservatives who zealously pursue and harass nationalists and true patriots.

These serial pests, shut-ins, and obsessive compulsives are crowing loud and long about their tactics of mass reporting of any dissident thought having brought down pages such as UNA, UPF and Reclaim Australia, to name a few.

Looking at the situation logically, while having a basic grasp of how Facebook actually works and its record on such matters since the inception of the platform, we can only come to one conclusion: this cull of dissenting points of view, this purge of ideas which contradict the globalist capitalist line must have been done in the name of the almighty dollar.

Rupert Murdoch, Michael Bloomberg
Fifteen years ago we were worried about the old media barons taking over the internet

After all, the White trash of Antifa and their ideological brothers and sisters in the civic patriot groups have been mass reporting genuine dissident material 24 hours a day, 365 days a year since the days of Myspace and message boards. Their numbers have actually greatly decreased over that time so the decision to kill off unpopular ideas on Facebook is clearly a commercial decision, not the result of a tactical breakthrough by a few, numerically irrelevant Trolls.

What is also clear to the logical observer is that cyberspace, to all intents and purposes, is no longer a neutral space, that corporations rule the internet, that what is commonly called “political correctness” is now an integral part of globalist lifestyle branding and that the only social engineering being attempted is within the consumer “culture” of the multinational corporation.

Looking at the situation logically, while having a basic grasp of how Facebook actually works and its record on such matters since the inception of the platform, we can only come to one conclusion: this cull of dissenting points of view, this purge of ideas which contradict the globalist capitalist line must have been done in the name of the almighty dollar.

The fashion in which the Facebook software tailors the user experience with targeted advertising, friend and page recommendations based on the browsing history of the individual user makes it unlikely that a person is ever going to see any content which may offend them, unless they go looking for it on purpose or something slips through on the feed of a friend.

sjw-freakshow-lauren-southern
No, uppity Social Justice Warriors had nothing to do with the great social media purges of 2017

This analysis also proves the fears regarding net neutrality, long held by futurists the world over; granted in the early years of the noughties it seemed as if Newscorp and traditional media might take over the web and turn it into something like Foxtel, however, the reality is that middle-of-the-road neo-liberalism now reigns supreme online.

The move to rid Facebook of commercially problematic content may be a way of appeasing the direct demands of its corporate partners, or it may simply be an expression of good faith by a company long criticised for hosting “extremist” points of view, we cannot say for sure.

It all makes sense to anyone in business, the inclusion of all individuals into the global consumer class and the accommodation of all their whims, tastes and fancies is obviously the best way to make money and the best use of the internet as a sales tool.

Globalist corporations support same-sex marriage, for example, because marketing these days largely revolves around concepts of lifestyle and a mix-and-match set of personal values drawn from the prescribed life choices of the cosmopolitan consumer culture; the more variations this culture can accept the more product the corporations can shift.

The move to rid Facebook of commercially problematic content may be a way of appeasing the direct demands of its corporate partners, or it may simply be an expression of good faith by a company long criticised for hosting “extremist” points of view, we cannot say for sure.

It is impossible to monetise ideas such as nationalism, patriotism, traditionalism and even Communism because they all rely on making us versus them distinctions and prescribe in-group loyalty above all else. If the consumer culture can be described as a smorgasbord, where the individual chooses his own identity from a range of possible components then its opposite must be a set menu, where a strictly limited number of options are available and the group assigns an identity for all.

enhanced-buzz-1504-1379943854-7
Liberals used to think this way

This is the heart of the matter and the real implication of the great social media purges of 2017, we must take the globalist-capitalists at their word.

They accuse Nationalists and true patriots of fostering division and unrest; a breakdown in social cohesion is their greatest fear but it is not the nation, the physical communities of towns and suburbs or the family they seek to protect, it is their global consumer monoculture, the deracinated, classless society held together by money and the material things it can buy.

We at UNA are, fortunately, on the record as being long term skeptics of social media, we use it when convenient but scarcely miss it when it is no longer available due to the fact that radicalisation of the proletariat and marginalised people via Facebook never seemed feasible to us.

What is more the people we seek to turn on to our brand of radical Australianism are not to be found on Facebook, where it is well known that something in the order of 80% of traffic is generated by around 10% of users; they are in the outer suburbs of our cities and the rural hinterland and outreach to those Whites with ears to hear has always been our primary concern.

alfred-e-neuman.jpeg

UNITED NATIONALISTS AUSTRALIA BANNED FROM FACEBOOK

UNITED NATIONALISTS AUSTRALIA BANNED FROM FACEBOOK

The Facebook page of United Nationalists Australia has been banned by the globalist powers operating the social media platform.

There has been a spate of such censorship recently, with any page opposing Islam, fake refugees, or globalism having their plugs pulled on the grounds of what is suggested to be “hate speech”. The most notable of these, apart from us was the United Patriots Front, which had been promoting such Zionists as Avi Yemini anyway, so go figure.

In fact, in the lead up to our hell-banning, an ultra-globalist Facebook page hosted a number of feral scabs purporting to have reported just about anything to get us taken down. And Facebook responded.

We received a message that the logo we use, two White hands shaking, breached community standards. Which community? What standards? Left-wing extremists like Antifa posting images of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro? They are the community? They determine the political standards? We could have posted a picture of a kitten. It wouldn’t have mattered.

The editor-in-chief of UNA has been banned a number of times for posting material on our former page that upset both the civic patriots and the snowflakes on the left. On one memorable occasion, his personal Facebook account was given a 30-day ban for posting the word “Amen”. This demonstrates that there are no community standards — all there are is a set of algorithms responding to a dedicated troll force committed to banning pages they don’t like.

There is no human force tending the light at the end of the tunnel, mainly as there is no light.

We received a message that the logo we use, two White hands shaking, breached community standards. Which community? What standards?

It is a sad reflection for nationalists that we cannot summon the same amount of will and energy to return the favour, but the problem isn’t so much which group gets the most takedowns, but the fact that we have become dependent on (((Facebook))).

This is quite pathetic, but Facebook has such a monopoly on communication flow, that many are hopelessly hooked on the audience numbers, which are massive.

rsz_18554436_447245232304406_1539718614_n
The image of the shaking hands breached Facebook’s “Community Standards”

This is the thing, it has become like trying to host an anti-Zog meeting at a synagogue — we are in an untenable position.

It is well-known that epochal traitor and peace criminal, German chancellor Angela Merkel met with Facebook’s chief rabbi Mark Zuckerberg asking him to ensure action was taken to stop any dissenting commentary about the rapeugee invasion of Europe, which she, along with her master George Soros, engineered. Moreover, from news reports covering the removal of the UPF’s page, it seems Australian pages are now being deemed “hate speech” and removed, possibly, too, because of government requests. Frankly, we do not know either way, and Facebook is not making any statements.

This is quite pathetic, but Facebook has such a monopoly on communication flow, that many are hopelessly hooked on the audience numbers, which are massive.

This, despite the loss of the instant audiences and large reach that Facebook offers, is an opportunity. It makes no sense to be captive to globalist forces with such important activism to pursue. Just as Stormfront Downunder became an untenable platform for Australian nationalists due to the high penetration of leftist trolls, conservative saboteurs such as Howard Crawford, and lunatics so Facebook has been more trouble than it is worth.

It is evident that despite being able to command audiences in the tens of thousands, none of this ‘reach’ has had much practical application. The political arm of the United Patriots Front, Fortitude, was intended to sign up users and establish a political party but — in spite of having tens of thousands of page likes — they barely got a trickle of memberships.

2CDCC5C800000578-3252209-image-a-11_1443456957855
Zucc and Merkel meet to silence Globalism’s critics, especially those upset at being raped and killed in Europe by fake male refugees of fighting age

For all the social media activity of Reclaim Australia, except for a fleeting moment, none of that activity ever translated to bodies on the street when it came to demonstrations. As such, the validity of these vast numbers has proven to be an illusion.

Why then suffer all the pain of feeding globalist parasites like the anarchists who seem to exist only to be outraged by patriot Facebook pages?

The nationalist community is as divided on Facebook as it is in the corporeal world. Instead of uniting under one group, subscribing to one page, there are a plethora of these pages of which most are simply newsfeeds regarding non-White crime. Nobody was ever happy to just participate, everyone had to go out and start their own thing, which is both a positive and a negative.

Why then suffer all the pain of feeding globalist parasites like the anarchists who seem to exist only to be outraged by patriot Facebook pages?

United Nationalists Australia went out of its way to buck this ‘pointing at the news’ trend. We refused to subscribe to the central tenet that Facebook audiences could not read anything wordier than a caption. Instead of grammatically impoverished one-sentence introductions to the same news all the other pages were sharing, we made the nationalist community, and anything affecting it, the subject of our focus, in very long, often complicated essays that challenged the reader.

And it worked! In fact, it worked so well that we became — disregarding our meek number of page ‘likes’ — one of the most influential voices of the nationalist pages. As we said, the civic patriots detested us, and often had our material removed, as did the lefties, challenged by the fact we are brainier than they are.

Now it is time to look to the future. If we have only a small community, let that community come to places where they will not become trolled, banned, harassed by the scum of the left; or misdirected by the Zionist-operated civic patriots.

Let them come to places where word of mouth can spread, and only those truly dedicated interact.

Leaving Facebook is a MUST. All nationalists must surrender the apathy of Facebook and make a serious effort. We must deprive Zucc of our patronage and the advertising dollars that automatically accompany our presence. No more will we be at the mercy of “community standards” which only reflect those eager to destroy White nations — and have the White race bred off with every black and brown monkey on the planet.

In this, we shall lead the way. The UNA blog will soon become UNA media, and we will operate where the whores of mammon cannot touch us.

En garde, Zucc, your filthy skype days are numbered!

facebook-jew

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

What do you do with the UPF? If you’re Facebook, you shut down their main page. So what do THEY then do? They migrate as much Zionist supporting material as they can to sister pages and to their Reclaim Australia – West Australia Rally page.

In every quote to the media, however, you will find their leadership claiming to be ‘nationalist’ and not ‘patriot’ which is such a conscious delineation that its intention is coldly clear to true Australian nationalists.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

On the same page (RA-WA) you will find a link to a True Blue Crew flag march where Whiteness is heavily emphasised. Then it’s back to the kosher meal of every possible Zionist-related entity they chug up – Britain First and Tommy Robinson shares right there in among them.

Well, they know by now; surely they aren’t naive. They know that promoting ultra-Zionists like Avi Yemini is a contradiction in terms to the single-minded cause of fighting Islamic extremism. Ultra-Zionists like Avi and his fellow countrymen create such extremism. They do so both by having manufactured ISIS, so as to pit them against the unfriendly Moslems on their list – and by continually stoking bloody conflict in the region.

The perennial program of destabilisation establishes a power balance that benefits the security of the state of Israel and services whatever objectives its allies may have in the region. But it also does something else – and has done so since the 1970s – it creates a mass migration of Middle Easterners into Australia.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

What does this portend for the ‘nationalism’ that they claim to be championing, having knowingly appropriated the term from staunch supporters of a new White Australia Policy? It kills it because those same Zionists do everything possible to eradicate such nationalist beliefs. They do more though — they align with the Left to attack serious nationalists such as we saw recently with Fairfax’s criminal toll Luke McMahon, who is known to have ties with Zionist-convert Neil Erikson.

Erikson, along with Nick Folkes, Howard Crawford, Scott Moerland and others have campaigned heavily against true nationalists. We are not at all surprised to find the UPF making the self-defeating move to once again associate with these cagey globalists in the hope of puffing up their waning profile.

Thus, nationalists for a White Australia become treated worse than kiddy fiddlers, and the planes keep flying more and more Indians, Chinese, Africans and MOSLEMS from the Middle East. The cathartic activity of stoking enmity against Islam merely gives a moral license to our globalist government to support military crimes in the Middle East which benefit Israel.

In this battle, all those values that Australians regarded as part of their birthright are trampled on. Zionists in Australia, while demanding racial and religious homogeneity at home, are forever insisting on total diversity for Australia and all White countries.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

This diversity has transformed our cities into utterly foreign destinations. The quarter-acre home has been replaced by towering (shoddily built) concrete toolboxes crammed with Chinese and Indians; the odour of their spicy cooking permeating the streets.

Australia needs reclaiming from all of this, not just one particular branch of this allegedly diverse community.

It is not the Indians, Africans, or Chinese who are losing their identities. They’ve never had it so sweet. While White Australians are slowly being discouraged from even considering ourselves Australian, this new population get dual identities. They get to be Indian AND Australian; they get to be African AND Australian, and they get to be Chinese AND Australian.

Islam is just a symptom of this single world government that has its master Zionist America. But while all these terms we throw about ‘Zionist’ ‘civic patriot’ and whatever might confuse the casual punter it is all quite simple. Unless you live in one of those last posts White Australian areas that are only ‘gradually’ being de-Europeanised you only have to take a walk, open your eyes, and smell the pungent waft of curry.

What difference does Islam make if – in the highly improbable event of removing it – you do so only to find yourself a stranger in your own country, shivering and alone among a new population of aliens? What will you reclaim then?

Wake up to the Zionists — you are being used.

C1ePePgVEAAVEM4
Avi Yemini, the ultra-Zionist who is now the darling of the civic patriots now calling themselves Australian ‘nationalists’

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

If anything distinguishes those civic patriots on the right from us radical nationalists it is by whom we are most attacked.

In the case of the civics, they are dogged by what we collectively term ‘the left’, while radical nationalists, who occupy a third position on the political spectrum cop the most grief from either the civic patriots or those in the conservative camp.

Bear in mind that ‘the left’ is as eclectic when it comes to issues, identity, philosophy, and strategy as ‘the right’.

The left wants the patriot movement dispersed while the conservatives aim to drive away radical nationalists so they can inhabit our political ground and remodel it in their crypto-globalist image.

This is a curious fact that allows us to discuss a couple of cases in point. Let us begin with what some of those from the civic patriot side of the quadrangle contend with in their present day ‘clicktivism’. This essay shall be in two parts on account of its length and the dedication required to each of its players.

1. THE PATRIOT ACTORS AND THE COMBATANTS OF THE LEFT

There is a particularly malicious element at play among those who oppose the growth of the patriots. They view patriots as more of a concern than the nationalist movement given its mainstream accessibility. On that side, the Bogan element is mocked by those who are their mirror image with one factor separating them by the slimmest degree: the perception of their engaging in ‘racism’. This is, despite the ambiguity on the question of race amplified in the patriot fold.

Nationalists define Australianness as being of White European stock, as opposed to Aborigines. Patriots, who misuse the term nationalism understanding it not, and often deliberately misappropriating it, are nebulous in their definition of an Australian. Many are in mixed-race relationships and as such loath the absolutism of nationalism which would exclude them on the grounds of breaching its inviolate precepts.

However, it is important in the propaganda war of those conflicting with the anti-Islam movement to lump each in the same basket and defame both they and nationalists, as ‘Nazis’; which is like calling all socialists Marxists or anarchists communists. The Nazi tag is meant to invoke images of state organised terror that would ensue if these groups are allowed to put down political roots in the community.

In the lexicon of those of the left, patriots are ‘potatriots’, a witticism intended to disdain that group as ‘potato heads’. This is a derisive term that was originally applied to skinheads. Since the advent of the Reclaim Australia movement, which is almost exclusively dramatized on Facebook, a number of pages and counter-identities have sprung up to oppose the patriot pages and the groups that employ them.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

But virtue is subjective in this day and age when that moral asset is destroying the west. Opposition to Islam is the kindling of the realisation something is amiss. Australians are being de-culturized while globalism is dialectically re-culturizing us with a religion that negates the very tenets underpinning the idea of universal equality at play. Both are at the mercy of the culturally vacuous reality of globalism.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113
Alex Gollan, the assistant school principal and anti-fascist anarchist who ran the ‘anti-bogan’ word press site and was arrested for bulk kiddie porn

This is visible nowhere better than on those oppositional pages, which we mentioned. This genre has no purpose other than to negate. They do not attempt to counter ‘potatriot’ messages by promoting their own positive counter-messages they literally take the aforementioned messages and desecrate them. There is no intellectual component at play in the deconstruction of the patriot message. Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is a sledgehammer used to beat down the message and the messenger so that the mission becomes personal.

A very telling post occurred on one such page with a prominent leftist troll, “Can’t we just kill them [patriots] all?” The admin replied, “No, because then we would be Nazis.”
Disregarding the fact that had that comment been made on a nationalist page it would have been hidden or removed, it is a very instructive insight into both the pathology of the poster and the counter movement. The duplicitous essence of it is summed up in the gag, “We’re starting a war for peace.”

The assumed virtue of the poster is instantly invalidated by the revelation of this tyrannical instinct.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

This is, however, but one example. Narrowed down to a central theme outside of ‘race’ is the implication that patriots will potentially auger in a dictatorial system reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, the calls for an authoritarian response to the patriots are constant on the sample page we have used for our study.

There are flippant, but often sincere calls for patriots to be pursued by ASIO, or to be charged with offences that — were they on the other foot — would be vehemently contested as breaches of civil liberties. So we come to the actors or combatants, and here we shall actually name some.

Smith
Pete Smith from Melbourne, heavily active on Facebook, is linked to Antifascist Action Sydney and other ‘anarchist’ pages

 

We have had correspondence with a few members of the patriot movement, putting aside our ideological differences, keen to highlight certain combatants and the disreputable methods they have employed to target one or other of the patriot actors.

One, in particular, has been defamed over and over by combatants using various Facebook identities and private messaging the patriot actor we shall call ‘Mark’.

Mark is being consistently vilified as a person of heinous substance and the nature of the slander has transcended any honourable intent. The attacks led to the hostilities emerging from a social media setting and into the corporeal world when the authorities were involved. Mark is not alone in these vicious online assaults but his example is notable.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

So, who is behind these assaults on Mark’s character? Here, we merely repeat what he believes: John Linden Faulkner. But we also mention two others, Alex Gollan and David Hollis.

download (3)
Sydney’s Tayce Brown, shoplifter, hair stylist to the scabby, and a real skank

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This blog, as in others we’ve mentioned, is a flagrant vehicle to attack political opponents. Faulkner and Gollan are said to have co-administrated the site. Gollan, a former assistant school principal has since disappeared from ‘anti-fascist’ activities after being charged with child-sex offences.

Faulkner, who Mark and others believe to be behind a series of online profiles identifiable by their malevolence, has a criminal past to make anyone suddenly hosting him start eyeing the nearest exit. Faulkner was imprisoned for nine years for armed robberies in which women were his soft targets. He appealed his sentence as harsh, but in doing so was told it was actually lenient under the circumstances.

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This week [originally posted on Facebook March 11] , it was revealed that David Albain Hollis, the man in the red ‘Truth’ cap who accompanied Sue Munro to the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court to spy on the Bendigo Three’s supporters — and who appeared in an opportunistic pic with John Safran taken on the day — went on a “stabbing spree” in 1991, knifing seven people one of whom later died.

Hollis served only 17 months in jail on the grounds of diminished responsibility as he was in the throes of a “psychotic episode”, although how that should mitigate anything so appalling we do not know.

There are other cases on that extreme left of the bench such as Tayce Brown of Antifascist Action Sydney whose conduct and lifestyle are such that she would be considered a habitual criminal outside of the political activist underworld.

The radical left is sure something — in a world inhabited by junkies, thugs, hookers, thieves, and ex-murderers does becoming ‘anti-racist’ mean atoning for dissolute, wasted lives. Does championing the ‘other’ allow them to graduate from their moral squalor merely on the basis they aren’t racist? We are not psychologists, and this is not a forensic examination, but the pattern cannot be ignored.

Bear in mind, Blair Cottrell was confronted with a video created inside the correctional system while he was doing time for a crime of passion. He never killed anyone, nor caused anyone harm. What of these three? All fall into the very worst categories, and all comport themselves on social media in a manner that delegitimizes any hypothetical argument they believe they have concerning right and wrong.

If Faulkner is behind this campaign of defamation and stalking against Mark, then it appears that he has in no way left behind his violent past, but merely justified it in the context of the political theatre. He has reinvented himself as the ‘good guy’ and deemed those patriot actors as ‘bad guys’ in a morality play where his own contaminated ethics are masked by a blindness born of criminal denial.

In our next article, we will turn the focus on the patriots, who are to nationalists what the leftists we have described here have been to them.

oie_DqksmJ43gaGr
Anarchist Psycho

 

THE AUSSIE RACIST IS THE LATEST IN WATER COOLER ENTERTAINMENT

THE AUSSIE RACIST IS THE LATEST IN WATER COOLER ENTERTAINMENT

Punters were quick to highlight the dubious nature of the latest in a slew of SBS programs dealing exclusively with alleged White racism in Australia.

Is Australia Racist had only just aired when many took to social media either to ask WTF or to revel in the quasi-religious fervour of virtue signalling coming from anti-Whites.

Ray Martin is an excellent choice for host given how terribly Australia has treated him during his life. Halfway through his career Ray found out that he had a great, great, great grandmother fifty times removed on one parent’s side who was an indigenous person and right away it all fell into place: the crude Abo jokes tittered behind his back; the refusal of bottle shop service on Saturday nights; and the way the maître d’ always susses him out as if he’s about to bolt on the bill in any restaurant he eats at. Because let’s face it, Ray is as black as a barrel of crude oil.

download-7
Ray Martin is one-billionth Aboriginal and very sensitive about his cultural roots

Given his powerful credentials as a victim of racism who was held back from earning his first two million because of rampant prejudice in this country, as we say, Ray is the ideal choice to host a show that has about as much integrity as a bookmaker drumming up business at a Gambling Anonymous meeting.

See, folks, SBS is a business and people tend to forget this because they have some duped notion spawned by a halfwit myth of an antiquated thing called ‘journalistic integrity’ which old-timers go on about. Journalists would be the first to laugh at hearing this oxymoron, but none more so than the pot-smoking hipsters over at SBS. They know it’s all about ratings because simply being a government broadcaster is no guarantee of broadcast survival in an industry where economic sustainability trumps any unprofitable ethical and ideological considerations.

Which is why, when even a study by Flinders University debunked this myth of Australian ‘Islamophobia’, SBS will not let go of the racism cudgel because it is a guaranteed ratings’ winner.

Given his powerful credentials as a victim of racism who was held back from earning his first two million because of rampant prejudice in this country, as we say, Ray is the ideal choice to host a show that has about as much integrity as a bookmaker drumming up business at a Gambling Anonymous meeting.

As the abovementioned report revealed, when you stop skewing the survey questions to find the answers that you want (say, that most Aussies are racist), you get a more realistic picture of where we are at.

The question of ‘racism’ is something you have a position upon reliant on your interest in it. Tim Soutphommasane, the Race Discrimination Commissioner has to justify his $300K in taxpayer’ spoils each year. Given he wasn’t born here and arrived with ‘issues’ related to his background growing up in France to Laotian parents, you get an idea why it’s in his best interest to find racism everywhere he looks.

download-8
Our writers can’t get book contracts, but this Sudanese Moslem blow-in can get anything she wants just ‘cos she is a Google

Likewise, Yassmin Abdel-Magied is a 25-year-old Sudanese Moslem “engineer” and “author” whose entire existence is dependent upon her race, ethnicity, and religion. It is ironic that given most White Australians will never receive the opportunities she has based on the same criteria. We could pull out example after example, but you get the rub.

Now, what about us? The concept that a nationalist, who is chasing a racialist end, is not necessarily racist in act, word, or deed is an idea that would totally send the virtue signallers spinning on their pointy heads. But for bona fide nationalists, this is true. To want your own self-determination as a race doesn’t mean you spend your time 24/7 hating on every non-White that you pass by on the street. It doesn’t mean you load on hate when you buy a magazine from an Asian newsagent. You might even be polite in the course of your inevitable interactions.

The nationalist understands that multiracialism, and the presence of so many non-Whites, is a symptom, not the cause.

The nationalist understands that multiracialism, and the presence of so many non-Whites, is a symptom, not the cause.

But this is digression that has no place in a single-stream discussion about identity because the Aussie racist is entertainment pure and simple. He, or she, sells advertising and guarantees clicks and views.

It is all the better when some irate Australian reacting to the relentless tide of multicultural propaganda aimed at assimilating him or her reacts with a blown valve in a social situation and gets caught on a camera. This is the latest empirical evidence of a country so far to the right of Josef Mengele.

SBS will continue to pump out this garbage as surely as Coca-Cola will keep producing bottled cola and McDonald’s will serve up burgers: because it is an earner. Selah.

main-qimg-90079925f78ef2f013df2c1f474c55d3-c
Fuck it, let’s just break out the jackboots!

GLOBALISM IS THE ERSATZ CULTURE OF OUR TIME

GLOBALISM IS THE ERSATZ CULTURE OF OUR TIME

A recent article in UK’s uber-liberal The Independent suggested that conservatism (which it was addressing) is but a subculture not “the” counterculture as Infowars shill Paul Watson supposedly claimed.

The author also said “our generation is living in the midst (sic) the greatest cultural renaissance in history. Today we can taste the food, music, art, and storytelling of every culture in the world.”

We make no comment about “conservatism”, but the rest is, of course, utopian drivel and an advertisement for a liberal globalist myth. The British Empire, under Queen Victoria also had access to the “food, music, art, and storytelling” of every substantial culture in the world. The heads of exotic animals hung on the walls of the ruling class, and artefacts of their cultures became items of status, indicators of chic, and objects of curiosity. Thereafter, they became commodities.

oie_ifd5fvtoa8jj
Paul Watson has to be understood in context with his masters

Their cuisine was assimilated into western diets and, as is often the case, the results were actually westernised interpretations of foreign cooking that were modified for domestic palates. However, in spite of this early taste of ‘globalism’ — and a desire on behalf of those generations to both explore the newfound exotic and import aspects of distant cultures for cosmopolitan tastes and consumption — there were no unicorns and a magic rainbow did not appear.

Globalism has been with us for a while now, all-be-it not with the speed that modern travel and communication allows. And in the midst of that globalism that was facilitated by travel and trade nationalism still existed and even grew, as we saw at the beginning of last century. To some, the early stage of globalism, sailing, created irritants for the host culture. Take the Japanese, for just one example, who went to strict measures to prevent the spread of Christianity in their country while nonetheless engaging in trade. What’s more, they were right to do so.

The article concludes by suggesting, “And with the help of the internet, creators can combine parts of all our cultures to make something new. The decades ahead will be a cultural wonder we can’t begin to imagine.”

We make no comment about “conservatism”, but the rest is, of course, utopian drivel and an advertisement for a liberal globalist myth.

Again, we heard all of that from the digital utopians late last century who imagined the internet would upload us into a golden era of virtual hand holding without greed or prejudice. But the utopian dream never eventuated. This is because it is a nebulous concept that dazzles with vague promises of human advancement without taking account of its dialectic.

More to the point, what does it mean? The idea of “culture” is rapidly losing its traction to any pertinent meaning in the digital age. These liberal globalists speak of a wealth of cultures without recognising their globalism is having the effect of destroying the individual cultures they make a fetish of.

culture

Culture has been replaced by consumerism. We have a universal consumerist culture that has negated anything but the quaint. What are these cultural aspects the Independent’s naïve author writes of? Is it Tribal Papua New Guinean headdress? Because now, when we strain our minds to find examples of existent culture as we can reasonably understand it, we reach for the quaint.

We either harken back to a time of folkish community, or we reference peoples as yet not assimilated into the global monoculture of mammon, such as distant Amazonian tribes, and parts of Europe, Asia, or the Mid-East which through poverty or remoteness cling to bygone modes of dress, expressions of dance, and community rituals.

When we referenced globalism in the time of Queen Victoria and the great age of British Imperialism we made it pretty clear that one culture became a commodity for another. The benefit, as we can see, is aiding enlightenment, but that, as we also argued, can be achieved without surrendering a unique identity of one’s own. Thereafter, it is all about commerce. Happy idiots like the Independent’s author will be over the moon chatting to their Botswanan friend on a digital device while wearing the colourful plumage of a forgotten Eastern costume.

More to the point, what does it mean? The idea of “culture” is rapidly losing its traction to any pertinent meaning in the digital age. These liberal globalists speak of a wealth of cultures without recognising their globalism is having the effect of destroying the individual cultures they make a fetish of.

As to the rest, it is not about opening up but breaking down. Globalism wants to break down everything: morals, values, science, borders, beliefs, and cultures and all for the masses, who are all reduced to slaving on part-time work but to continue to fatten up the usual elites.

Globalism as a utopian concept is just another opiate for the masses. But it is gold for the elites. Yet, it is also the pervasive ersatz culture, and it is very destructive.

images-1
Counter culture? Not us!

CONSERVATIVE MUSLIMS ARE NO MATCH FOR PROGRESSIVES

CONSERVATIVE MUSLIMS ARE NO MATCH FOR PROGRESSIVES

In our ongoing campaign against Islamophobic conservatives, self-styled civic patriots and those whose primary goal is protecting the interests of the Zionist entity, Nationalists are frequently accused of being “soft” on Islam.

We use the attack word, Islamophobia, in its proper context; that is to say that, in most cases, our enemies on the right are not capable of thinking clearly, nor of behaving rationally around the subject of Islam and Muslims.

It is a fact that the line pushed by these Zio-patriots has become the basis of an asocial internet cult for lonely, dysfunctional and depressed workers and marginalised people.

We hear often enough that it’s better to feel as though one belongs to something bigger than the sum of its parts, even if the whole program is flawed and most of the followers know that the emperor has no clothes.

As any frequent reader of our Nationalist media will observe, the main grievances against Islam expressed by the patriots are fear mongering of one sort or another, or ephemera and trivia gleaned from overseas news sources and conflated with events closer to home.

Nationalists really do not care about the inhabitants of, say Mauritania, Afghanistan or Bangladesh; it is none of our concern whether Islamic jurists push onerous Sharia laws upon the peasants of those regions; nor do we care about the status of women and minorities living under those regimes.

It is a fact that the line pushed by these Zio-patriots has become the basis of an asocial internet cult for lonely, dysfunctional and depressed workers and marginalised people.

We don’t feel the need to mention Islam in every single article we pen or to bring discussions of genital mutilation, halal slaughter or terrorism into our readers’ news feeds simply to shock and traumatise them into supporting a particular point of view.

Islam and Muslims in Australia are, as we see it, at a crossroads of sorts in that by allowing themselves to be manipulated into supporting progressive identity politics they have shackled themselves to a doomed project.

Tobes.png
Progressive Moslem, Toby Cook, is a member of multiracial Civic Nationalist Party for Freedom

As any White Nationalist knows, the whole progressive programme is calculated to bring about absolute equality of all people, by any means necessary, up to and including waging wars of aggression and imperialist adventures.

Since the end of the great European fratricide of the 20th century, progressive subversion has been directed to the sole purpose of eradicating the national, spiritual and communal life of all the White groups across the globe.

It is to this project, genocide according to the rules laid down by progressives themselves, that the modern Australian Muslim, whether he agrees with it or not, finds himself shackled via the umbilical cord of identity politics.

As any White Nationalist knows, the whole progressive programme is calculated to bring about absolute equality of all people, by any means necessary, up to and including waging wars of aggression and imperialist adventures.

The patriots own rhetoric, addled as it is, clearly announces that their targets are Islam and the Left, whom they see as allies at least, co-conspirators at worst; Muslims are therefore held to be equally culpable for the actions of their progressive allies.

We already see Islam in Australia being re-defined by progressives and attempts made to philosophically and physically reconstruct that religion into something which, like the “reformed” Christian and Jewish movements, can be slaved to the globalist liberal project.

The Islamic State group, which all well-informed people regard as a literal manifestation of Mohammedan teachings, routinely berates Muslims in the west for their subservience to the progressive cause, after their duty to their god the main talking point expressed by these Jihadists is the desire to crush the decadent, degenerate and weakened progressive western nations.

27df95e
When you see this logo, you know that you will not be blown up without a damn good reason… like, you insulted trannies

As the progressives would have it, however, Islam’s inbuilt militancy and its demands for conquest can be simply sidestepped by liberal reforms to the faith; we see a desire among progressives to neuter Islam, to transform it into something like the Uniting Church.

As all clear thinking people know, though, the progressive project has proven itself to be useless at reconstructing national, ethnic and religious groups via liberal reforms; rather they tend to kill these things with kindness, so to speak, the treatment of Aboriginal children and wards of the state in the 20th century are but two examples.

Muslims would be well advised to avoid entanglements with the progressives since, from the White population, there is already great enmity toward their oriental faith and its adherents just on the basis of its basic incompatibility with our way of life; alliances with the widely hated progressives only strengthen the conviction that there must be something on the nose in Islam.

As the progressives would have it, however, Islam’s inbuilt militancy and its demands for conquest can be simply sidestepped by liberal reforms to the faith; we see a desire among progressives to neuter Islam, to transform it into something like the Uniting Church.

Islam in Australia can only ever return to what it was before the 1990’s, a little known but tolerated minority grouping which stood aloof from the mainstream and stayed out of politics.

Any opportunism by Muslims while under the wing of the progressives will backfire due mainly to the fact that, while many are prepared to ignore Muslims most of the time, a good many of our people seek to crush the progressives and globalist liberals.

download-1
Tolerance of other religions could be taken as insufficient devotion to your own

The Zio-patriots claim to have solutions to the “Muslim problem”, all of which are ill-conceived, immoral, impractical and, if carried to fruition, would likely see any hypothetical “Patriotic” government hauled before the International Criminal Court on charges of committing acts in preparation for genocide.

The Nationalists Primary Solution, however, the move to heavy immigration restriction would see adherents of Islam in Australia having to fall back on their own resources; with foreign-born Imams and Muslim immigrants unable to enter the country, coupled with the removal of state funding for all faith-based schools we would naturally expect the character of the local Islamic community to change over time.

Under current immigration rules, foreign-born people with serious criminal offences to their names can be deported to their home country, in most cases; the issue of immigrant crime could be largely solved by tightening this regime to include charges arising from less serious anti-social behaviour, such as persistent flouting of the road rules, habitual drug use, welfare fraud and so forth.

Any opportunism by Muslims while under the wing of the progressives will backfire due mainly to the fact that, while many are prepared to ignore Muslims most of the time, a good many of our people seek to crush the progressives and globalist liberals.

Further to that, allowing aspiring Jihadis to leave the country forever, to renounce their citizenship and leave Australia for whatever fate their god has in store for them on a one-way ticket would go some way to solving the expensive and time-consuming problem of detecting and preventing such excursions.

As we can see, under the Nationalist Primary Solution, the more troublesome aspects of hosting a Muslim minority, the crime, the problematic religious fanaticism and anti-social behaviour could be alleviated, if not removed altogether, all by peaceful, legal means.

Jamal ud-Din Arrest
A world of regret in the making

You see, comrades, Nationalists have no interest in traumatising the whole country with pogroms, deportations and persecution of people who have done nothing wrong; can you imagine what rounding up and deporting close to half a million people would do to our society?

Our Primary Solution puts the ball in the court of the Muslims, if we rid their community of troublemakers, parasites and fanatics but otherwise leave them alone, then they have the option of living here as a minority with all the same rights and obligations as everyone else.

If however, they want a more authentic life in submission to Allah then there are over 50 countries which would be able to provide just that.

As we can see, under the Nationalist Primary Solution, the more troublesome aspects of hosting a Muslim minority, the crime, the problematic religious fanaticism and anti-social behaviour could be alleviated, if not removed altogether, all by peaceful, legal means.

As it stands, though, the Muslim minority in Australia is being led down the path to further conflict with Australians due to the opportunism and corruption of their spokesmen, the infiltration of the faith by progressives and converts with other agendas besides religion and the subversion of traditional values by Leftist and liberal reformers.

The real choice for Muslims is not East vs West, it is whether they want to live their lives as they choose, albeit with no support for their faith from the state; or whether they will allow progressives to reform Islam and remake it according to their ideals.

The reality is that Muslims have to ask themselves if they want their faith to become a joke, like some of the progressive, mainstream Christian churches.

Does anyone, in fact really want to see secularised Mosques under the direction of, say, transvestite Imams as the call to prayer is delivered by a White, Lesbian Muezzin? How would that ensure peace and good order in our most “vibrant” suburbs?

download-2
See, it’s like… um… you know when… ah, fuck it