HALAL CERTIFICATION BOSS WANTS WHITE WOMEN FERTILISED BY MOSLEM MEN

HALAL CERTIFICATION BOSS WANTS WHITE WOMEN FERTILISED BY MOSLEM MEN

A leading Moslem businessman has delighted over figures released by a bogus Jewish university that alleges a 52% decline in the sperm count of Australian males in a push against White Australia.

In a post to Facebook, which would have anybody White arrested if the message was reversed, Mohamed Elmouelhy gloated, “According to the Hebrew University, Australian men’ (sic) sperm count has decline (sic) by 52% over the last 40 years so your men are a dying breed, Australian women need us to fertilise them and keep them surrounded by Muslim babies while beer swilling, cigarette smoking, drug injecting can only dream of what Muslim men are capable of.

“If the country is left to the bigots the white race will be extinct in another 40 years. Muslims have a duty to make your women happy because you are declining, better go chose (sic) a plot for youself (sic) at your local cemetery. If you can’t afford it, commit suicide it is a cheaper alternative for bigots.”

42BBFAFE00000578-4735588-Halal_Certification_Authority_boss_says_Australian_women_need_Mu-a-11_1501158686559

Elmouelhy is president of the Halal Certification Authority, which is responsible for milking Australians for a religious tax (like Kosher) slapped on food products which fill up the coffers of Moslem supremacists whether we like it or not. This is a scam guaranteed by our own traitorous government which is the only truly guilty party when any outrage of this sort surfaces.

Of course, UNA, not being a reactionary bunch, can recognise the glaring absurdities in all of this.

Anything that comes out of a Jewish university relating in any way to the White race would have to be regarded as prejudiced. But this “research” is somewhat at odds with all the Multicultural bullshit that we’ve been forced to swallow as a people. Indeed, just who are these “Australian men”? We’ve had it bashed into us that we are the last in line to be considered Australians.

 

BPA affects sperm quality really worried dot blogspot dot com-1
Hebrew University used this still as the basis of their research

We come after “First Peoples” and every Syrian so-called refugee who has set foot here in the last six months is more of an Aussie than us White fellas according to government and media — so what are the terms of reference of this kike university’s supposed ‘research’?

In fact, the research, which was published in science journal Human Reproduction Update, refers to men from “western countries” which includes, apart from Australians, New Zealanders, Europeans, North Americans and others.

It was based on 185 studies of 43,000 men between 1973 and 2011, and nothing that we’re aware of specifies WHITE. Nonetheless, the anti-White propagandists of the media who have so excited this Moslem crank seem to be leaning hard on the inference that it refers to White taddies. This suggests that 43,000 White men were recruited on the basis of race, asked to jack off into test tubes, and tested for these dystopian results. Either that or fertility clinics shared their data, but again, was this information selected on the basis of a racial designation that we’re not aware is recorded in such instances?

42BBF65000000578-4735588-image-a-38_1501157136763
Mohamed Elmouelhy wants White women impregnated with Arab, Moslem semen; ideally his own

If not, this means, dear Arab pervert, that YOU are included in those statistics by virtue of the fact you’re situated in the west, where you shouldn’t even be.

And given the lifestyle stresses that factor into this supposed fall in sperm counts, it’s hard to see how your saggy, greasy Arab balls get off the hook, given how practically every single one of your countries are either in some state of civil war, or else so poverty struck you’re forced to drink donkey pee — animals which are also your sexual partners in about 90% of cases.

What’s more, you Arabs have the worst diet of any creature alive outside of a billy goat. And the Arab pretty much introduced the world to hard drugs, which your own various peoples ingest on a massive scale, regardless of any halfwit myths about Moslem piety.

Elmouelhy has written with frantic glee and in such a garbled prose that we can only surmise he is in fact three sheets to the wind, probably on Johnnie Walker Blue Label, a favourite among Moslem drug dealers.

But it’s interesting that this hook-nose invader, who is making a killing on this enforced tax that is a perk his people have spiked us “White Australians” with, should be so quick to label all Australians as ‘bigots’ even though he is still here and prospering nicely.

What he really means is, political correctness has allowed him to express his own Arab bigotry through the diversity prism, which permits anti-White bigotry, but not the opposite. Let us also reflect on all these stereotypes that the Moslem people hold about us Whites as all being drunks, addicts, and spiritual burn outs.

It should also be understood that if this low sperm-count thing is a condition solely afflicting White men — then it is probably down to the fact that we work ourselves blind just to keep Arabs and their households of sixteen wives and 83 children supported by Medicare and Centrelink benefits.

However, the base message here is that Arab men want to fuck White women. We know this. Those that don’t have the fortune of having drunk White women passed out in their taxis either forcibly rape, kidnap or force them into slavery. It is happening about 20,000 times each day all throughout Europe and only a knob, cuck, or SJW would refuse to believe it happens here. And all courtesy of your one-world government.

Elmouelhy probably has a permanently reserved table podium-side at his local strip club. His sole obsession is White women and his one mission in life is to contaminate our genetic lines.

We don’t advocate trolling, but if readers are hopelessly predisposed to such dark entertainments than we suggest a good account to start with would be the Facebook account — and any others — belonging to Mohamed Elmouelhy.

He needs learning, as does the treasonous government that set him and his people among us.

pjimage (1).jpg
These two flags ought to combine

WHITE IDENTITY, CHAUVINISM AND THE FUTILITY OF APPEASEMENT

WHITE IDENTITY, CHAUVINISM AND THE FUTILITY OF APPEASEMENT

If Nationalists have said it once, we have said it a thousand times, the concept socioeconomic class and the politics of class struggle are intrinsic to our ideology of Australianism.

The idea that Australia, in its post-modern clothing is somehow en-route to becoming a classless “level playing field”, with equality and prosperity for all is, like so much of the Globalist rhetoric, completely self-serving.

The old Aussie platitude: “She’ll be right mate”, once a sly dig at working class complacency and indifference is now being uttered with greater and greater frequency by the chattering classes as they contemplate their worst fears: a largely redundant and idle White working class.

There is a definitely forced tone in the voices of the narrators of the great 21st century Australian decline, where they once scoffed and mocked “Ockers” and “Bogans” who were regarded as too stupid to do anything but drink, root and vote Labor, they now nervously talk of White despair, the fracturing of our society and the soaring rates of addiction, madness and suicide.

depression
She’ll be right mate

Yet this affected concern for the well-being of those less fortunate is, again, narrowly focused and self-serving on the part of the provider; whereas being poor, White and desperate was once seen as a moral failing, it is now seen as akin to an illness to be treated and monitored.

The idea that Australia, in its post-modern clothing is somehow en-route to becoming a classless “level playing field”, with equality and prosperity for all is, like so much of the Globalist rhetoric, completely self-serving.

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

The delivery of social programs of this nature always comes with a heavy helping of middle-class chauvinism and saccharine condescension, we can observe there the intersection of bourgeois politics, with its cult of underdog victimhood and the new age therapeutical movement which seeks to pathologise all human behaviour which might tend to be counterproductive to the cosmopolitan ideal.

Nationalists could all find examples of this type of intervention in their own community, where they might see a neighbourhood group of well to do citizens with ties to mainstream globalist political parties running so-called “Men’s Sheds” or counselling the unemployed

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

The political activism of the do-gooders, be it the Greens, Labor or Liberal is a betrayal of the White workers and marginalised people so their therapeutic interventions into lower social classes are largely cynical and geared toward subduing any hostility toward the bourgeoisie and the elites beyond.

No Joe Blow, they say; you are angry because you are sick, not because you have been betrayed by those who rule you; you lash out at your loved ones because of your toxic masculinity, not out of frustration at your socioeconomic circumstances; here, take an antidepressant and join the boys on suicide watch at the community centre.

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

When you investigate these groups, who provide therapy to Whites under the euphemistically described outreach toward “Tradies” or “Sports Clubs” there is always, too, a strong relationship with self-styled Anti-Racist activists and people espousing similar anti-Nationalist or anti-Worker ideas.

On that basis, we cannot help wondering if, on one level, these programmes are a form of counter-radicalisation initiative calculated to head off any politicisation of the increasingly redundant White, blue collar male segment of society?

boofhead
Boofhead is of us, but he’s not really one of us

One contemporary clique who aggressively promotes this globalist oriented therapeutic movement is Mark Latham and his Outsiders; Latham provides the political credibility via his, admittedly encyclopaedic, insider knowledge of the mainstream players; Bettina Arndt is the court therapist, Daisy Cousens the winsome right-wing gadfly and the sundry other conspiracy theorists and down at heel media figures appearing on the show provide the illusion of a “debate’.

Latham and his co-presenters peddle the assimilationist line, the cult of male victimhood and men’s rights and the particularly counterproductive narrative of pervasive Anti-White Racism; all of which, unfortunately, seem to be having an effect upon working class consciousness.

The reality is that White working class unity is being subverted by the upper classes and their bourgeoisie via false victim narratives and the therapeutic movement, the whole point of their intervention is to head off any large scale political radicalisation of Whites.

The result of this line of thinking is a growing number of marginalised White people who are being conned into believing that seeking the approval of the upper classes and playing into their victim narratives with “Aussie Pride”, “White Genocide” and similar sentiments will lead to anything but further betrayal.

The irony here is that the groups and individuals falling into this trap are becoming stereotypically “racist”, as Leon Trotsky, who invented the concept, would have understood it; this, of course, sets them up for betrayal by their demagogues, racism of that sort demands walking a fine line, a balancing act which most civic Patriots are too uncoordinated to pull off.

Daisy cousens
Fetching sucker bait for disaffected White males

The reality is that White working class unity is being subverted by the upper classes and their bourgeoisie via false victim narratives and the therapeutic movement, the whole point of their intervention is to head off any large scale political radicalisation of Whites.

A radical White movement resting on the structure of socioeconomic class with the ideology of Australianism informing its politics is the only way forward for our working and marginalised people; currying favour with the elites by pushing the assimilationist line, or going cap in hand to the bourgeoisie for hand outs and treatment is undignified and unacceptable.

We are not victims of anything but the economic circumstances imposed upon us by globalist capitalism; our anger is righteous and justified as opposed to pathological and irrational; we are not sick, just sick and tired of being talked down to by people who have only their own interests in mind.

federation

 

DINGOES CONNED?

DINGOES CONNED?

You say 1488, I say 1788

Matthew Grant

There is a valid reason we lead this week’s story on last Saturday night’s Dingocon with the brilliant quote above.

It is all to do with a difference of perspective which separates Australian Nationalist activists from those inside the ‘Australian alt-right’ phenomenon.

Do not misunderstand us; we are not out to trash the Dingoes. We merely bear the kind of admonitions one should expect from us, as well as sober observations from the perspective of those involved in a political movement informed by experience.

Firstly, no UNA member was in attendance on the evening in question. It was not expected that we would be invited any more than would Australia First Party president Jim Saleam have been.

C92udsHUwAA1n4r.jpg
The ad forgot to say “Political Nationalists Not Welcome!”

Nobody from the Australian Protectionist Party was invited either, although we understand Nationalist Alternative was represented.

Contrary to popular belief, we state again, Jim Saleam wields no influence over United Nationalists Australia regardless of whether some of our writers are AFP members. We offer ALL true Nationalists an opportunity of expression, but so far only AFP members have accepted that invitation, which permanently stands. As such, Jim Saleam is totally free to submit whenever he wishes, and we are delighted to publish him. Likewise, AFP often shares links to UNA material, and we are grateful for the extended reach that affords us. We are, after all, working together in the interests of the Australian nationalist movement. AFP is internationally recognised for its work in nationalism.

It is all to do with a difference of perspective which separates Australian Nationalist activists from those inside the ‘Australian alt-right’ phenomenon.

We raise the subject of Jim Saleam, as we learned from sources that he was a contentious figure at Dingocon. There was an implication that his article ‘Rape House’ was a mitigating factor in the snub. In fact, a UNA rep met with Dingocon’s organiser a few weeks before the convention so we could suss each other out. The message was then as it was afterwards that Jim Saleam was “too much of a divisive figure”. The question is, divisive for whom? We shall get to that, although this matter is only a sidebar subject of this article.

In fact, if you want to get down to brass tacks, it was the Australian Nationalist Movement in its Political aspect that was excluded from Dingocon. So let us stop for a moment and ask, what is a Dingo?

anthro_dash_dingo_by_skull1045oscar-d56rkyf.png
A Dingo

UNA always regarded a Dingo as an editorial contributor to the Podcast bearing the name of the Dingoes; although in fact (according to one youth we asked) it is a generic appellation for nativist followers of Australia’s alt-right movement. We knew anyway, we just wanted to hear how they described themselves.

They are irreverent, social-media savvy, politically-incorrect, meme-focused, and just like their American cousins communicate via their own coded lingo. Their weapon is humour with a generous dash of irony.

In fact, if you want to get down to brass tacks, it was the Australian Nationalist Movement in its Political aspect that was excluded from Dingocon. So let us stop for a moment and ask, what is a Dingo?

This subculture rejects the “old school” Nationalists as irrelevant. In short, they are full of the self-assuredness of youth, and the conviction that in their freshness and vigour they will be able to institute a change that us others have thus far ‘failed’ to deliver. Moreover, they are not interested in political activism in the conventional sense and wouldn’t lay a vote AFP’s way; although they follow One Nation because they have this idea about invading its youth wing. According to one who was close to the Dingoes of the Podcast fame, while they might employ the usual alt-right National Socialist schtick, they are quite Civic in regards to homosexuals and even on the Zionist question.

We cannot comment on that claim other than to say the young person who told us seemed sound. Others suggest this youngster has issues.

Here, we wish to refute accusations that UNA is “hostile” to the Dingoes in regards to the loose affiliation of those who collect under its banner. We are not hostile to them in any way. But we know those behind the Dingoes’ curtain are very much hostile to us, but more so to Jim Saleam.

14705738_334529890272448_421088926577493001_n
You say 1488, Matt says 1788!

At this point, our commentary splits into two key areas: addressing those operators behind that curtain, and the nature of this ‘Dingo’ counterculture and how it relates to the spirit of the Australian Nationalist Movement.

Again, we refer back to our initial meeting with Dingocon’s organiser. It was made clear to UNA that Jim Saleam was in no uncertain terms unwelcome. Following Dingocon the word was that he had been the subject of much derision. So we ask ourselves, why would a young scene that has had no prior dealings with Jim Saleam prejudice him thus? The short answer is they wouldn’t. It is those operating the convention that sought to isolate him from the various guests. Who are these operators? Apart from ex-Klub Nation’s David McBryde, who Dingocon’s organiser refused to discuss, we have also confirmed the presence of Luke Torrisi, whom he particularly declined to comment on.

We cannot comment on that claim other than to say the young person who told us seemed sound. Others suggest this youngster has his or her own issues. The point in mentioning is to allow for a fuller coverage of the subject.

Torrisi is a “paleoconservative” and a contributor to the ultra-conservative Sydney Traditionalists. We have had unconfirmed reports, too, that Torrisi was a past financier of Nick Folkes and the Party for Freedom. The Sydney Trads and Nationalists acrimoniously diverge on the question of a White Australia (they are conservatives after all). Yet, Torrisi hosts a conservative show Monday nights on 88.9FM on which he will give a conspiratorial ‘wink’ to White Nationalism; even though he is fundamentally at odds with it.

Two other names have come our way, but we cannot confirm either was present, and they are associates of McBryde — Morgan Qasabian (ex-Klub Nation), and Dylan Anderson.

-v8J1t-O_400x400.jpg
It’s all about the Principle on the Sydney Trads’ colours

If there is one message that UNA has been tirelessly pushing it is the threat to Nationalism posed by manipulative conservatives. It is a story as old as Zeus and it never seems to change. Here we have a fledgeling movement in the sphere of influence of conservatives.

In a December 2016 article on The Dingoes, Pommy social researcher John Smith said ‘these groups are’, “People saying things which aren’t themselves objectionable, which appeal to people’s sense of patriotism and identity. It is often used as a way of smuggling in a kind of much more nationalist politics, a politics which is much further right than most people would agree with.”

However, Smith does not venture to consider that the very opposite might be the case, and people might say objectionable things as a means of smuggling in a more conservative politics than the third position of where true Nationalism must inevitably end up. We contend this is exactly what is happening.

Two other names have come our way, but we cannot confirm either was present, and they are associates of McBryde — Morgan Qasabian (ex-Klub Nation), and Dylan Anderson.

It is little wonder those organisers would not have countenanced Jim Saleam coming among them or even the Australian Protectionist Party, who are similarly wise to their scam. It is not that these Dingoes are necessarily going to be rewired into conservatives but rather that the whole movement ends up being steered out to sea. And would that bother Nationalists? In a sense, no it wouldn’t.

A prominent figure in the movement told a UNA reporter, in conversation, that the fundaments of this young generation involve a conscious shift from a Beta type to an Alpha. This means they look to building themselves up both physically, in the gym, and socially, in their earning power (and there is nothing wrong at all with doing so). According to him, there is a competitive edge to the alt-right youth as they seek to dominate, and become “superior to” the bloke next to him. There is no distinction of whether this other “bloke” happens to be White also, in which case, the competitiveness becomes for its own sake.

screen-shot-2015-11-03-at-6-21-31-pm
David McBryde, the man behind the Dingocon curtain

Bear in mind, too, just as an interesting observation, that girls are noticeably excluded from this movement.

Our characterisation of the alt-right as a counterculture, as opposed to a Political movement, seems right enough. From what we can gather, this subculture is by its nature upwardly mobile, and consciously elitist. In essence, those are the persnickety qualities of the Young Liberals, even if those involved haven’t realised it. If what our source told us is on the money, then by that description they risk becoming concerned with acquisition and confusing status with strength, while pride in race becomes simply pride.

There is also, speaking plainly, arrogance on show. The contention that anyone over the age of 25 who has been involved in the movement longer than yesterday is somehow a failure demonstrates a total lack of comprehension of the enormity of what our people face. It is not a matter of convincing the masses they need Alpha heroes to worship, but of bringing down an immovable system. Those in the American alt-right might have noticed this about their ‘Emperor God’ Donald Trump. Sure, he won the Presidency, but any idealistic notions he may have had of seriously changing things have been thwarted by the very system that has stymied — and will continue to block — Australian Nationalists at every turn.

Bear in mind, too, just as an interesting observation, that girls are noticeably excluded from this movement.

Characters like McBryde and Torissi arguably ARE that system, if they are only concerned with matters of tradition, and by interposing themselves in the Dingo counterculture they are meddling. In their desire to misdirect these kids from Nationalism, they might not be intent on creating an ‘alt-light’, but simply a movement unable to actually move anywhere. This is the risk it faces on its own, anyway, as it is in danger of being stuck in a cul-de-sac from where it cannot advance onto political turf because it is founded purely on counterculture codes and insider signalling.

Moreover, the very quality of ‘youth’ being flaunted is undermined by the fact the people organising them are old men. We find this particularly ironic. UNA reiterates, however, that we are not concerned either way. For our part, we do not wish to influence this Dingo subculture. Frankly, it is irrelevant to us.

download (3).jpg
Far more relevant to Aussies than a swastika

Our purpose IS political and it is not egos we as Nationalists aim to shape but the hearts and minds of White Australians. The mass of White Aussies who voted in Pauline Hanson’s One Nation to the Senate believing they were getting a Nationalist were not cocky youths judging them on their cut pecs and speccy hairstyles. The Australians who we need do not understand the codewords used by the alt-right, nor do they necessarily ‘get’ their memes. For memes will not fill their bellies, nor save their jobs, or stop them from becoming homeless.

The Australians that Nationalism needs are aged from ten to a hundred. We do not judge them on their body shape, or whether they can afford boutique beers at a trendy foodie establishment for we know they cannot.

UNA reiterates, however, that we are not concerned either way. For our part, we do not wish to influence this Dingo subculture. Frankly, it is irrelevant to us.

Right now, the Australians whose support we seek are begging charity to help them pay for unaffordable utility bills. They are dying in hospital queues while waiting rooms are overcrowded by an unsustainable influx of non-White aliens generated by the very conservatives whose obsequiousness to the globalist powers open our airport gates. The solidarity that these conservatives share with America and therefore Israel keep us involved in illegal military actions in the Middle East which generate a ceaseless traffic of non-Whites and Moslems hell-bent on knocking down this spiritually desolate marketplace our nation has become (which isn’t a bad thing) and instating a state founded on a Semitic faith (which is an egregious prospect).

While some devote themselves to executing “edgy” performances with National Socialist symbols in the belief they are spearheading a counter-cultural revolution, Australians are disappearing in the blackening shadows of Chinese-owned tower blocks soon to be filled with our replacement population. To date, no known Larrikinism, or meme, has been able to prevent Chinese entry into our country.

The Australia we wish to change is not within the clique of a single generation but out there in the un-sexy wild of the Australian suburbs and rural zones.

They might give 88 an Aussie twist, but it’s still 88, and as Matthew Grant said, “You say 14/88, I say 1788.” You say, Adolf Hitler, we say, William Lane, Jack Lang, John Curtin, Percy Stephensen and Henry Lawson. You say Nuremberg, we say Lambing Flats.

We close by reminding our readers that this is in no way intended as a sledge against this alt-right counterculture nor do we even regard it as an infallible account of it. We are on different paths anyway. We also stress that just because individuals turned up to Dingocon does not mean they have been influenced by a strain of conservatism they might otherwise find unacceptable if those we mentioned do hold undue sway.

We are just responding to the fact that Nationalism was stopped from entering the doors of Dingocon last Saturday night. And while we applaud the alt-right for being there and exhibiting signs of cockiness, UNA reminds our young friends that we’ve been down this road ourselves and as much as you think that it’s new it really doesn’t change. We all started out brimming with confidence and believing our predecessors had dropped the ball.

Awaiting you, young friends is all the hurt that is part and parcel of the struggle against the one-world government. Awaiting you is doxing, broken friendships, backstabbing, betrayal and potential loss of income. Awaiting you is aggro,  and total silence from those who you thought were your allies but turn out to be no better than window dummies when you are dropped in it. You will be lied about, misrepresented, they will call you names, accuse you of things you haven’t done, and in some cases, they will jail you. Perhaps some have already figured this out. In the end, you will learn the bitter lesson that things are not (pardon the pun) black and White and those who you would think are like us turn out to be bigger enemies than the Trots on the Left.

dingo.jpeg
This Dingo eats conservatives

MEANINGLESS STATISTICS FOR ROOTLESS COSMOPOLITANS

MEANINGLESS STATISTICS FOR ROOTLESS COSMOPOLITANS

 

The data from the extended cyber-espionage episode known as the 2016 Australian Census has just now been released to the public, to clamorous applause from anti-patriotic types and innumerate bourgeois aesthetes.

In spite of the typically skewed reporting of “tipping points” and “Asianisation”, which are just thinly veiled jabs at the White majority, Nationalist radicals could find in the document no case for extensive commentary above and beyond our normal calls for immigration to be pared back to a yearly intake of some tens of thousands of foreign technical experts, who might be needed to help re-industrialise our economy.

The census gives us a picture of an Australian population which has grown larger but which has remained mostly demographically static over the last five years; population increase sits at around 1.6%, which is about the average for the post-1945 era.

19511152_1747960515232910_6157674156421120830_n
The actual census figures regarding the place of birth of citizens contradict most everything the bourgeois press have said on the issue

The main anti-White talking point to emerge from the media in their reporting of the census is the revelation that some 51% of Australians were either born overseas or have a parent who was a migrant; this piece of fluff has been delivered as one of those “gotcha!” lines intended to denigrate and browbeat our people, but we are happy to shrug it off as the nonsense it clearly is.

This “tipping point” is no such thing, if one actually bothers to look at the figures they are little changed from the previous census and the increases in numbers of non-White ethnic groups are trivial in the scheme of things.

The census gives us a picture of an Australian population which has grown larger but which has remained mostly demographically static over the last five years; population increase sits at around 1.6%, which is about the average for the post-1945 era.

What this crowing over the 51%, which is mostly the residual effect of the postwar European immigration boom, shows us is the hatred the chattering classes have for the White majority; even if we at UNA, for tactical reasons, choose not to harp on idea of a White genocide, it is clearly uppermost in the minds of our class enemies.

There may be a tipping point in 40 or 50 years, however that eventuality is not certain, in an interconnected global economy the grass is always greener somewhere else and if this country is pillaged by capitalists and ruptured by civil strife, as many predict, we may yet see an exodus of our “fair weather friends” and their offspring.

brothels_jakarta_11
Brothels in a Jakarta slum: the nether reaches of Asian style societies

Yes, there are a lot of Chinese and Indians here and they make up the bulk of migrants, however a distinction must be made between immigrants and foreign residents; there are, most people would agree, far too many foreigners living in Australia and that it is this alien element who are causing massive distortions in the economic and social life of the country.

We are not defending non-White immigration here merely to make a point about the deleterious effects upon Australian society resulting from our being forced to host several million unassimilable foreigners; far from it, however the migrant, to a great extent is living under the same set of rules as we do, whereas the Asiatic foreigners live in what is effectively a parallel society.

It is this parallel society which best represents the process of Asianisation due to the fact that from the top to the bottom, from its garish high society to the sub-cultural level this nether world of so-called “students”, illegal workers, trafficked slaves, poor remittance men and corrupt nouveau riche Asians is, in microcosm, all which is wrong with globalist cosmopolitanism.

If we are to describe the true characteristics of Asianisation we would begin by pointing out that it is a pervasive and pernicious set of behaviours, or social norms, more so than a literal invasion which threatens to overwhelm us by sheer weight of numbers.

There may be a tipping point in 40 or 50 years, however that eventuality is not certain, in an interconnected global economy the grass is always greener somewhere else and if this country is pillaged by capitalists and ruptured by civil strife, as many predict, we may yet see an exodus of our “fair weather friends” and their offspring.

Asianisation is the normalisation of the corruption, nepotism, self-interest, cruelty and general indifference to the effects of one’s greed upon others which is endemic to all Asiatic societies; it is the mindset of political hacks and their Asian cronies, property developers, brothel keepers, human traffickers and drug dealers; a state of mind where the only god is money and personal gain.

This way of thinking is enabled by the enthusiastic endorsement of the worst kinds of Asian bandit capitalism by the elite political and business classes of Australia; these White sellouts and parliamentary pensioned traitors open the doors to the corruption, while the identity politics of the censorious, bourgeois “do-gooder” shields the wrongdoers from scrutiny or criticism by the working classes.

akwhawdengchina-20131219210408375222
Bob Hawke opened the door to Asianisation

Australian Nationalists are awake to this ugly process of Asianisation, the vertical Asian slums of Melbourne’s Docklands, or Ultimo in Sydney, are merely the most obvious symbols of the globalists social engineering; the downward shift in expectations, the cultural malaise, the crime the creeping poverty and disillusionment which pervades their society is the real rot eating away the heart of their world.

Asianisation is the normalisation of the corruption, nepotism, self-interest, cruelty and general indifference to the effects of one’s greed upon others which is endemic to all Asiatic societies; it is the mindset of political hacks and their Asian cronies, property developers, brothel keepers, human traffickers and drug dealers; a state of mind where the only god is money and personal gain.

If readers want to see the end point of the globalist program of Asianisation simply tour the back streets of Jakarta, Manila or Shanghai; there you will meet people who, by turns are neglected and oppressed by their ruling classes, who have no hope, who don’t even think about the future and whose children have no prospect of upward social mobility.

When the politicians and captains of industry of the 1980’s and 1990’s were pushing us closer to Asia, in particular, China, they must have done so in the full knowledge that it was always going to be a race to the bottom, a process of degrading and demoralising Australians so that they might gradually become Asianised, with an Asian mindset.

The Nationalists are, at present, the only radical group fighting this resurgent class war on behalf of our national group, the White working class and our marginalised people; we urge all patriotic Australians, be they radicalised or moderate, to act in solidarity with our struggle against cosmopolitanism, the money power and the Asianisation of our way of life.

Massage parlour
As above, so below, the Asianised sex industry, with all its attendant cruelty is thriving in Australian suburbs

 

MEDIA PREDICTABLY SKEWS T.B.C RALLY AS ANTI-RACIST EVENT

MEDIA PREDICTABLY SKEWS T.B.C RALLY AS ANTI-RACIST EVENT

Anyone surprised that the mainstream media intentionally skewed the reporting of yesterday’s Australian Pride March organised by the True Blue Crew should yield their right to inhale oxygen.

Indeed, a striking image of a protester sporting a sandwich board emblazoned with the message, “FAKE NEWS: WHAT YOU SEE ON TV IS ALL LIES” wins the day’s award for the most ironic placard. It would prove to be an astute observation.

The Daily Mail, which is the absolute Crack Whore of tabloid garbage that masquerades as news in this conquered land, chose to report the event as if it was all along organised as an ‘anti-racist’ event.

19420874_1291013437677936_4937703267314276168_n
Amen, cobber!

Was this lack of prescience on their part but another sorry example of their unfitness to inform the Australian public or was it a contrived policy to invalidate the sentiment of this and any other such event?

Despite two facts — that it was organised by Australian Patriots — and that the basis of the event was to demonstrate pride of oneself in their Australianness by parading with an Aussie flag — the snakes and hacks of the press still managed to misconstrue the non-signalling of any anti-group message by the organisers as ‘racist’. By that we mean it was not an ‘anti-Moslem’ march, or whatever they automatically assume it was billed as, but simply a defiance of a present convention that abhors any expression of pride in Australianness — if you are White.

And God forbid they should have actually researched and reported the facts without bias or prejudice!

The Daily Mail, which is the absolute crack whore of tabloid garbage that masquerades as news in this conquered land, chose to report the event as if it was all along organised as an ‘anti-racist’ event.

Yes, if you read it from the mainstream media’s point of view, the whole reason for anyone turning out yesterday was to publically exhibit their unwavering commitment to and fervour for the Cult of Diversity. They were there to oppose those antiquated racists who would dare to consider the Australian colours as anything but emblematic of minority oppression. The racist Patriots, of course, were the target of the day — not the focus — and the ‘protesters’ the heroes.

imageedit_2_8940330687
If the media says the rally was an anti-racist event that must be what it was!

Anyone not criticising or demeaning the White Australian people — or expressing shame for imaginary crimes — is a deviant who has surrendered their right to their implied freedom of expression. It is an interesting observation from a medium-contact perspective that the organising of this event took place on Facebook, and a comment from a self-styled ‘anti-racist’ posting in the comments section of a thread dedicated to the Sunday rally highlighted who the genuine bigots are.

Yes, in the shaping of young hearts and minds in this country, the system has managed to churn out some of the worst class-cultural bigots in existence. Take a look at this post by Tim Sullivan who it appears is a New Zealander anyway: “It just looked like a bunch of poorly educated, low socio-economic (sic), tattooed bogans? I was just passing… not participating btw. But, what was the point of the demonstration? I don’t think the message was really conveyed effectively.”

imageedit_6_5093235455
Anti-racist Tim Sullivan is a practising social media bigot who hates poor  uneducated people, White Australians, and anyone with ‘tatts’ 

Well, Tim Tims, despite the fact you followed a statement with a question mark, casting doubts on your own IQ as judged by your own rules, the point of the whole thing was just to be visible.

In a country that is controlled by foreign interests, which favours and takes foreign money and facilitates programs that favour the benefactors of that filthy lucre, it is very hard for ordinary Australians to be noticed.

Their voice is howled down by home-grown ideological attack dogs like you who are raised and nurtured in the schools and academies of this system. These ‘bogans’ are being driven out of affordable housing, employment, and even their right to a voice in this globalised nation of ours.

And God forbid they should have actually researched and reported the facts without bias or prejudice!

On the one hand, the Left would champion the downtrodden, purely in the pursuit of their own political motives, but as UNA tirelessly point out they are elitists. This Tim Sullivan, for all his affected casualness in the comments on that page has expressed contempt for anyone who has not been indoctrinated by tertiary education, who aren’t earning at least $100K a year, and who questions the dogma of Diversity. What’s more, he probably lives in an all-White neighbourhood.

41BA336100000578-4636726-image-a-88_1498367834041
The message is that Australians are nothing, own nothing, and have no right to anything in this nation built by Aboriginals, Chinese, Africans and Middle Easterners to which Whites owe all their gratitude

In fact, Timmy is the very reason that the T.B.C and their supporters were out there yesterday. It wasn’t Moslems, it wasn’t the Chinese buying up their future, or the African ‘refugees’ swarming through their neighbourhoods like tribes of berserk warriors, but people like Tim who create that environment which oppresses them.

By standing up proud in whom they are regardless of whether they’d ever been a school Dux, or are an Alumnus, or have swindled their way into the property market to stand atop a balcony crowing over the sweaty plebs below — they are making a very bold statement.

In fact, their statement is so bold it has to be completely misrepresented by the machinery of misinformation that underpins this crooked system that keeps us all in chains.

UNA will state here and now that before any confrontation happens with any group of outsiders in this nation the first battles will be Whites against Whites. It will be the likes of those with the fortitude to stand up, like those in Melbourne on Sunday, and internal enemies such as Timmy who have been mass-produced by successive globalist occupying governments.

In fact, their statement is so bold it has to be completely misrepresented by the machinery of misinformation that underpins this crooked system that keeps us all in chains.

No, the media was never concerned with accuracy in the reporting of Sunday’s march. If they were, they would have not made the very tourist make of presuming it was organised by Blair Cottrell of the United Patriots Front, which the DM did, or mistaking Kane Miller for Blair, which they also did.

This means, of course, that Blair has become the ‘Snowball’ of the Patriot movement and anything else. By this, we refer to George Orwell’s classic take on Stalin, Animal Farm.

In Orwell’s political parable of the twentieth century, the Stalinesque pig Napoleon usurps the ideologically-driven pig Snowball and thereafter any failure of his regime, anything that goes wrong, anything and everything is blamed on Snowball.

Heh, in that regards Blair has become like Jim Saleam.

pjimage.jpg
Yep, it was that pesky Blair all along… In fact, Blair was responsible for the Holocaust that killed six and a half zillion Jewish babies

 

SCREWED AT ULURU

SCREWED AT ULURU

The recent and, some would say, abortive convention on the constitutional recognition of First Nations people in Australia has raised more questions than it has answered.

Amid the collective blowing of gaskets among the right-wingers, the ill-informed cheering of the White bourgeoisie and the callous schadenfreude of the social media pundits, the substance of the resolutions reached and the chicanery behind the scenes has gone largely unreported by the mainstream press.

For those interested in the radical Aboriginal position Ghillar Michael Anderson of the Euahlayi Peoples Republic has penned a detailed article describing his experiences at the Uluru convention; the picture he paints of the workshops and the participants is one of dysfunction, division and outside manipulation of the agenda.

Historically the Australian nationalists have supported Aboriginal advancement, this is beyond contradiction and the position of amity and peaceful co-existence between White and Indigenous remains to this day.

The can of worms opened by the Uluru declaration, though, raises some interesting issues for us, particularly on the status of nations, or those asserting nationhood however defined, under the present commonwealth system.

gough aborigines
Gough confronted a lot of these issues, but they still remain unresolved

The declaration calls for a Makaratta Commission as a supervisory body entrusted with oversight of all agreements between first peoples and governments, Makaratta being there defined as “the coming together after a struggle”.

According to Ghillar, however, Makaratta might be better defined as the resumption of social norms after blood debts have been settled by payback and the appropriate ceremonies have been performed. As a veteran campaigner, he recalls that this approach was tried in the past as a workaround, but that the opinion of the state was, and presumably remains, that such a framework could be accommodated by the present “colonial” legal system.

The can of worms opened by the Uluru declaration, though, raises some interesting issues for us, particularly on the status of nations, or those asserting nationhood however defined, under the present commonwealth system.

We can agree on principle that each nation has the authority to define itself, collectively, however, it chooses and that any treaties or agreements should be made according to international law rather than current state or commonwealth laws.

Little wonder that this subversive concept of a Makaratta body representing First Nations operating under the present system was mooted given the reported makeup of the body of delegates at Uluru.

From the top down, from the Referendum Council to the group discussion level, the accusation has been made that the whole consultative process has been rigged and is being directed by “hidden hands”, namely east coast Aboriginal bureaucrats, right-wingers and agents of the state.

leibler-pearson
Yes, he is always there, yet nothing ever seems to change for the better

The makeup of the Constitutional Recognition Referendum Council itself is an indicator that something is on the nose; Noel Pearson, Marcia Langton, Patrick Dodson and Mark Leibler, to White Nationalists, at least represent the essence of the problem facing any ethno-nationalist or indigenous sovereignty movement on this continent.

This board of sell outs, globalist shills, moderates and the ever present Zionist influence in Leibler cannot be seen to have the interests of any nation, tribe or ethnic group in mind simply because they are known to be hostile to the very concepts of nation and ethnicity.

From the top down, from the Referendum Council to the group discussion level, the accusation has been made that the whole consultative process has been rigged and is being directed by “hidden hands”, namely east coast Aboriginal bureaucrats, right-wingers and agents of the state.

The goal of the declaration, it seems to us, is to nullify concepts of nationality separate from Commonwealth citizenship or a sense of belonging to anything beyond the narrow, prescribed, globalist-cosmopolitan identity, via a dubious process of reconciliation.

It is further alleged that the council and its paid employees are mere “puppets” of Mr Leibler, who reportedly sat in a separate room in Yulara resort during the conference, his instructions to his co-chair being relayed back and forth by runners or electronic messaging.

We leave that comment hanging as we can only rely upon the accounts of others, needless to say, that we are not surprised that Mr Leibler is at the centre of this process and that as a result, events have taken this turn.

1st-tent-embassy2
Ghillar Michael Anderson is the last surviving member of the original tent embassy

There are broader issues here too, the demands for sovereignty by radicals, such as Ghillar Michael Anderson are well and good, we would be hypocrites to disagree; however, land rights and occupation of territory do not mean the same today as they did in 1788.

Ownership of natural resources by First Nations, in a globalised economy dominated by multinationals, will not necessarily guarantee a return for those nations; if leasing and royalty fees are too onerous the capitalists will simply invest elsewhere or import materials from the global marketplace.

There are broader issues here too, the demands for sovereignty by radicals, such as Ghillar Michael Anderson are well and good, we would be hypocrites to disagree; however, land rights and occupation of territory do not mean the same today as they did in 1788.

Another unhelpful development arising from the Uluru conference was a claim, by some, for separate dealings with “urban, educated” Aborigines and “full bloods”; this we interpret as the creation of categories of assimilated and unassimilated persons, which further betrays another agenda by the convenors and the Turnbull government.

For the White Nationalists, there is no issue of splitting our people up into defined groups based upon, perhaps, degrees of loyalty to cosmopolitanism, or whether our people are assimilated into multiculturalism or not and we reject the idea that this type of divisive meddling should be imposed upon others.

We will not be so silly as to trumpet “solidarity” with the First Nations, we all have a long way to go in our parallel national struggles before that could become a realistic proposition. We merely point out these interesting developments as they highlight to the general public the realities of national struggle and the systems which are deployed against any group deviating from the prescribed globalist-consumerist-cosmopolitan pathway.

marcia
Marcia Langton was once a radical activist too

DANIEL ANDREWS AND HIS BROWN VAGINA FORCE FIELD

DANIEL ANDREWS AND HIS BROWN VAGINA FORCE FIELD

Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews is an odd duck and no mistake; seemingly a nice enough bloke he is outwardly unfettered by guile or cynicism; yet he is the quintessential “Nebbish”, to borrow from the Yiddish vernacular.

The latest in a long line of baffling publicity stunts has seen Andrews apologising to a throng of Chinatown honchos for the ancient, long forgotten landing tax imposed upon Chinese immigrants during the gold rushes of the 19th century.

There was an aura of weirdness and unreality surrounding this performance, as there is around so much of the premier’s work; who were these Asian dignitaries and what was their connection, if any to the prospectors and fossickers of yore?

Should we simply remit the ten bob poll tax to all persons of Chinese extraction on the off chance that one of their relatives chose to sail across to Port Phillip rather than stiff the customs of their dues and hoof it overland from Adelaide to the diggings?

Clarinda MP Hong Lim claims much of the credit for this venture, which surprises us not a bit, the astonishing revelation, though, is that the apology was two years in the planning.

Daniel-Andrews-2
Schlemiel! Schlimazel! ALP Incorporated!

This absurd pantomime is, however, consistent with a broader ALP strategy to insulate the party and its globalist-cosmopolitan agenda from scrutiny or criticism; the party seems intent on obscuring its machinations behind a screen of ethnics and women, its much publicised “diversity” agenda.

“Should we simply remit the ten bob poll tax to all persons of Chinese extraction on the off chance that one of their relatives chose to sail across to Port Phillip rather than stiff the customs of their dues and hoof it overland from Adelaide to the diggings?

It is obvious to anyone not taken in by the mantra of equality for all that the so-called “progressives” of the current Victorian parliament seek to create a sort of perverse political etiquette wherein certain classes of people are immune from criticism and whose opinions are held to be sacrosanct.

Question a Victorian woman in a position of authority and you are a misogynist Troll; cock an eyebrow at the ravings of a non-White public servant and you’ve dragged us a few more steps back down the road to Auschwitz; dare to challenge a non-White, female companion of the chattering classes and you may as well have immolated a basket of puppies and danced upon their ashes.

Feminists
Feminists used to attack the system, now the ARE the system

This is no joke readers, Daniel Andrews may be all dimples and ill- fitting moleskins but behind the doors of Treasury Place lurk functionaries of a Machiavellian temper not seen since the courtiers of Heinrich Himmler and his Waffen SS.

Of course, we do not hit women, but nowadays we are not supposed to even question them; outright contradiction of Feminist dogma is basically seen by the progressives as actionable “hate speech” and any affront to a Muslim, Asian or Jewish politician is met with a rain of ruin upon the head of the transgressor.

To be serious though, this state of affairs should be seen as a problem for dissidents of all persuasions; if the opinions of certain classes of people are held to be unfalsifiable and their actions as elected officials or servants of the crown are put beyond scrutiny or censure, then democracy is impossible and the corruption just beneath the skin of the ALP behemoth is cloaked from the outside world, once and for all.

“This is no joke readers, Daniel Andrews may be all dimples and ill- fitting moleskins but behind the doors of Treasury Place lurk functionaries of a Machiavellian temper not seen since the courtiers of Heinrich Himmler and his Waffen SS.”

The perimeter wall of ethnicity and gender surrounding the ALP is not hiding anything good or worthy of support by White workers and marginalised people, it merely covers up the machinations of factional cronies, the shady deals with arch-capitalists and would-be suburban property barons and it facilitates the ongoing “culture bust” of globalism.

This is the same rationale as seen in the diversification of the Police service, female officers are less likely to be challenged or attacked by lawbreakers, most criminals will still baulk at hitting a woman even if she is intent on carting him off to the lockup.

Footscray goddess.
The boundless plains of…Footscray

Politicians and public servants whose word is law merely due to their race or gender, who cannot be confronted or challenged because they might burst into tears or make a human rights complaint are cogs in a machinery of a state which grinds on toward totalitarianism at an ever quickening pace.

Feminist politics here deserves a special level of opprobrium since, over the past 25 years it has been fused completely to the globalist capitalist state; in truth, we are no longer looking at a left-right distinction, rather a movement which has forgone revolution in favour of liberal reform.

To close this article and to put the stunning contradiction at the heart of our discussion into words all workers will understand we refer to Marxist social critic John Pilger, who, on the occasions when he is right, is really right:

Today’s liberal feminism is a sinister 21st century variant of historical feminism. It is one key apparatus of many currently being utilised by the capitalist system rooted in patriarchy, misogyny and racism. This nefarious system employs trillions of dollars funnelled through the non-profit industrial complex (via foundations) to protect and expand these formidable power structures. Today’s liberal feminism is a racist fascism, bound by whiteness, privilege and class, that markets reformism and accommodationism under the clever guise of grassroots activism.”

quote-official-truths-are-often-powerful-illusions-john-pilger-23-19-12
Pilger is lucky, the zeitgeist conformed to his predictions before senility set in