THE BILDERBERG CHILD WHO WON’T STAND FOR HER PEOPLE

THE BILDERBERG CHILD WHO WON’T STAND FOR HER PEOPLE

Anti-Australians are celebrating news of a nine-year-old girl in Queensland who refused to stand for our national anthem as in her mind it excludes Aborigines.

The parents of nine-year-old Harper Nielsen who attends Kenmore South State School are claiming their pesky daughter was given detention following a “silent protest” when she refused to stand for our national anthem. The school has denied their allegations. The fourth-grader told the Daily Telegraph she boycotted the national anthem on the basis that “Advance Australia Fair means advance White Australia”. She added, “When it says were are young it completely ignores the fact that indigenous culture was here for over 50,000 years before colonisation.”

How this became news is about as much of a mystery as is where babies come from since her parents, both who look like they graduated from Chairman Mao 101 on an Australian Unions scholarship, went out of their way to ensure it became news. The very name ‘Harper’ we would wager is her parents’ dedication to liberal author Harper Lee, who wrote To Kill a Mockingbird.

Media has since lined up to sensationalise the frumpy pre-tween automaton when they should be interviewing her parents whom the good money’s odds say put her up to it for their own interests.

http_%2F%2Fprod.static9.net.au%2F_%2Fmedia%2F2018%2F09%2F12%2F18%2F42%2FANTHEMSTILL2.jpg
Let’s just hope Harper learns to despise her parents when she reaches her rebellious teen years which aren’t far off

At the tender age of nine, this child is merely parroting what’s been inculcated into her by the two agents of social decay she calls mum and dad (assuming they’re as traditional as to permit these stereotypical designations). These two Trotsykites are raising their brat to conform to all the desires of the misanthropes who comprise the Bilderberg Group.

The Bilderberg Group is a complex topic the reader must investigate independently. While we add a link to a useful webpage, we can only generally describe them and their goals. We invoke them here simply to alert the reader that this ‘news’ is hooey calculated to create tension and division.

Media has since lined up to sensationalise the frumpy pre-tween automaton when they should be interviewing her parents whom the good money’s odds say put her up to it for their own interests.  

Firstly, isn’t it odd that when globalists wish to paralyse this nation through moral invalidation they imply Australia is “all White” and thus all institutions, every significant cultural article, and each strand of our national aplomb is “White” and must be recoded. However, when they wish to own it and to repudiate an increasingly agitated White Australia this country is “multicultural (multiracial)”.

So there are two states of being for Australia and the two can only mutually exist if the paradox is permitted by lazy thinking. The Bilderberg Group advocates population control. Sociologist Hadley Cantril describes employing “Psycho-political operations” as “propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”

This is what we’re seeing all around the western, or to put it bluntly, the White world. This is because another goal of the one-world, one-government, and one-system controllers is the abolition of nation states. It’s little surprise then that the Bilderberg group boasts among its membership such luminaries of globalism as Henry Kissinger, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, David Rockefeller, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Ben Bernanke, and Rupert Murdoch just to name a few.

download (5).jpg

Rupert Murdoch is a glaring presence. The Bilderberg Group uses its media, such as CBS (which it is known to invite along to its secret meetings on the promise of secrecy), to promote mind-wash. Given that the group is not a conspiracy invented by right-wingers, it’s interesting to note that the left has virtually nothing to say about them, which isn’t all that surprising when as we’ve consistently pointed out, they stopped thinking independently long ago. This is why you can witness such incongruous behaviour as self-described “anarchist” Professor Rob Sparrow (aka Slackbastard) championing the cause of the Bilderbergs while believing he’s supporting a cadre of fellow travellers in a global revolution of non-existent “workers”.

Slackbastard swooped like a chicken hawk (or is that like convicted paedophile antifascist Alex Gollan?) onto this child’s story. Rob posted on the SB Facebook page, “mAAAAAAd props to the 9yo grrl for refusing to follow the herd — you rock!” We’re sure glad he isn’t her English teacher.

Sociologist Hadley Cantril describes employing “Psycho-political operations” as “propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”

Meanwhile, the clichés of fake indigenous activism over at Blackfulla Revolution (another FB group) used her case in a rhetorical bush breakfast when they tried to juxtapose the controversy over Herald Sun cartoonist Michael Knight’s spoof of Serena Williams’ recent dummy spit, with Harper’s story by offering up a yawning ‘meme’. Apparently, one is permissible (and racist) and the other is censored (and anti-racist).

41663711_1211907875616153_233038117957795840_n.jpg
Um, no… not even close. We know you’re the sanctified professional underdogs of this country but even you mob ought to be obliged to be accurate now and then

Michael Knight is a satirical cartoonist and well in his rights to exaggerate his subjects, and the other was never censored but instead given a platform which was picked up internationally giving Harper and her hippy parents their 15 mins of social justice-connected fame. It’s also led to her being viciously trolled, which is an inevitability her parents should’ve considered before putting her up to this attention-grabbing media stunt.

8e76d961900cbcbf097a9fe12deac8c0.jpg
Depicting coloured people in cartoons will soon be as dangerous as depicting the Prophet Mohammed 

Fake Nationalist Pauline Hanson even got an opportunity to try and steal back some ground lost to Katter Australia Party’s senator Fraser Anning. She slid out of her money chamber to offer a predictable quote about how she’d give the tot “a kick up the backside”.

Thus, a supposedly pressing social issue has become a kind of perverse entertainment in which the invalid nation state is tossed like a bone for two dogs to fight over. The messages behind these stories are quite startling. The furore over the depiction of Serena Williams now posits that people of colour, no matter how badly behaved, are beyond criticism by Whites; much like depicting the Prophet Mohammed will get your throat slit by a fundamentalist Moslem.

In the case of Harper’s media narrative, a phoney sense of expression on the issue of the supposed plight faced by indigenous Australians is given artificial oxygen. For, if there is a voice united in sounding about the indigenous cause, what is that cause? What is it really? Once they’ve figured out all that maybe they can ponder who it is they’re petitioning.  Is it a collective conscience? Is it political representatives?

Fake Nationalist Pauline Hanson even got an opportunity to try and steal back some ground lost to Katter Australia Party’s senator Fraser Anning. She slid out of her money chamber to offer a predictable quote about how she’d give the tot “a kick up the backside”.

If they really believe that any side that stands for office in Australian parliament will ever have the tools at their disposal to right a social wrong they’re back in the Dreamtime. They haven’t noticed that whichever government is elected serves the internationalist Anglo-American-Zionist bloc which is a faction of the One World Government cabal. The members of the Bilderberg Group aren’t interested in emancipation for the world’s peoples unless it leads to their military industrial complex profiting from war.

If it’s the collective conscience then that is filled now with the self-interest of countless ‘minority associations’ which see themselves as the primary ‘victim’ of White Australia, so in that sense, they’ve pushed the Abo out of the queue.

The oligarchs don’t want Aboriginal tribes achieving native title over lucrative mining assets they want to flog to China because assets are not for the serfs. It’ll never happen. Instead, it’s better to have the serfs beating each other in an irreconcilable conflict that has its flames nefariously fanned by those controlling the actors who are simultaneously condoning and condemning either one or both sides.

As to little Harper, maybe she can figure out whether she wants to stand for the parenting payment that helped raise her, or the Medicare benefits which keep her fit, the state education she receives, the accoutrements of the White race that she denounces that she couldn’t live without, such as her toys, computer, phone, technology in general, and the medium she has used to spit in the face of her own race. Because, little girl, you wouldn’t last long if you were shanghaied off and dropped in the middle of an outback Aboriginal community. Your parents’ rhetoric wouldn’t save you from the fate suffered by their own flesh and blood on a nauseatingly repetitive basis.

Perhaps she could also benefit from an education which permits an untarnished understanding of the origins of our country and how the indigenous people had no claims on it as a nation since they were disparate tribes and NOT a nation. Just maybe she might realise that those people were destined to be conquered by the rules of the human animals: if it wasn’t by the British Empire, it would certainly have been the Dutch or the Chinese. Moreover, she benefits nothing from those like her parents adding to the division of our people; only the certainty that the bigger gap they create in our nation the more inevitable it is that another force will seize on that and push right on through to take us over. In fact, it’s happening now.

Indeed, this little girl, so fresh off the potty yet so quick with the universal condemnations of her own country, should like to spare a thought for the current Chinese invasion now underway in Australia and just how much those in Beijing are likely to give a shit about the Aborigines that she and her parents patronise so.

But she is, as we say, a child. No kid could have the sophistication to make any sort of informed judgment on such matters. Likewise, no nipper could be filled with such patriotism as to look forward to assembly just for an opportunity to stand for the flag. These are kids, they’d rather be off playing.

None of this was ever about thinking… just reacting.

Screenshot_20180912-022419_Chrome.jpg
National Australia Bank employing Bilderberg logic in their ads: promoting multiracialism while brushing over the fact a practising Moslem would wholeheartedly revile their whole stinking usury system

NEWSPEAK HATE SPEECH LAWS HIT NEW SOUTH WALES

NEWSPEAK HATE SPEECH LAWS HIT NEW SOUTH WALES

New laws come into effect in NSW this week. Anyone “inciting violence” on the basis of race, minority religious status, sexual orientation, or this bogus Orwellian construct of “intersex people” face $11,000 fine or three years in jail.

United Nationalists Australia declares this the ‘Newspeak laws’ since anyone threatening violence against anybody is or should be, dealt with under existing laws. However, these laws, which were lobbied for hard by “minority organisations” adds a special status to anyone in these favoured political categories. This makes the rest of us (White Australians) an increasing sub-class subject to greater social restrictions and with less access to similar legal consideration.

politics-immigration-immigrants-american_politics-inboxes-outboxes-cgon838_low.jpg

Nationalists have long felt the “un-person” status by crossing the social rubicon and calling out occupied multiracial Australia. The Police are disinclined to act upon threats against us by extremist groups linked to institutions of globalist organized-thuggery such as the Construction Forestry Mining, Maritime and Energy Union (CFMMEU). Likewise, complaints based on incitements to violence, such as those by members of the clandestine terror group Antifascist Action, are ignored by a compliant state apparatus.

Now, the discussion about the ethnic cleansing of true Australians as defined by the European settlers of this land and who created this nation that all these rapacious other races swarm to will have to be necessarily handled by the more articulate and savvy among us. The reckless and immature propaganda purveyed by the likes of Antipodean Resistance only ever helped create these laws just as much as it managed to cause its British counterpart and inspiration National Action to become a proscribed organisation in England.

Make no mistake, the signifiers used in mainstream anti-White propaganda are unashamed in highlighting the fact these laws are aimed at White Australians. A screengrab from a June ABC report on the laws uses an image of patriots standing with Aussie flags to illustrate the story and secure in the reader’s mind just who these political amendments to the Crimes Act 1900 target.

dadgg.png
The red arrow points to the subjects of this bill. Yes, White Countries have a habit of legislating heavily against their own people in favour of every other non-threatened race on the face of this yellow, brown and black planet

The bill is called the Crimes Amendment (Publically Threatening and Inciting Violence) Bill 2018 and we probably have Nick Folkes, Neil Erikson, Mark Campbell-McDonald, Shermon Burgess and Ralph Cerminara to thank for it. There are three schedules the first of which inserts section 93Z into the Crimes Act while the second “…removes certain offences from the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 and makes a consequential amendment.” The third makes any of the described offences against the special citizens a summary offence.

Under the act, it won’t matter if threats are made in the heat of the moment, or if no violence is carried out. The bill concerns what it terms a “public act” which is defined as:

(a) any form of communication (including speaking, writing, displaying notices, playing of recorded material, broadcasting and communicating through social media and other electronic methods) to the public, and

(b) any conduct (including actions and gestures and the wearing or display of clothing, signs, flags, emblems and insignia) observable by the public, and (c) the distribution or dissemination of any matter to the public.

That is a fairly hefty set of criteria and as you can see open to wide interpretation and given the summary nature of the act it pretty much places all the power in the hands of the offended person(s), or group. The already litigious ‘minority’ groups will now be further emboldened to examine any context under which criticism is made for an interpretation of threat, violence, or vilification. This will be particularly so after the maiden speech by Katter’s Australia party senator Fraser Anning whose truths about the state of immigration and cultural disintegration has triggered the globalist jack-booters in the left-wing media to an even greater volume of anti-White hysteria.

And who is largely responsible for bringing these laws about? Aside from the NSW Liberal & Nationals we have a coalition group called ‘Keep NSW Safe’. Who comprises this group? They are as follows:

  • Federation of Indian Associations of Australia (Curry store owners)

  • Australian Hellenic Council NSW

  • New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies (Big surprise there)

  • Australian National Imams Council

  • Chinese Australian Services Society

  • Korean Society of Sydney

  • Australian Kurdistan Veteran Association

  • Assyrian Australian National Federation

  • Chinese Australia Forum (which works for Beijing’s interest to infiltrate Australian institutions)

  • International Coptic Union

  • Vietnamese Community in Australia – NSW Chapter

  • Australian South Sea Islanders

  • Hindu Council of Australia

  • Basmala Australia Inc (An Islamic mob)

  • Armenian National Committee of Australia

  • The Australian Egyptian Council Forum

  • South Asian Study Group, University of Sydney (Asian invaders taking jobs, shifting into high-rise apartments bought by rich Chinese parents, creating homelessness for Aussies)

  • Sikh Youth Australia (Gets to carry knives on religious grounds)

  • Cambodian-Australian Welfare Council of NSW (Pol Pot’s former soldiers)

  • NSW Council of Christians and Jews Inc. (Evangelical warmongers)

  • Australian Hellenic Educational Progressive Association (More Socialist Greek traitors)

  • Muslim Women Association (Burka battle axes)

  • Australian Cook Islander Community NSW

  • Australian Federation of Ukrainian Associations (Shame)

  • National Sikh Council of Australia (Like, India is >>>>THAT way!)

  • NSW Council for Pacific Communities

  • Philippine Community Council of NSW (Fuck off)

  • Warren Mundine (Get on out of it)

As you can see, these pork-barreling “communities” cobble together at the first chance to alter and affect the national character with the aid of the traitor political class. It would be like us shifting over to Arabia and forming the Australian Council of Pork-Munching Beer-Swillers, and then campaigning for the right to strut nude up and down the front of the country’s mosques in only our thongs and terrycloth hats.

However, what is also amusing is that these laws potentially threaten a little-publicised tactic used by the left itself. There are those among the anarchist and antifascist milieu who actually adopt ‘racist’ guises to harass and intimidate ideological opponents; one or two are even known to contribute to mainstream media. In fact, the anarcho-anti-globalist brown shirts are the readiest and willing to use threats and to vilify on the basis of race and religion, which is one of their myriad hyper-contradictions. It will be interesting to see how these laws affect that sector’s black ops.

Meanwhile, it will pay to be very measured in how our side communicates, but more to the point, such restrictions can only refine our language and grant our message precision.

article-5978-thumb.jpg
Once upon a time stating the obvious didn’t land you 3 years lag

 

PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

In the early months of this blog, we promised our readers that we would make an effort to examine the current affairs of the day in a sort of semi-frequent “news wrap”.

Snowed under as we have been, with the antics of our enemies on the far-right, sundry nutcases, cyber-pests and square-eyed Trolls occupying bulk column inches of our output, we feel obliged to give our followers a break from this bombast and have a dig at the big doings in the mainstream White world.

Hipster Melbourne was rocked this week by the death of one of its promising young scions, 22-year-old Eurydice Dixon met her end in middle-class Parkville, raped and left for dead by a total stranger, later revealed to be one Jaymes Todd, 19, of Broadmeadows.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-around good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

tribute
Tributes laid in Princes Park Melbourne for murdered artist Eurydice Dixon.

Eurydice’s talents on stage may have been questionable but being violated and dumped, lifeless, on a soccer pitch in the middle of the night by a marauding, outer suburban sex predator is a sad end for one of our own, who by all accounts did no harm in her short life.

The response to her death by the chattering classes was predictable, even though murders of this kind run at about five a year in Victoria, the usual suspects led by the lamentable premier Daniel Andrews, managed to blow the killing way out of proportion as a sop to their inner city, Greenbelt voting public.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-round good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

This insight clearly went over the heads of the ostentatiously ignorant members of the commentariat; re-animated after the long hiatus between stranger murders, Feminists and their fellow travellers have energised their “War On Women” narrative and began wailing that the problem is “Toxic Masculinity”.

We can imagine these harridans on the edge of their seats as the news of the murder broke, waiting, their claws reflexively drawing in and out of their sheaths in anticipation of the inevitable verbal misstep by Police or public officials, they were not disappointed.

ted-bundy---betrayal
American serial killer and rapist Ted Bundy would strike when women had their guard down, in supposedly “safe” areas.

The Police, who had all the data at their fingertips regarding crimes in the area surrounding the park where Eurydice was killed, and fearing in light of other attacks on women in Parkville, that there may have been a serial offender on the loose made the fatal mistake of urging women to take greater responsibility for their own safety.

From there it was on for young and old, the tired old trope “teach men not to rape” made an early and frequent appearance as did “women’s right to feel safe”, no matter the level of risk they are prepared to take in exercising their rights.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

If we take the three most recent and high-profile cases of stranger murder in Melbourne, those of Jill Meagher, Masa Vukotic and Euryidice Dixon one of these patterns appears, a pattern which is evident in many such crimes across the Anglosphere and across a time span of almost fifty years.

Misogynist criminals, rapists and killers are drawn to locations and situations in which women feel comfortable enough to let their guard down, or are otherwise vulnerable; this mode of operation is akin to that of any other predator in nature, which will attack weak and isolated members of a prey herd, or strike when the animals are at a waterhole.

bayley
Adrian Bayley, his sinister sexual urges would boil over into blind rage against women, he is the real face of misogyny.

Time and time again we have been presented with testimony from woman hating brutes and serial killers detailing their thought process in selecting victims; thinking people such as ourselves are, or ought to be, au fait with the tricks employed by dangerous men.

The more intelligent and devious predators, such as Ted Bundy and Ed Kemper, specifically chose university campuses as their hunting grounds or students as their victims based on the premise that women feel safe in such environments, so whatever ruse the killer might employ would be more likely taken in good faith by the victim.

A great deal of work has been done by the medical professions and law enforcement, both here and abroad, on understanding the way violent men think so as to be better able to predict and mitigate against their actions in the interest of public safety.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

To a great extent the routine activities of potential victims, the environments in which they move and even urban planning must be considered when trying to get into the minds of predators; this is at odds with premier Andrews’ exhortation for women to do whatever they want, whenever they want and for them to trust that putting a guilt trip on men as a group will be enough to deter potential rapists and killers.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

masa-and-killer
Masa Vukotic was chosen at random to be murdered by Sean Price, does he look like the sort of bloke who could be shamed into changing his ways?

Sean Price, the deranged killer of young Masa Vukotic in Doncaster in 2015 travelled all the way across Melbourne to a “safe” suburb and, in order to carry out his plan to blitz and kill a female, he lay in wait in bushes for a pretty “middle class” girl to pass on a popular walking track.

Adrian Bayley, the serial rapist and murderer of Jill Meagher prowled areas where young women were accessible and vulnerable, the backpacker havens and red light zones of St Kilda and the tangled, 19th-century streetscape of Brunswick, which is rich with female pedestrians but riddled with dark laneways and alcoves.

Society in general and women in particular need protection from dangerous men, as we have seen often enough, a single man in his wrath can destroy a whole community; what is needed however is a return to sensible education on matters of personal safety and codes of conduct in which everyone, women included, play their part in mitigating the threat of violence.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

The bare fact is that, contrary to the Feminist dogma, predatory males are not formed by society, nor is their behaviour an aspect of masculinity; such men are freaks and deviants and they almost always live their lives largely apart from normal men, who would most likely pick up on the fact that something is wrong with them.

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

The natural reaction by good men toward abusers of women and girls is to form a posse, hunt the offender down and mete out justice before the savage wreaks even more havoc upon the community, though in modern times we delegate this duty to the state which employs its hired gunmen, the police.

truro
The Truro killers were homosexuals, freaks and total social outcasts who got their kicks hurting women, nobody in the “straight” world had any time for them.

The police in the Euryidice Dixon case merely gave out the same advice we would expect a citizen posse to give the women they rally to protect: until this threat to your safety passes stay alert sisters, watch your backs, don’t take unnecessary risks and do not hesitate to call for help if you feel that something is not right in your surroundings.

So perhaps walking through the park alone late at night, in your “safe” suburb, which is almost certainly a magnet for sexual predators, with your headphones on and wearing high heels is actually making the jobs of those sworn to protect you more difficult?

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

In the end, however, what Feminists such as the Premier of Victoria say in public and what they do in private are likely two different things; we can credit the childless humanities department harpies and their virginal undergraduate acolytes with a lack of sense and a true belief in bullshit such as “toxic masculinity”, but most people do not think the way they do.

Daniel and Catherine Andrews are loving and responsible parents, just like the rest of us, so we highly doubt that they’re going to fill their own daughter’s head with nonsense and send her into harms way under the misapprehension that no matter the risks she takes if she is unfortunate enough to become a victim then society is wholly to blame.

andrews family
Victorian Premier Danny Andrews puts his son in a chokehold just in case he grows up to be a predator

ANZAC DAY – A REASON TO WHINGE FOR SOME AND AN EXCUSE FOR A PISS-UP TO OTHERS

ANZAC DAY – A REASON TO WHINGE FOR SOME AND AN EXCUSE FOR A PISS-UP TO OTHERS

We are not sure, and we were never actually there ourselves, but we’re fairly certain that the poor Anzacs waiting to be shredded piecemeal by Turk artillery while landing at Anzac Cove in the twilight of the 25th of April, 1915, weren’t sucking on tinnies of VB.

Thus, this tradition of getting pissed at six in the am on this period of national commemoration has more than a hint of Melbourne Cup Day about it. Nonetheless, those who made it back from that disastrous landing courtesy of the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, were no doubt in need of strong drink for the rest of their lives.

Anzac Day has been used as a pawn in the culture wars by those on the bourgeois liberal left fond of attacking national-spirited notches on the calendar, and by the government, marching in step with the internationalist agenda.

This year the whole parade has turned limp-wristed by inexplicably making it about women. Next year it might about gays or Rohingya refugees, but this year women are to march up the front while those regrettable specimens of Australian manhood must follow in their saintly shadow with heads bowed and any signifiers of masculinity kept out of sight. We’re grateful for the nurses that served, mind you, but we’ll be crocked if we’ll concede the entire Anzac Day over to a feminist narrative just because the army has turned so PC you could plug it in and surf the internet. Only recently they were trying to fish out servicemen who weren’t supporters of homosexual marriage, and now they want to ban ‘death symbols’ from being displayed on military hardware, despite the fact a smiley face stencilled on the side of a tank would seem way more jarring.

The majority of women who join the army can’t even make it through basic training but they expect us to cop this?

As Nationalists, we acknowledge the spirit of Anzac Day and defend it staunchly from those who would desecrate this National holiday with their identity politics. But we will not allow the globalist government, whoever they are to dictate its meaning to us. For they already try and have us believe that Australia Day is all about celebrating everything non-Australian. Likewise, they use Anzac Day to promote a false spirit of ‘service’ to foreign powers, to die for conflicts far removed from the interests of Australia.

Anzac Day has been used as a pawn in the culture wars by those on the bourgeois liberal left fond of attacking national-spirited notches on the calendar, and by the government, marching in step with the internationalist agenda.

Over a century has passed since the landing at Anzac Cove, a conflict between European empires triggered when an Austrian Archduke was shot by a Bosnian Serb and England got involved because Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia and Germany marched into Belgium threatening the Frogs. It was all riveting stuff and fairly typical of Europe up to that point in history.

Australians had no business in that war, but we were drawn in using the patriotic propaganda of Empire and a genuine sense of duty. In fact, the nation threw itself into the cause with gusto and the average bloke viewed it as an adventure, at a time when ideals were sharpened by romanticism and the national identity was still shackled to the concept of colony and motherland. Also, as with nearly all wars, there was the mistaken belief that it would all be over by Christmas. But it soon became clear this was no Boys’ Own adventure but a massacre. At that time, Australia was a paltry population of five million. Nearly five-hundred thousand enlisted with a loss of 60,000 and 156,000 wounded or taken prisoner.

71-gallipoliposter

From fervent allies of mother England, the spirit soured. As men were minced up on the battlefields of France etcetera England put pressure on Australians, now more reluctant to join the conflict, to introduce conscription. A plebiscite on the issue was twice defeated and resulted in queer fish Billy Hughes being turfed out of the Labor party.

Australia was not a paradise following the end of WW1. Those men who returned were broken physically and mentally and many of them turned to alcohol and crime. Indeed, during this period the rate of crime trebled. The social impact was monstrous as the pain of the generation that fought was passed onto their sons who were in turn born into trauma.

Anzac Day is, in reality, about acknowledging the sacrifices of Australians in all different foreign conflicts, from WW1 to Afghanistan, and if the globalists have their way, we’ll soon be serving an evil alliance as it aims to tear apart Syria and install an Israeli puppet as head of state. For this has been the sad fact of all these ‘sacrifices’ and all this service – with the exception of what was derisively called our ‘chocolate soldiers’, who were, in fact, our Kokoda heroes, we fought the one war in which our nation was truly endangered; the war against Japan.

The majority of women who join the army can’t even make it through basic training but they expect us to cop this?

This fact of the glorified military history seems to overlook our Kokoda heroes in favour of those who have ‘served’ globalist adventures.

Australia had no business shooting at the Boers, or backing England in suppressing the Boxer Rebellion or fighting in Korea, or Vietnam, or Afghanistan and so on. We did so because we’re part of a global gang whose interests our sons’ blood is spilt is never ours.

The meaning of Anzac Day, to Nationalists, is, therefore, a sober meditation on the idea of an Australia independent from being forced to sacrifice our own for the goals of overseas powers, or by “serving” in an auxiliary capacity a superpower protector.

As this author types these words, the sound of young people partying fills the cool midnight air. They are loud, and they are clearly not in a sombre, reflective mood. Earlier he passed a nightclub which was unusually busy with a queue of White Australian youth stretching down the street from the bollards and rope at the doors where they had to show ID to bouncers so they can get inside and join a debauched bash with DJs and scantily clad girls.

To them, Anzac Day is a day off – a day to get wrecked. To others, who’ll be awake for the service, they fly the Aussie flag because that’s what they’re supposed to do, just like at Christmas when they’re expected to put up a tree and decorate it with tinsel. They would be offended at Nationalist suggestions that there is a falsehood to the mainstream narrative of Anzac Day, as they watch the prescribed parade, hit the early opening bars and get next to anyone who looks like a legitimate serviceman so they can exaggerate whatever military credentials or legacy they feel they can boast, play two-up, and basically adopt what they estimate is a patriotic mind-frame.

This fact of the glorified military history seems to overlook our Kokoda heroes in favour of those who have ‘served’ globalist adventures.

Attending a dawn service doesn’t make you a greater patriot than one who stays home and reads a little of the true cost of that war. It does not make you less of a Nationalist to join in either, that’s not what we’re saying. Our message is simply that the spirit of Anzac, enveloping as it does myths of heroism, mateship, and honour, qualities presumed to be in the national character, should also question our endless service to conflicts which are none of our affair, not in our national interest, and to which in the case of the Middle East and Vietnam the whole basis was morally flawed.

Once we get through that we can travel to the root of the idea of an independent Australia, and then, when we’ve found that we can rejoice in finally coming to recognise we are Australians, and not just part of a globalist franchise of multi-racial, multiculturalists whose blood is shed in the pursuance of the wealth of and the accretion of land and resources for a cabal of ugly bankers, industrialists, warmongers and Zionists.

4B8B6A6600000578-5655153-image-a-41_1524665479011.jpg
Cup day or Anzac day? Actually, believe it or not, it’s Anzac Day

 

EXIT HOMOPHOBIA, ENTER HETEROPHOBIA: “SODOM” VOTERS PROVE DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

EXIT HOMOPHOBIA, ENTER HETEROPHOBIA: “SODOM” VOTERS PROVE DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

Scrawled in pink chalk on a Sydney pathway in the wake of today’s vote on the Sodom Law were two words, “Love Wins.”

This is a propagandistic slogan if ever there was one. We should know since we’ve come up with enough of our own.

Once you’ve understood the slogan’s referential function, deduced its expressive function, surmised its conative function, fathomed its phatic function and flipped by its contextual function you’ll realise what the slogan would properly mean separated from the sentimentality of its addresser is that “institutionalized love wins”. Once you’ve dealt with that dialectic you should be free enough from the propaganda to deduce that this has nothing to do with ‘love’.

Love doesn’t require the formal acknowledgement of an institution to prosper and in fact, it is more likely to stifle and suppress that love.

Moreover, you must grapple with the logic of tearing down the pillars of an institution to institutionalise that which the former pillars existed to ensure did not endanger the institution that was in place to safeguard against what the new institution formally validates. Meaning, there was, beyond what the Cultural Marxists who voted Yes perceive, more to the institution of marriage than “love”. Indeed, it was a social contract beyond enshrining the rights of deviant minorities into law.

But before we use the word deviant we must now readdress the contextual relevance of that word since deviancy can only really be determined by the majority of society and policed by its agents of social control, such as the media, lawmakers, academics, politicians, Waleed Aly and so forth.

Even here we have a problem since the degenerate homos who have won this “right” to smash apart a sacred pact between a man and a woman are not of themselves in the majority but the reverse. It is their agents who are in the majority.

gay
Consider this when putting shekels in the coffers of these corporations who have forced upon us the reign of everything abominable to a healthy society

For that matter, the vote only passed by a rabbit’s dick of 7% with some Labor electorates like ‘Calwell’ in Victoria, named after our Nationalist Aussie hero Arthur Calwell, doing us proud by voting No. Now it is down to the traitor political class to pass this bullshit law and applaud themselves for having totally fucked everything that this country once stood for. It is now in the hands of the banks, corporations, and the hedonistic consumers who keep their share portfolios fattening with profit. This same-sex marriage vote was, after all, pushed heavily by media and the corporations.

Anyway, having digressed for a moment, we have ascertained that the majority has granted the minority an unequal representation among the majority. If we tie that back to what social science once understood about deviancy we now have anyone from the former institution who is strident enough to hold firm to their beliefs cast on the outside of what society now upholds to be ‘normal’. The respectable is now the outsider and the deviant is the pillar of this brave new society.

Since we’re talking about institutions, it seems fair to acknowledge that garbage from the baby boomer generation who trampled this filth into our lives — who inculcated these Cultural Marxist codes into the heads of our youth via the institutions they took over — were the ones who loathed the very concept of the institution of marriage. Their lot burned their bras and jockstraps and went in for “free love” and threw things at Servicemen returning from the horrors of America’s doomed war in Vietnam.

lesbian-wedding-14.jpg
This is an SJW two-fer deal, yet get the dyke White woman with the black dyke and they may adopt a White male baby and kill it

Yet, here are the fruits of their decades of campaigning — they have killed the social and religious premise of marriage. They have redefined it and in doing so have set in motion an entire wheel of social changes that will exclude, criminalise, and disadvantage all of those whose ideological and religious convictions now place them as an “other”.

The despised “cisgender” White male; the devout Christian; the fervent social conservative are all now outside of that societal approval and therefore beyond the gates of the institution which ironically once upon a time they were the most ardent advocates for.

Any parent who doesn’t wish their child to be taught the finer points of buggery by a genderless freak reared in the social laboratory of modern society will be demonised, ostracised, and — if they aren’t just patronisingly dismissed as absurdly quaint — used as an example of that which is abhorrent to this newfangled society based on repudiated gender and opposition to the fundamentals of nature. Any Christian who refuses to accommodate a reception or conduct a marriage between freakish gender-confused parties will be sued, vilified, hounded, doxed, and probably beaten up by roaming squadrons of Nazi Dykes, Faggots, and Transgender Chemical commandos.

It will be ironic to see how they must now shuffle their hierarchy of victimhood to accommodate the obvious dissension of devout Moslems, which are still currently a protected species in the Social Justice Warrior red book.

Now they need another cause; now they’ve run out of steam there is another minority group whose interests must usurp that of the majority until there is nothing left but until the day invading armies of Chinese soldiers paint the walls with their soft, squishy, fucked-up, chemically-altered brains.

Yes, folks, we are on the road to being a PC Police State, just like England.

EDIT: After we went to press with this item out came the images from the unscheduled orgy at Hyde Park where fairies, fags, dykes, princesses, lady boys, he-girls and every kind of pervert combo imagined in this age of decadence, got straight down to exposing themselves and cavorting in a manner that would, in saner countries, have them all shot.

4660722000000578-0-image-a-39_1510748685748.jpg
A bizarre dyke with hairy legs, hairy armpits struts half-nude (blarrggggh) in a major Sydney park because that’s what the world will be like now that the Yes vote got through by a whisker.
4660904400000578-0-image-a-42_1510748699620
Broad daylight and the green-light signals for the degenerate exhibitionists. That’s nothing, but, wait till you see the latest dog-collars, leashes and leatherwear for next year’s Back to School uniforms!

oie_JhUXWGI010X4.jpg

 

DANIEL ANDREWS AND HIS BROWN VAGINA FORCE FIELD

DANIEL ANDREWS AND HIS BROWN VAGINA FORCE FIELD

Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews is an odd duck and no mistake; seemingly a nice enough bloke he is outwardly unfettered by guile or cynicism; yet he is the quintessential “Nebbish”, to borrow from the Yiddish vernacular.

The latest in a long line of baffling publicity stunts has seen Andrews apologising to a throng of Chinatown honchos for the ancient, long forgotten landing tax imposed upon Chinese immigrants during the gold rushes of the 19th century.

There was an aura of weirdness and unreality surrounding this performance, as there is around so much of the premier’s work; who were these Asian dignitaries and what was their connection, if any to the prospectors and fossickers of yore?

Should we simply remit the ten bob poll tax to all persons of Chinese extraction on the off chance that one of their relatives chose to sail across to Port Phillip rather than stiff the customs of their dues and hoof it overland from Adelaide to the diggings?

Clarinda MP Hong Lim claims much of the credit for this venture, which surprises us not a bit, the astonishing revelation, though, is that the apology was two years in the planning.

Daniel-Andrews-2
Schlemiel! Schlimazel! ALP Incorporated!

This absurd pantomime is, however, consistent with a broader ALP strategy to insulate the party and its globalist-cosmopolitan agenda from scrutiny or criticism; the party seems intent on obscuring its machinations behind a screen of ethnics and women, its much publicised “diversity” agenda.

“Should we simply remit the ten bob poll tax to all persons of Chinese extraction on the off chance that one of their relatives chose to sail across to Port Phillip rather than stiff the customs of their dues and hoof it overland from Adelaide to the diggings?

It is obvious to anyone not taken in by the mantra of equality for all that the so-called “progressives” of the current Victorian parliament seek to create a sort of perverse political etiquette wherein certain classes of people are immune from criticism and whose opinions are held to be sacrosanct.

Question a Victorian woman in a position of authority and you are a misogynist Troll; cock an eyebrow at the ravings of a non-White public servant and you’ve dragged us a few more steps back down the road to Auschwitz; dare to challenge a non-White, female companion of the chattering classes and you may as well have immolated a basket of puppies and danced upon their ashes.

Feminists
Feminists used to attack the system, now the ARE the system

This is no joke readers, Daniel Andrews may be all dimples and ill- fitting moleskins but behind the doors of Treasury Place lurk functionaries of a Machiavellian temper not seen since the courtiers of Heinrich Himmler and his Waffen SS.

Of course, we do not hit women, but nowadays we are not supposed to even question them; outright contradiction of Feminist dogma is basically seen by the progressives as actionable “hate speech” and any affront to a Muslim, Asian or Jewish politician is met with a rain of ruin upon the head of the transgressor.

To be serious though, this state of affairs should be seen as a problem for dissidents of all persuasions; if the opinions of certain classes of people are held to be unfalsifiable and their actions as elected officials or servants of the crown are put beyond scrutiny or censure, then democracy is impossible and the corruption just beneath the skin of the ALP behemoth is cloaked from the outside world, once and for all.

“This is no joke readers, Daniel Andrews may be all dimples and ill- fitting moleskins but behind the doors of Treasury Place lurk functionaries of a Machiavellian temper not seen since the courtiers of Heinrich Himmler and his Waffen SS.”

The perimeter wall of ethnicity and gender surrounding the ALP is not hiding anything good or worthy of support by White workers and marginalised people, it merely covers up the machinations of factional cronies, the shady deals with arch-capitalists and would-be suburban property barons and it facilitates the ongoing “culture bust” of globalism.

This is the same rationale as seen in the diversification of the Police service, female officers are less likely to be challenged or attacked by lawbreakers, most criminals will still baulk at hitting a woman even if she is intent on carting him off to the lockup.

Footscray goddess.
The boundless plains of…Footscray

Politicians and public servants whose word is law merely due to their race or gender, who cannot be confronted or challenged because they might burst into tears or make a human rights complaint are cogs in a machinery of a state which grinds on toward totalitarianism at an ever quickening pace.

Feminist politics here deserves a special level of opprobrium since, over the past 25 years it has been fused completely to the globalist capitalist state; in truth, we are no longer looking at a left-right distinction, rather a movement which has forgone revolution in favour of liberal reform.

To close this article and to put the stunning contradiction at the heart of our discussion into words all workers will understand we refer to Marxist social critic John Pilger, who, on the occasions when he is right, is really right:

Today’s liberal feminism is a sinister 21st century variant of historical feminism. It is one key apparatus of many currently being utilised by the capitalist system rooted in patriarchy, misogyny and racism. This nefarious system employs trillions of dollars funnelled through the non-profit industrial complex (via foundations) to protect and expand these formidable power structures. Today’s liberal feminism is a racist fascism, bound by whiteness, privilege and class, that markets reformism and accommodationism under the clever guise of grassroots activism.”

quote-official-truths-are-often-powerful-illusions-john-pilger-23-19-12
Pilger is lucky, the zeitgeist conformed to his predictions before senility set in

 

LIVING IN THE AGE OF VAGINAGGRESSION

LIVING IN THE AGE OF VAGINAGGRESSION

Worldwide anti-Trump rallies have exposed an immutable truth about what was once referred to as the fairer sex — they are in sorry moral and aesthetic disorder. Indeed, today’s woman, invariably politicised, has all the appeal of untreated sewage.

Not every woman deserves this criticism; there are fine nationalist women out there who do us all proud. However, this is not about them.

This is not even about the women who fall short of being nationalists. But it IS about those social feminists who are so wrapped up in a bubble of their own self-importance that they cannot compute the reality that they are in fact chauvinists.

download-13
Women complain about not being taken seriously

Let us get something straight — western women are not victims. There is no pay gap. Women are not paid less than men and their prospects are generally much brighter than men’s. They receive a superior deal in education, workplace politics always favour them, and even if they cannot gain work on their intellectual merits they can earn a packet working the dance pole for Arab taxi drivers at Pure Platinum. Family Law Court is a palace of female privilege where just about every ruling goes in the favour of the female as though it is a biological determination. You can hardly land a teaching gig if you’re a man because a cabal of women will hound you out of the profession with scurrilous imputations of paedophilia. Overall, society has placed women upon a pedestal from which, for some reason, they churlishly moon us while cultivating hairy armpits and taunting us with ‘pussy’ hats on.

This is not even about the women who fall short of being nationalists. But it IS about those social feminists who are so wrapped up in a bubble of their own self-importance that they cannot compute the reality that they are in fact chauvinists.

The only tough ride women get is the one that all must endure or else which they create for themselves. So what is their problem and why are the same communist Jewish hags baiting us with decades-old bullshit that was lies even back then?

Women who shamelessly go topless to promote their “right” to dress like “sluts” will then lock elbows in a daisy chain of dingbat womanhood chanting slogans against those men they accuse of treating them like sluts. But not if they live in Europe and Moslem men are objectifying and raping them. This is like a black hole of logic collapsed in on itself, which possibly describes the psychic condition of these women. When that happens, all you can hear are crickets chirping, as they instead find reasons to blame men of their own race for the behaviour of the parasites.

tumblr_nz9cw6insg1scro0fo1_1280
When women have something to say about being reduced to a sexual stereotype, they tend to speak as a sexual stereotype

Women who label themselves feminists are in fact at war with the very notion of what constitutes femininity.

There used to be a joke about how women’s bodily functions were a big secret and men often doubted they even had them. It went something like, “You know what they say about boys who hang around women’s lavatories? They tend to have their illusions shattered.”

But nowadays that rather elegant myth is being smashed apart by women themselves. Yes, scrabbling for oppressed credibility, created a Free the Poop movement last year where they happily discussed their bowel movements and revelled in infantile coprophilous attitudes.

Women who label themselves feminists are in fact at war with the very notion of what constitutes femininity.

The maternal instinct of women is being both gratuitously flaunted and simultaneously repudiated. Certain women make a deliberate issue out of breastfeeding by hauling their infant down to a public café, flopping out their mammary, and letting the sprog gnaw on their tit while patrons are trying to sip hot milk-based beverages. This will understandably cause revulsion for a cross-section of the community not so enamoured of the intimate biological functions of individual females of questionable hygiene. It is a crass display for bored mothers to affect some sort of controversy to lift them above what they treat as the mediocrity of child-rearing.

The female paedophile is on the rise. Check your tabloids daily, and inevitably there is another story about a (usually) female teacher who has taken advantage of some young male pupil to satisfy her predatory libido. You will read about mothers pimping out their own daughters to pay for drugs, or even joining is as they’re raped by hairy losers with Satan fetishes. How come so many women become pen-pals to notorious murderers and then want to marry them? You can’t count on women to cook anymore; you cannot count on them for fucking anything much except victim attitudes. The worst thing yet, they would betray their nation and race as quickly as pulling a tampon string. It is somehow an expression of liberation from non-existent oppression for women to declare they are “nasty” and make virtues out of traits that they condemn in men.

We could frankly go on and on and rattle out a list that will trigger many and inspire even more but we’ve made our point.

5883cb181700009f0a92b763.jpeg
Offers Hillary voters head-jobs, turned a generation of girls into vacuous sluts, wears a “pussy” hat to signify her mouldy old vagina, but has an issue with Trump because he said something sexist about thirty years ago

Jewish-run Hollywood takes a big chunk of responsibility for moulding the slatternly role models that these women invariably assimilate. Nonetheless, we aren’t letting them off that easy. No way, the onus is upon them alone. If Hollywood told them to go out and snort bird shit would they do it?

The whole “princess” deal where girls, forever slaves to materialism and mammon, exploit their bodies in the name of ‘empowerment’ is a fine example of the inherent insincerity and deep falsehood at the heart of what we might as well call ‘the movement’. Hollywood and glamour media promote it, and “society” enables it.

Jewish-run Hollywood takes a big chunk of responsibility for moulding the slatternly role models that these women invariably assimilate. Nonetheless, we aren’t letting them off that easy. No way, the onus is upon them alone. If Hollywood told them to go out and snort bird shit would they do it?

But if that is true, what the hell is ‘society’ and is that a croc of balls? They blame society, yet they ARE society. They object to society, and yet they change society into an objectionable setting.

So what the fuck were all those anti-Trump demonstrations about anyway? There is a vague, base claim at the heart of it that Trump represents the ‘objectification’ of women. Yet, they objectify themselves in response to this bogus perception. They wear “pussy hats” and dress up as vaginas. Some flash themselves, they brandish placards with baffling sentiments and at the end of it you have to ask, what the fuck is it they want?
What are their demands? What is the problem?

The problem is those women themselves. The irony of it all was the protesters who turn out to be the real issue and not their supposed target.

They are the privileged sex with aggressive vaginas wanting to throw their weight around and these days just about any excuse will do.

16194998_1410113392374839_7634493332513611596_n
Any man willing or sick enough to want to grab it would need to mine for it underneath that umpteen tonnage of blubber