NOT-SO-WHITE ROSE SOCIETY AT CENTRE OF MAJOR DEFAMATION

NOT-SO-WHITE ROSE SOCIETY AT CENTRE OF MAJOR DEFAMATION

Imagine being nationally condemned in China for believing China should not be forced to absorb millions of non-Chinese. Consider a scenario where arguing that China should retain its distinctive racial and cultural independence involved risking your livelihood, reputation, and possibly your freedom.

Then, entertain the idea of being reviled as Chinese supremacists by your fellow Chinese, who considered it evil to desire a racially homogenous China. Not only would such a scenario seem far-fetched, but one would reject it as implausible.

In the west, however, that bizarre world is a reality! Despite all that the ‘free west’ rests its reputation on, and backs-up militarily, that sort of view is indeed taboo at a social level. In fact, as Australia is forced by the globalist order to de-Europeanise into a Babylonian satellite predicated upon consumerism, one would imagine it was desirable that a voice is given to a racial group entering minority status — but no such thing.

Likewise, it would be odd to encounter young Turks expressing hypercritical ideas about what it means to be ethnically Turkish: dredging up and interpreting history to fortify arguments that persuade curbing their racial group from expanding or prospering in their home country.

In the west, Pavlovian self-abasement has been engendered into White people. It is comparable to what heathens faced in the centuries after Rome converted to Christianity when the sandal was on the other foot. There is some truth to the maxim that patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel. But when patriotism becomes heretical then it is not the patriot who is the scoundrel but his oppressor. Indeed, his patriotism is no longer an empty grab for salvation but a dutiful act of defiance.

Thus, as the globalists strive to end the dominion of White man over this nation, and which none of the shrill critics of White Australia is lining up to leave, expressing pro-White sentiment is akin to “extremism”. There is no delineation of the protagonists in what the mainstream lumps together as “the far-right”. This ‘far-right’ now occupies a similar space that communists once inhabited as folk devils.

Then, entertain the idea of being reviled as Chinese supremacists by your fellow Chinese, who considered it evil to desire a racially homogenous China. Not only would such a scenario seem far-fetched, but one would reject it as implausible.

Nothing is what it seems in the ‘far-right’ milieu but that doesn’t matter to the volunteer sentries of globalism. Bundling all the groups underneath the ‘far-right’ umbrella is like comparing Sunnis to Shias because they’re all Moslems. The media has had long enough to acquaint itself with disparities between civic patriots, nationalists, alt-righters and Tom Sewell from the Lads Society.

These differences are profound and in many cases run contrary to the narrative they have ascribed their subjects. For instance, the Australian Liberty Alliance could hardly be described as a “White Supremacist” group, with its acceptance of multiracialism and its basis in evangelical Christianity. Yet, that’s what these absolutists of globalism do in their bid to demonise anyone who whatsoever questions their script.

TmCsqOaa_400x400
Wes Fang, one of the most violently anti-White members of the Nationals

By daring to join and naively attempt to influence the executive council of the Young Nationals NSW in a righteous direction, a group of young Australians have run afoul not only of their chosen party but the duplicitous forces of media and its shadowy cabal of auxiliaries who recognise nothing in the hypocrisy of their actions.

To wit; the so-called White Rose Society has just doxed young, proud, White Australians. This act of publication, United Nationalists Australia suggests is a defamation that those involved should immediately pursue in court. To do nothing would give validation for the left side of the ideological spectrum. To accede to their dogma would be a sheepish act of guilt as if they have anything to be guilty for.

That the ABC collaborated in a joint exercise between the metrosexual Alex Mann and this cluster of trolls led by a China-shill living in Tasmania for a project fraught with political bias, normalising the idea that to object to population replacement, or resist sublimating to identity politics, is “extreme” and not a defensive counter-reaction, is a selective use of a public resource. Where was the depth of analysis, where was the balance? Why not also expose Antifa for evenness; surely to discuss one it is only reasonable to explain the other? Or at least aim to put the alt-right in context rather than fail to explain why the Australian alt-right came about. Moreover, it is becoming a trend wherein the Alex Manns of this world hope to make their bones with their hardly investigative exposes of the alt-right while everything they themselves stand for corrodes western society.

By daring to join and naively attempt to influence the executive council of the Young Nationalists NSW in a righteous direction, a group of young Australians have run afoul not only of their chosen party but the duplicitous forces of media and its shadowy cabal of auxiliaries who recognise nothing in the hypocrisy of their actions.

Allegations made about persons in that article, which is supported by the hyperbole of Mann’s podcast ‘Haircuts and hate: Inside the rise of Australia’s alt-right’, expresses no irony about using as sources social media “infiltrators” to frame a titillating narrowcast about nationalistic youth subverting a party that has traded on its voters naïve assumption that it too is nationalist.

The suggestion that these parties may be being infiltrated by radical elements is made while they themselves harbour dangerous extremists in their political choices. For instance, the ABC is as we have seen synced with Labor Party. Today, the Facebook page The Australian Labor Party Supporters shared a link to the WRS’s story coming via the anarchist page ‘Kieran’s Review’. This anarchist links in with Antifascist Action which has never shied away from violence, vandalism, or theft: and the other mainstream political party is normalising that extreme sector.

Within the orbit of the Australian Labor Party are dangerous zealots who hide inside the union fold. UNA has revealed how the CFMMEU hosts leftist extremist groups like the Communist Workers Party of Australia. In the ranks of these are sociopaths such as David Gullis, who has been reported for various assaults and acts of threatening lives to Newtown Police in NSW, who choose not arrest him.

Major news media groups employ trolls who target ideological victims by stalking them online and then dox them, endangering their employment prospects, their ability to rent a home, and ultimately destroy the quality of their lives. This is considered justifiable behaviour, but which is far worse than anything the groups they report on has ever done. In fact, the most extreme acts thus far by anyone on the ‘far-right’ have been the beheading of a dummy in a public place by a group of civic patriots or flinging pig’s guts outside the door of some perceived traitor. Yet, the ABC has no interest in doxing ideological comrades regardless of how vile their hearts and minds are.

Fascinating, too, is how they only ever hunt those who have somehow ‘threatened’ the establishment. Why would the media go after particular persons, such as Fairfax Media has done in the past, and avoid others like the leader of the Sydney Lads Society? In that whole rubbishy article by the White Rose Society they never once named the truly diabolical characters on the scene. The media only goes after the sincere patriots and nationalists.

Allegations made about persons in that article, which is supported by the hyperbole of Mann’s podcast ‘Haircuts and hate: Inside the rise of Australia’s alt-right’, expresses no irony about using as sources social media “infiltrators” to frame a titillating narrowcast about nationalistic youth subverting a party that has traded on its voters naïve assumption that it too is nationalist.

Mark McDonald Campbell (yes – that is what he calls himself) was appointed the leader of the Sydney Lads Society by that group’s founder, a fellow New Zealander, Tom Sewell. Conceited to a fault, Sewell has made it his life’s mission to bullishly appropriate all nationalist assets and disdain any veteran (except when in trouble). He has engendered a subculture that is politically and ideologically unintelligible and which contains strong elements of ageism and other biases not in accord with nationalist thinking.

This young fool, against the strongest warnings of seasoned nationalists, appointed McDonald to head his Sydney franchise of the Lads. It would be in the realm of high probability that McDonald, through his shady connections that lead back to darker political forces, played a hand in doxing certain persons included in that article. And yet, despite being the former leader of Squadron 88, with the notoriety of stunts attributable to that small group, the media has never profiled him. Is it because he’s made himself an asset to them? With what we know about Matey Mate, believe us, this is not at all a possibility anyone involved should dismiss.

Do note, in a central image used by the ABC Blair Cottrell and one other, are named, but conspicuously not Matey Mate, who is probably one of those requiring exposing the most, having played an endless background role linking to the likes of Liberal Party dirty tricks man, Howard Crawford. He has burned nationalists, too, and Sewell was warned that he is regarded as filth by the established Australian nationalist brand. However, it strikes UNA as astounding these lug nuts obligingly lined up grinning for a pic that would be used in a damaging piece. They have betrayed the fact they adore media attention at their own peril whereas seasoned nationalists are wise to the perfidy of the media.

Matey.png
Ah, Mark McDonald Campbell (centre) yet again evades scrutiny by the media. Funny how the ex-Squadron-88 leader and the head of the Lads Society Sydney always manages to do that. It might have something to do with that “get out of jail free card” he used to boast about

But while Matey presents one area of inquiry, it goes without saying that the National Party itself, especially privileged former private school boy Ethan Gordon, under the instructions of John Barilaro, worked to expose and will ultimately expel these loyal young Australians. The penetration of the Young Nationals was not an idea that nationalists supported. The belief that a group could infiltrate and overtake a party is seriously misguided, for either they are exposed, as has happened, or it is they themselves who become overtaken.

There was no way that a party like the Nationals which includes such rabid globalists as the son of Chinese immigrants Wes Fang was about to be undermined by pro-White Australians. The Nationals’ interest lies in the commoditising of Australia: it believes in mass immigration and has no time for anyone who might endanger their greasing their sweaty palms with Chinese baksheesh. Furthermore, the NSW Young Nationals had backed gay marriage, which is such an obvious signal of their mainstream ambitions.

Already, two of those named have been removed from the NSW Young Nationals executive pending a review which will inevitably turn them out. We shall not contribute to their doxing and refuse to name them out of respect.

Already, two of those named have been removed from the NSW Young Nationals executive pending a review which will inevitably turn them out. We shall not contribute to their doxing and refuse to name them out of respect.

But why fight it? Hell, it should be a ‘fair cop’ and a ‘nice try’ with a Cheshire grin but maybe now you young folks should turn your attention towards, oh, we don’t know, a PROPER Australian Nationalist Party, like, perhaps, the Australia First Party!? That they never do is an endless point of irritation to nationalists.

r0_0_5472_3648_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg
Like Wes Fang, The Nationals’ John Barilaro (pictured) hates Nationalists with a vengeance

This time, instead of shrouding your beliefs, how about being unashamed about expressing them? They are better expressed through a Nationalist organisation rather than a mainstream host, which was inevitably going to rumble your act. Bring that energy to bear to proper nationalist activism and away from elitist playpens marshalled by wreckers.

Oh, and while we’re at it, lose the embarrassing African-American style gang signs. They are not an expression of Australian nativism and are totally juvenile. Have a little bit of dignity and class.

But this is all part and parcel of the broad church that exists in the catchall ‘alt-right’ social media world of these young people replete with insular alphabets. Flirting with concepts that seem to them edgy but bear no kinship with Australian nationalism like ‘The New Guard’ and Italian Fascism has given them little room to retreat. None of them really understand that to invoke the New Guard pretty much puts them back in the conservative stick-pile of the prejudiced middle-class.

Oh, and while we’re at it, lose the embarrassing African-American style gang signs. They are not an expression of Australian nativism and are totally juvenile. Have a little bit of dignity and class.

Likewise, even notionally supporting The Antipodeans, a group that modelled itself directly on the MI5-riddled National Action which Nick Griffin revealed, pardon the pun, queerly approved homosexuality creeping into the ranks, was always likely to back-spray on these inexperienced kids. And it has never occurred to the Antipodeans themselves that they are serving up with a cherry on top the very menace that the Jewish community especially thrives on. They not only validate those ‘concerns’ of anti-Semitism but they cheerfully oblige by wearing the right costumes and acting the part of the Nazi to a tee.

It seems more to be a matter of peer-identification than sound calibrating of ideology to share a room with those who assume that German National Socialism, Fascism, White Nationalism, Nationalism, Civic Patriotism, and whatever other ism is more-or-less the same thing, or at least, intent on achieving the same goal. It’s even sadder when they adopt these appellations without understanding them, or for reasons of shock value, or because it’s fashionable.

The easiest thing to remember, aside from the inherent truth in the 14 words, is that Australians are White, and Whites are under threat.

In the end, the most these infiltrators have done is give the Nationals a free kick in signalling their commitment to multiracialism. If they had dedicated that energy to the AFP, who knows? But then those who swim in their current and claim to be promoting Nationalism are really doing the absolute opposite: helping to cripple it.

THE WHITE ROSE SOCIETY’S LINK TO COMMUNIST CHINA

This second part of our article, following what we believe was a necessary digression, gets right down to brass tacks. Given they’ve plagued other people’s lives it’s only fair that we now turnabout and establish who this collective of parasites are.

We know from Alex Mann’s podcast that the central figure is a Tasmanian Asian Studies lecturer and Sinophile, Kaz Ross. Kaz’s Twitter page is an infestation of materials relating to Asia and in particular to China. In an interview with her beta male ABC compatriot, she described how she strayed into doxing. “I started off tracking anti-Chinese sentiment and I got involved looking at the anti-Chinese action on Facebook. There is a very short path between anti-Chinese sentiment and neo-Nazis.”

6532970-3x4-700x933
Morbidly obese Kaz Ross, (most likely) coordinator of the White Rose Society and a shill for China

That comment is so ludicrous but it raises questions of how close to Chinese interests this woman is. UNA notes that we have Chinese eyes watching our content, as does the Australia First Party, and no doubt other groups that publish nationalist content.

The White Rose Society borrows its name from a resistance group that distributed anti-Nazi leaflets during the days of the Third Reich, so it’s funny that its principal coordinator should be a shill for China.

Also, it’s worth noting that the National Party was one of those who received $100,000 in donations from Communist China-agent Chau Chak Wing from 2013-14. With a rural constituency and preparations underway for the movement of a large immigrant population into regional Australia Chinese money will inevitably be changing hands and it wouldn’t do to have a bunch of “White Supremacists” in your party if you hope to get a hold of any of that Communist lucre. This is notwithstanding the flogging of Aussie farmland and primary exports.

Of course, the Nationals really don’t need the mere possibility of profiting from China to have targeted any pro-White people coming within their executive. This is a party that voted in favour of gay marriage and is doing its damned best to fall into line with mainstream identity politics.

But in the case of Kaz Ross, shilling for China is a fanatical ideal, and boy, does she shill for China! You don’t need that above quote alone to put her prejudice into context. In September 2012, Kaz Ross penned a paper titled ‘Building an ‘Asia capable’ state: Response to the Tasmania’s Place in the Asian Century Issues Paper’ The paper is a prep piece for the Asianisation of the Australian workforce as well as an ad spruiking Tasmania as a destination for Asian students where apparently “there is a burgeoning interest in Australian literature, poetry and art”.

In 2016, Ross authored an op-ed piece for The Mercury in which she weighed in on the sale of Australia’s largest dairy producer, the Van Diemen’s Land Company. She dismissed concerns about the sale to Chinese billionaire Lu Xianfeng as “anti-Chinese dog whistling”. The rest is a soliloquy to what she believes is the essential role the Chinese have played in creating Tasmania and how that engagement with Asians must continue and grow. She writes, “Tasmania’s forgotten past connections with Asia remind us of one important fact: Tasmania has always needed Asia. And it still does today.”

Kaz has been preoccupied with those she perceives as hating on her beloved China. She was quoted in a 2017 ABC radio report ‘Calls for Facebook to be more accountable for the rise in fear and hatred on social media’.

In this interview, she details how she began snooping for dissidents commenting negatively on the sale of the Van Diemen’s Land Company to the Chinese. She described how Facebook should be policing comments unfriendly to globalism and admitted that “I report probably at least a dozen posts every single day and some days I might get two or three posts taken down but not always.”

It is patently evident that this traitor has formed an alliance with trolls from the extreme left whose interest is in chopping down any development of a discussion relating to the repopulation of this country. It’s quite in keeping with her beloved Beijing masters’ penchant for strict censorship, too.

Therefore, we can quite unequivocally state that Kaz Ross is doubtless the central force behind the White Rose Society and that if those who’ve had their futures compromised for belonging to a non-traditional political position choose to pursue action there is a good place to start. Her contact details will be available on the University of Tasmania web page.

But it would also be interesting to cover what role, if any, the Chinese interests have played in the doxing of these young people since the connection is right there.

UPDATE: Following the publication of this article the ABC gave the White Rose Society leader a platform to post her views.

Twitter
Kaz Ross responding to our article and clearly enjoys the attention