GAME OVER FOR NICK FOLKES

GAME OVER FOR NICK FOLKES

Nick Folkes has an occasional good idea. His best so far was when he encouraged his loyal Peanuts, who were out at Lithgow last weekend, to nuisance call certain people between one and three on Saturday morning.

Actually, nuisance is a benign word; they were, in fact, obscene calls conveyed in a lewd and debasing fashion. This brilliant caper not only signifies the end of his political ‘career’, a word we parenthesise for its irony, but could also impact his freedom; which is ironic too, given his perennially unregistered micro party is named Party for Freedom.

Yes, as Nick’s brainstorms go, this was a tempest. Bravely timed, knowing none of their victims would be awake at those hours, the Peanuts recorded a series of offensive messages on various phones. Their choice of targets was notable, too, in that the motives for the calls ranged from vindictiveness to outright jealousy. And this is the party that dares to demonstrate certain issues under a disingenuous banner of “decency”.

pjimage.jpg
Wouldn’t YOU vote for a man like this?

Currently, a matter involving Folkes is before a Brisbane Magistrate’s Court initiated by a homosexual man crying foul over a placard waved about at a PfF demonstration against Safe Schools. Folkes no doubt believes he acted in the interests of public morals, as much as he genuinely believes in anything. However, his personal morals come out of a beer can, and burn with the pungent tang of cannabis smoke; no doubt the twin inspirations for his maverick brainchild. Nick and the Peanuts issue from an established “party” culture. Hence, the “Party” in Party for Freedom, is appropriately employed in its hedonistic sense.

Those harassed were nearly all women, except for the calls made to AFP President, Jim Saleam, which might prove the most significant in terms of nailing Nick. Up to that point, we understand, Nick had egged his minions on to do the dirty calling; so that he might avoid any blowback. But then, Nick can resist anything but temptation, and so he grabbed the blower to partake in his own downfall.

Two of those others abused were former members of PfF, whose personal details, including phone numbers, Nick freely shared with his cronies. This, as Love Australia or Leave Party President Kim Vuga pointed out, breaches the Privacy Act. However, it is also a violation of good faith and only serves to illustrate why those sober ex-members chose to leave behind the diabolical farce that is PfF.

tobesonpingas.png
 Toby Cook in this captured video of him on Pingas at the Masif nightclub in Darlinghurst

In a past series of disclosures leaked to UNA, the timeline of PfF’s ultimate dysfunction was pinpointed to the arrival of Toby Cook. Toby is a morbidly obese, confused youth of dubious heritage, who was infamously filmed messed up on “pingas” during a night out at Darlinghurst nightclub ‘Masif’ with newly arrived floozy, Penny Louise; a single mother who has abandoned her nipper in favour of hitting the gas with Nick and the gang. She is also in a conjugal relationship with George Jameson, who is twice her age.

Penny initiated the ribald calls that Kim Vuga slammed as “disgusting” and “pornographic” in a statement condemning PfF. Not only were these calls made to women, but one of those is a respected elderly lady.

Kim Vuga’s admin was vilified over her weight, which is amazing, given that Toby Cook is so fat that for every meal he scarfs down in Australia, two hundred people die of famine halfway around the world.

And why target Kim Vuga’s people at all? Well, UNA can reveal the intense jealousy that Nick suffered when Kim went off and started her own party. Nick had some idea that she would dote on him, bringing him publicity, while he reaped the glory. The fact that she outflanked him in a contest of his own imagining is a testament to her moral and intellectual superiority, which is not just a figment of his worst fears of inadequacy, but a bona fide reality that he senses and pathologically resents. The lady he targeted had betrayed him in his twisted, drug-addled reckoning. Kim’s strength resulted in Nick’s bitterness. But if Nick feels emasculated then he was all along in denial about his feeble manhood.

Nick has proven, time and time again, that he fails on all fronts as both a politician and a man. His ambitions exceed his abilities. His envy of the Australia First Party is well documented and was no doubt an inciting factor in the puerile messages he and Toby left on Jim Saleam’s message bank; messages, which like the others, will form the basis of a legitimate police complaint.

So far, we can confirm two serious complaints have been filed against Folkes, Cook, and Louise, and there may be more.

Adding to their genius, was the fact they didn’t even bother to hide their numbers, or in the case of other calls, disguise their voices. It is as though they wanted to get sprung. Some elect death by Police, as they charge officers with knives intent on ending it all in a hail of police bullets; maybe Folkes and Co. have chosen death by foolishness.

UNA has learned that a campaign is underway in Lithgow to deny Folkes a venue for his anti-mosque protests. In this case, we sympathise, given that Nick has no interest in saving Lithgow from invasion by an alien culture. His sole interest, as always, is self-promotion.

One wonders what sort of maniac would be drubbed into believing that PfF is in any position to lecture anyone on anything, much less offer themselves as representatives of the government. Given this incident, no clear-headed person should be in any doubt as to their unfitness as human beings and political activists. Questions would have to be seriously asked about anyone who has learned of these degrading, carnal communications, and continued to lend Folkes their support.

Moreover, how could any of his followers have failed to question the yo-yo that is PfF, which never settles down to fixed ideals but seeks only to cash in on popular trends solely through negation; anti-Islam one day, pretending to be White Nationalist the next, but never actually being anything real or sincere?

Well, it’s all in the past now anyway. Folkes and his party are finished. They are just too hungover to have figured this out.

19554392_1519049921485522_3833965075677453832_n.jpg
George Jameson with Penny Louise, who initiated phone attacks on former PfF members. So much for the sisterhood

RAPE HOUSE

RAPE HOUSE

Introduction

A COUPLE of months ago, a social media phenomenon, an embryonic political-cultural movement in fact – ‘the Dingoes’ – came in for public criticism. Its advent reminded the liberal media that the ‘Alt Right’ had made its way to Australia and that its emergence opened a new front against the ideological props of the liberal globalist society. Some of the Dingoes began the process of Australianizing their reference points which placed them onto the path of embracing Australian Nationalism.

But then there were those who set out to stop that process from maturing. They decided to do this by stealing the Dingo phenomenon.

It is a sad fact that the Dingoes, indeed the Alt Right generally, became subjects for subversion courtesy of a poisonous group whose line of political descent over decades demonstrates a long history of parasitism, wrecking and plain sociopathy.

It is necessary to start somewhere in discussing these wreckers and our reference to the attempted takeover of the Dingo movement only sets our stage. Their subversion runs deeper than the Dingoes.

As we shall see, if it isn’t ‘other people’s money’, it is ‘other people’s efforts’ that are to the attention of the wrecking group.

We speak here of the ‘Rape House’, not just because of some sexual assaults which occurred in proximity to this group, but rather because the group mentally despoils any rational and fair element with whom it comes into contact.

The time has come for this garbage-group was the subject not only of ruthless exposure but a concerted drive to eliminate them from the terrain of any movement that may contribute to national regeneration.

We want their guts and we want them gone.

However, given the tangled connections of the Rape House gang, that is easier said than done! It must be the subject of a mobilization by all nationalists. We can begin first with the Dingoes and help them purge these wreckers and then we can move on with other struggles to limit the wreckers’ field of action, all while we consolidate the Australian Nationalist message in every way possible.

Dr Jim Saleam, 2017

The Rape House

In 2007, Jason Rafty rented a house on Fennell Street, North Parramatta. He moved in a few tenants from his ‘scene’ and made a profit on the rent.

Whether this profit went to his new creation the ‘Public Information Forum’ (or Klub Nation as it was generally known) we don’t know, but this unofficial headquarters of his enterprise gave him a centre for his officers (sic) to live in, and act out of, as they contrived a series of schemes.

Jason Rafty, as the impresario of Klub Nation, was a product of a long-standing gang which he had served already for eight years, but we shall get to that. A remarkable letter came into our possession addressed by Rafty to Jeremy Jones of the Australia Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC). It is reproduced at the end of this article.

Here, Rafty offers to travel to Russia and spy on Russian nationalists and in particular an organisation known as Russian National Unity. He asks AIJAC for money and equipment and he sets out in detail how the operation would work and how he might also profit at the end, with book rights no less. It is understood the letter was written around 1999. He also refers to his Jewish wife, a peculiar circumstance, given the internal game-playing of Klub Nation, often involved its claim to represent neo-nazism.

The existence of the letter was well known to the Klub Nation gang, but it did not seem to worry them, accepting as they will say they did Rafty’s chutzpah explanation that he was trying to rip off Jones.

That in itself sets a certain tone for Rafty, but the very idea of trying to panhandle Jones, given his professional resources at disentangling bullshit – was incredible. More likely, the letter was a ‘genuine’ attempt to get money and betray people whom Rafty later said he found ideologically agreeable. As we shall see, Rafty was not the only person in Klub Nation with special connections. Did Rafty continue this connection with AIJAC?

The existence of the letter was well known to the Klub Nation gang, but it did not seem to worry them, accepting as they will say they did Rafty’s chutzpah explanation that he was trying to rip off Jones. 

The morally oblique style of Klub Nation extended to one of Jason Rafty’s closest lieutenants formally recruited in 2007 but known to the gang before this time. This person, who functioned as his number-two, was the person for whom Rape House is dedicated. Some three women were sexually assaulted at the Fennell Street house. One was raped and two others sexually assaulted in different ways.

Rafty
The only known correspondence from Klub Nation was this letter from Rafty to Jeremy Jones of  the Australia/Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) offering to spy on Nationalists in Russia 

The assaults were known to the residents. Around 2011, one Michael Holt resided there and paid rent. As he recounted to other persons, the assaults were talked about and were to be hushed up. This troubled young man who mucked about with neo-nazi ideology would later be imprisoned on gun charges and was accused of planning a mass shooting. For ourselves, we have also talked to one of the victims who are quite specific about her experiences and she named the other victims. She certainly named the perpetrator. It is our understanding that one of the tenants remains furious with the rapist for using his bed and leaving traces of the assault. Charming.

oie_n7tcGoe6Sl1D
Klub Nation scammer Andrew Wilson of the Rape House infamy is now appropriating political real estate of The Dingoes

The cover up of sexual assault by this gang is despicable, but it’s just the start. Covering their tracks is something we just cannot permit. How can we understand Klub Nation?

Klub Nation met at the Humanist House in the inner-Sydney suburb of Chippendale from early 2005 until October 2009. It met every few weeks and its political identity was known to the Humanist member who permitted their presence by renting out the rooms. The same Humanist member must have been aware of ‘something’ going on when members of Klub Nation began to actually join the Humanist Society itself as members. He cannot say he wasn’t warned as Jim Saleam spoke to him at some point about the group and what its real intentions might be.

1486122148137
Rape House resident Michael Holt is now in prison for violating Duke Nukem’s copyright 

Ultimately, the Klub Nation members made a bid to take over the Humanist Society because as an incorporated body it owned the property and other assets, over a million dollars worth. Fortunately, they were beaten back, evicted from the use of the facility and their members removed from the Society. This effort to steal the assets of a community organisation wasn’t a new thing to Klub Nation, as we shall also explain.

The cover up of sexual assault by this gang is despicable, but it’s just the start. Covering their tracks is something we just cannot permit. How can we understand Klub Nation?

Klub Nation was remarkable in that it had no website, no magazine, no political manifesto, never organized a demonstration, nor contested an election, nor ran any campaign of agitation, nor even performed any specific act of violence (given the tone of its meetings on occasion). It claimed to be a forum of ideas and held ‘talks’, sometimes graced by Rafty wearing a Soviet military tunic; but it also said it was a survival club and a group that would raise money towards the purchase of a property in a rural setting. Yet essentially, it was simply whatever its leaders said it was at any particular moment, and to whomsoever the‘mark’ might be.

So what was it really? A big-mouth group with no real records or obvious structure could be a type of fraud, or perhaps a version of the French Resistance. And our choice of options – is the former. It was a con. Not just a money con for the operators, but a political charade.

Humanist_House4©R.jpg
The Humanist Society house in Sydney’s Chippendale which Klub Nation tried taking over

Klub Nation has been described by some who blundered into it and by those affected and burned by it in several overlapping ways: listening post, Liberal Party dirty-tricks op, drain-pool of the mentally challenged, a pretend survivalist club, a money-making operation for Rafty, neutralizing agency for anyone with a brain, a counter-gang and a rumour mill that would target genuine nationalists and patriots. Each of these claims reflected the truth.

At its ‘height’ in 2009, this group pretended that it was going to purchase a block of rural land as an investment upon which buildings would be constructed for the use of the whole patriotic movement and this would serve as a training centre in trades and politics for young people. Its leaders said that they were really the “general staff” in waiting for the Australian patriot movement and the genuine force of “nationalism” (they appropriated the term), not like all of us pretenders in our various organisations.

They said they were the focal point for building the real unity that was so lacking with all of us. They tried to con into their web the new Nationalist Alternative and even older Skinhead groups. But all saw through them.

So what was it really? A big-mouth group with no real records or obvious structure could be a type of fraud, or perhaps a version of the French Resistance. And our choice of options – is the former. It was a con. Not just a money con for the operators, but a political charade.

People from an array of patriot groups did at different times attend their gatherings, usually invited by ‘runners’ but with the true nature of the group concealed from them. This was essential cover and useful in garnering intelligence and spreading misinformation about genuine groups. Newbies were quietly relieved of their money. Some were even sold silver bars which they could ‘re-invest’, or they were asked to invest in a Ponzi scheme of Pyramid-selling-type intricacy. We won’t try to explain it as it’s just too hard. Some withdrew from contact with Klub Nation, but some got hooked on the hype. A five-figure-sum bank account (after expenses and there were a lot of those) was built.

Key players in Klub Nation included Andrew Wilson, David McBryde, Steven Moore and Mark Pavic. All had murky histories, personal and political. John Boyle, a solicitor who had run the Liberal Party’s ‘Chinese Special Branch’ in Haymarket and who later became a China immigration agent and who married a Chinese woman, was noted at the meetings. Moore and Boyle were linked to the Fellowship of the Round Table a private discussion group now known as ‘Western Heritage’ and which today runs meetings at NSW Parliament House. This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party.

This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party. The Fellowship was run by the very Humanist who first let in the Klub Nation crew at the Chippendale building.

With Klub Nation, weakened after the failure to rip off the Humanists, a new plan came into being. Meetings resumed in 2010 at the Mechanics Institute in Pitt Street Sydney and the members began to join this society, also with the plan to rort it, or at least, to make fulsome use of its resources. A witness says he was handed a Mechanics membership form at the Rape House and told to “join”. Once again, nationalists warned the Mechanics what the plan was. Ultimately also, this new scam came to nought. We were also advised that nationalists were accused of warning a bowling club which they intended to ‘take over’ – and they were booted from there. On this occasion, we deny any involvement.

By late 2013, some of the ‘investors’ in Klub Nation, essentially some of those basically conned by it, were clamouring for their money. Others decided they also wanted their money, particularly a certain Peter Coleman, whom we shall meet shortly. David McBryde (who was the “treasurer”) made a big play of refunding a percentage of this money (but much was simply missing). In what must be a bemusing moment, a witness says that some of this money was repaid to claimants sometime in late 2014 or early 2015, “during a social” at an address in Summer Hill – which was also the ‘headquarters’ of the neo-nazi grouplet Squadron 88.

This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party. The Fellowship was run by the very Humanist who first let in the Klub Nation crew at the Chippendale building.

It wasn’t over. The Klub Nation crew were ready to move on. But first, a question. Where did this gang come from? Klub Nation was follow-on incarnation of a group that came into existence in Sydney in 1988 – 1989.

Nationalists call this first group the Palmer-Coleman gang, naming it after Peter Coleman, a member of Jack van Tongeren’s (misnamed) Australian Nationalists Movement and a seemingly eccentric jack-in-the-box, David Palmer.

Palmerr.png
David Palmer described himself  as “some sort of ASIO asset”

Below are two documents from the Jim Saleam Special Branch police file. One shows that Coleman was not averse to providing material to the Special Branch about nationalism (in this case Jim Saleam). The second shows that Neville Ireland, who ran the case against the nationalist organisation National Action in 1988 – 1991, had an appointment in late May 1989 with an informer called ‘Cabbie’. This informer was Coleman. Both men in a court in November 1990 denied meeting each other until that very day, a little piece of perjury that covered over a substantial relationship.

 

Sal2 001.jpg
Neville Ireland’s Duty Book reveals an informant called ‘Cabbie’. This was
Peter Coleman

 

At the Police Royal Commission in 1997, Coleman received a title, ‘Commission Code 18’ (CC18). He was important to Neville Ireland’s operations. Indeed, as we reasonably know, Coleman betrayed van Tongeren to prison and from the outside managed some disruption of National Action in the years 1989-1991.

Did Klub Nation concern itself with this? Was any member worried about it at all? No, they weren’t. Coleman’s former status was just another day in the life of the group. It was well known.

Nationalists call this first group the Palmer-Coleman gang, naming it after Peter Coleman, a member of Jack van Tongeren’s (misnamed) Australian Nationalists Movement and a seemingly eccentric jack-in-the-box, David Palmer.

David Palmer came on the scene late in 1988, joined with Coleman in early 1989 and carried on from there and in 1990 established a neo-nazi group calling itself the National Socialist Defending Aryan People Party. Well, that’s what it said it was. In 2005, he would even say in writing that he had been some sort of ASIO asset. To other people, he confessed receiving “$200 a report” from ASIO.

Did anyone in Klub Nation ever come forward to explain their relationship with Palmer or to provide information to nationalists about him? Not at all. Again, it was just another day.

 

Sal1 001.jpg
A Special Branch incident report: Peter Coleman happily provides information

In tandem and for years, these two political police assets harassed nationalists, appeared in the press with provocative statements, made their statements a parody of ‘racist’ thought and reported back to their masters. So what was the Palmer-Coleman gang?

It was listening post, an ASIO / Special Branch dirty-tricks op which collected intelligence on an array of patriotic people, a drain-pool of the mentally challenged, a neutralizing agency for anyone who wanted to be an ‘activist’, a counter-gang and a rumour mill. Each of these claims reflected the truth.

At different points, Australians would hear these actors had infiltrated Pauline Hanson’s party, controlled terror networks and were ready to bomb the Olympics. A seemingly ‘believing’ media would always report them. We wonder why?

Did anyone in Klub Nation ever come forward to explain their relationship with Palmer or to provide information to nationalists about him? Not at all. Again, it was just another day.

Then in 1999, Palmer decided to infiltrate the religious society, the British Israel World Federation. They had inherited a house in the Blue Mountains and $140,000 in cash and already maintained a bookshop in York Street with maybe $20,000 in assets there.

Palmer had met Rafty and a man called Mark Pavic. This quality lad had spent years in gaol for weighing down his mum’s body at the bottom of Lake Burley Griffin. But better still, he had tried to rort the Theosophical Society in 1996-7 and take its assets by moving in, siding with a ‘faction’, helping that faction and trying to come out on top. The Court of Appeal decision that saw him defeated makes interesting reading. He was a perfect organizer for the takeover of British Israel just as he was later an operator in trying to take over the Humanists.

The British Israel scheme collapsed finally in 2002 when the company was wound up and the assets found their way to the good guys in the affair. John Boyle was their solicitor and he profited to the tune of $50,000 in fees paid for (as the law demanded) by the legitimate company.  Nice.

Did the attempt to defraud British Israel ‘disturb’ the later Klub Nation leaders? Not at all. They thought to carry on with the Humanists, the Mechanics …

Taking over groups

Taking over organisations (and not just for the money) has been a stock in trade of the Palmer-Coleman gang and the successor Klub Nation gang.

In 2000, Palmer made moves to enter the Australians Against Further Immigration Party in New South Wales. That was exposed by the nationalists and the gang came up zero. Perhaps the plan was to run a party that would truly be a counter to legitimate patriotic parties? With the funds of British Israel, had they been acquired, this brand of provocation would have had long-term viability.

Klub Nation sought to take over — or at least coordinate — some nationalist and patriotic youth groups. They sought to integrate them with the funds’ raising and the plans for youth fronts, camps and the fantastic property they would buy. It was again the suspicions they incited and the counsel sought out by the supposed victims – again – which kept them out. The nationalists put the obstacles in their way.

So today, when we learn of plans to take over the Dingoes, we are not surprised. This is just another ‘takeover’ along the way. However, this time around, the gang has ‘professionalised’ itself and sounds much more believable.

The Liberal Party connection

The connection between the Palmer-Coleman gang and Klub Nation and the Liberal Party was continuous. That is another secret in the life of this gang.

Palmer, who had once been a Liberal party candidate in Queensland, boasted often of his links with senior Liberals. He meant those Liberals who described themselves as ‘conservatives’, ‘the hard right’, ‘the uglies’ in the party. This group had a long history, but as a so-called faction, it was revamped in August 1996 by no less than Tony Abbott himself. It formed up at a planning meeting (one month before Hanson’s so-called ‘maiden speech’ in parliament that set off a furore) and formalised in December 1996 (four months before Hanson launched One Nation). Its aim was to anchor Liberal Party supporters against any defection to One Nation while that party was permitted to ‘run’ – and then, once One Nation had normalised certain ideas and opinions, the Liberals simply would reel it all back in. Howard’s master stroke! Palmer, as noted, tried to disrupt One Nation as part of the shepherding strategy.

John Boyle was one of these Liberals in this so called ‘faction’. As said, the Fellowship was part of it. The Liberal connection was a portent for the future. Now as open Liberal and Liberal-satellite auxiliary activists

The collapse of Klub Nation made for a new change in the group. They had done their apprenticeship and could now be trusted with higher tasks.

After Klub Nation dissolved, McBryde and a new player Morgan Qasabian, joined a Liberal Branch. They then went on in 2012 to form the Sydney Traditionalists. They advertise Cory’s Tories (Cory Bernardi’s ‘Australian Conservatives’) and Cory’s book The Conservative Revolution. This group parades itself as “conservative”. And that is good. They are not nationalists. Yet, they are described as offering the “sister site” to the Dingoes website. Who puts that on the Dingoes website?

 

screen-shot-2015-11-03-at-6-21-31-pm.png
David McBryde is to nationalism what Ribena is to hard liquor

There is zero nationalism in them; no commitment to the old ideal of White Australia, no base in the Australian radical nationalist tradition that proclaimed the vision of Australia as the workingman’s paradise. Quite the contrary. The rabble at Sydney Traditionalists considers themselves ‘born to rule’, a ‘growing’ special caste who serve the wealthy and are to one day be promoted as part of the ruling Tory class. After all, Cory’s Tories was launched upon the blessing of the oligarch, Gina Rinehart. The Traditionalists invited Cory Bernardi to a forum and gained his personal blessings too. The rabid free marketeer multiracialist Bernardi offers another angle for ‘promotion’. Bernardi’s Conservatives are also a Liberal satellite and really are nothing different from the Liberal Party.

Qasabian
Morgan Qasabian 

The ex Klub Nation conservative players will occasionally playact that they are concerned at immigration, or might even say something cryptic about Zionism (Bernardi’s party is actually Zionophile), but they always refuse to answer hard questions in writing, or commit themselves except orally to anything and then with nods and winks and one can believe what one likes. When pushed about onto the social question – they support free market economics as ‘success’ proves the worth of the better people. They do not want Australian wealth in the hands of our people, nor the social uplift of all of us. Born to rule reactionaries are better (sic) than the ordinary people?

Alt Rights and Counter-gangs — the final battle

This gang has since 2013 been part of a new ‘conservative front’ in Sydney. Howard Crawford, the Liberal Party dirty tricks operator, has played a major role in building it, just as he struck at the genuine nationalists especially Australia First Party. Certain Liberals like Penrith Councillor Marcus Cornish (a multiracialist), the Sydney Traditionalists, the Reclaim movement and Nick Folkes’s ‘Party For Freedom’ (PFF) make up the system of orbiting satellites.

The Reclaim movement tried to refocus the immigration debate upon Islam only. They deny the challenge to Australia of Chinese imperialism. Many of its leaders sought to propagate the idea that Zionist Israel was the world’s friend against Islamism. People like Cornish exhausted the people’s anti-mosque movement in Penrith. As all the while the Chinese began the ‘move in’ he still found himself lauded as a conservative leader.

The gang turned up during the Penrith ‘anti-Mosque’ protests in 2014 and would bloc with Nick Folkes’s Party For Freedom (PFF), The PFF copies nationalists; from little things like allowing a member to go about in a Golden Dawn T-shirt, to flying the Eureka Flag, and even flying the Celtic Cross to talking of campaigns against Chinese takeover and about the “white genocide”. Folkes mimics others, a sure giveaway about his role, and acts like a clownish idiot. All the while, he calls nationalists ‘Nazis’. Of course, it was PFF, as we have exposed elsewhere, that met at the ‘Nazi’ headquarters in Sydney, met with Squadron 88 and had its leader close at its side. Indeed, when he wound up the Squadron, its leader told his friends he would just run with those opposed to “Islam” and would “work with Nick Folkes”. Just as the ex Klub Nation gang did too.

Crawford had his hands over Squadron 88 and gave money to it and seems to have known of ‘plans’ to attack a Muslim prayer hall in Newcastle. Did he also know of the plan of Squadron 88’s leader to attack the homes of Penrith councillors? What were the purposes of such plans being talked about? The playacting with neo-nazism serves a minor role in this conservative front. If it follows the usual pathway, it is to have fired up foolish or mad people on hand who can be encouraged to attack nationalists in one way or another on the basis that they are in the way of the birth of Fourth Reich. In what must be an amusing con, Crawford told Squadron 88 that the Liberal Party was founded by Hitler-friendly conservatives who let lots of ‘Nazis’ into Australia after the War. And they were always there and now, their descendants and acolytes are ready to ‘takeover’! Given that Crawford was caught on video urging attacks upon Australia First Party people and property, it is arguable that this was the role he would have ascribed to the Squadron had things not gone belly-up.

The ex Klub Nation gang also took on a new impresario, relevant to the Dingoes tale. It is a certain Clifford Jennings has been put out front as the Alt-Right leader and the organizer of Dingo activity, But Clifford was a member of the Liberal Party till recently (did he resign on purpose?). Information reveals that while he was never part of the scammers of Klub Nation years back, but he knows them as brothers and also attended fests with them in the company of Squadron 88 and the choirmaster, Howard Crawford.

Information to hand says that Clifford has told Dingoes and some other patriots that his force will either “take over the Young Liberals” or in the alternate, form a “youth wing of One Nation” and be the power there. Again takeover and role playing. We do not accept that Clifford is a nationalist and we again say that this is really an effort to grind up patriot and potentially nationalist young people in a mincer machine that will turn out more useless conservative sausages.

Final conflict

The Dingoes are just the latest victims of the gang. We have no doubt that they will ultimately be beaten off.

In the final conflict between the nationalists and the gang, it will be said by them (and remember they have a history that spans almost thirty years) that the nationalists are an ‘old road’, and that they are fresh and new. They will say simply that the nationalists – lie! “That was the past, they are talking about. We are us and we have plans for growth.”

Sheltering behind newbie Alt-Right folk, they will say they can take it to the skies. Some may believe them. The nationalists shall say: “they are fakers and a look at who they are, at their actual history and who they connect to, sets you straight. They simply cannot be what they say they are.” The gang will hold frenetic meetings, talk of takeovers and rising hordes, their contacts in the Libs and Cory’s Tories who are “ready to move” and maybe even “big dollars”, but even more maddening for the newbies struggling with it all, they will look them straight in the eye and say: “we are you and you are us; we are the toughest of the tough and the hardest of the hard, but we are clever and work through groups and systems.”

Nationalist ideology and politics are a unity. The ideology of Australian nativist nationalism is grounded in the old radical-nationalist-labourist traditions of long ago. Its heroes are Henry Lawson and William Lane, Jack Lang and William Spence, John Curtin and Percy Stephensen. Its flag is the Southern Cross. It is the people’s cause. This cause is the true cause of Australian identity, independence and freedom and it needs a movement that is independent of the system’s ideology and politics. It does not pretend to infiltrate the regime parties. Quite the contrary, it calls them traitors and organizes against them. That means as a matter of course that these conservatives do not serve the Australian People, but the system. Yes, perhaps a few might be genuine folk mixed there in the pot, but to use an old Christian adage, it is time to come out from amongst them and be separate. The final conflict will resolve whether the conservatives will blunt and defeat the new arising movements of patriotism and nationalism or whether they will b e put to rout.

It is time to shut the Rape House – once and for all.

Screenshot_2016-09-30_09.48.00

MEDIA PREDICTABLY SKEWS T.B.C RALLY AS ANTI-RACIST EVENT

MEDIA PREDICTABLY SKEWS T.B.C RALLY AS ANTI-RACIST EVENT

Anyone surprised that the mainstream media intentionally skewed the reporting of yesterday’s Australian Pride March organised by the True Blue Crew should yield their right to inhale oxygen.

Indeed, a striking image of a protester sporting a sandwich board emblazoned with the message, “FAKE NEWS: WHAT YOU SEE ON TV IS ALL LIES” wins the day’s award for the most ironic placard. It would prove to be an astute observation.

The Daily Mail, which is the absolute Crack Whore of tabloid garbage that masquerades as news in this conquered land, chose to report the event as if it was all along organised as an ‘anti-racist’ event.

19420874_1291013437677936_4937703267314276168_n
Amen, cobber!

Was this lack of prescience on their part but another sorry example of their unfitness to inform the Australian public or was it a contrived policy to invalidate the sentiment of this and any other such event?

Despite two facts — that it was organised by Australian Patriots — and that the basis of the event was to demonstrate pride of oneself in their Australianness by parading with an Aussie flag — the snakes and hacks of the press still managed to misconstrue the non-signalling of any anti-group message by the organisers as ‘racist’. By that we mean it was not an ‘anti-Moslem’ march, or whatever they automatically assume it was billed as, but simply a defiance of a present convention that abhors any expression of pride in Australianness — if you are White.

And God forbid they should have actually researched and reported the facts without bias or prejudice!

The Daily Mail, which is the absolute crack whore of tabloid garbage that masquerades as news in this conquered land, chose to report the event as if it was all along organised as an ‘anti-racist’ event.

Yes, if you read it from the mainstream media’s point of view, the whole reason for anyone turning out yesterday was to publically exhibit their unwavering commitment to and fervour for the Cult of Diversity. They were there to oppose those antiquated racists who would dare to consider the Australian colours as anything but emblematic of minority oppression. The racist Patriots, of course, were the target of the day — not the focus — and the ‘protesters’ the heroes.

imageedit_2_8940330687
If the media says the rally was an anti-racist event that must be what it was!

Anyone not criticising or demeaning the White Australian people — or expressing shame for imaginary crimes — is a deviant who has surrendered their right to their implied freedom of expression. It is an interesting observation from a medium-contact perspective that the organising of this event took place on Facebook, and a comment from a self-styled ‘anti-racist’ posting in the comments section of a thread dedicated to the Sunday rally highlighted who the genuine bigots are.

Yes, in the shaping of young hearts and minds in this country, the system has managed to churn out some of the worst class-cultural bigots in existence. Take a look at this post by Tim Sullivan who it appears is a New Zealander anyway: “It just looked like a bunch of poorly educated, low socio-economic (sic), tattooed bogans? I was just passing… not participating btw. But, what was the point of the demonstration? I don’t think the message was really conveyed effectively.”

imageedit_6_5093235455
Anti-racist Tim Sullivan is a practising social media bigot who hates poor  uneducated people, White Australians, and anyone with ‘tatts’ 

Well, Tim Tims, despite the fact you followed a statement with a question mark, casting doubts on your own IQ as judged by your own rules, the point of the whole thing was just to be visible.

In a country that is controlled by foreign interests, which favours and takes foreign money and facilitates programs that favour the benefactors of that filthy lucre, it is very hard for ordinary Australians to be noticed.

Their voice is howled down by home-grown ideological attack dogs like you who are raised and nurtured in the schools and academies of this system. These ‘bogans’ are being driven out of affordable housing, employment, and even their right to a voice in this globalised nation of ours.

And God forbid they should have actually researched and reported the facts without bias or prejudice!

On the one hand, the Left would champion the downtrodden, purely in the pursuit of their own political motives, but as UNA tirelessly point out they are elitists. This Tim Sullivan, for all his affected casualness in the comments on that page has expressed contempt for anyone who has not been indoctrinated by tertiary education, who aren’t earning at least $100K a year, and who questions the dogma of Diversity. What’s more, he probably lives in an all-White neighbourhood.

41BA336100000578-4636726-image-a-88_1498367834041
The message is that Australians are nothing, own nothing, and have no right to anything in this nation built by Aboriginals, Chinese, Africans and Middle Easterners to which Whites owe all their gratitude

In fact, Timmy is the very reason that the T.B.C and their supporters were out there yesterday. It wasn’t Moslems, it wasn’t the Chinese buying up their future, or the African ‘refugees’ swarming through their neighbourhoods like tribes of berserk warriors, but people like Tim who create that environment which oppresses them.

By standing up proud in whom they are regardless of whether they’d ever been a school Dux, or are an Alumnus, or have swindled their way into the property market to stand atop a balcony crowing over the sweaty plebs below — they are making a very bold statement.

In fact, their statement is so bold it has to be completely misrepresented by the machinery of misinformation that underpins this crooked system that keeps us all in chains.

UNA will state here and now that before any confrontation happens with any group of outsiders in this nation the first battles will be Whites against Whites. It will be the likes of those with the fortitude to stand up, like those in Melbourne on Sunday, and internal enemies such as Timmy who have been mass-produced by successive globalist occupying governments.

In fact, their statement is so bold it has to be completely misrepresented by the machinery of misinformation that underpins this crooked system that keeps us all in chains.

No, the media was never concerned with accuracy in the reporting of Sunday’s march. If they were, they would have not made the very tourist make of presuming it was organised by Blair Cottrell of the United Patriots Front, which the DM did, or mistaking Kane Miller for Blair, which they also did.

This means, of course, that Blair has become the ‘Snowball’ of the Patriot movement and anything else. By this, we refer to George Orwell’s classic take on Stalin, Animal Farm.

In Orwell’s political parable of the twentieth century, the Stalinesque pig Napoleon usurps the ideologically-driven pig Snowball and thereafter any failure of his regime, anything that goes wrong, anything and everything is blamed on Snowball.

Heh, in that regards Blair has become like Jim Saleam.

pjimage.jpg
Yep, it was that pesky Blair all along… In fact, Blair was responsible for the Holocaust that killed six and a half zillion Jewish babies

 

THE BERNARDI BLACKSHIRT BEACH BLANKET BINGO

THE BERNARDI BLACKSHIRT BEACH BLANKET BINGO

If we here at UNA were addicted to games of chance rather than alliterated headlines we feel sure we would be able to clean up should anyone run a book on the future trajectory of conservative politics in this country.

While maintaining our customary passive-aggressive, give ‘em enough rope to hang themselves approach to the right-wing we are nevertheless prepared to speculate upon how the last embers of white shoe conservatism will be snuffed out.

The last man standing is Senator Cory Bernardi with his Australian Conservatives, which by all accounts is a growing movement and, as yet, untainted by scandal.

These conservatives seem to be the usual yawn-worthy formation of pearl clutching wowsers, po-faced killjoys and evangelical holy rollers intent on routing all the arse bandits, Commies and bludgers present in civil society; to repel, or moderate, these moral degenerates with good old “Judeo-Christian” values.

Caleb bond
Caleb Bond: The future of White youth?

Given the temperament and value systems of today’s Third World migrants we can imagine that this schtick will play well with Indian and Chinese Catholics, Korean Protestants and the savage, semi-heathen sects of the dark continent; high immigration is a dead weight upon  the rest of us but this uncritical audience may be the fillip that the Australian Conservatives need.

When we say that they are untainted by scandal we mean real juicy, Hanson or Dastyari level mischief; well so far so good as far as this, we hope, the final incarnation of old-school civic patriotism goes, but mischief of a different kind is inevitable

These conservatives seem to be the usual yawn-worthy formation of pearl clutching wowsers, po-faced killjoys and evangelical holy rollers intent on routing all the arse bandits, Commies and bludgers present in civil society; to repel, or moderate, these moral degenerates with good old “Judeo-Christian” values.

Yes, gentle reader, the spectre of Neo-Nazism haunts the conservatives.

At any minute their movement will be convulsed in collective outrage as, somewhere, the Manchurian Candidate programming of one of the many sideshow freaks likely embedded in their meetings will kick in and he will spring bolt upright screaming “Gas the Kikes!” just as the post-prandial tin of Quality Street is passed around.

Now we cannot predict exactly when such an outrage will occur, only that it will, an attempt by one of the LNP dirty tricks cadres is always on the cards and is easily predictable by those who know what they are looking at.

https-blueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.comuploadscardimage28005522487be77bfe44bbbe5db46dc7a57406
Get your conservative war bonnet while stocks last

Nor can we predict the exact form the fascist faux pas will take; we live in an age of advanced technology and instant communication, perhaps one of the state organisers will be gulled into appearing on an edgy Alt-Right web radio show?

Maybe the interloper will make it all the way to pre-selection before flipping his wig at the rostrum, calling for the death penalty for buggers and blaming the outburst on a mix-up in his medication?

At any minute their movement will be convulsed in collective outrage as, somewhere, the Manchurian Candidate programming of one of the many sideshow freaks likely embedded in their meetings will kick in and he will spring bolt upright screaming “Gas the Kikes!” just as the post-prandial tin of Quality Street is passed around.

Some of the other dramatis personae beloved of the sponsored counter-gang bosses are the “Racist with an Asian wife and children”, the “Redneck with undisclosed indigenous heritage” and the unassailable narrative figure of the “Islamophobe who loves Israel”.

Yes, what they lack in imagination the movement wreckers make up for in sheer dogged determination and the infinite amounts of abuse and invective they are able to tolerate before being cycled out of circulation and shelved for future projects.

The amazing thing is that there does not seem to be a lot of money in the venture for the sponsored interlopers and their handlers, which leads us to the conclusion that, perhaps, the wreckers are cultivated by astute, yet fanatical minions of the political class who can spot a pathological narcissist, or borderline personality case a mile off.

nedjpg-67c33c_1280w
Conservatives are usually only one doodly away from a meltdown

We have discussed this theory with our readers before, the fact is though that well-organised groups of any kind, but political groups, in particular, attract more than their fair share of people with anti-social personality disorders.

It is no wonder then that so many of the known political wreckers check all the boxes for these infirmities of the mind; many of them are loquacious, brash and even charming but beneath the thin facade of their adopted personae we can glimpse the howling void of emptiness at the core of all such people.

Nationalists are experienced at detecting and repelling sociopaths and serial pests, simply because we have historically been the prime targets of every manifestation of these dirty tricks campaigns, we sincerely doubt, though, that the type of person likely to be attracted to the Australian Conservatives, its office holders and principals will be so streetwise.

In any event, we hereby make the prediction that Bernardi’s outfit will be embroiled in one of these staged scandals and that it will likely be a watershed for his movement in that they will waste their resources putting out spot fires of “extremism” until the ultimate dissolution of their party and the re-absorption of its members into the LNP base.

Don’t ever go against the family Cory.

hanson bernardi
An ominous greeting

 

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

What do you do with the UPF? If you’re Facebook, you shut down their main page. So what do THEY then do? They migrate as much Zionist supporting material as they can to sister pages and to their Reclaim Australia – West Australia Rally page.

In every quote to the media, however, you will find their leadership claiming to be ‘nationalist’ and not ‘patriot’ which is such a conscious delineation that its intention is coldly clear to true Australian nationalists.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

On the same page (RA-WA) you will find a link to a True Blue Crew flag march where Whiteness is heavily emphasised. Then it’s back to the kosher meal of every possible Zionist-related entity they chug up – Britain First and Tommy Robinson shares right there in among them.

Well, they know by now; surely they aren’t naive. They know that promoting ultra-Zionists like Avi Yemini is a contradiction in terms to the single-minded cause of fighting Islamic extremism. Ultra-Zionists like Avi and his fellow countrymen create such extremism. They do so both by having manufactured ISIS, so as to pit them against the unfriendly Moslems on their list – and by continually stoking bloody conflict in the region.

The perennial program of destabilisation establishes a power balance that benefits the security of the state of Israel and services whatever objectives its allies may have in the region. But it also does something else – and has done so since the 1970s – it creates a mass migration of Middle Easterners into Australia.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

What does this portend for the ‘nationalism’ that they claim to be championing, having knowingly appropriated the term from staunch supporters of a new White Australia Policy? It kills it because those same Zionists do everything possible to eradicate such nationalist beliefs. They do more though — they align with the Left to attack serious nationalists such as we saw recently with Fairfax’s criminal toll Luke McMahon, who is known to have ties with Zionist-convert Neil Erikson.

Erikson, along with Nick Folkes, Howard Crawford, Scott Moerland and others have campaigned heavily against true nationalists. We are not at all surprised to find the UPF making the self-defeating move to once again associate with these cagey globalists in the hope of puffing up their waning profile.

Thus, nationalists for a White Australia become treated worse than kiddy fiddlers, and the planes keep flying more and more Indians, Chinese, Africans and MOSLEMS from the Middle East. The cathartic activity of stoking enmity against Islam merely gives a moral license to our globalist government to support military crimes in the Middle East which benefit Israel.

In this battle, all those values that Australians regarded as part of their birthright are trampled on. Zionists in Australia, while demanding racial and religious homogeneity at home, are forever insisting on total diversity for Australia and all White countries.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

This diversity has transformed our cities into utterly foreign destinations. The quarter-acre home has been replaced by towering (shoddily built) concrete toolboxes crammed with Chinese and Indians; the odour of their spicy cooking permeating the streets.

Australia needs reclaiming from all of this, not just one particular branch of this allegedly diverse community.

It is not the Indians, Africans, or Chinese who are losing their identities. They’ve never had it so sweet. While White Australians are slowly being discouraged from even considering ourselves Australian, this new population get dual identities. They get to be Indian AND Australian; they get to be African AND Australian, and they get to be Chinese AND Australian.

Islam is just a symptom of this single world government that has its master Zionist America. But while all these terms we throw about ‘Zionist’ ‘civic patriot’ and whatever might confuse the casual punter it is all quite simple. Unless you live in one of those last posts White Australian areas that are only ‘gradually’ being de-Europeanised you only have to take a walk, open your eyes, and smell the pungent waft of curry.

What difference does Islam make if – in the highly improbable event of removing it – you do so only to find yourself a stranger in your own country, shivering and alone among a new population of aliens? What will you reclaim then?

Wake up to the Zionists — you are being used.

C1ePePgVEAAVEM4
Avi Yemini, the ultra-Zionist who is now the darling of the civic patriots now calling themselves Australian ‘nationalists’

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

Enthusiastically waiting to see your enemy’s name appear in the obituary is, perhaps, something a Seinfeld episode should have tackled. But in absence of a half-hour sitcom mocking the ethics of such a scene comes our rather blunt desire to see in big, beautiful text the confirmation of conservatism’s departure from this world for good.

And it would be a mercy. The ideological vagrant of the modern era is in agony; a shadow of its former self that, in losing its mental faculties gave us the playbook for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation; in losing control of its bowels gave us the Party for Freedom to clean up; and in its jittered ramblings at night gave us the Patriot’s Poet to, well, laugh at. And why wouldn’t we laugh?

Who would have thought that acquiring oriental wives, rampant alcoholism and aimlessly flying the Star of David would in any way forms the face of modern conservatism – that safeguard of traditionalism? In a way that says more about the progressive left if this is the standard an acceptable alternative is held to, but nonetheless, we diagnose cancer as cancer when we see it.

As befitting of an extended life, however, conservatism is a broad grouping of ideas and practices that through the centuries melded into particular localities and built up its own organic character.

Before the Tories of the U.K. and the Republicans of the US succumbed to the dreariness of the modern world and became the stock-standard “centre-right” parties – which plague our present-day political institutions with equal parts boredom and treason – there was, if only from a historical standpoint, more character and life prevalent in the internal workings of the party and its duties within the country.

Such a thing can be admitted without the analysing of the good or ill that became of these entities. Suffice to say that compared to its modern manifestation there was something that, from our perspective, draws less ire than the present set against the historic backdrop of actual traditionalism holding ground.

Though conservatism is a term seldom used as the main grouping of its constituent factions, it is the college where civic nationalists, patriots and other assorted fruit loops graduated from even though they try to paint themselves in a different light. As the main tributary, it is conservatism, particularly in regards to combatting the progressive left over the prominent issue of Islam and the extreme end of identity politics, that guides the more hard-line, right-wing groups.

By our standards, they are in their formulation reactionary without the reaction. The scattering of conservatism in Australia is less a developed ideology but rather pub-banter that became a little too rowdy.

Their analysis of a world gone awry fuelled their febrile imagination. Islam, the left, and the agreement that the Liberals had betrayed the core tenets of conservatism amounted to a call to arms of an invigorated force to take to the streets. Through its brief public rallies and continued online presence, it revealed to be inept at forming any manner of lasting policy that actually worked for the best interests of this country. Its tenure among our acceptance went from weak to its now non-existent status.

So when will it die?

The ideas of man are invested with his own similarity, and an idea’s death follows a metaphysical equivalent of the biological process whereby the cessation of its vital functions leads to its absolute end.

The conservative has sealed his own fate because while he sees the nation as the vital organ he refuses, to his fatal detriment, to recognise the nation as the culmination of race and culture; not cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism and every perversion betwixt which he defends and fruitlessly tries to tame in order to avoid the baneful accusation of racism.

It is ironical that conservatives ultimately laud the version of our nation that was designed by their apparent enemies on the left. For what else is the presentation of the 21st century, multicultural Australia but the great fantasy of progressives as the first stage of removing the nation state and its racial identity?

Indeed its days are numbered but there are no doubts conservatism’s last moments will be messy, and there’s no telling what yet-to-be-revealed horrors will spew forth from its ideological orifices in a last attempt to show there’s life in it.

In these times it won’t be bothered to keep up the façade there’s any real difference between itself and the left, but will instead – as we have seen – go after the force that exposed and systemically broke down its lies: Nationalism. It is Nationalism which remains the inextinguishable light of reason.

Its pillars are unchanging. Its leaders – both here and abroad in friendly movements – are some of the most besmirched figures in existence and yet remain defiant to their ideals.

As the leaders of fake conservatism rot, the former adherents to such leeches will atone for their misguidance by embracing Nationalism, in fact, they will realise it was what they were after all along: a place to call home among their own people.

God willing, here is another nail in the coffin of the unconvinced as to why our expedient wish for the demise of conservatism and its inbred children is not morbid gossip, nor a critique for the sake of a critique, nor a selfish ruse on our behalf, but a necessity on which the termination of this foul parasite can allow our own ideals to truly flourish; where those ideals are that of the nationhood of Australia: an Australia that lives up to its historic creation as a nation built by the White man and for the sake of the White man.

oie_qPhWNDomOMRR

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

If anything distinguishes those civic patriots on the right from us radical nationalists it is by whom we are most attacked.

In the case of the civics, they are dogged by what we collectively term ‘the left’, while radical nationalists, who occupy a third position on the political spectrum cop the most grief from either the civic patriots or those in the conservative camp.

Bear in mind that ‘the left’ is as eclectic when it comes to issues, identity, philosophy, and strategy as ‘the right’.

The left wants the patriot movement dispersed while the conservatives aim to drive away radical nationalists so they can inhabit our political ground and remodel it in their crypto-globalist image.

This is a curious fact that allows us to discuss a couple of cases in point. Let us begin with what some of those from the civic patriot side of the quadrangle contend with in their present day ‘clicktivism’. This essay shall be in two parts on account of its length and the dedication required to each of its players.

1. THE PATRIOT ACTORS AND THE COMBATANTS OF THE LEFT

There is a particularly malicious element at play among those who oppose the growth of the patriots. They view patriots as more of a concern than the nationalist movement given its mainstream accessibility. On that side, the Bogan element is mocked by those who are their mirror image with one factor separating them by the slimmest degree: the perception of their engaging in ‘racism’. This is, despite the ambiguity on the question of race amplified in the patriot fold.

Nationalists define Australianness as being of White European stock, as opposed to Aborigines. Patriots, who misuse the term nationalism understanding it not, and often deliberately misappropriating it, are nebulous in their definition of an Australian. Many are in mixed-race relationships and as such loath the absolutism of nationalism which would exclude them on the grounds of breaching its inviolate precepts.

However, it is important in the propaganda war of those conflicting with the anti-Islam movement to lump each in the same basket and defame both they and nationalists, as ‘Nazis’; which is like calling all socialists Marxists or anarchists communists. The Nazi tag is meant to invoke images of state organised terror that would ensue if these groups are allowed to put down political roots in the community.

In the lexicon of those of the left, patriots are ‘potatriots’, a witticism intended to disdain that group as ‘potato heads’. This is a derisive term that was originally applied to skinheads. Since the advent of the Reclaim Australia movement, which is almost exclusively dramatized on Facebook, a number of pages and counter-identities have sprung up to oppose the patriot pages and the groups that employ them.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

But virtue is subjective in this day and age when that moral asset is destroying the west. Opposition to Islam is the kindling of the realisation something is amiss. Australians are being de-culturized while globalism is dialectically re-culturizing us with a religion that negates the very tenets underpinning the idea of universal equality at play. Both are at the mercy of the culturally vacuous reality of globalism.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113
Alex Gollan, the assistant school principal and anti-fascist anarchist who ran the ‘anti-bogan’ word press site and was arrested for bulk kiddie porn

This is visible nowhere better than on those oppositional pages, which we mentioned. This genre has no purpose other than to negate. They do not attempt to counter ‘potatriot’ messages by promoting their own positive counter-messages they literally take the aforementioned messages and desecrate them. There is no intellectual component at play in the deconstruction of the patriot message. Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is a sledgehammer used to beat down the message and the messenger so that the mission becomes personal.

A very telling post occurred on one such page with a prominent leftist troll, “Can’t we just kill them [patriots] all?” The admin replied, “No, because then we would be Nazis.”
Disregarding the fact that had that comment been made on a nationalist page it would have been hidden or removed, it is a very instructive insight into both the pathology of the poster and the counter movement. The duplicitous essence of it is summed up in the gag, “We’re starting a war for peace.”

The assumed virtue of the poster is instantly invalidated by the revelation of this tyrannical instinct.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

This is, however, but one example. Narrowed down to a central theme outside of ‘race’ is the implication that patriots will potentially auger in a dictatorial system reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, the calls for an authoritarian response to the patriots are constant on the sample page we have used for our study.

There are flippant, but often sincere calls for patriots to be pursued by ASIO, or to be charged with offences that — were they on the other foot — would be vehemently contested as breaches of civil liberties. So we come to the actors or combatants, and here we shall actually name some.

Smith
Pete Smith from Melbourne, heavily active on Facebook, is linked to Antifascist Action Sydney and other ‘anarchist’ pages

 

We have had correspondence with a few members of the patriot movement, putting aside our ideological differences, keen to highlight certain combatants and the disreputable methods they have employed to target one or other of the patriot actors.

One, in particular, has been defamed over and over by combatants using various Facebook identities and private messaging the patriot actor we shall call ‘Mark’.

Mark is being consistently vilified as a person of heinous substance and the nature of the slander has transcended any honourable intent. The attacks led to the hostilities emerging from a social media setting and into the corporeal world when the authorities were involved. Mark is not alone in these vicious online assaults but his example is notable.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

So, who is behind these assaults on Mark’s character? Here, we merely repeat what he believes: John Linden Faulkner. But we also mention two others, Alex Gollan and David Hollis.

download (3)
Sydney’s Tayce Brown, shoplifter, hair stylist to the scabby, and a real skank

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This blog, as in others we’ve mentioned, is a flagrant vehicle to attack political opponents. Faulkner and Gollan are said to have co-administrated the site. Gollan, a former assistant school principal has since disappeared from ‘anti-fascist’ activities after being charged with child-sex offences.

Faulkner, who Mark and others believe to be behind a series of online profiles identifiable by their malevolence, has a criminal past to make anyone suddenly hosting him start eyeing the nearest exit. Faulkner was imprisoned for nine years for armed robberies in which women were his soft targets. He appealed his sentence as harsh, but in doing so was told it was actually lenient under the circumstances.

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This week [originally posted on Facebook March 11] , it was revealed that David Albain Hollis, the man in the red ‘Truth’ cap who accompanied Sue Munro to the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court to spy on the Bendigo Three’s supporters — and who appeared in an opportunistic pic with John Safran taken on the day — went on a “stabbing spree” in 1991, knifing seven people one of whom later died.

Hollis served only 17 months in jail on the grounds of diminished responsibility as he was in the throes of a “psychotic episode”, although how that should mitigate anything so appalling we do not know.

There are other cases on that extreme left of the bench such as Tayce Brown of Antifascist Action Sydney whose conduct and lifestyle are such that she would be considered a habitual criminal outside of the political activist underworld.

The radical left is sure something — in a world inhabited by junkies, thugs, hookers, thieves, and ex-murderers does becoming ‘anti-racist’ mean atoning for dissolute, wasted lives. Does championing the ‘other’ allow them to graduate from their moral squalor merely on the basis they aren’t racist? We are not psychologists, and this is not a forensic examination, but the pattern cannot be ignored.

Bear in mind, Blair Cottrell was confronted with a video created inside the correctional system while he was doing time for a crime of passion. He never killed anyone, nor caused anyone harm. What of these three? All fall into the very worst categories, and all comport themselves on social media in a manner that delegitimizes any hypothetical argument they believe they have concerning right and wrong.

If Faulkner is behind this campaign of defamation and stalking against Mark, then it appears that he has in no way left behind his violent past, but merely justified it in the context of the political theatre. He has reinvented himself as the ‘good guy’ and deemed those patriot actors as ‘bad guys’ in a morality play where his own contaminated ethics are masked by a blindness born of criminal denial.

In our next article, we will turn the focus on the patriots, who are to nationalists what the leftists we have described here have been to them.

oie_DqksmJ43gaGr
Anarchist Psycho