EVERYONE IS A NAZI NOW – THE NEVER ENDING CONSERVATIVE SUBTERFUGE OF NATIONALISM

EVERYONE IS A NAZI NOW – THE NEVER ENDING CONSERVATIVE SUBTERFUGE OF NATIONALISM

BACK IN 2015, the bulk of the patriot movement was dodging any accusation they might be ‘racist’ in the hope of garnering widespread acceptance. The Nazis were infiltrating Reclaim Australia, or so they complained.

But the civic patriots who gathered at rallies in Australian cities weren’t about White supremacy or worshipping Hitler, which they believed were synonymous. No, they were a mainstream movement where anyone was welcome so long as they ‘accepted our values’ and abided by ‘our laws’. It was a refrain coming loudest from the queen of civic patriots, Pauline Hanson, who pushed smiling media opportunities with African children. She even forged a slogan saying ‘You don’t have to be White to be Australian’.

Hanson had more to gain from this mainstreaming scam than anyone since it was her that 90% of the civic movement was throwing their support behind.

Steps were taken to oust persons whose views ran contrary to an acceptance of diversity minus Islam. What “our values” happened to be was never satisfactorily defined except broadly as ‘Christian values’. This vagueness was not resident purely in the rhetoric but in the construction of these allegedly ‘patriot’ groups.

Israeli flags flapped alongside the Southern Cross at counter-demonstrated rallies. Inscribed into the core policies of civic patriot micro parties like the Australian Liberty Alliance and Danny Nalliah’s Rise Up Australia was a fundamental support for the State of Israel. Remember, these others were founded on the pretext of a pro-Australian locus yet here they were concerning themselves with a foreign nation embroiled in the military intrigues of the Middle East generating the flow of displaced Moslems which they objected to in the first place. Thus, it was never Australianness they were demonstrating for, but something that the rank and file would never be sufficiently able to articulate, much less understand.

Arch-Zionist Avi Yemini was raised as an orthodox Jew who wasn’t allowed to mingle with Aussie kids. Now he is the duck’s guts of the anti-Islam movement personifying for many disenfranchised patriots these nebulous ‘Aussie values’ while facilitating members of his gym to go and kill Palestinians for Israel. Yemini is the leftover from a milieu which has experienced a cosmic shift since Reclaim Australia activity generated clickbait. He came in almost as if he was selected by forces unknown to challenge Blair Cottrell for the position of patriot leader. It was Liberal Party’s grubby hack man Howard Crawford who cited Jim Saleam and Blair Cottrell as being the two “biggest threats” to conservatism.

Hanson had more to gain from this mainstreaming scam than anyone since it was her that 90% of the civic movement was throwing their support behind.

Styling himself as spokesman for Australian patriotism, he is actually saying that we as a nation are just a strand of a Western Alliance centred around his beloved Israel and to not face up to that is somehow unpatriotic. To show patriotism to this country means loyalty to the ends and purposes of the Western Alliance currently ganging up on Syria and Iran.

Yemini’s Facebook page boasts hundreds of thousands of followers, while he commands a presence in conservative media like the Daily Mail and Sky News; the latter on which he recently appeared drumming up membership to get the ALA, for which he is now a leading member, registered in Victoria in time for the elections. Avi might be in Tel Aviv one minute, and West Australia the next. Just quietly, it wouldn’t surprise us if he is being bankrolled by the Mossad.

hasnon
Australianness is a simple matter of values, not skin colour, sez Pauline

Yet, in the maelstrom of that ambiguous crossover that always existed between the groups who staunchly supported Israel, and those claiming to be mainstreaming as a strategy, the vociferous kosher patriots have dwindled. With the influence of the Alt-Right, which protagonists from the anti-Islam movement latched onto, it’s not so cool to back Israel now. It’s much more fashionable to come across ‘edgy fash’. Today, even Nick Folkes is a Nazi. Yesterday, he was burning Nazi flags. The component of this alleged ‘Nazism’, the identitarian aspect of asserting Whiteness is the entire vogue whereas only a couple of years ago Pauline was, as we have said, telling us we don’t have to be White to be Australian. Her message was backed up by the same people now professing to be all about ‘the White race’.

Shermon Burgess, when teamed up with fellow political wrecking ball Neil Erikson, produced videos purportedly exposing their fellow comrades from the defunct UPF as ‘Nazis’. Burgess even made a video recommending White Australian men sleep with Asian women because according to him they made better wives.

Now, Shermon has created another of his endless Facebook pages, one of which is ‘No More White Guilt’. He is also associated with former Party for Freedom stalwarts Toby Cook, Matt Lowe and Chris Grantham in a new entity the name of which we won’t even bother including since it will have changed by next week. But all of these people were fervently ‘anti-Nazi’ and PfF made a major campaign out of smearing Australia First Party leader Jim Saleam as a Nazi and burned a Nazi battle flag outside of the party’s Tempe headquarters in 2016. Several names were symbolically listed on that flag including United Nationalists Australia.

Shermon Burgess, when teamed up with fellow political wrecking ball Neil Erikson, produced videos purportedly exposing their fellow comrades from the defunct UPF as ‘Nazis’.

But who were these Nazis so deplored? In fact, Australian Nationalists who opposed the globalist imposition of mass-immigration of non-Whites leading to population replacement of Australians were primarily in the crosshairs of these civic patriots. They opposed only Moslem immigration and then only if they did not “assimilate”. It was, to anyone gifted with logic and reason, an inexplicable position.

Meanwhile, also in their crosshairs but avoiding Australian Nationalists for the same reason was the United Patriots Front. Between the leadership of UPF, specifically Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell, a channel was open to veteran nationalists via, among others, the Whitelaw Towers’ blog and Nationalist Alternative.

UPF steve
Mainstreaming puts non-Whites first for cunning strategic reasons which have something to do with fooling “the masses”

Chief among these communicating was Neil Erikson, the harbinger of disharmony, who would later crucify online just about anybody serious who he had associations with. Likewise, despite the advice and encouragement received from the Nationalists, the United Patriots Front’s Blair and Tom treated us as if we had herpes. They much preferred to be photographed ‘getting along’ with people of colour than being seen with anyone known to be an Australian Nationalist, or the more generic White Nationalist.

They would say this was for ‘strategic reasons’. If they had the capacity to listen and learn instead of dictate they might have been able to absorb that this was a doomed approach. We said so then and we were proved right when their political entity Fortitude crashed and burned like the African space program. Yet, where arrogance and inexperience were UPF’s fault, the others with whom they now sat uneasily in a bloc with, something else altogether was happening.

As far as they were concerned, Australia First Party had failed under Jim Saleam, they were too old, and Blair has a special contempt for Nationalist Alternative the origins of which are obscure. Their bias continues today, but they are joined by equally domineering upstarts, who believe ‘they’ and only ‘they’ are right despite being neophytes and not understanding the history, aims of, and essential tenets of Australian Nationalism.

Meanwhile, also in their crosshairs but avoiding Australian Nationalists for the same reason was the United Patriots Front. Between the leadership of UPF, specifically Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell, a channel was open to veteran nationalists via, among others, the Whitelaw Towers’ blog and Nationalist Alternative.

Thus, they argue, their latest manifestation, The Lads Society, is the only viable organisation for ‘young’ White Australians and others. And the emphasis is most definitely on ‘young’ but we’ll get to that in due course. They are joined by another exclusively young set, which is doing everything possible to provide authorities with an excuse to outlaw them as a terrorist group, The Antipodeans.

It’s a sign of the times that much of the dark humour that resides in The Antipodean’s propaganda materials are now regarded with fear and loathing. About 50 years ago, chuckle magazines like National Lampoon were cracking up a generation with tasteless material that helped shape the funny bone of the times. They were not afraid to touch on race either and frequently did. Posters such as the one in which The Antipodeans would “Legalise the execution of Jews” would’ve slipped in there no worries. But it’s a big ask to expect the Australian people to swallow the thought of killing any group of people even if it is said in a satirical manner calculated to deliberately upset and shock.

images
There’s always somebody who’ll be silly enough to do it

A major hypocrisy exists with Julie Nathan, research officer with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry condemning them in the name of Jews when Israel’s Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef referred to black people as ‘monkeys’, and for many Jewish people, the feeling against non-Jews is one of unconcealed contempt. It certainly is for the Palestinians and others of their neighbours. UNA views the model these boys have based themselves on and sees them speeding headlong into a disaster which will blow back on anyone even six-degrees separated from them.

IsraeliHumiliatesAfrican.jpg
An Israeli citizen drags a black by his hair and takes a selfie with the “monkey”. But oi vey, what about the Holocaust says the ECAJ

Nevertheless, the point is made that ‘the movement’ as elements of this melange of rightist entities refers to its associations, is now all ‘Nazi’. We use that term advisedly. The non-racialists are now touting racialist sentiments, even if only obliquely at times, while this appears to be a change it is in fact not; it’s just that the Liberal party connections behind the curtain have decided to absorb the ‘Alt-Right’ the same way they jumped on board Reclaim Australia the moment it got going and steered it on a course towards kosher patriotism. We are not suggesting they influence every entity but they are sure trying to. Right now, the Lads Society is firmly in their sights, only the leadership of that group is too stubborn to heed a word the veteran nationalists have to say; dismissing it as anything but what it is.

In Sydney, they already have a foot through the door with the appointment of Mark “matey mate” McDonald, ex-cohort of Howard Crawford and still, from what we guarantee, moving in murky Liberal-connected circles. If you know your Aussie Nationalist history, you will recognise this is not a fanciful conspiracy theory but a time-honoured strategy.

A major hypocrisy exists with Julie Nathan, research officer with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry condemning them in the name of Jews when Israel’s Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef referred to black people as ‘monkeys’, and for many Jewish people, the feeling against non-Jews is one of unconcealed contempt.

Rather than rewrite this history from the 1960s to the 2000s we include here a link to Kangaroo Reich which details the curious early history of the Liberal Party “rubbing up against the so-called National Socialist Party of Australia (NSPA)”.

It mentions certain names that are still ghosting in the shadows today, hovering on the fringes, and coveting groups such as The Lads Society. And it’s noteworthy that all of these entities of what we shall refer to as an Alt-Right oeuvre discuss among themselves “infiltrating” parties and institutions without realising it is they are most likely to be, and in fact are being, infiltrated themselves.

Familiarity with the Australian far-right’s history helps you see how back in the day when the Liberal Party flirted with neo-Nazis because they were anti-communist in character, these days they wish to direct them into the conservative current or render them inoperable. And this is why it is only ever true Nationalism that is constantly coming under attack as these operatives infiltrate and use these groups as weapons with which to attack the established Nationalists. The one thing that is unacceptable to the Western Alliance is a truly nationalised Australia.

This is why it confounds us that many young blokes of the Alt-Right still keep a foot in the Young Liberal camp. How could they want to? Is it the old familiar line about changing from within, for it is those fools who are the ones to get changed?

Everything on the fringes is something else, or up to something else. For instance, there can be little doubt remaining to all but the unreachable that Neil Erikson is collaborating, in whatever manner, with the authorities. How so? None of his shenanigans, nothing he has to say is either consistent with a political line or true to an ideology. His are just utterances of a conservative style that are simply negation.

Rather than rewrite this history from the 1960s to the 2000s we include here a link to Kangaroo Reich which details the curious early history of the Liberal Party “rubbing up against the so-called National Socialist Party of Australia (NSPA)”.

Arthur Conan Doyle, who created Sherlock Holmes, wrote: “Eliminate the impossible, and whatever remaining, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”

This is a valuable rule when dealing with the hucksters, dupe-merchants, swindlers and hacks that appear in the topography whenever anything vaguely resembling the Nationalistic arises. Indeed, they are much happier with Neo-Nazis since they so easily play into the narrative that serves both the system and its Zionist beneficiaries of this ‘menace’ which they can point at.

Nothing that offers a hope of change exists in those fetishists who are more concerned with mimicking a uniform and profess to ‘White Nationalism’ above nativism. Take for instance Robert Edhouse and Melony Atwood. Robert, who once went under the name Mathew Collins, visited the United States and was granted permission by Aryan Nations to set up a “chapter” here.

This was not a Nationalist entity but a gang. And what did this fervent ally of the White Race do? He conspired with Atwood, his lover, to murder Atwood’s 42-year-old husband, Alan Taylor while living under his roof.

Taylor was a hard-working White Man with a young son by Atwood. He was murdered for a one-million-dollar life insurance policy he supposedly held. Now they’re both serving minimum terms of 21 years. Atwood will be a scarecrow by the time she is released and Edhouse an institutionalised old man.

Arthur Conan Doyle, who created Sherlock Holmes, wrote: “Eliminate the impossible, and whatever remaining, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”

All of this noise around the fringes of Nationalism keeps the real thing from spreading. So rather than accept the tenets of Australian Nationalism those who cannot fulfil its needs bitch and gripe that certain people “think they make the rules”. The rules are tenets and those tenets exist independent of those persons who for one reason or another do not seem to be able to live up to them. So in a rash fit, they simply steal the word ‘Nationalism’ and remodel it into their own identitarian image.

United Nationalists Australia was conceived back in 2016 as an antidote to this violation of our ideology. It came ahead of the anticipated Coalition of Australian Nationalists (CAN). It envisaged a Fortress Nationalism fortified against these unsavoury elements. But nothing came of it. It was immediately undermined by those elements we’ve described that still resided in one or more of those parties involved. It rotted from the inside before it ever ripened. Then, to the horror of UNA, Nationalist Alternative not only never had our back, but they actually threw their support behind Blair Cottrell, of all people; a kid with absolutely no respect for anybody else. This mistake has left the house of Nationalism in disarray.

But that is just for now since identitarian is the flavour of the month. Those young folk who have pledged themselves to certain fraternities masquerading as ‘societies’, which are in fact just club life, risk being set on the wrong path forever, winding back the true cause at least another ten years. Presumably, there’ll be new Liberal agents waiting in the bracken for when that time comes.

One thing is for sure, the anarchists and anti-fascists who so love to quote the others have never and will never reference our commentaries on this link to the conservatives. In some cases, there is an overlap, as the aforementioned are only half of the enemy. The Nationalist finds himself burned by conservatives only too happy to utilize these agencies of the state against him.

Palmerr
David Palmer, one of the earliest to subvert the Nationalist Movement (see Kangaroo Reich link)

 

ANZAC DAY – A REASON TO WHINGE FOR SOME AND AN EXCUSE FOR A PISS-UP TO OTHERS

ANZAC DAY – A REASON TO WHINGE FOR SOME AND AN EXCUSE FOR A PISS-UP TO OTHERS

We are not sure, and we were never actually there ourselves, but we’re fairly certain that the poor Anzacs waiting to be shredded piecemeal by Turk artillery while landing at Anzac Cove in the twilight of the 25th of April, 1915, weren’t sucking on tinnies of VB.

Thus, this tradition of getting pissed at six in the am on this period of national commemoration has more than a hint of Melbourne Cup Day about it. Nonetheless, those who made it back from that disastrous landing courtesy of the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, were no doubt in need of strong drink for the rest of their lives.

Anzac Day has been used as a pawn in the culture wars by those on the bourgeois liberal left fond of attacking national-spirited notches on the calendar, and by the government, marching in step with the internationalist agenda.

This year the whole parade has turned limp-wristed by inexplicably making it about women. Next year it might about gays or Rohingya refugees, but this year women are to march up the front while those regrettable specimens of Australian manhood must follow in their saintly shadow with heads bowed and any signifiers of masculinity kept out of sight. We’re grateful for the nurses that served, mind you, but we’ll be crocked if we’ll concede the entire Anzac Day over to a feminist narrative just because the army has turned so PC you could plug it in and surf the internet. Only recently they were trying to fish out servicemen who weren’t supporters of homosexual marriage, and now they want to ban ‘death symbols’ from being displayed on military hardware, despite the fact a smiley face stencilled on the side of a tank would seem way more jarring.

The majority of women who join the army can’t even make it through basic training but they expect us to cop this?

As Nationalists, we acknowledge the spirit of Anzac Day and defend it staunchly from those who would desecrate this National holiday with their identity politics. But we will not allow the globalist government, whoever they are to dictate its meaning to us. For they already try and have us believe that Australia Day is all about celebrating everything non-Australian. Likewise, they use Anzac Day to promote a false spirit of ‘service’ to foreign powers, to die for conflicts far removed from the interests of Australia.

Anzac Day has been used as a pawn in the culture wars by those on the bourgeois liberal left fond of attacking national-spirited notches on the calendar, and by the government, marching in step with the internationalist agenda.

Over a century has passed since the landing at Anzac Cove, a conflict between European empires triggered when an Austrian Archduke was shot by a Bosnian Serb and England got involved because Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia and Germany marched into Belgium threatening the Frogs. It was all riveting stuff and fairly typical of Europe up to that point in history.

Australians had no business in that war, but we were drawn in using the patriotic propaganda of Empire and a genuine sense of duty. In fact, the nation threw itself into the cause with gusto and the average bloke viewed it as an adventure, at a time when ideals were sharpened by romanticism and the national identity was still shackled to the concept of colony and motherland. Also, as with nearly all wars, there was the mistaken belief that it would all be over by Christmas. But it soon became clear this was no Boys’ Own adventure but a massacre. At that time, Australia was a paltry population of five million. Nearly five-hundred thousand enlisted with a loss of 60,000 and 156,000 wounded or taken prisoner.

71-gallipoliposter

From fervent allies of mother England, the spirit soured. As men were minced up on the battlefields of France etcetera England put pressure on Australians, now more reluctant to join the conflict, to introduce conscription. A plebiscite on the issue was twice defeated and resulted in queer fish Billy Hughes being turfed out of the Labor party.

Australia was not a paradise following the end of WW1. Those men who returned were broken physically and mentally and many of them turned to alcohol and crime. Indeed, during this period the rate of crime trebled. The social impact was monstrous as the pain of the generation that fought was passed onto their sons who were in turn born into trauma.

Anzac Day is, in reality, about acknowledging the sacrifices of Australians in all different foreign conflicts, from WW1 to Afghanistan, and if the globalists have their way, we’ll soon be serving an evil alliance as it aims to tear apart Syria and install an Israeli puppet as head of state. For this has been the sad fact of all these ‘sacrifices’ and all this service – with the exception of what was derisively called our ‘chocolate soldiers’, who were, in fact, our Kokoda heroes, we fought the one war in which our nation was truly endangered; the war against Japan.

The majority of women who join the army can’t even make it through basic training but they expect us to cop this?

This fact of the glorified military history seems to overlook our Kokoda heroes in favour of those who have ‘served’ globalist adventures.

Australia had no business shooting at the Boers, or backing England in suppressing the Boxer Rebellion or fighting in Korea, or Vietnam, or Afghanistan and so on. We did so because we’re part of a global gang whose interests our sons’ blood is spilt is never ours.

The meaning of Anzac Day, to Nationalists, is, therefore, a sober meditation on the idea of an Australia independent from being forced to sacrifice our own for the goals of overseas powers, or by “serving” in an auxiliary capacity a superpower protector.

As this author types these words, the sound of young people partying fills the cool midnight air. They are loud, and they are clearly not in a sombre, reflective mood. Earlier he passed a nightclub which was unusually busy with a queue of White Australian youth stretching down the street from the bollards and rope at the doors where they had to show ID to bouncers so they can get inside and join a debauched bash with DJs and scantily clad girls.

To them, Anzac Day is a day off – a day to get wrecked. To others, who’ll be awake for the service, they fly the Aussie flag because that’s what they’re supposed to do, just like at Christmas when they’re expected to put up a tree and decorate it with tinsel. They would be offended at Nationalist suggestions that there is a falsehood to the mainstream narrative of Anzac Day, as they watch the prescribed parade, hit the early opening bars and get next to anyone who looks like a legitimate serviceman so they can exaggerate whatever military credentials or legacy they feel they can boast, play two-up, and basically adopt what they estimate is a patriotic mind-frame.

This fact of the glorified military history seems to overlook our Kokoda heroes in favour of those who have ‘served’ globalist adventures.

Attending a dawn service doesn’t make you a greater patriot than one who stays home and reads a little of the true cost of that war. It does not make you less of a Nationalist to join in either, that’s not what we’re saying. Our message is simply that the spirit of Anzac, enveloping as it does myths of heroism, mateship, and honour, qualities presumed to be in the national character, should also question our endless service to conflicts which are none of our affair, not in our national interest, and to which in the case of the Middle East and Vietnam the whole basis was morally flawed.

Once we get through that we can travel to the root of the idea of an independent Australia, and then, when we’ve found that we can rejoice in finally coming to recognise we are Australians, and not just part of a globalist franchise of multi-racial, multiculturalists whose blood is shed in the pursuance of the wealth of and the accretion of land and resources for a cabal of ugly bankers, industrialists, warmongers and Zionists.

4B8B6A6600000578-5655153-image-a-41_1524665479011.jpg
Cup day or Anzac day? Actually, believe it or not, it’s Anzac Day

 

SYRIA IS ISRAEL’S FLIGHT PATH TO WAR WITH IRAN VIA A HISTORY MUDDLED BY A DEMOCRAT BOOZEHOUND

SYRIA IS ISRAEL’S FLIGHT PATH TO WAR WITH IRAN VIA A HISTORY MUDDLED BY A DEMOCRAT BOOZEHOUND

History might very well be a broken record and it always seems to be one group of people who keep breaking it. In this case, it’s the unholy US-Israel alliance (with their unlikely ties to terrorist-financing Saudi Arabia) that is scratch-mixing it in a loop back-and-forth so that the same verse follows the same familiar chorus.

Last time it was Iraq and ‘Saddam Hussein’ who paid a hefty price for the blowback from the CIA’s covert funding of the Mujahideen thanks to a heavy boozing, womanising, and cocaine snorting Texas congressman named Charlie Wilson. The congressman had been to the refugee camps inside Pakistan in the early 1980s and its effect on him and others he was to take along as witnesses were profound.

It was through his subsequent lobbying along with a bible-bashing millionaire floozy from Houston named Joanne Herring (who he was banging on the side) together with a CIA spook named Gust Avrakotos who were able through strategic manipulation to amass from the US government the millions of dollars that would help the suffering people of Soviet-occupied Afghanistan “…do everything possible to kill Russians, as painfully as possible.”

11wilson_CA-popup
Charlie Wilson was literally gunning for Russia

That wasn’t such a bad thing from the Afghanis’ point of view since the Russkis were blowing the bejesus out of them. These sandaled peasants had only WW1 rifles to shoot back at Mil Mi-24 helicopters which the Russians used to pick them off like ducks at a shooting gallery. It was a turkey shoot.

The money bought Russian weapons from Israel which were funnelled through Pakistan and into the hands of the Mujahideen. Suddenly they weren’t trying to pop at the Russian helicopters with slings and arrows any longer but with stinger missiles and other high-grade military weaponry.

The money bought Russian weapons from Israel which were funnelled through Pakistan and into the hands of the Mujahideen. Suddenly they weren’t trying to pop at the Russian helicopters with slings and arrows any longer but with stinger missiles and other high-grade military weaponry.

By the end of the 1980s, the Soviets were driven out and that was all she wrote for communist Russia as the Soviet Union soon collapsed. For those who’d funded the Mujahideen rebels, it was yesterday’s news but not Charlie. He knew something dirty was coming since there had been no planning or financing for the aftermath. Afghanistan’s infrastructure was decimated; there were no schools, no hospitals, and no law.

This is where Osama bin Laden was able to slip into the void and seize control never having fired a single bullet against the Russians since the Yanks closed the bank and lost interest in Afghanistan. Frankly, their contribution hadn’t all been all in the name of Jesus and the brotherhood of man, but as a wily manoeuvre in their cold war against the Soviet Union.

images (1).jpg
Charlie Wilson (circled) with his Afghan pals and one of the stinger missiles his lobbying bought them

What’s interesting about Charlie Wilson is that he owed his position, and openly admitted so, to New York Jews who held the sway of his Democratic party. There were probably two Jews in his entire constituency. But Charlie was a big fan of Israel regardless and spurred on by a sense of unity with the “underdog” Israel in the Yom Kippur war of 1973 was responsible for jacking up US aid to Israel to a walloping $3 billion annually. Wilson was the total liberal, too, barracking for minority rights, women’s rights, and the inalienable right for Stan to have babies even though he can’t have babies which was nobody’s fault, not even the Romans.

Charlie is remembered as a hero and honoured with an award from the CIA. What has Charlie got to do with anything? Well, everything, and nothing. His good intentions aside it’s ironic that after all that through his efforts the Mujahedeen would come after his country as “the great Satan” and that over ten years later the home of the brave would be more-or-less occupying Afghanistan although not to spread communism.

The legacy of the freedom fighters would end up with the Twin Towers being taken down, 3000 Americans killed, and America’s fall guy in the Middle East, Saddam Hussein, being described as a “monster”, just as the dynastic heir to American Imperialist wrath, Bashar al-Assad, is today, and accused of gassing his own people. The US is lining up pawns against the Russians once more, and American money is buying arms that are being smuggled to Arabs who hate them so they can kill other Arabs who they hate even more. And those people are the enemies of Charlie’s beloved Israelites.

This is where Osama bin Laden was able to slip into the void and seize control never having fired a single bullet against the Russians since the Yanks closed the bank and lost interest in Afghanistan. Frankly, their contribution hadn’t been all in the name of Jesus and the brotherhood of man, but as a wily manoeuvre in their cold war against the Soviet Union.

Saddam Hussein had no “weapons of mass destruction” and the inspectors the UN insisted on sending in found jack. Again, they are calling for inspectors to go into Syria and look for Assad’s phantom stash and, well, as you’ve no doubt figured because you’re reading this page it is all a crock of horseshit.

This has about as much to do with chemical weapons as spark plugs have to do with dental hygiene. Iraq opened up a giant hole, one that was necessary for a regime change in order to weaken the region and destabilise surrounding states. The US desires Israel expand its territories according to the Yinon Plan and aid in the Balkanization of the Middle East. Saudi Arabia, which hates the US and Israel, loathes Shia Moslem Iran even more and so aids its enemies in isolating it.

download (2)
One thoroughly evil Zionist cunt

All sorts of other unbelievable shenanigans have gone on, too numerous and complex to go into, but to cut a long story short Iran was invited into Syria along with Russia to fight the Islamist terrorists who the US and Israel have assisted so they can topple Assad for the necessary expansion plans outlined above.

But this time Russia is not going to be so easily shuffled out. Whatever noble intentions Charlie Wilson may honestly have held there are none to be found anywhere in Trump’s camp which includes as National Security Advisor the insane neo-conservative Zionist war monger John Bolton whose entire career has been dedicated to bringing on World War 3; not to mention the bomb-happy US Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley whose soul is so dangerous to life on earth that it’s kept securely guarded at a top secret military complex deep in the Antarctic in case its darkness blots out the sun for eternity.

Yes, it’s history repeating, but whereas Wilson and his CIA cronies hid behind Pakistan, Egypt and Israel to fight their war against the Soviet Union now all the players are facing off squarely. It’s eyeball-to-eyeball stuff and if the world is to survive this it’ll all be down to who actually blinks first.

Israel wants after Iran to stem its growing influence and Russia has Iran’s back. It was John Bolton who a decade ago was agitating for a war against Iran led by Israel. Israel and Iran have already traded shots with a drone attack and an airstrike. The Zionists view Iran’s involvement in Syria as the place setting for a base of operations against Israel and the two are on the hair-trigger. If that happens, the US and Russia go to the mat, and that means a world-changing throw of a set of dice that might turn nuclear as the brinkmanship gets real.

oie_XPFB99YvxMWY

 

ARROGANCE BEGAT INSECURITY: A REPLY TO DR TIM SOUTPHOMMASANE

ARROGANCE BEGAT INSECURITY: A REPLY TO DR TIM SOUTPHOMMASANE

Australia’s Race Discrimination Commissioner Dr Tim Soutphommasane is not only an overpaid and under-talented diversity hire, he is also a weaver of bad fiction in support of his own, self-serving hoax narrative.

For a recent column in the Fairfax press, Dr Tim has cobbled together an extraordinary tale framing 2017 as a year which saw rising support for White supremacy, the mainstreaming of anti-immigrant politics and a resurgence of Neo-Nazism.

Yes, comrades, this painful screed is every bit as ridiculous as it sounds; if one-tenth of the commissioner’s mantra of rote-learned talking points bore any relationship to the real world then cosmopolitan, capitalist run Australia would be in serious trouble.

In the time-honoured Anti-Racist fashion, the commissioner seems to have written a list of everyone he hates, or who disagrees with the goals of globalist capitalism on his boardroom wall and wired together a schizophrenic narrative with push-pins and string, like some sweaty stalker out of a Hollywood movie.

Goodes-26-Jan_adj
Dr Tim attempting to absorb credibility through the armpit of celebrity activist Adam Goodes

Little of it makes sense to anyone who knows what they are looking at, Dr Tim writes of “Right-Wing Nationalism” as if it is an authentic political tendency; the reality is, of course, that few if any “Right Wingers” approve of the radical Nationalist program, preferring instead their attachments to Zionism and a version of multiculturalism which excludes Islam and Muslims.

This pig-headed refusal by Tim and his broader academic caste to look beyond the outdated binary view of politics has already made them into figures of fun; if there is an ascendant “Right Wing Nationalism” then according to that rigid worldview there must also be left and centrist versions, sadly for these blockheads no such tendencies exist.

In the time honoured Anti-Racist fashion the commissioner seems to have written a list of everyone he hates, or who disagrees with the goals of globalist capitalism on his boardroom wall and wired together a schizophrenic narrative with push-pins and string, like some sweaty stalker out of a Hollywood movie.

There are Right Wingers and Left Wingers along the mainstream political axis who all enthusiastically support the globalist capitalist programme of mobile Third World populations, totalitarian humanist equality for all and the replacement of the citizen with the atomised, unquestioning, apolitical consumer who is ruled by oligarchs and their bourgeoisie.

Nationalism, as we practice it is neither left nor right, what it truly represents is secession from cosmopolitanism, a rejection of the binary worldview with all its rigid conformity and ever-thickening tangle of artificial social mores and pedantic restrictions upon the liberty of the working classes.

Dr Tim wilfully misrepresents recent events in Europe and North America in his attempt to lull his readers into believing that, say, the mass actions surrounding Polish independence day, the electoral success of AFD in Germany and the ill-fated Unite The Right rallies in the U.S.A are all part of some global trend toward a resurgent White supremacy.

Again, real Nationalists would have none of this since we reject outright the mindset which allows one to believe that the world is now integrated to the degree that universal White unity is a realistic possibility; universal ideals such as this do not enter the heads of radicals, this is the mindset of the globalists or the religious nuts, Islamic Jihadists being the obvious example.

Protesters-march-Sydney-September
Muslims in Sydney demanding that they are taken seriously by the chattering classes

This brings us to another dodgy connection in Tim’s web of untruths: Why would the people he labels conservatives, anti Semites or neo-Nazis have such a problem with Islam?

On the face of it Right Wing Islamophobia makes no sense, there is no logical explanation as to why one group of socially conservative people should be hostile to another group holding basically identical views, that is until one listens to what the right wingers are actually saying.

The natural reaction of the upper classes, of which Tim Soutphommasane is most decidedly a member, is to scoff and roll their eyes at any utterance by the “little people”; the problem, though, in assuming that their class holds the correct values and opinions on all matters is that these twits render themselves unable to take seriously anything which exists outside their bubble of self-satisfied political correctness.

On the face of it Right Wing Islamophobia makes no sense, there is no logical explanation as to why one group of socially conservative people should be hostile to another group holding basically identical views, that is until one listens to what the right wingers are actually saying.

The Right Wingers, on the other hand, take both cosmopolitanism and Islam completely seriously, probably more so than many Muslims and the faults they find with that way of life are all, basically, to do with its perceived negative effects upon multiculturalism, women’s rights, homosexual rights and the interests of Jews and Israel.

Dr Tim mentions in his article Milo Yiannopoulis, the homosexual, Jewish, Libertarian provocateur who is married to a black man; Tim is seemingly agog at the popularity of such a character in this day and age, however seen in its proper context Milo’s stage show is pure multicultural theatre, he is a perfect poster boy for the Right Wing because he embodies all that they hold dear and all that the upper classes lay claim to but, in their cynicism, neglect.

milo
Milo “The Dangerous Faggot” is not literally Hitler, he is more like the Dick Emery of globalist culture

The Islamic Jihad in the West is explicitly aimed at smashing social cohesion in multicultural societies by attacking its constituent parts,. The Right Wingers are one hundred percent correct on that score. Anyone who is capable of thinking tactically appreciates the structural weaknesses in cosmopolitanism, not to mention the studied indifference to this holy war among the upper classes, the politicians and the bourgeoisie.

This inability to think like one’s enemy by the people supposedly in charge leaves a cosmopolitan society wide open to subversion and the shock tactics of terrorists. If anything has become normalised in 2017 it is not “racism” as alleged by Dr Tim, rather it is this blasé attitude toward Islamic Jihad and its stated goals, which are the complete destruction of the multicultural West and the subjugation of its peoples by Muslims.

Further to his ballyhoo over the “Far Right” Soutphommasane also dramatically plays up the Neo-Nazi menace, albeit without specifically identifying anyone who openly admits to holding such opinions. We suspect this is because, like most people of his station his view of the new Nazis is likely informed by email circulars penned by Andre Oboler and the Jewish Board Of Deputies, so, therefore, we can assume that he knows nothing much about Nazis, either historical or contemporary.

Let us be blunt, Tim Soutphommasane is in trouble, if certain illiberal elements within the mainstream political scene have their way he and his fellow commissioners at HREOC will soon be out of a job, so he has to come up with something, anything really, to justify his three hundred thousand dollar a year salary.

The role most of the Neo-Nazis, as we have exhaustively explained in several articles is to stifle any dissent against globalist cosmopolitanism — to snuff out any spark of national feeling among Whites by tainting groups and individuals in guilt by association stings. True, some of these characters are motivated by the prospect of looting the money that organised political groups or clubs can raise, but in the main, they are wreckers under the direction of mainstream operatives.

Neo-Nazism, in contrast to Tim’s thesis, is actually the nemesis of White Nationalism and self-determination. It is chauvinistic within the context of White Australia since it attempts to apply phoney Third Reich racial categories to the White Australian ethnicity, something which, given our history on this continent, can never be accepted by true patriots.

charlottesvilleswast_14699_tn-992x558
The Neo-Nazi cuts a lonely figure at Unite The Right in Charlottesville

Dr Tim is peddling a load of horse manure. He is cobbling together a narrative of White supremacy and rising neo-Nazism to shore up his own precarious position as a globalist bureaucrat. If it all smacks of desperation it must be because Tim is, these days, a desperate man at the top tier of a widely hated bureaucracy.

Let us be blunt, Tim Soutphommasane is in trouble. Should certain illiberal elements within the mainstream political scene have their way he and his fellow commissioners at HREOC will soon be out of a job. He has to come up with something, anything really, to justify his three hundred thousand dollar a year salary.

Human rights are under attack by the minions of globalist capitalism; the idea is to roll back the legal protections available to citizens in the name of progress so that the transnational corporations can further embed themselves in the day to day life of working people.

Dr Tim is simply being made redundant by his real bosses. Maybe if he had done his job and protected the human rights of all Australians, rather than cultivating his reputation for arrogance, race-baiting and attacking the White majority, then he might have left his post in good standing and at a time of his choosing. As it stands though, he will probably be fired. His unpronounceable name will live on in infamy as just another haughty bureaucrat who got too big for his boots.

Dastyari
Pride comes before a fall, arrogant public servants in this country quickly grow into tall poppies, ripe for a hard pruning

Dr Jim Saleam: Fascists and Conservatives

Dr Jim Saleam: Fascists and Conservatives

Some people, who may be good patriots and who may yet make good nationalists attached as they are to the Alt-Right and to other patriot structures, have made favourable references to the Australian 1930’s paramilitary group, the New Guard. They have suggested it could be a fountainhead for Australian nationalism. I consider the New Guard – the exact opposite.

The New Guard, formed in 1931, was an armed and violent conservative movement which set out to undermine the Jack Lang government of New South Wales. In Lang, they saw ‘communism’. After all, he repudiated the war debts to London, stood up for the mass of the unemployed and pushed for credit expansion to ease the Depression. Lang stood for Australia first, for the struggle of the productive classes. Meantime, the New Guard espoused ‘unswerving loyalty’ to the Empire, ‘sane finance’ (deflation) and a managerial government run by ‘the best families’. The New Guard programme represented the class war from above dressed up as patriotism.

In 1933, the leader of the New Guard, Eric Campbell, met Sir Oswald Mosley of the British Union of Fascists. Mosley considered the New Guard to be fascist. He was wrong. And by this time too, Campbell was openly calling himself ‘fascist’. He was wrong too.

Campbell.jpg
Colonel Campbell does the one-arm backstroke under hypnosis by a visiting American entertainer

What is the problem?

Well, the New Guard certainly went about uniformed and did violence, offering fascist salutes and saying it was fascist. It said it wanted to crush communism by violence and it claimed to be militantly patriotic.

But the New Guard was connected throughout its four-year life by subliminal sentiments, imperial and class ideological references and organisational threads to the Old Guard conservatives, the rich colonial-imperial bourgeoisie who wanted to hang on to their wealth against the challenge from the people. Social change, Australian economic independence, the Labor Party – all was communism. The Old Guard would rely upon the state apparatus and a secret paramilitary apparatus and putsch for power if need be. The New Guard, its bastard child, would do the street violence. It was no challenge to capitalism either.

Irony entered in. In July 1932, Lang was sacked by Sir Phillip Game, the governor, such that New South Wales be ‘saved’ from communism and civil war (sic). Four years later, Game was in London, making sure in his capacity as Commissioner of Police, that Mosley’s fascists could not be an effective challenge to the British elite. Two countries. Same imperial elite. Same interests to be defended.

For me, Jack Lang, brother-in-law to Henry Lawson, was the real deal. He was the champion of the people. He railed against international finance capital, against those who could not act and think as Australians in the banks and the corporations. In his extreme old age, he remained the fighter for White Australia. If there is a fountainhead for nationalism, it was Lang and not the New Guard.

Lang
The “communist” NSW Premier who was ousted for putting White Australia first – what sort of fascists would do that to such a ridgey didge Patriot?

In what must be suggestive of ideological place, I recall a chat some years ago with a Klub Nation reactionary, one of the shysters who recently conned his way into the Aussie Alt-Right phenomenon. He told me that the New Guard was a real nationalist movement and that its opposition to ‘leftist’ Lang was correct. It was ‘fascist’ too, he said – as if I would be turned on. So the circle completes and we again, in the immediate period, find ourselves assessing the relationship of fascism and conservatism – from the past.

Of course, there is a large academic literature these days that explains how fascist and conservative groups, under the pressure of events and the challenge of the Left in 1930s Europe, might share external features. Decades ago, the study was fresh and it was easier for political newbies and others to confuse the two. No more. Names like Martin Blinkhorn, Eugen Weber, Stanley Payne, A. James Gregor, Roger Griffin, Roger Eatwell can be traced by the curious today and it’ll be explained. Conservatism and fascism were mutually exclusive things.

Nonetheless, in my decades of political activity, I have continually come upon conservatives playacting at being militants and at being ‘fascists’ and even ‘Nazis’. It took me time to understand their essential ‘bs’.

When I was a high school kid, I came upon Eugen Weber’s Varieties Of Fascism. It taught me that fascism in one vital sense was a synthesis of nationalism and socialism. It varied from country to country, in how it arranged that synthesis from source-material and in what it looked like, but that synthesis was a key element of it. So, I tried to apply that knowledge to people I met.

I remember blundering into a Brisbane meeting of Eastern European ‘fascists’ in 1972. They gave each other salutes, chatted about fighting the Labor communists (?!) and doing violence – and then talked over how to help the Liberal Party stay in government. The Liberal Party? It seemed the Libs were going along with the USA to roll back East European communism and they would help the Libs make it happen. They were not alone in that sort of notion.

Consider the colourful – if ridiculous – Australian Nazi phenomenon during the period that the extreme-left in Australia gained some size (1969-75). Some of these so-called Nazis believed that they would ‘prove’ themselves to the conservative moneybags by fighting those commies in the street and, out of desperation at being unable to stem the Red tide any other way, the conservatives would ‘call them in’ to save the country. A Liberal-Nazi government would form to fight communism and perhaps even win the war in Vietnam! I remember asking one of these Nazis if that meant the Liberals would allow some socialist reforms of banking and the multinationals – but I was told that was communism too. “Are you a communist?”, he asked me. Much of the time, the Nazis took cues from the Special Branch political police in attacking the Left, yet considered that normal, a primer before the curtain was raised on their taking power. Nazis in Queensland thought Premier Joh was Australia’s von Hindenberg, the patriot who would team up with the tough boys to save the country. Delusional maybe, but all this demonstrated the essential linkage between the conservatives and would-be fascists. These fascists (sic) considered themselves as conservatives with one difference: they reasoned the conservatives weak and unwilling to do the dirty work – which meant someone had to break the law to fight those Reds!

Joh
Joh Bjelke Petersen was tipped to be the next Liberal Party Nazi leader… or something

However, there was for me, one good bump in the conservative road. I also met the émigré Hungarian fascists who had a different story. They told me that you: “cannot have nationalism without socialism and socialism without nationalism”. They said most of the émigré fascists (Eastern Europeans by and large) were flunkeys of the Liberals and that the Libs were the quintessential party of capital. They even told me that if ever they returned to Hungary, they thought it best that the property socialised by the communist regime from the aristocracy and the old wealthy elite– stay in state hands! Maybe they were communists like me?

In the late 1970’s, I was in Sydney, a member of the first nationalist groups when we met those Liberals known as ‘the Uglies’. Their descendants still survive as rabid free marketeers. This gang posed then as the toughest of the tough and the hardest of the hard Right. Or so they said. They told the nationalists that they were us and we were them, except they were going to take over the Liberal Party and ‘come out’ when the day came. The day never came and generation after generation of young people has heard their story. The nationalists worked it out. The Uglies were spinning a yarn to suck people in and neutralize them forever. The Liberal machine would mince them up into becoming Libs and run them as lures for other ‘radicals’ who might upset the conservative applecart.

There was a twist. This Liberal lot also told us that they were secret ‘fascists’ and even ‘Nazis’. After all, Menzies who had been an ‘Appeaser’ of fascism in the 1930’s had let into the country the East European collaborators after 1949. They said Hitler really knew how to screw communism by fighting it in the streets. Why he finally grew up and attacked the Soviet Union. Nazism was the highest form of patriotism because it defended its principles violently. But Aussie people didn’t really know all that so its secret message would stay the glue that will bind us – while we take over the Liberal Party. I started to think: is the Soviet Union even the enemy? Why fight them for the USA? And why are these Uglies all the way with Uncle Sam? How does their taking over the Liberal Party help the nationalist cause? We, nationalists, wanted an independent Australia and their programme isn’t nationalist. They said they just hated the ‘wet’ Malcolm Fraser, but supported everything he said about deregulation and ‘fighting communism’. After 1979, they followed Margaret Thatcher; she would beat communism by privatising everything, they said.

The dirty truth (part of it at least) came out in 1978 when the leader of the Uglies (Lyenko Urbanchich, a Slovenian collaborator with Germany and Italy) called for the recruitment of Vietnamese and other Indo-China ‘refugees’ into the Liberal Party as supporters of the war against communism. We, nationalists, were concerned with our European identity not communism as threats to the nation, so the division was in the open. Even so, they kept telling us for years they were ‘fascists’, just like us, ad nauseum. When one of us quipped to an Urbanchich follower, we would prefer a Soviet White Australia to a capitalist multiracial sewer, the old Slovenian guru finally said that Australian nationalism was bolshie anyway (1987). Thanks for that!

Lyenko.jpg
Lyenko Urbanchich called for Vietnamese and Indo-china refugees to join the Liberal Party against communism

In the mid-1980’s, a wag in the nationalist Australian National Action, of which I was the Chairman by then, came up with a goodie: the conservative Liberals will tolerate Nazis, but they will never tolerate nationalist-socialists.

Did these Liberals ever want the nationalisation of the banks? Did they want free education and socialised medicine? Did they want our mineral wealth controlled by the nation? Did they want direct democracy? Not at all. They adored free dog-eat-dog enterprise and government by parliament. They abhorred ‘dole bludgers’ (read: anyone who lost his job), considered themselves the born-to-rule elite and they regarded the working class person as not their equal. They never thought in terms of the fiercely independent nation with a destiny of its own, but revelled in the dependent country beholden to great allies.

Not too much ‘socialism’ in their national socialism? I suspect that in so far as they liked (sic) Nazis and fascists, it was all about the fascist regimes that went to war against communism and then only so far as they did fight communism as a system. Such social change that the fascists did implement was ignored in that argument. Past that, these conservatives weren’t part of fascism at all, but no end of game-players calling themselves ‘fascists’ would hang around them. They could sit around and talk and talk and dream – and do the dirty work of the conservatives.

What I did see in most of those who wanted to talk about fascism in those days of the 1970’s and 1980’s (and in possibly even now?), is that they wanted to discuss regime-fascism and how ‘good’ it was. They liked pretty pics of parades, invasions of the USSR, a few criticisms of ‘Jewish capital’ (but seldom, gentile capital), the myth of the great leader. In so far as any of it had some transcendental relevance to any Australian struggle, none seemed that interested in the mechanics of revolutionary action. This alone should have suggested that their talk of fascism was a block in the way of action! Fascism was for them just a myth to be talked about in a club of such people with Libs in attendance who could provide a ‘political’ outlet for them.

It became clearer to the nationalists. There had always been a real demarcation line between historical fascists and conservatives. If there had been anything positive in fascism that ‘line’ was it. And fascism’s essential sin (not the only one I would add) had been its alliances with the conservatives. Its revolution was bowdlerized before it got going. In that regard, I do remember meeting in the 1980’s an Italian who fought for the Italian Social Republic. He opined that the Mussolini regime till 1943 had been an illusion, a travesty of fascism’s potential. The Italian civil war brought the people into play against the industrialists and the landowners, the church and the monarchy, those whom the regime had previously indulged. That sounded different!

Of course, the discourse of a revolutionary fascism hardly gets a look-in with the debate on fascism, locked as it usually was, into a look-in at the regimes and their wondrous (sic) surface-appearances. The curiosity for me was the deepest fault of fascism in the 1930s and 1940s – that it temporized with the conservatives and the joke in the contemporary world was that the would-be fascists confused the two and pimped for the conservatives as errand boys.

The joke is still being played out in small circles.

I write as an Australian nationalist. My interest in fascism would be literary only if it was not for conservatives who put out bait and for a few people who muck about with fascism in the hope it might offer them something. The latter is more of the problem. Do they still mean regime-fascism? Or do they mean that synthesis of nationalism and socialism that the fascists, to their credit, attempted? And if they do mean that, did not the Australian radical nationalists and our labour movement achieve that synthesis but in our language and in a popular-democratic form? If that was true, why have the discussion about fascism at all?

I would conclude this article with a commentary about Australia from Antonio Grossardi, the Consul General in Australia of Fascist Italy. He said:

“Australia…since the day of its federation has lived…in the rosy certitude that it was the wealthiest, most capable, privileged and hard working country in the world, a type of Earthly Paradise,” God’s Own Country”, such that with a blind and constant faith in the present and future resources of the country, it abandoned itself to social-proletarian experiments of all sorts without taking into account the obstacles, the costs and the possibilities of success.”

Grossardi thought such was the wealth that the Australian people enjoyed they could afford to launch “continuous experiments in social-democracy”. This included a pragmatic labour party, distant from the ideological strife of the Old Continent, bent on enriching the poor rather than taking from the rich like the old socialisms. He went on to describe Australia’s social security system unsurprisingly as “overly generous”. Such comments beg comparison to the Italian reality at the same time, where the Fascist government was only beginning to introduce the rudiments of social welfare.

I am not surprised really that the regime-fascists thought ill of us. Australia is not the Old Continent, but a New Continent – and our challenges are our own.

images
It’s all too familiar

 

 

PATRIOT JEW – THE DEEP-STATE STAIN LEFT OVER FROM THE RECLAIM AUSTRALIA DEBACLE

PATRIOT JEW – THE DEEP-STATE STAIN LEFT OVER FROM THE RECLAIM AUSTRALIA DEBACLE

If Neil Erikson isn’t under strict orders to fuck over Australian Nationalism then we are the editorial team for the Australian Women’s Weekly.

Yet again this problematical dick has managed to contaminate our cause through a perception of his association with us — a perception he has consciously worked at establishing especially in the gullible mind of the media.

His latest caper involves him and an associate knucklehead in a Hi-Vis shirt confronting Labor senator Sam Dastyari at a Melbourne university bar. There, despite the little ‘daigou’ standing at the bar buying beers contradictory to strict Moslem religious observance (and the fact he is non-practising) they film themselves abusing him as a “terrorist” and telling him to go back to “Iran”. Erikson later claimed on FB that he was addressing concerns Dastyari holds “duel” citizenship. It is about as embarrassing a political attack as this big fruit has thus far managed and so far wide of the mark it keeps circumference with Erikson’s bloated waistline.

Consequently, the headline in the ABC report is caterwauling about “White Nationalism” being on the rise.

If you plan to attack Dastyari it should be about his in flagrante delicto role in the selling off of Australia to China. But that’s not the point — Erikson is an arch-traitor to the White Nationalist movement yet the media now regards him as its stubbie-skolling ambassador, a situation that hasn’t come about by accident.

Many things have contributed to this beast’s destructive rampage not least the failure of prominent Nationalists to speak up against him despite the many lies, insults, and injuries he has knowingly inflicted on our cause.

Yet again this problematical dick has managed to contaminate our cause through a perception of his association with us — a perception he has consciously worked at establishing especially in the gullible mind of the media.

Erikson is aligned with Zionist Avi Yemini and has for a long time been in cahoots with Nick Folkes’s anti-Nationalist Peanuts for Freedom. A network of whispers has him linked to even more nefarious characters such as the fake news freelancer Luke McMahon and in all probability Liberal Party black ops coordinator Howard Crawford.

Back when he was cranking out defamatory videos on a Facebook page with fellow feral Shermon Burgess, one could discern the invisible trails of the lies he told from whom they originated. His and Burgess’s attacks were like a script and not one borne of spite or jealousy but a particular motive despite the pair being collectively too stupid to even have a motive beyond getting wasted.

VIDEO-STILL
Avi Yemini sends Erikson off for lox and bagels outside the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court

Strong suspicion arose with many——and it is a theory strengthened continually by everything this numpty does——that he was “turned” by the state following charges over his harassment of Rabbi Dovid Gutnick in 2014, an offence for which he mysteriously served no jail time. Then he totally went rogue.

The very Nationalists from whom Erikson sought advice prior to his inexplicably eventually landing himself a high-flying lawyer became the targets of his attack when he was denied a senior role in the equally disastrous United Patriots Front. In that case, such as he had similarly done with a Nationalist group beforehand, he used his administrator status on the UPF’s Facebook page to lock everyone out.

Erikson had been all along been soliciting advice from Nationalist sources which advised him not to go ahead with the Bendigo beheading stunt and if he did to not involve any of the UPF’s senior members or else legal hassles would follow. He ignored this warning and the rest is now legal history. At this point, when UPF’s leadership were distancing the group from the uncontrollable Erikson, he attempted to start a splinter project with among others Burgess and Ralph Cerminara. They intended to appropriate the Identitarian Movement from the French despite all being non-Nationalists. This was a deliberate provocation but when Australian WNs contacted France he shelved the idea.

Consequently, the headline in the ABC report is caterwauling about “White Nationalism” being on the rise.

Thereafter he reinvented his vehicles but never himself, teaming up with Sherm the Germ, and most recently provoking the Nationalist movement in Australia by appropriating the name ‘Nationalist Uprising’ while promoting Zionism.

Ah yes, the Zionism. In his many guises after UPF Erikson went on a ferocious dox against his former comrades, turning out secret video footage of Blair Cottrell and others, and denouncing all as ‘Nazis’. He made a point of claiming to have been a member of Blood & Honour and Nationalist Alternative and expressing redemption for his misguided and misspent skinhead past. In fact, Neil was largely responsible for bringing ‘Nazis’ to the rallies that he was later beseeching be cleansed of goose-steppers.

By this stage, the lies were flying from his bearded lips like shit squirting from the arse of a goose. A 2016 video is like a Best Hits of Neil Erikson lies. It includes:

  • He was a member of Nationalist Alternative
  • He was a member of Australia First Party
  • That Sammy Binz and/or an AFP member sent pictures of a “dead baby” to him over Facebook
  • That an AFP member who he’d never met, talked to, laid eyes on or been involved in any sort of social media interaction with is Jewish
  • That a certain person known only for his quality of character was guilty of a carnal indiscretion over social media
  • That he is a Nationalist

This is apart from the 6000 terabytes of lies told in videos and on FB posts stored away in which his bullshit is plentiful enough to outnumber the individual grains of sand on every beach in Australia.

Leaping to the present, and Neil’s ‘Patriot Blue’ incarnation, which he nicked from a forthcoming Net series based on the movie Romper Stomper due to appear on the Stan streaming service — We say, given his proclamation that “you cannot be a Nationalist WITHOUT supporting Israel”, they should rename their Facebook group, Patriot Jew.

46247BD300000578-5064085-An_anti_Islam_activist_has_defended_calling_senator_Sam_Dastyari-a-1_1510182585461
Australian Nationalism needs more dumb cunts in High-Vis shirts who’re prepared to follow Neil Erikson around

But you have to ask yourself, who benefits from all of this? Erikson is not running a political party, nor could he be given his fractured personality and lack of mental discipline. Is he hoping to start a mass movement? Not likely given his fractured personality and lack of mental discipline. And how did he just happen to be in that particular bar when last time we checked he’d moved his suffering missus and sprog to the Apple Isle? It’s as though someone wanted him there.

Again, who benefits? When you join all the dots on Erikson’s Conservative Reactionary associates then the picture begins to at least make a little more sense.

Erikson is a useful idiot with handlers and he is doing what he is told. His mission, at the end of the day, is to achieve certain ends for his shrouded Conservative connections while bringing Nationalism into disrepute.

Finally, it has to be accepted that Erikson came out of the unmitigated disaster of the Reclaim Australia movement. In fact, just about every ‘personality’ that emerged from that cluster fuck has somehow damaged Nationalism and generated factionalism, elite groups, and coteries that spring up and disappear just as quickly. True politics, true Australian Nationalist tradition and spirit are derided as quaint and irrelevant in this single-minded stampede for the ‘next’ big possibility.

There is too much changing, too much repackaging, too much mainstreaming and too little resolve.

4624996500000578-5064085-Neil_Erikson_founder_of_far_right_group_Patriot_Blue_filmed_hims-a-2_1510182585764.jpg
All of Neil Erikson’s best ideas come out of a VB bottle 

 

DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

Over the past year, UNA has spent bulk column inches describing the type of society Australia has been moulded into since the globalist, cosmopolitan juggernaut shifted into top gear under the Howard regime.

We have outlined, in broad strokes, the re-jigged class system being implemented by the bosses to pacify and subject the polyglot masses which now underpin the global capitalist power; likewise, we have examined, in depth, the bones of the system itself, that cunning fusion of second-generation Communism and limited free market capitalism.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

The trouble is that this increase in state power over the individual and the suppression of non-consumerist dissident tendencies is unlikely to be as spectacular, or compelling as the Spanish Civil War or The Great Leap Forward; the slide into, what Nationalists freely admit, is a looming dystopia will likely be slow, controlled and it will not flatter the egos of these prophets of doom.

special-ops-group2
If you really annoy the Globalists they do more than cancelling your Facebook account and getting you fired from your job

If we are truly on the hunt for signs and wonders in this age of mass surveillance and rule by global corporations then we might argue that present developments should occupy the bulk of our attention rather than endless examinations of the past.

We apply a slight caveat here in that there is nothing new under the sun as far as repressive regimes are concerned; the old rules of Stasi, Gestapo or Special Branch skullduggery still apply and we can be reasonably sure that if things really ran out of hand, as they did in the mid 20th century, that the knuckledusters and water board would be employed without hesitation by today’s state-sanctioned goon squads.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

As we have explained in a previous article, the Pigs serve the Globalists; if we may borrow from the lexicon of 1960’s Hippie radicals, the Pigs in blue, or in plain clothes and the Pig media support the big Capitalist Pigs on high.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

Smith
A Dog of the Leftist variety who regularly boasts of ratting people out to the Federal Police

In the Australia of 2017, this Dog culture is rampant and we would suggest that is the main impediment to radical political activism, no matter from where said radicals draw their inspiration; these days sincere Leftists are just as likely to be pilloried for their views as  Nationalists or Muslim fundamentalists.

We are appalled by the way Right-Wingers, Leftists and most people in between seem intent on publicly denouncing anything and anyone who challenges the mainstream narrative, or even mildly irritates them in a Facebook stoush, even to the point of bullying mentally unstable people into rash, or violent actions merely to tar their friends and comrades with the “extremist” label.

These attempts to pillory often harmless people are rarely done to gain political advantage, or to undermine the system, the snitch collectives, such as Antifa, as well as the Far-Right vigilantes really have no political background or strategic objective.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

The goal is to humiliate others and throw them into the maw of the security state based on where one stands of the false ideological divisions and ever-shifting, fantasy role-playing conventions of cyberspace.

This is not to say that there are no real-world consequences for people who interrupt or harass the minions of globalism, the security state loves a conspiracy or a human rights charge; as we saw with the Bendigo Three there is basically no way to defend oneself from accusations of so-called “Hate Crime”.

Erikson jameson
Fake Muslim but proud, self-described ASIO informant

We ask our readers to ponder that very situation and ask themselves why upsetting Muslims might, in theory, create a problem for the state to the degree that they are willing to pursue people uphill and down dale over a social media post deriding Jihadist Muslim terrorism?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

If we are to believe the top cops then all that has prevented Pitt St and Federation Square from being strewn with body parts from some Muslim outrage is the cooperation they receive from, we guess, “good Muslims”; though that brings up the question of who is really holding all the cards in the war on terror?

Who is to say that these Muslim collaborators are acting altruistically as opposed to playing a long game of their own?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

Globalist Cosmopolitanism requires Orwellian oversight, multiculturalism clearly cannot sustain itself without a substantial number of citizens being willing to act as de-facto censors and unpaid informers for the state and the corporations who are gradually assimilating into its institutions.

Furthermore, the only way the modern state can accommodate fractious minority groups, mainly, but not limited to, those citizens devoted to Mohammed is to cultivate an even more pervasive surveillance and informant network, a process, we now know, which requires total silence and obedience by all other Australians.

The absolute worst thing an Aussie can do these days is to disturb the status quo, to question where this regime of Globalist Capitalism fused to second generation Communism is leading us; forget your posterity, forget any notions of justice or fair play; do not disturb the Rats, just sit down, grab your iPad and credit cards and consume! Consume! Consume!

snitch161004