UNION THUG DAVE GULL SPOTTED WITH CFMEU MEMBERS AT ALP STATE CONFERENCE

UNION THUG DAVE GULL SPOTTED WITH CFMEU MEMBERS AT ALP STATE CONFERENCE

A union thug that attacked the home of a United Nationalists Australia editor, as well as harassing the President of the Australia First Party was spotted with CFMEU delegates at Labor’s 2018 NSW conference.

Previously, the CFMEU had denied any knowledge of Dave Gull when approached by one of the complainants and advised him to instead contact police. He did this and an apprehended violence order was issued by Newtown Local Court. However, it proved an impossible task to track Gull to his address and NSW Police refused to assist in tracing him which meant the order could not proceed; leaving the impression of state sympathy with this mindless brute. It also draws a very distinct line of connection between the ALP and Antifascist Action.

Cleary, the CFMEU knew his whereabouts all along and questions now arise about their knowledge of his actions against the UNA editor.

Our editor refuses to let this matter rest knowing that Gull is a dangerous animal who should not be allowed to roam the streets freely menacing citizens with differing opinions from his own. It is therefore interesting that intelligence provided to UNA places him in the company of CFMEU delegates who were reportedly strutting around arrogantly at the Australian Labor Party’s (ALP) state conference at Sydney Town Hall on Saturday, June 30.

The CFMEU clearly kids itself that it holds a position of influence within the Australian Labor Party. The rank and file, such as Gull, also have a cognitive dissonance when it comes to understanding that the multimillion-dollar CFMEU no longer represents hard hats like him but is an auxiliary for a globalist party with central policies that conflicts with the interests of Australian workers they supposedly represent.

Interesting, too, is that by the terms of admission to the NSW ALP Conference that “observers” who registered for the event must also be ALP members. This presents the strong likelihood that Gull is also an ALP member and Labor, therefore, had his address on file, something which will need to be surrendered so that due process can be pursued against this totalitarian nightmare of an individual.

Bear in mind, that by having knowledge of Gull’s actions – which the CFMEU did – only amplifies accusations of that militant organisation’s reliance on violence and intimidation in the pursuance of its political ideas.

11188276_877885448935926_5245648042568850460_n - Copy.jpg
Dave Gull in his CFMEU night stalking outfit
20171207051924999.jpeg
Gull goes on the job at one of our editor’s homes in December 2017. Despite this video evidence, NSW cops did what they do best — NOTHING
20180409023555123
Gull was caught on camera again at his third visit to our editor’s home, having previously attacked it with a firehose and threatening to “kill” him

If anyone has knowledge of Dave Gull please contact us by email @ UNAmedia1@outlook.com.

Dr Jim Saleam: Fascists and Conservatives

Dr Jim Saleam: Fascists and Conservatives

Some people, who may be good patriots and who may yet make good nationalists attached as they are to the Alt-Right and to other patriot structures, have made favourable references to the Australian 1930’s paramilitary group, the New Guard. They have suggested it could be a fountainhead for Australian nationalism. I consider the New Guard – the exact opposite.

The New Guard, formed in 1931, was an armed and violent conservative movement which set out to undermine the Jack Lang government of New South Wales. In Lang, they saw ‘communism’. After all, he repudiated the war debts to London, stood up for the mass of the unemployed and pushed for credit expansion to ease the Depression. Lang stood for Australia first, for the struggle of the productive classes. Meantime, the New Guard espoused ‘unswerving loyalty’ to the Empire, ‘sane finance’ (deflation) and a managerial government run by ‘the best families’. The New Guard programme represented the class war from above dressed up as patriotism.

In 1933, the leader of the New Guard, Eric Campbell, met Sir Oswald Mosley of the British Union of Fascists. Mosley considered the New Guard to be fascist. He was wrong. And by this time too, Campbell was openly calling himself ‘fascist’. He was wrong too.

Campbell.jpg
Colonel Campbell does the one-arm backstroke under hypnosis by a visiting American entertainer

What is the problem?

Well, the New Guard certainly went about uniformed and did violence, offering fascist salutes and saying it was fascist. It said it wanted to crush communism by violence and it claimed to be militantly patriotic.

But the New Guard was connected throughout its four-year life by subliminal sentiments, imperial and class ideological references and organisational threads to the Old Guard conservatives, the rich colonial-imperial bourgeoisie who wanted to hang on to their wealth against the challenge from the people. Social change, Australian economic independence, the Labor Party – all was communism. The Old Guard would rely upon the state apparatus and a secret paramilitary apparatus and putsch for power if need be. The New Guard, its bastard child, would do the street violence. It was no challenge to capitalism either.

Irony entered in. In July 1932, Lang was sacked by Sir Phillip Game, the governor, such that New South Wales be ‘saved’ from communism and civil war (sic). Four years later, Game was in London, making sure in his capacity as Commissioner of Police, that Mosley’s fascists could not be an effective challenge to the British elite. Two countries. Same imperial elite. Same interests to be defended.

For me, Jack Lang, brother-in-law to Henry Lawson, was the real deal. He was the champion of the people. He railed against international finance capital, against those who could not act and think as Australians in the banks and the corporations. In his extreme old age, he remained the fighter for White Australia. If there is a fountainhead for nationalism, it was Lang and not the New Guard.

Lang
The “communist” NSW Premier who was ousted for putting White Australia first – what sort of fascists would do that to such a ridgey didge Patriot?

In what must be suggestive of ideological place, I recall a chat some years ago with a Klub Nation reactionary, one of the shysters who recently conned his way into the Aussie Alt-Right phenomenon. He told me that the New Guard was a real nationalist movement and that its opposition to ‘leftist’ Lang was correct. It was ‘fascist’ too, he said – as if I would be turned on. So the circle completes and we again, in the immediate period, find ourselves assessing the relationship of fascism and conservatism – from the past.

Of course, there is a large academic literature these days that explains how fascist and conservative groups, under the pressure of events and the challenge of the Left in 1930s Europe, might share external features. Decades ago, the study was fresh and it was easier for political newbies and others to confuse the two. No more. Names like Martin Blinkhorn, Eugen Weber, Stanley Payne, A. James Gregor, Roger Griffin, Roger Eatwell can be traced by the curious today and it’ll be explained. Conservatism and fascism were mutually exclusive things.

Nonetheless, in my decades of political activity, I have continually come upon conservatives playacting at being militants and at being ‘fascists’ and even ‘Nazis’. It took me time to understand their essential ‘bs’.

When I was a high school kid, I came upon Eugen Weber’s Varieties Of Fascism. It taught me that fascism in one vital sense was a synthesis of nationalism and socialism. It varied from country to country, in how it arranged that synthesis from source-material and in what it looked like, but that synthesis was a key element of it. So, I tried to apply that knowledge to people I met.

I remember blundering into a Brisbane meeting of Eastern European ‘fascists’ in 1972. They gave each other salutes, chatted about fighting the Labor communists (?!) and doing violence – and then talked over how to help the Liberal Party stay in government. The Liberal Party? It seemed the Libs were going along with the USA to roll back East European communism and they would help the Libs make it happen. They were not alone in that sort of notion.

Consider the colourful – if ridiculous – Australian Nazi phenomenon during the period that the extreme-left in Australia gained some size (1969-75). Some of these so-called Nazis believed that they would ‘prove’ themselves to the conservative moneybags by fighting those commies in the street and, out of desperation at being unable to stem the Red tide any other way, the conservatives would ‘call them in’ to save the country. A Liberal-Nazi government would form to fight communism and perhaps even win the war in Vietnam! I remember asking one of these Nazis if that meant the Liberals would allow some socialist reforms of banking and the multinationals – but I was told that was communism too. “Are you a communist?”, he asked me. Much of the time, the Nazis took cues from the Special Branch political police in attacking the Left, yet considered that normal, a primer before the curtain was raised on their taking power. Nazis in Queensland thought Premier Joh was Australia’s von Hindenberg, the patriot who would team up with the tough boys to save the country. Delusional maybe, but all this demonstrated the essential linkage between the conservatives and would-be fascists. These fascists (sic) considered themselves as conservatives with one difference: they reasoned the conservatives weak and unwilling to do the dirty work – which meant someone had to break the law to fight those Reds!

Joh
Joh Bjelke Petersen was tipped to be the next Liberal Party Nazi leader… or something

However, there was for me, one good bump in the conservative road. I also met the émigré Hungarian fascists who had a different story. They told me that you: “cannot have nationalism without socialism and socialism without nationalism”. They said most of the émigré fascists (Eastern Europeans by and large) were flunkeys of the Liberals and that the Libs were the quintessential party of capital. They even told me that if ever they returned to Hungary, they thought it best that the property socialised by the communist regime from the aristocracy and the old wealthy elite– stay in state hands! Maybe they were communists like me?

In the late 1970’s, I was in Sydney, a member of the first nationalist groups when we met those Liberals known as ‘the Uglies’. Their descendants still survive as rabid free marketeers. This gang posed then as the toughest of the tough and the hardest of the hard Right. Or so they said. They told the nationalists that they were us and we were them, except they were going to take over the Liberal Party and ‘come out’ when the day came. The day never came and generation after generation of young people has heard their story. The nationalists worked it out. The Uglies were spinning a yarn to suck people in and neutralize them forever. The Liberal machine would mince them up into becoming Libs and run them as lures for other ‘radicals’ who might upset the conservative applecart.

There was a twist. This Liberal lot also told us that they were secret ‘fascists’ and even ‘Nazis’. After all, Menzies who had been an ‘Appeaser’ of fascism in the 1930’s had let into the country the East European collaborators after 1949. They said Hitler really knew how to screw communism by fighting it in the streets. Why he finally grew up and attacked the Soviet Union. Nazism was the highest form of patriotism because it defended its principles violently. But Aussie people didn’t really know all that so its secret message would stay the glue that will bind us – while we take over the Liberal Party. I started to think: is the Soviet Union even the enemy? Why fight them for the USA? And why are these Uglies all the way with Uncle Sam? How does their taking over the Liberal Party help the nationalist cause? We, nationalists, wanted an independent Australia and their programme isn’t nationalist. They said they just hated the ‘wet’ Malcolm Fraser, but supported everything he said about deregulation and ‘fighting communism’. After 1979, they followed Margaret Thatcher; she would beat communism by privatising everything, they said.

The dirty truth (part of it at least) came out in 1978 when the leader of the Uglies (Lyenko Urbanchich, a Slovenian collaborator with Germany and Italy) called for the recruitment of Vietnamese and other Indo-China ‘refugees’ into the Liberal Party as supporters of the war against communism. We, nationalists, were concerned with our European identity not communism as threats to the nation, so the division was in the open. Even so, they kept telling us for years they were ‘fascists’, just like us, ad nauseum. When one of us quipped to an Urbanchich follower, we would prefer a Soviet White Australia to a capitalist multiracial sewer, the old Slovenian guru finally said that Australian nationalism was bolshie anyway (1987). Thanks for that!

Lyenko.jpg
Lyenko Urbanchich called for Vietnamese and Indo-china refugees to join the Liberal Party against communism

In the mid-1980’s, a wag in the nationalist Australian National Action, of which I was the Chairman by then, came up with a goodie: the conservative Liberals will tolerate Nazis, but they will never tolerate nationalist-socialists.

Did these Liberals ever want the nationalisation of the banks? Did they want free education and socialised medicine? Did they want our mineral wealth controlled by the nation? Did they want direct democracy? Not at all. They adored free dog-eat-dog enterprise and government by parliament. They abhorred ‘dole bludgers’ (read: anyone who lost his job), considered themselves the born-to-rule elite and they regarded the working class person as not their equal. They never thought in terms of the fiercely independent nation with a destiny of its own, but revelled in the dependent country beholden to great allies.

Not too much ‘socialism’ in their national socialism? I suspect that in so far as they liked (sic) Nazis and fascists, it was all about the fascist regimes that went to war against communism and then only so far as they did fight communism as a system. Such social change that the fascists did implement was ignored in that argument. Past that, these conservatives weren’t part of fascism at all, but no end of game-players calling themselves ‘fascists’ would hang around them. They could sit around and talk and talk and dream – and do the dirty work of the conservatives.

What I did see in most of those who wanted to talk about fascism in those days of the 1970’s and 1980’s (and in possibly even now?), is that they wanted to discuss regime-fascism and how ‘good’ it was. They liked pretty pics of parades, invasions of the USSR, a few criticisms of ‘Jewish capital’ (but seldom, gentile capital), the myth of the great leader. In so far as any of it had some transcendental relevance to any Australian struggle, none seemed that interested in the mechanics of revolutionary action. This alone should have suggested that their talk of fascism was a block in the way of action! Fascism was for them just a myth to be talked about in a club of such people with Libs in attendance who could provide a ‘political’ outlet for them.

It became clearer to the nationalists. There had always been a real demarcation line between historical fascists and conservatives. If there had been anything positive in fascism that ‘line’ was it. And fascism’s essential sin (not the only one I would add) had been its alliances with the conservatives. Its revolution was bowdlerized before it got going. In that regard, I do remember meeting in the 1980’s an Italian who fought for the Italian Social Republic. He opined that the Mussolini regime till 1943 had been an illusion, a travesty of fascism’s potential. The Italian civil war brought the people into play against the industrialists and the landowners, the church and the monarchy, those whom the regime had previously indulged. That sounded different!

Of course, the discourse of a revolutionary fascism hardly gets a look-in with the debate on fascism, locked as it usually was, into a look-in at the regimes and their wondrous (sic) surface-appearances. The curiosity for me was the deepest fault of fascism in the 1930s and 1940s – that it temporized with the conservatives and the joke in the contemporary world was that the would-be fascists confused the two and pimped for the conservatives as errand boys.

The joke is still being played out in small circles.

I write as an Australian nationalist. My interest in fascism would be literary only if it was not for conservatives who put out bait and for a few people who muck about with fascism in the hope it might offer them something. The latter is more of the problem. Do they still mean regime-fascism? Or do they mean that synthesis of nationalism and socialism that the fascists, to their credit, attempted? And if they do mean that, did not the Australian radical nationalists and our labour movement achieve that synthesis but in our language and in a popular-democratic form? If that was true, why have the discussion about fascism at all?

I would conclude this article with a commentary about Australia from Antonio Grossardi, the Consul General in Australia of Fascist Italy. He said:

“Australia…since the day of its federation has lived…in the rosy certitude that it was the wealthiest, most capable, privileged and hard working country in the world, a type of Earthly Paradise,” God’s Own Country”, such that with a blind and constant faith in the present and future resources of the country, it abandoned itself to social-proletarian experiments of all sorts without taking into account the obstacles, the costs and the possibilities of success.”

Grossardi thought such was the wealth that the Australian people enjoyed they could afford to launch “continuous experiments in social-democracy”. This included a pragmatic labour party, distant from the ideological strife of the Old Continent, bent on enriching the poor rather than taking from the rich like the old socialisms. He went on to describe Australia’s social security system unsurprisingly as “overly generous”. Such comments beg comparison to the Italian reality at the same time, where the Fascist government was only beginning to introduce the rudiments of social welfare.

I am not surprised really that the regime-fascists thought ill of us. Australia is not the Old Continent, but a New Continent – and our challenges are our own.

images
It’s all too familiar

 

 

TWENTY FIVE FANTASTIC THESES ON FASCISM: A REPLY TO SHANE BURLEY

TWENTY FIVE FANTASTIC THESES ON FASCISM: A REPLY TO SHANE BURLEY

Shane Burley of the Black Rose Anarchist Federation website has favoured observers of alternative politics with an article outlining his Twenty-Five Theses On Fascism.

By James Hillman

Without conducting a tedious point by point examination of his theory of Fascism in the post-modern era we will nevertheless confront Burley’s hysterical, reactionary screed on the historical continuity and mass appeal of so-called 21st-century neo-Fascism.

This brand of Anarcho-Idiocy should be laughed back into the oblivion of cyberspace by all right-thinking people, however, as we all know, the basic principles of this anti-Fascist argument are being adopted by globalist-capitalist public relations officers to further the interests of the international commercial elites.

It would appear to the casual reader that Shane Burley is singing from the same hymn sheet as the evangelists of hyper-consumerism, indeed his thesis puts him in a very safe space; his views would tend to endear him to the proponents of totalitarian humanism with their dreams of a global village inhabited only by consumers.

antifa1
Antifa: The guardians of the political vacuum caused by the retreat of the Left

These 25 talking points, even though they are repetitive and obtuse in parts scream Bourgeois adventurism with every line, Burley puts so many theoretical roadblocks in the path of grassroots radical action, applies so many caveats to working-class mobilisation that we might imagine him, in silk cravat and frock coat, swooning on his embroidered chaise through the effort of writing his polemic.

This brand of Anarcho-idiocy should be laughed back into the oblivion of cyberspace by all right thinking people, however, as we all know, the basic principles of this anti-Fascist argument are being adopted by globalist-capitalist public relations officers to further the interests of the international commercial elites.

The basic threads in this neurotic, overly tightly wrapped tapestry of nonsense are that Fascism is everywhere hoovering up doctrine and practical political measures from all tendencies; that even though the Left have all but submitted to the global money power and abandoned radical action the anti-Capitalist efforts of anyone not explicitly identifying himself as an Anti-Fascist must be de-platformed, physically attacked and, if possible, utterly destroyed.

alt-right
The neo-Fascist elements gravitating toward the Alt-Right are just as much blocking force in the road to radical change

Under Burley’s model it is forbidden to hold views which amount to a Third Position, it is unacceptable for anyone to  carry out activism in the political spaces lately abandoned by the Left; “Fascists” should be prevented at all costs from agitating against capitalism and war, for working-class unity or in solidarity with movements of national liberation in the Third World.

In essence, we have a theory which places the Anti-Fascists in the role of ideological squatters, a loose assemblage of people who occupy political spaces merely so that nobody else may utilise them to radicalise and mobilise the working class and marginalised people.

All that these Anarchists are doing is behaving in a manner identical to their globalist-capitalist sympathisers, this approach is akin to the mentality of the property speculator who buys up cheap apartments and leaves them empty as they appreciate in value; it drains his capital in the short term and denies working people a place to live, creating a social deficit in the hope of future profit.

In essence we have a theory which places the Anti-Fascists in the role of ideological squatters, a loose assemblage of people who occupy political spaces merely so that nobody else may utilise them to radicalise and mobilise the working classes and marginalised people.

The post-modern Left as exemplified by the Black Rose writers are holding political spaces aside for some future, utopian mass movement of a cosmopolitan character, in the process draining the political capital of the radical Left through their violence toward opposing tendencies and their tolerance toward, if not outright collusion with capitalist interests.

It is no wonder that Civic Patriot groups are intruding upon the politically vacant, yet energetically policed spaces notionally held by Anti-Fascists; for all Shane’s blather about entryism and co-option of Left tactics it is plain to see that the Civics are moving in upon a political vacuum, effectively a clean slate upon which to write their own dogma once the rabble squatting there has been run off.

PFF
Team Idiot, the Civic Patriots, will take any opportunity afforded them, to muddy the waters and dilute the core nationalist message of White survival

There is a danger here too that other tendencies, with whom the Nationalists have much in common, in their efforts to take the reactionary anti-Fascists head on and break their hold on these spaces would similarly occupy them only to leave them ideologically vacant.

We refer here to the issue of subcultures and the club mentality, as opposed to radicalised cadres prepared to settle into the unflattering roles of, say, anti-war protestors, city councillors or grassroots advocates for the White ethnic group.

There is simply no time left for playing the Antifa at their own games, we cannot afford another fifteen year cycle of clubs and gangs, of edgy internet banter, ironic Roman salutes and any of the other artefacts of the great meme wars of the early 21st century, or the brothers wars of the 20th.

Anti-Fascists such as Burley rely heavily on strawman arguments, misinformation, fiction and the creation of satirical dramatis personae for publicly identifiable dissidents; the Fascists to which he refers are largely caricatures invented by the left for their own ends.

In reality we cannot fight fire with fire, we cannot adopt the same tactics used by the Anti-Fascists lest they produce identical outcomes; bear in mind always that the reason they adopt this hysterical, authoritarian position is that they are, in principle, totally against the idea of any form of politics at all.

We could point out here that the Australian pioneer ethos, that wellspring of the Australian Nationalist movements is fundamentally a form of Anarcho-Syndicalism and that, contrary to their utterances, the Anti-Fascists oppose any and all manifestations of that primal national character, that they are anti-political to the core and as such cannot ever fully occupy the political landscape and develop a coherent, much less a democratic movement.

It falls upon Nationalist dissidents and their allies to not only challenge these ideological squatters and enablers of the money power, to fight them for the power vacuums in post-modern politics, but it is incumbent upon us to radicalise and motivate our people to hold them and establish concrete political principles and a framework for collective action with which to fill the void.

There is simply no time left for playing the Antifa at their own games; we cannot afford another fifteen-year cycle of clubs and gangs, of edgy internet banter, ironic Roman salutes and any of the other artefacts of the great meme wars of the early 21st century, or the brothers’ wars of the 20th.

The time to move is now, the real Left is in retreat and the field of struggle is being squatted by ragpickers, retards and Bourgeois dilettantes, meanwhile immigrants flood in, the suburbs degenerate into something reminiscent of A Clockwork Orange and the globalist money men consolidate their power as they count their loot.

1re2tu
Anti-Fascists refuse to confront the real problem because the solutions are incongruous with the arcane codes of conduct underpinning their fantasy world

THE LEFT ARE NOW THE BOSSES’ BEST FRIENDS

THE LEFT ARE NOW THE BOSSES’ BEST FRIENDS

What are we to make of today’s Leftist? We could follow the standard conservative line and declare them to be anachronistic Marxist hold-outs who could never accept the dissolution of International Socialism in the heady days of 1989, but that is simplistic and we are better than that.

If anything, the Left of 2017 with their arcane take on identity politics represent a failure of Marxist ideals, they are, in effect pushing a distorted version of Socialism which has now fused with the superstructure of globalist capitalism.

White Nationalists in the U.S.A developed a theory in the mid-2000’s which placed the modern Left as the junior partner in a hybrid economic and social system, which fused a type of globalist feudalism with second generation Communism.

Tim Murdock, who further developed the theories of a former Washington political insider, the late Bob Whitaker, not only described the system commonly known as “Cultural Marxism” but put forward his tactical approach to overthrowing both the burgeoning Leftist cultural hegemony and its capitalist cronies.

whitaker_header_101 (1).png
The late Bob Whitaker was a former Washington political insider turned pro-White dissident

Murdock’s method centres on practical politics, the repetition of talking points and the tactical humiliation of Leftists at every opportunity; non-violence is stressed as the most radical path to confronting the Left, “dealing steel”, as he puts it, cannot produce satisfactory results.

White Nationalists in the U.S.A developed a theory in the mid-2000’s which placed the modern Left as the junior partner in a hybrid economic and social system, which fused a type of globalist feudalism with second generation Communism.

We saw this principle at work on our shores in the tumult of the 2015 civic patriot uprisings, chiefly carried forth by Melbourne based United Patriots Front and their allies; the tactics employed by this group mirrored the Murdock method, even if the Patriots themselves were unaware of what they were unleashing.

In the beginning, the use of non-violent demonstrations and the tactical humiliation of key opposition figures had the Left and their sponsors reeling in shock; who could forget the comical visits by UPF members to the Melbourne Anarchist Club and Leftist propaganda radio station 3CR?

riot
Antifa got more than they bargained for when they broke police lines at Coburg, the TV news didn’t show the part where the Left turned and ran away when the fists started flying

As the UPF provocations intensified, the Left, wounded and embarrassed spiralled into ever more extreme rhetoric and behaviour as their supporting cast of well fed, middle-class activists drifted away and their visible street movement dwindled, from some hundreds to a core of about eighty.

The Civic Patriot rising showed what is possible when dash and bravery are coupled with the right rhetoric and clever tactics; the modern Left fall apart when seriously challenged as they lack the discipline of their Communist forebears, the core of their activist base being made up primarily of Bohemians, hysterics, Peter Pan cases and middle-class adventurers.

 Had the young civic patriots known the powerful effects of their non-violent activities they might have husbanded their resources and held the line; in the end though, the debacle on Bell Street, Coburg in 2016 knocked the wind out of their sails as they, from that point, became folk devils in their own right.

The Civic Patriot rising showed what is possible when dash and bravery are coupled with the right rhetoric and clever tactics; the modern Left fall apart when seriously challenged as they lack the discipline of their Communist forebears, the core of their activist base being made up primarily of Bohemians, hysterics, Peter Pan cases and middle-class adventurers.

joyce
Alan Joyce, capitalist patron of the radical Left, he is donating a million dollars of his personal fortune to help rig the same sex marriage survey

It is only their connection to the institutions of capitalist power which sustains the wider Left, though it is now landlocked within the new class system and operates on the level of a Stasi like militia, policing the Working Class and Marginalised People on behalf of the bosses.

There is no other way of viewing the Left in 2017, their campaigns against ordinary folk, reason and common decency all lob the ball squarely back into the court of the Bourgeoisie and the global corporations; their denunciations of so-called “Hate Speech” and their insistence that transgressors be fired from their jobs does nothing but empower the bosses to silence the political opinions of workers.

For at one level this really is a quasi-religious problem, the Left being concerned with what they suspect people of believing and how, with their serial killer style system of thumbtacks and string, they weave a web of intersectionality fine enough to catch the mildest transgression.

This is a serious and growing problem, especially for authentic radicals and dissidents, with the puritanical Left coming down like a tonne of bricks upon anyone who dares step out of line, say the wrong thing or express scepticism toward their dogma.

For at one level this really is a quasi-religious problem, the Left being concerned with what they suspect people of believing and how, with their serial killer style system of thumbtacks and string, they weave a web of intersectionality fine enough to catch the mildest transgression.

You see, for the schtick with which they beat the lower classes to make an impact everyone must, in effect, wholeheartedly accept the idea that people have immortal souls; that a man can be trapped in a woman’s body or vice versa; that a person of one of the victim classes lives the oppression and hurt visited upon his ancestors; or that White people are automatically networked and privileged via their spiritual succession of the pioneering settlers

aglCEO
AGL boss Andrew Vesey, another patron of social justice causes and supporter of the LGBTI movement

As mad as all of this sounds, it is not enough to say that the Left are useful idiots, putty in the hands of the capitalist classes, especially when they are visibly part of the globalist machine, with CEO’s and directors of companies enthusiastically supporting causes such as Same Sex Marriage, the refugee scams and anti-racism initiatives while creating formal partnerships with Leftist activist groups.

If a social movement is sponsored by Google, endorsed by Qantas and patronised by the CEO’s of resource and infrastructure corporations it is a pretty safe bet to assume that the rhetoric coming from Left activists, the junior partners, is calculated to support the people and corporations further up the food chain.

fair_use_white_rabbit_bio_STFU-750x410
Follow the White Rabbit

 

CHARLOTTESVILLE CARMAGEDDON – A RADICAL REVOLUTION

CHARLOTTESVILLE CARMAGEDDON – A RADICAL REVOLUTION

A pessimist might look at the recent Charlottesville “Unite The Right” rally and claim it achieved nothing for “the movement”.

After all a motley crew of edgy racists, libertarians, and other assorted right-wing types going head to head with anti-fascist and Black Lives Matter activists, resulting in the death of one childless thirty-something land whale, two police officers, along with the hospitalisation of 20 others by the one and only Based Car Man (not to mention what happens when one goes up against capsicum spray and unhinged leftists), is hardly what one would call a success with regards to raising the popular image of the right wing and promoting racial awareness.

images (1)
This is how the “riot” would have looked if you were sitting in a bar watching it on a TV screen and not actually there in person

However, there is another, more optimistic way of looking at what occurred over the weekend. While hopes of a mass movement to seize power from Jewish tyranny in the United States may have died with Commander George Lincoln Rockwell in 1967 following his assassination, and a few hundred or so people armed with tiki torches is a far cry from the millions of votes required to gain control of a country, what happened over the weekend (and the general idea of a show of force) has the potential to not only wake up a few of receptive Whites, but more importantly it has the power to weaken and ultimately contribute to the destruction of the Jew-capitalist system that has long kept the White majority out of power.

GeorgeLincolnRockwell
George Lincoln Rockwell channelling General Douglas MacArthur’s famous corncob pipe

While no statistics so far have been released so far as to what the rally cost local and state law enforcement, and thus it is hard to quantify the impact of it in real terms of economic damage to ZOG, given 50 racist liberals dressed up as ghosts cost the city of Charlottesville $32,835 ($41,876 AUD) when they protested the removal of the statue honouring General Robert E. Lee in July with little fanfare, it’s fair to say that with two dead police officers, one dead land-whale, and 20+ crippled by Based Car Man, the Unite The Right rally will have cost ZOG a hell of a lot more than that.

land_whale_by_dwarf4r-d8i1xr3
Heather Heyer who was killed by Based Car Man 

While plenty of moderate conservatives and “sensible government” types will groan at this expense, and expense they will ultimately bear the brunt of, consider the impact to ZOG here in Australia as a result of the various anti-Islam rallies:

The Melton rally was part of a national day of action by Reclaim­ Australia against the Islamisation of Australia’ with rallies held across the country. Similar clashes in Bendigo and Melbourne earlier this year each cost taxpayers about $250,000 in police resources, however, the Melton rally was even larger and more costly.”

That’s a grand total of more than $750,000 AUD the state government had to draw from somewhere: Whether that $750,000 was diverted away from indoctrinating children into becoming catamites for the sexual deviants employed by Victorian Department of Education (or any of the other sick programmes the State of Victoria employs the sodomites and Trotskyites at LaTrobe University to come up with); or it was drawn from the Victoria Police budget and was $750,000 that wasn’t there to stop the negroes in Dandenong and Melton from engaging in home invasions and carjackings; the boots on the ground approach makes it increasingly harder for Joe Sixpack and Sally Soccermum to ignore the problems the Jew-capitalist elite create in our societies, and will ultimately lower their faith in the system and turn them towards our ideologies. As Uncle Bill once wrote:

“A revolutionary attitude is virtually non-existent in America, outside the Organization, and all our activities to date don’t seem to have changed this fact. The masses of people certainly aren’t in love with the System-in fact, their grumbling has increased steadily over the past six or seven years as living conditions have deteriorated – but they are still far too comfortable and complacent to entertain the idea of revolt.”
William Luther Pierce, The Turner Diaries

So while our lack of media control and therefore lack of influence may prevent us from taking power through the way of mass movement, this doesn’t mean there aren’t other means of cultivating a revolutionary spirit within our people. While some moderates might be scared off, and the perpetual contrarians might call the rallies “bad for optics and PR”, this shouldn’t stop further displays of mass force and boots on the ground as means of, as James Mason would put it, “smashing the Pig System” and bringing about Total Aryan Victory once and for all.

GeneralLee
The General Robert E. Lee Monument breaks free of its plinth at Emancipation Park

FAIRFAX MEDIA’S CRIMINAL TROLL EXPOSED!

 

B/ The sick Fairfax troll Luke McMahon

I have already addressed the untruths printed about me in a fake-news article by shadowy Fairfax journalist, Luke McMahon. Having been labelled one of Australia’s worst trolls — even though I have not had any complaints of trolling levelled my way — I can go on to reveal the troll is in fact – McMahon himself.

McMahon has, for nearly two years, been stalking me around social media. He has created YouTube channels, fake Facebook accounts, and even been active on Twitter. He also created a Daily Stormer profile under the name ‘That Aussie Guy’ on which he shared a defamatory page about me from the extremist Antifascist Action Sydney blog (which we suspect he has a hand in maintaining). It has shown all evidence of being a deranged obsession.

But the level of McMahon’s stalking is now in the criminal realm and it is a matter of whether or not to make an official police complaint against the Fairfax employee: a development that would surely require comment from his supporting editors at the odious organisation! We shall see.

Luke
Luke McMahon. If anyone in Melbourne knows this guy, please contact either Australia First Party or UNA. He is wanted for making serious threats among his other crimes

 

I blocked McMahon from my Facebook a long time ago, but he turned up again prior to and after the publication of the fake news article. The trouble is, he was stalking the account of a party colleague, who he was convinced – was me.

His baiting came from two accounts, of which forensic testing of his computers will reveal both belong to McMahon. In one, he posted as Luke McMahon. In the other, he adopted the vile persona of Mark Watford. He revealed them to be one and the same by cross-sharing information on both accounts, and dually targeting the wrong chap. Also, he made no effort to conceal the pathology of his own typing habits so you can plainly see they were sent by the same person: of this, there is no doubt whatsoever. Maybe McMahon wants to get caught, who can say?

McMahon’s Watford account is a straight case of using a carriage to harass and intimidate. In the screen grabs supplied to the Australia First Party, this very sick man, who is supposedly anti-racist, made heavy use of anti-Semitic slurs and outright threats of violence. He did this as part of his campaign to convince nationalists that I am Jewish. His theory appears to be that if he goads long enough I’ll somehow snap. It is ‘gaslighting’.

I blocked McMahon from my Facebook a long time ago, but he turned up again prior to and after the publication of the fake news article. The trouble is, he was stalking the account of a party colleague, who he was convinced – was me.

Soon after publication of the defamatory fake-news article by Fairfax, a video I made a while ago, and which I explained in the previous instalment of this story, appeared on a YouTube channel called ‘Aussie Lads’ I NOTE THIS is a very similar moniker to his Daily Stormer account, ‘That Aussie Guy’.

I COMPLAINED TO YOUTUBE.

McMasters
McMahon or ‘McMasters’ uses Fairfax’s address to conduct his trolling

 

In the process of issuing my complaint, McMahon’s details were supplied to me with a mobile phone number and an address which turns out to be Fairfax offices in Melbourne. Also, his name is given as ‘Luke McMasters’. Now, this is significant, because this YouTube channel exists to troll patriots. It is trolling. Moreover, it is happening directly in the name of Fairfax Media. McMahon has used his credentials to try and appropriate my copyright on my own video as a means of ‘trolling’ me.

But that is not the most disturbing part: growing increasingly frustrated at his lack of response from the account holder on Facebook he was convinced was me, McMahon posted evidence that he has been stalking what he believes to be my home address.

18175790_455425074804189_457123512_oCavendish

Watford1

Watford2

On the Watford account, along with a lot of sick threats and deranged dribble about “following” me home, he posted a pic of what he purports is where I live. At the same time, on the tranche of harassing private messages in the name of Luke McMahon, he provides that same address, making careful allusions to physical threats to be carried out. He even makes screen grabs of his Daily Stormer posts in those messages. So now one must question the sanity of the fellow.

Regardless or not of any hereditary mental illness he may be suffering, McMahon is a Fairfax Media employee, whose defamations were allowed to be published without question by a supposed institution of hard news.

But that is not the most disturbing part: growing increasingly frustrated at his lack of response from the account holder on Facebook he was convinced was me, McMahon posted evidence that he has been stalking what he believes to be my home address.

Yet, he also makes reference to “Andy Hutchings” (PROBABLE EARLIER IDENTITY OF SLACKBASTARD BUT A PLAYER IN THE NETWORK)) having information on me, suggesting that the CURRENT Slackbastard operator (real name Professor Rob Sparrow of Monash University), is perhaps paying for a private investigator.

The pics of what he believes are my address, and which will have to become subject to a police report, were either taken by a private investigator or one of the networks of anarchists working in the area. ‘Yusef’ of the Australian Communist Workers Party made threats of violence against me and Jim Saleam after the publication of the fake news. His connection to the duo and their threats of violence is yet to be determined.

So, it is no surprise that this campaign of harassment is being waged by both Slackbastard and McMahon who are known to be close associates.

So who IS McMahon? A search of the electoral role pinpointed him clearly as the Luke McMahon whose details are “suppressed”.

However, his Linked account gives a nice little biographical background which we shall use to track him down.

So, it is no surprise that this campaign of harassment is being waged by both Slackbastard and McMahon who are known to be close associates.

According to his profile, the one who calls me a “bin scab” lists his major talents as Investigative Journalism (lol), Law (as in ‘breaking it’), and Advisory (as in reporting to Slackbastard).

He is listed as Australian coordinator — ‘founder’ of Media Direct. Thereafter, he references several positions that he has held, and which people might remember him from, such as Managing Director of ‘Job Community’, and IYSS case manager for Anglicare Australia. Perhaps those organisations can provide a comment on this man’s behaviour, too. Finally, he was educated at the University of Melbourne, and has, if he is not just fabricating his work history, a degree in law.

Yes, in law… This is what age we are living in folks, investigative journalists that don’t investigate the stories they fake up, and lawyers whose principal occupation is breaking the very law they spent years studying.

It is of the utmost importance that readers in Melbourne or elsewhere who know anything about McMahon either contact the Australia First Party or the United Nationalists Australia. We will provide an image of him on our blog. We want to know everything: where he hangs out, who his friends are, where he parks his car, where he walks his dog (or boyfriend), where he buys his lipstick, what drugs the degenerate uses — everything.

I wish to finish by pointing out an irony. It was around two years ago when I learned that Christopher Shortis had been defamed in an article by Fairfax Media. In it, every effort was made to infer, based on a video that Chris had uploaded to YouTube that given his faith in Jesus and his fondness for collecting guns he was a potential ‘Anders Breivik’. I was studying media law at the time and recognised this right away as gross defamation. I did not know Chris then, but I passed on this word through back channels.

Who would have thought that soon after leaving court having travelled to Melbourne to support my now-colleague Christopher Shortis I would be subject to the same treatment by the same Fairfax criminal? It makes you wonder.

Nathan Sykes

20160622_192042
McMahon survivors together

 

COMMUNIST EXTREMIST IN TERROR PLOT AGAINST AUSSIE NATIONALISTS

COMMUNIST EXTREMIST IN TERROR PLOT AGAINST AUSSIE NATIONALISTS

A communist extremist is said to be plotting an act of terror against two Australian nationalists, as reported by the Australia First Party.

A member of the Communist Workers’ Party of Australia — a radicalised splinter group — and admin of their Facebook Page identified as “Yousef” is alleged to be behind the plan. The two nationalists are named as Australia First Party President Jim Saleam, and AFP member, Nathan Sykes.

Using the Facebook identity Sleek Castro, Yousef, who is of Lebanese descent, is said to be preoccupied with violent revolution and wishes to make a name on the Communist scene.

We are unaware of whether the Federal Police are investigating Yousef or his group, who are regular protestors at the Villawood Detention Centre in Sydney.

We are unaware of whether the Federal Police are investigating Yousef or his group, who are regular protestors at the Villawood Detention Centre in Sydney.

The extremists have been involved in pro-refugee activities outside the centre such as the “Free Saeed” campaign, who is an Iraqi refugee.

Yousef is reported to have organised the assaults at the Villawood picket site last fortnight after reading a defamatory article about Sykes penned by Fairfax troll, Luke McMahon.

In the article, McMahon deliberately misrepresented Sykes as “Jewish” and a major racist “troll”.

In the article, McMahon deliberately misrepresented Sykes as “Jewish” and a major racist “troll”.

It was a fascination with McMahon’s slurs that is said to have inspired Yousef’s plan, which involved assembling a group to stalk and assault the two men.

We are making nationalists aware of this “Yousef”, his ‘party’, and his social media page which we link to.

It is unknown at this stage whether McMahon or his friend “Slackbastard” are linked to the plot.

tyusef
Yousef, or “Sleek Castro” as he appears on his Facebook page is behind a terror plot against nationalists