STREET PROTESTS: OUR FAVOURITE WASTE OF TIME

STREET PROTESTS: OUR FAVOURITE WASTE OF TIME

Once again, Cobbers, we have sent out our cub reporter to cover a Civic Patriot versus Anti-Fascist showdown on Spring Street in Melbourne.

The demonstration was called by Avi Yemeni in aid of his pet causes: crime prevention, getting more paying pupils for his martial arts club and, naturally, the Avi Yemini Admiration Society, of which he is the sole director and beneficiary.

Whatever else we have written about Avi, who has no place speaking on behalf of Aussies in any case, the gravest accusation we can now level at him is that we do not believe he is sincere in what he is saying.

His performance at the microphone today was rambling, self-conscious and put forth a narrative so hackneyed and yet so vague that it really led the listener nowhere in particular.

carf
The counter rally was small, yet they still outnumbered the Right-Wing contingent by three to one.

Every conservative and right-wing law and order trope were rolled out, repeatedly, by the four main speakers: Avi, some Jewish guy whose name we didn’t catch, an incredibly boring man from an anti-crime Facebook group who droned on for almost half an hour and jolly Hugh Pearson, the Asian loving patriot.

Whatever else we have written about Avi, who has no place speaking on behalf of Aussies in any case, the gravest accusation we can now level at him is that we do not believe he is sincere in what he is saying.

Having witnessed Avi Yemini’s half-hearted build up for his rally over social media and then been present for the whole spectacle we had the impression that he only showed up in the end to save face, his many thousands of page likes online only translating to fewer than 60 attendees.

This disconnect between cyberspace and the real world is something we have pointed out, time and again, on our blog; it has been our contention that what people say online and what they are prepared to do out in the real world have no relationship to one another.

avi yemini
Avi Yemini, the blustering Oaf who organised the rally, tries and fails to inspire his followers

Despite all the rhetoric from government, the security services, and the panhandling anti-radicalisation experts it is our firm belief that the internet is effectively useless as a tool to mould minds and urge people to concrete action; in the rare cases where the hook has been set in some individuals it has appeared to us to be the most inefficient and time-consuming method of political practice.

The telling aspect of the rally was that well over two-thirds of the people in attendance were die-hard patriots from established street crews, chiefly Soldiers Of Odin and True Blue Crew; without their numbers, Avi Yemini would have been preaching to less than twenty of his followers.

This disconnect between cyberspace and the real world is something we have pointed out, time and again, on our blog; it has been our contention that what people say online and what they are prepared to do out in the real world have no relationship to one another.

What is more, Avi, when questioned by a journalist on whether he was aware that some of the people at his rally were avowed “Nationalists” he played the old free speech card, saying he didn’t agree with them but that he respected their right to hold whatever views they choose to.

Yemini need not have worried since the now familiar patriot bands hung on his every word and ate up his hard-edged but decidedly cosmopolitan spiel as if it was their last supper; given the “racist” public utterances, over the years, of many of these patriots we are happy to call bullshit on the whole affair, just as the Antifa did.

We are sure that in the coming hours and days certain photographs will emerge, be prepared for the Patriots to pass on shots of a photogenic young Asian girl posed with an Australian flag and a placard; in their efforts to appear “non-racist” the Patriots staged her as some antipodean, cosmopolitan Nike, a truly sad display.

antifa arrest
A historic photograph of Melbourne’s final Black Bloc being unceremoniously dismantled by the Traps

In effect, on Spring Street today we witnessed two cosmopolitan, hard-edged, anti-Fascist demonstrations with tirades of malapropisms and misinformation flung hither and yon over the barricades and police lines; the differences between the two formations were probably only ones of social class, all certainly agreed that “Fascism” was to be thwarted, we can attest to that much.

The most interesting aspect of the twin rallies was the police response to the Antifa and Left-Wing provocations; having, only last week, gained access to new powers to move-on or arrest troublemakers the riot squad pounced upon anyone wearing masks or Black Bloc attire, with several arrests being made even before the counter rally set off on their march.

Antifa on the streets were never a threat to anyone but themselves and the wider Leftist milieu due to the heat they brought down on that side with their unhinged antics, yet it is amusing to see these supposedly tough guys being manhandled like toddlers by the cops.

These new police powers, which were made necessary by near riots at Coburg in 2016, have effectively put an end to the anonymous Antifa and Black Bloc violence in Melbourne which has plagued public demonstrations since the late 1990’s.

Antifa on the streets was never a threat to anyone but themselves and the wider Leftist milieu due to the heat they brought down on that side with their unhinged antics, yet it is amusing to see these supposedly tough guys being manhandled like toddlers by the cops.

In the end, our reporter wasted the better part of his Sunday watching the usual suspects: the same old patriots, the same journalists, the same Leftists and even the same Police officers milling about in the city, achieving nothing and signifying little.

However, now we know without a doubt that Avi Yemini is just another narcissistic nobody with a Facebook page, that certain patriot groups would turn up to the opening of a letter if the Left were going to be there and that today saw the sunset on twenty years of Antifa tomfoolery.

neil
Neil Erikson being throttled by a Communist, the day summed up in one frame
Advertisements

‘OZRAELI AVI YEMINI’ AND THE MOSSAD PATRIOT CHAIN

‘OZRAELI AVI YEMINI’ AND THE MOSSAD PATRIOT CHAIN

The background

When one of our staff messaged Zionist Avi Yemini by Facebook to substantiate any involvement with fringe political crook Nick Folkes we knew it was a roll of the dice as to whether or not he would respond, and if he did, would he be straight with us?

Nationalists had detected links between Folkes’s Party for Freedom and Yemini. There has been no proof to date that he and Folkes have any direct involvement together, yet members of his unregistered micro party certainly have, so the prospect existed.

However, as unsurprising as all this is, it actually warrants a good explanation, given its maze of ethical contradictions. For instance, UNA has learned that the former leader of Squadron 88, who goes by the possible alias Mark McDonald (we say alias because not even those in his inner circle really know anything about him), is now operating as PfF’s “security”. Once again, Matey Mate is recruiting for another suspect gang.

McDonald went hell for leather when he mysteriously appeared everywhere on the scene at once in 2013. Like a character from a spy novel, he materialised out of thin air, suddenly contacting anyone of note in the nationalist movement. How he came to make such varied connections is itself a mystery given the boy was a total greenhorn. Nevertheless, in no time he would bring ignominy down upon the Nationalist community while arrogantly dismissing every veteran around him. Just like Folkes, he became the latest in a historical chain of provocateurs, creating only discord for our nationalism.

When one of our staff messaged Zionist Avi Yemini by Facebook to substantiate any involvement with fringe political crook Nick Folkes we knew it was a roll of the dice as to whether or not he would respond, and if he did, would he be straight with us?

Matey Mate and his misfits were responsible for letterboxing Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s electorate in Sydney’s Eastern suburbs in September 2014 with badly written anti-Semitic flyers. The area has a high concentration of Jews. The purpose of the stunt was to gain notoriety for their group on the back of a recent incident of anti-Semitism that made the news. A gang of drunken teenagers (it has been suggested of Middle Eastern heritage) had boarded a bus bound for Bondi Junction and then allegedly threatened Jewish children as young as five. This generated community outrage and McDonald, who was enlisting for S88 via Stormfront Down Under, had the bright spark to cash in on it.

Interesting was, at the time, McDonald and his crew were in contact with one Howard Crawford, a Liberal party operative and, ironically, a staunch Zionist. Crawford was also involved with Folkes, and a peculiar alliance began. It was especially strange since S88 was primarily anti-Jew. McDonald lived in a dilapidated house belonging to a member of PfF. McDonald hosted many meetings at that house. Crawford was a regular visitor who occasionally brought gifts of beer and pizza.

The thing is, no matter how much it tries to piggyback on prevailing trends like the recent ‘edgy’ Alt-Right phenomenon, PfF is both a kosher patriot set and spoiler outfit. Radka Smith, who is the party’s second-in-charge, is Jewish. James Sternhell, who is not a PfF member but still supports PfF is as Jewish as a lox bagel. Thereafter, PfF was created specifically as an anti-Islam party. Folkes’s endorsement of Israel dates back to the days of when he and Darrin Hodges protested in defence of Max Brenner chocolates, a Jewish chain store targeted by left-wing pro-Palestinian groups.

screen-shot-2015-11-03-at-3-59-52-pm
George Jameson (L), Radka Smith (C), and some git (R). Back in 2014, Radka was abused for being a Jew by Mark McDonald who is now the Peanuts’ security. Is he another repentant Neil Erikson?

What then would supposedly fanatical neo-Nazis want with this mob? Putting aside Crawford and his Patriot Games, the question is as relevant as ever, since McDonald is back following an extended hiatus.

The Petersham-based McDonald was present earlier this year when the Peanuts hijacked a Penrith anti-mosque demonstration at Penrith. He also travelled to Lithgow for a failed demonstration against a proposed Moslem centre. He put in a furtive appearance at Newtown when Antifa failed to face down Nick and the Peanuts. Most recently, he marched with the Peanuts in Sydney, rallying around the statue of Captain Cook in Hyde Park. In one pic, he can be seen with his young recruits standing behind Jewish Jimmy Sternhell who is carrying a flagstaff. This did not seem to bother the supposedly virulent anti-Semite.

21754556_517427725286156_1363375268_n
Mark “Matey Mate” McDonald, the virulent anti-Semite standing behind James Sternhell (holding flag), who is very much a Semite. Contradictions? Nah…

What then would supposedly fanatical neo-Nazis want with this mob? Putting aside Crawford and his Patriot Games, the question is as relevant as ever, since McDonald is back following an extended hiatus.

Also at that rally was George Jameson who is of Serbian heritage. Seldom has a Patriot rally gone down when George wasn’t there. Wherever action is, Jameson is sure to be on hand. He waved the Israeli flag in the infamous image taken at the 2014 Penrith anti-mosque rally. His unremarkable Malteser head is everywhere if you browse through snaps from rallies past. Yet, despite his ubiquitousness, he remains a curious, marginal figure.

120914-diwarnai-bentrokan-pembangunan-musala-di-sydney-disetujui2-618x412
Georgie Boy Jameson intensifying his shilling for Israel

Jameson has been allied to rat Neil Erikson and attended each court date of The Bendigo Three, Erikson’s sole ally. Erikson has a history of involving himself in Folkes’s murky business. For a time there, Folkes’s enemies were Erikson’s enemies. Folkes’s lies became Erikson’s lies, and nobody tells pork pies quite as easily and unashamedly as Erikson. Erikson has lied so long and so often that to him truth is whatever pops into his mouth. Outside the trial, many nationalists reported Jameson was spotted with his skank Penny Tridgell in close consultation with Yemini. The three sure seemed thick as thieves. So when an emergent Zionist Patriot hero like Avi Yemini links up with associates of a freshly Nazified Nick Folkes you naturally ask, “What’s all this then?”

Similarly, when you hear from very reliable sources that the kid who modelled himself on Romper Stomper’s Hando, now aligned with Folkes, is attending Krav Maga classes in Bondi, a hand-to-hand combat system developed by the Israeli Defence Force, and of which Avi Yemini is a well-known exponent and entrepreneur then you sense the plot thickening.

Then, if you’re anything like our UNA staff, you fire off a private message to Yemini himself and ask him some rather blunt questions about his relationship with these characters. After all, true nationalism must be protected at all costs.

The Daily Mail and the “mocking” Jew

Just about every conspiracy theory regarding the Jews and their command of the mainstream media came true this week when our UNA staffer hit the send button on a series of private messages to Yemini.

That which started out as a fishing expedition for a quote regarding Yemini and Folkes wound up as a fake news story in the egregious Daily Mail. What was truly ridiculous was the angle given the story.

See, initially, our staffer asked Yemini about his involvement with Folkes. Yemini actually responded, much to his surprise. He told our chap that he had no involvement with Folkes. Our staffer then mentioned Jameson and asked about their tête-à-tête. Yemini, whose gift for champagne comedy rivals the greatest comedians who ever cracked a jape, responded with, “No. We’re in a gay relationship. He’s my sugar daddy.”

At this point, our staffer required emergency surgery so that his split sides could be sewn back together. Recoiling from the greatest rejoinder ever, the exchange eventually degenerated until it culminated with our scribe suggesting Avi tests out his “bullshit Jew martial art” in a “cage fight” with an “Aryan”. This wasn’t serious, although, frankly, it would be well worth the ticket price. As he put it to us, “I was dealing with an obtuse pillock whose schoolyard comebacks were deeply irritating and that’s what he got. Plus, I had several glasses of wine.”

So, imagine all of our surprises when we clicked on the Daily Mail and discovered this abortive exchange was deemed to be a news story in which a “neo-Nazi thug” was “mocked” by the hero Jew Patriot. In essence, the might of the mainstream media just did Avi’s fighting for him, and you have to interrogate that.

That which started out as a fishing expedition for a quote regarding Yemini and Folkes wound up as a fake news story in the egregious Daily Mail. What was truly ridiculous was the angle given the story.

This epochal put-down of his was not a genuine riposte since our writer never actually zinged him, to begin with. He only asked about a meeting witnessed between Avi and the Serb. When it came to print, however, that crucial point of the whole story was reduced to what is known in the trade as “bullshit”. It was inferred that he just happened by chance to be sitting next to “another” random “extreme right activist” in “the public gallery”, who was not mentioned by name. In fact, the meeting did not occur in the public gallery. After all of this, Yemini is still evading the question.

Then we had to field another problem, “How does a private message exchange from Facebook even end up with a journalist?”

12291897_904753899562212_1995994119040259997_o.jpg
A fully wakkas Aussie boy from Avi’s IDF school shows his Aussie Pride

There are two possibilities here: Yemini, being so proud of his fatuous response published it on his Facebook page and it was randomly spotted by a Daily Mail hack, or else Yemini has a hotline to the hacks and reported it promptly desiring either publicity or payback. Either is just as likely to be true. The disturbing thing is Yemini seems to be so regularly in the news.

As we ruminate about this mysterious Zionist’s power to command media, we will revisit our previous question about how this happened in the first place. This is where we took a look at the “journalist” involved and what did we discover? We found that Stephen Johnson is not one of your typical left-wing liberal ABC MEAA mafias, but is himself a civic patriot. This is interesting.

We checked out Johnson’s Twitter account since he had closed-settings on his Facebook page and we found a veritable who’s who of civic patriots and groups. By all accounts, this witless drab is a supporter of Avi Yemini and either is in contact with him regularly or makes a point of checking Avi’s FB page.

Then we had to field another problem, “How does a private message exchange from Facebook even end up with a journalist?”

So we have an ultra-orthodox Jew, or at least one with strong Zionist loyalties who has snagged for himself the leadership role in the yawning vacuum of the Reclaim Australia movement, consorting with a close comrade of Nick Folkes. When asked about this he whistled a sardonic tune to drown out the question and two days later is artificially declared the victor of a non-existent battle of wits by the DM, which is championing one who is making his bones as an anti, anti-racist activist. Confused?

It gets even more baffling since we got to this place in the first instance trying to figure out why this poster boy for Mossad is dealing with civics that deal with Nazis who deal with Jews.

Oh, and in its fake news article, it is worth noting that Johnson described Yemini as a “Jewish activist”. Bear this in mind because the distinction is of the utmost significance in its inadvertent resonance of truth.

The Mossad Patriot

The thing to do at a time like this is to stop, take a deep breath, and find out who the fuck Avi Yemini really is. What does a Jew think he’s doing styling himself as a dinky-di Aussie Patriot for Zionist Israel? Why do idiots buy into it in their tens of thousands on his tacky Facebook page? We can at least answer some of these questions.

As UNA types this screed, Yemini is preparing for a rally at Melbourne’s state parliament this Sunday to push his “Patriot” credentials on the broad basis of protesting a crime wave which he holds Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews responsible for. The platform is nebulous enough to satisfy all the requirements of the mainstreaming which the RA movement is infamous for. However, we think he hasn’t got the nuts to say what he really means, which is an AFRICAN crime wave. But there, we said it for him.

There is indeed a problem with Africans in Melbourne and it’s ironic that a Jewish fundamentalist has an issue with it since back in Israel they wanted to deal with their African problem by sending all of them here. But hey, where Jews are concerned, contradictions line the road like cryptic signposts.

Countering this nebulous show of civic dissatisfaction will be Antifa and a bunch of far left-wing groups who according to The Australian want to exert a show of strength against “the homophobic far-right”, which would suggest that some, or probably all of the parties involved, seriously have their issues mixed up.

But how could they make so angry when the chief organiser on the right side of the fence is a JEW? Haven’t they heard about the fourteen billion who were gassed and turned into ironing board covers and pillowcases during the thirty years of The Holocaust™?! Shouldn’t they be defending Avi, who, as persecuted minorities go in the game of victimhood, sits at the top of that particular food chain?

In that case, Avi is ‘the one’ since they don’t come more Jewish, or more Aussie, than Aussie Avi. So intertwined are the fortunes of our historically-wedded neighbouring nations that Avi had the genius inspiration to coin the term, Ozrael.

This is the price a patriot, and self-touted possible future candidate for One Nation must pay if he is going to do stuff. But what stuff is Avi going to do? Avi aims to reclaim Australia for Israel while reclaiming the Patriot movement from Blair Cottrell, who is a Nazi after all. If it’s to be a truly Australian movement then it must accept Jews. There should be nothing confusing about that since as brilliant nationalist theorist Neil Erikson pointed out when he told The Australian, “You cannot be a nationalist and NOT support Israel”.

In that case, Avi is ‘the one’ since they don’t come more Jewish, or more Aussie, than Aussie Avi. So intertwined are the fortunes of our historically-wedded neighbouring nations that Avi had the genius inspiration to coin the term, Ozrael.

21729089_516499462045649_1061722325_n
The easiest way to make Australia safe is to cut all ties with Israel and its bitch the UN, and send home all of its troublemakers

It’s pretty cool when, unlike an actual Australian, you inherit two identities. An Australian is just a, well, Australian, and we’re not even that because we’re mere boat people and anyone can be Australian. Only Aboriginals can truly be ridgy-didge Australians; even if White Europeans actually built this country. But an ISRAELI-AUSTRALIAN, well, he or she can enjoy the best of both worlds; shooting Palestinian kids one week, and bathing on iconic Bondi Beach the next. In fact, murdering Palestinians is as Australian as chucking a snag on the barbie or slicing a baby’s penis while a room full of kvetching Skypes nibbles a catered lunch.

Aussie Avi is so hell-bent on restoring this country to a pre-Whitlam Xanadu that he is doling out free stickers with “Make Australia Safe Again” on them. This must mean he is sincere!

Trouble is Australia will never be safe so long as these tribal Jews have any involvement in our country since they’re the most vociferous proponents of filling it with hostile aliens and then enacting laws so that we cannot speak out against them.

In that case, Avi is ‘the one’ since they don’t come more Jewish, or more Aussie, than Aussie Avi. So intertwined are the fortunes of our historically-wedded neighbouring nations that Avi had the genius inspiration to coin the term, Ozrael.

It is thanks to our “special relationship” with Israel that “international obligations” compel us to accept quota after quota of the refugees generated from pushing Israel’s agenda in the Middle East, so some, we’re not saying all, but some cynical souls just might want to tell Avi to fuck right off back to the red sea and drown.

So is Avi the darling of all media? Does the Jewish community, in general, regard him as an unsung hero for his tireless work promoting both himself and his homeland of Israel… erm, we mean, Australia?

Oddly enough, it depends on the ideological soundness of the publication, but we’ve discovered that Australian Jewish News isn’t terribly impressed with Avi’s dalliances with One Nation and ex-boot boy dickheads like Neil Erikson. In fact, they cannot get past the Erikson thing at all. This is a trend repeated by Jewish journalists in The New Matilda (no surprises there) and The Guardian. However, The Times of Israel, a neoconservative rag, allowed him a whole blog to gush about “Why I’m proud to be a fucking Jew”.

images
Avi never joined the Australian Defence Force. But instead, he went back to Israel to shoot Palestinian children

Nevertheless, when his first bold dash to seize patriot ground was attempted back in December last year after he invited One Nation senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts to address a meeting in a hall booked from Glen Eyrie Council matters came unstuck after the council cancelled the booking. But worse, the Jewish community was unified in their opposition to the meeting. Yemini responded by branding the council “anti-Semitic”.

Currently, Avi had his name and photo removed from the webpage of the Australian Jewish Association (AJA). The AJA was cobbled together only recently and Avi’s role in it is vague to those outside of its circles. For their part they claim, “Mr Yemini was never a director, office-bearer or spokesman for AJA.”

So is Avi the darling of all media? Does the Jewish community, in general, regard him as an unsung hero for his tireless work promoting both himself and his homeland of Israel… erm, we mean, Australia?

Yemini spat the dummy, accusing the fledgeling association of “cowardice” and adding, “I am resigning the board as I have lost faith in it.” Then he took credit for the whole idea, grizzling, and “I do it with a heavy heart as I do believe in the mission statement. In fact, the entire organisation was my idea.”

The first order of business at the AJA’s very recent launch at South Caulfield Synagogue was to discuss “The Threat of Islam to Jews”. This was after another, more nervous venue cancelled, for fears of a terror attack. It wasn’t ‘the threat of Islam to Australians’ but to “Jews”.

Avi’s objectives couldn’t be clearer — to garner support for his true homeland — and those who are fool enough to revere this foreign agent as being somehow emblematic of “Aussie pride” just reveal their ignorance. They are also hopelessly doomed to being fodder for the system.

Avi-Yemini.png
Once again, Avi showing his pride in another Nation, this time America’s (then soon-to-be) President

On another occasion, ever sensitive to Israel’s interests, Avi took offence at the ABC broadcasting a graphic in which Israel appeared to Yemini to have been blacked over on the map and captioned as being ‘Palestine’ in a news item. Posting once more on his Facebook page gained him media coverage after he feverishly wrote, “Last night ABC News wiped Israel off their map. They’re literally doing the Islamists’ dirty work for them. We must defund these traitors immediately.”

If it isn’t patently obvious by now that Yemini is a full-time shill for Israel then consider that through his “IDF Training” gym in Melbourne the former Israeli soldier has trained members to fight in Israel — that means to kill Palestinians. There is even an online application to join the Israeli Army on his IDF Training webpage! Ignoring the narrative of the occupiers,  Palestinian people’s land is being occupied by an aggressor comparable to the Nazis of Jewish Hollywood. It has been reported, too, that at his gym he ran a charity drive collecting money for Israeli Defence Force (IDF) families back in Israel: not Legacy.

Just in case there is any doubt remaining that Avi serves Israel’s interest and his whole involvement in Patriot Politics is to drum up backing for the chosen ones and their illegal wars, Avi runs the Facebook Page “I Stand with Mossad”.

Yemini was born here yet served as in the Israeli army — a soldier for a foreign state — and his loyalties so clearly lie with that aggressive little stretch of desert which is, one way or another, determining the fate of the entire world. If Israel was not unduly “recognised” by our government he would be considered in terms of a terrorist.

21729084_516499528712309_1264026518_n
Avi’s “other” group is not titled I Stand With ASIO

All his life Avi was burning to return to his Israel and kill Palestinians; a western-mandated one-sided conflict that is generating nearly all contretemps with the Arab world. This is very Australian of him. And this loyalty to an alien race is something else that typifies what we know as the far-right in this country — this blurring of the line that assumes any enemy of Islam is an ally of Australia and through that alliance IS Australian.

Nationalists first saw this in Reclaim Australia which ignited but then quickly came under the control of the Zionists who rebranded Patriotism and now want to own the word ‘Nationalism’. Indeed, just as much of what we buy is branded “MADE IN CHINA”, so much of what passes for far-right politics in this country should be stamped “MADE IN ISRAEL”.

UNA has defined Nationalism for our readers in every permutation possible. But here is the Collins English Dictionary definition: “Loyalty or devotion to one’s country; patriotism” — got that, Avi, to ONE’S country, not someone else’s country.

Just in case there is any doubt remaining that Avi serves Israel’s interest and his whole involvement in Patriot Politics is to drum up backing for the chosen ones and their illegal wars, Avi runs the Facebook Page “I Stand with Mossad”.

In 2010, it was revealed that Mossad faked three Australian passports used to murder Hamas leader Mahmoud Al Mabhouh in Dubai. Mossad regularly used fake Australian passports. Israel got snooty when our government asked questions. This is what a great friend Israel and Mossad are to us.

Birth of a Zionist

In 2004, a 52 min documentary Welcome To The Waks Family aired on SBS. Produced by a friend of Avi’s father, Zephaniah Waks, it documented a period in the lives of his Melbourne-based, Jewish orthodox family.

Avraham was one of 17 children raised in strict Chabad observance by Zephaniah and his wife, Chaya.

What stuck out was that Zephania’s  family did not bring him up to be such a fanatical Yid. They raised him in what most would describe as an “assimilated” lifestyle on Sydney’s North Shore.

welcometothewaksfamily.png
It was like Sylvania Waters only with the score to Fiddler on the Roof playing in the background

As a young bloke in the 70s, the liberal Zephaniah led a hippy lifestyle. He smoked Pot, surfed, and was ‘groovy’. But he began to feel spiritual pangs (either that or the munchies). His metaphysical yearnings led him to Buddhism, but he soon met some Lubavitch Jews. Before long he was sporting a gruesome beard, locks, and observing all the Hebrew pieties. Zephaniah was back with the tribe and that, in essence, is the goal of the Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidic movement — to reunite Jews with their faith so that Maschiach, or the Messiah, will rock back on down to earth and high-five all the Israelites (except the women, for modesty reasons).

Yemini Hippie Father
Avi’s dad Zephaniah back in his secular hippy days channeling Frank Zappa

Meanwhile, Avi’s mother grew up in Israel as strict as they come. At the time of the doco, the woman had never visited a cinema, or attended a gig; not even to see Simon and Garfunkel. The 70s were wasted on her. But she obediently submitted to her wifely duties squeezing out 17 new Jews. She spent the rest of her time wiping their bums and cooking. But not on Saturdays, since work of any kind are forbidden to these weirdos: they’re not even allowed to turn off a light-switch.

Avraham was one of 17 children raised in strict Chabad observance by Zephaniah and his wife, Chaya.

Outside of that, they were not permitted to play with “goyim” children. In one scene of this documentary, rather than risk mixing with the goyim, the Jewish community hires out Melbourne’s Luna Park for a day of fun in their yarmulkes. But they cannot leave well enough alone even on a break and the men can be seen stopping to pray in a room. This is where we come to wonder about Avi’s obsession with Islam. For all intents and purposes, his lifestyle was Islamic.

Instead of veils, Chabad women wear wigs or hats. They’re not as bad as Islamic women, certainly, but the men’s look is seriously crook. What’s more, due to modesty laws, Hasidic men and women, regardless of whether they’re married or not, cannot touch one another or socialise; even at a wedding. That sort of inhuman observance would please any Grand Mufti. But the Taliban stuff continued: movies, novels, mainstream music, none of these were allowed in the Waks household (what kind of name is Waks?). They had a TV and entertainment unit, but tacked to the glass of the cabinet was a note that read, “This unit is used only for Kadesh secular educational and family videos.”

Pity Hollywood Jews don’t feel that way when it comes to entertainment and the goyim mind.

PossibyAvi
The “Patriot” in embryo

Then there is food; Chabad Jews are just as fucked up about their food as Moslems. The Waks required two different stoves and a whole extended kitchen just to deal with their kosher requirements. Apparently, the council was so suspicious over planning drafts they suspected the Waks was planning on building a boarding house since their kitchen was so unbelievably huge.

Sealing them even more hermetically in a Jewish bubble, the family house was across the road from the Chabad factory: the St Kilda Yeshiva College, which is not only where the children were sent for religious indoctrination, but where Manny Waks, Avi’s brother, was sexually abused by a male guard.

Pity Hollywood Jews don’t feel that way when it comes to entertainment and the goyim mind.

Two other members of the Waks family were also interfered with while building their acquaintanceship with Hashem.

This all came out many years later and was the catalyst for the smashing of Manny and Zephania’s faith while Avi would side with the college and the Chabad community. This we draw attention to since it says much about Avi’s loyalty as a son and brother but more so where his loyalties lie to Australia. Avi wants to protest those Moslems who hold our laws in contempt yet opposes Mesirah, which is where a Jew reports another Jew to non-Rabbinic persons. How’s that any different from Sharia, or a Moslem refusing to observe respect for a magistrate or judge?

BetterPictureofYeshivaWhereMannyWasMolested.png
The view of the pedo rape house Jew college from the house where Yemini grew up

Manny’s case brought a supportive father out of a religious order Zephaniah Waks now dismisses as a “cult”. The charges were upheld and the college shamed. The case became a subject of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Rabbi Zvi Telsner, The Rabbi in charge of the college resigned in 2015 (his contract was renewed in August 2017, after the head died down). But for going against the tribe Manny, Zephaniah and Chaya were ostracised by the “cult” community.

AvisFatherJewishCommunityHiresOutLunaParkToCelebrateHolidayMostlyGoyimFree(exceptforshleppingstaff)
Avi’s dad and the Melbourne Jewish community enjoy a Goyim-free day at Luna Park

Avi’s parents sold up their house and moved on. But Avi is the most vicious of anyone in that cult: he went levelled bogus allegations of abuse against his own father in a bid to invalidate their accusations, which have been confirmed by the process of Australian law. He accused his victimised brother and father of conspiring in a lie.

A case of defamation arose between him and his brother over a Facebook post in which he inferred that, because of a disgraced Rabbi, who had been charged in New York with child offences, stayed at their home, they were hypocrites. The family claims they were unaware and asked him to leave when they learned the truth.

Two other members of the Waks family were also interfered with while building their acquaintanceship with Hashem.   

Note, too, that Avi no longer uses the surname Waks (can hardly blame him there) but Yemini. This is interesting since his mother was actually born in Yemen and moved to Israel as a nipper.

Can'tgetMoreAussieThanThis.png
The full Waks

In the end, what is the difference between the Islam that Avi wants us to unite with the Jews against and his Hasidic community and other outspoken Jews? They are both alien cultures who wish to recreate their foreign environment within our midst and impose their beliefs and attitudes.

As demonstrated above, when it came to a choice between his Judaism and his family, his religion came first. How do you think he feels about Australia?

Strictly business

In an interview with the Times of Israel, Avi admitted his intentions have little to do with embracing Australianness. He said, “My wife and I launched our business, IDF Training in 2009. Our goal went beyond supporting our growing family. Our mission was to show (Australian) Jews that being a proud Jew, being a proud Zionist can work for you and should be part of your business plan.”

And that, Folks, is the rub. If you think that Avi came amongst us inept Goyim to expunge “Nazis” from the Patriot Movement and lead us to a new golden age of Aussie identity, think again. His purpose is two-fold, to garner backing for Israel, and to fill his pockets with shekels. He has already admitted that he has political ambitions, and much as Pauline Hanson cynically used the Australian people for a payday this is Avi’s goal too.

Our media gives this Zionist oxygen, and the manner in which he was inserted into the contentious Game of Patriots to rival the “Nazi” Blair Cottrell should speak volumes to those who truly oppose the Globalist Order.

Sadly, the average Aussie Patriot is out of his ken when it comes to these matters, especially when the beguiling element of Zionism is thrown into the mix. They make the simple arithmetic that an enemy of their enemy is not only their friend but their ally. They have never had a head for world affairs and cannot draw the lines that connect Israel and its American host with the deeds and intrigues that generate Moslem immigration in the first place. They have little idea of the role that Israel has played in destabilising Syria which led to Tony Abbott, himself a Zionist, to import 12,000 Syrians into our country.

Because they are so clueless, these ‘Patriots’ as they apocryphally call themselves, haven’t figured out you can only be patriotic to your own people — not an alien Semitic race. But time and time again they fail this lesson, as they did by throwing support behind non-Australian, non-White Danny Nalliah.

These faux patriots are just as likely to support an African “Patriot” if he interposed himself on their movement. All he would need to do is to wrap the flag around himself, mouth a few platitudes, and due to the novelty of it all he would win their vote.

We now return to where we started — Nick Folkes and his Peanuts for Freedom. We have it on good authority that Nick Folkes did not sanction the stunt in which Jameson, a Downs Syndrome sufferer, and Neil Erikson stormed a Yarra Council meeting. And knowing Nick, who is jealous of anyone he senses as a rival, he is not pleased with the rise of Avi Yemini. But as capitulation is his only option, will Nick now once again publicly return to his support for Zionism and ditch the Totenkopf decals of the “edgy” Alt-Right?

Something is happening there, and because of the over-the-top reaction when UNA merely asked Avi what his business with Jameson is — seeing as how Jameson and his Peanut friends now have a staunch anti-Semite SS wannabe as “security” — we suggest that it is important enough since the question was so publically obfuscated by a curious chain of Zionist Patriots.

dekzjagtnlyuxgx-800x800-nopad
Aussie Patriots, we present Blair Cottrell’s replacement as Supreme Leader of the Aussie Patriot Movement for Reclaim Australia

 

 

THE ‘BENDIGO THREE’ VERDICT — INSIDE KANGAROO COURTROOM 19 AS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS REPEALED IN VICTORIA

THE ‘BENDIGO THREE’ VERDICT — INSIDE KANGAROO COURTROOM 19 AS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS REPEALED IN VICTORIA

Victoria is now officially an Orwellian Police State following last week’s conviction of the Bendigo Three on charges arising from the mock beheading of a dummy.

On Tuesday, September 5, in Melbourne Magistrates Court, Magistrate John Hardy found Blair Cottrell, Neil Erikson, and Chris Shortis guilty under section 25(2) of The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act, 2001 (RRTA). This is the first time that section of the law has been used in a prosecution. A conviction was recorded for each defendant, and a fine of $2000 plus a $79.50 statutory charge was imposed.

This judgment marks a turning point. Having peeled off its mask, the multiculturalist state is now showing its true authoritarian face. Magistrate Hardy’s judgment has not only set the bar for prosecution perilously low but decided it can be set anywhere the state chooses. Freedom of speech is the foundation of all other freedoms in a democratic society. Before the advent of multiculturalism in this country, the main restrictions to that implied freedom of expression were defamation, obscenity, intellectual property and incitement. While some argue that vilification laws are similar to defamation laws, the differences between the two indicate how far our freedoms have been eroded in the name of safeguarding feelings.

download (3)
The much overused still from the infamous video that incited hatred against Moslems and will probably trigger World War Three

Firstly, defamation is civil law, whereas section 25(2) of the RRTA is criminal law. Secondly, in defamation law, the plaintiff initiates a lawsuit and seeks a legal remedy. In Ross versus Shortis, Cottrell and Erikson, there was no complainant as in a criminal case. No Muslim had ever complained they felt ridiculed, hated, or treated as an object of contempt. No Patriot has testified that the video had incited them to have these attitudes. Instead, the case was brought by the Director of Public Prosecutions with Constable Erin Ross as the informant, who both exercised the entitlement that they, unlike ordinary citizens, have not to take the witness stand. This meant that the defendants could not cross examine their accusers as there were no accusers: a fundamental breach of procedural fairness, due process, and natural justice.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading. The video of the stunt together with extra footage of members walking and riding around Bendigo was uploaded to the United Patriots Front Facebook page as publicity for a 2015 rally held in Bendigo to protest the proposed building of a mosque.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading.

The first of the charges was ‘defacing the footpath and wall of the garden bed’ with ‘the emission of the red substance’. The second charge was ‘willfully damaging property’. “Damage does not need to be permanent”, presiding Magistrate Hardy informed the court. He left aside the question of why any rational person would describe a temporary stain on a footpath from water soluble food dye as “damage”. It took Bendigo Council two attempts to remove the pesky stain. The first time, ordinary water pressure from a hose wasn’t enough, but success was achieved the second time with a Gerni. A few weeks of weather and rain would probably have washed it away but then no-one would have been able to pretend it was a matter criminal enough to press charges. Chris Shortis actually paid the Council over $1000, a fine which exceeds the original cleaning bill. But the State required its pound of flesh!

download (6)
Magistrate John Hardy. He can find the harmless trigger of an eyebrow as incitement to ridicule or contempt

The first and second charges amounted to a prosecutorial fishing trip. The prosecutor, Fran Dalziel, was shamelessly up-front about this. She asked the Magistrate to hear the third charge first and only hear the other charges if the first charge was not proved. Hardy obligingly granted her request. The first two charges were only a backup. Clearly, it had been decided that the accused had to be charged with something, even if it ended up being trivial. Can anyone thereafter doubt that this trial was all along political and owed nothing to any theoretical victim?

RKTHwtp
The real victims in all of this

The trial lasted two days starting on a Monday. Supporters of the three accused had to pass through airport-style security on the ground floor, which was run by a security company. After queuing on the fifth floor, they passed through further security checkpoints, this time conducted by Victoria Police. These included complete photo ID scanning and twin 3D video cameras. Inside Courtroom 19, seating was restricted to 27 bodies, and much of that room was taken up by the less than objective media scrum. The lack of seating meant many travelled to court only to miss out on public seating.

Magistrate Hardy presented a curious anachronism, looking like a cross between Gandalf the Grey and Karl Marx. He informed the court that he had downloaded the RRTA and would read it out in the evening. However, by the end of the farcical proceedings, he would unquestioningly accept the prosecutor’s submission in what was so obviously a fait accompli. Before that, every pretence was made to try and lend seriousness to what was so evidently a show trial. Thus, presiding as he was over a circus, he cracked his whip on Day One of the two-day trial.

The Farce before the force

From the outset, a degree of exaggeration was necessary to contrive a sense of menace out of the stunt and convey this element of folk devilry to the court. A former official of the Greater Bendigo City Council took the stand, doing his best during testimony to convince the court this was a serious affair. After all, he had faced the extreme logistical difficulty and sheer angst posed by the mysterious red fluid it was his insurmountable duty to clean. Almost in judgement of this poppycock, a spectator’s mobile phone suddenly sounded, and the well-timed ringtone of The Benny Hill Show theme mocked the witness. He was subsequently cross-examined by each defendant in turn. Shown a more recent photograph of the ‘damage’ done by one of the defendants with the dummy’s fake blood, he sheepishly admitted that “the red spot may be a pebble”, and there was “no staining”. No graffiti artist had ever been held to such account.

download (4)
The Australia First Party have previously demonstrated in defence of the Bendigo Three

Thereafter, State functionaries dominated the first day’s proceedings with inane testimony that served only to pad out the dubious basis of the charges and give the court a false impression of their gravitas. Senior Sergeant John Phillip Dalton, the detective who headed the police response to the United Patriots Front Bendigo rallies, answered questions about the aims of the UPF. The prosecution then played the video, which was the only proper evidence presented throughout the trial. Afterwards, proceedings took a turn for the silly as Fran asked, “What is on Mr Shortis’s head?” “I’d say a religious cloth of some type”, Dalton replied. Under cross-examination, focus remained on the incriminating headdress worn by Chris Shortis, until Magistrate Hardy informed the defendants that a policeman’s opinion about a headdress was not admissible evidence. They might as well have taken Victorian taxpayer dollars and burnt the lot in a waste bin.

The following witness, Officer Gary Jenkins (a Freemason), didn’t even bother showing up. An excuse was given, that he had suffered a motorcycle accident. Examining the medical certificate (provided by one of the ‘brothers’?), Magistrate Hardy asked why he couldn’t be brought to court, as the certificate only covered work, not court. It was decided not to bother with his evidence, and another thrumming moment in Australian legal history squiggled to the ceiling like a yawning Z.

If the consequences of the day’s judgment would not turn out to be so grave, one may have been tempted to laugh as Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith took the stand. He led a raid on Chris Shortis’s house on Good Friday, 2016, where he seized Chris’s T-Shirt, jeans, and a toy Pirate’s sword. Of these vital pieces of evidence, the most dangerous was the T-Shirt, which hadn’t been washed. However, he forgot to bring them to court, a ditzy oversight that caused a 15-minute delay as they were sent for.

download (5)
Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith before Magistrate Hardy stole his Pirate sword

Once they arrived, Smith beamed devilishly. He could now show the court this damning evidence which he gleefully gathered up and fumbled with in his hands like an excited Lex Luther taunting Superman with kryptonite. But this was a comedy, not drama, and given such, he managed to clumsily drop the T-Shirt, sucking out the tiny puff of air that had momentarily inflated his sails in his moment of glory. He might have got to wave the sword about in a Douglas Fairbanks Jnr impression had the object described on the Bendigo Police evidence register as “One Fake Pirate Knife/Sword” not have been issued for destruction over a year earlier.

Another day, another truckload of taxpayers’ dollars

The morning of Day Two was taken up with submissions from the prosecutor and the three defendants followed by a rebuttal from Miss Dalziel. For reasons unknown, Detective Senior Constable Smith once more attended court, possibly hoping someone had found the Pirate sword. He evidently thought the prosecutor might have it, because in-between sessions he kept whispering anxiously in her ear. A request by Chris Shortis to quote from the Holy Qur’an was denied. He had hoped to share verse 8:12, which says, “Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): ‘I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them’.”

Denied this opportunity to be enriched by the words of the Prophet, the court adjourned for lunch so that Magistrate Hardy could consider his ruling and possibly play with the Pirate sword. On returning at 2 pm, the assembled were informed that Magistrate Hardy needed a further hour’s deliberation, proving he had found the sword after all. In the wash-up, and following all the tedious testimony from the witnesses, the only evidence taken into consideration was the first 39 seconds of the UPF video. Magistrate Hardy seemed particularly taken by this portion of the video given it contained his esteemed Pirate sword.

behead-the-infidel
Another victim of The Bendigo Three’s “intentions”

Mr Shortis had argued that since beheading is illegal, and the RRTA only protects lawful religious activity, the video cannot be subject to the act. Magistrate Hardy rejected this argument as “teleological”. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines teleology as “The explanation of phenomena in terms of the purpose they serve rather than of the cause by which they arise”. This seems to say more about Hardy’s convoluted reflections on the 39 seconds in the video than it does to Chris’s argument in their defence. In fact, we’re pretty sure it sounds like bullshit. Hardy might as well have yelled, “look behind you” for all the clarity of this argument. Likewise, he argued that the law was dealing with “Muslims not beheading”, which is again odd given that there were no Muslims in the video and the only thing beheaded was a sex toy.

But as sure as he invalidated all of Chris’s arguments, he ignored his contention relevant sections of the Australian Constitution imply freedom of expression and that Australia is a signatory to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The latter includes the right to freedom of opinion and expression as a basic principle. Hardy did not agree that there is a conflict between the RRTA and the corresponding Federal law. He did not refer to the Keating government memorandum which suggests there may be. As to the lack of a plaintiff or complainant, he simply said that section 25 does not require it, airily dismissing legal investigation. He noted that the video had chalked-up 275 likes, establishing that it had an audience, which was, to him, a solid basis for construing the malicious intent in the video he believed exists had probably gestated already in weak minds.

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.  Where intent is the issue then inference must be used … The context of the video leaves me no alternative than to find that the intention was to incite serious contempt or ridicule of persons of the Muslim faith.”

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.

So, no actual incitement needs to occur, mere intention, a mental state, is enough to convict and inference is all that’s required to “prove” the mental state of the accused. Thus the burden of proof is reversed for an action merely imputed, which is abstraction upon abstraction. No real barrier remains for the prosecution of anyone the state does not like and the broadness as well as the vagueness of the offending article is pure Kafka. Thus, the presentation of opposing views to any area of the multicultural dogma is potentially a punishable offence, be it Islam, African crime, Chinese imperialism or the objection to curry odours in a unit block. If these views are presented publicly, regardless of whether criminal activity occurs as a result, it can be considered as “incitement”, demonstrable by a few clicks of the ‘like’ button on Facebook. In other words, opposing multiculturalism is a thought crime as well as a hate crime, especially if expressed on Facebook, which half of the legal justice system and Police Force seem to spend their time (and our money) gawping at.

The one glimmer of light from the Magistrate in this otherwise grotesque Stalinesque show trial came during sentencing. The prosecutor claimed that the defendants were lacking in remorse.  Magistrate Hardy, for once disagreeing with Miss Dalziel, noted that remorse in issues of principle is a bit different from remorse in matters such as rape. Undeterred, Fran declared that “Opposition to Islam continues to be held by these men!”

Magistrate Hardy, salvaging an atom of credibility, reminded Miss Dalziel that “They are entitled to oppose Islam it is how that opposition is expressed that is at issue”. But this is another instance of Hardy’s dingbat logic given that opposition cannot exist WITHOUT expression and there are no terms of reference to define the acceptable expression.

In other words, two plus two now equals anything but four.

It is worth noting, too, that when the guilty verdict was delivered members of the media — some believe from the ABC — pumped the air with their fists in a show of celebration.

Following the decision, Blair Cottrell and what’s-his-name went off to file an appeal. Chris Shortis is considering his options.

Bendigo-Three-Arrive-at-Labors-Show-Trial
UNA salutes our smiling hero, Chris Shortis

ED — We point out here that Chris Shortis is a member of United Nationalists Australia, however, this article was produced by another member of our growing team who was present both days of the Kangaroo court.

GAME OVER FOR NICK FOLKES

GAME OVER FOR NICK FOLKES

Nick Folkes has an occasional good idea. His best so far was when he encouraged his loyal Peanuts, who were out at Lithgow last weekend, to nuisance call certain people between one and three on Saturday morning.

Actually, nuisance is a benign word; they were, in fact, obscene calls conveyed in a lewd and debasing fashion. This brilliant caper not only signifies the end of his political ‘career’, a word we parenthesise for its irony, but could also impact his freedom; which is ironic too, given his perennially unregistered micro party is named Party for Freedom.

Yes, as Nick’s brainstorms go, this was a tempest. Bravely timed, knowing none of their victims would be awake at those hours, the Peanuts recorded a series of offensive messages on various phones. Their choice of targets was notable, too, in that the motives for the calls ranged from vindictiveness to outright jealousy. And this is the party that dares to demonstrate certain issues under a disingenuous banner of “decency”.

pjimage.jpg
Wouldn’t YOU vote for a man like this?

Currently, a matter involving Folkes is before a Brisbane Magistrate’s Court initiated by a homosexual man crying foul over a placard waved about at a PfF demonstration against Safe Schools. Folkes no doubt believes he acted in the interests of public morals, as much as he genuinely believes in anything. However, his personal morals come out of a beer can, and burn with the pungent tang of cannabis smoke; no doubt the twin inspirations for his maverick brainchild. Nick and the Peanuts issue from an established “party” culture. Hence, the “Party” in Party for Freedom, is appropriately employed in its hedonistic sense.

Those harassed were nearly all women, except for the calls made to AFP President, Jim Saleam, which might prove the most significant in terms of nailing Nick. Up to that point, we understand, Nick had egged his minions on to do the dirty calling; so that he might avoid any blowback. But then, Nick can resist anything but temptation, and so he grabbed the blower to partake in his own downfall.

Two of those others abused were former members of PfF, whose personal details, including phone numbers, Nick freely shared with his cronies. This, as Love Australia or Leave Party President Kim Vuga pointed out, breaches the Privacy Act. However, it is also a violation of good faith and only serves to illustrate why those sober ex-members chose to leave behind the diabolical farce that is PfF.

tobesonpingas.png
 Toby Cook in this captured video of him on Pingas at the Masif nightclub in Darlinghurst

In a past series of disclosures leaked to UNA, the timeline of PfF’s ultimate dysfunction was pinpointed to the arrival of Toby Cook. Toby is a morbidly obese, confused youth of dubious heritage, who was infamously filmed messed up on “pingas” during a night out at Darlinghurst nightclub ‘Masif’ with newly arrived floozy, Penny Louise; a single mother who has abandoned her nipper in favour of hitting the gas with Nick and the gang. She is also in a conjugal relationship with George Jameson, who is twice her age.

Penny initiated the ribald calls that Kim Vuga slammed as “disgusting” and “pornographic” in a statement condemning PfF. Not only were these calls made to women, but one of those is a respected elderly lady.

Kim Vuga’s admin was vilified over her weight, which is amazing, given that Toby Cook is so fat that for every meal he scarfs down in Australia, two hundred people die of famine halfway around the world.

And why target Kim Vuga’s people at all? Well, UNA can reveal the intense jealousy that Nick suffered when Kim went off and started her own party. Nick had some idea that she would dote on him, bringing him publicity, while he reaped the glory. The fact that she outflanked him in a contest of his own imagining is a testament to her moral and intellectual superiority, which is not just a figment of his worst fears of inadequacy, but a bona fide reality that he senses and pathologically resents. The lady he targeted had betrayed him in his twisted, drug-addled reckoning. Kim’s strength resulted in Nick’s bitterness. But if Nick feels emasculated then he was all along in denial about his feeble manhood.

Nick has proven, time and time again, that he fails on all fronts as both a politician and a man. His ambitions exceed his abilities. His envy of the Australia First Party is well documented and was no doubt an inciting factor in the puerile messages he and Toby left on Jim Saleam’s message bank; messages, which like the others, will form the basis of a legitimate police complaint.

So far, we can confirm two serious complaints have been filed against Folkes, Cook, and Louise, and there may be more.

Adding to their genius, was the fact they didn’t even bother to hide their numbers, or in the case of other calls, disguise their voices. It is as though they wanted to get sprung. Some elect death by Police, as they charge officers with knives intent on ending it all in a hail of police bullets; maybe Folkes and Co. have chosen death by foolishness.

UNA has learned that a campaign is underway in Lithgow to deny Folkes a venue for his anti-mosque protests. In this case, we sympathise, given that Nick has no interest in saving Lithgow from invasion by an alien culture. His sole interest, as always, is self-promotion.

One wonders what sort of maniac would be drubbed into believing that PfF is in any position to lecture anyone on anything, much less offer themselves as representatives of the government. Given this incident, no clear-headed person should be in any doubt as to their unfitness as human beings and political activists. Questions would have to be seriously asked about anyone who has learned of these degrading, carnal communications, and continued to lend Folkes their support.

Moreover, how could any of his followers have failed to question the yo-yo that is PfF, which never settles down to fixed ideals but seeks only to cash in on popular trends solely through negation; anti-Islam one day, pretending to be White Nationalist the next, but never actually being anything real or sincere?

Well, it’s all in the past now anyway. Folkes and his party are finished. They are just too hungover to have figured this out.

19554392_1519049921485522_3833965075677453832_n.jpg
George Jameson with Penny Louise, who initiated phone attacks on former PfF members. So much for the sisterhood

PEANUTS ON PINGAS! NICK’S FRIDAY NIGHT PHONE CARNAGE

PEANUTS ON PINGAS! NICK’S FRIDAY NIGHT PHONE CARNAGE

Nick Folkes and his Peanuts for Freedom will have awoken to their own version of The Hangover following some “shit the bed” shenanigans.

Nick and his Boy Friday Toby Cook may face legal action after the leader of Australia’s largest Nationalist Party was targeted with offensive phone messages overnight — and the culprits did not even bother hiding their voices!

Nick and the Pinga Posse appear to have hit the ‘Earl Scruggs’ hard. In the wee hours of Saturday morning, they amused themselves by foolishly Crank Calling a list of people, some of whom are their OWN MEMBERS.

Their victims include Kim Vuga’s secretary, a former PfF supporter who is an elderly lady – and others from AFP. It is understood that the core group of offenders were Nick Folkes, a VERY toasted Toby Cook, and George Jameson’s troubled squeeze, Penny Louise, who also uses the name Tridgell.

But craziest of all, they even made abusive calls to fee-paying members of their own party!

These actions beautifully showcase the Peanuts’ level of Political sophistication. This behaviour comes at a time that Nick is striving hard to pass the Peanuts off as Ian Donaldson’s choice of Australian political parties, by employing every reference to White Nationalism they can think of. Yet, Nick doesn’t seem to understand this is not how White Nationalists behave!

In the upcoming anti-mosque protest at Lithgow, which Nick is characteristically trying to hijack, he posted on his group page (seeing as how his FB page has been deleted) about heading up there in the “hate bus” – a clear reference to George Lincoln Rockwell.

He has employed the SS Totenkopf symbol in his propaganda and is now talking about defending ‘Blood and Soil’ even though his blood has mixed with Asian DNA and the only things soiled are his and Toby’s jocks.

Nick is giving NSW an insight into how things would be if he ever got control of our power structure — it would be Mardis Gras 24/7 with nothing left to pay for roads and transport. If PfF is supposed to offer an alternative to the “corrupt” major parties then that alternative is worse than the standard.

Moreover, this clown and his followers are acting like High School kids on a summer camp when the matters before us are of the utmost seriousness.

Another serial abuser of electronic carriers is the Slackbastard-affiliated Fairfax journalist Luke McMahon, whose bizarre messages to Nathan Sykes we uploaded to a YouTube video narrated by the victim himself. After tomorrow, UNA will no longer be able to comment on matters regarding Luke McMahon, for legal reasons, but we will continue to monitor the puerile antics of Peanuts for Freedom.

oie_R0S1F6D46vMa (1)

 

WHITE IDENTITY, CHAUVINISM AND THE FUTILITY OF APPEASEMENT

WHITE IDENTITY, CHAUVINISM AND THE FUTILITY OF APPEASEMENT

If Nationalists have said it once, we have said it a thousand times, the concept socioeconomic class and the politics of class struggle are intrinsic to our ideology of Australianism.

The idea that Australia, in its post-modern clothing is somehow en-route to becoming a classless “level playing field”, with equality and prosperity for all is, like so much of the Globalist rhetoric, completely self-serving.

The old Aussie platitude: “She’ll be right mate”, once a sly dig at working class complacency and indifference is now being uttered with greater and greater frequency by the chattering classes as they contemplate their worst fears: a largely redundant and idle White working class.

There is a definitely forced tone in the voices of the narrators of the great 21st century Australian decline, where they once scoffed and mocked “Ockers” and “Bogans” who were regarded as too stupid to do anything but drink, root and vote Labor, they now nervously talk of White despair, the fracturing of our society and the soaring rates of addiction, madness and suicide.

depression
She’ll be right mate

Yet this affected concern for the well-being of those less fortunate is, again, narrowly focused and self-serving on the part of the provider; whereas being poor, White and desperate was once seen as a moral failing, it is now seen as akin to an illness to be treated and monitored.

The idea that Australia, in its post-modern clothing is somehow en-route to becoming a classless “level playing field”, with equality and prosperity for all is, like so much of the Globalist rhetoric, completely self-serving.

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

The delivery of social programs of this nature always comes with a heavy helping of middle-class chauvinism and saccharine condescension, we can observe there the intersection of bourgeois politics, with its cult of underdog victimhood and the new age therapeutical movement which seeks to pathologise all human behaviour which might tend to be counterproductive to the cosmopolitan ideal.

Nationalists could all find examples of this type of intervention in their own community, where they might see a neighbourhood group of well to do citizens with ties to mainstream globalist political parties running so-called “Men’s Sheds” or counselling the unemployed

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

The political activism of the do-gooders, be it the Greens, Labor or Liberal is a betrayal of the White workers and marginalised people so their therapeutic interventions into lower social classes are largely cynical and geared toward subduing any hostility toward the bourgeoisie and the elites beyond.

No Joe Blow, they say; you are angry because you are sick, not because you have been betrayed by those who rule you; you lash out at your loved ones because of your toxic masculinity, not out of frustration at your socioeconomic circumstances; here, take an antidepressant and join the boys on suicide watch at the community centre.

The limited number of programs being set up with the implied goal of arresting White dysfunction tend to be premised on treating the symptoms of social decline such as addiction to drugs and gambling, or depression and anxiety, with a heavy focus on correcting supposedly “toxic” White male behaviour, which is seen as the root cause of many social ills.

When you investigate these groups, who provide therapy to Whites under the euphemistically described outreach toward “Tradies” or “Sports Clubs” there is always, too, a strong relationship with self-styled Anti-Racist activists and people espousing similar anti-Nationalist or anti-Worker ideas.

On that basis, we cannot help wondering if, on one level, these programmes are a form of counter-radicalisation initiative calculated to head off any politicisation of the increasingly redundant White, blue collar male segment of society?

boofhead
Boofhead is of us, but he’s not really one of us

One contemporary clique who aggressively promotes this globalist oriented therapeutic movement is Mark Latham and his Outsiders; Latham provides the political credibility via his, admittedly encyclopaedic, insider knowledge of the mainstream players; Bettina Arndt is the court therapist, Daisy Cousens the winsome right-wing gadfly and the sundry other conspiracy theorists and down at heel media figures appearing on the show provide the illusion of a “debate’.

Latham and his co-presenters peddle the assimilationist line, the cult of male victimhood and men’s rights and the particularly counterproductive narrative of pervasive Anti-White Racism; all of which, unfortunately, seem to be having an effect upon working class consciousness.

The reality is that White working class unity is being subverted by the upper classes and their bourgeoisie via false victim narratives and the therapeutic movement, the whole point of their intervention is to head off any large scale political radicalisation of Whites.

The result of this line of thinking is a growing number of marginalised White people who are being conned into believing that seeking the approval of the upper classes and playing into their victim narratives with “Aussie Pride”, “White Genocide” and similar sentiments will lead to anything but further betrayal.

The irony here is that the groups and individuals falling into this trap are becoming stereotypically “racist”, as Leon Trotsky, who invented the concept, would have understood it; this, of course, sets them up for betrayal by their demagogues, racism of that sort demands walking a fine line, a balancing act which most civic Patriots are too uncoordinated to pull off.

Daisy cousens
Fetching sucker bait for disaffected White males

The reality is that White working class unity is being subverted by the upper classes and their bourgeoisie via false victim narratives and the therapeutic movement, the whole point of their intervention is to head off any large scale political radicalisation of Whites.

A radical White movement resting on the structure of socioeconomic class with the ideology of Australianism informing its politics is the only way forward for our working and marginalised people; currying favour with the elites by pushing the assimilationist line, or going cap in hand to the bourgeoisie for hand outs and treatment is undignified and unacceptable.

We are not victims of anything but the economic circumstances imposed upon us by globalist capitalism; our anger is righteous and justified as opposed to pathological and irrational; we are not sick, just sick and tired of being talked down to by people who have only their own interests in mind.

federation

 

WHO IS BEHIND ‘AUSSIE NATIONALISTS’ AND ‘THOSE’ POSTERS?

WHO IS BEHIND ‘AUSSIE NATIONALISTS’ AND ‘THOSE’ POSTERS?

It took UNA just the time needed to type in a URL to discover the most likely culprit behind a series of well publicised ‘White Nationalist’ posters that have appeared in Sydney today.

Don’t get us wrong, they’re great posters and a top troll. But we are not here to discuss the posters per se: our point relates to our prime suspect for the creation of “Aussie Nationalists”. Coming from anyone else we might have cause to want to high-five a comrade too, but given the general motives of the suspected instigator, whose obsession with Whiteness ended at his choice of a wife and the children produced from their mixed-race marriage, we must abjure. If our mistrust seems offputting, it comes with the territory, sadly, because Nationalists don’t fight hostiles on the Left, we spend all our time tied up struggling to keep our politics protected from Right Wing fakers.

We will explain…

waleed
Don’t get us wrong, they’re great posters and a top troll

When we saw ‘AussieNationalists.wordpress.com’ as the address of the posters’ authors we did the obvious thing and visited the site. We encountered a WordPress blog barren, except for an incongruous trio of items: the first of which is a link to a demonstration in Lithgow hosted by — ta-ra, Peanuts for Freedom! This, of course, is the golden giveaway, or to us anyway, particularly since it bears the headline, “Next nationalist event you need to attend”.

The PfF Facebook page that it originates from appears to have been removed, either temporarily or permanently, which wouldn’t be a first for the Peanuts.

The second item is, for some bizarre reason, a link to a YouTube video about Oswald Mosely (an odd choice for those purporting to be ‘Aussie Nationalists’), which is an addendum to a gallery of the images from the Pokemon-themed posters plastered up around the inner-west of Sydney, which, again, are very clever and right on the target. They have achieved their desired aim of generating publicity. But to where does this publicity funnel? There is nothing at the end of it, no contact details, nothing but a cue back to this blog and the PfF rally. it advertises. It seems to be a one-shot blog. Given the rally flyer, in all likelihood, the blog’s creator has a vested interest in promoting that group. This would, by logic, place its ownership in that group’s orbit. In this case, the heavy emphasis on the designation “Nationalism” is a key element of the authors’ intentions. If you cannot change Nationalism, then change its definition.

The Facebook page that it originates from appears to have been removed, either temporarily or permanently, which wouldn’t be a first for the Peanuts.

The Sydney Traditionalists tried the same game of appropriation that Folkes is infamous for when they got involved with The Dingoes and surreptitiously organised the Dingocon [see Rape House and Dingoes Conned]. They saw a young movement and wanted to control its direction. We hazard a guess that the Trads have some link to Folkes, who, on the same day as Dingocon, took his family of Peanuts to Newtown to face down an absent Antifa. Anyway, now that we’ve figured out the most likely culprits, we can dismiss their claims to be Nationalists, yet take note of the strange activity occurring around them, which is indicative of the Patriot Games of old.

In attendance at Folkes’s rally was New Zealand provocateur Mark McDonald, who has been vandalising Australian Nationalism in one way or another since his feet landed on our soil in 2013. McDonald has no ties to the Australian soil or its people. He is White, but he is a foreigner. This hasn’t stopped him trying to poison our movement and members who have an earnest dedication to the principles of Australian Nationalism.

The same cannot be said for either he or his new Peanut tribe. Now is a good time to consider the absolute gobsmacking hypocrisy of Folkes.

In February, Folkes burned a Nazi flag outside the Tempe headquarters of Australia First Party (while he and his Boy Friday, Tobes, were very convincingly dressed as Moslems) protesting — we’re still not sure what — but making it clear that he and his Zion-friendly PfF oppose the racial politics of AFP.

imageedit_6_6825016602.jpg
A few months ago ‘edgy’ symbols like this upset Nicky boy (note the UNA reference on the flag)
imageedit_2_9753072060
If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em, eh Nick?

He did this before with the “bunker” video (Nick Folkes is now referring to his home as the ‘Rozelle Bunker’), in which Jim Saleam and others toasted the passing of slain Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. Much was made of the Nationalist Socialist flags which appear in the background of the host’s apartment. He is known to be a collector of such memorabilia and being a guest who was just passing through, Jim had no control over what bric-a-brac or ornamentation decorated the apartment. Of course, it was a connection to Folkes from this person and his acquaintances that put the video in the possession of Howard Crawford to begin with, a contradiction never reflected on by those who mistook both its relevance and currency.

Present there, and we have a pic of him from the event tucked away for a rainy day, is New Zealand provocateur Mark McDonald, who has been trying to ruin Australian Nationalism since his two left feet landed on our country’s soil in 2013.

Now, of course, Folkes is “joining in” with the whole alt-right fashion, which utilises edgy ‘fash’ symbolism. Folkes appropriated the Totenkopf symbol, often associated with Hitler’s SS, on a flyer for the demonstration in Newtown. The more influential it becomes, the more Folkes tries reinventing himself so he can get inside it. This is in spite of defaming true Nationalists as “Nazis” — along with his cohorts like Dan Evans, Neil Erikson and mad Scotty Moerland.

Bear in mind that while enacting that ‘anti-Nazi’ shtick, Folkes was keeping lines open to McDonald. This here poses questions about the purity of S88, which was going hell for leather to be the most undisputed anti-Jewish show in town. Yet, here now, as then, we have its former Fuhrer photographed (on file) within spitting distance of Radka Smith, second-in-charge of Peanuts for Freedom.

download (1) (1)
The message behind this  PfF character reads, “It’s a foreign invasion”. Erm, ever get the feeling someone’s having a lend?

Radka is Jewish. But there must be a degree of indignation Radka feels being in the presence of Matey Mate, since in 2014 when McDonald met Smith he almost spat the words in her face, “You’re a JEW!” Indeed, Matey is quick to accuse people of being Jewish, and yet has no problem with associating with Jewish-friendly organisations.

Remember too, Jewish James Sternhell is a supporter of the Peanuts, which also boasts an Asian member. This should be borne in mind when viewing Folkes’s take on appropriating the White Genocide message. Do not put out of mind their strong links to Liberal Party operator Howard Crawford, who is a major league Zionist. They must wonder too about Toby’s “I Support Open Borders for Israel”, but they’re a crazy, whacky, zany bunch of cripples round at Peanut Palace. Even odder, is that Dan Evans, an absolute multi-racialist and enemy of Australian Nationalism was a speaker at Nick’s rally against Antifa. How does a character like that accord with one like Matey Mate with his Seig Heil and 14/88 cliches? About the same as they ever did, because the pattern is this: Larping is fine so long as real Nationalists with purist inclinations don’t come by rocking the boat.

Bear this in mind, because S88 tried passing itself off as hard-core anti-Jewish. But here we have its former Fuhrer standing within pissing distance of Radka Smith, second-in-charge of Peanuts for Freedom.

Radka’s Jewishness is of no concern to us. However, in this instance, it is a level indicator of the kind of deceit that is PfF’s stock in trade.

We call on Folkes to publically denounce his own contributions to White Genocide, by despoiling his bloodline with Asian genes, and to state categorically that PfF is dedicated to restoring a White Australia.

This is where you get to nail Nicholas since he won’t do either.

Thus, we swing back to those posters, which we repeat, are just a product and not the subject of our editorial. Under different circumstances, we could applaud the trolling along with everyone else. But knowing what a fragile state true Nationalism is in presently we would be contributing to its hastening demise by giving kudos to those who seek to subvert it. What’s more, it is the ‘usual suspects’ who have been pursuing this goal for years.

These creatures have never shied away from doxing true Nationalists to either the Media and our ideological opponents on the Left. In fact, that has been one of their longstanding tactics, so bear that in mind when they showily ‘face off’ with Antifa as they are staring down the same people they secretly supply info when hiding behind their computers.

A friend of ours told us in all soberness that what is needed is for everything to absolutely go to crap. It all needs to be broken apart and smashed up because only on fresh, healthy soil, can we hope to grow anew. He might be onto something.

Still, they are great posters, and that message is always welcome even if the messenger is on the nose.

11058381_1614577155478721_2950402781380467801_n
One of Nick’s regular anti-White Genocide campaigners