UNITED NATIONALISTS AUSTRALIA BANNED FROM FACEBOOK

UNITED NATIONALISTS AUSTRALIA BANNED FROM FACEBOOK

The Facebook page of United Nationalists Australia has been banned by the globalist powers operating the social media platform.

There has been a spate of such censorship recently, with any page opposing Islam, fake refugees, or globalism having their plugs pulled on the grounds of what is suggested to be “hate speech”. The most notable of these, apart from us was the United Patriots Front, which had been promoting such Zionists as Avi Yemini anyway, so go figure.

In fact, in the lead up to our hell-banning, an ultra-globalist Facebook page hosted a number of feral scabs purporting to have reported just about anything to get us taken down. And Facebook responded.

We received a message that the logo we use, two White hands shaking, breached community standards. Which community? What standards? Left-wing extremists like Antifa posting images of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro? They are the community? They determine the political standards? We could have posted a picture of a kitten. It wouldn’t have mattered.

The editor-in-chief of UNA has been banned a number of times for posting material on our former page that upset both the civic patriots and the snowflakes on the left. On one memorable occasion, his personal Facebook account was given a 30-day ban for posting the word “Amen”. This demonstrates that there are no community standards — all there are is a set of algorithms responding to a dedicated troll force committed to banning pages they don’t like.

There is no human force tending the light at the end of the tunnel, mainly as there is no light.

We received a message that the logo we use, two White hands shaking, breached community standards. Which community? What standards?

It is a sad reflection for nationalists that we cannot summon the same amount of will and energy to return the favour, but the problem isn’t so much which group gets the most takedowns, but the fact that we have become dependent on (((Facebook))).

This is quite pathetic, but Facebook has such a monopoly on communication flow, that many are hopelessly hooked on the audience numbers, which are massive.

rsz_18554436_447245232304406_1539718614_n
The image of the shaking hands breached Facebook’s “Community Standards”

This is the thing, it has become like trying to host an anti-Zog meeting at a synagogue — we are in an untenable position.

It is well-known that epochal traitor and peace criminal, German chancellor Angela Merkel met with Facebook’s chief rabbi Mark Zuckerberg asking him to ensure action was taken to stop any dissenting commentary about the rapeugee invasion of Europe, which she, along with her master George Soros, engineered. Moreover, from news reports covering the removal of the UPF’s page, it seems Australian pages are now being deemed “hate speech” and removed, possibly, too, because of government requests. Frankly, we do not know either way, and Facebook is not making any statements.

This is quite pathetic, but Facebook has such a monopoly on communication flow, that many are hopelessly hooked on the audience numbers, which are massive.

This, despite the loss of the instant audiences and large reach that Facebook offers, is an opportunity. It makes no sense to be captive to globalist forces with such important activism to pursue. Just as Stormfront Downunder became an untenable platform for Australian nationalists due to the high penetration of leftist trolls, conservative saboteurs such as Howard Crawford, and lunatics so Facebook has been more trouble than it is worth.

It is evident that despite being able to command audiences in the tens of thousands, none of this ‘reach’ has had much practical application. The political arm of the United Patriots Front, Fortitude, was intended to sign up users and establish a political party but — in spite of having tens of thousands of page likes — they barely got a trickle of memberships.

2CDCC5C800000578-3252209-image-a-11_1443456957855
Zucc and Merkel meet to silence Globalism’s critics, especially those upset at being raped and killed in Europe by fake male refugees of fighting age

For all the social media activity of Reclaim Australia, except for a fleeting moment, none of that activity ever translated to bodies on the street when it came to demonstrations. As such, the validity of these vast numbers has proven to be an illusion.

Why then suffer all the pain of feeding globalist parasites like the anarchists who seem to exist only to be outraged by patriot Facebook pages?

The nationalist community is as divided on Facebook as it is in the corporeal world. Instead of uniting under one group, subscribing to one page, there are a plethora of these pages of which most are simply newsfeeds regarding non-White crime. Nobody was ever happy to just participate, everyone had to go out and start their own thing, which is both a positive and a negative.

Why then suffer all the pain of feeding globalist parasites like the anarchists who seem to exist only to be outraged by patriot Facebook pages?

United Nationalists Australia went out of its way to buck this ‘pointing at the news’ trend. We refused to subscribe to the central tenet that Facebook audiences could not read anything wordier than a caption. Instead of grammatically impoverished one-sentence introductions to the same news all the other pages were sharing, we made the nationalist community, and anything affecting it, the subject of our focus, in very long, often complicated essays that challenged the reader.

And it worked! In fact, it worked so well that we became — disregarding our meek number of page ‘likes’ — one of the most influential voices of the nationalist pages. As we said, the civic patriots detested us, and often had our material removed, as did the lefties, challenged by the fact we are brainier than they are.

Now it is time to look to the future. If we have only a small community, let that community come to places where they will not become trolled, banned, harassed by the scum of the left; or misdirected by the Zionist-operated civic patriots.

Let them come to places where word of mouth can spread, and only those truly dedicated interact.

Leaving Facebook is a MUST. All nationalists must surrender the apathy of Facebook and make a serious effort. We must deprive Zucc of our patronage and the advertising dollars that automatically accompany our presence. No more will we be at the mercy of “community standards” which only reflect those eager to destroy White nations — and have the White race bred off with every black and brown monkey on the planet.

In this, we shall lead the way. The UNA blog will soon become UNA media, and we will operate where the whores of mammon cannot touch us.

En garde, Zucc, your filthy skype days are numbered!

facebook-jew

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

What do you do with the UPF? If you’re Facebook, you shut down their main page. So what do THEY then do? They migrate as much Zionist supporting material as they can to sister pages and to their Reclaim Australia – West Australia Rally page.

In every quote to the media, however, you will find their leadership claiming to be ‘nationalist’ and not ‘patriot’ which is such a conscious delineation that its intention is coldly clear to true Australian nationalists.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

On the same page (RA-WA) you will find a link to a True Blue Crew flag march where Whiteness is heavily emphasised. Then it’s back to the kosher meal of every possible Zionist-related entity they chug up – Britain First and Tommy Robinson shares right there in among them.

Well, they know by now; surely they aren’t naive. They know that promoting ultra-Zionists like Avi Yemini is a contradiction in terms to the single-minded cause of fighting Islamic extremism. Ultra-Zionists like Avi and his fellow countrymen create such extremism. They do so both by having manufactured ISIS, so as to pit them against the unfriendly Moslems on their list – and by continually stoking bloody conflict in the region.

The perennial program of destabilisation establishes a power balance that benefits the security of the state of Israel and services whatever objectives its allies may have in the region. But it also does something else – and has done so since the 1970s – it creates a mass migration of Middle Easterners into Australia.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

What does this portend for the ‘nationalism’ that they claim to be championing, having knowingly appropriated the term from staunch supporters of a new White Australia Policy? It kills it because those same Zionists do everything possible to eradicate such nationalist beliefs. They do more though — they align with the Left to attack serious nationalists such as we saw recently with Fairfax’s criminal toll Luke McMahon, who is known to have ties with Zionist-convert Neil Erikson.

Erikson, along with Nick Folkes, Howard Crawford, Scott Moerland and others have campaigned heavily against true nationalists. We are not at all surprised to find the UPF making the self-defeating move to once again associate with these cagey globalists in the hope of puffing up their waning profile.

Thus, nationalists for a White Australia become treated worse than kiddy fiddlers, and the planes keep flying more and more Indians, Chinese, Africans and MOSLEMS from the Middle East. The cathartic activity of stoking enmity against Islam merely gives a moral license to our globalist government to support military crimes in the Middle East which benefit Israel.

In this battle, all those values that Australians regarded as part of their birthright are trampled on. Zionists in Australia, while demanding racial and religious homogeneity at home, are forever insisting on total diversity for Australia and all White countries.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

This diversity has transformed our cities into utterly foreign destinations. The quarter-acre home has been replaced by towering (shoddily built) concrete toolboxes crammed with Chinese and Indians; the odour of their spicy cooking permeating the streets.

Australia needs reclaiming from all of this, not just one particular branch of this allegedly diverse community.

It is not the Indians, Africans, or Chinese who are losing their identities. They’ve never had it so sweet. While White Australians are slowly being discouraged from even considering ourselves Australian, this new population get dual identities. They get to be Indian AND Australian; they get to be African AND Australian, and they get to be Chinese AND Australian.

Islam is just a symptom of this single world government that has its master Zionist America. But while all these terms we throw about ‘Zionist’ ‘civic patriot’ and whatever might confuse the casual punter it is all quite simple. Unless you live in one of those last posts White Australian areas that are only ‘gradually’ being de-Europeanised you only have to take a walk, open your eyes, and smell the pungent waft of curry.

What difference does Islam make if – in the highly improbable event of removing it – you do so only to find yourself a stranger in your own country, shivering and alone among a new population of aliens? What will you reclaim then?

Wake up to the Zionists — you are being used.

C1ePePgVEAAVEM4
Avi Yemini, the ultra-Zionist who is now the darling of the civic patriots now calling themselves Australian ‘nationalists’

NO, PAULINE, THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO SAVE AUSTRALIA

NO, PAULINE, THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO SAVE AUSTRALIA

Pauline Hanson has bulk to learn when it comes to understanding the expectations of those who voted for her.

Regardless of what the cucks trumpet on her behalf, this is not about treating Australian identity like a piece of paper stamped by a government department that anyone can own. By that we mean it’s not about coming from anywhere you like as long as you ‘assimilate’ and don’t practise Islamic teachings.

It doesn’t work like that in China, or Japan, most African countries or anywhere that hasn’t turned itself into a colossal tin of human Smarties.

But Pauline either doesn’t get that message or is so wrapped up in proving she is not what most of us know she isn’t any way that she went out of her way to air-kiss a woman who has no place in Australia let alone in our parliament.

We speak, of course, of Kenyan-born ‘lawyer’ Lucy Gichuhi, who takes over the Family First senator’s seat vacated by Bob Day.

401E0D6B00000578-4486898-image-a-69_1494304916163
See. She’s no racist. But she should be. We are of course talking about the black woman.

Yes, Pauline, we are meant to be encouraging highly skilled individuals like Lucy to return to Kenya and share her gift with her own people and own nation. That way, her people benefit, and we get to have our own nation back. How many colourful and vibrant souls like her and that African thing with the glasses that hates Australia are we meant to cop just because we are part of this anti-White organisation called the United Nations?

By welcoming her, particularly when your presence is supposed to connote some sort of nationalism (lol) you are not only behaving against the interests of your voters but you are complicit in the ruination of Australia.

But then Pauline clearly doesn’t have a clue, and as we’ve argued ourselves hoarse here explaining, she is just a woman with a meal ticket in politics. She hasn’t made one single contribution to politics which isn’t purely symbolic and symbolic of all the things she actually doesn’t stand for.

8135976-3x2-700x467
Erm, yeah, and then there was this. She actually sacked her Asian candidate for being “homophobic”

LUKE MCMAHON: FAIRFAX’S ANARCHIST TROLL

LUKE MCMAHON: FAIRFAX’S ANARCHIST TROLL

Part A/ Addressing the lies

A few weeks ago, I was the victim of a scurrilous and defamatory fake-news article printed by Fairfax. The attack piece, scribbled by a shady hack named Luke McMahon, claimed among other things I am “Jewish”, and that I am one of Australia’s biggest trolls.

Before I reveal that the twisted “troll” is, in fact, McMahon, with a bit of help from Neil Erikson, I will respond to his lies. I do that in the knowledge that whatever I say wouldn’t move the real troll one degree so I make it only in the interest of truth.

Firstly, I am about as Jewish as Benito Mussolini. My family is of British/Irish descent and many generations Australian on the maternal side. This predictable calumny is instructive since we were able to trace its trajectory from associates of Nick Folkes, who hate my party before it travelled to his cohort and traitor Neil Erikson, who used it to slander me, even though he doesn’t know me from a bar of soap.

I have met Nick on only two brief occasions, neither of which he would recall, and Erikson never. In fact, we know the very person who generated the “Jewish” lie. We know his motives at the time and are certain that he was, as stated above, in the slow orbit of both Nick Folkes and Howard Crawford.

Yet, on the basis of this and foolishness regarding my name, McMahon — who has some connection to these warthogs — figures it will queer my act and uses it.

Why wouldn’t he? His purpose is to attack the Australia First Party. Fairfax has a history of defamatory entanglements with the AFP, starting chiefly with our president, Jim Saleam. Their last slanderous effort against an AFP candidate blew up in their communist faces so this is payback.

Before I reveal that the twisted “troll” is, in fact, McMahon, with a bit of help from Neil Erikson, I will respond to his lies. I do that in the knowledge that whatever I say wouldn’t move the real troll one degree so I make it only in the interest of truth.

Moreover, there is no chorus of wailing Jews stepping out of the woodwork wagging their fingers and shouting, “Oy vey, ‘tis him! I remember him from the latke bar. I bought him a dreidel. He used to be a BEAUTIFUL Jew! Where did he go wrong? Why is he now a Nazi? Does he not know about the Holocaust? How could he betray the tribe?”

There are no former rabbis, or friends with stories from my Bar Mitzvah, for the elementary fact that it is all fallacious. Sorry, dipsticks, but you’re not getting your True Believer ending. However, if you want to shut up a nationalist who is causing your cause distress then accusing him of being a Jew is the first tactic in the book. In this case, it’s not working.

Nevertheless, this lie is not only one of those defamatory claims made by McMahon, who we believe has some collusion with Erikson, but the article is riddled with absurdities. It is claimed that as an editor at ACP I played “German marching music” at my desk. Seriously, how Fairfax’s chief sub didn’t question that howling bit of bullshit is a testament to the low calibre of their editorial.

Next, he fabricated a quote supposedly from a colleague. There was no colleague interviewed and they would never have said I was Jewish since it would have been presumptuous on their part anyway. The only people who were close to me at ACP would not speak to these duds. It is poppycock. McMahon is a deceiver.

I know that journalists often claim privilege for sources, but that one can be blown open by asking the source to come forward. There isn’t one.

McMahon got a hold of my book, Stuck Forever in the Throat of Society, which I published on Amazon, as you cannot land a book deal here unless you’re a child refugee or a Moslem with interesting things to say.

I know that journalists often claim privilege for sources, but that one can be blown open by asking the source to come forward. There isn’t one.

Whereas I wrote a black comedy, making fun of a toxic work culture that I endured while at ACP, he is attempting to skew it as evidence of me being a potential random sniper. Another Brevik? And McMahon has used the Brevik line on my AFP colleague Chris Shortis back in November 2015.

I am more worried he is; valid fears I reveal in the next instalment. When I write about “trolling” in my first novel, it is total fiction. This is the thing about good writing, it must convince the reader. In McMahon’s case I was so convincing and he so gullible that he cannot assess it from fact.

I never seriously trolled. I used to treat the old Yahoo7 message boards like a cricket pitch, but that was all I referred to. The character in the book is a comical figure created so that any hagiographical material does not take itself too seriously. I deliberately wrote him as an ineffectual curmudgeon. I would hope I am not so dispassionate as he.

Nonetheless, McMahon lifted select passages to validate his un-researched, defamatory, cobbled-together cluster of unwieldy sentences as ridgy didge journalism. What’s more, McMahon is jealous of me as a writer, and that is powerfully evident and a motivating factor in his spite, or so my mate the psychologist reckons.

One of the few actual truths in the book, my attempting to give away an Adolf Hitler doll as a prize for the magazine I was editor of, is likewise attributed a false narrative. He claims I was the subject of company reprimand, or suchlike, for the stunt. This, like everything else this sick puppy writes, is baloney.

The character in the book is a comical figure created so that any hagiographical material does not take itself too seriously. I deliberately wrote him as an ineffectual curmudgeon. I would hope I am not so dispassionate as he.

It was in fact approved by the outgoing editor-in-chief beforehand who understood the humour behind it. The entire purpose of the gag was to run a headline strap, “WIN A WAR CRIMINAL”.

See, in magazines, the cover is everything. You create content with a mind to how to sell it. It was a low-rent Category One girlie magazine, so I figured it wasn’t about to upset our discerning readership.

At this time, in the company, I was not involved in politics, and this goes to the other stuff he tries using to impute an unsound mind. I am a collector of action figures. They are grouse. Some of the biggest pages on Facebook are dedicated to modellers and fanciers of scale figures. It is no more absurd than gaming. More to the point, intelligent people collect historical figures. Stupid people mock them for doing so.

I started collecting them as curios when I earned a bit of dosh and the collection grew. It had nothing to do with politics. But it does not entirely consist of “Nazis”, which do make interesting collectables. I have figures of Churchill, Montgomery, English soldiers, American soldiers, Roman soldiers, James Bond figures, Churchill and even Ariel Sharon! I also have a wonderful figure of Stalin! Does that make me a communist now?

Having raided my Facebook page for his “evidence” and relying on say-so from boofhead Neil Erikson, McMahon had only my book to go on. Oh, and he searched and discovered I am a bankrupt, the scourge of the left wing, a fact that he cheaply employs as a pejorative. Shame on this ‘anarchist’.

It was in fact approved by the outgoing editor-in-chief beforehand who understood the humour behind it. The entire purpose of the gag was to run a headline strap, “WIN A WAR CRIMINAL”.

I did not think they made status judgements like that. There were a lot of us underdogs coming out of the cowboy banker created Global Financial Crisis; we got hurt, they were rewarded. But that’s the Left for you; bourgeois as fuck.

I did not think they made status judgements like that. There were a lot of us underdogs coming out of the cowboy banker created Global Financial Crisis; we got hurt, they were rewarded. But that’s the Left for you; bourgeois as fuck.

Now, to the video…

In a video created to taunt Antifascist Action Sydney, I wear an SS officer’s cap. This, like my action figures, was purchased before I had a political awakening.

I was part of a circle of friends who decided we’d buy ‘drinking hats’. One bought a Russian bearskin hat; another procured a bowler hat, someone else acquired a pith helmet, while I purchased this SS cap because I wanted to be more outrageous. We would wear them while getting juiced. It was capital fun.

The video was a response to the clownery of Antifa, who found a UNA sticker someone glued up on a sign in Newtown. These nitwits made a big deal about posting one of their crappy stickers over the top of it, claiming they had captured a flag, so to speak, and so I went and peeled it off. For a laugh I made a video treating the sticker as a kidnap victim. I was sending up their ludicrousness. I was making fun of the “Nazi” tag.

In a video created to taunt Antifascist Action Sydney, I wear an SS officer’s cap. This, like my action figures, was purchased before I had a political awakening.

Anyone who knows me understands well that I do not approve of pussyfooters who believe slapping an iron cross on a bomber jacket and reciting facts about Hitler makes them a nationalist. I am not that kind of nationalist at all. I discourage cosplay and the sort of “club life” that believes that shouting 14/88 is a means to an end.

Finally, on the charge of being a troll, which McMahon is about to pay dearly for, I can say that I have no charges pending against me for the simple reason that I haven’t trolled anybody, unlike Luke.

The most I have done is pop onto one of their leftist pages, which exist for the very purpose of trolling patriot pages and have some sport with the semi-retarded individuals who inhabit those spaces.

In hoping to defame me as a “troll” and therefore as a ‘pest’, he implies some connection with Joshua Goldberg, who he alleges I met on Stormfront.

Goldberg is a nut — a quite surprising one — but a fruitcake nonetheless. If he wasn’t banged up in a loony bin in the US I would have been tempted to think Goldberg IS Luke McMahon.

On a final note in this first part, may I just say, this habit of Antifa’s referring to me as AFP’s “number two” is the cherry on the cake. I’m not even number 42. I am a rank-and-file member. What’s more, I have retired from public demonstrations because I don’t believe I am photogenic enough to go there.

Nathan Sykes

HORROR PICS! TOBY COOK DROOLS IN HIS SLEEP!

HORROR PICS! TOBY COOK DROOLS IN HIS SLEEP!

Being a Peanut is tiring work. Just look at young Toby here — he’s a growing boy (growing from the belt outwards).

Things got a bit much for the young fella when he accompanied the Peanuts to a rally somewhere in Sydney that we don’t care enough about to properly report on. The Peanuts had their placards, their loud hailers, and their sandals.

They yelled at the population of Sydney and when they were done they maybe went off for a few dozen beers and burgers with extra chips. Nick probably ate sushi.

Of course, Tobes had most likely been out on the pingas the night before, so he was especially tired out. But when the Fellowship of the Peanut got back to Peanut Palace, that’s when it all proved too much for our half-Paki White Supremacist. The poor tyke was tired out after yelling at seagulls about halal food, Moslem refugees, ‘what race is Islam’, and all that stuff from the Peanuts’ repertoire.

17857318_445053795841317_324503772_n
Toby dreams about hot curries

He fell asleep, napping on Nick’s garden chair; his manifold chins resting on the airbag of his enormous belly. Toby started to dream. We can only guess at what he was dreaming about — it might have been Nick dressed up in Lederhosen leading the Peanuts in a victorious parade while he stood at his side. He may have been dreaming that Penny Louise had asked him to do her laundry or he might well have been dreaming about one of those yummy curries his mum used to make when he was a boy and they had just arrived in the country from Pakistan.

We guess he probably was dreaming about food after all because once the sandman had finished sprinkling his daylight dust on Tobes’s hefty eyelids, dribble issued forth from his lips, captured by someone on their phone… or maybe on their camera.

Yep, looking at Tobes is a major gross-out at the best of times, but to witness this snoring gorgon dribbling spittle down his flabby chins is enough to kill a person’s appetite for at least 72 hours. Once seen, this image cannot be unseen. There were distressing images doing the rounds after yesterday’s horrendous truck attack in Sweden — victims splattered all over the road in a sprawling pool of nauseous pink paste. But even that paled next to the sight of toby drooling like a mental patient.

17857299_445054102507953_6516015_n.jpg
WARNING!!! THE FOLLOWING IMAGE WILL MAKE YOU LOSE YOUR LUNCH!

It really isn’t normal behaviour. The average person doesn’t drool in their sleep, only people on heavy psych meds salivate helplessly like that.

We are feeling pretty sick right now, folks, so you will have to let us end this write-up here. There is only one bucket in the UNA Towers’ office, and right now Chris Shortis is heaving uncontrollably into it.

We might even have to call a doctor, but the only one we know is Dr Jim Saleam, and he’s too busy running the Internet to see us now. He’s not a doctor of medicine either.

download
UNA’s head of accounts after viewing the above image. He is expected to be off work for at least a week

 

PATRIOTS, LOOK TO THE SOUTH AND THE DESTINY OF YOUR PEOPLE!

PATRIOTS, LOOK TO THE SOUTH AND THE DESTINY OF YOUR PEOPLE!

Once again the Nationalists are bound to respond to further provocation from the civic patriots. The appropriation of the description “nationalism”, by groups who, despite affecting patriotic airs, still have a wholly globalist-liberal outlook is unacceptable and demands a stern reply.

One of the key elements of our Australian Nationalism is the concept of independence from foreign or imperial powers; we reject absolutely the rule of the British monarchy, the resurgent imperialism of the Chinese, Americans and Russians or the soft Jihad of the Sunni Islamists.

Certain people need to get it into their heads that Australia is a young country of the global south, that we must look to ourselves, to the south, for inspiration in matters of national identity.

It is unacceptable for any Australian political operator to adopt the name Nationalist while his gaze is still directed to the north, while he still hangs on every word emanating from so-called “patriots” of the old world he can never be a true patriot to his own nation, which is of the new world.

Take, as an example, Donald Trump, a figure whose brand of populist showmanship is much in vogue among the yokels and numbskulls currently enamoured of civic patriotism.

The appropriation of the description “nationalism”, by groups who, despite affecting patriotic airs, still have a wholly globalist-liberal outlook is unacceptable and demands a stern reply.

We at UNA have previously written on the character both of the man and the Trump administration so our readers will not be shocked by our criticism of his agenda or leadership style.

Trump’s treatment of Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany during her recent state visit to the U.S.A is telling.

images (6)
The Donald’s hand will need amputating after touching her

Naturally Mrs Merkel’s politics are basically incompatible with our own ideals, however, the manner in which president Trump publicly humiliated her revealed him as the worst kind of imperialist thug; he displayed the manners of a tyrant dealing with an errant vassal. Having said, he should have nutted her, and then broken both her ankles for destroying Europe.

Trump should be no hero of patriots, no matter their national or racial background, in Trump is manifested the old-school colonial bully, the big country kicking the little country; his treatment of middle tier players, such as the Germans, bodes not well for little countries such as Australia.

We see also, in the Australian patriot circles the idolatry of foreign nationalist movements, the promotion of their activism and even attempts to transplant such groups down under; this is without the patriots having much of an idea about what these groups stand for.

We at UNA have previously written on the character both of the man and the Trump administration so our readers will not be shocked by our criticism of his agenda or leadership style.

UNA are, of course, interested in overseas nationalist movements but having had some interaction with various groups, particularly in Europe we are well placed to point out that many such organisations are extremely xenophobic; they are often hostile even toward sympathetic people if they are from a different European national background.

The language barrier is also a major hurdle, we cannot be sure where, say, Polish, Hungarian, or Russian nationalists stand on certain issues because they do not distribute their platforms in English, or that they simply do not use social media much at all.

Australian patriots seem to be dazzled by the large rallies held in some of the European capitals, the footage from Russia Today or Reuters looks impressive to those who see such displays as central to their cause; but who are the groups facilitating the marches? What is their reputation among the working classes, are they connected to the state or foreign governments and so forth?

We know for a fact that some European nationalists are tolerant of Shia Islam, or of certain other immigrant groups and native-born, non-European people with whom they share some common cause. That is, of course, their own business but rather than idolising foreign groups, or simply copying their aesthetics, the Australian patriots, as we say, need to look to the south for inspiration; the old-world groups may look flash in Youtube clips, but unless you speak their language fluently it is hard to know what you are imitating.

The other bone we at UNA have to pick with the civic patriots is this conflation of the foreign Islamist threat with current affairs in Australia; one example might be the elevation to folk devil status of the presently incarcerated troublemaker Anjem Choudhary.

The language barrier is also a major hurdle, we cannot be sure where, say, Polish, Hungarian, or Russian nationalists stand on certain issues because they do not distribute their platforms in English, or that they simply do not use social media much at all.

Choudhary is a U.K based Islamist loudmouth whose career was given a massive boost by the indulgence of mainstream media outlets. The BBC, Sky TV and others gave him a platform to spread his nonsense and he allowed the media to make him into a sort of Emmanuel Goldstein figure, against which all and sundry could rant and rave to blow off steam.

Australian Nationalists realise that the threat from political Islamism and the wider, nihilistic Jihadist worldview is real, that due to the nature of the religion this menace does spread through ostensibly “peaceful” dialogue by diaspora Muslims; however, Anjem Choudhary could never have had the profile he did in the U.K in our country.

Islamic march in Wootton Bassett cancelled
Anjem Choudhary’s likeness will soon appear on the five pound note

The Australian media would not allow a radical Islamist the airtime needed to become a folk devil, mainly, we suspect, because most editors and producers within the system are wary of promoting anything which could lead to a negative perception of Muslims.

Furthermore, Choudhary’s sophistry and the way he always just skirted the anti-terrorism laws by choosing his words carefully would not wash in this country; he would likely have been jailed a lot sooner here than he was in the U.K.

In the end, this idolatry of the European political movements and excessive focus on the social problems of the northern hemisphere is counterproductive.

Australian Nationalists realise that the threat from political Islamism and the wider, nihilistic Jihadist worldview is real, that due to the nature of the religion this menace does spread through ostensibly “peaceful” dialogue by diaspora Muslims; however, Anjem Choudhary could never have had the profile he did in the U.K in our country.

Looking longingly at groups, who by virtue of existing in far more populous, and for that matter densely populated countries can obviously put more feet on the street than Australian patriots leads only to a paralysing sense of ennui, which we have seen occur time and time again.

We urge all patriots to stop fumbling around, to cease the promotion to the Australian workers and marginalised people of foreign nationalist ideas, which you only half understand.
It is time to give up the support for the imperialist gangster Donald Trump and the hollow populism of Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen or Pauline Hanson.

White Australians, the only true Aussies, already have a brand of political nationalism which was laid out by our recent forefathers with the express intention of creating a truly progressive society, a system where White men and women could thrive and authentic social justice could be achieved.

The radicals of UNA and our friends in other nationalist groups will continue to promote the ideals of White Australia, the only form Australian nationalism can realistically take; as for the civic patriots, the time has come to make a choice.

Will they continue to play silly games, to cast their gaze back at the old world and avoid taking responsibility for their race and nation?

Or will they, sometime soon, look to the South, as all true nationalists do and begin to really care about the destiny of their own people, the White Australians?

whiteaustraliablackhistory
Fixed!

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

Enthusiastically waiting to see your enemy’s name appear in the obituary is, perhaps, something a Seinfeld episode should have tackled. But in absence of a half-hour sitcom mocking the ethics of such a scene comes our rather blunt desire to see in big, beautiful text the confirmation of conservatism’s departure from this world for good.

And it would be a mercy. The ideological vagrant of the modern era is in agony; a shadow of its former self that, in losing its mental faculties gave us the playbook for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation; in losing control of its bowels gave us the Party for Freedom to clean up; and in its jittered ramblings at night gave us the Patriot’s Poet to, well, laugh at. And why wouldn’t we laugh?

Who would have thought that acquiring oriental wives, rampant alcoholism and aimlessly flying the Star of David would in any way forms the face of modern conservatism – that safeguard of traditionalism? In a way that says more about the progressive left if this is the standard an acceptable alternative is held to, but nonetheless, we diagnose cancer as cancer when we see it.

As befitting of an extended life, however, conservatism is a broad grouping of ideas and practices that through the centuries melded into particular localities and built up its own organic character.

Before the Tories of the U.K. and the Republicans of the US succumbed to the dreariness of the modern world and became the stock-standard “centre-right” parties – which plague our present-day political institutions with equal parts boredom and treason – there was, if only from a historical standpoint, more character and life prevalent in the internal workings of the party and its duties within the country.

Such a thing can be admitted without the analysing of the good or ill that became of these entities. Suffice to say that compared to its modern manifestation there was something that, from our perspective, draws less ire than the present set against the historic backdrop of actual traditionalism holding ground.

Though conservatism is a term seldom used as the main grouping of its constituent factions, it is the college where civic nationalists, patriots and other assorted fruit loops graduated from even though they try to paint themselves in a different light. As the main tributary, it is conservatism, particularly in regards to combatting the progressive left over the prominent issue of Islam and the extreme end of identity politics, that guides the more hard-line, right-wing groups.

By our standards, they are in their formulation reactionary without the reaction. The scattering of conservatism in Australia is less a developed ideology but rather pub-banter that became a little too rowdy.

Their analysis of a world gone awry fuelled their febrile imagination. Islam, the left, and the agreement that the Liberals had betrayed the core tenets of conservatism amounted to a call to arms of an invigorated force to take to the streets. Through its brief public rallies and continued online presence, it revealed to be inept at forming any manner of lasting policy that actually worked for the best interests of this country. Its tenure among our acceptance went from weak to its now non-existent status.

So when will it die?

The ideas of man are invested with his own similarity, and an idea’s death follows a metaphysical equivalent of the biological process whereby the cessation of its vital functions leads to its absolute end.

The conservative has sealed his own fate because while he sees the nation as the vital organ he refuses, to his fatal detriment, to recognise the nation as the culmination of race and culture; not cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism and every perversion betwixt which he defends and fruitlessly tries to tame in order to avoid the baneful accusation of racism.

It is ironical that conservatives ultimately laud the version of our nation that was designed by their apparent enemies on the left. For what else is the presentation of the 21st century, multicultural Australia but the great fantasy of progressives as the first stage of removing the nation state and its racial identity?

Indeed its days are numbered but there are no doubts conservatism’s last moments will be messy, and there’s no telling what yet-to-be-revealed horrors will spew forth from its ideological orifices in a last attempt to show there’s life in it.

In these times it won’t be bothered to keep up the façade there’s any real difference between itself and the left, but will instead – as we have seen – go after the force that exposed and systemically broke down its lies: Nationalism. It is Nationalism which remains the inextinguishable light of reason.

Its pillars are unchanging. Its leaders – both here and abroad in friendly movements – are some of the most besmirched figures in existence and yet remain defiant to their ideals.

As the leaders of fake conservatism rot, the former adherents to such leeches will atone for their misguidance by embracing Nationalism, in fact, they will realise it was what they were after all along: a place to call home among their own people.

God willing, here is another nail in the coffin of the unconvinced as to why our expedient wish for the demise of conservatism and its inbred children is not morbid gossip, nor a critique for the sake of a critique, nor a selfish ruse on our behalf, but a necessity on which the termination of this foul parasite can allow our own ideals to truly flourish; where those ideals are that of the nationhood of Australia: an Australia that lives up to its historic creation as a nation built by the White man and for the sake of the White man.

oie_qPhWNDomOMRR