DANNY ANDREWS’ ‘ONE BELT ONE ROAD’ PRO-CHINA DEAL WEAKENS AUSTRALIA

DANNY ANDREWS’ ‘ONE BELT ONE ROAD’ PRO-CHINA DEAL WEAKENS AUSTRALIA

CHINA is one state closer to achieving its militaristic objective of attaining economic and strategic domination over Australia after traitor Victorian premier Daniel Andrews signed on for its One Belt One Road ‘global trade initiative’.

Andrews has finalised a memorandum of understanding with China’s ambassador to Australia Cheng Jingye which will indenture Victorians under the lie of jobs creation and economic benefits.

His treasonous step comes after Australia has resisted joining China’s Silk Road. The brainchild of Chinese dictator Xi Jinping, the One Belt One Road is his imperialistic vision of, as Professor Clive Hamilton describes in his book Silent Invasion, “restoring China to its rightful place, not through military conquest, but through economic domination.”

The aim of the thinly-disguised grab for global might is otherwise explained as restoring China’s ancient silk trading route which would link Europe and Africa to Asia and Oceania; although Australia was never on China’s ancient Silk Road despite false histories touted by the Chinese government.

In terms of how it works, you only have to look at those gullible countries that lent their signature to the deal then took the money. Sri Lanka signed on for the OBOR ‘initiative’ supposedly for ‘infrastructure projects’ and then had to hand over 70% of its Hambantota Port when it couldn’t pay. The surrendering of the port gives China a strategical vantage point in the Indian Ocean from which to launch its naval power.

Andrews has finalised a memorandum of understanding with China’s ambassador to Australia Cheng Jingye which will indenture Victorians under the lie of jobs creation and economic benefits.

Chinese buyers accounted for $24 billion of Australian real state gobbled up in 2017. China is now the biggest foreign owner of Australian farmland; a booty that includes in no particular order Kidman Cattle Station, which mining Oligarch Gina Rinehart used her pal, Pauline Hanson, for Australians, but lines the pockets of the sellers, and ships top quality fruit and vegetables that we once took for granted over to China to fill Communist bellies. This leaves little of the good stuff for us, yet marks up the price for domestic consumption. Chinese buyers are now achieving a lock on Australia’s celebrated wineries. It was just announced that 10% of South Australia’s Barossa Valley is now in the hands of those loyal to Beijing.

10435376-3x2-700x467
A most significant act of treason against Australia here is being committed by Victoria’s communist premier

Australians may be oblivious to this, but China is eyeing off northern Australia. Beijing refers to Australia’s north as “the northern gateway” and greedy traitors like Gina Rinehart have been keenly pushing what they call the “Northern Australia Agenda” or the northern zone, which aims to partition Australia and transform the north into Chinese territory in all but name.

The Australian government ironically describes this sale of our nation as “unlocking the region’s full economic potential” and creating a “trade and investment gateway”. The idea being the north becomes both the food bowl and mineral resource centre for China’s growth with some vague promise of Australians economically benefiting from this unbelievable act of high treason. This means Chinese firms, which already own so much of Australia’s valuable mines, flying in Chinese workers and paying them in Renminbi to send food and minerals back to China. The only economic gain is for quislings like Rinehart selling off what belongs to Australians.

When you add up the key infrastructure falling either wholly or partly into Chinese hands in conjunction with that already acquired on an OBOR basis you get an unnerving sense that the significant work of occupying Australia is well underway. Take for instance Darwin and Melbourne Ports: Darwin Port’s lease was bought by Landbridge, a company owned by Chinese billionaire Ye Cheng, while Melbourne Port’s lease is controlled by a consortium of which China Investment Corp owns a fifth-share. Take these strategic assets into consideration while recognising that China-linked companies are dominating our gas and electricity network. So our power is rapidly falling into Chinese control along with our farmland and mines; all for quick sales to a class who don’t recognise Australia as anything more than a commodity to be flogged for the biggest profit they can wrangle.

Yet, while all our primary resources are flowing in a single direction back to China, the Chinese people are streaming back here; topping the immigration figures and numbers of “foreign students”.

Yet, while all our primary resources are flowing in a single direction back to China, the Chinese people are streaming back here; topping the immigration figures and numbers of “foreign students”.

The education sector is such a cash cow that teaching our people ranks way below the interests of big-fee paying students from abroad of which the Chinese are the largest group. And don’t think they’re here to learn: migration agents don’t bother veiling enticement of permanent residency.

This is the goal of China’s young and they come hauling silk sacks full of cash from their parents to buy up Australian homes. From the moment you touch down at our major airports, roadside billboards written in Chinese spruik real estate. In Sydney’s Mascot, these signs form a colonnade that stretches beyond vision.

Chinkshit.png

You don’t even need a keen eye to spot these signs they’re so ubiquitous, but what is harder not to notice are the eyesore Asian-style high-rise apartments eating up entire neighbourhoods and forming clusters so dense they rank as new cities. These are not just filling a sudden demand either, they’ve been planned for, and they’re not for you white person — these are earmarked for the new replacement population of those from both Asia and the sub-continent, but mainly for the Chinese.

A company named Consolidated Land and Rail Australia (CLARA) is a private group which has as its mission statement, “…to understand a re-balancing of our settlement and deliver new ways of imagining, planning and building cities, transport and infrastructure.” This is the insidious cabal creating ‘educities’ for our replacement population and then linking them via rail. And yet, officially, Australia — with the now exception of Victoria under its communist sympathiser premier Daniel Andrews — has resisted aligning with China’s Silk Road. But this ambivalence is more a contest between Australia’s security services and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT).

On the one hand, our security services recognise implicitly the threat being posed by China’s infiltration through business. Chinese espionage in Australia is at an all-time high. The country is flooded with individuals and groups aiming to manipulate the views of the Australian public, the media, business and it is especially targeting Australian government officials, where it often finds easy pickings, such as former Labor senator San Dastyari who resigned from his position after it was revealed he tipped off Chinese billionaire Huang Xiangmo that his phone was being tapped by ASIO.

The infiltration of Chinese spies marks what it considers dissident elements among the Chinese community in Australia, and runs campaigns pursuing churches and institutions and practises it deems undesirable. But it’s not just spooks in happy shoes that have Australia’s national security bodies worried; so far they’ve blocked two Chinese companies from bidding for Australia’s national broadband network deeming Huawei and ZTE presented an unacceptable security risk.

This is the goal of China’s young and they come bearing silk sacks full of cash from their parents to buy up Australian homes. From the moment you touch down at our major airports, roadside signs in Chinese spruik real estate. In Sydney’s Mascot, these signs form a colonnade that stretches beyond vision.

But DFAT like the rest of the mercantile class sees Australia strictly in economic terms and plays down any threat as just some continuance of a post-colonial paranoia about the yellow peril which has no place in enlightened business. But then again, unlike the security services, those in government and the business sector are in a nice position to be wooed by Chinese billionaires bearing financial gifts and promises of lucrative jobs. Indeed, Australia’s commitment to democracy has proven dolefully weak. China has used a mixture of courtship and threat; grooming “friends” to facilitate their influence over the Australian government. In the tactics of their trade politics, they have become adept at manipulating our political class such as they did while negotiating the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA). And it always seems to come back to pressuring tactics and tweaking White guilt where Chinese interests are concerned.

We have business people, organisations, and advocacy groups here using ‘donations’ to curry favour among business people and politicians. Domination of Australia is important as China considers Australia and New Zealand test cases in their rehearsals for world domination. We are regarded already as a tribute state to China and it is becoming harder to see how we can possibly extricate ourselves from this invidious position since the whole system stinks with collaborators.

Australian companies.png
Australian companies trading Australia’s future away to Beijing

Andrew Robb was the architect of ChAFTA, a bum deal for all Australians which has dumped rubbish Chinese products onto our markets and handed our jobs over to Chinese workers with zip in return. As his reward, he was given an $880k job as a personal consultant to Ye Cheng. As we’ve already indicated, Ye Cheng owns Landbridge which controls the 99-year lease on Darwin Port. He also belongs to the national Chinese People’s Consultative Committee which has a duty to uphold the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) without question. Therefore Robb is now working for the Communist Party of China. And bear in mind that he sits alongside BHP director and Orica chairman Malcolm Broomhead on the board of the Australia-China Belt & Road Initiative (ACBRI).

As if having our corpuscles sucked empty by Beijing isn’t bad enough we then have to compete with, apart from Chinese beating us out of part-time work, often doing so illegally, the daigou shopper, which acts as an independent agent, buying up goods with high resale value back in China and then shipping them home at a massive profit.

ACBRI.png
A list of Chinese rats and their co-conspirators. The Australia-China One Belt Road invasion committee

Currently, topping the food chain for the daigou shopper is our baby formula since back in China their milk is like radioactive sewage. A veritable black trade in the stuff has sprung up. For years now our supermarket shelves have been stripped of baby formula with stores imposing limits on customer purchases they seldom enforce. Thus Chinese shoppers queue up at major shops exclusively interested in hoarding baby formula which they flog for an untaxed income that would keep a small Australian family alive. And all because no one stops them literally stealing milk out of the mouths of Australian babies.

It would be nice to gather a posse, rock on down to Coles, and crack these Chinese serpents on their pan heads with hockey sticks. It would be lovely to firebomb Chinese invaders out of our land but what would that lead to? Once Australia is established on the Silk Road then, much as the West has done where its investments were concerned, China’s commercial interests require protection. Consider Darwin Port — the Chinese owner controls a maritime militia that is, as Clive Hamilton describes it, “…a vast reserve army of military-trained civilians working the fishing industry and ports”. He explains that their purpose is to “intimidate rival fishers.” So imagine when Australian fishing waters become the object of Beijing’s desire as their empire expands. This maritime militia then also serve the function of forcing the intimidated nation to a position of brinkmanship where the only possible outcome is war.

Chinese companies.png
Chinese companies overseeing the occupation of Australia

Hypothetically speaking, if Australians react negatively against becoming the servile class to Chinese landowners and subordinates as they assume the plum positions among the managerial class, what happens? It’s not something that hasn’t occurred to Beijing. Apart from negotiating “private security” where, say, the northern zone is concerned, or wherever their people proliferate in the mushrooming cities built for them by CLARA, the People’s Liberation Army will be ready to respond to any threat to their commercial interests, or wherever their people are harmed.

Hamilton writes, “We need to protect ourselves forward ten or fifteen years, when Chinese investment in infrastructure abroad approaches the expected scale so that China’s continued economic health and global influence are dependent on highly valuable but far-off assets. If control over those assets is jeopardised by a local revolt, a blockade or nationalism, then it would be only a matter of time before China sent its armed forces abroad to protect Chinese-owned facilities and Chinese citizens.”

But, putting aside what the quislings are selling off to the yellow devils, what about what is already ours! China already has its slanty eyes on our Australian Antarctic Territory, a gobsmacking 5.9 million square km of breathtaking ice. We have three research stations located there and we’re carrying out dozens of scientific programs. But China is now sensing the mining possibilities of the Antarctic and with its new “everything belongs to us” policy it’s only a matter of time until its navy plants its ugly red flag in the iceberg and proclaims itself owner of the vast frozen plane.

Likewise, as its OBOR is forced upon our Asian neighbours how long until adding to our quotas are those economic refugees fleeing displacement by Chinese occupiers?

It is ironic that a supposed ‘Labor man’ would make such a deal with China considering that back in the day a Labour man strove for a vision of a White Working Man’s Paradise. If one of their own had come among them championing Chinese labour he’d have been dropped like a bag of Emu dung. How things have changed.

AndrewsCunt.jpg
“Australian security services said what now?”

NOT-SO-WHITE ROSE SOCIETY AT CENTRE OF MAJOR DEFAMATION

NOT-SO-WHITE ROSE SOCIETY AT CENTRE OF MAJOR DEFAMATION

Imagine being nationally condemned in China for believing China should not be forced to absorb millions of non-Chinese. Consider a scenario where arguing that China should retain its distinctive racial and cultural independence involved risking your livelihood, reputation, and possibly your freedom.

Then, entertain the idea of being reviled as Chinese supremacists by your fellow Chinese, who considered it evil to desire a racially homogenous China. Not only would such a scenario seem far-fetched, but one would reject it as implausible.

In the west, however, that bizarre world is a reality! Despite all that the ‘free west’ rests its reputation on, and backs-up militarily, that sort of view is indeed taboo at a social level. In fact, as Australia is forced by the globalist order to de-Europeanise into a Babylonian satellite predicated upon consumerism, one would imagine it was desirable that a voice is given to a racial group entering minority status — but no such thing.

Likewise, it would be odd to encounter young Turks expressing hypercritical ideas about what it means to be ethnically Turkish: dredging up and interpreting history to fortify arguments that persuade curbing their racial group from expanding or prospering in their home country.

In the west, Pavlovian self-abasement has been engendered into White people. It is comparable to what heathens faced in the centuries after Rome converted to Christianity when the sandal was on the other foot. There is some truth to the maxim that patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel. But when patriotism becomes heretical then it is not the patriot who is the scoundrel but his oppressor. Indeed, his patriotism is no longer an empty grab for salvation but a dutiful act of defiance.

Thus, as the globalists strive to end the dominion of White man over this nation, and which none of the shrill critics of White Australia is lining up to leave, expressing pro-White sentiment is akin to “extremism”. There is no delineation of the protagonists in what the mainstream lumps together as “the far-right”. This ‘far-right’ now occupies a similar space that communists once inhabited as folk devils.

Then, entertain the idea of being reviled as Chinese supremacists by your fellow Chinese, who considered it evil to desire a racially homogenous China. Not only would such a scenario seem far-fetched, but one would reject it as implausible.

Nothing is what it seems in the ‘far-right’ milieu but that doesn’t matter to the volunteer sentries of globalism. Bundling all the groups underneath the ‘far-right’ umbrella is like comparing Sunnis to Shias because they’re all Moslems. The media has had long enough to acquaint itself with disparities between civic patriots, nationalists, alt-righters and Tom Sewell from the Lads Society.

These differences are profound and in many cases run contrary to the narrative they have ascribed their subjects. For instance, the Australian Liberty Alliance could hardly be described as a “White Supremacist” group, with its acceptance of multiracialism and its basis in evangelical Christianity. Yet, that’s what these absolutists of globalism do in their bid to demonise anyone who whatsoever questions their script.

TmCsqOaa_400x400
Wes Fang, one of the most violently anti-White members of the Nationals

By daring to join and naively attempt to influence the executive council of the Young Nationals NSW in a righteous direction, a group of young Australians have run afoul not only of their chosen party but the duplicitous forces of media and its shadowy cabal of auxiliaries who recognise nothing in the hypocrisy of their actions.

To wit; the so-called White Rose Society has just doxed young, proud, White Australians. This act of publication, United Nationalists Australia suggests is a defamation that those involved should immediately pursue in court. To do nothing would give validation for the left side of the ideological spectrum. To accede to their dogma would be a sheepish act of guilt as if they have anything to be guilty for.

That the ABC collaborated in a joint exercise between the metrosexual Alex Mann and this cluster of trolls led by a China-shill living in Tasmania for a project fraught with political bias, normalising the idea that to object to population replacement, or resist sublimating to identity politics, is “extreme” and not a defensive counter-reaction, is a selective use of a public resource. Where was the depth of analysis, where was the balance? Why not also expose Antifa for evenness; surely to discuss one it is only reasonable to explain the other? Or at least aim to put the alt-right in context rather than fail to explain why the Australian alt-right came about. Moreover, it is becoming a trend wherein the Alex Manns of this world hope to make their bones with their hardly investigative exposes of the alt-right while everything they themselves stand for corrodes western society.

By daring to join and naively attempt to influence the executive council of the Young Nationalists NSW in a righteous direction, a group of young Australians have run afoul not only of their chosen party but the duplicitous forces of media and its shadowy cabal of auxiliaries who recognise nothing in the hypocrisy of their actions.

Allegations made about persons in that article, which is supported by the hyperbole of Mann’s podcast ‘Haircuts and hate: Inside the rise of Australia’s alt-right’, expresses no irony about using as sources social media “infiltrators” to frame a titillating narrowcast about nationalistic youth subverting a party that has traded on its voters naïve assumption that it too is nationalist.

The suggestion that these parties may be being infiltrated by radical elements is made while they themselves harbour dangerous extremists in their political choices. For instance, the ABC is as we have seen synced with Labor Party. Today, the Facebook page The Australian Labor Party Supporters shared a link to the WRS’s story coming via the anarchist page ‘Kieran’s Review’. This anarchist links in with Antifascist Action which has never shied away from violence, vandalism, or theft: and the other mainstream political party is normalising that extreme sector.

Within the orbit of the Australian Labor Party are dangerous zealots who hide inside the union fold. UNA has revealed how the CFMMEU hosts leftist extremist groups like the Communist Workers Party of Australia. In the ranks of these are sociopaths such as David Gullis, who has been reported for various assaults and acts of threatening lives to Newtown Police in NSW, who choose not arrest him.

Major news media groups employ trolls who target ideological victims by stalking them online and then dox them, endangering their employment prospects, their ability to rent a home, and ultimately destroy the quality of their lives. This is considered justifiable behaviour, but which is far worse than anything the groups they report on has ever done. In fact, the most extreme acts thus far by anyone on the ‘far-right’ have been the beheading of a dummy in a public place by a group of civic patriots or flinging pig’s guts outside the door of some perceived traitor. Yet, the ABC has no interest in doxing ideological comrades regardless of how vile their hearts and minds are.

Fascinating, too, is how they only ever hunt those who have somehow ‘threatened’ the establishment. Why would the media go after particular persons, such as Fairfax Media has done in the past, and avoid others like the leader of the Sydney Lads Society? In that whole rubbishy article by the White Rose Society they never once named the truly diabolical characters on the scene. The media only goes after the sincere patriots and nationalists.

Allegations made about persons in that article, which is supported by the hyperbole of Mann’s podcast ‘Haircuts and hate: Inside the rise of Australia’s alt-right’, expresses no irony about using as sources social media “infiltrators” to frame a titillating narrowcast about nationalistic youth subverting a party that has traded on its voters naïve assumption that it too is nationalist.

Mark McDonald Campbell (yes – that is what he calls himself) was appointed the leader of the Sydney Lads Society by that group’s founder, a fellow New Zealander, Tom Sewell. Conceited to a fault, Sewell has made it his life’s mission to bullishly appropriate all nationalist assets and disdain any veteran (except when in trouble). He has engendered a subculture that is politically and ideologically unintelligible and which contains strong elements of ageism and other biases not in accord with nationalist thinking.

This young fool, against the strongest warnings of seasoned nationalists, appointed McDonald to head his Sydney franchise of the Lads. It would be in the realm of high probability that McDonald, through his shady connections that lead back to darker political forces, played a hand in doxing certain persons included in that article. And yet, despite being the former leader of Squadron 88, with the notoriety of stunts attributable to that small group, the media has never profiled him. Is it because he’s made himself an asset to them? With what we know about Matey Mate, believe us, this is not at all a possibility anyone involved should dismiss.

Do note, in a central image used by the ABC Blair Cottrell and one other, are named, but conspicuously not Matey Mate, who is probably one of those requiring exposing the most, having played an endless background role linking to the likes of Liberal Party dirty tricks man, Howard Crawford. He has burned nationalists, too, and Sewell was warned that he is regarded as filth by the established Australian nationalist brand. However, it strikes UNA as astounding these lug nuts obligingly lined up grinning for a pic that would be used in a damaging piece. They have betrayed the fact they adore media attention at their own peril whereas seasoned nationalists are wise to the perfidy of the media.

Matey.png
Ah, Mark McDonald Campbell (centre) yet again evades scrutiny by the media. Funny how the ex-Squadron-88 leader and the head of the Lads Society Sydney always manages to do that. It might have something to do with that “get out of jail free card” he used to boast about

But while Matey presents one area of inquiry, it goes without saying that the National Party itself, especially privileged former private school boy Ethan Gordon, under the instructions of John Barilaro, worked to expose and will ultimately expel these loyal young Australians. The penetration of the Young Nationals was not an idea that nationalists supported. The belief that a group could infiltrate and overtake a party is seriously misguided, for either they are exposed, as has happened, or it is they themselves who become overtaken.

There was no way that a party like the Nationals which includes such rabid globalists as the son of Chinese immigrants Wes Fang was about to be undermined by pro-White Australians. The Nationals’ interest lies in the commoditising of Australia: it believes in mass immigration and has no time for anyone who might endanger their greasing their sweaty palms with Chinese baksheesh. Furthermore, the NSW Young Nationals had backed gay marriage, which is such an obvious signal of their mainstream ambitions.

Already, two of those named have been removed from the NSW Young Nationals executive pending a review which will inevitably turn them out. We shall not contribute to their doxing and refuse to name them out of respect.

Already, two of those named have been removed from the NSW Young Nationals executive pending a review which will inevitably turn them out. We shall not contribute to their doxing and refuse to name them out of respect.

But why fight it? Hell, it should be a ‘fair cop’ and a ‘nice try’ with a Cheshire grin but maybe now you young folks should turn your attention towards, oh, we don’t know, a PROPER Australian Nationalist Party, like, perhaps, the Australia First Party!? That they never do is an endless point of irritation to nationalists.

r0_0_5472_3648_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg
Like Wes Fang, The Nationals’ John Barilaro (pictured) hates Nationalists with a vengeance

This time, instead of shrouding your beliefs, how about being unashamed about expressing them? They are better expressed through a Nationalist organisation rather than a mainstream host, which was inevitably going to rumble your act. Bring that energy to bear to proper nationalist activism and away from elitist playpens marshalled by wreckers.

Oh, and while we’re at it, lose the embarrassing African-American style gang signs. They are not an expression of Australian nativism and are totally juvenile. Have a little bit of dignity and class.

But this is all part and parcel of the broad church that exists in the catchall ‘alt-right’ social media world of these young people replete with insular alphabets. Flirting with concepts that seem to them edgy but bear no kinship with Australian nationalism like ‘The New Guard’ and Italian Fascism has given them little room to retreat. None of them really understand that to invoke the New Guard pretty much puts them back in the conservative stick-pile of the prejudiced middle-class.

Oh, and while we’re at it, lose the embarrassing African-American style gang signs. They are not an expression of Australian nativism and are totally juvenile. Have a little bit of dignity and class.

Likewise, even notionally supporting The Antipodeans, a group that modelled itself directly on the MI5-riddled National Action which Nick Griffin revealed, pardon the pun, queerly approved homosexuality creeping into the ranks, was always likely to back-spray on these inexperienced kids. And it has never occurred to the Antipodeans themselves that they are serving up with a cherry on top the very menace that the Jewish community especially thrives on. They not only validate those ‘concerns’ of anti-Semitism but they cheerfully oblige by wearing the right costumes and acting the part of the Nazi to a tee.

It seems more to be a matter of peer-identification than sound calibrating of ideology to share a room with those who assume that German National Socialism, Fascism, White Nationalism, Nationalism, Civic Patriotism, and whatever other ism is more-or-less the same thing, or at least, intent on achieving the same goal. It’s even sadder when they adopt these appellations without understanding them, or for reasons of shock value, or because it’s fashionable.

The easiest thing to remember, aside from the inherent truth in the 14 words, is that Australians are White, and Whites are under threat.

In the end, the most these infiltrators have done is give the Nationals a free kick in signalling their commitment to multiracialism. If they had dedicated that energy to the AFP, who knows? But then those who swim in their current and claim to be promoting Nationalism are really doing the absolute opposite: helping to cripple it.

THE WHITE ROSE SOCIETY’S LINK TO COMMUNIST CHINA

This second part of our article, following what we believe was a necessary digression, gets right down to brass tacks. Given they’ve plagued other people’s lives it’s only fair that we now turnabout and establish who this collective of parasites are.

We know from Alex Mann’s podcast that the central figure is a Tasmanian Asian Studies lecturer and Sinophile, Kaz Ross. Kaz’s Twitter page is an infestation of materials relating to Asia and in particular to China. In an interview with her beta male ABC compatriot, she described how she strayed into doxing. “I started off tracking anti-Chinese sentiment and I got involved looking at the anti-Chinese action on Facebook. There is a very short path between anti-Chinese sentiment and neo-Nazis.”

6532970-3x4-700x933
Morbidly obese Kaz Ross, (most likely) coordinator of the White Rose Society and a shill for China

That comment is so ludicrous but it raises questions of how close to Chinese interests this woman is. UNA notes that we have Chinese eyes watching our content, as does the Australia First Party, and no doubt other groups that publish nationalist content.

The White Rose Society borrows its name from a resistance group that distributed anti-Nazi leaflets during the days of the Third Reich, so it’s funny that its principal coordinator should be a shill for China.

Also, it’s worth noting that the National Party was one of those who received $100,000 in donations from Communist China-agent Chau Chak Wing from 2013-14. With a rural constituency and preparations underway for the movement of a large immigrant population into regional Australia Chinese money will inevitably be changing hands and it wouldn’t do to have a bunch of “White Supremacists” in your party if you hope to get a hold of any of that Communist lucre. This is notwithstanding the flogging of Aussie farmland and primary exports.

Of course, the Nationals really don’t need the mere possibility of profiting from China to have targeted any pro-White people coming within their executive. This is a party that voted in favour of gay marriage and is doing its damned best to fall into line with mainstream identity politics.

But in the case of Kaz Ross, shilling for China is a fanatical ideal, and boy, does she shill for China! You don’t need that above quote alone to put her prejudice into context. In September 2012, Kaz Ross penned a paper titled ‘Building an ‘Asia capable’ state: Response to the Tasmania’s Place in the Asian Century Issues Paper’ The paper is a prep piece for the Asianisation of the Australian workforce as well as an ad spruiking Tasmania as a destination for Asian students where apparently “there is a burgeoning interest in Australian literature, poetry and art”.

In 2016, Ross authored an op-ed piece for The Mercury in which she weighed in on the sale of Australia’s largest dairy producer, the Van Diemen’s Land Company. She dismissed concerns about the sale to Chinese billionaire Lu Xianfeng as “anti-Chinese dog whistling”. The rest is a soliloquy to what she believes is the essential role the Chinese have played in creating Tasmania and how that engagement with Asians must continue and grow. She writes, “Tasmania’s forgotten past connections with Asia remind us of one important fact: Tasmania has always needed Asia. And it still does today.”

Kaz has been preoccupied with those she perceives as hating on her beloved China. She was quoted in a 2017 ABC radio report ‘Calls for Facebook to be more accountable for the rise in fear and hatred on social media’.

In this interview, she details how she began snooping for dissidents commenting negatively on the sale of the Van Diemen’s Land Company to the Chinese. She described how Facebook should be policing comments unfriendly to globalism and admitted that “I report probably at least a dozen posts every single day and some days I might get two or three posts taken down but not always.”

It is patently evident that this traitor has formed an alliance with trolls from the extreme left whose interest is in chopping down any development of a discussion relating to the repopulation of this country. It’s quite in keeping with her beloved Beijing masters’ penchant for strict censorship, too.

Therefore, we can quite unequivocally state that Kaz Ross is doubtless the central force behind the White Rose Society and that if those who’ve had their futures compromised for belonging to a non-traditional political position choose to pursue action there is a good place to start. Her contact details will be available on the University of Tasmania web page.

But it would also be interesting to cover what role, if any, the Chinese interests have played in the doxing of these young people since the connection is right there.

UPDATE: Following the publication of this article the ABC gave the White Rose Society leader a platform to post her views.

Twitter
Kaz Ross responding to our article and clearly enjoys the attention

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

Nothing prevented Saturday’s bi-state ‘International Freedom of Speech’ day, which is of itself ironic. However, in this muddle of libertarian and identity politics, attended by the usual provocateurs, when speech has no substantial content the point of whether or not it is free is moot.

The two-state ‘event’, which we cannot find any evidence of being internationally recognised despite its bold appellation, although there is said to a London event, was held in both Melbourne Docklands, where Jewish supremacist and mega Zionist Avi Yemini was joined by Senator Fraser Anning, with a crowd of around 50 free speech advocates, after the first got underway at Sydney’s Wiley Park, in Lakemba.

We will address the Wiley Park leg shortly, but first-up Anning’s speech would reveal a lot about this mysterious ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’. Senator Anning’s maiden speech, like Pauline Hanson’s before him, caused sparks when he called for a return to a “European Christian” immigration system. Yet, it did not take long to forge an allegiance with the Zionist ALA. This seems to be an inevitable pattern when it comes to outspoken politicians on the “right side”, especially those who create a false hope that they’ll support a return to the White Australia Policy.

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

He then got down to business and we’ll place a transcript of his speech verbatim on this page. What will become apparent is his pro-Zionism as he told the sparsely peopled audience, “My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’.

“This year we gave the Palestinian authority $43.8 million. They use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority.”

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

Australia shouldn’t be paying any money to that region, for sure, but that’s not what Anning’s point was – he doesn’t want it paid because, according to the very Zionist logic, innocent Israelis are being killed by evil Palestinians who have some screwed-up notion about wanting to stop their land being stolen by Jews.

The only attempt to shut down Fraser’s freedom of speech came from a longhaired ginger dressed in black who was shouted down by Avi and his supporters who chanted, “Zuck off!” a reference to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerbeg, who they blame personally for de-speeching them on his social media platform.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Meanwhile, Blair Cottrell did not attend the Melbourne rally. Instead, he drove to Sydney to yell at gimps in a windy park through a Chinese manufactured megaphone. He shook hands with the likes of marijuana advocate and serial instigator Nick Folkes who is back from cannabis country with his small multi-racial cast of resurrected Party for Freedom members (or as we dubbed them, Peanuts for Freedom) as he joined a line-up that included some uninteresting woman and Cottrell’s lawyer, John Bolton.

dfadsfs.png
Blair is a man who never lets standards get in the way of the company he consorts with (Folkes centre, Bluebeard taking a fan snap on the right)

Present also was Neil Erikson’s partner in crime, Rino Grgurgovic, aka Bluebeard, along with members of the Lads Society Sydney. If there was a Pictionary definition of “idiot” then Bluebeard’s picture would be posted there in all its pot-bellied glory, stink lines included. There would even be a colouring-in version for autistic kids.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which would be like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

MateyandFokles.png
The Fellowship of the Chicken is reunited. Matey Mate, Hollywood Nazi on the right, with his Zionist mate and colleague, Nick Folkes

It’s grouse Matey Mate is back with Nick because it’s like a reunion of the old fellowship of the chicken which was centred around the deep-seed Liberal muckraker and sometimes poultry farmer Howard “I’m not a financial member of any party” Crawford.  Howie even “liked” Nick’s post about the rally on his Facebook page which means so much for any of them retiring.

But what is more significant about these two is that it proves that Matey Mate, far from being owned by ‘The Lads’ is a random equation infecting the numbers. Any belief that he is not a two-way transistor between the meddlesome world of the Zionist spiv and the “youth” who have gravitated to Sewell’s boys’ club betrays an inadvisable trust in the skunk. Matey Mate’s record speaks for itself, and his intrigues run deep. It wouldn’t surprise UNA at all if he was receiving secret funding from a government agency. Likewise, given the ongoing theatre, and all the incongruities of his allegiances, policies, platform and behaviour, who is handling Nick Folkes?

Thus, with a gale blowing, and nobody infringing on their ‘free speech’, Bolton led the proceedings by opening up with a spiel about Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern; all this while the antifascist voyeurs tracked them with what must’ve been the cheapest drone on the market – a Chinese knock-off bought for a lobster from the markets. Those assembled in the park appear in an image smugly uploaded to the Anonykatz Facebook page from a vertigo-inducing height and with a visibility that rendered the whole exercise even more futile than what was happening down below.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer 8Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which is like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

Screenshot_20181006-230600_Facebook.jpg
The Antis will try to say that the object of the exercise was to view crowd numbers. But that’s a lie, they wanted to see who was there, but their cheap and nasty drone failed them. Lulz

Nick Folkes, no doubt nicely toasted on seventh-generation Indica skunk weed, then grabbed the bullhorn to foghorn about his freedom of speech, or should that be, his excess of it. Folkes is an idiot and no matter what anyone believes about personal liberty the whole world would be better off if a special law was passed limiting him to the use of sign language.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

Singling out “dogmatic communists” he aired his angst about how they “want to take freedom of speech and it’s an attack on the only civilisation in modern history that brought around freedom of speech is the British Empire.”

Perhaps they should tell that to D.H Lawrence or any of the other writers whose books were originally banned in England.

It’s worth noting too that both Folkes and Anning cited “communists” as being responsible for taking away their freedom of speech while last we checked Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk, who led a charge to censor Anning and stripped him of staff funding and extra staff is a dyed in the wool conservative.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

And while Folkes gasbags about freedom of speech he seems to forget when he attempted to shut down Australia First Party president Jim Saleam’s freedom of speech at the Reclaim Australia rally at Martin Place in Sydney during 2015 when he connived with the marshals to have him removed. Likewise, the marshals forbade AFP from distributing any materials at the rally but didn’t impose any ban on the kosher groups.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care. It is very clear that he chose long ago the path of civic patriotism. And for all the fascist talk from the Lads Society once again Matey Mate and his offsider Alex had no problem embedding themselves with Zionists and supporting an event that is fundamentally pro-Israel.

a7a6dc4f492afb2d327d9e154432017f
John Bolton, Zionist, anti-Islam activist, and most likely chief organiser of International Freedom of Speech day in Australia

John Bolton is probably the key to Cottrell’s attendance since as a lawyer he has taken up his appeal pro bono against charges of inciting serious contempt against Moslems. Did Blair really drive all the way to Sydney just to help his mate out, or did he have other business? Was he asked not to attend the Melbourne leg of the rally, or would Tom Sewell, the chock-heeled boss of the Lads Society have forbidden it? It’s hard to be sure once you try to figure out who put this thing together and why.

United Nationalists Australia has attempted to identify who the principal organisers of the ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’ are. Our strongest lead is actually John Bolton. He released a YouTube video on October 1 in which his concerns about freedom of speech link primarily to former EDL head and Zionist Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern who was prevented from entering the Moslem enclave of Lakemba during her tour of Sydney. Bear in mind, the Lads Society provided security for Southern both at Sydney and her Melbourne show.

During that tour, Southern appeared with Stefan Molyneux in a video filmed at Sydney’s Botanic Gardens in which she detailed how police prevented her exercising the simple right to walk the streets since her presence would be seen as a provocation. She claimed there was hypocrisy at play because mainstream media, which were actually filming her, were put under no such restrictions. Nonetheless, Southern began by explaining how her team had contacted police to advise them she would be journeying down with her crew.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care.

One could say it was stupid tipping them off, but one could also cynically suggest that she got the reaction she intended. If she was fair dinkum about slinking into a Moslem neighbourhood incognito — and let’s face it, most Moslems like most Aussies wouldn’t have known her from a bar of soap — there were countless other areas that are chockers with the followers of Mohammed; Punchbowl being one; Beverly Hills another. Either she was worried they might get creamed or else she’d calculated the police response and just how marvellously it would dovetail her narrative.

It was with this same expectation of publicity that Bolton chose Wiley Park near Lakemba to stage his rally. He stated so in his video in which he grimly warned against anyone inciting violence or attempting violence against his people. He clearly spelt out it was a test of “freedom” to be in the area. In the end, no one attempted anything, except some numbskull Antis who took their cheap-arse drone for a spin in the drizzle.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

So, Bolton is at the centre of this theatre that has drawn together the usual faces. But he is Cottrell’s lawyer and Blair is synonymous with allegedly suggesting that every classroom in Australia should have a copy of Mein Kampf (We are not sure if that quote is apocryphal or not). How does that then fit in with Bolton’s worldview? We quote him from the video, “As Australians, we are a melting pot. Women and men in Australia are equal. People of every race in Australia are equal. It’s abhorrent that people want to divide us.”

Well, isn’t Blair Cottrell one of those trying to divide us? I know we are. We’re proud to admit it since the only “us” we recognise are actual Australians, which means we aim to divide their “us”. So, if that’s the case, does he support freedom of speech by those who want to repudiate his statements of values as a bunch of gay libertarian crap? Did he not just call such abhorrent? On his Weebly blog, among an impressive list of professional credentials, Bolton describes himself as “conservative” but “politically independent”. We see a lot of that around the anti-Islam scene. And John is no stranger to that arena. In 2017, he joined the Peanuts as a speaker at their rally against a proposed Islamic school in Penrith.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

Among those were ‘Australian Patriot Uprising’ Commandant Matt Lowe and his non-Aryan Sergeant Schultz, Toby Cook.

Matt Lowe took over while Nick Folkes was on hiatus. He and fat boy Toby, who we understand to be a former mental patient, essentially formed the core of this absurd Facebook club along with Shermon Burgess, who himself made a quantum leap from strict kosher patriot to fully-blown neo-Nazi with such a vengeance that it defies credulity. Just as the movement was adopting a conspicuously fascist style, Folkes stepped sideways, Lowe et al moved in, but now they’re gone and Folkes is back along with the bagel brigade. But it remains of Mr Bolton to explain just what these glaring inconsistencies mean to him because being such a bright lad he cannot have failed to be aware of them. By the same token, Bolton cannot be unaware of what Blair Cottrell represents to the mainstream, while Nationalists know the truth and these associations of his only confirm: the man is a civic patriot and always will be.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

We now return to Nick Folkes’s comment about “it’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here”. It’s a shame that after all this time the dumb bastard hasn’t worked out why.

The last any significant support was galvanised for a comparable cause was the Reclaim Australia rallies. If we’re talking about Sydney alone, then the 2015 rallies were the ceiling. But let’s focus on that, shall we? How come they failed to capitalise on the kind of public support they saw from that concept? Arguably, it was a number of reasons. Firstly, too many civic micro-parties played tug-o-war with it, such as the ALA, and the unregistered PfF and those parties were avowedly Zionist. But while other factors occurred, especially in Melbourne where the street jouster mentality of the UPF had turned off the mums and dads (or “peasants” as Blair Cottrell charitably labels them), the simple fact no one seems to recognise is because they never actually stated what it is they wanted.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

What was it they wanted; a total end to Moslem immigration? Not really, if you attended the rallies and listened to the speeches, despite the slant the hard-left and globalist media put on it, they asked only for “assimilation”. Who was it that this petition was directed at? Was it the Moslem community, who were not represented and never addressed? Was it the politicians? There were frequent calls for “politicians” to “do something”. That’s a mighty naïve expression of faith right there, trusting a ‘politician’ working for an internationalist world-order controlled by corporations. The politicians are dedicated universally to pumping this country full of as much non-Anglo human content as can be mustered. This is the idea.

Opposition leader Bill Shorten has approached Scott Morrison to agree to a bipartisan commitment to a “big Australia”, and a big Australia means unfettered immigration.

The little-known corporation Consolidated Land & Rail (CLARA) has as its mission statement: “CLARA is an Australian private group formed to deliver a program to change Australia. We seek to undertake a re-balancing of our settlement and deliver new ways of imagining, planning and building cities, transport and infrastructure.”

This is insidious stuff: a private group with endless land assets knocking up micro-cities and connecting them with rail all over Australia. Who is to live in those cities? Well, CLARA says, “Australia’s population is projected to increase 69% between now and 2061 — up from 24.7 million to 41.5 million people, that is 16.8 million more Australians needing a home.”

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

Australians…? They seriously just called that projected figure Australians when they’re constantly harping on about the declining birth rate among White Australians?! No, that’s an import figure, and what’s more, CLARA seems to know something we don’t because they’re already building their cities and rails to accommodate this massive increase which will come from Asia, the Sub-Continent, the Middle-East and Africa, but really largely from China, and to serve the new Sino-Australia.

How can such a newish population in any way be Australian? By their importation, they signal the end of Australia and the creation of an artificial nation not founded on culture, race or custom, but on consumerism and serfdom to oligarchical concerns.

Given all this is happening, tiny little voices squeaking about “freedom of speech” in an ill-defined way don’t seem to grasp the issues especially when, like Bolton and all civic patriots, they accept a “melting pot” so long as it doesn’t come with Moslems and their “sharia law”.

But it also explains why Nick and Co can’t get massive numbers to their rallies despite the size of the cities because they are lost in a wilderness where their concerns are outnumbered by the demographic realities of those very cities.

The Nationalist message is very different and it is uncompromising and unwavering. And the key to the activism resides in that message and its purity something those who complain about “keyboard warriors” not attending these hopeless rallies cannot get their heads around.

Given the divide we suffer in major cities, the only logical thing to do is seek out our people where they reside, and where they are receptive to our message and that might not be in the sexy surrounds of an urban environment. It might be spread apart and out in the dust 200 kilometres each way between. But the cities are lost and those Whites remaining and who’ve adapted to this prefabricated metropolis are from the virtue-signalling hypocrite elites. Which is another thing Anning, Bolton and Yemini don’t understand about their “free speech”, especially when they equate it with social media — the political element of their “speech” is a product of the commercial.

Identity politics is a device by which aspirational consumers signal their social status. The greatest advocates of all these guises of progressive politics are in fact the corporations who splinter it all up into a consumerist matrix. It’s not even accurate to suggest that Facebook targets them on the basis of their politics, although it’s not so unfair an accusation to level at Twitter. Facebook operates on a combination of algorithms and human moderators and while the inconsistencies of their adjudications are frustrating they are more random than they seem. But if they really want to get down to an understanding what they lack is not a freedom of speech but a market share.

The topic of “freedom of speech” is too complex to be condensed for a mass audience at least in the fashion the civics are doing it. What their “freedom of speech” is banging up against is this very global order. There are no worries for Moslem Arabs discussing the finer points of socially unpalatable aspects of an extreme reading of their religion at meetings in Lakemba, for instance. They are no challenge to that order. But as Christopher Shortis found out when he, Cottrell and Neil Erikson were convicted of inciting serious contempt against Moslems, it sure isn’t so lenient when it happens the other way. While Moslems are allowed to discuss extreme ideas to characterise them as extreme, which is what the Bendigo Three did in their video, is considered the more extreme acts of the two. Indeed, we may consider naming the monster now to be heretical speech.

And once one makes a concession to unfettered freedom of expression where does it end? We cannot argue for the unconditional freedom of speech which would demand things like sex with baby giraffes or to legalise cannibalism. And as society fragments along the lines of those directing from the Bilderberg Group, it seems that sick ideas are gaining respectability on a daily basis. We’re already at the stage that we’ve repudiated nature and argued she is wrong, that there is no such thing as race or gender, and one woman described as an author and educator argues that parents should gain permission from their babies before changing their nappies. These are the signs of a society on the way out and that’s where the oligarchs want it so that it can be replaced by a new serfdom. When the serfs speak up about anything that may draw attention to this then, of course, that speech is no longer but very, very expensive.

As Nationalists we do not fight vigorously for freedom of speech, we strive to emphasize the hypocrisy of those who wish to silence us and demonise us in the name of an inclusive and progressive democracy in which freedom of expression is implied.

Anning.png
Senator Fraser Anning expressing his fear that Israelis might be being murdered by Palestinians

Senator Fraswer Anning’s Speech, Verbatim, Docklands, Melbourne, Oct 6, 2018 (don’t say we tried to take your free speech)

“ALA is the only democratic party in this state. These African gangs who are attacking people, destroying property and bashing different people and getting away with it is probably some of the worst things I’ve seen and I’m sure it’s not the fault of the police, I’m sure their hands have been tied by somebody further up. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right for any nation, it’s the first thing that goes and then normally what happens in a communist society they take your freedom of speech first, so occasionally we have clowns like this who deny you your right to freedom of speech,” (enter bozo ranga) to disrupt the event. Avi grabbed the mic and led the small gathering of ALA supporters and others in a chant of “Zucc off, mate!” Anning, continued, “So the first thing that goes in a communist country is your freedom of speech, just recently, as Avi said, both our (Facebook) pages were shut down. The premier in Queensland asked our members there – and three state members – to denounce my speech or lose funding for staff members. Now, that’s a travesty of justice, it was illegal, she eventually took those staff members and took that funding because they did not want to renounce me. My Facebook page, as far as I know, was taken down… we’ve never called for any violence… neither Avi or myself have called for any violence against anyone and never will. My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’ (loud claps from Zionist Avi and his ALAers). This year we give the Palestinian authority $43.8 million they use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority. And that’s where our tax dollars are going and when I called for that, in the senate, all three parties, the Liberals, Labor and the Greens vote against me every time. They’re the same people who the day after my speech were all crying and hugging and ringing their hands and they never damped a tissue but they pretended to cry then they denounce me — but they’re the same three parties who regularly vote against the motions that I put up to stop funding the Palestinian authority but also I call for getting the White South African farmers out of South Africa (Avi leads clapping) and again they vote against me so they’re hypocrites, they took two words out of context then they decided they would try to make some mileage out of that but they made their impatient speeches but the next day when the polls came out, even the ABC poll, they found around 80% of Australians were supporting me so, ah… (Applause) so they’ll have to eat their words a little bit. So we’ve got some big problems to overcome, we are supposed to have a conservative government but then they’re here five years but we still have 18C on the books, which takes away your freedom of speech. What’s happening there? So really what’s happened is that the parties that used to represent us have moved so far to the left that they don’t represent us anymore. There’s a vacuum on the right. We saw that in 2016 in America when Trump came like a freight train and hit poor old Hillary Clinton. She didn’t see that coming (laughter). He’s been a great man for America, he’s done a huge amount of work for America and America has never been better now economically or any other way you like to look at it. So a lot of this, this trying to take away our freedom of speech is coming out of the United Nations. Now, I’ve been calling for us to get out of Paris and to get out of the United Nations. They have no business here, they have no business with us, and their politicians like Marise Payne who’s over there now signing away your rights to everything, ah, she has no business doing that on your behalf. She’s signing a thing called the Immigration Compact, now, and that will effectively give your rights to who comes into this country – it will be handed over to the United Nations so you can imagine what’s going to happen with our society. By the way, that speech, that part with the final solution, what was actually said was ‘the final solution to our immigration problem is for the Australian people to have a vote via plebiscite’. And I will still continue to push that agenda because we’ve had votes on all sorts of things like same sex marriage and everything else, why should we not have the right to have a vote on not just how many people will come here but who comes here, what the makeup of this country will be like later on. So really I think the big fear is that good Australian men and a lot of them only boys died on battlefields all over the world. They died in freezing bloody muddy trenches in France and Belgium and other places and in the jungles of New Guinea and they died for one thing and that is for your freedom and for your rights. They stood up in front of bullets and they took bullets a lot of them and they’re not here with us anymore and the least we can do is to do what good people like yourselves are doing now and stand up for our freedoms and I applaud you all for being here and we’ve got to keep up the fight.”

NEWSPEAK HATE SPEECH LAWS HIT NEW SOUTH WALES

NEWSPEAK HATE SPEECH LAWS HIT NEW SOUTH WALES

New laws come into effect in NSW this week. Anyone “inciting violence” on the basis of race, minority religious status, sexual orientation, or this bogus Orwellian construct of “intersex people” face $11,000 fine or three years in jail.

United Nationalists Australia declares this the ‘Newspeak laws’ since anyone threatening violence against anybody is or should be, dealt with under existing laws. However, these laws, which were lobbied for hard by “minority organisations” adds a special status to anyone in these favoured political categories. This makes the rest of us (White Australians) an increasing sub-class subject to greater social restrictions and with less access to similar legal consideration.

politics-immigration-immigrants-american_politics-inboxes-outboxes-cgon838_low.jpg

Nationalists have long felt the “un-person” status by crossing the social rubicon and calling out occupied multiracial Australia. The Police are disinclined to act upon threats against us by extremist groups linked to institutions of globalist organized-thuggery such as the Construction Forestry Mining, Maritime and Energy Union (CFMMEU). Likewise, complaints based on incitements to violence, such as those by members of the clandestine terror group Antifascist Action, are ignored by a compliant state apparatus.

Now, the discussion about the ethnic cleansing of true Australians as defined by the European settlers of this land and who created this nation that all these rapacious other races swarm to will have to be necessarily handled by the more articulate and savvy among us. The reckless and immature propaganda purveyed by the likes of Antipodean Resistance only ever helped create these laws just as much as it managed to cause its British counterpart and inspiration National Action to become a proscribed organisation in England.

Make no mistake, the signifiers used in mainstream anti-White propaganda are unashamed in highlighting the fact these laws are aimed at White Australians. A screengrab from a June ABC report on the laws uses an image of patriots standing with Aussie flags to illustrate the story and secure in the reader’s mind just who these political amendments to the Crimes Act 1900 target.

dadgg.png
The red arrow points to the subjects of this bill. Yes, White Countries have a habit of legislating heavily against their own people in favour of every other non-threatened race on the face of this yellow, brown and black planet

The bill is called the Crimes Amendment (Publically Threatening and Inciting Violence) Bill 2018 and we probably have Nick Folkes, Neil Erikson, Mark Campbell-McDonald, Shermon Burgess and Ralph Cerminara to thank for it. There are three schedules the first of which inserts section 93Z into the Crimes Act while the second “…removes certain offences from the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 and makes a consequential amendment.” The third makes any of the described offences against the special citizens a summary offence.

Under the act, it won’t matter if threats are made in the heat of the moment, or if no violence is carried out. The bill concerns what it terms a “public act” which is defined as:

(a) any form of communication (including speaking, writing, displaying notices, playing of recorded material, broadcasting and communicating through social media and other electronic methods) to the public, and

(b) any conduct (including actions and gestures and the wearing or display of clothing, signs, flags, emblems and insignia) observable by the public, and (c) the distribution or dissemination of any matter to the public.

That is a fairly hefty set of criteria and as you can see open to wide interpretation and given the summary nature of the act it pretty much places all the power in the hands of the offended person(s), or group. The already litigious ‘minority’ groups will now be further emboldened to examine any context under which criticism is made for an interpretation of threat, violence, or vilification. This will be particularly so after the maiden speech by Katter’s Australia party senator Fraser Anning whose truths about the state of immigration and cultural disintegration has triggered the globalist jack-booters in the left-wing media to an even greater volume of anti-White hysteria.

And who is largely responsible for bringing these laws about? Aside from the NSW Liberal & Nationals we have a coalition group called ‘Keep NSW Safe’. Who comprises this group? They are as follows:

  • Federation of Indian Associations of Australia (Curry store owners)

  • Australian Hellenic Council NSW

  • New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies (Big surprise there)

  • Australian National Imams Council

  • Chinese Australian Services Society

  • Korean Society of Sydney

  • Australian Kurdistan Veteran Association

  • Assyrian Australian National Federation

  • Chinese Australia Forum (which works for Beijing’s interest to infiltrate Australian institutions)

  • International Coptic Union

  • Vietnamese Community in Australia – NSW Chapter

  • Australian South Sea Islanders

  • Hindu Council of Australia

  • Basmala Australia Inc (An Islamic mob)

  • Armenian National Committee of Australia

  • The Australian Egyptian Council Forum

  • South Asian Study Group, University of Sydney (Asian invaders taking jobs, shifting into high-rise apartments bought by rich Chinese parents, creating homelessness for Aussies)

  • Sikh Youth Australia (Gets to carry knives on religious grounds)

  • Cambodian-Australian Welfare Council of NSW (Pol Pot’s former soldiers)

  • NSW Council of Christians and Jews Inc. (Evangelical warmongers)

  • Australian Hellenic Educational Progressive Association (More Socialist Greek traitors)

  • Muslim Women Association (Burka battle axes)

  • Australian Cook Islander Community NSW

  • Australian Federation of Ukrainian Associations (Shame)

  • National Sikh Council of Australia (Like, India is >>>>THAT way!)

  • NSW Council for Pacific Communities

  • Philippine Community Council of NSW (Fuck off)

  • Warren Mundine (Get on out of it)

As you can see, these pork-barreling “communities” cobble together at the first chance to alter and affect the national character with the aid of the traitor political class. It would be like us shifting over to Arabia and forming the Australian Council of Pork-Munching Beer-Swillers, and then campaigning for the right to strut nude up and down the front of the country’s mosques in only our thongs and terrycloth hats.

However, what is also amusing is that these laws potentially threaten a little-publicised tactic used by the left itself. There are those among the anarchist and antifascist milieu who actually adopt ‘racist’ guises to harass and intimidate ideological opponents; one or two are even known to contribute to mainstream media. In fact, the anarcho-anti-globalist brown shirts are the readiest and willing to use threats and to vilify on the basis of race and religion, which is one of their myriad hyper-contradictions. It will be interesting to see how these laws affect that sector’s black ops.

Meanwhile, it will pay to be very measured in how our side communicates, but more to the point, such restrictions can only refine our language and grant our message precision.

article-5978-thumb.jpg
Once upon a time stating the obvious didn’t land you 3 years lag

 

KOOYONG’S CHICKENS ARE COMING HOME TO ROOST

KOOYONG’S CHICKENS ARE COMING HOME TO ROOST

Readers of this blog will have, no doubt, been amused to read of yet another group of “Teens” trashing a short-term rental property, this time in leafy, well-heeled Hawthorn.

In Hastings Rd this past weekend we saw the well-tested party plan of bogus identification being used by African youths to book an Airbnb rental, subsequent heavy drinking and drug use, then the customary early morning explosion of ad-hoc alterations to the decor.

This time, however, there were significant escalations in violence as neighbours, fearing for the safety of their properties and their very lives armed themselves with makeshift weapons and attempted to mount a defence; two elderly White bystanders were assaulted with one old gent admitted to hospital after being set upon by a gang of African females.

The police, as usual, waited until the fracas had burned itself out before venturing into the neighbourhood, no arrests were made on the night, however, we understand a series of raids have since been carried out and at least one boy has been charged.

riot
Victoria Police facing off against African rioters in 2017, the youths, we are told, won the battle of Kensington

This approach, though cold comfort to the embattled citizens, does make a certain amount of sense from a tactical point of view; the cops know who these Sudanese delinquents are, it is probably just easier to pick them off one by one, roust them out of bed at home rather than get crowned by a house brick trying to subdue fifty drunks at once.

The federal seat of Kooyong, in which Hawthorn is situated is a safe Liberal seat, once held by the likes of Sir Robert Menzies and Andrew Peacock the current sitting member is the minister for environment and energy Josh Frydenberg.

 Now, before we go all gushy over this latest outrage and lest we further entrench the perception that Nationalists are nothing but heartless pragmatists we will profess that we do care about the White residents affected by this incident simply because they are our kin, however, the inevitable considerations of class consciousness and voter behaviour in bourgeois suburbs must take precedence.

The federal seat of Kooyong, in which Hawthorn is situated is a safe Liberal seat, once held by the likes of Sir Robert Menzies and Andrew Peacock the current sitting member is the minister for environment and energy Josh Frydenberg.

We can safely say that the residents of Hawthorn, who habitually vote for the Liberals, must therefore be firmly in favour of globalism, high immigration, kowtowing to Beijing and the dissolution of our once prosperous and largely homogenous society into an Asian style free for all, where workers are pitted against one another and only investors, speculators and crooks can even afford to live in an area like Hastings Rd.

dutch migrants
Menzies is the real father of multiculturalism, though he had the sense to invite the right type of migrants, such as these Dutch people arriving in 1954

Time and again we have heard dissident voices exclaim that if only the negative effects of Third World immigration were visited upon the blue ribbon suburbs then the middle-class voters residing within could be shocked into action, that some of them could be swayed to the side of Nationalism and the workers struggle.

Well here is their reality check, globalisation writ large on the streets of Hawthorn: an African mob destroying a Chinese owned rental property hired out through an American website underwritten by a predatory coalition of hedge funds and Silicon Valley speculators.

Time and again we have heard dissident voices exclaim that if only the negative effects of Third World immigration were visited upon the blue ribbon suburbs then the middle class voters residing within could be shocked into action, that some of them could be swayed to the side of Nationalism and the workers struggle.

Assuming these out of control Sudanese parties can be taken at face value and are not part of some insurance scam by the Chinese owners then there is a double irony here in that we see more and more of the children of these middle-class suburbanites being locked out of the owning a house or even renting in their own suburb, due in large part to distortions in the market caused by foreign buyers and companies such as Airbnb.

peacock
Former member for Kooyong Andrew Peacock now resides in the U.S.A, far away from the effects of his party’s disastrous immigration policies.

Our question to the people in the seat of Kooyong, those White families who have held property there since the days of Bob Menzies would be: “When are you going to stand up for the future of your children?”

The inner Eastern suburbs of Melbourne are dotted with blocks of flats built over the past 80 years; ranging from stately low-rise Art Deco buildings to simple 1970’s brick veneer boxes, in fact 20 years ago it used to be a relatively cheap area to rent a flat, local kids could move out of home, get onto their feet and then buy in to the area themselves.

No more, the housing crisis has hit the middle class particularly hard as overseas buyers from Asia and opportunistic property tycoons have inflated the prices to the point that only the most wealthy people can afford to own a house in Hawthorn, Camberwell or Surrey Hills.

Our question to the people in the seat of Kooyong, those White families who have held property there since the days of Bob Menzies would be: “When are you going to stand up for the future of your children?”

So the Liberal die-hards of Kooyong either need to adjust to the new globalist reality, the incursions of troublesome migrant gangs and Asian profiteers drawn by the newly created and foreign driven short-term rental scene; they can get used to the noise, the loss of amenity and the hardships foisted upon their kids, or they can opt for change and take political action to arrest the decline of their neighbourhoods.

Nationalists have the program to stop the rot, but if Hawthorn’s good folk are not willing to accept a radical solution then at least they will still have their adult sons at home to wield the Gray Nicolls as Ice addled Negroes come over the back fence and the cops steadfastly ignore their triple zero calls for assistance.

house trashed
This ugly villa is what three million bucks buys you in Hawthorn, gang tags courtesy of Airbnb

UNION THUG DAVE GULL SPOTTED WITH CFMEU MEMBERS AT ALP STATE CONFERENCE

UNION THUG DAVE GULL SPOTTED WITH CFMEU MEMBERS AT ALP STATE CONFERENCE

A union thug that attacked the home of a United Nationalists Australia editor, as well as harassing the President of the Australia First Party was spotted with CFMEU delegates at Labor’s 2018 NSW conference.

Previously, the CFMEU had denied any knowledge of Dave Gull when approached by one of the complainants and advised him to instead contact police. He did this and an apprehended violence order was issued by Newtown Local Court. However, it proved an impossible task to track Gull to his address and NSW Police refused to assist in tracing him which meant the order could not proceed; leaving the impression of state sympathy with this mindless brute. It also draws a very distinct line of connection between the ALP and Antifascist Action.

Cleary, the CFMEU knew his whereabouts all along and questions now arise about their knowledge of his actions against the UNA editor.

Our editor refuses to let this matter rest knowing that Gull is a dangerous animal who should not be allowed to roam the streets freely menacing citizens with differing opinions from his own. It is therefore interesting that intelligence provided to UNA places him in the company of CFMEU delegates who were reportedly strutting around arrogantly at the Australian Labor Party’s (ALP) state conference at Sydney Town Hall on Saturday, June 30.

The CFMEU clearly kids itself that it holds a position of influence within the Australian Labor Party. The rank and file, such as Gull, also have a cognitive dissonance when it comes to understanding that the multimillion-dollar CFMEU no longer represents hard hats like him but is an auxiliary for a globalist party with central policies that conflicts with the interests of Australian workers they supposedly represent.

Interesting, too, is that by the terms of admission to the NSW ALP Conference that “observers” who registered for the event must also be ALP members. This presents the strong likelihood that Gull is also an ALP member and Labor, therefore, had his address on file, something which will need to be surrendered so that due process can be pursued against this totalitarian nightmare of an individual.

Bear in mind, that by having knowledge of Gull’s actions – which the CFMEU did – only amplifies accusations of that militant organisation’s reliance on violence and intimidation in the pursuance of its political ideas.

11188276_877885448935926_5245648042568850460_n - Copy.jpg
Dave Gull in his CFMEU night stalking outfit
20171207051924999.jpeg
Gull goes on the job at one of our editor’s homes in December 2017. Despite this video evidence, NSW cops did what they do best — NOTHING
20180409023555123
Gull was caught on camera again at his third visit to our editor’s home, having previously attacked it with a firehose and threatening to “kill” him

If anyone has knowledge of Dave Gull please contact us by email @ UNAmedia1@outlook.com.

ABSURD SAME-SEX MARRIAGE VOTE DISTRACTS FROM CHINESE INVASION

ABSURD SAME-SEX MARRIAGE VOTE DISTRACTS FROM CHINESE INVASION

While Australians are preoccupied with the pressing “issue” of voting on ‘same-sex marriage’ it is noteworthy how many matters are subordinate to the lifestyle choices of a small percentage of society.

It seems that the chattering classes would much rather rally around a cause which is when all else is said and done, absurd. See, those that are loud-hailing for inclusivity in the ‘institution’ of marriage are the very types to abhor convention.

The homosexual subculture was a rejection of society’s norms, and particularly the nuclear family. Those who would once upon a time have urged liberation from the ‘shackles’ of conformity in marriage now aim to herald success in social progress by becoming the most vociferous advocates for the very institution they spurned.

So, frankly, all you withered old bra-burners and whatnot, what was wrong with marriage, to begin with?

oie_VVDDwh3InOyL
Opposition leader Bill Shorten who is rumoured to make a habit of turning a ‘No’ into a ‘Yes’

Never mind, it is not the subject of our article, and we don’t talk to degenerates. What we WILL say, however, before we return to the point of our piece, is that in a fine example of ethical dissonance, Sydney mayor Clover Moore has wasted $110k of public money to pay for rainbow flags urging a “yes” vote throughout Sydney.

So, frankly, all you withered old bra-burners and whatnot, what was wrong with marriage, to begin with?

Bear in mind, only a few weeks back, Sydney’s homeless were occupying Martin Place. A standoff occurred between the ‘principled’ Clover Moore and NSW’s Armenian Premier, Liberal Gladys Berejiklian, with Berejiklian wanting them removed because they made her “completely uncomfortable”. Clover stood by the homeless. Or did she?

Wouldn’t that $110k have better served the homeless than being wasted on a propaganda campaign? Bear in mind, the essence of this campaign is revenge, in that queers win the satisfaction of having non-supportive normies forcibly recognise them as being ‘lawfully wedded’ until either AIDS or domestic violence they do part.

Hug
The love that dares not come anywhere near us

Again, we digress, because what we REALLY want to say is that the acquisition of social recognition for these chatterers and their darling freaks will count for zip in no time at all. Assuming they win the vote, according to a complacent enabler of Australia’s cultural ruination, multi-millionaire Gerry Harvey, this country is destined to become ‘Asian’. And since there is really no such thing as a generic ‘Asian’ what he means is ‘Chinese’.

Being a typical Globalist Mercantile Mercenary, he limply shrugs off entrepreneur Dick Smith’s caveats about unfettered population growth arguing that “The problem is you can’t control it. The rest of the world at some stage is not going to let you control it. Sometimes when you smell the inevitable you’ve got to go along with it.”

He says that “The people that exist today, me and you, we all have our view but we’ll be long gone.”

He says that “The people that exist today, me and you, we all have our view but we’ll be long gone.”

China holds that belief, too. While its Global Times labelled Australia as “Second class citizen of the West”, whatever that means, they’re busily acquiring our ports, farm, electricity, gas, water, and residential properties. They are, in fact, procuring entire suburbs by stealth as development changes the face of Australian cities into something resembling downtown Hong Kong.

How is this playing out for the ‘same sex’ couples who’ll be hoping to set up a nice little nest and feather it with little luxuries like food?

As more and more primary production falls into majority Chinese ownership then they will effectively own our food supply. The best product will be shipped to Chinese markets and we’ll be left with rotting scraps which will command inflated prices. Our market will be lost and the jobs, now already being handed to foreign workers, will be taken over as Chinese owners fly in their own workers.

If Australia was one great milkshake, China just stuck one fantastic straw into us and is busily slurping up all our nutrients. Meanwhile, the matter at hand is whether a bunch of fags, dykes and unclassifiable freaks of our decadent age have the right to hang a “just married” sign on the back of their imported car.

ED -We note, too, with disgust and irony that WordPress has imposed a rainbow banner on our view reader. Incredible.

artworks-000064468589-ocjp70-t500x500
Cupid needs bringing up to date