THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

What do you do with the UPF? If you’re Facebook, you shut down their main page. So what do THEY then do? They migrate as much Zionist supporting material as they can to sister pages and to their Reclaim Australia – West Australia Rally page.

In every quote to the media, however, you will find their leadership claiming to be ‘nationalist’ and not ‘patriot’ which is such a conscious delineation that its intention is coldly clear to true Australian nationalists.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

On the same page (RA-WA) you will find a link to a True Blue Crew flag march where Whiteness is heavily emphasised. Then it’s back to the kosher meal of every possible Zionist-related entity they chug up – Britain First and Tommy Robinson shares right there in among them.

Well, they know by now; surely they aren’t naive. They know that promoting ultra-Zionists like Avi Yemini is a contradiction in terms to the single-minded cause of fighting Islamic extremism. Ultra-Zionists like Avi and his fellow countrymen create such extremism. They do so both by having manufactured ISIS, so as to pit them against the unfriendly Moslems on their list – and by continually stoking bloody conflict in the region.

The perennial program of destabilisation establishes a power balance that benefits the security of the state of Israel and services whatever objectives its allies may have in the region. But it also does something else – and has done so since the 1970s – it creates a mass migration of Middle Easterners into Australia.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

What does this portend for the ‘nationalism’ that they claim to be championing, having knowingly appropriated the term from staunch supporters of a new White Australia Policy? It kills it because those same Zionists do everything possible to eradicate such nationalist beliefs. They do more though — they align with the Left to attack serious nationalists such as we saw recently with Fairfax’s criminal toll Luke McMahon, who is known to have ties with Zionist-convert Neil Erikson.

Erikson, along with Nick Folkes, Howard Crawford, Scott Moerland and others have campaigned heavily against true nationalists. We are not at all surprised to find the UPF making the self-defeating move to once again associate with these cagey globalists in the hope of puffing up their waning profile.

Thus, nationalists for a White Australia become treated worse than kiddy fiddlers, and the planes keep flying more and more Indians, Chinese, Africans and MOSLEMS from the Middle East. The cathartic activity of stoking enmity against Islam merely gives a moral license to our globalist government to support military crimes in the Middle East which benefit Israel.

In this battle, all those values that Australians regarded as part of their birthright are trampled on. Zionists in Australia, while demanding racial and religious homogeneity at home, are forever insisting on total diversity for Australia and all White countries.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

This diversity has transformed our cities into utterly foreign destinations. The quarter-acre home has been replaced by towering (shoddily built) concrete toolboxes crammed with Chinese and Indians; the odour of their spicy cooking permeating the streets.

Australia needs reclaiming from all of this, not just one particular branch of this allegedly diverse community.

It is not the Indians, Africans, or Chinese who are losing their identities. They’ve never had it so sweet. While White Australians are slowly being discouraged from even considering ourselves Australian, this new population get dual identities. They get to be Indian AND Australian; they get to be African AND Australian, and they get to be Chinese AND Australian.

Islam is just a symptom of this single world government that has its master Zionist America. But while all these terms we throw about ‘Zionist’ ‘civic patriot’ and whatever might confuse the casual punter it is all quite simple. Unless you live in one of those last posts White Australian areas that are only ‘gradually’ being de-Europeanised you only have to take a walk, open your eyes, and smell the pungent waft of curry.

What difference does Islam make if – in the highly improbable event of removing it – you do so only to find yourself a stranger in your own country, shivering and alone among a new population of aliens? What will you reclaim then?

Wake up to the Zionists — you are being used.

C1ePePgVEAAVEM4
Avi Yemini, the ultra-Zionist who is now the darling of the civic patriots now calling themselves Australian ‘nationalists’

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

If anything distinguishes those civic patriots on the right from us radical nationalists it is by whom we are most attacked.

In the case of the civics, they are dogged by what we collectively term ‘the left’, while radical nationalists, who occupy a third position on the political spectrum cop the most grief from either the civic patriots or those in the conservative camp.

Bear in mind that ‘the left’ is as eclectic when it comes to issues, identity, philosophy, and strategy as ‘the right’.

The left wants the patriot movement dispersed while the conservatives aim to drive away radical nationalists so they can inhabit our political ground and remodel it in their crypto-globalist image.

This is a curious fact that allows us to discuss a couple of cases in point. Let us begin with what some of those from the civic patriot side of the quadrangle contend with in their present day ‘clicktivism’. This essay shall be in two parts on account of its length and the dedication required to each of its players.

1. THE PATRIOT ACTORS AND THE COMBATANTS OF THE LEFT

There is a particularly malicious element at play among those who oppose the growth of the patriots. They view patriots as more of a concern than the nationalist movement given its mainstream accessibility. On that side, the Bogan element is mocked by those who are their mirror image with one factor separating them by the slimmest degree: the perception of their engaging in ‘racism’. This is, despite the ambiguity on the question of race amplified in the patriot fold.

Nationalists define Australianness as being of White European stock, as opposed to Aborigines. Patriots, who misuse the term nationalism understanding it not, and often deliberately misappropriating it, are nebulous in their definition of an Australian. Many are in mixed-race relationships and as such loath the absolutism of nationalism which would exclude them on the grounds of breaching its inviolate precepts.

However, it is important in the propaganda war of those conflicting with the anti-Islam movement to lump each in the same basket and defame both they and nationalists, as ‘Nazis’; which is like calling all socialists Marxists or anarchists communists. The Nazi tag is meant to invoke images of state organised terror that would ensue if these groups are allowed to put down political roots in the community.

In the lexicon of those of the left, patriots are ‘potatriots’, a witticism intended to disdain that group as ‘potato heads’. This is a derisive term that was originally applied to skinheads. Since the advent of the Reclaim Australia movement, which is almost exclusively dramatized on Facebook, a number of pages and counter-identities have sprung up to oppose the patriot pages and the groups that employ them.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

But virtue is subjective in this day and age when that moral asset is destroying the west. Opposition to Islam is the kindling of the realisation something is amiss. Australians are being de-culturized while globalism is dialectically re-culturizing us with a religion that negates the very tenets underpinning the idea of universal equality at play. Both are at the mercy of the culturally vacuous reality of globalism.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113
Alex Gollan, the assistant school principal and anti-fascist anarchist who ran the ‘anti-bogan’ word press site and was arrested for bulk kiddie porn

This is visible nowhere better than on those oppositional pages, which we mentioned. This genre has no purpose other than to negate. They do not attempt to counter ‘potatriot’ messages by promoting their own positive counter-messages they literally take the aforementioned messages and desecrate them. There is no intellectual component at play in the deconstruction of the patriot message. Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is a sledgehammer used to beat down the message and the messenger so that the mission becomes personal.

A very telling post occurred on one such page with a prominent leftist troll, “Can’t we just kill them [patriots] all?” The admin replied, “No, because then we would be Nazis.”
Disregarding the fact that had that comment been made on a nationalist page it would have been hidden or removed, it is a very instructive insight into both the pathology of the poster and the counter movement. The duplicitous essence of it is summed up in the gag, “We’re starting a war for peace.”

The assumed virtue of the poster is instantly invalidated by the revelation of this tyrannical instinct.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

This is, however, but one example. Narrowed down to a central theme outside of ‘race’ is the implication that patriots will potentially auger in a dictatorial system reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, the calls for an authoritarian response to the patriots are constant on the sample page we have used for our study.

There are flippant, but often sincere calls for patriots to be pursued by ASIO, or to be charged with offences that — were they on the other foot — would be vehemently contested as breaches of civil liberties. So we come to the actors or combatants, and here we shall actually name some.

Smith
Pete Smith from Melbourne, heavily active on Facebook, is linked to Antifascist Action Sydney and other ‘anarchist’ pages

 

We have had correspondence with a few members of the patriot movement, putting aside our ideological differences, keen to highlight certain combatants and the disreputable methods they have employed to target one or other of the patriot actors.

One, in particular, has been defamed over and over by combatants using various Facebook identities and private messaging the patriot actor we shall call ‘Mark’.

Mark is being consistently vilified as a person of heinous substance and the nature of the slander has transcended any honourable intent. The attacks led to the hostilities emerging from a social media setting and into the corporeal world when the authorities were involved. Mark is not alone in these vicious online assaults but his example is notable.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

So, who is behind these assaults on Mark’s character? Here, we merely repeat what he believes: John Linden Faulkner. But we also mention two others, Alex Gollan and David Hollis.

download (3)
Sydney’s Tayce Brown, shoplifter, hair stylist to the scabby, and a real skank

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This blog, as in others we’ve mentioned, is a flagrant vehicle to attack political opponents. Faulkner and Gollan are said to have co-administrated the site. Gollan, a former assistant school principal has since disappeared from ‘anti-fascist’ activities after being charged with child-sex offences.

Faulkner, who Mark and others believe to be behind a series of online profiles identifiable by their malevolence, has a criminal past to make anyone suddenly hosting him start eyeing the nearest exit. Faulkner was imprisoned for nine years for armed robberies in which women were his soft targets. He appealed his sentence as harsh, but in doing so was told it was actually lenient under the circumstances.

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This week [originally posted on Facebook March 11] , it was revealed that David Albain Hollis, the man in the red ‘Truth’ cap who accompanied Sue Munro to the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court to spy on the Bendigo Three’s supporters — and who appeared in an opportunistic pic with John Safran taken on the day — went on a “stabbing spree” in 1991, knifing seven people one of whom later died.

Hollis served only 17 months in jail on the grounds of diminished responsibility as he was in the throes of a “psychotic episode”, although how that should mitigate anything so appalling we do not know.

There are other cases on that extreme left of the bench such as Tayce Brown of Antifascist Action Sydney whose conduct and lifestyle are such that she would be considered a habitual criminal outside of the political activist underworld.

The radical left is sure something — in a world inhabited by junkies, thugs, hookers, thieves, and ex-murderers does becoming ‘anti-racist’ mean atoning for dissolute, wasted lives. Does championing the ‘other’ allow them to graduate from their moral squalor merely on the basis they aren’t racist? We are not psychologists, and this is not a forensic examination, but the pattern cannot be ignored.

Bear in mind, Blair Cottrell was confronted with a video created inside the correctional system while he was doing time for a crime of passion. He never killed anyone, nor caused anyone harm. What of these three? All fall into the very worst categories, and all comport themselves on social media in a manner that delegitimizes any hypothetical argument they believe they have concerning right and wrong.

If Faulkner is behind this campaign of defamation and stalking against Mark, then it appears that he has in no way left behind his violent past, but merely justified it in the context of the political theatre. He has reinvented himself as the ‘good guy’ and deemed those patriot actors as ‘bad guys’ in a morality play where his own contaminated ethics are masked by a blindness born of criminal denial.

In our next article, we will turn the focus on the patriots, who are to nationalists what the leftists we have described here have been to them.

oie_DqksmJ43gaGr
Anarchist Psycho

 

THE NATURE OF THE BOGAN

THE NATURE OF THE BOGAN

Australian culture, it is often derided, exists solely within the stereotypes of vulgarity endemic to the bogan. Whether the term itself is evoked or not is irrelevant; its existence is tacitly understood as the central character in representing all the undesirable nature of Australia’s seedy underworld.

There is no denying that the meat of the bogan in its current form is its crassness; despite a quixotic array of definitions, this one attribute shines brightly as the reference point for understanding what separates a bogan from a non-bogan. Crass in every facet of outward demeanour, every facet of inward demeanour, and a Weltanschauung so tainted by the basest instincts that we could scarcely believe these characters exist in anything other than dystopian fiction.

30f138c776740a06aebfd3059b9c58bb
This is Daryl. He wants to marry your daughter

In this world, empty appraisal of sport and junkie gossip fill the social milieu, complemented by excessive booze, ciggies and narcotics. The most lurid vernacular and atrocious illiteracy assails the primacy of the English language. Hitherto indifference has ruled our collective policy on this netherworld, yet posed with a personal question we cut away at all indifference and politeness: would you impose upon your children this lifestyle?

We are right to say ‘lifestyle’, in doing so we correct a fallacy that usually attaches itself to the above, namely that the bogan is an exclusive product of the working class. We ought not to suggest the crass, loutish behaviours and outlooks are in the exclusive domain of any class; rather it is spread all amongst White Australia. The true psychology of the bogan is that it clasps, clumsily at that, the last remnants of internalised Whiteness but can’t at the same time overturn the cannibalised chaff deposited on it by the cosmopolitan elite.

Nationalists are aesthetes, not snobs. Our judgment is reserved for those whose agency is tainted by a wilful arrestment of decency regardless of their lot in life and regardless of the behavioural trends society’s elite seek to groom them with. Our standards are not material, but immaterial in advancing the psyche of Australianness to those who have been inducted into perverted copy of it.

Evidently, it is here we depart from the braggart and soulless urbanite; those social climbers whose quips on bogans were forged in the beginning from contempt, not critique. These identity freeloaders are the first to mercilessly lampoon Australian culture and in the very next breath whine about its lack of anything that isn’t borne of the very same tropes they have spent years lumping onto, and obviously shaping, the nature of. Akin to repeatedly lambasting an otherwise average man he’s an idiot of the highest order, are we not surprised that the initial innocence of our people was so pliable to degenerate into the designated mythos the media pushed?

Nationalists are aesthetes, not snobs. Our judgment is reserved for those whose agency is tainted by a wilful arrestment of decency regardless of their lot in life and regardless of the behavioural trends society’s elite seek to groom them with. Our standards are not material, but immaterial in advancing the psyche of Australianness to those who have been inducted into perverted copy of it.

For far from a stereotype, the bogan is a mutation of the healthy citizenry; similar to J.R.R. Tolkien’s genealogy (or one of them) of the vile Orc as a corruption and mutilation of the fair and noble Elves. The bogan no doubt grew from what we once knew as the Aussie larrikin, that down-to-earth man who knew his place in the world and still acted in the greater interest of nation and people; the sort of man discernible in archival footage and the undying pages of past literature that attests to being the stalwart of our Antipodean Jewel – dare we say the most perfected and balanced evolution of the Anglo. We must press this imagery to truly grasp the devolution of what we are becoming. Indeed, our friends at the Eureka Youth League recently published a short list of recommended literature pertaining to this bygone era.

The ‘Australianness’ mentioned supra is a term Nationalists hold great attachment to. In fact, it’s a necessary vested interest as a precursor to cultural revival, and one would be hard pressed to encounter a Nationalist placing little faith in the study, refinement and advancement of culture. The bogan, a sizeable portion of the White populace, falls under this by default.

As far as we’re concerned it’s as good a time as any to broach this subject; the coming role for Nationalists is to pierce the heart of this sensation – and it is just that – to reinstate the ‘status quo ante’ vigour of a Nativist identity that flourished prior to gates of the citadel being flung opened far and wide to the barbaric hordes. The nature of the bogan must metamorphose into the nature of the Australian, lest its devolution reaches its last stop at extinction, and with it, a large portion of White Australia.

e967cc9216e4943646af8f77555e8950
Henry Lawson never saw this lot coming