AFRICAN CRIME BECOMES AFRICAN VICTIMHOOD AT ST. KILDA BEACH

AFRICAN CRIME BECOMES AFRICAN VICTIMHOOD AT ST. KILDA BEACH

Once again a Patriot Rally has been generating media hype for negative reasons. The central issue that inspired the gathering at St Kilda beach on Saturday 5 has been obfuscated by a narrative about extremism, racism, and the threat from ‘far right’ groups. The word ‘Nazi’ is appearing everywhere.

Moreover, it all arose thanks to the habitual instigator, social media impresario, and reputed state informant Neil Erikson after he seized on the controversy surrounding a clash between African gangsters and members of the Vietnamese community in St Albans in the week leading up to the rally. All of a sudden, the talk ceased being about African-related crime and was all about the danger of White extremists.

United Nationalists Australia makes no criticism of those well-intentioned Aussies who attended the ‘Reclaim the Beach’ rally at Melbourne’s St Kilda beach believing that they were standing up for a principle. We ask our readers to accept that we are seasoned nationalists that have witnessed much in our time and this informs what is often mistakenly conceived as negative commentaries, but whereas in truth our goal is quite the opposite; to illuminate our people to the political frauds that feed on those who stray into far-right politics.

We wish honest nationalists to discern the true essence of those individuals and groups they lend their support to because 99 times out of 100 they’re being misdirected by many who would misspend their enthusiasm and exhaust their political will.

For in politics, deception is a constant, and in “far-right” politics, there is nothing but false players, swindlers, and provocateurs, and through a conspiratorial arc, they become the champions of the ill-informed. And now we dispense with this necessary introduction let us get down to the nitty-gritty of the rally that is still being reported on.

We wish honest nationalists to discern the true essence of those individuals and groups they lend their support to because 99 times out of 100 they’re being misdirected by many who would misspend their enthusiasm and exhaust their political will.

A news.com.au report reproduced a screenshot purportedly lifted from a private group “Cooks Convicts Inner Circle” on which Neil Erikson was offering notes on the organising his rally. Ultimately, the rhetoric surrounding the event was watered-down from a hoped-for confrontation with Sudanese youth to appease the powers and was instead presented as a peaceful “community meeting”.

According to the screengrab supposedly posted by Erikson, “The goal is not violence it’s exposure to our pages”. Ironic then that during the week leading up to the rally Facebook removed Neil’s pages and his Twitter account was taken down. But while the tone of the post quoted is nothing unsurprising its authenticity has been questioned. A battered sav has more brain cells than Neil Erikson and yet the spelling “watching us like horks (sic)” and “good to have you back on bored Blair (sic)” seems pretty dense even for him. Still, as we say, you could tread in dog faeces that possess greater hopes of sentient evolution than Erikson.

s.png
The authenticity of this post has been questioned yet it somehow screams NOOL

Erikson, as we’ve pointed out many times, is a serial provocateur. His entire existence confirms regardless of how flagrantly shonky a person can be he or she will still find loyal followers to lead down the garden path. UNA last year reported on how Blair Cottrell simply disregarded all the rotten things that Neil did to him: doxing him; calling him names, making up wild rumours about him — to join with this jackal. Note that Blair would never make such an exception for the members of UNA, or AFP, who’ve only ever been frank about his activities, yet when it comes to a twerp as crooked as Erikson is he is prepared time and time again to put aside any differences and unite for some inadequately defined purpose. So too, the True Blue Crew allied with this reunification as the old band got back together.

Just who was leading who behind the scenes we do not know but the idea that any right-thinking activist would willingly associate with an Erikson circus is contemptible. Blair has been ambiguous to some younger followers given how he freely admits to chatting with ASIO regularly and continues the associations with civics. Some say he is pursuing clever tactics to cover himself while others take a harder line. Our point simply is that a discussion has begun in Blair’s supporter-base and how he addresses it all will ultimately be important to progress or decline.

Indeed, the very prospect of the rally had set the media into a frenzy of hyperbole and already, where once it was generating clickbait from African gangsters it was now focusing squarely on the “threat” of White extremists. Erikson has already built up quite a form for himself leading up to the rally by crashing an African cultural event and provoking a situation on St Kilda beach by filming a group of African youths playing football. Helpful too was that the Antipodean Resistance decided to piggyback on the controversy by posting their stickers outside a Jewish nursing home for Holocaust survivors. While this was a droll move by these serial paper hangers, it does the cause of Australian nationalism about as much good as if they’d dressed in white sheets and dragged a Negro down Flinders Street tied behind a pick-up truck.

Such was the composition of those behind the rally that the Australia First Party released a media statement distancing itself from Erikson and his rally and qualifying their objection to the use of the name ‘nationalist’ by these civics. In a submission to Victoria’s Police Commissioner, the question was even asked outright whether Victoria Police was prepared to admit that Neil Erikson acts as an informant and is a troublemaker operating with a green light. These squealers are spreading.

For in politics, deception is a constant, and in “far-right” politics, there is nothing but false players, swindlers, and provocateurs, and through a conspiratorial arc, they become the champions of the ill-informed. And now we dispense with this necessary introduction let us get down to the nitty-gritty of the rally that is still being reported on.

There is only one reason anyone should talk to the police and that’s to tell them to fuck off. Hunter S. Thompson, the late gonzo journalist, had a note stuck to his refrigerator that reiterated this wisdom and it read: “Never ring 911 for anything! Ever! And that means YOU!” The idea that the police are in any way supportive of right-wing politics or its cause is whacko. They hate left and right equally and are beholden only to themselves: they are their own gang and any information drip fed to them can and probably will be used against us at some later stage.

There is a further anomaly that indicates a certain acquiescence to the state which can threaten Lads integrity as an organisation. Tom Sewell, the Lads Society leader admitted in a screenshot taken from a private group that he regularly chats to Victoria Police. Might it better to not be so ‘helpful’? And it is recorded by leftists present that Tom and his Lads including the inveterate liar Mark McDonald and his bestie Alex Annenkov were present in an aborted attempt to intimidate picnicking lefties. Although the reliability of that account is open to question.

46952269_676201839482275_8499608964453892096_n.png
Worryingly enough, Sewell freely admits to flapping his gums to the cops

In the struggle for influence over the patriot scene, it’s also been alleged by some close to the Lads that in a bid to undermine what he sees as his competition from established nationalists Tom Sewell has been willing to freely leak to anti-fascists. Such a claim now being spread about should be treated with real caution, but the allegation itself points to difficulties in a scene where ideological consistency has been lacking and personalisms rule the roost – and ideology should be the glue that keeps things together. Or on the other hand, as is quite possible, anti-fascists have found a way to plant such a toxic story through bad elements to sink the credibility of the group? Whatever it may all be in actuality, serious folk should keep right out of it.

Thus, with Erikson as the nucleus of an opportunistic rally that once upon a time would’ve been typical of the civic patriot dero Nick Folkes, a dubious coalition has formed in spite of an article published in The Age claiming that “the far right has been divided and conquered – by themselves”. In this inaccurate piece of reportage which claims that Blair Cottrell is Australia’s most prominent nationalist the author has failed to perceive that the broad conservative milieu, give or take certain players, is indeed functioning in unison. It is correct that ‘the movement’ is divided by those supportive of Israel and those who’re not, which explains why the Australian Liberty Alliance weren’t represented, but it isn’t accurate either.

There is only one reason anyone should talk to the police and that’s to tell them to fuck off. Hunter S. Thompson, the late gonzo journalist, had a note stuck to his refrigerator that reiterated this wisdom and it read: “Never ring 911 for anything! Ever! And that means YOU!”

Senator Fraser Anning, whose appearance at the rally has become the media focal point of Nazi hysteria, given Anning’s support for a White European Australia he is nonetheless an outspoken advocate of Israel. Last October he supported Avi Yemini at a rally in Melbourne and declared his support for Israel. The following day of the St Kilda rally he went on national television and did likewise. None of his pro-Israel rhetoric seems to have troubled his ‘anti-Semitic’ supporters like Blair Cottrell.

But then, nothing has changed for Blair – be it cognitive dissonance or simply a desire to overcome accusations of racism he has a fine knack for appearing in grip-and-grin shots with non-Whites as he did during drinks following the rally when he appeared with a Vietnamese man holding out the South Vietnamese flag. Any self-respecting nationalist, if he HAD to appear in front of a Vietnamese flag would’ve been better of standing with a North Vietnamese flag given the South was a corrupt sell-out to foreign interests while the north was fighting essentially for nationalism. As it happens, the Vietnamese community boycotted the event.

screenshot_20190105-180512_facebook
Cottrell and Ricky Turner all grins with their token Viet and the abominable South Vietnamese flag which no nationalist would recognise since the South was a sell-out

These acts of sucking up to “integrated” Asian minority groups further betray Cottrell and Erikson’s youthful naiveté, anyone over 40 will remember the hideous violence perpetrated by Vietnamese immigrants in the 1980’s and 1990’s. By the turn of the millennium the news media were salivating over stories of Asian gang fights, limbs severed in machete attacks, muggings and street brawls involving dozens of combatants; not to mention the cruelty of Vietnamese dog and cockfighting rings, their drug pushing, car re-birthing scams and standover rackets which persist to this day.

Then, too, is the way the conservative youth media voices of XYZ and The Unshackled have shamelessly plugged Neil Erikson almost in defiance of the pig’s history. Just the same way that Future Now happily declares him a “mate” despite the fact he’d pimp out their grandmothers for crisps money if he could get the chance. There isn’t anybody Erikson wouldn’t rat out, sell out, or stab in the back. There is no lie he wouldn’t tell or stunt he wouldn’t pull. If anyone truly wanted to serve the movement they’d push him in front of a speeding garbage truck and encourage the driver to reverse back and forth over his body about two dozen times. The types of characters that get drawn to Erikson speak for themselves.

Take Rino Grgrovuic, AKA Blue Beard for instance. Leading up to Christmas Blue Beard encountered Left Wing pest Tom Tengu by chance on a Melbourne Street. One thing led to another and he ended up allegedly assaulting the cuck’s girlfriend. Now, don’t get us wrong, we couldn’t give a crap for either party, but it was the confrontation that ensued with Victoria Police, caught by Blue Beard on his own phone, that truly demonstrated what a basket case he is. Then there is Ricky T, Neil’s offsider who is thicker than a side of beef and has all the charisma of soiled underpants. The way things are going Neil’s next sidekick and newest political spokesman will be suffering Down syndrome. As it is, Ricky T is not too far off.

These acts of sucking up to “integrated” Asian minority groups further betray Cottrell and Erikson’s youthful naiveté, anyone over 40 will remember the hideous violence perpetrated by Vietnamese immigrants in the 1980’s and 1990’s.

The least impressive thing about the rally was the rally itself despite the media hype. The emphasis on ‘Nazis’ being present seemed contrived. In footage taken one man holds his finger against his top lip and gives a Nazi salute before goose-stepping away. The context of this act is never made clear. Was it taken while the rally’s organisers were giving their speeches or was he mocking the Nazi accusation while facing off with the anti-racists? Yet, when a drongo rolled up in a Cosmic Psychos top, holding an SS helmet the optics changed decidedly Nazi. We have made enquiries and so far nobody has any idea who this joker is leading to speculation that he might well have been planted there.

fb81d2ca3619023742d60cb306cf967f.jpg
The bloke in the Cosmic Psychos T-Shirt shows off a souvenir from his days working for Social Security

Following an unremarkable bunch of sentences from Senator Anning, Blair’s speech was interesting from the point of view that he correctly blamed the state for the presence of the African criminals. But when he flew into Fuhrer mode as he is apt to do when speaking publicly and vowed to march to Daniel Andrews office he betrayed the fact that he hadn’t figured out who was really in control. It wasn’t he or his motley supporters it was the Victoria Police who had each side well corralled and controlled. Blue Beard learned as much when he attempted to taunt the opposition but wound up confronted by a mounted policeman with whom he had an exchange that resulted in about ten cops rugby tackling him to the ground and presumably arresting him, possibly for breach of bail conditions resulting from his run-in with Tom Tengu.

When it was Neil’s turn to speak he gave some wimpy whine about his social media accounts before blowing off like a popcorn fart. Then he asked whether there were any Nazis present and made a joke about a couple of Vietnamese chaps. Obviously, he hadn’t seen the stooge in the Cosmic Psychos T-Shirt with the SS helmet. It kind of undermined the counter optics he was suggesting.

The most interesting thing about the rally was the victory against the left who have hitherto marshalled a greater presence and organised themselves far better than those on the right. In fact, the rally has left certain parties in disarray, with The Smashed Avocado movement being accused of being piss-weak liberals by the ‘Anarchists in Narrm.’ Likewise, at some point, police control of the crowd purportedly got lax and anti-racists holding a picnic were menaced by members of the right. Complaints were made that Citizens against Racism and Fascism (CARF) split leaving their comrades in danger. Later on, or earlier on, we can’t be sure, a truck laden with sound equipment broadcasting reggae music and anti-racist messages was targeted by a group of right-wing protesters who busted some speakers and messed with other equipment. UNA can officially declare we have no sympathy whatsoever for the antis.

The final indignity for the Anarcho-Communists and their bourgeois cat-lady allies was being shepherded to the Acland St tram terminus by scores of police, all the while being harangued and cat-called by a numerically superior and physically more aggressive civic patriot mob. This is the fundamental problem for the CARF and their fellow travellers, as much as they try to project a tough, rebellious and counter-cultural image the demographics of their movement let them down; there is no way a group comprising around 85% women can physically confront an opposing mob which is obviously 99% male.

The events on the St Kilda foreshore that afternoon and their mostly incoherent talking points have been largely obscured by the flood of disinformation emanating from the dinosaur media, which was slavishly repeated by politicians and pundits on all sides. As of this writing, the most interesting development has been the announcement by Senator Fraser Anning that he is attempting to register a new micro-party, the Conservative Nationals.

But there are reports that a fake-news-journalist is fishing around to get a story together about neo-nazis and terrorism given that a couple of months back a gaggle of so-called neo-nazis met in a Sydney hotel with a couple of civics to discuss their two pet targets – Australia First Party and the Lads Society. A rumour says that they are communicating with the journalist in what would be a two-way street. While it is true these people have long had connections to political police agencies and Fairfax, might they not conjure up a terrorism case and a terrorism story?

That is a lot more serious and allowing too the fake-news-journalist may have a couple of ‘ins’ to shifties who attached themselves to the protest, it bodes badly for all. We will see how far the spirit of St Kilda takes Anning and the Civic Patriots. We are willing to bet that once the registration of a new pseudo-nationalist party is ratified by the AEC, head cases such as Erikson and Burgess and opportunists like Avi Yemini will be all over it like a rash. Blair Cottrell will be in a singular position to signal clearly what he is and is not. That will be a big decision and we await it with concern.

660d30ef94ba273f3f5d01a0fb23f709.jpg
The dark side of the force was present that day

DISSIDENT POLITICAL ACTIVISM IS NOT A WORTHWHILE SACRIFICE FOR THE YOUNG

DISSIDENT POLITICAL ACTIVISM IS NOT A WORTHWHILE SACRIFICE FOR THE YOUNG

Jordan Peterson, when he keeps his beak out of politics, is a compelling speaker and a wise man; his lectures on men and masculinity are recommended viewing for young people.

We particularly admire Peterson’s take on the post-modern orthodoxy where men, and in particular young White men are being gradually hammered down to near the bottom of the “progressive stack”; this is the theoretical pecking order imposed by globalist liberalism, the effect being a rising tide of “man-babies” and Peter Pan cases.

Young White men today are told, in no uncertain terms that their kind is on the way out, that women and non-Whites are morally and intellectually superior to “old White men”; given this prevailing view among the elites and upper castes some of our young men are taking the view that there is no point growing up and they retreat from adulthood to pursue a life of childish hedonism.

antifa punk
Antifa is full of Peter Pan cases, it is premised on the truth that an “Anarchist’ at 60 is just as silly and immature as one of 15

We would never tar the whole of our youth with the epithet “Peter Pan”, the majority of young Whites are blissfully unaffected by the dogmatic Globalists, the media and the bourgeois Left types with their Newspeak and tawdry historical revisionism; that is one of the unintended consequences of a politically correct education, so much of it is fluff that it goes in one ear and out the other leaving the young with no real frame of reference on which to hang their White guilt.

We are seeing this very fable manifested in society in many sectors of society, the groups of Lost Boys congregating on social media, in clubs and underground associations, accompanied at times by their undemanding Tinker Bell female accomplices.

Allegorically Peter Pan was the boy who refused to grow up because he had Captain Hook as his example of adult life; the tyrant Hook is condemned and pursued by age, the lurking figure of the crocodile, announced by his tick-tock rhythm of time gradually chipping away at both the pirate leader’s sanity and his physical body.

Peter Pan instead chooses to be the eternal teenager, leading his band of Lost Boys, with all their insecurities and sorrows; the only female archetype in their world being the fairy Tinker Bell, the ethereal, one-dimensional girl who is mostly an enabler of their shared delusion.

greg davies
There is a whole genre of comedy based on the intersection of Peter Pan syndrome and midlife crisis

We are seeing this very fable manifested in society in many sectors of society, the groups of Lost Boys congregating on social media, in clubs and underground associations, accompanied at times by their undemanding Tinker Bell female accomplices.

In his work on contemporary masculinity Jordan Peterson points out that avoiding the sacrifices required of manhood and behaving like the eternal teenager into one’s thirties, or even forties is a road to personal desolation; a youth only gets to choose the sacrifice he is going to make to become an adult, he does not have the option of avoiding it if he wishes to take his place in the world of men.

Peter Pan cases are the most negative element when it comes to misleading the youth into throwing themselves into the maw of the globalist state, effectively wrecking their future prospects for no personal gain or any tangible benefit to their nation.

What is meant by sacrifice? The simplest way of visualising it would be to imagine masculinity as having an hourglass shape.

The lower half of our hourglass represents youth, with all of its potentials, while the upper portion is manhood with all the variety of options available to a man who has made a successful transition from the world of boys.

The narrow section in the middle is the period of sacrifice in which the boy becomes something more than he was by accepting a narrowing of his world and submitting himself to the guidance of his elders, as a student, an apprentice, a cadet and so forth.

Youth has to become something through sacrificing, for a time, all the freedoms and relative luxuries of childhood to pursue and gain mastery over an occupation in order that he, as a man, might enjoy the freedoms and numerous pathways to spiritual and material enrichment available only to adults.

Dawn rising on muddy, horrific battlefie
“In war, you learn your lessons and they stay learned”- Ernst Jünger

As has been noted, avoidance of this period of sacrifice, with all its limitations and the necessity for developing social skills such as humility, patience, tolerance and perseverance will only end in disaster; as Peterson puts it, instead of choosing the sacrifice he wishes to make in order to become a man the Peter Pan case will end up having sacrifices imposed by time and ageing, sacrifices which will likely crush him.

This brings us to the point of the article, dissident political action should not be regarded as a sacrifice worth making by the White youth of Australia, especially in an era when being blacklisted for life can be the result of a few lines of text on social media or an ill-judged appearance in public among the wrong crowd.

Transition to manhood is impossible from within a tribe of Lost Boys led by a would-be Peter Pan, therefore, a youth movement without connection to and supervision by sober adults is bound for disaster.

Peter Pan cases are the most negative element when it comes to misleading the youth into throwing themselves into the maw of the globalist state, effectively wrecking their future prospects for no personal gain or any tangible benefit to their nation.

Political engagement should only be considered in the light of maturity, once the sacrifices required of manhood have been made and all the options of the adult world are open to the individual; nobody expects the youth to march as the vanguard in the great struggle; it is immoral to do so and those lessons were learned long ago, at Passchendaele and Kokoda.

It is the responsibility of the elders to guard against the exploitation of our most precious resource, the youth; it is for this reason we expose and undermine charlatans, globalist pimps, Peter Pan cases and any other bad actors seeking to act as puppeteers of young White men.

870x489_gilets_jaune_2
French “Yellow Vest” protestors, this is what a grassroots movement looks like

 

EUREKA – THE SPIRIT OF AUSTRALIAN NATIONALISM!

EUREKA – THE SPIRIT OF AUSTRALIAN NATIONALISM!

The central myth of the Eureka Rebellion and its Southern Cross flag as promoted by mainstream pundits has it as a symbol of, apart from other things, multiculturalism.

This is because two black men, a Jamaican and a black American, were present along with the majority White European “diggers” during the uprising. Whatever ascribing of qualities the opponents of nationalism use to interpret this epochal moment at the dawn of the Australian nation it was first and foremost a rebellion against government oppression in a struggle for justice and democratic rights.

Gold miners, tired of being forced to pay dearly for licenses, rose up after certain inciting incidents and mobilised themselves into a paramilitary. A license was no guarantee of finding gold, and the miners were refused the rights of the land they mined. Added to this was the brutal and contemptuous manner with which miners were treated by the colonial autocrats.

300px-Theeurekaflag
Always was, always will be, a symbol of White Australia

On Dec 03, 1854, having three days earlier gathered under the Eureka Flag and elected Peter Lalor their leader, and now having fortified their stockade at Bakery Hill, in Ballarat, the miners numbering around 500 clashed with police and a larger presence of soldiers. The diggers, brave though their resolve was, had not the capacity to withstand the combined force of police and military. Subsequently, 22 diggers sacrificed their lives while six police and soldiers were killed. Of those miners arrested and tried, only one was found guilty. The rebellion led to a change in the mining system so that thereafter miners paid a tax on the gold they found.

In the 1970s, the union movement found a nice fit by appropriating the symbol and mythology of the Eureka Rebellion to suit its ultra-communistic agenda. However, it’s important to interpret and divide the mythology of the rebellion and the symbolism of the flag from the narrative of those communists who adopted a red Eureka and the workers who had long before gathered beneath it in the nationalist spirit as they rioted against the presence of Chinese workers.

Anti-Chinese demonstrations occurred at Lambing Flat on the goldfields of central NSW in 1861. Aussie diggers numbering 1,500 – 2000, resentful of the hive-like industry of the Chinese and incensed by the wastage of water in their mining process attacked the Chinese encampment and drove them off.

During the Seamen’s Strike of 1878, the Eureka Flag was raised by trade unionists. The Sydney Morning Herald wrote of that strike, “The strike of the A.S.N Company’s Seamen has assumed larger dimensions, and has led to active measures on the part of the labouring classes against Chinese importation or immigration. The actual dispute between the seamen and the A.S.N Company has been almost lost sight of in the larger question of a general introduction of Chinese, which trade unions have done their best to persuade the people is only a matter of time, and must result in the complete exclusion of Europeans from the labour market unless the threatened evil is at once nipped in the bud.”

download (1)
Peter Lalor, leader of the Rebellion, and not Ulysses S. Grant, although if you have had a shot of Johnnie Walker Green Label you might just get the two confused

A version of the Eureka Flag flew during the shearers’ strike at Barcaldine in 1891. One of the demands of the shearers was an exclusion of low-cost Chinese labour. Thereafter, workers’ concerns about being undermined by the Chinese led to the Immigration Restriction Act or White Australia Policy. Therefore, the relationship between the tradition of Australian Nationalism and the Eureka Flag is irrefutable. Open to contention are the overarching interpretations derived from the uprising at the Ballarat goldfields in terms of the formation of Australian identity.

200px-Raffaello_Carboni.jpg
Raffaello Carboni wrote the stirring words, “When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie, that’s amore”

It is important to understand that there was no Australia at the time of the rebellion so any arguments about the events at Eureka and the conception of Australia as a “multicultural country” or a land of perpetual migration are specious. We can speak of the spirit of the Eureka Rebellion, and there again, Nationalists have the much stronger claim — and more so when you consider the current relationship between the worker and the political class. The militant “unionists” couldn’t give a damn for the Australian worker, as they are too busy assisting the multinational corporations and the quisling politicians in flooding the country with plague-level immigration. The unions stand for a “big Australia”, which means Australian workers and their conditions being undercut by an unceasing stream of foreign labour.

This post-Communist Globalist style of unionism, therefore, has no claim on the spirit of the traditional Australian working man to whom the lore of the Eureka Rebellion belongs.

What they do focus on in their swindling of the Eureka narrative are the words of Raffaello Carboni who wrote a first-hand description of the rebellion in his book The Eureka Stockade. When the miners gathered on November 30 to swear their allegiance under the Eureka flag he called on them to “irrespective of nationality, religion or colour to salute the Southern Cross as a refuge of all the oppressed countries on earth.”

This, according to the multiculturalists, is an incontrovertible expression of the underlying essence of inclusivity and diversity as proof of the multiracial sentiment of the rebellion and its miners. Ergo, the Australian identity is formulated along these principles. Yet, again, there was no Australia yet, although it was interesting that while reporting on the rebellion The Age described the Eureka Flag as “the flag of Australian independence”.

As we have seen, the Australian worker would view their independence as being founded firmly upon their identity as White Europeans. And those quoting Raffaello Carboni neglect to mention that he was an Italian Nationalist who fought against Austrian influence in the country of his birth, which he returned to. He never made the colony his home but travelled back to Europe dying in Rome in 1875. Therefore, his rousing words, especially the utterance “of all the oppressed countries on earth” were an anti-colonialist comment by a stateless fortune seeker not an affirmation of miscegenation by an early globalist. The flag itself, as we have explained, went on to become a symbol of Australianness very much defined by race and colour; that meaning only perverted when the Commies of Norm Gallagher’s ilk marched along in the 1970s during their passionate love affair with Mao’s China.

Nowadays, with China the largest owner of Australian farming resources, and Chinese ownership of our key assets at an unheralded level, as the Chinese “student” presence in Australia becomes entrenched and developments are underway to have them replace Anglo-Celtic-European Australia in alarming increments, the wisdom of those White Australian working men becomes all the more salient – as does the spirit of the flag they flew.

oie_TQiguoZdBURC.jpg
The anti-Chinese sentiment of the Eureka flag becomes a haunting caveat from our White Australian past

 

A FEW WORDS ON THE SUBJECT OF MARTYRDOM

A FEW WORDS ON THE SUBJECT OF MARTYRDOM

There ought to be a realisation by now, among Nationalistic people, that the Internet and in particular social media are these days very much a hindrance, rather than an aid in pursuing the cause of national revolution.

Time after time we are presented with the stories of people who have lost their way and become obsessed with the fantasy world of Facebook, Twitter, Gab and the myriad other portals through which people shout into the abyss of cyberspace; many of these individuals suffer full-blown mental breakdowns as a result of their journeys beyond the looking glass.

We have already posted several articles on this blog on the topics of violent extremism, unilateral action by Lone Wolf actors and the way ill, desperate or lonely Cybernauts are consistently fed false information and distortions of fact when it comes to matters of authentic political dissent against the Globalist-Capitalist system.

wretström
Daniel Wretström, a Swedish skinhead murdered by immigrants in 2000 is regarded by many on the continent as a martyr

We have laboured long and hard on blog posts which have examined the near zero potential of terrorism and political violence as a means of effecting lasting societal change; in addition to that we have been relentless in our criticism of the globalist leaning Alt-Right posers who have hijacked the Nationalist narrative and attempted to replace political principles with juvenile cyber-gibberish.

As sincere radicals we long ago came to the conclusion that social media is a cancer, that its potential to draw citizens together into a common cause for a better world was a mirage, a con-job by the owners of the sites which sucked billions across the world into submitting to a Globalist-Capitalist data mining and surveillance programme.

That is not to say, of course, that we wish to denigrate hardworking Nationalistic writers, it is important to create for posterity a permanent record of our theories and the overall tone of early 21st century Nationalism; the problem is that to the time poor worker, sorting the gold from the dross is nigh on impossible a task in the face of so much white noise coming from the social media zoo.

As sincere radicals we long ago came to the conclusion that social media is a cancer, that its potential to draw citizens together into a common cause for a better world was a mirage, a con-job by the owners of the sites which sucked billions across the world into submitting to a Globalist-Capitalist data mining and surveillance programme.

The problem is that the real world does not work in the same way as the cyber-playpens; pretty much every time the psychodrama of meme-rich social media groups is transposed onto the streets it has ended in ignominious failure, recriminations and bitter divides among participants, this is as true of the so-called “Far Right” as it is of Antifa and their ilk.

The really sad part of this is the potential for the disillusioned Cybernaut to spiral into an episode of mental decompensation when he is faced with this clash of values; when his hopes of concrete action, camaraderie and a lasting commitment to a great cause are dashed before his eyes the temptation to go it alone and create a spectacle can become overwhelming.

tommy
Tommy Robinson may be a fraud with suspicious ties to the Zionist entity but there is no doubt he is being ruthlessly persecuted by the UK authorities, his perseverance makes him a hero to civic patriots

Shooting up a house of worship, assassinating a minor politician or driving a van into a crowd of civilians will not make a martyr of the assailant, his reams of blog posts and social media interactions will be immediately expunged from the internet and in a few months, after he is tried and convicted, nobody but those with an academic interest in the case will remember his name.

Innocence, perseverance in the face of impossible odds, showing grace under fire and, above all survival to the very last, no matter what occurs, are the qualities of a martyr; such people are outwardly unaffected by frustration or despair and they are hailed for their self-sacrifice and their considered approach to their situation.

Shooting up a house of worship, assassinating a minor politician or driving a van into a crowd of civilians will not make a martyr of the assailant, his reams of blog posts and social media interactions will be immediately expunged from the internet and in a few months, after he is tried and convicted, nobody but those with an academic interest in the case will remember his name.

Think about this for a moment: Who can name, off the top of their head, one rank and file member of the SS Einsatzgruppen, or a police officer, who roamed Eastern Europe doing the dirty work of eliminating Jews, Communists and Partisans from the occupied zones?

We are talking here of the people who heard the screams and got blood spattered on their boots; so who can name one Khmer Rouge cadre? One Hutu militiaman from Rwanda in 1994? One Phalangist gunman from the Sabra and Shatila atrocity in 1982?

SS&SD unit Somewhere in Russia
The SS and SD Einsatzgruppen did all the dirty work on the Eastern front, they were the most ruthless and efficient killing machine going around, yet 70 years later their names are unknown outside academic circles

In truth, as horrible as it sounds, those killers were actually making their mark on the world, following orders as part of a great machine with clear orders, the camaraderie of brothers and a sense of purpose, yet they are forgotten by the world and only the names of their ideologues and leaders are barely remembered by ordinary workers, even if it is often for the wrong reasons.

Getting all worked up over social media memes, “truths” which are usually anything but true and expecting communion, or even ovations from your online peers when you finally flip out and do something spectacularly stupid is a sad way to live.

True radicals have their eyes on the horizon awaiting the new dawn, they move toward the light on the hill, so to speak; they see the good in the world and recoil from negativity and the dark side of life; they elevate beauty, vitality, art and love over depression, paranoia and insanity.

Getting all worked up over social media memes, “truths” which are usually anything but true and expecting communion, or even ovations from your online peers when you finally flip out and do something spectacularly stupid is a sad way to live.

If you see no hope of salvation, if the world seems to be spinning out of control and if your online fantasy world fails to reach its potential as a vehicle to sweep the globalists and their cronies from power then you can either step away from the keyboard, seek treatment for your mental problems and find something else to occupy your evenings, or you can implode and take the coward’s way out.

So put up or shut up, if the world is as fucked as you think it is and throwing away your life on a spectacular action seems the only option, instead of taking out your frustrations on others, why not write your great manifesto and last testament, lay down on your flag and put the gun to your temple?

Assuming that your writing was any good if you were possessed of great insight and could conceivably have made a wider contribution to “the cause” your death will be mourned as a tragedy and your name will live forever.

If, on the other hand, you really were just a sad, internet-addled loser parroting half-truths and engaging in social media group hysteria, so be it: to dust you will return in your forgotten and untended grave.

_54203247_comp_hess
When people began making pilgrimages to the grave of Rudolf Hess the German authorities exhumed his remains and levelled the site

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

Nothing prevented Saturday’s bi-state ‘International Freedom of Speech’ day, which is of itself ironic. However, in this muddle of libertarian and identity politics, attended by the usual provocateurs, when speech has no substantial content the point of whether or not it is free is moot.

The two-state ‘event’, which we cannot find any evidence of being internationally recognised despite its bold appellation, although there is said to a London event, was held in both Melbourne Docklands, where Jewish supremacist and mega Zionist Avi Yemini was joined by Senator Fraser Anning, with a crowd of around 50 free speech advocates, after the first got underway at Sydney’s Wiley Park, in Lakemba.

We will address the Wiley Park leg shortly, but first-up Anning’s speech would reveal a lot about this mysterious ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’. Senator Anning’s maiden speech, like Pauline Hanson’s before him, caused sparks when he called for a return to a “European Christian” immigration system. Yet, it did not take long to forge an allegiance with the Zionist ALA. This seems to be an inevitable pattern when it comes to outspoken politicians on the “right side”, especially those who create a false hope that they’ll support a return to the White Australia Policy.

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

He then got down to business and we’ll place a transcript of his speech verbatim on this page. What will become apparent is his pro-Zionism as he told the sparsely peopled audience, “My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’.

“This year we gave the Palestinian authority $43.8 million. They use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority.”

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

Australia shouldn’t be paying any money to that region, for sure, but that’s not what Anning’s point was – he doesn’t want it paid because, according to the very Zionist logic, innocent Israelis are being killed by evil Palestinians who have some screwed-up notion about wanting to stop their land being stolen by Jews.

The only attempt to shut down Fraser’s freedom of speech came from a longhaired ginger dressed in black who was shouted down by Avi and his supporters who chanted, “Zuck off!” a reference to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerbeg, who they blame personally for de-speeching them on his social media platform.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Meanwhile, Blair Cottrell did not attend the Melbourne rally. Instead, he drove to Sydney to yell at gimps in a windy park through a Chinese manufactured megaphone. He shook hands with the likes of marijuana advocate and serial instigator Nick Folkes who is back from cannabis country with his small multi-racial cast of resurrected Party for Freedom members (or as we dubbed them, Peanuts for Freedom) as he joined a line-up that included some uninteresting woman and Cottrell’s lawyer, John Bolton.

dfadsfs.png
Blair is a man who never lets standards get in the way of the company he consorts with (Folkes centre, Bluebeard taking a fan snap on the right)

Present also was Neil Erikson’s partner in crime, Rino Grgurgovic, aka Bluebeard, along with members of the Lads Society Sydney. If there was a Pictionary definition of “idiot” then Bluebeard’s picture would be posted there in all its pot-bellied glory, stink lines included. There would even be a colouring-in version for autistic kids.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which would be like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

MateyandFokles.png
The Fellowship of the Chicken is reunited. Matey Mate, Hollywood Nazi on the right, with his Zionist mate and colleague, Nick Folkes

It’s grouse Matey Mate is back with Nick because it’s like a reunion of the old fellowship of the chicken which was centred around the deep-seed Liberal muckraker and sometimes poultry farmer Howard “I’m not a financial member of any party” Crawford.  Howie even “liked” Nick’s post about the rally on his Facebook page which means so much for any of them retiring.

But what is more significant about these two is that it proves that Matey Mate, far from being owned by ‘The Lads’ is a random equation infecting the numbers. Any belief that he is not a two-way transistor between the meddlesome world of the Zionist spiv and the “youth” who have gravitated to Sewell’s boys’ club betrays an inadvisable trust in the skunk. Matey Mate’s record speaks for itself, and his intrigues run deep. It wouldn’t surprise UNA at all if he was receiving secret funding from a government agency. Likewise, given the ongoing theatre, and all the incongruities of his allegiances, policies, platform and behaviour, who is handling Nick Folkes?

Thus, with a gale blowing, and nobody infringing on their ‘free speech’, Bolton led the proceedings by opening up with a spiel about Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern; all this while the antifascist voyeurs tracked them with what must’ve been the cheapest drone on the market – a Chinese knock-off bought for a lobster from the markets. Those assembled in the park appear in an image smugly uploaded to the Anonykatz Facebook page from a vertigo-inducing height and with a visibility that rendered the whole exercise even more futile than what was happening down below.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer 8Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which is like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

Screenshot_20181006-230600_Facebook.jpg
The Antis will try to say that the object of the exercise was to view crowd numbers. But that’s a lie, they wanted to see who was there, but their cheap and nasty drone failed them. Lulz

Nick Folkes, no doubt nicely toasted on seventh-generation Indica skunk weed, then grabbed the bullhorn to foghorn about his freedom of speech, or should that be, his excess of it. Folkes is an idiot and no matter what anyone believes about personal liberty the whole world would be better off if a special law was passed limiting him to the use of sign language.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

Singling out “dogmatic communists” he aired his angst about how they “want to take freedom of speech and it’s an attack on the only civilisation in modern history that brought around freedom of speech is the British Empire.”

Perhaps they should tell that to D.H Lawrence or any of the other writers whose books were originally banned in England.

It’s worth noting too that both Folkes and Anning cited “communists” as being responsible for taking away their freedom of speech while last we checked Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk, who led a charge to censor Anning and stripped him of staff funding and extra staff is a dyed in the wool conservative.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

And while Folkes gasbags about freedom of speech he seems to forget when he attempted to shut down Australia First Party president Jim Saleam’s freedom of speech at the Reclaim Australia rally at Martin Place in Sydney during 2015 when he connived with the marshals to have him removed. Likewise, the marshals forbade AFP from distributing any materials at the rally but didn’t impose any ban on the kosher groups.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care. It is very clear that he chose long ago the path of civic patriotism. And for all the fascist talk from the Lads Society once again Matey Mate and his offsider Alex had no problem embedding themselves with Zionists and supporting an event that is fundamentally pro-Israel.

a7a6dc4f492afb2d327d9e154432017f
John Bolton, Zionist, anti-Islam activist, and most likely chief organiser of International Freedom of Speech day in Australia

John Bolton is probably the key to Cottrell’s attendance since as a lawyer he has taken up his appeal pro bono against charges of inciting serious contempt against Moslems. Did Blair really drive all the way to Sydney just to help his mate out, or did he have other business? Was he asked not to attend the Melbourne leg of the rally, or would Tom Sewell, the chock-heeled boss of the Lads Society have forbidden it? It’s hard to be sure once you try to figure out who put this thing together and why.

United Nationalists Australia has attempted to identify who the principal organisers of the ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’ are. Our strongest lead is actually John Bolton. He released a YouTube video on October 1 in which his concerns about freedom of speech link primarily to former EDL head and Zionist Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern who was prevented from entering the Moslem enclave of Lakemba during her tour of Sydney. Bear in mind, the Lads Society provided security for Southern both at Sydney and her Melbourne show.

During that tour, Southern appeared with Stefan Molyneux in a video filmed at Sydney’s Botanic Gardens in which she detailed how police prevented her exercising the simple right to walk the streets since her presence would be seen as a provocation. She claimed there was hypocrisy at play because mainstream media, which were actually filming her, were put under no such restrictions. Nonetheless, Southern began by explaining how her team had contacted police to advise them she would be journeying down with her crew.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care.

One could say it was stupid tipping them off, but one could also cynically suggest that she got the reaction she intended. If she was fair dinkum about slinking into a Moslem neighbourhood incognito — and let’s face it, most Moslems like most Aussies wouldn’t have known her from a bar of soap — there were countless other areas that are chockers with the followers of Mohammed; Punchbowl being one; Beverly Hills another. Either she was worried they might get creamed or else she’d calculated the police response and just how marvellously it would dovetail her narrative.

It was with this same expectation of publicity that Bolton chose Wiley Park near Lakemba to stage his rally. He stated so in his video in which he grimly warned against anyone inciting violence or attempting violence against his people. He clearly spelt out it was a test of “freedom” to be in the area. In the end, no one attempted anything, except some numbskull Antis who took their cheap-arse drone for a spin in the drizzle.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

So, Bolton is at the centre of this theatre that has drawn together the usual faces. But he is Cottrell’s lawyer and Blair is synonymous with allegedly suggesting that every classroom in Australia should have a copy of Mein Kampf (We are not sure if that quote is apocryphal or not). How does that then fit in with Bolton’s worldview? We quote him from the video, “As Australians, we are a melting pot. Women and men in Australia are equal. People of every race in Australia are equal. It’s abhorrent that people want to divide us.”

Well, isn’t Blair Cottrell one of those trying to divide us? I know we are. We’re proud to admit it since the only “us” we recognise are actual Australians, which means we aim to divide their “us”. So, if that’s the case, does he support freedom of speech by those who want to repudiate his statements of values as a bunch of gay libertarian crap? Did he not just call such abhorrent? On his Weebly blog, among an impressive list of professional credentials, Bolton describes himself as “conservative” but “politically independent”. We see a lot of that around the anti-Islam scene. And John is no stranger to that arena. In 2017, he joined the Peanuts as a speaker at their rally against a proposed Islamic school in Penrith.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

Among those were ‘Australian Patriot Uprising’ Commandant Matt Lowe and his non-Aryan Sergeant Schultz, Toby Cook.

Matt Lowe took over while Nick Folkes was on hiatus. He and fat boy Toby, who we understand to be a former mental patient, essentially formed the core of this absurd Facebook club along with Shermon Burgess, who himself made a quantum leap from strict kosher patriot to fully-blown neo-Nazi with such a vengeance that it defies credulity. Just as the movement was adopting a conspicuously fascist style, Folkes stepped sideways, Lowe et al moved in, but now they’re gone and Folkes is back along with the bagel brigade. But it remains of Mr Bolton to explain just what these glaring inconsistencies mean to him because being such a bright lad he cannot have failed to be aware of them. By the same token, Bolton cannot be unaware of what Blair Cottrell represents to the mainstream, while Nationalists know the truth and these associations of his only confirm: the man is a civic patriot and always will be.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

We now return to Nick Folkes’s comment about “it’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here”. It’s a shame that after all this time the dumb bastard hasn’t worked out why.

The last any significant support was galvanised for a comparable cause was the Reclaim Australia rallies. If we’re talking about Sydney alone, then the 2015 rallies were the ceiling. But let’s focus on that, shall we? How come they failed to capitalise on the kind of public support they saw from that concept? Arguably, it was a number of reasons. Firstly, too many civic micro-parties played tug-o-war with it, such as the ALA, and the unregistered PfF and those parties were avowedly Zionist. But while other factors occurred, especially in Melbourne where the street jouster mentality of the UPF had turned off the mums and dads (or “peasants” as Blair Cottrell charitably labels them), the simple fact no one seems to recognise is because they never actually stated what it is they wanted.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

What was it they wanted; a total end to Moslem immigration? Not really, if you attended the rallies and listened to the speeches, despite the slant the hard-left and globalist media put on it, they asked only for “assimilation”. Who was it that this petition was directed at? Was it the Moslem community, who were not represented and never addressed? Was it the politicians? There were frequent calls for “politicians” to “do something”. That’s a mighty naïve expression of faith right there, trusting a ‘politician’ working for an internationalist world-order controlled by corporations. The politicians are dedicated universally to pumping this country full of as much non-Anglo human content as can be mustered. This is the idea.

Opposition leader Bill Shorten has approached Scott Morrison to agree to a bipartisan commitment to a “big Australia”, and a big Australia means unfettered immigration.

The little-known corporation Consolidated Land & Rail (CLARA) has as its mission statement: “CLARA is an Australian private group formed to deliver a program to change Australia. We seek to undertake a re-balancing of our settlement and deliver new ways of imagining, planning and building cities, transport and infrastructure.”

This is insidious stuff: a private group with endless land assets knocking up micro-cities and connecting them with rail all over Australia. Who is to live in those cities? Well, CLARA says, “Australia’s population is projected to increase 69% between now and 2061 — up from 24.7 million to 41.5 million people, that is 16.8 million more Australians needing a home.”

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

Australians…? They seriously just called that projected figure Australians when they’re constantly harping on about the declining birth rate among White Australians?! No, that’s an import figure, and what’s more, CLARA seems to know something we don’t because they’re already building their cities and rails to accommodate this massive increase which will come from Asia, the Sub-Continent, the Middle-East and Africa, but really largely from China, and to serve the new Sino-Australia.

How can such a newish population in any way be Australian? By their importation, they signal the end of Australia and the creation of an artificial nation not founded on culture, race or custom, but on consumerism and serfdom to oligarchical concerns.

Given all this is happening, tiny little voices squeaking about “freedom of speech” in an ill-defined way don’t seem to grasp the issues especially when, like Bolton and all civic patriots, they accept a “melting pot” so long as it doesn’t come with Moslems and their “sharia law”.

But it also explains why Nick and Co can’t get massive numbers to their rallies despite the size of the cities because they are lost in a wilderness where their concerns are outnumbered by the demographic realities of those very cities.

The Nationalist message is very different and it is uncompromising and unwavering. And the key to the activism resides in that message and its purity something those who complain about “keyboard warriors” not attending these hopeless rallies cannot get their heads around.

Given the divide we suffer in major cities, the only logical thing to do is seek out our people where they reside, and where they are receptive to our message and that might not be in the sexy surrounds of an urban environment. It might be spread apart and out in the dust 200 kilometres each way between. But the cities are lost and those Whites remaining and who’ve adapted to this prefabricated metropolis are from the virtue-signalling hypocrite elites. Which is another thing Anning, Bolton and Yemini don’t understand about their “free speech”, especially when they equate it with social media — the political element of their “speech” is a product of the commercial.

Identity politics is a device by which aspirational consumers signal their social status. The greatest advocates of all these guises of progressive politics are in fact the corporations who splinter it all up into a consumerist matrix. It’s not even accurate to suggest that Facebook targets them on the basis of their politics, although it’s not so unfair an accusation to level at Twitter. Facebook operates on a combination of algorithms and human moderators and while the inconsistencies of their adjudications are frustrating they are more random than they seem. But if they really want to get down to an understanding what they lack is not a freedom of speech but a market share.

The topic of “freedom of speech” is too complex to be condensed for a mass audience at least in the fashion the civics are doing it. What their “freedom of speech” is banging up against is this very global order. There are no worries for Moslem Arabs discussing the finer points of socially unpalatable aspects of an extreme reading of their religion at meetings in Lakemba, for instance. They are no challenge to that order. But as Christopher Shortis found out when he, Cottrell and Neil Erikson were convicted of inciting serious contempt against Moslems, it sure isn’t so lenient when it happens the other way. While Moslems are allowed to discuss extreme ideas to characterise them as extreme, which is what the Bendigo Three did in their video, is considered the more extreme acts of the two. Indeed, we may consider naming the monster now to be heretical speech.

And once one makes a concession to unfettered freedom of expression where does it end? We cannot argue for the unconditional freedom of speech which would demand things like sex with baby giraffes or to legalise cannibalism. And as society fragments along the lines of those directing from the Bilderberg Group, it seems that sick ideas are gaining respectability on a daily basis. We’re already at the stage that we’ve repudiated nature and argued she is wrong, that there is no such thing as race or gender, and one woman described as an author and educator argues that parents should gain permission from their babies before changing their nappies. These are the signs of a society on the way out and that’s where the oligarchs want it so that it can be replaced by a new serfdom. When the serfs speak up about anything that may draw attention to this then, of course, that speech is no longer but very, very expensive.

As Nationalists we do not fight vigorously for freedom of speech, we strive to emphasize the hypocrisy of those who wish to silence us and demonise us in the name of an inclusive and progressive democracy in which freedom of expression is implied.

Anning.png
Senator Fraser Anning expressing his fear that Israelis might be being murdered by Palestinians

Senator Fraswer Anning’s Speech, Verbatim, Docklands, Melbourne, Oct 6, 2018 (don’t say we tried to take your free speech)

“ALA is the only democratic party in this state. These African gangs who are attacking people, destroying property and bashing different people and getting away with it is probably some of the worst things I’ve seen and I’m sure it’s not the fault of the police, I’m sure their hands have been tied by somebody further up. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right for any nation, it’s the first thing that goes and then normally what happens in a communist society they take your freedom of speech first, so occasionally we have clowns like this who deny you your right to freedom of speech,” (enter bozo ranga) to disrupt the event. Avi grabbed the mic and led the small gathering of ALA supporters and others in a chant of “Zucc off, mate!” Anning, continued, “So the first thing that goes in a communist country is your freedom of speech, just recently, as Avi said, both our (Facebook) pages were shut down. The premier in Queensland asked our members there – and three state members – to denounce my speech or lose funding for staff members. Now, that’s a travesty of justice, it was illegal, she eventually took those staff members and took that funding because they did not want to renounce me. My Facebook page, as far as I know, was taken down… we’ve never called for any violence… neither Avi or myself have called for any violence against anyone and never will. My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’ (loud claps from Zionist Avi and his ALAers). This year we give the Palestinian authority $43.8 million they use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority. And that’s where our tax dollars are going and when I called for that, in the senate, all three parties, the Liberals, Labor and the Greens vote against me every time. They’re the same people who the day after my speech were all crying and hugging and ringing their hands and they never damped a tissue but they pretended to cry then they denounce me — but they’re the same three parties who regularly vote against the motions that I put up to stop funding the Palestinian authority but also I call for getting the White South African farmers out of South Africa (Avi leads clapping) and again they vote against me so they’re hypocrites, they took two words out of context then they decided they would try to make some mileage out of that but they made their impatient speeches but the next day when the polls came out, even the ABC poll, they found around 80% of Australians were supporting me so, ah… (Applause) so they’ll have to eat their words a little bit. So we’ve got some big problems to overcome, we are supposed to have a conservative government but then they’re here five years but we still have 18C on the books, which takes away your freedom of speech. What’s happening there? So really what’s happened is that the parties that used to represent us have moved so far to the left that they don’t represent us anymore. There’s a vacuum on the right. We saw that in 2016 in America when Trump came like a freight train and hit poor old Hillary Clinton. She didn’t see that coming (laughter). He’s been a great man for America, he’s done a huge amount of work for America and America has never been better now economically or any other way you like to look at it. So a lot of this, this trying to take away our freedom of speech is coming out of the United Nations. Now, I’ve been calling for us to get out of Paris and to get out of the United Nations. They have no business here, they have no business with us, and their politicians like Marise Payne who’s over there now signing away your rights to everything, ah, she has no business doing that on your behalf. She’s signing a thing called the Immigration Compact, now, and that will effectively give your rights to who comes into this country – it will be handed over to the United Nations so you can imagine what’s going to happen with our society. By the way, that speech, that part with the final solution, what was actually said was ‘the final solution to our immigration problem is for the Australian people to have a vote via plebiscite’. And I will still continue to push that agenda because we’ve had votes on all sorts of things like same sex marriage and everything else, why should we not have the right to have a vote on not just how many people will come here but who comes here, what the makeup of this country will be like later on. So really I think the big fear is that good Australian men and a lot of them only boys died on battlefields all over the world. They died in freezing bloody muddy trenches in France and Belgium and other places and in the jungles of New Guinea and they died for one thing and that is for your freedom and for your rights. They stood up in front of bullets and they took bullets a lot of them and they’re not here with us anymore and the least we can do is to do what good people like yourselves are doing now and stand up for our freedoms and I applaud you all for being here and we’ve got to keep up the fight.”

THE BILDERBERG CHILD WHO WON’T STAND FOR HER PEOPLE

THE BILDERBERG CHILD WHO WON’T STAND FOR HER PEOPLE

Anti-Australians are celebrating news of a nine-year-old girl in Queensland who refused to stand for our national anthem as in her mind it excludes Aborigines.

The parents of nine-year-old Harper Nielsen who attends Kenmore South State School are claiming their pesky daughter was given detention following a “silent protest” when she refused to stand for our national anthem. The school has denied their allegations. The fourth-grader told the Daily Telegraph she boycotted the national anthem on the basis that “Advance Australia Fair means advance White Australia”. She added, “When it says were are young it completely ignores the fact that indigenous culture was here for over 50,000 years before colonisation.”

How this became news is about as much of a mystery as is where babies come from since her parents, both who look like they graduated from Chairman Mao 101 on an Australian Unions scholarship, went out of their way to ensure it became news. The very name ‘Harper’ we would wager is her parents’ dedication to liberal author Harper Lee, who wrote To Kill a Mockingbird.

Media has since lined up to sensationalise the frumpy pre-tween automaton when they should be interviewing her parents whom the good money’s odds say put her up to it for their own interests.

http_%2F%2Fprod.static9.net.au%2F_%2Fmedia%2F2018%2F09%2F12%2F18%2F42%2FANTHEMSTILL2.jpg
Let’s just hope Harper learns to despise her parents when she reaches her rebellious teen years which aren’t far off

At the tender age of nine, this child is merely parroting what’s been inculcated into her by the two agents of social decay she calls mum and dad (assuming they’re as traditional as to permit these stereotypical designations). These two Trotsykites are raising their brat to conform to all the desires of the misanthropes who comprise the Bilderberg Group.

The Bilderberg Group is a complex topic the reader must investigate independently. While we add a link to a useful webpage, we can only generally describe them and their goals. We invoke them here simply to alert the reader that this ‘news’ is hooey calculated to create tension and division.

Media has since lined up to sensationalise the frumpy pre-tween automaton when they should be interviewing her parents whom the good money’s odds say put her up to it for their own interests.  

Firstly, isn’t it odd that when globalists wish to paralyse this nation through moral invalidation they imply Australia is “all White” and thus all institutions, every significant cultural article, and each strand of our national aplomb is “White” and must be recoded. However, when they wish to own it and to repudiate an increasingly agitated White Australia this country is “multicultural (multiracial)”.

So there are two states of being for Australia and the two can only mutually exist if the paradox is permitted by lazy thinking. The Bilderberg Group advocates population control. Sociologist Hadley Cantril describes employing “Psycho-political operations” as “propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”

This is what we’re seeing all around the western, or to put it bluntly, the White world. This is because another goal of the one-world, one-government, and one-system controllers is the abolition of nation states. It’s little surprise then that the Bilderberg group boasts among its membership such luminaries of globalism as Henry Kissinger, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, David Rockefeller, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Ben Bernanke, and Rupert Murdoch just to name a few.

download (5).jpg

Rupert Murdoch is a glaring presence. The Bilderberg Group uses its media, such as CBS (which it is known to invite along to its secret meetings on the promise of secrecy), to promote mind-wash. Given that the group is not a conspiracy invented by right-wingers, it’s interesting to note that the left has virtually nothing to say about them, which isn’t all that surprising when as we’ve consistently pointed out, they stopped thinking independently long ago. This is why you can witness such incongruous behaviour as self-described “anarchist” Professor Rob Sparrow (aka Slackbastard) championing the cause of the Bilderbergs while believing he’s supporting a cadre of fellow travellers in a global revolution of non-existent “workers”.

Slackbastard swooped like a chicken hawk (or is that like convicted paedophile antifascist Alex Gollan?) onto this child’s story. Rob posted on the SB Facebook page, “mAAAAAAd props to the 9yo grrl for refusing to follow the herd — you rock!” We’re sure glad he isn’t her English teacher.

Sociologist Hadley Cantril describes employing “Psycho-political operations” as “propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”

Meanwhile, the clichés of fake indigenous activism over at Blackfulla Revolution (another FB group) used her case in a rhetorical bush breakfast when they tried to juxtapose the controversy over Herald Sun cartoonist Michael Knight’s spoof of Serena Williams’ recent dummy spit, with Harper’s story by offering up a yawning ‘meme’. Apparently, one is permissible (and racist) and the other is censored (and anti-racist).

41663711_1211907875616153_233038117957795840_n.jpg
Um, no… not even close. We know you’re the sanctified professional underdogs of this country but even you mob ought to be obliged to be accurate now and then

Michael Knight is a satirical cartoonist and well in his rights to exaggerate his subjects, and the other was never censored but instead given a platform which was picked up internationally giving Harper and her hippy parents their 15 mins of social justice-connected fame. It’s also led to her being viciously trolled, which is an inevitability her parents should’ve considered before putting her up to this attention-grabbing media stunt.

8e76d961900cbcbf097a9fe12deac8c0.jpg
Depicting coloured people in cartoons will soon be as dangerous as depicting the Prophet Mohammed 

Fake Nationalist Pauline Hanson even got an opportunity to try and steal back some ground lost to Katter Australia Party’s senator Fraser Anning. She slid out of her money chamber to offer a predictable quote about how she’d give the tot “a kick up the backside”.

Thus, a supposedly pressing social issue has become a kind of perverse entertainment in which the invalid nation state is tossed like a bone for two dogs to fight over. The messages behind these stories are quite startling. The furore over the depiction of Serena Williams now posits that people of colour, no matter how badly behaved, are beyond criticism by Whites; much like depicting the Prophet Mohammed will get your throat slit by a fundamentalist Moslem.

In the case of Harper’s media narrative, a phoney sense of expression on the issue of the supposed plight faced by indigenous Australians is given artificial oxygen. For, if there is a voice united in sounding about the indigenous cause, what is that cause? What is it really? Once they’ve figured out all that maybe they can ponder who it is they’re petitioning.  Is it a collective conscience? Is it political representatives?

Fake Nationalist Pauline Hanson even got an opportunity to try and steal back some ground lost to Katter Australia Party’s senator Fraser Anning. She slid out of her money chamber to offer a predictable quote about how she’d give the tot “a kick up the backside”.

If they really believe that any side that stands for office in Australian parliament will ever have the tools at their disposal to right a social wrong they’re back in the Dreamtime. They haven’t noticed that whichever government is elected serves the internationalist Anglo-American-Zionist bloc which is a faction of the One World Government cabal. The members of the Bilderberg Group aren’t interested in emancipation for the world’s peoples unless it leads to their military industrial complex profiting from war.

If it’s the collective conscience then that is filled now with the self-interest of countless ‘minority associations’ which see themselves as the primary ‘victim’ of White Australia, so in that sense, they’ve pushed the Abo out of the queue.

The oligarchs don’t want Aboriginal tribes achieving native title over lucrative mining assets they want to flog to China because assets are not for the serfs. It’ll never happen. Instead, it’s better to have the serfs beating each other in an irreconcilable conflict that has its flames nefariously fanned by those controlling the actors who are simultaneously condoning and condemning either one or both sides.

As to little Harper, maybe she can figure out whether she wants to stand for the parenting payment that helped raise her, or the Medicare benefits which keep her fit, the state education she receives, the accoutrements of the White race that she denounces that she couldn’t live without, such as her toys, computer, phone, technology in general, and the medium she has used to spit in the face of her own race. Because, little girl, you wouldn’t last long if you were shanghaied off and dropped in the middle of an outback Aboriginal community. Your parents’ rhetoric wouldn’t save you from the fate suffered by their own flesh and blood on a nauseatingly repetitive basis.

Perhaps she could also benefit from an education which permits an untarnished understanding of the origins of our country and how the indigenous people had no claims on it as a nation since they were disparate tribes and NOT a nation. Just maybe she might realise that those people were destined to be conquered by the rules of the human animals: if it wasn’t by the British Empire, it would certainly have been the Dutch or the Chinese. Moreover, she benefits nothing from those like her parents adding to the division of our people; only the certainty that the bigger gap they create in our nation the more inevitable it is that another force will seize on that and push right on through to take us over. In fact, it’s happening now.

Indeed, this little girl, so fresh off the potty yet so quick with the universal condemnations of her own country, should like to spare a thought for the current Chinese invasion now underway in Australia and just how much those in Beijing are likely to give a shit about the Aborigines that she and her parents patronise so.

But she is, as we say, a child. No kid could have the sophistication to make any sort of informed judgment on such matters. Likewise, no nipper could be filled with such patriotism as to look forward to assembly just for an opportunity to stand for the flag. These are kids, they’d rather be off playing.

None of this was ever about thinking… just reacting.

Screenshot_20180912-022419_Chrome.jpg
National Australia Bank employing Bilderberg logic in their ads: promoting multiracialism while brushing over the fact a practising Moslem would wholeheartedly revile their whole stinking usury system

WE ARE THE PEACEKEEPERS

WE ARE THE PEACEKEEPERS

Amid all the political ructions in Canberra and the doings of the big end of town we thought it timely to spend some time on an examination of power in 21st century Australia.

If asked, we would guess that the average worker would name the government and the police as the organisations who wield power and enforce codes of behaviour upon the citizen; a cynic might suggest that there exists another layer of power above the institutions, an elite made up of shadowy oligarchs and “old money” or suchlike.

This is true, up to a certain point, that point is the limit of the patience, tolerance and goodwill of the people and their willingness to submit to being governed and abide by the law; the real power lies with the citizens with the institutions only able to function as they do with our total cooperation.

When citizens decide to disobey the rules, to go their own way or to take the outlaw path in life serious problems arise for the institutions of power, their bureaucrats and the police.

We do not have to look too far for examples of modern day outlawry which have delivered a shock to the system and had the law dogs scrambling to formulate a response; when bad men become convinced that compliance with the status quo is purely optional they can quickly overload the state’s response mechanisms.

Scenarios of this type are a nightmare for the authorities, since the beginnings of White colonisation of this continent there have been individuals and groups of people who have carried out acts of criminality or civil disobedience and in doing so they have exposed the fragility and the limitations of institutional power and its mercenary enforcers, the cops.

Ben_Hall_HISTORICALsmall
Bold Ben Hall, he showed the Traps some fun

We do not have to look too far for examples of modern day outlawry which have delivered a shock to the system and had the law dogs scrambling to formulate a response; when bad men become convinced that compliance with the status quo is purely optional they can quickly overload the state’s response mechanisms.

In our own backyard fugitives such as rapist and murderer Malcolm Naden and the latter day bushranging duo Gino and Mark Stocco, as the old Aussie folk song says “showed the Traps some fun” evading capture for many years despite a massive investment of police time and resources.

In the U.K we can observe the terror and confusion sown by maniacs on the loose such as Raoul Moat and Derrick Bird, who went on a sort of armed “Death Ride” as their lives spiralled out of control and they became convinced that murder, mayhem and suicide was their preferred method of exiting the mortal realm.

“Home grown” Islamic extremists, in spite of what the media and politicians would have us believe, also fall into this category of sad nihilists, misfits and wannabes; there is no revolutionary potential in throwing away one’s life on a one-off spectacular stunt, thus no real threat of a widespread Islamic insurgency in Australia.

The United States has been the setting for myriad outrages of a similar type, beginning in the Old West and carrying on into the 21st century with the escapades of disgruntled cop Christopher Dorner, or the Negro supremacists John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, nicknamed the D.C Snipers.

To this list we could add some Islamic terrorists such as the Kouachi Brothers who, after participating in the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris attempted a Death Ride of their own, leading the Gendarmerie on a chase through the suburbs which ended in their last stand on an industrial estate in Dammartin-en Goële.

naden cops
The hunt for psychopathic fugitive Malcolm Naden, if you are a big enough problem for the state the gloves quickly come off

We give these examples as an illustration of how even fairly deranged, though cunning and organised criminals can wreak absolute havoc in a community and bring the law enforcement apparatus close to breaking point simply by evading capture and carrying out their atrocities on the move; yet these people are, in the main, nihilistic and see no consequence of their actions other than their own death in an exchange of fire with the authorities.

“Homegrown” Islamic extremists, in spite of what the media and politicians would have us believe, also fall into this category of sad nihilists, misfits and wannabes; there is no revolutionary potential in throwing away one’s life on a one-off spectacular stunt, thus no real threat of a widespread Islamic insurgency in Australia.

Revolutionaries must, logically, live to fight another day and another, and so on; even if they do choose the path of the violent uprising they choose their battles carefully and martyrdom is an occupational hazard, as opposed to a tactic in itself.

Imagine then the impact of a hundred, or a thousand highly motivated revolutionaries who were living for the future, whose eyes were fixed upon the horizon for the coming of a new age; imagine a cadre of activists in every town and suburb, a distributed insurgency permanently embedded within the population.

For all the horror and upset caused by terrorists and rampaging, nihilistic criminals intent on making their last stand and their exposure of the limitations of state power in the face of a determined Lone Wolf, or small autonomous cell their outrages are notable for the fact that they never attract any real support or sympathy from normal citizens.

raoul moat
Raoul Moat spun out a jealous rage into a seven day “Death Ride” which caused panic across northern England; his sawn-off shotgun left one killed, one maimed, a policeman permanently blinded and Moat dead of a self-inflicted wound.

Here we come to the crux of the matter, we the workers are the ones who keep the peace in our society, not the state and not its mercenaries and spies.

Consider for a moment the demonstrable impact of one Lone Wolf insurgent upon a high tech, high trust society such as ours.

Now observe the level of fear caused by semi-organised gangs of ethnic criminals, say, the Islander or Sudanese hoodlums, who have no other objective beyond self-gratification, notoriety and the acquisition of cyberspace era electronic trinkets.

Imagine then the impact of a hundred, or a thousand highly motivated revolutionaries who were living for the future, whose eyes were fixed upon the horizon for the coming of a new age; imagine a cadre of activists in every town and suburb, a distributed insurgency permanently embedded within the population.

Indeed, we are the peacekeepers, it is only with our consent and tolerance that the modern, globalist techno-state remains stable; its fragility is obvious to anyone capable of thinking tactically, of wondering in all seriousness “How would we take down the system?”

It is the hope of Nationalists that the widespread withdrawal of consent to the status quo by the working classes, what we call the “secession of the mind” will be enough to frighten the globalist cronies, that this fear of popular revolt will stay their hand.

At this point in time the powers that be are walking a fine line between mere harassment of dissidents and secessionists and outright repression; should the balance tip toward tyranny, then rebellion becomes inevitable and all are acutely aware of the limits of state power, none more so than its architects and enforcers.

800px-Pikeman-IMG_0150-wiki