LADS’ LEADER HAS “MAORI BLOOD,” SAYS INSIDER

LADS’ LEADER HAS “MAORI BLOOD,” SAYS INSIDER

According to a confidential source with intimate ties to the Sydney Lads Society, their shady leader has, pardon the pun, a dark secret he is keeping closely guarded — he has Maori ancestry in his bloodline.

Mark McDonald, who is also known as Mark Campbell, among other aliases, is one of the cagiest cats in the Identitarian alleyway. Speaking on the assurance of anonymity, our insider says, “He has these two old people that he tries passing off as his parents. But there is no way they are his parents. He doesn’t want us to know who his real parents are because that will just confirm our suspicions about his tainted heritage.”

We fully support our New Zealand brothers and sisters, but we’re sure our Nationalist friends in NZ would agree it is not the place of Australian Nationalists to dictate New Zealandness to them. Likewise, it’s too much to cop that Mark “Matey Mate” is here trying to tell Australians what the deal is with our own kind. It’s doubly galling to know that the Lads Society’s supreme leader, Thomas Sewell, is himself a Kiwi.

pjimage.jpg
We ran a little digital scan test. And we needed surgery after laughing so hard

But whereas we’re sure Sewell’s bloodline is clean of Maori genetics, it is very likely that the same cannot be said of his illustrious Sydney 2IC who our deep-throat describes as being “as dumb as a box of broken hammers”.

Apparently, Matey Mate’s grey matter is likely to present a concern since he cannot hold a serious discussion about politics and lacks educational basics. “If you asked him whereabouts Belgium sat on the world map, for instance, he’d probably point at South America.”

mate
Matey Mate in his 45-degree bomber jacket

McDonald, or Campbell, or perhaps Tunafahekatamooki, is also said to be “back on the steroids” to improve his body image as Lads’ tribal chief. He appears to be on rocky ground leadership-wise, too, since his bidding to have Nick Folkes’s “boy” Toby Cook come aboard and join The Lads was down-thumbed by a majority vote. What’s even more curious is why he’d want an embarrassing lump like Toby in the club in the first place; perhaps since their mixed-race peccadillo is something they can both share. Or maybe there is a more sinister agenda at work given his connections to Liberal party para-state operatives and his relationship with cronies that surrounded the former Party for Freedom.

But this is not the only area that McDonald/Campbell has clashed with club policy: he is breaking with the strict Men’s Movement ideals of the Lads by reportedly having “gotten engaged” to an actual female. It is hoped that his bride to be is well-off with her own home because Matey is back in Summer Hill living at Club Squalor in the dilapidated house belonging to former PfF member Jerry Dragosevic. There are so many holes in the floor, ceiling and walls at Club Squalor that any attempt at consummating his marriage could lead to him unwittingly providing a free peep show to his landlord. But given that Matey is “back on the steroids” then the shrivelled offerings this will make of his wedding tackle makes that scenario most unlikely.

Lastly, our source made mention of reports that Matey Mate has “bragged” about having “frequently met with ASIO” and how he “enjoys a protected status because of it”. This is nothing more than what UNA has maintained from the get-go. But now he’s the Lads problems and given that it’s all just one deep murky pond in which the same toxic fish all swim and feed off the usual plankton it’s of little concern to us. We do, however, enjoy a good gloat from time to time.

33cb6e1d69b3a51c90d6cd146f6bbc0f
Once Were White Nationalists

 

 

ANZAC DAY – A REASON TO WHINGE FOR SOME AND AN EXCUSE FOR A PISS-UP TO OTHERS

ANZAC DAY – A REASON TO WHINGE FOR SOME AND AN EXCUSE FOR A PISS-UP TO OTHERS

We are not sure, and we were never actually there ourselves, but we’re fairly certain that the poor Anzacs waiting to be shredded piecemeal by Turk artillery while landing at Anzac Cove in the twilight of the 25th of April, 1915, weren’t sucking on tinnies of VB.

Thus, this tradition of getting pissed at six in the am on this period of national commemoration has more than a hint of Melbourne Cup Day about it. Nonetheless, those who made it back from that disastrous landing courtesy of the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, were no doubt in need of strong drink for the rest of their lives.

Anzac Day has been used as a pawn in the culture wars by those on the bourgeois liberal left fond of attacking national-spirited notches on the calendar, and by the government, marching in step with the internationalist agenda.

This year the whole parade has turned limp-wristed by inexplicably making it about women. Next year it might about gays or Rohingya refugees, but this year women are to march up the front while those regrettable specimens of Australian manhood must follow in their saintly shadow with heads bowed and any signifiers of masculinity kept out of sight. We’re grateful for the nurses that served, mind you, but we’ll be crocked if we’ll concede the entire Anzac Day over to a feminist narrative just because the army has turned so PC you could plug it in and surf the internet. Only recently they were trying to fish out servicemen who weren’t supporters of homosexual marriage, and now they want to ban ‘death symbols’ from being displayed on military hardware, despite the fact a smiley face stencilled on the side of a tank would seem way more jarring.

The majority of women who join the army can’t even make it through basic training but they expect us to cop this?

As Nationalists, we acknowledge the spirit of Anzac Day and defend it staunchly from those who would desecrate this National holiday with their identity politics. But we will not allow the globalist government, whoever they are to dictate its meaning to us. For they already try and have us believe that Australia Day is all about celebrating everything non-Australian. Likewise, they use Anzac Day to promote a false spirit of ‘service’ to foreign powers, to die for conflicts far removed from the interests of Australia.

Anzac Day has been used as a pawn in the culture wars by those on the bourgeois liberal left fond of attacking national-spirited notches on the calendar, and by the government, marching in step with the internationalist agenda.

Over a century has passed since the landing at Anzac Cove, a conflict between European empires triggered when an Austrian Archduke was shot by a Bosnian Serb and England got involved because Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia and Germany marched into Belgium threatening the Frogs. It was all riveting stuff and fairly typical of Europe up to that point in history.

Australians had no business in that war, but we were drawn in using the patriotic propaganda of Empire and a genuine sense of duty. In fact, the nation threw itself into the cause with gusto and the average bloke viewed it as an adventure, at a time when ideals were sharpened by romanticism and the national identity was still shackled to the concept of colony and motherland. Also, as with nearly all wars, there was the mistaken belief that it would all be over by Christmas. But it soon became clear this was no Boys’ Own adventure but a massacre. At that time, Australia was a paltry population of five million. Nearly five-hundred thousand enlisted with a loss of 60,000 and 156,000 wounded or taken prisoner.

71-gallipoliposter

From fervent allies of mother England, the spirit soured. As men were minced up on the battlefields of France etcetera England put pressure on Australians, now more reluctant to join the conflict, to introduce conscription. A plebiscite on the issue was twice defeated and resulted in queer fish Billy Hughes being turfed out of the Labor party.

Australia was not a paradise following the end of WW1. Those men who returned were broken physically and mentally and many of them turned to alcohol and crime. Indeed, during this period the rate of crime trebled. The social impact was monstrous as the pain of the generation that fought was passed onto their sons who were in turn born into trauma.

Anzac Day is, in reality, about acknowledging the sacrifices of Australians in all different foreign conflicts, from WW1 to Afghanistan, and if the globalists have their way, we’ll soon be serving an evil alliance as it aims to tear apart Syria and install an Israeli puppet as head of state. For this has been the sad fact of all these ‘sacrifices’ and all this service – with the exception of what was derisively called our ‘chocolate soldiers’, who were, in fact, our Kokoda heroes, we fought the one war in which our nation was truly endangered; the war against Japan.

The majority of women who join the army can’t even make it through basic training but they expect us to cop this?

This fact of the glorified military history seems to overlook our Kokoda heroes in favour of those who have ‘served’ globalist adventures.

Australia had no business shooting at the Boers, or backing England in suppressing the Boxer Rebellion or fighting in Korea, or Vietnam, or Afghanistan and so on. We did so because we’re part of a global gang whose interests our sons’ blood is spilt is never ours.

The meaning of Anzac Day, to Nationalists, is, therefore, a sober meditation on the idea of an Australia independent from being forced to sacrifice our own for the goals of overseas powers, or by “serving” in an auxiliary capacity a superpower protector.

As this author types these words, the sound of young people partying fills the cool midnight air. They are loud, and they are clearly not in a sombre, reflective mood. Earlier he passed a nightclub which was unusually busy with a queue of White Australian youth stretching down the street from the bollards and rope at the doors where they had to show ID to bouncers so they can get inside and join a debauched bash with DJs and scantily clad girls.

To them, Anzac Day is a day off – a day to get wrecked. To others, who’ll be awake for the service, they fly the Aussie flag because that’s what they’re supposed to do, just like at Christmas when they’re expected to put up a tree and decorate it with tinsel. They would be offended at Nationalist suggestions that there is a falsehood to the mainstream narrative of Anzac Day, as they watch the prescribed parade, hit the early opening bars and get next to anyone who looks like a legitimate serviceman so they can exaggerate whatever military credentials or legacy they feel they can boast, play two-up, and basically adopt what they estimate is a patriotic mind-frame.

This fact of the glorified military history seems to overlook our Kokoda heroes in favour of those who have ‘served’ globalist adventures.

Attending a dawn service doesn’t make you a greater patriot than one who stays home and reads a little of the true cost of that war. It does not make you less of a Nationalist to join in either, that’s not what we’re saying. Our message is simply that the spirit of Anzac, enveloping as it does myths of heroism, mateship, and honour, qualities presumed to be in the national character, should also question our endless service to conflicts which are none of our affair, not in our national interest, and to which in the case of the Middle East and Vietnam the whole basis was morally flawed.

Once we get through that we can travel to the root of the idea of an independent Australia, and then, when we’ve found that we can rejoice in finally coming to recognise we are Australians, and not just part of a globalist franchise of multi-racial, multiculturalists whose blood is shed in the pursuance of the wealth of and the accretion of land and resources for a cabal of ugly bankers, industrialists, warmongers and Zionists.

4B8B6A6600000578-5655153-image-a-41_1524665479011.jpg
Cup day or Anzac day? Actually, believe it or not, it’s Anzac Day

 

ANDREW FORSTER & THE ALLEY KATZ — THE LEFT’S TROLLING CULTURE EXPOSED

ANDREW FORSTER & THE ALLEY KATZ — THE LEFT’S TROLLING CULTURE EXPOSED

The Left is addicted to trolling. If there were no ‘right wing’ Facebook pages, or social media sites for them to troll, they’d fade into a suffocating obscurity; seeking recognition by trying to write ‘urban rhymes’ or making personal YouTube videos or blogging about the insignificant experiences of their drab lives as if in that turgid oblivion of their soul-destroying mediocrity was the nucleus of something far more metaphysical and vital to impart to the human race.

Instead, they inhabit Facebook pages like Anonykatz and entertain themselves by being routinely un-amazed at the typically inane postings of the cognizant-dissonant on the political right of the social-media tennis court.

Their day revolves around entertaining themselves reviewing the latest sarcastically reworked ‘potatriot posts’ uploaded by the admins of their favourite pages and then lending droll witticisms as an ideological antidote to what they’re confronted with. In most cases, one group of idiots is passing judgement on another — and we don’t employ ‘idiot’ as a pejorative here, it’s simply all we can deduce by examining the pathology of the thoughts they express.

oie_4bFHMBvR1Sj0

If, say, Anonykatz had any grasp of Nationalist politics it wouldn’t even bother with the likes of Neil Erikson or Shermon Burgess, who’re blank cartridges from a circus shooting range.

These characters, like many who comment from their side of the fence, are the product of the social media identity factory and the digital age that spawned it. In the 1970s, Alvin Toffler wrote a book called Future shock predicting the absorption into a myriad of subcultures for a population divided along complex social strata, and if he was still alive, he’d deserve a cigar for this prophecy alone; although he only died in 2016 so he pretty much saw it come true. More-or-less, he predicted the Internet.

There is no political substance or even consistency of message from the flaky characters that Anonykatz fixates on and yet they’ve never bothered to address this in any scrupulous detail — they simply guffaw at the overall ideology as they perceive it — mainly because they are the flipside to the same coin.

They are no more sophisticated than those they deride. The UNA team actually read a poster responding to Nick Folkes on the Anonykatz page who claimed that Hitler went to jail with Heinrich Himmler and there devised the National Socialist German Workers Party. No Katz admin bothered to correct this boob who had the comical impudence to then censure Folkes for not being intelligent enough to have assimilated this important historical fact. But, we digress…

Antifa1

Erikson, Folkes, and Blair Cottrell are the constructions of a media that were once obsessed with the anti-Islam movement and required ‘actors’ for the narrative surrounding this multicultural society of Australia. It inflated them, and then, when it all became passé, they pricked their hides and deflated their spirits, which were always inordinately out of scale compared to the size of any actual talent they might have possessed. They now play a constant game of catch-up with that sub-tier celebrity which, of all of them, Erikson Joneses for the most.

If, say, Anonykatz had any grasp of Nationalist politics it wouldn’t even bother with the likes of Neil Erikson or Shermon Burgess, who’re blank cartridges from a circus shooting range.

Individually, none of those mentioned above is remarkable people. Yet, like most human beings, they crave attention. The need for recognition is one of the most powerful human motivators which are why there are those who’ll seek it in evil and anti-social ways, such as mass-shooters, and serial killers.

Once upon a time, this type of character was the feeder for the music industry as the promise of ‘fame’ for the not-so-talented were offered by the vision of pop stars which they looked at and thought, “I could do that too”. So they formed bands or became performance artists or did anything that might lead to that ‘break’. Andy Warhol observed all this and made one of the most astute utterances of the 20th century — that one day every person would have their fifteen minutes of fame. And Warhol understood fame better than anyone.

This is why it ill-behoves the likes of Anonykatz to feed the egos of these pseudo-revolutionaries, but to make such an assertion fails to take into account that by doing so the players from their camp are exercising their own egocentricities. Again, they are the same animal. Erikson, Folkes, Cottrell do not pursue issues, as would be expected of earnest political crusaders, but rather use a cause to promote themselves. Separated from the substance of issues, we have mere personalities, and a kind of ‘fanboy’ nationalism, which is a term coined by UNA and covered in a previous article.

TROLLING TO THE LEFT, TROLLING TO THE RIGHT

The Alt-Right gained its infamy through ‘trolling’; it doesn’t necessarily make anything better if the Left apes those tactics which, when all has been said and done, were questionable (although often hugely successful) to begin with. Let’s deal with a semantic before we get down to brass tacks here: We call this opposition ‘the Left’ for convenience purposes, or even ‘Cultural Marxists’, but that’s not necessarily accurate.

Much of what is assumed to be politically Left are actually the lackeys of the pseudo-progressive-democratic-liberal-globalist-capitalist-world-order. In the most basic reading of the morality contest underlying the narrative in which the Left is pitted against the Far Right, the former are supposedly upholding virtues that the latter dream of stripping from civic life for the sake of an authoritarian, race-based order. This assumes ‘good guys and bad guys’ when viewed through the glass of 20th century western struggles against Fascism, Japanese Imperialism, and National Socialism. Here we invoke Alvin Toffler once more because he had another insight into the future. He wrote: “The illiterate of the 21st Century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn”.

quote-the-illiterate-of-the-21st-century-will-not-be-those-who-cannot-read-and-write-but-those-who-alvin-toffler-287763

In this era, for either side, applying historical lessons, or ideologies, or prejudices from a bygone era is a glittering example of that new millennium illiteracy of which he wrote. So, with the exception of pure Nationalists, or even fluid-thinking true leftists whose worldview we may largely oppose but whose sincerity and logic we might otherwise respect, we have the ‘Katz’ — whose own obsessions are every bit as unhealthy as those provocateurs they make a subculture out of countering online.

The time has, therefore, come to bring these ‘Katz’ into the spotlight. For the main part, those posters who fill the ranks can be easily searched and profiled for themselves. But who runs Anonykatz?

In our last entry, we responded to an article by Honi Soit that claimed that we ‘doxx lefties’ under the guise of self-defence. In this case, we do it as a public service.

In our last entry, we responded to an article by Honi Soit that claimed that we ‘doxx lefties’ under the guise of self-defence. In this case, we do it as a public service.

United Nationalists Australia has been, for a long time now, flooded with requests to doxx the admin of Anonykatz. We have been given theories on who runs it, and countless links. We, therefore, posit the following as a theory which we back up with what we believe is convincing evidence. But as we doxx Anonykatz it is now incumbent on us to out one of its most consistent serial pests — Andrew J. Forster.

ANDREW ‘J’ FORSTER AKA FORESTER

There are amusing trolls, there are witty combatants, and then there are those who if they weren’t harassing people online they would be stealing women’s underwear off clotheslines and wearing it over their heads as they tortured small furry animals. Andrew Forster fits into the latter category.

Hardly a nationalist, patriot or anyone ‘rightist’ conservative has not had an uninvited excretion from the poster using the name Andrew Forster appearing in their messenger inbox. He is unbothered by any transgression of Facebook policy, about laws pertaining to electronic-devices and stalking, or even whether or not he comes across as a complete body snatcher.

He has poured vile abuse on women, accessed accounts belonging to minors, attacked the sick, and violated the privacy of at least one person grieving over the passing of a close relative. It doesn’t matter to him. He is not made of the stuff that exhibits conscience nor is he equipped with the intellectual faculties to express an ideological rationale. He is purely a sociopath with access to the Internet.

He is by no means clever — he often gets rattled when challenged to any degree and scurries off to hit the ‘block’ button even though it was he who initiated contact. It all depends on how much alcohol or pot is in his system or whether or not the methamphetamine he has smoked was of a high enough grade. All in all, his entire act is based on a war of attrition, or who will blink first.

The best response to Forster is to block him. You are not dealing with an intellect, but a lummox whose cerebral deadness serves him well in his abusive trespasses onto the accounts of others. The nature of the world he supposedly abhors in the reckoning of his political opposition is exactly the one which he inhabits online: one where ideas must be singular, where the debate gets shut down, and where other human beings are objectified and reduced to caricatures.

Hardly a nationalist, patriot or anyone ‘rightist’ conservative has not had an uninvited excretion from the poster using the name Andrew Forster appearing in their messenger inbox. He is unbothered by any transgression of Facebook policy, about laws pertaining to electronic-devices and stalking, or even whether or not he comes across as a complete body snatcher.

His profiles list him as residing in Perth. In the past, we have had intelligence pinpointing him to a certain address, but we cannot be sure that information is accurate. We do have what we are assured are images of him. We share two of his Facebook profiles, which are queer things. He seems to have a fetish for the obscure matron of the 1990s British sitcom Keeping Up Appearances, Hyacinth Bucket. In others, he has cheesy personalities from bygone pop culture decorating his bizarre user profile. Likewise, when he wants to be tricky he uses the alias Andrew Forester (see what he did there, genius).

Forster.png
Jame Gumb, stand aside, there is a new retro freak in town

UNA recently, through a lengthy operation, uncovered the address and information regarding the business practices of fake news journalist Luke McMahon. We have his residential address, and we know a lot about him now. We are in the process of uncovering even more information. The same will apply to Forster, who has made such a bore of himself we will coordinate with our people – and even those who aren’t nationalists – in West Australia to finally trace him to his lair. That will be a day he will wish had never come. Thanks to a major financial injection by a benefactor, we have resources that a year ago was not available to us.

Forester.png
Well, it’s pretty obvious Andy is an X-Genner. Note how this profile he brilliantly moves around the letters of his alleged surname to create ‘Forester’. We suggest everyone inbox him and congratulate him on his cleverness. Or just keep reporting his bogus accounts

Firstly, we have to question whether or not Forster is his actual name, and true identity. It will be easy enough to ascertain, but for the sake of discussion, we suggest that it might very well be, given the arguments about identity and ego that we’ve laid out above. It is in the psychopathology of someone like Forster to seek credit for his deeds otherwise he would operate under ever-changing aliases such as Luke McMahon has done.

Forster.png
Hip? Forster barely has a pelvis

It is also noteworthy that his profile appears on the friends’ list of lefty author John Birmingham, which might mean that Birmingham approves any old friend request, or else he is known to the man. Around 1990, when Birmingham contributed to Rolling Stone, he wrote an article about Jim Saleam and National Action that was a direct reflection of the lies being promulgated by disgraced Special Branch detective Neville Ireland; which would suggest that a relationship existed between the two. Jim Saleam complained and either a letter was published in Rolling Stone, or there was a retraction, but he cannot say for sure.

It is also noteworthy that his profile appears on the friends’ list of lefty author John Birmingham, which might mean that Birmingham approves any old friend request, or else he is known to the man.

In Birmingham’s book, Leviathan published around 2000, which is sold as “an electrifying epic history of the city of Sydney” reference was made to Jim Saleam and National Action and an incident involving an alleged theft from a woman by him and a man named Peter Coleman. The case was in dispute and when Jim Saleam confronted the publishers those extracts were subsequently expurgated from the paperback edition.

All in all, it appears that Birmingham, who models himself as a rebel, may very well have been a snitch operating with the corrupt authorities of the time.

17842257_1686981177996769_360839335_n.png
We are told this is a floor plan to Forster’s Perth home. The hydroponic chamber is listed as ‘BRM 2’

But returning to Andrew ‘J’ Forster, we are also informed that he might be lying about the ‘J’ initial in his name, as we are told his name is Andrew Robert Forster.

Whatever, the thing to do now with all his accounts, if you do not block them, is to inundate them until it becomes unviable for him to post any more of his scurrilous silliness. Troll the troll. Find him wherever he is and just let him have it. His accounts are most likely fake so there is little point in him crying to Facebook, and you can make all sorts of threats, and say any sick thing that comes into your head, because the police simply won’t do a damned thing about it and he is too compromised to make such a complaint anyhow. Go for it. He is a real petal; a total snowflake.

PETE SMITH, ARIANA KLEPAC, AND ANONYKATZ

download (2)

The most obvious eccentricity of those running Anonykatz is their obsession with felines. It goes beyond a simple shtick and into the realm of full-blown mania.

pl21
Smith and Anthony Albanese: boy the air must’ve smelt bad when that shot was taken

Therefore when it turns out that noted anti-fascist, the mushy-bellied beer-quaffing Pete Smith and his equally chubby partner Ariana Klepac are the authors of two books classified as “humour” and which reflect an almost Egyptian worship of pussycats it seems a reasonable enough contention that these two are responsible for Anonykatz. At least, this is the theory being presented to us. Obviously, we cannot say definitively, but the circumstances certainly make it highly plausible.

SmithLabor
Awww, look at that, Pete’s a Labor man, which means he’s not a proper lefty at all. Slackbastard should stop talking to him

The pair has authored the books How to Get Ahead in Business with Office Cat, and The Cat-phabet: A Guide to our Furry Overlords — From A to Z. We do not recommend you buy these books unless for some reason Kleenex is in dire shortage. Given the level of wit expressed on what may or may not be their Facebook page, the quality of humour is obviously somewhere about the level of Bill Shorten after a few snorts of paint thinners.

61FG3Xpn2dL._UX250_
Mrs Anonykatz (allegedly), Ariana Klepac, whose public persona along with her partner is as an author of two naff cat books and who looks like she applies her lipstick with a paint roller

Klepac also notably wrote a book titled Stark Raving Mod about the Mod scene in Australia from the late 1970s to 1980s. The book is currently unavailable for purchase.

17AnnStBalmain.png
The blurriness of Katz Palace (allegedly) in Balmain must be down to all the beers Pete drinks to try and make his missus look attractive. And vice versa. Ho ho… just a jolly jape, we are pretty sure both would nab first place in any swimsuit contest

What we DO know is that they both live in Balmain, or Toy World, as some wags refer to it, and if they do in fact control Anonykatz then their background could not be more perfect given the character of the suburb. However, if you want to Google their ‘publisher address’, which is Klepac’s residential & business address, you’ll encounter the extremely odd situation of finding their house blurred out on all Google Street View maps. We are not sure how, or why, one goes about getting their residence blurred out – especially when it is supplied by Google as a place of business – so we’ll just show you a blurry image of the joint which won’t mean much without an accompanying address so they can spare us any bullshit about litigation. As we say, it’s on Google anyway if you search Ariana Klepac. Both are authors which place them in the public domain and their works are therefore subject to fair comment, opinion, and literary criticism.

What also is justified editorial comment in the context of this article is Smith’s alleged connection to the convicted paedophile and former anti-fascist state informant, Alex Gollan. A former assistant principal at a Sydney school, Gollan led a double life as an anti-racist crusader, running a blog called Anti-Bogan at the WordPress site. Smith is implicated in having shared editorial responsibilities with the Gollan, who in 2016 was jailed for possession of child abuse material, released on bail, and the story sort of goes cold there. Perhaps his police handlers, long used to dealing with kiddy fiddlers, provided him with some sort of out clause. We’re sure to find out one way or another. Meanwhile, this does not cast Smith in a very convincing light as a social crusader.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113.jpg
Convicted pedo Alex Gollan was allegedly an associate of Smith

So, folks, there you have it; these anti-fascists are literally a bunch of pussies, with the gayest being Andrew Forster and his psychosexual fixation with Hyacinth Bucket. Perhaps she reminds him of the mother he’s always wanted to get into the sack. Who knows with these sickos? Adieu.

SmithCat2.png
The technical term for this item is a ‘waste of money’

A REPLY TO HONI SOIT ON ‘DOXXING’

A REPLY TO HONI SOIT ON ‘DOXXING’

UNA has received a mention in the latest analysis piece in the pinko University of Sydney student newspaper Honi Soit.

Liam Donohoe has pulled on his Care Bears’ themed oven mitts and pummeled out a piece that is balanced all the way to the left of his inculcated worldview; not that any surprise should be experienced by the reader at that revelation. This is Sydney University after all; the esteemed institution of higher learning that’s student union president is insisting its debating team become 50% female, or transgender, or any mutant derivative that doesn’t identify as ‘cisgender male’. Plus, one of his other recent write-ups was a dray spray at Australia Day in the inevitable anti-Australian vein of his democratic-liberal-pluralist-globalist-virtue-signalling-revisionist ilk. He and his genderless rabble wouldn’t know a real Aboriginal fella if he blew chunks into their avocado smash.

51d395c28109a474494e73170e27197f.jpg
Liam Donohoe needed a ladder to reach puberty

In ‘The doxxing ring’, Donohoe makes half of a fair, if not obvious, point. Both the ‘left’ and ‘right’ use doxxing to further the absolutism of their political worldview and that “…violence is a strategic necessity more than a focus of moral enquiry”. After that, he’s got nothing. We will address this remark about “violence” once we’ve stopped laughing at his picture. But first we’ll point out that Donohoe fails to mention how the mainstream media, especially Fairfax Media, is an accomplice in this nefarious practice; such as when it publishes the falsehoods of pseudo-journalists like Luke McMahon, who UNA is pleased to announce we tracked down to his privileged lair near Melbourne CBD, and who shall be helping us with our enquiries as things progress. Whether he likes it or not.

The mainstream media, in the guise of Fairfax, The Guardian, and the Australian Broadcasting Commission (ABC) have all given the fictitious ‘Andy Fleming’ (a.ka. Professor Rob Sparrow) a political platform. And yes, this self-described anarchist is all about politics, which says something about the genuineness of this Pied Piper of the anti-fascism underground who parades that ‘A’ symbol as if it actually means what it supposedly represents.

Ideally, if Donohoe’s argument holds true about United Nationalists Australia’s implacable need to “focus on the identities of Antifa activists” (a statistical falsehood if you examine our archives), then we should publish a Google street view image of McMahon’s address right here so anyone who wants to go along and cream the queer fuck has enhanced odds of doing so. If you trace those UNA has ‘doxxed’ then, aside from Rob Sparrow and Luke McMahon, whose willingness to transgress all the polite rules of journalism to score a hit regardless of how, coming with the prestige of the publication they appear in, those lies impact a person’s life, our last significant target was one Dave Gullis — a violent oaf from the left. This we raise in response to his cynical aside about us doxxing his Lefty comrades “under the pretence of self-defence”.

In the early days of last December, the trade unionist David Gullis made an uninvited visit to the Tempe headquarters of the Australia First Party. Having roused the overworked AFP leader out of bed, he subjected him to a primitive display of snarling, base name calling, witless slander, and death threats. Then he tossed the remnants of a cup of coffee at him. He was, fortunately, unable to bite his leg like a rabid dog thanks to the security gate which kept him at bay. This was not the last stop of the night, however, because he travelled five minutes up the road to the home of an AFP member and caused criminal damage to his residence while he slept. He had previously gone to the same address in broad daylight and made death threats to the tenant. The address was supplied to him by Lefty doxxers, full-well knowing the dangers he posed. Indeed, it was the very reason the address was passed on.

Legend has it that Gullis flew to Ukraine at the peak of its disturbances and fought against ‘fascists’ reputedly killing a Ukranian man whose political orientation he didn’t like. God knows how ASIO let him do so, but it doesn’t get any more ‘left’ and ‘violent’ than that. The fact that his target has never committed a single act of violence compounds the folly of Donohoe’s dismissiveness.

20171207051942777
Mental case and lefty terrorist Dave Gullis attacks the home of a Nationalist

Likewise, in 2014, when C.F.M.E.U thugs were recruited to join a march attacking Australia First Party Qld members as they held a support rally for imprisoned Golden Dawn members, Slackbastard was identified as the principal organizer of the violence. Any doubts about Sparrow’s willingness to employ violence can be dispelled here in this 1999 article he wrote Anarchist Politics & Direct Action. We quote SB as follows, “The state has more repressive force at its command than we can ever hope to muster. This is not a pacifist position. We have every right to employ force in the attempt to resist the violence of the state.”

This is the same ‘state’ that he and his minions are a beneficiary of, just by the way; they sure get enough air-time from state mouthpieces. We have no examples of the Australian right conducting campaigns of violence against this ‘Left’ that Liam defends.

Donohoe, who looks so fresh-faced it’s as if he’s only just been weaned off his mother’s tit, holds that the “far-right seems more prepared to resort to violence in order to solve its problems”. He makes this unsubstantiated, inexperienced claim (assuming he is sticking to a discussion about the Australian far-right, which UNA is NOT a representative of) immediately after exonerating the far-left by arguing, “Holding the far-left to this sort of higher standard, however, not only assumes a ‘moralistic’ concept of left-wing politics [Lol – ED], but also ignores that the far-left has little other option but to doxx”.

This is a bald-faced lie since the left doxxes first and asks (no) questions later. The reason lefties get doxxed, when their identities can finally be discovered, is because they haunt the ‘far-right’ like feminists bother men. They hide under aliases on social media and make it their entire raison d’être to pursue their hated targets from one social media page to the next. Without the far-right to fret over, they’d shrivel up and blow away like dried dog shit in a wind storm.

Here, we understand that Donohoe has invoked the American experience to justify his position, admitting violence from the far-left, but muting it by writing, “Though there certainly are real cases of Lefty violence, that there was more reporting of the “violent” hucking of hummus at Catholic Society members last November than there has been of the myriad of murders and assaults committed by the far-right”.

McMahon
Australia First Party president Jim Saleam drops a greeting card in Luke McMahon’s letterbox

What “myriad of murders and assaults committed by the far-right”? Donohoe then winds up all this thinly-veiled justification for “Lefty” doxxing and violence with a “doxxing is bad, m’kay” broadside that should just be scrunched up and flushed down the potty along with its whippersnapper author.

He failed to get inside one of the intrinsic contradictions of this whole “doxxing” thing in regards to the far-right, which he mistakenly brackets us in with. And that is just how much the ‘far-right’ doxxes its own and especially, in the well-publicized example of former chief peanut of the supposedly now-defunct Party for Freedom, Nick Folkes, who has in the past fortnight used Anonykatz to air his karmic angst against former members and perceived enemies. It is common for dross like Folkes to use Leftist channels to smear their right-side rivals.

We have had some from Folkes’s side of the kindie fence accuse us of doxxing, and here and there, in the interests of the hygiene of Australian Nationalism, we admit to having done so but only in a manner of speaking. Hell, if we wanted to, we could publish Toby Cook’s address, along with the addresses of other pond scum he associates with. But we’re not going to because without the Peanuts this Lads’ Society member and Australia’s first fully coloured Hollywood Nazi is just a walking cause of earthly famine. Let the righteous starving deal with him when they’re finally sick of him scarfing down half the nation’s food supply.

As to Liam Donohoe, next time you try to reach some sort of political maturity, try standing on a chair.

3b8f425945be8ba601fd6d10c91e107d
Doctor Doxx himself: the cosmopolitan restaurant radical Rob Sparrow who denies being Slackbastard (Lol)

 

INTER-ETHNIC WORKING CLASS SOLIDARITY IS TRIGGERING SJW RAGE

INTER-ETHNIC WORKING CLASS SOLIDARITY IS TRIGGERING SJW RAGE

If it is not already apparent to all Aussie workers, the penny will soon drop and the realisation will dawn that the system under which we live, this regime of forcible globalist cosmopolitanism (or totalitarian humanism, take your pick) was set up to be a zero-sum game.

The evidence is there for all to see and in every facet of thought and deed the monied elites and their bourgeoisie promote the idea that the world is made up of winners and losers; that based upon on an ideological consensus among the upper classes certain groups of people should profit that others should, therefore, suffer a loss in direct proportion to the gains of others.

This mindset is most obvious in the attitudes of the elites toward the White Australian workers, whose class solidarity and social mobility they deliberately set out to crush through mass Third World immigration, their ceaseless attacks upon the labour movement and trade unions and the draconian restrictions upon freedom of speech and assembly specifically targeted at the White majority.

We have also witnessed, over the past ten years, the rise of the so-called Social Justice Warrior; these eager foot-soldiers of Capitalism have bullied and harangued their way into dominance over the internet and traditional media, working tirelessly and with the zealous energy of the true fanatic in their efforts to undermine the workers and normalise the globalist corporate code of conduct.

Jacinta-Price
Jacinta Price: an effective advocate for her people, which is why she is ridiculed by the sell-outs and White SJW’s

White working-class solidarity is, of course, utterly beyond the pale as far as the SJW is concerned; they react with bug-eyed fury at the mere mention of Whites organising in their own interest, typically sputtering out a string of epithets and clichés to shame and brow-beat anyone who dares step out of line.

When we think about it, Nelly Yoa is no more or less qualified to speak on the subject of Sudanese youth than Clementine Ford can be considered an expert on women, or Jeff Sparrow an authority on racism.

We note, however, another problematic tactic which is becoming increasingly common among the more shrill social justice advocates; the practice of sidelining or aggressively shutting down advocates of working-class unity among non-White ethnic groups.

The most obvious recent example of this in the much-hyped moral panic surrounding African street gangs in Victoria; the fashion in which the SJW’s and the state’s elite have approached this problem of lawlessness among Sudanese migrants reveals their true motivation.

Nelly yoa
Nelly Yoa may be a bit of a bullshit artist but that machete scar on his arm gives him a certain authority when it comes to the subject of Sudanese gangs.

The public humiliation of a young Sudanese man, Nelly Yoa is a prime example.

Yoa, who padded his resume in order to gain a platform to express his views on integration into Aussie society and access to employment appropriate to the meagre skills possessed by wayward African youth also made the mistake of suggesting that Sudanese crime was the real threat to social cohesion in the multicultural outer Western suburbs, not “racism”.

When we think about it, Nelly Yoa is no more or less qualified to speak on the subject of Sudanese youth than Clementine Ford can be considered an expert on women, or Jeff Sparrow an authority on racism.

Snide remarks about “internalised racism” will be made about such people, implying that they are somehow under the spell of some nefarious White supremacist tendency within broader society; we would argue though that the real sellouts and crawlers are the ethnic community “leaders” who cosy up to the state and co-operate with Police and bourgeois social justice activists.

Yoa is a Sudanese youth, Ford is a woman and Sparrow is a pseudo-communist arsehole; for what its worth, due to lived experience the opinions of all three could be considered as having equal weight; in fact the SJW usually insists on personal opinions and gut feelings being given higher priority than conventional wisdom or empirical facts.

With his emphasis on youth participation in sport as a road to redemption and his suggestion that being able to stick with hard, blue-collar work, day-in, day-out is a sign of self improvement and moral strength Nelly Yoa set himself on a collision course with the people who only see the African minority in terms of success stories or perpetual victimhood.

Africans, and non-Whites, in general, are supposed to turn to the state, the White bourgeoisie or the collaborators and sell outs of the educated “Community Leadership” and mentoring groups if they need help or have taken the wrong path in life; they are not supposed to knock around with the local footy players, act White and learn a trade or set themselves up as self-taught youth workers.

VICTORIA POLICE SUDANESE COMMUNITY
The state tends to throw its weight behind “educated” SJW’s, do not be fooled into thinking that bourgeois activism of this type is an exclusively White pursuit.

In fact the term “self-appointed” is now an epithet used to deride and denigrate any person who pops their head above the parapet and speaks without the permission of the Social Justice Warriors; Nelly Yoa is not the only person to have fallen foul of this unwritten law concerning who can, or cannot, participate in discussions of multiculturalism and integration.

Another case would be that of Adelaide based Shia cleric Mohammed Tawhidi; the self-appointed “Imam Of Peace” with his hokey spiel on tolerance and the need to reform Islam and combat Jihadism he has been pilloried by the mainstream media and subject to violent assaults by vested interests within Islam and the elites.

In fact the term “self-appointed” is now an epithet used to deride and denigrate any person who pops their head above the parapet and speaks without the permission of the Social Justice Warriors; Nelly Yoa is not the only person to have fallen foul of this unwritten law concerning who can, or cannot, participate in discussions of multiculturalism and integration.

So too indigenous commentator Jacinta Price, whose no-nonsense ideas on Aboriginal advancement and reconciliation put her squarely in the crosshairs of the SJW’s; she refuses to support the narrative, so she should be no longer heard.

Snide remarks about “internalised racism” will be made about such people, implying that they are somehow under the spell of some nefarious White supremacist tendency within broader society; we would argue though that the real sellouts and crawlers are the ethnic community “leaders” who cosy up to the state and co-operate with Police and bourgeois social justice activists.

Civic patriots too are basically the SJW’s public enemy number one at the present time because they refuse to follow the narrative and not get ideas from above their station; already excommunicated and “unpersoned” by the mainstream, outfits such as the True Blue Crew and their allies are a thorn in the side of the elitists because they promise to draw non-Whites away from the sell-out ethnic councils and into an integrated, grassroots and somewhat class-conscious movement.

Unlike the Social Justice Warriors the Nationalists have seen the T.B.C in action, at close quarters, over the course of their two year development; what else are we to make of their campaign to take back the streets of the Western suburbs from the gangs and run community safety patrols but an attempt at inter-ethnic, working class solidarity?

We know the Civic Patriots have no problem mixing and working with migrants and people of colour who are willing to integrate into their particular, simplistic version of a rainbow society where everyone is welcome as long as they “respect Aussie values”; so we can confidently predict that their forthcoming planning meeting in Tarneit will be an opportunity to connect with and recruit members of the Indian, Vietnamese, Lebanese, Pacific Islander and Chinese communities.

Tawhidi
Mohammed Tawhidi, the Angry Anderson of reformist Islam

This course of action really infuriates the SJW’s because it, in their minds, threatens social cohesion; the response by the Victoria Police, the media and academia have been totally over the top, to the point of harassing and intimidating Nationalists and our allies, who have nothing in common with Civic Patriots and who take no part in their schemes.

By their deeds we can judge the Social Justice Warriors; it is clear that their vision of a cohesive society is something like modern day China; a world where the state is always right and nobody can advocate on behalf of a class of people unless they register with the authorities and toe the party line.

Our prime concerns are identity, independence and freedom for the White majority, which puts us well out into the political wilderness with the handful of genuinely radical, alternative movements.

As Australian Nationalists we are no fans of Civic Patriotism and the easy path of populism; like all things sugary and sweet excessive consumption is bad for you in the long run.

Our prime concerns are identity, independence and freedom for the White majority, which puts us well out into the political wilderness with the handful of genuinely radical, alternative movements.

If this multi-ethnic people’s rising gains momentum we hope that their participation in the mainstreamers zero-sum game causes much distress and injury to the state, it’s minions and the Social Justice Warriors.

If the Ocker integrationist and elitist cosmopolitan movements wear each other down, so much the better; the weaker the state and the less cohesive mainstream society become, the more avenues of exploitation the Nationalists will find, until the entire edifice of Globalist-Capitalism is undermined to the point of collapse.

UPF steve
Vietnamese Steve, the “New Man” of working-class Civic Patriotism

THE FIGHTING SEASON: THOUGHTS ON THE MILITARISATION OF PUBLIC SPACES FROM KABUL TO MELBOURNE

THE FIGHTING SEASON: THOUGHTS ON THE MILITARISATION OF PUBLIC SPACES FROM KABUL TO MELBOURNE

The twilight zone between the end of the festive season and the resumption of the work year is, of late, a good opportunity to make the most of our Netflix and Stan subscriptions and in amongst the growing clutter of Bollywood movies and incomprehensible Taiwanese rom-coms we were able to find a few gems with which to pass the time.

A recent addition to the lineup was Ricky Schroder’s six part documentary series The Fighting Season, which follows several units of U.S Army military advisors and their Afghan allies as they develop security arrangements in Kabul during an election campaign, hunt Taliban fighters in the countryside and attempt to kill or capture an elusive insurgent commander.

To be frank, Schroder is a propagandist of the Obama era military effort in Afghanistan and the phased draw-down of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF); in general his film leans toward supporting the narrative of the Afghan National Army (ANA) and police finding their feet and slowly taking responsibility for their own security.

The Fighting Season, however, is very revealing in its depiction of modern, highly specialised combat troops re-tasked as, basically, police units and tactical response teams on overwatch, ready to leap into action should the Afghan forces get in over their heads.

Ricky schroder
Ricky Schroder, the former 1970’s child star is now an effective propagandist for the U.S war machine

In that sense this is a curious story, it has little in common with other War On Terror films, such as Sebastian Junger’s excellent Restrepo, or the dismal spectacle of the Ben Anderson documentary This Is What Winning Looks Like; the U.S paratroopers and 10th Mountain Division soldiers as depicted by Schroder exude a barely repressed bitterness and frustration even as they repeat the talking points of the official narrative.

From the slightly loopy security commander swanning around the teeming streets of Kabul as if he is going out for ice cream in his Midwestern hometown, seemingly oblivious to the threat of suicide bombers and kidnappers; to the hardened African American forward air controller calling in bombing runs on Taliban snipers these characters all ooze a superficial confidence and self control, but it is clear that they hate what they are doing and are deeply skeptical of the mission.

To be frank, Schroder is a propagandist of the Obama era military effort in Afghanistan and the phased draw-down of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF); in general his film leans toward supporting the narrative of the Afghan National Army (ANA) and police finding their feet and slowly taking responsibility for their own security.

Part of the dramatic tension which sets the pace across The Fighting Season’s six episodes is the sense that the Americans cannot trust the Afghan civilians, or rely upon the ANA and National Police to do their jobs; these are not, however, the drug addicts, child molesters and congenital idiots shown by Vice and Ben Anderson in 2013; on the contrary the Afghan soldiers are a mixed bag, ranging from merely competent, to tactically astute and, in some cases, almost suicidally brave.

sebastian junger tim hetherington
Sebastian Junger and Tim Hetherington produced an excellent film ,Restrepo, which captured life on a remote American firebase in the wilds of Afghanistan

Whether this is a completely accurate portrayal of the real ANA is another matter, we suspect the reality lies somewhere between Anderson’s pessimism and Schroders optimism; what is interesting from the point of our social commentary is this idea of a semi-competent but poorly equipped security force moving among the general population and maintaining a physical presence on the ground; guarded all the while by a high-tech, highly effective surveillance and intelligence group and backed up by heavily armed tactical units whose only task is to respond to emergencies.

It is this three-tiered security system used by foreign occupation forces in counter-insurgency operations, on behalf of their client regimes, which caught the eye of our writers; despite differences in the tempo of operations and the nature of the threats to civilians there is much in The Fighting Season which will feel familiar to the viewers, tucked up safe in their homes in the suburbs.

To the keen observer, there are distinct parallels between the militarization of public space in Afghanistan and the hardening of security precautions, recent restructure of police forces and the massive ramping up of state surveillance in Australian societies.

col graham
Colonel John Graham , on the right, confers with his long-suffering bodyguard; the colonel is a weird sort of fellow but his story is very interesting

One of the most striking scenes in Schroder’s series shows American advisors driving around Kabul performing spot checks on Afghan police vehicle control points; the commander of the inspection team, Colonel Graham who is, as we mentioned, somewhat of a weird, reckless character spends some minutes in effusive praise of the officers who man these roadblocks, search cars and try to detect Jihadist suicide bombers as they enter the city.

To the keen observer there are distinct parallels between the militarisation of public space in Afghanistan and the hardening of security precautions, recent restructure of police forces and the massive ramping up of state surveillance in Australian societies.

What Graham is saying, if we read between the lines, is that the ANP officers, the lowest tier of the security operation, are basically expendable; it is expected that if a suicide bomber or insurgent gunman is detected that there will be police casualties and that they are only expected to hold their own until the American rapid response teams and Afghan special forces can be scrambled, with their armoured vehicles, superior training and heavy weapons.

Put that into the context of Melbourne or Sydney, sure the threat is lower here and we do not have terrorist attacks every few weeks as they do in Kabul but broadly the same tactical, counterinsurgency regime is being applied in our cities; first responders, usually general duties police, will generally be running blindly into danger during an attack and even in bucolic Melbourne it is understood that they make take casualties before the better-equipped squads are deployed.

Afghan joint
An Afghan policeman smokes a spliff while on patrol in a scene from the confronting 2013 Vice documentary This Is What Winning Looks Like

Colonel Graham proudly shows off his “Ring Of Steel” around Kabul, the picket of concrete bollards, chicanes and fighting positions which has been built across Kabul to, if nothing else, impede insurgent attacks until a counter attack can be mounted; the topic of insurgent attacks is discussed as a certainty and the one gets the sense that the lowest tier officers and fortifications are in place to absorb most of the impact, that crime cannot be prevented, only a reactive use of force is available to mop up after any initial strike on the barricades.

In our cities similar measures are now in place: in keeping with the threat levels we have concrete bollards and discrete hardening of urban infrastructure, soft checkpoints such as booze buses and Protective Service officers at railway stations and the network of private security guards, authorised officers and municipal inspectors who provide eyes on capability across the community.

The Fighting Season’s other plot-lines provide not only the most exciting battlefield action sequences but show the middle path of pro-active counter-insurgent operations; the tactics of the famed U.S 10th Mountain Division and their ANA allies sit between the nearly passive defences of the “Ring Of Steel” and the reactive elements of the ISAF Quick Reaction Force made up of paratroopers and commandos.

The young American soldiers clearly hate the Afghan locals and gleefully take on the task of “getting in the face” of suspected Taliban insurgents; it is here we can see a contrast between this middle tier of counter terrorism operations in a combat zone and the pro-active policing efforts in the suburbs of Australian cities.

The young American soldiers clearly hate the Afghan locals and gleefully take on the task of “getting in the face” of suspected Taliban insurgents; it is here we can draw a comparison between this middle tier of counter-terrorism operations in a combat zone and the pro-active policing efforts in the suburbs of Australian cities.

forward
Forward Air Controller Sergeant Letnam, his hatred of the Afghans is apparent after he calls in an airstrike on a Taliban sniper nest and the insurgents walk away from the bombed-out position grinning and denying that they are fighters.

The point of the 10th Mountain troops operation was to disrupt, disturb and confront the Taliban and other outlaws, to break their routines, rattle their nerves and if possible kill or capture the fighters and drug smugglers; they patrolled in known Taliban strongholds, rousted their supporters in the villages, confiscated any goods or weapons suspected of belonging to fighters and attempted, by show of force, to diminish the Islamists standing in the community.

Australian police will claim that they are also pro-active when it comes to fighting our own low-level Islamic insurgency and gang crime, however it is this middle tier which, to many, has been the weak link in the local response, this is the cohort which has, in the minds of many workers been hobbled by political correctness and the point of the spear, so to speak, blunted by interference from government and social justice warriors.

It is generally accepted now that the day-to-day attempts by Australian police to play the “hearts and minds” routine in high crime suburbs, particularly those with high Third World migrant populations, have been a failure; what is more, by showing weakness they have actually made the problems worse.

What the people are becoming really agitated about is the weak effort at disrupting criminals and terrorists before they become a real problem, that not enough is being done to shut down radical Islamist recruiters and other fringe dwellers; there is also general outrage over the lack of in-patient services for the dangerously mentally ill or drug addicted and the apparent hands-off approach being taken toward ethnocentric criminal gangs.

It is significant that Aussie workers have quickly cottoned on to the fact that the fortification of public spaces and expansion of heavily armed flying squads are a necessary and proportionate reaction to the current threat environment; nobody seems particularly bothered by the sight of semi-trailers being used as shields against vehicle attacks outside the Cricket, or the unmarked vans cruising the streets loaded with specialist police armed with assault rifles.

What the people are becoming really agitated about is the weak effort at disrupting criminals and terrorists before they become a real problem, that not enough is being done to shut down radical Islamist recruiters and other fringe dwellers; there is also general outrage over the lack of in-patient services for the dangerously mentally ill or drug addicted and the apparent hands-off approach being taken toward ethnocentric criminal gangs.

sog
Tactical squads only arrive as an emergency unfolds, they are a reactive force, not pro-active.

In the general discussion of the militarization of police in Australia and the wider Anglosphere the tendency is, especially among the more libertarian or SJW cliques, to criticise the obvious trappings of the heightened security posture; the self-styled “cop watchers” seem to think that a citywide crackdown on civil liberties is underway merely because the security services have been on a spending spree, purchasing new carbines, armoured vehicles and surveillance gear.

As we have shown it is the tactical posture and the way policing is being conducted in our cities which is evidence of the move toward a counterinsurgency model rather than the traditional, low-key methods of the past; the real problem then becomes the synchronisation of the three tiers of security response: the bullet sponge beat cops, security guards and the fortifications; the pro-active, day-to-day, operations to disrupt, eliminate or humiliate Jihadis and criminal gangs and the rapid reaction forces who only appear once the threat is fully realised

Older Aussies may pine for the society we had and the bright future it promised, but which was squandered by the globalists; unfortunately there is the way things ought to be and the way things are; if Melbourne and Sydney are starting to resemble Kabul then half measures, a compassionate approach and political correctness have no place in the system.

If we are to accept this new security regime, which it is clear we must, at least in the short term purely as a matter of self-preservation then we expect the middle tier of state counter-terrorism operators and ASIO goons to emulate the 10th Mountain division in proportion to the scale of the threat.

If the cops are not kicking in the doors of rogue Imams, leaning hard on self-styled immigrant “community leaders” and making the lives of slacker Jihadis and ethnocentric street gangs utterly miserable then front line cops will have their blood spilled over those concrete bollards before the rapid reaction force can arrive, their bravery and that of the citizens who rush forward into danger will all count for nothing.

We, the workers of Australia, know what has to be done and we know why these very real but wholly imported threats to our lives have been allowed to fester all these years; we know that terrorism and ethnic gang crime is a direct result of globalist-capitalism, the vanity and cynicism of upper-class Whites and the creed of totalitarian humanism.

Older Aussies may pine for the society we had and the bright future it promised, but which was squandered by the globalists; unfortunately there is the way things ought to be and the way things are; if Melbourne and Sydney are starting to resemble Kabul then half measures, a compassionate approach and political correctness have no place in the system.

If we are to suffer under an insurgency where terrorism and gross crimes of violence are simply to be accepted as part of the “enriching” multicultural tapestry, then the security forces need to get serious; they should at least get the three tiers of policing working effectively, in the manner of ISAF and the SJW’s, politicians and do-gooders need to be kicked to the curb and no longer heard.

ring of steel
Afghan National Police: Expendable personnel deployed in the “Ring Of Steel” to absorb attacks, rather than repel them

WHAT DOES THE AFRICAN GANG MEME REALLY SAY ABOUT AUSTRALIA?

WHAT DOES THE AFRICAN GANG MEME REALLY SAY ABOUT AUSTRALIA?

As expected, the powers that be in the state of Victoria and beyond have been dragged, kicking and screaming, into a debate over youth crime and more specifically Sudanese gang crime in Melbourne.

There are a few memes concerning the issue bouncing around in cyberspace, some of them prescient, some ludicrous, while some are blatant Strawman arguments, it falls upon Nationalists, the only true outsider political tendency, to put some pressure on these talking points by, to some extent, playing Devil’s advocate.

The foremost and most popular among the bourgeois commentariat is the usual obfuscation of the issue with the cry: “Not all Africans!”

This defensive tactic is popular in the milieux who gain most of their insight into the workings of the world through the lens of ABC, Guardian and SBS editorials; we suspect that the intended outcome is that people will be shamed into remaining silent on the very real issue of Black gang crime when confronted with immigrant success stories and interviews with well dressed, articulate Africans.

sneetches_on_beaches
The Star-Bellied Sneetches thought they were all that and more, unfortunately, today’s SJW shows far worse character than any snooty Sneetches did

What we have here is just another case of filibustering by the Bourgeois media; the domination of public discourse with white noise, irrelevant information and the diversion of necessary and healthy democratic debate into side issues and intellectual dead-ends is a time-worn tactic.

In fact this tactic reveals the deep cynicism and arrogance of the upper castes; they seem to believe that if they can filibuster on the airwaves for a couple of 24 hour news cycles during a time of crisis, or widespread public disquiet, then the working classes will get sick of the noise and, easily distracted as we appear to those above, quickly move on to some other garish spectacle.

What we have here is just another case of filibustering by the Bourgeois media; the domination of public discourse with white noise, irrelevant information and the diversion of necessary and healthy democratic debate into side issues and intellectual dead-ends is a time worn tactic.

The Not All Africans meme is also problematic on other levels due to the fact that if it fails to mollify the population, as it has in recent weeks due to a spike in Sudanese gang crime and bullying targeting working class people, then it opens the door to widespread discrimination against very specific groups of people.

We understand that the upper castes do not want the little people thinking about big questions, that is why in Victoria it is a criminal offence to notice, then publicise obvious ethnic differences; nevertheless, think we do and the realisation soon comes that the more concentrated the demographic profile of serious youth offending becomes, the worse the true picture must be.

Let us take at face value the assertion that not all African migrants are troublemakers, which is obviously the case, so what we are left with is a very specific demographic cohort, Sudanese under the age of 30; in other words refugees from Sudan and their locally born children are the problem and given their astronomical rates of offending relative to their small population this becomes very much an issue of ethnicity.

1200px-Death_of_General_Gordon_at_Khartoum,_by_J.L.G._Ferris
Gordon of Khartoum, the original Social Justice Warrior captured in monochrome as his life is snuffed out by slaveholding Sudanese Muslims

The profile of “African” offenders can be broken down further, it is mainly the negroid South Sudanese who are the problem, Sudan, of course, is a racially, religiously and linguistically divided region with Muslim Arab influence in the north and tribal Negro populations in the south, this further concentration when taken in the context of their importation into our country makes the whole mess into a political question.

As well informed people will know the Sudan conflict began with the Arab Muslim conquest of Byzantine Christian Egypt in the year 642; Muslim slavers have been ranging south into Africa ever since, despite numerous interventions by outside forces intent on abolishing the trade in Negro slaves, notably the British and lately the United Nations.

Let us call the Sudan problem by its proper name, it is a near 1500 year race war in which the intellectually and materially superior Muslim Northerners have dominated the Negro populations of the south, who never developed beyond the stage of bronze age cattle herding, tribal society and animistic spiritualism.

We understand that the upper castes do not want the little people thinking about big questions, that is why in Victoria it is a criminal offence to notice, then publicise obvious ethnic differences; nevertheless, think we do and the realisation that the more concentrated the demographic profile of serious youth offending becomes, the worse the true picture must be.

The politicians of the Howard era immigration ministry, notably Phillip Ruddock and Amanda Vanstone, therefore, went on a mission to deliberately induct into our society the most helpless specimens of the losing side in a centuries-long racial struggle, all in the name of compassion and for the international prestige of their regime.

This analysis is borne out not only in the appalling behaviour of the Sudanese migrants and their inability to integrate, which became a problem as soon as they arrived and were concentrated in housing commission areas, it is the attitudes expressed by their spokesmen and apologists which totally give the game away.

Every time Sudanese migrants run out of control, be it in the context of a gang attack, the grotesque family violence which wracks their community or as a result of their general lack of intelligence the “community leaders” are wheeled out to decry the lack of resources and government guidance allocated to Sudanese people; in other words the senior members of that ethnic group clearly came here with the expectation of unlimited handouts and a free ride through life for their kids.

GrapesWrath_030Pyxurz
For the Joad family, the acceptance of welfare in the refugee camps of California was a grave moral issue

As Ma Joad in John Steinbeck’s masterpiece, The Grapes Of Wrath observed: “Charity leaves a stain”; never a truer word was written and in the Sudanese we have seen the importation, by ill-informed do-gooders, of a group of people with an ingrained welfare mentality into a social security system which does not tolerate slackers and malingerers.

What does this say about the status of the Sudanese in Australia and the refugees of the 21st century generally?

Comrades, never underestimate the vanity and cynicism of the politicians and managerial castes of the globalist cosmopolitan enterprise; they will do anything and say anything to achieve their end goal of the destruction of all nationalities and ethnic identities in the name of capitalism.

Australians are pretty good at looking after people with special needs, the aged and disabled care systems, while not perfect, work well for the most part and peoples basic needs are met, lessening the burden on families; however the system is not set up to cater for people with special needs based on ethnicity and family history.

Are Sudanese leaders asking for their ethnic group to become wards of the state in some sense?

Why is it up to the government to provide unlimited material support and guidance and to give a failing group of people, who when taken as a whole are nothing but trouble a free ride?

Rhetorical questions aside we cannot be too hard on the refugees when they were obviously sold on the idea of migration with a pack of lies by recruiters in the refugee camps all those years ago; after all, having been supported, for free, by the U.N for many years these people could be excused for thinking that everyone in developed societies receives the same indulgences and whole of life welfare support.

1200px-Elderly_swagman
An Aussie down on his luck, in the era before social security “humping Bluey” up and down the East coast, was the only way to survive

Comrades, never underestimate the vanity and cynicism of the politicians and managerial castes of the globalist cosmopolitan enterprise; they will do anything and say anything to achieve their end goal of the destruction of all nationalities and ethnic identities in the name of capitalism.

We are at the point, in 2018, where a group like Campaign Against Racism And Fascism, which is directly connected to the regime, will spread blatant lies about an assault on a Muslim woman to goad immigrant youth into fighting with police, as happened in the Milo Yiannopoulis counter-demonstration in Kensington recently.

Even as the anti-racism spiel is wearing thin and significant numbers of migrants from other, non-White ethnic groups are speaking out about Sudanese dysfunction the elites and their bourgeois agents in the “Social Justice” sphere are doubling down on the rhetoric and lashing out at all who dare challenge their dogma, to the point of going to ridiculous and dangerous extremes.

We are at the point in 2018 where a group like the Campaign Against Racism And Fascism, which is directly connected to the regime, will spread blatant lies about an assault on a Muslim woman to goad immigrant youth into fighting with police, as happened in the Milo Yiannopoulis counter-demonstration in Kensington recently.

The point of that exercise was to create the conditions for a progressive, White led “Black Lives Matter” movement, as evidenced by their follow up rally in the same neighbourhood some weeks later; what is implicit in the actions of CARF is that they are prepared to see immigrant youths incarcerated or, hopefully from their perspective, gunned down by the Pigs if it helps the cause of globalist progress.

This is where things stand in the first days of 2018, if history is our guide the current crop of Sudanese gang members will burn out and fade away within a few years, however, the dark, malignant core of the globalist system remains, with its determined race baiters and the freaks who daydream of an unthinking, coffee coloured humanity which does nothing but consume and generate debt to the oligarchy.

Sudanese do not belong in our society, this much is true, but they are here and we must never stop pointing out the reasons why they were imported and repeating the names of the people responsible for the refugee disaster in order to prevent them from making the situation infinitely worse.

895369-amanda-vanstone
Former immigration minister Amanda Vanstone shows off her prized Juan Peron action figure in the hope of redeeming herself in the eyes of the working class