UNITED NATIONALISTS AUSTRALIA BANNED FROM FACEBOOK

UNITED NATIONALISTS AUSTRALIA BANNED FROM FACEBOOK

The Facebook page of United Nationalists Australia has been banned by the globalist powers operating the social media platform.

There has been a spate of such censorship recently, with any page opposing Islam, fake refugees, or globalism having their plugs pulled on the grounds of what is suggested to be “hate speech”. The most notable of these, apart from us was the United Patriots Front, which had been promoting such Zionists as Avi Yemini anyway, so go figure.

In fact, in the lead up to our hell-banning, an ultra-globalist Facebook page hosted a number of feral scabs purporting to have reported just about anything to get us taken down. And Facebook responded.

We received a message that the logo we use, two White hands shaking, breached community standards. Which community? What standards? Left-wing extremists like Antifa posting images of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro? They are the community? They determine the political standards? We could have posted a picture of a kitten. It wouldn’t have mattered.

The editor-in-chief of UNA has been banned a number of times for posting material on our former page that upset both the civic patriots and the snowflakes on the left. On one memorable occasion, his personal Facebook account was given a 30-day ban for posting the word “Amen”. This demonstrates that there are no community standards — all there are is a set of algorithms responding to a dedicated troll force committed to banning pages they don’t like.

There is no human force tending the light at the end of the tunnel, mainly as there is no light.

We received a message that the logo we use, two White hands shaking, breached community standards. Which community? What standards?

It is a sad reflection for nationalists that we cannot summon the same amount of will and energy to return the favour, but the problem isn’t so much which group gets the most takedowns, but the fact that we have become dependent on (((Facebook))).

This is quite pathetic, but Facebook has such a monopoly on communication flow, that many are hopelessly hooked on the audience numbers, which are massive.

rsz_18554436_447245232304406_1539718614_n
The image of the shaking hands breached Facebook’s “Community Standards”

This is the thing, it has become like trying to host an anti-Zog meeting at a synagogue — we are in an untenable position.

It is well-known that epochal traitor and peace criminal, German chancellor Angela Merkel met with Facebook’s chief rabbi Mark Zuckerberg asking him to ensure action was taken to stop any dissenting commentary about the rapeugee invasion of Europe, which she, along with her master George Soros, engineered. Moreover, from news reports covering the removal of the UPF’s page, it seems Australian pages are now being deemed “hate speech” and removed, possibly, too, because of government requests. Frankly, we do not know either way, and Facebook is not making any statements.

This is quite pathetic, but Facebook has such a monopoly on communication flow, that many are hopelessly hooked on the audience numbers, which are massive.

This, despite the loss of the instant audiences and large reach that Facebook offers, is an opportunity. It makes no sense to be captive to globalist forces with such important activism to pursue. Just as Stormfront Downunder became an untenable platform for Australian nationalists due to the high penetration of leftist trolls, conservative saboteurs such as Howard Crawford, and lunatics so Facebook has been more trouble than it is worth.

It is evident that despite being able to command audiences in the tens of thousands, none of this ‘reach’ has had much practical application. The political arm of the United Patriots Front, Fortitude, was intended to sign up users and establish a political party but — in spite of having tens of thousands of page likes — they barely got a trickle of memberships.

2CDCC5C800000578-3252209-image-a-11_1443456957855
Zucc and Merkel meet to silence Globalism’s critics, especially those upset at being raped and killed in Europe by fake male refugees of fighting age

For all the social media activity of Reclaim Australia, except for a fleeting moment, none of that activity ever translated to bodies on the street when it came to demonstrations. As such, the validity of these vast numbers has proven to be an illusion.

Why then suffer all the pain of feeding globalist parasites like the anarchists who seem to exist only to be outraged by patriot Facebook pages?

The nationalist community is as divided on Facebook as it is in the corporeal world. Instead of uniting under one group, subscribing to one page, there are a plethora of these pages of which most are simply newsfeeds regarding non-White crime. Nobody was ever happy to just participate, everyone had to go out and start their own thing, which is both a positive and a negative.

Why then suffer all the pain of feeding globalist parasites like the anarchists who seem to exist only to be outraged by patriot Facebook pages?

United Nationalists Australia went out of its way to buck this ‘pointing at the news’ trend. We refused to subscribe to the central tenet that Facebook audiences could not read anything wordier than a caption. Instead of grammatically impoverished one-sentence introductions to the same news all the other pages were sharing, we made the nationalist community, and anything affecting it, the subject of our focus, in very long, often complicated essays that challenged the reader.

And it worked! In fact, it worked so well that we became — disregarding our meek number of page ‘likes’ — one of the most influential voices of the nationalist pages. As we said, the civic patriots detested us, and often had our material removed, as did the lefties, challenged by the fact we are brainier than they are.

Now it is time to look to the future. If we have only a small community, let that community come to places where they will not become trolled, banned, harassed by the scum of the left; or misdirected by the Zionist-operated civic patriots.

Let them come to places where word of mouth can spread, and only those truly dedicated interact.

Leaving Facebook is a MUST. All nationalists must surrender the apathy of Facebook and make a serious effort. We must deprive Zucc of our patronage and the advertising dollars that automatically accompany our presence. No more will we be at the mercy of “community standards” which only reflect those eager to destroy White nations — and have the White race bred off with every black and brown monkey on the planet.

In this, we shall lead the way. The UNA blog will soon become UNA media, and we will operate where the whores of mammon cannot touch us.

En garde, Zucc, your filthy skype days are numbered!

facebook-jew

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

Enthusiastically waiting to see your enemy’s name appear in the obituary is, perhaps, something a Seinfeld episode should have tackled. But in absence of a half-hour sitcom mocking the ethics of such a scene comes our rather blunt desire to see in big, beautiful text the confirmation of conservatism’s departure from this world for good.

And it would be a mercy. The ideological vagrant of the modern era is in agony; a shadow of its former self that, in losing its mental faculties gave us the playbook for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation; in losing control of its bowels gave us the Party for Freedom to clean up; and in its jittered ramblings at night gave us the Patriot’s Poet to, well, laugh at. And why wouldn’t we laugh?

Who would have thought that acquiring oriental wives, rampant alcoholism and aimlessly flying the Star of David would in any way forms the face of modern conservatism – that safeguard of traditionalism? In a way that says more about the progressive left if this is the standard an acceptable alternative is held to, but nonetheless, we diagnose cancer as cancer when we see it.

As befitting of an extended life, however, conservatism is a broad grouping of ideas and practices that through the centuries melded into particular localities and built up its own organic character.

Before the Tories of the U.K. and the Republicans of the US succumbed to the dreariness of the modern world and became the stock-standard “centre-right” parties – which plague our present-day political institutions with equal parts boredom and treason – there was, if only from a historical standpoint, more character and life prevalent in the internal workings of the party and its duties within the country.

Such a thing can be admitted without the analysing of the good or ill that became of these entities. Suffice to say that compared to its modern manifestation there was something that, from our perspective, draws less ire than the present set against the historic backdrop of actual traditionalism holding ground.

Though conservatism is a term seldom used as the main grouping of its constituent factions, it is the college where civic nationalists, patriots and other assorted fruit loops graduated from even though they try to paint themselves in a different light. As the main tributary, it is conservatism, particularly in regards to combatting the progressive left over the prominent issue of Islam and the extreme end of identity politics, that guides the more hard-line, right-wing groups.

By our standards, they are in their formulation reactionary without the reaction. The scattering of conservatism in Australia is less a developed ideology but rather pub-banter that became a little too rowdy.

Their analysis of a world gone awry fuelled their febrile imagination. Islam, the left, and the agreement that the Liberals had betrayed the core tenets of conservatism amounted to a call to arms of an invigorated force to take to the streets. Through its brief public rallies and continued online presence, it revealed to be inept at forming any manner of lasting policy that actually worked for the best interests of this country. Its tenure among our acceptance went from weak to its now non-existent status.

So when will it die?

The ideas of man are invested with his own similarity, and an idea’s death follows a metaphysical equivalent of the biological process whereby the cessation of its vital functions leads to its absolute end.

The conservative has sealed his own fate because while he sees the nation as the vital organ he refuses, to his fatal detriment, to recognise the nation as the culmination of race and culture; not cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism and every perversion betwixt which he defends and fruitlessly tries to tame in order to avoid the baneful accusation of racism.

It is ironical that conservatives ultimately laud the version of our nation that was designed by their apparent enemies on the left. For what else is the presentation of the 21st century, multicultural Australia but the great fantasy of progressives as the first stage of removing the nation state and its racial identity?

Indeed its days are numbered but there are no doubts conservatism’s last moments will be messy, and there’s no telling what yet-to-be-revealed horrors will spew forth from its ideological orifices in a last attempt to show there’s life in it.

In these times it won’t be bothered to keep up the façade there’s any real difference between itself and the left, but will instead – as we have seen – go after the force that exposed and systemically broke down its lies: Nationalism. It is Nationalism which remains the inextinguishable light of reason.

Its pillars are unchanging. Its leaders – both here and abroad in friendly movements – are some of the most besmirched figures in existence and yet remain defiant to their ideals.

As the leaders of fake conservatism rot, the former adherents to such leeches will atone for their misguidance by embracing Nationalism, in fact, they will realise it was what they were after all along: a place to call home among their own people.

God willing, here is another nail in the coffin of the unconvinced as to why our expedient wish for the demise of conservatism and its inbred children is not morbid gossip, nor a critique for the sake of a critique, nor a selfish ruse on our behalf, but a necessity on which the termination of this foul parasite can allow our own ideals to truly flourish; where those ideals are that of the nationhood of Australia: an Australia that lives up to its historic creation as a nation built by the White man and for the sake of the White man.

oie_qPhWNDomOMRR

THE LEFT ARE NOT TAKING HANSON AND THE CONSERVATIVES SERIOUSLY

THE LEFT ARE NOT TAKING HANSON AND THE CONSERVATIVES SERIOUSLY

It has been a while since we published any substantial articles on those formations which, for the sake of brevity and clarity, we must still describe as the Left.

It is true that the Left has gone into rapid decline over the last ten years, we could put that down to their ageing supporter and activist bases, or the fact that they failed to produce enough children of their own who could carry forth the values of their parents.

That last point makes some sense when viewed in a historical context; we would expect that the political radicalisation toward the left of disaffected Irish immigrant labourers with a houseful of mouths to feed may have been somewhat easier to achieve than the indoctrination of, relatively speaking, well off and child-free workers in the current year.

A failure to radicalise one generation effectively breaks the chain and denies a movement any real sense of cohesion and continuity, few people are going to become invested in something which seemingly has no future.

While it is still possible to radicalise a tiny minority of young people, undergraduate girls, for the most part, these “conversions” are almost always temporary; these youths, with few exceptions, grow up to be middle of the road liberals or soppy social democrats.

The changing nature of work in the 21st century could be said to have contributed to the Left’s freefall into obscurity, as would the significant demographic changes wrought by 20 years of relentless immigration from the third world; our theory that the immigration program is now “rigged for success” valuing, most of all, quality over quantity seems more prescient now than ever.

A failure to radicalise one generation effectively breaks the chain and denies a movement any real sense of cohesion and continuity, few people are going to become invested in something which seemingly has no future.

It would be difficult to recruit the conservative, conformist minded and deeply religious Asians of the new Australian middle class to Left groups using their currently ubiquitous tactics of pilfered subaltern identity politics, humourless satire, censorship, pseudoscience and character assassination.

Australian Leftists also fell into the same trap as many on the right; as political tendencies of all shades have mostly retreated to internet safe spaces where only compliments are allowed, dissent can be easily squashed by a few mouse clicks and the flow of information strictly controlled.

The result of this has been the proliferation of loosely organised micro-groups and flash mobs, whose outlook is conceived in an internet echo chamber and whose aesthetics are that of internet pop-culture; veteran campaigners such as the U.S based Maoist Jason Unruhe have also noted with dismay the rise of this “alt-Left” to counter the equally problematic alt-Right.

As Nationalists well know, this insistence by some people on taking to the streets their internet role playing, with its eclectic mix of foreign and just completely made-up folklore, has not produced a stable base on which to stand a cohesive and durable activist collective.

This all begs the question: If not the Left, with all its material resources and residual goodwill from the days when it actually stood for working Whites, then who on the political scene besides the Nationalists is fit to stand against the approaching juggernaut of the LNP and One Nation coalition?

Australian Leftists also fell into the same trap as many on the right; as political tendencies of all shades have mostly retreated to internet safe spaces where only compliments are allowed, dissent can be easily squashed by a few mouse clicks and the flow of information strictly controlled.

Comrades, we are, of course, in no way suggesting any sort of alliance or compromise between ourselves and the “Loony Left”, in most cases the enemy of our enemy is just another enemy, however the prospect of widespread acceptance by the White workers of the Hanson deception, purely because there are no other options, is a real cause for concern.

Inasmuch as we can trust opinion polls, the recent surveys indicating a One Nation-LNP victory in the 2018 Victorian election are notable for one thing, they suggest a substantial defection of Labor voters toward the Hanson camp; this information will surely add to the sense of ill foreboding which must, by now, hang like a black cloud over the Daniel Andrews team offices in Treasury Place.

Consider the implications here; we have workers in the most Left friendly state in the federation abandoning their traditional party, the ALP, for an anti-worker, pro-globalist, conservative snake-in-the-grass like Pauline Hanson and her cohort of conspiracy nuts, rural knuckle draggers and unfathomable multicult freaks.

Nationalists understand the reasons for this disillusionment among White workers, the Victorian ALP is rotten, from the branch level to the caucus the party is riddled with crooks and bourgeois opportunists.

From the thieving MP’s like Don Nardella and Telmo Languiller, to the corrupt union bosses who hold sway over the rank and file and the morally bankrupt grassroots leaders, such as the appalling Intaj Khan in Wyndham, the party is no longer seen as something which working people of good conscience and who hold on to healthy values can support.

Nationalists understand the reasons for this disillusionment among White workers, the Victorian ALP is rotten, from the branch level to the caucus the party is riddled with crooks and bourgeois opportunists.

The problems also extend to the policies of the ALP and the leadership style of Daniel Andrews’ Left faction, deficiencies which are mirrored, to a large extent, in the other state branches as well as the federal parliamentary party.

The very policies which have, in large part, caused the electoral collapse of the Left and opened the door to right wingers are still being employed, in the most pig-headed fashion, as a supposed defence against conservatism and Hansonism; we could cue that old Albert Einstein quote about the definition of madness here, but the Left are not really mad in that sense, they are simply lazy, smug and complacent.

Identity politics, feminism and poorly written satire will be no match for the likes of Kevin Andrews and his murder of Crows in the Liberal right and who knows what manner of suburban Frankenstein’s monsters Pauline will cobble together as candidates; the Leftists can scoff, roll their eyes and make fun to their hearts content, but unless they start to take their politics seriously they can expect to lose, big time.

We have no words of encouragement to offer the Left, we merely point out that they are on the road to ruin, our solution to their problems is simply to ask the genuine radicals among them to jump ship and become Australian Nationalists.

For that is the real political battle of our age, the struggle between globalist-capitalism and Nationalism.

Our side will continue with our programme of White radicalisation, as we always have, but calling Pauline Hanson a racist from your internet safe space and expecting the White working class to self-radicalise on the basis of hollow virtue signalling and confected moral panics is worse than doing nothing, it actually makes resistance to globalism harder across the board.

oie_h7XOIyDK6dnW

COMMIES KVETCH WHILE NATIONALISTS NOSH

COMMIES KVETCH WHILE NATIONALISTS NOSH

Well, comrades, the Bendigo Three have made their initial appearance in the Melbourne magistrates court on trumped up, political charges relating to the now infamous mock ISIS beheading video shot in 2015.

The Nationalist contingent arrived just as the doors to the court building were opening, once we had negotiated the police cordon outside and gone through the rigmarole of the security screening we repaired to the foyer coffee shop, to wait.

See that is the main feature of the Victorian justice system, the glacial pace at which it moves; in the end, the hour and some minutes we waited were well spent as we mingled with the supporters of the three accused men.

Even though there is a serious divide between Nationalists and Civic Patriot groups the mood was upbeat and the conversations between members of the different groups were civil, convivial even.

patriot woman
A lone patriot protester who should have been INSIDE the court rather than confronting the few dozen protesters outside

Two feral spies from the No Room For Racism grouplet were skulking about early in the piece, attempting to take video on their phones but were quickly spotted, confronted by some Nationalist women and sent packing.

Things were going swimmingly on our side as the stereotypical chanting of the anti-racists could be heard wafting in from the street like a bad smell; that was until the arrival of “Antifa Neil” Erikson and his new bum-chum “Serbian George” Jameson, who were inexplicably dressed in white Haji style robes and carrying Muslim prayer mats.

Contrast this with the Nationalist and Patriot supporters who opted either for suits and ties or smart casual wear out of respect for the defendants, the court and each other.

This pathetic duo of impostors and their minuscule band of hangers-on were a sad sight to behold as they stood to one side of the foyer, ostracised by their former comrades and guarded by a detachment of riot police.

Eventually the defendants were called to the chamber but the demand for seating in the courtroom outstripped the limited supply, as a result a sizeable contingent of Bendigo Three supporters had to remain in the foyer while the hearing took place, the wait was quite short and the news was relayed back that the case had been adjourned until late May.

The court was soon empty and the foyer once again full of Nationalists, Patriots and police officers; keen to get on with their operations the senior officers and public order squads marshalled us into their cordon and gave us their instructions on how we were to exit the building.

Walking quickly, as directed by the coppers we were marched out into the blazing morning sunlight to be greeted by the usual screaming mob of retired teachers, spotty student types, meth-head looking spastics and superannuated union representatives.

Some thirty in number this foolish assembly of movement has-beens and their juvenile acolytes might easily have been mistaken for a long lost element of some 1970’s era Vietnam war moratorium march.

As these “Anti-Racists” struggled weakly against the police cordon we were struck by the absence of one notable contingent: the Antifa or Black Bloc hooligans.

We suspect that there has been a split between the Anarchists and the union-backed rent-a-crowd which is run out of Trades Hall, this is the third rally in succession at which there has been no Antifa presence to speak of.

In any event, the Anarchists would have been up against it had they tried to harass or attack the Patriots and Nationalists, many of our people expressed disappointment at the lack of argy-bargy and the tiny turnout of leftists.

As we walked down Lonsdale street and the Bendigo Three were mobbed by the media, one smart-alec lefty decided he would try to video some of the Patriots, only to have his phone slapped out of his hand by a tiny blonde haired woman and almost copping a punch in the head from her boyfriend.

After Erikson, Jameson and their cast of morons had beaten a hasty retreat in a Taxi the media circus moved into Healey’s lane, behind the court complex and as the police contingent departed we stood for some time talking and enjoying the cool, shaded cafe area.

Soon it was time to bid goodbye to the Patriots and folk who’d stood beside Chris Shortis and Blair Cottrell; the Nationalists sought out a pub, enjoyed a counter lunch and spent the rest of our time together socialising and enjoying the afternoon.

We look forward to the next hearing in May, which, despite the ordeal for the defendants will no doubt be another good opportunity to get together with our comrades; we wonder how the state will proceed with its case and we are curious to see if the Left can still muster a credible counter rally in Melbourne?

Screen Shot 2017-03-09 at 3.37.05 pm
Chris Shortis was the embodiment or radical nationalism on the day

NICK FOLKES — THE IDIOT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING

NICK FOLKES — THE IDIOT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING

Nick Folkes is lamenting SBS bias after appearing in their race-baiting virtue-porn reality series The Truth About Racism.

Speaking to the Daily Mail, Folkes has said, “It’s completely biased. SBS is only interested in showing the token White guy as a bigot and racist.”

In the program, which is one of a genre paid for by the Australian taxpayer and aimed at demonising us as low-intellect bigots blocking social progress, Nick faces off with serial Sudanese Moslem Yassmin Abdel-Magied. During a “scientific test” centred on empathic reactions to pain, he is accused of exhibiting less empathy for people of colour. They obviously don’t know about his wife and children who are all yellow; although by all accounts he hasn’t much compassion for them either, so maybe that’s not such a great example. Moreover, the test is supposed to measure brainwaves so we’d be astounded if Nick’s monitor registered any activity at all.

This “test” is based on the Milgram Experiments of 1961, in which participants were encouraged to administer electric shocks to a subject to evaluate their willingness to accede to authority regardless of the ethical component. Stanley Milgram, who concocted the research, was a Jew and the tests were inspired by the trial of Adolf Eichmann occurring in Jerusalem around the same time.

Meanwhile, Abdel-Magied is the latest in a never-ending stream of ‘others’ who are granted societal privilege in Australia so they can highlight how unjust we are. They occupy a place in media as semi-political figures standing sentries for multi-racialism and even when they fuck up like Yassmin did after she was caught on social media asking for pointers on Sharia Law from a radical Islamic, they roll out of it spotless.

This is the narrative, and this is the purpose of the show. Only masochists and anti-White voyeurs would tune into that piffle. As we have said, they have reduced the ‘Aussie racist’ stereotype to household entertainment: an idiot who can be caught on spy camera and used for the quasi-religious catharsis of the virtue signalling elites.

But this is SECOND TIME that Folkes has thrown himself at the feet of the anti-White public broadcaster in his unquenchable thirst for notoriety. He made a nana out himself in 2014 when he appeared in Living with the Enemy. Folkes should have learned his lesson by then, but then Nick has no shame; he would pull down his pants and play with his willy if there was an audience.

Folkes had, prior to the televising of this dreck, engaged in his usual game of signalling ambiguously on sentiments of White pride. We happen to know that he has questioned privately Australia First Party’s policy on Whiteness, which he regards as extreme.

As such, it is unsurprising when he makes comments like, “I believe Australia is a tolerant country, and most people don’t make opinions based on skin colour.”

Nationalists understand there should be very few occasions when we agree to speak to the mainstream media. There is no question of them NOT skewing their reportage, which is why they are so eager to buttonhole us.

But Nick’s type isn’t about what is sensible any more than he represents patriotic activists around Australia. Folkes is, if anything, a showman. He is in it strictly for the publicity and the less easily classifiable rewards that come from being an infamous person.

Folkes complaining about being duped by SBS is like complaining about contracting salmonella after eating at an Asian chew ’n’ spew.

10686607_366509190185792_6825946808527311876_n
Is Nick a buffoon? We will let you make up your own mind

 

WHAT IS OUR PROBLEM?

WHAT IS OUR PROBLEM?

Readers of our social media pages over the past week will have noticed another flare-up in hostilities between us Nationalists and the self-styled “far right”.

We will not get hung up on details here, scroll down and it is all there for the world to see, the reasons behind this enmity, however, bear repeating.

At this point in time we are prepared to declare that the patriot movement, by the actions of its prominent spokesmen is now an anti-Australian movement; that said we do reserve some sympathy for the White workers and marginalised people who have been gulled by these rats.

In their desperation to defend themselves against the superior politics and quicker wits of the Nationalists, the patriot talking heads have devised ever more bizarre and convoluted additions to their already shambolic platforms.

Indeed, these Wombats have taken the definition of Australian identity into territories not even explored by the most drug-addled, schizophrenic examples of the Leftist ideologue.

“Anything but White!” may as well be the new catch cry of the patriot movement; it is this total negation of the true Australian identity which sets them apart from the Leftists; at least the left-leaning anti-Whites, in their genocidal rage against the “system” mostly agree with our definition of Australianism.

In their desperation to defend themselves against the superior politics and quicker wits of the Nationalists, the patriot talking heads have devised ever more bizarre and convoluted additions to their already shambolic platforms.

The White issue is inescapable, while we do not play identity politics in the Nationalist milieu the concept of Australian identity is set in stone as far as most people are concerned; even the self-hating White in his aboriginal flag T-shirt seeks to atone for his whiteness and, by doing so, at least acknowledges his heritage.

Far from being self-hating Whites, with a clear sense of identity, the senior patriots just seem to hate consciously White people in general; we struggle to find another interpretation of their thinking since, aside from Muslims, they only criticise people who are comfortable in their own skin, or repentant of it, as the case may be.

hasnon
The queen of Civic Patriotism with two little piccaninnies

Nationalists may regard psychoanalysis as Jewish pseudo-science but there does seem to be a degree of almost Freudian projection at work among the patriots.

Given the obviously poor life choices, bad habits and curious allusions to mixed heritage shown by many of the patriots we shouldn’t wonder at their inferiority complexes, paranoia and antipathy toward people with firmly held convictions regarding race, ethnicity and nationality.

The Muslims too, when all is said and done, exhibit a strong sense of both group and individual identity all couched in solid notions of race and ethnicity, a state of mind which appears to really upset many on the far right.

Nationalists may regard psychoanalysis as Jewish pseudo-science but there does seem to be a degree of almost Freudian projection at work among the patriots.

The world outside social media, cyberspace being the only real territory held by the patriots, is rapidly transitioning into the “age of identity”; that is to say that globalisation, far from eliminating difference, is bringing the different races and ethnic groups into contact with one another.

Mass immigration of non-traditional groups into White lands has become a global exhibition of the often massive and intractable differences between the different human sub-species; even from an aesthetic point of view, a million Asians moving in and residing around us has markedly changed the way most Australians see their society.

2ad7c71600000578-3174846-image-a-6_1437885236127
Danny Nalliah runs a Zionist-supporting, multi-racialist Civic Patriot party called Rise UP Australia

Some people are able to convince themselves that these differences are a good thing, others, such as the Nationalists regard immigration as a negative on that basis; it is another thing to altogether, as the patriots do, claim that Australian identity is “whatever you want it to be.”

This is our problem, this is why we fight them and why we hate them. Nobody but the patriots seek to obliterate White identity as a component of authentic Australianism, the Left, for all their shrieking and garment rending over the colonial era subscribe to the same general Australian folklore as do the Nationalists, only the different conclusions we choose to draw from that lore set us at odds.

The real class struggle, the Nationalist cause if you will, is the globalist liberal project, at present the Left, in general terms, are unwilling, or unable to wean themselves of rank and privilege under that system, so they are not a threat to the status quo in the immediate future.

Some people are able to convince themselves that these differences are a good thing, others, such as the Nationalists regard immigration as a negative on that basis; it is another thing to altogether, as the patriots do, claim that Australian identity is “whatever you want it to be.”

Generational change is under way, of course, and the Nationalists would expect some sort of counter-reaction to globalist-liberalism from the Left; the children of the “Gen-X” bourgeois lefties are, after all, as much affected by the scourge of globalism and mass immigration as those of the White workers and marginalised people.

In the event of a resurgent Left we would, of course, be able to present a competent political struggle against them, should we, in fact, find ourselves in disagreement; we are done with arguing with their parents who have, almost to a man, abandoned the field.

At this juncture, though the main anti-Nationalist and anti-White tendencies are found on the far right, so it is there that we must take our struggle until their nihilism, falsehoods, treachery and negativity are no longer a factor in dissident politics.

images-2
The Civic Parrot manifesto in its entirety

ROB SPARROW AND ANTIFA’S OBSESSION WITH THE COWARD PUNCHING OF RICHARD SPENCER

ROB SPARROW AND ANTIFA’S OBSESSION WITH THE COWARD PUNCHING OF RICHARD SPENCER

If you care to witness an infant playing with its own faeces, head on over to Rob Sparrow’s Slackbastard page and note how he will not let this Richard Spencer thing go.

Most in Australia are not au fait with the American Alt-Right scene. However, for those who do not know, Richard Spencer is president of the National Policy Institute and is one of the most influential people in America’s Alt-Right movement. In fact, he claims to have authored the name Alt-Right.

Richard was attending Donald Trump’s inauguration as the 45th US president on January 20 when a Soros-sponsored anti-Trump protestor coward-punched him as he gave an impromptu interview to media.

turns-out-neo-nazi-richard-spencer-caught-two-fades-last-week-715x395
So desperate are the Annies and Socialists and all those grubs to grab anything that the gutless actions of a chicken shit who hit Richard Spencer and ran like a girl while he was being interviewed are held as heroism

Spencer was looking into a camera when a pseudo black bloc fag with his face covered ran up and coward slapped him. The ponce then bravely ran away as fast as his unisex trainers would carry him. A Trump supporter gave chase.

Richard was attending Donald Trump’s inauguration as the 45th US president on January 20 when a Soros-sponsored anti-Trump protestor coward-punched him as he gave an impromptu interview to media.

This gutless act, which offends every manly code, has been applauded wildly by the pussies on the militant Left. The biggest mangina to treat this as though he had possession of the enemy’s captured flag is Professor Rob Sparrow, AKA Andy Fleming, of the Slackbastard blog.

Rob is not a masculine sort, as his picture shows. His innumerable ear piercings attest to an Evie Amati-like gender-identity crisis. He is probably a homosexual but we are not interested in exploring his debased sexuality, we are more concerned with his celebration of cowardice as heroics.

spencer1

spencer2

It would be SO easy for folk from (what we might for the purpose of this article collectively refer to as) Australia’s Alt-Right to take a trip out to Monash University, and then sucker-punch him as he steps out of his office. That shot would become the most shared image in Australian Alt-Right, transcending factions, and bringing joy to thousands.

We are not saying anyone SHOULD do that, as much as we would enjoy seeing it, but we say it to illustrate a point. It would be a gutless act. If his would-be punishers announced themselves first up, recounted his myriad crimes, and then CREAMED his effeminate mug with a solid set of knuckles that would be OK.

But coward punching is a massive problem. In NSW, it led to early lock-out laws which spotty dopehead muso sorts whine has killed their putrid live music scene. At least that is one good thing to have come from those laws. But it did cut down the number of these callow attacks. Now we have a university professor condoning this sort of un-heroic action.

It would be SO easy for folk from (what we might for the purpose of this article collectively refer to as) Australia’s Alt-Right to take a trip out to Monash University, and then sucker-punch him as he steps out of his office. That shot would become the most shared image in Australian Alt-Right, transcending factions, and bringing joy to thousands.

Moreover, there is also a lack of reality-engagement evident here. Do these Annies seriously believe that one poof running up and coward punching Richard Spencer is going to impact on that movement?

Do they think anyone over here knows who Spencer is or is even that troubled? We have already seen what rat-like tactics are used by these globalist foot-soldiers. We are aware that they have no shame, no pride, and no moral compass.

It does not at all surprise us. Antifa act in packs where even then they only create enough combined muscle to wrestle a teabag into a cup. They are too exhausted to lift the kettle and add the water. These are not MMA fighters. The whole reason they became involved in sordid subcultures was because they failed the test of manhood and through a warped sort of bohemian existence they hope to at least salvage themselves with the consolation of a degenerate philosophy.

spencer3