We have stretched definitions here, since the subjects of today’s chat we do not regard as bona fide Nationalists. Nevertheless, they are considered to be so by outsiders and the clueless.

Worse yet, recognised Nationalists are now fawning over one or more of their ‘heroes’ and it is as much a betrayal of Nationalist precepts as the actual duplicities by those we indirectly refer to.

True Nationalism has as its most unwavering principles the cessation of immigration to this country, the abolition of multiculturalism, and the recognition of White Australians as the only Australians. Aboriginals are Aboriginals, and Australians are White Europeans. We aim for a mono-racial, Protective, mono-cultural state. The wisdom is manifold when the corrosiveness of pluralism is understood socially, economically, and psychologically.

Many years back, a group around a twerp called Darrin Hodges began spruiking the fool’s gold of mainstreaming. This has as its primary tenet something roughly along the lines that ‘the masses’ will be turned off by the racialism of White Nationalism. Rather than ever dare mention Israel, or god forbid the Zionists, the mainstream party actually becomes inclusive on a multiracial basis of anyone opposed to Islam. Thus was coined the expression ‘Diversity minus Islam’ and subsequently Zionists became fervent proponents.

What would, by all other measures, be a simpatico parallel movement to Nationalism, in fact, began to see Nationalists as enemies. No longer satisfied with carving out turf for its own manoeuvres, it came to desire the destruction of Nationalism as inherently counter its nebulous aims. Suddenly, this unwanted bastard child of Nationalism is worried about how Nationalism affects IT as if the hammer came before the stone.

Mainstreaming, of course, by its own rules, became occupied by the very mainstream it hoped to influence. Rather, the mainstream influences it and not the other way round. To that end, political interests of the “right” found it a useful vehicle.

This idea of ‘mainstreaming’ is something that subsequent groups that sprung out of Reclaim Australia embraced as infallible wisdom and who, today, their principle players are far from having renounced. Any Nationalism on their part is “assumed” as if it is a tacit secret between them and their ‘fans’.

There, we said it, ‘fans’. Because the colourful heroes sucking up all the follows on Twitter, and all the ‘likes’ on Facebook do not have serious political adherents, they have ‘fans’. They are admired for some aspect other than their politics since none of them has ever definitively stated their true Political orientation, their aims, or expressed sincere beliefs.

They have ‘winked’ at certain issues while becoming mawkish about them whenever they sensed the kind of negative publicity that might compromise their mainstream standing.

Likewise, a study of their personality type tends to reveal a character with a desire for adoration and popularity. The cause becomes the vehicle with which to drive them to their desired destination of popularity, recognition, and ultimately ‘fame’. Time and time again a misdirected desire for sub-tier fame has created and burnt out identities on the Patriot side. It has generated more hubris than a meeting of oil barons.

And there, beaut reader is the reason that we see so many woeful, embarrassing wet farts like Zionist Avi Yemini’s great Patriot rally in Melbourne: it is because their followers are fans and not serious activists.

Again, it is a shame Nationalists who should know better are smitten with these fleeting idols like gushing teenyboppers. The real Nationalism is THAT WAY, folks, and we don’t require an X-Factor to pass along the simple message that unless you stand up, you … are … doomed.

Hodges and other Ziobots defend Jews
The original mainstreamers Nick Folkes and Darrin Hodges protest in support of a Jewish Chocolate Store targeted by anti-Zionists





Victoria is now officially an Orwellian Police State following last week’s conviction of the Bendigo Three on charges arising from the mock beheading of a dummy.

On Tuesday, September 5, in Melbourne Magistrates Court, Magistrate John Hardy found Blair Cottrell, Neil Erikson, and Chris Shortis guilty under section 25(2) of The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act, 2001 (RRTA). This is the first time that section of the law has been used in a prosecution. A conviction was recorded for each defendant, and a fine of $2000 plus a $79.50 statutory charge was imposed.

This judgment marks a turning point. Having peeled off its mask, the multiculturalist state is now showing its true authoritarian face. Magistrate Hardy’s judgment has not only set the bar for prosecution perilously low but decided it can be set anywhere the state chooses. Freedom of speech is the foundation of all other freedoms in a democratic society. Before the advent of multiculturalism in this country, the main restrictions to that implied freedom of expression were defamation, obscenity, intellectual property and incitement. While some argue that vilification laws are similar to defamation laws, the differences between the two indicate how far our freedoms have been eroded in the name of safeguarding feelings.

download (3)
The much overused still from the infamous video that incited hatred against Moslems and will probably trigger World War Three

Firstly, defamation is civil law, whereas section 25(2) of the RRTA is criminal law. Secondly, in defamation law, the plaintiff initiates a lawsuit and seeks a legal remedy. In Ross versus Shortis, Cottrell and Erikson, there was no complainant as in a criminal case. No Muslim had ever complained they felt ridiculed, hated, or treated as an object of contempt. No Patriot has testified that the video had incited them to have these attitudes. Instead, the case was brought by the Director of Public Prosecutions with Constable Erin Ross as the informant, who both exercised the entitlement that they, unlike ordinary citizens, have not to take the witness stand. This meant that the defendants could not cross examine their accusers as there were no accusers: a fundamental breach of procedural fairness, due process, and natural justice.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading. The video of the stunt together with extra footage of members walking and riding around Bendigo was uploaded to the United Patriots Front Facebook page as publicity for a 2015 rally held in Bendigo to protest the proposed building of a mosque.

All up, The Bendigo Three faced three charges (an earlier fourth charge was withdrawn). These resulted from a stunt they performed outside the Bendigo Council Offices involving a mock beheading.

The first of the charges was ‘defacing the footpath and wall of the garden bed’ with ‘the emission of the red substance’. The second charge was ‘willfully damaging property’. “Damage does not need to be permanent”, presiding Magistrate Hardy informed the court. He left aside the question of why any rational person would describe a temporary stain on a footpath from water soluble food dye as “damage”. It took Bendigo Council two attempts to remove the pesky stain. The first time, ordinary water pressure from a hose wasn’t enough, but success was achieved the second time with a Gerni. A few weeks of weather and rain would probably have washed it away but then no-one would have been able to pretend it was a matter criminal enough to press charges. Chris Shortis actually paid the Council over $1000, a fine which exceeds the original cleaning bill. But the State required its pound of flesh!

download (6)
Magistrate John Hardy. He can find the harmless trigger of an eyebrow as incitement to ridicule or contempt

The first and second charges amounted to a prosecutorial fishing trip. The prosecutor, Fran Dalziel, was shamelessly up-front about this. She asked the Magistrate to hear the third charge first and only hear the other charges if the first charge was not proved. Hardy obligingly granted her request. The first two charges were only a backup. Clearly, it had been decided that the accused had to be charged with something, even if it ended up being trivial. Can anyone thereafter doubt that this trial was all along political and owed nothing to any theoretical victim?

The real victims in all of this

The trial lasted two days starting on a Monday. Supporters of the three accused had to pass through airport-style security on the ground floor, which was run by a security company. After queuing on the fifth floor, they passed through further security checkpoints, this time conducted by Victoria Police. These included complete photo ID scanning and twin 3D video cameras. Inside Courtroom 19, seating was restricted to 27 bodies, and much of that room was taken up by the less than objective media scrum. The lack of seating meant many travelled to court only to miss out on public seating.

Magistrate Hardy presented a curious anachronism, looking like a cross between Gandalf the Grey and Karl Marx. He informed the court that he had downloaded the RRTA and would read it out in the evening. However, by the end of the farcical proceedings, he would unquestioningly accept the prosecutor’s submission in what was so obviously a fait accompli. Before that, every pretence was made to try and lend seriousness to what was so evidently a show trial. Thus, presiding as he was over a circus, he cracked his whip on Day One of the two-day trial.

The Farce before the force

From the outset, a degree of exaggeration was necessary to contrive a sense of menace out of the stunt and convey this element of folk devilry to the court. A former official of the Greater Bendigo City Council took the stand, doing his best during testimony to convince the court this was a serious affair. After all, he had faced the extreme logistical difficulty and sheer angst posed by the mysterious red fluid it was his insurmountable duty to clean. Almost in judgement of this poppycock, a spectator’s mobile phone suddenly sounded, and the well-timed ringtone of The Benny Hill Show theme mocked the witness. He was subsequently cross-examined by each defendant in turn. Shown a more recent photograph of the ‘damage’ done by one of the defendants with the dummy’s fake blood, he sheepishly admitted that “the red spot may be a pebble”, and there was “no staining”. No graffiti artist had ever been held to such account.

download (4)
The Australia First Party have previously demonstrated in defence of the Bendigo Three

Thereafter, State functionaries dominated the first day’s proceedings with inane testimony that served only to pad out the dubious basis of the charges and give the court a false impression of their gravitas. Senior Sergeant John Phillip Dalton, the detective who headed the police response to the United Patriots Front Bendigo rallies, answered questions about the aims of the UPF. The prosecution then played the video, which was the only proper evidence presented throughout the trial. Afterwards, proceedings took a turn for the silly as Fran asked, “What is on Mr Shortis’s head?” “I’d say a religious cloth of some type”, Dalton replied. Under cross-examination, focus remained on the incriminating headdress worn by Chris Shortis, until Magistrate Hardy informed the defendants that a policeman’s opinion about a headdress was not admissible evidence. They might as well have taken Victorian taxpayer dollars and burnt the lot in a waste bin.

The following witness, Officer Gary Jenkins (a Freemason), didn’t even bother showing up. An excuse was given, that he had suffered a motorcycle accident. Examining the medical certificate (provided by one of the ‘brothers’?), Magistrate Hardy asked why he couldn’t be brought to court, as the certificate only covered work, not court. It was decided not to bother with his evidence, and another thrumming moment in Australian legal history squiggled to the ceiling like a yawning Z.

If the consequences of the day’s judgment would not turn out to be so grave, one may have been tempted to laugh as Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith took the stand. He led a raid on Chris Shortis’s house on Good Friday, 2016, where he seized Chris’s T-Shirt, jeans, and a toy Pirate’s sword. Of these vital pieces of evidence, the most dangerous was the T-Shirt, which hadn’t been washed. However, he forgot to bring them to court, a ditzy oversight that caused a 15-minute delay as they were sent for.

download (5)
Detective Senior Constable Jason Smith before Magistrate Hardy stole his Pirate sword

Once they arrived, Smith beamed devilishly. He could now show the court this damning evidence which he gleefully gathered up and fumbled with in his hands like an excited Lex Luther taunting Superman with kryptonite. But this was a comedy, not drama, and given such, he managed to clumsily drop the T-Shirt, sucking out the tiny puff of air that had momentarily inflated his sails in his moment of glory. He might have got to wave the sword about in a Douglas Fairbanks Jnr impression had the object described on the Bendigo Police evidence register as “One Fake Pirate Knife/Sword” not have been issued for destruction over a year earlier.

Another day, another truckload of taxpayers’ dollars

The morning of Day Two was taken up with submissions from the prosecutor and the three defendants followed by a rebuttal from Miss Dalziel. For reasons unknown, Detective Senior Constable Smith once more attended court, possibly hoping someone had found the Pirate sword. He evidently thought the prosecutor might have it, because in-between sessions he kept whispering anxiously in her ear. A request by Chris Shortis to quote from the Holy Qur’an was denied. He had hoped to share verse 8:12, which says, “Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): ‘I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them’.”

Denied this opportunity to be enriched by the words of the Prophet, the court adjourned for lunch so that Magistrate Hardy could consider his ruling and possibly play with the Pirate sword. On returning at 2 pm, the assembled were informed that Magistrate Hardy needed a further hour’s deliberation, proving he had found the sword after all. In the wash-up, and following all the tedious testimony from the witnesses, the only evidence taken into consideration was the first 39 seconds of the UPF video. Magistrate Hardy seemed particularly taken by this portion of the video given it contained his esteemed Pirate sword.

Another victim of The Bendigo Three’s “intentions”

Mr Shortis had argued that since beheading is illegal, and the RRTA only protects lawful religious activity, the video cannot be subject to the act. Magistrate Hardy rejected this argument as “teleological”. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines teleology as “The explanation of phenomena in terms of the purpose they serve rather than of the cause by which they arise”. This seems to say more about Hardy’s convoluted reflections on the 39 seconds in the video than it does to Chris’s argument in their defence. In fact, we’re pretty sure it sounds like bullshit. Hardy might as well have yelled, “look behind you” for all the clarity of this argument. Likewise, he argued that the law was dealing with “Muslims not beheading”, which is again odd given that there were no Muslims in the video and the only thing beheaded was a sex toy.

But as sure as he invalidated all of Chris’s arguments, he ignored his contention relevant sections of the Australian Constitution imply freedom of expression and that Australia is a signatory to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The latter includes the right to freedom of opinion and expression as a basic principle. Hardy did not agree that there is a conflict between the RRTA and the corresponding Federal law. He did not refer to the Keating government memorandum which suggests there may be. As to the lack of a plaintiff or complainant, he simply said that section 25 does not require it, airily dismissing legal investigation. He noted that the video had chalked-up 275 likes, establishing that it had an audience, which was, to him, a solid basis for construing the malicious intent in the video he believed exists had probably gestated already in weak minds.

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.  Where intent is the issue then inference must be used … The context of the video leaves me no alternative than to find that the intention was to incite serious contempt or ridicule of persons of the Muslim faith.”

During his dénouement, Hardy said, “I accept Miss Dalziel’s submission that the intention of the video was to incite and that it is not necessary to prove that it would incite or that it did so.

So, no actual incitement needs to occur, mere intention, a mental state, is enough to convict and inference is all that’s required to “prove” the mental state of the accused. Thus the burden of proof is reversed for an action merely imputed, which is abstraction upon abstraction. No real barrier remains for the prosecution of anyone the state does not like and the broadness as well as the vagueness of the offending article is pure Kafka. Thus, the presentation of opposing views to any area of the multicultural dogma is potentially a punishable offence, be it Islam, African crime, Chinese imperialism or the objection to curry odours in a unit block. If these views are presented publicly, regardless of whether criminal activity occurs as a result, it can be considered as “incitement”, demonstrable by a few clicks of the ‘like’ button on Facebook. In other words, opposing multiculturalism is a thought crime as well as a hate crime, especially if expressed on Facebook, which half of the legal justice system and Police Force seem to spend their time (and our money) gawping at.

The one glimmer of light from the Magistrate in this otherwise grotesque Stalinesque show trial came during sentencing. The prosecutor claimed that the defendants were lacking in remorse.  Magistrate Hardy, for once disagreeing with Miss Dalziel, noted that remorse in issues of principle is a bit different from remorse in matters such as rape. Undeterred, Fran declared that “Opposition to Islam continues to be held by these men!”

Magistrate Hardy, salvaging an atom of credibility, reminded Miss Dalziel that “They are entitled to oppose Islam it is how that opposition is expressed that is at issue”. But this is another instance of Hardy’s dingbat logic given that opposition cannot exist WITHOUT expression and there are no terms of reference to define the acceptable expression.

In other words, two plus two now equals anything but four.

It is worth noting, too, that when the guilty verdict was delivered members of the media — some believe from the ABC — pumped the air with their fists in a show of celebration.

Following the decision, Blair Cottrell and what’s-his-name went off to file an appeal. Chris Shortis is considering his options.

UNA salutes our smiling hero, Chris Shortis

ED — We point out here that Chris Shortis is a member of United Nationalists Australia, however, this article was produced by another member of our growing team who was present both days of the Kangaroo court.



One thing that can be said about the West is that it sure swallows lies easily. It had no problem buying into the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie that Dubya and his allies used as a pretext to illegally invade Iraq and kill its leader. That’s just one example.

As Adolf Hitler said, “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”

Now the mainstream media talks about “fake news”. What a chutzpah. When it comes to most geopolitical matters and anything involving the Globalist narrative fake news is all that it’s serving.

But lies and gullibility are just symptoms of Western infantilism. An infantilised people respond well to the Globalist Media. Think of this fine example of infantilism: When Donald Trump won the 2017 Presidential Election, in spite of the relentless negative media coverage he received, college students were so traumatised that they were given Play-Doh as therapy.

Play-Doh is the Prozac of Generation Triggered

Another troubled petal publicly defecated on a pro-Trump placard in the wave of anarchy that followed the result and swept the streets of US cities — a very infantile demonstration of anal aggression from one who is no doubt receiving a first world education in one of the world’s most advanced and militaristic nations.

As Adolf Hitler said, “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”

Indeed, you can see this infantilism in much of the way that the CTRL-LEFT advocates through its pervasive hysteria. If it doesn’t have its way, it will scream, and cry, and break things. It will fall thrashing to the ground like a misbehaving cat.

It is at once a spoiled brat and a bully believing itself to be functioning at the highest level of human consciousness.

ISIS have their counterparts in the CTRL-LEFT

However, it is not this infantilism alone, but the new religion of the West, which has cast off Christianity and replaced it with the bourgeoisie dogma of Virtue. And Virtue has a duty to atone for sins, real and imagined — while forcing others to recompense too regardless of whether or not they subscribe to its collective guilt.

Virtue gives no quarter and has its brutal way, even if its actions and philosophies are contradictory of the very moral foundation it is imagined to rest upon.

This is why Virtue, with its very coloured concept of history, absorbed through a didactic prism of historical Civil Rights Movement revisionism, considers no hypocrisy in stigmatising White people.

It is at once a spoiled brat and a bully believing itself to be functioning at the highest level of human consciousness.

Virtue, not satisfied with its history, sets about erasing it and rewriting it as it would like to believe it was. Virtue can abhor ISIS for destroying wondrous historical monuments of bygone civilisations, and yet it impels others to destroy historical tributes from its own past in the course of abolishing that history.

Virtue speaks of truth through lying lips and waxes lyrical about love while its heart is full of hate. Virtue condemns the totalitarianism it perceives in Fascism and Nationalism while its own sensibilities are authoritarian.

Black Caesar
Caesar was black. Caesar has always been black. The historical inaccuracy is those two White guys who would never have been in African Ancient Rome

Virtue is the religion of Globalism even though Globalism recognises no religion. Globalism doesn’t care — globalism is, at its core, a business and to it, the precepts of the Virtue religion are just marketable values.

The alt-right, in an alternate universe, would be understood as being a legitimate manifestation coming out of a genuine civil rights position.

The alt-right, in an alternate universe, would be understood as being a legitimate manifestation coming out of a genuine civil rights position.

When you are told that you are to blame for every misfortune befalling every minority; when you are taught not to judge others for the colour of their skin but then receive lessons in how you are a privileged person, a racist, and a fool based on the colour of yours – you either submit to the shaming or resist.

You particularly resist when at the same time you are casually informed you are part of a race that is dying. More irksome is when you understand your race is on a downward slope because it is being asked to make space for much larger races which aren’t in danger of disappearing from the earth.

Virtue calls for spiritual ablution by writing anti-White gibberish all over your face in dark pen

Black Lives Matter is celebrated, but the alt-right is demonised. The central message of BLM is that black people are the victim of White people when anyone with open eyes can see that now it’s completely the other way around.

As blacks, Asians and Middle Easterners spread across Europe, their riotous numbers are driving the aboriginal peoples of nearly every single European country into minority status. As the European peoples are replaced, so their culture, and the marvels of the civilisation that bear their names, disappears too. The gates are being forced open by the Globalists and the only crime is to speak out against it. In Europe, that can be a serious crime indeed.

This is what George Orwell meant when he wrote that “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four.”

This is what George Orwell meant when he wrote that “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four.”

This religion of Virtue, more than anything else, was the trigger for Charlottesville. It was the very thing against which the alt-right was demonstrating whether or not it managed to articulate that fact sufficiently. It would not have mattered if there was no small presence of play-actors with Swastikas, or bogeyman Klansman outfits because the ‘White Supremacist’ angle was predetermined.

While the Police ignored a federal injunction permitting the Unite the Right rally to take place they allowed the so-called counter protesters — you might call them the Inquisitors of the Virtue religion — to continue. The state created that scene and the Globalist media wrote the narrative. It stoked the fire.

As alt-righters are doxed and face losing their jobs for attending a legally sanctioned rally, those who vandalise statues; those who throw bottles, and use intimidation wherever possible, are rewarded for their Globalist Crusade.

Demonstrations continue to ignite like spot fires around the US. Those CTRL-LEFT protesters not defacing historical monuments are openly waving placards with messages like “KILL WHITEY”. Graffiti is appearing  with no less subtle sentiment. In one pic from a protest a smiling college girl holds a sign that reads, “LOL. YOUR GRAND-KIDS WILL BE BROWN”. Meanwhile, the State stands by like a mute centurion condemning only alt-right apostates.

Wonder Woman is based on the goddess ISIS who was, as everyone knows, either black or a beaner



It took UNA just the time needed to type in a URL to discover the most likely culprit behind a series of well publicised ‘White Nationalist’ posters that have appeared in Sydney today.

Don’t get us wrong, they’re great posters and a top troll. But we are not here to discuss the posters per se: our point relates to our prime suspect for the creation of “Aussie Nationalists”. Coming from anyone else we might have cause to want to high-five a comrade too, but given the general motives of the suspected instigator, whose obsession with Whiteness ended at his choice of a wife and the children produced from their mixed-race marriage, we must abjure. If our mistrust seems offputting, it comes with the territory, sadly, because Nationalists don’t fight hostiles on the Left, we spend all our time tied up struggling to keep our politics protected from Right Wing fakers.

We will explain…

Don’t get us wrong, they’re great posters and a top troll

When we saw ‘’ as the address of the posters’ authors we did the obvious thing and visited the site. We encountered a WordPress blog barren, except for an incongruous trio of items: the first of which is a link to a demonstration in Lithgow hosted by — ta-ra, Peanuts for Freedom! This, of course, is the golden giveaway, or to us anyway, particularly since it bears the headline, “Next nationalist event you need to attend”.

The PfF Facebook page that it originates from appears to have been removed, either temporarily or permanently, which wouldn’t be a first for the Peanuts.

The second item is, for some bizarre reason, a link to a YouTube video about Oswald Mosely (an odd choice for those purporting to be ‘Aussie Nationalists’), which is an addendum to a gallery of the images from the Pokemon-themed posters plastered up around the inner-west of Sydney, which, again, are very clever and right on the target. They have achieved their desired aim of generating publicity. But to where does this publicity funnel? There is nothing at the end of it, no contact details, nothing but a cue back to this blog and the PfF rally. it advertises. It seems to be a one-shot blog. Given the rally flyer, in all likelihood, the blog’s creator has a vested interest in promoting that group. This would, by logic, place its ownership in that group’s orbit. In this case, the heavy emphasis on the designation “Nationalism” is a key element of the authors’ intentions. If you cannot change Nationalism, then change its definition.

The Facebook page that it originates from appears to have been removed, either temporarily or permanently, which wouldn’t be a first for the Peanuts.

The Sydney Traditionalists tried the same game of appropriation that Folkes is infamous for when they got involved with The Dingoes and surreptitiously organised the Dingocon [see Rape House and Dingoes Conned]. They saw a young movement and wanted to control its direction. We hazard a guess that the Trads have some link to Folkes, who, on the same day as Dingocon, took his family of Peanuts to Newtown to face down an absent Antifa. Anyway, now that we’ve figured out the most likely culprits, we can dismiss their claims to be Nationalists, yet take note of the strange activity occurring around them, which is indicative of the Patriot Games of old.

In attendance at Folkes’s rally was New Zealand provocateur Mark McDonald, who has been vandalising Australian Nationalism in one way or another since his feet landed on our soil in 2013. McDonald has no ties to the Australian soil or its people. He is White, but he is a foreigner. This hasn’t stopped him trying to poison our movement and members who have an earnest dedication to the principles of Australian Nationalism.

The same cannot be said for either he or his new Peanut tribe. Now is a good time to consider the absolute gobsmacking hypocrisy of Folkes.

In February, Folkes burned a Nazi flag outside the Tempe headquarters of Australia First Party (while he and his Boy Friday, Tobes, were very convincingly dressed as Moslems) protesting — we’re still not sure what — but making it clear that he and his Zion-friendly PfF oppose the racial politics of AFP.

A few months ago ‘edgy’ symbols like this upset Nicky boy (note the UNA reference on the flag)
If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em, eh Nick?

He did this before with the “bunker” video (Nick Folkes is now referring to his home as the ‘Rozelle Bunker’), in which Jim Saleam and others toasted the passing of slain Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. Much was made of the Nationalist Socialist flags which appear in the background of the host’s apartment. He is known to be a collector of such memorabilia and being a guest who was just passing through, Jim had no control over what bric-a-brac or ornamentation decorated the apartment. Of course, it was a connection to Folkes from this person and his acquaintances that put the video in the possession of Howard Crawford to begin with, a contradiction never reflected on by those who mistook both its relevance and currency.

Present there, and we have a pic of him from the event tucked away for a rainy day, is New Zealand provocateur Mark McDonald, who has been trying to ruin Australian Nationalism since his two left feet landed on our country’s soil in 2013.

Now, of course, Folkes is “joining in” with the whole alt-right fashion, which utilises edgy ‘fash’ symbolism. Folkes appropriated the Totenkopf symbol, often associated with Hitler’s SS, on a flyer for the demonstration in Newtown. The more influential it becomes, the more Folkes tries reinventing himself so he can get inside it. This is in spite of defaming true Nationalists as “Nazis” — along with his cohorts like Dan Evans, Neil Erikson and mad Scotty Moerland.

Bear in mind that while enacting that ‘anti-Nazi’ shtick, Folkes was keeping lines open to McDonald. This here poses questions about the purity of S88, which was going hell for leather to be the most undisputed anti-Jewish show in town. Yet, here now, as then, we have its former Fuhrer photographed (on file) within spitting distance of Radka Smith, second-in-charge of Peanuts for Freedom.

download (1) (1)
The message behind this  PfF character reads, “It’s a foreign invasion”. Erm, ever get the feeling someone’s having a lend?

Radka is Jewish. But there must be a degree of indignation Radka feels being in the presence of Matey Mate, since in 2014 when McDonald met Smith he almost spat the words in her face, “You’re a JEW!” Indeed, Matey is quick to accuse people of being Jewish, and yet has no problem with associating with Jewish-friendly organisations.

Remember too, Jewish James Sternhell is a supporter of the Peanuts, which also boasts an Asian member. This should be borne in mind when viewing Folkes’s take on appropriating the White Genocide message. Do not put out of mind their strong links to Liberal Party operator Howard Crawford, who is a major league Zionist. They must wonder too about Toby’s “I Support Open Borders for Israel”, but they’re a crazy, whacky, zany bunch of cripples round at Peanut Palace. Even odder, is that Dan Evans, an absolute multi-racialist and enemy of Australian Nationalism was a speaker at Nick’s rally against Antifa. How does a character like that accord with one like Matey Mate with his Seig Heil and 14/88 cliches? About the same as they ever did, because the pattern is this: Larping is fine so long as real Nationalists with purist inclinations don’t come by rocking the boat.

Bear this in mind, because S88 tried passing itself off as hard-core anti-Jewish. But here we have its former Fuhrer standing within pissing distance of Radka Smith, second-in-charge of Peanuts for Freedom.

Radka’s Jewishness is of no concern to us. However, in this instance, it is a level indicator of the kind of deceit that is PfF’s stock in trade.

We call on Folkes to publically denounce his own contributions to White Genocide, by despoiling his bloodline with Asian genes, and to state categorically that PfF is dedicated to restoring a White Australia.

This is where you get to nail Nicholas since he won’t do either.

Thus, we swing back to those posters, which we repeat, are just a product and not the subject of our editorial. Under different circumstances, we could applaud the trolling along with everyone else. But knowing what a fragile state true Nationalism is in presently we would be contributing to its hastening demise by giving kudos to those who seek to subvert it. What’s more, it is the ‘usual suspects’ who have been pursuing this goal for years.

These creatures have never shied away from doxing true Nationalists to either the Media and our ideological opponents on the Left. In fact, that has been one of their longstanding tactics, so bear that in mind when they showily ‘face off’ with Antifa as they are staring down the same people they secretly supply info when hiding behind their computers.

A friend of ours told us in all soberness that what is needed is for everything to absolutely go to crap. It all needs to be broken apart and smashed up because only on fresh, healthy soil, can we hope to grow anew. He might be onto something.

Still, they are great posters, and that message is always welcome even if the messenger is on the nose.

One of Nick’s regular anti-White Genocide campaigners



You say 1488, I say 1788

Matthew Grant

There is a valid reason we lead this week’s story on last Saturday night’s Dingocon with the brilliant quote above.

It is all to do with a difference of perspective which separates Australian Nationalist activists from those inside the ‘Australian alt-right’ phenomenon.

Do not misunderstand us; we are not out to trash the Dingoes. We merely bear the kind of admonitions one should expect from us, as well as sober observations from the perspective of those involved in a political movement informed by experience.

Firstly, no UNA member was in attendance on the evening in question. It was not expected that we would be invited any more than would Australia First Party president Jim Saleam have been.

The ad forgot to say “Political Nationalists Not Welcome!”

Nobody from the Australian Protectionist Party was invited either, although we understand Nationalist Alternative was represented.

Contrary to popular belief, we state again, Jim Saleam wields no influence over United Nationalists Australia regardless of whether some of our writers are AFP members. We offer ALL true Nationalists an opportunity of expression, but so far only AFP members have accepted that invitation, which permanently stands. As such, Jim Saleam is totally free to submit whenever he wishes, and we are delighted to publish him. Likewise, AFP often shares links to UNA material, and we are grateful for the extended reach that affords us. We are, after all, working together in the interests of the Australian nationalist movement. AFP is internationally recognised for its work in nationalism.

It is all to do with a difference of perspective which separates Australian Nationalist activists from those inside the ‘Australian alt-right’ phenomenon.

We raise the subject of Jim Saleam, as we learned from sources that he was a contentious figure at Dingocon. There was an implication that his article ‘Rape House’ was a mitigating factor in the snub. In fact, a UNA rep met with Dingocon’s organiser a few weeks before the convention so we could suss each other out. The message was then as it was afterwards that Jim Saleam was “too much of a divisive figure”. The question is, divisive for whom? We shall get to that, although this matter is only a sidebar subject of this article.

In fact, if you want to get down to brass tacks, it was the Australian Nationalist Movement in its Political aspect that was excluded from Dingocon. So let us stop for a moment and ask, what is a Dingo?

A Dingo

UNA always regarded a Dingo as an editorial contributor to the Podcast bearing the name of the Dingoes; although in fact (according to one youth we asked) it is a generic appellation for nativist followers of Australia’s alt-right movement. We knew anyway, we just wanted to hear how they described themselves.

They are irreverent, social-media savvy, politically-incorrect, meme-focused, and just like their American cousins communicate via their own coded lingo. Their weapon is humour with a generous dash of irony.

In fact, if you want to get down to brass tacks, it was the Australian Nationalist Movement in its Political aspect that was excluded from Dingocon. So let us stop for a moment and ask, what is a Dingo?

This subculture rejects the “old school” Nationalists as irrelevant. In short, they are full of the self-assuredness of youth, and the conviction that in their freshness and vigour they will be able to institute a change that us others have thus far ‘failed’ to deliver. Moreover, they are not interested in political activism in the conventional sense and wouldn’t lay a vote AFP’s way; although they follow One Nation because they have this idea about invading its youth wing. According to one who was close to the Dingoes of the Podcast fame, while they might employ the usual alt-right National Socialist schtick, they are quite Civic in regards to homosexuals and even on the Zionist question.

We cannot comment on that claim other than to say the young person who told us seemed sound. Others suggest this youngster has issues.

Here, we wish to refute accusations that UNA is “hostile” to the Dingoes in regards to the loose affiliation of those who collect under its banner. We are not hostile to them in any way. But we know those behind the Dingoes’ curtain are very much hostile to us, but more so to Jim Saleam.

You say 1488, Matt says 1788!

At this point, our commentary splits into two key areas: addressing those operators behind that curtain, and the nature of this ‘Dingo’ counterculture and how it relates to the spirit of the Australian Nationalist Movement.

Again, we refer back to our initial meeting with Dingocon’s organiser. It was made clear to UNA that Jim Saleam was in no uncertain terms unwelcome. Following Dingocon the word was that he had been the subject of much derision. So we ask ourselves, why would a young scene that has had no prior dealings with Jim Saleam prejudice him thus? The short answer is they wouldn’t. It is those operating the convention that sought to isolate him from the various guests. Who are these operators? Apart from ex-Klub Nation’s David McBryde, who Dingocon’s organiser refused to discuss, we have also confirmed the presence of Luke Torrisi, whom he particularly declined to comment on.

We cannot comment on that claim other than to say the young person who told us seemed sound. Others suggest this youngster has his or her own issues. The point in mentioning is to allow for a fuller coverage of the subject.

Torrisi is a “paleoconservative” and a contributor to the ultra-conservative Sydney Traditionalists. We have had unconfirmed reports, too, that Torrisi was a past financier of Nick Folkes and the Party for Freedom. The Sydney Trads and Nationalists acrimoniously diverge on the question of a White Australia (they are conservatives after all). Yet, Torrisi hosts a conservative show Monday nights on 88.9FM on which he will give a conspiratorial ‘wink’ to White Nationalism; even though he is fundamentally at odds with it.

Two other names have come our way, but we cannot confirm either was present, and they are associates of McBryde — Morgan Qasabian (ex-Klub Nation), and Dylan Anderson.

It’s all about the Principle on the Sydney Trads’ colours

If there is one message that UNA has been tirelessly pushing it is the threat to Nationalism posed by manipulative conservatives. It is a story as old as Zeus and it never seems to change. Here we have a fledgeling movement in the sphere of influence of conservatives.

In a December 2016 article on The Dingoes, Pommy social researcher John Smith said ‘these groups are’, “People saying things which aren’t themselves objectionable, which appeal to people’s sense of patriotism and identity. It is often used as a way of smuggling in a kind of much more nationalist politics, a politics which is much further right than most people would agree with.”

However, Smith does not venture to consider that the very opposite might be the case, and people might say objectionable things as a means of smuggling in a more conservative politics than the third position of where true Nationalism must inevitably end up. We contend this is exactly what is happening.

Two other names have come our way, but we cannot confirm either was present, and they are associates of McBryde — Morgan Qasabian (ex-Klub Nation), and Dylan Anderson.

It is little wonder those organisers would not have countenanced Jim Saleam coming among them or even the Australian Protectionist Party, who are similarly wise to their scam. It is not that these Dingoes are necessarily going to be rewired into conservatives but rather that the whole movement ends up being steered out to sea. And would that bother Nationalists? In a sense, no it wouldn’t.

A prominent figure in the movement told a UNA reporter, in conversation, that the fundaments of this young generation involve a conscious shift from a Beta type to an Alpha. This means they look to building themselves up both physically, in the gym, and socially, in their earning power (and there is nothing wrong at all with doing so). According to him, there is a competitive edge to the alt-right youth as they seek to dominate, and become “superior to” the bloke next to him. There is no distinction of whether this other “bloke” happens to be White also, in which case, the competitiveness becomes for its own sake.

David McBryde, the man behind the Dingocon curtain

Bear in mind, too, just as an interesting observation, that girls are noticeably excluded from this movement.

Our characterisation of the alt-right as a counterculture, as opposed to a Political movement, seems right enough. From what we can gather, this subculture is by its nature upwardly mobile, and consciously elitist. In essence, those are the persnickety qualities of the Young Liberals, even if those involved haven’t realised it. If what our source told us is on the money, then by that description they risk becoming concerned with acquisition and confusing status with strength, while pride in race becomes simply pride.

There is also, speaking plainly, arrogance on show. The contention that anyone over the age of 25 who has been involved in the movement longer than yesterday is somehow a failure demonstrates a total lack of comprehension of the enormity of what our people face. It is not a matter of convincing the masses they need Alpha heroes to worship, but of bringing down an immovable system. Those in the American alt-right might have noticed this about their ‘Emperor God’ Donald Trump. Sure, he won the Presidency, but any idealistic notions he may have had of seriously changing things have been thwarted by the very system that has stymied — and will continue to block — Australian Nationalists at every turn.

Bear in mind, too, just as an interesting observation, that girls are noticeably excluded from this movement.

Characters like McBryde and Torissi arguably ARE that system, if they are only concerned with matters of tradition, and by interposing themselves in the Dingo counterculture they are meddling. In their desire to misdirect these kids from Nationalism, they might not be intent on creating an ‘alt-light’, but simply a movement unable to actually move anywhere. This is the risk it faces on its own, anyway, as it is in danger of being stuck in a cul-de-sac from where it cannot advance onto political turf because it is founded purely on counterculture codes and insider signalling.

Moreover, the very quality of ‘youth’ being flaunted is undermined by the fact the people organising them are old men. We find this particularly ironic. UNA reiterates, however, that we are not concerned either way. For our part, we do not wish to influence this Dingo subculture. Frankly, it is irrelevant to us.

download (3).jpg
Far more relevant to Aussies than a swastika

Our purpose IS political and it is not egos we as Nationalists aim to shape but the hearts and minds of White Australians. The mass of White Aussies who voted in Pauline Hanson’s One Nation to the Senate believing they were getting a Nationalist were not cocky youths judging them on their cut pecs and speccy hairstyles. The Australians who we need do not understand the codewords used by the alt-right, nor do they necessarily ‘get’ their memes. For memes will not fill their bellies, nor save their jobs, or stop them from becoming homeless.

The Australians that Nationalism needs are aged from ten to a hundred. We do not judge them on their body shape, or whether they can afford boutique beers at a trendy foodie establishment for we know they cannot.

UNA reiterates, however, that we are not concerned either way. For our part, we do not wish to influence this Dingo subculture. Frankly, it is irrelevant to us.

Right now, the Australians whose support we seek are begging charity to help them pay for unaffordable utility bills. They are dying in hospital queues while waiting rooms are overcrowded by an unsustainable influx of non-White aliens generated by the very conservatives whose obsequiousness to the globalist powers open our airport gates. The solidarity that these conservatives share with America and therefore Israel keep us involved in illegal military actions in the Middle East which generate a ceaseless traffic of non-Whites and Moslems hell-bent on knocking down this spiritually desolate marketplace our nation has become (which isn’t a bad thing) and instating a state founded on a Semitic faith (which is an egregious prospect).

While some devote themselves to executing “edgy” performances with National Socialist symbols in the belief they are spearheading a counter-cultural revolution, Australians are disappearing in the blackening shadows of Chinese-owned tower blocks soon to be filled with our replacement population. To date, no known Larrikinism, or meme, has been able to prevent Chinese entry into our country.

The Australia we wish to change is not within the clique of a single generation but out there in the un-sexy wild of the Australian suburbs and rural zones.

They might give 88 an Aussie twist, but it’s still 88, and as Matthew Grant said, “You say 14/88, I say 1788.” You say, Adolf Hitler, we say, William Lane, Jack Lang, John Curtin, Percy Stephensen and Henry Lawson. You say Nuremberg, we say Lambing Flats.

We close by reminding our readers that this is in no way intended as a sledge against this alt-right counterculture nor do we even regard it as an infallible account of it. We are on different paths anyway. We also stress that just because individuals turned up to Dingocon does not mean they have been influenced by a strain of conservatism they might otherwise find unacceptable if those we mentioned do hold undue sway.

We are just responding to the fact that Nationalism was stopped from entering the doors of Dingocon last Saturday night. And while we applaud the alt-right for being there and exhibiting signs of cockiness, UNA reminds our young friends that we’ve been down this road ourselves and as much as you think that it’s new it really doesn’t change. We all started out brimming with confidence and believing our predecessors had dropped the ball.

Awaiting you, young friends is all the hurt that is part and parcel of the struggle against the one-world government. Awaiting you is doxing, broken friendships, backstabbing, betrayal and potential loss of income. Awaiting you is aggro,  and total silence from those who you thought were your allies but turn out to be no better than window dummies when you are dropped in it. You will be lied about, misrepresented, they will call you names, accuse you of things you haven’t done, and in some cases, they will jail you. Perhaps some have already figured this out. In the end, you will learn the bitter lesson that things are not (pardon the pun) black and White and those who you would think are like us turn out to be bigger enemies than the Trots on the Left.

This Dingo eats conservatives




A COUPLE of months ago, a social media phenomenon, an embryonic political-cultural movement in fact – ‘the Dingoes’ – came in for public criticism. Its advent reminded the liberal media that the ‘Alt Right’ had made its way to Australia and that its emergence opened a new front against the ideological props of the liberal globalist society. Some of the Dingoes began the process of Australianizing their reference points which placed them onto the path of embracing Australian Nationalism.

But then there were those who set out to stop that process from maturing. They decided to do this by stealing the Dingo phenomenon.

It is a sad fact that the Dingoes, indeed the Alt Right generally, became subjects for subversion courtesy of a poisonous group whose line of political descent over decades demonstrates a long history of parasitism, wrecking and plain sociopathy.

It is necessary to start somewhere in discussing these wreckers and our reference to the attempted takeover of the Dingo movement only sets our stage. Their subversion runs deeper than the Dingoes.

As we shall see, if it isn’t ‘other people’s money’, it is ‘other people’s efforts’ that are to the attention of the wrecking group.

We speak here of the ‘Rape House’, not just because of some sexual assaults which occurred in proximity to this group, but rather because the group mentally despoils any rational and fair element with whom it comes into contact.

The time has come for this garbage-group was the subject not only of ruthless exposure but a concerted drive to eliminate them from the terrain of any movement that may contribute to national regeneration.

We want their guts and we want them gone.

However, given the tangled connections of the Rape House gang, that is easier said than done! It must be the subject of a mobilization by all nationalists. We can begin first with the Dingoes and help them purge these wreckers and then we can move on with other struggles to limit the wreckers’ field of action, all while we consolidate the Australian Nationalist message in every way possible.

Dr Jim Saleam, 2017

The Rape House

In 2007, Jason Rafty rented a house on Fennell Street, North Parramatta. He moved in a few tenants from his ‘scene’ and made a profit on the rent.

Whether this profit went to his new creation the ‘Public Information Forum’ (or Klub Nation as it was generally known) we don’t know, but this unofficial headquarters of his enterprise gave him a centre for his officers (sic) to live in, and act out of, as they contrived a series of schemes.

Jason Rafty, as the impresario of Klub Nation, was a product of a long-standing gang which he had served already for eight years, but we shall get to that. A remarkable letter came into our possession addressed by Rafty to Jeremy Jones of the Australia Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC). It is reproduced at the end of this article.

Here, Rafty offers to travel to Russia and spy on Russian nationalists and in particular an organisation known as Russian National Unity. He asks AIJAC for money and equipment and he sets out in detail how the operation would work and how he might also profit at the end, with book rights no less. It is understood the letter was written around 1999. He also refers to his Jewish wife, a peculiar circumstance, given the internal game-playing of Klub Nation, often involved its claim to represent neo-nazism.

The existence of the letter was well known to the Klub Nation gang, but it did not seem to worry them, accepting as they will say they did Rafty’s chutzpah explanation that he was trying to rip off Jones.

That in itself sets a certain tone for Rafty, but the very idea of trying to panhandle Jones, given his professional resources at disentangling bullshit – was incredible. More likely, the letter was a ‘genuine’ attempt to get money and betray people whom Rafty later said he found ideologically agreeable. As we shall see, Rafty was not the only person in Klub Nation with special connections. Did Rafty continue this connection with AIJAC?

The existence of the letter was well known to the Klub Nation gang, but it did not seem to worry them, accepting as they will say they did Rafty’s chutzpah explanation that he was trying to rip off Jones. 

The morally oblique style of Klub Nation extended to one of Jason Rafty’s closest lieutenants formally recruited in 2007 but known to the gang before this time. This person, who functioned as his number-two, was the person for whom Rape House is dedicated. Some three women were sexually assaulted at the Fennell Street house. One was raped and two others sexually assaulted in different ways.

The only known correspondence from Klub Nation was this letter from Rafty to Jeremy Jones of  the Australia/Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) offering to spy on Nationalists in Russia 

The assaults were known to the residents. Around 2011, one Michael Holt resided there and paid rent. As he recounted to other persons, the assaults were talked about and were to be hushed up. This troubled young man who mucked about with neo-nazi ideology would later be imprisoned on gun charges and was accused of planning a mass shooting. For ourselves, we have also talked to one of the victims who are quite specific about her experiences and she named the other victims. She certainly named the perpetrator. It is our understanding that one of the tenants remains furious with the rapist for using his bed and leaving traces of the assault. Charming.

Klub Nation scammer Andrew Wilson of the Rape House infamy is now appropriating political real estate of The Dingoes

The cover up of sexual assault by this gang is despicable, but it’s just the start. Covering their tracks is something we just cannot permit. How can we understand Klub Nation?

Klub Nation met at the Humanist House in the inner-Sydney suburb of Chippendale from early 2005 until October 2009. It met every few weeks and its political identity was known to the Humanist member who permitted their presence by renting out the rooms. The same Humanist member must have been aware of ‘something’ going on when members of Klub Nation began to actually join the Humanist Society itself as members. He cannot say he wasn’t warned as Jim Saleam spoke to him at some point about the group and what its real intentions might be.

Rape House resident Michael Holt is now in prison for violating Duke Nukem’s copyright 

Ultimately, the Klub Nation members made a bid to take over the Humanist Society because as an incorporated body it owned the property and other assets, over a million dollars worth. Fortunately, they were beaten back, evicted from the use of the facility and their members removed from the Society. This effort to steal the assets of a community organisation wasn’t a new thing to Klub Nation, as we shall also explain.

The cover up of sexual assault by this gang is despicable, but it’s just the start. Covering their tracks is something we just cannot permit. How can we understand Klub Nation?

Klub Nation was remarkable in that it had no website, no magazine, no political manifesto, never organized a demonstration, nor contested an election, nor ran any campaign of agitation, nor even performed any specific act of violence (given the tone of its meetings on occasion). It claimed to be a forum of ideas and held ‘talks’, sometimes graced by Rafty wearing a Soviet military tunic; but it also said it was a survival club and a group that would raise money towards the purchase of a property in a rural setting. Yet essentially, it was simply whatever its leaders said it was at any particular moment, and to whomsoever the‘mark’ might be.

So what was it really? A big-mouth group with no real records or obvious structure could be a type of fraud, or perhaps a version of the French Resistance. And our choice of options – is the former. It was a con. Not just a money con for the operators, but a political charade.

The Humanist Society house in Sydney’s Chippendale which Klub Nation tried taking over

Klub Nation has been described by some who blundered into it and by those affected and burned by it in several overlapping ways: listening post, Liberal Party dirty-tricks op, drain-pool of the mentally challenged, a pretend survivalist club, a money-making operation for Rafty, neutralizing agency for anyone with a brain, a counter-gang and a rumour mill that would target genuine nationalists and patriots. Each of these claims reflected the truth.

At its ‘height’ in 2009, this group pretended that it was going to purchase a block of rural land as an investment upon which buildings would be constructed for the use of the whole patriotic movement and this would serve as a training centre in trades and politics for young people. Its leaders said that they were really the “general staff” in waiting for the Australian patriot movement and the genuine force of “nationalism” (they appropriated the term), not like all of us pretenders in our various organisations.

They said they were the focal point for building the real unity that was so lacking with all of us. They tried to con into their web the new Nationalist Alternative and even older Skinhead groups. But all saw through them.

So what was it really? A big-mouth group with no real records or obvious structure could be a type of fraud, or perhaps a version of the French Resistance. And our choice of options – is the former. It was a con. Not just a money con for the operators, but a political charade.

People from an array of patriot groups did at different times attend their gatherings, usually invited by ‘runners’ but with the true nature of the group concealed from them. This was essential cover and useful in garnering intelligence and spreading misinformation about genuine groups. Newbies were quietly relieved of their money. Some were even sold silver bars which they could ‘re-invest’, or they were asked to invest in a Ponzi scheme of Pyramid-selling-type intricacy. We won’t try to explain it as it’s just too hard. Some withdrew from contact with Klub Nation, but some got hooked on the hype. A five-figure-sum bank account (after expenses and there were a lot of those) was built.

Key players in Klub Nation included Andrew Wilson, David McBryde, Steven Moore and Mark Pavic. All had murky histories, personal and political. John Boyle, a solicitor who had run the Liberal Party’s ‘Chinese Special Branch’ in Haymarket and who later became a China immigration agent and who married a Chinese woman, was noted at the meetings. Moore and Boyle were linked to the Fellowship of the Round Table a private discussion group now known as ‘Western Heritage’ and which today runs meetings at NSW Parliament House. This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party.

This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party. The Fellowship was run by the very Humanist who first let in the Klub Nation crew at the Chippendale building.

With Klub Nation, weakened after the failure to rip off the Humanists, a new plan came into being. Meetings resumed in 2010 at the Mechanics Institute in Pitt Street Sydney and the members began to join this society, also with the plan to rort it, or at least, to make fulsome use of its resources. A witness says he was handed a Mechanics membership form at the Rape House and told to “join”. Once again, nationalists warned the Mechanics what the plan was. Ultimately also, this new scam came to nought. We were also advised that nationalists were accused of warning a bowling club which they intended to ‘take over’ – and they were booted from there. On this occasion, we deny any involvement.

By late 2013, some of the ‘investors’ in Klub Nation, essentially some of those basically conned by it, were clamouring for their money. Others decided they also wanted their money, particularly a certain Peter Coleman, whom we shall meet shortly. David McBryde (who was the “treasurer”) made a big play of refunding a percentage of this money (but much was simply missing). In what must be a bemusing moment, a witness says that some of this money was repaid to claimants sometime in late 2014 or early 2015, “during a social” at an address in Summer Hill – which was also the ‘headquarters’ of the neo-nazi grouplet Squadron 88.

This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party. The Fellowship was run by the very Humanist who first let in the Klub Nation crew at the Chippendale building.

It wasn’t over. The Klub Nation crew were ready to move on. But first, a question. Where did this gang come from? Klub Nation was follow-on incarnation of a group that came into existence in Sydney in 1988 – 1989.

Nationalists call this first group the Palmer-Coleman gang, naming it after Peter Coleman, a member of Jack van Tongeren’s (misnamed) Australian Nationalists Movement and a seemingly eccentric jack-in-the-box, David Palmer.

David Palmer described himself  as “some sort of ASIO asset”

Below are two documents from the Jim Saleam Special Branch police file. One shows that Coleman was not averse to providing material to the Special Branch about nationalism (in this case Jim Saleam). The second shows that Neville Ireland, who ran the case against the nationalist organisation National Action in 1988 – 1991, had an appointment in late May 1989 with an informer called ‘Cabbie’. This informer was Coleman. Both men in a court in November 1990 denied meeting each other until that very day, a little piece of perjury that covered over a substantial relationship.


Sal2 001.jpg
Neville Ireland’s Duty Book reveals an informant called ‘Cabbie’. This was
Peter Coleman


At the Police Royal Commission in 1997, Coleman received a title, ‘Commission Code 18’ (CC18). He was important to Neville Ireland’s operations. Indeed, as we reasonably know, Coleman betrayed van Tongeren to prison and from the outside managed some disruption of National Action in the years 1989-1991.

Did Klub Nation concern itself with this? Was any member worried about it at all? No, they weren’t. Coleman’s former status was just another day in the life of the group. It was well known.

Nationalists call this first group the Palmer-Coleman gang, naming it after Peter Coleman, a member of Jack van Tongeren’s (misnamed) Australian Nationalists Movement and a seemingly eccentric jack-in-the-box, David Palmer.

David Palmer came on the scene late in 1988, joined with Coleman in early 1989 and carried on from there and in 1990 established a neo-nazi group calling itself the National Socialist Defending Aryan People Party. Well, that’s what it said it was. In 2005, he would even say in writing that he had been some sort of ASIO asset. To other people, he confessed receiving “$200 a report” from ASIO.

Did anyone in Klub Nation ever come forward to explain their relationship with Palmer or to provide information to nationalists about him? Not at all. Again, it was just another day.


Sal1 001.jpg
A Special Branch incident report: Peter Coleman happily provides information

In tandem and for years, these two political police assets harassed nationalists, appeared in the press with provocative statements, made their statements a parody of ‘racist’ thought and reported back to their masters. So what was the Palmer-Coleman gang?

It was listening post, an ASIO / Special Branch dirty-tricks op which collected intelligence on an array of patriotic people, a drain-pool of the mentally challenged, a neutralizing agency for anyone who wanted to be an ‘activist’, a counter-gang and a rumour mill. Each of these claims reflected the truth.

At different points, Australians would hear these actors had infiltrated Pauline Hanson’s party, controlled terror networks and were ready to bomb the Olympics. A seemingly ‘believing’ media would always report them. We wonder why?

Did anyone in Klub Nation ever come forward to explain their relationship with Palmer or to provide information to nationalists about him? Not at all. Again, it was just another day.

Then in 1999, Palmer decided to infiltrate the religious society, the British Israel World Federation. They had inherited a house in the Blue Mountains and $140,000 in cash and already maintained a bookshop in York Street with maybe $20,000 in assets there.

Palmer had met Rafty and a man called Mark Pavic. This quality lad had spent years in gaol for weighing down his mum’s body at the bottom of Lake Burley Griffin. But better still, he had tried to rort the Theosophical Society in 1996-7 and take its assets by moving in, siding with a ‘faction’, helping that faction and trying to come out on top. The Court of Appeal decision that saw him defeated makes interesting reading. He was a perfect organizer for the takeover of British Israel just as he was later an operator in trying to take over the Humanists.

The British Israel scheme collapsed finally in 2002 when the company was wound up and the assets found their way to the good guys in the affair. John Boyle was their solicitor and he profited to the tune of $50,000 in fees paid for (as the law demanded) by the legitimate company.  Nice.

Did the attempt to defraud British Israel ‘disturb’ the later Klub Nation leaders? Not at all. They thought to carry on with the Humanists, the Mechanics …

Taking over groups

Taking over organisations (and not just for the money) has been a stock in trade of the Palmer-Coleman gang and the successor Klub Nation gang.

In 2000, Palmer made moves to enter the Australians Against Further Immigration Party in New South Wales. That was exposed by the nationalists and the gang came up zero. Perhaps the plan was to run a party that would truly be a counter to legitimate patriotic parties? With the funds of British Israel, had they been acquired, this brand of provocation would have had long-term viability.

Klub Nation sought to take over — or at least coordinate — some nationalist and patriotic youth groups. They sought to integrate them with the funds’ raising and the plans for youth fronts, camps and the fantastic property they would buy. It was again the suspicions they incited and the counsel sought out by the supposed victims – again – which kept them out. The nationalists put the obstacles in their way.

So today, when we learn of plans to take over the Dingoes, we are not surprised. This is just another ‘takeover’ along the way. However, this time around, the gang has ‘professionalised’ itself and sounds much more believable.

The Liberal Party connection

The connection between the Palmer-Coleman gang and Klub Nation and the Liberal Party was continuous. That is another secret in the life of this gang.

Palmer, who had once been a Liberal party candidate in Queensland, boasted often of his links with senior Liberals. He meant those Liberals who described themselves as ‘conservatives’, ‘the hard right’, ‘the uglies’ in the party. This group had a long history, but as a so-called faction, it was revamped in August 1996 by no less than Tony Abbott himself. It formed up at a planning meeting (one month before Hanson’s so-called ‘maiden speech’ in parliament that set off a furore) and formalised in December 1996 (four months before Hanson launched One Nation). Its aim was to anchor Liberal Party supporters against any defection to One Nation while that party was permitted to ‘run’ – and then, once One Nation had normalised certain ideas and opinions, the Liberals simply would reel it all back in. Howard’s master stroke! Palmer, as noted, tried to disrupt One Nation as part of the shepherding strategy.

John Boyle was one of these Liberals in this so called ‘faction’. As said, the Fellowship was part of it. The Liberal connection was a portent for the future. Now as open Liberal and Liberal-satellite auxiliary activists

The collapse of Klub Nation made for a new change in the group. They had done their apprenticeship and could now be trusted with higher tasks.

After Klub Nation dissolved, McBryde and a new player Morgan Qasabian, joined a Liberal Branch. They then went on in 2012 to form the Sydney Traditionalists. They advertise Cory’s Tories (Cory Bernardi’s ‘Australian Conservatives’) and Cory’s book The Conservative Revolution. This group parades itself as “conservative”. And that is good. They are not nationalists. Yet, they are described as offering the “sister site” to the Dingoes website. Who puts that on the Dingoes website?


David McBryde is to nationalism what Ribena is to hard liquor

There is zero nationalism in them; no commitment to the old ideal of White Australia, no base in the Australian radical nationalist tradition that proclaimed the vision of Australia as the workingman’s paradise. Quite the contrary. The rabble at Sydney Traditionalists considers themselves ‘born to rule’, a ‘growing’ special caste who serve the wealthy and are to one day be promoted as part of the ruling Tory class. After all, Cory’s Tories was launched upon the blessing of the oligarch, Gina Rinehart. The Traditionalists invited Cory Bernardi to a forum and gained his personal blessings too. The rabid free marketeer multiracialist Bernardi offers another angle for ‘promotion’. Bernardi’s Conservatives are also a Liberal satellite and really are nothing different from the Liberal Party.

Morgan Qasabian 

The ex Klub Nation conservative players will occasionally playact that they are concerned at immigration, or might even say something cryptic about Zionism (Bernardi’s party is actually Zionophile), but they always refuse to answer hard questions in writing, or commit themselves except orally to anything and then with nods and winks and one can believe what one likes. When pushed about onto the social question – they support free market economics as ‘success’ proves the worth of the better people. They do not want Australian wealth in the hands of our people, nor the social uplift of all of us. Born to rule reactionaries are better (sic) than the ordinary people?

Alt Rights and Counter-gangs — the final battle

This gang has since 2013 been part of a new ‘conservative front’ in Sydney. Howard Crawford, the Liberal Party dirty tricks operator, has played a major role in building it, just as he struck at the genuine nationalists especially Australia First Party. Certain Liberals like Penrith Councillor Marcus Cornish (a multiracialist), the Sydney Traditionalists, the Reclaim movement and Nick Folkes’s ‘Party For Freedom’ (PFF) make up the system of orbiting satellites.

The Reclaim movement tried to refocus the immigration debate upon Islam only. They deny the challenge to Australia of Chinese imperialism. Many of its leaders sought to propagate the idea that Zionist Israel was the world’s friend against Islamism. People like Cornish exhausted the people’s anti-mosque movement in Penrith. As all the while the Chinese began the ‘move in’ he still found himself lauded as a conservative leader.

The gang turned up during the Penrith ‘anti-Mosque’ protests in 2014 and would bloc with Nick Folkes’s Party For Freedom (PFF), The PFF copies nationalists; from little things like allowing a member to go about in a Golden Dawn T-shirt, to flying the Eureka Flag, and even flying the Celtic Cross to talking of campaigns against Chinese takeover and about the “white genocide”. Folkes mimics others, a sure giveaway about his role, and acts like a clownish idiot. All the while, he calls nationalists ‘Nazis’. Of course, it was PFF, as we have exposed elsewhere, that met at the ‘Nazi’ headquarters in Sydney, met with Squadron 88 and had its leader close at its side. Indeed, when he wound up the Squadron, its leader told his friends he would just run with those opposed to “Islam” and would “work with Nick Folkes”. Just as the ex Klub Nation gang did too.

Crawford had his hands over Squadron 88 and gave money to it and seems to have known of ‘plans’ to attack a Muslim prayer hall in Newcastle. Did he also know of the plan of Squadron 88’s leader to attack the homes of Penrith councillors? What were the purposes of such plans being talked about? The playacting with neo-nazism serves a minor role in this conservative front. If it follows the usual pathway, it is to have fired up foolish or mad people on hand who can be encouraged to attack nationalists in one way or another on the basis that they are in the way of the birth of Fourth Reich. In what must be an amusing con, Crawford told Squadron 88 that the Liberal Party was founded by Hitler-friendly conservatives who let lots of ‘Nazis’ into Australia after the War. And they were always there and now, their descendants and acolytes are ready to ‘takeover’! Given that Crawford was caught on video urging attacks upon Australia First Party people and property, it is arguable that this was the role he would have ascribed to the Squadron had things not gone belly-up.

The ex Klub Nation gang also took on a new impresario, relevant to the Dingoes tale. It is a certain Clifford Jennings has been put out front as the Alt-Right leader and the organizer of Dingo activity, But Clifford was a member of the Liberal Party till recently (did he resign on purpose?). Information reveals that while he was never part of the scammers of Klub Nation years back, but he knows them as brothers and also attended fests with them in the company of Squadron 88 and the choirmaster, Howard Crawford.

Information to hand says that Clifford has told Dingoes and some other patriots that his force will either “take over the Young Liberals” or in the alternate, form a “youth wing of One Nation” and be the power there. Again takeover and role playing. We do not accept that Clifford is a nationalist and we again say that this is really an effort to grind up patriot and potentially nationalist young people in a mincer machine that will turn out more useless conservative sausages.

Final conflict

The Dingoes are just the latest victims of the gang. We have no doubt that they will ultimately be beaten off.

In the final conflict between the nationalists and the gang, it will be said by them (and remember they have a history that spans almost thirty years) that the nationalists are an ‘old road’, and that they are fresh and new. They will say simply that the nationalists – lie! “That was the past, they are talking about. We are us and we have plans for growth.”

Sheltering behind newbie Alt-Right folk, they will say they can take it to the skies. Some may believe them. The nationalists shall say: “they are fakers and a look at who they are, at their actual history and who they connect to, sets you straight. They simply cannot be what they say they are.” The gang will hold frenetic meetings, talk of takeovers and rising hordes, their contacts in the Libs and Cory’s Tories who are “ready to move” and maybe even “big dollars”, but even more maddening for the newbies struggling with it all, they will look them straight in the eye and say: “we are you and you are us; we are the toughest of the tough and the hardest of the hard, but we are clever and work through groups and systems.”

Nationalist ideology and politics are a unity. The ideology of Australian nativist nationalism is grounded in the old radical-nationalist-labourist traditions of long ago. Its heroes are Henry Lawson and William Lane, Jack Lang and William Spence, John Curtin and Percy Stephensen. Its flag is the Southern Cross. It is the people’s cause. This cause is the true cause of Australian identity, independence and freedom and it needs a movement that is independent of the system’s ideology and politics. It does not pretend to infiltrate the regime parties. Quite the contrary, it calls them traitors and organizes against them. That means as a matter of course that these conservatives do not serve the Australian People, but the system. Yes, perhaps a few might be genuine folk mixed there in the pot, but to use an old Christian adage, it is time to come out from amongst them and be separate. The final conflict will resolve whether the conservatives will blunt and defeat the new arising movements of patriotism and nationalism or whether they will b e put to rout.

It is time to shut the Rape House – once and for all.




Anyone surprised that the mainstream media intentionally skewed the reporting of yesterday’s Australian Pride March organised by the True Blue Crew should yield their right to inhale oxygen.

Indeed, a striking image of a protester sporting a sandwich board emblazoned with the message, “FAKE NEWS: WHAT YOU SEE ON TV IS ALL LIES” wins the day’s award for the most ironic placard. It would prove to be an astute observation.

The Daily Mail, which is the absolute Crack Whore of tabloid garbage that masquerades as news in this conquered land, chose to report the event as if it was all along organised as an ‘anti-racist’ event.

Amen, cobber!

Was this lack of prescience on their part but another sorry example of their unfitness to inform the Australian public or was it a contrived policy to invalidate the sentiment of this and any other such event?

Despite two facts — that it was organised by Australian Patriots — and that the basis of the event was to demonstrate pride of oneself in their Australianness by parading with an Aussie flag — the snakes and hacks of the press still managed to misconstrue the non-signalling of any anti-group message by the organisers as ‘racist’. By that we mean it was not an ‘anti-Moslem’ march, or whatever they automatically assume it was billed as, but simply a defiance of a present convention that abhors any expression of pride in Australianness — if you are White.

And God forbid they should have actually researched and reported the facts without bias or prejudice!

The Daily Mail, which is the absolute crack whore of tabloid garbage that masquerades as news in this conquered land, chose to report the event as if it was all along organised as an ‘anti-racist’ event.

Yes, if you read it from the mainstream media’s point of view, the whole reason for anyone turning out yesterday was to publically exhibit their unwavering commitment to and fervour for the Cult of Diversity. They were there to oppose those antiquated racists who would dare to consider the Australian colours as anything but emblematic of minority oppression. The racist Patriots, of course, were the target of the day — not the focus — and the ‘protesters’ the heroes.

If the media says the rally was an anti-racist event that must be what it was!

Anyone not criticising or demeaning the White Australian people — or expressing shame for imaginary crimes — is a deviant who has surrendered their right to their implied freedom of expression. It is an interesting observation from a medium-contact perspective that the organising of this event took place on Facebook, and a comment from a self-styled ‘anti-racist’ posting in the comments section of a thread dedicated to the Sunday rally highlighted who the genuine bigots are.

Yes, in the shaping of young hearts and minds in this country, the system has managed to churn out some of the worst class-cultural bigots in existence. Take a look at this post by Tim Sullivan who it appears is a New Zealander anyway: “It just looked like a bunch of poorly educated, low socio-economic (sic), tattooed bogans? I was just passing… not participating btw. But, what was the point of the demonstration? I don’t think the message was really conveyed effectively.”

Anti-racist Tim Sullivan is a practising social media bigot who hates poor  uneducated people, White Australians, and anyone with ‘tatts’ 

Well, Tim Tims, despite the fact you followed a statement with a question mark, casting doubts on your own IQ as judged by your own rules, the point of the whole thing was just to be visible.

In a country that is controlled by foreign interests, which favours and takes foreign money and facilitates programs that favour the benefactors of that filthy lucre, it is very hard for ordinary Australians to be noticed.

Their voice is howled down by home-grown ideological attack dogs like you who are raised and nurtured in the schools and academies of this system. These ‘bogans’ are being driven out of affordable housing, employment, and even their right to a voice in this globalised nation of ours.

And God forbid they should have actually researched and reported the facts without bias or prejudice!

On the one hand, the Left would champion the downtrodden, purely in the pursuit of their own political motives, but as UNA tirelessly point out they are elitists. This Tim Sullivan, for all his affected casualness in the comments on that page has expressed contempt for anyone who has not been indoctrinated by tertiary education, who aren’t earning at least $100K a year, and who questions the dogma of Diversity. What’s more, he probably lives in an all-White neighbourhood.

The message is that Australians are nothing, own nothing, and have no right to anything in this nation built by Aboriginals, Chinese, Africans and Middle Easterners to which Whites owe all their gratitude

In fact, Timmy is the very reason that the T.B.C and their supporters were out there yesterday. It wasn’t Moslems, it wasn’t the Chinese buying up their future, or the African ‘refugees’ swarming through their neighbourhoods like tribes of berserk warriors, but people like Tim who create that environment which oppresses them.

By standing up proud in whom they are regardless of whether they’d ever been a school Dux, or are an Alumnus, or have swindled their way into the property market to stand atop a balcony crowing over the sweaty plebs below — they are making a very bold statement.

In fact, their statement is so bold it has to be completely misrepresented by the machinery of misinformation that underpins this crooked system that keeps us all in chains.

UNA will state here and now that before any confrontation happens with any group of outsiders in this nation the first battles will be Whites against Whites. It will be the likes of those with the fortitude to stand up, like those in Melbourne on Sunday, and internal enemies such as Timmy who have been mass-produced by successive globalist occupying governments.

In fact, their statement is so bold it has to be completely misrepresented by the machinery of misinformation that underpins this crooked system that keeps us all in chains.

No, the media was never concerned with accuracy in the reporting of Sunday’s march. If they were, they would have not made the very tourist make of presuming it was organised by Blair Cottrell of the United Patriots Front, which the DM did, or mistaking Kane Miller for Blair, which they also did.

This means, of course, that Blair has become the ‘Snowball’ of the Patriot movement and anything else. By this, we refer to George Orwell’s classic take on Stalin, Animal Farm.

In Orwell’s political parable of the twentieth century, the Stalinesque pig Napoleon usurps the ideologically-driven pig Snowball and thereafter any failure of his regime, anything that goes wrong, anything and everything is blamed on Snowball.

Heh, in that regards Blair has become like Jim Saleam.

Yep, it was that pesky Blair all along… In fact, Blair was responsible for the Holocaust that killed six and a half zillion Jewish babies