PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

In the early months of this blog, we promised our readers that we would make an effort to examine the current affairs of the day in a sort of semi-frequent “news wrap”.

Snowed under as we have been, with the antics of our enemies on the far-right, sundry nutcases, cyber-pests and square-eyed Trolls occupying bulk column inches of our output, we feel obliged to give our followers a break from this bombast and have a dig at the big doings in the mainstream White world.

Hipster Melbourne was rocked this week by the death of one of its promising young scions, 22-year-old Eurydice Dixon met her end in middle-class Parkville, raped and left for dead by a total stranger, later revealed to be one Jaymes Todd, 19, of Broadmeadows.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-around good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

tribute
Tributes laid in Princes Park Melbourne for murdered artist Eurydice Dixon.

Eurydice’s talents on stage may have been questionable but being violated and dumped, lifeless, on a soccer pitch in the middle of the night by a marauding, outer suburban sex predator is a sad end for one of our own, who by all accounts did no harm in her short life.

The response to her death by the chattering classes was predictable, even though murders of this kind run at about five a year in Victoria, the usual suspects led by the lamentable premier Daniel Andrews, managed to blow the killing way out of proportion as a sop to their inner city, Greenbelt voting public.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-round good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

This insight clearly went over the heads of the ostentatiously ignorant members of the commentariat; re-animated after the long hiatus between stranger murders, Feminists and their fellow travellers have energised their “War On Women” narrative and began wailing that the problem is “Toxic Masculinity”.

We can imagine these harridans on the edge of their seats as the news of the murder broke, waiting, their claws reflexively drawing in and out of their sheaths in anticipation of the inevitable verbal misstep by Police or public officials, they were not disappointed.

ted-bundy---betrayal
American serial killer and rapist Ted Bundy would strike when women had their guard down, in supposedly “safe” areas.

The Police, who had all the data at their fingertips regarding crimes in the area surrounding the park where Eurydice was killed, and fearing in light of other attacks on women in Parkville, that there may have been a serial offender on the loose made the fatal mistake of urging women to take greater responsibility for their own safety.

From there it was on for young and old, the tired old trope “teach men not to rape” made an early and frequent appearance as did “women’s right to feel safe”, no matter the level of risk they are prepared to take in exercising their rights.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

If we take the three most recent and high-profile cases of stranger murder in Melbourne, those of Jill Meagher, Masa Vukotic and Euryidice Dixon one of these patterns appears, a pattern which is evident in many such crimes across the Anglosphere and across a time span of almost fifty years.

Misogynist criminals, rapists and killers are drawn to locations and situations in which women feel comfortable enough to let their guard down, or are otherwise vulnerable; this mode of operation is akin to that of any other predator in nature, which will attack weak and isolated members of a prey herd, or strike when the animals are at a waterhole.

bayley
Adrian Bayley, his sinister sexual urges would boil over into blind rage against women, he is the real face of misogyny.

Time and time again we have been presented with testimony from woman hating brutes and serial killers detailing their thought process in selecting victims; thinking people such as ourselves are, or ought to be, au fait with the tricks employed by dangerous men.

The more intelligent and devious predators, such as Ted Bundy and Ed Kemper, specifically chose university campuses as their hunting grounds or students as their victims based on the premise that women feel safe in such environments, so whatever ruse the killer might employ would be more likely taken in good faith by the victim.

A great deal of work has been done by the medical professions and law enforcement, both here and abroad, on understanding the way violent men think so as to be better able to predict and mitigate against their actions in the interest of public safety.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

To a great extent the routine activities of potential victims, the environments in which they move and even urban planning must be considered when trying to get into the minds of predators; this is at odds with premier Andrews’ exhortation for women to do whatever they want, whenever they want and for them to trust that putting a guilt trip on men as a group will be enough to deter potential rapists and killers.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

masa-and-killer
Masa Vukotic was chosen at random to be murdered by Sean Price, does he look like the sort of bloke who could be shamed into changing his ways?

Sean Price, the deranged killer of young Masa Vukotic in Doncaster in 2015 travelled all the way across Melbourne to a “safe” suburb and, in order to carry out his plan to blitz and kill a female, he lay in wait in bushes for a pretty “middle class” girl to pass on a popular walking track.

Adrian Bayley, the serial rapist and murderer of Jill Meagher prowled areas where young women were accessible and vulnerable, the backpacker havens and red light zones of St Kilda and the tangled, 19th-century streetscape of Brunswick, which is rich with female pedestrians but riddled with dark laneways and alcoves.

Society in general and women in particular need protection from dangerous men, as we have seen often enough, a single man in his wrath can destroy a whole community; what is needed however is a return to sensible education on matters of personal safety and codes of conduct in which everyone, women included, play their part in mitigating the threat of violence.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

The bare fact is that, contrary to the Feminist dogma, predatory males are not formed by society, nor is their behaviour an aspect of masculinity; such men are freaks and deviants and they almost always live their lives largely apart from normal men, who would most likely pick up on the fact that something is wrong with them.

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

The natural reaction by good men toward abusers of women and girls is to form a posse, hunt the offender down and mete out justice before the savage wreaks even more havoc upon the community, though in modern times we delegate this duty to the state which employs its hired gunmen, the police.

truro
The Truro killers were homosexuals, freaks and total social outcasts who got their kicks hurting women, nobody in the “straight” world had any time for them.

The police in the Euryidice Dixon case merely gave out the same advice we would expect a citizen posse to give the women they rally to protect: until this threat to your safety passes stay alert sisters, watch your backs, don’t take unnecessary risks and do not hesitate to call for help if you feel that something is not right in your surroundings.

So perhaps walking through the park alone late at night, in your “safe” suburb, which is almost certainly a magnet for sexual predators, with your headphones on and wearing high heels is actually making the jobs of those sworn to protect you more difficult?

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

In the end, however, what Feminists such as the Premier of Victoria say in public and what they do in private are likely two different things; we can credit the childless humanities department harpies and their virginal undergraduate acolytes with a lack of sense and a true belief in bullshit such as “toxic masculinity”, but most people do not think the way they do.

Daniel and Catherine Andrews are loving and responsible parents, just like the rest of us, so we highly doubt that they’re going to fill their own daughter’s head with nonsense and send her into harms way under the misapprehension that no matter the risks she takes if she is unfortunate enough to become a victim then society is wholly to blame.

andrews family
Victorian Premier Danny Andrews puts his son in a chokehold just in case he grows up to be a predator

LADS’ LEADER SUPPORTS NEIL ERIKSON AFTER EVERYTHING NOOL HAS DONE

LADS’ LEADER SUPPORTS NEIL ERIKSON AFTER EVERYTHING NOOL HAS DONE

ON Friday, June 8, Blair Cottrell lobbed up at a court appearance where Neil Erikson and his Muppets were facing charges of behaving in a riotous manner.

In a pic posted on the Facebook page of ‘Cooks Convicts’, (CC being the latest publicity-grabbing social-media enterprise generated by movement wrecker and state informant Neil Erikson), the two share a quality moment of ‘unity’ together in a café after proceedings. Neil’s hand rests tenderly on Blair’s muscly shoulder as if he wants to start caressing it. It suggests nothing of their culpabilities, contradictions, or their grubby history, much less the gaping hole in one another’s pseudo-political routines.

Yes, Blair was there to show ‘solidarity’ with “fellow patriots” whose charges stem from clashes at the December 2017 Milo Yiannopolous event at Melbourne Pavilion which was a shrewdly engineered riot that garnered not only publicity for its star but those like Erikson who trotted along to leech off Milo’s infamy. The “Milo five” are Neil Erikson, Ricky Turner, Richard Whelan, Garry Hume, and Garry Mattson. Richard Whelan, aka Richie Rich, has been a lifelong buddy to Erikson and has served time for various alcohol-related transgressions.

34892223_1049372775216933_8486637957061541888_n
(Pic Facebook) Neil Erikson lovingly strokes the shoulder of the man he denounced as a Nazi and an enemy of the ‘Patriot movement’. No hard feelings, but

Yiannopolous is a bourgeois homosexual who styles himself as a conservative and Alt-Right “troll”. He is an unlikely celebrity of America’s tangled Alt-Right. He once made a comment that veered perilously close to paedophilia advocacy and he is “married” to a Negro man so it defies belief that these supposed ‘conservatives’ would fawn after him. Simply supporting such a creature speaks volumes about their (lack of) creed.

This image of comradery comes after a torrid history where Erikson publically ratted on his former United Patriots Front (UPF) comrade, condemned him as a “Nazi”, and held him up to scorn for his audience. Neil also shut his other compatriots out of their Facebook page (a trick he and Richie Rich pulled on Nationalist Alternative) and worked to undermine each and every one of them. And having burned his people, what was Neil’s punishment? What did Blair do? He might as well have gotten down on his hands and knees, pulled down his fly, and blown him for all the disapproval he has publically expressed. Neil is now sharing Cottrell’s videos on his CC page (and endorsing former foes the True Blue Crew), so, here we go on the old Patriot Soap Opera Express. What, in fact, DO any of these jokers hold sacred?

Meanwhile, UNA has only ever scrutinised Cottrell and called him to account for his transgressions of the tenets of the Nationalism he claims a leadership role over but doesn’t uphold. Moreover, Cottrell genuinely despises us, even though we’ve never judged him on anything which he hasn’t said or done. Our criticisms have always been in the interests of the furtherance of Australian Nationalist focus; something we’ve never compromised and have held to steadfastly. Yet, he would not come down and show solidarity with us at any court appearance. Interesting, no? Added to that, he will talk to the mixed-race civics from The Unshackled on identitarian issues or, as he actually did, stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Sri Lankan Christian dingbat Danny Nalliah’s people before he ever accepted the Australian Nationalist community.

Yiannopolous is a bourgeois homosexual who styles himself as a conservative and Alt-Right “troll”.

Blair’s disdain is instructive of everything we’ve upheld about him and the infected milieu he inhabits. United Nationalists Australia has long maintained that Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell are about as nationalist as the parking lot outside of SBS studios. They may fool their cliquey Lads Society admirers, but they haven’t hoodwinked staunch nationalists such as us (although they did beguile others who call themselves nationalists).

Blair and Tom’s refusal to heed anyone of wider experience has fostered their self-deceiving soma. Owing to their insistence on dictating to others, an authority they have granted to themselves on the basis of conceit and a popularity derived from the lottery stakes of their proximity to the Reclaim Australia movement at its media heyday—and while bearing in mind that in the overall scheme of things they are still political greenhorns—means they never will. Putting it colloquially, they think they’re the duck’s guts.

34741162_2085225755082290_1415895810905735168_n.jpg
(Pic Facebook) Neil and soon-to-be Kook’s Convicts: Some bloke (L), Ricky Turner, Nool (C), and Richie Rich

Therefore, it’s irksome to honest activists that they’ve come along and wilfully disturbed the already chaotic thermosphere of the pro-Australian vanguard. But, our revolution is not theirs, since they are unable to articulate what their struggle actually is. Their mission, such as it can be discerned, is a hodgepodge of foreign identitarian concepts mixed with fragments of Australian nationalist rhetoric they’ve appropriated and used as adornments to their stage-managed facade.

This doesn’t mean that those veterans are vexed at their appearance in the theatre over lack of obsequiousness to ‘elders’, but they are understandably bothered by the damage these kids cause through their politics of personal identity wherein they take from the collective to expand their individual profile (although that more describes Blair than it does, Tom, speaking fairly). We know, too, that their defiance is grounded upon their fear of having their intellectual flaws laid bare.

Subsequently, they bob around and around in the civic patriot eddy while their Nationalism, such as it is, remains a general identitarian facsimile of what overseas ‘Alt-Right’ personalities are saying, kept strictly in-house lest they are held to any branding.

Blair and Tom’s refusal to heed anyone of wider experience has fostered their self-deceiving soma.

Given that we’ve so consistently argued these are not Nationalists, why should it even concern us?

Tom and Blair have contrived to market themselves as Nationalists, as has Neil Erikson, and others who fly around in their clucky coup. The Lads have conspicuously employed the Southern Cross on their Facebook page and in their clubhouse (which they are entitled to do) not because they are nativist, but because the Australia First Party uses it. They made a point of interposing themselves to poach any would-be members to their circle where they’ve fed them a poisoned line about established Nationalist organisations. It’s the equivalent to a shop owner stealing his competitor’s sign so he can misguide the other’s customers.

milo
So conservative, so Alt-Right, so incredibly race-mixingly homo: Milo, the hero of the hardcore Aussie Patriot movement. You cannot get more Aussie or conservative than him

They posit their club as “the only hope” while Tom Sewell is reputed to have remarked that sleeping with Asian women is OK “so long as you don’t get them pregnant”. No, it’s not OK. Blair said on ABC TV that “you don’t have to be White” to be a patriot, echoing the queen of civics, Pauline Hanson. But on the same hand, he talked about White identity to The Unshackled, which is multi-racialist and definitely no Nationalist mouthpiece.

As such, they would come onto ground, appropriate symbols which hold meaning to us and then undermine all the values inherent in them. They vacillate, so they say, to popularise a demonstrably failed strategy and certainly nothing original.

And how do they handle criticism? Right now, they’re engaged in the most puerile trolling antics. An associate member of theirs, ‘Darcey’ from Vic, has been creating fake Facebook profiles mocking critics of Tom Sewell. They share it around the Lads and all of them jump on board “friending” these fake pages. And Tom finds it funny as hell. How advanced of them. This is what their dynamic resorts to in place of having any actual words to state their case.

Subsequently, they bob around and around in the civic patriot eddy while their Nationalism, such as it is, remains a general identitarian facsimile of what overseas ‘Alt-Right’ personalities are saying, kept strictly in-house lest they are held to any branding.  

Blair getting chummy with Neil, who he should have bashed on sight, is another example of how staying in that half-stepping pseudo-celebrity terrain between nativism and the global ‘Alt-Right’ is more important than conceding to Nationalist beliefs. Furthermore, they will never do this because of their misguided conviction that Patriotism is inexorably intertwined with ‘conservatism’.

They cannot understand that our Nationalism is based on the traditional Australian labourist movement of early last century. They consider this “communist” in flavour, even though at the time Nationalists were attacked by both the conservatives and the communists. Nationalism is a third position neither left nor right.

And what of the evil clown Erikson? Neil has no discernible politics at all, and he is not fit to represent anybody. He couldn’t even hold his small family together: as soon as he moved to Tasmania to mooch off his missus’s people she threw him out for being a useless pilchard. He can’t hold a job because his shenanigans and desire for notoriety override his need to provide for his family. Nevertheless, he wants to ‘represent’ the Australian people and as such, in a wonderful arc of bullshit at court, he and his retarded entourage managed to evade an order on their bail conditions requiring they do not consort with one another. Why? Because he argued they’re starting a “political party” around “Cook’s Convicts” and they need to brainstorm together. This lot haven’t the combined mental energy to figure out how to unpack a box of groceries and if Fortitude failed, this palooka has a less than one in two-hundred trillion chance of getting registered.

More amazing, however, is that Gold Coast businessman Daniel Spiller was actually prepared to finance this walking disaster in another spectacular nativist move to bring a couple of foreign Alt-Right shuckers into Australia for a speaking circuit. In what was dubbed ‘Future Now’, he planned to finance the degenerate Yiannopolous back for another swing, along with ‘Proud Boy’ Canuck kook Gavin McInnes and Info Wars Alex Jones. Erikson was to join them, which would have created the impression he was in their ‘league’ whatever that’s supposed to figure as.

Spiller may also account for how come a bum like Erikson and his fellow debris can afford to travel all around the country when they should collectively be unable to afford the price of a McDonald’s cup of coffee.

Meanwhile, another one with more money than sense, David Pellowe of Axiomatic Events is adding to the improved wisdom of proud patriots by bringing Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux to Australia. Erikson and Turner along with some knuckleheads travelled to Queensland to storm his front door over accusations that he—along with Nool’s former Zionist ally, Avi Yemini—had sabotaged Spiller’s Future Now event by claiming to media that “Nazis” were organising the event.

Slapstick theatre aside, it says so much about this lot and their supposed ‘patriotism’ that they shun the many local veteran Nationalist speakers with so much to share for free in favour of Canadians speaking a generic ‘conservative line’. Molyneux is no Nationalist, or even White Nationalist, he is, if anything, a Libertarian, while Lauren Southern is an Alt-Right conservative without a real clue about Australian Nationalist issues. What’s more, to see them will cost upwards of $80 to $800.

Do not be mistaken; this sweep of conservatives trying to pass themselves off as Nationalists is just the same old players with a couple of new faces thrown in. Erikson is being funded from somewhere other than possibly Spiller, and it doubtless all ties back to the Liberal ‘far right’, he is speaking to the state, and the entire edifice of this ‘Cook’s Convicts’ and now Blair’s ‘Lads’ is just another conservative front misdirecting the eternal dumb that support them. No one expecting any sort of Nationalist result we see anything resembling change by supporting this string of show ponies.

Serious Nationalists never deviate from our position or compromise our principles and this implacability seems to upset these Patriots who trade allegiances like they change their socks (if in fact, they change their socks). We never make allies with those who’ve been proven to have violated codes of honour. What’s more, we are not squeamish about our Australianness, while waving flags and claiming to be “loyal patriots”.

Likewise, we don’t carelessly publish videos that inadvertently dox our own members, such as the brains trust at The Lads managed to achieve with their crowing ‘fight night’ videos posted to their FB page.

video-still.jpg
A lovers quarrel erupts over who is more Alt-Righty and less Nazi and more Aussie

PC IS NOT DEAD – IT IS THE MCCARTHYISM OF THE NEW MILLENIUM

PC IS NOT DEAD – IT IS THE MCCARTHYISM OF THE NEW MILLENIUM

NETFLIX is currently airing a movie about a bunch of Commie — and mostly Jewish — blacklisted scriptwriters in Hollywood during the 1950s in that period from 1947 to 1956 now known as the era of McCarthyism.

The movie is Trumbo, a 2015 biographical drama focusing on screenwriter Dalton Trumbo, who was blacklisted by Hollywood and served jail time after failing to sufficiently grovel to the House Committee on Un-American activities when accused of promoting communist propaganda.

In one sense, he was a hero, who transcended the politics of the time as we understand and characterise them today. On another, he was just a Hollywood spiv cranked up on Benzedrine and polluting his liver while disseminating his ideology through the medium of cinema. Yet, while that is all very interesting, this is not a pro-Commie rave, and he is not our subject; merely our point of entry.

While McCarthyism denotes a period in the mid-20th century characterised by political paranoia about ‘the red menace’, the Wikipedia definition creates a wholly more practical description for our purposes, “the practise of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence.”

What is interesting about it is that it describes the world today — only the ‘menace’ is more ephemeral and the line of delineation broader. But we’ll segue into that hypothesis once we’re done dealing with the confounding shock at the level of ‘sexual harassment’ being revealed in that great new church of ours, Hollywood.

We are seeing Goliaths of the PC capital of Hollywood being crucified on their self-constructed altar for gross violations of their own dogma. The icons of liberalism are being rounded-up and put on public trial and it is, for us nationalists, a joy to observe. The latest is Morgan Freeman, the 80-year-old African American actor and black-rights champion who has been accused of sexually harassing eight women — and not all of them sharing his skin tone.

The movie is Trumbo, a 2015 biographical drama focusing on screenwriter Dalton Trumbo, who was blacklisted by Hollywood and served jail time after failing to sufficiently grovel to the House Committee on Un-American activities when accused of promoting communist propaganda.

The “discovery” of his transgressions has happened at the height of the #MeToo anti-sexual-harassment campaign, and in the shadow of Harvey Weinstein’s colossal downfall for his sadistically predatory behaviour against defenceless, wholly innocent, pure and virtuous Hollywood actresses.

Indeed, what is amazing about the slew of scandals uncovered in this atmosphere is that nobody could possibly have imagined degenerates inhabit a world as morally correct as Hollywood. It is every bit as surprising as discovering that the desert is actually covered in sand. But let’s not labour that gag – in fact, let’s wipe away the irony and consider its implications.

download
The suspiciously bourgeois Dalton Trumbo in a classic communist pose reminiscent of Churchill at work 

The very name ‘Hollywood’ is synonymous with degeneracy — the evocation of the casting couch, wild parties, and cocaine flowing more freely than at a Colombian drug lord’s favourite sister’s wedding. Hollywood stars marry for publicity opportunities, adopt children on the same basis, and live lives that make the Elephant Man’s time on earth seem conventional.

Hollywood promotes degeneracy every chance it gets. Sure, it encourages a heap of good American, good world citizen, good globalist crap, but thanks to Hollywood, corruptive concepts are normalised and brought into our lives. What once occupied the milieu of pornography is now regarded as popular entertainment.

Paradoxically, society has historically regarded actors as equalling a social level of prostitutes, which in a sense, they are. These days, they are the new high priests, and especially if they’re coloured, they are the alpha heroes and founts of all wisdom and enlightenment — while enjoying all the liberal freedoms of hedonism which the average prostitute pursues such as drugs and countless sexual partners — all in a world so far removed from the reality of the average person that they could not be more distant from us if they were to exist on Alpha Centauri.

The “discovery” of his transgressions has happened at the height of the #MeToo anti-sexual-harassment campaign, and in the shadow of Harvey Weinstein’s colossal downfall for his sadistically predatory behaviour against defenceless, wholly innocent, pure and virtuous Hollywood actresses.

Yet, now we find there are “rules” and “boundaries” and concepts of “decency”, hitherto undetectable to the human eye, which have been violated. These binding values are just as enforceable against errant homos too, as Kevin Spacey found out when his alleged history of harassing male actors emerged and his brilliant career nosedived. Moreover, each of the condemned is “left-leaning” politically.

The central contradiction here is tied to the notion of consent encrypted in a narrative-strand concerning empowerment. This particular species of moral relativity asserts its absolutism in the theatre of “slut walks” where females (usually the ugly ones) deliberately set out to provoke with their sexuality while simultaneously denying it — using it, if you will, as a form of entrapment. They wish that eyes covet them salaciously so that they can screech, “Stop looking at me!”

morgan-freeman-quote-whatever-we-decide-we-want-to-do-is-what-we-do.jpg
A fine quote from Freeman. Of course, what he means is, if we decide to play grab-ass, then that’s what we do

One would argue if they did not wish to be gawked at that they hide their flesh, but they use their bodies as a form of ‘empowerment’ by inciting a perfectly natural response that they can then go on to censure. Within the inequality of that performance is the very logic of a new McCarthyism that has moved beyond the black and white of communism VS the American way and grown vast tentacles into areas that govern a range of principles: some political, some moral, some ethical, but others entirely nebulous.

There is nothing unreasonable about women, or men, expecting not to be sexually harassed. And if that whole movement and the witch-hunts growing out of it are simply about changing the working culture in that egregious community then so be it. But these are actors and actresses and Hollywood is a vast stage.

What we are seeing is a performance intended for our consumption. It is an instructive drama to alter the way we think and behave and its underlying message is that men are natural predators. It has delivered a problem, it has identified the cause, but its solution is yet to be decided.

What we are seeing is a performance intended for our consumption. It is an instructive drama to alter the way with think and behave and its underlying message is that men are natural predators. It has delivered a problem, it has identified the cause, but its solution is yet to be decided.

We began by talking about McCarthyism and made a wide curve into the corrupt culture of Hollywood but they are related. For, this new McCarthyism is not fixed to an “us VS them” narrative, but an organic conflict where “us” and what “we” believe is an ever-evolving set of social laws.

A new lexicon is needed to deal with everything from people with physical handicaps, to the Babylon of races flooding into western lands. The terms we use to describe our own sexes “boy and girl” are now the subjects of political revisionism and the misuse of the appropriate terminology may result in falling foul of an omnipresent “House committee into Un-Enlightened Attitudes”.

download (1).jpg
This pic is meant to prove a point but really it just makes us want to reach for a sick bag

There will be no panel seated to hear charges in this era of McCarthyism — instead, everyone becomes a committee judge.

We used the example of the “slut walk” as an entrapment and so too this goes for the rubbing in our faces of diversity. We are goaded with this purposefully-engineered population change, this demographic shift, and the abolition of every expectation we were born to. The media riles us up and then slaps us when those of us not conditioned to the Enlightened Attitudes voice our opposition.

They blacklisted Trumbo and his commie mates. In theory, this meant they couldn’t work (even though Trumbo used aliases to sell his work) and today they do the same to dissidents against the lunacy of the PC world in all its ‘diversity’. We employed Wikipedia’s entry definition of McCarthyism earlier and liked how it referred to “the practise of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence.”

There will be no panel seated to hear charges in this era of McCarthyism — instead, everyone becomes a committee judge.

In this era, to point at the social damage being done by uncapped immigration will earn you such tags as ‘Nazi’ with all its attendant anti-social signifiers and interpretations. This is regardless of whether or not you subscribe to National Socialist views. Your name will be besmirched on social media, and on the Google search engine, and blacklisting will begin.

Employers will Google your name as a matter of routine employment check and the calumny will disadvantage you. You will find that you are no longer treated equally by the police, or by the law. Your blacklisting might not even come about as a result of a division on the question of immigration or race it might be tied to views oppositional to other tenets of this mercurial PC dogma.

Trumbo waited it out — even winning an academy award or two under his non de plumes. In a sense, he helped to shape the new Hollywood. Does that mean his communism won out? Not really, it just meant that the overarching paranoia about it had relaxed. But we’re not dealing with paranoia; we’re up against the mind-viruses of a crypto global dictatorship centred round an almighty, omniscient floating shekel.

Nothing is as it seems.

obama-weinstein.jpg
Picture perfect — Weinstein was a massive financial contributor to the Democrats. But the fat Jew bastard ain’t laughing now

 

KLUB DEFAMATION: AFP LEADER BEING SUED OVER UNA KLUB NATION EXPOSÉ

KLUB DEFAMATION: AFP LEADER BEING  SUED OVER UNA KLUB NATION EXPOSÉ

Former members of the defunct Klub Nation have joined together to launch a defamation suit against Australia First Party president Jim Saleam for an article published on this blog in June 2017.

Led by Andrew Wilson, who has filed a statement of claim several months after the publication of ‘Rape House’, notices of concern have also been filed by Jason Rafty, Steven Moore, and Peter Coleman. What is unusual is that all four applications have been made from different states claiming damages collectively to the value of $530,000.

It is understood that following the issuing of his statement of claim, Andrew Wilson has travelled to NSW to muster up support for his action.

Information received suggests that another associate of Klub Nation, Mark Pavic, is playing an instrumental role behind the scenes, and may yet himself issue a concerns notice. Mr Pavic was convicted in relation to the death of his mother in 1985 with evidence proving he weighted down his mother’s body beneath the waters of Lake Burley Griffin.

When asked whether he planned to fight the suit, Dr Saleam told UNA, “Of course, these actions will be resisted – with hard evidence. I have noted the assertions of the plaintiffs. It is true I have commented upon them over the decades and have maintained records and files on their activities. One of the current plaintiffs is even referred to in my doctoral thesis. I suppose this will all make for a remarkable ‘show trial’.”

Dr Saleam is also confident of his legal challenge: “I have only the most positive view of the final outcome. Already, I have been contacted by many people throughout the country who are prepared to either offer their evidence or other assistance against the Klub Nation plaintiffs. I thank some who have already pledged financial support.”

Rape-House-e1498716402584

LADS’ LEADER HAS “MAORI BLOOD,” SAYS INSIDER

LADS’ LEADER HAS “MAORI BLOOD,” SAYS INSIDER

According to a confidential source with intimate ties to the Sydney Lads Society, their shady leader has, pardon the pun, a dark secret he is keeping closely guarded — he has Maori ancestry in his bloodline.

Mark McDonald, who is also known as Mark Campbell, among other aliases, is one of the cagiest cats in the Identitarian alleyway. Speaking on the assurance of anonymity, our insider says, “He has these two old people that he tries passing off as his parents. But there is no way they are his parents. He doesn’t want us to know who his real parents are because that will just confirm our suspicions about his tainted heritage.”

We fully support our New Zealand brothers and sisters, but we’re sure our Nationalist friends in NZ would agree it is not the place of Australian Nationalists to dictate New Zealandness to them. Likewise, it’s too much to cop that Mark “Matey Mate” is here trying to tell Australians what the deal is with our own kind. It’s doubly galling to know that the Lads Society’s supreme leader, Thomas Sewell, is himself a Kiwi.

pjimage.jpg
We ran a little digital scan test. And we needed surgery after laughing so hard

But whereas we’re sure Sewell’s bloodline is clean of Maori genetics, it is very likely that the same cannot be said of his illustrious Sydney 2IC who our deep-throat describes as being “as dumb as a box of broken hammers”.

Apparently, Matey Mate’s grey matter is likely to present a concern since he cannot hold a serious discussion about politics and lacks educational basics. “If you asked him whereabouts Belgium sat on the world map, for instance, he’d probably point at South America.”

mate
Matey Mate in his 45-degree bomber jacket

McDonald, or Campbell, or perhaps Tunafahekatamooki, is also said to be “back on the steroids” to improve his body image as Lads’ tribal chief. He appears to be on rocky ground leadership-wise, too, since his bidding to have Nick Folkes’s “boy” Toby Cook come aboard and join The Lads was down-thumbed by a majority vote. What’s even more curious is why he’d want an embarrassing lump like Toby in the club in the first place; perhaps since their mixed-race peccadillo is something they can both share. Or maybe there is a more sinister agenda at work given his connections to Liberal party para-state operatives and his relationship with cronies that surrounded the former Party for Freedom.

But this is not the only area that McDonald/Campbell has clashed with club policy: he is breaking with the strict Men’s Movement ideals of the Lads by reportedly having “gotten engaged” to an actual female. It is hoped that his bride to be is well-off with her own home because Matey is back in Summer Hill living at Club Squalor in the dilapidated house belonging to former PfF member Jerry Dragosevic. There are so many holes in the floor, ceiling and walls at Club Squalor that any attempt at consummating his marriage could lead to him unwittingly providing a free peep show to his landlord. But given that Matey is “back on the steroids” then the shrivelled offerings this will make of his wedding tackle makes that scenario most unlikely.

Lastly, our source made mention of reports that Matey Mate has “bragged” about having “frequently met with ASIO” and how he “enjoys a protected status because of it”. This is nothing more than what UNA has maintained from the get-go. But now he’s the Lads problems and given that it’s all just one deep murky pond in which the same toxic fish all swim and feed off the usual plankton it’s of little concern to us. We do, however, enjoy a good gloat from time to time.

33cb6e1d69b3a51c90d6cd146f6bbc0f
Once Were White Nationalists

 

 

EVERYONE IS A NAZI NOW – THE NEVER ENDING CONSERVATIVE SUBTERFUGE OF NATIONALISM

EVERYONE IS A NAZI NOW – THE NEVER ENDING CONSERVATIVE SUBTERFUGE OF NATIONALISM

BACK IN 2015, the bulk of the patriot movement was dodging any accusation they might be ‘racist’ in the hope of garnering widespread acceptance. The Nazis were infiltrating Reclaim Australia, or so they complained.

But the civic patriots who gathered at rallies in Australian cities weren’t about White supremacy or worshipping Hitler, which they believed were synonymous. No, they were a mainstream movement where anyone was welcome so long as they ‘accepted our values’ and abided by ‘our laws’. It was a refrain coming loudest from the queen of civic patriots, Pauline Hanson, who pushed smiling media opportunities with African children. She even forged a slogan saying ‘You don’t have to be White to be Australian’.

Hanson had more to gain from this mainstreaming scam than anyone since it was her that 90% of the civic movement was throwing their support behind.

Steps were taken to oust persons whose views ran contrary to an acceptance of diversity minus Islam. What “our values” happened to be was never satisfactorily defined except broadly as ‘Christian values’. This vagueness was not resident purely in the rhetoric but in the construction of these allegedly ‘patriot’ groups.

Israeli flags flapped alongside the Southern Cross at counter-demonstrated rallies. Inscribed into the core policies of civic patriot micro parties like the Australian Liberty Alliance and Danny Nalliah’s Rise Up Australia was a fundamental support for the State of Israel. Remember, these others were founded on the pretext of a pro-Australian locus yet here they were concerning themselves with a foreign nation embroiled in the military intrigues of the Middle East generating the flow of displaced Moslems which they objected to in the first place. Thus, it was never Australianness they were demonstrating for, but something that the rank and file would never be sufficiently able to articulate, much less understand.

Arch-Zionist Avi Yemini was raised as an orthodox Jew who wasn’t allowed to mingle with Aussie kids. Now he is the duck’s guts of the anti-Islam movement personifying for many disenfranchised patriots these nebulous ‘Aussie values’ while facilitating members of his gym to go and kill Palestinians for Israel. Yemini is the leftover from a milieu which has experienced a cosmic shift since Reclaim Australia activity generated clickbait. He came in almost as if he was selected by forces unknown to challenge Blair Cottrell for the position of patriot leader. It was Liberal Party’s grubby hack man Howard Crawford who cited Jim Saleam and Blair Cottrell as being the two “biggest threats” to conservatism.

Hanson had more to gain from this mainstreaming scam than anyone since it was her that 90% of the civic movement was throwing their support behind.

Styling himself as spokesman for Australian patriotism, he is actually saying that we as a nation are just a strand of a Western Alliance centred around his beloved Israel and to not face up to that is somehow unpatriotic. To show patriotism to this country means loyalty to the ends and purposes of the Western Alliance currently ganging up on Syria and Iran.

Yemini’s Facebook page boasts hundreds of thousands of followers, while he commands a presence in conservative media like the Daily Mail and Sky News; the latter on which he recently appeared drumming up membership to get the ALA, for which he is now a leading member, registered in Victoria in time for the elections. Avi might be in Tel Aviv one minute, and West Australia the next. Just quietly, it wouldn’t surprise us if he is being bankrolled by the Mossad.

hasnon
Australianness is a simple matter of values, not skin colour, sez Pauline

Yet, in the maelstrom of that ambiguous crossover that always existed between the groups who staunchly supported Israel, and those claiming to be mainstreaming as a strategy, the vociferous kosher patriots have dwindled. With the influence of the Alt-Right, which protagonists from the anti-Islam movement latched onto, it’s not so cool to back Israel now. It’s much more fashionable to come across ‘edgy fash’. Today, even Nick Folkes is a Nazi. Yesterday, he was burning Nazi flags. The component of this alleged ‘Nazism’, the identitarian aspect of asserting Whiteness is the entire vogue whereas only a couple of years ago Pauline was, as we have said, telling us we don’t have to be White to be Australian. Her message was backed up by the same people now professing to be all about ‘the White race’.

Shermon Burgess, when teamed up with fellow political wrecking ball Neil Erikson, produced videos purportedly exposing their fellow comrades from the defunct UPF as ‘Nazis’. Burgess even made a video recommending White Australian men sleep with Asian women because according to him they made better wives.

Now, Shermon has created another of his endless Facebook pages, one of which is ‘No More White Guilt’. He is also associated with former Party for Freedom stalwarts Toby Cook, Matt Lowe and Chris Grantham in a new entity the name of which we won’t even bother including since it will have changed by next week. But all of these people were fervently ‘anti-Nazi’ and PfF made a major campaign out of smearing Australia First Party leader Jim Saleam as a Nazi and burned a Nazi battle flag outside of the party’s Tempe headquarters in 2016. Several names were symbolically listed on that flag including United Nationalists Australia.

Shermon Burgess, when teamed up with fellow political wrecking ball Neil Erikson, produced videos purportedly exposing their fellow comrades from the defunct UPF as ‘Nazis’.

But who were these Nazis so deplored? In fact, Australian Nationalists who opposed the globalist imposition of mass-immigration of non-Whites leading to population replacement of Australians were primarily in the crosshairs of these civic patriots. They opposed only Moslem immigration and then only if they did not “assimilate”. It was, to anyone gifted with logic and reason, an inexplicable position.

Meanwhile, also in their crosshairs but avoiding Australian Nationalists for the same reason was the United Patriots Front. Between the leadership of UPF, specifically Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell, a channel was open to veteran nationalists via, among others, the Whitelaw Towers’ blog and Nationalist Alternative.

UPF steve
Mainstreaming puts non-Whites first for cunning strategic reasons which have something to do with fooling “the masses”

Chief among these communicating was Neil Erikson, the harbinger of disharmony, who would later crucify online just about anybody serious who he had associations with. Likewise, despite the advice and encouragement received from the Nationalists, the United Patriots Front’s Blair and Tom treated us as if we had herpes. They much preferred to be photographed ‘getting along’ with people of colour than being seen with anyone known to be an Australian Nationalist, or the more generic White Nationalist.

They would say this was for ‘strategic reasons’. If they had the capacity to listen and learn instead of dictate they might have been able to absorb that this was a doomed approach. We said so then and we were proved right when their political entity Fortitude crashed and burned like the African space program. Yet, where arrogance and inexperience were UPF’s fault, the others with whom they now sat uneasily in a bloc with, something else altogether was happening.

As far as they were concerned, Australia First Party had failed under Jim Saleam, they were too old, and Blair has a special contempt for Nationalist Alternative the origins of which are obscure. Their bias continues today, but they are joined by equally domineering upstarts, who believe ‘they’ and only ‘they’ are right despite being neophytes and not understanding the history, aims of, and essential tenets of Australian Nationalism.

Meanwhile, also in their crosshairs but avoiding Australian Nationalists for the same reason was the United Patriots Front. Between the leadership of UPF, specifically Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell, a channel was open to veteran nationalists via, among others, the Whitelaw Towers’ blog and Nationalist Alternative.

Thus, they argue, their latest manifestation, The Lads Society, is the only viable organisation for ‘young’ White Australians and others. And the emphasis is most definitely on ‘young’ but we’ll get to that in due course. They are joined by another exclusively young set, which is doing everything possible to provide authorities with an excuse to outlaw them as a terrorist group, The Antipodeans.

It’s a sign of the times that much of the dark humour that resides in The Antipodean’s propaganda materials are now regarded with fear and loathing. About 50 years ago, chuckle magazines like National Lampoon were cracking up a generation with tasteless material that helped shape the funny bone of the times. They were not afraid to touch on race either and frequently did. Posters such as the one in which The Antipodeans would “Legalise the execution of Jews” would’ve slipped in there no worries. But it’s a big ask to expect the Australian people to swallow the thought of killing any group of people even if it is said in a satirical manner calculated to deliberately upset and shock.

images
There’s always somebody who’ll be silly enough to do it

A major hypocrisy exists with Julie Nathan, research officer with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry condemning them in the name of Jews when Israel’s Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef referred to black people as ‘monkeys’, and for many Jewish people, the feeling against non-Jews is one of unconcealed contempt. It certainly is for the Palestinians and others of their neighbours. UNA views the model these boys have based themselves on and sees them speeding headlong into a disaster which will blow back on anyone even six-degrees separated from them.

IsraeliHumiliatesAfrican.jpg
An Israeli citizen drags a black by his hair and takes a selfie with the “monkey”. But oi vey, what about the Holocaust says the ECAJ

Nevertheless, the point is made that ‘the movement’ as elements of this melange of rightist entities refers to its associations, is now all ‘Nazi’. We use that term advisedly. The non-racialists are now touting racialist sentiments, even if only obliquely at times, while this appears to be a change it is in fact not; it’s just that the Liberal party connections behind the curtain have decided to absorb the ‘Alt-Right’ the same way they jumped on board Reclaim Australia the moment it got going and steered it on a course towards kosher patriotism. We are not suggesting they influence every entity but they are sure trying to. Right now, the Lads Society is firmly in their sights, only the leadership of that group is too stubborn to heed a word the veteran nationalists have to say; dismissing it as anything but what it is.

In Sydney, they already have a foot through the door with the appointment of Mark “matey mate” McDonald, ex-cohort of Howard Crawford and still, from what we guarantee, moving in murky Liberal-connected circles. If you know your Aussie Nationalist history, you will recognise this is not a fanciful conspiracy theory but a time-honoured strategy.

A major hypocrisy exists with Julie Nathan, research officer with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry condemning them in the name of Jews when Israel’s Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef referred to black people as ‘monkeys’, and for many Jewish people, the feeling against non-Jews is one of unconcealed contempt.

Rather than rewrite this history from the 1960s to the 2000s we include here a link to Kangaroo Reich which details the curious early history of the Liberal Party “rubbing up against the so-called National Socialist Party of Australia (NSPA)”.

It mentions certain names that are still ghosting in the shadows today, hovering on the fringes, and coveting groups such as The Lads Society. And it’s noteworthy that all of these entities of what we shall refer to as an Alt-Right oeuvre discuss among themselves “infiltrating” parties and institutions without realising it is they are most likely to be, and in fact are being, infiltrated themselves.

Familiarity with the Australian far-right’s history helps you see how back in the day when the Liberal Party flirted with neo-Nazis because they were anti-communist in character, these days they wish to direct them into the conservative current or render them inoperable. And this is why it is only ever true Nationalism that is constantly coming under attack as these operatives infiltrate and use these groups as weapons with which to attack the established Nationalists. The one thing that is unacceptable to the Western Alliance is a truly nationalised Australia.

This is why it confounds us that many young blokes of the Alt-Right still keep a foot in the Young Liberal camp. How could they want to? Is it the old familiar line about changing from within, for it is those fools who are the ones to get changed?

Everything on the fringes is something else, or up to something else. For instance, there can be little doubt remaining to all but the unreachable that Neil Erikson is collaborating, in whatever manner, with the authorities. How so? None of his shenanigans, nothing he has to say is either consistent with a political line or true to an ideology. His are just utterances of a conservative style that are simply negation.

Rather than rewrite this history from the 1960s to the 2000s we include here a link to Kangaroo Reich which details the curious early history of the Liberal Party “rubbing up against the so-called National Socialist Party of Australia (NSPA)”.

Arthur Conan Doyle, who created Sherlock Holmes, wrote: “Eliminate the impossible, and whatever remaining, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”

This is a valuable rule when dealing with the hucksters, dupe-merchants, swindlers and hacks that appear in the topography whenever anything vaguely resembling the Nationalistic arises. Indeed, they are much happier with Neo-Nazis since they so easily play into the narrative that serves both the system and its Zionist beneficiaries of this ‘menace’ which they can point at.

Nothing that offers a hope of change exists in those fetishists who are more concerned with mimicking a uniform and profess to ‘White Nationalism’ above nativism. Take for instance Robert Edhouse and Melony Atwood. Robert, who once went under the name Mathew Collins, visited the United States and was granted permission by Aryan Nations to set up a “chapter” here.

This was not a Nationalist entity but a gang. And what did this fervent ally of the White Race do? He conspired with Atwood, his lover, to murder Atwood’s 42-year-old husband, Alan Taylor while living under his roof.

Taylor was a hard-working White Man with a young son by Atwood. He was murdered for a one-million-dollar life insurance policy he supposedly held. Now they’re both serving minimum terms of 21 years. Atwood will be a scarecrow by the time she is released and Edhouse an institutionalised old man.

Arthur Conan Doyle, who created Sherlock Holmes, wrote: “Eliminate the impossible, and whatever remaining, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”

All of this noise around the fringes of Nationalism keeps the real thing from spreading. So rather than accept the tenets of Australian Nationalism those who cannot fulfil its needs bitch and gripe that certain people “think they make the rules”. The rules are tenets and those tenets exist independent of those persons who for one reason or another do not seem to be able to live up to them. So in a rash fit, they simply steal the word ‘Nationalism’ and remodel it into their own identitarian image.

United Nationalists Australia was conceived back in 2016 as an antidote to this violation of our ideology. It came ahead of the anticipated Coalition of Australian Nationalists (CAN). It envisaged a Fortress Nationalism fortified against these unsavoury elements. But nothing came of it. It was immediately undermined by those elements we’ve described that still resided in one or more of those parties involved. It rotted from the inside before it ever ripened. Then, to the horror of UNA, Nationalist Alternative not only never had our back, but they actually threw their support behind Blair Cottrell, of all people; a kid with absolutely no respect for anybody else. This mistake has left the house of Nationalism in disarray.

But that is just for now since identitarian is the flavour of the month. Those young folk who have pledged themselves to certain fraternities masquerading as ‘societies’, which are in fact just club life, risk being set on the wrong path forever, winding back the true cause at least another ten years. Presumably, there’ll be new Liberal agents waiting in the bracken for when that time comes.

One thing is for sure, the anarchists and anti-fascists who so love to quote the others have never and will never reference our commentaries on this link to the conservatives. In some cases, there is an overlap, as the aforementioned are only half of the enemy. The Nationalist finds himself burned by conservatives only too happy to utilize these agencies of the state against him.

Palmerr
David Palmer, one of the earliest to subvert the Nationalist Movement (see Kangaroo Reich link)

 

ANZAC DAY – A REASON TO WHINGE FOR SOME AND AN EXCUSE FOR A PISS-UP TO OTHERS

ANZAC DAY – A REASON TO WHINGE FOR SOME AND AN EXCUSE FOR A PISS-UP TO OTHERS

We are not sure, and we were never actually there ourselves, but we’re fairly certain that the poor Anzacs waiting to be shredded piecemeal by Turk artillery while landing at Anzac Cove in the twilight of the 25th of April, 1915, weren’t sucking on tinnies of VB.

Thus, this tradition of getting pissed at six in the am on this period of national commemoration has more than a hint of Melbourne Cup Day about it. Nonetheless, those who made it back from that disastrous landing courtesy of the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, were no doubt in need of strong drink for the rest of their lives.

Anzac Day has been used as a pawn in the culture wars by those on the bourgeois liberal left fond of attacking national-spirited notches on the calendar, and by the government, marching in step with the internationalist agenda.

This year the whole parade has turned limp-wristed by inexplicably making it about women. Next year it might about gays or Rohingya refugees, but this year women are to march up the front while those regrettable specimens of Australian manhood must follow in their saintly shadow with heads bowed and any signifiers of masculinity kept out of sight. We’re grateful for the nurses that served, mind you, but we’ll be crocked if we’ll concede the entire Anzac Day over to a feminist narrative just because the army has turned so PC you could plug it in and surf the internet. Only recently they were trying to fish out servicemen who weren’t supporters of homosexual marriage, and now they want to ban ‘death symbols’ from being displayed on military hardware, despite the fact a smiley face stencilled on the side of a tank would seem way more jarring.

The majority of women who join the army can’t even make it through basic training but they expect us to cop this?

As Nationalists, we acknowledge the spirit of Anzac Day and defend it staunchly from those who would desecrate this National holiday with their identity politics. But we will not allow the globalist government, whoever they are to dictate its meaning to us. For they already try and have us believe that Australia Day is all about celebrating everything non-Australian. Likewise, they use Anzac Day to promote a false spirit of ‘service’ to foreign powers, to die for conflicts far removed from the interests of Australia.

Anzac Day has been used as a pawn in the culture wars by those on the bourgeois liberal left fond of attacking national-spirited notches on the calendar, and by the government, marching in step with the internationalist agenda.

Over a century has passed since the landing at Anzac Cove, a conflict between European empires triggered when an Austrian Archduke was shot by a Bosnian Serb and England got involved because Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia and Germany marched into Belgium threatening the Frogs. It was all riveting stuff and fairly typical of Europe up to that point in history.

Australians had no business in that war, but we were drawn in using the patriotic propaganda of Empire and a genuine sense of duty. In fact, the nation threw itself into the cause with gusto and the average bloke viewed it as an adventure, at a time when ideals were sharpened by romanticism and the national identity was still shackled to the concept of colony and motherland. Also, as with nearly all wars, there was the mistaken belief that it would all be over by Christmas. But it soon became clear this was no Boys’ Own adventure but a massacre. At that time, Australia was a paltry population of five million. Nearly five-hundred thousand enlisted with a loss of 60,000 and 156,000 wounded or taken prisoner.

71-gallipoliposter

From fervent allies of mother England, the spirit soured. As men were minced up on the battlefields of France etcetera England put pressure on Australians, now more reluctant to join the conflict, to introduce conscription. A plebiscite on the issue was twice defeated and resulted in queer fish Billy Hughes being turfed out of the Labor party.

Australia was not a paradise following the end of WW1. Those men who returned were broken physically and mentally and many of them turned to alcohol and crime. Indeed, during this period the rate of crime trebled. The social impact was monstrous as the pain of the generation that fought was passed onto their sons who were in turn born into trauma.

Anzac Day is, in reality, about acknowledging the sacrifices of Australians in all different foreign conflicts, from WW1 to Afghanistan, and if the globalists have their way, we’ll soon be serving an evil alliance as it aims to tear apart Syria and install an Israeli puppet as head of state. For this has been the sad fact of all these ‘sacrifices’ and all this service – with the exception of what was derisively called our ‘chocolate soldiers’, who were, in fact, our Kokoda heroes, we fought the one war in which our nation was truly endangered; the war against Japan.

The majority of women who join the army can’t even make it through basic training but they expect us to cop this?

This fact of the glorified military history seems to overlook our Kokoda heroes in favour of those who have ‘served’ globalist adventures.

Australia had no business shooting at the Boers, or backing England in suppressing the Boxer Rebellion or fighting in Korea, or Vietnam, or Afghanistan and so on. We did so because we’re part of a global gang whose interests our sons’ blood is spilt is never ours.

The meaning of Anzac Day, to Nationalists, is, therefore, a sober meditation on the idea of an Australia independent from being forced to sacrifice our own for the goals of overseas powers, or by “serving” in an auxiliary capacity a superpower protector.

As this author types these words, the sound of young people partying fills the cool midnight air. They are loud, and they are clearly not in a sombre, reflective mood. Earlier he passed a nightclub which was unusually busy with a queue of White Australian youth stretching down the street from the bollards and rope at the doors where they had to show ID to bouncers so they can get inside and join a debauched bash with DJs and scantily clad girls.

To them, Anzac Day is a day off – a day to get wrecked. To others, who’ll be awake for the service, they fly the Aussie flag because that’s what they’re supposed to do, just like at Christmas when they’re expected to put up a tree and decorate it with tinsel. They would be offended at Nationalist suggestions that there is a falsehood to the mainstream narrative of Anzac Day, as they watch the prescribed parade, hit the early opening bars and get next to anyone who looks like a legitimate serviceman so they can exaggerate whatever military credentials or legacy they feel they can boast, play two-up, and basically adopt what they estimate is a patriotic mind-frame.

This fact of the glorified military history seems to overlook our Kokoda heroes in favour of those who have ‘served’ globalist adventures.

Attending a dawn service doesn’t make you a greater patriot than one who stays home and reads a little of the true cost of that war. It does not make you less of a Nationalist to join in either, that’s not what we’re saying. Our message is simply that the spirit of Anzac, enveloping as it does myths of heroism, mateship, and honour, qualities presumed to be in the national character, should also question our endless service to conflicts which are none of our affair, not in our national interest, and to which in the case of the Middle East and Vietnam the whole basis was morally flawed.

Once we get through that we can travel to the root of the idea of an independent Australia, and then, when we’ve found that we can rejoice in finally coming to recognise we are Australians, and not just part of a globalist franchise of multi-racial, multiculturalists whose blood is shed in the pursuance of the wealth of and the accretion of land and resources for a cabal of ugly bankers, industrialists, warmongers and Zionists.

4B8B6A6600000578-5655153-image-a-41_1524665479011.jpg
Cup day or Anzac day? Actually, believe it or not, it’s Anzac Day