WILL SERIOUS CHARGES BE LAID AGAINST MOVEMENT-WRECKER NEIL ERIKSON?

WILL SERIOUS CHARGES BE LAID AGAINST MOVEMENT-WRECKER NEIL ERIKSON?

United Nationalists Australia can reveal a groundswell of concerned friends of an unidentified person who has privately levelled serious allegations against serial provocateur Neil Erikson.

For legal reasons, we cannot identify the person or the nature of their accusations except to say they delve into a very dark corner of human conduct. One believes that nothing Erikson does could generate surprise but then he managed to outdo himself in terms of depraved conduct during a visit to Perth for a rally in aid of the South African Farmers earlier this year.

Erikson, who describes himself as a “journalist” on his Facebook page (we know, we know), has been a cancerous growth on what could be loosely described for the purposes of this bulletin as ‘the movement’ since the days of Reclaim Australia.

Riding on the notoriety gained during his time with the defunct United Patriots Front, and his ceaseless social media shenanigans ever since which saw him team up with the likes of fellow grub Shermon Burgess, Erikson has maintained an ignominious profile. Willing to embarrass himself for any opportunity at publicity, whenever a right-wing event is held, Erikson will turn up and make a noise.

His escapades have involved avoiding conviction for making harassing phone calls to a Melbourne rabbi; for his part in a video stunt in which he beheaded a dummy and was convicted for inciting serious contempt for Moslems; contempt of court relating to a work uniform belonging to his former employer Toll; being charged with “assaulting an activist” at homo race-traitor Milo Yiannopolous’s 2017 publicity tour; and finally being charged with “using threat to prevent a clergyman to discharging his duties”.

Oh, he was also arrested at the September Nigel Farage event in Melbourne, but that didn’t result in charges.

34892223_1049372775216933_8486637957061541888_n
Blair Cottrell welcomed Erikson back to the fold despite all the crap he has pulled

Most of this is just bullshit, especially the dummy beheading, but it’s the crime the name of which we cannot utter that will prove the most injurious when it comes to finally taking him out of circulation.

Erikson has long been a retardant to the growth of serious counter-politics in this country and has almost certainly served the state as an informant. He has previously bragged about involvement with ASIO and members of the Federal Police. However, being as how 90% of Australian ‘patriots’ don’t even share so much as a single brain cell between them, Erikson has enjoyed an undiscerning following on his social media accounts despite the harm he has brought to genuine Patriots and Nationalists alike.

A Melbourne magistrate stated the obvious when she said that Erikson has a “tenuous relationship with the truth”.

In fact, Erikson is one of the most unashamed liars that have ever gushed forth into the porcelain bowl of Civic Patriotism. He turned on his former colleagues at Nationalist Alternative even after they’d supported him through his court matter with Rabbi David Gutnick, and then followed suit when he was moved sideways from the United Patriots Front leadership.

Erikson has aligned with the very worst of the Civic Patriot undergrowth and even supported arch Zionist and pseudo-Patriot Avi Yemini before turning on him too. Recently, businessman and Christian Daniel Spiller who controls the Future Now event has politely let Erikson go ahead of his November event in which Milo Yiannopolous will be appearing alongside Senator Fraser Anning, Ann Coulter, and Zio fraud Tommy Robinson (assuming he hasn’t been locked up again).

It is not clear whether Future Now has distanced themselves from Erikson on the back of these heinous allegations, which stem from a visit to Perth earlier this year, and involve accusations that include “threatening behaviour” among more serious others.

NOOL
Dumped ever so politely

United Nationalists Australia is well aware of the allegations and encourages the victim in question to immediately contact Perth police and waste no time in making a statement. We can assure this person that threats from Erikson are not to be taken seriously.

Recently, Erikson produced a low-rent video of himself with 29-year-old Andrew Nolch, a “comedian” who was charged with defacing a memorial to murdered fellow comedian Eurydice Dixon in the name of anti-feminism or something.

Nolch is that rare creature who is actually dumber and even more lacking in charisma than creepy Erikson.

However, this association speaks volumes about the pathology involved in the alleged crimes that Erikson is being accused of.

9942828-3x2-700x467
Andrew Nolch out-stupids even Erikson

THE BILDERBERG CHILD WHO WON’T STAND FOR HER PEOPLE

THE BILDERBERG CHILD WHO WON’T STAND FOR HER PEOPLE

Anti-Australians are celebrating news of a nine-year-old girl in Queensland who refused to stand for our national anthem as in her mind it excludes Aborigines.

The parents of nine-year-old Harper Nielsen who attends Kenmore South State School are claiming their pesky daughter was given detention following a “silent protest” when she refused to stand for our national anthem. The school has denied their allegations. The fourth-grader told the Daily Telegraph she boycotted the national anthem on the basis that “Advance Australia Fair means advance White Australia”. She added, “When it says were are young it completely ignores the fact that indigenous culture was here for over 50,000 years before colonisation.”

How this became news is about as much of a mystery as is where babies come from since her parents, both who look like they graduated from Chairman Mao 101 on an Australian Unions scholarship, went out of their way to ensure it became news. The very name ‘Harper’ we would wager is her parents’ dedication to liberal author Harper Lee, who wrote To Kill a Mockingbird.

Media has since lined up to sensationalise the frumpy pre-tween automaton when they should be interviewing her parents whom the good money’s odds say put her up to it for their own interests.

http_%2F%2Fprod.static9.net.au%2F_%2Fmedia%2F2018%2F09%2F12%2F18%2F42%2FANTHEMSTILL2.jpg
Let’s just hope Harper learns to despise her parents when she reaches her rebellious teen years which aren’t far off

At the tender age of nine, this child is merely parroting what’s been inculcated into her by the two agents of social decay she calls mum and dad (assuming they’re as traditional as to permit these stereotypical designations). These two Trotsykites are raising their brat to conform to all the desires of the misanthropes who comprise the Bilderberg Group.

The Bilderberg Group is a complex topic the reader must investigate independently. While we add a link to a useful webpage, we can only generally describe them and their goals. We invoke them here simply to alert the reader that this ‘news’ is hooey calculated to create tension and division.

Media has since lined up to sensationalise the frumpy pre-tween automaton when they should be interviewing her parents whom the good money’s odds say put her up to it for their own interests.  

Firstly, isn’t it odd that when globalists wish to paralyse this nation through moral invalidation they imply Australia is “all White” and thus all institutions, every significant cultural article, and each strand of our national aplomb is “White” and must be recoded. However, when they wish to own it and to repudiate an increasingly agitated White Australia this country is “multicultural (multiracial)”.

So there are two states of being for Australia and the two can only mutually exist if the paradox is permitted by lazy thinking. The Bilderberg Group advocates population control. Sociologist Hadley Cantril describes employing “Psycho-political operations” as “propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”

This is what we’re seeing all around the western, or to put it bluntly, the White world. This is because another goal of the one-world, one-government, and one-system controllers is the abolition of nation states. It’s little surprise then that the Bilderberg group boasts among its membership such luminaries of globalism as Henry Kissinger, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, David Rockefeller, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Ben Bernanke, and Rupert Murdoch just to name a few.

download (5).jpg

Rupert Murdoch is a glaring presence. The Bilderberg Group uses its media, such as CBS (which it is known to invite along to its secret meetings on the promise of secrecy), to promote mind-wash. Given that the group is not a conspiracy invented by right-wingers, it’s interesting to note that the left has virtually nothing to say about them, which isn’t all that surprising when as we’ve consistently pointed out, they stopped thinking independently long ago. This is why you can witness such incongruous behaviour as self-described “anarchist” Professor Rob Sparrow (aka Slackbastard) championing the cause of the Bilderbergs while believing he’s supporting a cadre of fellow travellers in a global revolution of non-existent “workers”.

Slackbastard swooped like a chicken hawk (or is that like convicted paedophile antifascist Alex Gollan?) onto this child’s story. Rob posted on the SB Facebook page, “mAAAAAAd props to the 9yo grrl for refusing to follow the herd — you rock!” We’re sure glad he isn’t her English teacher.

Sociologist Hadley Cantril describes employing “Psycho-political operations” as “propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”

Meanwhile, the clichés of fake indigenous activism over at Blackfulla Revolution (another FB group) used her case in a rhetorical bush breakfast when they tried to juxtapose the controversy over Herald Sun cartoonist Michael Knight’s spoof of Serena Williams’ recent dummy spit, with Harper’s story by offering up a yawning ‘meme’. Apparently, one is permissible (and racist) and the other is censored (and anti-racist).

41663711_1211907875616153_233038117957795840_n.jpg
Um, no… not even close. We know you’re the sanctified professional underdogs of this country but even you mob ought to be obliged to be accurate now and then

Michael Knight is a satirical cartoonist and well in his rights to exaggerate his subjects, and the other was never censored but instead given a platform which was picked up internationally giving Harper and her hippy parents their 15 mins of social justice-connected fame. It’s also led to her being viciously trolled, which is an inevitability her parents should’ve considered before putting her up to this attention-grabbing media stunt.

8e76d961900cbcbf097a9fe12deac8c0.jpg
Depicting coloured people in cartoons will soon be as dangerous as depicting the Prophet Mohammed 

Fake Nationalist Pauline Hanson even got an opportunity to try and steal back some ground lost to Katter Australia Party’s senator Fraser Anning. She slid out of her money chamber to offer a predictable quote about how she’d give the tot “a kick up the backside”.

Thus, a supposedly pressing social issue has become a kind of perverse entertainment in which the invalid nation state is tossed like a bone for two dogs to fight over. The messages behind these stories are quite startling. The furore over the depiction of Serena Williams now posits that people of colour, no matter how badly behaved, are beyond criticism by Whites; much like depicting the Prophet Mohammed will get your throat slit by a fundamentalist Moslem.

In the case of Harper’s media narrative, a phoney sense of expression on the issue of the supposed plight faced by indigenous Australians is given artificial oxygen. For, if there is a voice united in sounding about the indigenous cause, what is that cause? What is it really? Once they’ve figured out all that maybe they can ponder who it is they’re petitioning.  Is it a collective conscience? Is it political representatives?

Fake Nationalist Pauline Hanson even got an opportunity to try and steal back some ground lost to Katter Australia Party’s senator Fraser Anning. She slid out of her money chamber to offer a predictable quote about how she’d give the tot “a kick up the backside”.

If they really believe that any side that stands for office in Australian parliament will ever have the tools at their disposal to right a social wrong they’re back in the Dreamtime. They haven’t noticed that whichever government is elected serves the internationalist Anglo-American-Zionist bloc which is a faction of the One World Government cabal. The members of the Bilderberg Group aren’t interested in emancipation for the world’s peoples unless it leads to their military industrial complex profiting from war.

If it’s the collective conscience then that is filled now with the self-interest of countless ‘minority associations’ which see themselves as the primary ‘victim’ of White Australia, so in that sense, they’ve pushed the Abo out of the queue.

The oligarchs don’t want Aboriginal tribes achieving native title over lucrative mining assets they want to flog to China because assets are not for the serfs. It’ll never happen. Instead, it’s better to have the serfs beating each other in an irreconcilable conflict that has its flames nefariously fanned by those controlling the actors who are simultaneously condoning and condemning either one or both sides.

As to little Harper, maybe she can figure out whether she wants to stand for the parenting payment that helped raise her, or the Medicare benefits which keep her fit, the state education she receives, the accoutrements of the White race that she denounces that she couldn’t live without, such as her toys, computer, phone, technology in general, and the medium she has used to spit in the face of her own race. Because, little girl, you wouldn’t last long if you were shanghaied off and dropped in the middle of an outback Aboriginal community. Your parents’ rhetoric wouldn’t save you from the fate suffered by their own flesh and blood on a nauseatingly repetitive basis.

Perhaps she could also benefit from an education which permits an untarnished understanding of the origins of our country and how the indigenous people had no claims on it as a nation since they were disparate tribes and NOT a nation. Just maybe she might realise that those people were destined to be conquered by the rules of the human animals: if it wasn’t by the British Empire, it would certainly have been the Dutch or the Chinese. Moreover, she benefits nothing from those like her parents adding to the division of our people; only the certainty that the bigger gap they create in our nation the more inevitable it is that another force will seize on that and push right on through to take us over. In fact, it’s happening now.

Indeed, this little girl, so fresh off the potty yet so quick with the universal condemnations of her own country, should like to spare a thought for the current Chinese invasion now underway in Australia and just how much those in Beijing are likely to give a shit about the Aborigines that she and her parents patronise so.

But she is, as we say, a child. No kid could have the sophistication to make any sort of informed judgment on such matters. Likewise, no nipper could be filled with such patriotism as to look forward to assembly just for an opportunity to stand for the flag. These are kids, they’d rather be off playing.

None of this was ever about thinking… just reacting.

Screenshot_20180912-022419_Chrome.jpg
National Australia Bank employing Bilderberg logic in their ads: promoting multiracialism while brushing over the fact a practising Moslem would wholeheartedly revile their whole stinking usury system

WE ARE THE PEACEKEEPERS

WE ARE THE PEACEKEEPERS

Amid all the political ructions in Canberra and the doings of the big end of town we thought it timely to spend some time on an examination of power in 21st century Australia.

If asked, we would guess that the average worker would name the government and the police as the organisations who wield power and enforce codes of behaviour upon the citizen; a cynic might suggest that there exists another layer of power above the institutions, an elite made up of shadowy oligarchs and “old money” or suchlike.

This is true, up to a certain point, that point is the limit of the patience, tolerance and goodwill of the people and their willingness to submit to being governed and abide by the law; the real power lies with the citizens with the institutions only able to function as they do with our total cooperation.

When citizens decide to disobey the rules, to go their own way or to take the outlaw path in life serious problems arise for the institutions of power, their bureaucrats and the police.

We do not have to look too far for examples of modern day outlawry which have delivered a shock to the system and had the law dogs scrambling to formulate a response; when bad men become convinced that compliance with the status quo is purely optional they can quickly overload the state’s response mechanisms.

Scenarios of this type are a nightmare for the authorities, since the beginnings of White colonisation of this continent there have been individuals and groups of people who have carried out acts of criminality or civil disobedience and in doing so they have exposed the fragility and the limitations of institutional power and its mercenary enforcers, the cops.

Ben_Hall_HISTORICALsmall
Bold Ben Hall, he showed the Traps some fun

We do not have to look too far for examples of modern day outlawry which have delivered a shock to the system and had the law dogs scrambling to formulate a response; when bad men become convinced that compliance with the status quo is purely optional they can quickly overload the state’s response mechanisms.

In our own backyard fugitives such as rapist and murderer Malcolm Naden and the latter day bushranging duo Gino and Mark Stocco, as the old Aussie folk song says “showed the Traps some fun” evading capture for many years despite a massive investment of police time and resources.

In the U.K we can observe the terror and confusion sown by maniacs on the loose such as Raoul Moat and Derrick Bird, who went on a sort of armed “Death Ride” as their lives spiralled out of control and they became convinced that murder, mayhem and suicide was their preferred method of exiting the mortal realm.

“Home grown” Islamic extremists, in spite of what the media and politicians would have us believe, also fall into this category of sad nihilists, misfits and wannabes; there is no revolutionary potential in throwing away one’s life on a one-off spectacular stunt, thus no real threat of a widespread Islamic insurgency in Australia.

The United States has been the setting for myriad outrages of a similar type, beginning in the Old West and carrying on into the 21st century with the escapades of disgruntled cop Christopher Dorner, or the Negro supremacists John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, nicknamed the D.C Snipers.

To this list we could add some Islamic terrorists such as the Kouachi Brothers who, after participating in the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris attempted a Death Ride of their own, leading the Gendarmerie on a chase through the suburbs which ended in their last stand on an industrial estate in Dammartin-en Goële.

naden cops
The hunt for psychopathic fugitive Malcolm Naden, if you are a big enough problem for the state the gloves quickly come off

We give these examples as an illustration of how even fairly deranged, though cunning and organised criminals can wreak absolute havoc in a community and bring the law enforcement apparatus close to breaking point simply by evading capture and carrying out their atrocities on the move; yet these people are, in the main, nihilistic and see no consequence of their actions other than their own death in an exchange of fire with the authorities.

“Homegrown” Islamic extremists, in spite of what the media and politicians would have us believe, also fall into this category of sad nihilists, misfits and wannabes; there is no revolutionary potential in throwing away one’s life on a one-off spectacular stunt, thus no real threat of a widespread Islamic insurgency in Australia.

Revolutionaries must, logically, live to fight another day and another, and so on; even if they do choose the path of the violent uprising they choose their battles carefully and martyrdom is an occupational hazard, as opposed to a tactic in itself.

Imagine then the impact of a hundred, or a thousand highly motivated revolutionaries who were living for the future, whose eyes were fixed upon the horizon for the coming of a new age; imagine a cadre of activists in every town and suburb, a distributed insurgency permanently embedded within the population.

For all the horror and upset caused by terrorists and rampaging, nihilistic criminals intent on making their last stand and their exposure of the limitations of state power in the face of a determined Lone Wolf, or small autonomous cell their outrages are notable for the fact that they never attract any real support or sympathy from normal citizens.

raoul moat
Raoul Moat spun out a jealous rage into a seven day “Death Ride” which caused panic across northern England; his sawn-off shotgun left one killed, one maimed, a policeman permanently blinded and Moat dead of a self-inflicted wound.

Here we come to the crux of the matter, we the workers are the ones who keep the peace in our society, not the state and not its mercenaries and spies.

Consider for a moment the demonstrable impact of one Lone Wolf insurgent upon a high tech, high trust society such as ours.

Now observe the level of fear caused by semi-organised gangs of ethnic criminals, say, the Islander or Sudanese hoodlums, who have no other objective beyond self-gratification, notoriety and the acquisition of cyberspace era electronic trinkets.

Imagine then the impact of a hundred, or a thousand highly motivated revolutionaries who were living for the future, whose eyes were fixed upon the horizon for the coming of a new age; imagine a cadre of activists in every town and suburb, a distributed insurgency permanently embedded within the population.

Indeed, we are the peacekeepers, it is only with our consent and tolerance that the modern, globalist techno-state remains stable; its fragility is obvious to anyone capable of thinking tactically, of wondering in all seriousness “How would we take down the system?”

It is the hope of Nationalists that the widespread withdrawal of consent to the status quo by the working classes, what we call the “secession of the mind” will be enough to frighten the globalist cronies, that this fear of popular revolt will stay their hand.

At this point in time the powers that be are walking a fine line between mere harassment of dissidents and secessionists and outright repression; should the balance tip toward tyranny, then rebellion becomes inevitable and all are acutely aware of the limits of state power, none more so than its architects and enforcers.

800px-Pikeman-IMG_0150-wiki