UNION THUG DAVE GULL SPOTTED WITH CFMEU MEMBERS AT ALP STATE CONFERENCE

UNION THUG DAVE GULL SPOTTED WITH CFMEU MEMBERS AT ALP STATE CONFERENCE

A union thug that attacked the home of a United Nationalists Australia editor, as well as harassing the President of the Australia First Party was spotted with CFMEU delegates at Labor’s 2018 NSW conference.

Previously, the CFMEU had denied any knowledge of Dave Gull when approached by one of the complainants and advised him to instead contact police. He did this and an apprehended violence order was issued by Newtown Local Court. However, it proved an impossible task to track Gull to his address and NSW Police refused to assist in tracing him which meant the order could not proceed; leaving the impression of state sympathy with this mindless brute. It also draws a very distinct line of connection between the ALP and Antifascist Action.

Cleary, the CFMEU knew his whereabouts all along and questions now arise about their knowledge of his actions against the UNA editor.

Our editor refuses to let this matter rest knowing that Gull is a dangerous animal who should not be allowed to roam the streets freely menacing citizens with differing opinions from his own. It is therefore interesting that intelligence provided to UNA places him in the company of CFMEU delegates who were reportedly strutting around arrogantly at the Australian Labor Party’s (ALP) state conference at Sydney Town Hall on Saturday, June 30.

The CFMEU clearly kids itself that it holds a position of influence within the Australian Labor Party. The rank and file, such as Gull, also have a cognitive dissonance when it comes to understanding that the multimillion-dollar CFMEU no longer represents hard hats like him but is an auxiliary for a globalist party with central policies that conflicts with the interests of Australian workers they supposedly represent.

Interesting, too, is that by the terms of admission to the NSW ALP Conference that “observers” who registered for the event must also be ALP members. This presents the strong likelihood that Gull is also an ALP member and Labor, therefore, had his address on file, something which will need to be surrendered so that due process can be pursued against this totalitarian nightmare of an individual.

Bear in mind, that by having knowledge of Gull’s actions – which the CFMEU did – only amplifies accusations of that militant organisation’s reliance on violence and intimidation in the pursuance of its political ideas.

11188276_877885448935926_5245648042568850460_n - Copy.jpg
Dave Gull in his CFMEU night stalking outfit
20171207051924999.jpeg
Gull goes on the job at one of our editor’s homes in December 2017. Despite this video evidence, NSW cops did what they do best — NOTHING
20180409023555123
Gull was caught on camera again at his third visit to our editor’s home, having previously attacked it with a firehose and threatening to “kill” him

If anyone has knowledge of Dave Gull please contact us by email @ UNAmedia1@outlook.com.

PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

PEDDLING LIES MEANS WOMEN WILL DIE

In the early months of this blog, we promised our readers that we would make an effort to examine the current affairs of the day in a sort of semi-frequent “news wrap”.

Snowed under as we have been, with the antics of our enemies on the far-right, sundry nutcases, cyber-pests and square-eyed Trolls occupying bulk column inches of our output, we feel obliged to give our followers a break from this bombast and have a dig at the big doings in the mainstream White world.

Hipster Melbourne was rocked this week by the death of one of its promising young scions, 22-year-old Eurydice Dixon met her end in middle-class Parkville, raped and left for dead by a total stranger, later revealed to be one Jaymes Todd, 19, of Broadmeadows.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-around good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

tribute
Tributes laid in Princes Park Melbourne for murdered artist Eurydice Dixon.

Eurydice’s talents on stage may have been questionable but being violated and dumped, lifeless, on a soccer pitch in the middle of the night by a marauding, outer suburban sex predator is a sad end for one of our own, who by all accounts did no harm in her short life.

The response to her death by the chattering classes was predictable, even though murders of this kind run at about five a year in Victoria, the usual suspects led by the lamentable premier Daniel Andrews, managed to blow the killing way out of proportion as a sop to their inner city, Greenbelt voting public.

Ms Dixon has been remembered as an aspiring comedian and all-round good sort; not to speak ill of the dead, but having seen snippets of her act we would describe her as more of a post-modernist performance artist; comedians make us laugh with jokes and gags, as opposed to the eye-rolling, faux befuddlement and contrived irony which are the fashion on today’s stand up circuit.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

This insight clearly went over the heads of the ostentatiously ignorant members of the commentariat; re-animated after the long hiatus between stranger murders, Feminists and their fellow travellers have energised their “War On Women” narrative and began wailing that the problem is “Toxic Masculinity”.

We can imagine these harridans on the edge of their seats as the news of the murder broke, waiting, their claws reflexively drawing in and out of their sheaths in anticipation of the inevitable verbal misstep by Police or public officials, they were not disappointed.

ted-bundy---betrayal
American serial killer and rapist Ted Bundy would strike when women had their guard down, in supposedly “safe” areas.

The Police, who had all the data at their fingertips regarding crimes in the area surrounding the park where Eurydice was killed, and fearing in light of other attacks on women in Parkville, that there may have been a serial offender on the loose made the fatal mistake of urging women to take greater responsibility for their own safety.

From there it was on for young and old, the tired old trope “teach men not to rape” made an early and frequent appearance as did “women’s right to feel safe”, no matter the level of risk they are prepared to take in exercising their rights.

Being a woman and having the misfortune to be killed by a stranger in a chance encounter is some way down the list of likely ways to kick the bucket, we would put it somewhere in the area of probability bracketed by misadventures such as fatal lightning strikes or dog maulings, Ms Dixon was incredibly unlucky.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

If we take the three most recent and high-profile cases of stranger murder in Melbourne, those of Jill Meagher, Masa Vukotic and Euryidice Dixon one of these patterns appears, a pattern which is evident in many such crimes across the Anglosphere and across a time span of almost fifty years.

Misogynist criminals, rapists and killers are drawn to locations and situations in which women feel comfortable enough to let their guard down, or are otherwise vulnerable; this mode of operation is akin to that of any other predator in nature, which will attack weak and isolated members of a prey herd, or strike when the animals are at a waterhole.

bayley
Adrian Bayley, his sinister sexual urges would boil over into blind rage against women, he is the real face of misogyny.

Time and time again we have been presented with testimony from woman hating brutes and serial killers detailing their thought process in selecting victims; thinking people such as ourselves are, or ought to be, au fait with the tricks employed by dangerous men.

The more intelligent and devious predators, such as Ted Bundy and Ed Kemper, specifically chose university campuses as their hunting grounds or students as their victims based on the premise that women feel safe in such environments, so whatever ruse the killer might employ would be more likely taken in good faith by the victim.

A great deal of work has been done by the medical professions and law enforcement, both here and abroad, on understanding the way violent men think so as to be better able to predict and mitigate against their actions in the interest of public safety.

We guess that what separates bourgeois Feminists from Nationalists and, more broadly, all other people with half a brain and no axe to grind is our ability to see patterns in society and modify our behaviour accordingly.

To a great extent the routine activities of potential victims, the environments in which they move and even urban planning must be considered when trying to get into the minds of predators; this is at odds with premier Andrews’ exhortation for women to do whatever they want, whenever they want and for them to trust that putting a guilt trip on men as a group will be enough to deter potential rapists and killers.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

masa-and-killer
Masa Vukotic was chosen at random to be murdered by Sean Price, does he look like the sort of bloke who could be shamed into changing his ways?

Sean Price, the deranged killer of young Masa Vukotic in Doncaster in 2015 travelled all the way across Melbourne to a “safe” suburb and, in order to carry out his plan to blitz and kill a female, he lay in wait in bushes for a pretty “middle class” girl to pass on a popular walking track.

Adrian Bayley, the serial rapist and murderer of Jill Meagher prowled areas where young women were accessible and vulnerable, the backpacker havens and red light zones of St Kilda and the tangled, 19th-century streetscape of Brunswick, which is rich with female pedestrians but riddled with dark laneways and alcoves.

Society in general and women in particular need protection from dangerous men, as we have seen often enough, a single man in his wrath can destroy a whole community; what is needed however is a return to sensible education on matters of personal safety and codes of conduct in which everyone, women included, play their part in mitigating the threat of violence.

The point we make here is that artificial “safe-spaces” for women attract sexual predators just as soft targets attract terrorism and gun-free zones in the U.S attract mass shooters; the dangerous men in society may be mad dogs, but they’re not stupid in that they will always take the path of least resistance to their goal.

The bare fact is that, contrary to the Feminist dogma, predatory males are not formed by society, nor is their behaviour an aspect of masculinity; such men are freaks and deviants and they almost always live their lives largely apart from normal men, who would most likely pick up on the fact that something is wrong with them.

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

The natural reaction by good men toward abusers of women and girls is to form a posse, hunt the offender down and mete out justice before the savage wreaks even more havoc upon the community, though in modern times we delegate this duty to the state which employs its hired gunmen, the police.

truro
The Truro killers were homosexuals, freaks and total social outcasts who got their kicks hurting women, nobody in the “straight” world had any time for them.

The police in the Euryidice Dixon case merely gave out the same advice we would expect a citizen posse to give the women they rally to protect: until this threat to your safety passes stay alert sisters, watch your backs, don’t take unnecessary risks and do not hesitate to call for help if you feel that something is not right in your surroundings.

So perhaps walking through the park alone late at night, in your “safe” suburb, which is almost certainly a magnet for sexual predators, with your headphones on and wearing high heels is actually making the jobs of those sworn to protect you more difficult?

Even when “called out” by good men the bad man is unlikely to listen to reason, he will either retaliate against his accusers or run away to sulk until his damaged ego is restored and he can regain his composure.

In the end, however, what Feminists such as the Premier of Victoria say in public and what they do in private are likely two different things; we can credit the childless humanities department harpies and their virginal undergraduate acolytes with a lack of sense and a true belief in bullshit such as “toxic masculinity”, but most people do not think the way they do.

Daniel and Catherine Andrews are loving and responsible parents, just like the rest of us, so we highly doubt that they’re going to fill their own daughter’s head with nonsense and send her into harms way under the misapprehension that no matter the risks she takes if she is unfortunate enough to become a victim then society is wholly to blame.

andrews family
Victorian Premier Danny Andrews puts his son in a chokehold just in case he grows up to be a predator

LADS’ LEADER SUPPORTS NEIL ERIKSON AFTER EVERYTHING NOOL HAS DONE

LADS’ LEADER SUPPORTS NEIL ERIKSON AFTER EVERYTHING NOOL HAS DONE

ON Friday, June 8, Blair Cottrell lobbed up at a court appearance where Neil Erikson and his Muppets were facing charges of behaving in a riotous manner.

In a pic posted on the Facebook page of ‘Cooks Convicts’, (CC being the latest publicity-grabbing social-media enterprise generated by movement wrecker and state informant Neil Erikson), the two share a quality moment of ‘unity’ together in a café after proceedings. Neil’s hand rests tenderly on Blair’s muscly shoulder as if he wants to start caressing it. It suggests nothing of their culpabilities, contradictions, or their grubby history, much less the gaping hole in one another’s pseudo-political routines.

Yes, Blair was there to show ‘solidarity’ with “fellow patriots” whose charges stem from clashes at the December 2017 Milo Yiannopolous event at Melbourne Pavilion which was a shrewdly engineered riot that garnered not only publicity for its star but those like Erikson who trotted along to leech off Milo’s infamy. The “Milo five” are Neil Erikson, Ricky Turner, Richard Whelan, Garry Hume, and Garry Mattson. Richard Whelan, aka Richie Rich, has been a lifelong buddy to Erikson and has served time for various alcohol-related transgressions.

34892223_1049372775216933_8486637957061541888_n
(Pic Facebook) Neil Erikson lovingly strokes the shoulder of the man he denounced as a Nazi and an enemy of the ‘Patriot movement’. No hard feelings, but

Yiannopolous is a bourgeois homosexual who styles himself as a conservative and Alt-Right “troll”. He is an unlikely celebrity of America’s tangled Alt-Right. He once made a comment that veered perilously close to paedophilia advocacy and he is “married” to a Negro man so it defies belief that these supposed ‘conservatives’ would fawn after him. Simply supporting such a creature speaks volumes about their (lack of) creed.

This image of comradery comes after a torrid history where Erikson publically ratted on his former United Patriots Front (UPF) comrade, condemned him as a “Nazi”, and held him up to scorn for his audience. Neil also shut his other compatriots out of their Facebook page (a trick he and Richie Rich pulled on Nationalist Alternative) and worked to undermine each and every one of them. And having burned his people, what was Neil’s punishment? What did Blair do? He might as well have gotten down on his hands and knees, pulled down his fly, and blown him for all the disapproval he has publically expressed. Neil is now sharing Cottrell’s videos on his CC page (and endorsing former foes the True Blue Crew), so, here we go on the old Patriot Soap Opera Express. What, in fact, DO any of these jokers hold sacred?

Meanwhile, UNA has only ever scrutinised Cottrell and called him to account for his transgressions of the tenets of the Nationalism he claims a leadership role over but doesn’t uphold. Moreover, Cottrell genuinely despises us, even though we’ve never judged him on anything which he hasn’t said or done. Our criticisms have always been in the interests of the furtherance of Australian Nationalist focus; something we’ve never compromised and have held to steadfastly. Yet, he would not come down and show solidarity with us at any court appearance. Interesting, no? Added to that, he will talk to the mixed-race civics from The Unshackled on identitarian issues or, as he actually did, stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Sri Lankan Christian dingbat Danny Nalliah’s people before he ever accepted the Australian Nationalist community.

Yiannopolous is a bourgeois homosexual who styles himself as a conservative and Alt-Right “troll”.

Blair’s disdain is instructive of everything we’ve upheld about him and the infected milieu he inhabits. United Nationalists Australia has long maintained that Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell are about as nationalist as the parking lot outside of SBS studios. They may fool their cliquey Lads Society admirers, but they haven’t hoodwinked staunch nationalists such as us (although they did beguile others who call themselves nationalists).

Blair and Tom’s refusal to heed anyone of wider experience has fostered their self-deceiving soma. Owing to their insistence on dictating to others, an authority they have granted to themselves on the basis of conceit and a popularity derived from the lottery stakes of their proximity to the Reclaim Australia movement at its media heyday—and while bearing in mind that in the overall scheme of things they are still political greenhorns—means they never will. Putting it colloquially, they think they’re the duck’s guts.

34741162_2085225755082290_1415895810905735168_n.jpg
(Pic Facebook) Neil and soon-to-be Kook’s Convicts: Some bloke (L), Ricky Turner, Nool (C), and Richie Rich

Therefore, it’s irksome to honest activists that they’ve come along and wilfully disturbed the already chaotic thermosphere of the pro-Australian vanguard. But, our revolution is not theirs, since they are unable to articulate what their struggle actually is. Their mission, such as it can be discerned, is a hodgepodge of foreign identitarian concepts mixed with fragments of Australian nationalist rhetoric they’ve appropriated and used as adornments to their stage-managed facade.

This doesn’t mean that those veterans are vexed at their appearance in the theatre over lack of obsequiousness to ‘elders’, but they are understandably bothered by the damage these kids cause through their politics of personal identity wherein they take from the collective to expand their individual profile (although that more describes Blair than it does, Tom, speaking fairly). We know, too, that their defiance is grounded upon their fear of having their intellectual flaws laid bare.

Subsequently, they bob around and around in the civic patriot eddy while their Nationalism, such as it is, remains a general identitarian facsimile of what overseas ‘Alt-Right’ personalities are saying, kept strictly in-house lest they are held to any branding.

Blair and Tom’s refusal to heed anyone of wider experience has fostered their self-deceiving soma.

Given that we’ve so consistently argued these are not Nationalists, why should it even concern us?

Tom and Blair have contrived to market themselves as Nationalists, as has Neil Erikson, and others who fly around in their clucky coup. The Lads have conspicuously employed the Southern Cross on their Facebook page and in their clubhouse (which they are entitled to do) not because they are nativist, but because the Australia First Party uses it. They made a point of interposing themselves to poach any would-be members to their circle where they’ve fed them a poisoned line about established Nationalist organisations. It’s the equivalent to a shop owner stealing his competitor’s sign so he can misguide the other’s customers.

milo
So conservative, so Alt-Right, so incredibly race-mixingly homo: Milo, the hero of the hardcore Aussie Patriot movement. You cannot get more Aussie or conservative than him

They posit their club as “the only hope” while Tom Sewell is reputed to have remarked that sleeping with Asian women is OK “so long as you don’t get them pregnant”. No, it’s not OK. Blair said on ABC TV that “you don’t have to be White” to be a patriot, echoing the queen of civics, Pauline Hanson. But on the same hand, he talked about White identity to The Unshackled, which is multi-racialist and definitely no Nationalist mouthpiece.

As such, they would come onto ground, appropriate symbols which hold meaning to us and then undermine all the values inherent in them. They vacillate, so they say, to popularise a demonstrably failed strategy and certainly nothing original.

And how do they handle criticism? Right now, they’re engaged in the most puerile trolling antics. An associate member of theirs, ‘Darcey’ from Vic, has been creating fake Facebook profiles mocking critics of Tom Sewell. They share it around the Lads and all of them jump on board “friending” these fake pages. And Tom finds it funny as hell. How advanced of them. This is what their dynamic resorts to in place of having any actual words to state their case.

Subsequently, they bob around and around in the civic patriot eddy while their Nationalism, such as it is, remains a general identitarian facsimile of what overseas ‘Alt-Right’ personalities are saying, kept strictly in-house lest they are held to any branding.  

Blair getting chummy with Neil, who he should have bashed on sight, is another example of how staying in that half-stepping pseudo-celebrity terrain between nativism and the global ‘Alt-Right’ is more important than conceding to Nationalist beliefs. Furthermore, they will never do this because of their misguided conviction that Patriotism is inexorably intertwined with ‘conservatism’.

They cannot understand that our Nationalism is based on the traditional Australian labourist movement of early last century. They consider this “communist” in flavour, even though at the time Nationalists were attacked by both the conservatives and the communists. Nationalism is a third position neither left nor right.

And what of the evil clown Erikson? Neil has no discernible politics at all, and he is not fit to represent anybody. He couldn’t even hold his small family together: as soon as he moved to Tasmania to mooch off his missus’s people she threw him out for being a useless pilchard. He can’t hold a job because his shenanigans and desire for notoriety override his need to provide for his family. Nevertheless, he wants to ‘represent’ the Australian people and as such, in a wonderful arc of bullshit at court, he and his retarded entourage managed to evade an order on their bail conditions requiring they do not consort with one another. Why? Because he argued they’re starting a “political party” around “Cook’s Convicts” and they need to brainstorm together. This lot haven’t the combined mental energy to figure out how to unpack a box of groceries and if Fortitude failed, this palooka has a less than one in two-hundred trillion chance of getting registered.

More amazing, however, is that Gold Coast businessman Daniel Spiller was actually prepared to finance this walking disaster in another spectacular nativist move to bring a couple of foreign Alt-Right shuckers into Australia for a speaking circuit. In what was dubbed ‘Future Now’, he planned to finance the degenerate Yiannopolous back for another swing, along with ‘Proud Boy’ Canuck kook Gavin McInnes and Info Wars Alex Jones. Erikson was to join them, which would have created the impression he was in their ‘league’ whatever that’s supposed to figure as.

Spiller may also account for how come a bum like Erikson and his fellow debris can afford to travel all around the country when they should collectively be unable to afford the price of a McDonald’s cup of coffee.

Meanwhile, another one with more money than sense, David Pellowe of Axiomatic Events is adding to the improved wisdom of proud patriots by bringing Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux to Australia. Erikson and Turner along with some knuckleheads travelled to Queensland to storm his front door over accusations that he—along with Nool’s former Zionist ally, Avi Yemini—had sabotaged Spiller’s Future Now event by claiming to media that “Nazis” were organising the event.

Slapstick theatre aside, it says so much about this lot and their supposed ‘patriotism’ that they shun the many local veteran Nationalist speakers with so much to share for free in favour of Canadians speaking a generic ‘conservative line’. Molyneux is no Nationalist, or even White Nationalist, he is, if anything, a Libertarian, while Lauren Southern is an Alt-Right conservative without a real clue about Australian Nationalist issues. What’s more, to see them will cost upwards of $80 to $800.

Do not be mistaken; this sweep of conservatives trying to pass themselves off as Nationalists is just the same old players with a couple of new faces thrown in. Erikson is being funded from somewhere other than possibly Spiller, and it doubtless all ties back to the Liberal ‘far right’, he is speaking to the state, and the entire edifice of this ‘Cook’s Convicts’ and now Blair’s ‘Lads’ is just another conservative front misdirecting the eternal dumb that support them. No one expecting any sort of Nationalist result we see anything resembling change by supporting this string of show ponies.

Serious Nationalists never deviate from our position or compromise our principles and this implacability seems to upset these Patriots who trade allegiances like they change their socks (if in fact, they change their socks). We never make allies with those who’ve been proven to have violated codes of honour. What’s more, we are not squeamish about our Australianness, while waving flags and claiming to be “loyal patriots”.

Likewise, we don’t carelessly publish videos that inadvertently dox our own members, such as the brains trust at The Lads managed to achieve with their crowing ‘fight night’ videos posted to their FB page.

video-still.jpg
A lovers quarrel erupts over who is more Alt-Righty and less Nazi and more Aussie