ANDREW FORSTER & THE ALLEY KATZ — THE LEFT’S TROLLING CULTURE EXPOSED

ANDREW FORSTER & THE ALLEY KATZ — THE LEFT’S TROLLING CULTURE EXPOSED

The Left is addicted to trolling. If there were no ‘right wing’ Facebook pages, or social media sites for them to troll, they’d fade into a suffocating obscurity; seeking recognition by trying to write ‘urban rhymes’ or making personal YouTube videos or blogging about the insignificant experiences of their drab lives as if in that turgid oblivion of their soul-destroying mediocrity was the nucleus of something far more metaphysical and vital to impart to the human race.

Instead, they inhabit Facebook pages like Anonykatz and entertain themselves by being routinely un-amazed at the typically inane postings of the cognizant-dissonant on the political right of the social-media tennis court.

Their day revolves around entertaining themselves reviewing the latest sarcastically reworked ‘potatriot posts’ uploaded by the admins of their favourite pages and then lending droll witticisms as an ideological antidote to what they’re confronted with. In most cases, one group of idiots is passing judgement on another — and we don’t employ ‘idiot’ as a pejorative here, it’s simply all we can deduce by examining the pathology of the thoughts they express.

oie_4bFHMBvR1Sj0

If, say, Anonykatz had any grasp of Nationalist politics it wouldn’t even bother with the likes of Neil Erikson or Shermon Burgess, who’re blank cartridges from a circus shooting range.

These characters, like many who comment from their side of the fence, are the product of the social media identity factory and the digital age that spawned it. In the 1970s, Alvin Toffler wrote a book called Future shock predicting the absorption into a myriad of subcultures for a population divided along complex social strata, and if he was still alive, he’d deserve a cigar for this prophecy alone; although he only died in 2016 so he pretty much saw it come true. More-or-less, he predicted the Internet.

There is no political substance or even consistency of message from the flaky characters that Anonykatz fixates on and yet they’ve never bothered to address this in any scrupulous detail — they simply guffaw at the overall ideology as they perceive it — mainly because they are the flipside to the same coin.

They are no more sophisticated than those they deride. The UNA team actually read a poster responding to Nick Folkes on the Anonykatz page who claimed that Hitler went to jail with Heinrich Himmler and there devised the National Socialist German Workers Party. No Katz admin bothered to correct this boob who had the comical impudence to then censure Folkes for not being intelligent enough to have assimilated this important historical fact. But, we digress…

Antifa1

Erikson, Folkes, and Blair Cottrell are the constructions of a media that were once obsessed with the anti-Islam movement and required ‘actors’ for the narrative surrounding this multicultural society of Australia. It inflated them, and then, when it all became passé, they pricked their hides and deflated their spirits, which were always inordinately out of scale compared to the size of any actual talent they might have possessed. They now play a constant game of catch-up with that sub-tier celebrity which, of all of them, Erikson Joneses for the most.

If, say, Anonykatz had any grasp of Nationalist politics it wouldn’t even bother with the likes of Neil Erikson or Shermon Burgess, who’re blank cartridges from a circus shooting range.

Individually, none of those mentioned above is remarkable people. Yet, like most human beings, they crave attention. The need for recognition is one of the most powerful human motivators which are why there are those who’ll seek it in evil and anti-social ways, such as mass-shooters, and serial killers.

Once upon a time, this type of character was the feeder for the music industry as the promise of ‘fame’ for the not-so-talented were offered by the vision of pop stars which they looked at and thought, “I could do that too”. So they formed bands or became performance artists or did anything that might lead to that ‘break’. Andy Warhol observed all this and made one of the most astute utterances of the 20th century — that one day every person would have their fifteen minutes of fame. And Warhol understood fame better than anyone.

This is why it ill-behoves the likes of Anonykatz to feed the egos of these pseudo-revolutionaries, but to make such an assertion fails to take into account that by doing so the players from their camp are exercising their own egocentricities. Again, they are the same animal. Erikson, Folkes, Cottrell do not pursue issues, as would be expected of earnest political crusaders, but rather use a cause to promote themselves. Separated from the substance of issues, we have mere personalities, and a kind of ‘fanboy’ nationalism, which is a term coined by UNA and covered in a previous article.

TROLLING TO THE LEFT, TROLLING TO THE RIGHT

The Alt-Right gained its infamy through ‘trolling’; it doesn’t necessarily make anything better if the Left apes those tactics which, when all has been said and done, were questionable (although often hugely successful) to begin with. Let’s deal with a semantic before we get down to brass tacks here: We call this opposition ‘the Left’ for convenience purposes, or even ‘Cultural Marxists’, but that’s not necessarily accurate.

Much of what is assumed to be politically Left are actually the lackeys of the pseudo-progressive-democratic-liberal-globalist-capitalist-world-order. In the most basic reading of the morality contest underlying the narrative in which the Left is pitted against the Far Right, the former are supposedly upholding virtues that the latter dream of stripping from civic life for the sake of an authoritarian, race-based order. This assumes ‘good guys and bad guys’ when viewed through the glass of 20th century western struggles against Fascism, Japanese Imperialism, and National Socialism. Here we invoke Alvin Toffler once more because he had another insight into the future. He wrote: “The illiterate of the 21st Century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn”.

quote-the-illiterate-of-the-21st-century-will-not-be-those-who-cannot-read-and-write-but-those-who-alvin-toffler-287763

In this era, for either side, applying historical lessons, or ideologies, or prejudices from a bygone era is a glittering example of that new millennium illiteracy of which he wrote. So, with the exception of pure Nationalists, or even fluid-thinking true leftists whose worldview we may largely oppose but whose sincerity and logic we might otherwise respect, we have the ‘Katz’ — whose own obsessions are every bit as unhealthy as those provocateurs they make a subculture out of countering online.

The time has, therefore, come to bring these ‘Katz’ into the spotlight. For the main part, those posters who fill the ranks can be easily searched and profiled for themselves. But who runs Anonykatz?

In our last entry, we responded to an article by Honi Soit that claimed that we ‘doxx lefties’ under the guise of self-defence. In this case, we do it as a public service.

In our last entry, we responded to an article by Honi Soit that claimed that we ‘doxx lefties’ under the guise of self-defence. In this case, we do it as a public service.

United Nationalists Australia has been, for a long time now, flooded with requests to doxx the admin of Anonykatz. We have been given theories on who runs it, and countless links. We, therefore, posit the following as a theory which we back up with what we believe is convincing evidence. But as we doxx Anonykatz it is now incumbent on us to out one of its most consistent serial pests — Andrew J. Forster.

ANDREW ‘J’ FORSTER AKA FORESTER

There are amusing trolls, there are witty combatants, and then there are those who if they weren’t harassing people online they would be stealing women’s underwear off clotheslines and wearing it over their heads as they tortured small furry animals. Andrew Forster fits into the latter category.

Hardly a nationalist, patriot or anyone ‘rightist’ conservative has not had an uninvited excretion from the poster using the name Andrew Forster appearing in their messenger inbox. He is unbothered by any transgression of Facebook policy, about laws pertaining to electronic-devices and stalking, or even whether or not he comes across as a complete body snatcher.

He has poured vile abuse on women, accessed accounts belonging to minors, attacked the sick, and violated the privacy of at least one person grieving over the passing of a close relative. It doesn’t matter to him. He is not made of the stuff that exhibits conscience nor is he equipped with the intellectual faculties to express an ideological rationale. He is purely a sociopath with access to the Internet.

He is by no means clever — he often gets rattled when challenged to any degree and scurries off to hit the ‘block’ button even though it was he who initiated contact. It all depends on how much alcohol or pot is in his system or whether or not the methamphetamine he has smoked was of a high enough grade. All in all, his entire act is based on a war of attrition, or who will blink first.

The best response to Forster is to block him. You are not dealing with an intellect, but a lummox whose cerebral deadness serves him well in his abusive trespasses onto the accounts of others. The nature of the world he supposedly abhors in the reckoning of his political opposition is exactly the one which he inhabits online: one where ideas must be singular, where the debate gets shut down, and where other human beings are objectified and reduced to caricatures.

Hardly a nationalist, patriot or anyone ‘rightist’ conservative has not had an uninvited excretion from the poster using the name Andrew Forster appearing in their messenger inbox. He is unbothered by any transgression of Facebook policy, about laws pertaining to electronic-devices and stalking, or even whether or not he comes across as a complete body snatcher.

His profiles list him as residing in Perth. In the past, we have had intelligence pinpointing him to a certain address, but we cannot be sure that information is accurate. We do have what we are assured are images of him. We share two of his Facebook profiles, which are queer things. He seems to have a fetish for the obscure matron of the 1990s British sitcom Keeping Up Appearances, Hyacinth Bucket. In others, he has cheesy personalities from bygone pop culture decorating his bizarre user profile. Likewise, when he wants to be tricky he uses the alias Andrew Forester (see what he did there, genius).

Forster.png
Jame Gumb, stand aside, there is a new retro freak in town

UNA recently, through a lengthy operation, uncovered the address and information regarding the business practices of fake news journalist Luke McMahon. We have his residential address, and we know a lot about him now. We are in the process of uncovering even more information. The same will apply to Forster, who has made such a bore of himself we will coordinate with our people – and even those who aren’t nationalists – in West Australia to finally trace him to his lair. That will be a day he will wish had never come. Thanks to a major financial injection by a benefactor, we have resources that a year ago was not available to us.

Forester.png
Well, it’s pretty obvious Andy is an X-Genner. Note how this profile he brilliantly moves around the letters of his alleged surname to create ‘Forester’. We suggest everyone inbox him and congratulate him on his cleverness. Or just keep reporting his bogus accounts

Firstly, we have to question whether or not Forster is his actual name, and true identity. It will be easy enough to ascertain, but for the sake of discussion, we suggest that it might very well be, given the arguments about identity and ego that we’ve laid out above. It is in the psychopathology of someone like Forster to seek credit for his deeds otherwise he would operate under ever-changing aliases such as Luke McMahon has done.

Forster.png
Hip? Forster barely has a pelvis

It is also noteworthy that his profile appears on the friends’ list of lefty author John Birmingham, which might mean that Birmingham approves any old friend request, or else he is known to the man. Around 1990, when Birmingham contributed to Rolling Stone, he wrote an article about Jim Saleam and National Action that was a direct reflection of the lies being promulgated by disgraced Special Branch detective Neville Ireland; which would suggest that a relationship existed between the two. Jim Saleam complained and either a letter was published in Rolling Stone, or there was a retraction, but he cannot say for sure.

It is also noteworthy that his profile appears on the friends’ list of lefty author John Birmingham, which might mean that Birmingham approves any old friend request, or else he is known to the man.

In Birmingham’s book, Leviathan published around 2000, which is sold as “an electrifying epic history of the city of Sydney” reference was made to Jim Saleam and National Action and an incident involving an alleged theft from a woman by him and a man named Peter Coleman. The case was in dispute and when Jim Saleam confronted the publishers those extracts were subsequently expurgated from the paperback edition.

All in all, it appears that Birmingham, who models himself as a rebel, may very well have been a snitch operating with the corrupt authorities of the time.

17842257_1686981177996769_360839335_n.png
We are told this is a floor plan to Forster’s Perth home. The hydroponic chamber is listed as ‘BRM 2’

But returning to Andrew ‘J’ Forster, we are also informed that he might be lying about the ‘J’ initial in his name, as we are told his name is Andrew Robert Forster.

Whatever, the thing to do now with all his accounts, if you do not block them, is to inundate them until it becomes unviable for him to post any more of his scurrilous silliness. Troll the troll. Find him wherever he is and just let him have it. His accounts are most likely fake so there is little point in him crying to Facebook, and you can make all sorts of threats, and say any sick thing that comes into your head, because the police simply won’t do a damned thing about it and he is too compromised to make such a complaint anyhow. Go for it. He is a real petal; a total snowflake.

PETE SMITH, ARIANA KLEPAC, AND ANONYKATZ

download (2)

The most obvious eccentricity of those running Anonykatz is their obsession with felines. It goes beyond a simple shtick and into the realm of full-blown mania.

pl21
Smith and Anthony Albanese: boy the air must’ve smelt bad when that shot was taken

Therefore when it turns out that noted anti-fascist, the mushy-bellied beer-quaffing Pete Smith and his equally chubby partner Ariana Klepac are the authors of two books classified as “humour” and which reflect an almost Egyptian worship of pussycats it seems a reasonable enough contention that these two are responsible for Anonykatz. At least, this is the theory being presented to us. Obviously, we cannot say definitively, but the circumstances certainly make it highly plausible.

SmithLabor
Awww, look at that, Pete’s a Labor man, which means he’s not a proper lefty at all. Slackbastard should stop talking to him

The pair has authored the books How to Get Ahead in Business with Office Cat, and The Cat-phabet: A Guide to our Furry Overlords — From A to Z. We do not recommend you buy these books unless for some reason Kleenex is in dire shortage. Given the level of wit expressed on what may or may not be their Facebook page, the quality of humour is obviously somewhere about the level of Bill Shorten after a few snorts of paint thinners.

61FG3Xpn2dL._UX250_
Mrs Anonykatz (allegedly), Ariana Klepac, whose public persona along with her partner is as an author of two naff cat books and who looks like she applies her lipstick with a paint roller

Klepac also notably wrote a book titled Stark Raving Mod about the Mod scene in Australia from the late 1970s to 1980s. The book is currently unavailable for purchase.

17AnnStBalmain.png
The blurriness of Katz Palace (allegedly) in Balmain must be down to all the beers Pete drinks to try and make his missus look attractive. And vice versa. Ho ho… just a jolly jape, we are pretty sure both would nab first place in any swimsuit contest

What we DO know is that they both live in Balmain, or Toy World, as some wags refer to it, and if they do in fact control Anonykatz then their background could not be more perfect given the character of the suburb. However, if you want to Google their ‘publisher address’, which is Klepac’s residential & business address, you’ll encounter the extremely odd situation of finding their house blurred out on all Google Street View maps. We are not sure how, or why, one goes about getting their residence blurred out – especially when it is supplied by Google as a place of business – so we’ll just show you a blurry image of the joint which won’t mean much without an accompanying address so they can spare us any bullshit about litigation. As we say, it’s on Google anyway if you search Ariana Klepac. Both are authors which place them in the public domain and their works are therefore subject to fair comment, opinion, and literary criticism.

What also is justified editorial comment in the context of this article is Smith’s alleged connection to the convicted paedophile and former anti-fascist state informant, Alex Gollan. A former assistant principal at a Sydney school, Gollan led a double life as an anti-racist crusader, running a blog called Anti-Bogan at the WordPress site. Smith is implicated in having shared editorial responsibilities with the Gollan, who in 2016 was jailed for possession of child abuse material, released on bail, and the story sort of goes cold there. Perhaps his police handlers, long used to dealing with kiddy fiddlers, provided him with some sort of out clause. We’re sure to find out one way or another. Meanwhile, this does not cast Smith in a very convincing light as a social crusader.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113.jpg
Convicted pedo Alex Gollan was allegedly an associate of Smith

So, folks, there you have it; these anti-fascists are literally a bunch of pussies, with the gayest being Andrew Forster and his psychosexual fixation with Hyacinth Bucket. Perhaps she reminds him of the mother he’s always wanted to get into the sack. Who knows with these sickos? Adieu.

SmithCat2.png
The technical term for this item is a ‘waste of money’

A REPLY TO HONI SOIT ON ‘DOXXING’

A REPLY TO HONI SOIT ON ‘DOXXING’

UNA has received a mention in the latest analysis piece in the pinko University of Sydney student newspaper Honi Soit.

Liam Donohoe has pulled on his Care Bears’ themed oven mitts and pummeled out a piece that is balanced all the way to the left of his inculcated worldview; not that any surprise should be experienced by the reader at that revelation. This is Sydney University after all; the esteemed institution of higher learning that’s student union president is insisting its debating team become 50% female, or transgender, or any mutant derivative that doesn’t identify as ‘cisgender male’. Plus, one of his other recent write-ups was a dray spray at Australia Day in the inevitable anti-Australian vein of his democratic-liberal-pluralist-globalist-virtue-signalling-revisionist ilk. He and his genderless rabble wouldn’t know a real Aboriginal fella if he blew chunks into their avocado smash.

51d395c28109a474494e73170e27197f.jpg
Liam Donohoe needed a ladder to reach puberty

In ‘The doxxing ring’, Donohoe makes half of a fair, if not obvious, point. Both the ‘left’ and ‘right’ use doxxing to further the absolutism of their political worldview and that “…violence is a strategic necessity more than a focus of moral enquiry”. After that, he’s got nothing. We will address this remark about “violence” once we’ve stopped laughing at his picture. But first we’ll point out that Donohoe fails to mention how the mainstream media, especially Fairfax Media, is an accomplice in this nefarious practice; such as when it publishes the falsehoods of pseudo-journalists like [temporarily removed] who UNA is pleased to announce we tracked down to his privileged lair near Melbourne CBD, and who shall be helping us with our enquiries as things progress. Whether he likes it or not.

The mainstream media, in the guise of Fairfax, The Guardian, and the Australian Broadcasting Commission (ABC) have all given the fictitious ‘Andy Fleming’ (a.ka. Professor Rob Sparrow) a political platform. And yes, this self-described anarchist is all about politics, which says something about the genuineness of this Pied Piper of the anti-fascism underground who parades that ‘A’ symbol as if it actually means what it supposedly represents.

Ideally, if Donohoe’s argument holds true about United Nationalists Australia’s implacable need to “focus on the identities of Antifa activists” (a statistical falsehood if you examine our archives), then we should publish a Google street view image of [temporarily removed] right here so anyone who wants to go along and cream the queer fuck has enhanced odds of doing so. If you trace those UNA has ‘doxxed’ then, aside from Rob Sparrow and [temporarily removed] whose willingness to transgress all the polite rules of journalism to score a hit regardless of how, coming with the prestige of the publication they appear in, those lies impact a person’s life, our last significant target was one Dave Gullis — a violent oaf from the left. This we raise in response to his cynical aside about us doxxing his Lefty comrades “under the pretence of self-defence”.

In the early days of last December, the trade unionist David Gullis made an uninvited visit to the Tempe headquarters of the Australia First Party. Having roused the overworked AFP leader out of bed, he subjected him to a primitive display of snarling, base name calling, witless slander, and death threats. Then he tossed the remnants of a cup of coffee at him. He was, fortunately, unable to bite his leg like a rabid dog thanks to the security gate which kept him at bay. This was not the last stop of the night, however, because he travelled five minutes up the road to the home of an AFP member and caused criminal damage to his residence while he slept. He had previously gone to the same address in broad daylight and made death threats to the tenant. The address was supplied to him by Lefty doxxers, full-well knowing the dangers he posed. Indeed, it was the very reason the address was passed on.

Legend has it that Gullis flew to Ukraine at the peak of its disturbances and fought against ‘fascists’ reputedly killing a Ukranian man whose political orientation he didn’t like. God knows how ASIO let him do so, but it doesn’t get any more ‘left’ and ‘violent’ than that. The fact that his target has never committed a single act of violence compounds the folly of Donohoe’s dismissiveness.

20171207051942777
Mental case and lefty terrorist Dave Gullis attacks the home of a Nationalist

Likewise, in 2014, when C.F.M.E.U thugs were recruited to join a march attacking Australia First Party Qld members as they held a support rally for imprisoned Golden Dawn members, Slackbastard was identified as the principal organizer of the violence. Any doubts about Sparrow’s willingness to employ violence can be dispelled here in this 1999 article he wrote Anarchist Politics & Direct Action. We quote SB as follows, “The state has more repressive force at its command than we can ever hope to muster. This is not a pacifist position. We have every right to employ force in the attempt to resist the violence of the state.”

This is the same ‘state’ that he and his minions are a beneficiary of, just by the way; they sure get enough air-time from state mouthpieces. We have no examples of the Australian right conducting campaigns of violence against this ‘Left’ that Liam defends.

Donohoe, who looks so fresh-faced it’s as if he’s only just been weaned off his mother’s tit, holds that the “far-right seems more prepared to resort to violence in order to solve its problems”. He makes this unsubstantiated, inexperienced claim (assuming he is sticking to a discussion about the Australian far-right, which UNA is NOT a representative of) immediately after exonerating the far-left by arguing, “Holding the far-left to this sort of higher standard, however, not only assumes a ‘moralistic’ concept of left-wing politics [Lol – ED], but also ignores that the far-left has little other option but to doxx”.

This is a bald-faced lie since the left doxxes first and asks (no) questions later. The reason lefties get doxxed, when their identities can finally be discovered, is because they haunt the ‘far-right’ like feminists bother men. They hide under aliases on social media and make it their entire raison d’être to pursue their hated targets from one social media page to the next. Without the far-right to fret over, they’d shrivel up and blow away like dried dog shit in a wind storm.

Here, we understand that Donohoe has invoked the American experience to justify his position, admitting violence from the far-left, but muting it by writing, “Though there certainly are real cases of Lefty violence, that there was more reporting of the “violent” hucking of hummus at Catholic Society members last November than there has been of the myriad of murders and assaults committed by the far-right”.

What “myriad of murders and assaults committed by the far-right”? Donohoe then winds up all this thinly-veiled justification for “Lefty” doxxing and violence with a “doxxing is bad, m’kay” broadside that should just be scrunched up and flushed down the potty along with its whippersnapper author.

He failed to get inside one of the intrinsic contradictions of this whole “doxxing” thing in regards to the far-right, which he mistakenly brackets us in with. And that is just how much the ‘far-right’ doxxes its own and especially, in the well-publicized example of former chief peanut of the supposedly now-defunct Party for Freedom, Nick Folkes, who has in the past fortnight used Anonykatz to air his karmic angst against former members and perceived enemies. It is common for dross like Folkes to use Leftist channels to smear their right-side rivals.

We have had some from Folkes’s side of the kindie fence accuse us of doxxing, and here and there, in the interests of the hygiene of Australian Nationalism, we admit to having done so but only in a manner of speaking. Hell, if we wanted to, we could publish Toby Cook’s address, along with the addresses of other pond scum he associates with. But we’re not going to because without the Peanuts this Lads’ Society member and Australia’s first fully coloured Hollywood Nazi is just a walking cause of earthly famine. Let the righteous starving deal with him when they’re finally sick of him scarfing down half the nation’s food supply.

As to Liam Donohoe, next time you try to reach some sort of political maturity, try standing on a chair.

3b8f425945be8ba601fd6d10c91e107d
Doctor Doxx himself: the cosmopolitan restaurant radical Rob Sparrow who denies being Slackbastard (Lol)

 

THE END OF THE UGLY PATRIOT — THE FALL OF PARTY FOR FREEDOM

THE END OF THE UGLY PATRIOT — THE FALL OF PARTY FOR FREEDOM

Now is the winter of Nick Folkes’s discontent. This very moment, he is weeping into his 49th stubbie of lager. For teary-eyed Nick, whatever solace can be had, comes out of a bottle. No bottle is deep enough to brighten Nick’s spirits.

Yet, that bottle now defines Nick; it directs his actions, and ultimately contributed to his ignominious downfall. Those high times spent making a goose of himself on SBS reality shows like ‘I’m Not Racist, But’ and being recognised in public are over — his king-tide ride as media provocateur has passed. Nick is now sombrely talking about “writing a book”, or hagiography, which is a concession of defeat if ever there was one. We can think of a million titles for his magnum opus, but the most appropriate is already taken, The Idiot.

Yes, readers, it’s all over for Nick, and even better, it’s the end of the road for his beloved Peanuts for Freedom.

Nick is a man in shock — a wobbly jester struggling to come to terms with his inglorious banishment from court. All his putrid karma has swung back and hit him in the face like the stink from an Egyptian port-a-loo. It has left him even more dazed and confused than one of his benders. Frankly, we are delighted. So where did it all start to unravel for the grotty burke and his obese offsider?

Nick began the Peanuts for Freedom in 2012 after splitting from the Australian Protectionist Party. In its nearly six years of existence, it has never come within a cooee of being registered. The word ‘Party’ in its name has therefore always served more of a pointer to its orgiastic activities than any qualifier of the group as a bona fide political group.

Over the years, Nick has spent more time in Arab drag than the combined hierarchy of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils. Except for those occasions when he’s inexplicably starkers, it’s his number one favourite choice of presentation. Perhaps shutting the curtains and dressing up as the Grand Mufti of Lakemba is one of the last innocent pleasures left to Nick now that the Peanuts have been officially roasted.

Yes, readers, it’s all over for Nick, and even better, it’s the end of the road for his beloved Peanuts for Freedom.

Nick’s hasn’t been the clean death that many of those who wear the cloth prefer when administering the last rites. Periods of acceptance are punctuated by episodes of him thrashing about on his death-bed like Reagan freaking out in The Exorcist; spewing green bile hither and thither on social media. The devil just doesn’t want to leave Nick; he has his nails dug in sharper than a kitten clawing at a tea cosy. But what’s obvious is that he can never rebuild what was.

Those supporters of his that he savagely burned and abused are now exacting their sweet revenge on him all over Facebook. In fact, having said more about Nick than any other blog in existence, we shall leave the final word up to former associate Deb Daldy, who posted a long denunciation of Folkes on Facebook.

pjimage
We just cannot figure out why people would turn their backs on Nick…

Deb is from Kim Vuga’s party, Love Australia or Leave. As a matter of fact, many former members of PfF are now with Kim. Deb herself explains why, but before we get to that we will recap. The divisions really began long before the infamous night of the Peanuts on Pingas, when Nick, Toby Cook, and Penny Louise got wasted and began carnage calling former members whose numbers Nick gleefully provided. But that was as good a marker as any for the purposes of establishing a point of its decline.

UNA had previously published an account provided by one such insider, who blew the whistle on its drug culture and Nick’s unsuitability for representing any aspect of Australia save for its inebriates.

Certain opportunities to appear cohesive cropped up after the Peanuts on Pingas incident, like a rally in Penrith which he characteristically hijacked, and a protest against the defacement of a statue of Captain Cook in Sydney’s Hyde Park. But like much surrounding these civic patriots, it was largely an illusion with his numbers bolstered by others, including repugnant Kiwi troublemaker Mark McDonald, the Hollywood Nazi who has been appointed Sydney organiser for the Lads Society.

UNA had previously published an account provided by one such insider, who blew the whistle on its drug culture and Nick’s unsuitability for representing any aspect of Australia save for its inebriates.

None of this could mask the cracks, however, and as loyal lieutenant George Jameson and his skank Penny Tridgell moved closer to soon-to-be-jailed sewer-rat Neil Erikson, the green-eyed-monster reared its head. Hell hath no fury like a jealous Nick Folkes, so we’re told, and he is constantly jealous. You could be on the ground being kicked by cops and Nick would be envious you were getting more attention than him.

When Jam Jams split and joined the multiculturalist dental cases of the True Blue Crew taking with him a bunch of dumb PfF placards, Nick went a curious Bananas-in-Pyjamas version of Tony Montana. Nick and his remaining circle of loyal Peanuts accused Jameson of being a “Jew lover”, which is rich given their past associations with kosher conservatives. Unbelievably, PfF’s Jewish second-in-command, Radka Smith, even got in the swing and in one Facebook post accuses “Mr Buttman” (Jameson) of being a ‘Mossad agent’, which is definitely the pot calling the kettle black.

Nick-Folkes-Zion-Puppet
Mr “Buttman”, aka George Jameson, once loved for his Jewish flag is now a Peanuts’ pariah

We’ll just veer off topic for two seconds to explain the ‘Mr Buttman’ reference since it speaks volumes not only of Jambalaya but about his former party. Apparently, Jameson had publically expressed his love of anal sex with the object of his cradle-snatching, Pen Pen. Tridgell, who is more than half Jameson’s age, abandoned her infant child to smoke drugs with the Peanuts and cop it up the date from Jam Jams, and, even more sordidly,  his brother.

Now Pen is preggers and it’s a miracle since women aren’t usually impregnated via their clacker. Either Jameson or his bro is incredibly fertile or now and then they broke with habit and rolled on top of her. But nobody wants to think about that since the image it invokes is too disturbing. Plus, this is a family blog.

This spat has caused sparks to fly between T.B.C and PfF, or T.B.C Sydney and Melbourne or something, and, so we hear but cannot be bothered confirming, Ralph Cerminara, who was the subject of shocking allegations revealed to us by a whistle-blower, is acting as peacemaker. Hurrah.

This spat has caused sparks to fly between T.B.C and PfF and, so we hear but cannot be bothered confirming, Ralph Cerminara, who was the subject of shocking allegations revealed to us by a whistle-blower, is acting as peacemaker. Hurrah.

Meanwhile, the remnants of the Peanuts are reportedly turning ‘hard-core racialist’, most likely with the influence of Sydney Lads leader Mark ‘Matey Mate’ McDonald’. With Toby Cook modelling himself as a racially impure George Lincoln Rockwell, they are attempting to steal the thunder from The Antipodeans by going all-out anti-Semitic (with Jewess Radka Smith wholeheartedly supporting them).

Tobes has apparently created a Facebook group of limited membership named ‘Aryan Brothers and Sisters’. (We know, we know, it’s too much already). We still have all the footage of Tobes helping burn a Nazi flag outside the Australia First Party headquarters in Tempe; just one of the many contradictions in the baffling free-for-all that has bubbled up from the civic patriot swamp.

oie_HkPPEfraPMW7.png
The saviour of the White race. Himmler would have appointed him head of the SS Racial Purity Division

Now, it’s about time this was settled once and for all — there is no way on God’s earth that Toby Cook is White. His fanatical Julius Streicher act is totally designed to draw attention away from his racial shortcomings. He seems to have the deluded idea that by thumping hard about the Jews he is less likely to be scrutinised for his ancestral roots, which, given the thickness of his lips, the rich caterpillar fuzziness of his eyebrows, and the overall Islander cast of his Polynesian head have caused great speculation. We have some bets that he is a mix of Malaysian and Islander, some suggest he has Bornean DNA.

UNA is very close to answering the question that has puzzled Nationalists for three years now — what race is Toby Cook? We will publish our results when we finally unearth them. In the meantime, this new core of crazy racialist warriors including Toby, Matt Lowe, and some slapper who looks like a former groupie for a third-rate pub rock band are rumoured to be attempting to move in on The Lads Society, possibly since their man Matey Mate McDonald has successfully infiltrated them.

imageedit_6_6825016602
The Peanuts once burned Nazi flags. Now they swear by ’em

Matt is apparently the new leader of PfF which means that they’ll be struggling to get the kind of publicity they’re addicted to since it takes an un-embarrass-able twit like Folkes to make enough of a tool of himself to generate that publicity.

Regardless, they’ll never be registered, and will never be anything but a tick fastened to a host group.

Now, we shall raise the tone somewhat so that Deb Daldy can take it from here. We post this knowing she would prefer this account of hers remained in the public sphere. Her post is reproduced exactly as it appeared. Take it away, Deb!

Party for Freedom is Airing dirty laundry? Ok, Lets!!

I used to create memes for PFF. Free of charge, as that was part of my contribution to the patriotic movement. My hubby also contributed, out of respect for me, by assisting with the PFF website. We did this for months.

Then, when the Love Australia or Leave Party was set up, I advised both of the respective party leaders that I would be happy to assist helping both of them generate memes and do admin work for them, but it was necessary from my point of view to be transparent to both parties from the beginning. I advised Nick Folkes that I would be assisting LAOL with their memes, to which he agreed wholeheartedly, only to have a change of heart three weeks later. What should have occurred was that we walk away amicably. But Nick got nasty, accusing me and the leader of LAOL, Kim Vuga of helping LAOL steal PFF people from his political party. FACT: Nick, It’s not a political party, until its registered with the AEC. All you have is a boys club minus the cubby house. You do however have pass the bong game and nude activities for attendees, so I’m told. Lol FACT: PFF members were never poached, but since we are here airing everything…truth be told, your members flocked to LAOL. In droves. Their reasoning: because they never believed you would ever get registered with the AEC.

FACT: They were right. My current sentiment of your party should have been alerted long ago when you rang me up, asking for advice on whether it was a good idea to attend the funeral service of Curtis Cheng, sit in the service wearing badges making a political statement!! The fact you had to ask whether that was a good idea indicated your lack of judgement and complete disrespect for people just wanting to mourn the loss of their family member. The only redeeming outcome was that I was able to talk you out of it, and you didn’t go ahead with it. You make the claim that George was a helpful PFF member for the best part of three years. So helpful, that you saw fit to bag George out behind his back to anyone that would listen. Now, I am certainly no fan of George, but what kind of a leader discusses party members with other members behind their backs, and even with people that aren’t party members?

I find it nothing short of comical how quickly you turned on Penny, when not even 8 months ago you defended Penny, almost parading her as the PFF mascot. You were so loyal to Penny, a newcomer, that when others took issue with Penny’s deviant behavior, you saw fit to rebuke the loyal in favour of the newcomer. That’s the kind of loyalty YOU show people. You demand loyalty but never give it. Or if you do, its always with strings attached.

Now, lets talk about the placards. To be honest, I don’t give a crap who owns the placards, but if I’m going to call a spade a spade, I would have thought it wouldn’t matter to someone that was ALL about the patriotic movement, WHO used the placards, as long as the message that was on the placard was being shown in public. I mean, isn’t that was its supposed to be about…educating the public, publicly supporting our views and beliefs and showing the rest of Australia that there are people that care about the country? So why, then, if that is the sole purpose of those placards would it matter who was holding them up? From a party leader point of view, I would have thought that getting the PFF name out there with the message was constructive, or at least it was till your petty carry on ensure George cut the bottom off. Now nobody wins.

THAT’S SOME GREAT LEADERSHIP!!

You saw no problem with sharing other people’s platforms at events like Reclaim Rallies and jumped on other party’s bandwagons, even going so far as to make a homeless video with a real patriotic party, who’s idea it was in the first place, then putting your logo all over it. When asked for a copy of the video, you wouldn’t give them the footage. So, before you are quick to publicly execute George for not handing over stuff that wasn’t his, can I offer you a mirror?

And as for hypocrisy, let’s talk about the defamation you heaped on Jim Saleam for years, even allowing people to believe that he had a Nazi styled bunker in his place with the Nazi Flag hung up. What you don’t realise and probably never banked on, was that other people in the patriotic movement had reason to visit Jim’s house (courtesy of you) and this couldn’t be further from the truth. You have willfully deceived patriots right across the movement that Jim Saleam is a Nazi. Where is your integrity? Nothing wrong with disagreeing with Jim’s political views, as there are quite a few I disagree with, but to outright character assassinate him, you should consider yourself fortunate you haven’t found yourself in front of a magistrate having to defend defamation charges. If we take that mirror I offered you before, assuming you have not broken the mirror in frustration and anger, and hold it up to for self- examination of PFF then it’s clear, thanks to Toby (Tobias Cook) and the “Aryan Brothers and Sisters” chat group, where those with real Nazi beliefs (and flags to boot, reside). It’s in the pretend cubby house.

Now let’s talk about your weekend parties, oh sorry, party meetings, where the sole entertainment seems to be you handing out past members (and associates) phone numbers so that you can harass them in the wee early hours of the morning. And by harass, I mean ring them up and verbally abuse people in a manner that is so crass, crude and vulgar that the contents of those phone conversations only serve to show the character of the man that you are by handing out those phone numbers and then sitting in the back laughing and egging them all on for your amusement. People don’t ever seem to be able to amicably walk away from your party, you just turn nasty and see fit to try and intimidate them. Again….fabulous adult leadership. The last time most people reading this made prank obscene phone calls was back when they were 12-13 years of age. I do see that you now attempting to blame Penny for making the phone calls. Well that’s a coward act, with the exception of when you hid behind two patriotic women Tess Pearce and Jody R Henry at a rally because ANTIFA showed up, if ever I have seen one. It was YOU and YOU alone that had the phone numbers of Jody R Henry and Judith Macalpine, and Penny would never have been able to have made those calls had you not handed her those phone numbers on a silver platter. So if you are going to air dirty laundry, then at least do it with a mirror, and take personal responsibility for your part in it. In saying that, Penny is as equally responsible for those calls, as are the Toby and Matt Lowe for those obscene calls. As the leader of PFF Nick, you are responsible for your members do, especially when they are in your presence and whilst representing your party.

Are you registered yet with the AEC, where again, money collected requires transparency? NO! So until such a time, all that happened was that money was given to Nick by George and you bought placards with that money putting and put a wannabe political party name on the bottom of them. As the party is not registered, the party technically doesn’t exist and therefore the placards belong to nobody. Sure, you can go through the motions of holding pretend committee meetings, but at the end of the day, the only people you are fooling into believing PFF is a registered political party, is yourselves. Don’t be too embarrassed, when my daughter was 6 she liked to play doctors and nurses, so you aren’t completely alone in your desire for playing make-believe games.

Right now, all I see, and everyone watching this post from afar (and there are lots) is your party imploding. The only one to blame here is you, as with any organization, registered or make-believe without a cubby house, the buck stops at the top! Your pettiness is what has alienated people from your wannabe party. Your disloyalty to past and current members has and will be your complete undoing.

The one thing, I want to make clear, is that I don’t write this in favour of either George or Penny, as I have issues with both of them, including but not limited to the way George has treated women in the past by attempting to hit a patriotic women by launching over a table at her, and Penny because I will never understand how a person that has walked out on her kid has any right to lecture other people on how to mother. Any woman that can then make prank phone calls to harass people because she was called out on her BS is childish and immature and leaves me questioning her age and maturity level.

Out of nothing but sheer jealousy you have turned on people that were your friends, that were loyal to the patriotic movement and would have moved heaven and earth to have helped you. I know, I was one of them. In fact, all of the people I know that you have shat on, all say the same thing: the only person you are loyal to is yourself. If you can so easily talk about George behind his back when he was loyal to you and your party, what on earth would make others want to be loyal to you? Then there is the small issue of you accusing a women that financially contributed to your party in ways that far exceed just money, of being the reason another member committed suicide. WHO DOES THAT!! That would be you, Nick, who had so much respect for the dearly departed Fiona, that you and your PFF crew saw fit to smoke weed at her
funeral to the horror of her family.

No doubt your first instinct, once you have read this, will be to delete my post. But you can’t. Your sordid history of the way you treat people will no doubt be doing the rounds over FB. For once, just once, try and resist the urge to be a coward for a change and own your responsibility of the collapse and destruction of PFF.

I stand by everything I have written in this post as it is a true and correct statement. For those doubtful there are quite a few people that I can think of off the top of head that would be able to verify this post.

All Australia wants is for people to come together, and all you’ve achieved is nothing but division in order to satisfy your ego, and all over placards. There’s a part of me that should be sad at the division you have generated amongst the patriotic movement, but there’s no point. It’s what I’ve come to expect. I’ve heard it said: “He who laughs last, laughs loudest”. Well you can rest assured that I have never laughed as hard as what I have in the last few days watching you and your PFF crew reap what they sow! These days, I have no need to think about PFF and how pathetic it is, but you can rest assured that we have made it a habit of telling everyone about PFF and what complete jokes you all are, before advising them that its best they don’t support PFF as it is considered to be an embarrassment to real patriots, particularly those in Victoria. You are just mock worthy, cringe worthy and the only worth you all possess now is to be ex-communicated out of the movement altogether.

This post was going to be as a response to your post, but when I saw you delete Jody Renay’s response for calling a spade a spade re PFF, then saw fit to outright fabricate and accuse her of being on welfare, (as though that’s somehow derogatory) even though she’s not, as a way of deterring people from her truthful claims, I have now seen fit to post this to my wall and into groups, where you will have lost all power to have it deleted, where you can’t cover up the truth any more. Of course, there will be people that screen shot it and send it to you. I’m banking on it and expecting a course of abusive phone calls to ensue in the coming months, but you will never be able to cover up what you did to loyal members of your party and how your party has self-destructed almost completely, at your hand. Not while there is breath in my body.

f952fecefa2764880190f64910d0bd2d
The two leaders. The burke in the blue shirt is Matt Lowe. He is apparently a Nazi or something cool like that

 

 

ARE THE LADS SOCIETY KLUB NATION 2.0?  

ARE THE LADS SOCIETY KLUB NATION 2.0?  

ED: The following account has been by a Victorian Nationalist, himself a young chap, who does NOT accord with the direction of this article’s subjects – despite having approached them initially with an open mind. His work has naturally been edited, and here and there an addition made by the editor to improve its cogency. The editor has added some details unknown to the author, but the thrust of it is otherwise his own words, although it has been necessary to effect a few tricks of the trade to disguise his identity.

Introduction

During last December’s meeting at the anniversary of the Eureka Uprising in Victoria, a Nationalist gave a speech urging everyone to set aside their differences and work together for our common interest. It was a nice pep-talk and well-received. However, its flaw lay in this notion of ‘everyone’ and, frankly, in the concept of a ‘common interest’. This is not a swipe at the speaker, whose intentions were honourable, but the time has come to address current events in the context of his message.

His speech might be understood as directed at United Nationalists Australia blogsite and probably others we weren’t aware of. Our unwavering commitment to the precepts of Australian Nationalism seems to bother many of those he implied in his use of the pronoun.

Those it troubles do not fall into the category of ‘Nationalist’ and they have now come together as an organisation. Yet we have the incredible situation where one of the most influential of Nationalist thinkers has thrown his all in with this non-Nationalist group. Moreover, he is paying it tributes that not only it hasn’t earned, but which are not in any way deserved by this non-political, non-activist, non-Nationalist association.

We will not name the individual or any organisation to which this Nationalist may belong, but by ‘this group’ – we mean the ‘Lads Society’.

KLUB NATION 2.0?

A broad column of individuals exists in the wilds between a definitive Nationalist organisation with a confirmed mission-statement, philosophy, core-policies, written history and political intent — and a notional collective of an imprecise creed that seems to have as its intentions to vacuum up all those who would dedicate their energies other than to its own. And they wish to marshal all that energy for what purpose? Just because ‘one day’ there’ll be a reckoning… What sort of reckoning? They are unable to say.

Over the years there have been other such clusters of suggested Nationalists and Patriots usually springing up with duplicitous intentions and huckster aims. Klub Nation was one such mob. It was all about the shekels and was an outright scam. Now we have The Lads Society, which is the brainchild of Tom Sewell, called by some ‘the permanent shadow’ of Blair Cottrell. But is it Klub Nation 2.0? Tom and Blair, as everyone knows, were the Batman & Robin of the United Patriots Front after its founding members and Christopher Shortis split.

In a way, it’s a pity about Tom, because in those days of 2015 he could be relied upon to support Nationalist views. He even supported the Australia First Party in a video that Blair had removed because it might upset half-stepping civic patriots who, having no education on politics, passionately back ‘diversity minus Islam’. It seems Tom finally went in that direction too in practise if not always in words. In the beginning, the word is, Tom was much more amenable to what proper Nationalists had to say.

Some of those involved in this civic patriot milieu are touchy on the question of White Australia, often because they’re busy copulating with Asian women.

It is an open secret that Tom Sewell was in a relationship with a part Filipino (some Sydney civics now say ‘Vietnamese’ and say it is current) girl as recently as 2015. All believe he would no longer engage in such relationships and congratulate him on that.  Maybe some of those attacking Tom on this have an agenda, which we will discuss in a moment?

Some of those involved in this civic patriot milieu are touchy on the question of White Australia, often because they’re busy copulating with Asian women.

From the very outset, the political kids of the UPF, particularly Blair and Tom, pronounced themselves to be ‘the’ answer. They had not figured out the question yet, but they were unflappable in their chauvinism. This has been observed by some young people who are not so naïve to believe that before them being on the scene – there was never any sort of nationalist or patriot movement.

At the time, they dismissed the bedrock Nationalist leaders of the Australia First Party as “too old” and charged that it had “done nothing”. This last criticism betrayed the kind of arrogance one expects but which is not helpful for any side. Having just landed on the ground they had no concept of the terrain but with the cocksureness of inexperience divined themselves as superior to surviving Nationalists because they were loudly out and facing off with Antifa in city areas of Melbourne long ago lost to the fifth-columnists of globalism.

So, from their arrival, they were derisive of veteran Nationalists, going so far as to encourage others to avoid the established organisations. Remarkably, they now accuse veteran-Nationalists of undermining them while encouraging every young bloke from the Alt-Right or wherever to join them and avoid the “baby boomers” and “Gen-Xers” of AFP and similar. Apparently, they, and those at UNA “shoot too far to the right”, whatever that’s supposed to mean, since Nationalism shoots neither left or right, it is simply a Third Position.

Nationalists from all groups have never advised political prospects not to deal with the Lads Society. UNA has never, until now, even mentioned them. More to the point, Nationalists such as the AFP and others wants to work with any bona fide Nationalist, on any agreeable terms. They would be pleased for them to join their cause but are under no pressure. AFP has long worked with non-members. The absolutism of The Lads Society is therefore hypocritical on this score since according to hypnotic messages delivered to its younger members by Tom during bonding sessions, the Lads Society is “the only” group who can “save Australia.”

Any individual who did not burst out laughing, get up and walk out at this point is open to accusations of gullibility. His act bears more in common with the sale of snake oil and rain dances than with anything founded on credible Nationalist ground. It is a wonder he and Blair aren’t issuing absolution on the way out the door.

From the very outset, the political kids of the UPF, particularly Blair and Tom, pronounced themselves to be ‘the’ answer. They had not figured out the question yet, but they were unflappable in their chauvinism.

What an outrageous assertion for a club to make given they have no political direction and exist as only a fraternal structure!

And that is the thing about the Lads! They are CLUB LIFE pure and simple. There is a gym, and a bar and they encourage attendance in a cultish kind. Membership is exclusively open to males. Given how any swing towards Nationalism would require a substantial female input, their prospects of ‘saving Australia’ are presently limited.

There is no quarrel at all with some of the aims of the Lads: the push to fitness and the improvement of the self-esteem of young Aussie blokes is a commendable thing. But if they wish to emulate ‘the Hitler youth’ then they have overlooked that it was, in fact, an organisation attached to a political party. It was not of itself a movement.

Cartman_hitler
“Listen up, Lads…”

Most alarming of all is that the Lads are not even choosing to identify as Nationalists anywhere but on the quiet. This is classic UPF; it is exactly what Tom and Blair did all along with the UPF; they made overtures to Nationalists with a nod and wink that ‘one day’ when the political climate was right they would emerge as fully-fledged Nationalists. Nationalists were sceptical about them then, and now we outright call bullshit!

Blair Cottrell admitted in a recent video posted to his new Facebook page in which he identifies as “right wing” and “conservative.” Does that mean he is pitching away from Nationalism? Furthermore, the Lads’ association with the non-political, non-Nationalist, street association known as The True Blue Crew continues. This is a bunch of blokes with utterly no political comprehension whatsoever who make no secret about being an openly civic patriot unit. It has been said the two groups are merging at the Lads’ Melbourne clubhouse to share rent and better coordinate activities. This is as direct a disavowal of Nationalist principles as can be understood.

What an outrageous assertion for a club to make given they have no political direction and exist as only a fra!ternal structure

Thus we come back to the original speech about ‘everyone’ and ‘common interest’. Through the perversity of the thing, this ‘everyone’ excludes true Nationalists, and ‘interests’ could not be less common.

Nationalists understand that patriotic cause can only be served politically and with absolute preservation of its ideals. It cannot be talked away from its implicit understanding of Australianness as being determined solely by White heritage.

The Lads Society is a monetised operation dependent on fee-paying members to sustain the club and maintain its equipment. Klub Nation was likewise monetised although it was done so along the lines of a Ponzi scheme.  It does not possess a real hope of survival. This is subculture at best and as such it has a finite lifespan. Under the conditions described there is no hope of ‘saving Australia’, particularly when its leaders are reticent about committing to a definition of what constitutes an Australian.

Unless they are prepared to come out and say ‘Australians are White, and Whites are under threat, and we support the cause of Australian Nationalism, and agree with the idea of a White Australia Policy’, then they are grifting us all just like in the UPF days.

THE ‘SYDNEY PROBLEM’

It’s not enough that Tom and Blair are silly enough to view themselves as ‘saviours’, but they have chosen not to confine the infection of their Lads Society to Melbourne. Tom is quoted as having addressed ‘the Sydney problem’.

Those Sydney Nationalists see the only ‘problem’ as being people like Tom and his Lads Society. Their status as a corrosive ‘problem’ was confirmed when Tom had the stunning absence of mind to fly to Sydney a few weeks ago and appoint none other than former Squadron 88 leader Mark McDonald (real name unknown) to arrange its Sydney operations, which we understand are destined for setting up with a ‘clubhouse’ in Cronulla. This has caused a real upset in the Alt-Right ranks in Sydney. None of them wants anything to do with McDonald.

The choice of area is predictable given McDonald’s connection to the leftovers of the civic patriot Party for Freedom, which is eyeing off the Lads Society, and at its very least, hopes to become its political arm. Is it the PfF civics who are now telling that ‘Vietnamese’ story about Tom as part of a final takeover bid? If this group of Sydney civics is a Klub Nation 2,0, spreading deceits undermines the target so they can get control.

In 2015, Nick and his Peanuts for Freedom attempted to hijack the Cronulla Uprising commemoration in a cheap grab for publicity. The fallout led to his mate Shermon Burgess being slugged with a $100k fine from the local council. These crooks are now all over Sydney Lads and if they use the same talent for disaster that they had then, Melbourne Lads is in for a rough ride.

Much has been written about McDonald and this truth is just too well known. His track record of spreading discord is infamous and his every furtive move involves acquisition and recruitment. He has been connected to Party for Freedom since he arrived on the scene but he has attempted to involve himself in every known Nationalist group, or White Nationalist organisation.

It’s not enough that Tom and Blair are silly enough to view themselves as ‘saviours’, but they have chosen not to confine the infection of their Lads Society to Melbourne. Tom is quoted as having addressed ‘the Sydney problem’.

He is, in fact, a New Zealander. In the case of ‘Matey Mate’ McDonald, with his history of attempting to rope others into criminal activities; his refusal to reveal the truth about his past and his identity; and an avowed determination to create havoc for true Australian Nationalists before one asks anything else, the primary question is, “What are you really?” He can’t be doing it for Australia because he’s not an Australian. He is not even a New Zealand patriot because nobody over there has ever heard of him.

The Party for Freedom has shed its leader of many years, Nick Folkes. He has been sidelined, some say, for the establishment of a “harder” more “Nationalist” PfF, which is classic Peanuts gameplay. We have a lot of groups and individuals who therefore can never stay one course, but have to reinvent themselves like fashions. The one thing they have in common is that their goals are just to ‘attract’, never to pursue an issue towards public influence.

They have also never done a thing to help true Nationalists. Blair Cottrell has long preferred (he says for ‘tactical reasons’) to shake hands with non-Whites for grip-and-grin opportunities than being caught dead hosting Nationalists. On the other hand, Nationalists tried their hardest to provide the UPF with guidance and advice. One bit of advice was to avoid Mark McDonald like the plague. Tom’s solution, and what is really a foul gob in the eye of all Nationalists, is to appoint this shifty narc its Sydney organiser, complete with access to Lads Society funds.

All in all, this talk about ‘everyone’ and ‘common interests’ is naïve indeed; it is really time to talk facts and truths and for the Lads to clean up its act.

Boys only tree house
The Lads Society clubhouse in Melbourne