ASSERTIVE NEUTRALITY: THE NATIONALIST ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT

ASSERTIVE NEUTRALITY: THE NATIONALIST ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT

In our ideological struggle against the system and its toadies, we must constantly be on the front foot in terms of laying out for our people exactly where we stand on the issues of the day.

It should go without saying that Australian Nationalists oppose, on principle, any involvement of the national defence forces in the wars of imperialism currently being waged by the so-called “coalition of the willing”.

Our doctrine of identity, independence and freedom sits at the polar extreme to that of all-conquering globalist capitalism; we value genuine diversity among the nations of the world, a position which obviously rejects any false notions of equality, supremacy or inferiority in the relationships between the mosaic of national groups.

Furthermore, we reject out of hand the adherence to treaties entailing international obligations which might needlessly put our people in harm’s way at the behest of the superpowers, or which could seriously interfere with the self-determination, good order or sovereignty of other nations.

aleppo
Aleppo, Syria: a tragic situation, but it has nothing to do with us

 

For example, our position on the recent Sunni insurgencies in Syria and Iraq has been consistent as we have stated from the beginning of the hostilities that this conflict should be fought and won by a strong coalition of Middle-Eastern regional forces and their northern hemisphere allies.

This eternal struggle for the soul of the Islamic world has nothing whatsoever to do with Australians, who are a people of the global south and should see ourselves as a nation apart from the endless squabbling among some 70 factions of Mohammedans with their myriad tribal and ethnic divisions.

There is no need for a nation of the south, which is socially, racially and geographically a world away from North Asia to be involved in the politics of that region, especially not as the yapping Lap Dog of the clown president Donald Trump and his Zionist cronies.

So too the sabre rattling by Canberra’s imperial globalist warmongers against the hermit state of North Korea is strongly condemned by Australian Nationalists for it is no concern of ours whether the Kim family stands or falls as rulers, or whether their crypto-Fascist system of government remains in place.

KCNA picture of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un speaking at the first party committee meeting in Pyongyang
We would bet the farm that Kim Jong Un will never bother us if we do not bother him

 

The possession of weapons of mass destruction by such regimes has, in recent times, tended to mitigate against widespread conventional warfare of the sort which ravaged the world in the 20th century, so it is no concern of ours whether North Korea remains as it is, armed to the teeth and ruled by a despot and his secret police.

There is no need for a nation of the south, which is socially, racially and geographically a world away from North Asia to be involved in the politics of that region, especially not as the yapping lap Dog of the clown president Donald Trump and his Zionist cronies.

The threats posed by Jihadism are likewise made far more manageable by a prudent immigration program which excludes non-assimilable Mohammedans, a move to Australian neutrality in foreign affairs, including cutting ties with the Zionist entity and an end to opportunistic political support for Islamism by the current political elites.

 

Talal Almeddine
Talal Almeddin and the other plotters of the Parramatta outrage are symptoms, not the disease and the cure is simple

 

As a nation we are blessed to inhabit one of the quieter corners of the globe and Nationalists feel no shame in our past reputation as a cozy, bucolic backwater at the ends of the earth, this ideal is, in fact, the state of affairs which patriotic folk ought to have explicitly tried to “reclaim” in the heady days of 2015.

The threats posed by Jihadism are likewise made far more manageable by a prudent immigration program which excludes non-assimilable Mohammedans, a move to Australian neutrality in foreign affairs, including cutting ties with the Zionist entity and an end to opportunistic political support for Islamism by the current political elites.

In the era of immigration restriction and White supremacy Australia was a genuinely progressive society and despite being embroiled in the wars of the 20th century, the second of which was unavoidable anyway, there was a sense of relentless forward momentum, optimism and the feeling that through the pursuit of social justice at home we might lead by example the developing nations of the world.

The heroes of Kokoda and the men who fought the campaigns against Japanese Fascism across our region are the examples for our assertive brand of neutrality; they fought for blood and soil, in the interests of their nation against a foe who sought to obliterate all societies in its path and impose totalitarian rule across the Pacific.

Let us be clear, however, that we are in no way “Antifascist” in the context of the fake Left and Zionist Right, we are simply aloof from that fraudulent and time-wasting argument because Australian Nationalists are the legitimate heirs and standard bearers of the political theories and way of life which exterminated the anti-national, totalitarian regimes of the 20th century.

kokoda_australians
The heroes of Kokoda, they fought against imperialist bullies and the killers of nations

 

To hostile powers, despots and imperialists Australian Nationalists would issue the admonition: leave us alone and benefit from our diplomatic skills, engineering prowess and scientific know-how; trade with us and receive goods of the best quality, clean foodstuffs and licences to deal your produce in kind.

However, intimidate or threaten us, make demands of, or coerce our nearest neighbours and, as an armed but neutral nation, we will send you scurrying away, starving and in rags, like General Horii and his Japanese forces in 1942.

Australian Nationalists hate war and imperialism, we hate the anti-nationalist, globalist thugs who are flourishing under Trump and Turnbull just as our forebears hated the anti-nationalist bullies of the 1930’s and 1940’s.

eureka

Advertisements

DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

Over the past year, UNA has spent bulk column inches describing the type of society Australia has been moulded into since the globalist, cosmopolitan juggernaut shifted into top gear under the Howard regime.

We have outlined, in broad strokes, the re-jigged class system being implemented by the bosses to pacify and subject the polyglot masses which now underpin the global capitalist power; likewise, we have examined, in depth, the bones of the system itself, that cunning fusion of second-generation Communism and limited free market capitalism.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

The trouble is that this increase in state power over the individual and the suppression of non-consumerist dissident tendencies is unlikely to be as spectacular, or compelling as the Spanish Civil War or The Great Leap Forward; the slide into, what Nationalists freely admit, is a looming dystopia will likely be slow, controlled and it will not flatter the egos of these prophets of doom.

special-ops-group2
If you really annoy the Globalists they do more than cancelling your Facebook account and getting you fired from your job

If we are truly on the hunt for signs and wonders in this age of mass surveillance and rule by global corporations then we might argue that present developments should occupy the bulk of our attention rather than endless examinations of the past.

We apply a slight caveat here in that there is nothing new under the sun as far as repressive regimes are concerned; the old rules of Stasi, Gestapo or Special Branch skullduggery still apply and we can be reasonably sure that if things really ran out of hand, as they did in the mid 20th century, that the knuckledusters and water board would be employed without hesitation by today’s state-sanctioned goon squads.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

As we have explained in a previous article, the Pigs serve the Globalists; if we may borrow from the lexicon of 1960’s Hippie radicals, the Pigs in blue, or in plain clothes and the Pig media support the big Capitalist Pigs on high.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

Smith
A Dog of the Leftist variety who regularly boasts of ratting people out to the Federal Police

In the Australia of 2017, this Dog culture is rampant and we would suggest that is the main impediment to radical political activism, no matter from where said radicals draw their inspiration; these days sincere Leftists are just as likely to be pilloried for their views as  Nationalists or Muslim fundamentalists.

We are appalled by the way Right-Wingers, Leftists and most people in between seem intent on publicly denouncing anything and anyone who challenges the mainstream narrative, or even mildly irritates them in a Facebook stoush, even to the point of bullying mentally unstable people into rash, or violent actions merely to tar their friends and comrades with the “extremist” label.

These attempts to pillory often harmless people are rarely done to gain political advantage, or to undermine the system, the snitch collectives, such as Antifa, as well as the Far-Right vigilantes really have no political background or strategic objective.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

The goal is to humiliate others and throw them into the maw of the security state based on where one stands of the false ideological divisions and ever-shifting, fantasy role-playing conventions of cyberspace.

This is not to say that there are no real-world consequences for people who interrupt or harass the minions of globalism, the security state loves a conspiracy or a human rights charge; as we saw with the Bendigo Three there is basically no way to defend oneself from accusations of so-called “Hate Crime”.

Erikson jameson
Fake Muslim but proud, self-described ASIO informant

We ask our readers to ponder that very situation and ask themselves why upsetting Muslims might, in theory, create a problem for the state to the degree that they are willing to pursue people uphill and down dale over a social media post deriding Jihadist Muslim terrorism?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

If we are to believe the top cops then all that has prevented Pitt St and Federation Square from being strewn with body parts from some Muslim outrage is the cooperation they receive from, we guess, “good Muslims”; though that brings up the question of who is really holding all the cards in the war on terror?

Who is to say that these Muslim collaborators are acting altruistically as opposed to playing a long game of their own?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

Globalist Cosmopolitanism requires Orwellian oversight, multiculturalism clearly cannot sustain itself without a substantial number of citizens being willing to act as de-facto censors and unpaid informers for the state and the corporations who are gradually assimilating into its institutions.

Furthermore, the only way the modern state can accommodate fractious minority groups, mainly, but not limited to, those citizens devoted to Mohammed is to cultivate an even more pervasive surveillance and informant network, a process, we now know, which requires total silence and obedience by all other Australians.

The absolute worst thing an Aussie can do these days is to disturb the status quo, to question where this regime of Globalist Capitalism fused to second generation Communism is leading us; forget your posterity, forget any notions of justice or fair play; do not disturb the Rats, just sit down, grab your iPad and credit cards and consume! Consume! Consume!

snitch161004

THE MAN WITH THE IRON HEART AND NO PERSONALITY

THE MAN WITH THE IRON HEART AND NO PERSONALITY

The new film from French director Cédric Jiminez (The Connection, Aux Yeux De Tous) represents nothing but a series of opportunities to tell an interesting story which has been squandered through equivocation in narrative and a lack of detail in its script.

The Man With The Iron Heart, abbreviated to HHhH, has so many problems it is hard to know where to start; it is poorly edited, the nominally stellar cast is restrained by hamfisted writing and poor character development and it is difficult to discern what point, if any, the writer-director is trying to make.

The story centres on the 1942 assassination, in Prague, of SS General Reinhard Heydrich. We are given some snapshots of his former life as a Navy officer, his rise through the ranks of the NSDAP, and his ascension to the top echelons of the National Socialist hierarchy.

hhhh-h_2017
Jason Clarke and Rosamund Pike as Reinhard and Lina Heydrich: a strong woman and her unfathomable blob of a husband

This series of badly constructed jump cuts, flashbacks and flashes forward, introduces Jason Clarke as Heydrich, Rosamund Pike as his wife Lina, and the always excellent Stephen Graham as an eerily realistic Heinrich Himmler.

The trouble with this opening sequence, however, is that the writers assume that the viewer already knows who the characters are, the timeline of NSDAP history, and the events which led up to Hitler’s ascension to power in 1933; we are confident that the average moviegoer would have no idea where, say, Ernst Röhm or Heinrich Müller fit into the story

The Man With The Iron Heart, abbreviated to HHhH, has so many problems it is hard to know where to start; it is poorly edited, the nominally stellar cast is restrained by hamfisted writing and poor character development and it is difficult to discern what point, if any, the writer-director is trying to make.

Röhm and Müller appear as pop-up characters for mere seconds of screentime in HHhH, Hitler is absent altogether and highly significant events, such as the “Night Of The Long Knives” are glossed over in a way which might leave the average punter scratching his head in confusion over what he had just watched.

Kubis
The Czech resistance also suffers at the hands of director Jiminez

Clarke’s Heydrich comes across as a flat, even passive character; he is sometimes annoyed, sometimes explosively violent but he never has anything really profound or interesting to say.

We would assume that the writers were aiming for a steely, near psychopathic aura for the character, but the result is a dull and listless cartoon of a man whose personal motivations and deeper thoughts are never made clear.

Moreover, Jiminez plays it so safe with his “Holocaust” narrative that he almost strays into the area of heresy by the omission of pertinent details of the (((official))) WW2 story.

The repression of Czech resistance, the police actions and mass killings carried out by Heydrich’s SS units are, remarkably, even turned into boring vignettes in HHhH; to anyone familiar with the real story the film goes close to exculpating senior NS officials by effectively cutting them out of the picture.

Clarke’s Heydrich comes across as a flat, even passive character; he is sometimes annoyed, sometimes explosively violent but he never has anything really profound or interesting to say

You see, in opposition to the mainstream, Hollywood inspired story of the Holocaust there is a school of thought which puts forth the idea that the Final Solution was a criminal conspiracy carried out by elements within the SS in pursuit of their own objectives; that the true magnitude of the mass killings and ethnic cleansing was deliberately kept from Hitler and his inner circle.

By omitting Hitler from the film the director has, perhaps unwittingly, veered into forbidden territory. If the viewer is paying attention, he could easily form the impression that Heydrich really was the sole architect of the planned destruction of native Czech culture and the liquidation of ethnic minorities within his area of responsibility.

The second half of the film is utterly forgettable in spite of the introduction of some fine actors into the cast; Mia Wasikowska, Jack Raynor and Jack O’Connell form the nexus of the Czech resistance plotline but that too falls flat and fails to make an impact on the viewer, there is simply not enough meat on the bones of the characters for the script to be effective.

anthropoid
Jamie Dornan and Cillian Murphy in Anthropoid, fine actors who were clearly given good direction and a first-rate script by Sean Ellis

In contrast to HHhH we recommend the excellent film Anthropoid. The 2016 feature directed by Sean Ellis examines in detail the actual plot to assassinate Heydrich which was led by resistance fighters and British trained Czech special forces soldiers Jan Kubis and Josef Gabcíc.

Jamie Dornan and Cillian Murphy are altogether more convincing as Kubis and Gabcíc, their operation, codenamed Anthropoid, takes place amid a far more fraught atmosphere, a vision of Prague riddled with collaborators, cowardly resistance turncoats and Gestapo spies.

By omitting Hitler from the film the director has, perhaps unwittingly, veered into forbidden territory, if the viewer is paying attention he could easily form the impression that Heydrich really was the sole architect of the planned destruction of native Czech culture and the liquidation of ethnic minorities within his area of responsibility.

The supporting cast, though lacking the big names of HHhH are equally impressive; Charlotte Le Bon and Anna Geislerova acquit themselves well in their roles as resistance sympathisers Marie and Lenka, who sacrifice everything they hold dear to free their country.

Anthropoid2
Young love was thought the perfect cover in a city brimming with spies and collaborators

Due to superior writing, it is what is said in Anthropoid, as opposed to what is explicitly shown, but poorly explained in HHhH that drives home to the viewer the horrors inflicted upon the people of Czechoslovakia by the National Socialists.

The impact of the SS reprisals against those who aided Heydrich’s assassins as depicted in the former film is far more dramatic than in the latter simply because by the climax of the film one has begun to sympathise with the characters in Anthropoid, due to their being more well rounded and the actors working from a better-prepared script.

In the end, HHhH is a badly made Holocaust drama which fails to land any of its punches due to the limitations of that genre, even though it does appear, to the trained eye at least, to bend that tiresome narrative to some extent.

Anthropoid, on the other hand, is a film Australian Nationalists may relate to, being as it is a depiction of where true patriots can be taken in their fight for a free country; it shows in graphic detail the sacrifices required of resistance fighters in a struggle against a tyrannical colonial power bent on crushing the native society.

There is much in the story of Kubis and Gabcíc and the wider European resistance movements against National Socialist and, later, Soviet imperialism which should inspire Nationalists everywhere, Anthropoid, as an entertaining piece of popular culture is a good place to start.

Mother
Alena Mihulová, playing the heroic Mrs Moravec, who faces the Gestapo as the reprisal raids begin

BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

If there is one demographic, or social stratum, which regularly draws the ire of UNA bloggers it is the waffling bourgeoisie and their nominally empty-headed offspring, who sound off like a battery of howitzers every time an issue of so-called “social justice” is inserted into public discourse.

Take young Frances Abbott, the middle child of Tony and Margie, who, channelling Mary Bennet, the middle sister in Jane Austen’s Pride And Prejudice, felt moved to put forth a Vlog on matters of love, romance and tier-one Lesbianism in support of same-sex marriage.

Quoting the experience of her aunt, Christine Forster, who is a middle-aged homosexual convert, Frances declared that people “cannot help who they fall in love with” and that “love is unexpected”.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

frances abbott
Bourgeois Bikini Babe Frances Abbott: all brawn, little brains

If homosexual relationships are based on love then it is clearly a completely different form of bond to opposite-sex unions; in which, as lifelong spinster Jane Austen herself observed, there are much more considerations than “love” to be taken into account when making a match.

In its most basic, and most commonly understood form the pair-bond between man and woman is based on a partnership to take on the challenges of the world together and raise children, if they are lucky the spouses will get along well and, in time, come to love each other.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

In most cases in which men and women marry for love, the unions quickly fall apart as the realisation hits home that such a marriage is lacking in substance, has no direction and no real reason to exist aside from the vanity, or unrealistic expectations of the spouses.

Pride pejudice
The Bennet sisters scan the horizon for well-endowed suitors

Of course we understand the reasoning behind the patter which upper-class twits such as Ms Abbott have been trained to parrot, we can never, ever describe homosexuality as a choice, nor credit homosexuals with the agency to make their own decisions; rather, according to Globalist social convention, they are subjects whose vital nature is simply something which has “occurred”.

Here we find another point of difference, which also gives the lie to the calls for absolute equality for all: heterosexuality is very much a choice, yet we are taught to believe that homosexuality is something which “just happens”.

muslims1
Guess which other global capitalist side project also poo-poohs the idea of free will?

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

If homosexuals are not going through these processes and are subject to the whims of some deity, or hidden forces in the universe then equality will remain a distant dream, regardless of the outcome of the postal survey and subsequent parliamentary vote.

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

Of course, we know full well why this meme has been propagated, that in fact most people who begin their intimate lives in the homosexual world are actually deprived of choice by virtue of, in the main, having been seduced and manipulated into that lifestyle by self-serving adults while in their early teens.

This detail, however, is beyond the scope of our discussion and, as we have stated before, we simply do not care enough about homosexuals, their tiny queer sub-culture or their struggles against normal society to develop an in-depth critique of them as people.

Orlando united
Omar Mateen was homosexual and Muslim, obviously  the Pulse nightclub outrage “just happened”

As ever, we at UNA are interested in the bigger picture and the picture of Globalist equality, that synthesis of second-generation Communism and multinational corporate hegemony, has come into sharp relief during the SSM debate; the man behind the curtain pulling the levers has been revealed.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

“Things just happen” only to subjects, rather than workers in charge of their own fate; subjects are drafted into the military against their will, they are unfairly taxed, sold shoddy goods, given poor quality housing, or arbitrarily arrested and jailed; this is why most forms of monarchy, dictatorship and theocracy have such a bad reputation.

What “Love Is Love” in its proper context, globalist cosmopolitanism, ultimately boils down to is that we are all no greater or more able to master our own destiny than that young child whose choices are limited by the actions of the adults around them; that we are apt to just fall into situations and that it is advisable simply to go with the flow rather than resist or seek our own autonomy.

 

mateen-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwfSVWeZ_vEN7c6bHu2jJnT8
Agents act, subjects are acted upon, inshallah