AVI YEMINI — MAXIMUM LEADER OF AUSSIE PATRIOTS

AVI YEMINI — MAXIMUM LEADER OF AUSSIE PATRIOTS

The Australian Patriot Movement has a new figurehead and he is as Aussie as gefilte fish. His name is Avi Yemini and he used to shoot Palestinian children because he is a chosen one and God told him to do so.

That is the Jewish God, not your bogus God because they’re not the same and they wouldn’t agree to share a restroom.

You have to understand, Palestine is a land that was promised to the Jews, and so Palestinians have been squatting in their home for the past two thousand years. Therefore, think of those IDF bullets as eviction notices.

70ccd7fcb4621193c2788a0cba3524e9
Avi will teach you the Jewish technique of crying out in pain before striking your opponent

Yemini’s time in the IDF serving as a sniper for the Israeli Defence Forces (Defence?) is just one of the feathers in his IDF-issue yarmulke. Avi has been bravely blooded in the conflict against Islam, which is the biggest threat to the Australian way of life since killer Drop Bears, so this seals his reputation as a fully wukkas Australian hero.

Don’t forget, the Australians fought in Beersheba so that the Jews could have a homeland. This means that Aussies share a closer bond with Israel than we do with our dairy-obsessed UnZud neighbours.

But seriously — just in case your irony radar is experiencing interference, we jest. In fact, UNA signals what we regard as an extremely dangerous development in that sloppy circus known as the Civic Patriot Movement.

That is the Jewish God, not your bogus God because they’re not the same and they wouldn’t agree to share a restroom.

Scratch that, the Patriots have ALWAYS been a dangerous development but now their full conversion into a satellite of the Zionist movement is signed and sealed. From now on, to march publically with an Australian flag in any sort of demonstration of Aussie pride will mean respecting the flag of Israel.

The arc of Civic Patriotism runs in a half crescent moon from Victoria through New South Wales and up into Queensland where numb-nut Zionist shonk-merchants like Mike Holt push solidarity with Israel. Following that arc back down again and it comes to a full stop at the doors of the IDF Training Gym in the Jewish stronghold of Caulfield, Victoria. This is Avi’s Fortress of Solitude from where he controls the entire Australian Patriot Movement.

So who the cuck is Avi Yemini, for those who’ve had their brains bashed out with a bowling ball?

Yemini sort of materialised as the whole Patriot thing was in full stride. An Orthodox Jew fully to the right of Moses his gym teaches a martial arts mishmash that is ideal for fending off attacks occurring as you’re stepping out of a sauna.

He also has some sort of shooter’s club for Jews and Goyim who want to fly over to Gaza and blow the brains out of stone-throwing Arab kiddies.

So who the cuck is Avi Yemini, for those who’ve had their brains bashed out with a bowling ball?

For an orthodox Jew, Yemini failed to heed that bit they teach Jews about honouring their father, as he made a bogus claim against the old man who was a righteous activist against child abuse by rabbis in the Jewish community.

Avi saw this as a betrayal of Judaism and told the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse that his pops was a brute that beat him as a kid and was therefore guilty of abuse. This was, of course, completely irrelevant to the commission’s terms of reference but it demonstrated his mettle as Jew from the hard right.

Erikson.png
Yes, the skunk who spent two years ratting out Nationalists for opposing Israel is attempting to be ironic about the J question

Since then Avi has become the Kosher Ying to the Civic Patriot Yang and you will find his stuff being shared on the pages of all strictly anti-Islam protagonists. In fact, he has become a dominant force in this satellite politics, and a thumbs-down from Avi can ruin your Facebook career as a Civic.

When Sherm the Germ tried to reinvent himself as a ‘Nazi’ after doxing any anti-Zionist during his partnership with gerbil Neil Erikson Avi expelled him from the fold. This has also cost Neil Erikson his Kosher credentials and now the Fink who has done more than anyone from the Left to hammer Nationalists is trying to worm his way back with ironic posts and references to Israel on his drastically reduced ‘Nationalist Uprising’ Facebook page (without Facebook Erikson would be like a lifetime junkie undergoing a bone shivering cold turkey). But if anyone wants to know how much support Erikson enjoys they only have to visit Melbourne Magistrate’s Court when the Bendigo Three is in session. Neil’s only mate is the Serbian, George Jameson, with the bald head who famously waved an Israeli flag at the 2014 Penrith rally in Sydney. Other than that, he is surrounded by tumbleweeds and chirping cicadas. But we digress…

Whereas once only the Trotskyite baby killers from the Left had exclusive entrée into the elite media the ‘right wing’ Yemini only has to pluck a nose hair to secure mainstream coverage.

For an orthodox Jew, Yemini failed to heed that bit they teach Jews about honouring their father, as he made a bogus claim against the old man who was a righteous activist against child abuse by rabbis in the Jewish community.

Recently, Avi called for the government to proscribe Antifa as a terrorist organisation (even though it isn’t an organisation) in the wake of the Bolt assault.

When that White Pommy bloke took revenge on the Finsbury Park Mosque following the London terror attacks The Daily Mail, which sucks pig dick, reported on his condemnation of the Moslem community’s double standards in condemning one and not the other. And that should not even be news, but hey.

He received news coverage when some idiot rang up his gym and made a death threat, a total non-event covered by The Age’s Bianca Hall. That recently had a book-end last week when again the Daily Mail reported that the police bothered to track down an unnamed man and arrest him over the phone call. Let’s see if they take Luke McMahon into custody. Fingers crossed.

Realise, too, that Avi’s relationship with the media isn’t necessarily like that of Blair Cottrell. When the media quotes Blair it is to load the reportage but Avi, being untouchable, gets a free run. This was even the case when his attempt to arrange a meeting between Pauline Hanson and her mad dog Malcolm Roberts was protested by the Jewish Left Side. And that’s hardly everything but we’re sick of writing about him

Oh, wait on, we can’t leave it there, we haven’t mentioned the DONATION drive. Avi is chasing shekels on a Go Fund Me type page to “Help Avi Grow”. In this case, he hasn’t so much got what he wanted as what he deserved: $0.00. Something is the matter there.

Yes, folks; Avi Yemini is the new face of Australian Patriotism. The circle is complete. The anti-Islam message is as shrill as ever and inclusivity still rules so long as it doesn’t involve rag heads and Muzzie converts.

Remember, too, all of these tiny satellites are part of the much larger conservative organ which devotedly bangs its head against the Wailing Wall.

Any doubts about Jewish chutzpah in appropriating Australian political real estate is at an all-time high should be allayed by the fact that a person claiming to represent the ‘Australian Jewish Defence League’ recently messaged the Australia First Party offering ‘support’. If that doesn’t take the bagel.

IMPORTANT EDIT: UNA has examined this page supposedly belonging to Neil Erikson and has decided that it is most likely fake. Erikson would never extend to us the courtesy of acknowledging an erroneous source, but in our case, we believe the page we have referenced does not fall under Erikson’s admin but more likely those from our side who would choose to mock him. As funny as that is, UNA desires accuracy, and in the interests of such, admits that references to Erikson in this article must be discarded.

19554223_10155519408563699_1548960775942887118_n.jpg

 

A RAT IN OUR RANKS

A RAT IN OUR RANKS

UNA can now reveal that for more than a year a rat has been operating at a high level within a major Australian Nationalist organisation.

For security purposes, we will not be naming the traitor or the organisation but it is in the interests of the health of Australian Nationalism that we highlight a problem that will continue to plague our movement.

What is so disturbing in this case is that the betrayer in question was brought in as a known pathological troll to undertake a serious intelligence-gathering operation. Fears were expressed at the time over the reliability of Gerbil X but despite this, he was allowed within the organisation’s inner-sanctum.

Under normal circumstances, a flawed character such as Gerbil X would not have been allowed access to sensitive areas of this group but he was trusted largely on the basis of his lifelong association with a prominent officer of this body.

It is not suggested that this officer is complicit in Gerbil X’s activities — although there are questions over his conduct as well — yet he is refusing to acknowledge the guilt of his friend or accept his culpability in the weak judgement he displayed in introducing him to Nationalists. This we see as a major problem.

In the interests of reasonable disclosure, we declare that Gerbil X had in the past provided intelligence to UNA. Yet, it comes as a shock that the trading of secrets was a two-way stream between his targets, us, and the Nationalist organisation that he is still purporting to represent.

Under normal circumstances, a flawed character such as Gerbil X would not have been allowed access to sensitive areas of this group but he was trusted largely on the basis of his lifelong association with a prominent officer of this body.

Of even greater concern, Gerbil X had interposed himself as a go-between in what is now to become a legal matter, and it appears likely that he conducted a nefarious relationship with the offender.

The extent of Gerbil X’s betrayals is yet to become apparent but the alarm was raised when he exposed himself as the source of a leak involving a Nationalist operation. UNA is 100% satisfied that Gerbil X — who was known to be involved with the recipients of this information supposedly in the capacity of a mole — either provided the information himself or allowed the spy into the group.

hang-noose-fit-for-a-traitor

His subsequent baffling behaviour only confirmed his lack of innocence and forced a certain Nationalist to raise the alarm.

Gerbil X had long been known to enjoy using sock puppet accounts to spy on Nationalist enemies, and establish relationships with protagonists on the opposite side of the fence, both in the Civic scene and those of what we call Lefties.

The exact reasoning behind his actions is the subject of much speculation but in a rational reading of events, he seems to have been motivated purely by his troll instincts. Speaking on a basis of anonymity, a Nationalist whistle-blower told us, “The warning signs became gradually apparent as he was thwarted in achieving recognition for his activities. Always an arrogant sort, he exhibited symptoms of a dangerous ego and began to see himself as a major force within this Nationalist organisation. It was as though he was getting drunk on his own image of himself.

His subsequent baffling behaviour only confirmed his lack of innocence and forced a certain Nationalist to raise the alarm.

“I knew when he styled a Facebook user profile for himself as though it was a business card that we were about to see trouble. Frankly, I think his actions are more down to the fact that he has ambitions beyond his limited abilities. Whatever the case, he turned rat, and that is a bad thing.”

Afterwards, our witness realised Gerbil X had goaded him, sneakily waving his handiwork at him as though he was merely passing on the news. “I told him I didn’t want to know what rubbish was posted about me but he insisted on PMing me with their defamations. Only now do I realise he was really dangling in front of me the fruits of his dirty deeds.”

The importance of Gerbil X’s trolling on the organisation’s behalf was not only widely exaggerated by himself but by the officer we mentioned earlier. It would confuse certain Nationalists as to why, when in company with Nationalists — particularly during important occasions — this person would put Gerbil X on the loud speaker to facilitate unsolicited group conversations. Again, we do not suggest that there were unwholesome motives behind this, but it is something given the situation that cannot be recalled without pause.

As stated in our introduction, UNA will not be naming the traitor, but we couldn’t if we wanted to. Gerbil X was always cagey about revealing his true legal name. He existed on aliases, which should have been causing concern all along, or at least a sensible effort should have been made to question why.

The officer we refer to is refusing to provide that information and has expressed hostility towards United Nationalists Australia. However, we do know that Gerbil X habitually abuses a certain controlled substance and other medications, a peccadillo that was politely overlooked in light of his original contributions to the Nationalist effort. This habit may in some part account for his behaviour, but not excuse it.

Right now, Gerbil X has control of a particular social media asset that was built up by others. In the wake of his showing his hand, he set about deleting the only other remaining administrator. Earlier, he had mysteriously and without explanation deleted another trusted Nationalist from the asset, which was only discovered in the wake of the aforementioned inciting incident.

Again, speaking anonymously, the originator of most of the asset’s content told us, “He did nothing (on the asset). I work and have a girlfriend and a life and I just couldn’t deal with the demands of running it singlehandedly any longer. I got the feeling he was quietly waiting, like a crocodile, for me to tire myself out then come in and take over. Not long after I got a call from the other admin telling me what had happened. Unfortunately, we just let the matter lie, and didn’t pursue it.”

“I knew when he styled a Facebook user profile for himself as though it was a business card that we were about to see trouble. Frankly, I think his actions are more down to the fact that he has ambitions beyond his limited abilities. Whatever the case, he turned rat, and that is a bad thing.”

Gerbil X told a UNA staffer that a money offer had been made on the asset and that he intended to sell it, which would, of course, have been morally contrary to Nationalist ethics. When confronted about his motives Gerbil X resorted to outlandish strawman arguments and attempted to lay blame on his questioner, citing a higher loyalty. This was immediately apparent as lies.

So far, Gerbil X’s betrayal has been hushed up, in an understandable bid to control further damage from occurring. Nonetheless, he is well aware that anything that he does hereafter will bring about the gravest consequences for himself.

Only yesterday UNA published an article about the dangers that Facebook egos pose to the Patriot movement. In Gerbil X, we see the exact same behaviour. In fact, the parallels between him and Neil Erikson are staggering.

Being outside of social media is, as history has shown us, far from any guarantee that rats and ego junkies won’t pose problems for the movement. But social media provides such concentrated conditions for this type of animal to thrive.

There are definitely lessons to be heeded from Gerbil X.

images (2)

 

FACEBOOK EGOS WILL EAT THE PATRIOTS

FACEBOOK EGOS WILL EAT THE PATRIOTS

Facebook is yet to be thoroughly examined to ascertain the full scope of its social impact on the players in the psychodramas that it enables. However, we have witnessed enough to observe that it aggravates the sociopaths who gravitate to this Patriot thing.

The relationship between trolling and the anonymity of social media has been well recognised but whether or not the reach of Facebook creates the sociopath or that personality type is drawn to the Patriot Movement could be the subject of a peer-reviewed paper.

What we have recognised is that when starved of attention, or removed from the spotlight, certain personalities in the Patriot movement become destructive.

UNA offers this insight as Nationalists, whose separate movement doesn’t seem to harbour the same level of miscreants. There is in itself a lesson to be gleaned from a comparison between the two. Who, for instance, could locate in Nationalist Alternative the kind of monstrous egos that are evident in a Neil Erikson, Shermon Burgess or Nick Folkes?

We name these three individuals because UNA has such experience with chronicling their behaviour but they are far from the entirety of problematic persons who feel that the Patriot Movement offers them an opportunity for the celebrity they will never attain on the basis of personal merit in the outside world.

Here, it is probably useful for newcomers if we define the two in a manner that makes this pronounced difference between both movements understandable. We have, at UNA, had cause to define Patriots and Nationalists in a couple of different ways, but here we highlight the aspect of which ‘mainstreaming’ is the significant catalyst for egocentricity in the individual player.

What we have recognised is that when starved of attention, or removed from the spotlight, certain personalities in the Patriot movement become destructive.

The Patriots desire appeal, and as such focus on a message that emphasises the incompatibility of Islam with Western life. Arguably, therein is a kernel of acknowledgement of the Nationalist awareness of race as being central to national and social cohesion, but this is repudiated for the popularity that comes from inclusiveness.

That is to say, the Patriot will argue that ‘Asians’ are capable of assimilation or that non-Islamic Indians are welcome as supporters. This is as much a cynical means for them to dispute accusations of ‘racism’ which a learned Nationalist will dismiss as irrelevant name calling. All of this is for the sake of achieving a wider following, to which they are prepared to surrender a fundamental integrity of the issue, and turn their eyes to the critical truth that all immigration of a non-White European kind principally alters the fabric of the Australianness central to what we are defending.

It is here that we challenge the assertion made by many who follow this path that by broader exposure they will achieve their objectives, since in the course of seeking popularity they have obscured their former goals, and altered them from a mission to change the social contract of Australian citizenship, to one of accruing approval for rewards both definable and less easily classifiable.

The Nationalist has a greater understanding of the futility of challenging the dominant system in a prescribed manner. But we do not wish to be tangentially misdirected because the salient factor here is ‘popularity’ and its relationship to the the Patriot Egoist.

It is much easier to gain Facebook appeal when not exhorting followers to necessarily exclude others. Nationalists will exclude those of non-White European backgrounds. Also, most who subscribe to the Patriot pages are still indoctrinated into a ‘multicultural’ attitude; it’s just that — being creations of the very system they believe they are in dispute with — they desire Diversity minus Islam.

The Nationalist has a greater understanding of the futility of challenging the dominant system in a prescribed manner. But we do not wish to be tangentially misdirected because the salient factor here is ‘popularity’ and its relationship to the pathology of the Patriot Egoist.

Thus, we have those who regard themselves as ‘players’ because they have a message of sorts, an audience, and a platform with which to interact with that active audience. It is no secret that the reach of Patriot pages far eclipses those of the Nationalists and we will argue that those who administrate their pages have become enticed away from the principles that are assumed to be associated with their activities in preference for the ‘Facebook fame’ they feel they have achieved.

Indeed, why change the outside world when what happens out there sustains the inner world of Facebook they have created for themselves?

We will not go into a full definition of a sociopath as that would be treading ground, not in the purview of this essay. But some traits of the sociopath involve a lack of conscience, an absence of remorse or shame, unreliability, and fantastical behaviour.

We have witnessed all of this with, just as one example, and probably the best, Neil Erikson. But we are not here to revisit the topic of Erikson but telegraph a warning about a type that will ultimately destroy this brand of alternative politics for want of attention.

UNA recently had an experience with the admin of a high-reach page who, for over a year, was trusted among us. Yet, he was always of a volatile personality type and began exhibiting the classic signs that of the Patriot Egoist. So concealed was the more extreme elements of his pathology that we didn’t even notice he was suffering from this condition until he outed some of us to Leftists and threw shared admins off his page which he now clings to, not because it is a tool in our political struggle, but as it is an ace in his hand.

Indeed, why change the outside world when what happens out there sustains the inner world of Facebook they have created for themselves?

Never once was he ever concerned with the quality of commentary passing through his page, but was more obsessed with the ‘reach’ and was constantly fetishizing the number of likes and visits and how they inflated his status. But his critical motivator was jealousy over his abilities as a communicator not measuring up to ours and while we never judged him on this defecit it caused in him seething as it challenged his ego. To that end he sought our destruction.

Neil Erikson is the absolute prototype of this in the Patriot scene. When his access to attention is ever challenged, he will dox, defame, lie, and use any tactic within his arsenal to damage the very thing that supposedly spawned him.

When deprived of exposure on Facebook, this type will display symptoms equivalent to narco-dependency. They actually exhibit symptoms of withdrawal. If they do not regain the attention they are reliant on they become dangerous. The ‘movement’ ceases to matter. All that is left is their jilted ego.

Again, we present nationalists like Nationalist Alternative as a counter example. There is clearly humility within its rank and file based on true belief in the cause. True believers will subjugate themselves for the sake of the cause. We see the same thing in the Australia First Party, and the selflessness of Dr Jim Saleam and the Australia-wide party membership, as well as the Australian Protectionist Party, who likewise have no such characters as Erikson to scandalise them.

Finally, we offer ourselves, since no UNA writer who is not already a public figure seeks the attention of notoriety. Let’s hope it stays that way because we forecast a disaster on the horizon based on this beast that is Facebook and the social phenomena it has produced.

Unknown

MEANINGLESS STATISTICS FOR ROOTLESS COSMOPOLITANS

MEANINGLESS STATISTICS FOR ROOTLESS COSMOPOLITANS

 

The data from the extended cyber-espionage episode known as the 2016 Australian Census has just now been released to the public, to clamorous applause from anti-patriotic types and innumerate bourgeois aesthetes.

In spite of the typically skewed reporting of “tipping points” and “Asianisation”, which are just thinly veiled jabs at the White majority, Nationalist radicals could find in the document no case for extensive commentary above and beyond our normal calls for immigration to be pared back to a yearly intake of some tens of thousands of foreign technical experts, who might be needed to help re-industrialise our economy.

The census gives us a picture of an Australian population which has grown larger but which has remained mostly demographically static over the last five years; population increase sits at around 1.6%, which is about the average for the post-1945 era.

19511152_1747960515232910_6157674156421120830_n
The actual census figures regarding the place of birth of citizens contradict most everything the bourgeois press have said on the issue

The main anti-White talking point to emerge from the media in their reporting of the census is the revelation that some 51% of Australians were either born overseas or have a parent who was a migrant; this piece of fluff has been delivered as one of those “gotcha!” lines intended to denigrate and browbeat our people, but we are happy to shrug it off as the nonsense it clearly is.

This “tipping point” is no such thing, if one actually bothers to look at the figures they are little changed from the previous census and the increases in numbers of non-White ethnic groups are trivial in the scheme of things.

The census gives us a picture of an Australian population which has grown larger but which has remained mostly demographically static over the last five years; population increase sits at around 1.6%, which is about the average for the post-1945 era.

What this crowing over the 51%, which is mostly the residual effect of the postwar European immigration boom, shows us is the hatred the chattering classes have for the White majority; even if we at UNA, for tactical reasons, choose not to harp on idea of a White genocide, it is clearly uppermost in the minds of our class enemies.

There may be a tipping point in 40 or 50 years, however that eventuality is not certain, in an interconnected global economy the grass is always greener somewhere else and if this country is pillaged by capitalists and ruptured by civil strife, as many predict, we may yet see an exodus of our “fair weather friends” and their offspring.

brothels_jakarta_11
Brothels in a Jakarta slum: the nether reaches of Asian style societies

Yes, there are a lot of Chinese and Indians here and they make up the bulk of migrants, however a distinction must be made between immigrants and foreign residents; there are, most people would agree, far too many foreigners living in Australia and that it is this alien element who are causing massive distortions in the economic and social life of the country.

We are not defending non-White immigration here merely to make a point about the deleterious effects upon Australian society resulting from our being forced to host several million unassimilable foreigners; far from it, however the migrant, to a great extent is living under the same set of rules as we do, whereas the Asiatic foreigners live in what is effectively a parallel society.

It is this parallel society which best represents the process of Asianisation due to the fact that from the top to the bottom, from its garish high society to the sub-cultural level this nether world of so-called “students”, illegal workers, trafficked slaves, poor remittance men and corrupt nouveau riche Asians is, in microcosm, all which is wrong with globalist cosmopolitanism.

If we are to describe the true characteristics of Asianisation we would begin by pointing out that it is a pervasive and pernicious set of behaviours, or social norms, more so than a literal invasion which threatens to overwhelm us by sheer weight of numbers.

There may be a tipping point in 40 or 50 years, however that eventuality is not certain, in an interconnected global economy the grass is always greener somewhere else and if this country is pillaged by capitalists and ruptured by civil strife, as many predict, we may yet see an exodus of our “fair weather friends” and their offspring.

Asianisation is the normalisation of the corruption, nepotism, self-interest, cruelty and general indifference to the effects of one’s greed upon others which is endemic to all Asiatic societies; it is the mindset of political hacks and their Asian cronies, property developers, brothel keepers, human traffickers and drug dealers; a state of mind where the only god is money and personal gain.

This way of thinking is enabled by the enthusiastic endorsement of the worst kinds of Asian bandit capitalism by the elite political and business classes of Australia; these White sellouts and parliamentary pensioned traitors open the doors to the corruption, while the identity politics of the censorious, bourgeois “do-gooder” shields the wrongdoers from scrutiny or criticism by the working classes.

akwhawdengchina-20131219210408375222
Bob Hawke opened the door to Asianisation

Australian Nationalists are awake to this ugly process of Asianisation, the vertical Asian slums of Melbourne’s Docklands, or Ultimo in Sydney, are merely the most obvious symbols of the globalists social engineering; the downward shift in expectations, the cultural malaise, the crime the creeping poverty and disillusionment which pervades their society is the real rot eating away the heart of their world.

Asianisation is the normalisation of the corruption, nepotism, self-interest, cruelty and general indifference to the effects of one’s greed upon others which is endemic to all Asiatic societies; it is the mindset of political hacks and their Asian cronies, property developers, brothel keepers, human traffickers and drug dealers; a state of mind where the only god is money and personal gain.

If readers want to see the end point of the globalist program of Asianisation simply tour the back streets of Jakarta, Manila or Shanghai; there you will meet people who, by turns are neglected and oppressed by their ruling classes, who have no hope, who don’t even think about the future and whose children have no prospect of upward social mobility.

When the politicians and captains of industry of the 1980’s and 1990’s were pushing us closer to Asia, in particular, China, they must have done so in the full knowledge that it was always going to be a race to the bottom, a process of degrading and demoralising Australians so that they might gradually become Asianised, with an Asian mindset.

The Nationalists are, at present, the only radical group fighting this resurgent class war on behalf of our national group, the White working class and our marginalised people; we urge all patriotic Australians, be they radicalised or moderate, to act in solidarity with our struggle against cosmopolitanism, the money power and the Asianisation of our way of life.

Massage parlour
As above, so below, the Asianised sex industry, with all its attendant cruelty is thriving in Australian suburbs

 

RAPE HOUSE

RAPE HOUSE

Introduction

A COUPLE of months ago, a social media phenomenon, an embryonic political-cultural movement in fact – ‘the Dingoes’ – came in for public criticism. Its advent reminded the liberal media that the ‘Alt Right’ had made its way to Australia and that its emergence opened a new front against the ideological props of the liberal globalist society. Some of the Dingoes began the process of Australianizing their reference points which placed them onto the path of embracing Australian Nationalism.

But then there were those who set out to stop that process from maturing. They decided to do this by stealing the Dingo phenomenon.

It is a sad fact that the Dingoes, indeed the Alt Right generally, became subjects for subversion courtesy of a poisonous group whose line of political descent over decades demonstrates a long history of parasitism, wrecking and plain sociopathy.

It is necessary to start somewhere in discussing these wreckers and our reference to the attempted takeover of the Dingo movement only sets our stage. Their subversion runs deeper than the Dingoes.

As we shall see, if it isn’t ‘other people’s money’, it is ‘other people’s efforts’ that are to the attention of the wrecking group.

We speak here of the ‘Rape House’, not just because of some sexual assaults which occurred in proximity to this group, but rather because the group mentally despoils any rational and fair element with whom it comes into contact.

The time has come for this garbage-group was the subject not only of ruthless exposure but a concerted drive to eliminate them from the terrain of any movement that may contribute to national regeneration.

We want their guts and we want them gone.

However, given the tangled connections of the Rape House gang, that is easier said than done! It must be the subject of a mobilization by all nationalists. We can begin first with the Dingoes and help them purge these wreckers and then we can move on with other struggles to limit the wreckers’ field of action, all while we consolidate the Australian Nationalist message in every way possible.

Dr Jim Saleam, 2017

The Rape House

In 2007, Jason Rafty rented a house on Fennell Street, North Parramatta. He moved in a few tenants from his ‘scene’ and made a profit on the rent.

Whether this profit went to his new creation the ‘Public Information Forum’ (or Klub Nation as it was generally known) we don’t know, but this unofficial headquarters of his enterprise gave him a centre for his officers (sic) to live in, and act out of, as they contrived a series of schemes.

Jason Rafty, as the impresario of Klub Nation, was a product of a long-standing gang which he had served already for eight years, but we shall get to that. A remarkable letter came into our possession addressed by Rafty to Jeremy Jones of the Australia Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC). It is reproduced at the end of this article.

Here, Rafty offers to travel to Russia and spy on Russian nationalists and in particular an organisation known as Russian National Unity. He asks AIJAC for money and equipment and he sets out in detail how the operation would work and how he might also profit at the end, with book rights no less. It is understood the letter was written around 1999. He also refers to his Jewish wife, a peculiar circumstance, given the internal game-playing of Klub Nation, often involved its claim to represent neo-nazism.

The existence of the letter was well known to the Klub Nation gang, but it did not seem to worry them, accepting as they will say they did Rafty’s chutzpah explanation that he was trying to rip off Jones.

That in itself sets a certain tone for Rafty, but the very idea of trying to panhandle Jones, given his professional resources at disentangling bullshit – was incredible. More likely, the letter was a ‘genuine’ attempt to get money and betray people whom Rafty later said he found ideologically agreeable. As we shall see, Rafty was not the only person in Klub Nation with special connections. Did Rafty continue this connection with AIJAC?

The existence of the letter was well known to the Klub Nation gang, but it did not seem to worry them, accepting as they will say they did Rafty’s chutzpah explanation that he was trying to rip off Jones. 

The morally oblique style of Klub Nation extended to one of Jason Rafty’s closest lieutenants formally recruited in 2007 but known to the gang before this time. This person, who functioned as his number-two, was the person for whom Rape House is dedicated. Some three women were sexually assaulted at the Fennell Street house. One was raped and two others sexually assaulted in different ways.

Rafty
The only known correspondence from Klub Nation was this letter from Rafty to Jeremy Jones of  the Australia/Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) offering to spy on Nationalists in Russia 

The assaults were known to the residents. Around 2011, one Michael Holt resided there and paid rent. As he recounted to other persons, the assaults were talked about and were to be hushed up. This troubled young man who mucked about with neo-nazi ideology would later be imprisoned on gun charges and was accused of planning a mass shooting. For ourselves, we have also talked to one of the victims who are quite specific about her experiences and she named the other victims. She certainly named the perpetrator. It is our understanding that one of the tenants remains furious with the rapist for using his bed and leaving traces of the assault. Charming.

oie_n7tcGoe6Sl1D
Klub Nation scammer Andrew Wilson of the Rape House infamy is now appropriating political real estate of The Dingoes

The cover up of sexual assault by this gang is despicable, but it’s just the start. Covering their tracks is something we just cannot permit. How can we understand Klub Nation?

Klub Nation met at the Humanist House in the inner-Sydney suburb of Chippendale from early 2005 until October 2009. It met every few weeks and its political identity was known to the Humanist member who permitted their presence by renting out the rooms. The same Humanist member must have been aware of ‘something’ going on when members of Klub Nation began to actually join the Humanist Society itself as members. He cannot say he wasn’t warned as Jim Saleam spoke to him at some point about the group and what its real intentions might be.

1486122148137
Rape House resident Michael Holt is now in prison for violating Duke Nukem’s copyright 

Ultimately, the Klub Nation members made a bid to take over the Humanist Society because as an incorporated body it owned the property and other assets, over a million dollars worth. Fortunately, they were beaten back, evicted from the use of the facility and their members removed from the Society. This effort to steal the assets of a community organisation wasn’t a new thing to Klub Nation, as we shall also explain.

The cover up of sexual assault by this gang is despicable, but it’s just the start. Covering their tracks is something we just cannot permit. How can we understand Klub Nation?

Klub Nation was remarkable in that it had no website, no magazine, no political manifesto, never organized a demonstration, nor contested an election, nor ran any campaign of agitation, nor even performed any specific act of violence (given the tone of its meetings on occasion). It claimed to be a forum of ideas and held ‘talks’, sometimes graced by Rafty wearing a Soviet military tunic; but it also said it was a survival club and a group that would raise money towards the purchase of a property in a rural setting. Yet essentially, it was simply whatever its leaders said it was at any particular moment, and to whomsoever the‘mark’ might be.

So what was it really? A big-mouth group with no real records or obvious structure could be a type of fraud, or perhaps a version of the French Resistance. And our choice of options – is the former. It was a con. Not just a money con for the operators, but a political charade.

Humanist_House4©R.jpg
The Humanist Society house in Sydney’s Chippendale which Klub Nation tried taking over

Klub Nation has been described by some who blundered into it and by those affected and burned by it in several overlapping ways: listening post, Liberal Party dirty-tricks op, drain-pool of the mentally challenged, a pretend survivalist club, a money-making operation for Rafty, neutralizing agency for anyone with a brain, a counter-gang and a rumour mill that would target genuine nationalists and patriots. Each of these claims reflected the truth.

At its ‘height’ in 2009, this group pretended that it was going to purchase a block of rural land as an investment upon which buildings would be constructed for the use of the whole patriotic movement and this would serve as a training centre in trades and politics for young people. Its leaders said that they were really the “general staff” in waiting for the Australian patriot movement and the genuine force of “nationalism” (they appropriated the term), not like all of us pretenders in our various organisations.

They said they were the focal point for building the real unity that was so lacking with all of us. They tried to con into their web the new Nationalist Alternative and even older Skinhead groups. But all saw through them.

So what was it really? A big-mouth group with no real records or obvious structure could be a type of fraud, or perhaps a version of the French Resistance. And our choice of options – is the former. It was a con. Not just a money con for the operators, but a political charade.

People from an array of patriot groups did at different times attend their gatherings, usually invited by ‘runners’ but with the true nature of the group concealed from them. This was essential cover and useful in garnering intelligence and spreading misinformation about genuine groups. Newbies were quietly relieved of their money. Some were even sold silver bars which they could ‘re-invest’, or they were asked to invest in a Ponzi scheme of Pyramid-selling-type intricacy. We won’t try to explain it as it’s just too hard. Some withdrew from contact with Klub Nation, but some got hooked on the hype. A five-figure-sum bank account (after expenses and there were a lot of those) was built.

Key players in Klub Nation included Andrew Wilson, David McBryde, Steven Moore and Mark Pavic. All had murky histories, personal and political. John Boyle, a solicitor who had run the Liberal Party’s ‘Chinese Special Branch’ in Haymarket and who later became a China immigration agent and who married a Chinese woman, was noted at the meetings. Moore and Boyle were linked to the Fellowship of the Round Table a private discussion group now known as ‘Western Heritage’ and which today runs meetings at NSW Parliament House. This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party.

This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party. The Fellowship was run by the very Humanist who first let in the Klub Nation crew at the Chippendale building.

With Klub Nation, weakened after the failure to rip off the Humanists, a new plan came into being. Meetings resumed in 2010 at the Mechanics Institute in Pitt Street Sydney and the members began to join this society, also with the plan to rort it, or at least, to make fulsome use of its resources. A witness says he was handed a Mechanics membership form at the Rape House and told to “join”. Once again, nationalists warned the Mechanics what the plan was. Ultimately also, this new scam came to nought. We were also advised that nationalists were accused of warning a bowling club which they intended to ‘take over’ – and they were booted from there. On this occasion, we deny any involvement.

By late 2013, some of the ‘investors’ in Klub Nation, essentially some of those basically conned by it, were clamouring for their money. Others decided they also wanted their money, particularly a certain Peter Coleman, whom we shall meet shortly. David McBryde (who was the “treasurer”) made a big play of refunding a percentage of this money (but much was simply missing). In what must be a bemusing moment, a witness says that some of this money was repaid to claimants sometime in late 2014 or early 2015, “during a social” at an address in Summer Hill – which was also the ‘headquarters’ of the neo-nazi grouplet Squadron 88.

This Fellowship group was also attended occasionally by David Clarke, then leader of the so-called ‘hard right’ group in the New South Wales Liberal Party. The Fellowship was run by the very Humanist who first let in the Klub Nation crew at the Chippendale building.

It wasn’t over. The Klub Nation crew were ready to move on. But first, a question. Where did this gang come from? Klub Nation was follow-on incarnation of a group that came into existence in Sydney in 1988 – 1989.

Nationalists call this first group the Palmer-Coleman gang, naming it after Peter Coleman, a member of Jack van Tongeren’s (misnamed) Australian Nationalists Movement and a seemingly eccentric jack-in-the-box, David Palmer.

Palmerr.png
David Palmer described himself  as “some sort of ASIO asset”

Below are two documents from the Jim Saleam Special Branch police file. One shows that Coleman was not averse to providing material to the Special Branch about nationalism (in this case Jim Saleam). The second shows that Neville Ireland, who ran the case against the nationalist organisation National Action in 1988 – 1991, had an appointment in late May 1989 with an informer called ‘Cabbie’. This informer was Coleman. Both men in a court in November 1990 denied meeting each other until that very day, a little piece of perjury that covered over a substantial relationship.

 

Sal2 001.jpg
Neville Ireland’s Duty Book reveals an informant called ‘Cabbie’. This was
Peter Coleman

 

At the Police Royal Commission in 1997, Coleman received a title, ‘Commission Code 18’ (CC18). He was important to Neville Ireland’s operations. Indeed, as we reasonably know, Coleman betrayed van Tongeren to prison and from the outside managed some disruption of National Action in the years 1989-1991.

Did Klub Nation concern itself with this? Was any member worried about it at all? No, they weren’t. Coleman’s former status was just another day in the life of the group. It was well known.

Nationalists call this first group the Palmer-Coleman gang, naming it after Peter Coleman, a member of Jack van Tongeren’s (misnamed) Australian Nationalists Movement and a seemingly eccentric jack-in-the-box, David Palmer.

David Palmer came on the scene late in 1988, joined with Coleman in early 1989 and carried on from there and in 1990 established a neo-nazi group calling itself the National Socialist Defending Aryan People Party. Well, that’s what it said it was. In 2005, he would even say in writing that he had been some sort of ASIO asset. To other people, he confessed receiving “$200 a report” from ASIO.

Did anyone in Klub Nation ever come forward to explain their relationship with Palmer or to provide information to nationalists about him? Not at all. Again, it was just another day.

 

Sal1 001.jpg
A Special Branch incident report: Peter Coleman happily provides information

In tandem and for years, these two political police assets harassed nationalists, appeared in the press with provocative statements, made their statements a parody of ‘racist’ thought and reported back to their masters. So what was the Palmer-Coleman gang?

It was listening post, an ASIO / Special Branch dirty-tricks op which collected intelligence on an array of patriotic people, a drain-pool of the mentally challenged, a neutralizing agency for anyone who wanted to be an ‘activist’, a counter-gang and a rumour mill. Each of these claims reflected the truth.

At different points, Australians would hear these actors had infiltrated Pauline Hanson’s party, controlled terror networks and were ready to bomb the Olympics. A seemingly ‘believing’ media would always report them. We wonder why?

Did anyone in Klub Nation ever come forward to explain their relationship with Palmer or to provide information to nationalists about him? Not at all. Again, it was just another day.

Then in 1999, Palmer decided to infiltrate the religious society, the British Israel World Federation. They had inherited a house in the Blue Mountains and $140,000 in cash and already maintained a bookshop in York Street with maybe $20,000 in assets there.

Palmer had met Rafty and a man called Mark Pavic. This quality lad had spent years in gaol for weighing down his mum’s body at the bottom of Lake Burley Griffin. But better still, he had tried to rort the Theosophical Society in 1996-7 and take its assets by moving in, siding with a ‘faction’, helping that faction and trying to come out on top. The Court of Appeal decision that saw him defeated makes interesting reading. He was a perfect organizer for the takeover of British Israel just as he was later an operator in trying to take over the Humanists.

The British Israel scheme collapsed finally in 2002 when the company was wound up and the assets found their way to the good guys in the affair. John Boyle was their solicitor and he profited to the tune of $50,000 in fees paid for (as the law demanded) by the legitimate company.  Nice.

Did the attempt to defraud British Israel ‘disturb’ the later Klub Nation leaders? Not at all. They thought to carry on with the Humanists, the Mechanics …

Taking over groups

Taking over organisations (and not just for the money) has been a stock in trade of the Palmer-Coleman gang and the successor Klub Nation gang.

In 2000, Palmer made moves to enter the Australians Against Further Immigration Party in New South Wales. That was exposed by the nationalists and the gang came up zero. Perhaps the plan was to run a party that would truly be a counter to legitimate patriotic parties? With the funds of British Israel, had they been acquired, this brand of provocation would have had long-term viability.

Klub Nation sought to take over — or at least coordinate — some nationalist and patriotic youth groups. They sought to integrate them with the funds’ raising and the plans for youth fronts, camps and the fantastic property they would buy. It was again the suspicions they incited and the counsel sought out by the supposed victims – again – which kept them out. The nationalists put the obstacles in their way.

So today, when we learn of plans to take over the Dingoes, we are not surprised. This is just another ‘takeover’ along the way. However, this time around, the gang has ‘professionalised’ itself and sounds much more believable.

The Liberal Party connection

The connection between the Palmer-Coleman gang and Klub Nation and the Liberal Party was continuous. That is another secret in the life of this gang.

Palmer, who had once been a Liberal party candidate in Queensland, boasted often of his links with senior Liberals. He meant those Liberals who described themselves as ‘conservatives’, ‘the hard right’, ‘the uglies’ in the party. This group had a long history, but as a so-called faction, it was revamped in August 1996 by no less than Tony Abbott himself. It formed up at a planning meeting (one month before Hanson’s so-called ‘maiden speech’ in parliament that set off a furore) and formalised in December 1996 (four months before Hanson launched One Nation). Its aim was to anchor Liberal Party supporters against any defection to One Nation while that party was permitted to ‘run’ – and then, once One Nation had normalised certain ideas and opinions, the Liberals simply would reel it all back in. Howard’s master stroke! Palmer, as noted, tried to disrupt One Nation as part of the shepherding strategy.

John Boyle was one of these Liberals in this so called ‘faction’. As said, the Fellowship was part of it. The Liberal connection was a portent for the future. Now as open Liberal and Liberal-satellite auxiliary activists

The collapse of Klub Nation made for a new change in the group. They had done their apprenticeship and could now be trusted with higher tasks.

After Klub Nation dissolved, McBryde and a new player Morgan Qasabian, joined a Liberal Branch. They then went on in 2012 to form the Sydney Traditionalists. They advertise Cory’s Tories (Cory Bernardi’s ‘Australian Conservatives’) and Cory’s book The Conservative Revolution. This group parades itself as “conservative”. And that is good. They are not nationalists. Yet, they are described as offering the “sister site” to the Dingoes website. Who puts that on the Dingoes website?

 

screen-shot-2015-11-03-at-6-21-31-pm.png
David McBryde is to nationalism what Ribena is to hard liquor

There is zero nationalism in them; no commitment to the old ideal of White Australia, no base in the Australian radical nationalist tradition that proclaimed the vision of Australia as the workingman’s paradise. Quite the contrary. The rabble at Sydney Traditionalists considers themselves ‘born to rule’, a ‘growing’ special caste who serve the wealthy and are to one day be promoted as part of the ruling Tory class. After all, Cory’s Tories was launched upon the blessing of the oligarch, Gina Rinehart. The Traditionalists invited Cory Bernardi to a forum and gained his personal blessings too. The rabid free marketeer multiracialist Bernardi offers another angle for ‘promotion’. Bernardi’s Conservatives are also a Liberal satellite and really are nothing different from the Liberal Party.

Qasabian
Morgan Qasabian 

The ex Klub Nation conservative players will occasionally playact that they are concerned at immigration, or might even say something cryptic about Zionism (Bernardi’s party is actually Zionophile), but they always refuse to answer hard questions in writing, or commit themselves except orally to anything and then with nods and winks and one can believe what one likes. When pushed about onto the social question – they support free market economics as ‘success’ proves the worth of the better people. They do not want Australian wealth in the hands of our people, nor the social uplift of all of us. Born to rule reactionaries are better (sic) than the ordinary people?

Alt Rights and Counter-gangs — the final battle

This gang has since 2013 been part of a new ‘conservative front’ in Sydney. Howard Crawford, the Liberal Party dirty tricks operator, has played a major role in building it, just as he struck at the genuine nationalists especially Australia First Party. Certain Liberals like Penrith Councillor Marcus Cornish (a multiracialist), the Sydney Traditionalists, the Reclaim movement and Nick Folkes’s ‘Party For Freedom’ (PFF) make up the system of orbiting satellites.

The Reclaim movement tried to refocus the immigration debate upon Islam only. They deny the challenge to Australia of Chinese imperialism. Many of its leaders sought to propagate the idea that Zionist Israel was the world’s friend against Islamism. People like Cornish exhausted the people’s anti-mosque movement in Penrith. As all the while the Chinese began the ‘move in’ he still found himself lauded as a conservative leader.

The gang turned up during the Penrith ‘anti-Mosque’ protests in 2014 and would bloc with Nick Folkes’s Party For Freedom (PFF), The PFF copies nationalists; from little things like allowing a member to go about in a Golden Dawn T-shirt, to flying the Eureka Flag, and even flying the Celtic Cross to talking of campaigns against Chinese takeover and about the “white genocide”. Folkes mimics others, a sure giveaway about his role, and acts like a clownish idiot. All the while, he calls nationalists ‘Nazis’. Of course, it was PFF, as we have exposed elsewhere, that met at the ‘Nazi’ headquarters in Sydney, met with Squadron 88 and had its leader close at its side. Indeed, when he wound up the Squadron, its leader told his friends he would just run with those opposed to “Islam” and would “work with Nick Folkes”. Just as the ex Klub Nation gang did too.

Crawford had his hands over Squadron 88 and gave money to it and seems to have known of ‘plans’ to attack a Muslim prayer hall in Newcastle. Did he also know of the plan of Squadron 88’s leader to attack the homes of Penrith councillors? What were the purposes of such plans being talked about? The playacting with neo-nazism serves a minor role in this conservative front. If it follows the usual pathway, it is to have fired up foolish or mad people on hand who can be encouraged to attack nationalists in one way or another on the basis that they are in the way of the birth of Fourth Reich. In what must be an amusing con, Crawford told Squadron 88 that the Liberal Party was founded by Hitler-friendly conservatives who let lots of ‘Nazis’ into Australia after the War. And they were always there and now, their descendants and acolytes are ready to ‘takeover’! Given that Crawford was caught on video urging attacks upon Australia First Party people and property, it is arguable that this was the role he would have ascribed to the Squadron had things not gone belly-up.

The ex Klub Nation gang also took on a new impresario, relevant to the Dingoes tale. It is a certain Clifford Jennings has been put out front as the Alt-Right leader and the organizer of Dingo activity, But Clifford was a member of the Liberal Party till recently (did he resign on purpose?). Information reveals that while he was never part of the scammers of Klub Nation years back, but he knows them as brothers and also attended fests with them in the company of Squadron 88 and the choirmaster, Howard Crawford.

Information to hand says that Clifford has told Dingoes and some other patriots that his force will either “take over the Young Liberals” or in the alternate, form a “youth wing of One Nation” and be the power there. Again takeover and role playing. We do not accept that Clifford is a nationalist and we again say that this is really an effort to grind up patriot and potentially nationalist young people in a mincer machine that will turn out more useless conservative sausages.

Final conflict

The Dingoes are just the latest victims of the gang. We have no doubt that they will ultimately be beaten off.

In the final conflict between the nationalists and the gang, it will be said by them (and remember they have a history that spans almost thirty years) that the nationalists are an ‘old road’, and that they are fresh and new. They will say simply that the nationalists – lie! “That was the past, they are talking about. We are us and we have plans for growth.”

Sheltering behind newbie Alt-Right folk, they will say they can take it to the skies. Some may believe them. The nationalists shall say: “they are fakers and a look at who they are, at their actual history and who they connect to, sets you straight. They simply cannot be what they say they are.” The gang will hold frenetic meetings, talk of takeovers and rising hordes, their contacts in the Libs and Cory’s Tories who are “ready to move” and maybe even “big dollars”, but even more maddening for the newbies struggling with it all, they will look them straight in the eye and say: “we are you and you are us; we are the toughest of the tough and the hardest of the hard, but we are clever and work through groups and systems.”

Nationalist ideology and politics are a unity. The ideology of Australian nativist nationalism is grounded in the old radical-nationalist-labourist traditions of long ago. Its heroes are Henry Lawson and William Lane, Jack Lang and William Spence, John Curtin and Percy Stephensen. Its flag is the Southern Cross. It is the people’s cause. This cause is the true cause of Australian identity, independence and freedom and it needs a movement that is independent of the system’s ideology and politics. It does not pretend to infiltrate the regime parties. Quite the contrary, it calls them traitors and organizes against them. That means as a matter of course that these conservatives do not serve the Australian People, but the system. Yes, perhaps a few might be genuine folk mixed there in the pot, but to use an old Christian adage, it is time to come out from amongst them and be separate. The final conflict will resolve whether the conservatives will blunt and defeat the new arising movements of patriotism and nationalism or whether they will b e put to rout.

It is time to shut the Rape House – once and for all.

Screenshot_2016-09-30_09.48.00

FAIRFAX HYPOCRITES PROFILE TROLL VICTIMS WHILE JOURNALIST LUKE MCMAHON KEEPS TROLLING SOCIAL MEDIA

FAIRFAX HYPOCRITES PROFILE TROLL VICTIMS WHILE JOURNALIST LUKE MCMAHON KEEPS TROLLING SOCIAL MEDIA

Fairfax Media this week published a story entitled ‘Who will help the women being traumatised by anonymous trolls?’

The story comes a week after Fairfax ran a three-part series on trolling as if they actually care. The article detailed the futility certain women faced in trying to report cyber-stalking. It is a serious topic and the underlying message, that the law is so far behind the trolls, must come as welcome news to one of their contributing journalists, Luke McMahon.

Back in April, the editor of The Age green-lighted a hit piece by the mysterious Luke McMahon. The target of McMahon’s poison crayon was Nathan Sykes, a UNA writer and Australian nationalist. In it, he was defamed as, among other calumnies, a “Jewish” Nazi troll. This was news to Sykes who (is not Jewish) since he is, in fact, the victim of the troll — and the troll is McMahon himself.

Luke.v1
Luke McMahon of Geelong, Victoria, works for Fairfax Media and is one of the country’s worst trolls

In a report to be handed to NSW police this week, Sykes will describe how McMahon spent two years stalking him around social media with “shocking slurs” and threats the likes of which Jenny Noyes and Ginger Gorman outlined in their respective articles. An informant told us that McMahon had hatched the idea for the story in cahoots with an even bigger troll, self-described ‘Patriot’ Neil Erikson, early in 2016.

McMahon has gone to great lengths to maintain his anonymity, just like the malicious trolls in Noyes’ and Gorman’s stories. What we do know is that he is based in Geelong, Vic, and operates Media Direct, a bogus online ‘whistle-blower’ agency, which is a front for doxing political enemies of the Left. He is also a welcome contributor to Fairfax although his true status as a journalist has not been quantified.

Apart from his myriad social media identities, McMahon uses the alias “Luke McMasters” and gives his address as the Collins Street offices of Fairfax Media.

Apart from his myriad social media identities McMahon uses the alias “Luke McMasters” and gives his address as the Collins Street offices of Fairfax Media.

McMahon’s criminal trolling continues to this day, as Noyes’ article sits still fresh from publication. Presently, he is active on Twitter and Facebook. On the former, he has established a group of identities, one of which is Nathaniel J.S. Sykes “Unemployed, bankrupt, king of shrill (sic) & I love playing with my dolly.” He uses his other accounts to try to prod reactions from United Nationalists Australia and the Australia First Party. Meanwhile, on Facebook, he is taunting Sykes (via someone else’s account who he believes to be Sykes) to make his police report.

S1.png
Luke’s handiwork on Twitter

This same Fairfax troll has accounts on leading ‘hate sites’ such as Vanguard News Network, Stormfront, and Daily Stormer where he uses his fake identities to try and turn members against certain figures. He keeps several YouTube accounts such as one under the name ‘Aussie Lads’ where he promotes videos created by the extreme Left hate group Antifa, of which he is a prominent editor on their Antifascist Action Sydney blog.

In the course of his trolling, McMahon has had Sykes’s former apartment photographed and messaged him with the pic under an alias, published sensitive documents relating to his bankruptcy on a major website (again, goading him with proof of his deeds), used fake accounts to threaten Sykes with being “cut”, and has given his address and other details to CFMEU-related thugs. No doubt the Left-leaning authors of the Fairfax articles would find no fault with him given that Sykes is a Nationalist and his ideology puts him outside of their notion of human rights.

rsz_lukeyluke
In 2016, creepy McMahon expressed his frustrations towards his employer for not publishing his defamations

This is certainly the case with the Fairfax editor who approved the story, and who has failed to acknowledge any of UNA’s submissions to him on the matter. Nor did a demonstration held by supporters of Sykes outside of Fairfax’s Melbourne offices earlier this month elicit a peep. The demo was led by a colleague of Sykes who two years earlier was himself dealt the outrageous Fairfax/McMahon defamation treatment.

No doubt the Left-leaning authors of the Fairfax articles would find no fault with him given that Sykes is a Nationalist and his ideology puts him outside of their notion of human rights.

Christopher Shortis, a practising Christian and a licensed firearm collector (and UNA staffer), was forced into a costly legal battle in a bid to secure his shooter’s license after Fairfax irresponsibly published an article by McMahon designed to portray Chris as being like “Anders Breivik”. Shortis had produced a YouTube video in which he appeared with one of his rifles while addressing an American Christian audience, also sporting shooters with, of all things, a message of non-violence in response to government heavy-handedness in relation to a matter relating to civil liberties.

However, it was not until Chris became a leading figure in the fledgeling Patriot movement, and a prominent member of the United Patriots Front, that McMahon went on the attack. In both Sykes’s and Chris’s cases Fairfax has provided a monstrous weapon for the extremist McMahon to attack his political enemies. Fairfax, like McMahon, has more interest in harming its ideological opponents than caring much for the methods employed.

It is a stretch even to believe that McMahon’s gratification is drawn exclusively from political ammunition: he actually enjoys what he does. Noyes quotes Gorman on the pathology of trolls, “These trolls are not mucking around, they have told me themselves that they are trying to incite people to suicide. They find vulnerable people, they pick on them in a sustained way and they find their weakest point.”

Given the experiences of Sykes and Shortis, it is almost impossible for either to read these stories without being struck by the disingenuousness of their source.

We shall see how eager Fairfax is to report on the sick, vile, pernicious troll that it nurtures knowingly and without judgement of his methods under its mastheads.

Fairf.png
Chris Shortis and Australian nationalists call on Fairfax to expose their troll 

 

MEDIA PREDICTABLY SKEWS T.B.C RALLY AS ANTI-RACIST EVENT

MEDIA PREDICTABLY SKEWS T.B.C RALLY AS ANTI-RACIST EVENT

Anyone surprised that the mainstream media intentionally skewed the reporting of yesterday’s Australian Pride March organised by the True Blue Crew should yield their right to inhale oxygen.

Indeed, a striking image of a protester sporting a sandwich board emblazoned with the message, “FAKE NEWS: WHAT YOU SEE ON TV IS ALL LIES” wins the day’s award for the most ironic placard. It would prove to be an astute observation.

The Daily Mail, which is the absolute Crack Whore of tabloid garbage that masquerades as news in this conquered land, chose to report the event as if it was all along organised as an ‘anti-racist’ event.

19420874_1291013437677936_4937703267314276168_n
Amen, cobber!

Was this lack of prescience on their part but another sorry example of their unfitness to inform the Australian public or was it a contrived policy to invalidate the sentiment of this and any other such event?

Despite two facts — that it was organised by Australian Patriots — and that the basis of the event was to demonstrate pride of oneself in their Australianness by parading with an Aussie flag — the snakes and hacks of the press still managed to misconstrue the non-signalling of any anti-group message by the organisers as ‘racist’. By that we mean it was not an ‘anti-Moslem’ march, or whatever they automatically assume it was billed as, but simply a defiance of a present convention that abhors any expression of pride in Australianness — if you are White.

And God forbid they should have actually researched and reported the facts without bias or prejudice!

The Daily Mail, which is the absolute crack whore of tabloid garbage that masquerades as news in this conquered land, chose to report the event as if it was all along organised as an ‘anti-racist’ event.

Yes, if you read it from the mainstream media’s point of view, the whole reason for anyone turning out yesterday was to publically exhibit their unwavering commitment to and fervour for the Cult of Diversity. They were there to oppose those antiquated racists who would dare to consider the Australian colours as anything but emblematic of minority oppression. The racist Patriots, of course, were the target of the day — not the focus — and the ‘protesters’ the heroes.

imageedit_2_8940330687
If the media says the rally was an anti-racist event that must be what it was!

Anyone not criticising or demeaning the White Australian people — or expressing shame for imaginary crimes — is a deviant who has surrendered their right to their implied freedom of expression. It is an interesting observation from a medium-contact perspective that the organising of this event took place on Facebook, and a comment from a self-styled ‘anti-racist’ posting in the comments section of a thread dedicated to the Sunday rally highlighted who the genuine bigots are.

Yes, in the shaping of young hearts and minds in this country, the system has managed to churn out some of the worst class-cultural bigots in existence. Take a look at this post by Tim Sullivan who it appears is a New Zealander anyway: “It just looked like a bunch of poorly educated, low socio-economic (sic), tattooed bogans? I was just passing… not participating btw. But, what was the point of the demonstration? I don’t think the message was really conveyed effectively.”

imageedit_6_5093235455
Anti-racist Tim Sullivan is a practising social media bigot who hates poor  uneducated people, White Australians, and anyone with ‘tatts’ 

Well, Tim Tims, despite the fact you followed a statement with a question mark, casting doubts on your own IQ as judged by your own rules, the point of the whole thing was just to be visible.

In a country that is controlled by foreign interests, which favours and takes foreign money and facilitates programs that favour the benefactors of that filthy lucre, it is very hard for ordinary Australians to be noticed.

Their voice is howled down by home-grown ideological attack dogs like you who are raised and nurtured in the schools and academies of this system. These ‘bogans’ are being driven out of affordable housing, employment, and even their right to a voice in this globalised nation of ours.

And God forbid they should have actually researched and reported the facts without bias or prejudice!

On the one hand, the Left would champion the downtrodden, purely in the pursuit of their own political motives, but as UNA tirelessly point out they are elitists. This Tim Sullivan, for all his affected casualness in the comments on that page has expressed contempt for anyone who has not been indoctrinated by tertiary education, who aren’t earning at least $100K a year, and who questions the dogma of Diversity. What’s more, he probably lives in an all-White neighbourhood.

41BA336100000578-4636726-image-a-88_1498367834041
The message is that Australians are nothing, own nothing, and have no right to anything in this nation built by Aboriginals, Chinese, Africans and Middle Easterners to which Whites owe all their gratitude

In fact, Timmy is the very reason that the T.B.C and their supporters were out there yesterday. It wasn’t Moslems, it wasn’t the Chinese buying up their future, or the African ‘refugees’ swarming through their neighbourhoods like tribes of berserk warriors, but people like Tim who create that environment which oppresses them.

By standing up proud in whom they are regardless of whether they’d ever been a school Dux, or are an Alumnus, or have swindled their way into the property market to stand atop a balcony crowing over the sweaty plebs below — they are making a very bold statement.

In fact, their statement is so bold it has to be completely misrepresented by the machinery of misinformation that underpins this crooked system that keeps us all in chains.

UNA will state here and now that before any confrontation happens with any group of outsiders in this nation the first battles will be Whites against Whites. It will be the likes of those with the fortitude to stand up, like those in Melbourne on Sunday, and internal enemies such as Timmy who have been mass-produced by successive globalist occupying governments.

In fact, their statement is so bold it has to be completely misrepresented by the machinery of misinformation that underpins this crooked system that keeps us all in chains.

No, the media was never concerned with accuracy in the reporting of Sunday’s march. If they were, they would have not made the very tourist make of presuming it was organised by Blair Cottrell of the United Patriots Front, which the DM did, or mistaking Kane Miller for Blair, which they also did.

This means, of course, that Blair has become the ‘Snowball’ of the Patriot movement and anything else. By this, we refer to George Orwell’s classic take on Stalin, Animal Farm.

In Orwell’s political parable of the twentieth century, the Stalinesque pig Napoleon usurps the ideologically-driven pig Snowball and thereafter any failure of his regime, anything that goes wrong, anything and everything is blamed on Snowball.

Heh, in that regards Blair has become like Jim Saleam.

pjimage.jpg
Yep, it was that pesky Blair all along… In fact, Blair was responsible for the Holocaust that killed six and a half zillion Jewish babies