DANIEL ANDREWS AND HIS BROWN VAGINA FORCE FIELD

DANIEL ANDREWS AND HIS BROWN VAGINA FORCE FIELD

Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews is an odd duck and no mistake; seemingly a nice enough bloke he is outwardly unfettered by guile or cynicism; yet he is the quintessential “Nebbish”, to borrow from the Yiddish vernacular.

The latest in a long line of baffling publicity stunts has seen Andrews apologising to a throng of Chinatown honchos for the ancient, long forgotten landing tax imposed upon Chinese immigrants during the gold rushes of the 19th century.

There was an aura of weirdness and unreality surrounding this performance, as there is around so much of the premier’s work; who were these Asian dignitaries and what was their connection, if any to the prospectors and fossickers of yore?

Should we simply remit the ten bob poll tax to all persons of Chinese extraction on the off chance that one of their relatives chose to sail across to Port Phillip rather than stiff the customs of their dues and hoof it overland from Adelaide to the diggings?

Clarinda MP Hong Lim claims much of the credit for this venture, which surprises us not a bit, the astonishing revelation, though, is that the apology was two years in the planning.

Daniel-Andrews-2
Schlemiel! Schlimazel! ALP Incorporated!

This absurd pantomime is, however, consistent with a broader ALP strategy to insulate the party and its globalist-cosmopolitan agenda from scrutiny or criticism; the party seems intent on obscuring its machinations behind a screen of ethnics and women, its much publicised “diversity” agenda.

“Should we simply remit the ten bob poll tax to all persons of Chinese extraction on the off chance that one of their relatives chose to sail across to Port Phillip rather than stiff the customs of their dues and hoof it overland from Adelaide to the diggings?

It is obvious to anyone not taken in by the mantra of equality for all that the so-called “progressives” of the current Victorian parliament seek to create a sort of perverse political etiquette wherein certain classes of people are immune from criticism and whose opinions are held to be sacrosanct.

Question a Victorian woman in a position of authority and you are a misogynist Troll; cock an eyebrow at the ravings of a non-White public servant and you’ve dragged us a few more steps back down the road to Auschwitz; dare to challenge a non-White, female companion of the chattering classes and you may as well have immolated a basket of puppies and danced upon their ashes.

Feminists
Feminists used to attack the system, now the ARE the system

This is no joke readers, Daniel Andrews may be all dimples and ill- fitting moleskins but behind the doors of Treasury Place lurk functionaries of a Machiavellian temper not seen since the courtiers of Heinrich Himmler and his Waffen SS.

Of course, we do not hit women, but nowadays we are not supposed to even question them; outright contradiction of Feminist dogma is basically seen by the progressives as actionable “hate speech” and any affront to a Muslim, Asian or Jewish politician is met with a rain of ruin upon the head of the transgressor.

To be serious though, this state of affairs should be seen as a problem for dissidents of all persuasions; if the opinions of certain classes of people are held to be unfalsifiable and their actions as elected officials or servants of the crown are put beyond scrutiny or censure, then democracy is impossible and the corruption just beneath the skin of the ALP behemoth is cloaked from the outside world, once and for all.

“This is no joke readers, Daniel Andrews may be all dimples and ill- fitting moleskins but behind the doors of Treasury Place lurk functionaries of a Machiavellian temper not seen since the courtiers of Heinrich Himmler and his Waffen SS.”

The perimeter wall of ethnicity and gender surrounding the ALP is not hiding anything good or worthy of support by White workers and marginalised people, it merely covers up the machinations of factional cronies, the shady deals with arch-capitalists and would-be suburban property barons and it facilitates the ongoing “culture bust” of globalism.

This is the same rationale as seen in the diversification of the Police service, female officers are less likely to be challenged or attacked by lawbreakers, most criminals will still baulk at hitting a woman even if she is intent on carting him off to the lockup.

Footscray goddess.
The boundless plains of…Footscray

Politicians and public servants whose word is law merely due to their race or gender, who cannot be confronted or challenged because they might burst into tears or make a human rights complaint are cogs in a machinery of a state which grinds on toward totalitarianism at an ever quickening pace.

Feminist politics here deserves a special level of opprobrium since, over the past 25 years it has been fused completely to the globalist capitalist state; in truth, we are no longer looking at a left-right distinction, rather a movement which has forgone revolution in favour of liberal reform.

To close this article and to put the stunning contradiction at the heart of our discussion into words all workers will understand we refer to Marxist social critic John Pilger, who, on the occasions when he is right, is really right:

Today’s liberal feminism is a sinister 21st century variant of historical feminism. It is one key apparatus of many currently being utilised by the capitalist system rooted in patriarchy, misogyny and racism. This nefarious system employs trillions of dollars funnelled through the non-profit industrial complex (via foundations) to protect and expand these formidable power structures. Today’s liberal feminism is a racist fascism, bound by whiteness, privilege and class, that markets reformism and accommodationism under the clever guise of grassroots activism.”

quote-official-truths-are-often-powerful-illusions-john-pilger-23-19-12
Pilger is lucky, the zeitgeist conformed to his predictions before senility set in

 

Advertisements

FAIRFAX SILENT ON LUKE MCMAHON TROLLING

FAIRFAX SILENT ON LUKE MCMAHON TROLLING

No response has been forthcoming after United Nationalists Australia contacted the editor of The Age for comment over the unethical conduct of their freelance political writer Luke McMahon.

In April, Fairfax ran a fake news item penned by the Antifascist Action editor which made false claims and fabricated quotes about Australia First Party member, Nathan Sykes. But more galling than McMahon’s lies has been the two years of social media stalking, harassment, and threats conducted by the self-described law graduate.

Those malicious communications are now the subject of a police report being compiled with the assistance of AFP’s legal advisor.

However, in a further development overnight, McMahon has upped the ante by creating a fake Twitter account purporting to be Nathan Sykes. Thereafter, he has ‘Tweeted’ a series of rambling posts, raising serious questions about his mental health, and his fitness to be allowed access to social media.

McMahon runs a YouTube account under the name ‘Aussie Lads’ in which he posts material appropriated from patriots and nationalists and uses Fairfax’s Melbourne address as his contact details.

s2.png
McMahon cannot help himself — another account, another troll, another attack on Sykes

Clearly, his involvement with Fairfax and their refusal to fact check copy coming from the left-wing authoritarian extremist leads to further questions regarding Fairfax’s culpability in his trolling. For instance, when The Age’s editor Alex Lavelle, or his on-shift equivalent, approved the story, did they do so knowing that Sykes’s impecunious status would guarantee his inability to sue them for defamation? Fairfax has a history of supporting the hard-left especially when it comes to defamation against Australia First Party members although it hasn’t always gone their own way.

McMahon began a campaign against Sykes as early as 2016 after convicted anti-Semite Neil Erikson — who has never met Sykes — posted rumours about Sykes’s “Jewish” ancestry. The lie was conjured by the leader of former Hollywood Nazi spoiler-group Squadron 88. Its then leader was acting under instructions from Liberal Party operative Howard Crawford.

Scene 0 (00.05.28.000)
Howard Crawford was instrumental in spreading the rumour of Sykes’s Jewish ancestry

Thereafter, Erikson was encouraged to share this tactical lie via his and fellow Zionist-convert Shermon Burgess’s former muckraking Facebook Page. It is believed contact was made with McMahon to then use his contacts at Fairfax. Instead, McMahon, using his own account and two fake accounts, harassed Sykes with insults and threats via Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter. However, at that stage, no one at Fairfax was paying attention to his anarchist histrionics. Sometime in 2016, he posted his frustrations on Twitter provoking Fairfax with a Tweet saying, “Nathan Sykes from Nazi Australia First… the bloke The Age is so petrified to confront! Yikes!”

rsz_lukeyluke (1)
McMahon has a Twitter meltdown

However, following the first court appearance of the Bendigo Three at Melbourne Magistrate’s Court, Sykes was snapped exiting the court with others. Prior to that, McMahon had reactivated his ‘Mark Watford’ account and established a new one for Luke McMahon and attempted to contact Sykes, who was on a 30-day ban.

Sykes mentioned this to AFP party whip John Dickinson, who passed on the message to McMahon that given his vile trolling in the past, Sykes had no confidence in speaking to the fake journalist.

But McMahon is not of sound mind or reason and began to suspect that Dickinson was in fact, Sykes. Thereafter, he gave himself away by posting in tandem on both the abovementioned accounts threats, harassment, and anti-Semitic slurs in the belief it would somehow unnerve who he believed to be Sykes.

Luke
The person believed to be Luke McMahon

While posting, often within minutes of each account, McMahon goaded Sykes with an image of what he believed to be his residence, and details about his address, and local shopping habits.

Earlier that month, Sykes was confronted at an IGA store in Enmore by an Antifascist in a CFMEU shirt. The overweight thug was accompanied by an Aboriginal girl who Sykes had seen before in the company of another union hood who confronted him on Enmore Road months previous. Descriptions of both have been circulated among nationalists with a warning that both attempted violent engagement.

Doubtless, given the content of McMahon’s provocations, both have contact with McMahon and supplied information to him from Sydney. One or both may have been responsible for stalking Sykes to what they believed was his address.

18716396_782528651913275_287884658_n
Melbourne Antifascists believed to be connected to McMahon. Watch for them at the next Bendigo Three court appearance

United Nationalists Australia argues that Fairfax has enabled the implicit threat of violence against Sykes by publishing unverified material that prejudiced the writer and put him in the sights of psychotic street urchins associated with Antifa.

We assert that they knew their actions would endanger Sykes, and if they didn’t, their fitness for the positions in publishing must be questioned.

As the time draws near to the official police complaint against McMahon, the anarchist agitator is on a hiding to nothing. He has lost all self-control and aims to go out in a blaze of anarchist infamy.

Sykes told UNA, “McMahon will eventually be taught a lesson from an old adage; ‘He who lives by the sword dies by the sword’.”

It is important too, to reflect on the fact that all of this generated, not on the Leftist side of the fence, but with Hollywood Nazis and especially the kosher Patriots from Nick Folkes’s Party for Freedom.

These are the trials faced by genuine Australian nationalists who resist conservative coercion.

20170523_102904.jpg
Snapped in a laneway outside Melbourne Magistrate’s Court — we believe this man, who was taking intelligence on Patriots — is connected with McMahon. If you know anything about him, message us here at UNA

TOLERANCE, RESILIENCE AND THE POLITICS OF THE MARGINS

TOLERANCE, RESILIENCE AND THE POLITICS OF THE MARGINS

The Bendigo Three have appeared, for the second time, before the Melbourne Magistrates Court. Nationalist radicals and other supporters joined the defendants in the courtroom and at the subsequent social gathering afterwards.

The contest mention itself was unremarkable, the bulk of the time in the chamber was devoted to a back-and-forth discussion between the prosecutor and Magistrate Popovic regarding a date for the hearing itself, the earliest available time slot being September 4, 2017.

There was a depressingly ironic moment as, prior to the judge entering the court, breaking news of the Manchester Arena outrage was whispered among the Nationalists and Patriots seated in the public gallery. Given that we were there to support our respective comrades as they fight charges relating to political activism against militant Salafism and the doctrine of the Koran, the news was sadly poignant.

Jelena popovic
Magistrate Jelena Popovic, firm but fair

 

With the formalities of the day over it was once again time to form up and allow the riot squad to escort us from the court building, in contrast to the March 6 hearing the small Anti-Racist protest outside on William St had broken up, leaving only a handful of Antifa militants on scene to jeer and harass the Bendigo Three and their supporters.

There was a minor fracas as we made our way to Healey’s lane for the post-hearing morning tea and impromptu press conference, most of the aggravation was the fault of the media pack, who had to be held back by Police.

In the end, apart from a few easily thwarted attempts by Antifa to mingle with the Patriots and the comical, mutually assured destruction tactic of taking each other’s photographs, the mood was upbeat and congenial.

There was a depressingly ironic moment as, prior to the judge entering the court, breaking news of the Manchester Arena outrage was whispered among the nationalists and patriots seated in the public gallery. Given that we were there to support our respective comrades as they fight charges relating to political activism against militant Salafism and the doctrine of the Koran, the news was sadly poignant.

The real struggle for the Bendigo Three begins on September 4 and, as always UNA radicals will be there, front and centre to support our friend and comrade, Chris Shortis.

The bigger issue arising from the day went largely unnoticed by us, due to the fact that the leftist party had decamped while we were still inside the court complex; it was only upon returning home and watching video footage shot by others that we picked up on the motif of the counter protest.

MAIN-Manchester
Manchester’s fallen sons and daughters

As far as we can tell from the extensive, yet incomplete footage of the speeches the main gripe of these undergraduate socialists is that “far-right” activity somehow empowers capitalism and the oppression of not only marginalised groups but all citizens, by the state.

This is correct as insofar as there are many Hansonites, Liberal Party agents and conservatives operating under the broad Aussie Patriot banner; it is not true of all the factions represented among the Bendigo Three supporter group, most of them are good, honest people.

We cannot speak for others, but Australian Nationalism is not now, nor has it ever been an enabler or apologist of the worst kinds of crony capitalism, old-world privilege or the oppression of workers and marginalised people.

As far as we can tell from the extensive, yet incomplete footage of the speeches the main gripe of these undergraduate socialists is that “far-right” activity somehow empowers capitalism and the oppression of not only marginalised groups but all citizens, by the state.

The true situation is quite the opposite and we at UNA stand by our record of relentlessly criticising and exposing the very elements of the far-right which seem to so vex the Left; we go further in claiming that we, in fact, do much more to attack the state, expose the money power and harass the minions of Neo-Liberalism than any of the currently active leftists.

Nationalists would ask the Leftists to think the issue through more carefully, who are the groups coming under the most sustained and serious attack from these “far-right” groups and their sponsors?

hollis
The “Bum’s Rush” being applied to an actual bum

Any Leftist with a sharp mind can see that it is the radical Left and radical Nationalists who are being hammered by the globalist-capitalists and their media because we, in our different ways, represent the greatest threats to the capitalist programme. Granted, due to the success of the march through the institutions the Left have a lot more to lose in material terms, it will come as a shock to many on that side to be cast back out into the wilderness, however, we predicted this over a year ago.

Leftists are being purged from the mainstream and will soon inhabit the same space, beyond the pale, as all other true radicals; the difference is that Nationalists have a head start and are becoming adept at the politics of the margins, it is our home turf.

If they do not immediately succumb to the shock of banishment and collapse altogether, the real Left will have to make a choice: tolerate other dissidents as we wage parallel struggles against the Centrist mainstream, or exhaust themselves fighting us on our own ground.

9-3101566-new years 2016_t620.jpg

THE GREAT PURGE OF 2017: A LOGICAL EXPLANATION

THE GREAT PURGE OF 2017: A LOGICAL EXPLANATION

Readers would be well aware of a change in attitude toward dissident viewpoints, at management level within Google and Facebook.

Where previously these companies exercised a degree of tolerance toward most points of view, the commercial realities of allowing anti-capitalist, anti-globalist or even just plain stupid material to take hold on their platforms have been brought into sharp focus over the past few months.

From around the first week of April, reports began to appear in the mainstream press concerning a backlash of sorts by advertisers on the Google-owned YouTube platform; the issues raised included concerns over “inappropriate” videos being preceded by corporate advertising and a lack of control on the part of sponsors over where their ads were appearing.

Companies such as Toyota, McDonald’s, Pepsi, Starbucks and many other globalist brands pulled their advertising from YouTube due the fact that their videos were being attached to, among other things, clips espousing Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism; this resulted in a hit in the order of 4% to the share price of Google’s parent company, Alphabet Inc.

cfd

The remedial action taken by Google, in this case, is not yet clear, they have spoken about re-writing the algorithms in their operating software to better tailor the targeting of advertising and made some comments about allowing advertisers greater freedom to tailor the placement of their ads on YouTube, as well as the millions of other, third-party sites overseen by Google.

It remains to be seen whether the measures taken by YouTube will make a difference to the user experience, or lure back lucrative advertising contracts; we may never really know the outcome but there has long been a policy in place where they do not allow posters of controversial material to monetise their channels as YouTube partners.

William_Gibson_by_FredArmitage
William Gibson predicted the corporate takeover of cyberspace

Facebook, it would seem, has decided to act quickly in heading off any potential advertiser walk-out by permanently banning a swathe of controversial, nationalistic or civic patriot themed accounts and the personal pages of anyone associated with banned material, notable among them our own UNA Facebook account.

Where previously these companies exercised a degree of tolerance toward most points of view, the commercial realities of allowing anti-capitalist, anti-globalist or even just plain stupid material to take hold on their platforms have been brought into sharp focus over the past few months.

Now, much has been made of this purge by self-styled, online anti-racists and their mirror images in what we call the “right wing Antifa”, those conservatives who zealously pursue and harass nationalists and true patriots.

These serial pests, shut-ins, and obsessive compulsives are crowing loud and long about their tactics of mass reporting of any dissident thought having brought down pages such as UNA, UPF and Reclaim Australia, to name a few.

Looking at the situation logically, while having a basic grasp of how Facebook actually works and its record on such matters since the inception of the platform, we can only come to one conclusion: this cull of dissenting points of view, this purge of ideas which contradict the globalist capitalist line must have been done in the name of the almighty dollar.

Rupert Murdoch, Michael Bloomberg
Fifteen years ago we were worried about the old media barons taking over the internet

After all, the White trash of Antifa and their ideological brothers and sisters in the civic patriot groups have been mass reporting genuine dissident material 24 hours a day, 365 days a year since the days of Myspace and message boards. Their numbers have actually greatly decreased over that time so the decision to kill off unpopular ideas on Facebook is clearly a commercial decision, not the result of a tactical breakthrough by a few, numerically irrelevant Trolls.

What is also clear to the logical observer is that cyberspace, to all intents and purposes, is no longer a neutral space, that corporations rule the internet, that what is commonly called “political correctness” is now an integral part of globalist lifestyle branding and that the only social engineering being attempted is within the consumer “culture” of the multinational corporation.

Looking at the situation logically, while having a basic grasp of how Facebook actually works and its record on such matters since the inception of the platform, we can only come to one conclusion: this cull of dissenting points of view, this purge of ideas which contradict the globalist capitalist line must have been done in the name of the almighty dollar.

The fashion in which the Facebook software tailors the user experience with targeted advertising, friend and page recommendations based on the browsing history of the individual user makes it unlikely that a person is ever going to see any content which may offend them, unless they go looking for it on purpose or something slips through on the feed of a friend.

sjw-freakshow-lauren-southern
No, uppity Social Justice Warriors had nothing to do with the great social media purges of 2017

This analysis also proves the fears regarding net neutrality, long held by futurists the world over; granted in the early years of the noughties it seemed as if Newscorp and traditional media might take over the web and turn it into something like Foxtel, however, the reality is that middle-of-the-road neo-liberalism now reigns supreme online.

The move to rid Facebook of commercially problematic content may be a way of appeasing the direct demands of its corporate partners, or it may simply be an expression of good faith by a company long criticised for hosting “extremist” points of view, we cannot say for sure.

It all makes sense to anyone in business, the inclusion of all individuals into the global consumer class and the accommodation of all their whims, tastes and fancies is obviously the best way to make money and the best use of the internet as a sales tool.

Globalist corporations support same-sex marriage, for example, because marketing these days largely revolves around concepts of lifestyle and a mix-and-match set of personal values drawn from the prescribed life choices of the cosmopolitan consumer culture; the more variations this culture can accept the more product the corporations can shift.

The move to rid Facebook of commercially problematic content may be a way of appeasing the direct demands of its corporate partners, or it may simply be an expression of good faith by a company long criticised for hosting “extremist” points of view, we cannot say for sure.

It is impossible to monetise ideas such as nationalism, patriotism, traditionalism and even Communism because they all rely on making us versus them distinctions and prescribe in-group loyalty above all else. If the consumer culture can be described as a smorgasbord, where the individual chooses his own identity from a range of possible components then its opposite must be a set menu, where a strictly limited number of options are available and the group assigns an identity for all.

enhanced-buzz-1504-1379943854-7
Liberals used to think this way

This is the heart of the matter and the real implication of the great social media purges of 2017, we must take the globalist-capitalists at their word.

They accuse Nationalists and true patriots of fostering division and unrest; a breakdown in social cohesion is their greatest fear but it is not the nation, the physical communities of towns and suburbs or the family they seek to protect, it is their global consumer monoculture, the deracinated, classless society held together by money and the material things it can buy.

We at UNA are, fortunately, on the record as being long term skeptics of social media, we use it when convenient but scarcely miss it when it is no longer available due to the fact that radicalisation of the proletariat and marginalised people via Facebook never seemed feasible to us.

What is more the people we seek to turn on to our brand of radical Australianism are not to be found on Facebook, where it is well known that something in the order of 80% of traffic is generated by around 10% of users; they are in the outer suburbs of our cities and the rural hinterland and outreach to those Whites with ears to hear has always been our primary concern.

alfred-e-neuman.jpeg

UNITED NATIONALISTS AUSTRALIA BANNED FROM FACEBOOK

UNITED NATIONALISTS AUSTRALIA BANNED FROM FACEBOOK

The Facebook page of United Nationalists Australia has been banned by the globalist powers operating the social media platform.

There has been a spate of such censorship recently, with any page opposing Islam, fake refugees, or globalism having their plugs pulled on the grounds of what is suggested to be “hate speech”. The most notable of these, apart from us was the United Patriots Front, which had been promoting such Zionists as Avi Yemini anyway, so go figure.

In fact, in the lead up to our hell-banning, an ultra-globalist Facebook page hosted a number of feral scabs purporting to have reported just about anything to get us taken down. And Facebook responded.

We received a message that the logo we use, two White hands shaking, breached community standards. Which community? What standards? Left-wing extremists like Antifa posting images of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro? They are the community? They determine the political standards? We could have posted a picture of a kitten. It wouldn’t have mattered.

The editor-in-chief of UNA has been banned a number of times for posting material on our former page that upset both the civic patriots and the snowflakes on the left. On one memorable occasion, his personal Facebook account was given a 30-day ban for posting the word “Amen”. This demonstrates that there are no community standards — all there are is a set of algorithms responding to a dedicated troll force committed to banning pages they don’t like.

There is no human force tending the light at the end of the tunnel, mainly as there is no light.

We received a message that the logo we use, two White hands shaking, breached community standards. Which community? What standards?

It is a sad reflection for nationalists that we cannot summon the same amount of will and energy to return the favour, but the problem isn’t so much which group gets the most takedowns, but the fact that we have become dependent on (((Facebook))).

This is quite pathetic, but Facebook has such a monopoly on communication flow, that many are hopelessly hooked on the audience numbers, which are massive.

rsz_18554436_447245232304406_1539718614_n
The image of the shaking hands breached Facebook’s “Community Standards”

This is the thing, it has become like trying to host an anti-Zog meeting at a synagogue — we are in an untenable position.

It is well-known that epochal traitor and peace criminal, German chancellor Angela Merkel met with Facebook’s chief rabbi Mark Zuckerberg asking him to ensure action was taken to stop any dissenting commentary about the rapeugee invasion of Europe, which she, along with her master George Soros, engineered. Moreover, from news reports covering the removal of the UPF’s page, it seems Australian pages are now being deemed “hate speech” and removed, possibly, too, because of government requests. Frankly, we do not know either way, and Facebook is not making any statements.

This is quite pathetic, but Facebook has such a monopoly on communication flow, that many are hopelessly hooked on the audience numbers, which are massive.

This, despite the loss of the instant audiences and large reach that Facebook offers, is an opportunity. It makes no sense to be captive to globalist forces with such important activism to pursue. Just as Stormfront Downunder became an untenable platform for Australian nationalists due to the high penetration of leftist trolls, conservative saboteurs such as Howard Crawford, and lunatics so Facebook has been more trouble than it is worth.

It is evident that despite being able to command audiences in the tens of thousands, none of this ‘reach’ has had much practical application. The political arm of the United Patriots Front, Fortitude, was intended to sign up users and establish a political party but — in spite of having tens of thousands of page likes — they barely got a trickle of memberships.

2CDCC5C800000578-3252209-image-a-11_1443456957855
Zucc and Merkel meet to silence Globalism’s critics, especially those upset at being raped and killed in Europe by fake male refugees of fighting age

For all the social media activity of Reclaim Australia, except for a fleeting moment, none of that activity ever translated to bodies on the street when it came to demonstrations. As such, the validity of these vast numbers has proven to be an illusion.

Why then suffer all the pain of feeding globalist parasites like the anarchists who seem to exist only to be outraged by patriot Facebook pages?

The nationalist community is as divided on Facebook as it is in the corporeal world. Instead of uniting under one group, subscribing to one page, there are a plethora of these pages of which most are simply newsfeeds regarding non-White crime. Nobody was ever happy to just participate, everyone had to go out and start their own thing, which is both a positive and a negative.

Why then suffer all the pain of feeding globalist parasites like the anarchists who seem to exist only to be outraged by patriot Facebook pages?

United Nationalists Australia went out of its way to buck this ‘pointing at the news’ trend. We refused to subscribe to the central tenet that Facebook audiences could not read anything wordier than a caption. Instead of grammatically impoverished one-sentence introductions to the same news all the other pages were sharing, we made the nationalist community, and anything affecting it, the subject of our focus, in very long, often complicated essays that challenged the reader.

And it worked! In fact, it worked so well that we became — disregarding our meek number of page ‘likes’ — one of the most influential voices of the nationalist pages. As we said, the civic patriots detested us, and often had our material removed, as did the lefties, challenged by the fact we are brainier than they are.

Now it is time to look to the future. If we have only a small community, let that community come to places where they will not become trolled, banned, harassed by the scum of the left; or misdirected by the Zionist-operated civic patriots.

Let them come to places where word of mouth can spread, and only those truly dedicated interact.

Leaving Facebook is a MUST. All nationalists must surrender the apathy of Facebook and make a serious effort. We must deprive Zucc of our patronage and the advertising dollars that automatically accompany our presence. No more will we be at the mercy of “community standards” which only reflect those eager to destroy White nations — and have the White race bred off with every black and brown monkey on the planet.

In this, we shall lead the way. The UNA blog will soon become UNA media, and we will operate where the whores of mammon cannot touch us.

En garde, Zucc, your filthy skype days are numbered!

facebook-jew

NATIONALIST TO PURSUE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST MEDIA TROLL

NATIONALIST TO PURSUE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST MEDIA TROLL

An Australian nationalist defamed in a recent news article that labelled him a “troll” is to pursue legal action against the journalist responsible for the fake news item.

In two separate statements now removed from Facebook, but accessible on the UNA blog, the nationalist reveals how the journalist – who works for a major news organisation – has spent two years criminally trolling him on social media.

The alleged harassment has taken the form of the most serious offences, as confirmed by a liaison officer with the Australian Federal Police. These involved using a fake account to stalk and intimidate, and other offences that will be detailed in the statement to be submitted to police presently.

The nationalist, who we will not name, has described the actions of the journalist as “psychopathic” and says that “the only troll in this whole equation is him… and he is a very sick, deranged troll. I owe it to the community at large to see that he is taken off social media, and hopefully put away on a custodial sentence to reflect on his criminal activities.

“He is a very cowardly, insipid, and weak specimen. He is a living condemnation of what has become of western journalism — he is the absolute definition of a fake news merchant. He needs his comeuppance.”

The nationalist is furious at the article, which he argues contains demonstrable untruths.

“The article was mostly made up. It was sourced almost entirely from social media and its main contention was the basis of a rumour started by the Zionist-convert Neil Erikson acting in concert with the Party for Freedom. Its aim was to hurt the Australia First Party, of which I am a member.”

However, it was not even the content of the article that provoked his ire, so much as the alleged stalking.

“I am surprised one who claims to have a legal background would so casually leave themselves open like this, but nobody ever said he was intelligent. However, at the base of this are very serious criminal threats against my person.”

download

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

THE ZIOS ARE BACK AND THEY WANT TO RECLAIM AUSTRALIA

What do you do with the UPF? If you’re Facebook, you shut down their main page. So what do THEY then do? They migrate as much Zionist supporting material as they can to sister pages and to their Reclaim Australia – West Australia Rally page.

In every quote to the media, however, you will find their leadership claiming to be ‘nationalist’ and not ‘patriot’ which is such a conscious delineation that its intention is coldly clear to true Australian nationalists.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

On the same page (RA-WA) you will find a link to a True Blue Crew flag march where Whiteness is heavily emphasised. Then it’s back to the kosher meal of every possible Zionist-related entity they chug up – Britain First and Tommy Robinson shares right there in among them.

Well, they know by now; surely they aren’t naive. They know that promoting ultra-Zionists like Avi Yemini is a contradiction in terms to the single-minded cause of fighting Islamic extremism. Ultra-Zionists like Avi and his fellow countrymen create such extremism. They do so both by having manufactured ISIS, so as to pit them against the unfriendly Moslems on their list – and by continually stoking bloody conflict in the region.

The perennial program of destabilisation establishes a power balance that benefits the security of the state of Israel and services whatever objectives its allies may have in the region. But it also does something else – and has done so since the 1970s – it creates a mass migration of Middle Easterners into Australia.

True Australian nationalists would never bill an event in the following terms, “We are asking people of all walks of life, COLOR (sic) and ethnic background to stand as one against extremism”.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

What does this portend for the ‘nationalism’ that they claim to be championing, having knowingly appropriated the term from staunch supporters of a new White Australia Policy? It kills it because those same Zionists do everything possible to eradicate such nationalist beliefs. They do more though — they align with the Left to attack serious nationalists such as we saw recently with Fairfax’s criminal toll Luke McMahon, who is known to have ties with Zionist-convert Neil Erikson.

Erikson, along with Nick Folkes, Howard Crawford, Scott Moerland and others have campaigned heavily against true nationalists. We are not at all surprised to find the UPF making the self-defeating move to once again associate with these cagey globalists in the hope of puffing up their waning profile.

Thus, nationalists for a White Australia become treated worse than kiddy fiddlers, and the planes keep flying more and more Indians, Chinese, Africans and MOSLEMS from the Middle East. The cathartic activity of stoking enmity against Islam merely gives a moral license to our globalist government to support military crimes in the Middle East which benefit Israel.

In this battle, all those values that Australians regarded as part of their birthright are trampled on. Zionists in Australia, while demanding racial and religious homogeneity at home, are forever insisting on total diversity for Australia and all White countries.

Simple equation: Avi Yemini + Reclaim Australia + Dumb Aussie Supporters Who Hate Islam = Much More Moslems Entering the Country.

This diversity has transformed our cities into utterly foreign destinations. The quarter-acre home has been replaced by towering (shoddily built) concrete toolboxes crammed with Chinese and Indians; the odour of their spicy cooking permeating the streets.

Australia needs reclaiming from all of this, not just one particular branch of this allegedly diverse community.

It is not the Indians, Africans, or Chinese who are losing their identities. They’ve never had it so sweet. While White Australians are slowly being discouraged from even considering ourselves Australian, this new population get dual identities. They get to be Indian AND Australian; they get to be African AND Australian, and they get to be Chinese AND Australian.

Islam is just a symptom of this single world government that has its master Zionist America. But while all these terms we throw about ‘Zionist’ ‘civic patriot’ and whatever might confuse the casual punter it is all quite simple. Unless you live in one of those last posts White Australian areas that are only ‘gradually’ being de-Europeanised you only have to take a walk, open your eyes, and smell the pungent waft of curry.

What difference does Islam make if – in the highly improbable event of removing it – you do so only to find yourself a stranger in your own country, shivering and alone among a new population of aliens? What will you reclaim then?

Wake up to the Zionists — you are being used.

C1ePePgVEAAVEM4
Avi Yemini, the ultra-Zionist who is now the darling of the civic patriots now calling themselves Australian ‘nationalists’