If anything distinguishes those civic patriots on the right from us radical nationalists it is by whom we are most attacked.

In the case of the civics, they are dogged by what we collectively term ‘the left’, while radical nationalists, who occupy a third position on the political spectrum cop the most grief from either the civic patriots or those in the conservative camp.

Bear in mind that ‘the left’ is as eclectic when it comes to issues, identity, philosophy, and strategy as ‘the right’.

The left wants the patriot movement dispersed while the conservatives aim to drive away radical nationalists so they can inhabit our political ground and remodel it in their crypto-globalist image.

This is a curious fact that allows us to discuss a couple of cases in point. Let us begin with what some of those from the civic patriot side of the quadrangle contend with in their present day ‘clicktivism’. This essay shall be in two parts on account of its length and the dedication required to each of its players.

1. THE PATRIOT ACTORS AND THE COMBATANTS OF THE LEFT

There is a particularly malicious element at play among those who oppose the growth of the patriots. They view patriots as more of a concern than the nationalist movement given its mainstream accessibility. On that side, the Bogan element is mocked by those who are their mirror image with one factor separating them by the slimmest degree: the perception of their engaging in ‘racism’. This is, despite the ambiguity on the question of race amplified in the patriot fold.

Nationalists define Australianness as being of White European stock, as opposed to Aborigines. Patriots, who misuse the term nationalism understanding it not, and often deliberately misappropriating it, are nebulous in their definition of an Australian. Many are in mixed-race relationships and as such loath the absolutism of nationalism which would exclude them on the grounds of breaching its inviolate precepts.

However, it is important in the propaganda war of those conflicting with the anti-Islam movement to lump each in the same basket and defame both they and nationalists, as ‘Nazis’; which is like calling all socialists Marxists or anarchists communists. The Nazi tag is meant to invoke images of state organised terror that would ensue if these groups are allowed to put down political roots in the community.

In the lexicon of those of the left, patriots are ‘potatriots’, a witticism intended to disdain that group as ‘potato heads’. This is a derisive term that was originally applied to skinheads. Since the advent of the Reclaim Australia movement, which is almost exclusively dramatized on Facebook, a number of pages and counter-identities have sprung up to oppose the patriot pages and the groups that employ them.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

But virtue is subjective in this day and age when that moral asset is destroying the west. Opposition to Islam is the kindling of the realisation something is amiss. Australians are being de-culturized while globalism is dialectically re-culturizing us with a religion that negates the very tenets underpinning the idea of universal equality at play. Both are at the mercy of the culturally vacuous reality of globalism.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113
Alex Gollan, the assistant school principal and anti-fascist anarchist who ran the ‘anti-bogan’ word press site and was arrested for bulk kiddie porn

This is visible nowhere better than on those oppositional pages, which we mentioned. This genre has no purpose other than to negate. They do not attempt to counter ‘potatriot’ messages by promoting their own positive counter-messages they literally take the aforementioned messages and desecrate them. There is no intellectual component at play in the deconstruction of the patriot message. Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is a sledgehammer used to beat down the message and the messenger so that the mission becomes personal.

A very telling post occurred on one such page with a prominent leftist troll, “Can’t we just kill them [patriots] all?” The admin replied, “No, because then we would be Nazis.”
Disregarding the fact that had that comment been made on a nationalist page it would have been hidden or removed, it is a very instructive insight into both the pathology of the poster and the counter movement. The duplicitous essence of it is summed up in the gag, “We’re starting a war for peace.”

The assumed virtue of the poster is instantly invalidated by the revelation of this tyrannical instinct.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

This is, however, but one example. Narrowed down to a central theme outside of ‘race’ is the implication that patriots will potentially auger in a dictatorial system reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, the calls for an authoritarian response to the patriots are constant on the sample page we have used for our study.

There are flippant, but often sincere calls for patriots to be pursued by ASIO, or to be charged with offences that — were they on the other foot — would be vehemently contested as breaches of civil liberties. So we come to the actors or combatants, and here we shall actually name some.

Smith
Pete Smith from Melbourne, heavily active on Facebook, is linked to Antifascist Action Sydney and other ‘anarchist’ pages

 

We have had correspondence with a few members of the patriot movement, putting aside our ideological differences, keen to highlight certain combatants and the disreputable methods they have employed to target one or other of the patriot actors.

One, in particular, has been defamed over and over by combatants using various Facebook identities and private messaging the patriot actor we shall call ‘Mark’.

Mark is being consistently vilified as a person of heinous substance and the nature of the slander has transcended any honourable intent. The attacks led to the hostilities emerging from a social media setting and into the corporeal world when the authorities were involved. Mark is not alone in these vicious online assaults but his example is notable.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

So, who is behind these assaults on Mark’s character? Here, we merely repeat what he believes: John Linden Faulkner. But we also mention two others, Alex Gollan and David Hollis.

download (3)
Sydney’s Tayce Brown, shoplifter, hair stylist to the scabby, and a real skank

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This blog, as in others we’ve mentioned, is a flagrant vehicle to attack political opponents. Faulkner and Gollan are said to have co-administrated the site. Gollan, a former assistant school principal has since disappeared from ‘anti-fascist’ activities after being charged with child-sex offences.

Faulkner, who Mark and others believe to be behind a series of online profiles identifiable by their malevolence, has a criminal past to make anyone suddenly hosting him start eyeing the nearest exit. Faulkner was imprisoned for nine years for armed robberies in which women were his soft targets. He appealed his sentence as harsh, but in doing so was told it was actually lenient under the circumstances.

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This week [originally posted on Facebook March 11] , it was revealed that David Albain Hollis, the man in the red ‘Truth’ cap who accompanied Sue Munro to the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court to spy on the Bendigo Three’s supporters — and who appeared in an opportunistic pic with John Safran taken on the day — went on a “stabbing spree” in 1991, knifing seven people one of whom later died.

Hollis served only 17 months in jail on the grounds of diminished responsibility as he was in the throes of a “psychotic episode”, although how that should mitigate anything so appalling we do not know.

There are other cases on that extreme left of the bench such as Tayce Brown of Antifascist Action Sydney whose conduct and lifestyle are such that she would be considered a habitual criminal outside of the political activist underworld.

The radical left is sure something — in a world inhabited by junkies, thugs, hookers, thieves, and ex-murderers does becoming ‘anti-racist’ mean atoning for dissolute, wasted lives. Does championing the ‘other’ allow them to graduate from their moral squalor merely on the basis they aren’t racist? We are not psychologists, and this is not a forensic examination, but the pattern cannot be ignored.

Bear in mind, Blair Cottrell was confronted with a video created inside the correctional system while he was doing time for a crime of passion. He never killed anyone, nor caused anyone harm. What of these three? All fall into the very worst categories, and all comport themselves on social media in a manner that delegitimizes any hypothetical argument they believe they have concerning right and wrong.

If Faulkner is behind this campaign of defamation and stalking against Mark, then it appears that he has in no way left behind his violent past, but merely justified it in the context of the political theatre. He has reinvented himself as the ‘good guy’ and deemed those patriot actors as ‘bad guys’ in a morality play where his own contaminated ethics are masked by a blindness born of criminal denial.

In our next article, we will turn the focus on the patriots, who are to nationalists what the leftists we have described here have been to them.

oie_DqksmJ43gaGr
Anarchist Psycho

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s