COMMUNIST EXTREMIST IN TERROR PLOT AGAINST AUSSIE NATIONALISTS

COMMUNIST EXTREMIST IN TERROR PLOT AGAINST AUSSIE NATIONALISTS

A communist extremist is said to be plotting an act of terror against two Australian nationalists, as reported by the Australia First Party.

A member of the Communist Workers’ Party of Australia — a radicalised splinter group — and admin of their Facebook Page identified as “Yousef” is alleged to be behind the plan. The two nationalists are named as Australia First Party President Jim Saleam, and AFP member, Nathan Sykes.

Using the Facebook identity Sleek Castro, Yousef, who is of Lebanese descent, is said to be preoccupied with violent revolution and wishes to make a name on the Communist scene.

We are unaware of whether the Federal Police are investigating Yousef or his group, who are regular protestors at the Villawood Detention Centre in Sydney.

We are unaware of whether the Federal Police are investigating Yousef or his group, who are regular protestors at the Villawood Detention Centre in Sydney.

The extremists have been involved in pro-refugee activities outside the centre such as the “Free Saeed” campaign, who is an Iraqi refugee.

Yousef is reported to have organised the assaults at the Villawood picket site last fortnight after reading a defamatory article about Sykes penned by Fairfax troll, Luke McMahon.

In the article, McMahon deliberately misrepresented Sykes as “Jewish” and a major racist “troll”.

In the article, McMahon deliberately misrepresented Sykes as “Jewish” and a major racist “troll”.

It was a fascination with McMahon’s slurs that is said to have inspired Yousef’s plan, which involved assembling a group to stalk and assault the two men.

We are making nationalists aware of this “Yousef”, his ‘party’, and his social media page which we link to.

It is unknown at this stage whether McMahon or his friend “Slackbastard” are linked to the plot.

tyusef
Yousef, or “Sleek Castro” as he appears on his Facebook page is behind a terror plot against nationalists

HORROR PICS! TOBY COOK DROOLS IN HIS SLEEP!

HORROR PICS! TOBY COOK DROOLS IN HIS SLEEP!

Being a Peanut is tiring work. Just look at young Toby here — he’s a growing boy (growing from the belt outwards).

Things got a bit much for the young fella when he accompanied the Peanuts to a rally somewhere in Sydney that we don’t care enough about to properly report on. The Peanuts had their placards, their loud hailers, and their sandals.

They yelled at the population of Sydney and when they were done they maybe went off for a few dozen beers and burgers with extra chips. Nick probably ate sushi.

Of course, Tobes had most likely been out on the pingas the night before, so he was especially tired out. But when the Fellowship of the Peanut got back to Peanut Palace, that’s when it all proved too much for our half-Paki White Supremacist. The poor tyke was tired out after yelling at seagulls about halal food, Moslem refugees, ‘what race is Islam’, and all that stuff from the Peanuts’ repertoire.

17857318_445053795841317_324503772_n
Toby dreams about hot curries

He fell asleep, napping on Nick’s garden chair; his manifold chins resting on the airbag of his enormous belly. Toby started to dream. We can only guess at what he was dreaming about — it might have been Nick dressed up in Lederhosen leading the Peanuts in a victorious parade while he stood at his side. He may have been dreaming that Penny Louise had asked him to do her laundry or he might well have been dreaming about one of those yummy curries his mum used to make when he was a boy and they had just arrived in the country from Pakistan.

We guess he probably was dreaming about food after all because once the sandman had finished sprinkling his daylight dust on Tobes’s hefty eyelids, dribble issued forth from his lips, captured by someone on their phone… or maybe on their camera.

Yep, looking at Tobes is a major gross-out at the best of times, but to witness this snoring gorgon dribbling spittle down his flabby chins is enough to kill a person’s appetite for at least 72 hours. Once seen, this image cannot be unseen. There were distressing images doing the rounds after yesterday’s horrendous truck attack in Sweden — victims splattered all over the road in a sprawling pool of nauseous pink paste. But even that paled next to the sight of toby drooling like a mental patient.

17857299_445054102507953_6516015_n.jpg
WARNING!!! THE FOLLOWING IMAGE WILL MAKE YOU LOSE YOUR LUNCH!

It really isn’t normal behaviour. The average person doesn’t drool in their sleep, only people on heavy psych meds salivate helplessly like that.

We are feeling pretty sick right now, folks, so you will have to let us end this write-up here. There is only one bucket in the UNA Towers’ office, and right now Chris Shortis is heaving uncontrollably into it.

We might even have to call a doctor, but the only one we know is Dr Jim Saleam, and he’s too busy running the Internet to see us now. He’s not a doctor of medicine either.

download
UNA’s head of accounts after viewing the above image. He is expected to be off work for at least a week

 

TRUMP DUPED — THE DREAM IS OVER — SYRIA BOMBINGS TRIGGER A NEW IRAQ!

TRUMP DUPED — THE DREAM IS OVER — SYRIA BOMBINGS TRIGGER A NEW IRAQ!

We hate to say we told you so, but UNA did warn readers that Trump offered little more than the illusion of a change from a world controlled by Zionist warmongers.

This is not an order that can be changed so easily. As of today, we are proved correct. Trump both sold the alt-right and White nationalists a hell of a line or else he was sincere up to a point but just couldn’t maintain his vision against the agitations of dark forces behind the scenes.

We choose to believe the latter, that he really did want to bring about a new policy on Syria, but the system is not designed to be remodelled.

The ‘fake news’ department hit him with powerfully stirring images of little Syrian kids being gassed by Assad, a line reminiscent of the lies of the WMDs that led to the invasion of Iraq and the beginning of the mass relocations into the west by Middle Eastern ‘refugees’.

Let’s remember, the US, Israel and its allies had been supplying ISIS etc. with the weapons and wherewithal to wage an insurgency against President Bashar al-Assad, so it bears the culpability for this bloody conflict.

The only ones actually fighting ‘terrorists’ were the government forces under Assad, and Russia, with president Putin’s powerful resolve to stand in defiance of this sick, evil Zionist world order. They fought alone.

We choose to believe the latter, that he really did want to bring about a new policy on Syria, but the system is not designed to be remodelled.

Then, this gassing incident occurs, and immediately we return to the WMD narrative that brought down Saddam Hussein and forever compromised global security — Assad gassing fresh-faced little children, his people.

Of course, the western media has been pushing the Zionist lies all along and was never about to acknowledge the basic tenets of fair reportage. Instead, it continued to dump Zionist-globalist lies on us like asbestos rubble.

C8yOim3VYAA1ZcP
Yes, fancy this sick Jew warmonger sending support to his new partner in war crimes

Remember, fair reportage is a cornerstone of western journalism and therefore a pillar of this so-called democracy that it keeps blowing foreign states up to impose upon them. However, Assad maintains that a Syrian airstrike on the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhun, in the Idlib province, hit a terrorist chemical weapons lab causing the leak. This is quite plausible indeed. It is every bit as plausible as suggesting he gassed the little children out of some brand of cartoon villainy.

This explanation was roundly dismissed by the west, which had its propaganda machine primed and rearing to go. Kids play a valuable hand in beguiling the western people. When Beach Boy washed up on a Turkish shore he became the symbol of justification for flooding Europe with rapeugees, the exploits of which fill the pages of social media and alternative blog news feeds almost on a daily basis.

Following the heavily reported gassing, arch-Zionist and US Ambassador to the UN Security Council, Nikki Haley, a woman of Sikh descent, gave a speech invoking more images of dead kiddies, and imploring, “We cannot close our eyes to those pictures. We cannot close our minds of the responsibility to act…

Of course, the western media has been pushing the Zionist lies all along and was never about to acknowledge the basic tenets of fair reportage. Instead, it continued to dump Zionist-globalist lies on us like asbestos rubble.

“Russia cannot escape responsibility for this. We know that if nothing is done, these attacks will continue. Assad has no incentive to stop using chemical weapons as long as Russia continues to protect his regime from consequences.”

Then the clincher at the end, when she said, “When the United Nations consistently acts in its duty to act collectively there are times in the life of states we are compelled to take our own action.”

150420130502-syria-war-780x439
It is due to this Zionist interference in Syria that this not-so-fake gas attack became fake news that swayed Trump to reneg on his promises

Yes, we heard this from George W. Bush before he went into Iraq, this same sort of spiel. But now it is coming from the administration of a president who was voted in precisely on the promise that he would not go down bloodthirsty Hillary’s warmongering road — a path leading directly to a confrontation with Russia, as much as another embedded and tumultuous military catastrophe in the Middle East.

Meanwhile, the usual cast of happy Zionists lines up to help stoke the furnace. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cynically Tweeted, “When I saw pictures of babies suffocating from a chemical attack in Syria, I was shocked and outraged.”

This colourless quote, which lacks any true spark of sincerity, is understandable given it was Israeli involvement that caused the sarin gassing in the first place.

Then the clincher at the end, when she said, “When the United Nations consistently acts in its duty to act collectively there are times in the life of states we are compelled to take our own action.”

Then the Tweet from the AnneFrankCenter of the US, which howled a whopper when it uploaded an image of Anne Frank graphically superimposed onto a picture of Syrian children. It wrote, “The Anne Franks of our time”, which is funny, considering that Anne Frank was not gassed but died of typhus.

Yet, all of this goes to show the same techniques are being used once again to lead us into a savage and unnecessary conflict for Israel that will result in our countries having to absorb even greater numbers of Moslems and others.

17821058_757468844419256_1147292494_n
Except, of course, Anne Frank was phony, she never died of gassing, and oi very, muh sarin gassing!

This is what Trump is bringing us early in his term, about as early as Hillary would have had she been elected instead. And how could he not? The office of the president of the United States does not allow him any license to actually change the system. The system is what it is and that is staunchly Zionist. Remember, too, that Trump personally supports Israel, and regardless of what many Jewish groups had to say about him, it was this confidence in his support that led to Jewish expansion on the West Bank resuming.

Today, news reports say more than 50 Tomahawk missiles were fired against a Syrian air base. Trump, who is hosting Chinese President Xi Jinping was very much thinking about the children. He issued a statement condemning the gas attack and justifying the bombing, saying, “Even beautiful babies were cruelly murdered in this barbaric attack. It was a slow and brutal death for so many.”

Zionist commentator and Jew, Bill Kristol, Tweeted, “If Pres. Trump takes appropriate action against Assad this #NeverTrumper will, of course, support him. He’s the president, not merely ‘Trump’.”

This was re-tweeted by Scott Adams, the creator of the comic character Dilbert, who led by remarking, “Here’s how you know that the Syrian gas attack is not what it appears.”

3F064BC900000578-4388834-image-a-45_1491534382380
And (((it))) begins.

PATRIOTS, LOOK TO THE SOUTH AND THE DESTINY OF YOUR PEOPLE!

PATRIOTS, LOOK TO THE SOUTH AND THE DESTINY OF YOUR PEOPLE!

Once again the Nationalists are bound to respond to further provocation from the civic patriots. The appropriation of the description “nationalism”, by groups who, despite affecting patriotic airs, still have a wholly globalist-liberal outlook is unacceptable and demands a stern reply.

One of the key elements of our Australian Nationalism is the concept of independence from foreign or imperial powers; we reject absolutely the rule of the British monarchy, the resurgent imperialism of the Chinese, Americans and Russians or the soft Jihad of the Sunni Islamists.

Certain people need to get it into their heads that Australia is a young country of the global south, that we must look to ourselves, to the south, for inspiration in matters of national identity.

It is unacceptable for any Australian political operator to adopt the name Nationalist while his gaze is still directed to the north, while he still hangs on every word emanating from so-called “patriots” of the old world he can never be a true patriot to his own nation, which is of the new world.

Take, as an example, Donald Trump, a figure whose brand of populist showmanship is much in vogue among the yokels and numbskulls currently enamoured of civic patriotism.

The appropriation of the description “nationalism”, by groups who, despite affecting patriotic airs, still have a wholly globalist-liberal outlook is unacceptable and demands a stern reply.

We at UNA have previously written on the character both of the man and the Trump administration so our readers will not be shocked by our criticism of his agenda or leadership style.

Trump’s treatment of Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany during her recent state visit to the U.S.A is telling.

images (6)
The Donald’s hand will need amputating after touching her

Naturally Mrs Merkel’s politics are basically incompatible with our own ideals, however, the manner in which president Trump publicly humiliated her revealed him as the worst kind of imperialist thug; he displayed the manners of a tyrant dealing with an errant vassal. Having said, he should have nutted her, and then broken both her ankles for destroying Europe.

Trump should be no hero of patriots, no matter their national or racial background, in Trump is manifested the old-school colonial bully, the big country kicking the little country; his treatment of middle tier players, such as the Germans, bodes not well for little countries such as Australia.

We see also, in the Australian patriot circles the idolatry of foreign nationalist movements, the promotion of their activism and even attempts to transplant such groups down under; this is without the patriots having much of an idea about what these groups stand for.

We at UNA have previously written on the character both of the man and the Trump administration so our readers will not be shocked by our criticism of his agenda or leadership style.

UNA are, of course, interested in overseas nationalist movements but having had some interaction with various groups, particularly in Europe we are well placed to point out that many such organisations are extremely xenophobic; they are often hostile even toward sympathetic people if they are from a different European national background.

The language barrier is also a major hurdle, we cannot be sure where, say, Polish, Hungarian, or Russian nationalists stand on certain issues because they do not distribute their platforms in English, or that they simply do not use social media much at all.

Australian patriots seem to be dazzled by the large rallies held in some of the European capitals, the footage from Russia Today or Reuters looks impressive to those who see such displays as central to their cause; but who are the groups facilitating the marches? What is their reputation among the working classes, are they connected to the state or foreign governments and so forth?

We know for a fact that some European nationalists are tolerant of Shia Islam, or of certain other immigrant groups and native-born, non-European people with whom they share some common cause. That is, of course, their own business but rather than idolising foreign groups, or simply copying their aesthetics, the Australian patriots, as we say, need to look to the south for inspiration; the old-world groups may look flash in Youtube clips, but unless you speak their language fluently it is hard to know what you are imitating.

The other bone we at UNA have to pick with the civic patriots is this conflation of the foreign Islamist threat with current affairs in Australia; one example might be the elevation to folk devil status of the presently incarcerated troublemaker Anjem Choudhary.

The language barrier is also a major hurdle, we cannot be sure where, say, Polish, Hungarian, or Russian nationalists stand on certain issues because they do not distribute their platforms in English, or that they simply do not use social media much at all.

Choudhary is a U.K based Islamist loudmouth whose career was given a massive boost by the indulgence of mainstream media outlets. The BBC, Sky TV and others gave him a platform to spread his nonsense and he allowed the media to make him into a sort of Emmanuel Goldstein figure, against which all and sundry could rant and rave to blow off steam.

Australian Nationalists realise that the threat from political Islamism and the wider, nihilistic Jihadist worldview is real, that due to the nature of the religion this menace does spread through ostensibly “peaceful” dialogue by diaspora Muslims; however, Anjem Choudhary could never have had the profile he did in the U.K in our country.

Islamic march in Wootton Bassett cancelled
Anjem Choudhary’s likeness will soon appear on the five pound note

The Australian media would not allow a radical Islamist the airtime needed to become a folk devil, mainly, we suspect, because most editors and producers within the system are wary of promoting anything which could lead to a negative perception of Muslims.

Furthermore, Choudhary’s sophistry and the way he always just skirted the anti-terrorism laws by choosing his words carefully would not wash in this country; he would likely have been jailed a lot sooner here than he was in the U.K.

In the end, this idolatry of the European political movements and excessive focus on the social problems of the northern hemisphere is counterproductive.

Australian Nationalists realise that the threat from political Islamism and the wider, nihilistic Jihadist worldview is real, that due to the nature of the religion this menace does spread through ostensibly “peaceful” dialogue by diaspora Muslims; however, Anjem Choudhary could never have had the profile he did in the U.K in our country.

Looking longingly at groups, who by virtue of existing in far more populous, and for that matter densely populated countries can obviously put more feet on the street than Australian patriots leads only to a paralysing sense of ennui, which we have seen occur time and time again.

We urge all patriots to stop fumbling around, to cease the promotion to the Australian workers and marginalised people of foreign nationalist ideas, which you only half understand.
It is time to give up the support for the imperialist gangster Donald Trump and the hollow populism of Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen or Pauline Hanson.

White Australians, the only true Aussies, already have a brand of political nationalism which was laid out by our recent forefathers with the express intention of creating a truly progressive society, a system where White men and women could thrive and authentic social justice could be achieved.

The radicals of UNA and our friends in other nationalist groups will continue to promote the ideals of White Australia, the only form Australian nationalism can realistically take; as for the civic patriots, the time has come to make a choice.

Will they continue to play silly games, to cast their gaze back at the old world and avoid taking responsibility for their race and nation?

Or will they, sometime soon, look to the South, as all true nationalists do and begin to really care about the destiny of their own people, the White Australians?

whiteaustraliablackhistory
Fixed!

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

CONSERVATISM MUST DIE SO NATIONALISM CAN THRIVE

Enthusiastically waiting to see your enemy’s name appear in the obituary is, perhaps, something a Seinfeld episode should have tackled. But in absence of a half-hour sitcom mocking the ethics of such a scene comes our rather blunt desire to see in big, beautiful text the confirmation of conservatism’s departure from this world for good.

And it would be a mercy. The ideological vagrant of the modern era is in agony; a shadow of its former self that, in losing its mental faculties gave us the playbook for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation; in losing control of its bowels gave us the Party for Freedom to clean up; and in its jittered ramblings at night gave us the Patriot’s Poet to, well, laugh at. And why wouldn’t we laugh?

Who would have thought that acquiring oriental wives, rampant alcoholism and aimlessly flying the Star of David would in any way forms the face of modern conservatism – that safeguard of traditionalism? In a way that says more about the progressive left if this is the standard an acceptable alternative is held to, but nonetheless, we diagnose cancer as cancer when we see it.

As befitting of an extended life, however, conservatism is a broad grouping of ideas and practices that through the centuries melded into particular localities and built up its own organic character.

Before the Tories of the U.K. and the Republicans of the US succumbed to the dreariness of the modern world and became the stock-standard “centre-right” parties – which plague our present-day political institutions with equal parts boredom and treason – there was, if only from a historical standpoint, more character and life prevalent in the internal workings of the party and its duties within the country.

Such a thing can be admitted without the analysing of the good or ill that became of these entities. Suffice to say that compared to its modern manifestation there was something that, from our perspective, draws less ire than the present set against the historic backdrop of actual traditionalism holding ground.

Though conservatism is a term seldom used as the main grouping of its constituent factions, it is the college where civic nationalists, patriots and other assorted fruit loops graduated from even though they try to paint themselves in a different light. As the main tributary, it is conservatism, particularly in regards to combatting the progressive left over the prominent issue of Islam and the extreme end of identity politics, that guides the more hard-line, right-wing groups.

By our standards, they are in their formulation reactionary without the reaction. The scattering of conservatism in Australia is less a developed ideology but rather pub-banter that became a little too rowdy.

Their analysis of a world gone awry fuelled their febrile imagination. Islam, the left, and the agreement that the Liberals had betrayed the core tenets of conservatism amounted to a call to arms of an invigorated force to take to the streets. Through its brief public rallies and continued online presence, it revealed to be inept at forming any manner of lasting policy that actually worked for the best interests of this country. Its tenure among our acceptance went from weak to its now non-existent status.

So when will it die?

The ideas of man are invested with his own similarity, and an idea’s death follows a metaphysical equivalent of the biological process whereby the cessation of its vital functions leads to its absolute end.

The conservative has sealed his own fate because while he sees the nation as the vital organ he refuses, to his fatal detriment, to recognise the nation as the culmination of race and culture; not cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism and every perversion betwixt which he defends and fruitlessly tries to tame in order to avoid the baneful accusation of racism.

It is ironical that conservatives ultimately laud the version of our nation that was designed by their apparent enemies on the left. For what else is the presentation of the 21st century, multicultural Australia but the great fantasy of progressives as the first stage of removing the nation state and its racial identity?

Indeed its days are numbered but there are no doubts conservatism’s last moments will be messy, and there’s no telling what yet-to-be-revealed horrors will spew forth from its ideological orifices in a last attempt to show there’s life in it.

In these times it won’t be bothered to keep up the façade there’s any real difference between itself and the left, but will instead – as we have seen – go after the force that exposed and systemically broke down its lies: Nationalism. It is Nationalism which remains the inextinguishable light of reason.

Its pillars are unchanging. Its leaders – both here and abroad in friendly movements – are some of the most besmirched figures in existence and yet remain defiant to their ideals.

As the leaders of fake conservatism rot, the former adherents to such leeches will atone for their misguidance by embracing Nationalism, in fact, they will realise it was what they were after all along: a place to call home among their own people.

God willing, here is another nail in the coffin of the unconvinced as to why our expedient wish for the demise of conservatism and its inbred children is not morbid gossip, nor a critique for the sake of a critique, nor a selfish ruse on our behalf, but a necessity on which the termination of this foul parasite can allow our own ideals to truly flourish; where those ideals are that of the nationhood of Australia: an Australia that lives up to its historic creation as a nation built by the White man and for the sake of the White man.

oie_qPhWNDomOMRR

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

HOW THE LEFT AND RIGHT DO COMBAT IN THE CLICKTIVIST THEATRE

If anything distinguishes those civic patriots on the right from us radical nationalists it is by whom we are most attacked.

In the case of the civics, they are dogged by what we collectively term ‘the left’, while radical nationalists, who occupy a third position on the political spectrum cop the most grief from either the civic patriots or those in the conservative camp.

Bear in mind that ‘the left’ is as eclectic when it comes to issues, identity, philosophy, and strategy as ‘the right’.

The left wants the patriot movement dispersed while the conservatives aim to drive away radical nationalists so they can inhabit our political ground and remodel it in their crypto-globalist image.

This is a curious fact that allows us to discuss a couple of cases in point. Let us begin with what some of those from the civic patriot side of the quadrangle contend with in their present day ‘clicktivism’. This essay shall be in two parts on account of its length and the dedication required to each of its players.

1. THE PATRIOT ACTORS AND THE COMBATANTS OF THE LEFT

There is a particularly malicious element at play among those who oppose the growth of the patriots. They view patriots as more of a concern than the nationalist movement given its mainstream accessibility. On that side, the Bogan element is mocked by those who are their mirror image with one factor separating them by the slimmest degree: the perception of their engaging in ‘racism’. This is, despite the ambiguity on the question of race amplified in the patriot fold.

Nationalists define Australianness as being of White European stock, as opposed to Aborigines. Patriots, who misuse the term nationalism understanding it not, and often deliberately misappropriating it, are nebulous in their definition of an Australian. Many are in mixed-race relationships and as such loath the absolutism of nationalism which would exclude them on the grounds of breaching its inviolate precepts.

However, it is important in the propaganda war of those conflicting with the anti-Islam movement to lump each in the same basket and defame both they and nationalists, as ‘Nazis’; which is like calling all socialists Marxists or anarchists communists. The Nazi tag is meant to invoke images of state organised terror that would ensue if these groups are allowed to put down political roots in the community.

In the lexicon of those of the left, patriots are ‘potatriots’, a witticism intended to disdain that group as ‘potato heads’. This is a derisive term that was originally applied to skinheads. Since the advent of the Reclaim Australia movement, which is almost exclusively dramatized on Facebook, a number of pages and counter-identities have sprung up to oppose the patriot pages and the groups that employ them.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

Of course, the implication is that those who support “Moslems” have virtue, while those who view the global expansion of the Middle Eastern people and their dogmatic faith as dangerous are low in intellect, parochial, and bigoted.

But virtue is subjective in this day and age when that moral asset is destroying the west. Opposition to Islam is the kindling of the realisation something is amiss. Australians are being de-culturized while globalism is dialectically re-culturizing us with a religion that negates the very tenets underpinning the idea of universal equality at play. Both are at the mercy of the culturally vacuous reality of globalism.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

28EA4A6500000578-0-Homebush_Public_School_teacher_Alexander_Gollan_has_been_charged-m-22_1432157602113
Alex Gollan, the assistant school principal and anti-fascist anarchist who ran the ‘anti-bogan’ word press site and was arrested for bulk kiddie porn

This is visible nowhere better than on those oppositional pages, which we mentioned. This genre has no purpose other than to negate. They do not attempt to counter ‘potatriot’ messages by promoting their own positive counter-messages they literally take the aforementioned messages and desecrate them. There is no intellectual component at play in the deconstruction of the patriot message. Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is a sledgehammer used to beat down the message and the messenger so that the mission becomes personal.

A very telling post occurred on one such page with a prominent leftist troll, “Can’t we just kill them [patriots] all?” The admin replied, “No, because then we would be Nazis.”
Disregarding the fact that had that comment been made on a nationalist page it would have been hidden or removed, it is a very instructive insight into both the pathology of the poster and the counter movement. The duplicitous essence of it is summed up in the gag, “We’re starting a war for peace.”

The assumed virtue of the poster is instantly invalidated by the revelation of this tyrannical instinct.

In this ideological milieu, we butt heads with the protagonists on each side, and as we do we encounter the inherent hypocrisy of the players and their roles.

This is, however, but one example. Narrowed down to a central theme outside of ‘race’ is the implication that patriots will potentially auger in a dictatorial system reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, the calls for an authoritarian response to the patriots are constant on the sample page we have used for our study.

There are flippant, but often sincere calls for patriots to be pursued by ASIO, or to be charged with offences that — were they on the other foot — would be vehemently contested as breaches of civil liberties. So we come to the actors or combatants, and here we shall actually name some.

Smith
Pete Smith from Melbourne, heavily active on Facebook, is linked to Antifascist Action Sydney and other ‘anarchist’ pages

 

We have had correspondence with a few members of the patriot movement, putting aside our ideological differences, keen to highlight certain combatants and the disreputable methods they have employed to target one or other of the patriot actors.

One, in particular, has been defamed over and over by combatants using various Facebook identities and private messaging the patriot actor we shall call ‘Mark’.

Mark is being consistently vilified as a person of heinous substance and the nature of the slander has transcended any honourable intent. The attacks led to the hostilities emerging from a social media setting and into the corporeal world when the authorities were involved. Mark is not alone in these vicious online assaults but his example is notable.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

Much of the material we have viewed could be passed on to a criminal psychologist for analysis. Bearing in mind, when a point becomes exaggerated it is meaningless, the deviation from fact, or truth, to calumny in these dark communications is forged by iniquity.

So, who is behind these assaults on Mark’s character? Here, we merely repeat what he believes: John Linden Faulkner. But we also mention two others, Alex Gollan and David Hollis.

download (3)
Sydney’s Tayce Brown, shoplifter, hair stylist to the scabby, and a real skank

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This blog, as in others we’ve mentioned, is a flagrant vehicle to attack political opponents. Faulkner and Gollan are said to have co-administrated the site. Gollan, a former assistant school principal has since disappeared from ‘anti-fascist’ activities after being charged with child-sex offences.

Faulkner, who Mark and others believe to be behind a series of online profiles identifiable by their malevolence, has a criminal past to make anyone suddenly hosting him start eyeing the nearest exit. Faulkner was imprisoned for nine years for armed robberies in which women were his soft targets. He appealed his sentence as harsh, but in doing so was told it was actually lenient under the circumstances.

Faulkner and Gollan were linked via the Anti-Bogan Word Press blog and both utterly fail the character test, in fact, Faulkner makes most so-called Bogans appear convivial by comparison.

This week [originally posted on Facebook March 11] , it was revealed that David Albain Hollis, the man in the red ‘Truth’ cap who accompanied Sue Munro to the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court to spy on the Bendigo Three’s supporters — and who appeared in an opportunistic pic with John Safran taken on the day — went on a “stabbing spree” in 1991, knifing seven people one of whom later died.

Hollis served only 17 months in jail on the grounds of diminished responsibility as he was in the throes of a “psychotic episode”, although how that should mitigate anything so appalling we do not know.

There are other cases on that extreme left of the bench such as Tayce Brown of Antifascist Action Sydney whose conduct and lifestyle are such that she would be considered a habitual criminal outside of the political activist underworld.

The radical left is sure something — in a world inhabited by junkies, thugs, hookers, thieves, and ex-murderers does becoming ‘anti-racist’ mean atoning for dissolute, wasted lives. Does championing the ‘other’ allow them to graduate from their moral squalor merely on the basis they aren’t racist? We are not psychologists, and this is not a forensic examination, but the pattern cannot be ignored.

Bear in mind, Blair Cottrell was confronted with a video created inside the correctional system while he was doing time for a crime of passion. He never killed anyone, nor caused anyone harm. What of these three? All fall into the very worst categories, and all comport themselves on social media in a manner that delegitimizes any hypothetical argument they believe they have concerning right and wrong.

If Faulkner is behind this campaign of defamation and stalking against Mark, then it appears that he has in no way left behind his violent past, but merely justified it in the context of the political theatre. He has reinvented himself as the ‘good guy’ and deemed those patriot actors as ‘bad guys’ in a morality play where his own contaminated ethics are masked by a blindness born of criminal denial.

In our next article, we will turn the focus on the patriots, who are to nationalists what the leftists we have described here have been to them.

oie_DqksmJ43gaGr
Anarchist Psycho

 

THE RADICALISED SYDNEY HIGH SCHOOL PRINCIPAL AND THE BENDIGO THREE: HOW IT ALL ADDS UP TO REVERSE ASSIMILATION

THE RADICALISED SYDNEY HIGH SCHOOL PRINCIPAL AND THE BENDIGO THREE: HOW IT ALL ADDS UP TO REVERSE ASSIMILATION

As the Bendigo Three faces a Kangaroo court in Melbourne, in Sydney government high schools are validating every concern about the encroachment of Islamic doctrine that their beheading video stunt warned of.

At Western Sydney’s Punchbowl Boys High School the impact of Islam is reminiscent of a science fiction or horror film plot. The goings on at the government high school resemble one of those eerie films in which a traveller turns up in a strange town where everybody shares a dark secret. Either the townspeople are going off to worship Satan at midnight, or aliens have landed and replaced the population with replicas.

Punchbowl Boys High is one of 19 schools across Western Sydney that are, in government jargon, “at risk of radicalising Moslem students”. It would seem by the evidence that there is a disparity of imperative between the word “risk” and its fait accompli.

In the case of Punchbowl High, where outsider students were bullied into attending prayer sessions and adopting an appearance acceptable to Moslems that risk extended all the way up to the principal.

Chris Griffiths converted to Islam in 2014 while serving as the school’s principal. This is, of itself, intriguing. It’s probably not too far wrong as a guess to say that he was fiercely secular in his beliefs before his name was added to the principal’s door. Why the sudden flip to a medieval belief system that would no doubt generate a schism between himself, his family and his friends?

Here we can but speculate, had he been intimidated into converting? Had the students and their parents threatened him? Is Islam just so alluring in its teachings that once you are among large numbers of its adherents it becomes spiritually irresistible?

Was it even the pull of the religion at all? Perhaps there was such a high prevalence of Middle Easterners that as a White Australian outsider he felt compelled to assimilate to their religion by way of integrating as part of their community?

Anyone who has spent time at such schools can see evidence of the reverse assimilation effect. It is quite common to see young Australian girls who live in these areas going round with Middle Eastern boyfriends. This is the environment in which they have been raised and such couplings, although doubtless ill-fated and short-lasting due to the ethnic customs of the males, are normal. In fact, it is quite a disturbing thing to see. Are we essentially witnessing a kind of community Stockholm syndrome taking a grip?

Whatever the circumstance, he went native with a vengeance. Far from trying to prevent radicalisation, it seems that this White Australian convert was doing his best to expedite it.
In 2016, he was sacked by the Education Department after failing to implement de-radicalisation programs at his school. When his story recently broke, it was due to his having refused female teachers to be allowed at the graduation ceremony.

The new principal, Robert Patruno, was threatened with violence by the Moslem community when he undertook his new role.

But here we are, with two top Australian blokes and Neil Erikson, facing a possible six-month jail sentence for ostensibly warning about the perils of this type of thing which is by no means limited to the one high school mentioned.

Those scenes outside the Melbourne Magistrates Court were illuminating. A withering throng of tuck shop arms holding aloft placards deeming the B3 and their supporters to be Nazis, while they, who are aiding and abetting the spread of this dangerous doctrine, in which they chanted “Moslems are welcome, racists are not” assumed the moral high-ground. There is an alarming correlation between those Whites, and Chris Griffiths, as well as all the other White converts.

For it is not the Moslem community that can be seen to be pressuring us into allowing the spread of their draconian belief system, but our own people, which is quite an accomplishment when you think about it.

Nationalism argues that Islam alone is not the threat but those who have conditioned us to accept multiculturalism and multiracialism. We are now our own guards and executioners in the genocide of our nation.

 oie_vtWU30NrIAlU