As the Civic Patriots and Anti-fascists continue their tussle over the rights to the title of the most disgraceful example of the White race, the Nationalists, and we suspect the saner members of the traditional Left, are simply in awe of both sides capacity for self-abasement.

We have pointed out many times this duel between two factions of, let us be frank, White trash has its roots deep in the twilight world of social media banter, trolling and cyber-bullying.

To those of us who still live the bulk of our lives in the real world and are physically engaged in alternative politics this constant bickering and sniping between parties in cyberspace presents some infuriating problems.

We originally intended this article to be a guide on how to deal with narcissists who try to impose themselves upon organised political groups, however, as important an issue as that may be it is not the whole picture.

Narcissists, by which we mean those people with positively malignant personality disorders, as opposed to merely self-confident, impatient or pushy people, are mercifully rare, but even one such person can devastate an entire activist community.

These people have a need to cause drama, call it a hunger or a craving for chaos but, as the author and diagnosed narcissist Sam Vaknin observes, this behaviour is all geared to securing what he has termed “narcissistic supply”.

We have pointed out many times this duel between two factions of, let us be frank, White trash has its roots deep in the twilight world of social media banter, trolling and cyber-bullying.

In brief, the severe narcissist could best be portrayed as a black hole of self-loathing and self-doubt, these people are often described as having no emotional core and no actual personality just a series of masks they wear, depending on the temperament and interests of the people they are tapping for acknowledgement and validation.

These masks or personae may involve things like sexual seduction of others, grandiose plans to really shake up the world into which other people are drawn, or they may offer some insight into a hidden subculture, or obscure field of expertise in which the narcissist is the enlightened master or expert.

million flag
The Million Flag Patriot was almost bashed by Antifa at his first rally. His skits are so poorly done that most people still don’t get the joke

The severe narcissist is all things to all people, he is your best mate, your benefactor and teacher as long as he can be the centre of attention, play his mind games, tell his tall tales and big-note himself in order secure his narcissistic supply and stave off the howling emptiness at the core of his being.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, these narcissists are usually unable to hold themselves back from becoming abusive toward the people around them, this stems from the fact that they are basically parasites. With no emotional core they have no moral compass, so they will often steal, lie, swindle, blackmail and stand over the people in their social circle without even a hint of remorse.

It is when the narcissist is caught out in a lie or some other abusive behaviour that the real problems begin, when confronted they can be quite dangerous as they will fly into an uncontrollable rage, but once they have calmed down then the long, drawn-out, sadistic process of their retribution begins.

These masks or personae may involve things like sexual seduction of others, grandiose plans to really shake up the world into which other people are drawn, or they may offer some insight into a hidden subculture, or obscure field of expertise in which the narcissist is the enlightened master or expert.

When the narcissist is exposed as a liar or a thief, for example, this causes a deeply-felt psychic wound, there is no possibility of them apologising, taking their lumps and learning to be a better person in the future, because the narcissistic supply from that source is now tainted the source must be destroyed at all costs. You can see where we are going with this comrades.

Put this in the context of an activist group, or any political organisation for that matter; a prominent member of the group exhibits the symptoms of narcissism discussed above, he is discovered to be a liar, a thief, a gossip or a sexual predator and confronted by the other members of the collective.

His response will then be to turn on the group, maybe he will denounce its members, or ingratiate himself with opposing political groups and the security services, anything to secure a new source of narcissistic supply. He urgently needs people to listen to his stories, to value his expertise and expert knowledge of his former group and to help him exact revenge upon his former comrades.

This is why you sometimes see formerly well known political extremists re-inventing themselves as anti-racists or conservatives, as the case may be; the phenomenon of group-hopping where people constantly change alliances or even invent new political tendencies out of thin air may be a red flag for the activists the narcissist will approach in his search for a new host.

To go back to our main point, social media is obviously a haven for narcissists and anti-social personality types and unfortunately, these fora allow the narcissist to create potentially limitless little bubbles of chaos and insanity, which to some extent can be transferred out of cyberspace into the real world.

Put this in the context of an activist group, or any political organisation for that matter; a prominent member of the group exhibits the symptoms of narcissism discussed above, he is discovered to be a liar, a thief, a gossip or a sexual predator and confronted by the other members of the collective.

This willingness by some people to take internet drama or their online personae to the streets creates real headaches for the good, genuine activists trying to build effective political parties or clubs.

We encounter people who demand to be treated as comrades, or even dignitaries, if you like, on the basis of their blog posts or social media jottings; then there are those who expect to be able to roll up to a rally or gathering and use us as human shields against people they have offended or provoked online.

Unfortunately for them, out in the real world, where the Nationalists live there are rules and etiquette and laws of the land which must be obeyed in order to advance our cause.

Nationalists and the authentic Left know that threats and challenges made online are rarely carried out, however there is an unwritten agreement among all sensible activists regarding the escalation of hostilities generated in the political struggle into attacks on the person, vandalism of personal property or aggression against non-belligerents; spouses, children, parents and so on.

The internet heroes, narcissistic parasites, trolls and bullies make maintaining this “truce” difficult, every time some dotty Antifa or drug addled Zio-Patriot type blows a gasket starts throwing death threats around or commences stalking their opponents it increases the risk to real activists on both sides.

The danger lies in the difficulty some people have in distinguishing fact from fiction and fantasy from reality; coupled with the tunnel vision and paranoia generated in these flame wars and stalking incidents this disconnect has the potential to blow trivial social media comments out into cycles of violent payback in which innocent people will be harmed.

While our side would never shrink from confrontation and we are more than able to ensure our own safety in public, we really do not want to see the current vigorous back and forth between Nationalists and Globalists degenerate into European levels of political violence on the basis of hurt feelings and sore egos caused by cyber-bullying.

Unfortunately, there may well come a time when we are forced to fight to secure the existence of our people and a future for White children, but for our part, we will first employ all legal and morally defensible avenues in order to bring down the globalist hegemony.

Just do not expect us to go to war to secure your narcissistic supply or get involved in your unnecessary flame wars, we are on to the game players and headcases.

cyber-bullying-finalcolor.png
Everybody hurts sometime
Advertisements

COMMIES KVETCH WHILE NATIONALISTS NOSH

COMMIES KVETCH WHILE NATIONALISTS NOSH

Well, comrades, the Bendigo Three have made their initial appearance in the Melbourne magistrates court on trumped up, political charges relating to the now infamous mock ISIS beheading video shot in 2015.

The Nationalist contingent arrived just as the doors to the court building were opening, once we had negotiated the police cordon outside and gone through the rigmarole of the security screening we repaired to the foyer coffee shop, to wait.

See that is the main feature of the Victorian justice system, the glacial pace at which it moves; in the end, the hour and some minutes we waited were well spent as we mingled with the supporters of the three accused men.

Even though there is a serious divide between Nationalists and Civic Patriot groups the mood was upbeat and the conversations between members of the different groups were civil, convivial even.

patriot woman
A lone patriot protester who should have been INSIDE the court rather than confronting the few dozen protesters outside

Two feral spies from the No Room For Racism grouplet were skulking about early in the piece, attempting to take video on their phones but were quickly spotted, confronted by some Nationalist women and sent packing.

Things were going swimmingly on our side as the stereotypical chanting of the anti-racists could be heard wafting in from the street like a bad smell; that was until the arrival of “Antifa Neil” Erikson and his new bum-chum “Serbian George” Jameson, who were inexplicably dressed in white Haji style robes and carrying Muslim prayer mats.

Contrast this with the Nationalist and Patriot supporters who opted either for suits and ties or smart casual wear out of respect for the defendants, the court and each other.

This pathetic duo of impostors and their minuscule band of hangers-on were a sad sight to behold as they stood to one side of the foyer, ostracised by their former comrades and guarded by a detachment of riot police.

Eventually the defendants were called to the chamber but the demand for seating in the courtroom outstripped the limited supply, as a result a sizeable contingent of Bendigo Three supporters had to remain in the foyer while the hearing took place, the wait was quite short and the news was relayed back that the case had been adjourned until late May.

The court was soon empty and the foyer once again full of Nationalists, Patriots and police officers; keen to get on with their operations the senior officers and public order squads marshalled us into their cordon and gave us their instructions on how we were to exit the building.

Walking quickly, as directed by the coppers we were marched out into the blazing morning sunlight to be greeted by the usual screaming mob of retired teachers, spotty student types, meth-head looking spastics and superannuated union representatives.

Some thirty in number this foolish assembly of movement has-beens and their juvenile acolytes might easily have been mistaken for a long lost element of some 1970’s era Vietnam war moratorium march.

As these “Anti-Racists” struggled weakly against the police cordon we were struck by the absence of one notable contingent: the Antifa or Black Bloc hooligans.

We suspect that there has been a split between the Anarchists and the union-backed rent-a-crowd which is run out of Trades Hall, this is the third rally in succession at which there has been no Antifa presence to speak of.

In any event, the Anarchists would have been up against it had they tried to harass or attack the Patriots and Nationalists, many of our people expressed disappointment at the lack of argy-bargy and the tiny turnout of leftists.

As we walked down Lonsdale street and the Bendigo Three were mobbed by the media, one smart-alec lefty decided he would try to video some of the Patriots, only to have his phone slapped out of his hand by a tiny blonde haired woman and almost copping a punch in the head from her boyfriend.

After Erikson, Jameson and their cast of morons had beaten a hasty retreat in a Taxi the media circus moved into Healey’s lane, behind the court complex and as the police contingent departed we stood for some time talking and enjoying the cool, shaded cafe area.

Soon it was time to bid goodbye to the Patriots and folk who’d stood beside Chris Shortis and Blair Cottrell; the Nationalists sought out a pub, enjoyed a counter lunch and spent the rest of our time together socialising and enjoying the afternoon.

We look forward to the next hearing in May, which, despite the ordeal for the defendants will no doubt be another good opportunity to get together with our comrades; we wonder how the state will proceed with its case and we are curious to see if the Left can still muster a credible counter rally in Melbourne?

Screen Shot 2017-03-09 at 3.37.05 pm
Chris Shortis was the embodiment or radical nationalism on the day

MULTICULTURALISM WITHIN MULTICULTURALISM

MULTICULTURALISM WITHIN MULTICULTURALISM

Are we one, or many? Pertaining to Australia’s European-descended populace we feel it’s high time to inquire a tidbit that invariably rises out of our nation’s demographics; for as it can be seen, our European population is so diverse it could almost be said we are hosting multiculturalism within multiculturalism.

The initial disclaimer here is that pinpointing entire groups is an invalid practice, and more germane than tiresomely listing statistics is instead the shared attributes dotted throughout certain elements of the diasporic communities. Those attributes stem principally from a conflict of interest between the country of origin and country of residence, whereby we note the natural difficulty of serving two masters at the same time. It is precisely from this that it’s noted true loyalty often lies with the country of origin.

We can appreciate that for certain established people the past was full of prejudice and hostility to the point of only strengthening those in-group structures, perhaps of most renown being the treatment of the Greeks and Italians.

We can also appreciate that what is in the blood is what is in the blood; it would be blasphemy as Nationalists to suggest Greeks, Italians, Germans etc., ought to automatically forget their heritage, but at the same time is it not natural to presume the same enthusiasm and attachment is given to the host nation where a good life has been bestowed?

It is true that our frequent use of ‘White Australia’ relates to European mankind in general, but where does this one neurone of thought lead to? How many layers of nuance does ‘European’ comprise in this case? What properties of it correlate to a nativist loyalty as opposed to a mere citizen stripped of higher engagement to the land – an engagement often found abroad in the parent culture? What is the bridge between ‘White’ and ‘Australia’?

Does the manner of arrival and circumstances thereto factor into the inauguration of Australianness? These are awkward questions observable from the interactions of those around us; questions that were always inevitable, perhaps, given that the line between White and non-White migration has been blurred significantly under the revised multicultural mythology as to whether one is really distinct from the other when contrasted with the cultural antagonist that is the traditional Anglo-Celtic stock.

We lament that the view of Australia is too often associated as a place where a good life is to be found and every other culture under the sun can expand unanswerably. Our limitless commentary of the non-White exploiting this feature must now include certain members of our fellow kin to the extent Australia is to them nothing more than a convenient home base where the dreariness of day-to-day life is carried out in relative comfort, yet where true loyalty and zeal for life lies overseas.

Perhaps even more irksome to us Nationalists is the ease to which these people will side with antagonistic narratives that condemn the Anglo as butchers and thieves in the building of this nation which is so enjoyable to all and sundry today.

Under these circumstances what is Australia but the short end of the stick in the same parasitic relationship we usually attribute to multiculturalism in general? We hope that the Europeans in our own ranks who are, to put it frankly, the complete opposite of the sort of people here discussed can see our point with a degree of sympathy.

Our rallying call to alleviate this nuisance is twofold: those Europeans amongst us with the fires of iniquity burning in their ancestral hearts must put aside past differences as greater threats are recognised, likewise those amongst us with the fires of passion to distant lands must contain the flames lest it becomes a crazed force incompatible with the traditional order of things.

It is with a phlegmatic temperament that all parties should seek to form new bonds built not around lofty ideals nor exaggerated ills, but on the very concrete mission of advancing Australian Nationalism into a new era. In this era, there are no ‘wogs’ or ‘rednecks’, but Australians of wholly European extraction aiming to keep their country as such. A jovial poet might here be inclined to pen this as a great stride towards ‘White solidarity’, but in reality, it is – and rather unimpressively at that – sorting out our own collective community; garden work if you will, a spring cleaning of the national psyche.

The leaders of the diaspora are tasked with the responsibility of inciting this new wave of thought, especially to the youth and extinguishing the dross and petty complaints that spread disunity amongst an otherwise fraternal people.

If Nationalists are opposed to multiculturalism then they must also be opposed to the multiculturalism within multiculturalism, which refers explicitly to our own extended racial group and an almost impenetrable in-group that selfishly propagates its own existence at the expense of the wider nation and wider brotherhood.

download (10)
When in doubt for a pertinent image to accompany a blog, turn to The Simpsons

 

NICK FOLKES — THE IDIOT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING

NICK FOLKES — THE IDIOT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING

Nick Folkes is lamenting SBS bias after appearing in their race-baiting virtue-porn reality series The Truth About Racism.

Speaking to the Daily Mail, Folkes has said, “It’s completely biased. SBS is only interested in showing the token White guy as a bigot and racist.”

In the program, which is one of a genre paid for by the Australian taxpayer and aimed at demonising us as low-intellect bigots blocking social progress, Nick faces off with serial Sudanese Moslem Yassmin Abdel-Magied. During a “scientific test” centred on empathic reactions to pain, he is accused of exhibiting less empathy for people of colour. They obviously don’t know about his wife and children who are all yellow; although by all accounts he hasn’t much compassion for them either, so maybe that’s not such a great example. Moreover, the test is supposed to measure brainwaves so we’d be astounded if Nick’s monitor registered any activity at all.

This “test” is based on the Milgram Experiments of 1961, in which participants were encouraged to administer electric shocks to a subject to evaluate their willingness to accede to authority regardless of the ethical component. Stanley Milgram, who concocted the research, was a Jew and the tests were inspired by the trial of Adolf Eichmann occurring in Jerusalem around the same time.

Meanwhile, Abdel-Magied is the latest in a never-ending stream of ‘others’ who are granted societal privilege in Australia so they can highlight how unjust we are. They occupy a place in media as semi-political figures standing sentries for multi-racialism and even when they fuck up like Yassmin did after she was caught on social media asking for pointers on Sharia Law from a radical Islamic, they roll out of it spotless.

This is the narrative, and this is the purpose of the show. Only masochists and anti-White voyeurs would tune into that piffle. As we have said, they have reduced the ‘Aussie racist’ stereotype to household entertainment: an idiot who can be caught on spy camera and used for the quasi-religious catharsis of the virtue signalling elites.

But this is SECOND TIME that Folkes has thrown himself at the feet of the anti-White public broadcaster in his unquenchable thirst for notoriety. He made a nana out himself in 2014 when he appeared in Living with the Enemy. Folkes should have learned his lesson by then, but then Nick has no shame; he would pull down his pants and play with his willy if there was an audience.

Folkes had, prior to the televising of this dreck, engaged in his usual game of signalling ambiguously on sentiments of White pride. We happen to know that he has questioned privately Australia First Party’s policy on Whiteness, which he regards as extreme.

As such, it is unsurprising when he makes comments like, “I believe Australia is a tolerant country, and most people don’t make opinions based on skin colour.”

Nationalists understand there should be very few occasions when we agree to speak to the mainstream media. There is no question of them NOT skewing their reportage, which is why they are so eager to buttonhole us.

But Nick’s type isn’t about what is sensible any more than he represents patriotic activists around Australia. Folkes is, if anything, a showman. He is in it strictly for the publicity and the less easily classifiable rewards that come from being an infamous person.

Folkes complaining about being duped by SBS is like complaining about contracting salmonella after eating at an Asian chew ’n’ spew.

10686607_366509190185792_6825946808527311876_n
Is Nick a buffoon? We will let you make up your own mind

 

GENERATION ME AND THE ABANDONED COLLECTIVE

GENERATION ME AND THE ABANDONED COLLECTIVE

We live in strange times, comrades. Whither Collectivism? This was the original working title for the following piece, we felt however that this approach lacked a little something, for we know where the spirit of Australian collectivism rests, it is with the Nationalists.

True, the Nationalists have always held to the ideals of collective action by and on behalf of the true Australians; it is something we have never abandoned, nor even altered these long decades.

The stunning reverses in this area by the Left, however, bear some commentary since they have the ear of politicians at every level of government and their mean ideals are front and centre in mainstream politics.

At every level, the Left have abandoned the ideal and practices of collective action in favour of an open-ended and particularly selfish brand of Liberalism.

In truth the Left are as wholly occupied by individualism and the propagation of the globalist consumer culture as the most rapacious of the capitalists; the Left also take this to the extremes of narcissism and anarchy more typically associated with bandit capitalists and their underlings.

At every turn we see some half-baked Leftist ideological concoction or mash-up of ideas being expressed as a stream of their identity politics; what is more, these constructs all relate to the personal realm as adherents to this way of seeing the world primarily self-identify themselves, through a checklist of recently invented identitarian categories.

The stunning reverses in this area by the Left, however, bear some commentary since they have the ear of politicians at every level of government and their mean ideals are front and centre in mainstream politics.

There is a tendency among the less well-informed activists of the “far-right” to label the Left of 2017 as Marxists, or Communists; nothing could be further from the truth and, in fact, all that they currently stand for goes against the principles laid down by Marx, Engels, Lenin and their successors.

We would not bore our readers with a digression into the how and why of this abandonment of Marxist-Leninist thought, suffice it to say that the modern Leftist barely knows the names of the old socialists, much less has any real appreciation of their work.

download (9)
The collectivist spirit of the Aussie worker as seen in the film Sunday Too Far Away (1975)

We can, however, provide a few illustrations of the fallacies inherent in modern Leftist and progressive thinking, where the narrow individualist core of their worldview is cynically presented to the working class as a broad consensus.

Most notable among these fraught patterns of thought are the prevailing Leftist attitudes toward Islam and Muslims, for it is here we see, in graphic detail, the progressive mind in action.

Leftists generalise about Muslims all the time, they encourage people to see the followers of Muhammad as a collective, or a class of people in society.

We would not bore our readers with a digression into the how and why of this abandonment of Marxist-Leninist thought, suffice it to say that the modern Leftist barely knows the names of the old socialists, much less has any real appreciation of their work.

This is blatantly false, Muslims are probably the most divided, atomised, faith group in the world; sectarian tensions are rife in their social groupings, as are ethnic, tribal and political rivalries.

When this is pointed out to the Leftist, however, he will begin to extoll the benefits of diversity within collectives, such as his imagined Muslim “community”; when he is pressed further and challenged with the evidence that this diversity is actually an impediment in many respects he falls back to reliance on individualism.

Yes, comrades, here we see the Leftist’s core belief in the individual as the most important unit of society as he name-drops and puts upon a pedestal the most individually accomplished and successful of the Muslims in Australia.

The fêted individual Muslim is then presented as the standard, the benchmark or the lens through which all well-meaning and virtuous people are said to regard Muslims and their religion.

Only the individual truly matters to the modern Left. Our next example is taken from the headlines of recent weeks: the so-called homeless crisis in our capital cities.

Yes, comrades, here we see the Leftist’s core belief in the individual as the most important unit of society as he name-drops and puts upon a pedestal the most individually accomplished and successful of the Muslims in Australia.

Once again the Left, in their propaganda, collectivise vagrants, itinerants and rough sleepers but when the idea arises of these urchins being an actual class of people, in a class system, who are fairly judged as troublesome by most right-thinking people the reversion to reliance on exceptions to the rule, individual cases and personal feelings on the matter occurs.

This exhortation to put oneself in the shoes of another “less fortunate” individual, to identify and sympathise with this cherry-picked homeless person who claims to have fallen from the middle classes to penury and disgrace further reinforces the conviction that the subjective, personal viewpoint is the core principle of the Left.

So too, their discussion of immigration is infected by this tendency to fantasise about the lives of others, to attempt to relate to them person to person rather than as members of distinctly different, often hostile out-groups.

Television programmes such as “Go Back To Where You Came From” highlight this tactic, this subjective view of the, often negative, individual experiences of migrants as the determining factor in judging the utility of immigration policy.

Indeed the whole progressive, open borders, agenda is predicated on fair treatment, in their eyes, of individual migrants and asylum seekers as opposed to the fair treatment of very real and longstanding collectives, namely the nations of the world.

So too, their discussion of immigration is infected by this tendency to fantasise about the lives of others, to attempt to relate to them person to person rather than as members of distinctly different, often hostile out-groups.

Progressives wilfully ignore ideas such as showing responsibility to their own national collective, or the migrants’ responsibilities to their home country; the belief is that the individual has the right to live anywhere they choose regardless of any other considerations.

In the end, though, the Left are failing precisely because the White Australian majority can no longer deny themselves the collectivism of the national group on the promise of the future benefits of diversity.

Our people are looking for more than the crass, nihilistic individualism of the globalist capitalist castes and their Leftist imitators: we want our trade unions and political parties to faithfully represent us, we want the security and social justice that collective national action has been proven to bring about in this country.

The Nationalists would see this return to collectivism realised, we would re-affirm the trade union and the fighting workers’ party as the primary instruments of White working class political struggle and take all necessary measures to protect the national collective and commonwealth.

Our forebears believed as we do now, that once Australia was transformed into a place where White men and women could thrive, then true social justice and progress could be achieved.

The return to the forms of collectivism which served us so well in the past is the only way forward in the present age of decaying standards of living, uncertain prospects for our children and anti-worker hostility from the elites.

We call upon all true radicals, those disillusioned by crass individualism to join us, to take the fighting spirit and radical politics of the “hungry years” of the 19th century for their inspiration as together we strive to re-animate Australian national consciousness.

Borg-Drohnen_auf_der_Enterprise
The collectivist ideal is powerful in the Borg. Well. It’s true

THE TORY HEADS OF THE CIVIC PATRIOT BEAST

THE TORY HEADS OF THE CIVIC PATRIOT BEAST

Nationalists have for years regarded the ideological opposition that is typically lumped together and called “the Left” as irrelevant compared to the threat of civic patriotism. None typifies this menace to genuine nationalism more so than Pauline Hanson and those who bang the drum for her.

The danger of civic patriotism is far worse because it is false in its representation and preys upon the politically naïve: those who would be nationalists.

Pauline Hanson needs but a handful of nebulous statements and promises such as “I will ban the burka” to channel the sincere energy of otherwise patriotic Australians into support for a system that exists in antipathy to them.

8135976-3x2-700x467
Pauline Hanson with a token Asian candidate she dumped from One Nation for writing mean things about homos

We are, of course, being polite by describing her ardent support base — other than the cynical conservatives who fully understand her measure — in such terms. In fact, her grassroots supporters are a thorn in many a political craw because they are, putting it bluntly, stupid. There is no cure for stupid as much as there is no law against it. But the painful truth is that these people just get in the way when they try to be serious.

Once upon a time, this great ‘lumpenproletariat’ would have, by dint of class and location, voted Labor. These are the battlers, whose interests are not represented by men in blue ties who broker deals with the big end of town to ensure handsome wedge for their party coffers and sinecures when they leave politics.

The prejudices of the aspirants and middle-class who forced the conservatives into a coalition stood as an anathema to the Aussie worker. One has to grasp that essential quality of greed as the motivating factor behind conservatism to fully comprehend the holistic nature of conservatism in all its inherent meanness.

The danger of civic patriotism is far worse because it is false in its representation and preys upon the politically naïve: those who would be nationalists.

It was the Howard government that learned the political traction that was to be gained from deceiving the working class. The party that introduced ‘work choices’, the first serious assault on workers’ pay and conditions, hypnotised the battlers with flag waving and patriotic noises.

It was usual to find workers, who never appreciated just how precarious their jobs actually were, joining in on kicking the unemployed and the disenfranchised. In essence, with diabolical mastery, Howard changed his opponents into supporters but better yet he turned them into class bigots.

Australian PM John Howard Visits Ireland
The man who conned the workers into supporting their political nemesis 

Hanson was a product of this age, and originally, a member of that very Liberal Party. But she went a step further, with shrewd guidance from men behind the scenes, and tapped a vein that even the conservatives weren’t prepared to touch. It was not until post 9/11, and some time after that yet, such sentiments as Hanson had expressed regarding the Asianisation of Australia could be channelled into an anti-Islam fervour and eventually evolve into what we now term civic patriotism.

But the core essence of that civic patriotism was always a conservative construct with a means to an end for the conservatives and nothing has changed. Tony Abbott once used a slush-fund to shut down Pauline Hanson for encroaching on his party’s turf. But he now requires her to fend off the small l Liberals who usurped him and took over the Liberal Party.

Nationalists have long spoken of Liberal Party satellites, and it has to be stressed, we refer to the far-right of the Liberal Party. Now, for those with the faculty to comprehend our message, it is as clear as day. The civic patriots would have been unnecessary if Tony Abbott had retained control of the Liberal Party.

It was usual to find workers, who never appreciated just how precarious their jobs actually were, joining in on kicking the unemployed and the disenfranchised. In essence, with diabolical mastery, Howard changed his opponents into supporters but better yet he turned them into class bigots.

Those ‘patriots’ whose angst about Moslems could not be placated by Tony, would have had agents in their particular ‘movement’ to either co-opt them into the conservative fold or discredit them as dingbats and extremists.

A sober examination of that civic patriot spread can see quite clearly what is happening: that One Nation and all those smaller micro parties beneath her are being used to bolster Tony Abbott and his hard right. If Turnbull had been dumped at the last election and Tony Abbott once more floated as the leader of the coalition then Hanson’s returns at the ballot box would have been far less significant.

6776084-3x2-940x627
Malcolm Turnbull indicating exactly how much he can be trusted not to cuck

One thing that is no point of contention between Turnbull’s side and those on Abbott’s is the support for policies such as the cut to company tax. This is pure conservative policy no matter what stroke of shade.

It has just been revealed that companies have made a huge surge in profit this quarter as wages continue to decline. Workers in retail, hospitality and other service industries have lost their Sunday penalty rates, which in most cases, was all that kept them afloat. The lie behind it goes something like, when companies are doing well, wages will rise. This, of course, is balderdash. All that will happen next is that companies will argue that tax cuts if approved, did not go far enough.

But while the fat cats pay little to no tax, unemployed Aussies are being put through the social equivalent of the Tower of London with Centrelink running a shakedown scam that has caused at least one suicide.

One thing that is no point of contention between Turnbull’s side and those on Abbott’s is the support for policies such as the cut to company tax. This is pure conservative policy no matter what stroke of shade.

This is conservatism. If we go way back to when Howard hoodwinked the workers into keeping him in power so long we have to ask, well, what was it that they really wanted? What was it they believed they would get through trading their traditional Labor ties for those with the mean-spirited conservatives?

It was something between a sense of national identity and personal security. They believed that the conservatives would provide them with jobs, and hoist an umbrella over this nation to safeguard values they considered were synonymous with conservatism.

Meanwhile, Hanson sheds potential candidates like companies discard workers. Those, such as the former WA candidate, who wholly object to Hanson’s preferencing the Libs have failed to deduce the state of play. Much of her supporters won’t understand or even care but will attack those, like us, who continue to criticise her. In fact, they will be dumbfounded as to why we do.

download
An artist’s rendition of a conservative’s soul (if he had one)

THE AUSSIE RACIST IS THE LATEST IN WATER COOLER ENTERTAINMENT

THE AUSSIE RACIST IS THE LATEST IN WATER COOLER ENTERTAINMENT

Punters were quick to highlight the dubious nature of the latest in a slew of SBS programs dealing exclusively with alleged White racism in Australia.

Is Australia Racist had only just aired when many took to social media either to ask WTF or to revel in the quasi-religious fervour of virtue signalling coming from anti-Whites.

Ray Martin is an excellent choice for host given how terribly Australia has treated him during his life. Halfway through his career Ray found out that he had a great, great, great grandmother fifty times removed on one parent’s side who was an indigenous person and right away it all fell into place: the crude Abo jokes tittered behind his back; the refusal of bottle shop service on Saturday nights; and the way the maître d’ always susses him out as if he’s about to bolt on the bill in any restaurant he eats at. Because let’s face it, Ray is as black as a barrel of crude oil.

download-7
Ray Martin is one-billionth Aboriginal and very sensitive about his cultural roots

Given his powerful credentials as a victim of racism who was held back from earning his first two million because of rampant prejudice in this country, as we say, Ray is the ideal choice to host a show that has about as much integrity as a bookmaker drumming up business at a Gambling Anonymous meeting.

See, folks, SBS is a business and people tend to forget this because they have some duped notion spawned by a halfwit myth of an antiquated thing called ‘journalistic integrity’ which old-timers go on about. Journalists would be the first to laugh at hearing this oxymoron, but none more so than the pot-smoking hipsters over at SBS. They know it’s all about ratings because simply being a government broadcaster is no guarantee of broadcast survival in an industry where economic sustainability trumps any unprofitable ethical and ideological considerations.

Which is why, when even a study by Flinders University debunked this myth of Australian ‘Islamophobia’, SBS will not let go of the racism cudgel because it is a guaranteed ratings’ winner.

Given his powerful credentials as a victim of racism who was held back from earning his first two million because of rampant prejudice in this country, as we say, Ray is the ideal choice to host a show that has about as much integrity as a bookmaker drumming up business at a Gambling Anonymous meeting.

As the abovementioned report revealed, when you stop skewing the survey questions to find the answers that you want (say, that most Aussies are racist), you get a more realistic picture of where we are at.

The question of ‘racism’ is something you have a position upon reliant on your interest in it. Tim Soutphommasane, the Race Discrimination Commissioner has to justify his $300K in taxpayer’ spoils each year. Given he wasn’t born here and arrived with ‘issues’ related to his background growing up in France to Laotian parents, you get an idea why it’s in his best interest to find racism everywhere he looks.

download-8
Our writers can’t get book contracts, but this Sudanese Moslem blow-in can get anything she wants just ‘cos she is a Google

Likewise, Yassmin Abdel-Magied is a 25-year-old Sudanese Moslem “engineer” and “author” whose entire existence is dependent upon her race, ethnicity, and religion. It is ironic that given most White Australians will never receive the opportunities she has based on the same criteria. We could pull out example after example, but you get the rub.

Now, what about us? The concept that a nationalist, who is chasing a racialist end, is not necessarily racist in act, word, or deed is an idea that would totally send the virtue signallers spinning on their pointy heads. But for bona fide nationalists, this is true. To want your own self-determination as a race doesn’t mean you spend your time 24/7 hating on every non-White that you pass by on the street. It doesn’t mean you load on hate when you buy a magazine from an Asian newsagent. You might even be polite in the course of your inevitable interactions.

The nationalist understands that multiracialism, and the presence of so many non-Whites, is a symptom, not the cause.

The nationalist understands that multiracialism, and the presence of so many non-Whites, is a symptom, not the cause.

But this is digression that has no place in a single-stream discussion about identity because the Aussie racist is entertainment pure and simple. He, or she, sells advertising and guarantees clicks and views.

It is all the better when some irate Australian reacting to the relentless tide of multicultural propaganda aimed at assimilating him or her reacts with a blown valve in a social situation and gets caught on a camera. This is the latest empirical evidence of a country so far to the right of Josef Mengele.

SBS will continue to pump out this garbage as surely as Coca-Cola will keep producing bottled cola and McDonald’s will serve up burgers: because it is an earner. Selah.

main-qimg-90079925f78ef2f013df2c1f474c55d3-c
Fuck it, let’s just break out the jackboots!