ON THE RELATIVE UTILITIES OF ISLAMISM AND NEO-NAZISM IN A NATIONAL MOVEMENT FOR DEMOCRATIC CHANGE

ON THE RELATIVE UTILITIES OF ISLAMISM AND NEO-NAZISM IN A NATIONAL MOVEMENT FOR DEMOCRATIC CHANGE

Never fear comrades, that overly wordy headline is mere meme fodder for our opposition; granted, depending on whether the critic is a dumb right-winger or a dumb Antifa, our enemies naturally assume that we are either closet Nazis or Jihadis-in-waiting anyway.

What we intend to explore in this article are the relative theoretical merits of these two ideals and the tactical advantages, if any, which would accrue to a Nationalist movement should it decide to take either of the two courses.

Due to a lack of imagination on the part of the enemies of White Australia we, the Nationalists, are frequently tarred with the epithet “Nazi” in an effort to shame and silence any dissent against the globalist liberal world order.

goughwhitlam
Gough Whitlam was Australia’s first true Nazi

This tactic would probably have worked in, say, the 1970’s when the people who actually had a stake in the Fascist-Anti Fascist struggle were still active participants in our society, as opposed to drooling dementia patients.

The trouble is that in 2017 there are so few people left who could legitimately take offence at Neo-Nazi posturing, based on prior real life experiences, that the whole Antifa psychodrama requires a predilection to daydreaming and delusions of grandeur.

On whose behalf are the latter day Anti-Fascists mobilising? The dead? Those yet unborn but theoretically prone to victimisation? Imaginary victims of imaginary regimes?

Due to a lack of imagination on the part of the enemies of White Australia we, the Nationalists, are frequently tarred with the epithet “Nazi” in an effort to shame and silence any dissent against the globalist liberal world order.

More to the point, if Neo-Nazism was a viable tool in our national struggle why would us Nationalists have any qualms about donning our brown shirts and jodhpurs and simply getting on with the job?

Nazism, or Fascism, are ideas so at odds with the White Australian character and temperament that it is surely no mystery as to why our forebears so enthusiastically resisted their original proponents in the 1930’s and 1940’s.

491014a04e9929fe0590ff5f91d83a05
Paul Hogan in his Nazi phase

Could anyone seriously contemplate the rise of a Hitlerian-Aussie strongman in the Australia of 2017?

The closest we have ever come to that type of personality cult was, we suppose, the Whitlam years; yet old Gough was seen publicly, even by his fans, as the pompous, impatient and imperious individual that he surely was and he was mercilessly lampooned as a result.

Australians hate tall poppies, we cannot stand politicians or public figures who will not exhibit the traditional humility and conservatism expected of adults in our society; a Hitler-like figure could never survive in a nation where merely buying a new car can lead to assumptions by the neighbours that one is “too big for his boots”.

Nazism, or Fascism, are ideas so at odds with the White Australian character and temperament that it is surely no mystery as to why our forebears so enthusiastically resisted their original proponents in the 1930’s and 1940’s.

In recent years several people have attempted this type of fuhrerprinzip approach to Aussie street movements and ended up as laughingstocks; true, they lacked the intelligence and life experience of an old school Nazi, like Hitler, but they also lacked his personal modesty and self-effacing manner.

Neo-Nazism, to the Nationalists then, is worse than useless because, even stylistically, it is an affront to the national character of our people; among a nation wary of show ponies and wise to the ways of narcissistic blowhards and con artists it is simply a non-starter.

r811816_7259142
Arthur C. Smith, leader of the Australian Nazi Party circa 1964

Taken in that light the accusations of Nazism thrown our way are simply slurs intended to imply that Nationalists are stupid; the implication being that we are intent on employing tactics which could never work. However, we are clearly not stupid people though and having limited resources with which to run our campaigns we simply do not have the luxury of using dumb tactics which could never bear fruit for an Australian political movement.

The Left and Right wingers, by contrast, can get away with peddling nonsense and play-acting at anachronistic, 20th century politics due to the largesse of their benefactors; that is to say it’s pretty easy to pretend to be a Patriot, Trotskyite or Anarchist when you have the resources of the Jewish community, a trade union or a university to back you up.

Radical, Jihadist Islam, on the other hand, is a somewhat trickier subject; not least because it is a current — one might say eternal — stream of political thought and action bubbling away beneath the surface of world affairs, whereas Nazism has been dead for nigh on four generations.

Neo-Nazism, to the Nationalists then, is worse than useless because, even stylistically, it is an affront to the national character of our people; among a nation wary of show ponies and wise to the ways of narcissistic blowhards and con artists it is simply a non-starter.

Indeed White Nationalism in the broad sense, over the past fifteen years, has been fending off interlopers who, seduced by the apparent machismo and dash of the Jihadist gangs and dazzled by their open anti-Semitism, seek to create some detente between, or worse, fusion, of Islamic radicalism and pan-Europeanism.

These pernicious orientalists seem to be convinced that, in the hands of Whites at least, Islam could become something other than it has always been; that is to say that in the right hands there could be a real “golden age” where capitalism is overthrown, the Jews are servile dhimmis, the women kept barefoot and pregnant and all the better aspects of Sharia provide peace and plenty for all.

naziscan1
Before the Interwebs

Apart from the fact that these serial pests are almost always fruitcakes, stereotypical “racist” morons, bitter misogynists, or all three, there is the intractable problem of the Arab supremacism at the heart of Islam.

All roads lead to Mecca, all decisions on the future of the Ummah are taken by Islamic jurists in countries like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Egypt and Morocco; Islam is a religion centred on the orient, all of its traditions stem from the lands to the south and east of the Bosphorus.

Nationalist radicals understand the attraction of this way of thinking, in theory a mass conversion of Nationalists to Islam and the adoption of Jihadism would appear to be a path of least resistance; one could theoretically speak one’s mind and enjoy the protection of Australia’s de facto blasphemy laws, section 18c and the state human rights regimes.

Apart from the fact that these serial pests are almost always fruitcakes, stereotypical “racist” morons, bitter misogynists, or all three, there is the intractable problem of the Arab supremacism at the heart of Islam.

Presumably once a certain critical mass had been reached funds would begin flowing toward this all White, Islamo-racist cult from the gulf states and elsewhere, an insurgency against the globalist liberal order would ensue and the system would be overthrown.

Hardly, for one thing, the central issue here is ethnicity, it should be well understood by now that none of the protections afforded to Muslims by the current human rights framework apply to White Australians; so should some bright spark decide to call a “White Jihad” he might expect to be quickly snatched from his bed by the security services and then find himself buried alive in his local Supermax prison.

Imagine, if you can, a group of White men organising a stand alone group along the lines of Hizb-ut-Tahrir, holding rallies railing against the Zionist entity, issuing guidelines for the discipline of wives and female relatives and calling for death to unbelievers.

Muslim radicals have been pepper sprayed and set upon by police dogs conducting such activities even though they are under special protection by the state; we feel confident that any White power Islamists might be met with far more oppressive violence from the authorities.

In common with Nazism, Islamism is also at its core a multi-ethnic, internationalist creed; outfits styled after the Waffen SS and the early Jihadis would be, if true to the ideals of their forebears, compelled to admit anyone with the desired fanaticism and ambition, regardless of national origin.

Imagine, if you can, a group of White men organising a stand alone group along the lines of Hizb-ut-Tahrir, holding rallies railing against the Zionist entity, issuing guidelines for the discipline of wives and female relatives and calling for death to unbelievers.

Well, comrades, as edifying as this discussion of useless ideologies and tactics has been, we must here defend the modes of struggle presently employed by authentic Nationalist radicals after all these methods are all we have available to us.

Australian Nationalists have only the electoral system, the internet and the private meeting available as reliable fora; our activism takes place where it always has in our country: in the back rooms of pubs, on the worksites, in private suburban gatherings and now, online, our version of the sympathetic print media.

Unless we, by some stroke of fortune, attract a benefactor, a modern day J.F. Archibald figure then we are stuck with the un-glamorous lot of the grassroots, working class activist.

We would love to go poncing about the CBD in full regalia, with marching bands and eagle standards, or go tearing around the hinterland in our utes, bearded and armed to the teeth; the reality is though that White Australians would either laugh us out of existence, or beat the snot out of us every time we stepped out of our front doors.

download-6
Arthur Calwell, no flags, no uniforms, just honest Aussie nationalism
Advertisements

WE FELL FOR THE MEME NOT THE MAN

WE FELL FOR THE MEME NOT THE MAN

As the excitement subsides over Donald Trump’s unthinkable victory, Nationalists abroad are beginning to question just what exactly is going to change. In fact, amid a failing enthusiasm from capricious, even stupid decisions from the Trump administration, we’re beginning to think we fell for the meme, not the man.

Hardly any amongst us were not enthralled in the drawn out process of the Presidential election, and although it’s superfluous to waste words on the series of events itself we must reiterate that the greater portion of Nationalists the world over were glued to the virtual reality of memetic warfare with unquestioning faith in the Trump cause.

There was the hope that a certain je ne sais quoi moment was at our doorstep as the thinly veiled humour behind God Emperor memes revealed a subconscious yearning for such a figure to actually be walking among us.

images-2
Somewhere between man and meme lies Kek

In the past weeks of the Trump administration, however, we question the veracity of what we were told and more pertinently, what we told ourselves about the new POTUS. Detractors from the United States will argue that they had little choice given the alternate continuation of the Clinton family; they will say we are jumping the gun in too harsh a manner when the occupancy of the White House has just begun.

To an extent we concur, yet a greater catalyst to our derision forms: our riposte to Seppos in their time of apparent jubilee lies in questioning the primacy of American opinion in anything, for outside the realm of their own smugness lies a world that is deeply resentful of the gross impact of uninvited, unwanted imperialism for the past several decades.

In this regard, Trump is not only continuing that tradition but appears to be outdoing his predecessor in stirring the hornet’s nest that is the Middle East. The stern warnings sent to Iran and the politically motivated ‘Muslim ban’, contrary to Trump’s bloviating rants, puts no one but Israel first.

There was the hope that a certain je ne sais quoi moment was at our doorstep as the thinly veiled humour behind God Emperor memes revealed a subconscious yearning for such a figure to actually be walking among us.

Eric Trump gave a better picture on how deep Israeli interest runs in his father’s veins when, speaking to New York radio program AM 970 he revealed, “I think, honestly, the Iran nuclear deal was one of the things that made him jump into the race…I think that was a game changer for him. That is when he finally said, ‘Kids, I am going to do it. I am gong to give this a real shot.’”

Benjamin Netanyahu only earlier this month (Feb 17), no doubt emboldened by Trump’s staunch words of support to his close ally, claimed both the United Stares and Israel have a “grand mission” to confront the Iranian threat. We could go on and on listing saccharine statements made over the Chosen Land, but it would assail our principal point of asking why we need to justify a continued LARPing support over a President selling false goods.

maxresdefault
If only he would just bomb Israel we could get back to worshipping him 

Trump is a Zionist, and we’re sufficiently tired of hearing the ifs and buts avoiding that charge. If there’s one train of thought we don’t want to hear it’s the eternal excuse that the so-called most powerful man in the world cannot institute the reforms needed to clear away the irrefutable dross covering all corners of America’s political, economic and social bodies, so instead he’s just “playing games to remove them”; at this point in time it’s equivocal to saying “the dog ate my homework” – it’s a lie that’s biding time for the inevitable outing of the lie itself, whereby at the root of that falsehood is the absurd notion America can ever be the saviour of the West without being anything less than what we know as America, which it can’t, or won’t.

We note too with a mocking sneer at what this has done for the progression of Australian politics. It has come to our attention that a few self-styled “alt-right” publications have emerged with the intention of furthering Pauline Hanson as our answer to the same populist train-wreck that gave us Geert “I was under investigation by my own country for ties to Israel” Wilders.

The usual culprits in our patriot circus try to boost their own self-importance by rallying (unsuccessfully) around Hanson’s inner circle, so too do they champion Trump as a demigod; most cringeworthy of all are the exaltations to American patriots that are impossible not to be seen as anything other than a desperate grab for attention.

Eric Trump gave a better picture on how deep Israeli interest runs in his father’s veins when, speaking to New York radio program AM 970 he revealed, “I think, honestly, the Iran nuclear deal was one of the things that made him jump into the race…I think that was a game changer for him.

Trump made a good Pepe and captivated our interest as a God Emperor, but all the same, the power vested – or more precisely, imagined – in him was a dreamlike vapour that cannot and will not be translated into reality. The who, what, where, and when failed to correlate with the prerequisite conditions imposed on such a gargantuan figure. Likewise, the copycat minions scattered throughout the West are false idols on an even less impressive scale.

The idea of compromised Nationalism is no longer an acceptable game to place bets on, it dilutes our core message to an irrevocable perversion that can be seen in all its crassness throughout the civic nationalist fold. Australia finds more common ground than ever before with continental Europe’s Nationalist movements as our strident march towards sovereignty struggles with, among other things, throwing off American hegemony.

Trump may find it necessary to save Israel, we don’t. Which side will the people of Australia choose?

download-5
Alas…

GLOBALISM IS THE ERSATZ CULTURE OF OUR TIME

GLOBALISM IS THE ERSATZ CULTURE OF OUR TIME

A recent article in UK’s uber-liberal The Independent suggested that conservatism (which it was addressing) is but a subculture not “the” counterculture as Infowars shill Paul Watson supposedly claimed.

The author also said “our generation is living in the midst (sic) the greatest cultural renaissance in history. Today we can taste the food, music, art, and storytelling of every culture in the world.”

We make no comment about “conservatism”, but the rest is, of course, utopian drivel and an advertisement for a liberal globalist myth. The British Empire, under Queen Victoria also had access to the “food, music, art, and storytelling” of every substantial culture in the world. The heads of exotic animals hung on the walls of the ruling class, and artefacts of their cultures became items of status, indicators of chic, and objects of curiosity. Thereafter, they became commodities.

oie_ifd5fvtoa8jj
Paul Watson has to be understood in context with his masters

Their cuisine was assimilated into western diets and, as is often the case, the results were actually westernised interpretations of foreign cooking that were modified for domestic palates. However, in spite of this early taste of ‘globalism’ — and a desire on behalf of those generations to both explore the newfound exotic and import aspects of distant cultures for cosmopolitan tastes and consumption — there were no unicorns and a magic rainbow did not appear.

Globalism has been with us for a while now, all-be-it not with the speed that modern travel and communication allows. And in the midst of that globalism that was facilitated by travel and trade nationalism still existed and even grew, as we saw at the beginning of last century. To some, the early stage of globalism, sailing, created irritants for the host culture. Take the Japanese, for just one example, who went to strict measures to prevent the spread of Christianity in their country while nonetheless engaging in trade. What’s more, they were right to do so.

The article concludes by suggesting, “And with the help of the internet, creators can combine parts of all our cultures to make something new. The decades ahead will be a cultural wonder we can’t begin to imagine.”

We make no comment about “conservatism”, but the rest is, of course, utopian drivel and an advertisement for a liberal globalist myth.

Again, we heard all of that from the digital utopians late last century who imagined the internet would upload us into a golden era of virtual hand holding without greed or prejudice. But the utopian dream never eventuated. This is because it is a nebulous concept that dazzles with vague promises of human advancement without taking account of its dialectic.

More to the point, what does it mean? The idea of “culture” is rapidly losing its traction to any pertinent meaning in the digital age. These liberal globalists speak of a wealth of cultures without recognising their globalism is having the effect of destroying the individual cultures they make a fetish of.

culture

Culture has been replaced by consumerism. We have a universal consumerist culture that has negated anything but the quaint. What are these cultural aspects the Independent’s naïve author writes of? Is it Tribal Papua New Guinean headdress? Because now, when we strain our minds to find examples of existent culture as we can reasonably understand it, we reach for the quaint.

We either harken back to a time of folkish community, or we reference peoples as yet not assimilated into the global monoculture of mammon, such as distant Amazonian tribes, and parts of Europe, Asia, or the Mid-East which through poverty or remoteness cling to bygone modes of dress, expressions of dance, and community rituals.

When we referenced globalism in the time of Queen Victoria and the great age of British Imperialism we made it pretty clear that one culture became a commodity for another. The benefit, as we can see, is aiding enlightenment, but that, as we also argued, can be achieved without surrendering a unique identity of one’s own. Thereafter, it is all about commerce. Happy idiots like the Independent’s author will be over the moon chatting to their Botswanan friend on a digital device while wearing the colourful plumage of a forgotten Eastern costume.

More to the point, what does it mean? The idea of “culture” is rapidly losing its traction to any pertinent meaning in the digital age. These liberal globalists speak of a wealth of cultures without recognising their globalism is having the effect of destroying the individual cultures they make a fetish of.

As to the rest, it is not about opening up but breaking down. Globalism wants to break down everything: morals, values, science, borders, beliefs, and cultures and all for the masses, who are all reduced to slaving on part-time work but to continue to fatten up the usual elites.

Globalism as a utopian concept is just another opiate for the masses. But it is gold for the elites. Yet, it is also the pervasive ersatz culture, and it is very destructive.

images-1
Counter culture? Not us!

ABBOTT’S GHOST MAKES SHRILL ZIONISM ALL THE STRONGER

ABBOTT’S GHOST MAKES SHRILL ZIONISM ALL THE STRONGER

Tony Abbott has been a busy little bee. Published in the Australian Spectator late December last year, the member for Warringah nonchalantly documented his time as part of a largely unnoticed delegation to Jerusalem for the Australia-Israel-UK Leadership Dialogue – clearly in the interests of his North Sydney constituents.

With fellow travellers, including Opposition Leader Bill Shorten and Federal Trade Minister Steve Ciobo, this motley crew of international mercenaries, aside from making a predictable and superfluous gesture of commitment to Israel, gave worrying signs on the direction of Australian foreign policy; signs too portentous to be ignored as storm clouds gather over Iran.

The Dialogue, “Originally intended as another forum to familiarise Australia’s leaders with Israel…” is a curious thing indeed. The familiarity of Australia’s elite to Israel is hardly a fledgeling relation, nor one that needs more meet-and-greets to reach its full potential. A few brief hiccups here and there in the history of Australian-Israeli relations are nonconsequential footnotes in light of Australia’s subservience to the Jewish ethnostate. Abbott salivates over this long history, “And long before we were taught to think of ourselves as a multicultural country, Jews had been Australia’s Chief Justice, army commander and head of state (as that’s what our governor-general is). Indeed, we’re the only country with this distinction other than Israel itself.”

download-4
A stupid evangelical Zionist to the last

As if that’s supposed to woo the audience, he proceeds to the disturbing crux of the article. Says Abbott:

“In a witches’ brew of complexity and danger, Palestine is no longer the region’s most intractable problem. As we learnt, Israel’s establishment is clear-eyed about what’s happening: Iranian policy is a mix of ancient Persian imperialism with apocalyptic Islam; Turkey’s President Erdogan bankers to be a modern version of Suleiman the Magnificent; Russia has opportunistically used America’s diffidence to realise its historic dream of a warm water port; Syria will continue to be a graveyard or it will evolve into a series of semi-autonomous statelets.”

Talking about the dismantling of a sovereign nation as if nothing is amiss, he relates Syria’s planned future within the larger context, “The bottom line, as Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu makes abundantly clear, is that Iran cannot be allowed to become a nuclear power.”

As if that’s supposed to woo the audience, he proceeds to the disturbing crux of the article.

The bad news according to the former Prime Minister – remember this is a man who can only deal in “goodies and baddies” – is that “Iran (whose official policy is to destroy Israel and whose aim is world dominance is identical – only in Shia form – to that of the so-called Caliphate) now dominates Iraq and Syria while Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah, has more capacity than ever to ravage northern Israel…” He also makes no secret of the emerging oddities amongst the Middle East, “There is now informal Israeli security cooperation with the Saudis and Emiratis.” That must be why Saudi Arabia is immune from international condemnation.

Abbott continues to rant and rave a little about Palestine, manages to throw a few lines in about his grievances with Climate Change, and closes his little adventure by going “…for a fraternal jog with Bill Shorten around Jerusalem’s old city…”

1kizws

The short report ultimately reveals a stench emanating from Abbott more grave to the olfactory system than a body processing raw onion. This is irrefutable posturing for the balkanization of Israel’s neighbours, centred on unprecedented hostility towards Iran and, to a different extent and for different reasons, Russia. For what purpose is a back-bencher stoking the flames of war? Consciously or not (we’re inclined to believe the former), Abbott is working in tandem with the conclusions set out in the Yinon Plan [ ], which infamously sets out the strategic blueprint for the implementation of a Greater Israel at the expense of destabilising its neighbours along ethnic and religious lines into useless and powerless – as Abbott says – statelets.

It could be observed that the hovering spirit of Abbott is eager to be reanimated into a politically corporal form. It could also be observed his tone pays homage to that old Bush-Blair-Howard triumvirate of travelling democracy. It is not altogether unthinkable given both the unimpressive tenure of and Abbott’s axe to grind with Turnbull, that another leadership spill is possible. Subsequently, a malcontent conservative bloc of the electorate that stubbornly (and falsely believed) they deviated away from Liberal hegemony are still malleable enough to be mopped up by a strong unifier. Pauline Hanson and the renegade Liberals would be made redundant in what little independence they had as the true father of the conservative zeitgeist returns more powerful than before; here, the existence of the patriots proves little more than lowly cultists, whose unintelligible incantations are precursors to the arrival of Cthulhu.

The patriot groups, hasbara-fed imbeciles who naïvely wave the Star of David as if the religious/political fraternity is reciprocal, are crucial to normalising and desensitising not a small part of the population to anti-Islam rhetoric which can, in turn, be cashed in as justification for reckless foreign adventures vis-à-vis popular support. From One Nation to the Q Society, it works well for establishment politics to have the angry mob on board; fruitful indeed it is to have people both fearful of an Iran whose aim is defamatorily described as “world dominance” and, perhaps more importantly, excited to combat a nebulously understood ‘Islam’ wherever it may be found, be it Tehran, Raqqa or Lakemba.

Abbott continues to rant and rave a little about Palestine, manages to throw a few lines in about his grievances with Climate Change, and closes his little adventure by going “…for a fraternal jog with Bill Shorten around Jerusalem’s old city…”

The dangerous vainness of pursuing Islam as the demonic scapegoat should be more apparent yet it isn’t. When criticism of the faith itself is warranted, it in almost all cases begins with the extremism espoused by Saudi Arabia and its allies. Its state ideology of Wahabism is a term notably absent from Abbott and patriot groups alike; instead, we hear “Islamic extremism” which acts as a buffer from the true understanding of what it is and what causes it. When criticism of the demographic exodus from the Middle East and Africa is warranted, it begins with the egregious assault on common sense that the West inflicted on otherwise stable (relatively speaking) regions. To this date, Europe is paying for the illegal overthrow of Gaddafi, and it’s currently paying for the attempt to overthrow the Assad regime.

Nationalists hope that in the near future we won’t be talking about our due punishment for attempting anything in Iran; to lessen that likelihood all clear-minded Australians need to reassess why such fervent support for a foreign nation, much less one with such an odious reputation, comes into play within the sphere of Australia and its own interests. The average patriot, good-intentioned as they may be, need to come to terms with the ease to which they’re manipulated into taking moral responsibility for a surrogate nation and the manifold problems that come with it.

[1] A brief note on the Yinon Plan is necessary. Composed by Oded Yinon as “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties” in 1982, it appeared in the Kivunim (Directions), the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organisation. Its premise is not unique to one mere paper, but an internalised general plan for Israel to become an imperialist power in the region. Theodore Herzl, an integral figure in modern Zionism claimed the area of the Jewish State stretches “from the brook of Egypt to the Euphrates”. To take for example one revealing excerpt from Yinon: “Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run, it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon.”

During the Iran-Iraq War of 1980-1988, we see the extent of intrigue at play. Saddam Hussein was backed by America, France and the U.K., while Israel provided minimal support to Iran. Ironically, there was no problem then with Iraq’s actual use of chemical weapons on both military and civilian populations.

keepcalmstudio-com-dancing-crown-keep-calm-and-fuck-israel

NATIONALISTS HAVE NO USE FOR THE FAR RIGHT

NATIONALISTS HAVE NO USE FOR THE FAR RIGHT

Well, comrades, we called it straight after the 2016 federal election, time after time since then we have hammered home the point: Pauline Hanson’s One Nation are simply an organ of the Liberal party.

The preference deals struck by the Liberals with PHON for the coming Western Australian state election revealed, for all to see, the real game; it is also rumoured that the Kevin Andrews faction in Victoria is eyeing a similar arrangement.

We hardly need to point out the implications of these arrangements, our readers are more than capable of putting two and two together and coming up with the correct sum; so too, it seems, are some of the One Nation candidates in the West.

Margaret Dodd, PHON candidate for Scarborough has emphatically stated that she will defy party orders and choose her own preferences; Ms Dodd went so far as to describe the One Nation leadership as bullies.

So too, the Nationalists have gone to great lengths over the last 12 months to expose the links between so-called “far-right” groups and the Liberal party; by virtue of having made ourselves accessible to disaffected members of these groups, as confidants with a reputation for getting things done we are privy to all the goings-on in patriot and right wing circles.

Liberal party operatives have their sticky little fingers all over the far-right circus, this we have shown, through our own activism, to be absolutely true; from Party For Freedom to the Burgess-Erikson circle of provocateurs and the remnants of the Victorian street movements, all signs point back to Liberal fixers.

Margaret Dodd, PHON candidate for Scarborough has emphatically stated that she will defy party orders and choose her own preferences; Ms Dodd went so far as to describe the One Nation leadership as bullies.

What is also absolutely true is that the Nationalists, far from wanting supremacy over the far-right, want to see it pushed back and taken out of the lives of workers and marginalised people; to be clear, we want nothing from the right, its personnel, its ideals and its ludicrous talking points are of no use to us.

Veteran Nationalists we have spoken to are aghast at the simply mindless bigotry of many far-right figures, the sort of negative, angst-ridden “ugly Australians” you would expect to find portrayed in an SBS expose on racism.

9dc486b0029288d16273df2704dc45e4
Margaret Dodd understands that giving the Liberals preferences defeats the purpose of creating opposition

When we see literal race mixers, men with Asian wives and children at home, spewing venomous invective at immigrants and their advocates who among us could fail to be disgusted?

We do not merely point our fingers at these charlatans and scream “hypocrite!”, as people devoted to our families we are genuinely revolted by anyone who would put their loved ones through such humiliation, to the Nationalists this is an unforgivable transgression.

Likewise, we have no sympathy for the loyal followers of these would-be far-right demagogues, the people who, in full knowledge of the bad character of their spokesmen still continue to traipse around after them, defend these degenerates and delude themselves that they are part of a “movement”.

When we see literal race mixers, men with Asian wives and children at home, spewing venomous invective at immigrants and their advocates who among us could fail to be disgusted?

Readers may also have seen reports of the recent Q-Society fundraising events in Sydney and Melbourne; apart from the fact that this club is centred on bolstering support for the Zionist entity and that information to hand suggests a Kahanist element at work behind the scenes, we wonder if our comrades spotted the other obvious con-job going on?

We have long said that the only function of the conservative demagogue is to betray the workers and direct their votes toward the Liberal party, no clearer example of this could be found than on the list of speakers at the Q-Society functions.

16998221_1478762628810019_7467990098763364922_n
Embarrassing times for the Q Society

The presence of senator Cory Bernardi and MP George Christensen is self-explanatory in the context of this article, the addition to the bill of working class 1970’s cultural icons, Gary “Angry” Anderson and Larry Pickering is particularly galling, even upsetting for Nationalists of a certain age.

These men are cynically trading on their history as formerly respected artists, voices of the old Australia, that ghost society which now lives only in the memories of those White Australians born before the 1990’s.

Anderson, the rock and roll outlaw with his trademark Jacky Howe singlets and boiler suits and Pickering with his smutty cartoons lampooning the high and mighty of Australian society were much-loved figures; it is plain to see that both have long since abandoned their roots, sold out and now represent the big end of town, the globalist liberal project and the Israel first crowd.

These men are cynically trading on their history as formerly respected artists, voices of the old Australia, that ghost society which now lives only in the memories of those White Australians born before the 1990’s.

This is the hook to the swindle being played upon the workers and marginalised people by the far-right, two artists with whom the true Australians could once relate are effectively the bait in a political trap for well-meaning and genuinely patriotic Aussies; their brand of politics, though, directs that patriotic feeling to blatantly anti-Australian ends.

The more polished performers on the far-right circuit also give workers the impression that status could be gained by throwing in their lot with the Anti-Islam groups, that Whites could conceivably advocate on behalf of their people without being labelled as “racist” due to the admission to the fold of selected Asians or other “Uncle Toms”, to borrow an American pejorative term.

Unfortunately for the unwary, well-meaning Whites, this is not the case, it is merely another deception being perpetrated by opportunists and manipulative, anti-White globalists.

Nationalists know that under present conditions there is no “safe” way to advocate on behalf of White Australia; no amount of nostalgia, fluffy multiculturalism or false piety can obscure the fact that to take up the politics of White Nationalism is not only social suicide, but that it puts the Nationalist on a collision course with all elements of the globalist liberal mainstream, including the far-right.

At some point, our brand of politics will become safer as the right wing degenerates are rolled and their parties deactivated for good.

Until that time the Whites who are concerned for the fate of White Australia have only one option, the somewhat precarious life of the dissident White Nationalist in the struggle with the globalist establishment.

1480728284152
National Party Whip George Christensen no more. As of this blog’s publication, the fat bastard has resigned

CONSERVATIVE MUSLIMS ARE NO MATCH FOR PROGRESSIVES

CONSERVATIVE MUSLIMS ARE NO MATCH FOR PROGRESSIVES

In our ongoing campaign against Islamophobic conservatives, self-styled civic patriots and those whose primary goal is protecting the interests of the Zionist entity, Nationalists are frequently accused of being “soft” on Islam.

We use the attack word, Islamophobia, in its proper context; that is to say that, in most cases, our enemies on the right are not capable of thinking clearly, nor of behaving rationally around the subject of Islam and Muslims.

It is a fact that the line pushed by these Zio-patriots has become the basis of an asocial internet cult for lonely, dysfunctional and depressed workers and marginalised people.

We hear often enough that it’s better to feel as though one belongs to something bigger than the sum of its parts, even if the whole program is flawed and most of the followers know that the emperor has no clothes.

As any frequent reader of our Nationalist media will observe, the main grievances against Islam expressed by the patriots are fear mongering of one sort or another, or ephemera and trivia gleaned from overseas news sources and conflated with events closer to home.

Nationalists really do not care about the inhabitants of, say Mauritania, Afghanistan or Bangladesh; it is none of our concern whether Islamic jurists push onerous Sharia laws upon the peasants of those regions; nor do we care about the status of women and minorities living under those regimes.

It is a fact that the line pushed by these Zio-patriots has become the basis of an asocial internet cult for lonely, dysfunctional and depressed workers and marginalised people.

We don’t feel the need to mention Islam in every single article we pen or to bring discussions of genital mutilation, halal slaughter or terrorism into our readers’ news feeds simply to shock and traumatise them into supporting a particular point of view.

Islam and Muslims in Australia are, as we see it, at a crossroads of sorts in that by allowing themselves to be manipulated into supporting progressive identity politics they have shackled themselves to a doomed project.

Tobes.png
Progressive Moslem, Toby Cook, is a member of multiracial Civic Nationalist Party for Freedom

As any White Nationalist knows, the whole progressive programme is calculated to bring about absolute equality of all people, by any means necessary, up to and including waging wars of aggression and imperialist adventures.

Since the end of the great European fratricide of the 20th century, progressive subversion has been directed to the sole purpose of eradicating the national, spiritual and communal life of all the White groups across the globe.

It is to this project, genocide according to the rules laid down by progressives themselves, that the modern Australian Muslim, whether he agrees with it or not, finds himself shackled via the umbilical cord of identity politics.

As any White Nationalist knows, the whole progressive programme is calculated to bring about absolute equality of all people, by any means necessary, up to and including waging wars of aggression and imperialist adventures.

The patriots own rhetoric, addled as it is, clearly announces that their targets are Islam and the Left, whom they see as allies at least, co-conspirators at worst; Muslims are therefore held to be equally culpable for the actions of their progressive allies.

We already see Islam in Australia being re-defined by progressives and attempts made to philosophically and physically reconstruct that religion into something which, like the “reformed” Christian and Jewish movements, can be slaved to the globalist liberal project.

The Islamic State group, which all well-informed people regard as a literal manifestation of Mohammedan teachings, routinely berates Muslims in the west for their subservience to the progressive cause, after their duty to their god the main talking point expressed by these Jihadists is the desire to crush the decadent, degenerate and weakened progressive western nations.

27df95e
When you see this logo, you know that you will not be blown up without a damn good reason… like, you insulted trannies

As the progressives would have it, however, Islam’s inbuilt militancy and its demands for conquest can be simply sidestepped by liberal reforms to the faith; we see a desire among progressives to neuter Islam, to transform it into something like the Uniting Church.

As all clear thinking people know, though, the progressive project has proven itself to be useless at reconstructing national, ethnic and religious groups via liberal reforms; rather they tend to kill these things with kindness, so to speak, the treatment of Aboriginal children and wards of the state in the 20th century are but two examples.

Muslims would be well advised to avoid entanglements with the progressives since, from the White population, there is already great enmity toward their oriental faith and its adherents just on the basis of its basic incompatibility with our way of life; alliances with the widely hated progressives only strengthen the conviction that there must be something on the nose in Islam.

As the progressives would have it, however, Islam’s inbuilt militancy and its demands for conquest can be simply sidestepped by liberal reforms to the faith; we see a desire among progressives to neuter Islam, to transform it into something like the Uniting Church.

Islam in Australia can only ever return to what it was before the 1990’s, a little known but tolerated minority grouping which stood aloof from the mainstream and stayed out of politics.

Any opportunism by Muslims while under the wing of the progressives will backfire due mainly to the fact that, while many are prepared to ignore Muslims most of the time, a good many of our people seek to crush the progressives and globalist liberals.

download-1
Tolerance of other religions could be taken as insufficient devotion to your own

The Zio-patriots claim to have solutions to the “Muslim problem”, all of which are ill-conceived, immoral, impractical and, if carried to fruition, would likely see any hypothetical “Patriotic” government hauled before the International Criminal Court on charges of committing acts in preparation for genocide.

The Nationalists Primary Solution, however, the move to heavy immigration restriction would see adherents of Islam in Australia having to fall back on their own resources; with foreign-born Imams and Muslim immigrants unable to enter the country, coupled with the removal of state funding for all faith-based schools we would naturally expect the character of the local Islamic community to change over time.

Under current immigration rules, foreign-born people with serious criminal offences to their names can be deported to their home country, in most cases; the issue of immigrant crime could be largely solved by tightening this regime to include charges arising from less serious anti-social behaviour, such as persistent flouting of the road rules, habitual drug use, welfare fraud and so forth.

Any opportunism by Muslims while under the wing of the progressives will backfire due mainly to the fact that, while many are prepared to ignore Muslims most of the time, a good many of our people seek to crush the progressives and globalist liberals.

Further to that, allowing aspiring Jihadis to leave the country forever, to renounce their citizenship and leave Australia for whatever fate their god has in store for them on a one-way ticket would go some way to solving the expensive and time-consuming problem of detecting and preventing such excursions.

As we can see, under the Nationalist Primary Solution, the more troublesome aspects of hosting a Muslim minority, the crime, the problematic religious fanaticism and anti-social behaviour could be alleviated, if not removed altogether, all by peaceful, legal means.

Jamal ud-Din Arrest
A world of regret in the making

You see, comrades, Nationalists have no interest in traumatising the whole country with pogroms, deportations and persecution of people who have done nothing wrong; can you imagine what rounding up and deporting close to half a million people would do to our society?

Our Primary Solution puts the ball in the court of the Muslims, if we rid their community of troublemakers, parasites and fanatics but otherwise leave them alone, then they have the option of living here as a minority with all the same rights and obligations as everyone else.

If however, they want a more authentic life in submission to Allah then there are over 50 countries which would be able to provide just that.

As we can see, under the Nationalist Primary Solution, the more troublesome aspects of hosting a Muslim minority, the crime, the problematic religious fanaticism and anti-social behaviour could be alleviated, if not removed altogether, all by peaceful, legal means.

As it stands, though, the Muslim minority in Australia is being led down the path to further conflict with Australians due to the opportunism and corruption of their spokesmen, the infiltration of the faith by progressives and converts with other agendas besides religion and the subversion of traditional values by Leftist and liberal reformers.

The real choice for Muslims is not East vs West, it is whether they want to live their lives as they choose, albeit with no support for their faith from the state; or whether they will allow progressives to reform Islam and remake it according to their ideals.

The reality is that Muslims have to ask themselves if they want their faith to become a joke, like some of the progressive, mainstream Christian churches.

Does anyone, in fact really want to see secularised Mosques under the direction of, say, transvestite Imams as the call to prayer is delivered by a White, Lesbian Muezzin? How would that ensure peace and good order in our most “vibrant” suburbs?

download-2
See, it’s like… um… you know when… ah, fuck it

WHAT IS OUR PROBLEM?

WHAT IS OUR PROBLEM?

Readers of our social media pages over the past week will have noticed another flare-up in hostilities between us Nationalists and the self-styled “far right”.

We will not get hung up on details here, scroll down and it is all there for the world to see, the reasons behind this enmity, however, bear repeating.

At this point in time we are prepared to declare that the patriot movement, by the actions of its prominent spokesmen is now an anti-Australian movement; that said we do reserve some sympathy for the White workers and marginalised people who have been gulled by these rats.

In their desperation to defend themselves against the superior politics and quicker wits of the Nationalists, the patriot talking heads have devised ever more bizarre and convoluted additions to their already shambolic platforms.

Indeed, these Wombats have taken the definition of Australian identity into territories not even explored by the most drug-addled, schizophrenic examples of the Leftist ideologue.

“Anything but White!” may as well be the new catch cry of the patriot movement; it is this total negation of the true Australian identity which sets them apart from the Leftists; at least the left-leaning anti-Whites, in their genocidal rage against the “system” mostly agree with our definition of Australianism.

In their desperation to defend themselves against the superior politics and quicker wits of the Nationalists, the patriot talking heads have devised ever more bizarre and convoluted additions to their already shambolic platforms.

The White issue is inescapable, while we do not play identity politics in the Nationalist milieu the concept of Australian identity is set in stone as far as most people are concerned; even the self-hating White in his aboriginal flag T-shirt seeks to atone for his whiteness and, by doing so, at least acknowledges his heritage.

Far from being self-hating Whites, with a clear sense of identity, the senior patriots just seem to hate consciously White people in general; we struggle to find another interpretation of their thinking since, aside from Muslims, they only criticise people who are comfortable in their own skin, or repentant of it, as the case may be.

hasnon
The queen of Civic Patriotism with two little piccaninnies

Nationalists may regard psychoanalysis as Jewish pseudo-science but there does seem to be a degree of almost Freudian projection at work among the patriots.

Given the obviously poor life choices, bad habits and curious allusions to mixed heritage shown by many of the patriots we shouldn’t wonder at their inferiority complexes, paranoia and antipathy toward people with firmly held convictions regarding race, ethnicity and nationality.

The Muslims too, when all is said and done, exhibit a strong sense of both group and individual identity all couched in solid notions of race and ethnicity, a state of mind which appears to really upset many on the far right.

Nationalists may regard psychoanalysis as Jewish pseudo-science but there does seem to be a degree of almost Freudian projection at work among the patriots.

The world outside social media, cyberspace being the only real territory held by the patriots, is rapidly transitioning into the “age of identity”; that is to say that globalisation, far from eliminating difference, is bringing the different races and ethnic groups into contact with one another.

Mass immigration of non-traditional groups into White lands has become a global exhibition of the often massive and intractable differences between the different human sub-species; even from an aesthetic point of view, a million Asians moving in and residing around us has markedly changed the way most Australians see their society.

2ad7c71600000578-3174846-image-a-6_1437885236127
Danny Nalliah runs a Zionist-supporting, multi-racialist Civic Patriot party called Rise UP Australia

Some people are able to convince themselves that these differences are a good thing, others, such as the Nationalists regard immigration as a negative on that basis; it is another thing to altogether, as the patriots do, claim that Australian identity is “whatever you want it to be.”

This is our problem, this is why we fight them and why we hate them. Nobody but the patriots seek to obliterate White identity as a component of authentic Australianism, the Left, for all their shrieking and garment rending over the colonial era subscribe to the same general Australian folklore as do the Nationalists, only the different conclusions we choose to draw from that lore set us at odds.

The real class struggle, the Nationalist cause if you will, is the globalist liberal project, at present the Left, in general terms, are unwilling, or unable to wean themselves of rank and privilege under that system, so they are not a threat to the status quo in the immediate future.

Some people are able to convince themselves that these differences are a good thing, others, such as the Nationalists regard immigration as a negative on that basis; it is another thing to altogether, as the patriots do, claim that Australian identity is “whatever you want it to be.”

Generational change is under way, of course, and the Nationalists would expect some sort of counter-reaction to globalist-liberalism from the Left; the children of the “Gen-X” bourgeois lefties are, after all, as much affected by the scourge of globalism and mass immigration as those of the White workers and marginalised people.

In the event of a resurgent Left we would, of course, be able to present a competent political struggle against them, should we, in fact, find ourselves in disagreement; we are done with arguing with their parents who have, almost to a man, abandoned the field.

At this juncture, though the main anti-Nationalist and anti-White tendencies are found on the far right, so it is there that we must take our struggle until their nihilism, falsehoods, treachery and negativity are no longer a factor in dissident politics.

images-2
The Civic Parrot manifesto in its entirety