A guide to a sensible Nationalist worldview

As Nationalists we are often drawn into internet discussions of supposedly sensitive topics, and the social position of the Jewish minority inevitably comes up, as does their relationship to Australian Nationalism. We here at UNA will never recoil from confronting difficult issues, but we demand a high standard of writing from our contributors, in order to further the political education of our readers.

The most important tactic in dealing with the Jewish question is truthfulness. If we Nationalists simply tell the truth to the extent that we are able to discern it through rigorous research, if we always favour solid information over hearsay or confabulation, then our readership cannot ask for much more.

Much is made of so-called “conspiracy theories” concerning Jews. We don’t propose to go into the details of more popular memes in this short piece but rest assured that our writers, being enquiring minds, are all across this particular genre of internet entertainment.

Much is made of so-called “conspiracy theories” concerning Jews. We don’t propose to go into the details of more popular memes in this short piece but rest assured that our writers, being enquiring minds, are all across this particular genre of internet entertainment.

The talk of globo-capitalist cabals and cartels and the roles rich Jews play in their operation is interesting, to be sure, however, after a while, it becomes a tiresome diversion for Nationalists.

If all the stories are true, if these Rothschilds, crypto-Jewish plants, and subversive capitalists really wield the power ascribed to them then aspiring Nationalist tacticians should realise that, on the whole, our methods are not calculated to confront these semi-mythical beings.

In truth mythology or folklore is the most accurate description of the globo-Zionist-crypto-Jewish memes.

Readers must not think for a moment that we Australian Nationalists reject the power of folklore in a political movement, we enthusiastically embrace it. However, these conspiracy theories are not part of our own tradition.

Readers must not think for a moment that we Australian Nationalists reject the power of folklore in a political movement, we enthusiastically embrace it. However, these conspiracy theories are not part of our own tradition.

In truth, these ideas and the way they are propagated, are just another manifestation of the negative social outcomes stemming from globalisation; they encourage an outward-looking mindset and a belief in universal problems, with universal solutions.

hitler-arrested-baron-louis-de-rothschild
It wasn’t all bad news back in them days

Universal ideals obviously run contrary to everything embodied in the word Nationalism. Our tactics might be described by the slogan “Think local, act local”. Nationalism is not some crusading force bent on shining a light into every dark hollow and exposing these greater truths for the benefit of all mankind.

Of course, the Jewish question also exists at the local level. Nationalists must realise this and deal with it in a sane manner, completely rejecting as a tactic this reliance on internationalist folklore, and internet pop culture.

Of course, the Jewish question also exists at the local level. Nationalists must realise this and deal with it in a sane manner, completely rejecting as a tactic this reliance on internationalist folklore, and internet pop culture.

UNA writers being on firm ground discussing the realities of alternative politics in Australia are more than willing to take to task any person from the Jewish minority who takes a contrary position to that we Australian Nationalists hold.

download (1)

When such agitators choose to begin a sentence “As a Jew, I believe”, then proceed to critique, undermine or denigrate the White Australian ethnic group, our ideals, principles or political ambitions then we will respond to them as though they are hostiles from another tribe.

The situation, though, is not always clear-cut; take the notorious figure of John Safran, for example.

Now John, as we know, is from a Jewish family, but as he’s matured and honed his craft as an entertainer he has drifted away from the Jewish schtick he had affected early in his career.

Our issue with Safran is his opportunism (he is a journalist after all); his dishonest tactics and the fact that he cooperates with the political police, state-backed ANTIFA gangs, and anti-racist vigilantes.

Our issue with Safran is his opportunism (he is a journalist after all); his dishonest tactics and the fact that he cooperates with the political police, state-backed ANTIFA gangs, and anti-racist vigilantes.

As a documentary maker and author of non-fiction Safran is truthful up to a point, but he’s dishonest or self-serving in his intentions; he’s out for what he can get from his subjects but there is a level of collusion with the enemies of Australian workers, which makes him a serious problem for Nationalists.

safranchris.png
John Safran was expecting an idiot. Instead he got owned by Chris Shortis!

We do not make any assertions about the part Safran’s well-documented upbringing or ancestry play in shaping his activities; he’s simply a pest who actively works against the interests of our ethnic group; our working-class politics, and particularly against the struggling White underclass.

In the main, these ostensibly Jewish agitators who, from time-to-time, appear to annoy and disrupt the alternative political groups, are on punitive missions from the mainstream milieu; they are literal bourgeoisie in most cases who use their Jewishness as a shield while they punch downward at those considered to be beneath contempt.

Think of them as smug middle-class bullies who go out on Saturday night bashing homeless men for thrills; that is the mentality which we are dealing with here.

We Nationalists don’t deny that there exists a sort of consensus among many Jewish academics and intellectuals that, as Noel Ignatiev put it, “loyalty to Whiteness is treason to humanity” and that their published works are widely used to indoctrinate new generations of pesky undergraduate radicals.

We Nationalists don’t deny that there exists a sort of consensus among many Jewish academics and intellectuals that, as Noel Ignatiev put it, “loyalty to Whiteness is treason to humanity” and that their published works are widely used to indoctrinate new generations of pesky undergraduate radicals.

Once again, this consensus is formed by a globe-spanning meeting of minds, not all of them Jewish. It is a Universalist doctrine with input from many ethnic groups; the leading Jewish proponents are once again just thugs, shielded by the convenient social stigmas against the censure of Jews, they punch downward against the powerless on behalf of the powerful.

In the end, yes, we will confront the dreaded JQ as Nationalists and we won’t avoid discussing or diminish the agitation by self-professed Jews against the interests of the White working class, as and when it occurs.

What we will not do however is give credence to obviously false or unverifiable statements, conspiracy theories or globalist inspired problem-reaction-solution narratives! These we regard as pointless distractions leading inevitably to unhelpful conclusions.

Nationalists operate in the here and now, we’re focused on what’s going on in our towns and suburbs, the interlocking components of our nation are our immediate concern because even when victory comes, the hyper-rich elites, such as they are, will always be beyond the grasp of even the most “enlightened” conspiracy theorist.

In the world outside the internet, the much maligned “sheeple” need shepherds and sheepdogs to protect and nurture them, not jabbering doomsday preachers with pie in the sky ideas.

download (2)

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “GETTING IT RIGHT ON THE JEWISH QUESTION

  1. Jews control the global media. Sure they don’t own fairfax or newscorp, but in the bigger picture, they don’t need to. Would the author of this article dispute the claim that 96% of media is Jew owned? http://tapnewswire.com/2015/10/six-jewish-companies-control-96-of-the-worlds-media/ I’m curious. Maybe there is some concrete disagreement.

    The Aussie media is not independent. Have a look at the ABC or the Age and look at how much of their content is lifted straight from the heavily Jewish US and British networks. Journalists want an international career. That means that have to produce the sort of content that sells internationally, in the U.S.-Jewish dominated industry.

    Then there’s Hollywood!

    And how about finance? Goldman Sachs? The Fed Reserve system that was created by and has always been run by Jews? Again, we are colonised by that system. The RBA may have a gentile chairman, but he takes his cue from overseas.

    I really don’t know what the point is of attacking Safran as though he were the be all and end all of Jewish power in the Aussie media. Have you heard of James Spiegelman?

    This piece strikes me as a slap dash approach to a very important issue.

    Like

    1. Thank you for your contribution to the discussion,

      We have various writers, and as our mission statement explains, we offer all different nationalist viewpoints. We do not dictate what our audience should believe.

      Here then is the author’s reply

      Ed-in-chief

      ***

      Our article explains the possible range and scope of Australian Nationalist effectiveness on this particular issue.
      As was noted in the text we, as actors in the marginal, alternative Australian political scene limit our view to that which is immediately in front of us.
      Jewry in this country is in the main, a wealthy and powerful group embedded in the political and economic superstructure; an elite in other words.
      Think of that superstructure as a fort in the midst of a wilderness, a Roman fort on the Rhine in ancient times, if you like.
      Inside the fort are the rich civilians, the military garrison, Roman bureaucrats, and their trusted servants.
      Outside the fort are camped the tame German tribes who trade with the Romans and do their bidding in exchange for some of the trappings of civilised life, though they still dress in traditional clothing, worship Wotan and speak their ancestral tongue.
      Further out, in the forest, live the wild people, the untamed “barbarians” who have no use for the Romans and their civilisation, who desire only to burn down the fort and punish the tame lap dogs, camped outside its gates.
      Do you see where this train of thought is going?
      The wild tribes in the forest must spend most of their time on foraging, hunting, their clan politics, family life and religious devotion.
      These barbarians will strike down any Roman who is silly enough to come and annoy them in their own realm, but as small and divided clans they’re no match for a Legion, much less able to influence goings on in the fort.
      The tame tribes outside the gate are the bigger threat to the untamed people as they are outwardly similar, speak the same language and can appear, for all intents and purposes, to be friendly and co-operative; though they are in the service of their patrons within the walls.
      The interface between Roman and wild German occurs in the wilderness and the intermediaries; be it under a flag of truce, or in the form of a punitive raid will always have the face of the tame tribesman.
      So it is with Australian Nationalism, we’re out in the political wilderness, battling with the spies and agents of the mainstream, fighting for control of the political margins with Civic Patriots, dotty Communists and a nascent Islamist movement.
      We can’t influence the conduct of the state or the mercantile elites in our present condition, our struggle is to maintain and consolidate what little ground we hold on the political margins, in the face of a devious and hostile opposition.
      The actions of the Rothschilds bankers, the Hollywood Moguls or the elites of the Zionist entity will be forever beyond the influence of Australian Nationalists, as we said, that is the nature of Australianism.
      We deal with the agents of the elites as and when they appear before us, John Safran is one who repeatedly comes out into the wilderness to spy on and harass us, so he’s a good example.
      Andre Oboler, by contrast, is another anti-Australian figure who has an explicitly pro-Jewish agenda but he uses his spies and collaborators in ANTIFA and other compliant groups as intermediaries; he is beyond the reach of our criticism, safely inside the citadel.
      You understand that we can only disrupt the agents of the elite, we can deny Safran material for his articles and TV programmes by refusing to deal with him, starve him of information rather than indulging him like the star-struck patriots.
      We can devote much of our time to disorienting and demoralising Civic Patriot and Zionist front groups, those tame, boot licking White tribes who can’t live without the comforts of the globo-capitalist world order.
      It boils down to a question of scale, of what is possible and within our means, and what is not.
      When we, according to our ambitions, are the only group still operating on the margins then the conversation will turn to bigger projects, for now, we have our hands full.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s