SPEAKING FREELY ABOUT 18C

SPEAKING FREELY ABOUT 18C

A unique Nationalist perspective on a contentious law

18C sucks. It was brought in to keep the Jewish community happy. They are not, because they don’t believe it goes far enough. But now a plucky NSW Liberal Democrat senator, David Leyonhjelm, has issued a complaint to the Human Rights Commission after anti-White left wing journalist Mark Kenny described the senator as “an angry White male”, which was clearly intended in the pejorative. Leyonhjelm hopes to use the issue to prove that the law burdens free speech and that the law will view any action by White people as absurd since it exists purely as a stick to wave at us. We think the senator is trolling brilliantly. But there is also another point of view, which we publish here in the interests of open nationalist dialogue. UNA prides itself on affording all nationalist points of view a platform, short of allowing in movement wreckers, cucks, and Zionist stooges. Here then is the well acquitted opinion that 18c is irrelevant to smart nationalists. Feel free to comment, readers.

UNA Editor-in-chief.

download (10)
This is what is known as a “low act”

Given the hullabaloo over the revival of the section 18c debate in the new parliament, we as Nationalists feel somewhat compelled to offer some opinions on the subject. The contentious passage in the Australian human rights laws is explained by the Australian Human Rights And Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) on their website:

“Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act makes it unlawful for someone to do an act that is reasonably likely to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” someone because of their race or ethnicity.”

Section 18D of the Racial Discrimination Act contains exemptions which protect freedom of speech. These ensure that artistic works, scientific debate and fair comment on matters of public interest are exempt from section 18C, providing they are said or done reasonably and in good faith.

The words “offend, insult” have long been a target of conservative and libertarian pundits and politicians, they would argue that offence to certain words or acts is only taken as a matter of personal choice; the sticks and stones principle.

That is a reasonable argument but in reality, the two political camps most invested in this approach have differing motivations.

pjimage
We’re not saying that David Leyonhjelm is Blofeld, but you have to wonder

The conservatives seem to think, rightly as it happens, that 18c places too much power in the hands of their ideological enemies, or in other words, the Left.

This is a reasonable proposition because the HREOC is mainly staffed by university academics, lawyers and bureaucrats — all professions stacked to the brim with pinkos and fellow travellers.

Frankly, it doesn’t mean much. Generally speaking, we would like to think that 18c has no real bearing on what we do since we have a well-developed political position, which is expressed in an articulate manner, with wit, good humour, intelligence and tact.

This writer’s impression of the Libertarians published case, given that their chief spokesman senator David Leyonhjelm has the writing style of a twelve-year-old, is that they want the state power to censor speech wound back because, as the deeply ironic young people in our movement say, “Muh Liberty!”.

Well and good, let’s say senators Bernardi, Hinch, Hanson, Leyonhjelm and company prevail, what does that mean for Nationalists?

download (9)
Despite not being born here, this French-Laotian earns $300,000 of Australian taxpayer dollars every year to go around telling us how Australia would be better off without White people

Frankly, it doesn’t mean much. Generally speaking, we would like to think that 18c has no real bearing on what we do since we have a well-developed political position, which is expressed in an articulate manner, with wit, good humour, intelligence and tact.

Nevertheless, from time to time, trouble comes knocking anyway. “Racism” has a way of finding us even if we don’t normally engage in the crass identity politics of the present zeitgeist.

That is the point we would most like to impress upon our readers: repealing or modifying human rights laws will do little to aid the Nationalist struggle against entrenched power, globalist capitalism or its Universalist monoculture.

Our class, ethnic and political enemies have limitless funds which they can employ to disrupt dissident political groups, buy supportive media commentary for their anti-Australian worldview and, if need be, drag activists into endless and costly court cases.

Nationalists, who have kept abreast of events in North America over recent decades, can attest to the fact that even with the protection of the first amendment to the U.S constitution, successive Nationalist or even conservative groups have been dragged into civil suits by “Civil Rights” groups and bankrupted, or worse.

True, removing 18c takes away one advantage to our enemies in that they can no longer rely on free advice and legal backing from HREOC, but we can’t stress this point enough; THEY ARE RICH AND WE ARE NOT.

Even if our self-appointed adversaries do happen, at some point, to be workers themselves or people without means Nationalists can be assured that they will have human rights lawyers and wealthy social justice warriors beating a path to their door with offers of financial support and pro-bono legal representation.

Nationalists, who have kept abreast of events in North America over recent decades, can attest to the fact that even with the protection of the first amendment to the U.S constitution, successive Nationalist or even conservative groups have been dragged into civil suits by “Civil Rights” groups and bankrupted, or worse.

18c
The Jews know that freedom to identify race means the freedom to defend ourselves from White Genocide

Free speech does not guarantee freedom for the dissident Nationalist. Sure, Bernardi, Hanson and Leyonhjelm may benefit from changes to the laws but they are all system players, they are insulated by parliamentary privilege, wealth, and good standing with the elites.

Another effect of repeal or re-wording of 18c may be to embolden the nitwit civic patriots, demented Bogan bigots and Hollywood Nazi Provocateur fringe dwellers that incessantly pester Nationalists and create strife where none need exist.

In truth, though, how much worse could they get? Operators like Nick Folkes, Antifa Neil Erikson and Sherm “The Germ” Burgess are already so over the top that the only conclusion Australian workers can reach is that these dipsticks are protected from on high; they’ve already proven that they’ll press on with their desperately narcissistic behaviour regardless of any injunction from the human rights crowd.

Our alternative to political Islamism is political Australianism, however, the fact is that, with the curious exemption of Hizb Ut Tahrir, most powerful political Islamist tendencies are proscribed organisations in Australia, their leaders and devotees cannot legally travel to, raise funds from or organise in this country.

We are the movement of alternatives, of real solutions to difficult problems, and our ideas, while dangerous to the globalist money powers, are not normally offensive, even by the standards of the “loony left”.

Our alternative to Islam, for example, is Christianity. We would say to these “good” Moslems that the way of Jesus Christ is superior to the way of Mohammed and leave their conversion to Christian Nationalists.

Our alternative to political Islamism is political Australianism, however, the fact is that, with the curious exemption of Hizb Ut Tahrir, most powerful political Islamist tendencies are proscribed organisations in Australia, their leaders and devotees cannot legally travel to, raise funds from or organise in this country.

If and when an authentic, antipodean Islamist political movement should arise, Nationalists stand ready to challenge, dominate and defeat by political means any incursion by such groups onto our turf on the political margins.

For Nationalists it will always be business as usual, 18c certainly doesn’t protect us, for it was never intended to, yet it doesn’t hinder us or place any real obstacles in our path.

Our enemies will still routinely employ dirty tricks, slander and intimidation to suppress alternative ideas and a genuine worker’s movement we accept this as our lot and press on.

We should never play the victim, even facetiously to make a point as senator Leyonhjelm does. Every hateful libel, every lie against us is a learning experience. We are apart from the circus of post-modern identity politics. We march to the beat of our own drum.

images (8)

AUSTRALIANNESS EQUALS TERRORISM

AUSTRALIANNESS EQUALS TERRORISM

A dangerous media, treasonous authorities, and powerful interests

satpap.png
Why read Exodus when you have kosher Morry’s The Saturday Paper to thumb through over lox bagels?

Where young radicalised Moslem men are concerned, sentiments such as, “they can be de-radicalised” are common. This implies how at their core these are good boys led astray by bad people. They are infected by a doctrine, but a cure exists.

The onus transfers to the host society for failing to ‘properly assimilate’ this ‘youth’, due to systemic bias or neglect. It goes without saying.

No such empathy exists for the kindred of the host nation. There is no sympathy for young Australian men who have been disowned by the globalist model.

In fact, their fate is considered just desserts, based on pretexts of ‘historic injustice’ against the beatified Aborigine who is privileged by victimhood. Radicalised Moslem youth is likewise vindicated by the mercurial logic of multiculturalism in which the parent culture is guilty of everything. The Bogan patriot, consequently, came to their radicalism through poor education and endemic racism.

These kids are redundant as both Australians, and as males, and they should have reconciled with that by now (if you invoke feminist textual analysis).

In fact, their fate is considered just desserts, based on pretexts of ‘historic injustice’ against the beatified Aborigine who is privileged by victimhood. Radicalised Moslem youth is likewise vindicated by the mercurial logic of multiculturalism in which the parent culture is guilty of everything. The Bogan patriot, consequently, came to their radicalism through poor education and endemic racism.

Radicalised Moslems have a strong cultural identity which the state and media champion despite contrary perceptions. The ‘extreme right’ are simply dismissed as recalcitrant white trash. Their Australianness, which in most cases is all they have, is ridiculed as atavistic and invalidated by identity politics. Like all conquered peoples, their cultural identity is the first thing to be denied. Subordinated, those conquered people are consigned to quaintness. However, Australianness is now also symptomatic of ‘radicalisation’; by say, unfurling the national flag, or conforming to a particular stereotype.

Anything preferential, therefore, broadly speaking, favours the ‘migrant’ by a code of political politesse. The Australian “extremist” is the problem, not the Moslem; even though both are fighting for cultural dominance. The Left uses this as a propaganda tactic: claiming that patriotic activity stokes terrorism and emboldens (ta ra) ISIS!

1457086505013
Uthman Badar says Moslems are being “assimilated” in Aussie schools. We hadn’t noticed. This is last year’s pic, but

Yet, with the ground opened by globalism and the erasure of Australianness, distinct cultural identities out there — who are not denied — want to seize it.

Anything preferential, therefore, broadly speaking, favours the ‘migrant’ by a code of political politesse. The Australian “extremist” is the problem, not the Moslem; even though both are fighting for cultural dominance. The Left uses this as a propaganda tactic: claiming that patriotic activity stokes terrorism and emboldens (ta ra) ISIS!

Andrew Bolt reported that Hizb ut-Tahrir spokesman Uthman Badar addressed an ‘Innocent Until Proven Moslem’ forum, and told hundreds of braying Hajis that “The Australian anthem is based upon a particular view of history, it is a reading of history, and it is a statement which conforms to particular values. Now, if one does not share those values, why would they express it?”

He was talking about kids singing the national anthem in schools. This, he argues, is “forced assimilation”. When it comes to programs like ‘Safe Schools’, with its pervert LGBT bias, he will be on the more solid ground.

The media might even frame Badar as ‘an extremist’ but this is an open secret out in the communities that multiculturalism generates tribalism, with the host tribe formally denied tribal rights so as to balance out the playing field.18vg5b

The attendance at Bankstown outstripped any patriot demonstration in terms of supporting numbers. Yet, The Saturday Paper, which is owned by Morry Schwartz, a Jewish publisher and property developer (bing!), published a misleading, alarmist, and wholly biased piece entitled “How Reclaim Australia hid a terrorist”.

From the get-go, this thing sprays shit mist. The machinations of the ‘movement’ are all muddled up in a slick sort of sophistry, the writer and his socially aware publisher uninterested in critical details.

The media might even frame Badar as ‘an extremist’ but this is an open secret out in the communities that multiculturalism generates tribalism, with the host tribe formally denied tribal rights so as to balance out the playing field.

Reading this propaganda, we learn that ultimately all patriots “dream of Hitler”. We know that ultra-nationalist Nick Folkes does, as he’s rumoured to keep a portrait of the führer (or is it Humphrey Bear?) in his powder room. Otherwise, outside of that strategically re-quoted comment made by Blair Cottrell about giving students Mein Kampf as class reading (assuming you can find a student that can read), there is no Hitler fetish within the patriot movement. In fact, love of the former German leader is enough to get you barred from rallies and kicked off their Facebook pages.

But the key phrase that really stabs off the page is the writer’s subjective moral judgement of “supreme intolerance”, which he uses to characterise a ‘movement’ that he goes on to admit is not organised enough to qualify for the terminology.

18vfx9

Of course, the article really jumps the shark when it brings whacky Jack Van Tongeren into the narrative. He has about as much to do with the ‘patriot movement’, as Yogi Bear has to do with spelunking. You are reading something published by Morry Schwartz, and you can smell the bagels.

Whereas Moslems have a definite article to guide them in that weirdo book of theirs, no such manifesto exists to radicalise patriots. All they have are Blair Cottrell’s Conan addresses, and Sherm the Germ’s spastic sprays to the camera. It is a wonder that Facebook isn’t blamed for radicalising ‘da youf’, given different arguments.

More to the point, the “dangerous extremists” from the left, who use militant symbols and a stated policy of violent confrontation and that seriously do show “supreme intolerance”, come off like the tattling sister who is daddy’s favourite.images (4)

GETTING IT RIGHT ON THE JEWISH QUESTION

GETTING IT RIGHT ON THE JEWISH QUESTION

A guide to a sensible Nationalist worldview

As Nationalists we are often drawn into internet discussions of supposedly sensitive topics, and the social position of the Jewish minority inevitably comes up, as does their relationship to Australian Nationalism. We here at UNA will never recoil from confronting difficult issues, but we demand a high standard of writing from our contributors, in order to further the political education of our readers.

The most important tactic in dealing with the Jewish question is truthfulness. If we Nationalists simply tell the truth to the extent that we are able to discern it through rigorous research, if we always favour solid information over hearsay or confabulation, then our readership cannot ask for much more.

Much is made of so-called “conspiracy theories” concerning Jews. We don’t propose to go into the details of more popular memes in this short piece but rest assured that our writers, being enquiring minds, are all across this particular genre of internet entertainment.

Much is made of so-called “conspiracy theories” concerning Jews. We don’t propose to go into the details of more popular memes in this short piece but rest assured that our writers, being enquiring minds, are all across this particular genre of internet entertainment.

The talk of globo-capitalist cabals and cartels and the roles rich Jews play in their operation is interesting, to be sure, however, after a while, it becomes a tiresome diversion for Nationalists.

If all the stories are true, if these Rothschilds, crypto-Jewish plants, and subversive capitalists really wield the power ascribed to them then aspiring Nationalist tacticians should realise that, on the whole, our methods are not calculated to confront these semi-mythical beings.

In truth mythology or folklore is the most accurate description of the globo-Zionist-crypto-Jewish memes.

Readers must not think for a moment that we Australian Nationalists reject the power of folklore in a political movement, we enthusiastically embrace it. However, these conspiracy theories are not part of our own tradition.

Readers must not think for a moment that we Australian Nationalists reject the power of folklore in a political movement, we enthusiastically embrace it. However, these conspiracy theories are not part of our own tradition.

In truth, these ideas and the way they are propagated, are just another manifestation of the negative social outcomes stemming from globalisation; they encourage an outward-looking mindset and a belief in universal problems, with universal solutions.

hitler-arrested-baron-louis-de-rothschild
It wasn’t all bad news back in them days

Universal ideals obviously run contrary to everything embodied in the word Nationalism. Our tactics might be described by the slogan “Think local, act local”. Nationalism is not some crusading force bent on shining a light into every dark hollow and exposing these greater truths for the benefit of all mankind.

Of course, the Jewish question also exists at the local level. Nationalists must realise this and deal with it in a sane manner, completely rejecting as a tactic this reliance on internationalist folklore, and internet pop culture.

Of course, the Jewish question also exists at the local level. Nationalists must realise this and deal with it in a sane manner, completely rejecting as a tactic this reliance on internationalist folklore, and internet pop culture.

UNA writers being on firm ground discussing the realities of alternative politics in Australia are more than willing to take to task any person from the Jewish minority who takes a contrary position to that we Australian Nationalists hold.

download (1)

When such agitators choose to begin a sentence “As a Jew, I believe”, then proceed to critique, undermine or denigrate the White Australian ethnic group, our ideals, principles or political ambitions then we will respond to them as though they are hostiles from another tribe.

The situation, though, is not always clear-cut; take the notorious figure of John Safran, for example.

Now John, as we know, is from a Jewish family, but as he’s matured and honed his craft as an entertainer he has drifted away from the Jewish schtick he had affected early in his career.

Our issue with Safran is his opportunism (he is a journalist after all); his dishonest tactics and the fact that he cooperates with the political police, state-backed ANTIFA gangs, and anti-racist vigilantes.

Our issue with Safran is his opportunism (he is a journalist after all); his dishonest tactics and the fact that he cooperates with the political police, state-backed ANTIFA gangs, and anti-racist vigilantes.

As a documentary maker and author of non-fiction Safran is truthful up to a point, but he’s dishonest or self-serving in his intentions; he’s out for what he can get from his subjects but there is a level of collusion with the enemies of Australian workers, which makes him a serious problem for Nationalists.

safranchris.png
John Safran was expecting an idiot. Instead he got owned by Chris Shortis!

We do not make any assertions about the part Safran’s well-documented upbringing or ancestry play in shaping his activities; he’s simply a pest who actively works against the interests of our ethnic group; our working-class politics, and particularly against the struggling White underclass.

In the main, these ostensibly Jewish agitators who, from time-to-time, appear to annoy and disrupt the alternative political groups, are on punitive missions from the mainstream milieu; they are literal bourgeoisie in most cases who use their Jewishness as a shield while they punch downward at those considered to be beneath contempt.

Think of them as smug middle-class bullies who go out on Saturday night bashing homeless men for thrills; that is the mentality which we are dealing with here.

We Nationalists don’t deny that there exists a sort of consensus among many Jewish academics and intellectuals that, as Noel Ignatiev put it, “loyalty to Whiteness is treason to humanity” and that their published works are widely used to indoctrinate new generations of pesky undergraduate radicals.

We Nationalists don’t deny that there exists a sort of consensus among many Jewish academics and intellectuals that, as Noel Ignatiev put it, “loyalty to Whiteness is treason to humanity” and that their published works are widely used to indoctrinate new generations of pesky undergraduate radicals.

Once again, this consensus is formed by a globe-spanning meeting of minds, not all of them Jewish. It is a Universalist doctrine with input from many ethnic groups; the leading Jewish proponents are once again just thugs, shielded by the convenient social stigmas against the censure of Jews, they punch downward against the powerless on behalf of the powerful.

In the end, yes, we will confront the dreaded JQ as Nationalists and we won’t avoid discussing or diminish the agitation by self-professed Jews against the interests of the White working class, as and when it occurs.

What we will not do however is give credence to obviously false or unverifiable statements, conspiracy theories or globalist inspired problem-reaction-solution narratives! These we regard as pointless distractions leading inevitably to unhelpful conclusions.

Nationalists operate in the here and now, we’re focused on what’s going on in our towns and suburbs, the interlocking components of our nation are our immediate concern because even when victory comes, the hyper-rich elites, such as they are, will always be beyond the grasp of even the most “enlightened” conspiracy theorist.

In the world outside the internet, the much maligned “sheeple” need shepherds and sheepdogs to protect and nurture them, not jabbering doomsday preachers with pie in the sky ideas.

download (2)