SPEAKING FREELY ABOUT 18C

SPEAKING FREELY ABOUT 18C

A unique Nationalist perspective on a contentious law

18C sucks. It was brought in to keep the Jewish community happy. They are not, because they don’t believe it goes far enough. But now a plucky NSW Liberal Democrat senator, David Leyonhjelm, has issued a complaint to the Human Rights Commission after anti-White left wing journalist Mark Kenny described the senator as “an angry White male”, which was clearly intended in the pejorative. Leyonhjelm hopes to use the issue to prove that the law burdens free speech and that the law will view any action by White people as absurd since it exists purely as a stick to wave at us. We think the senator is trolling brilliantly. But there is also another point of view, which we publish here in the interests of open nationalist dialogue. UNA prides itself on affording all nationalist points of view a platform, short of allowing in movement wreckers, cucks, and Zionist stooges. Here then is the well acquitted opinion that 18c is irrelevant to smart nationalists. Feel free to comment, readers.

UNA Editor-in-chief.

download (10)
This is what is known as a “low act”

Given the hullabaloo over the revival of the section 18c debate in the new parliament, we as Nationalists feel somewhat compelled to offer some opinions on the subject. The contentious passage in the Australian human rights laws is explained by the Australian Human Rights And Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) on their website:

“Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act makes it unlawful for someone to do an act that is reasonably likely to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” someone because of their race or ethnicity.”

Section 18D of the Racial Discrimination Act contains exemptions which protect freedom of speech. These ensure that artistic works, scientific debate and fair comment on matters of public interest are exempt from section 18C, providing they are said or done reasonably and in good faith.

The words “offend, insult” have long been a target of conservative and libertarian pundits and politicians, they would argue that offence to certain words or acts is only taken as a matter of personal choice; the sticks and stones principle.

That is a reasonable argument but in reality, the two political camps most invested in this approach have differing motivations.

pjimage
We’re not saying that David Leyonhjelm is Blofeld, but you have to wonder

The conservatives seem to think, rightly as it happens, that 18c places too much power in the hands of their ideological enemies, or in other words, the Left.

This is a reasonable proposition because the HREOC is mainly staffed by university academics, lawyers and bureaucrats — all professions stacked to the brim with pinkos and fellow travellers.

Frankly, it doesn’t mean much. Generally speaking, we would like to think that 18c has no real bearing on what we do since we have a well-developed political position, which is expressed in an articulate manner, with wit, good humour, intelligence and tact.

This writer’s impression of the Libertarians published case, given that their chief spokesman senator David Leyonhjelm has the writing style of a twelve-year-old, is that they want the state power to censor speech wound back because, as the deeply ironic young people in our movement say, “Muh Liberty!”.

Well and good, let’s say senators Bernardi, Hinch, Hanson, Leyonhjelm and company prevail, what does that mean for Nationalists?

download (9)
Despite not being born here, this French-Laotian earns $300,000 of Australian taxpayer dollars every year to go around telling us how Australia would be better off without White people

Frankly, it doesn’t mean much. Generally speaking, we would like to think that 18c has no real bearing on what we do since we have a well-developed political position, which is expressed in an articulate manner, with wit, good humour, intelligence and tact.

Nevertheless, from time to time, trouble comes knocking anyway. “Racism” has a way of finding us even if we don’t normally engage in the crass identity politics of the present zeitgeist.

That is the point we would most like to impress upon our readers: repealing or modifying human rights laws will do little to aid the Nationalist struggle against entrenched power, globalist capitalism or its Universalist monoculture.

Our class, ethnic and political enemies have limitless funds which they can employ to disrupt dissident political groups, buy supportive media commentary for their anti-Australian worldview and, if need be, drag activists into endless and costly court cases.

Nationalists, who have kept abreast of events in North America over recent decades, can attest to the fact that even with the protection of the first amendment to the U.S constitution, successive Nationalist or even conservative groups have been dragged into civil suits by “Civil Rights” groups and bankrupted, or worse.

True, removing 18c takes away one advantage to our enemies in that they can no longer rely on free advice and legal backing from HREOC, but we can’t stress this point enough; THEY ARE RICH AND WE ARE NOT.

Even if our self-appointed adversaries do happen, at some point, to be workers themselves or people without means Nationalists can be assured that they will have human rights lawyers and wealthy social justice warriors beating a path to their door with offers of financial support and pro-bono legal representation.

Nationalists, who have kept abreast of events in North America over recent decades, can attest to the fact that even with the protection of the first amendment to the U.S constitution, successive Nationalist or even conservative groups have been dragged into civil suits by “Civil Rights” groups and bankrupted, or worse.

18c
The Jews know that freedom to identify race means the freedom to defend ourselves from White Genocide

Free speech does not guarantee freedom for the dissident Nationalist. Sure, Bernardi, Hanson and Leyonhjelm may benefit from changes to the laws but they are all system players, they are insulated by parliamentary privilege, wealth, and good standing with the elites.

Another effect of repeal or re-wording of 18c may be to embolden the nitwit civic patriots, demented Bogan bigots and Hollywood Nazi Provocateur fringe dwellers that incessantly pester Nationalists and create strife where none need exist.

In truth, though, how much worse could they get? Operators like Nick Folkes, Antifa Neil Erikson and Sherm “The Germ” Burgess are already so over the top that the only conclusion Australian workers can reach is that these dipsticks are protected from on high; they’ve already proven that they’ll press on with their desperately narcissistic behaviour regardless of any injunction from the human rights crowd.

Our alternative to political Islamism is political Australianism, however, the fact is that, with the curious exemption of Hizb Ut Tahrir, most powerful political Islamist tendencies are proscribed organisations in Australia, their leaders and devotees cannot legally travel to, raise funds from or organise in this country.

We are the movement of alternatives, of real solutions to difficult problems, and our ideas, while dangerous to the globalist money powers, are not normally offensive, even by the standards of the “loony left”.

Our alternative to Islam, for example, is Christianity. We would say to these “good” Moslems that the way of Jesus Christ is superior to the way of Mohammed and leave their conversion to Christian Nationalists.

Our alternative to political Islamism is political Australianism, however, the fact is that, with the curious exemption of Hizb Ut Tahrir, most powerful political Islamist tendencies are proscribed organisations in Australia, their leaders and devotees cannot legally travel to, raise funds from or organise in this country.

If and when an authentic, antipodean Islamist political movement should arise, Nationalists stand ready to challenge, dominate and defeat by political means any incursion by such groups onto our turf on the political margins.

For Nationalists it will always be business as usual, 18c certainly doesn’t protect us, for it was never intended to, yet it doesn’t hinder us or place any real obstacles in our path.

Our enemies will still routinely employ dirty tricks, slander and intimidation to suppress alternative ideas and a genuine worker’s movement we accept this as our lot and press on.

We should never play the victim, even facetiously to make a point as senator Leyonhjelm does. Every hateful libel, every lie against us is a learning experience. We are apart from the circus of post-modern identity politics. We march to the beat of our own drum.

images (8)

AUSTRALIANNESS EQUALS TERRORISM

AUSTRALIANNESS EQUALS TERRORISM

A dangerous media, treasonous authorities, and powerful interests

satpap.png
Why read Exodus when you have kosher Morry’s The Saturday Paper to thumb through over lox bagels?

Where young radicalised Moslem men are concerned, sentiments such as, “they can be de-radicalised” are common. This implies how at their core these are good boys led astray by bad people. They are infected by a doctrine, but a cure exists.

The onus transfers to the host society for failing to ‘properly assimilate’ this ‘youth’, due to systemic bias or neglect. It goes without saying.

No such empathy exists for the kindred of the host nation. There is no sympathy for young Australian men who have been disowned by the globalist model.

In fact, their fate is considered just desserts, based on pretexts of ‘historic injustice’ against the beatified Aborigine who is privileged by victimhood. Radicalised Moslem youth is likewise vindicated by the mercurial logic of multiculturalism in which the parent culture is guilty of everything. The Bogan patriot, consequently, came to their radicalism through poor education and endemic racism.

These kids are redundant as both Australians, and as males, and they should have reconciled with that by now (if you invoke feminist textual analysis).

In fact, their fate is considered just desserts, based on pretexts of ‘historic injustice’ against the beatified Aborigine who is privileged by victimhood. Radicalised Moslem youth is likewise vindicated by the mercurial logic of multiculturalism in which the parent culture is guilty of everything. The Bogan patriot, consequently, came to their radicalism through poor education and endemic racism.

Radicalised Moslems have a strong cultural identity which the state and media champion despite contrary perceptions. The ‘extreme right’ are simply dismissed as recalcitrant white trash. Their Australianness, which in most cases is all they have, is ridiculed as atavistic and invalidated by identity politics. Like all conquered peoples, their cultural identity is the first thing to be denied. Subordinated, those conquered people are consigned to quaintness. However, Australianness is now also symptomatic of ‘radicalisation’; by say, unfurling the national flag, or conforming to a particular stereotype.

Anything preferential, therefore, broadly speaking, favours the ‘migrant’ by a code of political politesse. The Australian “extremist” is the problem, not the Moslem; even though both are fighting for cultural dominance. The Left uses this as a propaganda tactic: claiming that patriotic activity stokes terrorism and emboldens (ta ra) ISIS!

1457086505013
Uthman Badar says Moslems are being “assimilated” in Aussie schools. We hadn’t noticed. This is last year’s pic, but

Yet, with the ground opened by globalism and the erasure of Australianness, distinct cultural identities out there — who are not denied — want to seize it.

Anything preferential, therefore, broadly speaking, favours the ‘migrant’ by a code of political politesse. The Australian “extremist” is the problem, not the Moslem; even though both are fighting for cultural dominance. The Left uses this as a propaganda tactic: claiming that patriotic activity stokes terrorism and emboldens (ta ra) ISIS!

Andrew Bolt reported that Hizb ut-Tahrir spokesman Uthman Badar addressed an ‘Innocent Until Proven Moslem’ forum, and told hundreds of braying Hajis that “The Australian anthem is based upon a particular view of history, it is a reading of history, and it is a statement which conforms to particular values. Now, if one does not share those values, why would they express it?”

He was talking about kids singing the national anthem in schools. This, he argues, is “forced assimilation”. When it comes to programs like ‘Safe Schools’, with its pervert LGBT bias, he will be on the more solid ground.

The media might even frame Badar as ‘an extremist’ but this is an open secret out in the communities that multiculturalism generates tribalism, with the host tribe formally denied tribal rights so as to balance out the playing field.18vg5b

The attendance at Bankstown outstripped any patriot demonstration in terms of supporting numbers. Yet, The Saturday Paper, which is owned by Morry Schwartz, a Jewish publisher and property developer (bing!), published a misleading, alarmist, and wholly biased piece entitled “How Reclaim Australia hid a terrorist”.

From the get-go, this thing sprays shit mist. The machinations of the ‘movement’ are all muddled up in a slick sort of sophistry, the writer and his socially aware publisher uninterested in critical details.

The media might even frame Badar as ‘an extremist’ but this is an open secret out in the communities that multiculturalism generates tribalism, with the host tribe formally denied tribal rights so as to balance out the playing field.

Reading this propaganda, we learn that ultimately all patriots “dream of Hitler”. We know that ultra-nationalist Nick Folkes does, as he’s rumoured to keep a portrait of the führer (or is it Humphrey Bear?) in his powder room. Otherwise, outside of that strategically re-quoted comment made by Blair Cottrell about giving students Mein Kampf as class reading (assuming you can find a student that can read), there is no Hitler fetish within the patriot movement. In fact, love of the former German leader is enough to get you barred from rallies and kicked off their Facebook pages.

But the key phrase that really stabs off the page is the writer’s subjective moral judgement of “supreme intolerance”, which he uses to characterise a ‘movement’ that he goes on to admit is not organised enough to qualify for the terminology.

18vfx9

Of course, the article really jumps the shark when it brings whacky Jack Van Tongeren into the narrative. He has about as much to do with the ‘patriot movement’, as Yogi Bear has to do with spelunking. You are reading something published by Morry Schwartz, and you can smell the bagels.

Whereas Moslems have a definite article to guide them in that weirdo book of theirs, no such manifesto exists to radicalise patriots. All they have are Blair Cottrell’s Conan addresses, and Sherm the Germ’s spastic sprays to the camera. It is a wonder that Facebook isn’t blamed for radicalising ‘da youf’, given different arguments.

More to the point, the “dangerous extremists” from the left, who use militant symbols and a stated policy of violent confrontation and that seriously do show “supreme intolerance”, come off like the tattling sister who is daddy’s favourite.images (4)

GETTING IT RIGHT ON THE JEWISH QUESTION

GETTING IT RIGHT ON THE JEWISH QUESTION

A guide to a sensible Nationalist worldview

As Nationalists we are often drawn into internet discussions of supposedly sensitive topics, and the social position of the Jewish minority inevitably comes up, as does their relationship to Australian Nationalism. We here at UNA will never recoil from confronting difficult issues, but we demand a high standard of writing from our contributors, in order to further the political education of our readers.

The most important tactic in dealing with the Jewish question is truthfulness. If we Nationalists simply tell the truth to the extent that we are able to discern it through rigorous research, if we always favour solid information over hearsay or confabulation, then our readership cannot ask for much more.

Much is made of so-called “conspiracy theories” concerning Jews. We don’t propose to go into the details of more popular memes in this short piece but rest assured that our writers, being enquiring minds, are all across this particular genre of internet entertainment.

Much is made of so-called “conspiracy theories” concerning Jews. We don’t propose to go into the details of more popular memes in this short piece but rest assured that our writers, being enquiring minds, are all across this particular genre of internet entertainment.

The talk of globo-capitalist cabals and cartels and the roles rich Jews play in their operation is interesting, to be sure, however, after a while, it becomes a tiresome diversion for Nationalists.

If all the stories are true, if these Rothschilds, crypto-Jewish plants, and subversive capitalists really wield the power ascribed to them then aspiring Nationalist tacticians should realise that, on the whole, our methods are not calculated to confront these semi-mythical beings.

In truth mythology or folklore is the most accurate description of the globo-Zionist-crypto-Jewish memes.

Readers must not think for a moment that we Australian Nationalists reject the power of folklore in a political movement, we enthusiastically embrace it. However, these conspiracy theories are not part of our own tradition.

Readers must not think for a moment that we Australian Nationalists reject the power of folklore in a political movement, we enthusiastically embrace it. However, these conspiracy theories are not part of our own tradition.

In truth, these ideas and the way they are propagated, are just another manifestation of the negative social outcomes stemming from globalisation; they encourage an outward-looking mindset and a belief in universal problems, with universal solutions.

hitler-arrested-baron-louis-de-rothschild
It wasn’t all bad news back in them days

Universal ideals obviously run contrary to everything embodied in the word Nationalism. Our tactics might be described by the slogan “Think local, act local”. Nationalism is not some crusading force bent on shining a light into every dark hollow and exposing these greater truths for the benefit of all mankind.

Of course, the Jewish question also exists at the local level. Nationalists must realise this and deal with it in a sane manner, completely rejecting as a tactic this reliance on internationalist folklore, and internet pop culture.

Of course, the Jewish question also exists at the local level. Nationalists must realise this and deal with it in a sane manner, completely rejecting as a tactic this reliance on internationalist folklore, and internet pop culture.

UNA writers being on firm ground discussing the realities of alternative politics in Australia are more than willing to take to task any person from the Jewish minority who takes a contrary position to that we Australian Nationalists hold.

download (1)

When such agitators choose to begin a sentence “As a Jew, I believe”, then proceed to critique, undermine or denigrate the White Australian ethnic group, our ideals, principles or political ambitions then we will respond to them as though they are hostiles from another tribe.

The situation, though, is not always clear-cut; take the notorious figure of John Safran, for example.

Now John, as we know, is from a Jewish family, but as he’s matured and honed his craft as an entertainer he has drifted away from the Jewish schtick he had affected early in his career.

Our issue with Safran is his opportunism (he is a journalist after all); his dishonest tactics and the fact that he cooperates with the political police, state-backed ANTIFA gangs, and anti-racist vigilantes.

Our issue with Safran is his opportunism (he is a journalist after all); his dishonest tactics and the fact that he cooperates with the political police, state-backed ANTIFA gangs, and anti-racist vigilantes.

As a documentary maker and author of non-fiction Safran is truthful up to a point, but he’s dishonest or self-serving in his intentions; he’s out for what he can get from his subjects but there is a level of collusion with the enemies of Australian workers, which makes him a serious problem for Nationalists.

safranchris.png
John Safran was expecting an idiot. Instead he got owned by Chris Shortis!

We do not make any assertions about the part Safran’s well-documented upbringing or ancestry play in shaping his activities; he’s simply a pest who actively works against the interests of our ethnic group; our working-class politics, and particularly against the struggling White underclass.

In the main, these ostensibly Jewish agitators who, from time-to-time, appear to annoy and disrupt the alternative political groups, are on punitive missions from the mainstream milieu; they are literal bourgeoisie in most cases who use their Jewishness as a shield while they punch downward at those considered to be beneath contempt.

Think of them as smug middle-class bullies who go out on Saturday night bashing homeless men for thrills; that is the mentality which we are dealing with here.

We Nationalists don’t deny that there exists a sort of consensus among many Jewish academics and intellectuals that, as Noel Ignatiev put it, “loyalty to Whiteness is treason to humanity” and that their published works are widely used to indoctrinate new generations of pesky undergraduate radicals.

We Nationalists don’t deny that there exists a sort of consensus among many Jewish academics and intellectuals that, as Noel Ignatiev put it, “loyalty to Whiteness is treason to humanity” and that their published works are widely used to indoctrinate new generations of pesky undergraduate radicals.

Once again, this consensus is formed by a globe-spanning meeting of minds, not all of them Jewish. It is a Universalist doctrine with input from many ethnic groups; the leading Jewish proponents are once again just thugs, shielded by the convenient social stigmas against the censure of Jews, they punch downward against the powerless on behalf of the powerful.

In the end, yes, we will confront the dreaded JQ as Nationalists and we won’t avoid discussing or diminish the agitation by self-professed Jews against the interests of the White working class, as and when it occurs.

What we will not do however is give credence to obviously false or unverifiable statements, conspiracy theories or globalist inspired problem-reaction-solution narratives! These we regard as pointless distractions leading inevitably to unhelpful conclusions.

Nationalists operate in the here and now, we’re focused on what’s going on in our towns and suburbs, the interlocking components of our nation are our immediate concern because even when victory comes, the hyper-rich elites, such as they are, will always be beyond the grasp of even the most “enlightened” conspiracy theorist.

In the world outside the internet, the much maligned “sheeple” need shepherds and sheepdogs to protect and nurture them, not jabbering doomsday preachers with pie in the sky ideas.

download (2)

D-DAY FOR WHITE-DISPLACEMENT IN AUSTRALIA BEGINS TODAY

D-DAY FOR WHITE-DISPLACEMENT IN AUSTRALIA BEGINS TODAY

Tim Soutphommasane is Australia’s unwanted, un-needed, and unwelcome Race Discrimination Commissioner. Born in France of Laotian parents, this clammy fraud rakes in $300K as a Rudd Government appointee. His job, if it HAS any meaning, is to ear-bash Australians about being “racist”, and “too White”. He has the non-White privilege to hold this title and its remuneration until 2018, by which time he will hopefully meet with a serious accident involving an airplane propeller and a radioactive suppository.

As of today, 29/07/2016, this podgy mixed-race gerbil along with globalist Westpac CEO Brian Hartzer launch ‘Leading for Change’, which is a program designed to sack Whitey from his own gig. And the best reasons they can come up with for this act of ethnic displacement is, “better financial performance”. Yes, it supposedly makes good business sense to not have Whites around in their own country, which might fly in the face of historical and empirical truths, but this isn’t about monetary-acquisition, any more than it pertains to spelunking.

Tim Soutphommasane horizontal close up
It falls to an Asian man born in France to tell Australians that they need to give their country over to non-Whites like him

Their template for White Displacement comes at a time where Europe is being deliberately flooded with millions of black and Haji “rapeugees” who can’t let a day go by without committing a barbaric act of mass murder on its peoples. These atrocities will not alter the will of European leaders to continue this process of outright genocide against Europeans, any more than it will stop the flow of money from those like George Soros to activist groups and media supporting this evil agenda at all costs.

Their template for White Displacement comes at a time where Europe is being deliberately flooded with millions of black and Haji “rapeugees” who can’t let a day go by without committing a barbaric act of mass murder on its peoples.

At the same time, a struggle is on to wrest the American presidency from a Democratic party with a black Moslem President and his White-female would-be successor who both condone the murder of White police officers, and endorse the group Black Lives Matter, which is treating Whites much like Jewish Hollywood has us believe Jews were treated in 1930s Germany.

Yes, in total chorus with these conspicuous events affecting Whites the world over, today the “Human Rights Commission” releases their “blueprint” to “rethink Anglo-Celtic bias”. In a booklet entitled Leading for Change: A blueprint for cultural diversity and inclusive leadership, they spell out how and why to go about this.

booklet
This is the guidebook to de-Whitening the country and putting non-Whites in charge

The headings are deceptively ominous:

  • Measuring cultural diversity: collect data and report progress
  • Accountability and targets
  • Dealing with bias and discrimination
  • Professional development: cultivate diverse leaders

Meanwhile, the content is six-million percent free of racial bias (except for its bias in favour of racial bias) and so fiscally sound you could toss it on a roulette table and scoop up a tower of chips.

  • There is mounting evidence that more diverse organisations achieve better performance. Analysis conducted by McKinsey, for example, indicated a positive relationship between a more diverse leadership team and better financial performance.

This means that before Australia received its squillions of brownish immigrants Aussies were living in the dirt trying to catch worms to feed their emaciated families. There was no money for anything because a lack of diversity meant we were all bog poor, so why any of these dynamic coloured peoples ever wanted to bring their economic miracle here in the first place is a hard call.

  • If under-representation of cultural diversity in leadership is symptomatic of bias and discrimination, this is not without its consequences. While there is limited research that has authoritatively quantified the financial cost of racial discrimination to society at large, they are likely to be substantial.

See, if you mix subjectivity with no scientific proof whatsoever you are guaranteed to get the answer you want. In this case, that “racial discrimination” costs society zillions of dollars and leads to holistic angst. And we know this because “limited research” suggests it is “likely”. And this limited research was carried about by people who are not racist Anglo-Celts, so it is not only accurate down to the microdot but also financially more responsible given the argument.

  • For an organisation to lead on diversity and inclusion, it has to put its money where its mouth is. It must not only dedicate serious resources to it, but also make it part of its managers’ performance appraisals. Leaders may require their direct reports to take responsibility for promoting cultural diversity, such as through sponsoring initiatives or mentoring diverse talent.

This means, quite sensibly, that apart from his or her (most likely ‘her’ given the general direction of all this) ascribed duties, the manager must now ‘police diversity’ within the organisational ranks or face the wrath of demerit. This will lead to a hiring policy that absolutely discriminates against anyone White, at a time when locals, such as nursing graduates, are losing jobs and careers as companies hire foreigners on working visas for reasons that nobody has had the good grace to bother explaining.

This approach worked wonders at Facebook, we are told. We are given a large paragraph gleefully recounting the miracle that was worked via positive discrimination against anyone with White skin:

  • Few were surprised when, in 2014, a number of US tech firms published diversity data that showed an underrepresentation of diversity – especially women and African-Americans. But some are now taking action. Perhaps most notably, Facebook introduced a course for its employees, Managing Bias. According to COO Sheryl Sandberg (OY VEY!), ‘one of the most important things we can do to promote diversity in the workplace is to correct for the unconscious bias that all of us have.’ Recognising that ‘organisations which consider themselves highly meritocratic can actually show more bias’, Sandberg said that ‘managing bias can help us build stronger, more diverse and inclusive companies – and drive better business results’. Facebook worked with researchers to develop Managing Bias, which it shares with the public through a dedicated website, managingbias.fb.com. The course includes case studies and workshop sessions. Using a series of videos to introduce topics to staff, the course focuses on four types of biases: Performance Bias, Performance Attribution Bias, Competence/Likeability Trade-off Bias, and Maternal Bias. While some of the biases relate exclusively to gender, others also have relevance to race and culture.

We also get a history lesson.

  • For over 40 000 years Australia was, of course, solely occupied by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, until the arrival of the First Fleet in 1788. With the colonisation of Australia, the population would become predominantly British (English, Scottish, Welsh) and Irish in background – scholars refer to Australian national identity being shaped during its colonial era by an ‘Anglo-Celtic’ hybrid culture.Such composition in the Australian colonial population was reinforced by cumulative immigration from the British Isles. Significant numbers of Chinese and other immigrants arrived during the gold rushes in the second half of the 19th century; there would also be many thousands of Pacific Islander workers who came to Australia as indentured labourers in the 19th century, largely in Queensland. But immigration restrictions imposed by colonial and later the Commonwealth governments meant the cultural impact of such immigration – namely, of nonAnglo-Celtic origin – was limited. The maintenance of the White Australia policy for most of the 20th century meant that immigration was mainly from the British Isles – that is, until the post-Second World War period. The 1950s and 60s were years when significant numbers of immigrants from Europe settled in Australia. This would inject a new non-Anglo-Celtic  European cultural component to the Australian population. The next waves of immigration have been of a non-European origin, with the formal dismantling of the White Australia policy in 1973, and the arrival of refugees following the conclusion of the Vietnam War and related strife in Cambodia and Laos. The late 1970s and early 1980s saw some 70 000 Indochinese refugees resettled in Australia, with many more thousands of these refugees’ relatives arriving in later years through family reunion programs. This has also been accompanied by the arrival of immigrants from other countries in Asia, as well as the Middle East, South America and Africa.

Of course, a hard-line nationalist might just be growing sick and tired of hearing about “40,000 years of Aboriginal occupation” and have become emboldened enough to say that Australia is an entirely different country to anything that the Abo went ‘walkabout’ on. Aboriginals were sidelined as the primitive beasts that natural selection has naturally counted them as. This country that is now being reorganised by ‘un-natural selection’ should pay no deference at all to this great myth of savage nobility. Instead a great big, “Sucked in, you lost” could be blown every time they try and provoke a pang of ‘shame’ and ‘guilt’.

images
Once in a while a cop comes along who you just wish would die in the course of duty

Yes, today the money changers in the hallowed halls of Westpac, one of the greediest and most skunk-like repositories of usury serpents in the land, sit down to prepare us all for a mammoth dive into non-White hegemony courtesy of a man not even born here, and supported by various greed-head traitors, Jews, and Nick Kaldas.

Indeed, Nick Kaldas. The man who greenlighted the Lebanese attacks during the Cronulla civil uprising… the man who has been invested in this country to agitate against Whitey. You can read about him here on the Australia First Party page. There is a little shout out to him hidden in the imprint of this obscene publication,

  • The Working Group thanks Nick Kaldas APM, who was a member of the group until March 2016. Dr Andreea Constantin provided research assistance, with the support of the University of Sydney Business School.

b4ad63fe0b3898ade5951142269a485ab0a8d411
Give it your best shot, Pepe

The essence of the Kalergi plan

In his book «Praktischer Idealismus», Kalergi indicates that the residents of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the People of the Old Continent, but a kind of sub-humans, products of miscegenation. He clearly states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and colored races, thus creating a multinational flock with no quality and easily controlled by the ruling elite.

Kalergi proclaims the abolition of the right of self-determination and then the elimination of nations with the use of ethnic separatist movements and mass migration. In order for Europe to be controlled by an elite, he wants to turn people into one homogeneous mixed breed of Blacks, Whites and Asians. Who is this elite however? Kalergi is particularly illuminating on this: 

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice.The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats.This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews [due to the actions taken by the French Revolution] 
 
Although no textbook mentions Kalergi, his ideas are the guiding principles of the European Union. The belief that the peoples of Europe should be mixed with Africans and Asians, to destroy our identity and create a single mestizo race, is the basis of all community policies that aim to protect minorities. Not for humanitarian reasons, but because of the directives issued by the ruthless Regime that machinates the greatest genocide in history. The Coudenhove-Kalergi European Prize is awarded every two years to Europeans who have excelled in promoting this criminal plan.Among those awarded with such a prize are Angela Merkel and Herman Van Rompuy.
 
The incitement to genocide, is also the basis of the constant appeals of the United Nations, that demands we accept millions of immigrants to help with the low birth rates of the EU. According to a report published on January 2000 in «Population division» Review of the United Nations in New York, under the title “Immigration replacement: A solution to declining and aging population,” Europe will need by 2025 159,000,000 migrants.

One could wonder how there can be such accuracy on the estimates of immigration, although it was not a premeditated plan. It is certain that the low birth rate could easily be reversed with appropriate measures to support families. It is just as clear that it is the contribution of foreign genes do not protect our genetic heritage, but that it enables their disappearance. The sole purpose of these measures is to completely distort our people, to turn them into a group of people without national, historical and cultural cohesion. In short, the policies of the Kalergi plan was and still is, the basis of official government policies aimed at genocide of the Peoples of Europe, through mass immigration. G. Brock Chisholm, former director of the World Health Organization (OMS), proves that he has learned the lesson of Kalergi well when he says: “What people in all places have to do is to limit of birthrates and promote mixed marriages (between different races), this aims to create a single race in a world which will be directed by a central authority. “

download
This guy wrote a book about White Genocide too

EXCUSES ARE THE REASON AFRICANS COMMIT SO MUCH CRIME

EXCUSES ARE THE REASON AFRICANS COMMIT SO MUCH CRIME

Sudanese commit crimes like ducks swim on water or cats chase butterflies. Loftily titled refugee immigrant ‘Africa Media Australia chief executive’ Clyde SALUMU SHARADY has offered reasons why; it’s because of excuses.

As usual, there is a laundry list of excuses as to why Sudanese refugees do what they do — and nearly all of them amount to “failure”. Indeed, the failure itself generates its own list of fails: failure of diversity, failure of policy, but more to the point the inherent failures of the Sudanese people themselves.

The Australian, which should be renamed The China, reports:

African youths causing a crime wave in Victoria are the product of eroded family units, trauma and an Australian society which does not sanction corporal punishment as a means of keeping them in line, claims a community leader.

Gangs of teenagers and young adults have been contributing to a surge in crimes, particularly in Melbourne’s east where carjackings, burglaries and theft are on the rise. But one of the defining characteristics of the young ­offenders is boldness and apparent indifferent to consequences.

Africa Media Australia chief executive Clyde Salumu Sharady told The Australian there is an increase in crime among young people broadly but particularly African youths, especially South Sudanese teenagers.

Mr Sharady said a medley of factors explained the phenomenon of rising criminality including unemployment rates, family trauma, language barriers and the demotion of men from traditional positions of influence in the family structure.

Sudanese should come with their own complex operating instructions when the UN dumps them here. These could resemble a list of a pet’s dietary needs, “Must have employment, language training, and men should immediately be promoted to the head of family structure to avoid anti-social behaviour and public disturbances. Please amend your society to accommodate this savage, warlike behaviour”.

Well, SALUMU, thanks to the international shifting of capital by a tiny percentage of the world’s richest we’re all in the same boat as to “unemployment” and the disappearance of the kind of blue-collar work that put men at a position of traditional influence in the family structure.

images (5)
This African is angry because of stuff

Although, it is equally courtesy of cultural Marxism that we have the academic and their political elites to thank for feminism, the dissolution of the family unit, and Waleed Aly.

Then again, aren’t those same cultural Marxists — who are your biggest apologists by the way — always arguing we live in a patriarchal society? In which case, we can scratch that one off the list.

“Kids are growing with very little structure within families, many of them don’t have male figures in their families,” he said. “Child protection laws are actually fuelling this crisis. There has got to be some understanding of the cultural background of people. In most African families, the rearing of the children is a little on the tough side rather than being very permissive.

“When that happens it is easy for child protection services to go in and qualify that as abuse and remove children from parents and that actually makes things worse. The children know they have a bit more power and a bit more rights and play with that.”

In other words, SALUMU, your people are naturally incompatible. The answer to ALL of their problems is to bite the hand that feeds them. Of course, you don’t mention how to African males, the concept of fidelity is like trying to figure out questions of quantum mechanics with a stick in the sand.

Mr Sharady is critical of attempts to dramatise the prevalence of the “Apex gang” which rose to notoriety after the Moomba riots in March but he conceded it is prevalent in Melbourne that young men and women meet up to steal cars and rob people.

Critical? As in sceptical? Yes, SALUMU, it’s all just an overreaction to a misunderstanding about what are, after all, elementary matters stemming from simple issues of cultural differences.

Crime generally in Victoria is up 12.3 per cent in the past year. Violent crime has increased, as has theft.

In the Greater Dandenong region, where the Apex gang took its name from a local street, more than 14,000 crimes of property, deception and crimes against people (assault) were committed in the year to March. The previous year fewer than 11,000 such offences were recorded. The rate is higher still in Latrobe.

Victoria was in the grip of a “crime crisis”, Liberal police spokesman Edward O’Donohue told The Australian, blaming Premier Daniel Andrews for “complete lack of leadership”.

“Clearly we need a multifaceted approach that deals with disengagement but we also need a strong message of deterrence with greater sanctions backed up by increased police resources to bring these offenders to justice.”

Disengagement? Perhaps the solution is a YOUTH FORUM. That will do the trick. Get all these Mogadishu Mobsters into one auditorium and TALK about their PROBLEMS. That is how you achieve a BIG FIX.

images (6)
The tough arm of the law: two pint-size girlie coppers using political correctness to deal with African street thugs

Because it’s not the thrill of crime and the absolute lack of any penalty for their actions that is to blame, it is D-I-S-E-N-G-A-G-E-M-E-N-T, which as we all know just requires a free hug and a listening ear.

The South Sudanese population in Victoria has grown sixfold since 2001 and there are now more than 7000 living in the area.

Victoria Police chief Graham Ashton said his force is “arresting the same young people again and again and again”.

Mr Sharady said bail laws, loosened under the Andrews government to make custody a last resort, “played in the minds of teenagers” who regard youth detention as “pretty much nothing”.

He said their fathers’ morale was also damaged by the struggle for even low-skilled work and payment of welfare mostly to mothers.

“So the mother becomes the breadwinner in that sense; the father can’t discipline their kids the way they wanted and a lot of the time they feel uncomfortable and useless, so they go back home,” he said.

Acting Police Minister Tim Pallas said increases in motor vehicle and burglary offences were part of a six-year trend, the government and police were “absolutely focused” on reversing.

“That’s why we’re funding hundreds more police, introducing new laws to target carjackers and home invaders, and also addressing how best we tackle youth recidivist offending in our ­community.”

OK, so “they go back home” do they? The whole point of being a refugee is that apparently the place where you’re coming from is TOO DANGEROUS to go back home. But clearly, this is not the case since the now jet-setting Sudanese man has the option of dumping his crime-prone children on Australia and flying back home to breed some more. If this is the case, then somebody somewhere is LYING to us.

Moreover, SALUMU, when our people arrived on these shores there was NOTHING. SQUAT. ZIP. NIL. NADA. SWEET BUGGER ALL. They were shackled in chains, whipped, beaten, starved, and had their feels hurt on a minute-by-minute basis. And the result of all those challenges is this nation — AUSTRALIA!

7648224-3x2-340x227
This is how they deal with the slide of civilisation caused by African crime: they get a bunch of non-Whites together to “talk” — and give ’em all expensive phones

You, SALUMU are here because you cannot even live among your own race. Your state is a failure, and your failures are therefore linked to your race. Sadly, our country is now slipping into ruin because the people have been forced to accept you and all the other GIMMES like you.

There is a simple solution and that involves organising a fleet of aircraft to return all of you to the Sudan, along with every other troublesome “refugee” and migrant community in Australia, so we can get back to the business of pursuing our collective destiny and happiness free from the threat of becoming a victim of our own national generosity of spirit.

r0_3_1200_678_w1200_h678_fmax
Meanwhile, this is how the first arrivals were treated merely for pinching a slice of bread. Makes you really FEEL for how tough the Sudanese have it

BOGAN BATTLEGROUND: THE PROS AND CONS OF TAKING THE FIGHT TO THE STREETS

BOGAN BATTLEGROUND: THE PROS AND CONS OF TAKING THE FIGHT TO THE STREETS

Sun Tzu, we recall said something about a wise general never showing his true face, or his true shape to the enemy. Wise counsel indeed but the patriotic street movements have taken that thought to the extreme, few people, even experienced Nationalists can now discern their intentions.

We will, in this article, focus on the street demonstration phenomenon, its meaning, practical effects and its future.

For nigh on 18 months Nationalists have regularly attended demonstrations held by both sides of the Patriot/Anti-Patriot street movement.

download (5)
The Kangaroo on the right is a patriot

We emphasise the use of the singular form “movement” due to the rapid metamorphosis of both sides into a state approaching symbiosis.

The one has become, not an opposite but merely a negative image of the other, the original picture is the same, as on photographic film, but it’s only when developed that the details are revealed.

For nigh on 18 months Nationalists have regularly attended demonstrations held by both sides of the Patriot/Anti-Patriot street movement.

There are superficial similarities nowadays, where before there were clearer divisions between Patriot and anti-racist; both sides have flirted with ethnic minority groups and tried to shield themselves behind the glow of the sacred “other”.

Both sides have also, over time, developed a much harder edge and attracted a rougher, more thuggish frontline element; this has come at the cost of alienating the older Leftists and the considerable White, working class following which had been attracted to the patriotic cause in 2015.

Both sides are now dependent upon one another for the cues to rally and demonstrate all actions are now motivated by the friction between the groups rather than any deep differences in principle or strongly held convictions.

There are superficial similarities nowadays, where before there were clearer divisions between Patriot and anti-racist; both sides have flirted with ethnic minority groups and tried to shield themselves behind the glow of the sacred “other”.

The really interesting aspect of this saga — the question keeping Nationalists awake at night — is the strategic implications of this push-me-pull-me pair of conjoined street movements.

As we understand the situation the fairly liberal approach to street demonstrations taken by the state of Victoria is, in light of the escalations in violence at Melton (2015) and Coburg (2016) about to change, with much stronger restrictions on where and when demonstrations can be held.

download (6)
Meanwhile, while Aussie fights Aussie over Islam, the joke is on us…

The issue of face coverings and masks, which for obvious reasons are worn by militants in public, is also to be addressed by acts of parliament.

As we understand the situation the fairly liberal approach to street demonstrations taken by the state of Victoria is, in light of the escalations in violence at Melton (2015) and Coburg (2016) about to change, with much stronger restrictions on where and when demonstrations can be held.

Affray laws are also to be beefed up along with police powers in relation to moving people on before trouble occurs or dispersing demonstrations which have gone south, so to speak.

In the early phase of the recent revival of street demonstrations the patriots were sorely tested by various anarchist and communist provocations and assaults, these they resisted, for the most part.

The turning point seems to have been the Melton rally of November 2015, which saw numbers of local White youth take on what was, by then, a much tougher brigade of ANTIFA. From that point, the provocations coupled with the drive to counter protest at every opportunity has taken over both sides.

In the early phase of the recent revival of street demonstrations the patriots were sorely tested by various anarchist and communist provocations and assaults, these they resisted, for the most part.

It is no longer a matter of making a point, rather the street crews are there to create a showing, a spectacle; they have to turn out now because the other side does.

Now we Nationalists being aficionados of smart tacticians, like Sun Tzu for example, read much into the initial patriot forays into “Charlie’s Point”, or as it’s commonly known, the Melbourne CBD.

We were sure that there was a point to this reckless charge into enemy territory, into that Blade Runneresque labyrinth, the home turf of the cosmopolitan, the anarchist and the bourgeois socialist.

The patriots initially differentiated themselves from ANTIFA by not rising to provocation, following police instructions and rejecting the use of masks, shamags and other face coverings.

Now we Nationalists being aficionados of smart tacticians, like Sun Tzu for example, read much into the initial patriot forays into “Charlie’s Point”, or as it’s commonly known, the Melbourne CBD.

They were the good guys, the White working class street movement born in the battles of Richmond, Bendigo and Federation Square, the rot however soon set in.

Tactically speaking, the patriots going onto the enemy’s turf and riling them into violence made sense to Nationalists, we saw it as a way to provoke the state into banning or heavily restricting street protests in the CBD. Such a move would have left the ANTIFA at an extreme disadvantage while allowing the patriots to concentrate on the preferred Nationalist method of conferences and sit down meetings held in suburban halls or country pubs.

20kyvqc
It is understood that the baseball bat used in this pic could never show itself at another game again

See, our people aren’t often in the CBD and have no interest in winning turf from the foreigners and rootless cosmopolitans who roost there. Our people are also sane, normal and not invested into these juvenile re-interpretations of West Side Story.

We would have expected the patriots to have followed or at least picked up on the tactical implications seized upon by Nationalists, at times it did seem as if they had done the smart thing and attempted to develop bastions where their sympathisers actually lived, in Bendigo for example.

See, our people aren’t often in the CBD and have no interest in winning turf from the foreigners and rootless cosmopolitans who roost there. Our people are also sane, normal and not invested into these juvenile re-interpretations of West Side Story.

This, however, by the close of 2015, had shifted away to the forms we see now, the symbiosis; the mutual dependence upon each other for cues as to what actions to take coupled with the transformation of the patriots into a pseudo black-bloc.

Nationalists see no value in expending energy to take ground in precincts which, to all intents and purposes, are no longer part of our society.

To be sure we applaud the use of these tactics to force the hand of the state, to use the weight of policing and by-laws shut down the anti-national forces arrayed under the ANTIFA banners.

Antifa1
Nick Folkes comes after ANTIFA but you cannot see him on this timeline

True asymmetrical warfare, we thought, never showing the true shape for sure, but we now realise that the patriots had little if any understanding of the long-term implications of their street actions.

We gloated over the impending doom of the Leftist street movements at the hands of politicians and bureaucrats who, though supportive of the Left on principle, were in no position to tolerate their violence and disruption of trade; not to mention the drain on the police budget as they devoted massive resources to each rally.

To be sure we applaud the use of these tactics to force the hand of the state, to use the weight of policing and by-laws shut down the anti-national forces arrayed under the ANTIFA banners.

Nationalists overestimated the patriots. Even though the desired result was achieved and the state is cracking down it simply looks as though it was inevitable rather than a result of a conscious effort by genuine dissidents.

There was a time for the patriots to withdraw and establish a heartland. We would judge that moment to have occurred after the Coburg debacle; the wash up of that demonstration and near riot left the inner suburban Leftists in deep disgrace with the politicians enraged and the pundits shrieking for explanations.

For all the accusations of Neo-Nazism thrown at the patriots the Nazis at least had Munich, the patriots had Bendigo from which to build a heartland base; but they chose to try and beat ANTIFA at their own game on their home turf and ended up becoming just a negative image of the people they profess to hate and despise.

maxresdefault
A typical Facebook war between ANTIS and patriots had its genisis in this

CHINESE GOVT’S AUSTRALIAN WHITE-GENOCIDE UNIT SUPPORTS ISLAM

CHINESE GOVT’S AUSTRALIAN WHITE-GENOCIDE UNIT SUPPORTS ISLAM

The Chinese Australian Forum popped up in the news the other day beating its hypocritical breast about Pauline Hanson. Some might say Chinese concern for “racism” is pretty rich considering they are ethnically cleansing the Tibetan people, as well as using their economic power to essentially occupy foreign nations for the benefit of their own state and citizenry. They have utterly no interest in “human rights” or other peoples of this earth, but here they are lecturing Australians on Pauline Hanson, who, if they had bothered actually listening to her, has totally backpedalled on the Asian invasion.

So what IS the Chinese Australian forum? This from their webpage:

The Chinese Australian Forum (CAF) is a non-partisan body established in 1985 to provide the Chinese community with a voice in the Australian political process. It began with the aim of raising the political awareness of Chinese Australians, but this objective quickly evolved and expanded to include involvement in contemporary social and political issues affecting the democratic process in Australia.

CAF regards diligent participation as an essential part of the integration of Chinese Australians with mainstream Australian society. By providing a forum for education and debate, and through responding to topical issues, CAF provides the voice for Chinese Australians to air their views and be heard. It is the only Chinese Australian organisation in NSW whose main activity is to engage members and supporters in the political process of this country.

You’ve got it. It exists to promote Chinese interests by meddling in our political process. The Chinese are, of course, shameless invaders and this brazen play on occidental liberal values is so stoked with audacity it almost explodes with self-mocking canned laughter.10463854_683900245057632_5846075256330141841_o.png

Anyhow, this gathering of aged Chinese Communists whose forum’s motto is “Building a socially harmonious and Cohesive Australia” had the cucked mainstream media aid and abett its anti-White agenda when they held a press conference to launch a #SayNoToPauline campaign. This is a bit like an Aussie group travelling to China to launch a #SayNoToTibetanGenocide campaign.

The ABC reports:

The Australian-Chinese community has launched a social media campaign to try to combat what it describes as intolerant and racist ideas being spread by senator-elect Pauline Hanson.

Community leaders said when Ms Hanson was last in parliament 20 years ago, they documented a significant increase in the number of people of Asian heritage being verbally and physically abused by strangers in public.

Dr Thiam Ang was the Chinese Australian Forum’s president in the 1990s during that period, and said he fears history will repeat itself.

“People tend to think that it’s confined to blue-collar workers, but that’s not true because in those days men in suits were spitting on Chinese Australians in the Chatswood and Turramurra stations,” he said.

“So I would like to appeal to middle Australia to guard against this trend and ask them to speak up when they see any instances of racial abuse.”

The Chinese Australian Forum is calling on people to take photos with signs that feature the #SayNoToPauline hash tag, and upload them to social media.

The forum’s president, Kenrick Cheah, said the organisation will join forces with the Muslim community and others being targeted by Ms Hanson’s party, One Nation.

“We condemn Islamaphobia,” he said.

“Just because we aren’t the main target this time does not mean that they won’t be coming for us or any other group. And no group in this country should be subject to any racial vilification, discrimination.”

Yeah, well, anyway, we know they’re full of shit. We also know that every single race seems to require their own community group formed for the purposes of telling White Australia how racist we are.

Mariam Veiszadeh is a fine example too. Born in Afghanistan, now here for whatever reason, she studied law on the Aussie taxpayers’ quid. Then she used her legal “kung fu” to establish a kind of honeypot social media operation where she lured outraged Aussies into breaching the 18C law… then she pounced. The hateful anti-White media loves her, and she is one of those repulsive “go-to” aliens they wheel out everytime there is justified reason to condemn Islamic cultural invasion.

download (1)
Chinese are teaching the Tibetans not to be racist by killing them off
download (2)
The Chinese show solidarity with their Moslem brothers by forcing them to dance and chant in a town square as an act of mass humiliation

The idea that there is an inherent justice in a cause is the illusion that these anti-White groups use to legitimise themselves through the traitor media.

But just like these dastardly yellow devils, they invariably show their hand. Such as here on the Chinese Australian Forum. Yes, you can read about how oppressive White Australia is; and how Islamic terrorism is nothing compared to how many people Whites kill every day. We supply snapshots from their page. We advise you head over and troll them to death. Troll their hashtag, troll their Facebook page, troll them on the beaches, troll them on the sand, troll them on… well, just troll them.

antiwiswww
The CAF Facebook page is a good place to troll
antiwhite
The UNA FB crew show how it’s done. Posted today on CAF’s anti-White FB page
Anti_white3
Posted on CAF’s FB page. Yep, it is Whites who are the real danger. The sooner Chinese take over the safer the world will be

anti-white