CONSERVATIVE MUSLIMS ARE NO MATCH FOR PROGRESSIVES

CONSERVATIVE MUSLIMS ARE NO MATCH FOR PROGRESSIVES

In our ongoing campaign against Islamophobic conservatives, self-styled civic patriots and those whose primary goal is protecting the interests of the Zionist entity, Nationalists are frequently accused of being “soft” on Islam.

We use the attack word, Islamophobia, in its proper context; that is to say that, in most cases, our enemies on the right are not capable of thinking clearly, nor of behaving rationally around the subject of Islam and Muslims.

It is a fact that the line pushed by these Zio-patriots has become the basis of an asocial internet cult for lonely, dysfunctional and depressed workers and marginalised people.

We hear often enough that it’s better to feel as though one belongs to something bigger than the sum of its parts, even if the whole program is flawed and most of the followers know that the emperor has no clothes.

As any frequent reader of our Nationalist media will observe, the main grievances against Islam expressed by the patriots are fear mongering of one sort or another, or ephemera and trivia gleaned from overseas news sources and conflated with events closer to home.

Nationalists really do not care about the inhabitants of, say Mauritania, Afghanistan or Bangladesh; it is none of our concern whether Islamic jurists push onerous Sharia laws upon the peasants of those regions; nor do we care about the status of women and minorities living under those regimes.

It is a fact that the line pushed by these Zio-patriots has become the basis of an asocial internet cult for lonely, dysfunctional and depressed workers and marginalised people.

We don’t feel the need to mention Islam in every single article we pen or to bring discussions of genital mutilation, halal slaughter or terrorism into our readers’ news feeds simply to shock and traumatise them into supporting a particular point of view.

Islam and Muslims in Australia are, as we see it, at a crossroads of sorts in that by allowing themselves to be manipulated into supporting progressive identity politics they have shackled themselves to a doomed project.

Tobes.png
Progressive Moslem, Toby Cook, is a member of multiracial Civic Nationalist Party for Freedom

As any White Nationalist knows, the whole progressive programme is calculated to bring about absolute equality of all people, by any means necessary, up to and including waging wars of aggression and imperialist adventures.

Since the end of the great European fratricide of the 20th century, progressive subversion has been directed to the sole purpose of eradicating the national, spiritual and communal life of all the White groups across the globe.

It is to this project, genocide according to the rules laid down by progressives themselves, that the modern Australian Muslim, whether he agrees with it or not, finds himself shackled via the umbilical cord of identity politics.

As any White Nationalist knows, the whole progressive programme is calculated to bring about absolute equality of all people, by any means necessary, up to and including waging wars of aggression and imperialist adventures.

The patriots own rhetoric, addled as it is, clearly announces that their targets are Islam and the Left, whom they see as allies at least, co-conspirators at worst; Muslims are therefore held to be equally culpable for the actions of their progressive allies.

We already see Islam in Australia being re-defined by progressives and attempts made to philosophically and physically reconstruct that religion into something which, like the “reformed” Christian and Jewish movements, can be slaved to the globalist liberal project.
The Islamic State group, which all well-informed people regard as a literal manifestation of Mohammedan teachings, routinely berates Muslims in the west for their subservience to the progressive cause, after their duty to their god the main talking point expressed by these Jihadists is the desire to crush the decadent, degenerate and weakened progressive western nations.

27df95e
When you see this logo, you know that you will not be blown up without a damn good reason… like, you insulted trannies

As the progressives would have it, however, Islam’s inbuilt militancy and its demands for conquest can be simply sidestepped by liberal reforms to the faith; we see a desire among progressives to neuter Islam, to transform it into something like the Uniting Church.

As all clear thinking people know, though, the progressive project has proven itself to be useless at reconstructing national, ethnic and religious groups via liberal reforms; rather they tend to kill these things with kindness, so to speak, the treatment of Aboriginal children and wards of the state in the 20th century are but two examples.

Muslims would be well advised to avoid entanglements with the progressives since, from the White population, there is already great enmity toward their oriental faith and its adherents just on the basis of its basic incompatibility with our way of life; alliances with the widely hated progressives only strengthen the conviction that there must be something on the nose in Islam.

As the progressives would have it, however, Islam’s inbuilt militancy and its demands for conquest can be simply sidestepped by liberal reforms to the faith; we see a desire among progressives to neuter Islam, to transform it into something like the Uniting Church.

Islam in Australia can only ever return to what it was before the 1990’s, a little known but tolerated minority grouping which stood aloof from the mainstream and stayed out of politics.

Any opportunism by Muslims while under the wing of the progressives will backfire due mainly to the fact that, while many are prepared to ignore Muslims most of the time, a good many of our people seek to crush the progressives and globalist liberals.

download-1
Tolerance of other religions could be taken as insufficient devotion to your own

The Zio-patriots claim to have solutions to the “Muslim problem”, all of which are ill-conceived, immoral, impractical and, if carried to fruition, would likely see any hypothetical “Patriotic” government hauled before the International Criminal Court on charges of committing acts in preparation for genocide.

The Nationalists Primary Solution, however, the move to heavy immigration restriction would see adherents of Islam in Australia having to fall back on their own resources; with foreign-born Imams and Muslim immigrants unable to enter the country, coupled with the removal of state funding for all faith-based schools we would naturally expect the character of the local Islamic community to change over time.

Under current immigration rules, foreign-born people with serious criminal offences to their names can be deported to their home country, in most cases; the issue of immigrant crime could be largely solved by tightening this regime to include charges arising from less serious anti-social behaviour, such as persistent flouting of the road rules, habitual drug use, welfare fraud and so forth.

Any opportunism by Muslims while under the wing of the progressives will backfire due mainly to the fact that, while many are prepared to ignore Muslims most of the time, a good many of our people seek to crush the progressives and globalist liberals.

Further to that, allowing aspiring Jihadis to leave the country forever, to renounce their citizenship and leave Australia for whatever fate their god has in store for them on a one-way ticket would go some way to solving the expensive and time-consuming problem of detecting and preventing such excursions.

As we can see, under the Nationalist Primary Solution, the more troublesome aspects of hosting a Muslim minority, the crime, the problematic religious fanaticism and anti-social behaviour could be alleviated, if not removed altogether, all by peaceful, legal means.

Jamal ud-Din Arrest
A world of regret in the making

You see, comrades, Nationalists have no interest in traumatising the whole country with pogroms, deportations and persecution of people who have done nothing wrong; can you imagine what rounding up and deporting close to half a million people would do to our society?

Our Primary Solution puts the ball in the court of the Muslims, if we rid their community of troublemakers, parasites and fanatics but otherwise leave them alone, then they have the option of living here as a minority with all the same rights and obligations as everyone else.

If however, they want a more authentic life in submission to Allah then there are over 50 countries which would be able to provide just that.

As we can see, under the Nationalist Primary Solution, the more troublesome aspects of hosting a Muslim minority, the crime, the problematic religious fanaticism and anti-social behaviour could be alleviated, if not removed altogether, all by peaceful, legal means.

As it stands, though, the Muslim minority in Australia is being led down the path to further conflict with Australians due to the opportunism and corruption of their spokesmen, the infiltration of the faith by progressives and converts with other agendas besides religion and the subversion of traditional values by Leftist and liberal reformers.

The real choice for Muslims is not East vs West, it is whether they want to live their lives as they choose, albeit with no support for their faith from the state; or whether they will allow progressives to reform Islam and remake it according to their ideals.

The reality is that Muslims have to ask themselves if they want their faith to become a joke, like some of the progressive, mainstream Christian churches.

Does anyone, in fact really want to see secularised Mosques under the direction of, say, transvestite Imams as the call to prayer is delivered by a White, Lesbian Muezzin? How would that ensure peace and good order in our most “vibrant” suburbs?

download-2
See, it’s like… um… you know when… ah, fuck it

WHAT IS OUR PROBLEM?

WHAT IS OUR PROBLEM?

Readers of our social media pages over the past week will have noticed another flare-up in hostilities between us Nationalists and the self-styled “far right”.

We will not get hung up on details here, scroll down and it is all there for the world to see, the reasons behind this enmity, however, bear repeating.

At this point in time we are prepared to declare that the patriot movement, by the actions of its prominent spokesmen is now an anti-Australian movement; that said we do reserve some sympathy for the White workers and marginalised people who have been gulled by these rats.

In their desperation to defend themselves against the superior politics and quicker wits of the Nationalists, the patriot talking heads have devised ever more bizarre and convoluted additions to their already shambolic platforms.

Indeed, these Wombats have taken the definition of Australian identity into territories not even explored by the most drug-addled, schizophrenic examples of the Leftist ideologue.

“Anything but White!” may as well be the new catch cry of the patriot movement; it is this total negation of the true Australian identity which sets them apart from the Leftists; at least the left-leaning anti-Whites, in their genocidal rage against the “system” mostly agree with our definition of Australianism.

In their desperation to defend themselves against the superior politics and quicker wits of the Nationalists, the patriot talking heads have devised ever more bizarre and convoluted additions to their already shambolic platforms.

The White issue is inescapable, while we do not play identity politics in the Nationalist milieu the concept of Australian identity is set in stone as far as most people are concerned; even the self-hating White in his aboriginal flag T-shirt seeks to atone for his whiteness and, by doing so, at least acknowledges his heritage.

Far from being self-hating Whites, with a clear sense of identity, the senior patriots just seem to hate consciously White people in general; we struggle to find another interpretation of their thinking since, aside from Muslims, they only criticise people who are comfortable in their own skin, or repentant of it, as the case may be.

hasnon
The queen of Civic Patriotism with two little piccaninnies

Nationalists may regard psychoanalysis as Jewish pseudo-science but there does seem to be a degree of almost Freudian projection at work among the patriots.

Given the obviously poor life choices, bad habits and curious allusions to mixed heritage shown by many of the patriots we shouldn’t wonder at their inferiority complexes, paranoia and antipathy toward people with firmly held convictions regarding race, ethnicity and nationality.

The Muslims too, when all is said and done, exhibit a strong sense of both group and individual identity all couched in solid notions of race and ethnicity, a state of mind which appears to really upset many on the far right.

Nationalists may regard psychoanalysis as Jewish pseudo-science but there does seem to be a degree of almost Freudian projection at work among the patriots.

The world outside social media, cyberspace being the only real territory held by the patriots, is rapidly transitioning into the “age of identity”; that is to say that globalisation, far from eliminating difference, is bringing the different races and ethnic groups into contact with one another.

Mass immigration of non-traditional groups into White lands has become a global exhibition of the often massive and intractable differences between the different human sub-species; even from an aesthetic point of view, a million Asians moving in and residing around us has markedly changed the way most Australians see their society.

2ad7c71600000578-3174846-image-a-6_1437885236127
Danny Nalliah runs a Zionist-supporting, multi-racialist Civic Patriot party called Rise UP Australia

Some people are able to convince themselves that these differences are a good thing, others, such as the Nationalists regard immigration as a negative on that basis; it is another thing to altogether, as the patriots do, claim that Australian identity is “whatever you want it to be.”

This is our problem, this is why we fight them and why we hate them. Nobody but the patriots seek to obliterate White identity as a component of authentic Australianism, the Left, for all their shrieking and garment rending over the colonial era subscribe to the same general Australian folklore as do the Nationalists, only the different conclusions we choose to draw from that lore set us at odds.

The real class struggle, the Nationalist cause if you will, is the globalist liberal project, at present the Left, in general terms, are unwilling, or unable to wean themselves of rank and privilege under that system, so they are not a threat to the status quo in the immediate future.

Some people are able to convince themselves that these differences are a good thing, others, such as the Nationalists regard immigration as a negative on that basis; it is another thing to altogether, as the patriots do, claim that Australian identity is “whatever you want it to be.”

Generational change is under way, of course, and the Nationalists would expect some sort of counter-reaction to globalist-liberalism from the Left; the children of the “Gen-X” bourgeois lefties are, after all, as much affected by the scourge of globalism and mass immigration as those of the White workers and marginalised people.

In the event of a resurgent Left we would, of course, be able to present a competent political struggle against them, should we, in fact, find ourselves in disagreement; we are done with arguing with their parents who have, almost to a man, abandoned the field.

At this juncture, though the main anti-Nationalist and anti-White tendencies are found on the far right, so it is there that we must take our struggle until their nihilism, falsehoods, treachery and negativity are no longer a factor in dissident politics.

images-2
The Civic Parrot manifesto in its entirety

MAJOR RESIGNATIONS FROM PARTY FOR FREEDOM AMID COMPLAINTS OF ‘PARTY BOY CULTURE’, LACK OF EMPATHY, AND SLEAZE

MAJOR RESIGNATIONS FROM PARTY FOR FREEDOM AMID COMPLAINTS OF ‘PARTY BOY CULTURE’, LACK OF EMPATHY, AND SLEAZE

Peanuts for Freedom is facing a revolt from loyal members fed up with what one described as “a get together for the boys that love to party.”

Nick Folkes and his deputy George Jameson come in for particular criticism over varying roguish traits of sleaze and “lack of empathy”.

The news comes after Nick was exposed as stirring up ‘Australian Conservative Capitalist’ admin Dan Evans into attacking United Nationalists Australia following our publication of a humorous takedown of the failed Sydney Reclaim Australia rally at Martin Place. Folkes has long held a grudge against UNA for our honest reportage of his ongoing efforts to sabotage the nationalist movement in Australia.

Last night we were inundated with links to Dan Evans’ Facebook page and a video he presented that attempted to invalidate the nationalist position on the basis “one day we will all be black”. According to Dan Evans, Aboriginals are the only true Australians, and race plays no part in Australian identity. But he also made reference to nationalism and complained that UNA sought to patent the term. Indeed we do, and we proudly do so, on behalf of Australian nationalism to protect it from multi-racialists such as Folkes and Evans seeking to exploit it for their own ends.

screen-shot-2016-02-22-at-12-45-01-am
Dan Evans as we like to see him: after getting his head punched in

Australian nationalism has a very old history and its fundaments reside in the idea of as race and culture being the basis of nationhood. It is not for a man who is essentially a Liberal conservative to come along and redefine our beliefs on behalf of those from the fledgeling Zionist anti-Islam movement. Evans has a hard time grappling with the concept of the distribution of wealth for citizens based on folkish principles because he is a conservative capitalist that has confused libertarian ideas with far-right conservatism. In fact, he is exactly the sort of animal that we seek to drive away from patriot-related politics since his stance is essentially a mercenary globalist-market concept… minus Islam.

Nick Folkes and his deputy George Jameson come in for particular criticism over varying roguish traits of sleaze and “lack of empathy”.

Folkes, of course, has a vested interest in attempting to subvert nationalist principles pertaining to race since he married a Japanese woman and produced mixed-race children. This is a common thread among those in Nick’s orbit. For instance, Shermon Burgess once infamously produced a video suggesting that White Australian males should be in relationships with Asian women.

Evans dismissed UNA as “White supremacists” but had no comment about the PfF’s Penny Louise’s ownership of a ‘White Pride’ flag or Toby Cook’s Celtic cross tattoo. These appropriations of ‘White Supremacist’ symbols seem incongruous with the position being pushed by both Folkes and Evans. Furthermore, it is strongly believed that Cook comes from a mixed-race background.

condoms
UNA understands that massive departures follow whenever Nick pulls a stunt like this

One last few points before we get down to our feature story is that nationalism exists — and has for decades — independent of this ‘patriot movement’. Nationalists long ago abandoned Reclaim Australia as a Zionist shilling front. We have made this absolutely clear time and time again. Likewise, we have never tagged Dan Evans in any post nor sought his opinion on anything. He is in opposition to Australian nationalism and we regard him as we would any member of the mainstream political mess.

Australia First Party President Jim Saleam told UNA that he will be contacting the Coalition of Australian Nationalists in regards to issuing a statement condemning Nick Folkes’s describing himself as a ‘nationalist’.

screen-shot-2015-11-03-at-10-31-33-pm

Nick’s protege Toby Cook was described as “just an overweight teenager”

*

A disillusioned member of Peanuts for Freedom has cashed in their membership and confided to a source close to UNA of disenchantment with both the partying culture within PfF and Nick’s failings of character.

According to our source, “[Nick’s] party is basically a get-together for the boys that love to party.”

The former member also criticised Nick’s handling of party funds, alleging “Nick doesn’t bother to issue receipts for members’ fees or donations anymore.”
He thereafter made reference to a “$20,000 bill” incurred by Folkes’ from the Cronulla mayor relating to the disastrous 2015 ‘Cronulla Riots’ barbeque. This is aside from the staggering court settlement costs heaped on Shermon Burgess for his part in the case filed by Arab supremacist Jamal Rifi.

By all accounts the acquisition of money and the pursuit of partying form a stronger basis for PfF membership than a serious dedication to political activism. Moreover, subterranean politics simply provides a setting for Folkes to pursue a dubious third-tier celebrity.

This boorish internal-party culture is off-putting for many who chose to offer PfF patronage but especially the women who often feel objectified by male members.

According to our source, “[Nick’s] party is basically a get-together for the boys that love to party.”

George Jameson comes in for special mention here as being a letch. Describing his relationship with Penny Louise, who was profiled by the Daily Mail after producing a video shared by the United Patriots Front (which Nick not so long ago actively campaigned against) we learn: “George has been up to his old tricks. He has manipulated a silly young girl from SA (Louise) to come over here. She left her little boy and partner and is living with him. She is 20 and he is 40-something. He is an arsehole. He got her now ex-partner a job with his Palestinian friends (Eh?-Ed) that underpaid him and treated him like crap and all because he wanted the young girl. He is not a true patriot: you can tell that he’s in it for something else altogether.”

The source goes on to reveal that Penny Louise has apparently now dubbed herself “the Queen of PfF” and flits about the party faithful like a femme fatale.

3cbe700600000578-4182518-image-a-37_1485998719688
Penny “the Queen of PfF” Louise abandoned her tiny son and partner to shack up with George Jameson
download-20
George Jameson, the oily gronk who lured Penny Louise away with a dodgy job offer for her husband

But the exploitation of women has been said to have taken a darker turn in the case of Fiona Field, a former member of the Australia First Party who was lured over to PfF and committed suicide within a year.

There are strong views from those in the PfF circle that Nick “got into Fiona’s head” and Jameson had tried to sexually involve himself with her.

Fiona had suffered from a history of mental-health issues and was once raped by a senior police officer. She became involved with former NSW Premier Nathan Rees when he was the Labor member for Toongabbie and the involvement triggered a downward spiral. Field was the subject of public scandal when she assaulted Rees at a shopping centre and thereafter claimed manipulation by him. She spoke of being used sexually and was often encouraged into playing kinky games with Rees either in his office or at a nearby park.

There are strong views from those in the PfF circle that Nick “got into Fiona’s head” and Jameson had tried to sexually involve himself with her.

Folkes was, by certain accounts, more interested in luring her away from AFP and Jim Saleam — a 30-year friend of the Field family — than he was in providing her with a stable environment: impossible in the chaotic atmosphere of Party for Freedom.
Fiona took her own life in 2016 and it was reported that PfF members led by Nick crashed the funeral and were caught smoking pot outside the funeral home by Fiona’s father who expressed his contempt for them.

Nick was more interested in using Fiona’s tragedy as a means to publicity. Our source reported the former member as saying, “I couldn’t believe the lack of empathy from Nick. It was as if he’d just washed his hands of the matter.”

He had also attempted to exploit the funeral of the murdered police worker Curtis Cheng who was shot by dead outside Parramatta Police Headquarters by 15-year-old Moslem Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar in 2015. He had planned to turn up with a demonstration. Apparently, it took some persuading before Nick could be talked out of it.

But the most telling revelation is that Nick seems doomed to never succeeding in registering his party: “He will never have enough members to register. He’s jealous of anyone that does.”

599369-92e08890-648d-11e4-a310-49154a12f97b
Fiona Field: a troubled life, a tragic end

THE PRIMARY SOLUTION — AN OVERVIEW OF NATIONALISM

THE PRIMARY SOLUTION — AN OVERVIEW OF NATIONALISM

Patriots are conservatives, nationalists are radicals

Patriots who practise conservative politics under the impression they are expressing ‘patriotism’, especially when that entails clear Anglophile bias, and who ignorantly appropriate the term ‘nationalism’ assuming both are one and the same ultimately pervert the meaning.

However, there is also a preeminent character flaw typical of those in that neophyte movement and it is ugly for its sheer arrogance. Those writing for United Nationalists Australia — its founding members — have all dedicated ten years or more to the study of nationalist principles. We have been both activists and theorists and yet we constantly go around in circles having to brook the same absurd charges of ‘White supremacism’ and ‘Nazism’ and state our identity and its purpose again and again.

If you cannot fathom the concept of the nation as inexorably moored to race then you are neither patriots nor nationalists but a conservative xenophobe.

We have no intention to ourselves appear arrogant, or snobby, by making such an assertion but rather it is an observation made over many years from examining the inevitable patterns associated with those who gravitate towards nationalist politics.
So, at the risk of appearing contradictory, yes we are unashamedly pro-White but no we are not ‘White supremacist’. So, at the risk of appearing contradictory, yes we are unashamedly pro-White but no we are not ‘White supremacist’.

ilangja001p1
Jack Lang, an Australian nationalist

The latter is a defamation employed by both left and right to delegitimise nationalists. By invoking imagery of men in sheets wielding shotguns and dragging Negroes behind pick-up trucks they create a mental association to villainy and barbarity. Moreover, they imply that this is indisputably our aim and if allowed to flourish all code of human conduct would be subverted to industrialised murder born out of base hatred. When a nationalist is presented as a ‘Nazi’ he is immediately repudiated on all fronts. It is an epithet and it is employed to dehumanise nationalists and validate the use of force to quiet us.

When our politics are compared to the very worst constructions of post-War propaganda involving Nazis spinning Jews into lampshades, and using their body fat to make soap, it presents our position as frightening and evil.

If you cannot fathom the concept of the nation as inexorably moored to race then you are neither patriots nor nationalists but a conservative xenophobe.

Very few on either the left side or those conservatives who claim WE are harming THEIR movement on the right side have bothered to exercise the scholastic effort to wipe away the propagandistic rhetoric and research the reality of our position; much less our long history as opposed to their fledgeling existence. For, were they to do so, they would discover a protectionist’ cause that has attained the understanding that a nation is the sum of racial kinship, with race denoting all aspects of the culture that thereafter make up its society.

By accepting that, then they must appreciate that the rule applies to all other races. The goal of a nationalist Australia — disregarding the inevitable vexed argument around theoretical ‘Aboriginal sovereignty’ — is no more than the desire it wishes for all races which is, without resorting to imperialism, to secure the right to pursue their own destiny in their own homeland without hindrance from more powerful states or coalitions of nations intent on exploitation.

image2
Bonza pro-White pineapples

In the age of globalism, it is especially a cogent philosophy. To that purpose, we here at UNA will endeavour to state our principles and objectives in an understandably imperfect kind, as we acknowledge that all learning is growing and therefore all teaching must be fluid. As times change, so do circumstances. As such, new challenges must be met with new solutions.

Nationalists have solutions; patriots are notoriously vague about their objectives. That vagueness is only in the rarest cases deliberate.

Those who believe they are gently acclimatizing ‘the masses’ to nationalism by leading them down the civic route have been responsible for destroying nationalism in the process. When the British National Party (BNP) adopted these ‘mainstreaming’ tactics British nationalism was contaminated beyond cure.

Nationalists have solutions; patriots are notoriously vague about their objectives. That vagueness is only in the rarest cases deliberate.

The BNP’s former leader Nick Griffin acknowledged this and apologised to British nationalists for his failed experiment which resulted in the establishment of the pro-Israeli anti-Islam movement the English Defence League. This, like all civic patriot anti-Islam groups, is mutton dressed as lamb for those seeking to defend blood and soil. That same mistake of mainstreaming was imported here and a few of those who introduced it into the bloodstream of Australian nationalism are currently still active; in some cases stirring up trouble once again.

Likewise, the French National Party under Marine Le Pen revoked the membership of her father its former leader of 39 years, Jean-Marie Le Pen, after controversy arose over him describing alleged Nazi concentration camps as “a detail of history”. The direction Marine Le pen has taken the veteran nationalist party is on a decidedly mainstream course, in the civic patriot vogue.

gettyimages-484584662
Jean-Marie Le Pen continues to shine the light for nationalism in France despite his own daughter turning traitor

Civic patriotism is, as nationalists understand, rooted deep in the interests of preserving Israel. It is a pro-foreign movement that has the audacity to kit itself in the regalia of militant patriotism. It seems to know only two positions: anti-Islam and anti-Leftist. Thereafter, in the case of Nick Folkes and his Party for Freedom, it will covet and appropriate nationalist issues which never gain traction or develop into solid policy under its leadership. At times, they even steal the symbols of White nationalism, yet their civic partners never call them on this.

The rank and file of civic patriot organisations are sensitive to other areas but the agencies they coalesce around do not expand to adapt those issues into their cause. For instance, there may be small vocal outbursts about Australia’s greatest national concern, China, but they peter out quickly. Most civic patriots, in fact, welcome Asian immigration for what they regard as the propensity of Asians to ‘assimilate’ into our culture; a concept that figures frequently in their rhetoric.

Likewise, many in its leadership entertain personal relationships with women of Oriental descent, which gives an immediate insight into why they take such an aggressive stance against White nationalists. On the other hand, comment on the high crime rates attributable to African migrants who create shocking headlines draws not just anger from civic nationalists but calls for “deportation” (the government is currently acting on the public mood and proposed the mandatory deportation of migrant criminals). So near, yet so far, one might say. What then is the missing link?

Civic patriotism is the vehicle of the pro-Israel agenda

Much has been written by nationalists about the civic patriot movement being a vehicle for Israeli interests. Nick Griffin, for one, wrote a lengthy investigative piece tying together Dutch politician Geert Wilders and his Party for Freedom with an expressly pro-Israel agenda. Thereto, he traced Israeli money and influence to the English Defence League. In Australia, the Q Society, and its political arm the Australian Liberty Alliance has written into its core policies support for Israel, as does Danny Nalliah’s Rise Up Australia party. These are just a few examples.

Why would this be? How can organisations that call themselves patriotic and cloak themselves in the national colours possibly be patriotic when they are in the long-term serving the interests of a foreign nation and its agenda?

120914-diwarnai-bentrokan-pembangunan-musala-di-sydney-disetujui2-618x412
Party for Freedom’s George Jameson is so patriotic that he waves the flag of a foreign nation — the very nation that got us all into this mess

Support for Israel is absolutely necessary if the international coalition led by the United States is to successfully enforce its will in the Middle East. Much of the contretemps that beset that region do so because of A) Arab anger over the subjugation of Palestine to the [illegal] expansion of the state of Israel B) the need for Israel and its allies to sustain a climate of conflict among Israel’s neighbours to keep them from unifying against Israel. That is, at any rate, a very basic outline of the situation.

Israel automatically becomes an ally in the reckoning of civic patriots because it is perceived as being an enemy of Islam. Moreover, conservatives (and even those from Labor’s side of the house) support military interventions which involve sending young Australians into combat on Arab soil. A strong opposition to Islam is a prerequisite to condition Australians to support such policies.

Nationalists at their fiercest oppose the state of Israel, on this and numerous other grounds, and at their most moderate simply wish an end to contact altogether.

Why would this be? How can organisations that call themselves patriotic and cloak themselves in the national colours possibly be patriotic when they are in the long-term serving the interests of a foreign nation and its agenda?

In our last chapter, we made reference to instances where civic patriots abandon their narrative that Australia is accepting of diversity ‘minus Islam’. It is natural that any group supportive of Israeli, and more accurately controlled by Jewish interests, will be hostile to the basic tenets of nationalism; the primary solution for which calls for ending immigration and gradual restoration of a White Australia.

Yet, as we shall argue further if Australia is not White, then how are we even a nation? Aboriginals, despite leftist revisionism, were never a nation. The abuse of our own history in terms of the nation’s settlement and especially in key narratives such as the battle of the Eureka Stockade has been introduced to aid a policy of deracinating post-colonial Australia. Regardless, Australia was perhaps the only nation to openly pursue a policy of protecting its White identity. And that IS Australian identity.

We make the comparison with China. Could we really regard China as being China if we were to swap the racial characteristics of a Chinese man with those of a Papua New Guinean highlander? Would this image gel in our reckoning? Can Africans truly be Greeks when Africans are so unmistakably of a different race altogether? The argument that race is a construct has become disseminated as an incontrovertible truth but not when applied to any other living animal. If we apply those same arguments to the animal world we find they are a fallacy. Only in certain parts of the world where a western, decidedly liberal notion of humanity reigns as gospel does this idea take seed.

The Primary Solution

All problems we face in Australia currently stem from one area — immigration. When the floodgates were opened to non-White immigration in the 1970s Australia’s aplomb was abandoned to quaintness and the era of our nation being predicated purely on an economic basis overtook. There is a marked difference between the economics of a nation and a nation as an economy. That definitive line has been so skilfully obfuscated by the globalist architects that the idea does not even occur to most. We are at a critical time.

If there was ever an argument that Australia is viewed by the oligarchs of industry and capitalism purely as a resource and its people simply in terms of consumers it can be made now. From academia to the media, to the government every effort is being made to eradicate the memory of White Australia and inculcate pluralist sensibilities. Who do these pluralist sensibilities benefit?

Tim Soutphommasane horizontal close up
Tim Soutphommasane, Australia’s Race Discrimination Commissioner who is a French-born Laotian who taxpayers fund to the tune of $300k

First up, they try and tell us that they benefit (White) Australians. The arguments are absurd, and begin with cuisine — the benefits of foreign cooking — and advance to the ludicrous — that we need masses of non-White immigration because we are “ageing”. That line about an “ageing population” and “declining birth rates” is ubiquitous anywhere White people have created a civilisation. Supposedly, those economically deprived, scientifically backwards peoples are more adept at sustaining life than those who transcended the gathering of the basic needs of sustaining life to organise societies so ordered and advanced they enabled us to reach the stars. In reality, it is only the immigrants that need us. What do we get from the deal? Well, to facilitate such a society we need laws to prevent us objecting to that society when we inevitably realise that our opportunities and way of life are being handed over to aliens. This resulted in laws that can be loosely termed anti-hate laws and which solely benefit, in practise and theory, non-Whites who migrate to Australia.

In fact, Australia currently has a non-Australian born Race Discrimination commissioner, Tim Soutphommasane. This person is paid an annuity of $300,000 by the Australian people to sustain a narrative about bigotry that he can then go on to address as a grave and ongoing concern that always grows worse. Yes, a man never born here, who has no kinship with White people and in fact every reason to despise us, is paid out of our own pockets to fault us on a racial basis. He has authored four books which are all centred on themes of Australians being fundamentally racist and why migrants like him are so important to us backwards White trash.

Oddly enough, those civic patriots who call us Nazis also object to this man and what he represents overall. However, they are in the thwarted position of being virulently opposed to the idea of a return to a White Australia. Notwithstanding, the very premise that merely to entertain a multiracial society requires legislating against its host population in stern draconian terms should be enough alone to question the justice of such a change.

If there was ever an argument that Australia is viewed by the oligarchs of industry and capitalism purely as a resource and its people simply in terms of consumers it can be made now. From academia to the media, to the government every effort is being made to eradicate the memory of White Australia and inculcate pluralist sensibilities. Who do these pluralist sensibilities benefit?

Alternately, it is what this man is paid to PROTECT that is equally deserving of outrage. Australia has always had its own problems with crime, but they were never on the epidemic scale we read about in the world news. There was a time Australians shook their head at the news coming out of, say, New York. The legendary crime rates achieved a kind of mystical quality for us. But now, in 2017, we live that same reality with a dull apathy and it is nearly always non-Whites who are perpetrating these crimes. From Africans as young as 12 carjacking, home invading, and rioting in the streets with machetes; to Middle Eastern crime gangs engaged in daily shootouts on what were only thirty years ago quiet suburban streets. We have bizarre stories from nearly every racial community.

Indeed, this is the much-flouted crime scenario that all White nationalists point at. But one must realise that immigration has led to all manner of ancillary issues: such as homelessness; the introduction of otherwise quarantined diseases; religious and ethnic conflicts that have been imported by these alien races; and the challenges of having to compete with them. It is no secret that many of Australia’s selective schools are stacked with Asian and Indian students.

The Primary Solution sweeps all of this, and every ill manifestation of multiracialism we have not included here, into the dust pile. It is the beginning, too, of protectionism; and a policy of self-sufficiency that is absolutely achievable given the extraordinary resources of this nation — resources currently being sold off at a rate that would make your hat spin.

This, of course, means that leadership and management roles will inevitably take on a brown and yellow colour. Australians are, before our eyes, becoming the underclass in their own country for a confluence of reasons. These changes are ground into our faces by the elites. Non-Whites have a great proclivity to breed and especially when they can do so with Australian welfare to enable them. The ever-growing strain on the welfare net will result in an end to welfare altogether. By welfare, we speak inclusively not just of the safety net that was paid by Australians to ensure their own security, but Medicare, child support and finally the pension.

The Primary Solution sweeps all of this, and every ill manifestation of multiracialism we have not included here, into the dust pile. It is the beginning, too, of protectionism; and a policy of self-sufficiency that is absolutely achievable given the extraordinary resources of this nation — resources currently being sold off at a rate that would make your hat spin.

You cannot end the spread of Islam without a total approach to immigration. There is no way a multiracial society can justify, or will ever ratify laws, that seek to exclude one group but permit the others. And how can they be so obsessed with the problems of those adherents to Islam and yet blind to all the problems stemming from every other alien race and culture?

Again, the complex problems created by this nightmare of diversity have one very simple solution: and Untied Nationalists Australia calls it the Primary Solution: an end to all immigration with the exception of White Europeans who desire to join us. Once we have done that, we have a chance to address the long process of reversing its effects. There too, we have solutions. But they will be covered in due course.

empty-north

GREY SKIES AND ELECTRIC LIGHT: METAL AS A METAPHOR FOR PLURALITY IN WHITE MOVEMENTS

GREY SKIES AND ELECTRIC LIGHT: METAL AS A METAPHOR FOR PLURALITY IN WHITE MOVEMENTS

Amid calls for White unity in the political struggles we face, both in mother Europa and in our diaspora homelands, a growing number of our people may wonder if unity, in the broad sense of a unified mass movement for change, is either practical or even desirable.

Here we would suggest that the idea of diversity plus tolerance of difference, rather than unity at the expense of tolerance and good relations, may be a far more effective strategy.
The other point we might make is that promoting competition within the broad pro-White, pro-European, ethnocentric or ethno-nationalist milieu may lead to better results than the “lowest common denominator” effect caused by avoiding conflict, affecting false piety and “playing nice” at all costs.

White social movements, it must be noted always seem to thrive on intense competition, even rivalry at times; we will here make an example of that uniquely White and modern phenomenon, Heavy Metal music, or simply Metal, as it is known among aficionados. The term Metal is important as it remains the suffix for all the myriad constituent genres and sub-categories of the movement, for we will hereafter refer to the Metal movement as something concrete, with its own weight and momentum, so to speak.

Declaring oneself to be a devotee of Metal is, for a White person, a declaration of amity with a wide cross-section of European and diaspora folk, via an appreciation of a shared history and cross-cultural understanding through commonly understood symbols, fashions and artistic styles.

Declaring oneself to be a devotee of Metal is, for a White person, a declaration of amity with a wide cross-section of European and diaspora folk, via an appreciation of a shared history and cross-cultural understanding through commonly understood symbols, fashions and artistic styles.

Beginning in the late 1960’s, in the United Kingdom, the then West Germany and North America, heavy music acts began to proliferate and gain a devoted following; we now talk about “waves” of Metal acts, with groups like Black Sabbath, The Scorpions, Hawkwind, Blue Cheer and others acknowledged as being the first wave.

The breakout period of the late 1970’s and 1980’s represents the second wave, bands such as Iron Maiden, Saxon, Judas Priest, Accept and Def Leppard gained huge success and cult followings, particularly after the advent of the dedicated music TV channels such as MTV.

By the mid-1990’s, the centre of gravity had shifted to northern Europe, the commercial success of the 1980’s golden era was harder to come by and as the focus of record companies shifted away from Metal music toward the more lucrative, Grunge, electronica and Hip-Hip genres a counter movement was born.

sabbath-top-10-albums
Black Sabbath was more than just Hippies without the incense and love-ins

While mainstream acts still toured, released albums and settled into middle-aged rock star lifestyles, the new sub-cultures of Metal were developing, in Sweden, Norway, Florida and Britain’s post-industrial towns new acts would emerge to take Metal to new depths of artistry and new extremes.

New themes began to take shape in the underground, acts became militantly anti-religious, anti-authoritarian, even exploring areas such as death, suicide, murder, misanthropy and mental illness.

So too, European folklore, paganism and fantasy fiction themes gained prominence in lyrics, artwork and merchandise such as clothing and jewellery.

New themes began to take shape in the underground, acts became militantly anti-religious, anti-authoritarian, even exploring areas such as death, suicide, murder, misanthropy and mental illness.

We could say that, in the present moment, Metal is the outlet for some of the most extreme and yet creative White people on the planet, people who will not compromise on any level and who will break any taboo or politically correct rule just to see where it takes them.

As Metal fans, we risk becoming bores on the subject of the more extreme and confronting music in our libraries. Underground music, such as Black Metal, is often deliberately made incomprehensible to outsiders; in some cases the songs are recorded in mono, or on antiquated cassette players and mixed by placing a microphone next to a speaker and overdubbing sound; often no lyrics are published, no photos of the performers exist and they never play live.

arkona_band
Russian Pagan Metal band Arkona once had a song featured on the American version of The Office (NBC, 2005-2013).

What is interesting though is that these subcultures are breaking through into the mainstream, large, well-attended music festivals in Europe that are dedicated to the more accessible genres of Pagan Metal, Folk Metal or the less antagonistic of the Death, Doom and Black Metal performers.

The more popular acts have even defied the digital download crisis and via frequent touring, maintaining an active social media presence and astute merchandising arrangements have managed to make a decent living.

The scene is, however, very competitive, especially where the fans are concerned and this has been a positive insofar as devoted movement people, who have grown to love a particular act in the underground, where rules of political correctness do not apply, will expect the artists to stand by their work, even if it means causing offence to those who might habitually take offence.

The more popular acts have even defied the digital download crisis and via frequent touring, maintaining an active social media presence and astute merchandising arrangements have managed to make a decent living.

Many of the more extreme underground acts frequently cross the lines into open warfare with Cultural Marxist social norms, a significant minority even openly endorse Nationalism and adopt symbols of bygone ethnocentric movements along with, to some extent, their politics.

Accusations of “Fascism” against Metal acts are common enough that fans and detractors will argue incessantly on the internet over the symbols, lyrics and personal convictions of the band members.

naer_mataron_2
Greek Black Metal combo Naer Mataron features bassist Giorgos Germenis (centre) who is a member of Golden Dawn and elected to Greek parliament

Fans are often “called out” for not condemning Eurocentrist or Nationalist artists by musicians outside the scene and anti-racism campaigners; the point, though, is that the Metal underground is seeding these ideas, largely via the internet, into the mainstream and there is wide tolerance of openly pro-White, political self-expression among confirmed followers.

Fans are fiercely protective of the artists, even the most extreme among them and the base and anti-authoritarian mood of the Metal world generally renders it inaccessible to and intolerant of cultural Marxists, Antifa vigilantes and other pests of that nature.
Where we see the example of Metal as instructive to Nationalist radicals is that the genres and their followers are steadily growing in number, uncompromising, competitive, diverse and tolerant, within the confines of an almost exclusively White popular culture.

The underground must never be forced to compromise with the visible elements of a White movement, the extremists must be allowed to pursue ideas to the limit of their capabilities and it should be the job of the people who live in the open to seed those ideas into the White mainstream insofar as they might be accepted by the workers and our middle-class sympathisers.

Accusations of “Fascism” against Metal acts are common enough that fans and detractors will argue incessantly on the internet over the symbols, lyrics and personal convictions of the band members.

The diverse elements of the underground should exist in a state of conflict as different ideas are developed, the different ethnic cliques and schools of thought should be encouraged to compete, to come up with ever more daring and demanding concepts with which to challenge each other.

The only tolerance needed is a realisation that, if a radicalised person or group has proven themselves to be dedicated to the White cause and to be trustworthy they should be given licence to develop their ideas, their particular styles of dress, art and symbolism free from the meddling of the over-ground activist.

Nationalists should be just as fiercely defensive of our eccentrics, artists, radicals and extremists as the Metal fans are of theirs; rather than becoming upset over competition within the ranks and fretting over supposed “infighting” we should realise that this tolerance of diversity within the parameters of the pro-White struggle is actually one of our strengths.

Metal fans don’t look at the first wave of heavy music as the be-all and end-all of the genre, but nor do we forget where we came from as a movement, our history; the past is with us permanently but we do not fear innovation or radical new ideas.
We are as tolerant of the old men in their Black Sabbath T-shirts as we are of the Black Metal fans in their leather and corpse paint because we know that change is essential to growth, but that growth can often be painful; there is something in that sentiment for Nationalists too.

88-failed-brainwasher-digipak
We figure these guys aren’t signed to a Jewish record company. Then again, knowing the Jew, anything is possible

 

TALES OF GENIUS WHITE MEN: 1) BEAU BRUMMELL – INVENTOR OF THE SUIT AND TIE

TALES OF GENIUS WHITE MEN: 1) BEAU BRUMMELL – INVENTOR OF THE SUIT AND TIE

If you’re a typical gentleman of the Caucasian persuasion you may have on occasion donned a suit and necktie and admired yourself in the mirror.

At some point in this extended period of self-gazing, your thoughts may have drifted from contemplating your own reflection to wondering whereabouts the men’s suit came from and asking what of its history? Was it a look collectively arrived at, or was there a little-known fashionista who matched this with that and by doing so split the fabric-atom of menswear and ta-ra, the modern suit was born!?

Indeed there was, and contrary to what you may be thinking, he was not of African origin. As surprising as it may seem it was a White man who gave us the suit and tie.
Beau Brummell was a visionary. He was a stylish cad who charmed London society while sponging off the Prince of Wales. Although not exactly a role model, he was undeniably typical of his time, and his story, if nothing else, is beaut.

history-lists-4-rules-for-bathing-according-to-beau-brummell_istock_000014482055medium-e
These were virtually unknown in England until Brummell made them popular

Young Beau fit right in among the gentry from the get-go. In the late 1700s, his father — a politician and Lord’s secretary — packed him and his brother off to Eton where he hobnobbed with the aristocracy. From early on he began to concern himself with fine-dress, elegant manners and refining his natural wit. In fact, the famed cravat worn by the Eton elite was given a natty upgrade after the precocious young Beau added a gold buckle to it. This amounted to a mini cultural revolution at the esteemed college.

When his old man croaked, the inheritance he bequeathed young Beau made the dashing young squid wealthy indeed.

Cutting from Oxford after just one term, despite showing great promise, Beau requested and received a commission in the 10th Light Dragoons. There, in the Prince of Wales’ own regiment, he rose to lieutenant after joining as a lowly cornet. The Hussars were by all accounts a pack of boozing tearaways with a reputation for debauchery. They did, however, look grouse in their spiffy uniforms.

When his old man croaked, the inheritance he bequeathed young Beau made the dashing young squid wealthy indeed.

This is where young Beau began to demonstrate his considerable flair for scrubbing up shmick. It was a hard act, what’s more, considering that an officer had to fork out for his own mount, mess bills, and uniforms. The Hussars uniforms changed with expensive regularity and the mess bills were astronomical since the regiment insisted upon the best victuals and finest grog known to humanity. These dinners came to resemble sumptuous orgies.

Admired by all, Beau cut such a dapper figure and possessed such swagger, that he was granted a license to act as he pleased. Consequently, he shirked his duties, failed to make parade, and skived off — all-be-it with a paramount of style. There was little left to do but promote him. Much to the consternation of those with more soldierly leanings, Beau was elevated to the rank of captain.

copy-of-beau-bonhams.jpg
We here at UNA have the utmost respect for cads

During his time with the Dragoons, the young Beau had ingratiated himself with the Prince of Wales after toadying his way into the royal inner circle. Brummell got so close to the Prince that in 1795 he supported him at his wedding to Princess Caroline. Later, the Princess would blame Brummell and his friends for getting pissed and spoiling the reception with bawdy antics like upchucking behind curtains and flashing the bridesmaids.

Now a captain, when Beau’s regiment was transferred from London to Manchester he said, “Sod it”. Being stationed to Manchester would have been too much like exile so he quit his commission and set his sights on London society.

images-7
James Purefoy played Brummell in the 2006 BBC movie This Charming Man. Hugh Bonneville played the witless Prince of Wales

It was there that his charm became his saving grace because it was the only currency he ever managed to save; the monetary variety slipped through his fingers like flour through a sieve. He estimated his addiction to buying clothes ran at around what would now be near enough to $200,000 a year. To maintain this extravagant habit, for a time anyway, he forewent the gambling and whoring that was the irresistible evening activities of the times. But his adventurous tailoring was turning heads and creating a stir especially among his tailors who he went to equally creative measures to avoid paying. Nevertheless, the garish powdered wigs of the 17th century were still in vogue, as were breeches and stockings. Along with the forerunner of what is now the standard gentleman’s suit, the snazzy courtier had perfected a unique necktie.

During his time with the Dragoons, the young Beau had ingratiated himself with the Prince of Wales after toadying his way into the royal inner circle. Brummell got so close to the Prince that in 1795 he supported him at his wedding to Princess Caroline. Later, the Princess would blame Brummell and his friends for getting pissed and spoiling the reception with bawdy antics like upchucking behind curtains and flashing the bridesmaids.

Today wigs and stockings are très homo, but in those days the conventions that Beau was brazenly flouting in favour of his bespoke full-length trousers and long tailored coats outraged many for their dandyish chic. Dressing as a bloke does today in a smoothly cut suit back then was the equivalent of prancing around like a poof on heat strangely enough despite dispensing with the pancake makeup and girly wigs, which were considered manly. Go figure.

However, society became enthralled with Brummell’s sartorial eccentricities. Even after leaving the 10th Light Dragoons, Beau kept sweet with the Prince of Wales, and in fact, was at the peak of his popularity with the slug-witted son of mad King George. In fact, his prized position at the Prince’s side proved useful in keeping his tiresome creditors at bay. He had long since burned through the fine fortune his father had left him.

beau-brummell-6
Dressing well is all part of the rich experience of being a White man

Beau was a wizard of garbs: coordinating colours with the gimlet eye of Michelangelo sizing up a canvas and partnering articles of clothing as though a cupid pairing lovers or a great chef creating a tantalising dish from unlikely ingredients.

Brummell claimed it took him five hours to dress in the morning. So fascinated with the ritual of putting on one’s day wear was the Prince, who had all the dress sense of a wedge of cheese, that he would spend hours at Beau’s Mayfair home studying him as he went through each stage of harmonising his wardrobe.

Before long, the whole upper stratum of London society was knocking at Beau’s door in the morning eager to observe Brummell in the routine of his toilette. They would literally watch spellbound as Beau pulled on his trousers one leg at a time until kitted out in his finery hours later he knotted his tie and fastened it with a dazzling pin. They might have been students of medicine observing a surgeon performing an operation. But the haughty Pom gents, despite the status of their class, had to learn how to brush their teeth by studying Brummell. It seems he was also pioneering personal hygiene in such innovative areas as taking a daily bath.

Brummell was thus drawn hammer-and-tongs into the Prince’s court and from there into the company of notorious libertine Lord Byron of whom the Prince did not at all approve. This coterie of gentlemen all dressed as Brummell did and the Watier’s Club, to which they all belonged, was dubbed “the Dandy club” by Byron. Having once avoided gambling, Beau was now racking up debts he had no hope of covering.

However, society became enthralled with Brummell’s sartorial eccentricities. Even after leaving the 10th Light Dragoons, Beau kept sweet with the Prince of Wales, and in fact, was at the peak of his popularity with the slug-witted son of mad King George. In fact, his prized position at the Prince’s side proved useful in keeping his tiresome creditors at bay. He had long since burned through the fine fortune his father had left him.

Beau’s success as often is the way with things heralded the beginning of his downfall. Already privately piqued that his upstart guest was more popular in society than himself, the Prince took exception to Brummell’s flowering friendship with Lord Byron. The Prince explicitly warned Beau to avoid his company and when he failed to do so the Prince publicly “cut” him. This resulted in Beau making an unfortunate quip that compounded the problem when upon their entrance and cognizant of the slight he asked the Prince’s guest “Alvanley, who is your fat friend?”

Thus far, Brummell had managed to survive despite penury on the basis of the line of credit afforded by his social status. When the Prince snubbed him, the fabric of Beau’s delicately woven society came unwoven. In debt to his fellow Dandies, Beau was booted out of the Watier’s club and he came a cropper. Skipping to France to avoid his creditors, Brummell died stricken with syphilis aged 61 at a French nuthouse.

Nonetheless, despite making a dog’s breakfast of his life, Brummell is remembered as the man who gave us the suit and tie. A statue was dedicated to him at London’s Jermyn Street in 2002. We thus raise our glasses to him. Only ours are filled with mineral water because we don’t want to end up like he did.

800px-beau_brummell_statue_jermyn_street-1
The Jermyn Street tribute to the man of style

 

WHERE WE STAND

WHERE WE STAND

Nationalist radicals are, once again, going on the front foot against civic patriots, Hansonites and other “conservative” impostors.

It is our long-held conviction that conservative activism exists only to betray the working classes of Australia by, in the most dishonest fashion, directing votes, along with the scarce free time and material resources of workers, back toward the liberal centre-ground.
Make no mistake comrades, it is this globalist-liberal status quo, the bloc of Liberal, National, Labor and Greens parties which present the greatest obstacle to the realisation of Australia as a real workers paradise.

Thus any formation of the “right” which, either openly, or by subterfuge directs support to the globalist bloc must be resisted tooth and nail by Nationalists.

One Nation, in particular, has shown themselves to be openly hostile toward workers and marginalised people; their voting record in the senate over the last months of 2016 revealed the true face of the Hanson revival.

We must judge them by the company they keep, the unravelling string of prospective One Nation candidates reveals a plethora of perverts, weirdos, conspiracy nuts and shysters.
We are tempted into optimism here, simply because the One Nation brand is so rotten from an ideological standpoint that we assume the workers and marginalised people smell the stench a mile off and refuse to have anything to do with the party.

One Nation, in particular, has shown themselves to be openly hostile toward workers and marginalised people; their voting record in the senate over the last months of 2016 revealed the true face of the Hanson revival.

The only people putting their hands up for One Nation pre-selection are from the very bottom of the barrel, the dregs of the suburban and rural middle classes who are too dissolute or just plain barmy to fit into the mainstream parties.

On the other hand, it would also make our lives easier if the Left were still able to do some of the heavy-lifting in the generations long class war; as it stands though they are mired in the failed identity politics of the liberal status quo.

30e5f6f600000578-3432965-image-a-61_1454648015582
Scott Moerland leads civic patriots on the road to nowhere which is where they wanted to go

The medium-term goal of our brand of Nationalism is the development and solidification of a viable third position with which to win over the White workers, the marginalised people and so many of the middle class as has ears to hear the message.

Genuine leftists must surely see now that there is no future in simple, superficial variations of globalist-liberal doctrine; that splitting hairs with liberals over things like same-sex activity in order to create the illusion of a radical difference of opinion really won’t wash.

The “loony” left merely perform the same function, albeit in mirror image, that One Nation and the civic patriots do on the right: they direct votes to the globalist parties in the lazy belief that “near enough is good enough”.

The medium-term goal of our brand of Nationalism is the development and solidification of a viable third position with which to win over the White workers, the marginalised people and so many of the middle class as has ears to hear the message.

The goal from both sides should be to put the squeeze on the liberal-globalist centre in order to create the new paradigm, the new order for the world after liberalism; the contemporary left, however, continues in a state of confused inertia while Nationalists take baby steps forward.

In the end, though, we don’t care too much about the Left since they contribute absolutely nothing to the debate over where our nation is headed and what type of society our children will be living in if globalist-liberalism is not reversed.

download-18
The “loony left” on day release from the marshmallow hospital

A strong alternative vision from the Left would at least give us an opportunity to form counter arguments and set ourselves to the task of political struggle, assuming of course that those ideas were wholly objectionable or flawed.

You see, comrade, Nationalists are not stupid people and we are not averse to appropriating, or supporting good ideas which would enhance the prospects of White Australians; should a restructured Left, in the future, come up with proposals which would benefit our people we would not necessarily oppose them.

In the end, though, we don’t care too much about the Left since they contribute absolutely nothing to the debate over where our nation is headed and what type of society our children will be living in if globalist-liberalism is not reversed.

This is pure speculation though, the Left are presently in such a poor state that we cannot envisage the rise of a viable “Alt-Left” with whom we could engage; the only possibility is that we could absorb some of their currently disillusioned young activists into third position Nationalism, a tactic which is bearing fruit at this writing.

Nationalists are presently embroiled in a two-front war against the dead ends of the political spectrum in the hope of cutting the supply lines of support to the liberal globalist status quo.

One side, the Left, suffering from shell shock have shot themselves in the foot and are immobilised until their wounds heal.

The other side, the Civic patriots, have raced ahead of the front and are a rabble without orders, living off the land and upsetting all the civilians with their noise and bravado.

59b1366d4c1ee7c7cb9c36fe09799ded
Finally we can breathe: a good old fashioned fascist