This title question here can only be answered by being honest, and above all things, we as Nationalists have a responsibility not to fall into the trap of platitudes.

By Christopher Shortis

Progressive politics are full of examples of platitudes and the most famous was arguably former Labour P.M. Kevin Rudd’s sorry speech. It created a fuzzy, feel-good moment to appease the conscience of the progressives by condemning early Australian history, but achieving little if any positive outcome for the Aboriginal people. This is also a great example of cultural, or indeed, white suicide rather than genocide.

Ultimately our nation’s woes are from condescending white people with an aristocratic mindset in power, appeasing their globalist puppet masters, filling our nation with third-world hordes and selling our ports, farmland and God-knows-what-else to an emerging China. These Judas Iscariots of our race don’t care about Aboriginal welfare, let alone their fellow white man. In time, at the rate we’re going, we could potentially be under Chinese occupation, and how will this fare for the Aboriginal people?

We at United Nationalists Australia know that Kevin Rudd’s sorry speech was patronizing pish because if white people in positions of power can sell out their own, then how can they genuinely claim to care about Aboriginal welfare? This, however, is not about Aboriginal welfare, but whether we as whites are suffering from white genocide or suicide?

Kevin Rudd’s expurgated speech: he meant to say, “As Prime Minister of Australia, I am a sorry son of a bitch.”

The most striking example of platitudes from pretentious Nationalists is the term “It’s O.K to be white”, the latest in a line of mantras including “Diversity means White Genocide”. These trite statements are often adopted by uncultured boobs who think waving signs and yelling out “It is O.K to be White” is the apex of political activism. Neil Erikson who has doxed just about every group that he has ever been involved with walked on stage at an African culture event in Melbourne and yelled out “It’s O.K to be white” and it was nothing more than an attempt to incite a reaction.

This alleged state snitch, police informant and all-around serial-pest continued his moronathon at St. Kilda beach by filming Africans playing soccer, which incited a reaction that Erikson was looking for, with one African arrested for assault on a police officer. This created the propaganda Erikson wanted to promote his St. Kilda “Political Meeting”, which in turn created the spectacle the establishment needed to condemn the rally as racist.

This alleged state snitch, police informant and all-around serial-pest continued his moronathon at St. Kilda beach by filming Africans playing soccer, which incited a reaction that Erikson was looking for, with one African arrested for assault on a police officer. This created the propaganda Erikson wanted to promote his St. Kilda “Political Meeting”, which in turn created the spectacle the establishment needed to condemn the rally as racist.

The predictable dumbathon between left and right played out to script, with the left being filled with their Marxist birdseed parroting the variant of the same chant. “Africans are welcome racists are not”. The media, as well as the Left, were engaging in the hype of the rise of Neo-Nazis after a couple of clowns were filmed doing the Nazi Salute. The Jewish community also had to have their say through The Australian Jewish News, with the story titled ‘When right is wrong’” and the chosen ones had to make it about them. Wasn’t the counter-protest against the far-right about alleged racism towards Africans?

This also triggered left-wing groups to launch their own protests, warning of the threat of growing Nazism chanting another clichéd mantra “Never Again” in the city of Melbourne, which was painted red long ago. The two predominant figures leading the cuckfest at St. Kilda beach were Neil Erikson and Blair Cottrell, the main act at the circus protesting against African violence.

B1 and B2 were falling over themselves trying to prove they’re not racist, and Cottrell posing for a picture with a South Vietnamese man with the defunct South Vietnamese flag. Oh, the irony! The so-called Nationalist with a man who fled his homeland to Australia with his defunct flag, because Ho Chi Minh fought to unite Vietnam and as it happens were more Nationalist then he was, and more Nationalist than Blair will ever be.

It’s a wonder these jokers won’t be holding their own citizenship ceremony on Australia Day. They can start with this token Asian.

Queensland Senator Fraser Anning unsurprisingly lent his support to the rally seemingly without a single advisor in his office warning him about being within 1000 miles radius of the Erikson termite. The old ‘I support Israel’ line came out when questioned by the media and the strong denials that he was with Neo-Nazis. This is despite supporters executing the Roman Salute and looking like extras in the series Romper Stomper. But now we must address the elephant in the room. Both left and right were at St. Kilda beach herded like cattle by the Police and in this circus were The Unshackled, Dia Beltran and Kane Miller from the True-Blue Crew, making up some of the social media identities.

This also triggered left-wing groups to launch their own protests, warning of the threat of growing Nazism chanting another cliché mantra “Never Again” in the city of Melbourne, which was painted red long ago. The two predominant figures leading the cuckfest at St. Kilda beach were Neil Erikson and Blair Cottrell, the main act at the circus protesting against African violence.

Most of the people at St. Kilda beach whether they were left, right, the police or media, parliamentarians both State and Federal are a majority WHITE! As Nationalists waging our political struggle, we must come to terms with this mother of all paradoxes. Before we blame Jews, Africans, Muslims, China and every other symptom plaguing our nation today, remember the success of ending White Australia was done by whites willing to bow down to the globalist, egalitarian and elitist mindset.

Without white collaborators, there could be no ending of White Australia or the destruction of western culture in general. We as Nationalists need to accept that white history is a dual history and that the Nationalist-minded man was and still is always in direct opposition politically against the mercantile classes. Nationalists wanted a white man’s working paradise, where wages and conditions were just and not undermined by cheap non-white labour, while the bourgeois will do anything for profit.

Early Australian historical events such as the Eureka Stockade 1854, Buckland River Riots 1857, Lambing Flats 1861 and the Shearers Strike 1891 are prime examples of the Nationalist-minded men standing up against the greedy pastoralists. From the shearers strike of 1891, emerged the Australian Labor Party and ten years later under Edmund Barton, the first Australian P.M. the first act of parliament, the Immigration Restriction Act was legislated. This is referred to as the White Australia Policy and our forefathers were prepared to stand for the principles of Nationalism by legislation and put into practice that the continent of Australia was to be a white man’s land.

Without getting into specifics too much, after the end of WW2, the United Nations was formed in 1948 and the declaration of human rights was established. In reality, becoming a member of the United Nations marked the beginning of surrender to national sovereignty to the global Overlords, and since then Australia has lost its racial homogeneity, manufacturing and identity. Legal, economic and racial sovereignty destroyed not by external forces, but the Judas Iscariots of our race in collaboration with the globalists. The majority of whites have learned to hate themselves because of the distorted black armed band view of our history being taught in our institutions when in three words history can be summed up accurately, the good, the bad and the ugly.

Our foes will only give you the bad and the ugly, but not the good, and the salient message here as Christ said, “Your enemies will be those of your own household,” and it’s going to take more than bromides to take on the globalist and the enemies within our midst. White genocide or White suicide? Somehow it seems to be the latter.

Blair Cottrell, the human megaphone, once again channelling Adolf Hitler while supporting a pro-Israel Senator and being photographed with an Asian man



Once again a Patriot Rally has been generating media hype for negative reasons. The central issue that inspired the gathering at St Kilda beach on Saturday 5 has been obfuscated by a narrative about extremism, racism, and the threat from ‘far right’ groups. The word ‘Nazi’ is appearing everywhere.

Moreover, it all arose thanks to the habitual instigator, social media impresario, and reputed state informant Neil Erikson after he seized on the controversy surrounding a clash between African gangsters and members of the Vietnamese community in St Albans in the week leading up to the rally. All of a sudden, the talk ceased being about African-related crime and was all about the danger of White extremists.

United Nationalists Australia makes no criticism of those well-intentioned Aussies who attended the ‘Reclaim the Beach’ rally at Melbourne’s St Kilda beach believing that they were standing up for a principle. We ask our readers to accept that we are seasoned nationalists that have witnessed much in our time and this informs what is often mistakenly conceived as negative commentaries, but whereas in truth our goal is quite the opposite; to illuminate our people to the political frauds that feed on those who stray into far-right politics.

We wish honest nationalists to discern the true essence of those individuals and groups they lend their support to because 99 times out of 100 they’re being misdirected by many who would misspend their enthusiasm and exhaust their political will.

For in politics, deception is a constant, and in “far-right” politics, there is nothing but false players, swindlers, and provocateurs, and through a conspiratorial arc, they become the champions of the ill-informed. And now we dispense with this necessary introduction let us get down to the nitty-gritty of the rally that is still being reported on.

We wish honest nationalists to discern the true essence of those individuals and groups they lend their support to because 99 times out of 100 they’re being misdirected by many who would misspend their enthusiasm and exhaust their political will.

A report reproduced a screenshot purportedly lifted from a private group “Cooks Convicts Inner Circle” on which Neil Erikson was offering notes on the organising his rally. Ultimately, the rhetoric surrounding the event was watered-down from a hoped-for confrontation with Sudanese youth to appease the powers and was instead presented as a peaceful “community meeting”.

According to the screengrab supposedly posted by Erikson, “The goal is not violence it’s exposure to our pages”. Ironic then that during the week leading up to the rally Facebook removed Neil’s pages and his Twitter account was taken down. But while the tone of the post quoted is nothing unsurprising its authenticity has been questioned. A battered sav has more brain cells than Neil Erikson and yet the spelling “watching us like horks (sic)” and “good to have you back on bored Blair (sic)” seems pretty dense even for him. Still, as we say, you could tread in dog faeces that possess greater hopes of sentient evolution than Erikson.

The authenticity of this post has been questioned yet it somehow screams NOOL

Erikson, as we’ve pointed out many times, is a serial provocateur. His entire existence confirms regardless of how flagrantly shonky a person can be he or she will still find loyal followers to lead down the garden path. UNA last year reported on how Blair Cottrell simply disregarded all the rotten things that Neil did to him: doxing him; calling him names, making up wild rumours about him — to join with this jackal. Note that Blair would never make such an exception for the members of UNA, or AFP, who’ve only ever been frank about his activities, yet when it comes to a twerp as crooked as Erikson is he is prepared time and time again to put aside any differences and unite for some inadequately defined purpose. So too, the True Blue Crew allied with this reunification as the old band got back together.

Just who was leading who behind the scenes we do not know but the idea that any right-thinking activist would willingly associate with an Erikson circus is contemptible. Blair has been ambiguous to some younger followers given how he freely admits to chatting with ASIO regularly and continues the associations with civics. Some say he is pursuing clever tactics to cover himself while others take a harder line. Our point simply is that a discussion has begun in Blair’s supporter-base and how he addresses it all will ultimately be important to progress or decline.

Indeed, the very prospect of the rally had set the media into a frenzy of hyperbole and already, where once it was generating clickbait from African gangsters it was now focusing squarely on the “threat” of White extremists. Erikson has already built up quite a form for himself leading up to the rally by crashing an African cultural event and provoking a situation on St Kilda beach by filming a group of African youths playing football. Helpful too was that the Antipodean Resistance decided to piggyback on the controversy by posting their stickers outside a Jewish nursing home for Holocaust survivors. While this was a droll move by these serial paper hangers, it does the cause of Australian nationalism about as much good as if they’d dressed in white sheets and dragged a Negro down Flinders Street tied behind a pick-up truck.

Such was the composition of those behind the rally that the Australia First Party released a media statement distancing itself from Erikson and his rally and qualifying their objection to the use of the name ‘nationalist’ by these civics. In a submission to Victoria’s Police Commissioner, the question was even asked outright whether Victoria Police was prepared to admit that Neil Erikson acts as an informant and is a troublemaker operating with a green light. These squealers are spreading.

For in politics, deception is a constant, and in “far-right” politics, there is nothing but false players, swindlers, and provocateurs, and through a conspiratorial arc, they become the champions of the ill-informed. And now we dispense with this necessary introduction let us get down to the nitty-gritty of the rally that is still being reported on.

There is only one reason anyone should talk to the police and that’s to tell them to fuck off. Hunter S. Thompson, the late gonzo journalist, had a note stuck to his refrigerator that reiterated this wisdom and it read: “Never ring 911 for anything! Ever! And that means YOU!” The idea that the police are in any way supportive of right-wing politics or its cause is whacko. They hate left and right equally and are beholden only to themselves: they are their own gang and any information drip fed to them can and probably will be used against us at some later stage.

There is a further anomaly that indicates a certain acquiescence to the state which can threaten Lads integrity as an organisation. Tom Sewell, the Lads Society leader admitted in a screenshot taken from a private group that he regularly chats to Victoria Police. Might it better to not be so ‘helpful’? And it is recorded by leftists present that Tom and his Lads including the inveterate liar Mark McDonald and his bestie Alex Annenkov were present in an aborted attempt to intimidate picnicking lefties. Although the reliability of that account is open to question.

Worryingly enough, Sewell freely admits to flapping his gums to the cops

In the struggle for influence over the patriot scene, it’s also been alleged by some close to the Lads that in a bid to undermine what he sees as his competition from established nationalists Tom Sewell has been willing to freely leak to anti-fascists. Such a claim now being spread about should be treated with real caution, but the allegation itself points to difficulties in a scene where ideological consistency has been lacking and personalisms rule the roost – and ideology should be the glue that keeps things together. Or on the other hand, as is quite possible, anti-fascists have found a way to plant such a toxic story through bad elements to sink the credibility of the group? Whatever it may all be in actuality, serious folk should keep right out of it.

Thus, with Erikson as the nucleus of an opportunistic rally that once upon a time would’ve been typical of the civic patriot dero Nick Folkes, a dubious coalition has formed in spite of an article published in The Age claiming that “the far right has been divided and conquered – by themselves”. In this inaccurate piece of reportage which claims that Blair Cottrell is Australia’s most prominent nationalist the author has failed to perceive that the broad conservative milieu, give or take certain players, is indeed functioning in unison. It is correct that ‘the movement’ is divided by those supportive of Israel and those who’re not, which explains why the Australian Liberty Alliance weren’t represented, but it isn’t accurate either.

There is only one reason anyone should talk to the police and that’s to tell them to fuck off. Hunter S. Thompson, the late gonzo journalist, had a note stuck to his refrigerator that reiterated this wisdom and it read: “Never ring 911 for anything! Ever! And that means YOU!”

Senator Fraser Anning, whose appearance at the rally has become the media focal point of Nazi hysteria, given Anning’s support for a White European Australia he is nonetheless an outspoken advocate of Israel. Last October he supported Avi Yemini at a rally in Melbourne and declared his support for Israel. The following day of the St Kilda rally he went on national television and did likewise. None of his pro-Israel rhetoric seems to have troubled his ‘anti-Semitic’ supporters like Blair Cottrell.

But then, nothing has changed for Blair – be it cognitive dissonance or simply a desire to overcome accusations of racism he has a fine knack for appearing in grip-and-grin shots with non-Whites as he did during drinks following the rally when he appeared with a Vietnamese man holding out the South Vietnamese flag. Any self-respecting nationalist, if he HAD to appear in front of a Vietnamese flag would’ve been better of standing with a North Vietnamese flag given the South was a corrupt sell-out to foreign interests while the north was fighting essentially for nationalism. As it happens, the Vietnamese community boycotted the event.

Cottrell and Ricky Turner all grins with their token Viet and the abominable South Vietnamese flag which no nationalist would recognise since the South was a sell-out

These acts of sucking up to “integrated” Asian minority groups further betray Cottrell and Erikson’s youthful naiveté, anyone over 40 will remember the hideous violence perpetrated by Vietnamese immigrants in the 1980’s and 1990’s. By the turn of the millennium the news media were salivating over stories of Asian gang fights, limbs severed in machete attacks, muggings and street brawls involving dozens of combatants; not to mention the cruelty of Vietnamese dog and cockfighting rings, their drug pushing, car re-birthing scams and standover rackets which persist to this day.

Then, too, is the way the conservative youth media voices of XYZ and The Unshackled have shamelessly plugged Neil Erikson almost in defiance of the pig’s history. Just the same way that Future Now happily declares him a “mate” despite the fact he’d pimp out their grandmothers for crisps money if he could get the chance. There isn’t anybody Erikson wouldn’t rat out, sell out, or stab in the back. There is no lie he wouldn’t tell or stunt he wouldn’t pull. If anyone truly wanted to serve the movement they’d push him in front of a speeding garbage truck and encourage the driver to reverse back and forth over his body about two dozen times. The types of characters that get drawn to Erikson speak for themselves.

Take Rino Grgrovuic, AKA Blue Beard for instance. Leading up to Christmas Blue Beard encountered Left Wing pest Tom Tengu by chance on a Melbourne Street. One thing led to another and he ended up allegedly assaulting the cuck’s girlfriend. Now, don’t get us wrong, we couldn’t give a crap for either party, but it was the confrontation that ensued with Victoria Police, caught by Blue Beard on his own phone, that truly demonstrated what a basket case he is. Then there is Ricky T, Neil’s offsider who is thicker than a side of beef and has all the charisma of soiled underpants. The way things are going Neil’s next sidekick and newest political spokesman will be suffering Down syndrome. As it is, Ricky T is not too far off.

These acts of sucking up to “integrated” Asian minority groups further betray Cottrell and Erikson’s youthful naiveté, anyone over 40 will remember the hideous violence perpetrated by Vietnamese immigrants in the 1980’s and 1990’s.

The least impressive thing about the rally was the rally itself despite the media hype. The emphasis on ‘Nazis’ being present seemed contrived. In footage taken one man holds his finger against his top lip and gives a Nazi salute before goose-stepping away. The context of this act is never made clear. Was it taken while the rally’s organisers were giving their speeches or was he mocking the Nazi accusation while facing off with the anti-racists? Yet, when a drongo rolled up in a Cosmic Psychos top, holding an SS helmet the optics changed decidedly Nazi. We have made enquiries and so far nobody has any idea who this joker is leading to speculation that he might well have been planted there.

The bloke in the Cosmic Psychos T-Shirt shows off a souvenir from his days working for Social Security

Following an unremarkable bunch of sentences from Senator Anning, Blair’s speech was interesting from the point of view that he correctly blamed the state for the presence of the African criminals. But when he flew into Fuhrer mode as he is apt to do when speaking publicly and vowed to march to Daniel Andrews office he betrayed the fact that he hadn’t figured out who was really in control. It wasn’t he or his motley supporters it was the Victoria Police who had each side well corralled and controlled. Blue Beard learned as much when he attempted to taunt the opposition but wound up confronted by a mounted policeman with whom he had an exchange that resulted in about ten cops rugby tackling him to the ground and presumably arresting him, possibly for breach of bail conditions resulting from his run-in with Tom Tengu.

When it was Neil’s turn to speak he gave some wimpy whine about his social media accounts before blowing off like a popcorn fart. Then he asked whether there were any Nazis present and made a joke about a couple of Vietnamese chaps. Obviously, he hadn’t seen the stooge in the Cosmic Psychos T-Shirt with the SS helmet. It kind of undermined the counter optics he was suggesting.

The most interesting thing about the rally was the victory against the left who have hitherto marshalled a greater presence and organised themselves far better than those on the right. In fact, the rally has left certain parties in disarray, with The Smashed Avocado movement being accused of being piss-weak liberals by the ‘Anarchists in Narrm.’ Likewise, at some point, police control of the crowd purportedly got lax and anti-racists holding a picnic were menaced by members of the right. Complaints were made that Citizens against Racism and Fascism (CARF) split leaving their comrades in danger. Later on, or earlier on, we can’t be sure, a truck laden with sound equipment broadcasting reggae music and anti-racist messages was targeted by a group of right-wing protesters who busted some speakers and messed with other equipment. UNA can officially declare we have no sympathy whatsoever for the antis.

The final indignity for the Anarcho-Communists and their bourgeois cat-lady allies was being shepherded to the Acland St tram terminus by scores of police, all the while being harangued and cat-called by a numerically superior and physically more aggressive civic patriot mob. This is the fundamental problem for the CARF and their fellow travellers, as much as they try to project a tough, rebellious and counter-cultural image the demographics of their movement let them down; there is no way a group comprising around 85% women can physically confront an opposing mob which is obviously 99% male.

The events on the St Kilda foreshore that afternoon and their mostly incoherent talking points have been largely obscured by the flood of disinformation emanating from the dinosaur media, which was slavishly repeated by politicians and pundits on all sides. As of this writing, the most interesting development has been the announcement by Senator Fraser Anning that he is attempting to register a new micro-party, the Conservative Nationals.

But there are reports that a fake-news-journalist is fishing around to get a story together about neo-nazis and terrorism given that a couple of months back a gaggle of so-called neo-nazis met in a Sydney hotel with a couple of civics to discuss their two pet targets – Australia First Party and the Lads Society. A rumour says that they are communicating with the journalist in what would be a two-way street. While it is true these people have long had connections to political police agencies and Fairfax, might they not conjure up a terrorism case and a terrorism story?

That is a lot more serious and allowing too the fake-news-journalist may have a couple of ‘ins’ to shifties who attached themselves to the protest, it bodes badly for all. We will see how far the spirit of St Kilda takes Anning and the Civic Patriots. We are willing to bet that once the registration of a new pseudo-nationalist party is ratified by the AEC, head cases such as Erikson and Burgess and opportunists like Avi Yemini will be all over it like a rash. Blair Cottrell will be in a singular position to signal clearly what he is and is not. That will be a big decision and we await it with concern.

The dark side of the force was present that day



Jordan Peterson, when he keeps his beak out of politics, is a compelling speaker and a wise man; his lectures on men and masculinity are recommended viewing for young people.

We particularly admire Peterson’s take on the post-modern orthodoxy where men, and in particular young White men are being gradually hammered down to near the bottom of the “progressive stack”; this is the theoretical pecking order imposed by globalist liberalism, the effect being a rising tide of “man-babies” and Peter Pan cases.

Young White men today are told, in no uncertain terms that their kind is on the way out, that women and non-Whites are morally and intellectually superior to “old White men”; given this prevailing view among the elites and upper castes some of our young men are taking the view that there is no point growing up and they retreat from adulthood to pursue a life of childish hedonism.

antifa punk
Antifa is full of Peter Pan cases, it is premised on the truth that an “Anarchist’ at 60 is just as silly and immature as one of 15

We would never tar the whole of our youth with the epithet “Peter Pan”, the majority of young Whites are blissfully unaffected by the dogmatic Globalists, the media and the bourgeois Left types with their Newspeak and tawdry historical revisionism; that is one of the unintended consequences of a politically correct education, so much of it is fluff that it goes in one ear and out the other leaving the young with no real frame of reference on which to hang their White guilt.

We are seeing this very fable manifested in society in many sectors of society, the groups of Lost Boys congregating on social media, in clubs and underground associations, accompanied at times by their undemanding Tinker Bell female accomplices.

Allegorically Peter Pan was the boy who refused to grow up because he had Captain Hook as his example of adult life; the tyrant Hook is condemned and pursued by age, the lurking figure of the crocodile, announced by his tick-tock rhythm of time gradually chipping away at both the pirate leader’s sanity and his physical body.

Peter Pan instead chooses to be the eternal teenager, leading his band of Lost Boys, with all their insecurities and sorrows; the only female archetype in their world being the fairy Tinker Bell, the ethereal, one-dimensional girl who is mostly an enabler of their shared delusion.

greg davies
There is a whole genre of comedy based on the intersection of Peter Pan syndrome and midlife crisis

We are seeing this very fable manifested in society in many sectors of society, the groups of Lost Boys congregating on social media, in clubs and underground associations, accompanied at times by their undemanding Tinker Bell female accomplices.

In his work on contemporary masculinity Jordan Peterson points out that avoiding the sacrifices required of manhood and behaving like the eternal teenager into one’s thirties, or even forties is a road to personal desolation; a youth only gets to choose the sacrifice he is going to make to become an adult, he does not have the option of avoiding it if he wishes to take his place in the world of men.

Peter Pan cases are the most negative element when it comes to misleading the youth into throwing themselves into the maw of the globalist state, effectively wrecking their future prospects for no personal gain or any tangible benefit to their nation.

What is meant by sacrifice? The simplest way of visualising it would be to imagine masculinity as having an hourglass shape.

The lower half of our hourglass represents youth, with all of its potentials, while the upper portion is manhood with all the variety of options available to a man who has made a successful transition from the world of boys.

The narrow section in the middle is the period of sacrifice in which the boy becomes something more than he was by accepting a narrowing of his world and submitting himself to the guidance of his elders, as a student, an apprentice, a cadet and so forth.

Youth has to become something through sacrificing, for a time, all the freedoms and relative luxuries of childhood to pursue and gain mastery over an occupation in order that he, as a man, might enjoy the freedoms and numerous pathways to spiritual and material enrichment available only to adults.

Dawn rising on muddy, horrific battlefie
“In war, you learn your lessons and they stay learned”- Ernst Jünger

As has been noted, avoidance of this period of sacrifice, with all its limitations and the necessity for developing social skills such as humility, patience, tolerance and perseverance will only end in disaster; as Peterson puts it, instead of choosing the sacrifice he wishes to make in order to become a man the Peter Pan case will end up having sacrifices imposed by time and ageing, sacrifices which will likely crush him.

This brings us to the point of the article, dissident political action should not be regarded as a sacrifice worth making by the White youth of Australia, especially in an era when being blacklisted for life can be the result of a few lines of text on social media or an ill-judged appearance in public among the wrong crowd.

Transition to manhood is impossible from within a tribe of Lost Boys led by a would-be Peter Pan, therefore, a youth movement without connection to and supervision by sober adults is bound for disaster.

Peter Pan cases are the most negative element when it comes to misleading the youth into throwing themselves into the maw of the globalist state, effectively wrecking their future prospects for no personal gain or any tangible benefit to their nation.

Political engagement should only be considered in the light of maturity, once the sacrifices required of manhood have been made and all the options of the adult world are open to the individual; nobody expects the youth to march as the vanguard in the great struggle; it is immoral to do so and those lessons were learned long ago, at Passchendaele and Kokoda.

It is the responsibility of the elders to guard against the exploitation of our most precious resource, the youth; it is for this reason we expose and undermine charlatans, globalist pimps, Peter Pan cases and any other bad actors seeking to act as puppeteers of young White men.

French “Yellow Vest” protestors, this is what a grassroots movement looks like




Thinking of a Golden Shlomo winner of this year’s award for Fake Aussie Nationalism wasn’t so easy since anyone outside of the Australia First Party must be considered a fake nationalist. There are, to put it simply, just too many entries.

One could single out the vile collaborator and provocateur Neil Erikson. One could also look at the games played by Nick Folkes, who keeps changing his definitions of himself as some charade to keep up with what he perceives to be political fashions. One could easily name the broadcasters of conservative fake nationalism such as The Unshackled (Unshekeled) or XYZ; the two most rubbishy pretenders out there.

One could ask why we are so passionate about this definition of Nationalism in the first place and thereafter are such sticklers about affording the designation to worthy parties. That’s also elementary to explain only the answer troubles so many since so few are the genuine article and yet are sworn to passing themselves off so.

Just because you can make a stupid African-American style hand symbol that’s edgy does not make you a nationalist, or even a serious White Nationalist for that matter: it simply makes you an egg.

Alternatively, “shit-posting” a vile euphemism for trolling ideological opponents with haw-haw memes and shifty commentaries is not an articulation of the tenets, aims, or interests of Australian nationalism. Believing that Australia is “European” and therefore adopting a Euro-centric notion of nationalism which is to be shared only with an approved coterie of boys who believe they’re building a “community” situation by staying underground and punching each other in the head once a week (although we approve of the latter) does not maketh for nationalism.

It just lays the seeds for the inevitable disgruntlement at whoever can be heard cheering on your opponent to knock you out.

Australian nationalism is not a war against Islam, either. Islam, like any other racial group, such as Africans, Chinese, Nepalese and those who practise the craft of curry manufacture are symptoms of a White Political Class. Make no mistake, and it’s a class war against traitors who are too keen to grab Beijing’s lucre for personal gain or in the interests of advancing the cause of their party.

Nationalists are not Jewish gnomes who coin the term “Ozraeli” and then connive with evangelical Christians from Australian Liberty Alliance to unite us all against an enemy that is, paradoxically, a product of evangelical Christianity at play in western powers. Following these nitwits because you don’t like Islam only creates more Islam not less. And Islam is where the concerns of many ends: they do not see the complete sinofication of our Australian cities and the unprecedented ownership of Australian primary assets by China as a threat to Australian independence at all. Nope, they quip, “At least China knows how to handle Moslems.”

Nationalists are not Jewish gnomes who coin the term “Ozraeli” and then connive with evangelical Christians from Australian Liberty Alliance to unite us all against an enemy that is, paradoxically, a product of evangelical Christianity at play in western powers.

The spread of fake nationalism is so far and wide and while it has at its centre the inevitable “far right” hypocrites it is now using “the left” in the guise of Antifascist persons to pursue its agenda against nationalists. Yes, because nothing upsets a fake nationalist more than a real nationalist so the thing to do is to invalidate the true nationalist and accuse him of being a fake. To do this, you connive with Antifascists such as a certain entity whose Facebook productions this year have been a treasure trove of forensic information about the goings-on in the camp of the conservative shucksters.

Ladsleaks, which is composed of two persons, one of them an open secret and the other having just revealed himself, Mark McDonald and Andrew Wilson, has a surprising tandem with Antifascist Action. The two parties work in unison and as the New Year unfolds UNA will hopefully have some damaging stuff to report about how deep this alliance runs.

The nationalist movement is not the far-right movement as that milieu is interested in feeding back into the system to the coffers of established conservative entities. They ape the nationalist and they are always to be found making cheeky winks to Antisemitism as a device to establish bogus credentials but there are always Zionists lurking behind their curtain and instructing their gameplay.

But now we’ve just come to the crux of why United Nationalists Australia is so controversial for its unwaveringness. We have been watching the co-opting of nationalism for so many years now we can sniff out a conservative shuck in our midst (Australian Meditations we’re looking at you). The civic patriot deplores the exactitude of Australian nationalism because it affects its inclusiveness.

The argument from civic patriots has always been about ‘inclusivity’ and ‘reaching out’ and they forever display chagrin when any criticism comes their way and dismiss it as an attack on “the movement”.

The nationalist movement is not the far-right movement as that milieu is interested in feeding back into the system to the coffers of established conservative entities. They ape the nationalist and they are always to be found making cheeky winks to Antisemitism as a device to establish bogus credentials but there are always Zionists lurking behind their curtain and instructing their gameplay.

Conservatism serves the interest of the capitalist and mercantile classes: just like its ideological opposition, it is a wholly class-centred church. The aims of Australian nationalism are agin its central philosophy; rather than closing the borders it seeks to open them up for trade; it desires an open Australia so that it can import cheap labour and inflate its profits at the cost of Aussie working conditions and wages. It doesn’t care if you are White, black, yellow or brown so long as you can somehow keep the money rolling in.

Just because you can make a stupid African-American style hand symbol that’s edgy does not make you a nationalist, or even a serious White Nationalist for that matter: it simply makes you an egg.

To that end, these conservatives secrete themselves among those who grossly mistake conservatism as having an inherent interest in patriotism or the politics of whiteness. They listen to Pauline Hanson when she says “it’s OK to be White” but somehow are deaf when she slams Senator Fraser Anning as a racist when he calls for a return to a White Australia style immigration policy.

The conservative milieu listens to anyone BUT nationalists. It aligns itself with all manner of sub-tier foreign “alt-right” celebrities rather than risk upsetting the rank-and-file by inviting along an established home-grown nationalist. Their cultural cringe is quite revealing but their choices are more so.

This year’s Golden Shlomo for fake Australian Nationalism, therefore, goes to ANYONE NOT IN THE AUSTRALIA FIRST PARTY WHO CALLS THEMSELVES A NATIONALIST.

Enjoy your award. imageedit_1_2996129378

Australia First Party — the only true stamp of whether or not somebody is an Australian Nationalist

Golden Shlomo award for being fake anarchist Slackbastard


This goes to the architect of fake anarchism, Professor Rob Sparrow of Monash University. Rob went offline with his Slackbastard channels late this year and many were wondering why. Some, such as the villainous state turncoat and sometime collaborator with Antifa, Neil Erikson, took advantage of the situation to promote fake news about his arrest on terrorism charges. Only, he didn’t name him Rob. But we bothered to actually ring Rob’s number at Monash University on the understanding that if his online resources resumed operations once he returned from overseas (rumour has it from Syria) on November 2 as he stated in his phone message then it’s just more proof that Rob is SB. He did not disappoint. Rob, you are a dickhead. You and your entire family should be stuffed in a barrel and cast into an open sewer. Each and every one of you is a piece of trash that a billy goat wouldn’t eat. Therefore Rob, being Slackbastard, you receive this year’s UNA Golden Shlomo award for being fake anarchist Slackbastard. You know where you can stick it. imageedit_1_2996129378

download (4).jpg

Professor Rob Slackbastard of Monash University uses anarchists to further an agenda of far-left politics. He is a dick



Here it is, folks, the el gran queso, or for those who don’t speak spick, the big cheese. This is our holy monument award, the big kahuna, the one which is bigger than all the rest and which you could use to split open the skull of a bull dyke. Yes, dear readers, it is the GOLDEN SHLOMO AWARD. Don’t ask for what. Don’t demand a category because it transcends words and instruction. It just IS. Yes, and this year it IS awarded to FACEBOOK.

There has been no more of a damaging instrument used against nationalist and other folks than Facebook. It’s a cesspit of anonymous activity that led to the doxing of certain young alt-right folk who had a bright idea (it is alleged) to infiltrate the ranks of the National Party and turn it into a tool for Whiteness.

It has enabled disgruntled and perennial disruptors like Mark McDonald to play both sides. It has enabled unwholesome hypocrites from Antifascist Action to pursue his or her often illegal activity in the name of having been born too late to have fought alongside camaradas in the Spanish Civil War. It has damaged reputations, harmed careers, stirred up ill-will and created more enemies than the Kaiser.

We are not even going to single it down to Zuckerberg since Facebook goes beyond him. It IS Facebook. It is time and a matter of grave importance that nationalists start to abandon this medium and use it only as the most basic and casual tool. So far, for most of the groups that purport to be on the “right side” of politics, it is their entire world. Imagine, for instance, what would become of dreck like Neil Erikson if Facebook disappeared tomorrow. He would vanish too, forever and ever.

What a lovely country we’d have. imageedit_1_2996129378

Burn, Facebook, burn! Or at least, go offline permanently!



It has been one year since Newtown Police refused to acknowledge any of the three known complaints made against David Gullis for threatening behaviour, assault, intimidation, and vandalism.

This is because the cops over there are probably all big union people and Delusional Dave is protected by the CFMMEU and their Labor counterparts.

We cannot really state why the useless Newtown cops turn a blind eye to this criminal, they might all be having sexual relations with him, but we do know that he is a dangerous terrorist and is still at large.

Gullis goes berserk! An Antifa terrorist on the job

On December 7, 2017, our UNA editor was living in the not-so-salubrious surrounds of Enmore, in Sydney’s inner-west. His address had been provided to an Antifa operative living in Melbourne by rogue elements who, unknown to us at the time, were feeding information about our man back to Antifa via this troll. These two will be revealed at an appropriate time in the coming New Year.

We recap from our previous blog

On Thursday, December 7, at 4:30 am when most were snug in bed, Dave Gullis was amped for mayhem. Takeaway coffee in hand, which he purchased at a nearby service station, he began banging at the side gate of the Australia First Party’s Tempe headquarters. He disturbed the peace until the AFP President, Jim Saleam, was groggily forced downstairs. A busy man who catches only a regimented allotment of sleep, disturbing Jim at this hour was at best an act of rudeness. Curious what all the ruckus was about, as Jim answered the door, he was confronted by an aggressive Gull wearing a jacket and his trademark cap. His adoption of this garb was a craven attempt to dodge identification.

Thus disguised, an overwrought Gull began yelling about Jim being an “ASIO agent” and “a paedophile” and repeatedly challenged him to “fight”. Jim is in his sixties and Gull is a burly tradesman who is at least 30 years his junior. This challenge was an act of gutlessness that is in keeping with past CFMEU-member organised attacks upon our older people. Waiting till the dead of the morning was likewise a grub tactic. But it was not the last grubby deed that Gull would be guilty of that morning.

Gull again ranted at Jim nonsense about being an “ASIO agent” and a “paedophile” so to create the impression this was an attack by Civics. Jim fired back, “I don’t know who you are, son!”

Gull then uttered a series of unequivocal death threats before throwing the dregs of his coffee at Jim, with only a few splashes hitting their mark. Fortunately, the locked gate divided them, or Gull would have forced an intrusion. In another room, a friend of Jim’s overheard the entire exchange having been awoken too. As Jim tried figuring out if this was a raving lunatic or an organised confrontation Davey boy turned tail and fled into the night. But this was not to be his last stop. He was to save his best, and most spineless, for what would now be around 20 odd mins later when he made his way to a nearby suburb.

At 4.49 by the CCTV clock when a fellow Australian Nationalist and AFP member was asleep a thunderous banging assailed his door. In a blink, he knew who was there. There was not enough security in this building to keep him out. Gull had visited this person on the 1st of October using his eyewear and cap as a cover. Yet, after leaving Tempe he was so confident of carrying out his mission in the dark that he ditched the hat and jacket. This was very fortunate for as he pulled a firehose from beside the nationalist’s window he was being captured in joyous detail on the building’s CCTV camera system. The cameras had not been there upon his last trespass but were now fully functioning day and night — each moment and image being shared on an Internet-accessible database.

There, in the surveillance footage, Delusional Dave can be seen pumping the hose through the window and turning it on full blast.

To a brainwashed head-case like Dave, this was some sort of victory for the workers, but for the occupant, it would prove a scrabble to prevent his own electrocution. The haphazard spray, which had soaked his bedclothes, was aiming perilously close to live electrical equipment.

Fully pleased with his act of blatant vandalism, itself comparable to a home invasion, Dave yelled out, “Nick Folkes sent us! This is for being a Nazi and paedophile!”

As our hero fought to shut the window on the gushing H2O and prevent his own manslaughter the would-be union assassin pushed the nozzle further in between the window jamb and the electrical equipment which sat between them creating an obstacle. Luckily curtains were helping to absorb much of the spray and forestall the consequences of spraying water onto live power cords. The floor, being tiled, offered no insulation and would have served as a conductor for the catastrophe that Dave was seeking to create. For it is highly probable that, after his last visit, Dave had conceived of this as a form of execution… and against a total stranger.

Back in Oct when he first made an egotistical exhibition of introducing himself, all-be-it behind his sunnies and cap, our nationalist friend had observed Dave snooping about outside his apartment.

Because of the nature of the area, strays occasionally wandered in where they shouldn’t, but so did those who were lost. Our hero stuck his head out the door, which was open to allow in fresh air, and sensing our friend had sussed him Dave paused on his way out. Dave half-turned and gave a serial killer’s semi-smile before flourishing his finger in a throat-slitting gesture.

“Who are you?” asked our man.

“Your worst nightmare,” Dave replied. “I’m going to kill you.”

One is accustomed to Antifa adopting a customary mode of dress, but Dave didn’t fit that image. Taken aback, our man ventured, “Why?”

“Because you’re a Nazi and a paedophile,” he responded. Then he left.

Our friend was dumbfounded. Paedophile, he wondered? The Nazi comment was a direct reference to his Nationalist views but a paedophile? Then he remembered. The very day before Mike Holt, a so-called neo-Nazi had been sentenced to four years for possessing child pornography and illegal weapons. Suddenly the actions of any random are now a basis upon which to justify criminal activity against a perceived enemy of ‘the workers’. And to think, they locked Mike Holt up while this maniac was free to roam around.

There were no images to show the police that morning, but when he pondered the situation our man figured this person was linked to unions a hunch that turned out to be absolutely spot-on the mark.

Dave hooked the spraying nozzle inside the window before cutting a casual exit which, along with all his shenanigans that morning was caught on camera. But our man still had to push the nozzle away, and mop up the flood that this dangerous idiot had created. This was after rushing outside to shut off the hose all the while mindful of the spray hitting any of the active power appliances waiting to fry him.

It took the police a couple of hours to arrive that morning because they were “between shifts”. But when our man gave his account to Senior Constable Matthew Williams he was now in the better position of being able to provide an image.

Having mopped up as much of the water as he could, he rewound the footage from that morning and, in a way, this whole thing was a blessing. Water dripped from the ceiling as his clothes and possessions sat drying. Meanwhile, there, in flangrante delicto was Dave, the paedophile obsessed Commie criminal born a hundred years too late.

After running our campaign to help identify him, we have been able to supply Newtown Police with Dave’s name. Searches conducted had failed to turn up much on Dave, who has itinerant qualities about him. Yet, through a united effort, we nailed the prick.

Pinning together the events of December 7, Jim Saleam and our man figured it was linked to the Eureka Commemoration by Nationalists on December 3rd. They realised that the gooney birds of the militant union subculture and Antifa had a willing stooge in Dave to send along to do their dirty work. Dave is a total mental case and accepted the job no worries. He enjoys this sort of thing, just as the Scorpio killer liked slaying those young lovers.

At the time, we were not aware that other incidents involving Gullis had been reported to Newtown Police (who did what they excel at, nothing). We were contacted by a young Alt-Right chap who didn’t wish to be identified.

He told us that prior to Gullis’s first invasion of our man’s space at Enmore, he was on the platform of Newtown Station with his friends when Gullis happened by.

Taking exception to the Make America Great Again cap that the young bloke wore, he tore it off his head, and allegedly assaulted him.

The young bloke reported this to Newtown Police and provided an image which one of his friends captured on their phone. This was an image of the same person who our man provided to Newtown Police, yet, you couldn’t get less action out of an immovable rock.

Then, we learned, in early 2018, Antifa defector and comedian, Shayne Hunter was assaulted by Gullis. In the video, titled ‘Punched by a Communist’, Hunter describes being confronted and assaulted by Gullis at Newtown library.

He went so far as to confirm that Gullis is a member of Antifascist Action Sydney and the whacko Commie party. Gullis punched him for “endangering Antifa” by outing them as brainwashed loonies. He too reported Gullis to Newtown Police. Hunter believes Newtown cops were actually keen to charge Gullis, but were unable to trace his address. We reckon differently.

It is our considered opinion that Newtown, which is like a mini Victoria, bends over backwards to accommodate the anti-White fruitcakes bred and manufactured at the nearby Sydney University.

Hunter also mentioned that Dave Gullis is an invasive, grabby, rampant homosexual, a revelation which had us all rolling around the floor cacking ourselves.

Nonetheless, following yet ANOTHER visitation from Gullis in March, our man made an attempt to file an Apprehended Violence Order against him but failed on the basis that Newtown Police did not have his address — and after all this.

Shayne Hunter shows off where got bopped by Gullis

Indeed, the onus was placed on our man to provide it, and at a hearing in March, the magistrate postponed her decision on the AVO telling our man, “It’s not the business of Newtown Police to act as your detective”.

The president of the Australia First Party, who was present and also has stakes in the Gullis affair, promptly rolled his eyes. Given his experiences with the bias of the legal justice system, he was not surprised.

Thus, it is one year later and the lump of meat with eyes and a brain the size of a pigeon’s willy is still on the loose – still free to go berserk if the thinks “da fashusts” are threatening his terrorist friends.

Previously, the CFMEU had denied any knowledge of Dave Gull when approached by one of the complainants and advised him to instead contact police. He did this and an apprehended violence order was issued by Newtown Local Court. However, it proved an impossible task to track Gull to his address and NSW Police refused to assist in tracing him which meant the order could not proceed; leaving the impression of state sympathy with this mindless brute. It also draws a very distinct line of connection between the ALP and Antifascist Action.

Cleary, the CFMEU knew his whereabouts all along and questions now arise about their knowledge of his actions against the UNA editor.

Our editor refuses to let this matter rest knowing that Gull is a dangerous animal who should not be allowed to roam the streets freely menacing citizens with differing opinions from his own. It is therefore interesting that intelligence provided to UNA places him in the company of CFMEU delegates who were reportedly strutting around arrogantly at the Australian Labor Party’s (ALP) state conference at Sydney Town Hall on Saturday, June 30.

The CFMEU clearly kids itself that it holds a position of influence within the Australian Labor Party. The rank and file, such as Gull, also have a cognitive dissonance when it comes to understanding that the multimillion-dollar CFMEU no longer represents hard hats like him but is an auxiliary for a globalist party with central policies that conflicts with the interests of Australian workers they supposedly represent.

Interesting, too, is that by the terms of admission to the NSW ALP Conference that “observers” who registered for the event must also be ALP members. This presents the strong likelihood that Gull is also an ALP member and Labor, therefore, had his address on file, something which will need to be surrendered so that due process can be pursued against this totalitarian nightmare of an individual.

Bear in mind, that by having knowledge of Gull’s actions – which the CFMEU did – only amplifies accusations of that militant organisation’s reliance on violence and intimidation in the pursuance of its political ideas.

A young bloke offered a reward for anyone identifying Gullis



The central myth of the Eureka Rebellion and its Southern Cross flag as promoted by mainstream pundits has it as a symbol of, apart from other things, multiculturalism.

This is because two black men, a Jamaican and a black American, were present along with the majority White European “diggers” during the uprising. Whatever ascribing of qualities the opponents of nationalism use to interpret this epochal moment at the dawn of the Australian nation it was first and foremost a rebellion against government oppression in a struggle for justice and democratic rights.

Gold miners, tired of being forced to pay dearly for licenses, rose up after certain inciting incidents and mobilised themselves into a paramilitary. A license was no guarantee of finding gold, and the miners were refused the rights of the land they mined. Added to this was the brutal and contemptuous manner with which miners were treated by the colonial autocrats.

Always was, always will be, a symbol of White Australia

On Dec 03, 1854, having three days earlier gathered under the Eureka Flag and elected Peter Lalor their leader, and now having fortified their stockade at Bakery Hill, in Ballarat, the miners numbering around 500 clashed with police and a larger presence of soldiers. The diggers, brave though their resolve was, had not the capacity to withstand the combined force of police and military. Subsequently, 22 diggers sacrificed their lives while six police and soldiers were killed. Of those miners arrested and tried, only one was found guilty. The rebellion led to a change in the mining system so that thereafter miners paid a tax on the gold they found.

In the 1970s, the union movement found a nice fit by appropriating the symbol and mythology of the Eureka Rebellion to suit its ultra-communistic agenda. However, it’s important to interpret and divide the mythology of the rebellion and the symbolism of the flag from the narrative of those communists who adopted a red Eureka and the workers who had long before gathered beneath it in the nationalist spirit as they rioted against the presence of Chinese workers.

Anti-Chinese demonstrations occurred at Lambing Flat on the goldfields of central NSW in 1861. Aussie diggers numbering 1,500 – 2000, resentful of the hive-like industry of the Chinese and incensed by the wastage of water in their mining process attacked the Chinese encampment and drove them off.

During the Seamen’s Strike of 1878, the Eureka Flag was raised by trade unionists. The Sydney Morning Herald wrote of that strike, “The strike of the A.S.N Company’s Seamen has assumed larger dimensions, and has led to active measures on the part of the labouring classes against Chinese importation or immigration. The actual dispute between the seamen and the A.S.N Company has been almost lost sight of in the larger question of a general introduction of Chinese, which trade unions have done their best to persuade the people is only a matter of time, and must result in the complete exclusion of Europeans from the labour market unless the threatened evil is at once nipped in the bud.”

download (1)
Peter Lalor, leader of the Rebellion, and not Ulysses S. Grant, although if you have had a shot of Johnnie Walker Green Label you might just get the two confused

A version of the Eureka Flag flew during the shearers’ strike at Barcaldine in 1891. One of the demands of the shearers was an exclusion of low-cost Chinese labour. Thereafter, workers’ concerns about being undermined by the Chinese led to the Immigration Restriction Act or White Australia Policy. Therefore, the relationship between the tradition of Australian Nationalism and the Eureka Flag is irrefutable. Open to contention are the overarching interpretations derived from the uprising at the Ballarat goldfields in terms of the formation of Australian identity.

Raffaello Carboni wrote the stirring words, “When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie, that’s amore”

It is important to understand that there was no Australia at the time of the rebellion so any arguments about the events at Eureka and the conception of Australia as a “multicultural country” or a land of perpetual migration are specious. We can speak of the spirit of the Eureka Rebellion, and there again, Nationalists have the much stronger claim — and more so when you consider the current relationship between the worker and the political class. The militant “unionists” couldn’t give a damn for the Australian worker, as they are too busy assisting the multinational corporations and the quisling politicians in flooding the country with plague-level immigration. The unions stand for a “big Australia”, which means Australian workers and their conditions being undercut by an unceasing stream of foreign labour.

This post-Communist Globalist style of unionism, therefore, has no claim on the spirit of the traditional Australian working man to whom the lore of the Eureka Rebellion belongs.

What they do focus on in their swindling of the Eureka narrative are the words of Raffaello Carboni who wrote a first-hand description of the rebellion in his book The Eureka Stockade. When the miners gathered on November 30 to swear their allegiance under the Eureka flag he called on them to “irrespective of nationality, religion or colour to salute the Southern Cross as a refuge of all the oppressed countries on earth.”

This, according to the multiculturalists, is an incontrovertible expression of the underlying essence of inclusivity and diversity as proof of the multiracial sentiment of the rebellion and its miners. Ergo, the Australian identity is formulated along these principles. Yet, again, there was no Australia yet, although it was interesting that while reporting on the rebellion The Age described the Eureka Flag as “the flag of Australian independence”.

As we have seen, the Australian worker would view their independence as being founded firmly upon their identity as White Europeans. And those quoting Raffaello Carboni neglect to mention that he was an Italian Nationalist who fought against Austrian influence in the country of his birth, which he returned to. He never made the colony his home but travelled back to Europe dying in Rome in 1875. Therefore, his rousing words, especially the utterance “of all the oppressed countries on earth” were an anti-colonialist comment by a stateless fortune seeker not an affirmation of miscegenation by an early globalist. The flag itself, as we have explained, went on to become a symbol of Australianness very much defined by race and colour; that meaning only perverted when the Commies of Norm Gallagher’s ilk marched along in the 1970s during their passionate love affair with Mao’s China.

Nowadays, with China the largest owner of Australian farming resources, and Chinese ownership of our key assets at an unheralded level, as the Chinese “student” presence in Australia becomes entrenched and developments are underway to have them replace Anglo-Celtic-European Australia in alarming increments, the wisdom of those White Australian working men becomes all the more salient – as does the spirit of the flag they flew.

The anti-Chinese sentiment of the Eureka flag becomes a haunting caveat from our White Australian past




Professor Rob Sparrow of Monash University, AKA Slackbastard, was quick to seize on screengrabs of a sleazy confab between the mixed all-sorts of the Lads Society on their Facebook group page.

Funny how whenever UNA mentions “Rob Sparrow” Slackbastard retaliates with one of his bogus attacks on a writer of ours — Sparrow isn’t happy being doxed but he’s as happy as a pig in sludge when doxing others.

Rob has a gig at Monash University, but not everyone is aware that he hails from a family of radical leftists. His sister Jill Sparrow, a rabid Trotskyite, helped establish Socialist Alternative. His brother Jeff is likewise a Trot and a major leftist who co-wrote extremist literature with his sister but is also to be found spruiking his seditious writings in the mainstream press and occasionally community radio station 3RRR where Slackbastard (his brother Rob AKA Andy Fleming) is a regular guest. Rob himself penned ‘Anarchist Politics & Direct Action’ which can be found here at the Anarchist Library.

The screenshots are widely believed to have been leaked by disgruntled former Klub Nation identity Andrew Wilson who, it is said, attempted to infiltrate the Lads Society in Sydney and Brisbane. There have been shocking allegations about Wilson and his activities in Perth and elsewhere but we won’t go into those here; it is a matter for the people involved. However, the very nature of the Lads and their page ensures infiltration, leaking, and because of their sloppiness, the “Lads” became an unwitting tool of the Antifascists.

Professor Rob Sparrow of Monash University_ maximum leader of Antifascist Action Australia, and everyone's pimp and messenger. M.jpg

The conversation, such as it is, focuses on a United Nationalists Australia contributor who has been the subject of three years of defamation from both left and right. Comments, mostly from those who’ve never even met him, support malicious lies generated by Mark “McDonald Campbell”. McDonald, manager of the Sydney Lads chapter, is not his real surname and is an alias the great boof created based on his love of the absurd Turner Diaries (taken from William Pierce’s nom de plume, Kevin MacDonald). So nobody even really knows who they’re truly dealing with or what his game is.

This cagey New Zealander turned up in Australia in 2013 and feverishly set about trying to recruit everyone and his dog to what can only be described as a terrorist group which he hoped to lead. Active on Stormfront down under, and notable for his incomprehensible posts, he targeted every local SF member via private message. He did so while consorting with staunch Zionist and ex-Liberal party spook Howard Crawford, who, playing his own game, was promising a “Nazi” revolution within the Young Liberals if Mark helped him recruit members. There was to be paramilitary training in the form of a kickboxing school, and McDonald was slated by Crawford as its “Fuhrer” of the western suburbs division. It was a total honeypot trap. In the end, he created “Squadron 88”. This grouplet lasted about as long as a bag of popcorn, managing to fill the letterboxes of East Sydney residents with badly-written antisemitic flyers that served no identifiable political purpose other than to attract attention.

Funny how whenever UNA mentions “Rob Sparrow” Slackbastard retaliates with one of his bogus attacks on a writer of ours — Sparrow isn’t happy being doxed but he’s as happy as a pig in sludge when doxing others.

McDonald has characteristically played down his involvement with Crawford, but then he has at least 47 versions of any controversy he’s been involved in, particularly when it comes to our writer who was unfortunate enough to have met him. None within his fold have ever questioned this duality: labelling our man a Jew (the oldest one in the book) and yet consorting with Crawford and the Party for Freedom, which was established as a spoiler tool against the Nationalists of the Australia First Party. His “Jew” accusation was shared both indirectly, and, as will become revealed, directly with an agent for Antifascist Action. Meanwhile, McDonald enjoys free passage, despite carrying the weight of the crimes he’s committed against Nationalists.

Questions naturally arise about those enabling McDonald, such as Tom Sewell, who appointed McDonald Sydney Lads Society leader as a deliberate affront to the Australia First Party’s president Jim Saleam who he disingenuously claims to respect. How can anyone occupying the hazardous turf of the far-right brush over the glaring inconsistencies in McDonald’s stories since you do so at your own peril? Why would they accept his blasé dismissals of these allegations so indifferently when the potential for damage is so great? This is how operators like McDonald get away with what they do.

Mark McDonald, looking just as fat and stupid as in real life

McDonald’s rap sheet should be of concern to any competent ‘leader’. If Tom Sewell truly respects Jim Saleam as he reckons how come he ignored his warnings about McDonald with such a show of personal defiance?

Before we get down to the brass tacks of linking McDonald to Antifascist propaganda, let’s take a look at this rap sheet.

McDonald’s rap sheet should be of concern to any competent ‘leader’. If Tom Sewell truly respects Jim Saleam as he claims in a comment taken from the screengrabs how come he deliberately snubbed him on one of the most important personnel warnings he made?

McDonald has, in his time, attempted to induce others into committing crimes such as kidnap and torture. Eyewitness accounts swear, among various plots, he sought to encourage his associates to attack the homes of Penrith counsellors and to arrange the firebombing of a Moslem prayer hall. He attempted to cajole others into kidnapping anarchist Dave Fregon, who had the computer server of Slackbastard, and torture him until he gave up the identity of Slackbastard.

A Nationalist who had dealings with McDonald told us, “He came on the scene from out of nowhere and almost instantly he knew everyone.  I still cannot put my finger on it to this day. I know he’s not genuine. Suddenly, from nowhere, he was everywhere. He knew everyone, or weaselled his way into people’s lives and work just like a damned agent. I used to notice his skittish behaviour. He talked tough but was a coward. He tried to entrap me too, I believe, with acts of violence. He tried to convince us to literally kidnap our enemies.”

Anarchist Dave Fregon who Mark McDonald tried to have kidnapped and tortured. By torture, he probably meant having to be in the same room as McDonald for more than two minutes

None of the potentials for entrapment in these overt incitements to criminality seems to bother those who gave a second lease of life to this scheming fush-and-chup quaffing scumbag. Our writer has experience with this sort of animal since by circumstance he encountered an actual super troll now in prison in America. The form was exactly the same: encouragement to commit acts just like those named. Unlike The Bozos Society, however, he had the nous to realise something was hinky and warn others.

Nothing that McDonald has said in those comments about our writer has even the whiff of honesty; it is all poisonous garbage from a gutless little punk picked up and shared by Tom Sewell who doesn’t possess the maturity or wit to intelligently address our criticisms (which, under the circumstances, are proven fully correct and we rest our case) so instead he resorts to tacky name-calling. The stuff about being “gay” is just over the top, and what’s the difference between saying that and David Gullis of Antifascist Action calling our man a “paedophile” to justify attacking him (even though Gullis is a homo and likely fondles his mates’ kids when their parents go to bed)? At least when we mention Sewell slept with a Filipina girl we aren’t lying.

Likewise, it’s ironic how McDonald made a big deal about our writer’s name but has never told the truth about his own. It is reasonable to expect that in the recent past, as UNA had cause to expose McDonald that he would have become prone to retaliating with lies. But bear in mind, he started this, yet we will be much more informed once we discover why: and it’s no point asking him since you would stand more chance of an honest response from a used car salesman in Tel Aviv. How come both the left and right have invested so much energy in trying to discredit our editor? What makes him so dangerous that they combine forces against him?

McDonald did not expect his comments to reach our eyes, and as such, has served his guilt up on a platter. Those lies about our writer have appeared before, and unfortunately, due to present circumstances, we cannot go into where or why because there are legal complications.

Having said, we’ll come straight to the point: none of the scenarios involving McDonald’s supposed friends, or “skinheads” ever happened, it’s all a dirty pack of lies, but still, he fed them to an Antifascist source long before UNA and the Lads ever butted heads. His mention of Neil Erikson and his involvement in spreading these rumours is a dead giveaway too because Erikson links back to this Antifascist identity in question through a complicated play that we must wait to publish. McDonald did not expect his own comments to reach our eyes, and as such, has served his guilt up on a platter in terms of revealing corresponding stories which cannot have been invented independently by the Antifascist and logically could only share identicality if both parties had colluded to create them. We cannot be more detailed due to the circumstances as legal complications are preventing us.

The gravity of what we are revealing is ENORMOUS and by casually going along with these crafted rumours because Sewell hates our man for daring to write critically about his activities doesn’t mitigate the fact he has just served the cause of Antifascism, although, we have heard rumours that it’s not a strategy that Sewell is adverse to when pursuing his own political ends. We cannot state that is the truth, however, but others, who aren’t prone to muckraking, have concerns about his soundness.

The Lads society blows, or throws blows, one of the two. Pity, too, they don’t turn around and punch the fat bald slob for being a spineless spectator

We may share this alarming news, but we don’t expect those we criticise to heed it, and while we could go on ad infinitum dissecting what we’ve read on those screengrabs, especially in defence of our man’s honour, we shall focus on this issue. Tom Sewell’s careless leadership of the Lads Society has partly resulted in the mass doxing of a number of young NSW Alt-Right activists (obviously the Nats themselves were also responsible), while he has essentially let the Lads do Antifa’s work by sharing their weaponised lies. They have vindicated the most pernicious Antifascist troll currently active and one of the worst conmen in the movement of theirs. No matter what your beef, enabling Antifa just to fight your battles is about as low as it gets! Indeed, it is tantamount to allying with them.

His mentioning of Neil Erikson and his involvement in the spreading of these lies is a dead giveaway too because Erikson links back to this Antifascist identity in a complicated play that, again, we must wait to publish.

At no point has UNA ever claimed that the idea of the Lads is wrong — just that we question the motives of the leadership, the desirability of their methods, and the tone they have generated. UNA penned the article ‘Are The Lads Society Klub Nation 2.0’ when it was revealed from a Lads’ insider that Sewell was actively dissuading members from associating with Australia First Party and from reading the UNA blog. Until then we had no interest in commenting on their activities and those who’ve crossed from editorial roles on our page over to their side might well affirm this truth.

However, the raison d’être for the Lads’ Society was never to champion the social and political rights of the diminishing White Australian population but to service Tom Sewell’s monolithic ego. Far from him being reluctant to “kiss” our man’s “ring” he was eager that he, along with everyone else, would kiss his. Having been told he was not a Nationalist by “baby boomers and generation Xers” (sic) he decided to just declare himself a Nationalist and build a gang from all the young blokes following him on Facebook.

The Lads usually don’t like girls. And why is the joker with the Village People mo wearing fingerless gloves? 

So for those coming in late, who the hell is Tom Sewell and what has he got to do with anything?

A fresh-faced kid straight out of the Australian Army’s catering corps, Tom Sewell surfed in on the 2015 Reclaim Australia wave where he met Blair Cottrell and soon became his loyal lieutenant; even if he did require a ladder to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the big guy. As a leading member of the UPF under Blair’s dictatorship, Tom Thumb enjoyed a ready-made support base that sprung — not out of White Nationalist politics — but from the hordes who rushed online to their anti-Islam movement, something which he and Blair travelled to Sydney to explain to Jim Saleam they were keeping as was in spite of all the chatter about them being crypto National Socialists. Ironic, then, we fast forward to the present hour and he’s now demanding ownership over Australian White Identity. Indeed, he knows better than those who’ve never been civic patriots or wavered from their position as Australian Nationalists.

Being so young, and strolling into a wide support base, gave this lad a sense of entitlement to lead. We argue he isn’t ready, but then, he can do what he likes as long as he doesn’t try to market himself as a Nationalist (unless he becomes one, which is a whole different matter), but we’ll come to that. It was excruciating to read him lament of an “old guard”, being ludicrous enough to put our writer in that category, particularly when he is hazy on who is guarding what exactly. It is absurd to even have that category, assuming he was actually talking about an Australian Nationalist movement and not the pan-Europeanist identitarian club that he’s put together (describing it as “new Nationalism”, for fuck’s sake). Furthermore, it’s presumptuous to treat activists like the job market treats anyone over 40, by tossing them away regardless of their experience and wisdom. Half these kids never even lived in a predominantly White Australia.

There is no new guard or old guard there are only dedicated activists. James Perren, whose excitability at throwing his support behind any “new” thing that comes along with the gusto of a born loser and which is perhaps one of his greatest flaws, should be rebuked for encouraging this idea. He talks of those wanting to “cling on” to power, but there is no power but rather an authority based on knowledge and experience, and the real trouble is not those ‘leading’ but those who refuse to support since there is always some new Jack waltzing in believing ‘they’ have the plan and vision to be this great dictator they misguidedly think everyone is waiting for. James might be a wanker, but he is also a great Nationalist, and the only voice of reason evident in that lavatory of a thread (even if he is a fatalistic, panicky idiot). He is right too in arguing that Sewell should have been above that sort of muckraking and once upon a time he would have been.

Thus we come to the third of the triumvirate of interested parties in this sordid matter; the first being Sparrow and his cabal of Antifascist trolls; the second being McDonald, and finally we have Tom Sewell.

James Perren correctly pointed out how Sewell forgets the support he and Blair received from our writer, through commentaries, and pieces written in their defence during 2015. When it became apparent this was a one-way street and that Nationalists were to be used for their knowledge, support, and then tossed away in favour of a civic base then all bets were off. Suddenly everyone who had dallied with the proven failure of ‘mainstreaming’ and who had consciously or through inexperience “diversified” the field wanted terribly much to call themselves a “Nationalist”.

Designations are not just party hats to be passed around in the bonhomie of the mood but are precise definitions of a person or organisation and what they represent! If the wrong person is wearing the wrong hat then the hat becomes representative of the wrong things. Neil Erikson knew this when he deliberately appropriated the name “Nationalist” after being explicitly warned not to. You cannot pursue the line of a civic patriot which believes it’s OK to make allies of non-Whites; who tones down any explicitly White rhetoric; whose actions lead them to support the conservatives in their capacity as the ideological guard for the globalist capitalist oligarchs (read One Nation, LNP, et al) and then assume all that in the name a Nationalist strives for.

Howard Crawford (L-centre) with Mark McDonald beside him no doubt unable to comprehend whatever the speaker is saying. They were going to build a Nazi party inside the Young Liberals despite Howard being a Zionist

Tom Sewell’s Lads Society has supported Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux and would probably provide security for Gavin Mcinnes and Tommy Robinson if asked to. None of these impresarios are Australian Nationalists, yet, Tom and his boys have the sniffles because they think AFP is claiming a “patent” on the word Nationalist.  As far as the margins of political Nationalism in this country are concerned, the Australia First Party owns them! Those who are not absolutely committed to these nativist principles have no business on their turf. Therefore the word ‘Nationalist’ belongs to the AFP.

Mr Welf Herfurth might disagree but then Welf is a “National Anarchist” which is about the most ridiculous thing anybody could be outside of a goldfish tamer. Furthermore, Welf has consistently refused to answer whether or not he is a multi-racialist. He certainly is no Australian, but then either is Mark McDonald, who cannot even vote here, or his Russian friend, or Tom Sewell. We seem to have a hell of a lot of foreigners trying to tell us what Australian Nationalism is all about. So in the interests of inclusivity, they’ve decided it can be everything from civic patriotism to Alt-Right.

Being a Nationalist entails defending a set of principles; holding steadfast beliefs; and being committed to an unambiguous cause. A pan-Europeanist is really not too different from a globalist as they mistakenly think we are “working for the same thing”. But there is no “we” and “we” are not working for the same thing.

Being a Nationalist entails defending a set of principles; holding steadfast beliefs; and being committed to an unambiguous cause. A pan-Europeanist is really not too different from a globalist as they mistakenly think there is a “we” and that we are “working for the same thing”. But there is no “we” and “we” are not working for the same thing.

Finally, the motivation for these leaks is to provoke discord, and we at UNA may have bitten a little, but not too much. We have issues with the Lads Society’s leadership, and they have been made worse by their enabling Antifascist Action’s campaign to ruin Nationalists one by one. When these Lads erroneously condemn our writer as “always attacking Nationalists” can they dare to prove it? Who are these “nationalists”? Neil Erikson? Nick Folkes? Toby Cook (the obviously non-White Hitler Youth who’s gone all African American culture now)? Shermon Burgess? The Sons of Odin? The True Blue Crew? There is a major difference between critical commentary and “attacking” and if they are such shrinking violets that any criticism injures them for life then they should probably find a nice safe space because the truth is brutal.

Thomas Sewell in his totally Aussie Nationalist civic patriot Oswald Mosley phase. Tom takes himself very, very, very, very seriously, as you can tell by the Mosely tash

What are Antifa and the two main trolls behind this project going to gain? Stuff all. And as far as the Lads or any other group are concerned the Australia First Party is as solid as ever. It will not fade away. It will be here long after they are off proving what little conservatives they were all along. Our writer, too, is going nowhere. He’s not about to put a gun barrel in his mouth like Sparrow and his mate are hoping. They can call him names all day but he only grows stronger.

What they REALLY hope for is to create an atmosphere that results in violence. They are banking on someone out there in the Lads being mad enough to make an attempt on our man’s life. Selah.

McDonald must go! There will be no dialogue or detente with  Nationalists so long as this virus remains in the bloodstream. There will be no peace until he is unconditionally removed and never allowed to ever again spread his poison. Australia is not his country and he is not a Nationalist. He is simply not welcome, and as to the damage he’s caused, that will one day have to be paid for! This is not negotiable. Besides, it’s in everybody’s interest.