DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

DO NOT DISTURB THE RATS

Over the past year, UNA has spent bulk column inches describing the type of society Australia has been moulded into since the globalist, cosmopolitan juggernaut shifted into top gear under the Howard regime.

We have outlined, in broad strokes, the re-jigged class system being implemented by the bosses to pacify and subject the polyglot masses which now underpin the global capitalist power; likewise, we have examined, in depth, the bones of the system itself, that cunning fusion of second-generation Communism and limited free market capitalism.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

The trouble is that this increase in state power over the individual and the suppression of non-consumerist dissident tendencies is unlikely to be as spectacular, or compelling as the Spanish Civil War or The Great Leap Forward; the slide into, what Nationalists freely admit, is a looming dystopia will likely be slow, controlled and it will not flatter the egos of these prophets of doom.

special-ops-group2
If you really annoy the Globalists they do more than cancelling your Facebook account and getting you fired from your job

If we are truly on the hunt for signs and wonders in this age of mass surveillance and rule by global corporations then we might argue that present developments should occupy the bulk of our attention rather than endless examinations of the past.

We apply a slight caveat here in that there is nothing new under the sun as far as repressive regimes are concerned; the old rules of Stasi, Gestapo or Special Branch skullduggery still apply and we can be reasonably sure that if things really ran out of hand, as they did in the mid 20th century, that the knuckledusters and water board would be employed without hesitation by today’s state-sanctioned goon squads.

Much is made of the supposedly totalitarian nature of the “New World Order”, with all sides seeking some sign of a return by the “Elites” to the practices of the feudal, or totalitarian past; some are obsessed with Adolf Hitler and see his shadow over every globalist misdeed, while others predict the rise of Stalin/Mao 2.0.

As we have explained in a previous article, the Pigs serve the Globalists; if we may borrow from the lexicon of 1960’s Hippie radicals, the Pigs in blue, or in plain clothes and the Pig media support the big Capitalist Pigs on high.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

Smith
A Dog of the Leftist variety who regularly boasts of ratting people out to the Federal Police

In the Australia of 2017, this Dog culture is rampant and we would suggest that is the main impediment to radical political activism, no matter from where said radicals draw their inspiration; these days sincere Leftists are just as likely to be pilloried for their views as  Nationalists or Muslim fundamentalists.

We are appalled by the way Right-Wingers, Leftists and most people in between seem intent on publicly denouncing anything and anyone who challenges the mainstream narrative, or even mildly irritates them in a Facebook stoush, even to the point of bullying mentally unstable people into rash, or violent actions merely to tar their friends and comrades with the “extremist” label.

These attempts to pillory often harmless people are rarely done to gain political advantage, or to undermine the system, the snitch collectives, such as Antifa, as well as the Far-Right vigilantes really have no political background or strategic objective.

The big totalitarian tell is, or should be, the fostering of a snitch mentality among citizens by the corporations and state agencies; co-operation with the authorities by a significant segment of the population is essential for these types of games to work, the more people who are willing to turn Dog on their neighbours the easier it is to implement the will of the bosses.

The goal is to humiliate others and throw them into the maw of the security state based on where one stands of the false ideological divisions and ever-shifting, fantasy role-playing conventions of cyberspace.

This is not to say that there are no real-world consequences for people who interrupt or harass the minions of globalism, the security state loves a conspiracy or a human rights charge; as we saw with the Bendigo Three there is basically no way to defend oneself from accusations of so-called “Hate Crime”.

Erikson jameson
Fake Muslim but proud, self-described ASIO informant

We ask our readers to ponder that very situation and ask themselves why upsetting Muslims might, in theory, create a problem for the state to the degree that they are willing to pursue people uphill and down dale over a social media post deriding Jihadist Muslim terrorism?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

If we are to believe the top cops then all that has prevented Pitt St and Federation Square from being strewn with body parts from some Muslim outrage is the cooperation they receive from, we guess, “good Muslims”; though that brings up the question of who is really holding all the cards in the war on terror?

b3d725a2f95c8b319adc267fb75b3556
Alex Gollan: ANTIFA pioneer, paedophile and longtime informant for the security services

 

Who is to say that these Muslim collaborators are acting altruistically as opposed to playing a long game of their own?

The security chiefs give us the answer on a plate: rattling the cages of the Hajis might jeopardise their networks of informers within the Muslim minority groups; this fact should bother the Left and Right as much as it bothers Nationalists, the fact that it doesn’t would seem to seriously undermine the claim of both tendencies to any real radicalism.

Globalist Cosmopolitanism requires Orwellian oversight, multiculturalism clearly cannot sustain itself without a substantial number of citizens being willing to act as de-facto censors and unpaid informers for the state and the corporations who are gradually assimilating into its institutions.

Furthermore, the only way the modern state can accommodate fractious minority groups, mainly, but not limited to, those citizens devoted to Mohammed is to cultivate an even more pervasive surveillance and informant network, a process, we now know, which requires total silence and obedience by all other Australians.

The absolute worst thing an Aussie can do these days is to disturb the status quo, to question where this regime of Globalist Capitalism fused to second generation Communism is leading us; forget your posterity, forget any notions of justice or fair play; do not disturb the Rats, just sit down, grab your iPad and credit cards and consume! Consume! Consume!

snitch161004

Advertisements

THE MAN WITH THE IRON HEART AND NO PERSONALITY

THE MAN WITH THE IRON HEART AND NO PERSONALITY

The new film from French director Cédric Jiminez (The Connection, Aux Yeux De Tous) represents nothing but a series of opportunities to tell an interesting story which has been squandered through equivocation in narrative and a lack of detail in its script.

The Man With The Iron Heart, abbreviated to HHhH, has so many problems it is hard to know where to start; it is poorly edited, the nominally stellar cast is restrained by hamfisted writing and poor character development and it is difficult to discern what point, if any, the writer-director is trying to make.

The story centres on the 1942 assassination, in Prague, of SS General Reinhard Heydrich. We are given some snapshots of his former life as a Navy officer, his rise through the ranks of the NSDAP, and his ascension to the top echelons of the National Socialist hierarchy.

hhhh-h_2017
Jason Clarke and Rosamund Pike as Reinhard and Lina Heydrich: a strong woman and her unfathomable blob of a husband

This series of badly constructed jump cuts, flashbacks and flashes forward, introduces Jason Clarke as Heydrich, Rosamund Pike as his wife Lina, and the always excellent Stephen Graham as an eerily realistic Heinrich Himmler.

The trouble with this opening sequence, however, is that the writers assume that the viewer already knows who the characters are, the timeline of NSDAP history, and the events which led up to Hitler’s ascension to power in 1933; we are confident that the average moviegoer would have no idea where, say, Ernst Röhm or Heinrich Müller fit into the story

The Man With The Iron Heart, abbreviated to HHhH, has so many problems it is hard to know where to start; it is poorly edited, the nominally stellar cast is restrained by hamfisted writing and poor character development and it is difficult to discern what point, if any, the writer-director is trying to make.

Röhm and Müller appear as pop-up characters for mere seconds of screentime in HHhH, Hitler is absent altogether and highly significant events, such as the “Night Of The Long Knives” are glossed over in a way which might leave the average punter scratching his head in confusion over what he had just watched.

Kubis
The Czech resistance also suffers at the hands of director Jiminez

Clarke’s Heydrich comes across as a flat, even passive character; he is sometimes annoyed, sometimes explosively violent but he never has anything really profound or interesting to say.

We would assume that the writers were aiming for a steely, near psychopathic aura for the character, but the result is a dull and listless cartoon of a man whose personal motivations and deeper thoughts are never made clear.

Moreover, Jiminez plays it so safe with his “Holocaust” narrative that he almost strays into the area of heresy by the omission of pertinent details of the (((official))) WW2 story.

The repression of Czech resistance, the police actions and mass killings carried out by Heydrich’s SS units are, remarkably, even turned into boring vignettes in HHhH; to anyone familiar with the real story the film goes close to exculpating senior NS officials by effectively cutting them out of the picture.

Clarke’s Heydrich comes across as a flat, even passive character; he is sometimes annoyed, sometimes explosively violent but he never has anything really profound or interesting to say

You see, in opposition to the mainstream, Hollywood inspired story of the Holocaust there is a school of thought which puts forth the idea that the Final Solution was a criminal conspiracy carried out by elements within the SS in pursuit of their own objectives; that the true magnitude of the mass killings and ethnic cleansing was deliberately kept from Hitler and his inner circle.

By omitting Hitler from the film the director has, perhaps unwittingly, veered into forbidden territory. If the viewer is paying attention, he could easily form the impression that Heydrich really was the sole architect of the planned destruction of native Czech culture and the liquidation of ethnic minorities within his area of responsibility.

The second half of the film is utterly forgettable in spite of the introduction of some fine actors into the cast; Mia Wasikowska, Jack Raynor and Jack O’Connell form the nexus of the Czech resistance plotline but that too falls flat and fails to make an impact on the viewer, there is simply not enough meat on the bones of the characters for the script to be effective.

anthropoid
Jamie Dornan and Cillian Murphy in Anthropoid, fine actors who were clearly given good direction and a first-rate script by Sean Ellis

In contrast to HHhH we recommend the excellent film Anthropoid. The 2016 feature directed by Sean Ellis examines in detail the actual plot to assassinate Heydrich which was led by resistance fighters and British trained Czech special forces soldiers Jan Kubis and Josef Gabcíc.

Jamie Dornan and Cillian Murphy are altogether more convincing as Kubis and Gabcíc, their operation, codenamed Anthropoid, takes place amid a far more fraught atmosphere, a vision of Prague riddled with collaborators, cowardly resistance turncoats and Gestapo spies.

By omitting Hitler from the film the director has, perhaps unwittingly, veered into forbidden territory, if the viewer is paying attention he could easily form the impression that Heydrich really was the sole architect of the planned destruction of native Czech culture and the liquidation of ethnic minorities within his area of responsibility.

The supporting cast, though lacking the big names of HHhH are equally impressive; Charlotte Le Bon and Anna Geislerova acquit themselves well in their roles as resistance sympathisers Marie and Lenka, who sacrifice everything they hold dear to free their country.

Anthropoid2
Young love was thought the perfect cover in a city brimming with spies and collaborators

Due to superior writing, it is what is said in Anthropoid, as opposed to what is explicitly shown, but poorly explained in HHhH that drives home to the viewer the horrors inflicted upon the people of Czechoslovakia by the National Socialists.

The impact of the SS reprisals against those who aided Heydrich’s assassins as depicted in the former film is far more dramatic than in the latter simply because by the climax of the film one has begun to sympathise with the characters in Anthropoid, due to their being more well rounded and the actors working from a better-prepared script.

In the end, HHhH is a badly made Holocaust drama which fails to land any of its punches due to the limitations of that genre, even though it does appear, to the trained eye at least, to bend that tiresome narrative to some extent.

Anthropoid, on the other hand, is a film Australian Nationalists may relate to, being as it is a depiction of where true patriots can be taken in their fight for a free country; it shows in graphic detail the sacrifices required of resistance fighters in a struggle against a tyrannical colonial power bent on crushing the native society.

There is much in the story of Kubis and Gabcíc and the wider European resistance movements against National Socialist and, later, Soviet imperialism which should inspire Nationalists everywhere, Anthropoid, as an entertaining piece of popular culture is a good place to start.

Mother
Alena Mihulová, playing the heroic Mrs Moravec, who faces the Gestapo as the reprisal raids begin

BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

BOURGEOIS PERVERSIONS AND THE TRAP OF GLOBAL EQUALITY

If there is one demographic, or social stratum, which regularly draws the ire of UNA bloggers it is the waffling bourgeoisie and their nominally empty-headed offspring, who sound off like a battery of howitzers every time an issue of so-called “social justice” is inserted into public discourse.

Take young Frances Abbott, the middle child of Tony and Margie, who, channelling Mary Bennet, the middle sister in Jane Austen’s Pride And Prejudice, felt moved to put forth a Vlog on matters of love, romance and tier-one Lesbianism in support of same-sex marriage.

Quoting the experience of her aunt, Christine Forster, who is a middle-aged homosexual convert, Frances declared that people “cannot help who they fall in love with” and that “love is unexpected”.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

frances abbott
Bourgeois Bikini Babe Frances Abbott: all brawn, little brains

If homosexual relationships are based on love then it is clearly a completely different form of bond to opposite-sex unions; in which, as lifelong spinster Jane Austen herself observed, there are much more considerations than “love” to be taken into account when making a match.

In its most basic, and most commonly understood form the pair-bond between man and woman is based on a partnership to take on the challenges of the world together and raise children, if they are lucky the spouses will get along well and, in time, come to love each other.

Just in case it is not already painfully obvious, to form such opinions Frances Abbott must have led a sheltered life, as have the multitude of other nitwits peddling the “Love Is Love” message in order to guilt-trip voters into supporting SSM.

In most cases in which men and women marry for love, the unions quickly fall apart as the realisation hits home that such a marriage is lacking in substance, has no direction and no real reason to exist aside from the vanity, or unrealistic expectations of the spouses.

Pride pejudice
The Bennet sisters scan the horizon for well-endowed suitors

Of course we understand the reasoning behind the patter which upper-class twits such as Ms Abbott have been trained to parrot, we can never, ever describe homosexuality as a choice, nor credit homosexuals with the agency to make their own decisions; rather, according to Globalist social convention, they are subjects whose vital nature is simply something which has “occurred”.

Here we find another point of difference, which also gives the lie to the calls for absolute equality for all: heterosexuality is very much a choice, yet we are taught to believe that homosexuality is something which “just happens”.

muslims1
Guess which other global capitalist side project also poo-poohs the idea of free will?

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

If homosexuals are not going through these processes and are subject to the whims of some deity, or hidden forces in the universe then equality will remain a distant dream, regardless of the outcome of the postal survey and subsequent parliamentary vote.

Everyone over the age of consent has a choice in the matter of whether they engage with other people in sexual behaviour, or not; we all make that decision at some stage in our lives and even falling in love is a series of conscious steps and adjustments to our own lives by which we accommodate a partner.

Of course, we know full well why this meme has been propagated, that in fact most people who begin their intimate lives in the homosexual world are actually deprived of choice by virtue of, in the main, having been seduced and manipulated into that lifestyle by self-serving adults while in their early teens.

This detail, however, is beyond the scope of our discussion and, as we have stated before, we simply do not care enough about homosexuals, their tiny queer sub-culture or their struggles against normal society to develop an in-depth critique of them as people.

Orlando united
Omar Mateen was homosexual and Muslim, obviously  the Pulse nightclub outrage “just happened”

As ever, we at UNA are interested in the bigger picture and the picture of Globalist equality, that synthesis of second-generation Communism and multinational corporate hegemony, has come into sharp relief during the SSM debate; the man behind the curtain pulling the levers has been revealed.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

It should fairly clear to all that globalist capitalists have something to gain from watering down the concept of free choice in the masses, that people who see themselves as subjects living under a doctrine of equality laid down by the bosses are more likely to be passive consumers than political agitators or dissident thinkers.

“Things just happen” only to subjects, rather than workers in charge of their own fate; subjects are drafted into the military against their will, they are unfairly taxed, sold shoddy goods, given poor quality housing, or arbitrarily arrested and jailed; this is why most forms of monarchy, dictatorship and theocracy have such a bad reputation.

What “Love Is Love” in its proper context, globalist cosmopolitanism, ultimately boils down to is that we are all no greater or more able to master our own destiny than that young child whose choices are limited by the actions of the adults around them; that we are apt to just fall into situations and that it is advisable simply to go with the flow rather than resist or seek our own autonomy.

 

mateen-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwfSVWeZ_vEN7c6bHu2jJnT8
Agents act, subjects are acted upon, inshallah

 

WHITE AUSTRALIA DOES NOT HAVE A BLACK HISTORY

WHITE AUSTRALIA DOES NOT HAVE A BLACK HISTORY

History is written by the victor, we know this, so we can assume history and conquest have an inexorable linkage.

However, history requires the written word, archiving and preserving — but primarily it entails epochal events, heroes and villains, achievement and again, a permanency of record. Given that the Aboriginal race has never managed anything but some quaint Dreamtime stories and a few primitive rock paintings then what is this “black history” that White Australia is supposed to have? In fact, Aboriginals didn’t have a history until Whites came along and imparted the concept.

Through White Man’s magic we were able to learn a lot that can now be absorbed into a ‘history’ that could not exist but by a dubious word-of-mouth shared by particular Aboriginal tribes and heavily weighted down by the cultural context of those walkabout fullas. This much more reasonable argument turns that aforementioned maxim on its head because, in fact, Aboriginals owe the awareness of any history of theirs to White Australia.

Now, we’re not knocking the Aboriginal lifestyle per se. We acknowledge that it was harmonious, in respect of the land and all that. It was; no doubt about it. These people lived a compatible existence with the environment. This landscape, this ecosystem, the natural resources that surround us have been jeopardised by the greed of a few that exploit it for profit. Nationalists abhor this exploitation as much as any other activist set. The settlement itself has had consequences, but the settlement was coming, and it was either going to be by ‘liberal’ Whites or else by the Chinese whose attitude to other races is not so redactable.

351416-small
We post this pic to say a little about the duality of  White man: that side which cares and that which doesn’t give a fuck

Moreover is the question of what is nobler, maintaining the human species at a primitive rate of evolution, or accepting the changes of scientific advancement as part and parcel of the wonder of human progress?

So don’t give us this “White Australia has a black history” cod because that it is just self-effacing Cultural Marxist drivel.

And, what is this White Australia anyway? Are they once again getting our original British colonial overlords confused with the poor sucker political prisoners who were dragged here in chains, and who combatted adversity to become the indigenous ‘Australians’? Their version of White Australian history needs some serious adjustment, in that case, since it is viewed through the tampered lens of the partisan Left. These are the same tub-thumpers who loud hail about “multicultural Australia”, which therefore means, by the stringencies of their own particular rhetoric, all these other races and ‘cultures’ are complicit in alleged Aboriginal subjugation.

oie_NUQSh9HaukJK
Oh gee, it’s another anti-Semitic Soros conspiracy theory. Everyone knows Soros just sits at home enjoying his money and doesn’t involve himself in funding activist agents around the world

Are they saying we should ask the Abos to hand back every stitch of modern life we gave them in exchange for our passage back to an Islamic-occupied Europe so that the black fella can once more go walkabout and spear fish for supper?

Once triggered, there is no end to the cycle of guilt demanded by these political manipulators with their slogans. This history is still being written, it would seem. Aboriginal ‘advocates’ can either accept the reality of life here or submit to Chinese domination and 24th citizen-place status in a polyglot market nation.

Furthermore, Nationalists will not tolerate a treaty-based Australia in which lawyers grant Aboriginals a more-equal status on the back of a victimhood narrative. Either they are in this country, or they find some way to return to their nomadic ways and live outside of where the ‘history’ is made, but they will not have the two.

oie_JFNHbh04IJ29
A more correct version of a self-effacing Cultural Marxist maxim

 

THE MAIN PIG SHILLS FOR SATAN

THE MAIN PIG SHILLS FOR SATAN

“The survival of Western Civilisation is at stake. There is no ‘moral’ and ‘immoral’. The only immoral thing is to permit an enemy to destroy one’s people, either by decay or by physical annihilation.”
– George Lincoln Rockwell

Although it may give a sense of comfort and legitimacy for Patriots to ally themselves with the Police, to put oneself on the side of law and order, and to believe that the authority of the state tacitly approves their ideals, just reinforces a false sense of security.

Aussie Patriots have not figured out that Nationalism is not the will of the state; rather, to follow the Nationalist ideal is to run contrary to its will.  Ardent Nationalists realise this.

Any belief that the Australian state has Nationalist sympathies must be done away with. Nationalism is devotion to one’s nation, while Civic Patriotism is devotion to one’s government; the ideal is a nation-state in which the state and its apparatuses serve the nation, thereby making patriotism and nationalism indistinguishable, and reconciling their accurate meanings.

62643be694f822940319fd21a082e1ec
Southern Cross Soldier, 15-year-old Tyler Cassidy, is the youngest known person to be shot dead by Police. He was gunned down in Victoria under extremely dubious circumstances in 2009. The SCS was largely a myth but the media made much of his alleged associations. The boy had been a victim of ‘diversity’ which led to his meltdown.

In Australia today, you are free to be as patriotic as you like. You can support sodomy, usury, unsustainable immigration levels, environmental destruction, pointless wars, historical negationism, child grooming experiments in schools by intellectuals, or any of the other programmes sanctioned by the Commonwealth of Australia and/or state governments. You can support any or all of these with as fervently as you desire, and you won’t land yourself in any hot water with the various law enforcement agencies.

Nationalism is not the will of the Australian state; rather, to follow the Nationalist ideal is to run counter to that will.

However, if you question whether or not masturbating into another man’s anus is a valid basis for marriage, you’ll be branded as a “homophobe” and thus cast out as the media demands. If you active resentment for the 180,000 immigrants a year this country absorbs a year, you’ll be dragged in front of the courts for racial vilification. If you oppose expensive military operations conducted for the benefit of Israel, you’ll end up condemned by parliament as being a “freedom hater” or a “supporter of human rights violations”; and the list goes on.

Politics is the acquisition and retention of power – questioning and opposing state programmes threatens the power of the state, therefore anyone who does this will incur the wrath of the state.

r1250996_16668743.jpg
Pig breeding has gotten colourful over the years

No matter how safe an organisation plays it when it questions the state and its programmes the organisation becomes the enemy of the state which requires the police and the courts acting on behalf of the legislature, shut it down. The United Patriots Front is a telling example of this.

Everything the group did was lawful, at least up until the beheading video, which as Chris Shortis pointed out declaring it unlawful meant that the state was “effectively trying to defend what is an unlawful act under Australian law”. This didn’t matter, the group was declared an enemy of the State of Victoria, and it was shut down.

The conviction of the “Bendigo Three” came after the UPF, or at least some of the group’s members, organised a counter protest of Melbourne Black Lives Matter rally in July 2016 in a show of support for Police and the Blue Lives Matter cause. As the show of appreciation for this, the Australian Federal Police later pressured Facebook into removing the United Patriots Front’s page, which greatly reduced its capacity to organise, effectively leaving it dead in the water.

No matter how safe an organisation plays it when it questions the state and its programmes the organisation becomes the enemy of the state which requires the police and the courts acting on behalf of the legislature, shut it down. The United Patriots Front is a telling example of this.

Regardless of whether or not a group says that negroes shouldn’t kill police officers; gangs of Pacific Islanders should obey the law and not commit home invasions; or that Islamists should respect the Australian way of life, the state will come after you if you threaten their power – independent of whether or not the state technically should agree with in some legalistic manner. As Ian Stuart eloquently put it “the fucking boys in blue will do exactly what the Jew bastards in the government tell them to do”.

Support for the police is support for the enemy’s guardians. The legal system actively prevents Nationalists from gaining power; they did so with Jim Saleam; they did so with Pauline Hanson (she was imprisoned on fabricated charges of electoral fraud, and only allowed to sit in parliament once she abandoned nationalism), and they did so with the UPF.  The way to stop this enemy of Nationalism is not by supporting the Police, but by ending public faith in them.

images (5)
Australian woman Justine Damond was gunned down in Minneapolis this year by “Somali-American” cop Mohamed Noor. She was, in fact, alerting to the Police to a prowler when he blew her away for no discernible reason. The Police Union over there has stood by their trigger-happy non-White murdering pig.

Public faith in Police gives them their power, and once that faith is eroded, society will look to other means of protection which will allow for the creation of something similar to Golden Dawn. Think twice the next time you decide to show support for the Police – they do a decent job of eroding their support on their own (replacing officers with women, covering up the sexual assault of their female staff, and allowing the negroes to run wild through Australian homes, etc.).

There is no reason to slow this decline. And should another Curtis Cheng case arises, certainly don’t condemn Muslims for it, instead look at it with extreme indifference. They put Nationalists who oppose Islamic immigration in prison, and the Muslims put one of their people six feet under? Who cares? And if you want a laugh, tell your left-leaning friends about how you think it’s disgusting that police oppression of minorities has gotten to the point where the Muslims are left with no other option than to voice their cries for help by gunning down officers of the law – who knows, it might even get you the phone number of a cute Marxist girl at uni.

images (6)
March of the Nazi Faggots.

FANBOY NATIONALISM PUTS FACES FIRST AND POLITICS LAST

FANBOY NATIONALISM PUTS FACES FIRST AND POLITICS LAST

We have stretched definitions here, since the subjects of today’s chat we do not regard as bona fide Nationalists. Nevertheless, they are considered to be so by outsiders and the clueless.

Worse yet, recognised Nationalists are now fawning over one or more of their ‘heroes’ and it is as much a betrayal of Nationalist precepts as the actual duplicities by those we indirectly refer to.

True Nationalism has as its most unwavering principles the cessation of immigration to this country, the abolition of multiculturalism, and the recognition of White Australians as the only Australians. Aboriginals are Aboriginals, and Australians are White Europeans. We aim for a mono-racial, Protective, mono-cultural state. The wisdom is manifold when the corrosiveness of pluralism is understood socially, economically, and psychologically.

Many years back, a group around a twerp called Darrin Hodges began spruiking the fool’s gold of mainstreaming. This has as its primary tenet something roughly along the lines that ‘the masses’ will be turned off by the racialism of White Nationalism. Rather than ever dare mention Israel, or god forbid the Zionists, the mainstream party actually becomes inclusive on a multiracial basis of anyone opposed to Islam. Thus was coined the expression ‘Diversity minus Islam’ and subsequently Zionists became fervent proponents.

What would, by all other measures, be a simpatico parallel movement to Nationalism, in fact, began to see Nationalists as enemies. No longer satisfied with carving out turf for its own manoeuvres, it came to desire the destruction of Nationalism as inherently counter its nebulous aims. Suddenly, this unwanted bastard child of Nationalism is worried about how Nationalism affects IT as if the hammer came before the stone.

Mainstreaming, of course, by its own rules, became occupied by the very mainstream it hoped to influence. Rather, the mainstream influences it and not the other way round. To that end, political interests of the “right” found it a useful vehicle.

This idea of ‘mainstreaming’ is something that subsequent groups that sprung out of Reclaim Australia embraced as infallible wisdom and who, today, their principle players are far from having renounced. Any Nationalism on their part is “assumed” as if it is a tacit secret between them and their ‘fans’.

There, we said it, ‘fans’. Because the colourful heroes sucking up all the follows on Twitter, and all the ‘likes’ on Facebook do not have serious political adherents, they have ‘fans’. They are admired for some aspect other than their politics since none of them has ever definitively stated their true Political orientation, their aims, or expressed sincere beliefs.

They have ‘winked’ at certain issues while becoming mawkish about them whenever they sensed the kind of negative publicity that might compromise their mainstream standing.

Likewise, a study of their personality type tends to reveal a character with a desire for adoration and popularity. The cause becomes the vehicle with which to drive them to their desired destination of popularity, recognition, and ultimately ‘fame’. Time and time again a misdirected desire for sub-tier fame has created and burnt out identities on the Patriot side. It has generated more hubris than a meeting of oil barons.

And there, beaut reader is the reason that we see so many woeful, embarrassing wet farts like Zionist Avi Yemini’s great Patriot rally in Melbourne: it is because their followers are fans and not serious activists.

Again, it is a shame Nationalists who should know better are smitten with these fleeting idols like gushing teenyboppers. The real Nationalism is THAT WAY, folks, and we don’t require an X-Factor to pass along the simple message that unless you stand up, you … are … doomed.

Hodges and other Ziobots defend Jews
The original mainstreamers Nick Folkes and Darrin Hodges protest in support of a Jewish Chocolate Store targeted by anti-Zionists

 

STREET PROTESTS: OUR FAVOURITE WASTE OF TIME

STREET PROTESTS: OUR FAVOURITE WASTE OF TIME

Once again, Cobbers, we have sent out our cub reporter to cover a Civic Patriot versus Anti-Fascist showdown on Spring Street in Melbourne.

The demonstration was called by Avi Yemeni in aid of his pet causes: crime prevention, getting more paying pupils for his martial arts club and, naturally, the Avi Yemini Admiration Society, of which he is the sole director and beneficiary.

Whatever else we have written about Avi, who has no place speaking on behalf of Aussies in any case, the gravest accusation we can now level at him is that we do not believe he is sincere in what he is saying.

His performance at the microphone today was rambling, self-conscious and put forth a narrative so hackneyed and yet so vague that it really led the listener nowhere in particular.

carf
The counter rally was small, yet they still outnumbered the Right-Wing contingent by three to one.

Every conservative and right-wing law and order trope were rolled out, repeatedly, by the four main speakers: Avi, some Jewish guy whose name we didn’t catch, an incredibly boring man from an anti-crime Facebook group who droned on for almost half an hour and jolly Hugh Pearson, the Asian loving patriot.

Whatever else we have written about Avi, who has no place speaking on behalf of Aussies in any case, the gravest accusation we can now level at him is that we do not believe he is sincere in what he is saying.

Having witnessed Avi Yemini’s half-hearted build up for his rally over social media and then been present for the whole spectacle we had the impression that he only showed up in the end to save face, his many thousands of page likes online only translating to fewer than 60 attendees.

This disconnect between cyberspace and the real world is something we have pointed out, time and again, on our blog; it has been our contention that what people say online and what they are prepared to do out in the real world have no relationship to one another.

avi yemini
Avi Yemini, the blustering Oaf who organised the rally, tries and fails to inspire his followers

Despite all the rhetoric from government, the security services, and the panhandling anti-radicalisation experts it is our firm belief that the internet is effectively useless as a tool to mould minds and urge people to concrete action; in the rare cases where the hook has been set in some individuals it has appeared to us to be the most inefficient and time-consuming method of political practice.

The telling aspect of the rally was that well over two-thirds of the people in attendance were die-hard patriots from established street crews, chiefly Soldiers Of Odin and True Blue Crew; without their numbers, Avi Yemini would have been preaching to less than twenty of his followers.

This disconnect between cyberspace and the real world is something we have pointed out, time and again, on our blog; it has been our contention that what people say online and what they are prepared to do out in the real world have no relationship to one another.

What is more, Avi, when questioned by a journalist on whether he was aware that some of the people at his rally were avowed “Nationalists” he played the old free speech card, saying he didn’t agree with them but that he respected their right to hold whatever views they choose to.

Yemini need not have worried since the now familiar patriot bands hung on his every word and ate up his hard-edged but decidedly cosmopolitan spiel as if it was their last supper; given the “racist” public utterances, over the years, of many of these patriots we are happy to call bullshit on the whole affair, just as the Antifa did.

We are sure that in the coming hours and days certain photographs will emerge, be prepared for the Patriots to pass on shots of a photogenic young Asian girl posed with an Australian flag and a placard; in their efforts to appear “non-racist” the Patriots staged her as some antipodean, cosmopolitan Nike, a truly sad display.

antifa arrest
A historic photograph of Melbourne’s final Black Bloc being unceremoniously dismantled by the Traps

In effect, on Spring Street today we witnessed two cosmopolitan, hard-edged, anti-Fascist demonstrations with tirades of malapropisms and misinformation flung hither and yon over the barricades and police lines; the differences between the two formations were probably only ones of social class, all certainly agreed that “Fascism” was to be thwarted, we can attest to that much.

The most interesting aspect of the twin rallies was the police response to the Antifa and Left-Wing provocations; having, only last week, gained access to new powers to move-on or arrest troublemakers the riot squad pounced upon anyone wearing masks or Black Bloc attire, with several arrests being made even before the counter rally set off on their march.

Antifa on the streets were never a threat to anyone but themselves and the wider Leftist milieu due to the heat they brought down on that side with their unhinged antics, yet it is amusing to see these supposedly tough guys being manhandled like toddlers by the cops.

These new police powers, which were made necessary by near riots at Coburg in 2016, have effectively put an end to the anonymous Antifa and Black Bloc violence in Melbourne which has plagued public demonstrations since the late 1990’s.

Antifa on the streets was never a threat to anyone but themselves and the wider Leftist milieu due to the heat they brought down on that side with their unhinged antics, yet it is amusing to see these supposedly tough guys being manhandled like toddlers by the cops.

In the end, our reporter wasted the better part of his Sunday watching the usual suspects: the same old patriots, the same journalists, the same Leftists and even the same Police officers milling about in the city, achieving nothing and signifying little.

However, now we know without a doubt that Avi Yemini is just another narcissistic nobody with a Facebook page, that certain patriot groups would turn up to the opening of a letter if the Left were going to be there and that today saw the sunset on twenty years of Antifa tomfoolery.

neil
Neil Erikson being throttled by a Communist, the day summed up in one frame