HOW THE LADS SOCIETY WERE PLAYED BY ANTIFA

HOW THE LADS SOCIETY WERE PLAYED BY ANTIFA

Professor Rob Sparrow of Monash University, AKA Slackbastard, was quick to seize on screengrabs of a sleazy confab between the mixed all-sorts of the Lads Society on their Facebook group page.

Funny how whenever UNA mentions “Rob Sparrow” Slackbastard retaliates with one of his bogus attacks on a writer of ours — Sparrow isn’t happy being doxed but he’s as happy as a pig in sludge when doxing others.

Rob has a gig at Monash University, but not everyone is aware that he hails from a family of radical leftists. His sister Jill Sparrow, a rabid Trotskyite, helped establish Socialist Alternative. His brother Jeff is likewise a Trot and a major leftist who co-wrote extremist literature with his sister but is also to be found spruiking his seditious writings in the mainstream press and occasionally community radio station 3RRR where Slackbastard (his brother Rob AKA Andy Fleming) is a regular guest. Rob himself penned ‘Anarchist Politics & Direct Action’ which can be found here at the Anarchist Library.

The screenshots are widely believed to have been leaked by disgruntled former Klub Nation identity Andrew Wilson who, it is said, attempted to infiltrate the Lads Society in Sydney and Brisbane. There have been shocking allegations about Wilson and his activities in Perth and elsewhere but we won’t go into those here; it is a matter for the people involved. However, the very nature of the Lads and their page ensures infiltration, leaking, and because of their sloppiness, the “Lads” became an unwitting tool of the Antifascists.

Professor Rob Sparrow of Monash University_ maximum leader of Antifascist Action Australia, and everyone's pimp and messenger. M.jpg

The conversation, such as it is, focuses on a United Nationalists Australia contributor who has been the subject of three years of defamation from both left and right. Comments, mostly from those who’ve never even met him, support malicious lies generated by Mark “McDonald Campbell”. McDonald, manager of the Sydney Lads chapter, is not his real surname and is an alias the great boof created based on his love of the absurd Turner Diaries (taken from William Pierce’s nom de plume, Kevin MacDonald). So nobody even really knows who they’re truly dealing with or what his game is.

This cagey New Zealander turned up in Australia in 2013 and feverishly set about trying to recruit everyone and his dog to what can only be described as a terrorist group which he hoped to lead. Active on Stormfront down under, and notable for his incomprehensible posts, he targeted every local SF member via private message. He did so while consorting with staunch Zionist and ex-Liberal party spook Howard Crawford, who, playing his own game, was promising a “Nazi” revolution within the Young Liberals if Mark helped him recruit members. There was to be paramilitary training in the form of a kickboxing school, and McDonald was slated by Crawford as its “Fuhrer” of the western suburbs division. It was a total honeypot trap. In the end, he created “Squadron 88”. This grouplet lasted about as long as a bag of popcorn, managing to fill the letterboxes of East Sydney residents with badly-written antisemitic flyers that served no identifiable political purpose other than to attract attention.

Funny how whenever UNA mentions “Rob Sparrow” Slackbastard retaliates with one of his bogus attacks on a writer of ours — Sparrow isn’t happy being doxed but he’s as happy as a pig in sludge when doxing others.

McDonald has characteristically played down his involvement with Crawford, but then he has at least 47 versions of any controversy he’s been involved in, particularly when it comes to our writer who was unfortunate enough to have met him. None within his fold have ever questioned this duality: labelling our man a Jew (the oldest one in the book) and yet consorting with Crawford and the Party for Freedom, which was established as a spoiler tool against the Nationalists of the Australia First Party. His “Jew” accusation was shared both indirectly, and, as will become revealed, directly with an agent for Antifascist Action. Meanwhile, McDonald enjoys free passage, despite carrying the weight of the crimes he’s committed against Nationalists.

Questions naturally arise about those enabling McDonald, such as Tom Sewell, who appointed McDonald Sydney Lads Society leader as a deliberate affront to the Australia First Party’s president Jim Saleam who he disingenuously claims to respect. How can anyone occupying the hazardous turf of the far-right brush over the glaring inconsistencies in McDonald’s stories since you do so at your own peril? Why would they accept his blasé dismissals of these allegations so indifferently when the potential for damage is so great? This is how operators like McDonald get away with what they do.

MateyandFokles.png
Mark McDonald, looking just as fat and stupid as in real life

McDonald’s rap sheet should be of concern to any competent ‘leader’. If Tom Sewell truly respects Jim Saleam as he reckons how come he ignored his warnings about McDonald with such a show of personal defiance?

Before we get down to the brass tacks of linking McDonald to Antifascist propaganda, let’s take a look at this rap sheet.

McDonald’s rap sheet should be of concern to any competent ‘leader’. If Tom Sewell truly respects Jim Saleam as he claims in a comment taken from the screengrabs how come he deliberately snubbed him on one of the most important personnel warnings he made?

McDonald has, in his time, attempted to induce others into committing crimes such as kidnap and torture. Eyewitness accounts swear, among various plots, he sought to encourage his associates to attack the homes of Penrith counsellors and to arrange the firebombing of a Moslem prayer hall. He attempted to cajole others into kidnapping anarchist Dave Fregon, who had the computer server of Slackbastard, and torture him until he gave up the identity of Slackbastard.

A Nationalist who had dealings with McDonald told us, “He came on the scene from out of nowhere and almost instantly he knew everyone.  I still cannot put my finger on it to this day. I know he’s not genuine. Suddenly, from nowhere, he was everywhere. He knew everyone, or weaselled his way into people’s lives and work just like a damned agent. I used to notice his skittish behaviour. He talked tough but was a coward. He tried to entrap me too, I believe, with acts of violence. He tried to convince us to literally kidnap our enemies.”

Slackbastard-Dave-Fregon.jpg
Anarchist Dave Fregon who Mark McDonald tried to have kidnapped and tortured. By torture, he probably meant having to be in the same room as McDonald for more than two minutes

None of the potentials for entrapment in these overt incitements to criminality seems to bother those who gave a second lease of life to this scheming fush-and-chup quaffing scumbag. Our writer has experience with this sort of animal since by circumstance he encountered an actual super troll now in prison in America. The form was exactly the same: encouragement to commit acts just like those named. Unlike The Bozos Society, however, he had the nous to realise something was hinky and warn others.

Nothing that McDonald has said in those comments about our writer has even the whiff of honesty; it is all poisonous garbage from a gutless little punk picked up and shared by Tom Sewell who doesn’t possess the maturity or wit to intelligently address our criticisms (which, under the circumstances, are proven fully correct and we rest our case) so instead he resorts to tacky name-calling. The stuff about being “gay” is just over the top, and what’s the difference between saying that and David Gullis of Antifascist Action calling our man a “paedophile” to justify attacking him (even though Gullis is a homo and likely fondles his mates’ kids when their parents go to bed)? At least when we mention Sewell slept with a Filipina girl we aren’t lying.

Likewise, it’s ironic how McDonald made a big deal about our writer’s name but has never told the truth about his own. It is reasonable to expect that in the recent past, as UNA had cause to expose McDonald that he would have become prone to retaliating with lies. But bear in mind, he started this, yet we will be much more informed once we discover why: and it’s no point asking him since you would stand more chance of an honest response from a used car salesman in Tel Aviv. How come both the left and right have invested so much energy in trying to discredit our editor? What makes him so dangerous that they combine forces against him?

McDonald did not expect his comments to reach our eyes, and as such, has served his guilt up on a platter. Those lies about our writer have appeared before, and unfortunately, due to present circumstances, we cannot go into where or why because there are legal complications.

Having said, we’ll come straight to the point: none of the scenarios involving McDonald’s supposed friends, or “skinheads” ever happened, it’s all a dirty pack of lies, but still, he fed them to an Antifascist source long before UNA and the Lads ever butted heads. His mention of Neil Erikson and his involvement in spreading these rumours is a dead giveaway too because Erikson links back to this Antifascist identity in question through a complicated play that we must wait to publish. McDonald did not expect his own comments to reach our eyes, and as such, has served his guilt up on a platter in terms of revealing corresponding stories which cannot have been invented independently by the Antifascist and logically could only share identicality if both parties had colluded to create them. We cannot be more detailed due to the circumstances as legal complications are preventing us.

The gravity of what we are revealing is ENORMOUS and by casually going along with these crafted rumours because Sewell hates our man for daring to write critically about his activities doesn’t mitigate the fact he has just served the cause of Antifascism, although, we have heard rumours that it’s not a strategy that Sewell is adverse to when pursuing his own political ends. We cannot state that is the truth, however, but others, who aren’t prone to muckraking, have concerns about his soundness.

9844456-3x2-340x227
The Lads society blows, or throws blows, one of the two. Pity, too, they don’t turn around and punch the fat bald slob for being a spineless spectator

We may share this alarming news, but we don’t expect those we criticise to heed it, and while we could go on ad infinitum dissecting what we’ve read on those screengrabs, especially in defence of our man’s honour, we shall focus on this issue. Tom Sewell’s careless leadership of the Lads Society has partly resulted in the mass doxing of a number of young NSW Alt-Right activists (obviously the Nats themselves were also responsible), while he has essentially let the Lads do Antifa’s work by sharing their weaponised lies. They have vindicated the most pernicious Antifascist troll currently active and one of the worst conmen in the movement of theirs. No matter what your beef, enabling Antifa just to fight your battles is about as low as it gets! Indeed, it is tantamount to allying with them.

His mentioning of Neil Erikson and his involvement in the spreading of these lies is a dead giveaway too because Erikson links back to this Antifascist identity in a complicated play that, again, we must wait to publish.

At no point has UNA ever claimed that the idea of the Lads is wrong — just that we question the motives of the leadership, the desirability of their methods, and the tone they have generated. UNA penned the article ‘Are The Lads Society Klub Nation 2.0’ when it was revealed from a Lads’ insider that Sewell was actively dissuading members from associating with Australia First Party and from reading the UNA blog. Until then we had no interest in commenting on their activities and those who’ve crossed from editorial roles on our page over to their side might well affirm this truth.

However, the raison d’être for the Lads’ Society was never to champion the social and political rights of the diminishing White Australian population but to service Tom Sewell’s monolithic ego. Far from him being reluctant to “kiss” our man’s “ring” he was eager that he, along with everyone else, would kiss his. Having been told he was not a Nationalist by “baby boomers and generation Xers” (sic) he decided to just declare himself a Nationalist and build a gang from all the young blokes following him on Facebook.

DinZTXrU8AASxfn.jpg
The Lads usually don’t like girls. And why is the joker with the Village People mo wearing fingerless gloves? 

So for those coming in late, who the hell is Tom Sewell and what has he got to do with anything?

A fresh-faced kid straight out of the Australian Army’s catering corps, Tom Sewell surfed in on the 2015 Reclaim Australia wave where he met Blair Cottrell and soon became his loyal lieutenant; even if he did require a ladder to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the big guy. As a leading member of the UPF under Blair’s dictatorship, Tom Thumb enjoyed a ready-made support base that sprung — not out of White Nationalist politics — but from the hordes who rushed online to their anti-Islam movement, something which he and Blair travelled to Sydney to explain to Jim Saleam they were keeping as was in spite of all the chatter about them being crypto National Socialists. Ironic, then, we fast forward to the present hour and he’s now demanding ownership over Australian White Identity. Indeed, he knows better than those who’ve never been civic patriots or wavered from their position as Australian Nationalists.

Being so young, and strolling into a wide support base, gave this lad a sense of entitlement to lead. We argue he isn’t ready, but then, he can do what he likes as long as he doesn’t try to market himself as a Nationalist (unless he becomes one, which is a whole different matter), but we’ll come to that. It was excruciating to read him lament of an “old guard”, being ludicrous enough to put our writer in that category, particularly when he is hazy on who is guarding what exactly. It is absurd to even have that category, assuming he was actually talking about an Australian Nationalist movement and not the pan-Europeanist identitarian club that he’s put together (describing it as “new Nationalism”, for fuck’s sake). Furthermore, it’s presumptuous to treat activists like the job market treats anyone over 40, by tossing them away regardless of their experience and wisdom. Half these kids never even lived in a predominantly White Australia.

There is no new guard or old guard there are only dedicated activists. James Perren, whose excitability at throwing his support behind any “new” thing that comes along with the gusto of a born loser and which is perhaps one of his greatest flaws, should be rebuked for encouraging this idea. He talks of those wanting to “cling on” to power, but there is no power but rather an authority based on knowledge and experience, and the real trouble is not those ‘leading’ but those who refuse to support since there is always some new Jack waltzing in believing ‘they’ have the plan and vision to be this great dictator they misguidedly think everyone is waiting for. James might be a wanker, but he is also a great Nationalist, and the only voice of reason evident in that lavatory of a thread (even if he is a fatalistic, panicky idiot). He is right too in arguing that Sewell should have been above that sort of muckraking and once upon a time he would have been.

Thus we come to the third of the triumvirate of interested parties in this sordid matter; the first being Sparrow and his cabal of Antifascist trolls; the second being McDonald, and finally we have Tom Sewell.

James Perren correctly pointed out how Sewell forgets the support he and Blair received from our writer, through commentaries, and pieces written in their defence during 2015. When it became apparent this was a one-way street and that Nationalists were to be used for their knowledge, support, and then tossed away in favour of a civic base then all bets were off. Suddenly everyone who had dallied with the proven failure of ‘mainstreaming’ and who had consciously or through inexperience “diversified” the field wanted terribly much to call themselves a “Nationalist”.

Designations are not just party hats to be passed around in the bonhomie of the mood but are precise definitions of a person or organisation and what they represent! If the wrong person is wearing the wrong hat then the hat becomes representative of the wrong things. Neil Erikson knew this when he deliberately appropriated the name “Nationalist” after being explicitly warned not to. You cannot pursue the line of a civic patriot which believes it’s OK to make allies of non-Whites; who tones down any explicitly White rhetoric; whose actions lead them to support the conservatives in their capacity as the ideological guard for the globalist capitalist oligarchs (read One Nation, LNP, et al) and then assume all that in the name a Nationalist strives for.

download
Howard Crawford (L-centre) with Mark McDonald beside him no doubt unable to comprehend whatever the speaker is saying. They were going to build a Nazi party inside the Young Liberals despite Howard being a Zionist

Tom Sewell’s Lads Society has supported Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux and would probably provide security for Gavin Mcinnes and Tommy Robinson if asked to. None of these impresarios are Australian Nationalists, yet, Tom and his boys have the sniffles because they think AFP is claiming a “patent” on the word Nationalist.  As far as the margins of political Nationalism in this country are concerned, the Australia First Party owns them! Those who are not absolutely committed to these nativist principles have no business on their turf. Therefore the word ‘Nationalist’ belongs to the AFP.

Mr Welf Herfurth might disagree but then Welf is a “National Anarchist” which is about the most ridiculous thing anybody could be outside of a goldfish tamer. Furthermore, Welf has consistently refused to answer whether or not he is a multi-racialist. He certainly is no Australian, but then either is Mark McDonald, who cannot even vote here, or his Russian friend, or Tom Sewell. We seem to have a hell of a lot of foreigners trying to tell us what Australian Nationalism is all about. So in the interests of inclusivity, they’ve decided it can be everything from civic patriotism to Alt-Right.

Being a Nationalist entails defending a set of principles; holding steadfast beliefs; and being committed to an unambiguous cause. A pan-Europeanist is really not too different from a globalist as they mistakenly think we are “working for the same thing”. But there is no “we” and “we” are not working for the same thing.

Being a Nationalist entails defending a set of principles; holding steadfast beliefs; and being committed to an unambiguous cause. A pan-Europeanist is really not too different from a globalist as they mistakenly think there is a “we” and that we are “working for the same thing”. But there is no “we” and “we” are not working for the same thing.

Finally, the motivation for these leaks is to provoke discord, and we at UNA may have bitten a little, but not too much. We have issues with the Lads Society’s leadership, and they have been made worse by their enabling Antifascist Action’s campaign to ruin Nationalists one by one. When these Lads erroneously condemn our writer as “always attacking Nationalists” can they dare to prove it? Who are these “nationalists”? Neil Erikson? Nick Folkes? Toby Cook (the obviously non-White Hitler Youth who’s gone all African American culture now)? Shermon Burgess? The Sons of Odin? The True Blue Crew? There is a major difference between critical commentary and “attacking” and if they are such shrinking violets that any criticism injures them for life then they should probably find a nice safe space because the truth is brutal.

a2f818846e9ccd37fffdf1d81f9ca078.jpg
Thomas Sewell in his totally Aussie Nationalist civic patriot Oswald Mosley phase. Tom takes himself very, very, very, very seriously, as you can tell by the Mosely tash

What are Antifa and the two main trolls behind this project going to gain? Stuff all. And as far as the Lads or any other group are concerned the Australia First Party is as solid as ever. It will not fade away. It will be here long after they are off proving what little conservatives they were all along. Our writer, too, is going nowhere. He’s not about to put a gun barrel in his mouth like Sparrow and his mate are hoping. They can call him names all day but he only grows stronger.

What they REALLY hope for is to create an atmosphere that results in violence. They are banking on someone out there in the Lads being mad enough to make an attempt on our man’s life. Selah.

McDonald must go! There will be no dialogue or detente with  Nationalists so long as this virus remains in the bloodstream. There will be no peace until he is unconditionally removed and never allowed to ever again spread his poison. Australia is not his country and he is not a Nationalist. He is simply not welcome, and as to the damage he’s caused, that will one day have to be paid for! This is not negotiable. Besides, it’s in everybody’s interest.

Until.jpg

ANDREWS’ RE-ELECTION WILL GREENLIGHT AFRICAN CRIME

ANDREWS’ RE-ELECTION WILL GREENLIGHT AFRICAN CRIME

As election time looms for Melbournians the inevitability of Labor premier Danny Andrews being re-elected emerges with it. Which also means, African crime gets re-elected.

Andrews, who just signed Victorians over to the One Belt One Road Chinese invasion initiative, so that he can accrue debt to the hungry Chinese at the cost of Australia’s security, has presided over a state in the throes of lawlessness. African crime is out of control but the state’s police commissioner and the government itself are beside themselves peddling misdirection and denials.

African “youth” fear no reprisals from the Victorian legal justice system because there seldom are any. The government is more concerned with its image as the country’s most multicultural state than it is with safeguarding its citizens from the violent acts of savage African immigrants who are here due to refugee quotas. And those quotas come about because for some reason the west has chosen to rescue these savage tribal people from their own self-made horror and import that mayhem to our own “civilised” lands.

The spate of African crimes in the state of Victoria is so incessant and relentless that African fatigue often prevents each and every outrage from being shared on social media communities concerned with the breakdown of Australian society thanks to immigration and especially immigration from incompatible races.

Barely a week goes about without reports of out of control African youths; home invasions; muggings; assaults; robberies and car-jacking in which that familiar phrase we’ve all come to cynically grin at is used when describing the suspects: “Of African appearance.”

When police respond to these incidents they adopt a “munch doughnuts” tactic until addressing 3AW in which case they make out everything is under control; reports are exaggerated; that it’s only a “few bad apples” spoiling it for a great community who love footy and are upset with the way they are being portrayed in the media.

Back in 2010, Andrew Bolt reported on how the then police commissioner Simon Overland admitted that the Victorian Police was hiding the truth about the ethnic crime problem.

One of the most astonishing revelations in Bolt’s article, and one which cuts to the very particular insanity suffered by the virtue-signalling small ‘l’ liberals always at the centre of championing open borders concepts, was that police were loath to issue colour-specific descriptions of African offenders because describing them as ‘black’ might cause these savage criminals offence.

The logical conclusion is not to describe them as “attackers”, or detail any specifics of their crimes, in case the negative criminal associations have an undesirable impact on their future employability as brain surgeons and rocket scientists.

Professor Andrew Fraser sparked a maelstrom of globalist indignation for having the gall to name the beast in the room. In 2005, he wrote a letter to the Parramatta Sun in which he warned: “…an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of other social problems.”

He added, “The fact is that ordinary Australians are being pushed down the path to national suicide by their own political, religious and economic elites.”

andrewfraser
Canadian-born Professor Andrew Fraser easily makes it onto UNA’s honours list!

In the ensuing row from that ‘inconvenient truth’ multiracialist apologists scrambled to bash out editorials condemning Professor Fraser; Channel 9 unleashed Ray Martin to confront him with a congenial group of church-going Africans as though this ambassadorial set were to negate the realities of African crime in much the same way a lot of bad apples spoil it for the few good ones; and academic papers were authored.

Sadly, Andrew Fraser apologised for his remarks after Sudanese man Safi Hareer complained to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission. Professor Fraser also drew the ire of Macquarie University when he wrote a paper advocating for a return to the White Australia Policy. That paper and others can be found here.

Professor Fraser was forced to take an early retirement package, but we shall not forget his courageous stand to state what everyone should regard as the bleeding obvious.

victoria-feature-image.png
A typical front page from Australia’s answer to Mogadishu

The open-borders liberal-elites’ response to all of this is to blame the messenger. There is no African crime problem, they argue, it’s the inherently racist character of the media and others reporting on the situation. They’re skewing the facts, using hyperbole, and they’re overblowing a few regrettable incidents into a campaign that impugns an entire community. It’s not the African gangs that are the problem, they say, but “the racists” who vilify them. And it is these class bigots of, as Drew Fraser said, “the political, religious and economic elites” who will always win sway over Victoria; which is on one level a showcase for a de-Europeanised Australia, which is, after all, the goal of the elites.

SOC.png
Straight from the webpage of the Victorian Socialists. See, it’s not them, it’s us, how could they possibly be responsible for their own actions?

With such a free hand from the elites, it’s little wonder that the crime-prone gang members fear nothing, respect nothing, and aspire to nothing but the accretion of consumerist trophies. In Victoria, the crime is not that committed by so-called refugees and children of refugees, it’s to mention the crime committed by these without rationalising it away as inherently a by-product of Australia’s inherent racism.

Below is the latest from the ABC as of the publication date of this blog:

Police are looking for a group of 10 to 15 youths responsible for two “ugly” and “vicious” robberies on the busy St Kilda foreshore in Melbourne’s south on Thursday night.

Key points:

  • Police said the offenders in both attacks were “perceived to be of African appearance”
  • Investigators are examining if a metal or wooden pole was used in the assaults
  • Local council has been asked to reintroduce an alcohol ban on the St Kilda foreshore

Police said two men were punched and one had a bottle smashed over his head in separate, unprovoked assaults.

In the first attack, a man had his mobile phone stolen and was left with swelling on his face.

In the second, a 25-year-old man received cuts to his face and head and was treated by ambulance officers.

Police said the offenders involved in both attacks were “perceived to be of African appearance”.

Detective Sergeant David Schaefer condemned the assaults.

“These attacks are quite cowardly and vicious, unprovoked and really an ugly event that actually occurs in normally a peaceful location where people frequently enjoy themselves,” he said.

The attacks happened on Jacka Boulevard at about 10:00pm and police said they were investigating whether the offenders may have used either a metal or wooden pole.

Call for alcohol ban

“We’re looking for a group of males of African appearance which we believe were congregating along the foreshore last night,” he said.

“We can’t speculate as to the numbers involved but on the second assault there was anywhere up to around 10 people who were involved in that second robbery,” Detective Sergeant Schaefer said.

Police said the victims had been “enjoying the sights” of the “iconic” St Kilda foreshore.

“The first victim just decided to walk down [and] enjoy the scenes and the second male was visiting a friend down there when he was accosted by the group.”

Victoria Police Inspector Jason Kelly said he was “very disappointed in what occurred”.

“Unfortunately we’ve had a large group of youth attend and the combination of youth, alcohol and public spaces just simply doesn’t mix,” he said.

He said alcohol at the “iconic beach location” was a “recipe for disaster”.

Inspector Kelly said police were calling for a full alcohol ban along the St Kilda foreshore to be reintroduced by the City of Port Phillip Council.

A FEW WORDS ON THE SUBJECT OF MARTYRDOM

A FEW WORDS ON THE SUBJECT OF MARTYRDOM

There ought to be a realisation by now, among Nationalistic people, that the Internet and in particular social media are these days very much a hindrance, rather than an aid in pursuing the cause of national revolution.

Time after time we are presented with the stories of people who have lost their way and become obsessed with the fantasy world of Facebook, Twitter, Gab and the myriad other portals through which people shout into the abyss of cyberspace; many of these individuals suffer full-blown mental breakdowns as a result of their journeys beyond the looking glass.

We have already posted several articles on this blog on the topics of violent extremism, unilateral action by Lone Wolf actors and the way ill, desperate or lonely Cybernauts are consistently fed false information and distortions of fact when it comes to matters of authentic political dissent against the Globalist-Capitalist system.

wretström
Daniel Wretström, a Swedish skinhead murdered by immigrants in 2000 is regarded by many on the continent as a martyr

We have laboured long and hard on blog posts which have examined the near zero potential of terrorism and political violence as a means of effecting lasting societal change; in addition to that we have been relentless in our criticism of the globalist leaning Alt-Right posers who have hijacked the Nationalist narrative and attempted to replace political principles with juvenile cyber-gibberish.

As sincere radicals we long ago came to the conclusion that social media is a cancer, that its potential to draw citizens together into a common cause for a better world was a mirage, a con-job by the owners of the sites which sucked billions across the world into submitting to a Globalist-Capitalist data mining and surveillance programme.

That is not to say, of course, that we wish to denigrate hardworking Nationalistic writers, it is important to create for posterity a permanent record of our theories and the overall tone of early 21st century Nationalism; the problem is that to the time poor worker, sorting the gold from the dross is nigh on impossible a task in the face of so much white noise coming from the social media zoo.

As sincere radicals we long ago came to the conclusion that social media is a cancer, that its potential to draw citizens together into a common cause for a better world was a mirage, a con-job by the owners of the sites which sucked billions across the world into submitting to a Globalist-Capitalist data mining and surveillance programme.

The problem is that the real world does not work in the same way as the cyber-playpens; pretty much every time the psychodrama of meme-rich social media groups is transposed onto the streets it has ended in ignominious failure, recriminations and bitter divides among participants, this is as true of the so-called “Far Right” as it is of Antifa and their ilk.

The really sad part of this is the potential for the disillusioned Cybernaut to spiral into an episode of mental decompensation when he is faced with this clash of values; when his hopes of concrete action, camaraderie and a lasting commitment to a great cause are dashed before his eyes the temptation to go it alone and create a spectacle can become overwhelming.

tommy
Tommy Robinson may be a fraud with suspicious ties to the Zionist entity but there is no doubt he is being ruthlessly persecuted by the UK authorities, his perseverance makes him a hero to civic patriots

Shooting up a house of worship, assassinating a minor politician or driving a van into a crowd of civilians will not make a martyr of the assailant, his reams of blog posts and social media interactions will be immediately expunged from the internet and in a few months, after he is tried and convicted, nobody but those with an academic interest in the case will remember his name.

Innocence, perseverance in the face of impossible odds, showing grace under fire and, above all survival to the very last, no matter what occurs, are the qualities of a martyr; such people are outwardly unaffected by frustration or despair and they are hailed for their self-sacrifice and their considered approach to their situation.

Shooting up a house of worship, assassinating a minor politician or driving a van into a crowd of civilians will not make a martyr of the assailant, his reams of blog posts and social media interactions will be immediately expunged from the internet and in a few months, after he is tried and convicted, nobody but those with an academic interest in the case will remember his name.

Think about this for a moment: Who can name, off the top of their head, one rank and file member of the SS Einsatzgruppen, or a police officer, who roamed Eastern Europe doing the dirty work of eliminating Jews, Communists and Partisans from the occupied zones?

We are talking here of the people who heard the screams and got blood spattered on their boots; so who can name one Khmer Rouge cadre? One Hutu militiaman from Rwanda in 1994? One Phalangist gunman from the Sabra and Shatila atrocity in 1982?

SS&SD unit Somewhere in Russia
The SS and SD Einsatzgruppen did all the dirty work on the Eastern front, they were the most ruthless and efficient killing machine going around, yet 70 years later their names are unknown outside academic circles

In truth, as horrible as it sounds, those killers were actually making their mark on the world, following orders as part of a great machine with clear orders, the camaraderie of brothers and a sense of purpose, yet they are forgotten by the world and only the names of their ideologues and leaders are barely remembered by ordinary workers, even if it is often for the wrong reasons.

Getting all worked up over social media memes, “truths” which are usually anything but true and expecting communion, or even ovations from your online peers when you finally flip out and do something spectacularly stupid is a sad way to live.

True radicals have their eyes on the horizon awaiting the new dawn, they move toward the light on the hill, so to speak; they see the good in the world and recoil from negativity and the dark side of life; they elevate beauty, vitality, art and love over depression, paranoia and insanity.

Getting all worked up over social media memes, “truths” which are usually anything but true and expecting communion, or even ovations from your online peers when you finally flip out and do something spectacularly stupid is a sad way to live.

If you see no hope of salvation, if the world seems to be spinning out of control and if your online fantasy world fails to reach its potential as a vehicle to sweep the globalists and their cronies from power then you can either step away from the keyboard, seek treatment for your mental problems and find something else to occupy your evenings, or you can implode and take the coward’s way out.

So put up or shut up, if the world is as fucked as you think it is and throwing away your life on a spectacular action seems the only option, instead of taking out your frustrations on others, why not write your great manifesto and last testament, lay down on your flag and put the gun to your temple?

Assuming that your writing was any good if you were possessed of great insight and could conceivably have made a wider contribution to “the cause” your death will be mourned as a tragedy and your name will live forever.

If, on the other hand, you really were just a sad, internet-addled loser parroting half-truths and engaging in social media group hysteria, so be it: to dust you will return in your forgotten and untended grave.

_54203247_comp_hess
When people began making pilgrimages to the grave of Rudolf Hess the German authorities exhumed his remains and levelled the site

DANNY ANDREWS’ ‘ONE BELT ONE ROAD’ PRO-CHINA DEAL WEAKENS AUSTRALIA

DANNY ANDREWS’ ‘ONE BELT ONE ROAD’ PRO-CHINA DEAL WEAKENS AUSTRALIA

CHINA is one state closer to achieving its militaristic objective of attaining economic and strategic domination over Australia after traitor Victorian premier Daniel Andrews signed on for its One Belt One Road ‘global trade initiative’.

Andrews has finalised a memorandum of understanding with China’s ambassador to Australia Cheng Jingye which will indenture Victorians under the lie of jobs creation and economic benefits.

His treasonous step comes after Australia has resisted joining China’s Silk Road. The brainchild of Chinese dictator Xi Jinping, the One Belt One Road is his imperialistic vision of, as Professor Clive Hamilton describes in his book Silent Invasion, “restoring China to its rightful place, not through military conquest, but through economic domination.”

The aim of the thinly-disguised grab for global might is otherwise explained as restoring China’s ancient silk trading route which would link Europe and Africa to Asia and Oceania; although Australia was never on China’s ancient Silk Road despite false histories touted by the Chinese government.

In terms of how it works, you only have to look at those gullible countries that lent their signature to the deal then took the money. Sri Lanka signed on for the OBOR ‘initiative’ supposedly for ‘infrastructure projects’ and then had to hand over 70% of its Hambantota Port when it couldn’t pay. The surrendering of the port gives China a strategical vantage point in the Indian Ocean from which to launch its naval power.

Andrews has finalised a memorandum of understanding with China’s ambassador to Australia Cheng Jingye which will indenture Victorians under the lie of jobs creation and economic benefits.

Chinese buyers accounted for $24 billion of Australian real state gobbled up in 2017. China is now the biggest foreign owner of Australian farmland; a booty that includes in no particular order Kidman Cattle Station, which mining Oligarch Gina Rinehart used her pal, Pauline Hanson, for Australians, but lines the pockets of the sellers, and ships top quality fruit and vegetables that we once took for granted over to China to fill Communist bellies. This leaves little of the good stuff for us, yet marks up the price for domestic consumption. Chinese buyers are now achieving a lock on Australia’s celebrated wineries. It was just announced that 10% of South Australia’s Barossa Valley is now in the hands of those loyal to Beijing.

10435376-3x2-700x467
A most significant act of treason against Australia here is being committed by Victoria’s communist premier

Australians may be oblivious to this, but China is eyeing off northern Australia. Beijing refers to Australia’s north as “the northern gateway” and greedy traitors like Gina Rinehart have been keenly pushing what they call the “Northern Australia Agenda” or the northern zone, which aims to partition Australia and transform the north into Chinese territory in all but name.

The Australian government ironically describes this sale of our nation as “unlocking the region’s full economic potential” and creating a “trade and investment gateway”. The idea being the north becomes both the food bowl and mineral resource centre for China’s growth with some vague promise of Australians economically benefiting from this unbelievable act of high treason. This means Chinese firms, which already own so much of Australia’s valuable mines, flying in Chinese workers and paying them in Renminbi to send food and minerals back to China. The only economic gain is for quislings like Rinehart selling off what belongs to Australians.

When you add up the key infrastructure falling either wholly or partly into Chinese hands in conjunction with that already acquired on an OBOR basis you get an unnerving sense that the significant work of occupying Australia is well underway. Take for instance Darwin and Melbourne Ports: Darwin Port’s lease was bought by Landbridge, a company owned by Chinese billionaire Ye Cheng, while Melbourne Port’s lease is controlled by a consortium of which China Investment Corp owns a fifth-share. Take these strategic assets into consideration while recognising that China-linked companies are dominating our gas and electricity network. So our power is rapidly falling into Chinese control along with our farmland and mines; all for quick sales to a class who don’t recognise Australia as anything more than a commodity to be flogged for the biggest profit they can wrangle.

Yet, while all our primary resources are flowing in a single direction back to China, the Chinese people are streaming back here; topping the immigration figures and numbers of “foreign students”.

Yet, while all our primary resources are flowing in a single direction back to China, the Chinese people are streaming back here; topping the immigration figures and numbers of “foreign students”.

The education sector is such a cash cow that teaching our people ranks way below the interests of big-fee paying students from abroad of which the Chinese are the largest group. And don’t think they’re here to learn: migration agents don’t bother veiling enticement of permanent residency.

This is the goal of China’s young and they come hauling silk sacks full of cash from their parents to buy up Australian homes. From the moment you touch down at our major airports, roadside billboards written in Chinese spruik real estate. In Sydney’s Mascot, these signs form a colonnade that stretches beyond vision.

Chinkshit.png

You don’t even need a keen eye to spot these signs they’re so ubiquitous, but what is harder not to notice are the eyesore Asian-style high-rise apartments eating up entire neighbourhoods and forming clusters so dense they rank as new cities. These are not just filling a sudden demand either, they’ve been planned for, and they’re not for you white person — these are earmarked for the new replacement population of those from both Asia and the sub-continent, but mainly for the Chinese.

A company named Consolidated Land and Rail Australia (CLARA) is a private group which has as its mission statement, “…to understand a re-balancing of our settlement and deliver new ways of imagining, planning and building cities, transport and infrastructure.” This is the insidious cabal creating ‘educities’ for our replacement population and then linking them via rail. And yet, officially, Australia — with the now exception of Victoria under its communist sympathiser premier Daniel Andrews — has resisted aligning with China’s Silk Road. But this ambivalence is more a contest between Australia’s security services and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT).

On the one hand, our security services recognise implicitly the threat being posed by China’s infiltration through business. Chinese espionage in Australia is at an all-time high. The country is flooded with individuals and groups aiming to manipulate the views of the Australian public, the media, business and it is especially targeting Australian government officials, where it often finds easy pickings, such as former Labor senator San Dastyari who resigned from his position after it was revealed he tipped off Chinese billionaire Huang Xiangmo that his phone was being tapped by ASIO.

The infiltration of Chinese spies marks what it considers dissident elements among the Chinese community in Australia, and runs campaigns pursuing churches and institutions and practises it deems undesirable. But it’s not just spooks in happy shoes that have Australia’s national security bodies worried; so far they’ve blocked two Chinese companies from bidding for Australia’s national broadband network deeming Huawei and ZTE presented an unacceptable security risk.

This is the goal of China’s young and they come bearing silk sacks full of cash from their parents to buy up Australian homes. From the moment you touch down at our major airports, roadside signs in Chinese spruik real estate. In Sydney’s Mascot, these signs form a colonnade that stretches beyond vision.

But DFAT like the rest of the mercantile class sees Australia strictly in economic terms and plays down any threat as just some continuance of a post-colonial paranoia about the yellow peril which has no place in enlightened business. But then again, unlike the security services, those in government and the business sector are in a nice position to be wooed by Chinese billionaires bearing financial gifts and promises of lucrative jobs. Indeed, Australia’s commitment to democracy has proven dolefully weak. China has used a mixture of courtship and threat; grooming “friends” to facilitate their influence over the Australian government. In the tactics of their trade politics, they have become adept at manipulating our political class such as they did while negotiating the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA). And it always seems to come back to pressuring tactics and tweaking White guilt where Chinese interests are concerned.

We have business people, organisations, and advocacy groups here using ‘donations’ to curry favour among business people and politicians. Domination of Australia is important as China considers Australia and New Zealand test cases in their rehearsals for world domination. We are regarded already as a tribute state to China and it is becoming harder to see how we can possibly extricate ourselves from this invidious position since the whole system stinks with collaborators.

Australian companies.png
Australian companies trading Australia’s future away to Beijing

Andrew Robb was the architect of ChAFTA, a bum deal for all Australians which has dumped rubbish Chinese products onto our markets and handed our jobs over to Chinese workers with zip in return. As his reward, he was given an $880k job as a personal consultant to Ye Cheng. As we’ve already indicated, Ye Cheng owns Landbridge which controls the 99-year lease on Darwin Port. He also belongs to the national Chinese People’s Consultative Committee which has a duty to uphold the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) without question. Therefore Robb is now working for the Communist Party of China. And bear in mind that he sits alongside BHP director and Orica chairman Malcolm Broomhead on the board of the Australia-China Belt & Road Initiative (ACBRI).

As if having our corpuscles sucked empty by Beijing isn’t bad enough we then have to compete with, apart from Chinese beating us out of part-time work, often doing so illegally, the daigou shopper, which acts as an independent agent, buying up goods with high resale value back in China and then shipping them home at a massive profit.

ACBRI.png
A list of Chinese rats and their co-conspirators. The Australia-China One Belt Road invasion committee

Currently, topping the food chain for the daigou shopper is our baby formula since back in China their milk is like radioactive sewage. A veritable black trade in the stuff has sprung up. For years now our supermarket shelves have been stripped of baby formula with stores imposing limits on customer purchases they seldom enforce. Thus Chinese shoppers queue up at major shops exclusively interested in hoarding baby formula which they flog for an untaxed income that would keep a small Australian family alive. And all because no one stops them literally stealing milk out of the mouths of Australian babies.

It would be nice to gather a posse, rock on down to Coles, and crack these Chinese serpents on their pan heads with hockey sticks. It would be lovely to firebomb Chinese invaders out of our land but what would that lead to? Once Australia is established on the Silk Road then, much as the West has done where its investments were concerned, China’s commercial interests require protection. Consider Darwin Port — the Chinese owner controls a maritime militia that is, as Clive Hamilton describes it, “…a vast reserve army of military-trained civilians working the fishing industry and ports”. He explains that their purpose is to “intimidate rival fishers.” So imagine when Australian fishing waters become the object of Beijing’s desire as their empire expands. This maritime militia then also serve the function of forcing the intimidated nation to a position of brinkmanship where the only possible outcome is war.

Chinese companies.png
Chinese companies overseeing the occupation of Australia

Hypothetically speaking, if Australians react negatively against becoming the servile class to Chinese landowners and subordinates as they assume the plum positions among the managerial class, what happens? It’s not something that hasn’t occurred to Beijing. Apart from negotiating “private security” where, say, the northern zone is concerned, or wherever their people proliferate in the mushrooming cities built for them by CLARA, the People’s Liberation Army will be ready to respond to any threat to their commercial interests, or wherever their people are harmed.

Hamilton writes, “We need to protect ourselves forward ten or fifteen years, when Chinese investment in infrastructure abroad approaches the expected scale so that China’s continued economic health and global influence are dependent on highly valuable but far-off assets. If control over those assets is jeopardised by a local revolt, a blockade or nationalism, then it would be only a matter of time before China sent its armed forces abroad to protect Chinese-owned facilities and Chinese citizens.”

But, putting aside what the quislings are selling off to the yellow devils, what about what is already ours! China already has its slanty eyes on our Australian Antarctic Territory, a gobsmacking 5.9 million square km of breathtaking ice. We have three research stations located there and we’re carrying out dozens of scientific programs. But China is now sensing the mining possibilities of the Antarctic and with its new “everything belongs to us” policy it’s only a matter of time until its navy plants its ugly red flag in the iceberg and proclaims itself owner of the vast frozen plane.

Likewise, as its OBOR is forced upon our Asian neighbours how long until adding to our quotas are those economic refugees fleeing displacement by Chinese occupiers?

It is ironic that a supposed ‘Labor man’ would make such a deal with China considering that back in the day a Labour man strove for a vision of a White Working Man’s Paradise. If one of their own had come among them championing Chinese labour he’d have been dropped like a bag of Emu dung. How things have changed.

AndrewsCunt.jpg
“Australian security services said what now?”

A DAY WHICH WILL LIVE IN INFAMY

A DAY WHICH WILL LIVE IN INFAMY

The films of Paul Greengrass, of which the writers of this blog are longtime fans, are always compelling, often confronting and his latest, 22 July, is no exception.

Recently released on Netflix and in selected theatres 22 July is centred upon the crimes of Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik, who in 2011 carried out twin terrorist attacks, a bombing in the central Oslo area and a shooting attack on the island of Utøya, which claimed the lives of 77 people and left over 300 injured.

Greengrass has woven together the stories of four people involved in the outrage; the terrorist Breivik, one of his young victims named Viljar Hanssen who was left partially blinded and severely maimed by gunfire, Breivik’s defence lawyer Geir Lippestadt and then Norwegian prime minister Jens Stoltenberg.

The opening scenes detailing the bombing of the Norwegian prime minister’s offices and the shooting attack on defenceless young people at the Utøya youth camp are hard on the viewer; if Greengrass does one thing well it is his masterful direction of the action scenes and the depiction of the visceral horror of being caught up in acts of extreme violence.

norway bomb
The aftermath of the Oslo bombing

As in his other films, notably Bloody Sunday and United 93, the viewer’s familiarity with the subject matter only enhances the almost unbearable tension felt as the victims and their assailants, in this case a “Lone Wolf”, move toward their awful shared destiny.

The performances across the board are solid, the actors acquit themselves well enough as horrified victims or helpless bystanders and the revulsion felt toward Breivik by all who cross his path is central to the plot; by the standards of all decent people this terrorist deserved nothing but a quick lynching, yet the film goes into some detail concerning his interrogation and the struggle by the authorities to conduct a fair trial.

As in his other films, notably Bloody Sunday and United 93, the viewer’s familiarity with the subject matter only enhances the almost unbearable tension felt as the victims and their assailants, in this case a “Lone Wolf”, move toward their awful shared destiny.

The moral of the story would be that outsiders, social outcasts if you will, have no right to impose their will upon the many through violent means, even if, on the surface, their cause is righteous.

On this point a serious discussion was had among Nationalists the world over in the weeks following Breivik’s outrage, the enormity of what he had done laid bare the gulf between genuine political activists and the big talking, would-be cyber revolutionaries; this important point is mentioned in 22 July, but it bears further scrutiny with the benefits of hindsight.

norwegian-survivors-viljar
The real Viljar Hanssen, survivor of the Utøya massacre.

Upon hearing of the twin attacks everyone on our side hit the internet to find out who this Anders Behring Breivik was, the feeling of “not again”, the idea that one of our extended Nationalist family had acted rashly and run off the rails, as happens from time to time, was on all our minds.

This was not the case, as the picture became clearer and Breivik’s online manifesto was absorbed by our veteran campaigners and intellectuals it quickly became obvious to us that Breivik was not a political soldier striking out from a trans-European underground, but just another sad loser lost in a fantasy world of his own creation.

Since 2011 there has emerged a good deal of useful analysis of Breivik, his crimes and state of mind; while not conclusive the 2016 paper by University Of Salford academics Lino Faccini and Clare Allely is helpful in putting Anders Breivik in his proper place among the rogues gallery of 21st century mass killers.

This was not the case, as the picture became clearer and Breivik’s online manifesto was absorbed by our veteran campaigners and intellectuals it quickly became obvious to us that Breivik was not a political soldier striking out from a trans-European underground, but just another sad loser lost in a fantasy world of his own creation.

Anders Behring Breivik was no political activist, every attempt he had made to be part of an authentic movement had failed; nor was he part of an underground sect, a youth gang, a fraternal order or a wider online community of fellow travellers; he was, in reality, an isolated, ineffectual individual seemingly beset by pathological narcissism and lifelong insecurities.

22July Breivik
Anders Danielsen Lie turns in a capable performance as Breivik in 22July

Breivik has very little in common with modern, ideologically motivated terrorists, however, he sits alongside some of the worst offenders, the school shooters such as Adam Lanza, Nicholas Cruz and the Harris-Klebold dyad who started it all at Columbine in 1999.

Breivik’s narcissistic rage and psychological decomposition in the face of his failure to launch into normal adult life were the real motivations behind his actions; in this regard Greengrass and his writers fail the viewer, they depict him as having being abandoned by his equally nefarious online comrades, this was never the case, everyone on the so-called “far right” was just as taken aback by the events of 22 July as was the rest of the world.

anders-behring-breivik
Some of Breivik’s home-made costumes for his fantasy personae, far from being a latter day crusader, it was all in his head

NOT-SO-WHITE ROSE SOCIETY AT CENTRE OF MAJOR DEFAMATION

NOT-SO-WHITE ROSE SOCIETY AT CENTRE OF MAJOR DEFAMATION

Imagine being nationally condemned in China for believing China should not be forced to absorb millions of non-Chinese. Consider a scenario where arguing that China should retain its distinctive racial and cultural independence involved risking your livelihood, reputation, and possibly your freedom.

Then, entertain the idea of being reviled as Chinese supremacists by your fellow Chinese, who considered it evil to desire a racially homogenous China. Not only would such a scenario seem far-fetched, but one would reject it as implausible.

In the west, however, that bizarre world is a reality! Despite all that the ‘free west’ rests its reputation on, and backs-up militarily, that sort of view is indeed taboo at a social level. In fact, as Australia is forced by the globalist order to de-Europeanise into a Babylonian satellite predicated upon consumerism, one would imagine it was desirable that a voice is given to a racial group entering minority status — but no such thing.

Likewise, it would be odd to encounter young Turks expressing hypercritical ideas about what it means to be ethnically Turkish: dredging up and interpreting history to fortify arguments that persuade curbing their racial group from expanding or prospering in their home country.

In the west, Pavlovian self-abasement has been engendered into White people. It is comparable to what heathens faced in the centuries after Rome converted to Christianity when the sandal was on the other foot. There is some truth to the maxim that patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel. But when patriotism becomes heretical then it is not the patriot who is the scoundrel but his oppressor. Indeed, his patriotism is no longer an empty grab for salvation but a dutiful act of defiance.

Thus, as the globalists strive to end the dominion of White man over this nation, and which none of the shrill critics of White Australia is lining up to leave, expressing pro-White sentiment is akin to “extremism”. There is no delineation of the protagonists in what the mainstream lumps together as “the far-right”. This ‘far-right’ now occupies a similar space that communists once inhabited as folk devils.

Then, entertain the idea of being reviled as Chinese supremacists by your fellow Chinese, who considered it evil to desire a racially homogenous China. Not only would such a scenario seem far-fetched, but one would reject it as implausible.

Nothing is what it seems in the ‘far-right’ milieu but that doesn’t matter to the volunteer sentries of globalism. Bundling all the groups underneath the ‘far-right’ umbrella is like comparing Sunnis to Shias because they’re all Moslems. The media has had long enough to acquaint itself with disparities between civic patriots, nationalists, alt-righters and Tom Sewell from the Lads Society.

These differences are profound and in many cases run contrary to the narrative they have ascribed their subjects. For instance, the Australian Liberty Alliance could hardly be described as a “White Supremacist” group, with its acceptance of multiracialism and its basis in evangelical Christianity. Yet, that’s what these absolutists of globalism do in their bid to demonise anyone who whatsoever questions their script.

TmCsqOaa_400x400
Wes Fang, one of the most violently anti-White members of the Nationals

By daring to join and naively attempt to influence the executive council of the Young Nationals NSW in a righteous direction, a group of young Australians have run afoul not only of their chosen party but the duplicitous forces of media and its shadowy cabal of auxiliaries who recognise nothing in the hypocrisy of their actions.

To wit; the so-called White Rose Society has just doxed young, proud, White Australians. This act of publication, United Nationalists Australia suggests is a defamation that those involved should immediately pursue in court. To do nothing would give validation for the left side of the ideological spectrum. To accede to their dogma would be a sheepish act of guilt as if they have anything to be guilty for.

That the ABC collaborated in a joint exercise between the metrosexual Alex Mann and this cluster of trolls led by a China-shill living in Tasmania for a project fraught with political bias, normalising the idea that to object to population replacement, or resist sublimating to identity politics, is “extreme” and not a defensive counter-reaction, is a selective use of a public resource. Where was the depth of analysis, where was the balance? Why not also expose Antifa for evenness; surely to discuss one it is only reasonable to explain the other? Or at least aim to put the alt-right in context rather than fail to explain why the Australian alt-right came about. Moreover, it is becoming a trend wherein the Alex Manns of this world hope to make their bones with their hardly investigative exposes of the alt-right while everything they themselves stand for corrodes western society.

By daring to join and naively attempt to influence the executive council of the Young Nationalists NSW in a righteous direction, a group of young Australians have run afoul not only of their chosen party but the duplicitous forces of media and its shadowy cabal of auxiliaries who recognise nothing in the hypocrisy of their actions.

Allegations made about persons in that article, which is supported by the hyperbole of Mann’s podcast ‘Haircuts and hate: Inside the rise of Australia’s alt-right’, expresses no irony about using as sources social media “infiltrators” to frame a titillating narrowcast about nationalistic youth subverting a party that has traded on its voters naïve assumption that it too is nationalist.

The suggestion that these parties may be being infiltrated by radical elements is made while they themselves harbour dangerous extremists in their political choices. For instance, the ABC is as we have seen synced with Labor Party. Today, the Facebook page The Australian Labor Party Supporters shared a link to the WRS’s story coming via the anarchist page ‘Kieran’s Review’. This anarchist links in with Antifascist Action which has never shied away from violence, vandalism, or theft: and the other mainstream political party is normalising that extreme sector.

Within the orbit of the Australian Labor Party are dangerous zealots who hide inside the union fold. UNA has revealed how the CFMMEU hosts leftist extremist groups like the Communist Workers Party of Australia. In the ranks of these are sociopaths such as David Gullis, who has been reported for various assaults and acts of threatening lives to Newtown Police in NSW, who choose not arrest him.

Major news media groups employ trolls who target ideological victims by stalking them online and then dox them, endangering their employment prospects, their ability to rent a home, and ultimately destroy the quality of their lives. This is considered justifiable behaviour, but which is far worse than anything the groups they report on has ever done. In fact, the most extreme acts thus far by anyone on the ‘far-right’ have been the beheading of a dummy in a public place by a group of civic patriots or flinging pig’s guts outside the door of some perceived traitor. Yet, the ABC has no interest in doxing ideological comrades regardless of how vile their hearts and minds are.

Fascinating, too, is how they only ever hunt those who have somehow ‘threatened’ the establishment. Why would the media go after particular persons, such as Fairfax Media has done in the past, and avoid others like the leader of the Sydney Lads Society? In that whole rubbishy article by the White Rose Society they never once named the truly diabolical characters on the scene. The media only goes after the sincere patriots and nationalists.

Allegations made about persons in that article, which is supported by the hyperbole of Mann’s podcast ‘Haircuts and hate: Inside the rise of Australia’s alt-right’, expresses no irony about using as sources social media “infiltrators” to frame a titillating narrowcast about nationalistic youth subverting a party that has traded on its voters naïve assumption that it too is nationalist.

Mark McDonald Campbell (yes – that is what he calls himself) was appointed the leader of the Sydney Lads Society by that group’s founder, a fellow New Zealander, Tom Sewell. Conceited to a fault, Sewell has made it his life’s mission to bullishly appropriate all nationalist assets and disdain any veteran (except when in trouble). He has engendered a subculture that is politically and ideologically unintelligible and which contains strong elements of ageism and other biases not in accord with nationalist thinking.

This young fool, against the strongest warnings of seasoned nationalists, appointed McDonald to head his Sydney franchise of the Lads. It would be in the realm of high probability that McDonald, through his shady connections that lead back to darker political forces, played a hand in doxing certain persons included in that article. And yet, despite being the former leader of Squadron 88, with the notoriety of stunts attributable to that small group, the media has never profiled him. Is it because he’s made himself an asset to them? With what we know about Matey Mate, believe us, this is not at all a possibility anyone involved should dismiss.

Do note, in a central image used by the ABC Blair Cottrell and one other, are named, but conspicuously not Matey Mate, who is probably one of those requiring exposing the most, having played an endless background role linking to the likes of Liberal Party dirty tricks man, Howard Crawford. He has burned nationalists, too, and Sewell was warned that he is regarded as filth by the established Australian nationalist brand. However, it strikes UNA as astounding these lug nuts obligingly lined up grinning for a pic that would be used in a damaging piece. They have betrayed the fact they adore media attention at their own peril whereas seasoned nationalists are wise to the perfidy of the media.

Matey.png
Ah, Mark McDonald Campbell (centre) yet again evades scrutiny by the media. Funny how the ex-Squadron-88 leader and the head of the Lads Society Sydney always manages to do that. It might have something to do with that “get out of jail free card” he used to boast about

But while Matey presents one area of inquiry, it goes without saying that the National Party itself, especially privileged former private school boy Ethan Gordon, under the instructions of John Barilaro, worked to expose and will ultimately expel these loyal young Australians. The penetration of the Young Nationals was not an idea that nationalists supported. The belief that a group could infiltrate and overtake a party is seriously misguided, for either they are exposed, as has happened, or it is they themselves who become overtaken.

There was no way that a party like the Nationals which includes such rabid globalists as the son of Chinese immigrants Wes Fang was about to be undermined by pro-White Australians. The Nationals’ interest lies in the commoditising of Australia: it believes in mass immigration and has no time for anyone who might endanger their greasing their sweaty palms with Chinese baksheesh. Furthermore, the NSW Young Nationals had backed gay marriage, which is such an obvious signal of their mainstream ambitions.

Already, two of those named have been removed from the NSW Young Nationals executive pending a review which will inevitably turn them out. We shall not contribute to their doxing and refuse to name them out of respect.

Already, two of those named have been removed from the NSW Young Nationals executive pending a review which will inevitably turn them out. We shall not contribute to their doxing and refuse to name them out of respect.

But why fight it? Hell, it should be a ‘fair cop’ and a ‘nice try’ with a Cheshire grin but maybe now you young folks should turn your attention towards, oh, we don’t know, a PROPER Australian Nationalist Party, like, perhaps, the Australia First Party!? That they never do is an endless point of irritation to nationalists.

r0_0_5472_3648_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg
Like Wes Fang, The Nationals’ John Barilaro (pictured) hates Nationalists with a vengeance

This time, instead of shrouding your beliefs, how about being unashamed about expressing them? They are better expressed through a Nationalist organisation rather than a mainstream host, which was inevitably going to rumble your act. Bring that energy to bear to proper nationalist activism and away from elitist playpens marshalled by wreckers.

Oh, and while we’re at it, lose the embarrassing African-American style gang signs. They are not an expression of Australian nativism and are totally juvenile. Have a little bit of dignity and class.

But this is all part and parcel of the broad church that exists in the catchall ‘alt-right’ social media world of these young people replete with insular alphabets. Flirting with concepts that seem to them edgy but bear no kinship with Australian nationalism like ‘The New Guard’ and Italian Fascism has given them little room to retreat. None of them really understand that to invoke the New Guard pretty much puts them back in the conservative stick-pile of the prejudiced middle-class.

Oh, and while we’re at it, lose the embarrassing African-American style gang signs. They are not an expression of Australian nativism and are totally juvenile. Have a little bit of dignity and class.

Likewise, even notionally supporting The Antipodeans, a group that modelled itself directly on the MI5-riddled National Action which Nick Griffin revealed, pardon the pun, queerly approved homosexuality creeping into the ranks, was always likely to back-spray on these inexperienced kids. And it has never occurred to the Antipodeans themselves that they are serving up with a cherry on top the very menace that the Jewish community especially thrives on. They not only validate those ‘concerns’ of anti-Semitism but they cheerfully oblige by wearing the right costumes and acting the part of the Nazi to a tee.

It seems more to be a matter of peer-identification than sound calibrating of ideology to share a room with those who assume that German National Socialism, Fascism, White Nationalism, Nationalism, Civic Patriotism, and whatever other ism is more-or-less the same thing, or at least, intent on achieving the same goal. It’s even sadder when they adopt these appellations without understanding them, or for reasons of shock value, or because it’s fashionable.

The easiest thing to remember, aside from the inherent truth in the 14 words, is that Australians are White, and Whites are under threat.

In the end, the most these infiltrators have done is give the Nationals a free kick in signalling their commitment to multiracialism. If they had dedicated that energy to the AFP, who knows? But then those who swim in their current and claim to be promoting Nationalism are really doing the absolute opposite: helping to cripple it.

THE WHITE ROSE SOCIETY’S LINK TO COMMUNIST CHINA

This second part of our article, following what we believe was a necessary digression, gets right down to brass tacks. Given they’ve plagued other people’s lives it’s only fair that we now turnabout and establish who this collective of parasites are.

We know from Alex Mann’s podcast that the central figure is a Tasmanian Asian Studies lecturer and Sinophile, Kaz Ross. Kaz’s Twitter page is an infestation of materials relating to Asia and in particular to China. In an interview with her beta male ABC compatriot, she described how she strayed into doxing. “I started off tracking anti-Chinese sentiment and I got involved looking at the anti-Chinese action on Facebook. There is a very short path between anti-Chinese sentiment and neo-Nazis.”

6532970-3x4-700x933
Morbidly obese Kaz Ross, (most likely) coordinator of the White Rose Society and a shill for China

That comment is so ludicrous but it raises questions of how close to Chinese interests this woman is. UNA notes that we have Chinese eyes watching our content, as does the Australia First Party, and no doubt other groups that publish nationalist content.

The White Rose Society borrows its name from a resistance group that distributed anti-Nazi leaflets during the days of the Third Reich, so it’s funny that its principal coordinator should be a shill for China.

Also, it’s worth noting that the National Party was one of those who received $100,000 in donations from Communist China-agent Chau Chak Wing from 2013-14. With a rural constituency and preparations underway for the movement of a large immigrant population into regional Australia Chinese money will inevitably be changing hands and it wouldn’t do to have a bunch of “White Supremacists” in your party if you hope to get a hold of any of that Communist lucre. This is notwithstanding the flogging of Aussie farmland and primary exports.

Of course, the Nationals really don’t need the mere possibility of profiting from China to have targeted any pro-White people coming within their executive. This is a party that voted in favour of gay marriage and is doing its damned best to fall into line with mainstream identity politics.

But in the case of Kaz Ross, shilling for China is a fanatical ideal, and boy, does she shill for China! You don’t need that above quote alone to put her prejudice into context. In September 2012, Kaz Ross penned a paper titled ‘Building an ‘Asia capable’ state: Response to the Tasmania’s Place in the Asian Century Issues Paper’ The paper is a prep piece for the Asianisation of the Australian workforce as well as an ad spruiking Tasmania as a destination for Asian students where apparently “there is a burgeoning interest in Australian literature, poetry and art”.

In 2016, Ross authored an op-ed piece for The Mercury in which she weighed in on the sale of Australia’s largest dairy producer, the Van Diemen’s Land Company. She dismissed concerns about the sale to Chinese billionaire Lu Xianfeng as “anti-Chinese dog whistling”. The rest is a soliloquy to what she believes is the essential role the Chinese have played in creating Tasmania and how that engagement with Asians must continue and grow. She writes, “Tasmania’s forgotten past connections with Asia remind us of one important fact: Tasmania has always needed Asia. And it still does today.”

Kaz has been preoccupied with those she perceives as hating on her beloved China. She was quoted in a 2017 ABC radio report ‘Calls for Facebook to be more accountable for the rise in fear and hatred on social media’.

In this interview, she details how she began snooping for dissidents commenting negatively on the sale of the Van Diemen’s Land Company to the Chinese. She described how Facebook should be policing comments unfriendly to globalism and admitted that “I report probably at least a dozen posts every single day and some days I might get two or three posts taken down but not always.”

It is patently evident that this traitor has formed an alliance with trolls from the extreme left whose interest is in chopping down any development of a discussion relating to the repopulation of this country. It’s quite in keeping with her beloved Beijing masters’ penchant for strict censorship, too.

Therefore, we can quite unequivocally state that Kaz Ross is doubtless the central force behind the White Rose Society and that if those who’ve had their futures compromised for belonging to a non-traditional political position choose to pursue action there is a good place to start. Her contact details will be available on the University of Tasmania web page.

But it would also be interesting to cover what role, if any, the Chinese interests have played in the doxing of these young people since the connection is right there.

UPDATE: Following the publication of this article the ABC gave the White Rose Society leader a platform to post her views.

Twitter
Kaz Ross responding to our article and clearly enjoys the attention

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

FREEDOM OF SPEECH BREAKS FREE AS ZIONISTS LINK UP WITH THE LADS

Nothing prevented Saturday’s bi-state ‘International Freedom of Speech’ day, which is of itself ironic. However, in this muddle of libertarian and identity politics, attended by the usual provocateurs, when speech has no substantial content the point of whether or not it is free is moot.

The two-state ‘event’, which we cannot find any evidence of being internationally recognised despite its bold appellation, although there is said to a London event, was held in both Melbourne Docklands, where Jewish supremacist and mega Zionist Avi Yemini was joined by Senator Fraser Anning, with a crowd of around 50 free speech advocates, after the first got underway at Sydney’s Wiley Park, in Lakemba.

We will address the Wiley Park leg shortly, but first-up Anning’s speech would reveal a lot about this mysterious ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’. Senator Anning’s maiden speech, like Pauline Hanson’s before him, caused sparks when he called for a return to a “European Christian” immigration system. Yet, it did not take long to forge an allegiance with the Zionist ALA. This seems to be an inevitable pattern when it comes to outspoken politicians on the “right side”, especially those who create a false hope that they’ll support a return to the White Australia Policy.

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

He then got down to business and we’ll place a transcript of his speech verbatim on this page. What will become apparent is his pro-Zionism as he told the sparsely peopled audience, “My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’.

“This year we gave the Palestinian authority $43.8 million. They use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority.”

Addressing a crowd of around 50 persons, made up of ALA and others, Anning declared, “ALA is the only democratic party in this state.”

Australia shouldn’t be paying any money to that region, for sure, but that’s not what Anning’s point was – he doesn’t want it paid because, according to the very Zionist logic, innocent Israelis are being killed by evil Palestinians who have some screwed-up notion about wanting to stop their land being stolen by Jews.

The only attempt to shut down Fraser’s freedom of speech came from a longhaired ginger dressed in black who was shouted down by Avi and his supporters who chanted, “Zuck off!” a reference to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerbeg, who they blame personally for de-speeching them on his social media platform.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Meanwhile, Blair Cottrell did not attend the Melbourne rally. Instead, he drove to Sydney to yell at gimps in a windy park through a Chinese manufactured megaphone. He shook hands with the likes of marijuana advocate and serial instigator Nick Folkes who is back from cannabis country with his small multi-racial cast of resurrected Party for Freedom members (or as we dubbed them, Peanuts for Freedom) as he joined a line-up that included some uninteresting woman and Cottrell’s lawyer, John Bolton.

dfadsfs.png
Blair is a man who never lets standards get in the way of the company he consorts with (Folkes centre, Bluebeard taking a fan snap on the right)

Present also was Neil Erikson’s partner in crime, Rino Grgurgovic, aka Bluebeard, along with members of the Lads Society Sydney. If there was a Pictionary definition of “idiot” then Bluebeard’s picture would be posted there in all its pot-bellied glory, stink lines included. There would even be a colouring-in version for autistic kids.

Obviously, we’re not interested in anything Avi Yemini had to say, but we’re sure it came out of his mouth at twice the speed it was processed by his modest brain.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which would be like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

MateyandFokles.png
The Fellowship of the Chicken is reunited. Matey Mate, Hollywood Nazi on the right, with his Zionist mate and colleague, Nick Folkes

It’s grouse Matey Mate is back with Nick because it’s like a reunion of the old fellowship of the chicken which was centred around the deep-seed Liberal muckraker and sometimes poultry farmer Howard “I’m not a financial member of any party” Crawford.  Howie even “liked” Nick’s post about the rally on his Facebook page which means so much for any of them retiring.

But what is more significant about these two is that it proves that Matey Mate, far from being owned by ‘The Lads’ is a random equation infecting the numbers. Any belief that he is not a two-way transistor between the meddlesome world of the Zionist spiv and the “youth” who have gravitated to Sewell’s boys’ club betrays an inadvisable trust in the skunk. Matey Mate’s record speaks for itself, and his intrigues run deep. It wouldn’t surprise UNA at all if he was receiving secret funding from a government agency. Likewise, given the ongoing theatre, and all the incongruities of his allegiances, policies, platform and behaviour, who is handling Nick Folkes?

Thus, with a gale blowing, and nobody infringing on their ‘free speech’, Bolton led the proceedings by opening up with a spiel about Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern; all this while the antifascist voyeurs tracked them with what must’ve been the cheapest drone on the market – a Chinese knock-off bought for a lobster from the markets. Those assembled in the park appear in an image smugly uploaded to the Anonykatz Facebook page from a vertigo-inducing height and with a visibility that rendered the whole exercise even more futile than what was happening down below.

Here, things get interesting, because we have for the first time in ages the Sydney Lads’ leader and former Squadron 88 Fuhrer 8Mark McDonald Campbell. Yes, he claims that is his real name, which is like having a surname Hatfield McCoy, but we’ll indulge the little New Zealand rodent; hand-picked and appointed specifically by Tom Sewell.

Screenshot_20181006-230600_Facebook.jpg
The Antis will try to say that the object of the exercise was to view crowd numbers. But that’s a lie, they wanted to see who was there, but their cheap and nasty drone failed them. Lulz

Nick Folkes, no doubt nicely toasted on seventh-generation Indica skunk weed, then grabbed the bullhorn to foghorn about his freedom of speech, or should that be, his excess of it. Folkes is an idiot and no matter what anyone believes about personal liberty the whole world would be better off if a special law was passed limiting him to the use of sign language.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

Singling out “dogmatic communists” he aired his angst about how they “want to take freedom of speech and it’s an attack on the only civilisation in modern history that brought around freedom of speech is the British Empire.”

Perhaps they should tell that to D.H Lawrence or any of the other writers whose books were originally banned in England.

It’s worth noting too that both Folkes and Anning cited “communists” as being responsible for taking away their freedom of speech while last we checked Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk, who led a charge to censor Anning and stripped him of staff funding and extra staff is a dyed in the wool conservative.

He told the blowing wind, “It’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here.” We’ll address that shortly, but meanwhile, he defined freedom of speech as, “…about being an individual and not having the state control everything I do.”

And while Folkes gasbags about freedom of speech he seems to forget when he attempted to shut down Australia First Party president Jim Saleam’s freedom of speech at the Reclaim Australia rally at Martin Place in Sydney during 2015 when he connived with the marshals to have him removed. Likewise, the marshals forbade AFP from distributing any materials at the rally but didn’t impose any ban on the kosher groups.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care. It is very clear that he chose long ago the path of civic patriotism. And for all the fascist talk from the Lads Society once again Matey Mate and his offsider Alex had no problem embedding themselves with Zionists and supporting an event that is fundamentally pro-Israel.

a7a6dc4f492afb2d327d9e154432017f
John Bolton, Zionist, anti-Islam activist, and most likely chief organiser of International Freedom of Speech day in Australia

John Bolton is probably the key to Cottrell’s attendance since as a lawyer he has taken up his appeal pro bono against charges of inciting serious contempt against Moslems. Did Blair really drive all the way to Sydney just to help his mate out, or did he have other business? Was he asked not to attend the Melbourne leg of the rally, or would Tom Sewell, the chock-heeled boss of the Lads Society have forbidden it? It’s hard to be sure once you try to figure out who put this thing together and why.

United Nationalists Australia has attempted to identify who the principal organisers of the ‘International Freedom of Speech Day’ are. Our strongest lead is actually John Bolton. He released a YouTube video on October 1 in which his concerns about freedom of speech link primarily to former EDL head and Zionist Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern who was prevented from entering the Moslem enclave of Lakemba during her tour of Sydney. Bear in mind, the Lads Society provided security for Southern both at Sydney and her Melbourne show.

During that tour, Southern appeared with Stefan Molyneux in a video filmed at Sydney’s Botanic Gardens in which she detailed how police prevented her exercising the simple right to walk the streets since her presence would be seen as a provocation. She claimed there was hypocrisy at play because mainstream media, which were actually filming her, were put under no such restrictions. Nonetheless, Southern began by explaining how her team had contacted police to advise them she would be journeying down with her crew.

We do not know what Cottrell had to say and we don’t care.

One could say it was stupid tipping them off, but one could also cynically suggest that she got the reaction she intended. If she was fair dinkum about slinking into a Moslem neighbourhood incognito — and let’s face it, most Moslems like most Aussies wouldn’t have known her from a bar of soap — there were countless other areas that are chockers with the followers of Mohammed; Punchbowl being one; Beverly Hills another. Either she was worried they might get creamed or else she’d calculated the police response and just how marvellously it would dovetail her narrative.

It was with this same expectation of publicity that Bolton chose Wiley Park near Lakemba to stage his rally. He stated so in his video in which he grimly warned against anyone inciting violence or attempting violence against his people. He clearly spelt out it was a test of “freedom” to be in the area. In the end, no one attempted anything, except some numbskull Antis who took their cheap-arse drone for a spin in the drizzle.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

So, Bolton is at the centre of this theatre that has drawn together the usual faces. But he is Cottrell’s lawyer and Blair is synonymous with allegedly suggesting that every classroom in Australia should have a copy of Mein Kampf (We are not sure if that quote is apocryphal or not). How does that then fit in with Bolton’s worldview? We quote him from the video, “As Australians, we are a melting pot. Women and men in Australia are equal. People of every race in Australia are equal. It’s abhorrent that people want to divide us.”

Well, isn’t Blair Cottrell one of those trying to divide us? I know we are. We’re proud to admit it since the only “us” we recognise are actual Australians, which means we aim to divide their “us”. So, if that’s the case, does he support freedom of speech by those who want to repudiate his statements of values as a bunch of gay libertarian crap? Did he not just call such abhorrent? On his Weebly blog, among an impressive list of professional credentials, Bolton describes himself as “conservative” but “politically independent”. We see a lot of that around the anti-Islam scene. And John is no stranger to that arena. In 2017, he joined the Peanuts as a speaker at their rally against a proposed Islamic school in Penrith.

Nevertheless, Bolton seems to be the most identifiable organiser of the day. UNA attempted to contact Mr Bolton by email and ask him but he had not replied at the time this was published.

Among those were ‘Australian Patriot Uprising’ Commandant Matt Lowe and his non-Aryan Sergeant Schultz, Toby Cook.

Matt Lowe took over while Nick Folkes was on hiatus. He and fat boy Toby, who we understand to be a former mental patient, essentially formed the core of this absurd Facebook club along with Shermon Burgess, who himself made a quantum leap from strict kosher patriot to fully-blown neo-Nazi with such a vengeance that it defies credulity. Just as the movement was adopting a conspicuously fascist style, Folkes stepped sideways, Lowe et al moved in, but now they’re gone and Folkes is back along with the bagel brigade. But it remains of Mr Bolton to explain just what these glaring inconsistencies mean to him because being such a bright lad he cannot have failed to be aware of them. By the same token, Bolton cannot be unaware of what Blair Cottrell represents to the mainstream, while Nationalists know the truth and these associations of his only confirm: the man is a civic patriot and always will be.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

We now return to Nick Folkes’s comment about “it’s a pity in this city we can’t get thousands here”. It’s a shame that after all this time the dumb bastard hasn’t worked out why.

The last any significant support was galvanised for a comparable cause was the Reclaim Australia rallies. If we’re talking about Sydney alone, then the 2015 rallies were the ceiling. But let’s focus on that, shall we? How come they failed to capitalise on the kind of public support they saw from that concept? Arguably, it was a number of reasons. Firstly, too many civic micro-parties played tug-o-war with it, such as the ALA, and the unregistered PfF and those parties were avowedly Zionist. But while other factors occurred, especially in Melbourne where the street jouster mentality of the UPF had turned off the mums and dads (or “peasants” as Blair Cottrell charitably labels them), the simple fact no one seems to recognise is because they never actually stated what it is they wanted.

Likewise, International Freedom of Speech Day is demonstrably just another Zionist initiative, and it has nothing at all to do with Nationalist politics. It cannot be since the two fundamentally conflict.

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

What was it they wanted; a total end to Moslem immigration? Not really, if you attended the rallies and listened to the speeches, despite the slant the hard-left and globalist media put on it, they asked only for “assimilation”. Who was it that this petition was directed at? Was it the Moslem community, who were not represented and never addressed? Was it the politicians? There were frequent calls for “politicians” to “do something”. That’s a mighty naïve expression of faith right there, trusting a ‘politician’ working for an internationalist world-order controlled by corporations. The politicians are dedicated universally to pumping this country full of as much non-Anglo human content as can be mustered. This is the idea.

Opposition leader Bill Shorten has approached Scott Morrison to agree to a bipartisan commitment to a “big Australia”, and a big Australia means unfettered immigration.

The little-known corporation Consolidated Land & Rail (CLARA) has as its mission statement: “CLARA is an Australian private group formed to deliver a program to change Australia. We seek to undertake a re-balancing of our settlement and deliver new ways of imagining, planning and building cities, transport and infrastructure.”

This is insidious stuff: a private group with endless land assets knocking up micro-cities and connecting them with rail all over Australia. Who is to live in those cities? Well, CLARA says, “Australia’s population is projected to increase 69% between now and 2061 — up from 24.7 million to 41.5 million people, that is 16.8 million more Australians needing a home.”

In short, there was no message to be telegraphed other than, “We don’t like Moslems and we are afraid”.

Australians…? They seriously just called that projected figure Australians when they’re constantly harping on about the declining birth rate among White Australians?! No, that’s an import figure, and what’s more, CLARA seems to know something we don’t because they’re already building their cities and rails to accommodate this massive increase which will come from Asia, the Sub-Continent, the Middle-East and Africa, but really largely from China, and to serve the new Sino-Australia.

How can such a newish population in any way be Australian? By their importation, they signal the end of Australia and the creation of an artificial nation not founded on culture, race or custom, but on consumerism and serfdom to oligarchical concerns.

Given all this is happening, tiny little voices squeaking about “freedom of speech” in an ill-defined way don’t seem to grasp the issues especially when, like Bolton and all civic patriots, they accept a “melting pot” so long as it doesn’t come with Moslems and their “sharia law”.

But it also explains why Nick and Co can’t get massive numbers to their rallies despite the size of the cities because they are lost in a wilderness where their concerns are outnumbered by the demographic realities of those very cities.

The Nationalist message is very different and it is uncompromising and unwavering. And the key to the activism resides in that message and its purity something those who complain about “keyboard warriors” not attending these hopeless rallies cannot get their heads around.

Given the divide we suffer in major cities, the only logical thing to do is seek out our people where they reside, and where they are receptive to our message and that might not be in the sexy surrounds of an urban environment. It might be spread apart and out in the dust 200 kilometres each way between. But the cities are lost and those Whites remaining and who’ve adapted to this prefabricated metropolis are from the virtue-signalling hypocrite elites. Which is another thing Anning, Bolton and Yemini don’t understand about their “free speech”, especially when they equate it with social media — the political element of their “speech” is a product of the commercial.

Identity politics is a device by which aspirational consumers signal their social status. The greatest advocates of all these guises of progressive politics are in fact the corporations who splinter it all up into a consumerist matrix. It’s not even accurate to suggest that Facebook targets them on the basis of their politics, although it’s not so unfair an accusation to level at Twitter. Facebook operates on a combination of algorithms and human moderators and while the inconsistencies of their adjudications are frustrating they are more random than they seem. But if they really want to get down to an understanding what they lack is not a freedom of speech but a market share.

The topic of “freedom of speech” is too complex to be condensed for a mass audience at least in the fashion the civics are doing it. What their “freedom of speech” is banging up against is this very global order. There are no worries for Moslem Arabs discussing the finer points of socially unpalatable aspects of an extreme reading of their religion at meetings in Lakemba, for instance. They are no challenge to that order. But as Christopher Shortis found out when he, Cottrell and Neil Erikson were convicted of inciting serious contempt against Moslems, it sure isn’t so lenient when it happens the other way. While Moslems are allowed to discuss extreme ideas to characterise them as extreme, which is what the Bendigo Three did in their video, is considered the more extreme acts of the two. Indeed, we may consider naming the monster now to be heretical speech.

And once one makes a concession to unfettered freedom of expression where does it end? We cannot argue for the unconditional freedom of speech which would demand things like sex with baby giraffes or to legalise cannibalism. And as society fragments along the lines of those directing from the Bilderberg Group, it seems that sick ideas are gaining respectability on a daily basis. We’re already at the stage that we’ve repudiated nature and argued she is wrong, that there is no such thing as race or gender, and one woman described as an author and educator argues that parents should gain permission from their babies before changing their nappies. These are the signs of a society on the way out and that’s where the oligarchs want it so that it can be replaced by a new serfdom. When the serfs speak up about anything that may draw attention to this then, of course, that speech is no longer but very, very expensive.

As Nationalists we do not fight vigorously for freedom of speech, we strive to emphasize the hypocrisy of those who wish to silence us and demonise us in the name of an inclusive and progressive democracy in which freedom of expression is implied.

Anning.png
Senator Fraser Anning expressing his fear that Israelis might be being murdered by Palestinians

Senator Fraswer Anning’s Speech, Verbatim, Docklands, Melbourne, Oct 6, 2018 (don’t say we tried to take your free speech)

“ALA is the only democratic party in this state. These African gangs who are attacking people, destroying property and bashing different people and getting away with it is probably some of the worst things I’ve seen and I’m sure it’s not the fault of the police, I’m sure their hands have been tied by somebody further up. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right for any nation, it’s the first thing that goes and then normally what happens in a communist society they take your freedom of speech first, so occasionally we have clowns like this who deny you your right to freedom of speech,” (enter bozo ranga) to disrupt the event. Avi grabbed the mic and led the small gathering of ALA supporters and others in a chant of “Zucc off, mate!” Anning, continued, “So the first thing that goes in a communist country is your freedom of speech, just recently, as Avi said, both our (Facebook) pages were shut down. The premier in Queensland asked our members there – and three state members – to denounce my speech or lose funding for staff members. Now, that’s a travesty of justice, it was illegal, she eventually took those staff members and took that funding because they did not want to renounce me. My Facebook page, as far as I know, was taken down… we’ve never called for any violence… neither Avi or myself have called for any violence against anyone and never will. My Facebook page was taken down because I said things like ‘We should stop funding the Palestinian authority’ (loud claps from Zionist Avi and his ALAers). This year we give the Palestinian authority $43.8 million they use that for a thing called pay-to-slay where innocent Israeli citizens, women children and men, if you are Palestinian you kill some of these, then you’ll get an award from the Palestinian authority. And that’s where our tax dollars are going and when I called for that, in the senate, all three parties, the Liberals, Labor and the Greens vote against me every time. They’re the same people who the day after my speech were all crying and hugging and ringing their hands and they never damped a tissue but they pretended to cry then they denounce me — but they’re the same three parties who regularly vote against the motions that I put up to stop funding the Palestinian authority but also I call for getting the White South African farmers out of South Africa (Avi leads clapping) and again they vote against me so they’re hypocrites, they took two words out of context then they decided they would try to make some mileage out of that but they made their impatient speeches but the next day when the polls came out, even the ABC poll, they found around 80% of Australians were supporting me so, ah… (Applause) so they’ll have to eat their words a little bit. So we’ve got some big problems to overcome, we are supposed to have a conservative government but then they’re here five years but we still have 18C on the books, which takes away your freedom of speech. What’s happening there? So really what’s happened is that the parties that used to represent us have moved so far to the left that they don’t represent us anymore. There’s a vacuum on the right. We saw that in 2016 in America when Trump came like a freight train and hit poor old Hillary Clinton. She didn’t see that coming (laughter). He’s been a great man for America, he’s done a huge amount of work for America and America has never been better now economically or any other way you like to look at it. So a lot of this, this trying to take away our freedom of speech is coming out of the United Nations. Now, I’ve been calling for us to get out of Paris and to get out of the United Nations. They have no business here, they have no business with us, and their politicians like Marise Payne who’s over there now signing away your rights to everything, ah, she has no business doing that on your behalf. She’s signing a thing called the Immigration Compact, now, and that will effectively give your rights to who comes into this country – it will be handed over to the United Nations so you can imagine what’s going to happen with our society. By the way, that speech, that part with the final solution, what was actually said was ‘the final solution to our immigration problem is for the Australian people to have a vote via plebiscite’. And I will still continue to push that agenda because we’ve had votes on all sorts of things like same sex marriage and everything else, why should we not have the right to have a vote on not just how many people will come here but who comes here, what the makeup of this country will be like later on. So really I think the big fear is that good Australian men and a lot of them only boys died on battlefields all over the world. They died in freezing bloody muddy trenches in France and Belgium and other places and in the jungles of New Guinea and they died for one thing and that is for your freedom and for your rights. They stood up in front of bullets and they took bullets a lot of them and they’re not here with us anymore and the least we can do is to do what good people like yourselves are doing now and stand up for our freedoms and I applaud you all for being here and we’ve got to keep up the fight.”